The Ben Shapiro Show - September 22, 2026


I Don't Care If The Trump Administration "Banned" CNN

Hosted by
Mentioned
The Fed Just Raised Rates. Here's What It Means for You.

Episode Stats


Length

34 minutes

Words per minute

200.14

Word count

6,858

Sentence count

509

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Okay, so President Trump just banned CNN, Politico, and MS Now from the White House.
00:00:05.000 And I could not care less.
00:00:07.000 Why? 0.98
00:00:08.000 Well, because for decades, Democratic White Houses have worked hand in glove with compliant media while targeting right wing media.
00:00:14.000 And nobody said a word because, you know, they were polite about it.
00:00:17.000 They checked all of the proper boxes.
00:00:20.000 Well, President Trump doesn't do quiet and he doesn't check boxes.
00:00:23.000 He just does the thing out loud.
00:00:26.000 Is it ideal?
00:00:26.000 Not really.
00:00:27.000 We've been way past ideal, however, for a long time now.
00:00:30.000 I'll explain it all in just a moment.
00:00:32.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:40.000 Okay, so on Friday, President Trump put out a statement on Truth Social in which he said he was essentially banning CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House.
00:00:47.000 Here's what he said I'm proud to announce that, effective immediately, I'm banning fake news CNN, MS Now, who recently changed their name from MSNBC due to lack of viewership and credibility, and Politico, the recipients of an illegal and ridiculous $8 million subscription in all time record directly from the U.S. government under crooked Joe Biden in order to keep them alive.
00:01:06.000 Seems like corruption to me from the White House as a result of their constant reporting fake news.
00:01:11.000 Media outlets shouldn't be able to constantly write or report fiction and lies when they're covering the president of the United States, the Trump administration, or the United States of America.
00:01:18.000 Other fake news media outlets to follow.
00:01:20.000 Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump.
00:01:23.000 All right.
00:01:24.000 So, what access did the administration actually pull?
00:01:26.000 Let's start with that.
00:01:28.000 Well, they're not like going to the CNN headquarters and just pulling the plug or occupying the building over at MS Now or something.
00:01:35.000 Here's what they actually did they deactivated the press badges from entry to the White House.
00:01:40.000 If you had a press badge from MS Now, they pulled your press badge that included the briefing and workspaces in the lower press offices.
00:01:46.000 In the White House, just like a press office in the White House where some of the journalists and pseudo journalists work.
00:01:50.000 Outlets were also removed from the presidential press pool.
00:01:53.000 Okay, that is where basically there's essentially one stringer who works for all of these outlets and then puts a microphone and a camera aimed at the president.
00:02:02.000 And then all of these various outlets share the feed.
00:02:06.000 And that's basically what was happening here.
00:02:07.000 So let's start at the very beginning here.
00:02:10.000 This is not exactly a ban on press, it certainly doesn't violate the Constitution.
00:02:15.000 There's no institution called the press that gets special rights in America.
00:02:19.000 We all, as American citizens, have the same rights.
00:02:21.000 I'm going to read you the First Amendment because people never refer back to the text when they talk about this stuff.
00:02:26.000 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
00:02:38.000 Okay, so again, Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press.
00:02:43.000 You want to know what that means?
00:02:44.000 That means the government can't shut down press outlets, it can't censor press outlets.
00:02:49.000 This does not mean that if you label yourself a member of the press, As sort of a vocation, then you get to waltz into the White House and sit down and ask the president questions or the press secretary questions.
00:03:01.000 So, in other words, the First Amendment protects acts of journalism just as it protects acts of free speech and acts of free exercise of religion.
00:03:07.000 There are institutions that embody those acts.
00:03:09.000 So, for example, the government shouldn't shut down churches because it embodies free exercise of religion, and the government should not shut down newspapers because that embodies freedom of the press.
00:03:18.000 But there is no special class of individuals who get special protections under the law.
00:03:23.000 Like if you wear a journalist badge around, you don't get magical special.
00:03:26.000 Protections and privileges.
00:03:28.000 But journalists have decided that they get these special protections and special privileges.
00:03:33.000 That's wrong.
00:03:35.000 Now, let's start again at the beginning here.
