The Ben Shapiro Show


Ep. 275 - Can Everybody Stop Lying For 30 Seconds, Please?


Summary

In the wake of the attack on the Houses of Parliament, the British press has focused heavily on the identity of the perpetrator. Is it a Muslim? Is it not a Muslim at all? And what does this have to do with race and ethnicity? And why is the term "Asian" used so much in the media to describe the perpetrator? Ben Shapiro explains why the use of the term Asian is a cover for a Muslim perpetrator, and why the media should be ashamed of itself for it. He also explains why using the term Asian is a bad idea, and how the media and government use it to cover up for the fact that the perpetrator may not be a Muslim. And, of course, there's a bottle of wine to celebrate it all. Ben and WIllink discuss that and much more on today's episode of The Ben Shapiro Show. Music: Fair Weather Fans by The Baseball Project, Recorded live at WFMU and produced by Riley Bray Subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices. Rate, review and subscribe to our new podcast, The Five Starred Copycat Copycat by going to gimlet.fm/TheBenShapiroShow and leave us a rating and review on iTunes. Subscribe and review this episode on your favorite streaming platform so you can be notified when a new episode hits your favorite podcast platform! of the latest episode is available. Thank you for listening and sharing it! Subscribe, review, and spread the word out there about what you're listening to this podcast! and spread it around the world! Love, Ben Shapiro, you'll be helping us spread the truth about what's good, not just the truth, right here, and what's going out there? and we'll be spreading it everywhere else? - The truth about it's better than it's good enough, more like it's more than just good, right, more of it than that, right? -- Thank you, thank you, bye, bye bye bye, good night. - Yours Truly Truly Truly, Ben and truly, bye. -- Yours truly, -- The Reverend Ben Shapiro "The Reverend Jimmie, the Reverend - Vicky, Vicky and Kewl, Raldee, the Reverend Ben Jeeves, Sr., the Reverend Ed, Jr.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Media reports from the British press in the aftermath of Wednesday's truck and knife attack on Parliament, resulting in the death of at least four people and catastrophic injuries to more than a dozen more, have focused in on the identity of the perpetrator in vague terms.
00:00:12.000 We knew, according to The Telegraph, that the attacker was described by witnesses as, quote, an Asian guy in about his 40s carrying a knife about seven or eight inches long.
00:00:19.000 The Daily Star of the UK called the suspect a black or Asian man who was spotted running with an eight-inch knife.
00:00:25.000 The Daily Mirror called him, quote, reportedly Asian in appearance.
00:00:28.000 The picture of the suspect shows that he is, in fact, some guy from the Middle East or Pakistan.
00:00:34.000 In America, Asian has a different connotation than it does in the British press.
00:00:37.000 It generally means people of Pakistani or Indian descent, not people from Southeast Asia, as it does in the United States.
00:00:42.000 It's also often a cover for Islamic background.
00:00:45.000 The press will generally avoid talking about the religion of a suspect in favor of focusing in on ethnicity, and then they will broaden out the ethnic label to include people who aren't Pakistani in order to create the impression that the Pakistani perpetrator might not be a Muslim.
00:00:58.000 In May 2012, the BBC reported that groups representing Sikhs and Hindus complained to the media about the use of the term Asian to apply to nine Pakistani suspects erected for grooming girls for sex.
00:01:08.000 The network of Sikh organizations, UK, the Hindu Forum of Britain, the Sikh Media Monitoring Group, UK, accused the media
00:01:14.000 Of unwillingness to mention the, quote, disproportionate representation of Muslims in such cases, and the non-Muslim identities of the victims, calling the Asian label, quote, unfair to other communities of Asian responsibility, adding, quote, we believe that in this case, the government itself is sanctioning the use of the term Asian as a way of clouding responsibility.
00:01:33.000 The same pattern held true in reporting of the Rotherham incident, where British authorities, fearful of supposed backlash, held back on investigations into a serious upsurge in rape and child sex slavery involving Muslim men.
00:01:45.000 Up to 1,400 children were involved.
00:01:47.000 The police filed a report in 2010 openly mentioning, quote, a problem with networks of Asian offenders, both locally and nationally, and stated that the crimes were related to culture.
00:01:56.000 From 1997 to 2013, the crimes were under police and underreported.
