The Ben Shapiro Show - January 19, 2023


“Global Warming Will Kill Us All, So Give Us Ultimate Power” | Ep. 1650


Episode Stats

Length

48 minutes

Words per Minute

204.08609

Word Count

9,956

Sentence Count

682

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

The World Economic Forum crisis mongers to justify an international power grab. The movement to crack down on free speech online continues apace, and the Biden family s corruption problems aren t quite over. This is The Ben Shapiro Show, and it's sponsored by ExpressVPN. Protect your data at ExpressVpn.com/ProtectYourData. Ben Shapiro's new book, "The Dark Side of: How to Live a Good Life," is out now. It's available for pre-order wherever books are sold. The Dark Side Of: How To Live A Good Life: The Truth About Climate Change and Global Warming by Ben Shapiro and Mark Manson. It's also available on Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover, Audio Book, and Audio only version of these titles. If you don't already have a Kindle device, you can get a free eReader app from Amazon so you can read, write, and annotate books and other media as well. It'll take you less than a month to make a purchase, and you'll get 10% off the retail price of an eReader device, plus free shipping throughout the rest of the world, including Apple, Vimeo, and The Huffington Post, and other major third-party resellers worldwide. You'll get access to all the best ereaders, and access to the latest ebooks, train and training programs, including training, courses, and so much more. You'll also get a lifetime's worth of access to books and training throughout the world--from anywhere you get a choice of a global service, including the world's best browsers and they'll get a chance to speak to the best of it--and all of your choices, including a discount, including all of this will be paid for it--so much more, including "they'll get it all, they'll say it's all a good deal, including it's a great deal, and a whole lot of it, including access to it, and all of that will be a great place to say it'll also says it'll really, "so much of it will be like that, right, "and they'll hear it, "sauce and more, "they're going to be a good thing, "affeed it, right they'll also "of it, she's going to hear it's really, really, and more like it's truly, "of that, they're not going to get it, really they'll really like it, etc) " " "


Transcript

00:00:00.000 The World Economic Forum crisis mongers to justify an international power grab.
00:00:04.000 The movement to crack down on free speech online continues apace.
00:00:06.000 And the Biden family's corruption problems aren't really quite over.
00:00:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:10.000 This is the Bench Bureau Show.
00:00:17.000 This show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:18.000 It's time to stand up against big tech.
00:00:20.000 Protect your data at expressvpn.com slash Ben.
00:00:23.000 Well, Davos continues.
00:00:25.000 It's an almost endless series of foolish statements by people who really should know better, but have decided that the most important thing for them is to centralize power of policymaking, power of government, power of money to themselves.
00:00:38.000 And so the only way that the elitists at Davos at the World Economic Forum can actually justify the kind of power grabs that they want to make here, the power grab that suggests that they get to restructure the entire world economy, or they get to restructure energy markets, they get to regulate how you live your life.
00:00:53.000 The only way they can justify that is with absolute crisis mongering.
00:00:56.000 And so half of Davos is about trying to explain to the rest of the world that we are on the precipice of the global end, that essentially They are like Jor-El at the beginning of Superman the movie, explaining that Krypton is about to be eaten by the red sun over here.
00:01:11.000 And so we really need to do something about that.
00:01:12.000 You need to give me ultimate power.
00:01:14.000 They're really more like General Zod, right?
00:01:16.000 They're trying to take total power in order to achieve a goal.
00:01:19.000 Because after all, the crisis is afoot.
00:01:21.000 And that is really ugly stuff.
00:01:24.000 It also happens to be incredibly stupid stuff.
00:01:26.000 So to take an example, Vanessa Kerry is John Kerry's daughter.
00:01:29.000 John Kerry is the American climate envoy.
00:01:32.000 To the rest of the world.
00:01:35.000 So his daughter is also at the World Economic Forum.
00:01:39.000 Nepotism, man.
00:01:39.000 It's a drug.
00:01:40.000 In any case, she shows up at the World Economic Forum and she proceeds to explain that right now, one quarter of global deaths are from preventable environmental causes.
00:01:51.000 Now, no.
00:01:53.000 I mean, no.
00:01:56.000 Let's hear her out.
00:01:59.000 When you think about what most people's main assets are, it's their ability to work.
00:02:03.000 And if you're sick, you can't work, you can't participate in markets, GDPs don't grow.
00:02:09.000 And so we have a real opportunity to address this.
00:02:13.000 A quarter of the world's deaths currently are from preventable environmental causes.
00:02:18.000 So we're just, if we don't tackle this issue in this nexus, we're really setting ourselves up for a much harder pathway.
00:02:24.000 A quarter of the world's deaths are from preventable environmental causes?
00:02:27.000 I'm pretty sure that, like, virtually all deaths are from health issues in the West.
00:02:34.000 They're generally from health issues of old age.
00:02:38.000 I mean, I'm not sure exactly what she's trying to say here.
00:02:40.000 Maybe she's trying to say that a quarter of the world's preventable deaths are from preventable environmental causes.
00:02:45.000 I'm pretty sure the vast majority of people who are dying in the West in an old age home at the age of 87 are not dying from a preventable environmental cause.
00:02:54.000 OK, but but even if we correct her statement, we say what she really means is that a quarter of preventable deaths are from preventable environmental causes.
00:03:02.000 That's not really even true because here is the thing.
00:03:06.000 She's assuming that a preventable environmental cause would be, for example, global warming, right?
00:03:11.000 If we could stop global warming, then the amount of preventable death would decline.
00:03:15.000 There's only one problem with that, which is that way more people die on a yearly basis because things are cold and because things are hot.
00:03:22.000 Bjorn Lomberg over at the Copenhagen Institute, he put out a graphic recently showing this, demonstrating how this works.
00:03:29.000 The number of cold deaths has actually decreased since 2000 by 0.51 percent.
00:03:36.000 The number of heat deaths has increased by 0.21 percent.
00:03:39.000 But there's a problem.
00:03:41.000 The problem is that if you look at that on an absolute death level, what you see is that higher temperatures have actually decreased the amount of cold death by 283,000 cold deaths over that course of time.
00:03:56.000 And higher temperatures have increased heat deaths by about 116,000 deaths, which means that the net amount of death avoided is actually higher because of global warming.
00:04:06.000 If you're talking about the directly impacted people from global warming, a few more people have died because of heat, but a lot less people, a lot fewer people have died because it's cold because it's warm now, right?
00:04:17.000 So what she's saying is actively untrue.
00:04:21.000 But the crisis mongering has to continue.
00:04:23.000 And this is why you will hear people say there are billions of people homeless, billions of people crossing borders.
00:04:28.000 What you're going to say is mass death, catastrophe, cats and dogs living together, the end of the world.
00:04:34.000 This is the shtick.
00:04:35.000 Because if you claim that this is the shtick, this allows you to grab and wield unseemly power.
00:04:40.000 Another Davos speaker at the World Economic Forum, Professor Joyita Gupta, says that by 2070, 3 billion people will live in uninhabitable zones.
00:04:49.000 A forbidden zone from Planet of the Apes or something.
00:04:51.000 Here we go.
00:04:53.000 This uninhabitable zone is increasing.
00:04:57.000 If we continue with our greenhouse gas emissions, then by 2070, as many as 3 billion people will live in uninhabitable zones.
00:05:08.000 Well, I mean, the truth is that people right now live in heretofore uninhabitable zones.
00:05:14.000 As technology gets better, people are very, very good at adapting.
00:05:17.000 People are living in areas that are way too hot to really sustain human life, but we have air conditioning, for example.