00:03:37.000 Let's talk about the role of the press in America and how the press perceive themselves, because that disconnect between how the press perceive themselves now and how the press really operate is the big disconnect.
00:03:48.000 There's a gigantic lie about journalism in America that has prevailed for some decades in the United States.
00:03:53.000 That lie is that journalism is the exercise of an objective search for truth and facts.
00:03:58.000 Rather than what it really always has been, which is the narrative driven uncovering of some truth and some facts.
00:04:04.000 So, our first journalists in the United States were people like James Callender, a political pamphleteer who used to work for Thomas Jefferson, and he worked for the Republicans against the Federalists.
00:04:13.000 He went after George Washington.
00:04:15.000 He went after John Adams.
00:04:16.000 He most famously went after Alexander Hamilton.
00:04:18.000 He's the guy who exposed the affair between Alexander Hamilton and Maria Reynolds.
00:04:23.000 He ended up actually being prosecuted by the Adams administration.
00:04:26.000 And when Jefferson didn't appoint him to a patronage position, he then turned around and targeted Jefferson.
00:04:31.000 He was the first person.
00:04:32.000 To report on Jefferson having an affair with Sally Hemings.
00:04:36.000 Or other journalists.
00:04:37.000 Famous journalists in American history include people like Elijah Lovejoy, abolitionist journalist.
00:04:41.000 Now, again, a journalist who covered news events but was obviously politically motivated.
00:04:46.000 We would all say in the right direction, but certainly politically motivated.
00:04:49.000 He was not objective.
00:04:51.000 He located his abolitionist newspaper in Illinois.
00:04:54.000 His press was actually attacked by a gun wielding mob and he was murdered.
00:04:58.000 Or Fry Horace Greeley.
00:04:59.000 Again, these are some of the most famous names in the history of American journalism, all partisan.
00:05:03.000 He was founder and editor of the New York Tribune.
00:05:06.000 He encouraged Lincoln to emancipate the slaves before Lincoln did so.
00:05:09.000 He actually ended up running for president against Ulysses S. Grant in 1872.
00:05:13.000 He's one who famously told Americans, Go West, young man.
00:05:15.000 Again, very, very partisan.
00:05:18.000 And he moved forward in time to the muckrakers, Ida Tarbell and Upton Sinclair and Ida B. Wells.
00:05:22.000 These are the people who were clearly motivated by economic grievances to target the supposed robber barons for destruction.
00:05:29.000 And they worked hand in hand with the Teddy Roosevelt administration and the Wilson administration later to do all of that. 0.79
00:05:35.000 Or there were yellow journalists like William Randolph Hearst. 0.86
00:05:39.000 Who apocryphally telegraphed regarding the Spanish American War, you furnish the pictures, I'll furnish the war. 0.50
00:05:43.000 So, again, everyone at this point understood journalists are political creatures.
00:05:48.000 They have a narrative and then they search for facts to support that narrative.
00:05:52.000 So, where did this kind of image of journalists as an objective class of expert administrators come from?
00:05:57.000 As usual, from the elite.
00:05:59.000 It took until the early 20th century for journalists to start seeing themselves as a special class with special training and special rights.
00:06:06.000 This is how journalists turned from the guys who were wearing kind of battered hats and walking around in 1930s movies.
00:06:13.000 Digging up the scoops to the people who are graduates of journalism school.
00:06:17.000 So, Joseph Pulitzer in 1912 founds the Columbia School of Journalism to train journalists.
00:06:23.000 And then Walter Lippmann, again, a sort of elite journalist and an elite opinion writer in 1920, he pushed forward the idea of objective journalism.
00:06:31.000 He argued that journalism was a process and that journalists, quote, ought not to be serving a cause no matter how good.
00:06:37.000 Or again, this is where the idea of you have a special group of journalists and they are the objective truth tellers comes from.
00:06:43.000 He said, That the journalist, quote, ought not to be serving a cause no matter how good.
00:06:46.000 In his professional activity, it is no business of his to care whose ox is gored.
00:06:51.000 As the observer of the signs of change, his value to society depends upon the prophetic discrimination with which he selects those signs.
00:06:56.000 Again, it's kind of like a godlike figure sitting above all of the facts and determining the objective truth.
00:07:02.000 And sounds awesome, okay, but was never reality.