00:02:00.000 This is how media and government turn individual criminal issues into actual tribal conflicts.
00:02:05.000 By refusing to hold everyone to the same standard, refusing to acknowledge that not all cultures are equally compatible with Western standards of decency, and instead using ethnic descriptors rather than ideological ones, the media and authorities actually drives xenophobia rather than alleviating it, as well as sweeping up innocent people in the net.
00:02:23.000 Sikhs and Hindus do not deserve to be placed in the same risk category as radical Muslims with regard to terrorism.
00:02:29.000 Attempting to protect moderate Muslims by ignoring all ideological leanings whatsoever is stupid.
00:02:34.000 And using the overbroad ethnic descriptor Asian, pretending that Indians and Pakistanis are part of the same ethnic group for purposes of avoiding ideological conclusion jumping is purposeful obfuscation of accuracy.
00:02:45.000 Maybe the terrorist isn't Muslim.
00:02:47.000 We now know that he is.
00:02:48.000 That would have been possible.
00:02:49.000 But it's not fine to give the public misleading information on the grounds that they might jump to conclusions suggested by probabilistic thinking and then lump in innocent people in the process.
00:02:58.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:02:58.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:03:04.000 Okay, I'm gonna be spitting some hot fire today because there's a lot of lying going on.
00:03:07.000 I'm gonna debunk all of it because it's really maddening.
00:03:10.000 It's really making me upset.
00:03:11.000 I'm very sick of it.
00:03:12.000 I am annoyed.
00:03:13.000 I am frustrated.
00:03:15.000 Everyone is lying.
00:03:16.000 They're all lying to you and it is making me sick to my stomach and so we are going to put an end to that today when we discuss the truth about what's happening on this Trump-Russia stuff and on the wiretapping stuff and on all the rest of it on Trumpcare.
00:03:26.000 So many lies, so little time, so much to get to.
00:03:29.000 But first, we have to say thank you to our advertisers over at Wink.
00:03:34.000 If you are somebody who knows nothing about wine, like me, if you're somebody who would buy just a bottle of grape juice that is fermented too long and think that that was wine, number one, you don't know anything about wine.
00:03:44.000 Number two, you need to actually go to trywink.com slash Ben because you're going over to somebody's house and now you need to bring a decent bottle of wine and that old bottle of Ketam ain't gonna do it.
00:03:55.000 So you need something that's actually going to go with the food.
00:03:58.000 You go to trywink.com and they ask you what your tastes are like, what kind of flavors you like, and then they personalize a bottle to you.
00:04:05.000 They tell you what bottle you will like.
00:04:07.000 All the bottles of wine are cheap.
00:04:09.000 Our staff has tried them.
00:04:11.000 They say that the wine is really, really top-notch, which is why they're always drunk.
00:04:16.000 Trywink.com.
00:04:17.000 You get $20 off plus complimentary shipping when you trywink.com.
00:04:22.000 Slash Ben, and it's W-I-N-C.
00:04:24.000 It used to be Club W. It's W-I-N-C, Wink.com slash Ben.
00:04:30.000 And again, the bottles are not random.
00:04:32.000 They are personalized to your palate.
00:04:34.000 And you can rate the wine that you choose so that they won't send you the same bottle.
00:04:38.000 Again, if you don't like the wine, they will replace it with a bottle that you like.
00:04:42.000 No questions asked.
00:04:43.000 100% satisfaction guarantee.
00:04:45.000 Try Wink.com slash Ben.
00:04:46.000 They cover the shipping for $20 off right now, which could be like two bottles.
00:04:50.000 So that's a pretty solid deal.
00:04:51.000 Try wink.com slash been terrific service, particularly if you're ignorant about what wines are good.
00:04:56.000 Okay, so, so as I say, lots of lying going on, many a lie from all sides, and it's making me want to vomit.
00:05:03.000 So let's begin with the biggest lie told by the media last night, that Donald Trump is on the verge of impeachment.
00:05:09.000 All is over.
00:05:10.000 Donald Trump, they found the silver bullet.
00:05:12.000 Anderson Cooper,
00:05:14.000 Anderson Cooper is on CNN and he says, we have new information.
00:05:18.000 What is that new information?
00:05:19.000 Well, we now know that the FBI may or may not have information that Donald Trump's team was coordinating with the Russians in order to release info on Hillary Clinton during the campaign.
