The Ben Shapiro Show


Ep. 309 - Is It Okay To Body-Slam Reporters?


Summary

Ben Shapiro explains why the Trump bump is real, and why it matters. Plus, a call-in from Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Nebraska) about the recent body-slamming of a reporter in Montana, and a mailbag from listeners. Thanks to our sponsor, Wink, for sponsoring this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show. You can get 20% off your first bottle of wine, plus free shipping, when you fill out a quick survey that asks you what tastes like meal you're eating that night, then you can order a bottle direct from Wink at $20.00 plus shipping. You can't ask for much more. If you don't know much about wine, like me, you don t need to have expertise in wine, because Wink is for you, because they provide the expertise for you. And they're also going to help you conform your palate so you can get the best wine you're going to be getting, like, 20 bucks off + complimentary shipping, so you're gonna be getting some wine like you're drinking like a champagnes. Wink is a company that makes great wine, and it's so cheap it's going to make your life better, because it's gonna make you better than good wine. You don't need to be an expert sommelier to drink good wine, you can be a wine connoisseur, because you can drink it direct from a bottle that tastes like a good bottle of Champagne, and you're getting 20 bucks of wine that tastes good and tastes like it's good, too. . And it's also makes you feel like you re getting a good night out of your night out. -Wink's wine is so cheap, it's cheap, you won't even need to pay for a glass or two glasses of wine to drink it in a nice glass of good wine that s going to taste good, you'll be getting a little bit of wine in your mouthful of good vino, you're not going to have to pay a bunch of it in the morning after you've had enough wine to make you feel good about it, too! wink, Wink Wink's wine sipping on a glass of wine sips on a warm day in your day off, and then you'll feel like that sipping it like that's good enough, right there sipping a good day in the afternoon, right in the middleman?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 On Wednesday, Rasmussen Reports released its daily presidential tracking poll.
00:00:03.000 It put President Trump at 48% approval.
00:00:06.000 That's a four-point jump in two days from Rasmussen, a five-point increase from his recent low of 43% on May 16th.
00:00:12.000 Now, it is worth noting that other polls are far less favorable to Trump.
00:00:15.000 Two contemporaneous polls, The Economist and Gallup, have him at 40% and 38% respectively, and Fox News has him at 38% too.
00:00:21.000 But!
00:00:23.000 If the Trump bump is real, it makes a bit of sense.
00:00:25.000 That's for three reasons.
00:00:26.000 Number one, Trump isn't tweeting.
00:00:28.000 I know a lot of Zach-lites like when he tweets, but because Trump is overseas and busily traveling the globe, he's not up at all hours watching MSNBC and CNN and tweeting nasty notes to the hosts or retweeting botched summaries of Fox and Friends chyrons.
00:00:40.000 He's also not pouring more gasoline on the Trump-Russia kindling the media have said.
00:00:44.000 He hasn't tweeted.
00:00:45.000 I think so.
00:01:01.000 Second, the country isn't collapsing.
00:01:12.000 Trump left the country, the country's fine.
00:01:14.000 The left promulgates this myth, whereby the president must sit at the controls of the airliner that is the United States each and every day, lest we all go full zombie apocalypse on one another and the plane crashes into a building.
00:01:24.000 Instead, Trump is out of the country, partying it up with glowing orbs and swords, and the country's getting along pretty much just fine.
00:01:30.000 Nobody's dying.
00:01:31.000 Nobody's panicking.
00:01:32.000 In other words, a predictable government is the best available option.
00:01:35.000 And Trump gallivanting around reminds us all he's not capable of screwing it up this badly.
00:01:40.000 Terrorism is a winning issue for Trump.
00:01:42.000 This is the third point.
00:01:43.000 The terror attack on Monday obviously helped Trump politically because the left is so damn irresponsible about it.
00:01:48.000 Trump's perspective.
00:01:49.000 Fewer unvetted Muslims in the West means fewer unvetted Muslims killing other people in the West.
00:01:55.000 And that's eminently correct.
00:01:57.000 His skepticism of the radical Islam resonates far better than the left's asinine John Lennon imaginesque pseudo-philosophy.
00:02:03.000 Trump was elected to bomb the bleep out of ISIS.
00:02:05.000 Seeing the slaughter of eight-year-old girls at a pop concert reminds people that's a task worth pursuing.
00:02:10.000 President Trump should be making notes.
00:02:11.000 When he comes back to the U.S., he should be the same President Trump we're seeing abroad.
00:02:14.000 Muted but strong, a bombastic showman when the time is right.
00:02:17.000 If he does all that, maybe we can get this thing back on the rails.
00:02:20.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:02:20.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:02:26.000 So we have a huge show coming up for you today, coming up in just a couple of minutes.
00:02:29.000 We're supposed to have Senator Ben Sasse from Nebraska, whose book, The Vanishing American Adult, our coming-of-age crisis and how to rebuild a culture of self-reliance, is now number three on the New York Times bestseller chart.
00:02:40.000 I'm a big fan of Senator Sasse's, obviously one of the last honest conservatives in Washington, D.C.
00:02:46.000 Hopefully we can get the technology worked out.