00:05:23.000 We're able to move water to places where there is no water.
00:05:26.000 It used to be, if you go back 10,000 years, that people tended to live by rivers and lakes because this is where the water supply was.
00:05:31.000 They at least tended to live where the water table was relatively low because this meant that you were able to dig a well.
00:05:37.000 Now, because of the extraordinary technology that we've been able to bring to bear, you can build a city in the middle of the desert in Las Vegas, for example.
00:05:42.000 Okay, so there's that.
00:05:44.000 But put that aside.
00:05:45.000 Do you really think that all those people are just going to sit there while it gets really hot and not move?
00:05:50.000 Do you think that's what's going to happen over the course of the next 50 years?
00:05:53.000 This is a point that I've made before and people have Have intentionally misconstrued it because this is what we do on the internet is we tend to take people's arguments and then we pretend that they don't know exactly what they're saying or we take them in the stupidest possible way.
00:06:06.000 What I've said is that over the course of the century, people adapt, people move.
00:06:10.000 As the water levels rise, nobody is going to stand there as the water level approaches their ankles and then their knees and then their chest and then their nose and then they drown.
00:06:18.000 That's not how any of this works.
00:06:21.000 But if you can promote the notion that crisis is right at our doorstep, and it's a preventable crisis, we can do something about it, this allows you to grab ultimate power.
00:06:30.000 The alarmism here is extraordinary.
00:06:32.000 The UNICEF executive director Catherine Russell over at Davos did the same thing.
00:06:36.000 She says the climate crisis is a child health crisis.
00:06:39.000 Why can't you just say it's getting warmer and we have to adapt?
00:06:42.000 Or it's getting warmer and we might be able to stop or lower the amount of warming that is happening and that the costs of doing so are outweighed by the benefits.
00:06:50.000 That would be a normal argument.
00:06:51.000 Instead, it's like every crisis is a climate crisis.
00:06:54.000 You're having a bad day?
00:06:55.000 It's because of the climate.
00:06:57.000 You're going crazy?
00:06:57.000 You're having a mental health problem?
00:06:58.000 It's because of the climate.
00:06:59.000 Here we go.
00:07:00.000 You know, we're seeing so many children who have no idea where their next meal is coming from.
00:07:06.000 I saw it again in Yemen, you know, where children are just literally so vulnerable and all of these climate threats, everything that happens in the world, every bad thing that happens is a little bit worse for children.
00:07:17.000 And that's what we're seeing.
00:07:18.000 So we see the climate crisis as really a child health crisis.
00:07:21.000 Okay, I'm sorry, but this notion that kids are dying en masse because of starvation because of global warming is rebutted by the simple fact that there has been a massive decline in hunger in the developing world since essentially 1990.
00:07:36.000 There's been a decline of about 20% of people in the developing world who are starving to A little bit over 12% by say 2014.
00:07:48.000 And that decline has continued to pace.
00:07:50.000 Because it turns out that people are really good at shipping things places.
00:07:55.000 And that additional trade is helpful.
00:07:56.000 And that hunger has declined.
00:07:57.000 But you're not allowed to hear the good news.
00:07:59.000 The bad news is what allows them to grab power.
00:08:02.000 And then the best part of this is that the people who understand this the best are the people who actively are the poorest.
00:08:07.000 The people who are the poorest are saying, you know what I don't need?
00:08:09.000 I don't need you telling me I need to build a solar panel on my corrugated iron shack.
00:08:13.000 That's what I don't need you doing.
00:08:15.000 What I need you doing is making sure that I get the cheap energy that is necessary to power my life and develop my economy.
00:08:20.000 What I need from you is a stable set of governance rules that can be implemented by my government so that I can own my own property.
00:08:29.000 So that all of the locked up capital in the land that I'm sitting on, but it's not legally owned by me because of this bad property system, can be unlocked.
00:08:37.000 This is Hernando de Soto, the Latin American economist who won the Nobel Prize.
00:08:40.000 He has suggested that one of the big problems in the developing world, in the underdeveloped world, is that they don't have actual regulatory consistency.
00:08:48.000 So you don't know if you own a piece of land when you sit on that land for 20 years, for example.
00:08:52.000 There are a bunch of things we can do for the developing world.
00:08:54.000 Stable governance is one of those things.
00:08:56.000 Cheap energy is another one of those things.
00:08:58.000 The problem is that cheap energy comes in the form of carbon-based fossil fuels because that is the cheapest and most effective form of energy currently known to man.
00:09:07.000 And so this creates a problem for the elitists because they say, we're doing this on behalf of the poor, don't you see?
00:09:11.000 We're doing all, we need power so we can help the poor people, which sounds great.
00:09:15.000 We need power to help the people who are the most, the most hurt by climate change.
00:09:20.000 We need the power to help the people who are starving because there's only one problem.
00:09:23.000 If you ask those people, would you like cheap gas or these morons over here flying private jets and talking about solar panels, they're going to say, give us the cheap gas.
00:09:30.000 Give us the coal.
00:09:31.000 A huge percentage of the world's population, by the way, would kill for natural gas and oil.
00:09:35.000 I mean, literally kill for it because they are burning wood and dung for fuel.
00:09:40.000 You want to talk about, you want to talk about death, you know, needless death that is being caused right now by environmental hazard.
00:09:47.000 Try burning wood and dung in your corrugated iron shack for fuel and see how that goes for you in terms of your health.
00:09:54.000 By the way, the carbon emissions from that are pretty extraordinary.
00:09:58.000 So there's one additional element here that the Davos crowd has to do.
00:10:01.000 And that is we have to say that what we really have to do is we have to convince these poor people that they are ignorant and stupid.
00:10:06.000 They need to give us the power also.
00:10:08.000 You need to give us the power to help the poor people and the poor people don't want us to have that power.
00:10:10.000 Well, we need to convince those poor people that they should give us the power as well, because of course they're stupid.
00:10:16.000 I mean, they're stupid and they're poor.
00:10:17.000 So if we just explain to them that we need to put the solar power on their iron shacks, then probably that'll solve the problem.
00:10:26.000 So here is climate negotiator Nam Gage Hoden explaining just that.
00:10:29.000 I heard this amazing phrase yesterday where a friend of mine said that there are doors that we can walk through, but it's important that you hold that door so that someone less privileged than you can walk through it.
00:10:46.000 So something that you can think about is what are you doing in your position of privilege to make the conversation on climate more accessible to somebody who may not know about it or for someone who lives in a different part of the world where this conversation is not a possibility.
00:11:07.000 Maybe the reason that the conversation isn't a possibility is not because of government crackdowns.
00:11:11.000 Maybe the conversation isn't the possibility because people are too busy worrying about being able to eat and have enough heat to survive cold.
00:11:17.000 Maybe that's one of the problems.
00:11:18.000 We'll get to more on this in just one second.
00:11:21.000 First, I want to talk to you about Daily Wire's most trusted privacy partner and a premier sponsor of this show, ExpressVPN.
00:11:27.000 Using the internet without ExpressVPN is like checking in your baggage at the airport without a lock.
00:11:31.000 You think your stuff is kept private, but you never know who exactly is going through your personal items.
00:11:35.000 When you go online without a VPN, ISPs can see every single website you visit.
00:11:38.000 They can legally sell that information to ad companies and tech giants who then use it to target with their advertisements.
00:11:43.000 When you use ExpressVPN, ISPs can't see your online activity.
00:11:46.000 Your identity is anonymized by a secure VPN server.
00:11:49.000 Your data is also encrypted for maximum protection.
00:11:51.000 If that sounds confusing, it's not.