00:05:29.000 Here is the Silver Fox, Anderson Cooper.
00:05:31.000 She has Pamela Brown and Evan Perez joining us now.
00:05:34.000 They broke the story along with our justice reporter, Shimon Prokopez.
00:05:37.000 Pam, first, what are you learning?
00:05:39.000 Well, Anderson, the FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, U.S.
00:05:53.000 officials told us.
00:05:54.000 FBI Director James Comey made his bombshell announcement, as you'll recall, Monday before Congress that the FBI is investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia.
00:06:02.000 So the FBI is now reviewing this information, which includes human intelligence, travel, business and phone records,
00:06:09.000 But you admit all you have right now is a circumstantial case?
00:06:31.000 Actually, no, Chuck.
00:06:33.000 I can tell you that the case is more than that.
00:06:36.000 And I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.
00:06:40.000 So, again, I think... So you have seen direct evidence of collusion?
00:06:46.000 I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation.
00:06:55.000 Okay, this is rumor mongering, rumor mongering.
00:06:57.000 Here's what the CNN report actually said.
00:06:59.000 The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign.
00:07:09.000 Okay, so in the first sentence you have three qualifying words.
00:07:12.000 Indicates, suspected, and possibly.
00:07:14.000 And then when you read down to, of course, paragraph 9 or 10 in the article, quote,
00:07:32.000 Since it's largely circumstantial.
00:07:34.000 So no, Adam Schiff, apparently the information is largely circumstantial, according to other U.S.
00:07:39.000 officials.
00:07:39.000 So they got one person saying it's not circumstantial, a bunch of people saying it is circumstantial, and the entire media running with it, Trump is on the ropes!
00:07:46.000 It's all over!
00:07:47.000 Okay, no, it's not.
00:07:49.000 Come on, cut it out.
00:07:50.000 Okay, so that is side one, exaggerating the case, or lying, or making the case out to be ironclad, when it simply is not.
00:07:58.000 Then, on the other side, we have a bunch of people saying that Trump has been vindicated in his wiretapping claims.
00:08:02.000 So.
00:08:03.000 No, he hasn't.
00:08:04.000 No, he hasn't.
00:08:05.000 Okay, I'm just being honest here.
00:08:07.000 If you don't want honesty, there are plenty of other places that will tell you that Trump is the most vindicated person who has ever lived and all is well and all this crap.
00:08:13.000 Okay, here is what Trump actually said.
00:08:15.000 Trump said that like McCarthy, like McCarthy, there was purposeful wiretapping of Trump Tower.
00:08:20.000 And I'm not even going to be specific.
00:08:22.000 I'm not even going to say that it was wiretapping of Trump Tower specifically.
00:08:24.000 We'll make the claim a little broader.
00:08:26.000 We'll say that Trump said that Obama directed surveillance at him.
00:08:30.000 We'll make it even broader than that.
00:08:32.000 Trump said that Obama intelligence officials directed surveillance at him and his officials.
00:08:38.000 Okay, that's what we will say.
00:08:40.000 Now, is there any evidence of that whatsoever?
00:08:42.000 No, there isn't any evidence of that whatsoever.
00:08:44.000 Okay?
00:08:45.000 All the evidence suggests, so far, that if there were Trump associates who were caught up in the quote-unquote surveillance, they were caught up incidentally.
00:08:53.000 Meaning, we don't have any FISA warrants that we know about, other than I think one report in like Heat Street or something.
00:08:58.000 There are no FISA warrants that we know about that were actually directed at U.S.
00:09:01.000 citizens on this one.
00:09:03.000 There's no FISA warrant that went out on Mike Flynn, for example.
00:09:07.000 There's no FISA warrant as far as we know.
00:09:09.000 There was no direct surveillance of these people.
00:09:11.000 Now, does that mean that there was no surveillance of these people?
00:09:14.000 No, that there was surveillance of these people in the same way that, for example, you wouldn't say that the cops were targeting you if they were staking out a drug den and you were a client.
00:09:23.000 Okay, they weren't targeting you.
00:09:24.000 They were targeting the drug den, and you were a client.
00:09:27.000 Okay, this is the same thing that's happening here.
00:09:29.000 They were targeting the Russians, and the Russians were talking with Trump people, and some of the Trump people were on the line with the Russians.
