The Ben Shapiro Show - May 12, 2020


Did Trump Melt Down, Or Are The Media Melting Down? | Ep. 1009


Episode Stats

Length

57 minutes

Words per Minute

221.1245

Word Count

12,781

Sentence Count

877

Misogynist Sentences

9

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

Dr. Anthony Fauci testifies before the Senate in controversial fashion, President Trump comes under fire for telling a reporter to ask China about coronavirus damage, and the left's transformative vision of America begins to bear fruit. This is The Ben Shapiro Show, and it's sponsored by ExpressVPN. Stop putting your online data at risk. Get protected at ExpressVpn.org/ProtectYourData and get protected at 47474747. Ben Shapiro is a writer, speaker, and podcaster. His latest novel Other Words For Smoke is out now, and he's also a regular contributor to the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and other publications. His new book, "The Dark Side of America," is available for pre-order now. It's also available for purchase on Amazon Prime and Vimeo worldwide. Thanks for listening and share the podcast with your fellow podcasting friends! Ben Shapiro's new book "The Devil Next Door" is available now. The Dark Side Of America is out! If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and Subscribe on Apple Podcasts! It'll help us spread the word about what we're talking about. And we'll keep spreading the word to the world about what's going on! Subscribe to our new show "The Best of Ben Shapiro and His Amazing Journey Through the Mindfulness Podcast by Ben Shapiro, Jr. and His Other Words for His Amazing Experiences on Podcasts by His Amazing Adventures in the World's Most Powerful Podcasts and Places Across the Globe and Places He's Gave Us His Best Podcasts, Too Much Effort and Places They Say It's More Than That, Including His Best Advice And More! And We'll Be Thanked for Their Support, They'll Be Shoutout, They're Gave Me A Chance To Hear Them, Too Gave Him A Review, And They'll Also Get A Review And A Reviewed And More And More, So Much So Much More, They Say That, They Can Say It, They Will Also Say It And They Get It, He Gave Them A Review On It, Too FOTQ, They Also Will Also A Review Of It, So Be It, A Review & More And They're Not Squeep In That And They Will Gave It, Gee And They Gotta Say It So It's Gee R R His Reviewed It, It's Not More So Much And They Can Hear It, Sh Shr His Story, They've Gotta It, She'll Also Gee It's That & They'll Say It & They're A Review It's So Much Geeeeeeeeee R R It's It's A Good And A FQQ & They Will Say It Will Also Hear It And A They'll Gee He's A Thankeee It's Them Say It More So And A More So That It's Also A Squeeee Is That And A Shapism, A Few More And A Thank You, A More Gee & A Feee & A Thank It So Much It's FQ & A That's It Will Be More So It Will G It & A So It S Is That Sourse And A So Much FQ And A Sourse, A He's Not A Sayer, A SQR & A It's And A Gee Is That & A They Will A F His Or A F He's It, And A Good Fourseee, A Good It's...?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Dr. Anthony Fauci testifies before the Senate in controversial fashion.
00:00:03.000 President Trump comes under fire for telling a reporter to ask China about coronavirus damage.
00:00:08.000 And the left's transformative vision of America begins to bear fruit.
00:00:11.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:11.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:12.000 This show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:21.000 Stop putting your online data at risk.
00:00:22.000 Stop that.
00:00:23.000 Get protected at expressvpn.com slash Ben.
00:00:26.000 I want to start before I really begin the show.
00:00:28.000 I want to just give a shout out to our advertising partners who make this show possible.
00:00:32.000 Obviously, during down economic times, we understand that people are really sort of making sure that their bank accounts are secure, making sure that they are not spending money where it is needless to do so.
00:00:42.000 The reality is that our advertisers do rely on your business to keep in business and we rely on our advertisers to keep in business.
00:00:47.000 So we really appreciate that you continue to do business with them.
00:00:50.000 They are great folks and they make sure that you get the products that you need when you need them.
00:00:54.000 So please continue to patronize our advertisers.
00:00:56.000 We appreciate it.
00:00:56.000 They appreciate it.
00:00:57.000 And we're all working together to ensure that we can move forward as this horrible situation Speaking of this horrible situation, obviously the economic fallout from coronavirus continues to be absolutely astonishingly bad.
00:01:09.000 Over 30 million people have now lost their jobs.
00:01:12.000 They're talking about a 10-year recovery.
00:01:13.000 Now might be a good time to think about diversifying into precious metals.
00:01:16.000 Like, maybe you should have done that before when I told you to do so, like a year ago.
00:01:19.000 Maybe it would have been a good idea to do this before the stock market lost one-third of its value.
00:01:23.000 And we don't know where the stock market is going right now.
00:01:26.000 Frankly, it seems to a lot of people like the stock market is sort of disconnected from underlying market fundamentals, given the fact that it's actually bumped in the last month, despite the fact that there's not really a lot of good news on the horizon.
00:01:36.000 Well, right now might be a pretty good time to think about diversifying at least a little bit into precious metals.
00:01:41.000 And you know what I'm going to say.
00:01:42.000 Talk to my friends over at Birchgold to do so.
00:01:44.000 Call Birchgold right now and you could convert your traditional IRA or 401k into a precious metals IRA again.
00:01:49.000 It's just good sense to diversify.
00:01:50.000 You diversify even your stock holdings.
00:01:52.000 You should diversify between the resources that you do hold.
00:01:54.000 Before May 31st, with a qualifying purchase, Birchgold will give you a free emergency kit.
00:01:59.000 It's a backpack loaded with stuff you cannot buy right now.
00:02:02.000 So safeguard your savings with Birchgold, and they will help safeguard your family like they did mine.
00:02:06.000 There's no obligation.
00:02:07.000 You have nothing to lose to take that first step.
00:02:09.000 Birchgold Group has thousands of satisfied customers, countless five-star reviews, an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau.
00:02:14.000 Don't wait until the market drops more.
00:02:15.000 Okay, so the controversy of the morning is that Dr. Anthony Fauci testified before the Senate, where he explained that if people do not pay attention to the federal guidelines, maybe they will be reopening too soon, and then there will be consequences to reopening too soon.
00:02:26.000 to 47 47 47.
00:02:28.000 Okay, so the controversy of the morning is that Dr. Anthony Fauci testified before the Senate where he explained that if people do not pay attention to the federal guidelines, maybe they will be reopening too soon.
00:02:38.000 And then there will be consequences to reopening too soon.
00:02:40.000 There were several health experts testifying before the Senate Health Committee on Tuesday morning.
00:02:46.000 Pretty much everybody was doing this via internet.
00:02:48.000 Dr. Robert Redfield, the director of the CDC, warned the Senate Health Committee on Tuesday morning, we're not out of the woods yet.
00:02:53.000 That was the day after President Trump declared, we've met the moment and we have prevailed.
00:02:56.000 Dr. Redfield is one of four top health officials testifying remotely by video, three of whom in some form of self-isolation after exposure to a White House official that includes Dr. Anthony Fauci and Stephen Hahn, the FDA commissioner.
00:03:08.000 When Dr. Fauci had submitted his testimony beforehand, he was expected to tell the panel there could be needless suffering and death if the country opens prematurely.
00:03:15.000 As opposed to what?
00:03:16.000 Needful suffering and death?
00:03:18.000 Nobody's interested in killing people.
00:03:20.000 The question is, when is it appropriate to reopen?
00:03:22.000 What are the costs and effects?
00:03:23.000 What are exactly the risks?
00:03:25.000 He did say in his opening statement that the idea of having a treatment or vaccine available to facilitate the reentry of college students into the fall term would be a bit of a bridge too far.
00:03:35.000 One of the big problems here is that nobody is posing any alternative to reopening in cautious and calculated fashion.
00:03:41.000 It just seems to be this idea out there that if you just keep saying that we need to be locked down that this amounts to some sort of strategy and that obviously is not the case.
00:03:49.000 Fauci said the consequences could be really serious if states skip federal guidelines in order to reopen.
00:03:54.000 He said it's not just about reopening at the right time but having the capability to respond when some infections return.
00:04:00.000 That is a situation you would imagine that the governors are going to be best qualified to answer.
00:04:05.000 That would be the real question.
00:04:07.000 If you're a governor of a state and you know what exactly your state's medical capacity is, aren't you better qualified to say what your state's medical capacity is than the federal government?
00:04:15.000 In fact, isn't the federal government getting its information on what you need from you?
00:04:20.000 Andrew Cuomo was dictating to the federal government what kind of resources he needed.
00:04:22.000 The federal government was listening.
00:04:23.000 Andrew Cuomo was wrong.
00:04:25.000 He was saying they needed 40,000 ventilators.
00:04:27.000 They didn't need half of that, apparently.
00:04:29.000 But what we are seeing...
00:04:32.000 Let's put it this way.
00:04:35.000 I think that Dr. Fauci knows more than I do about this stuff, for sure.
00:04:39.000 I think that he is an expert on epidemiology, for sure.
00:04:42.000 I also do not think that he is the sole repository of all risk assessment when it comes to the best public policy.
00:04:47.000 And I also think that Dr. Fauci only gets blamed if there is an inordinate number of deaths.
00:04:52.000 He does not get blamed if the economy is locked down.
00:04:54.000 In other words, it is normal human, it is just The normal human tendency to stick within your area of expertise.
00:05:01.000 In the area of epidemiology, it is true that if you want to prevent more deaths, then what you're going to do is you're going to call for extended lockdown for long periods of time until it is quote-unquote safer to go outside, until some sort of therapeutic or vaccine has been found.
00:05:14.000 Realistically speaking, that is not a balancing of interests.
00:05:16.000 That is just you being an expert in your field.
00:05:18.000 If you asked an economist, what is the best for the economy?
00:05:20.000 The economist would probably say, best for the economy?