00:02:47.000 He's supposed to call in, so we'll chat with him about the issues of the day.
00:02:51.000 We're also going to talk about what's happening in Montana, where a Republican candidate for a special election congressional seat literally body-slammed a reporter.
00:03:00.000 And we'll talk about why it is that we continue to vote for people who body-slam reporters, and why it is that that's actually somewhat understandable.
00:03:07.000 We'll get to all of that, plus the mailbag.
00:03:09.000 But first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Wink.
00:03:12.000 So, if you are somebody who doesn't know much about wine, like me, if you think that
00:03:16.000 A wine and a bottle of vinegar are just separated by the taste, essentially.
00:03:20.000 Then, Wink is for you, because you don't need to have expertise with wine.
00:03:23.000 They provide the expertise for you.
00:03:25.000 You go to trywink.com, it's W-I-N-C, trywink.com, and you fill out a quick survey that asks you what tastes you like together, what kind of meal you're going to be eating that night, and then you can order a bottle of wine direct from Wink at trywink.com.
00:03:38.000 You get $20 off, plus complimentary shipping, and the fact of the matter is that the average bottle of wine at Wink costs like $13.
00:03:46.000 So 20 bucks off plus complimentary shipping means you're going to be getting some wine for yourself.
00:03:50.000 Try wink.com slash ben and the wine that you get is going to be better quality because number one, they cut out the middleman.
00:03:56.000 That's why it's so cheap.
00:03:57.000 And number two, it's also that they're going to help you pick the wine that best conforms to your palate and best conforms to the meal.
00:04:04.000 It's great if you're going over to someone's house and you want to look sophisticated, like you actually know what wine is good and what wine to bring, as opposed to just grabbing a bottle of wine off the shelf of your local liquor mart.
00:04:12.000 Trywink.com is the best way to do it.
00:04:14.000 So trywink.com, W-I-N-C dot com slash Ben.
00:04:18.000 You get $20 off your first order now, plus complimentary shipping.
00:04:21.000 And trywink.com slash Ben.
00:04:23.000 Use that slash Ben also so that they know that we sent you.
00:04:27.000 So, let's jump right in with Senator Ben Sasse.
00:04:30.000 Senator Sasse, thanks so much for joining the show.
00:04:32.000 Really appreciate your time.
00:04:34.000 Thank you for having me on.
00:04:35.000 I'm grateful for the invite.
00:04:36.000 Okay, so, Senator Sasse, I do want to ask you about your book, but first, I would be remiss if I didn't ask you about the news of the day.
00:04:41.000 I just want to get your basic take on how we should be looking at this situation in which a congressional candidate in Montana has apparently body slammed a reporter.
00:04:49.000 It's been confirmed, basically, by a Fox News report.
00:04:52.000 You know what should I think obviously everybody of goodwill can look at this and say this is ridiculous But how should Republicans be treating this because now they're stuck between a rock and a hard place They're in the middle of an election.
00:05:02.000 They don't want to see a Democrat win a seat How do you think Republicans ought to be treating this?
00:05:06.000 Yeah, so I've been in Commitments all morning back-to-back so I know almost nothing current on it except for just the the top-line fact of what happened last night and it seems to be pretty obvious that
00:05:19.000 If you are seeking a job as a public servant, one of your most fundamental duties is to teach American civics.
00:05:27.000 And since the First Amendment is the beating heart of the American experiment and of American civics,
00:05:33.000 That means many, many, many things, but one of the most basic things the First Amendment means is you don't body slam a reporter.
00:05:40.000 You celebrate the First Amendment.
00:05:42.000 Well, I appreciate your candor on that, Senator Sasse.
00:05:45.000 I think one of the big problems is obviously that if leadership in both parties doesn't say the same thing that you do, then what you end up with is sort of prisoner's dilemma.
00:05:52.000 I'm going to explain that a little bit to the listeners.
00:05:54.000 You end up with a sort of prisoner's dilemma where people feel, okay, I have to pick the second worst choice, and obviously we're electing a congressman, we're not electing a pastor, and that means that even if somebody does something that I find abhorrent, he's going to be a better legislator than somebody else, but the leadership of both parties needs to stand together and say that when, and it's a problem because they won't do it, that when people act like this, that they should not be seated, in my opinion.
00:06:17.000 I don't know what you think about that.
00:06:19.000 Yeah, so I'm shooting straight with you that I've had zero conversations with anybody about where any of the leaders are on an issue like that, or whether or not there's been a call for that joint press conference.
00:06:29.000 But let's just distinguish between short-term and long-term, because here's what I really care about.
00:06:34.000 I get that in a short-term basis, all through life, people are often presented with choices that feel like a lesser of two evils discussion.
00:06:42.000 That's not where I spend any of my energy.
00:06:45.000 I spend all of my time and energy on this, which is, what are we doing now to build a country where the American people will understand our shared narrative as a people, and where there will be more public trust 5 and 10 and 15 and 20 years from now?
00:07:01.000 Because we are not one election away from the eschaton.
00:07:05.000 We're not one election away from electing the guy who will drive some majority that's going to pass all their great legislation and they're going to bring about utopia.
00:07:14.000 America is centered in the local communities where people work and worship and where they're designing the next great app and where they're persuading people to join the Rotary Club.