00:09:34.000 That is not the same thing as what Trump was claiming, which was, Obama basically put a team on me and my friends, and then he was attempting to gather information on us so that he could release it and take us down.
00:09:43.000 Okay, that's not true.
00:09:44.000 So, it doesn't matter.
00:09:46.000 People have gotten into this business and it's driving me absolutely up a wall, up a freaking wall, okay?
00:09:51.000 The left did it during the Michael Brown-Darren Wilson scenario, where they claimed, hands up, don't shoot.
00:09:56.000 And people like me said, that never happened.
00:09:58.000 And the left said, ah, you're right, it never happened, but the facts may not be true, but the narrative is true.
00:10:05.000 And we'd say, what the hell does that mean?
00:10:06.000 Why don't you show me some facts, generating a narrative, and then we'll determine if it's true.
00:10:10.000 You can't just say the narrative is true without any facts to back it up.
00:10:13.000 The right is now doing a lot of the same stuff on Trump's surveillance claims.
00:10:16.000 So, it is true, factually speaking, that there were people who are in the Trump team who were caught up in the surveillance net that was directed at people who are not the Trump team.
00:10:25.000 Okay, that is true.
00:10:27.000 You don't have to draw a narrative from it.
00:10:28.000 Okay, that's just a fact.
00:10:30.000 What is not true is when you take Trump's original claim that he was purposefully wiretapped by Obama, and then you broaden it out to not only include Trump, but also his team, and then you broaden it out to also include incidental collection of information, and then you claim Trump is vindicated.
00:10:44.000 That's a bunch of horse crap.
00:10:45.000 Okay, so...
00:10:46.000 Here's what Devin Nunes said yesterday.
00:10:47.000 We're going to go through this in detail because I think it is important to debunk things that are not true.
00:10:52.000 I still care about things like truth, even if they don't benefit my side, quote-unquote.
00:10:55.000 Okay, here is Devin Nunes.
00:10:57.000 He starts off by saying, this is his big announcement that was supposedly earth-shattering yesterday.
00:11:01.000 He is the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.
00:11:05.000 And he had just gone to the White House and met with Trump on this.
00:11:08.000 I was concerned that other surveillance activities were used against President Trump and his associates.
00:11:16.000 So first, I recently confirmed that on numerous occasions, the intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S.
00:11:23.000 citizens involved in the Trump transition.
00:11:26.000 Details about U.S.
00:11:27.000 persons associated with the incoming administration, details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.
00:11:41.000 Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked.
00:11:48.000 And fourth, and finally, I want to be clear, none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities, or of the Trump team.
00:11:59.000 Okay, so, here's the important part.
00:12:01.000 So, we'll get to the wiretapping part, the leaks part in a second, because Nunes is right on the leaks.
00:12:06.000 That is the most important part of what is happening in all of this.
00:12:09.000 I agree with that.
00:12:10.000 Because again, there is no hard information that one, Obama directed wiretapping at Trump, or two, that Trump is in the pocket of the Russians.
00:12:16.000 But what we do know with 100% certitude is that Obama intelligence officials were leaking information to the press.
00:12:22.000 That is a crime, okay, and those people need to be tracked down and prosecuted because
00:12:27.000 Regardless of how they got the information on Mike Flynn being on the phone with Sergey Kislyak or whatever his name is, they were not supposed to release that.
00:12:34.000 That is illegal.
00:12:34.000 So the last part of what he's saying is not the controversial part.
00:12:36.000 It's the first part.
00:12:37.000 What did he say?
00:12:38.000 Here is what he exactly said again.
00:12:40.000 The intelligence community incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition.
00:12:46.000 Incidentally.
00:12:47.000 Okay, so for all the people claiming that this vindicates Trump, no, incidentally means the drug deal I was talking about before.
00:12:53.000 Incidentally means that they were listening to the Russians, and some Trump people were on the other end of the line.
00:12:57.000 That is not the same thing as what Trump claimed.
00:12:59.000 And to pretend that it is, is to be dishonest.
00:13:02.000 Okay, and then, it is clarified, okay, a reporter says, were these communications picked up at Trump Tower?
00:13:10.000 Was any of this, that sort of, uh, these communications, were they picked up at Trump Tower?
00:13:16.000 Uh, we don't know that yet.