00:05:23.000 Take the hit and go on, right?
00:05:24.000 And that would be a bad answer, too.
00:05:26.000 In other words, it is the job of policymakers to balance all these competing interests.
00:05:29.000 Dr. Fauci isn't the only voice in the room.
00:05:31.000 The media are treating him that way because he is saying the sort of stuff that they would like to hear.
00:05:35.000 In other words, let's lock down for a very, very long period of time.
00:05:38.000 So Dr. Fauci, for example, suggested that it might be too much to reopen campuses in September.
00:05:44.000 Well, that is a risk reward calculation because, again, these are a bunch of 20 year olds.
00:05:47.000 20-year-olds are not really at risk from COVID-19.
00:05:50.000 The level of risk to 20-year-olds is extraordinarily minimal.
00:05:53.000 And it may actually be better for the general health for a bunch of 20-year-olds to be on campus than at home hanging out with their 60-year-old parents.
00:06:00.000 Dr. Fauci didn't really explain why people should not go back to campus.
00:06:04.000 Well, Dr. Fauci did talk a little bit about vaccinations.
00:06:07.000 Here's what Dr. Fauci had to say.
00:06:10.000 Moving on to vaccines.
00:06:12.000 There are at least eight candidate COVID-19 vaccines in clinical development.
00:06:18.000 The NIH has been collaborating with a number of pharmaceutical companies at various stages of development.
00:06:24.000 I will describe one very briefly, which is not the only one, but one that we have been involved in heavily developing with Moderna.
00:06:32.000 It's a messenger RNA platform.
00:06:36.000 Okay, well obviously that would be a good thing.
00:06:38.000 The federal government is talking about 40 to 50 million coronavirus tests a month by September.
00:06:43.000 Okay, so forget about the 50 million a day that people were talking about.
00:06:46.000 Yeah, that ain't happening.
00:06:47.000 Or even 3 million a day.
00:06:48.000 That ain't happening.
00:06:49.000 That'd be 90 million a month.
00:06:51.000 Here's Anthony Fauci talking about warning against reopening.
00:06:54.000 And again, nobody wants to reopen in an uncalibrated fashion.
00:06:56.000 I'm just bewildered by the media's coverage that Brian Kemp is doing something deeply wrong by reopening in somewhat calibrated fashion and Ron DeSantis is doing something totally wrong.
00:07:06.000 But Jared Polis in Colorado isn't doing anything wrong, and Tim Walton in Minnesota isn't doing anything wrong, and Steve Bullock in Montana isn't doing anything wrong.
00:07:13.000 Why is it that when it comes to Democratic states, they can do no wrong, but when it comes to Republican states doing exactly the same thing, then all they do is wrong?
00:07:20.000 Anyway, here's Dr. Fauci talking about reopening.
00:07:24.000 What I've expressed then and again is my concern that if some areas, cities, states, or what have you, jump over those various checkpoints and prematurely open up without having the capability of being able to respond effectively and efficiently, my concern is that we will start to see little spikes that might turn into outbreaks.
00:07:49.000 Okay, notice what he says there, because it's very important.
00:07:52.000 What he says is he is afraid of overwhelming the healthcare system.
00:07:56.000 That's really what he's saying there.
00:07:57.000 What he's afraid of is that there will be a big spike and you don't have the capacity to at least test the spikes, and you don't have the capacity to handle the spikes over the healthcare system.
00:08:04.000 He is not saying that we have to remain locked down until this thing is dead.
00:08:07.000 And this is a major distinction, because the media are reading this as Fauci saying that we have to lock this thing down until basically the end of time, until a vaccine is developed.
00:08:15.000 And it seems like the American people are taking it that way.
00:08:18.000 I mean, if you read the media coverage of this, it's really intensely bad.
00:08:23.000 Really, really bad media coverage.
00:08:24.000 I've been honing in on this for a while because the fact is that the media, the so-called experts in our media, are not actually properly quoting even the experts in the health field.
00:08:33.000 So you get pieces like this from the New York Times.
00:08:39.000 Officials are under pressure to restart the economy, but many states are moving too quickly, researchers say.
00:08:43.000 The cost may be measured in lost lives.
00:08:45.000 In other words, people are rushing, and now they're killing people.
00:08:48.000 You're a killing grandma.
00:08:50.000 According to the New York Times, millions of working people and small business owners who cannot earn money while sheltering at home are facing economic ruin, so dozens of states seeking to ease the pain are coming out of lockdown.
00:08:58.000 Most have not met even minimal criteria for doing so safely, and some are reopening even as coronavirus cases rise, inviting disaster.
00:09:05.000 The much-feared second wave of infection may not wait until fall, many scientists say, and instead may become a storm of wavelets breaking unpredictably across the country.
00:09:12.000 The reopenings will proceed nonetheless.
00:09:14.000 The question now, scientists say, is whether the nation can minimize the damage by intelligently adopting new tactics.
00:09:20.000 Evidence is mounting that masks are far more effective at stopping transmission than previously realized.
00:09:24.000 And remember, these same experts two months ago were telling us, don't wear a mask.
00:09:26.000 It's a complete waste of time.
00:09:28.000 Across the nation, testing remains wholly inadequate, but home use nasal swabs and saliva tests are on the way that may provide a clearer picture of where the virus is.
00:09:35.000 Americans are lining up for antibody tests that may reveal who has some immunity.
00:09:38.000 Early surveys suggest more Americans may carry antibodies than initially thought.
00:09:41.000 Employers are moving to design safer workplaces.
00:09:44.000 But while it may still be possible to blunt the impact of reopenings, the nation is finding even this goal difficult.
00:09:49.000 And then they talk about how people are not staying six feet apart and there may be silent carriers of the virus.
00:09:55.000 And they talk about how some epidemiological models are worrying about the possibility of an outbreak.
00:10:01.000 But again, the point here is not that the number of cases is going to go up.
00:10:05.000 Everybody knows the number of cases is going to go up.
00:10:07.000 The question is whether it overwhelms the health care system.
00:10:09.000 And I feel like I'm repeating myself here, but that's because the media refused to get the message.
00:10:13.000 And so you end up with people like Chris Cuomo saying idiotic things on national TV nearly every night.
00:10:19.000 Chris Cuomo gets out there and he says, we don't have the testing and tracing in place in order to stop the virus.
00:10:24.000 It doesn't stop the virus.
00:10:25.000 Chris Cuomo said, none of the states that have reopened, none, has the capacity to test and trace the way they need to.
00:10:31.000 Okay, first of all, I think that the guy who violated his own quarantine rules so that he could go visit his second house, that guy probably is not your best source on this.
00:10:39.000 The guy who gives SOP interviews to his brother, who was involved in some of the worst policy planning for the coronavirus of anybody in America.
00:10:46.000 Probably he's not a great source, but beyond that, beyond the fact that Chris Cuomo isn't a great source, what does it mean?
00:10:50.000 Has the capacity to test and trace the way they need to?
00:10:53.000 I would love to hear him describe exactly what a test and trace regimen looks like that is sufficient for reopening.
00:10:59.000 And the answer is that nobody is providing any of that.
00:11:01.000 Instead, there's always safe to be found in saying, we're not ready yet.
00:11:05.000 Saying we're not ready yet, it's, look, there are inherent risks in opening up.
00:11:08.000 We all understand this.
00:11:10.000 But the question is, when are those risks well calibrated?
00:11:14.000 And when are you willing to take the risks?
00:11:15.000 Because it turns out that there are risks to inaction as well.
00:11:19.000 So take a war analogy, which apparently people like doing these days, trying to compare the virus to a war.
00:11:23.000 Back during the Civil War, President Lincoln had a general named George McClellan.
00:11:26.000 George McClellan was, he liked to style himself as little Napoleon.
00:11:31.000 And he was this kind of short dude who was very, very good at providing military training to his troops, but extraordinarily, extraordinarily reticent in using his troops to break the back of the Confederacy.
00:11:44.000 And President Lincoln became increasingly agitated with McClellan.
00:11:47.000 And eventually, he ended up firing McClellan.
00:11:49.000 This actually caused enough of a controversy that in 1864, George McClellan actually ran against Abraham Lincoln for the presidency.
00:11:55.000 But George McClellan, who was, again, this supposed great warrior, was really, really reticent to use his army.
00:12:02.000 And so eventually, Lincoln fired him, and he put in place generals who were willing to use the army, people like Grant, and people like Sherman.
00:12:08.000 That came with additional risks to troops, no question.
00:12:11.000 But also, it turns out that it was kind of important to win the Civil War.
00:12:13.000 Now, again, this isn't a war and we're trying to preserve as many lives as humanly possible.
00:12:18.000 But it is also true that if we all cower behind the lockdown mentality without doing the capable calculation of risks, The safest thing to do is never to fight a battle.
00:12:27.000 The safest thing to do is never to come out of lockdown, presumably.
00:12:30.000 But it is not the safest thing in terms of having a functioning economy and having a free America and having a functioning and prosperous nation.
00:12:39.000 And by the way, in terms of saving lives on the other end, from suicide and drug overdose and from deaths of despair and from the complete collapse of the American way of life.
00:12:47.000 So unless somebody's providing like an absolute metric and an explanation for those metrics, I don't want to hear vague terms like the testing and tracing are simply not up to snuff from Chris Cuomo.
00:12:57.000 He doesn't know anything about this.
00:12:58.000 He doesn't know more than I do about this.
00:13:00.000 And if I'm going to hear from an expert, I want to hear why the testing and tracing needs to be at a certain stage and what exactly those stages look like.
00:13:06.000 Because if you listen to Mike DeWine, he's reopening before they have hit the 14-day consistent downturn in diagnosed cases in Ohio.
00:13:12.000 But he says our testing and tracing has now been ramped up so that we're okay and our resources are okay.