00:07:05.000 Journalists were always partisan.
00:07:08.000 It never stopped.
00:07:10.000 It never stopped.
00:07:11.000 Woodward and Bernstein, partisan.
00:07:13.000 Huntley and Brinkley, partisan.
00:07:15.000 Edward Armuro, partisan.
00:07:15.000 Partisan.
00:07:16.000 Walter Cronkite, who basically helped us lose the Vietnam War, partisan.
00:07:21.000 So, why did this myth last so long?
00:07:22.000 Well, first of all, this was an era of high institutional trust and also heavily controlled media distribution mechanism, right?
00:07:29.000 You had three networks on TV for most of this time, and the opinions basically mirrored one another.
00:07:34.000 ABC, CBS, and NBC all had the same elite opinion. 0.66
00:07:37.000 You want to talk about a uniparty?
00:07:38.000 This was the time of a uniparty where there was broad national consensus on a wide variety of issues.
00:07:44.000 This is why the Republican Party.
00:07:45.000 Was maybe slightly to the right of the Democratic Party, but there was huge diversity inside both parties and huge crossover between the parties.
00:07:53.000 And then came the internet, and everybody realized the media weren't objective.
00:07:57.000 They were just on the left.
00:07:58.000 Now, everyone already knew that.
00:08:00.000 They just didn't say it out loud.
00:08:01.000 So, I'll tell you a story.
00:08:02.000 Okay.
00:08:03.000 So, back during the 2012 Republican National Convention, I was wandering, it was called Radio Road.
00:08:07.000 It still exists, which is where all the radio shows line up.
00:08:11.000 And I had a press pass.
00:08:12.000 So, I'm walking around Radio Road, and I see Sam Donaldson.
00:08:14.000 Sam Donaldson was a reporter back in the 1980s for ABC News.
00:08:19.000 And his job was to basically bother Ronald Reagan.
00:08:22.000 He would go into the White House press office or in the press room, and then he would ask badgering questions to Ronald Reagan and his press secretaries.
00:08:30.000 And he was considered, again, an objective journalist.
00:08:32.000 Well, now, as of 2012, Sam Donaldson had this radio show where he would give his take of the day.
00:08:37.000 And his take of the day was reliably of the left.
00:08:39.000 No surprise there.
00:08:40.000 So I walk up to Sam Donaldson, a man who, by the way, had eyebrows that I will say, as a man who's an aficionado of thick eyebrows, Sam Donaldson put me to shame.
00:08:48.000 Anyway, Sam Donaldson is sitting there.
00:08:51.000 And I walk up to him and I say, you know, Mr. Donaldson, I just want to ask you a question.
00:08:55.000 You're obviously quite partisan in your viewpoints.
00:08:57.000 Did you believe the same things when you were objectively journalism over for ABC News during the 1980s?
00:09:02.000 He said, of course.
00:09:04.000 And I said, well, doesn't.
00:09:05.000 That means that you were sort of fibbing to your viewers because obviously all of your questions were from those angles.
00:09:10.000 And he got very grumpy and he said, You think you're better than me?
00:09:14.000 And I said, Well, yeah, I mean, I'm honest about my own biases, not lying to the people who actually watch my content.
00:09:22.000 But the reality is that all the objective journalismers know that they are pursuing a particular political purpose.
00:09:28.000 None of them are doing the Walter Lippmann thing.
00:09:30.000 How many journalists do you believe, actually believe that it is no business of theirs to care whose ox is gored, the way Walter Lippmann said?
00:09:38.000 Do you think that anyone on CNN, any of these objective journalismers, you think that they really believe that they don't care whose ox is Gord?
00:09:44.000 Of course they care whose ox is Gord.
00:09:47.000 So here is the sad reality there is no objective press in the US that asks tough questions of all the parties.
00:09:54.000 No one does that, at least not in the equivalent way.
00:09:57.000 We believe things at the Daily Wire.
00:09:58.000 So we're openly conservative.
00:09:59.000 It's one of the reasons that people trust us.
00:10:01.000 It's one of the reasons that people know that we are who we say we are because we're open about what we are.
00:10:06.000 It's why you subscribe so that we'll go ask the tough questions that you want answered. 0.62
00:10:10.000 We're not going to go ask dumb questions of the Trump administration.