00:13:17.000 That's why we need to get the information.
00:13:19.000 Okay, and then he is asked specifically, was Trump targeted or was this just incidental collection of information?
00:13:26.000 Was he just on the other line?
00:13:27.000 Was the president also part of that incidental collection?
00:13:32.000 His communications?
00:13:33.000 Yes.
00:13:34.000 They were?
00:13:35.000 Yes.
00:13:37.000 Let me just clarify.
00:13:38.000 The President of the United States' personal communications were intercepted.
00:13:44.000 I think we have to, yeah, I think what we have to, it's very, when we talk about intelligence products here, we got to be very careful.
00:13:50.000 From what I know right now, it looks like incidental collection.
00:13:54.000 Stop it there.
00:13:55.000 Incidental collection.
00:13:56.000 Okay.
00:13:57.000 Clip four.
00:13:57.000 Are you concerned that the surveillance was done illegally?
00:14:00.000 Was there anything illegal here?
00:14:02.000 Here's Nunez.
00:14:03.000 Are you concerned that any of the surveillance was done illegally or it was incidental but a legal warrant?
00:14:10.000 Yeah, that's a really good question.
00:14:12.000 So, I believe it was all done legally.
00:14:16.000 Stop it there.
00:14:17.000 Again, that's not what Trump is claiming.
00:14:19.000 Trump is claiming that he was illegally surveilled.
00:14:21.000 That's what he says.
00:14:23.000 Okay, so again, is this great stuff?
00:14:26.000 No.
00:14:26.000 But are you claiming the intelligence community is doing things that they're not doing?
00:14:31.000 If Trump is doing that, that's bad.
00:14:33.000 It's just mind-boggling to me that people are willing to overlook basic truth because they want a political agenda to win here.
00:14:40.000 I hate this.
00:14:41.000 Trump could have easily made the case that the leaks that are coming out of the Obama apparatus are the problem.
00:14:45.000 That was the case that Mark Levin made.
00:14:47.000 Mark Levin was right.
00:14:48.000 The case that Trump has made is not that, because Trump reads the headline, assumes what he wants to assume, and then determines that it's true based on his gut that day.
00:14:56.000 He basically said that today in an interview with Time, which I'm going to get to in a second.
00:14:58.000 Again, just more fibs.
00:15:01.000 Okay.
00:15:01.000 Continues.
00:15:03.000 He has now asked Devin Nunez, the House Intel Chair, he has asked about whether the President's conversation appeared in intelligence reports.
00:15:10.000 Mr. Chairman, was the President's conversations or anything about the President appearing in intelligence reports?
00:15:15.000 Is that what you're saying?
00:15:17.000 I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, I guess, at least monitored and disseminated out in intelligence.
00:15:32.000 And what appears to be raw, or I shouldn't say raw, but intelligence reporting channels.
00:15:38.000 Nunes is not being exact in his language here.
00:15:40.000 It's annoying.
00:15:41.000 When he says his teamwork was monitored, people are latching onto that to say,
00:15:44.000 Ooh, that means that Trump was right.
00:15:46.000 He was surveilled.
00:15:46.000 Except that Nunes said a half dozen times in this press conference that it was the Russians or whoever was on the other... He doesn't even say it was the Russians.
00:15:53.000 He says it was whoever on the other end of the line was being surveilled.
00:15:56.000 And Trump was caught up incidentally.
00:15:57.000 He said that a thousand times.
00:15:58.000 We've just played it, him doing it a bunch of times in a row.
00:16:02.000 Okay?
00:16:02.000 And the weirdest part is that Nunes actually said it has nothing to do with the Russian investigations.
00:16:06.000 Also, all of this was happening between the election and Trump's inauguration.
00:16:11.000 Okay, so in other words, Trump claims he was wiretapped in October purposefully by Obama.
00:16:15.000 Not one element of that has been verified.
00:16:17.000 Okay, not one element of that has been verified.
00:16:19.000 It just hasn't.
00:16:21.000 Again, does that mean that the leaks are okay?
00:16:23.000 No, the leaks are terrible.
00:16:24.000 And that's why it's so stupid that everybody on the left keeps denying that the leaks are bad and everybody on the right keeps saying Trump was right.
00:16:31.000 No, none of- all of it's crap.
00:16:32.000 All of it's crap, all of it's crap.