00:13:16.000 I trust Mike DeWine on that more than I trust Chris Cuomo, and frankly, more than I trust Anthony Fauci, because guess who's going to bear the brunt of the fallout if that thing goes wrong?
00:13:23.000 It's going to be Mike DeWine, not Anthony Fauci.
00:13:26.000 In a second, we're going to get to some theories of reopening and what that would look like.
00:13:30.000 And I also want to talk about the effect of bad media coverage, because there's a poll number today that just demonstrates the wild disconnect that has been created in the American mind between what is rational to expect and what is irrational to expect at this point.
00:13:42.000 We'll get to that in just a moment.
00:13:43.000 First, let's talk about the fact that when you're at work, you really probably don't think all that much about the fact that your IT department is protecting your online activity.
00:13:50.000 But here's the reality.
00:13:51.000 In the time since I started using ExpressVPN, hacking methods have grown ever more sophisticated, and you are working from home right now, which means your IT department is not protecting you.
00:13:59.000 I've been talking about ExpressVPN on the show for so long, you already understand why encrypting your network data is important.
00:14:03.000 You might be thinking security threats don't affect you personally, but not using ExpressVPN is like leaving your front door unlocked every time you go out.
00:14:10.000 Sure, nothing might happen for years.
00:14:11.000 When a break-in does happen, it's going to be devastating.
00:14:13.000 One of the easiest ways to secure your internet data is with ExpressVPN.
00:14:17.000 You click one button on your computer or smartphone, and you are now protected.
00:14:21.000 Why haven't you gone out and gotten ExpressVPN yet?
00:14:21.000 Here's the only question.
00:14:23.000 I've been using it for years.
00:14:25.000 It's super easy to use.
00:14:25.000 You install it on your computer.
00:14:27.000 One click, you are now protected.
00:14:29.000 It does not slow down your internet, which makes a huge difference to me since I run an internet company.
00:14:33.000 Visit my special link right now at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:36.000 Get an extra three months of ExpressVPN for free.
00:14:38.000 Protect your internet today.
00:14:40.000 With the VPN I trust to keep my data safe, that's expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:44.000 Once more, expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:46.000 E-X-P-R-E-S-S vpn.com slash ben for more information.
00:14:51.000 Okay, so when I say the media coverage leads to some pretty egregious public relations results and expectations that simply do not meet with reality, here's an example.
00:15:00.000 There's a Gallup pullout.
00:15:02.000 It shows that 68% of Americans say a vaccine is needed before returning to normal life.
00:15:07.000 Now, I don't know what they qualify as normal life.
00:15:10.000 Does normal life mean before you go to a ballgame?
00:15:12.000 Okay, maybe.
00:15:13.000 But if what you mean by normal life is like going back to work and you're waiting for a vaccine, there is the significant possibility that a vaccine will appear never.
00:15:21.000 That there will not be a successful vaccine for this thing.
00:15:24.000 In fact, there are new reports out today, the NIH is suggesting it might need more than one round of vaccine.
00:15:28.000 They might need multiple vaccines.
00:15:31.000 And now Americans are also fibbing about this.
00:15:33.000 So 68% of Americans are saying they need a vaccine before they return to normal life.
00:15:37.000 But Gallup is finding that more people now say they're going to visit others in their homes.
00:15:42.000 16% of Americans reported they visited somebody else's home or apartment in the last 24 hours alone, which is an uptick since March.
00:15:49.000 The avoidance of small gatherings has decreased mostly among independents and Republicans.
00:15:52.000 It's down 10 percentage points among independents and down 7 percentage points among Republicans.
00:15:58.000 Which, by the way, I mean, that's a bigger change among independents than among Republicans.
00:16:01.000 So for all the talk about partisanship, the reality is that most Americans are just not willing to continue to avoid other human beings because this is not natural to human beings.
00:16:09.000 Normally, I've talked about this before, but normally in times of crisis, you go and you seek out other human beings for commonality.
00:16:13.000 You go to church, right?
00:16:14.000 You find other people you can find solidarity in.
00:16:16.000 During 9-11, people sought out crowds to be in.
00:16:19.000 Because not only does there feel like inherent safety in numbers, also we're all grieving together and mourning together.
00:16:24.000 This is really, really difficult because you're being told that the only way to prevent further tragedy is basically to stay away from other human beings as far as possible, which is really deeply unnatural.
00:16:33.000 But here's the problem.
00:16:34.000 If 68% of Americans are saying that they do not Feel like returning to normal life until there's a vaccine.
00:16:41.000 We're never returning to normal life, gang.
00:16:43.000 I mean, it could be 12 to 18 months at the inside, right?
00:16:46.000 Not at the outside, at the inside.
00:16:48.000 And let's be real about this.
00:16:49.000 Blue states are reopening too.
00:16:50.000 So while the media is trying to divide this into blue states versus red state, L.A.
00:16:54.000 is set to reopen its beaches on Wednesday, according to a tweet from the county.
00:16:58.000 New rules will be in place.
00:16:59.000 Physical activities, like running, swimming, and surfing, will be allowed.
00:17:02.000 Sedentary activity, like sunbathing and picnicking, will be prohibited.
00:17:05.000 I don't even know what the hell that means.
00:17:07.000 Like, seriously, I don't know what that means.
00:17:09.000 Have these people ever been to a beach?
00:17:10.000 What do they think people do on a beach?
00:17:12.000 Like, if my kids go into the water and then they get out of the water, do they think that my kids are going to run straight from the car into the water and then straight back into my car?
00:17:18.000 That's not how any of this works.
00:17:20.000 How about this?
00:17:20.000 How about you enforce rules that make sense, like social distancing rules?
00:17:23.000 Like, you guys are too close together.
00:17:24.000 Move five feet apart.
00:17:25.000 It's a big beach.
00:17:26.000 How about that?
00:17:27.000 Masks or face coverings must be worn unless you're in the water, which makes perfectly zero sense when you are more than six feet away from people.
00:17:35.000 Again, the media are so irresponsible about this stuff.
00:17:36.000 So they were making a big deal yesterday in the media about the fact that over at the White House, people were supposed to be wearing masks.
00:17:43.000 And so the members of the media were all wearing masks, but they were also socially distancing, which again, this is like wearing a mask in your own car when you're by yourself.
00:17:50.000 You don't have to do that, guys.
00:17:52.000 If you are 10 feet away from another person, you don't have to wear a mask if you're outdoors.
00:17:55.000 This is ridiculous.
00:17:56.000 But there's so much bad information and misinterpretation of information, it's really rather wild.
00:18:02.000 It's really quite insane.
00:18:03.000 And the American people are taking in the bad information, and they are also mis-evaluating their own risk because of this, and mis-evaluating the likelihood of a vaccine arriving any time in the near future.
00:18:13.000 According to Bloomberg, several vaccines will likely be needed to combat the coronavirus and immunize groups of people in America and abroad, according to the U.S.
00:18:19.000 National Institute of Health Director Francis Collins.
00:18:22.000 Collins is a physician and geneticist who leads the agency overseeing the U.S.
00:18:25.000 research response to the pandemic.
00:18:27.000 He said, "My expectation is, and I'm a bit of an optimist, we don't find out there's only one of these vaccines that work, but rather two or three of them come through the trials looking as though they're safe and effective.
00:18:34.000 They'll have somewhat different characteristics of where they work best, so we might need to do some matching then of which vaccine goes to which particular population." So according to Collins, the plan, which is a very optimistic one, is to begin to have doses this fall, first with 10 million, then maybe 100 million by late fall, maybe 300 million by January.
00:18:51.000 But is that a realistic assessment of the situation?
00:18:54.000 Who the hell knows?
00:18:56.000 And also, are we all going to stay locked in our houses until January?
00:18:59.000 Is that the actual plan here?
00:19:01.000 And if it is, then you better give me a damn guarantee that there's going to be a vaccine by January because you're talking about destroying the entire world economy.
00:19:07.000 Like literally the entire world economy not existing by January.
00:19:11.000 Every small business in America is already going under.
00:19:14.000 In fact, people are getting so desperate for speeding up a vaccine that scientists are debating whether to try a so-called human challenge trial.
00:19:21.000 Normally, you give somebody a vaccine and then you wait for somebody to sort of naturally acquire the disease to see if the vaccine worked.
00:19:26.000 Now what they're talking about is we give you the vaccine and then we deliberately infect you with coronavirus to see if the vaccine works.
00:19:31.000 And there's some scientists who are suggesting that maybe we need to do this in order to speed everything up.
00:19:36.000 They may very well be right.
00:19:37.000 Okay, there's another possibility here, and that possibility is That we need to tranche populations.
00:19:42.000 Again, the fact that we are treating all populations as equally susceptible to death, that we are treating all populations as equally susceptible to having severe health problems from COVID-19 is just foolishness.
00:19:53.000 Now, again, there will be some people who are young who get very sick from this.
00:19:57.000 Statistical probability does not mean that people who are on the wrong side of the statistical probability aren't affected.
00:20:03.000 They are.
00:20:04.000 If 2 in 1, if 2 in 10,000 people die from COVID-19, that means that 9,998 people don't die from COVID-19, but it means that 2 people do, right?
00:20:11.000 So, I mean, if somebody, you'll hear anecdotal evidence, and this is one of the, again, my bugaboos in the media, they will say things like, it's true that people above the age of 80 are dying en masse from this thing, and it's really dangerous for those above 80, but People who are 30 are dying too.
00:20:23.000 That doesn't help me in any way.
00:20:25.000 Make a statistical calculation.
00:20:27.000 It doesn't help me calculate risks.
00:20:28.000 At all.
00:20:29.000 Andrew Oswald.
00:20:31.000 That's a very good piece.
00:20:32.000 Over in the Irish Times, Andrew Oswald is a professor of economics and behavioral science at University of Warwick.