00:07:22.000 And politics is to provide a framework for that.
00:07:25.000 And right now, our politics is so lame and boring and stupidly short-sighted that it always feels like people think they're trying to make the lesser of two evils choice that will bring about heaven on earth.
00:07:36.000 It's not coming via this city.
00:07:38.000 I'm talking to you from D.C.
00:07:39.000 And this city is filled with people who are just not interesting enough to project your grand hopes and dreams on.
00:07:45.000 And so I think that one of the first duties of all politicians is to announce that politics isn't the center of our life.
00:07:51.000 And Senator Sasse is one of the things we love so much about you.
00:07:53.000 So, your new book, which I really want to get to, The Vanishing American Adult, Our Coming-of-Age Crisis, and How to Rebuild a Culture of Self-Reliance.
00:07:59.000 It's debuting at number three on the New York Times bestseller list for nonfiction.
00:08:03.000 And this is actually a book, folks.
00:08:05.000 I mean, it's not just a politician wrote a memoir and now you should go buy it because the politician needs to make money and put his kids through college.
00:08:10.000 Although I assume that Senator Sasse would like to put his kids through college with the money.
00:08:13.000 But I think that the book itself is actually an important look
00:08:18.000 Why it is that our common culture is eroding.
00:08:20.000 We talk a lot on the show, Senator Sasse, about the social capital that used to undergird American society.
00:08:27.000 And that's basically what your book is about, correct?
00:08:30.000 Exactly right.
00:08:31.000 The social capital is the term we should have in screaming lights in these conversations, because that's what's eroding.
00:08:37.000 And then all the politics are dysfunctional downstream from that poisoned river.
00:08:43.000 And so I think that, first of all, this book is 100 percent not about politics.
00:08:47.000 It's 99% not about policy.
00:08:50.000 The tiny point that it touches on policy is recognizing that education needs to be radically reformed and there's going to be different kinds of job training in the future when people are disrupted out of work and jobs at 40 and 45 and 50 and 55 years old.
00:09:03.000 But the vast majority of the book is about exactly what you flagged, which is social capital.
00:09:08.000 The American experiment recognizes that in a broken world,
00:09:11.000 You're going to have structure.
00:09:13.000 You're going to have order.
00:09:14.000 You're going to have security.
00:09:16.000 There's going to be restraint.
00:09:17.000 But what we want, and the American founders wanted, what I think the vast majority of the American people actually want, if you put the choice to them, is they want self-control, self-governance, self-discipline, self-restraint, not power and discipline and restraint coming from another, from a political center.
00:09:34.000 And right now, this city, D.C., is so populated by folks whose only long-term thought is about their own incumbency that they come to think that politics are the center of life.
00:09:43.000 Anybody who thinks that politics are the center of life is not well-suited to be an American politician.
00:09:49.000 So, Senator Sess, I want to ask you a question that I was asked last night at Northwestern.
00:09:52.000 I was speaking there about a lot of these same exact issues.
00:09:55.000 And it's, I think, the hardest question for politicians, particularly.
00:09:59.000 And that is, it's easy to a certain extent to say, here's what we need to do if we're starting from scratch, right?
00:10:03.000 You're 20 years old.
00:10:04.000 You're not married yet.
00:10:05.000 And now you're planning your life.
00:10:07.000 And I assume that your book is making the case that you need to get married.
00:10:10.000 You need to bring your children up in a place where there is social capital.
00:10:13.000 We need to make connections with each other at the local level, at our churches and community level, in a de Tocquevillian sense.
00:10:19.000 What do we do about the person who's already made a decision that takes them out of that?
00:10:23.000 So, you have a single mom, she's already made the decision, a bad decision, that she was going to get pregnant out of wedlock, now she has the baby, and she maybe doesn't have that support network.
00:10:33.000 What do we do about that?
00:10:34.000 You know, I call on people to provide charity, but for some people, they say that's not enough of an answer.
00:10:39.000 What do you think we ought to be doing about that?
00:10:41.000 Yeah, it's a very fair question.
00:10:43.000 So, you know, we live east of Eden, we live in a fallen world where things are broken,
00:10:48.000 And we're all, in my world view, we're not only all sinners, we're also all sinned against.
00:10:53.000 And so everybody's always got grievances and pain, and some people have pain that's much more substantial than others of us have ever experienced.
00:11:02.000 And so the first thing we need to do is have a shared understanding of what we can and can't accomplish in the world.
00:11:09.000 And what you want is a world where people are finding meaning in their local community, where they have meaningful work, where they have families,
00:11:16.000 Where they have social capital, where they have friendships, where they have intergenerational relationships, where they have the time and space to wrestle through the really big and important questions, which are so much bigger than politics.
00:11:28.000 And what we're really describing there is neighborhood.
00:11:31.000 What you want people to have is neighborliness.
00:11:33.000 You want them to have friendships.
00:11:35.000 You want them to have meaningful work.
00:11:38.000 And so we need to start by admitting that there is scar tissue in the world, but scar tissue is often to be celebrated because scar tissue is the foundation of future character.
00:11:49.000 There's healing and there's repair.