00:11:52.000 It really isn't.
00:11:53.000 All you have to do is fire up the app, click on a button.
00:11:54.000 It's really easy to do.
00:11:56.000 ExpressVPN works on all devices.
00:11:57.000 Phones, laptops, even routers.
00:11:59.000 So everyone who shares your Wi-Fi can be protected as well.
00:12:02.000 Go check out ExpressVPN right now.
00:12:03.000 Protect yourself the same way that I do online.
00:12:05.000 Check out ExpressVPN.com slash Ben today.
00:12:07.000 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N.com slash Ben.
00:12:10.000 You can get an extra three months for free when you do.
00:12:12.000 ExpressVPN.com slash Ben.
00:12:14.000 No reason to give anyone else access to your online activity.
00:12:17.000 It is your data.
00:12:18.000 Keep it your own.
00:12:19.000 Check out ExpressVPN.com slash Ben today.
00:12:23.000 Also, it's the start of a brand new year, and this year, invest in your spiritual health.
00:12:28.000 With Hallow, it's the number one Christian prayer app in the United States.
00:12:31.000 It is the number one Catholic app in the world.
00:12:33.000 I'm a big advocate of Christians performing their religion and acting in accordance with their religion.
00:12:39.000 It's great for you.
00:12:40.000 It is great for your soul.
00:12:41.000 Just like physical exercise, daily spiritual exercise is critical to your well-being, especially in a world where attacks on faith and religion happen all around us.
00:12:48.000 Hallow helps you maintain a daily prayer routine.
00:12:49.000 It is filled with studies, meditations, and reflections rooted in Christian prayer practices.
00:12:54.000 Start the new year with daily Bible readings and reflections from the number one Christian podcast, The Bible in a Year, or pray alongside Mark Wahlberg or world-class athletes who will help inspire and motivate you to work toward your true purpose in life and in accordance with God's will.
00:13:05.000 Halo has over 6,000 prayers, meditations, and peaceful music playlists to choose from and can help you sustain your spiritual practice throughout your entire day.
00:13:12.000 It is filled with studies, meditations, and reflections, including that number one Christian podcast, The Bible in a Year.
00:13:17.000 Try Halo for three months free at halo.com slash Shapiro.
00:13:21.000 That's H-A-L-O-W.com slash Shapiro to get started.
00:13:25.000 But all of this is the predicate to the power grab.
00:13:28.000 So the UN Secretary General, he says it's time to move beyond fossil fuels.
00:13:32.000 That's what we have to do.
00:13:33.000 That's the really important thing.
00:13:34.000 We have to move on climate, right?
00:13:36.000 We have this climate crisis, and if we don't actively act on the crisis, then we're all going to die.
00:13:41.000 Now, whenever somebody declares a world-ending crisis, Without the evidence to actually show it, you can typically guarantee that it's about the power.
00:13:50.000 Whether you're talking about people who were claiming that they should have ultimate power to decide literally everything in your life based on COVID, or whether you're talking about the UN Secretary General saying that climate change, the change of the climate over the course of a hundred years, and now you have to give me ultimate power.
00:14:06.000 Maybe they just want the ultimate power.
00:14:08.000 So here is the UN Secretary General saying it's time to move beyond fossil fuels.
00:14:11.000 This is not a decision that you get to make.
00:14:13.000 The real world still exists.
00:14:14.000 In the real world, solar panels are not nearly as effective as gas, natural gas, oil, even coal.
00:14:22.000 Here we go.
00:14:24.000 What can the UN do about it?
00:14:26.000 The UN is making a number of proposals.
00:14:30.000 Our proposal is to have a global stimulus.
00:14:33.000 A global stimulus able to redress the economies and a global stimulus able to address the challenges of the poorest in the world.
00:14:42.000 And at the same time, to create the funds that are necessary for a just transition in relation to climate change.
00:14:48.000 We need to move from a dominance of fossil fuels to a dominance of renewables, but we need to do that in a just way.
00:14:57.000 Okay, I love that they're talking about global redistributionism and a giant global stimulus, which means taxing you to have the governments of the world blow out their monetary supply, which is how we got an inflation spiral that we are currently in and trying to escape.
00:15:11.000 I love that they're doing this against the backdrop of beautiful mountains in Switzerland where rich people are skiing.
00:15:15.000 It's just, it's too much.
00:15:17.000 It's too much.
00:15:19.000 And this is the shtick.
00:15:19.000 This is constantly the shtick.
00:15:20.000 Give us more power to redistribute.
00:15:22.000 We'll sit here in our literal chalet, our ski chalet in Switzerland, and we will tell you why we need global redistributionism.
00:15:31.000 These people are Bond villains.
00:15:33.000 I have to say, God's casting process lately is just, it's broken.
00:15:37.000 God as casting director, as a big believer in the Almighty, I have to say that the Almighty casting process, it used to be a lot more subtle.
00:15:47.000 Now the Almighty is just typecasting at this point.
00:15:50.000 He's trotting out global supervillains like Klaus Schwab, who speaks in a German accent while explaining that you must give up your power.
00:15:57.000 You must give us the power!
00:15:59.000 Or you have this guy, the UN Secretary General, sitting there all fat-catted wearing a nice overcoat and a scarf at a ski chalet explaining why he needs more power.
00:16:09.000 Guys, something has happened.
00:16:12.000 God's casting process is off.
00:16:13.000 At least you ought to cast against type once in a while, God.
00:16:16.000 I mean, seriously.
00:16:17.000 You know, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, the Chancellor of Germany, he says, the fundamental task of our century is the transformation to a climate-neutral economy.
00:16:25.000 I feel like there are more fundamental tasks, actually, and that what you're actually talking about is we need innovation.
00:16:30.000 Well, congratulations.
00:16:32.000 Welcome to the world where innovation has always been necessary.
00:16:34.000 The fundamental task of our century is transformation to a climate-neutral economy.
00:16:38.000 Again, it's very reminiscent of the foolishness where Joe Biden will say, what we need is a cancer moonshot.
00:16:45.000 We need a cancer moonshot.
00:16:46.000 Yeah, it's bad.
00:16:47.000 I'll tell you a bad thing, guys.
00:16:49.000 Let me tell you some malarkey.
00:16:50.000 Cancer.
00:16:52.000 Cancer is a malarkey.
00:16:53.000 And to fight the cancer, we need some shampoo, and we also need a moonshot.
00:17:00.000 It's like, oh, you're right.
00:17:01.000 We haven't spent any money trying to cure cancer.
00:17:04.000 And it must be because of our insufficient commitment.
00:17:06.000 We haven't cured cancer.
00:17:06.000 So if we just think real hard and clap for Tinkerbell, cancer will be cured.
00:17:10.000 It's the same thing with these schmucks.
00:17:12.000 They're like, well, what we really need is a climate neutral economy.
00:17:16.000 And if we just think real hard about it and if we say over and over and over, that's what we need.
00:17:20.000 It will magically appear.
00:17:21.000 Magically, innovation will happen.
00:17:24.000 Or maybe that's not how innovation works.
00:17:26.000 Maybe you have posited no solutions that are actually sufficient to the problem you claim exists.
00:17:32.000 But at least you got people to cheer for you at the World Economic Forum, I suppose.
00:17:37.000 Our transformation toward a climate-neutral economy, the fundamental task of our century, is currently taking on an entirely new dynamic.
00:17:49.000 Not in spite of, but because of the Russian war and the resulting pressure on us Europeans to change.
00:17:57.000 Whether you are a business leader or a climate activist, a security policy specialist or an investor, it is now crystal clear to each and every one of us that the future belongs solely to renewables.