00:20:39.000 And he says that his strategy would be allow the young people to restart their lives and the economy.
00:20:45.000 He says the young are far, far safer than older people.
00:20:47.000 This is because for biological reasons, young humans have a much stronger immune response to almost all viral attacks on the body, including to a COVID-19 attack.
00:20:53.000 And we forced our youth inside as though they were at serious risk, like the old, when they're not.
00:20:57.000 In the UK, the fatality rate among those in their early 20s, for example, is 2 in 10,000.
00:21:02.000 Among those aged in their 60s, it's 80 times that.
00:21:05.000 See, now this would be a useful stat.
00:21:06.000 Or if you told young people, okay, here's the deal.
00:21:08.000 Older people are highly likely to be damaged by this, as in like 160 out of every 10,000 people who are above the age of 60 are going to die of this.
00:21:20.000 But you, it's 2 in 10,000.
00:21:23.000 Let's put it this way.
00:21:23.000 If somebody said to you, here is your choice today.
00:21:26.000 Your choice is, I'm going to give you a giant, giant vat of marbles.
00:21:30.000 It is 10,000 marbles.
00:21:31.000 Two of those marbles are going to be black, 9,998 of those marbles are going to be white.
00:21:36.000 Here is your choice.
00:21:37.000 You can either put your hand into that vat and pick a marble, or you can lose your entire income.
00:21:42.000 Not just this year, but you can do it for like a couple of years.
00:21:45.000 Minimum.
00:21:45.000 Right?
00:21:45.000 You can watch your entire way of life disintegrate.
00:21:47.000 Or, you can pick a marble.
00:21:49.000 How many people would actually pick the marble?
00:21:52.000 The vast majority of young people would pick the marble.
00:21:54.000 If you're older, you probably would not pick the marble, because again, the odds are better that you're gonna pick the wrong marble, and if it's the black marble, then you die, right?
00:22:01.000 That is the actual statistical calculation.
00:22:03.000 It is an amazing thing that so many members of the media are unwilling to give people the tranched information on health risks here.
00:22:10.000 And I just don't understand why, when Anthony Fauci testifies, when Dr. Birx testifies, when they do this sort of stuff, the first thing they don't say is, let me explain the risk factors for each particular population.
00:22:22.000 Why is that not like the first thing that we talk about?
00:22:24.000 And the answer is because, in some ways, the vagueness, the miasmatic sense that we are all equally at risk, that is the largest factor stumping for the lockdowns.
00:22:33.000 The largest factor stumping for the lockdowns is this belief that you or your friends are equally likely to die as an 80-year-old, or if you're less likely to die, it's only marginally so, not exponentially so.
00:22:46.000 Not hugely so.
00:22:48.000 According to this piece in the Irish Times, the key advantages of a rolling age release strategy, which would begin with youngest adult age groups and then work gradually up the age range, are it recognizes we cannot wait indefinitely to reopen the economy.
00:22:58.000 It's fair because it targets and helps the group currently hit hardest financially because we'll actually pay people to stay home if you're older.
00:23:04.000 It is the safest way to have an exit strategy until a vaccine is available.
00:23:09.000 By the way, it is also true that the jobs most likely to require you to be there are probably the jobs that are most likely to need young bodies.
00:23:17.000 In other words, if you are 60 and you are working, there's a good chance that you're working on your computer and that you're not in manual labor because you're 60, right?
00:23:24.000 The reality is that if you are in a physical labor-intensive industry, it is highly likely that you are disproportionately young because younger people are capable of lifting heavier objects.
00:23:32.000 They're capable of driving longer hours.
00:23:33.000 They're capable of driving trucks for longer, right?
00:23:36.000 This columnist suggests the young are going to be the most troublesome and the hardest to keep inside anyway.
00:23:40.000 Like, this policy is geared towards something that looks like reality.
00:23:44.000 You know what isn't?
00:23:45.000 These interminable statements that we're just gonna remain in lockdown indefinitely.
00:23:49.000 That's not going to work.
00:23:50.000 As I've said before, vagary is the enemy of obedience.
00:23:54.000 If you are vague about your rules, people are not going to obey them.
00:23:56.000 If you are pretty specific about your rules and what you expect people to do, people at least know what to expect.
00:24:00.000 And if they know what to expect, then they can obey the rules.
00:24:02.000 But this idea that we're just going to hold out indefinitely and we'll kind of let you know when it's kind of safe, but then we'll rip you if it's not safe, none of that is effective.
00:24:09.000 It's not effective policymaking.
00:24:10.000 In just a second, we'll get to what would be effective policymaking.
00:24:14.000 Beyond simply tranching out young populations, namely protecting the nursing homes as I've been talking about.
00:24:18.000 First, let's talk about the fact that if you are a male, there's a good shot that you will start losing your hair by the time you are 35 years old.
00:24:25.000 Male pattern baldness does run in my family.
00:24:28.000 It's one of the reasons that I have been using keeps.
00:24:29.000 Two out of three dudes are going to experience some form of male pattern baldness by the time they are 35.
00:24:33.000 The best way to prevent hair loss is to do something about it while you still have hair on your head.
00:24:37.000 You used to have to go to a doctor's office for your hair loss prescription.
00:24:40.000 Now, thanks to Keeps, you can visit a doctor online and get hair loss medication delivered directly to your home.
00:24:45.000 They make it easy.
00:24:46.000 They deliver your medication every three months, so you can say goodbye to pharmacy checkout lines and awkward doctor visits.
00:24:50.000 Of the only two FDA-approved hair loss products out there, they have access.
00:24:54.000 You may have tried them before.
00:24:55.000 Probably never afford this price.
00:24:56.000 Prevention is key.
00:24:57.000 Once you start losing your hair, it probably ain't coming back.
00:24:59.000 You need to make sure that you are getting what you need in order to maintain the hair.
00:25:03.000 Again, the reason that I've been taking it?
00:25:04.000 Male pattern baldness runs in my family.
00:25:06.000 Thank God for the yamaka.
00:25:07.000 And this is the reason why you need Keeps.
00:25:10.000 K-E-E-P-S dot com slash Ben to receive your first month of treatment for free.
00:25:13.000 That is K-E-E-P-S dot com slash Ben.
00:25:16.000 If you're ready to take action and prevent hair loss, keeps dot com slash Ben and you receive your first month of treatment for free.
00:25:21.000 Plus, you're going to save a lot of money as opposed to just going and picking up some sort of prescription.
00:25:25.000 It is a great, great service.
00:25:26.000 Check them out.
00:25:27.000 Keeps dot com slash Ben.
00:25:28.000 Save your hair now because you ain't going to be able to save it later.
00:25:30.000 Meanwhile, as I say, one of the keys to actually crafting an effective policy here would be protecting the nursing homes, which is, of course, exactly what so many failed to do.
00:25:41.000 And the fact is that if you look at the population in nursing homes, a good piece by Chris Pope at cityjournal.org, looking at the effect of nursing homes, it basically says, in 2016, nursing homes housed 1.3 million Americans, 39% aged 85 or over, 800,000 more lived in assisted living facilities, over 2 million Americans living in nursing homes or assisted living as of 2016.
00:26:03.000 Nursing home residents are extremely vulnerable to coronavirus due to multiple comorbidities.
00:26:07.000 72% have hypertension, 38% heart disease, 32% diabetes.
00:26:11.000 Even under normal circumstances, this population faces disproportionately high mortality risks.
00:26:16.000 In 2016, nursing home residents made up 0.4% of the U.S.
00:26:19.000 They accounted for 19% of deaths.
00:26:19.000 population.
00:26:22.000 And that wouldn't be COVID.
00:26:23.000 That's just like death.
00:26:24.000 Death comes for older people who have comorbidities.
00:26:27.000 A reality of life.
00:26:28.000 But the vulnerability of nursing home residents is simply not due to demographics of age and illness.
00:26:32.000 Nursing homes have long been particularly susceptible to infectious disease.
00:26:36.000 In 2016, 45% of nursing homes had infection control deficiencies.
00:26:40.000 As many as 380,000 people die every year of infections in long-term care facilities.
00:26:46.000 So what should be priority number one?
00:26:48.000 Cleaning out the nursing homes.
00:26:50.000 Ensuring the nursing home staff is tested.
00:26:51.000 These would be all the things that we actually need to do.
00:26:53.000 You do that and you can start talking about reopening.
00:26:56.000 And again, the fact that this has turned into a partisan issue is truly astonishing because Europe is moving toward reopening.
00:27:02.000 Europe doesn't have American partisan politics to blame.
00:27:05.000 Italy is moving toward reopening.
00:27:06.000 Germany is moving toward reopening.
00:27:08.000 The Netherlands is moving toward reopening.
00:27:10.000 Britain is moving toward reopening in very, very significant fashion.
00:27:14.000 Is that because of Trump?
00:27:15.000 Is that because of the evil Republicans?
00:27:16.000 By the way, you know who else is talking about reopening?
00:27:18.000 Democrats!
00:27:19.000 Connecticut's governor, who is a Democrat, says, yeah, I think it's time for us to reopen.
00:27:23.000 I mean, most of our deaths are happening in nursing homes and let's protect the nursing homes and let's move toward reopening.
00:27:27.000 Is this because the evil Connecticut governor is an evil, evil Republican?
00:27:30.000 Or do we just ignore him in our coronavirus critical coverage because he is not a Republican?
00:27:36.000 I am confident.
00:27:37.000 We've doubled the amount of testing in the last week.
00:27:40.000 We're going to double it again in the next week.
00:27:42.000 We're able to go after every single first responder, everybody in our nursing homes.
00:27:48.000 We're testing the door to the electric boat factories.
00:27:52.000 Everybody going in and out knows that they've been tested and safe.
00:27:56.000 So, this is all... May 20th was oriented around making sure we have the protective gear in place, we have the testing in place, and the track and trace.