00:16:34.000 And then, finally, Núñez is asked, this morning he was asked, actually, if he got all of this information from the White House, because he apparently went to the White House and gave them the information before he gave the Intelligence Committee all this new information, supposedly, that he's breaking, this Clip 16, and he won't answer the question.
00:16:51.000 Over the course of this investigation, we've had many sources who have come to this committee.
00:16:56.000 And as you can imagine, many don't want you to know, they don't want anyone to know who they are.
00:17:03.000 And I think you guys in the press understand this.
00:17:06.000 You have your own sources.
00:17:08.000 But there's suspicion that this was engineered by the Trump administration to muddy the waters, give them some political cover.
00:17:15.000 Yeah, look, I came out here and briefed you guys yesterday.
00:17:19.000 I said, this is what I'm going to go do so that you knew.
00:17:22.000 The president didn't invite me over.
00:17:23.000 I called down there and invited myself because I thought he needed to understand what I saw and that he needed to try to get that information because he has every right to see it.
00:17:35.000 Adam Schiff responds to this and he says, look, this is, you don't get to not tell the rest of the intel committee and then just go coordinate with the president on something that is currently at issue in investigation.
00:17:46.000 And I hate to say this, but Adam Schiff is not entirely incorrect here.
00:17:50.000 Adam Schiff, Democratic California.
00:17:51.000 And I can't stand Adam Schiff, but everybody's lying.
00:17:54.000 It's the worst.
00:17:55.000 Okay.
00:17:56.000 It's really impossible for us to evaluate any of the merits of what the chairman has said.
00:18:03.000 But I can say this.
00:18:05.000 The chairman will need to decide whether he is the chairman of an independent investigation into conduct, which includes allegations of potential coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russians, or he is going to act as a surrogate of the White House, because he cannot do both.
00:18:22.000 They're saying, oh, how dare Schiff go after Nunez for all of this?
00:18:26.000 Okay, you know what?
00:18:28.000 Okay, see this?
00:18:29.000 I don't have my shoe with me.
00:18:30.000 This is the shoe.
00:18:31.000 Put it on the other foot.
00:18:33.000 You see this shoe?
00:18:34.000 Put it on the other foot.
00:18:35.000 Let's pretend for a second that there was some independent investigation of Barack Obama going on.
00:18:40.000 Okay?
00:18:41.000 And Barack Obama made an allegation that Republicans were targeting him.
00:18:44.000 Okay?
00:18:45.000 And the head of the investigation into that thing then went to the White House without telling the other Republican members of the committee, briefed the President on all that stuff, and then came back with a bunch of talking points that helped the President.
00:18:55.000 Would you be okay with that?
00:18:56.000 I wouldn't be okay with that.
00:18:58.000 Everybody needs to stop with this crap.
00:18:59.000 What is true is true.
00:19:00.000 What is false is false.
00:19:01.000 And when people claim- Now Trump is claiming he's vindicated.
00:19:04.000 He's not vindicated!
00:19:05.000 Okay, Trump is claiming vindication on something where he's not vindicated.
00:19:08.000 And I'll explain why this matters in a second, and it's not just all talk and jabber.
00:19:12.000 Okay?
00:19:12.000 Here's Trump saying he was vindicated.
00:19:17.000 I somewhat do.
00:19:18.000 I must tell you, I somewhat do.
00:19:20.000 I very much appreciated the fact that they found what they found, but I somewhat do.
00:19:27.000 I somewhat do.
00:19:28.000 Okay, well, of course he feels vindicated, because anything that provides him any fig leaf under which to hide makes him feel vindicated.
00:19:34.000 Now, I'm going to explain in a second why all this matters, and why it's not just a bunch of jabber, and why I think there is something that is deep at stake that I don't like, okay?
00:19:43.000 But first, I want to say thank you to our advertisers over at Zeel.
00:19:46.000 So, zeel.com, promo code Ben, will get you 25 bucks off
00:19:50.000 I don't
00:20:08.000 Actually do massages on people in my family.
00:20:10.000 My sister has gotten a massage through Zeal.
00:20:12.000 I think two actually through Zeal.
00:20:13.000 My father has had one.
00:20:15.000 I've had one.
00:20:15.000 My wife has had one.
00:20:16.000 My mother-in-law has had one.