00:11:51.000 There's rebuilding that happens.
00:11:53.000 among neighbors and friends as they work through those problems together.
00:11:57.000 Charles Murray sometimes uses the line that government's job is to take the difficulty out of things.
00:12:04.000 But you've got to be clear about what things you want the government to take the difficulty out of versus not.
00:12:09.000 I want the government to take the difficulty out of walking home from a restaurant late at night.
00:12:13.000 I don't want there to be violence in anybody's neighborhood when they're walking home from a restaurant or walking home from work late at night.
00:12:20.000 But I don't want the government
00:12:23.000 To take the difficulty out of cleaning up puke for my six-year-old in the middle of the night.
00:12:28.000 Because if the government tries to come into my house and solve that problem, what it'll actually do is create passivity in me.
00:12:35.000 And it turns out, as I have three kids, 15, 13, 6.
00:12:39.000 I've had many, many sleepless nights over the course of my life where my kids are sick in the middle of the night, and my wife and I are on the edge of arguing with each other about why the other one didn't do enough to prevent this stupid thing from happening, you know?
00:12:51.000 Why would you let your kid eat that apple slice off the floor of the athletic arena?
00:12:56.000 That's the food poisoning that made him sick.
00:12:58.000 But you know what happened?
00:12:59.000 When we had to together clean up that puke in the middle of the night, we have a shared experience that was the foundation of future love.
00:13:05.000 We're good to go.
00:13:16.000 And so I think that you're flagging all of the brokenness of different neighborhoods and different social capital and different community.
00:13:22.000 Government, we should talk about it because there are things that government should do to mitigate some of the suffering, but we first have to have a shared understanding that government can't possibly bring about utopia.
00:13:33.000 Government won't be effective at helping us clean up from a sick kid in the middle of the night.
00:13:38.000 So we have to understand that government is limited and bounded.
00:13:41.000 Then let's have a meaningful argument.
00:13:42.000 I'll say one more thing here.
00:13:43.000 I think it's important to distinguish between our commitments, your and mine, to limited government and to small government.
00:13:50.000 Because you and I believe in both of them.
00:13:52.000 But limited government is far more important than small government.
00:13:55.000 Limited government is understanding that government is not utopian and that rights precede government.
00:14:01.000 Government isn't the author or the source of our rights.
00:14:03.000 Small versus medium-sized government should be what the debate is between the Republican and the Democratic Party.
00:14:08.000 How much intervention should there be in the economy?
00:14:10.000 And there could be Democrats who, if they would give a full-throated defense of limited government and then make their argument for medium-sized government, I might vote differently than they would, but we could stand together at the kind of press conference you're talking about and reaffirm basic American values and virtues.
00:14:27.000 And then we could argue about the stuff we vote on, but we'd recognize that the stuff that we're voting on is central.
00:14:32.000 It's not ultimate theological, philosophical dreaming.
00:14:36.000 Senator Ben Sasse, The Vanishing American Adult, terrific book, and Senator Sasse, one of the few honest men left in Washington, D.C.
00:14:42.000 Really appreciate it, showing that, you know, a phrase that is overused but under-understood, common sense still exists.
00:14:48.000 Thanks so much, Senator Sasse, for joining The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:14:50.000 Really appreciate your time and appreciate everything you're doing.
00:14:53.000 Thanks for the invite, Ben.
00:14:53.000 Have a great day.
00:14:54.000 Alrighty.
00:14:55.000 So, folks, meanwhile, I mentioned it to Senator Sasse there.
00:14:59.000 The big story of the day, obviously, is what's happening in Montana.
00:15:02.000 So there's a special election in Montana today.
00:15:05.000 The Democrat and the Republican are running pretty close together.
00:15:09.000 And it's now been thrown into turmoil because it looked like the Republican was going to win.
00:15:13.000 He's a guy named Gianforte, Greg Gianforte.
00:15:15.000 And Greg Gianforte, last night,
00:15:18.000 Apparently, he was being asked a question by Ben Jacobs, who's a reporter for, I think, Politico?
00:15:24.000 But in any case, he's for The Guardian, and Gin Forte apparently grabs this reporter and body slams him.
00:15:33.000 And this guy tweets out last night that I was body slammed, my glasses were broken.
00:15:37.000 Here is the reporter, Ben Jacobs, here's his description of being attacked last night.
00:15:43.000 Figured he was standing around there just to reach out and get his response to the CBO score.
00:15:47.000 Um, that he'd been talking about, uh, that he'd been holding off his opinion on healthcare, at least on the stunt until he saw the CBO score.
00:15:54.000 Next thing I know, I'm being body slammed.
00:15:57.000 And, uh, he, uh, you know, he's on top of me for a second.
00:16:02.000 My glasses are broken.
00:16:03.000 It's the strangest, the strangest moment in my entire life reporting.
00:16:09.000 He grabs my recorder.
00:16:11.000 on my phone and but the audio should be up right now in the Guardian and uh yeah throws me down my glasses break he sort of I think I'm pretty sure he's on top of me wailing for a second and then screams at me to get the hell out um and uh yeah his staffer comes in it's just it's just very strange and mortifying because
00:16:33.000 You know, I'm used to... I don't mind being blown off by politics.