00:28:04.000 We're ready to go, I think.
00:28:06.000 By the way, you know who else is ready to go?
00:28:09.000 I mean, I know.
00:28:09.000 Hero of the Republic, Andrew Cuomo.
00:28:11.000 He says, listen, we're turning toward reopening too.
00:28:12.000 One week ago, he was saying, my mom's life isn't worth a single reopening.
00:28:15.000 And now he's like, oh yeah, by the way, we're on the other side of the mountain.
00:28:17.000 We kind of have to reopen.
00:28:18.000 Yeah, no bleep, Sherlock.
00:28:20.000 So you tell me, Chris, right?
00:28:22.000 Talk to your brother.
00:28:23.000 Is the testing and tracing available in New York?
00:28:24.000 Are they ready to go in New York?
00:28:26.000 You tell me.
00:28:27.000 Or is it only that you say that everything is insufficient when it's a Republican opening up his state?
00:28:33.000 Now the decline has gotten to a point where we are just about where we started the journey.
00:28:40.000 So to turn to reopening, because we have abated the worst by what we've done, and now we can intelligently turn towards reopening.
00:28:52.000 And that's May 15th, that's this Friday, and local regions all across the state should start to prepare for it, and people as well.
00:29:03.000 Okay, so again, amazing, amazing.
00:29:06.000 Only Democrats get away with this sort of stuff.
00:29:08.000 Republicans do not.
00:29:08.000 So here's a perfect example.
00:29:10.000 So the Trump administration has been ripped up and down.
00:29:12.000 The Trump administration got people their ventilators.
00:29:14.000 The Trump administration gave governors what they need.
00:29:16.000 I will say that it is a dereliction of political duty for the Trump campaign not to have cut an ad just showing Democrats over and over and over again saying, we got what we needed from the White House.
00:29:27.000 Every single major Democrat has said this.
00:29:29.000 The governor of California has said it.
00:29:30.000 The governor of New York has said it.
00:29:31.000 The governor of New Jersey has said it.
00:29:32.000 Every major governor in every blue state has said when we asked the federal government for something, we got what we needed.
00:29:39.000 How the Trump campaign has not put out a video just demonstrating the gap between the media coverage and what the governors are saying is absolutely beyond me.
00:29:45.000 It is political dereliction of duty.
00:29:47.000 It's unbelievable.
00:29:48.000 It's just it's unthinkable that they haven't done this yet.
00:29:51.000 Truly.
00:29:52.000 But Jared Kushner yesterday, he is correct.
00:29:54.000 He said, if you needed a ventilator, you got one.
00:29:55.000 Remember when Jared Kushner was ripped up and down for suggesting that maybe people were exaggerating the number of ventilators that they needed?
00:30:00.000 Remember he suggested, by the way, we're a backup system and states should actually primarily be looking for ventilators on their own, but we're here to help.
00:30:06.000 And they got ripped up and down.
00:30:07.000 Very evil, Jared Kushner.
00:30:08.000 Evil, evil, evil, Jared Kushner.
00:30:10.000 Guess what?
00:30:11.000 The ventilators were there.
00:30:12.000 In fact, now we're talking about a surplus in this country of tens of thousands of ventilators because all the media could shout about for months on end was the need for ventilators, which by the way, are about 10% effective once you're in the ICU.
00:30:22.000 Here is Jared Kushner yesterday.
00:30:23.000 We all came together.
00:30:26.000 We worked very closely with New York.
00:30:27.000 We sent them 4,400 ventilators.
00:30:30.000 We've sent them money.
00:30:31.000 We've sent them resources.
00:30:33.000 We've sent them people.
00:30:33.000 We've sent them masks.
00:30:34.000 The goal here was just to make sure that we can get all the resources we needed to the front line to make sure the people who were in danger from the virus got what they needed.
00:30:42.000 And thankfully, in New York and throughout the country, anyone who needed a ventilator got a ventilator, and we've been able to bring good results to the country.
00:30:50.000 OK, that is correct.
00:30:52.000 But the media have an agenda, and the agenda is Trump is evil and Trump is wrong.
00:30:55.000 So yesterday, President Trump talked about meeting the moment.
00:30:58.000 He said, we've met the moment, we've prevailed.
00:31:00.000 Okay, well, again, I would have been very hesitant on a political level ever to declare victory in the middle of a pandemic, right?
00:31:05.000 That's just not something that you want to do.
00:31:07.000 And I don't think Trump was fully doing that, but that's certainly how the media covered it, because they were always going to cover it that way.
00:31:12.000 But when President Trump says that we gave people what they needed, he is right.
00:31:15.000 So here's President Trump yesterday.
00:31:17.000 In every generation, through every challenge and hardship and danger, America has risen to the task.
00:31:23.000 We have met the moment, and we have prevailed.
00:31:27.000 Americans do whatever it takes to find solutions, pioneer breakthroughs, and harness the energies we need to achieve a total victory.
00:31:36.000 Day after day, we're making tremendous strides.
00:31:39.000 With the dedication of our doctors and nurses, these are incredible people.
00:31:42.000 These are brave people.
00:31:43.000 These are warriors.
00:31:46.000 He is right about all of that.
00:31:48.000 Now, that was covered by the media as though he was saying a mission accomplished manner across the White House.
00:31:52.000 He never said anything like that.
00:31:53.000 As you'll see in just a second, the media do have an agenda here.
00:31:55.000 And their agenda is to rip Trump no matter what he does, no matter what he says.
00:32:00.000 I mean, it really is astonishing.
00:32:01.000 There are plenty of times when Trump says stuff where I'll criticize him and I'll say, that was incredibly dumb.
00:32:04.000 He certainly should not have said that.
00:32:05.000 There are times when he'll say something that's vulgar and vile.
00:32:07.000 He certainly shouldn't have said that.
00:32:09.000 Today, President Trump is on Twitter and he's talking about Joe Scarborough being a murderer or something idiotic and ridiculous like that.
00:32:15.000 That was not yesterday.
00:32:16.000 Yesterday, the media decided for no reason at all that Trump was in the middle of a meltdown.
00:32:20.000 No, what's happening is that our media are melting down right now because they are not giving you proper information.
00:32:24.000 They are only focused solely and completely on how can they use this as a club to beat Trump with.
00:32:30.000 I mean, really, when I say solely and completely, I mean the political media.
00:32:33.000 I, again, want to make a distinction.
00:32:34.000 There are people who actually report on health policy.
00:32:37.000 And many of those people are very good.
00:32:38.000 I will say it again, the Washington Post healthcare page, their health policy 202 page, it's very good.
00:32:43.000 The Wall Street Journal, same thing.
00:32:45.000 There are health reporters at various outlets that are actually doing a good job.
00:32:48.000 And then there's the political media, and the political media absolutely suck.
00:32:52.000 The people who are the White House reporters, they are just garbage.
00:32:54.000 The people who are on TV, and all they are interested in doing is getting their momentary clip, that moment of fame where they took on the president like Sam Donaldson in the old days, or Dan Rather in the old days, standing up and lecturing Ronald Reagan.
00:33:06.000 No, you just look like a douchebag.
00:33:07.000 Seriously.
00:33:08.000 And that's not on the president.
00:33:09.000 I'll give you a perfect example of this yesterday.
00:33:11.000 This posturing nonsense.
00:33:13.000 Get to that in just a second.
00:33:13.000 First, we are home more than usual these days, but it's still hard to keep a close eye on things.
00:33:18.000 More deliveries can mean more boxes left unattended and more opportunities for packages to go missing.
00:33:22.000 Plus, I gotta tell you, living in LA, there is more and more criminality these days.
00:33:26.000 My good friend, Dave Rubin, he had his mailbox robbed yesterday.
00:33:29.000 Somebody literally just walked up to his mailbox, opened up his mailbox, and took his stuff.
00:33:33.000 He has that on video because of Ring, and now he has submitted it to the police.
00:33:37.000 My friend, the other day, his house was robbed.
00:33:39.000 His video, from Ring.com, directly to the police.
00:33:41.000 Hopefully the police will do their job and track these people down.
00:33:44.000 As mayors are releasing criminals into public areas and not arresting them and keeping them in jail, crime rates are going up.
00:33:50.000 And that means that you really need to make sure you know what is going on inside and outside your house.
00:33:53.000 This is why you need Ring.
00:33:54.000 Ring gives you protection at every corner.
00:33:56.000 Video doorbells let you answer the door and check in on your home anytime.
00:33:59.000 Keep an eye on your doorstep or speak to delivery people when you can't come to the door.
00:34:02.000 With outdoor security cameras, you can check in on every part of your house and never miss a moment.
00:34:06.000 Smart lighting will brighten up the blind spot to make sure you always come home to a brightly lit house.
00:34:10.000 Full home security systems give you everything you need to protect your family, pets, and property.
00:34:14.000 You can get a special offer on the Ring Welcome Kit when you go to ring.com slash ben.
00:34:17.000 That welcome kit includes the Ring Video Doorbell 3 and the Chime Pro.
00:34:20.000 It's all you need to start building that custom security for your home today.
00:34:24.000 Go to ring.com slash ben.
00:34:25.000 That is ring.com slash ben.
00:34:27.000 Go check them out right now.
00:34:28.000 Ring.com slash ben.
00:34:30.000 All right, in just a second.
00:34:32.000 We are going to be getting to the insanity of the media because they were claiming yesterday that Trump melted down at a press conference.
00:34:38.000 He did not.
00:34:39.000 The media melted down and they exposed, honestly, they exposed themselves in tremendous ways.
00:34:43.000 They exposed themselves like a porn star at a Las Vegas convention.
00:34:46.000 It was amazing.
00:34:46.000 We'll get to that in a second.
00:34:47.000 First, I want to tell you about Daily Wire's newest, most exclusive membership tier, the All Access.