00:20:17.000 Zeal is a fantastic service.
00:20:19.000 And again, not only is it cheaper than having to go to a spa, it also means you don't have to wait in line at a spa.
00:20:23.000 You actually get to schedule it at your house.
00:20:25.000 They bring all the materials.
00:20:26.000 They bring the table.
00:20:27.000 They bring the soothing music.
00:20:29.000 The whole deal.
00:20:30.000 And it is just an excellent service.
00:20:34.000 One of the things that I like to say is that in life there are certain things that just make you feel rich even if you're not and ZEEL is one of those things.
00:20:41.000 ZEEL is one of the things that will make you feel not only rich but healthier after you use it.
00:20:47.000 To start off right now you go to ZEEL.com.
00:20:49.000 Make sure to click add promo code at checkout and use my name Ben.
00:20:52.000 You get 25 bucks off your first massage by doing that.
00:20:54.000 It's a pretty solid deal.
00:20:55.000 ZEEL.com.
00:20:57.000 ZEEL.com.
00:20:58.000 Promo code Ben.
00:21:00.000 And you can use their iPhone or Android app and you get that special offer with promo code Ben.
00:21:05.000 That also lets them know that we sent you as a thank you to them.
00:21:08.000 Okay, so the reason that all of this is important, and then I have to go to another set of lies on Trumpcare that Democrats are telling.
00:21:16.000 The reason all this is important is because, unfortunately, President Trump has an extraordinarily casual relationship with the truth.
00:21:22.000 That's not good for a Republican president.
00:21:24.000 If you want him to succeed, he needs to have a certain level of public trust.
00:21:27.000 And that level of public trust can only, only be built if he says true things.
00:21:33.000 I did an interview with Time Magazine, did President Trump today, and this interview is just, it's just awful, okay?
00:21:39.000 Again, I have a very consistent standard here.
00:21:42.000 When people tell the truth, I like it.
00:21:43.000 When people lie, when they obfuscate, I don't.
00:21:48.000 So, Trump, honest to God, the man treats the truth like a whore.
00:21:51.000 He treats the truth like a whore, and he leaves some money on the bedside stand in pursuit of his actual goal, which is power.
00:21:57.000 And you may like the things that he does with that, but let's not pretend that truth is not truth.
00:22:01.000 Democrats do the same thing.
00:22:02.000 I don't want to pretend that this is solely Trump, okay?
00:22:04.000 Democrats do the same thing, politicians do it all the time, but he's supposed to be somebody who represents me and represents the American people, and he's instead pursuing
00:22:12.000 Whatever idiocy comes into his mind at a given time.
00:22:15.000 I'm really angry about this because it's undermining what could be a great agenda.
00:22:18.000 It's undermining what could be great policies.
00:22:20.000 It's undermining true things that need to be said because he can't keep his mouth shut.
00:22:25.000 It's really frustrating.
00:22:26.000 It's really frustrating.
00:22:27.000 So two things.
00:22:28.000 One, Trump, number one, will say things that are just blatantly untrue and then he will defend them all the way down the line.
00:22:33.000 And two, Trump mistakes predicting things for saying true things.
00:22:38.000 Those are not the same thing.
00:22:40.000 Okay, they're not the same thing.
00:22:41.000 Donald Trump, for example, says things like, I was totally right about Brexit.
00:22:45.000 Okay, he did.
00:22:46.000 He predicted Brexit in March 2016.
00:22:47.000 Congratulations.
00:22:49.000 Does that mean that he said true things about Ted Cruz's father?
00:22:53.000 No, it doesn't mean he's a truth-telling person.
00:22:54.000 It means that he made a good prediction on Brexit.
00:22:56.000 Okay, bookies do it all the time.
00:22:58.000 Would you trust a bookie to take care of your kids at night?
00:23:00.000 Okay, not the same thing.
00:23:01.000 Just because you predict things, and I shouldn't say all things, you predict some things correctly, that does not mean that you are a trustworthy person.
00:23:09.000 And the reason that I say this is because in this interview, Trump says he's a very instinctual person, but my instinct turns out to be right.
00:23:15.000 So he just says things without any sort of verification.
00:23:18.000 Number one, he says, he was asked about the Obama wiretap Trump Tower comments.
00:23:22.000 He said, we will see what happens.