00:10:12.000 We'll ask smart questions of the Trump administration from a particular point of view.
00:10:16.000 We're honest about who we are.
00:10:17.000 You know who's not?
00:10:19.000 CNN, Politico. 0.93
00:10:20.000 I'll give it to MS Now, by the way. 1.00
00:10:21.000 They have the virtue of honesty. 1.00
00:10:22.000 You know when you turn on MS Now, it's going to be a bunch of leftists.
00:10:26.000 Now, White Houses have known all of this forever as well.
00:10:29.000 Forever.
00:10:30.000 GOP White Houses knew the media were opposed to them.
00:10:33.000 Ronald Reagan knew that.
00:10:34.000 George H.W. Bush and George W. both knew that.
00:10:37.000 Meanwhile, Democrats like Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, they knew that overall the legacy media loved them.
00:10:43.000 And let's be real, Democratic White Houses have pretended to abide by objective rules while promoting left wing outlets and denying access to right wing outlets for legitimately my entire lifetime.
00:10:53.000 So, all that Trump did is actually just do the quiet part out loud.
00:10:57.000 As we'll see, we'll talk about the precedent in a second.
00:11:00.000 Left wing White Houses have been going after conservative outlets for quite a while and boosting left wing outlets at the same exact time.
00:11:07.000 They've just been pretending they're neutral while they do it.
00:11:09.000 We'll get to more on this in a moment.
00:11:10.000 First, at a certain point, overpaying, it starts to become a choice, especially when there's a better option sitting right there in front of you.
00:11:16.000 I use PureTalk.
00:11:17.000 I make calls, send texts, watch videos, use unlimited data.
00:11:20.000 The coverage is awesome.
00:11:21.000 This isn't just my experience.
00:11:22.000 In a recent industry survey of more than 120,000 wireless customers, PureTalk was the only wireless company to get five out of five stars in coverage, support, value, and data, every category.
00:11:32.000 Meanwhile, unlimited high speed data is just $34.99 a month.
00:11:35.000 So I'm not sure exactly what it is you're waiting for.
00:11:37.000 Visit puretalk.comslash Shapiro to receive 50% off your initial month.
00:11:42.000 Switch over today.
00:11:43.000 Plus, with unlimited high speed data at only $34.99 per month, the total savings really add up.
00:11:48.000 You don't have to rely solely on my word when more than 120,000 wireless customers agree.
00:11:52.000 But you should, by the way, because I've been using Pure Talk myself for years.
00:11:55.000 The coverage is awesome.
00:11:55.000 It's great.
00:11:56.000 And again, you're not getting charged an arm and a leg.
00:11:58.000 Head on over to puretalk.comslash Shapiro now.
00:12:00.000 Get half off that first month, puretalk.comslash Shapiro.
00:12:04.000 Experience the difference for yourself.
00:12:06.000 That's puretalk.comslash Shapiro to get started right now.
00:12:10.000 So let's start with what Trump did not do here.
00:12:13.000 Okay.
00:12:13.000 He did not make himself inaccessible to media.
00:12:15.000 That's nonsense.
00:12:16.000 He's easily the most accessible president ever.
00:12:19.000 And you know who admits this?
00:12:21.000 The journalismers.
00:12:22.000 Here are Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman talking in June 2026.
00:12:24.000 And they have a best selling book all based on access to the White House, saying that the White House is significantly more accessible under Donald Trump than it was under Joe Biden.
00:12:34.000 But when he has an Oval Office meeting and says, Do you have any questions?
00:12:39.000 You could ask him anything you wanted, correct?
00:12:42.000 If I'm in the pool, which they do.
00:12:43.000 The White House now decides who's in the pool.
00:12:45.000 So, yeah, if I'm selected in the pool, sure.
00:12:49.000 But the composition of the pool has changed from what it used to be.
00:12:53.000 There are more friendly reporters there.
00:12:56.000 It is true.
00:12:57.000 Let me be clear about something.
00:12:59.000 He answers more questions than Joe Biden questions.
00:13:01.000 There's no question.
00:13:02.000 He's more available to questions.
00:13:03.000 I mean, there are reporters in there asking him questions, you know, when they're in the pool.