00:34:52.000 All Access membership.
00:34:53.000 It's our premier level of membership.
00:34:55.000 All AXS members get the benefits of our other membership tiers, including an ad-free website experience, access to all of our live broadcasts and show library, access to the show's mailbags, and the full three hours of The Ben Shapiro Show, along with dedicated editorials from moi.
00:35:08.000 All AXS members also get other amazing benefits, including, of course, the singular, irreplaceable Leftist Tiers Tumblr.
00:35:13.000 They also get to join live, exclusive online Q&As, DailyWire's new discussion feature, available on both the website and the DailyWire app.
00:35:19.000 They also get to participate in All Access Live, our brand new interactive programming featuring one of us DailyWire hosts as we hang out with you each night, 8 p.m.
00:35:26.000 Pacific, 5 p.m.
00:35:27.000 Eastern, 5 p.m.
00:35:28.000 I did one last night.
00:35:28.000 Pacific.
00:35:29.000 If you missed it, well, that's sad, but I'll be doing another one later this week.
00:35:32.000 Matt Walsh will be hosting you tonight.
00:35:33.000 And let me tell you, there is no party like a Matt Walsh party, so get excited!
00:35:37.000 Head on over to dailywire.com slash subscribe to join DailyWire's All Access Club with a new membership or an upgrade.
00:35:42.000 Get 10% off with coupon code SHAPIRO.
00:35:44.000 That is dailywire.com slash subscribe.
00:35:46.000 See you there.
00:35:47.000 You are listening to the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:35:47.000 there.
00:35:50.000 So this is all insanity.
00:35:59.000 Again, the media have lost their mind.
00:36:00.000 So, here was the moment yesterday that made all the rounds.
00:36:04.000 Trump meltdown was trending on Twitter.
00:36:05.000 So, let me show you the so-called meltdown.
00:36:07.000 So, President Trump is asked a question by a CBS reporter named Y. Zhe Zhang.
00:36:12.000 Okay, and the question is utterly stupid.
00:36:14.000 It's an idiotic question.
00:36:15.000 A truly idiotic question.
00:36:16.000 It's a typical gotcha, Mr. President, why are you so mean, bad, and ugly question, right?
00:36:22.000 Mr. President, when did you stop beating your wife question?
00:36:24.000 And this is the question that you get when the political reporters are in charge.
00:36:27.000 Again, I have suggested that the White House stop doing press conferences with President Trump.
00:36:33.000 Basically entirely.
00:36:34.000 Not because Trump is wildly mishandling them, although sometimes he does.
00:36:37.000 The real reason is because the political media are not giving the American public the information they need.
00:36:41.000 It's so funny, the political media are like, we shouldn't show Trump on TV because he's giving misinformation.
00:36:45.000 What about the fact that your entire agenda is completely directed toward the politics of the situation and making political hay?
00:36:52.000 As opposed to, you know, the actual question that Americans want answered like, How safe are we going to be?
00:36:56.000 What are the risk calculations?
00:36:57.000 And are we going to die?
00:36:59.000 Those seem like those would be more relevant considerations.
00:37:01.000 So how about you get your economic team up there and your health team up there and you have the economic and health teams from the newspapers ask the questions?
00:37:09.000 Because these people are asking the dumbest questions ever.
00:37:11.000 I mean, seriously, I've interviewed a lot of the same people who are being brought up to these press conferences, right?
00:37:16.000 I've interviewed Burks.
00:37:17.000 I've interviewed Mike Pence.
00:37:18.000 I've interviewed Scott Gottlieb.
00:37:20.000 I've interviewed like a bevy of public health experts.
00:37:23.000 And if you actually watch the interviews on the Sunday specials or listen to them, what you'll hear is me asking extremely specific questions about what is the nature of the testing?
00:37:30.000 What are the success rates?
00:37:31.000 What can we expect from them?
00:37:32.000 What level of prevalence do they have to have?
00:37:35.000 What is the herd immunity that we need to reach?
00:37:38.000 These are the questions that we need to know.
00:37:40.000 What is the timeline for the rollout of vaccines?
00:37:42.000 Those are the questions we need to know.
00:37:43.000 Instead, we get this kind of posturing bull bleep Why is this a global competition to you if every day Americans are still losing their lives and we're still seeing more cases every day?
00:37:51.000 Why Zhejiang?
00:37:51.000 And then posture as a victim.
00:37:53.000 So here is the exchange between Trump and why Zhejiang that led to a blow up.
00:37:56.000 Why is this a global competition to you if every day Americans are still losing their lives and we're still seeing more cases every day?
00:38:06.000 Well, they're losing their lives.
00:38:08.000 OK, before we get to Trump's answer, that question is so bad and so ridiculous and so stupid.
00:38:13.000 The reason it's bad and stupid and ridiculous is because Trump, before this, he claims that the United States is now testing more than any other country.
00:38:19.000 Now, on a raw basis, that's true.
00:38:21.000 On a per capita basis, it's approaching the truth, I think.
00:38:24.000 Last I checked.
00:38:25.000 Okay, now.
00:38:27.000 Why is he comparing how we're doing to other countries?
00:38:30.000 Because you guys keep saying that we are lagging based on other countries.
00:38:34.000 And so he has been responding to that.
00:38:36.000 So her question is, why do you keep comparing us to other countries when Americans are dying?
00:38:39.000 Because it's sort of relevant to determine our success levels in testing to compare us to other countries.
00:38:45.000 Because our test levels are never going to be sufficient to meet 50 million a day.
00:38:50.000 So it seems more reasonable to compare us to how are other countries who are successful doing.
00:38:54.000 It's a perfectly reasonable, it's a dumbass question and a perfectly reasonable thing for the President of the United States to compare how we're doing to other countries.
00:39:01.000 It's what we do every single day.
00:39:02.000 It's what Worldometers does, what Johns Hopkins does.
00:39:05.000 When we look at deaths per 100,000, what do you think we're doing?
00:39:07.000 What do you think we're doing?
00:39:09.000 Okay, so it's an idiotic question and here was Trump's answer.
00:39:12.000 Well, they're losing their lives everywhere in the world, and maybe that's a question you should ask China.
00:39:18.000 Sir, why are you saying that to me, specifically, that I should ask China?
00:39:21.000 I'm telling you, I'm not saying it specifically to anybody.
00:39:23.000 I'm saying it to anybody that would ask a nasty question like that.
00:39:26.000 That's not a nasty question.
00:39:27.000 Please go ahead.
00:39:28.000 Next, please.
00:39:29.000 You called on me.
00:39:30.000 I did, and you didn't respond, and now I'm calling on the young lady in the back.
00:39:35.000 Please.
00:39:35.000 I just wanted to let my colleague finish, but can I ask you a question?
00:39:37.000 Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much.
00:39:39.000 Appreciate it.
00:39:40.000 Thank you very much.
00:39:41.000 Okay, that's not a meltdown, because what happened there is that he then called on another reporter who raised her hand.
00:39:46.000 And she ceded her time back to the woman who was busy screaming at Trump, basically.
00:39:50.000 By the way, taking off her mask just so she could get on camera.
00:39:55.000 That's what she does.
00:39:57.000 Look at us, we're masked up just because we are so virtuous.
00:40:00.000 But you know what?
00:40:01.000 This is my big moment on camera.
00:40:02.000 I'm taking off the mask so you can see that I'm Chinese, and that's why you're asking the question.
00:40:07.000 Okay, so question.
00:40:08.000 Did Trump know she was Chinese or not?
00:40:10.000 Of Chinese extraction or not?
00:40:11.000 She's American, I assume.
00:40:12.000 She's of Chinese extraction, is my understanding.
00:40:14.000 So, if no one knew that she was of Asian extraction or Chinese extraction before she removed the mask, then it's not racist for him to say it.
00:40:21.000 By the way, it's not racist for him to say it anyway.
00:40:23.000 He's been saying for months, ask China about the levels of death.
00:40:26.000 Ask China about the levels.
00:40:28.000 Of course we should ask China about the levels of death.
00:40:29.000 This is China's damned fault.
00:40:31.000 China is still manipulating the WHO to keep Taiwan out of hearings on this stuff.
00:40:37.000 China still won't answer straight questions as to how this thing escaped Wuhan.
00:40:41.000 They still won't allow an investigation as to how this thing started.
00:40:45.000 Trump has been saying, talk to China for a long time.
00:40:47.000 So just because this reporter happens to be, I assume, of Chinese extraction, I don't even know, right?
00:40:52.000 She makes that the issue.
00:40:53.000 He doesn't.
00:40:54.000 But then she's like, why are you asking me that?
00:40:55.000 Are you saying that because I'm Chinese?
00:41:00.000 Okay, this is the most garbage, stupid form of media.
00:41:02.000 Naturally, the entire media jump on this.
00:41:04.000 So Brian Stelter, just journalism-ing up the wazoo, right?
00:41:07.000 Media watchdog Brian Stelter, he says, this is rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I think what we saw in that exchange with Wei Zhejiang is something that has racial overtones.
00:41:23.000 It is racist to look at an Asian-American White House correspondent and say, ask China.
00:41:29.000 This isn't happening in a vacuum.
00:41:31.000 This is part of a pattern of behavior from the president that goes back many years.
00:41:34.000 So he doesn't have the benefit of the doubt that someone might have if, for the first time ever in their life, they made a comment like that to a reporter.
00:41:43.000 That wasn't the first time in his life he made that comment.
00:41:45.000 He talks about China at every single press conference.
00:41:48.000 Didn't we have a controversy like a month and a half ago where he kept calling it the Chinese virus?
00:41:52.000 Right?
00:41:54.000 Have we all hit our heads and experienced short-term memory loss?
00:41:57.000 I understand that we now live in the world of Interstellar.
00:42:01.000 We're on like the water planet and every minute is seven years long and all of this.