00:16:51.000 Uh, or a battery is not an assault or a battery because we don't like the person who's being assaulted or batted around or we don't or we do like the person who's committing the assault and battery.
00:17:00.000 Uh, I have a basic standard on this.
00:17:01.000 I treat politicians like I treat every other human being.
00:17:03.000 And that is to say when they commit assault or battery, that is something wrong.
00:17:07.000 That is something bad.
00:17:08.000 Now, the right's immediate tendency, which was, oh, it couldn't have happened the way this reporter said it happened,
00:17:12.000 That sort of fell apart when number one audio came out of the actual confrontation.
00:17:16.000 Here's what it sounded like.
00:17:17.000 There's no video.
00:17:18.000 But here's audio of the actual confrontation between this fellow, Gianforte, the Republican candidate in Montana, and this reporter, Ben Jacobs.
00:17:27.000 And we'll talk to you about that later.
00:17:28.000 Yeah, but there's not going to be time.
00:17:29.000 I'm just curious.
00:17:30.000 Speak with Shane, please.
00:17:31.000 I'm sick and tired of you guys!
00:17:36.000 The last guy that came in here, you did the same thing!
00:17:38.000 Get the hell out of here!
00:17:40.000 Get the hell out of here!
00:17:43.000 The last guy did the same thing.
00:17:44.000 You were the guardian.
00:17:45.000 Yes, and you just broke my glasses.
00:17:47.000 The last guy did the same damn thing.
00:17:49.000 You just body slammed me and broke my glasses.
00:17:52.000 Get the hell out of here.
00:17:55.000 I mean, the audio is about as clear as it can be, and then Fox News comes out and confirms the account.
00:18:01.000 Again, very reminiscent of past situations, but the Fox News reports that, as part of our preparation for a story about Thursday's special election to air on Special Report with Bret Baier, we arranged interviews with the top two candidates.
00:18:14.000 I joined field producer Faith Mangan and photographer
00:18:17.000 Keith Rally and Bozeman for a scheduled interview with Gianforte.
00:18:19.000 The person writing is Alicia Acuna, who is a reporter for Fox News.
00:18:24.000 It says, at this point, Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him.
00:18:29.000 Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the reporter.
00:18:33.000 As Gianforte moved on top of Jacobs, he began yelling something to the effect of, I'm sick and tired of this.
00:18:38.000 Jacobs scrambled to his knees and said something about his glasses being broken.
00:18:41.000 He asked Faith, Keith, and myself for our names.
00:18:43.000 In shock, we did not answer.
00:18:44.000 Jacobs then said he wanted the police called and went to leave.
00:18:47.000 Gianforte looked at the three of us and repeatedly apologized.
00:18:49.000 At that point, I told him and Scanlan, who is now present, that we needed a moment, and then the men left.
00:18:55.000 A few things to be said about this.
00:18:57.000 I want to talk about the right's response to this because I think it's more interesting than the left's response.
00:19:01.000 The left's response is at least largely hypocritical, so we'll say about that briefly.
00:19:06.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at MyPatriotSupply.
00:19:11.000 So, if you are looking at the world right now and feeling uncertain about the way that the world is working, if you feel a little bit
00:19:17.000 We're good to go.
00:19:33.000 You order now, 888-803-1413, 888-803-1413, or online at preparewithben.com, preparewithben.com, and you get that 4-week emergency food supply for just $99.
00:19:47.000 The food apparently tastes like home cooking, people in the studio tell me.
00:19:49.000 It's preparewithben.com, 4-week emergency food supply for just $99, plus free shipping, and that makes sure that you are covered in case of emergency.
00:19:58.000 Okay, so, the right responds to this news about Gianforte.
00:20:01.000 I was online last night when this happened, and half the right says, this is pretty terrible, and the other half of the right goes, well, it can't possibly have happened that way.
00:20:08.000 But, the people who are really egregious say things like, well, he had it coming.
00:20:13.000 If you believe that a reporter can be bodyslammed because you don't like reporters, then let me say to you that you are doing American wrong.
00:20:22.000 You are just being an American wrong.
00:20:23.000 Americanism does not constitute people bodyslamming reporters because you don't like the question, especially when the question was, can you give me, the actual question was, can you give me your opinion on the Congressional Budget Office score of the new health care plan?
00:20:35.000 That was actually the question.
00:20:37.000 And he was bodyslammed.
00:20:38.000 One of the people who I thought was just egregious last night was Laura Ingram.
00:20:40.000 She tweeted a couple of times.
00:20:41.000 Here was Laura Ingram's tweet.
00:20:43.000 She said, Politicians always need to keep their cool.
00:20:46.000 But what would most Montana men do if bodyslammed for no reason by another man?
00:20:49.000 Okay, we live in a civilized society.
00:20:52.000 In a civilized society, when somebody assaults you, the best answer, if you can do it, is to withdraw and call the police because a crime has been committed.
00:20:59.000 The best answer is not to get into tribal warfare where you then go and clock the guy with a bottle.
00:21:04.000 This routine where it's like the reporter wasn't manly enough because the reporter didn't stand up to being assaulted is just ridiculous.