00:18:13.000 Wow, the future belongs solely to renewables.
00:18:15.000 Oh, I don't even know what that means.
00:18:17.000 The future belongs to, who decides this?
00:18:20.000 Doesn't the market typically decide who wins in the market?
00:18:23.000 And isn't all of Europe now essentially freezing because Russia turned off the oil and natural gas and now they're dependent on America shipping in a lot of that stuff?
00:18:32.000 It really is amazing stuff.
00:18:33.000 But again, the predicate is for a global redistributionist scheme.
00:18:38.000 Give us power for a global redistributionist scheme.
00:18:40.000 The person who makes this clearest is the Colombian president Gustavo Petro, who is in fact a socialist.
00:18:45.000 All of Latin America is undergoing right now a pink wave or large swaths of Latin America are undergoing a pink wave in which quasi socialists or open socialists take over countries and or attempt to overthrow Actual democracies, which is what's happening in Peru right now, but the media doesn't care about that, right?
00:19:01.000 The media only cares when Bolsonarists attack government buildings in Brazil.
00:19:04.000 They don't care when dozens of people are being killed in the middle of an actual conflict in Peru because the people who are protesting and committing acts of violence against the government, those are left-wingers.
00:19:12.000 In any case, here is Colombian President Gustavo Petro saying that what needs to end, if you want to fight climate change, what really needs to end is capitalism.
00:19:18.000 Capitalism is the real problem.
00:19:20.000 This is the underlying message of the World Economic Forum.
00:19:22.000 They like to claim that they're in favor of liberalized economies, but the minute that the liberalized economy runs up against their particular mode of morality, which is top down control corporatism, then they immediately throw that out the window. So here's Gustavo Petro.
00:19:37.000 The capitalism that we know nowadays has a driving force and logic.
00:19:44.000 And that is to increase our profits in such a way. And that's how we talk about history to regulate everything without political or social boundaries.
00:20:03.000 And that's the one we have.
00:20:04.000 This has resulted in some sort of global anarchy.
00:20:08.000 That's global anarchy, is what capitalism creates.
00:20:10.000 So what we actually need is top-down control, right?
00:20:12.000 The opposite of anarchy is control.
00:20:14.000 We need more control.
00:20:15.000 Al Gore is making his big reappearance.
00:20:17.000 This is a dude who's earned tens of millions of dollars with climate alarmism that has largely been proved false over the course of the last 20 years or so.
00:20:24.000 Remember all the polar bears were going to be dead at this point and the ice caps are going to be completely melted?
00:20:28.000 Al Gore is still here talking about man, bear, pig.
00:20:33.000 So, Al Gore over at the World Economic Forum.
00:20:36.000 Again, God's casting process is broken.
00:20:39.000 He says, you know, one of the big problems is the head of the World Bank.
00:20:42.000 Because the head of the World Bank is not actively giving loans to useless projects that are unlikely to be successful.
00:20:48.000 And the reason for that is because he's a climate denier.
00:20:50.000 He's a bad guy.
00:20:51.000 We need control of the World Bank, says Al Gore.
00:20:54.000 Young people around the world are looking at what we're doing.
00:20:58.000 They look at the World Bank and they say, oh, you've got a climate denier in charge of the World Bank.
00:21:03.000 So why are you surprised that the World Bank is completely failing?
00:21:07.000 It's completely failing.
00:21:09.000 Man, bear, pig.
00:21:10.000 Half man, half bear, half pig.
00:21:13.000 Not only that, says Al Gore, if we don't stop this climate, if we don't stop this climate crisis, we're going to see billions of climate refugees.
00:21:20.000 Billions of them.
00:21:22.000 I don't believe you, sir.
00:21:24.000 Creating the droughts and melting the ice and raising the sea level and causing these waves of climate refugees predicted to reach 1 billion in this century.
00:21:33.000 Look at the xenophobia and political authoritarian trends that have come from just a few million refugees.
00:21:40.000 What about a billion?
00:21:41.000 We would lose our capacity for self-governance.
00:21:46.000 It seems like you want us to lose the capacity for self-governance now, I noticed.
00:21:51.000 You would like to be the person who governs.
00:21:54.000 This is the left's version of democracy.
00:21:56.000 The left's version of democracy is we control things.
00:21:58.000 And if we lose, democracy has been overthrown.
00:22:00.000 You see this everywhere.
00:22:02.000 Whether you're talking about Peru, or whether you're talking about Brazil, or whether you're talking about the United States, or whether you're talking about Israel, anytime the left loses, their immediate move is democracy is under threat.
00:22:11.000 See, when Joe Biden wins the presidency, I don't think democracy is under threat.
00:22:15.000 I think something terrible has happened in the country and he shouldn't be the president of the United States.
00:22:19.000 And the American body of politics should reject that and move forward to kick him out of office as soon as humanly possible.
00:22:24.000 But that's not the same thing as democracy.
00:22:26.000 But all of these people who want global control, they're constantly suggesting that if they don't get global control, then somehow democracy has been defeated.
00:22:33.000 It seems to me that you just mean, by democracy, stuff I like.
00:22:39.000 So if you don't get the stuff you like, then democracy is in danger.
00:22:42.000 What is this all leading up to?
00:22:44.000 It's leading up to John Kerry, who says we don't have time for business as usual on climate.
00:22:47.000 And what he means by business as usual, of course, of course, forever and always.
00:22:50.000 Business as usual is the business of governing.
00:22:52.000 We don't have time for that.
00:22:53.000 We don't have time for all of this.
00:22:55.000 This sticking and moving and negotiation and democratic inter- We don't have time for any of that!
00:23:01.000 Well, it's an emergency!
00:23:02.000 This is war, dammit!
00:23:03.000 And this is something that you hear very often from government advocates, is that everything is akin to a war.
00:23:09.000 Right?
00:23:10.000 Because in a war, you get to suspend all civil liberties, force people to live in barracks, draft human beings, put them in battle.
00:23:10.000 Why?
00:23:16.000 The left actually loves the morality of war and the ethic of war.
00:23:21.000 They just want to direct it at a bunch of other causes.
00:23:24.000 And they want to be able to essentially draft your bank account for their needs.
00:23:29.000 They want to be able to control your life in these ways.
00:23:33.000 Here's John Kerry said, we don't, the crisis is so large that we don't have time for business as usual.
00:23:37.000 Remember business as usual just means freedom.
00:23:41.000 Red tape, the amount of paperwork, the amount of numbers, hiring that we have to do in a slowdown, an economic slowdown kind of environment.
00:23:50.000 How do we get above that concern for the private sector that this is going to represent a huge burden that, quite frankly, I don't have time for?
00:23:57.000 Because there is still this gap.
00:23:59.000 No, there is a gap, Julie.
00:24:01.000 You're absolutely correct.
00:24:03.000 And bureaucracy is the enemy of all of us.
00:24:06.000 We don't have time To do business as usual.
00:24:12.000 We don't.
00:24:13.000 Bureaucracy, red tape, democracy, you know, all of these things are a real problem.
00:24:18.000 And the end goal must, of course, be that your life has to change.
00:24:21.000 Your life has to change dramatically.
00:24:22.000 So the head of Siemens and Maersk, Maersk, of course, a major international shipping firm, his name is Jim Snabe.
00:24:28.000 He says, you know what the best possible thing, outcome here would be?
00:24:30.000 We should all stop eating meat.
00:24:32.000 A billion people need to stop eating meat right now.
00:24:34.000 Yes, this sounds like it's going to make your life significantly better is if you stop eating meat.