00:42:04.000 But it was like four weeks ago when we had an entire national controversy over Trump saying Chinese virus.
00:42:09.000 Was he doing that for the benefit of Wai Shih-Sheng?
00:42:11.000 Ridiculous!
00:42:12.000 Ridiculous!
00:42:14.000 He doesn't get the benefit of the doubt.
00:42:15.000 And then you get Rachel Maddow.
00:42:16.000 Something is wrong with Trump.
00:42:17.000 Something's wrong with... Clearly something is broken in Trump.
00:42:20.000 Or maybe you always thought something was broken, and now you have your confirmation bias, Rachel Maddow.
00:42:24.000 Ridiculous.
00:42:25.000 Ridiculous.
00:42:26.000 What great journalism in our media does.
00:42:29.000 First, they tell us that we can't leave our houses without a vaccine.
00:42:32.000 Then they refuse to give us statistics on the seroprevalence test so we know what the actual risk factors are by population.
00:42:36.000 Then they suggest that everybody who's a Republican governor is bad, even if Democratic governors are doing the exact same thing.
00:42:41.000 And then they suggest that if President Trump tells a reporter to ask China about deaths abroad, that that's because the reporter is Chinese.
00:42:49.000 What the hell is wrong with these people?
00:42:50.000 And then you wonder why American trust in the media is at an all-time low?
00:42:53.000 I wonder.
00:42:53.000 I cannot imagine why.
00:42:55.000 Rachel Maddow.
00:42:56.000 The president right now, in the midst of this crisis, is visibly struggling.
00:43:02.000 There is something wrong or he's just not doing okay.
00:43:06.000 I don't know.
00:43:06.000 But the president apparently just is not able to keep it together right now in his public appearances.
00:43:14.000 What is wrong with the president today?
00:43:18.000 Um, we don't know.
00:43:20.000 I mean, something's wrong.
00:43:21.000 I mean, whether or not you, you know, like the president or not, whether you enjoy his public affect or not on a regular basis, it's clear that there's something wrong.
00:43:31.000 Oh, is that clear?
00:43:32.000 Is that clear?
00:43:33.000 Or is it that there's something wrong with the media?
00:43:35.000 Trump has been Trump this whole time.
00:43:36.000 I'm old enough to remember when the media used to ask questions that were not entirely geared toward, Mr. Trump, you're very bad, orange, and large.
00:43:43.000 Why?
00:43:44.000 Why are your hands so tiny, Mr. President?
00:43:46.000 Are you just angry at me because I'm Chinese, Mr. President?
00:43:49.000 Our genius.
00:43:51.000 How dare, how dare Trump?
00:43:52.000 How dare he?
00:43:53.000 How dare he?
00:43:54.000 It's just absurd.
00:43:55.000 Okay, meanwhile, the same media who are asking serious questions of Trump, like, why are you so mean, bad, and orange, refuse to ask any serious questions of anyone inside the Obama team about what they are now calling Obamagate.
00:44:05.000 So, President Trump, yesterday, was asked about what Obama did, because he used the term Obamagate on Twitter.
00:44:10.000 And he says, listen, everybody knows what Obama did, right?
00:44:13.000 Now, here's the thing.
00:44:14.000 Everybody didn't know what Obama did.
00:44:15.000 Anyway, here is President Trump yesterday talking about how everybody knows.
00:44:18.000 I'm going to explain what Obama did momentarily, and it ain't great.
00:44:21.000 I'll explain in just one second, but here is President Trump yesterday.
00:44:25.000 Obamagate.
00:44:26.000 It's been going on for a long time.
00:44:28.000 It's been going on from before I even got elected, and it's a disgrace that it happened.
00:44:33.000 And if you look at what's gone on, and if you look at now, all of this information that's being released, and from what I understand, that's only the beginning.
00:44:41.000 What is the crime exactly that you're accusing him of?
00:44:43.000 You know what the crime is.
00:44:44.000 The crime is very obvious to everybody.
00:44:46.000 All you have to do is read the newspapers, except yours.
00:44:50.000 Okay, so the crime is not obvious to everybody, and it's not obvious exactly that Obama committed a crime.
00:44:54.000 Here is what did happen with the Mike Flynn stuff.
00:44:56.000 And the fact that the media have generally been unwilling to cover it is pretty astonishing.
00:45:01.000 Actually, I'm going to give credit where credit is due.
00:45:03.000 One person who actually asked the right question today was George Stephanopoulos.
00:45:06.000 I know, shocks me too.
00:45:08.000 George Stephanopoulos over at ABC News.
00:45:10.000 He had Joe Biden on his program.
00:45:12.000 Do we have this clip?
00:45:13.000 And Joe Biden was specifically asked about whether he was in the loop on all the Mike Flynn stuff.
00:45:21.000 And he says, no, I never knew about any of the Mike Flynn stuff.
00:45:23.000 We know he was in an Oval Office meeting where Barack Obama specifically asked Sally Yates to her surprise about how things were going with all the Michael Flynn stuff.
00:45:30.000 So Biden was, in fact, in the loop.
00:45:32.000 Here he was basically pretending he was not in the loop.
00:45:33.000 This is an untrue statement from Joe Biden.
00:45:36.000 And good for Stephanopoulos for asking it.
00:45:39.000 I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn, number one.
00:45:42.000 Number two, this is all about diversion.
00:45:45.000 You say you didn't know anything about it, but you were reported to be at a January 5th, 2017 meeting where you and the president were briefed on the FBI's plan to question Michael Flynn over those conversations he had with the Russian ambassador, Kislyak.
00:46:02.000 No, I thought you asked me whether or not I had anything to do with him being prosecuted.
00:46:06.000 Okay.
00:46:06.000 I'm sorry.
00:46:08.000 I was aware that there was, that they asked for an investigation.
00:46:12.000 But that's all I know about it, and I don't think anything else.
00:46:15.000 Oh, is that all?
00:46:17.000 So you just misheard the question.
00:46:19.000 Okay, well, it seems like it's kind of asking for an investigation when you know more than the DOJ, the acting director of the DOJ, Sally Gates, and that you bring it up in front of Sally Gates and James Comey.
00:46:30.000 So here's the timeline here.
00:46:32.000 This is what Trump is talking about.
00:46:33.000 And serious questions should be asked here because Barack Obama goes out and he says things like the Trump administration is undermining the rule of law and then you get this posturing letter from 2,000 DOJ officials, what we call low-level DOJ officials, calling for Bill Barr's resignation.
00:46:45.000 Here's exactly what happened.
00:46:46.000 Here's the timeline.
00:46:48.000 Flynn, first of all, Obama claimed that Flynn was charged with perjury.
00:46:50.000 He was never charged with perjury.
00:46:51.000 He was charged with lying to the FBI in the course of an investigation, which is a separate and far lesser offense, particularly given the fact that his alleged lie was immaterial to any underlying crime, which is something the FBI basically acknowledges at this point.
00:47:02.000 In fact, as Americans have found out over the past couple of weeks, Flynn wasn't supposed to be the subject of any investigation at all.
00:47:08.000 The FBI had decided to close an investigation into Flynn January 2017, maybe January 4th, 2017, even after the supposedly nefarious calls between Flynn and the Russian ambassador, Sergei Kislyak.
00:47:18.000 In fact, the FBI had the transcripts of the calls.
00:47:21.000 They knew that nothing inappropriate was said on the calls.
00:47:22.000 That's when disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok, that's the same guy who pledged his lover, Lisa Page, that there would be an insurance policy against Trump, intervened and suggested that the investigation be kept open.
00:47:33.000 The very next day, during an Oval Office meeting, President Obama himself asked the FBI Director James Comey about the Flynn-Kislyak communications.
00:47:40.000 And then Comey upped the ante.
00:47:42.000 He avoided following normal FBI White House protocols in order to interview Flynn.
00:47:46.000 His deputy, Andrew McCabe, avoided informing Flynn of his rights.
00:47:50.000 Still, the FBI agents who conducted the interview said they didn't actually think that Flynn was lying during the interview.
00:47:54.000 As it turns out, there were notes between FBI officials at the time asking, what's our goal?
00:47:58.000 Truth and mission?
00:47:59.000 Or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him and get him fired?
00:48:02.000 Flynn would later plead guilty to one count of lying to the FBI, at least in part because the FBI was threatening his son with prosecution.
00:48:07.000 In other words, he took the plea deal because he didn't want his son to go to jail.
00:48:10.000 This should be a massive scandal.
00:48:12.000 And members of the Obama administration should be under the gun for it.
00:48:15.000 Because the reality is that they perverted the rules of law in order to confirm what they thought was happening.
00:48:21.000 Now, best case scenario here is that they were convinced that there was something nefarious going on inside the Trump campaign, and they were basically winking and nodding at the Carter Page FISA warrant and at the attempt to bend the rule of law regarding Michael Flynn.
00:48:33.000 The more sinister idea is that they really knew there was nothing there with Trump and Russia, but they were willing to sort of create the impression that there was by really exaggerating.
00:48:43.000 Now, I always tend to attribute to stupidity things rather than malice, right?
00:48:46.000 If I'm given the choice between malice and stupidity, I always go with stupidity, but At a certain point, the stupidity becomes malicious.
00:48:54.000 Once you're bending the rules in order to confirm your priors about an evidence-less charge that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia, and you're bending the rules, that does undermine faith in law enforcement.
00:49:04.000 And the fact that the Democrats are suggesting that Bill Barr is the problem here is truly an astonishing, astonishing development.
00:49:09.000 Okay, time for some things that I hate.
00:49:12.000 All right, so let's talk about local policy because it is truly insane what local policy has wrought.
00:49:22.000 As I mentioned, I have two good friends who, in the course of the last 48 hours, have been the victims of crime in Los Angeles.