00:21:11.000 And she continued along these lines, tweet 14, if we can grab that, 14.
00:21:16.000 Yeah, she said, did anyone get his lunch money stolen today and then run to tell the recess monitor?
00:21:22.000 Okay, if I had something stolen from me, I'd run to tell the police, wouldn't you?
00:21:25.000 But again, there's this notion that there's this macho, brash stupidity that really is like high school bullying that has emerged on the right side of the aisle.
00:21:33.000 It's existed for parts of the left for a long time, but it's emerged on the right side of the aisle where it's like civilization takes it back to you.
00:21:39.000 I'd rather have a macho guy there because strength, strength, power, power, strength, macho!
00:21:44.000 Okay.
00:21:45.000 You don't need your congresspeople to be macho.
00:21:47.000 You need them to be wise.
00:21:49.000 You need them to exercise values.
00:21:50.000 You don't need them to be body-slamming reporters.
00:21:52.000 So this sort of stuff is really gross.
00:21:54.000 And I will say that it has risen in the wake of Trump because Trump used to talk like this on the campaign trail.
00:21:59.000 That is true.
00:22:00.000 The left has jumped on this to immediately suggest that it's about Trump, that Gianforte did this and he's going to get away with it because of Trump.
00:22:08.000 I don't think that's right.
00:22:08.000 I think that Trump is a symptom of something deeper.
00:22:10.000 I think Gianforte is a symptom of something deeper.
00:22:12.000 Kirsten Powers, who is a person of the left, she says that it's really Trump's fault because he needs reporters all the time that this happened.
00:22:20.000 Isn't this possibly tied into the fact that we have a president that's constantly fomenting rage against reporters?
00:22:27.000 I mean, is it possible that there's some connection here?
00:22:30.000 We have a country that doesn't trust reporting.
00:22:32.000 No, no, but it's at a different level than it's ever been.
00:22:34.000 I mean, there's no comparison to the way it is today than even a year ago, frankly.
00:22:39.000 The absolute rage towards reporters.
00:22:42.000 Okay, this idea that Trump's rage toward reporters, that people who don't like reporters are the reason, maybe it's that Gianforte's a nut, is the reason this happened.
00:22:48.000 You can't do this, what Kirsten Powers is doing, because number one, Trump isn't in Montana, even.
00:22:52.000 And number two, the fact is that people on the left use this kind of language all the time.
00:22:56.000 So, for example, last night, CNN counterterrorism analyst was very angry at Trey Gowdy, who's on the House Intelligence Committee, and this CNN counterterrorism analyst said this about Trey Gowdy.
00:23:08.000 See, Phil, that's what's so frustrating.
00:23:09.000 Did collusion exist?
00:23:11.000 That's the burning question that everybody wants answered.
00:23:13.000 And then Brennan says, well, I know of contacts and communication.
00:23:17.000 Well, Trey Gowdy ought to have his ass kicked.
00:23:19.000 He knows the difference between intelligence and evidence.
00:23:22.000 Let me tell you something, Allison.
00:23:23.000 If you're an American citizen, and the National Security Agency collects intelligence at its intercepts of Russians who report what you've said, do you think it's fair to go to a court and say that's evidence that you did something wrong?
00:23:36.000 That's why the FBI is going to take a year or more to investigate this, because the American citizens involved in this
00:23:41.000 Have a right to have evidence presented in a court beyond a conversation that a Russian official reports.
00:23:48.000 In my world, this distinction is black and white.
00:23:51.000 It's a hard line.
00:23:52.000 I know it's frustrating for the American people, but I hope they don't want evidence to be perceived as something that a Russian official says, and that's it.
00:24:00.000 You can be convicted on that.
00:24:02.000 Okay, so he actually goes ahead and he says that somebody should kick Gowdy's ass.
00:24:06.000 It's really ridiculous that people on the left can say that, and again, they'll say that this rhetoric causes no violence.
00:24:11.000 It causes no violence when Barack Obama says things like bring a knife to a gunfight, but it does cause violence when Trump says things like I'm going to defend somebody who punches somebody.
00:24:18.000 All of these things are wrong.
00:24:19.000 Okay, so now, with that said, I want to show you why it is that people are going to vote for this guy Gianforte anyway, and there's a logic to this.
00:24:26.000 We're going to actually get out the Glenn Beck chart.
00:24:29.000 We're going to get out the Glenn Beck whiteboard and do a full on chart.
00:24:32.000 Here we go.
00:24:32.000 So I know that game theory has become sort of a joke.
00:24:36.000 I know that people think that game theory, because on Twitter some guy badly laid out game theory.
00:24:41.000 But there's a real game theory reason as to why people are going to end up voting for Gianforte.
00:24:44.000 So this is a basic prisoner's dilemma.
00:24:46.000 In game theory, game theory is really about how two
00:24:49.000 How two people play a game together, how they come up with a strategy.
00:24:53.000 And the problem is that there's no coordination at the top level between the Republican and Democratic parties to say that bad behavior means you won't be seated.
00:25:00.000 Bad behavior means that we're not going to side with you, we're going to pull support.
00:25:03.000 So what you actually have, and the right has said this for a long time, is the left will endorse any bad behavior so long as it serves their side.