00:13:07.000 There's no question about that.
00:13:09.000 Again, half the stories that are printed in the press are coming directly from Donald Trump.
00:13:14.000 This is the reality about Trump Trump has a cell phone number.
00:13:16.000 Journalists literally call him up on his cell phone and he picks up.
00:13:20.000 It's wild, but that is a reality.
00:13:22.000 Okay, so what didn't Trump do?
00:13:24.000 He did not stop full access for these places.
00:13:26.000 The idea that they're not going to have any materials report is nonsense.
00:13:29.000 Also, President Trump did not violate the First Amendment, he's not censoring.
00:13:33.000 CNN or censoring Politico.
00:13:35.000 He's not stopping them from printing or even reporting.
00:13:37.000 He just said, You're not coming to the White House.
00:13:39.000 So the White House put out a statement Last week, President Donald J. Trump removed CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House grounds after years of false reporting.
00:13:46.000 The First Amendment protects their right to publish.
00:13:48.000 It does not entitle them to a hard pass briefing room seat or place in the press pool.
00:13:51.000 Access changes are nothing new.
00:13:53.000 What is new, however, is the sudden claim that it becomes sacred only when the outlets are friendly to the radical left.
00:13:58.000 The rule was never every outlet gets in, it was always our side stays in.
00:14:02.000 Okay, that is true.
00:14:03.000 That is true.
00:14:04.000 There are a bunch of outlets that are now in the White House press room that were never there before, including the Daily Wire.
00:14:09.000 We have a reporter, Mary Margaret Olihan, who's in the White House press room.
00:14:13.000 Are we under any illusion that if a Democrat wins in 2029, a reporter from the Daily Wire will be allowed in the White House press room?
00:14:20.000 Or are they just going to come up with some neutral fake reason to boot us out?
00:14:24.000 I think we all know the answer to all of this.
00:14:29.000 And let's be clear Donald Trump's rips on the left wing media, they are largely true.
00:14:33.000 It is just true that CNN and Politico and MSNow are wildly biased.
00:14:37.000 Again, of course, that's true.
00:14:40.000 Now, President Trump put out another one of his statements on Truth Social As expected, fake news CNN and Politico pay back the $8 million contribution made by the U.S. government to keep them afloat.
00:14:49.000 And MSNow, formerly known as MSDNC, have brought suits to gain access to the White House and your president, Meet.
00:14:54.000 They have drawn a great judge for them, a man who ruled in favor of Jim Acosta, who now seems to have disappeared from the planet.
00:14:59.000 The judge's name is Tim Kelly, and he was sadly appointed by Trump.
00:15:02.000 In other words, almost without question and as usual, we'll go for appeal.
00:15:06.000 Because fake news people and publications that only write negatively and who violate our national security by writing false and defamatory stories with unknown sources shouldn't be allowed access to the most important office anywhere in the world.
00:15:16.000 It is called the Oval Office, and it should be treated with decorum, respect, and dignity, not defiled by third-rate clowns who purposefully distort, twist, and degrade with everything they write or publish.
00:15:24.000 Virtually every story about me or anything having to do with me is negative, wrong, and in many cases dangerous for our country.
00:15:29.000 No matter how great my achievements, they trivialize and demean.
00:15:33.000 Fake news is a threat to democracy.
00:15:34.000 I will do whatever is necessary to make sure the USA thrives, make America great again.
00:15:38.000 It's festivous and Trump is airing his grievances.
00:15:41.000 But it is also true that, obviously, these are partisan news outlets.
00:15:46.000 And I'll get some legality of all this in a moment, because, again, that's a little bit less with the administration.
00:15:52.000 But here is the vice president explaining all the news that they cover is negative, which, of course, this is true.
00:15:57.000 I mean, this is just inarguably true.
00:15:59.000 I take some issue with the premise.
00:16:01.000 So he's not banning media outlets.
00:16:02.000 What he's doing is saying, we're not going to give you special access to the White House if you engage in what is effectively propaganda.
00:16:08.000 We have to remember those three outlets account for.
00:16:11.000 About 92% of the stories that they have on the President of the United States, on the administration, are negative.
00:16:17.000 That's not representative of the American people.
00:16:18.000 It's not representative of public opinion.