00:24:37.000 I'm not eating the bugs, guys.
00:24:39.000 It's not going to happen.
00:24:41.000 I'm not going vegan.
00:24:42.000 I'm not going vegetarian.
00:24:43.000 Meat tastes good and it's good for you.
00:24:46.000 Stop it.
00:24:47.000 Just stop.
00:24:48.000 But here we go.
00:24:51.000 So I stopped eating meat.
00:24:54.000 Now the math would say, well, you need to stop eating meat 11 years to compensate for a flight to Thailand.
00:25:03.000 Yes.
00:25:04.000 But if a billion people stop eating meat, I tell you, it has a big impact.
00:25:11.000 I love that.
00:25:12.000 So his idea is you should personally stop eating meat because if you do, maybe a billion people will stop eating meat.
00:25:17.000 Spoiler alert.
00:25:18.000 A billion people are not going to stop eating meat.
00:25:21.000 I don't mean to burst your bubble there, Jim, but it ain't going to happen.
00:25:24.000 Maybe you should come up with better solutions than a billion people suddenly stop eating meat.
00:25:28.000 Uh-huh.
00:25:29.000 Yeah, that's going to happen.
00:25:30.000 Meanwhile, Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock, who's been using the extraordinary power of BlackRock.
00:25:34.000 BlackRock, of course, is an investment firm that has a trillion dollars under management.
00:25:39.000 He was speaking also at the World Economic Forum, and he's angry that people are saying that the corporations who are now seeking stakeholder capitalism, meaning doing the work of this sort of globalized elite, he says that you're not really supposed to attack him.
00:25:52.000 During an interview on Tuesday in Davos, he said, quote, I'm taking it very seriously, the criticism.
00:25:57.000 We're trying to address the misconceptions.
00:25:58.000 It's hard because it's not business anymore.
00:26:00.000 They're doing it in a personal way.
00:26:01.000 For the first time in my professional career, attacks are now personal.
00:26:04.000 They're trying to demonize the issues.
00:26:06.000 Wait, demonizing the issues means it's not personal.
00:26:08.000 And that means that we're taking very seriously the way that you govern your company, which involves you, but is really not personal.
00:26:17.000 What, of course, is the problem?
00:26:18.000 The problem, he says, is that Elon Musk has been attacking the ESG movement, the Environmental Social Governance movement, which suggests that corporations should be working in line with major government in order to pursue some of these nefarious ends.
00:26:31.000 The desire for control is extraordinarily strong.
00:26:34.000 It's very, very strong.
00:26:35.000 And Davos is just a pure example of that.
00:26:37.000 It's not that they're actually going to be able to achieve all of this.
00:26:40.000 But they set the agenda.
00:26:40.000 They're not.
00:26:41.000 And then the minute that you notice the agenda, they're like, why are you noticing?
00:26:44.000 Again, it's the face tattoo center.
00:26:46.000 We're here.
00:26:46.000 We're having a big convocation of all the most important people.
00:26:49.000 We run industry.
00:26:50.000 We run government.
00:26:51.000 We run media.
00:26:52.000 We do all of these things.
00:26:54.000 But if you notice that we're doing these things, you're a conspiracy theorist.
00:26:56.000 You're doing it out in front, guys.
00:26:57.000 You're saying it out loud into microphones.
00:26:59.000 That's not a conspiracy.
00:27:00.000 That's you saying things and us noticing.
00:27:02.000 Okay, meanwhile, speaking of people saying things that we're not supposed to notice.
00:27:06.000 So there's been this major controversy that is now broken out over a hockey player for the Philadelphia Flyers named Ivan Provorov.
00:27:14.000 He committed a grave sin.
00:27:16.000 What is his grave sin?
00:27:17.000 He did not wear the colors.
00:27:19.000 He did not wear the ribbon.
00:27:21.000 He didn't do it.
00:27:22.000 He wouldn't wear the rainbow flag jersey for his warm-up at some LGBTQ-plus-minus-divided-by-a-sign-happy-face emoji tilde swindon.
00:27:30.000 No, just tilde.
00:27:34.000 Pride Night, or some such.
00:27:35.000 And this is very, very bad.
00:27:36.000 And he said, I'm not doing it because I'm a Russian Orthodox observer, and therefore, I don't believe in same-sex marriage, and I also don't believe in homosexual activity, in line with virtually all traditional religion.
00:27:48.000 This means, of course, that he has committed a grave sin, and he must be punished.
00:27:55.000 He must atone.
00:27:57.000 So here's a Canadian host named Sid Seixero ripping Properov in rather colorful terms because you're not allowed to disagree with the alphabet people.
00:28:06.000 You're not allowed to do that.
00:28:07.000 It's a bad thing.
00:28:08.000 You're not allowed to say, listen, you can do what you want in the privacy of your own bedroom, whatever, it's your life, but you can't force me to agree with you.
00:28:16.000 You're not allowed to do that anymore.
00:28:17.000 That's bad.
00:28:18.000 You must celebrate.
00:28:19.000 You will be forced to celebrate by the culture or you must be punished.
00:28:22.000 Here is this Canadian host going after Properov.
00:28:25.000 I think you find the flyers a million dollars for this.
00:28:27.000 I'm not kidding.
00:28:28.000 Figure this out and stop offending people on nights where it's not about that.
00:28:31.000 It's supposed to be about inclusivity.
00:28:34.000 The National Hockey League need to attack this and figure this out.
00:28:39.000 Because what I heard last night was offensive and didn't make any sense.
00:28:44.000 The National Hockey League today He needs to fine that organization a million dollars and reevaluate how they support gay rights.
00:28:51.000 Because that is insulting.
00:28:53.000 That is the number one trending topic in Canada.
00:28:55.000 That is insulting what happened in Philadelphia.
00:28:57.000 And if the NHL is serious about this, they say they are, we'll see.
00:29:02.000 We'll see how serious they are today.
00:29:04.000 Stop offending people on a night that's supposed to be about inclusivity.
00:29:07.000 We're not going to include you.
00:29:09.000 Our inclusivity means you shut the hell up.
00:29:12.000 That's what inclusivity means.
00:29:13.000 Guys, that's the best kind of inclusivity, says this moron Canadian host.
00:29:17.000 But unfortunately, this is large swaths of the sports media.
00:29:20.000 This is just one reason why you should, instead of subscribing to left-wing sports media companies that hate your guts, you should go check out Crane & Co, which actually covers sports from a perspective of people who actually like sports and don't hate you.
00:29:32.000 Mark Lazarus, a senior writer for The Athletic, he tweeted out, quote, I have no time for people who openly hate and hide behind religion.
00:29:39.000 If your religion preaches hate, your religion is bulls**t. I'm disappointed in Tortorella, who famously said that's the coach, who famously said he'd bench a player for protesting peacefully during the anthem in the wake of Colin Kaepernick.
00:29:49.000 Oh, you mean because we are all supposed to be unified in support for the United States of America?
00:29:55.000 I'm sorry if your vision of social justice elevates the Pride Progress flag to the place of the United States flag in the American pantheon, but that is not true for a vast bevy of Americans.
00:30:06.000 Lazarus says, he has a quote, Ivan Prokhorov made a decision not to participate in an event that was important to our team and to our fans.
00:30:12.000 As a result, we as a team made a decision not to play him out of respect to the LGBTQ plus minus divided by sign community and all our fans.
00:30:18.000 The end.
00:30:19.000 That's all he had to do.
00:30:20.000 All he had to say.
00:30:21.000 So he should have been fined.
00:30:22.000 He should have been played.