00:25:09.000 We can't be the only ones who are virtuous.
00:25:11.000 And you can see how this leads everyone into worse behavior.
00:25:14.000 It leads to worse standards for everyone.
00:25:15.000 So, the way that Game Theory works is basically, this is the most basic form of Game Theory, it's the most famous form of Game Theory, this is called the Prisoner's Dilemma.
00:25:23.000 So, here you have Prisoner 1, okay?
00:25:28.000 And here is Prisoner Number 2.
00:25:34.000 Okay, and they're arrested for murder.
00:25:39.000 They both killed somebody together, and now they're arrested.
00:25:42.000 And so they do what they do in LA Confidential.
00:25:44.000 They put them in separate interrogation rooms, and they tell one of them, here's the deal.
00:25:48.000 The deal is this.
00:25:49.000 If you confess, and your partner does not confess, then you get off scot-free.
00:25:54.000 You can blame it on your partner, right?
00:25:55.000 You can just say, my partner did it, it wasn't me.
00:25:57.000 If both of you confess, you're both going to jail for five years.
00:26:01.000 If neither of you confesses, then we can't really convict you, so we'll put you in jail for, like, a year for some lesser crime.
00:26:10.000 And if you're the person who doesn't confess, if you're the person who stays silent and your other guy blames you, you're gonna end up spending 10 years in prison.
00:26:16.000 So that's what it looks like on the board here.
00:26:17.000 So, on the board, basically, each of these prisoners has two choices.
00:26:21.000 Choice number one is to stay silent.
00:26:23.000 Choice number two is to confess.
00:26:25.000 Right?
00:26:26.000 Choice number one, to stay silent.
00:26:27.000 Choice number two, to confess.
00:26:30.000 Prisoner one, prisoner two.
00:26:31.000 The penalty, as I just laid it out, is if somebody, if both of them are silent, if both of them are silent, then they both go to jail for one year.
00:26:40.000 Right?
00:26:41.000 If prisoner one confesses, and prisoner two is silent, then prisoner one goes free because he blames the other guy, and prisoner two gets ten years in prison.
00:26:52.000 If they both confess, they both get five years in prison.
00:26:57.000 And if, again, Prisoner 1 stays silent and Prisoner 2 confesses, then Prisoner 1 ends up with 10 years in prison and Prisoner 2 ends up with zero years in prison because the person who ended up confessing is the person who ends up
00:27:13.000 Going free, basically.
00:27:14.000 So, how does this apply?
00:27:15.000 How does this make sense?
00:27:16.000 Okay, so, in the context of voting, when people say it's a binary choice, when people say the Democrats are going to cheat anyway, so it doesn't matter what you do, they're gonna cheat, the reason that both of these prisoners are going to end up confessing is because they don't trust each other.
00:27:30.000 If they trusted each other, they would end up here, right?
00:27:33.000 If they trusted each other, they would both shut their yaps, and they'd both spend a year in prison, and then they'd go free.
00:27:39.000 If they don't trust each other, if Prisoner 1 thinks that Prisoner 2 is going to confess, then he has two choices.
00:27:45.000 If Prisoner 1 thinks that Prisoner 2 is going to confess, then he's either going to spend 10 years in prison or 5 years in prison.
00:27:50.000 So he is going to confess also.
00:27:52.000 And if Prisoner 2 thinks that Prisoner 1 is going to confess, he has the same exact choice.
00:27:56.000 He can either spend 10 years in prison or he can spend 5 years in prison.
00:27:59.000 So if they don't trust each other, they're both going to confess.
00:28:01.000 And so you actually end up, this is the Prisoner's Dilemma, and this is what I believe they would call the Nash Equilibrium in this particular scenario.
00:28:08.000 This is where they would actually end up.
00:28:10.000 They would end up in this box.
00:28:11.000 If you don't trust each other, you end up in that box.
00:28:13.000 Now, the Republican Party and Democratic Party don't trust each other.
00:28:16.000 The Democrats think the Republicans are going to always elect the worst guy no matter what, and the Republicans think the Democrats are always going to elect the worst guy no matter what.
00:28:23.000 So they don't want to be in the position where the Democrats cheat, the Democrats put Teddy Kennedy in office and they don't care about it and it's fine, it's all good.
00:28:31.000 And then they're the ones who act virtuously.
00:28:33.000 They say, you know, we're not going to vote for our guy because he's a bad guy, and then we lose, and Hillary becomes president, and we lose, and this Democrat in Montana becomes president.
00:28:40.000 They don't want to end up in this box, so instead, they say, we'll vote for the crap guy, the guy who's a piece of crap, who body-slammed a reporter, and you end up in this box.
00:28:48.000 In other words, the distrust that we have for Americans with one another, we end up both making the second worst choice.
00:28:55.000 We both end up making the second worst choice, which for the country as a whole is basically the worst choice, because now both of you are in the worst situation.
00:29:03.000 The worst politician is always elected.
00:29:05.000 Everyone elects the worst politician, because you don't want to be the guy left out on the outside.
00:29:09.000 Now, this assumes two things.