00:23:24.000 Look, I predicted a lot of things that took a little bit of time.
00:23:26.000 Okay, that was not a prediction.
00:23:28.000 That was a claim of fact about what has already happened.
00:23:31.000 Okay, if I say that the War of 1812 was not engaged in 1812, that's not a prediction, that's a misstatement of fact.
00:23:39.000 If I say the Civil War didn't happen between the North and the South in America, my answer to that cannot be afterward, well, you know, eventually I'll be proved right.
00:23:49.000 No.
00:23:50.000 No.
00:23:51.000 It's just not true.
00:23:52.000 He's supposed to know.
00:23:53.000 He's the president.
00:23:54.000 He still says in this interview that he'll be proved right about his unsubstantiated claim of 3 million undocumented votes in the 2016 election.
00:24:02.000 No, you don't have any evidence of that, and you claimed that it happened, so you have to provide evidence of that.
00:24:08.000 I like evidence.
00:24:09.000 I like facts.
00:24:10.000 Don't tell me that the narrative is true and the facts are false.
00:24:12.000 It's a bunch of crap.
00:24:13.000 He justified, again, the Ted Cruz- again!
00:24:16.000 Okay, a year after it happened, the Ted Cruz's father murdered JFK garbage.
00:24:20.000 He called the- he said that- he said, quote, that was in a newspaper.
00:24:25.000 That was in a newspaper!
00:24:26.000 Number one, it was in the National Enquirer.
00:24:28.000 Number two, so the hell what?
00:24:29.000 You're the one who keeps saying that the news is fake news and you can't trust what you read in the newspaper, unless apparently it's the National Enquirer.
00:24:35.000 In the same interview, he calls the Wall Street Journal fake news.
00:24:37.000 So just to get this straight, the National Enquirer is real news, but the Wall Street Journal is fake news.
00:24:42.000 And when he's asked about his accusations that British intelligence was complicit in wiretapping him, he goes, why do you say I have to apologize?
00:24:48.000 I'm just quoting the newspaper.
00:24:50.000 Just like I quoted the judge the other day, Judge Napolitano.
00:24:53.000 You're the president.
00:24:54.000 You can pick up the phone and find out whether this is true.
00:24:57.000 Don't we have some responsibility to the truth?
00:24:59.000 And look, this is not about hurting Trump.
00:25:01.000 The minute he starts doing good things, I'm more than happy to praise him.
00:25:04.000 I want, I want to praise him.
00:25:07.000 Okay?
00:25:08.000 I want the president to do good things so I can praise him.
00:25:10.000 But I'm not going to praise him lying just because it benefits my side.
00:25:13.000 That's a bunch of horse manure.
00:25:14.000 And people who do that are complicit in destroying their own credibility and the credibility of politics.
00:25:19.000 We cannot have conversations with each other if all we do is say the facts don't matter, all that matters is my narrative.
00:25:24.000 If that's the case, the facts don't matter at all, and we cannot have a conversation in this lightest.
00:25:28.000 Okay.
00:25:29.000 With that rant done, I now want to move on to Trumpcare and where that is, because that is still moving along and there's a lot of controversy over where that's going, and a big lie that is currently happening from the left on Trumpcare.
00:25:40.000 We'll talk about that in just a second, but for that you have to go over to DailyWire.com and become a subscriber.
00:25:44.000 DailyWire.com, $8 a month, get you a subscription.
00:25:47.000 If you want an annual subscription over at DailyWire, then you can get a free signed copy of Reasons to Vote Democrat, a comprehensive guide by our very own Michael Mulls.
00:25:56.000 Brilliant, thorough piece of literature on why to vote Democrat.
00:26:00.000 And Amazon Best Seller.
00:26:01.000 Sold tens of thousands of copies.
00:26:02.000 The dude's getting rich off of it, which is shocking.
00:26:04.000 But in any case, dailywire.com.
00:26:06.000 You can get a free copy.
00:26:07.000 It's a lot of fun.
00:26:08.000 $8 a month, and annual subscribers get that copy of that book.
00:26:12.000 If you just want to listen to the rest of the show a little bit later, you go over to iTunes or SoundCloud, and you can check out the show over there.
00:26:18.000 Leave a review at iTunes.
00:26:19.000 We do appreciate it.
00:26:20.000 And this is the largest conservative podcast in the nation.