00:16:20.000 So, if you're going to engage in what is effectively far left propaganda, why would a Republican White House give you special access?
00:16:28.000 Okay, now, again, the idea here is not that these outlets are being shut down.
00:16:32.000 They're not being shut down.
00:16:34.000 When the administration says, by the way, that CNN is quote unquote fake news, it is obviously true that every error at CNN moves in the same direction.
00:16:42.000 All outlets make errors and all outlets correct their errors, but every single error at CNN moves in the same direction.
00:16:49.000 And some of these have been pretty egregious.
00:16:51.000 I mean, go back to the five year old clinging to his father during the ICE arrest.
00:16:55.000 The CNN headline about all of that.
00:16:59.000 Or the report that Hegsteth was going to kill everybody, that he said to kill everybody, which it turns out there was no support for.
00:17:06.000 Or MS Now's headline saying that Israel was starving Gaza and the U.S. was complicit.
00:17:10.000 And then they put up a photo of a Gazan baby with a genetic disorder, making it look as though the effects of starvation in Gaza, which by the way did not happen, it did not, there was no mass starvation in Gaza.
00:17:20.000 It is just a lie.
00:17:21.000 It was always a lie.
00:17:22.000 There are no statistics to back it.
00:17:24.000 It is not true.
00:17:25.000 Every prediction made about starvation in Gaza was a lie.
00:17:28.000 Israel shipped in more food to a wartime population than any population any time in the history of warfare.
00:17:34.000 It was reported by the media as a starvation campaign because, again, fake news.
00:17:38.000 CNN putting out headlines about Harris was never made Biden's border czar, or we may never know what happened to Jussie Smollett, or Politico suggesting that Elon Musk could put up a Nazi salute.
00:17:51.000 So, again, all the errors always move in the same exact direction.
00:17:55.000 And so, yes, these are all left wing outlets.
00:17:57.000 And yes, the Trump administration is just stripping off the mask because we'll explore in a moment.
00:18:01.000 Democrats have done the exact same stuff.
00:18:03.000 They just pretend it's neutral when they do it.
00:18:05.000 They use all the niceties and they check all the boxes, and President Trump doesn't do niceties and he doesn't do boxes.
00:18:10.000 He just says out loud, I don't like these outlets.
00:18:11.000 So they're gone.
00:18:12.000 They're fake news, and then just kicks them out.
00:18:15.000 But the reality is, again, Democratic White Houses have been doing this for literally decades while pretending that they are, in fact, not doing it.
00:18:21.000 Now, the media themselves love this stuff because now they get to play the righteously indignant members of the press.
00:18:29.000 We have been insulted, or our journalism has been insulted.
00:18:34.000 Oh.
00:18:35.000 Okay, guys, I'm sorry.
00:18:37.000 No one believes you.
00:18:38.000 No one. 0.75
00:18:39.000 Your approval ratings with the American public are worse than cancer.
00:18:42.000 Truly, like the last approval ratings, the trust ratings for the American media are in the 20s.
00:18:47.000 It's worse than certain forms of cancer.
00:18:49.000 Okay, so the joint statement from CNN, MS Now, and Politico This morning, we notified the government we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights.
00:18:58.000 Again, there is no First Amendment right to go to the White House press office.
00:19:02.000 There just isn't.
00:19:02.000 You can't do it.
00:19:03.000 You have to be granted a special press pass.
00:19:03.000 I can't do it.
00:19:05.000 And defend the principle government does not decide what the press reports or publishes.
00:19:09.000 Now, again, They are not deciding what the press reports or publishes.
00:19:11.000 You can publish whatever you want.
00:19:13.000 You just can't go to the White House.
00:19:14.000 Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalist credentials because it objected to our reporting.
00:19:19.000 Left unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the public's right to independent journalism free from government interference.
00:19:25.000 Does it, though?
00:19:25.000 Does it?
00:19:26.000 I mean, that's the real question.
00:19:28.000 I mean, because you know what wouldn't have violated their press freedom?
00:19:31.000 Let's say that the White House has simply said, you guys can all still come.
00:19:34.000 You can come to the press room.
00:19:35.000 We just won't answer any of your questions.
00:19:37.000 So every single time you come to the press, Room, we just ignore you.