00:29:10.000 It assumes, number one, that the person who is the criminal in this particular scenario is the best candidate and doesn't do any damage down the road.
00:29:17.000 I think that's a bad assumption.
00:29:19.000 I think that if Gianforte is elected in Montana, that Democrats will use that as a club to beat Republicans with for years, in the same way that they're now going to use Trump to beat Republicans for years.
00:29:27.000 So there are costs down the road, and I think that's what Senator Sasse was saying earlier.
00:29:31.000 Senator Sasse
00:29:32.000 Was basically laying out that short-term, it looks like the best situation is this, but long-term, you're not going to really win much more doing that, and you're going to undermine your own credibility because you're a criminal.
00:29:44.000 So, that's the, that's sort of like, at least here, the contention would be you maintained your silence because you were innocent, right?
00:29:50.000 You didn't confess because you were innocent.
00:29:51.000 So that's the, right?
00:29:53.000 None of these scenarios in the prisoner's dilemma actually take into account, what if one of the people's innocent?
00:29:57.000 What if you're innocent?
00:29:59.000 Maybe you go to jail anyway, but if you're innocent, then you can't actually confess.
00:30:02.000 So that's the values argument, is that we're actually outside the scope of this entire argument.
00:30:06.000 For values reasons, we can't confess.
00:30:08.000 We have to remain silent.
00:30:10.000 Regardless of what the other side does.
00:30:11.000 But, from a pure sort of political pragmatism point of view, you're going to end up in that bottom circle.
00:30:17.000 So how do we cure that?
00:30:18.000 How do we cure that?
00:30:19.000 In order to cure that, we actually need leadership of both parties.
00:30:22.000 It can't be on the voters.
00:30:24.000 It has to be on the leadership of both parties, because we can't, it's going to be too hard to get all voters all across the country to say we're not going to elect people who body slam people, because clearly the voters, there's a huge percentage of them who don't care.
00:30:34.000 They don't care if a politician does something bad.
00:30:36.000 So what you really need is a common deal between the leadership of both parties, I'm talking about Schumer and McConnell and Paul Ryan and Nancy Pelosi, that they are not going to seat people
00:30:45.000 Well, I would say convicted of crimes.
00:30:50.000 People who are convicted of crimes will not be seated in the Congress.
00:30:53.000 Right?
00:30:53.000 We're just not going to seat them.
00:30:55.000 And if we think that the evidence is sufficient that they will be convicted, then we will not stand by them.
00:31:01.000 Now, the leadership of both parties are going to do this because they don't want to lose the seat because then they lose their majority.
00:31:06.000 But that's what actually needs to happen.
00:31:08.000 You actually need to get to the point where instead of this,
00:31:11.000 We are here.
00:31:12.000 In order to get from here to there, we actually need to have a deal between both parties.
00:31:17.000 You need to show your commitment.
00:31:19.000 And you can't pre-commit, just you.
00:31:21.000 The other person also has to commit and you have to trust them.
00:31:22.000 So we have to build a shared trust that we're not going to seat people who are absolute pieces of crap.
00:31:26.000 Okay, so that's the basic reason why people vote for the second worst option.
00:31:30.000 And that's also the reason why we do need a deal as Americans.
00:31:33.000 And we need to build up the social capital that Senator Sasse is talking about, otherwise we end up in that bottom right square.
00:31:38.000 And that's the worst thing for the country, because now we're all criminals and we go to jail for a long time.
00:31:42.000 That's basically the logic there.
00:31:43.000 Okay, so, with all of that said, I want to move on on dailywire.com, and there I want to talk about what the CBO is reporting in other news.
00:31:54.000 So you're going to have to go to dailywire.com in order to subscribe to that.
00:31:58.000 $8 a month will get you a subscription over at Daily Wire.
00:32:01.000 And with that subscription, you get to see the rest of the show live.
00:32:06.000 You get to partake in the mailbag, which we are doing in short order here on The Ben Shapiro Show, which will be lots of fun.
00:32:12.000 And you get to have all your questions answered.
00:32:13.000 You get to see Clavin's show live.
00:32:14.000 You get to be part of his mailbag.
00:32:16.000 If you become an annual subscriber today, we are giving away a free signed copy of Say It's So.
00:32:21.000 It's a book written by me and my dad.
00:32:23.000 Say It's So, Papa, Dad, Me, and the 2005 Chicago White Sox Championship Season.
00:32:28.000 Really good book.
00:32:29.000 Endorsed by Mark Levin.
00:32:30.000 Endorsed by Dana Perino.
00:32:32.000 Not even available yet for general consumption.
00:32:34.000 Endorsed by Jerry Krasnick over at ESPN.
00:32:36.000 It's a really good sports book.
00:32:37.000 It's a really good book about dads and sons.
00:32:39.000 It's a lot of fun to write.
00:32:40.000 And my dad and I have a really good relationship, so obviously it's, I think, a lot of fun to read as well.
00:32:46.000 You can get a free signed copy when you become an annual subscriber.
00:32:48.000 Or if you just want to listen later, then go over to iTunes or SoundCloud, leave a rating, leave a review, subscribe.
00:32:54.000 We always appreciate it.
00:32:55.000 We are the largest conservative podcast in the nation.