00:49:28.000 Nobody will be caught, nobody will be prosecuted.
00:49:29.000 The police have basically told them that, you know, we don't even have bail anymore here.
00:49:33.000 So, if we jail these people, they'll be out on the streets within 24 hours.
00:49:36.000 How much do criminals know this?
00:49:38.000 Here's how much criminals know this.
00:49:40.000 The L.A.
00:49:40.000 County Sheriff released video yesterday of inmates infecting themselves in jail, trying to infect themselves in jail with COVID-19 so they could achieve release.
00:49:49.000 They thought it would force their release.
00:49:51.000 21 ended up infected.
00:49:53.000 According to the L.A.
00:49:53.000 County Sheriff, inmates at a jail in Castaic were sharing a water bottle, then rubbing the same mask on their faces to purposely infect themselves with COVID-19 because they understand that the easy way out of jail is to get COVID-19.
00:50:07.000 And so they're looking for release so they can go out and be criminals again because of the stupidity of the policy that suggests, well, you know, they're criminals, so I probably should just let them out of here.
00:50:15.000 Just genius stuff from our local government.
00:50:18.000 So here are the rules.
00:50:19.000 If you go to the beach and you are six feet away from somebody else, but you're not wearing a mask, then presumably they will arrest you or fine you.
00:50:26.000 If you are in jail because you committed some sort of serious crime, you just broke into somebody's house, Then you will be released even if you don't have COVID-19 because we can't have bail right now.
00:50:37.000 We don't want more people in jail.
00:50:39.000 You explain to me how a law-abiding citizen doing something reasonable like being at a beach 10 feet away from somebody else and not wearing a mask, which is perfectly reasonable, how that is more of a problem than actual criminals in Los Angeles being criminals and then basically being let off by the cops.
00:50:54.000 At the behest of the political actors, by the way, if you think the cops want to let these criminals off, you're dead wrong.
00:50:59.000 The cops do not want to do any of that.
00:51:01.000 It's just incredible.
00:51:02.000 It truly is.
00:51:03.000 Meanwhile, good news.
00:51:04.000 The New York Times is pushing some solutions for America's cities.
00:51:10.000 They're saying we got a problem with the cities because obviously these places are overcrowded.
00:51:14.000 They are hotbeds for infestations.
00:51:17.000 Bedbug infestations, for example, was a big issue in New York a couple of years ago.
00:51:20.000 They are bedbugs for, they are hotspots for infection and epidemics.
00:51:24.000 And so there have been a lot of expectations that people are going to move out of big cities now, which, by the way, would be good for the country.
00:51:29.000 It'd be good for the country if these cities would become a little bit less centralized.
00:51:32.000 But New York, obviously, the New York Times wants to save New York.
00:51:36.000 Their suggestion on how to save New York, it's truly incredible.
00:51:38.000 They say the biggest problem is that in New York, there are some areas that are nice and some areas that are not nice.
00:51:44.000 They say this pandemic has prompted some affluent Americans to wonder whether cities are broken for them.
00:51:48.000 It has suspended the charms of urban life while accentuating the risks, reviving a hoary American tradition of regarding cities with fear and loathing as such pools of disease, an image that all too easily aligns with prejudices about poverty and race and crime.
00:51:59.000 So if you're worried that New York has a lot of disease, it's because you're a racist now.
00:52:03.000 It's not because New York City actually has tons of disease and is the epicenter of this epidemic, like literally on planet Earth.
00:52:08.000 No, the real problem here is that you're a racist if you're worried about levels of disease in New York and you're thinking about moving out of town.
00:52:14.000 Even New York's governor, Andrew Cuomo, has described New York City's density as responsible for its suffering.
00:52:19.000 That's not racism.
00:52:20.000 That's the truth.
00:52:20.000 Population density has a major impact on epidemic spread, obviously.
00:52:24.000 So the New York Times has an idea.
00:52:26.000 They say the problem is that the crisis has prompted a flurry of fantasies about abandoning cities altogether, rooted in the idea that we'd all be a little better off at least a little further apart.
00:52:34.000 Social distancing is the salvation of society.
00:52:36.000 This is dangerously misguided.
00:52:38.000 Our cities are broken because affluent Americans have been segregating themselves from the poor, and our best hope for building a fairer, stronger nation is to break down these barriers.
00:52:46.000 So, in other words, because there are places of differential spread in New York City, the best thing to do would be to have a uniform spread inside New York City.
00:52:53.000 And that way, everybody feels like they are in the same boat.
00:52:56.000 How that solves an epidemic spread is beyond me.
00:52:57.000 I'm not sure why that would actually solve the problem.
00:53:00.000 But they say that the big problem in New York is of course that there is basically de facto self-segregation in New York City by housing price, that if you live on Fifth Avenue, that's not the same thing as living in Crown Heights, which obviously is true.
00:53:15.000 What is their suggestion?
00:53:16.000 How do they solve the problem of New York City?
00:53:18.000 The problem of New York City is not solved by For example, ensuring that every student has the ability to go to a good school.
00:53:26.000 The problem of New York City is solved by forcing the building of affordable housing in the richest areas of the city.
00:53:34.000 Which is a genius idea that was tried in Detroit and completely wrecked the city of Detroit because everybody who had the money then left.
00:53:39.000 Because it turns out that people don't actually want to live next to an affordable housing area where perhaps there are higher levels of crime or drug use, for example.
00:53:48.000 This is not to suggest that all the poor people in New York City are engaged in crime or drug use.
00:53:52.000 It is to suggest that areas that have high crime and high drug use Also happen to be very poverty stricken.
00:53:57.000 And if you take entire tenements and you move them from one area into another area, that will increase the life quality of people who have moved from the poor area into the richer area.
00:54:06.000 But it also means that some of the people who are living in the poor area who were some of the criminals, right?
00:54:12.000 Some of those criminals will be moving along with you, presumably.
00:54:15.000 And it turns out that people don't really want to do that or living in those areas.
00:54:18.000 The reason they're living in the higher income areas is because they would like to live in the higher income areas.
00:54:24.000 By the way, also affordable housing, how are you going to incentivize that?
00:54:27.000 When New York City tried this with rent control, they basically destroyed the capacity to build housing in New York City.
00:54:33.000 According to the New York Times, Yet, we can use this crisis as basically the idea.
00:54:35.000 Yeah.
00:54:59.000 The haves depend on each other, the rich need labor, the poor need capital, and the city needs both.
00:55:04.000 Building more diverse neighborhoods, disconnecting public institutions from private wealth, will ultimately enrich the lives of all Americans.
00:55:09.000 Good luck with this.
00:55:11.000 Good luck with this.
00:55:11.000 If you're worried about Americans in New York City buying second homes and leaving the city, definitely what you should probably do is pick up a, you should probably put public housing to, like a, like a, an actual Publicly built housing.
00:55:24.000 You should probably put national housing, essentially.
00:55:28.000 You should put tenements directly next to those Fifth Avenue walk-ups.
00:55:33.000 That's probably the best.
00:55:34.000 The rich people definitely won't leave.
00:55:36.000 They'll just stick around.
00:55:37.000 And they'll continue to pay exorbitant taxes in order to do so.
00:55:41.000 Great idea, guys.
00:55:42.000 Just wonderful, wonderful idea.
00:55:45.000 The New York Times, never failing to astonish.
00:55:46.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I like.
00:55:48.000 So, I had the opportunity to read a novel over the weekend.
00:55:52.000 It's a novel about free birth of Israel, Israel.
00:55:56.000 It's about the lead up to the declaration of the independence of the state of Israel.
00:55:59.000 It takes place in the period 1937 to 1939, and it's about the Jewish settlers who are moving from Europe into the land of Israel, about the British mandate that was very pro-Arab and very anti-Jewish.
00:56:14.000 It was about the shutdown of immigration from Europe into British Mandate Palestine.
00:56:19.000 At the behest of Arab officials.
00:56:22.000 And, I mean, it is pretty astonishing.
00:56:24.000 For folks who don't know the history, it is a good, interesting history book that is pretty well-rounded.
00:56:29.000 Thieves in the Night by Arthur Kessler.
00:56:30.000 Worth the read.
00:56:31.000 Arthur Kessler, of course, is more famous for his great book, Darkness at Noon, about communism.
00:56:34.000 But this is a very, very interesting book with a kind of fascinating perspective on the Arab-Israeli conflict.
00:56:40.000 Go check it out.
00:56:41.000 Thieves in the Night by Arthur Kessler.
00:56:42.000 It's still available, although it's not really in print right now.
00:56:45.000 Okay, we'll be back in a little bit.
00:56:46.000 Later today with two additional hours of content.
00:56:48.000 Otherwise, we will see you here tomorrow.
00:56:49.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:56:50.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:56:55.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
00:56:57.000 Directed by Mike Joyner.
00:56:59.000 Executive producer Jeremy Boring.
00:57:00.000 Supervising producer Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:57:03.000 Assistant director Pavel Lydowsky.
00:57:05.000 Technical producer Austin Stevens.
00:57:07.000 Playback and media operated by Nick Sheehan.
00:57:09.000 Associate producer Katie Swinnerton.
00:57:11.000 Edited by Adam Sajovic.
00:57:12.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:57:14.000 Hair and makeup is by Nika Geneva.
00:57:16.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:57:18.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:57:21.000 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is blaming Europe for the coronavirus, even as evidence mounts that China knew about the virus, covered it up, destroyed the world economy, and killed lots of people.
00:57:30.000 But American leftists keep defending the Chinese Communist Party because no less than their whole political program rides on it.
00:57:36.000 Then, a New York Times writer wants you to pay for raising her own children.
00:57:41.000 A judge issues a major ruling on transgenderism before the case even begins.
00:57:45.000 And Slate Magazine comes up with a new term for monogamy.
00:57:48.000 All that and more.