00:19:41.000 No questions from CNN, none from MS Now, none from Politico.
00:19:44.000 Could they sue?
00:19:45.000 Do they have a right to ask questions?
00:19:47.000 Like, how far do these supposed rights go?
00:19:50.000 The answer is, in reality, not very far.
00:19:53.000 As we'll explore, courts have come up with kind of a bizarre framework for how to adjudicate all of this.
00:19:59.000 But now the television networks have decided to suspend coverage of President Trump after these bans.
00:20:05.000 We'll get to more on that in just one moment.
00:20:07.000 First, central banks, not exactly known for impulse purchases.
00:20:10.000 Nobody accidentally adds 289 tons of gold to the shopping cart.
00:20:14.000 That is how much gold central banks around the world bought last quarter.
00:20:17.000 That is a record amount.
00:20:18.000 It's a 62% increase year over year because people are worried about inflation and government debt and all the rest.
00:20:23.000 Gold has now overtaken U.S. Treasuries as the top global reserve asset.
00:20:27.000 So while governments publicly insist everything is under control, they're privately moving enormous amounts of money into an asset that governments can't manufacture and they can't manipulate.
00:20:35.000 Washington can add another trillion dollars to the national debt and the Fed can just print more currency, but nobody can print more gold at a press conference, which is why I recommend Golden Crest Metals.
00:20:44.000 They offer widely recognized, highly liquid gold and silver, not overpriced collector coins that can be difficult to resell.
00:20:50.000 You know, the ones that say, you know, it's a It's a special presidential special, and then it's a print of something you can't get rid of it.
00:20:54.000 Instead, with Golden Crest, you're going to get transparent pricing, zero buyback fees, and a real person when you call.
00:20:59.000 Right now, get a free 2026 info kit or free portfolio review, plus up to 25 grand in free silver on qualifying purchases.
00:21:06.000 Call 888 429 3999.
00:21:08.000 Text Ben to Metals at 638 257 or head on over to goldencrestmetals.comslash Ben.
00:21:14.000 Apparently, the central banks have already gotten the memo.
00:21:17.000 According to the Wall Street Journal, Brian Boughton, the Washington Bureau chief at Fox News, is joining them.
00:21:22.000 Now, again, Fox News is doing this to preserve, I assume, Their own press spot if a Democrat becomes president.
00:21:27.000 They said effective today, the TV pool will not be covering events designated as pool coverage of the president.
00:21:32.000 This follows the White House's position preventing CNN from assigning its fulfilled duties.
00:21:38.000 Now, again, the press pool is not, you know, the press room.
00:21:41.000 The press pool is basically a rotation of reporters and videographers and such that cover the president when he travels, and then everybody uses the press pool reports in order to report off of.
00:21:53.000 White House television pool members Fox News, ABC News, CBS News, CNN, and NBC News said in a statement.
00:21:58.000 The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government.
00:22:02.000 No administration should restrict a news organization because it objects to its reporting.
00:22:06.000 Okay, so there are still outlets like Real America's Voice, which is scheduled to travel with the president to New York ahead of the UN General Assembly.
00:22:15.000 So it's not as though there will be no coverage.
00:22:16.000 There will be coverage.
00:22:18.000 And again, all of these self righteous outlets, including ones that have not been banned, by the way, are out there talking about how important they are, grasping their paroles.
00:22:27.000 The Atlantic put out a statement.
00:22:28.000 The Trump administration's decision to ban three news organizations from the White House represents a weak attempt to influence coverage of the presidency and is an outrageous attack on press freedom.
00:22:38.000 The Atlantic has demonstrated for nearly 170 years we are committed to values of democracy, accountability, and transparency.
00:22:45.000 Are you, though?
00:22:45.000 Is that what you've demonstrated for 170 years, The Atlantic?
00:22:48.000 Your current editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was a stenographer for Barack Obama.
00:22:52.000 Legitimately, a stenographer just reflected whatever Barack Obama wanted to tell him or whatever Ben Rhodes was selling that day.
00:22:59.000 Now, of course, Barack Obama himself is speaking out about all this.
00:23:02.000 Here he was Friday at Colgate University.
00:23:04.000 President Obama said it's unimaginable what Trump is doing.