00:30:25.000 Um, that is vile and disgusting, but unfortunately, a huge swath of the sports media that, again, hates traditional values, agrees with this.
00:30:33.000 Adam Protu, who is a writer for the Hockey News and Full Press NHL, he says, Ivan Provorov has the right to any opinion he chooses, and we have the right to have any opinion on Ivan Provorov we choose.
00:30:44.000 Like this, he's a shameful human being whose homophobia is only going to get more shameful over the years.
00:30:49.000 It's shameful, you see, to oppose the agenda.
00:30:52.000 Again, he didn't call for anybody to be punished.
00:30:54.000 He didn't call for anything to happen to people who were wearing pride flags.
00:30:57.000 He just said, I'm not going to do it.
00:30:59.000 And all these morons are the rioters in the Seinfeld episode.
00:31:02.000 Wear the ribbon!
00:31:03.000 Wear it now!
00:31:04.000 We're going to beat the living hell out of you!
00:31:06.000 Gord Miller, a commentator for TSN NHL says, Right, but there are no consequences because he didn't do anything wrong.
00:31:12.000 What is the thing that he did that is wrong?
00:31:13.000 He didn't celebrate.
00:31:14.000 in Philadelphia.
00:31:16.000 The Flyers should have responded by not allowing him to play in the game.
00:31:19.000 Freedom of expression doesn't give you freedom from the consequences of your words or actions.
00:31:22.000 Right, but there are no consequences because he didn't do anything wrong.
00:31:27.000 What is the thing that he did that is wrong?
00:31:30.000 He didn't celebrate.
00:31:31.000 He essentially did the Sir Thomas More thing.
00:31:36.000 He said, I'm just going to be silent here and not do that.
00:31:38.000 And like, nope, nope, you must be punished.
00:31:43.000 Pierre Lebrun, who is the official Twitter page of TSN and RDS Hockey Insider and a columnist for The Athletic, he says, Pravrov obviously does not respect everyone.
00:31:52.000 If he did respect everyone, he would have taken part in a warmup and worn the Pride Night jersey.
00:31:55.000 Don't hide behind religion.
00:31:56.000 Okay, so now the definition of respect, just to be clear, the definition of respecting everybody is wearing their emblem.
00:32:02.000 So let me just say, I don't believe that you respect the Jews unless you wear a yarmulke.
00:32:08.000 You see why this is real stupid, guys?
00:32:11.000 I think you can respect the Jews without wearing a yarmulke.
00:32:13.000 In fact, I think I can respect the Christians without wearing a cross.
00:32:16.000 I can respect all sorts of groups without wearing their emblem on my chest.
00:32:20.000 I can even respect the people and not respect the activity in which they participate.
00:32:23.000 I do that all the time, like pretty much every day.
00:32:26.000 Including to my children.
00:32:27.000 I respect them.
00:32:28.000 I don't respect all the things that they are doing every day.
00:32:31.000 But the left refuses to acknowledge these possibilities because in the end, the left believes that they must rule and you must, you must obey.
00:32:41.000 To the point, by the way, where even if the left agrees with you, if you are of the wrong skin color or you're of the wrong group, you're not allowed to talk about it.
00:32:48.000 So this is an amazing example.
00:32:50.000 So Leslie Jones, who for some odd reason is considered funny by some people.
00:32:53.000 I don't know whether they, I don't know whether they're like Phineas Gage and they were hit by some sort of mind, mind crankshaft, like through the, through the skull, went through the eye and like out the back of the head.
00:33:02.000 And so now they find Leslie Jones funny.
00:33:04.000 There must be some group of people who finds Leslie Jones funny.
00:33:07.000 I don't know who they are or where they live or why they exist, but in any case, Leslie Jones was guest hosting The Daily Show, and she was talking about this garbage statue, this MLK statue in Boston, the Embrace.
00:33:19.000 We talked about it on the show because it's hideous.
00:33:21.000 It's just a terrible piece of garbage statue.
00:33:23.000 I mean, there are lots of great statues of MLK.
00:33:25.000 There's a great one in Washington, D.C.
00:33:27.000 of MLK.
00:33:28.000 This is, by any stretch of the imagination, a hideous nightmare fuel aberration of a statue.
00:33:34.000 Everyone understands this.
00:33:36.000 And it literally looks like a person attempting to fight a boa constrictor.
00:33:42.000 And that is the rated G version of that statue.
00:33:45.000 Megyn Kelly had a slightly less rated G version of what this statue looks like.
00:33:49.000 In any case, Leslie Jones admits she hates the statue and that it's garbage.
00:33:53.000 And then she's like, but you white people can't talk about it being bad.
00:33:56.000 Why?
00:33:57.000 Why can't I say it's a bad statue?
00:33:59.000 I'm confused.
00:34:00.000 Does me being white mean that I am now blind?
00:34:02.000 Explain.
00:34:05.000 And let me tell you something, even though I'm about to go straight hard on this statue, I gotta talk to the white people for a second.
00:34:12.000 Woo!
00:34:13.000 Talk to the white people.
00:34:14.000 What?
00:34:14.000 White people?
00:34:20.000 You don't need to be saying s*** about this statue.
00:34:24.000 Clap guys, clap because she's a racist.
00:34:26.000 Black hands only!
00:34:28.000 You need to sit your s*** in the back of the bus for this one, okay?
00:34:32.000 You need to honor this statue.
00:34:34.000 This is our civil rights icon.
00:34:39.000 It isn't, though.
00:34:40.000 It's disembodied arms holding each other.
00:34:45.000 Also, I'd just like to follow this logic down to its extreme, okay?
00:34:49.000 So basically, she's now saying that if you associate complete garbage with a topic that is sacrosanct, then certain groups are not allowed to criticize the garbage for being garbage.
00:35:01.000 Here is a pile of human feces!
00:35:03.000 It's in the middle of the street!
00:35:06.000 But if I declare that this pile of human feces has some sort of political ramifications, that means you can't say anything.
00:35:13.000 You can't notice that it's stinking and steaming in the middle of the street.
00:35:17.000 She hates the statue too, but you're not allowed to talk about it because you're a white person.
00:35:20.000 This is, by the way, and she's doing this in the name of MLK, the man who is most famous for suggesting that people should be judged by the character Rather than the color of their skin.
00:35:32.000 And she's like, you white people!
00:35:34.000 You're not allowed to notice things.
00:35:36.000 Doing that white noticing thing?
00:35:36.000 What are you doing?
00:35:38.000 Again?
00:35:39.000 You noticing things, white people?
00:35:41.000 Can't notice things.
00:35:42.000 You stop that.
00:35:43.000 That's enough of that noticing.
00:35:44.000 Because that's a white thing.
00:35:48.000 Racism.
00:35:49.000 Some MLK Day racism there from Leslie Jones, who is, again, I'm confused why anyone finds her funny, but this is what wokeness amounts to.
00:35:56.000 What wokeness amounts to is if you're not part of the in-group, you don't get to talk.
00:35:59.000 And if you are part of the in-group, you can say whatever the hell you want, no matter how false it is.
00:36:02.000 We'll get to that in just one moment.
00:36:04.000 First, it's been a rough ride if you own a business over the past several years.
00:36:07.000 You had COVID-19, which probably destroyed your business, and then you were somehow able to survive, and then you got hit with Bidenflation, and now you're gonna be hit with stagnation.
00:36:14.000 Well, what if you overpaid your taxes over the past couple years and you could claw some of that back?
00:36:18.000 That is a possibility, and this is why you should contact my friends over at Innovation Refunds.
00:36:21.000 If your business Has five or more employees and managed to survive COVID.
00:36:24.000 You could be eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of up to 26 grand per employee.
00:36:28.000 It's not a loan.
00:36:29.000 It's a refund on your taxes.
00:36:29.000 There's no payback.
00:36:31.000 The challenge is how do you get your hands on it?
00:36:32.000 How do you cut through the red tape and get your business the refund money?
00:36:35.000 Head on over to getrefunds.com.
00:36:36.000 Their team of tax attorneys are highly trained in this little known payroll tax refund program.
00:36:40.000 They've already returned a billion dollars to businesses.
00:36:42.000 They can help you as well.
00:36:43.000 They do all the work, no charge upfront, simply share a percentage of the cash they get for you.
00:36:47.000 Businesses of all types can qualify, including those who took PPP, nonprofits, even those who had increases in sales.
00:36:52.000 Just go to GetRefunds.com, click on Qualify Me, answer a few quick questions to get started.
00:36:56.000 This payroll tax refund is only available for a limited amount of time, so you don't want to miss out.
00:37:00.000 Head on over to GetRefunds.com.
00:37:01.000 Again, that's G-E-T-R-E-F-U-N-D-S.com.
00:37:05.000 GetRefunds.com.
00:37:07.000 And see if maybe you can get some money back.
00:37:08.000 You shouldn't have paid to the government in the first place.
00:37:09.000 GetRefunds.com.
00:37:11.000 Also, you may have noticed that the government jacks around the interest rates.
00:37:15.000 It jacks around bond sales.
00:37:17.000 It jacks around the currency on a routine basis.
00:37:19.000 Maybe you wish to insulate yourself against all of that screwing around with the economy by the Federal Reserve, by the Treasury Department, by whichever administration is in power.
00:37:26.000 This is why you should insulate yourself at least a little bit by buying into precious metals.
00:37:29.000 And that's what the folks over at Birchgold can do for you.
00:37:31.000 Over 5,000 years, gold has withstood inflation, geopolitical turmoil, and stock market crashes.
00:37:36.000 Now you can own gold in a tax shelter retirement account.
00:37:38.000 Birch Gold makes it super easy to convert an IRA or 401k into an IRA in precious metals.
00:37:42.000 Text Ben to 989898.
00:37:44.000 Claim your free info kit on gold.
00:37:46.000 Then talk to one of their precious metal specialists.
00:37:48.000 When you purchase From Birch Gold by January 31st, you'll get a signed copy of my book, How to Destroy America in Three Easy Steps, which seems more and more like an actual playbook for the left these days.
00:37:57.000 With an A-plus rating, with the Better Business Bureau, thousands of happy customers, and countless five-star reviews, you can trust Birch Gold to help protect your savings.
00:38:03.000 I bought gold because I was tired of my money being impacted by dumb decisions made by our leaders over in Washington.
00:38:08.000 Well, if you want to be more like me, text Ben to 989898, claim that free information kit, get a signed copy of my book today.
00:38:14.000 That's Ben to 989898 to get started with my friends at Birch Gold.
00:38:16.000 Also, Folks, this month we are celebrating the anniversary of one of the great moments in Daily Wire history.
00:38:22.000 After months of us leading the legal battle against the federal government and a national Do Not Comply campaign, the Supreme Court ruled in our favor and blocked the Biden administration's outrageous VAX mandate.
00:38:31.000 That mandate would have set an incredibly dangerous precedent.
00:38:33.000 It would have given OSHA The power to basically force you to vaccinate was insane.
00:38:38.000 The Supreme Court recognized it was a gross power grab and struck it down.
00:38:41.000 We were proud to lead that fight.
00:38:43.000 We're the only major media corporation to lead that fight.
00:38:46.000 Thousands of you joined the Daily Wire.
00:38:47.000 Over a million Americans signed our petition against the mandates to celebrate.
00:38:50.000 We're offering 40% off our annual memberships with the code DO NOT COMPLY.
00:38:54.000 Obviously, it meant a lot to me on a personal level.
00:38:56.000 To do this, we as a company made this decision that we were going to stand up for our own employees and their right to decide whether or not they wish to vaccinate.
00:39:03.000 And not just our own employees, risking tens of millions of dollars in fines, but also employees all over the world.
00:39:08.000 So, celebrate one of the greatest moments in DailyWire history with 40% off on your annual membership.
00:39:13.000 Join now at dailywire.com slash subscribe.
00:39:15.000 Join the winning team as we continue to crush the left.
00:39:17.000 Remember, do not comply for 40% off.
00:39:19.000 Code, do not comply.
00:39:21.000 Okay, so, and the rule for the left is that if you're a member of an approved group, you get to say whatever you want, even if it's...
00:39:26.000 Abjectly untrue.
00:39:27.000 So Joy Reid on MSNBC doing that sort of work with Nikole Hannah-Jones yesterday.
00:39:31.000 So Nikole Hannah-Jones is the most overpaid and overestimated intellect of our time.
00:39:36.000 She was on with Joy Reid, another overpaid intellect.
00:39:39.000 And Joy Reid said, what's it like to be a truth teller?
00:39:44.000 If by truth teller you mean a repeatedly debunked falsifier of history, sure.
00:39:49.000 But Nikole Hannah-Jones is one of the specials, so she gets to say whatever the hell she wants.
00:39:54.000 There has been a resistance to what you have brought to the table, which is truth and telling the truth about this country, which for a lot of people is more than they can bear.
00:40:02.000 So I want you to just talk a little bit about what it's been like to experience being a truth teller in the way you've been with the 1619 Project and what you've received in return.
00:40:13.000 I am a truth teller and you are a truth teller and together we are truth tellers who lie all the time.
00:40:17.000 This is the problem with people who claim that they have an absolute monopoly on truth.
00:40:21.000 especially when they're lying, is they then seek to set standards for everybody else.
00:40:25.000 Which is why, over at Davos, back to the World Economic Forum, the UN Secretary General is now claiming that social media has to be held accountable for false information. And again, this is an element of control. If you're a member of a particular group, you can say whatever you want. Or if you have a message that is approved by the global elitist, then you can say whatever you want. Otherwise, you know, we're going to hold you accountable. In social media, there is no responsibility. And I can understand the argument of social media platforms saying,
00:40:52.000 well, this is put by people, so it's not our responsibility.
00:40:56.000 But the truth is that the algorithms are made in such a way that they amplify, in a preferential way, a certain number of things.
00:41:07.000 And when the algorithm amplifies Then there is, in my opinion, a responsibility and there should be accountability, including through the legal system.
00:41:19.000 That's an amazing thing.
00:41:20.000 He's now saying that all of these platforms should basically be held accountable for quote-unquote amplifying false information.
00:41:24.000 False information is defined by the UN Secretary General.
00:41:27.000 Again, the United Nations is a... is a...
00:41:30.000 Most nicely of international law, a rogues gallery of scum and villainy.
00:41:35.000 And all of this ties into something that my friend, well, I should say my colleague, Michael Moles has uncovered.
00:41:41.000 The safety by design agenda.
00:41:43.000 There's a whole Twitter thread about this that's kind of fascinating.
00:41:45.000 So safety by design might be the biggest tech threat you've never heard of.
00:41:47.000 The World Economic Forum, the Australian government and a radical bureaucrat named Julie Inman Grant are using it to impose their woke ideology onto the internet for everyone worldwide.
00:41:54.000 Here's how.
00:41:55.000 You might remember Julie Grant, the Australian e-safety commissioner from this viral World Economic Forum clip last year in which she proposed a recalibration of free speech.
00:42:02.000 Here's what she had to say last year.
00:42:04.000 We have increasing polarization everywhere.
00:42:07.000 And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be.
00:42:10.000 So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to, you know, to be free from online violence.
00:42:22.000 So, you know, we're going to recalibrate free speech.
00:42:24.000 So she tried that by going up against Microsoft and Adobe and Twitter before Elon Musk took over.
00:42:30.000 And as Michael points out, that went flat.
00:42:31.000 But then she moved over to the Australian government and the World Economic Forum.
00:42:36.000 We have something called the Basic Online Safety Expectations that looks at safety by design and basically says to companies, these are the basic safety standards we expect you to live by.
00:42:44.000 whatever it deems quote unquote harmful.
00:42:46.000 So what exactly does it mean for things to be quote unquote harmful?
00:42:50.000 Well, she explains.
00:42:52.000 We have something called the basic online safety expectations that looks at safety by design and basically says to companies, these are the basic safety standards we expect you to live by.
00:43:01.000 And if you don't, or if we cannot tell that you are enforcing your own, you know, terms of service and standards consistently and fairly, then I can compel transparency reports.
00:43:11.000 So for the first time anywhere in the world, if a person is at a very high threshold because we need to balance freedom of expression and freedom of opinion, you know, it's not just going to be about name calling or even character assassination.
00:43:22.000 This is serious cyber abuse with the intent to harm.
00:43:25.000 So we are drawing that line.
00:43:26.000 You see a lot of companies saying, well, how do you even tell what's harmful?
00:43:28.000 Well, we have to investigate every report that comes into us and and look at all the facts.
00:43:33.000 And is it menacing, harassing and offensive in every case?
00:43:36.000 And is there serious intent to cause harm?
00:43:38.000 OK, but how do you evaluate all of that?
00:43:40.000 So as Michael points out, safety by design is the notion that government regulators cannot possibly keep up with innovation.
00:43:45.000 So left wing regulatory preferences need to be built into the tech.
00:43:48.000 In order to operate in Australia and many more countries soon, if the WEF has its way, a company would have to abide by these basic online safety expectations and lean into the safety pushed by the eSafety Commissioner and the WEF.
00:44:00.000 So what exactly does the eSafety website say would fall under banned speech, quote-unquote hate speech, individual identity attacks, disinformation and misinformation, and conspiracy content?
00:44:10.000 This is the stuff that they want these companies to suppress.
00:44:13.000 So again, the idea is that anything they deem to be bad information must be suppressed.
00:44:16.000 This is the plan.
00:44:18.000 And we've seen how that plays out.
00:44:19.000 Reason.com has a fascinating piece today, going through a bunch of emails that they have now uncovered via the CDC, and how the CDC was essentially controlling what you could see on Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic.
00:44:32.000 Quote, according to a trove of confidential documents obtained by Reason, health advisors at the CDC had significant input on pandemic era social media policies at Facebook.
00:44:40.000 They were consulted frequently, at times daily.
00:44:42.000 They were actively involved in the affairs of content moderators, providing constant and ever-evolving guidance.
00:44:47.000 They requested frequent updates about which topics were trending on the platforms.
00:44:50.000 They recommended what kinds of content should be deemed false or misleading.
00:44:53.000 Here are two issues we are seeing a great deal of misinfo on.
00:44:56.000 We wanted to flag for you all, reads one note from a CDC official.
00:44:58.000 Another email with sample Facebook posts attached begins, be on the lookout for a small but growing area of misinformation.
00:45:04.000 The Facebook files show the platform responded with incredible deference.
00:45:07.000 Facebook routinely asked the government to vet specific claims, including whether the virus was quote, man-made rather than zoonotic in origin.
00:45:14.000 In other emails, Facebook asked the government, for each of the following claims, which we've recently identified on the platform, can you tell us if the claim is false?
00:45:20.000 And if believed, could it contribute to vaccine refusal?
00:45:23.000 The platforms may have thought they had little choice but to please the CDC, which of course is exactly right.
00:45:29.000 Again, the idea here is what is called jawboning.
00:45:31.000 This is where the government essentially tries to push private entities into doing their dirty work.
00:45:37.000 And that's what happened over at Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic.
00:45:43.000 So, as Robbie Sov writes, this has been the case throughout the pandemic.
00:45:47.000 With encouragement from government health advisors, congressional leaders, and White House officials, including Joe Biden, multiple social media companies have suppressed content that clashes with the administration's preferred narratives.
00:45:57.000 This has been the repeated process.
00:46:00.000 People who have been silenced just because the government says that they ought to be silenced.
00:46:04.000 And then as long as it's a private company doing the silencing, then it's presumably okay.
00:46:09.000 Top-down control is the true enemy of the people, is this sort of top-down control.
00:46:13.000 Obviously.
00:46:15.000 It's truly dangerous, dangerous stuff.
00:46:18.000 Okay, meanwhile, I would just like to take a moment, speaking of big tech and its suppression of free speech, take one moment to comment on a controversy that has broken out because my friend, Steven Crowder, I've been friends with Steven for a long time, like well over a decade.
00:46:34.000 I was his lawyer when he first signed a contract with Fox and I've been friendly for a very long time.
00:46:38.000 He put out a video essentially accusing Daily Wire of being in league with big tech.
00:46:43.000 He's accusing us of being in league with big tech because of a term sheet, a negotiable term sheet that we submitted to him that offered to pay him $50 million over four years.
00:46:52.000 And, um, and included provisions that said that if he got booted from arenas that would lose him ad dollars, since we would also lose the ad dollars, then he would lose money as well.
00:47:03.000 This is typically how contracts work.
00:47:06.000 If his show were to start losing money, this is true of my show, if I, if my show loses money and it loses the daily wire money, I lose money.
00:47:12.000 So if Stephen had come to work at Daily Wire Plus, it would have been precisely the same thing.
00:47:16.000 That if he had lost money in the ad space, and his show had lost money, then he also would have lost money because that's how a joint venture works.
00:47:23.000 Stephen interpreted that as somehow, misinterpreted, I'll give it the best possible gloss, he somehow misinterpreted that as us attempting to quote-unquote do the work of YouTube.
00:47:33.000 No.
00:47:35.000 No.
00:47:36.000 If you want more on that, then you should check out my friend and co-founder Jeremy Boring's 55-minute video going through every single word of the term sheet that Stephen selectively read on his own YouTube channel.
00:47:49.000 He read certain parts.
00:47:50.000 He didn't read other parts.
00:47:51.000 Jeremy reads literally word for word the entire term sheet and explains every single term therein.
00:47:55.000 I think it is well worth the watch.
00:47:57.000 We should all be on the same side of this thing.
00:47:59.000 I'm encouraging you that you should go subscribe to Stephen's Mug Club.
00:48:02.000 I hope that he's very successful in whatever endeavor he chooses to pursue.
00:48:06.000 That does not mean that he happens to be correct about the term sheet we submitted to him, and there is something rather nasty about attacking people who have been friends for over a decade, colleagues, defenders, for over a decade, on the basis of your own misinterpretation of a document that offers you $50 million over the course of four years.
00:48:25.000 Alrighty guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now.
00:48:26.000 You're not going to want to miss it.
00:48:27.000 We will be getting into Joe Biden and serious corruption concerns at the Penn Biden Center for receiving Chinese money.
00:48:33.000 We will also get to George Santos.
00:48:35.000 He's, if that's his real name, he's that congressperson from New York who it turns out was, I guess, a Brazilian drag queen at one point.
00:48:42.000 Yeah, things are getting weird.
00:48:43.000 If you're not a member, become a member and use code Shapiro.
00:48:45.000 Check out for two months free on all annual plans.