00:23:07.000 It's totally unimaginable, as we'll talk about in a second.
00:23:09.000 It is not only not unimaginable, it has happened before many, many, many times under both Obama and Biden.
00:23:15.000 I believe there was just an announcement that the White House decided.
00:23:20.000 You know what?
00:23:21.000 CNN, MSN, MSNow, maybe the New York Times was included.
00:23:29.000 You just can't come to. The White House press briefings anymore because you're giving the current president unfavorable coverage.
00:23:39.000 I'm trying to think what would have happened if I had said, you know what, Fox News, you're out of here.
00:23:46.000 It's unimaginable.
00:23:48.000 Is it unimaginable, actually?
00:23:51.000 So in 2009, one Barack Obama branded Fox News a quote, research and communications arm of the GOP and barred Fox from Sunday show interviews with anyone in the administration.
00:24:02.000 All the agencies were instructed to skip Fox reporters in the pool coverage.
00:24:05.000 So, again, what I suggested before do you have a right to ask questions of the administration?
00:24:09.000 According to Barack Obama, no.
00:24:10.000 So, as long as we just let you into the White House press room, you've fulfilled what you needed to do.
00:24:15.000 But you can just skip over all Fox News correspondents, never allow them to ask a question, and never allow anyone from your administration to speak with them, and that's totally fine.
00:24:24.000 Again, as long as you do the niceties, then everyone will pretend that it's totally fine.
00:24:29.000 In 2010, Obama went further.
00:24:31.000 He labeled Fox correspondent James Rosen a possible co conspirator in a criminal leak.
00:24:35.000 And then the administration, according to CBS, secretly monitored his emails and phone calls, according to court documents released three years later.
00:24:43.000 In 2011, Barack Obama restricted the Boston Herald because the paper ran a front page Romney op ed, and officials wrote the press pool slots depended on covering Obama fairly.
00:24:52.000 That was in 2011.
00:24:54.000 Same year, a San Francisco Chronicle reporter recorded protesters interrupting an Obama fundraiser.
00:24:59.000 The Obama White House threatened to strip their access and retaliate if the incident was reported on.
00:25:03.000 Same year, the media was blocked from an event with the Freedom of Information Day conference, where Obama was privately given an award by transparency advocates, according to Forbes.
00:25:11.000 In 2012, the Obama administration Sees two months of phone records from 20 plus AP journalists in a probe about leaked information.
00:25:18.000 In 2013, 40 outlets, including the White House Correspondents Association, accused the Obama administration of limiting access to photojournalists while allowing free reign to the White House's photographers.
00:25:29.000 Actually, the White House basically attempted to set up its own social media channel where all photos would come via the Obama administration.
00:25:35.000 And it was not unique to Obama.
00:25:36.000 This is why, again, all of your outrage and your umbrage, I don't believe you.
00:25:40.000 I don't believe you for one half a second.
00:25:41.000 It's just that Trump does the quiet part out loud, and you guys already did it.
00:25:45.000 As ever and always, Donald Trump is very rarely the murderer.
00:25:50.000 He is almost always the coroner.
00:25:51.000 He is just noting out loud what everyone has known for decades.
00:25:55.000 The Biden administration was even worse.
00:25:57.000 In 2023, Joe Biden restricted more than 440 reporters from White House access after they revised their credentialing process.
00:26:05.000 In 2023, Biden banned the New York Post reporters from Joe Biden's Only Daytime event because the Post correctly reported on Hunter Biden and his Hunter Biden laptop.
00:26:17.000 In their coverage of China and Ukraine.
00:26:19.000 And you'll recall that in April 2023, caught on tape, members of the press had pre submitted their questions to the administration with the pictures of the reporter so that Joe Biden knew precisely what was going to be asked.
00:26:32.000 So we're doing like full scale coordination between these supposed objective journalists who don't care whose ox is gored and the Biden White House.
00:26:40.000 Remember this?
00:26:41.000 President Biden was photographed holding a cheat sheet during his press conference yesterday.
00:26:48.000 It has a photo of Los Angeles Times reporter Courtney Subramanian, along with a pronunciation of her name.
00:26:54.000 But there's more.
00:26:55.000 The card also includes her question.
00:26:58.000 You can also see someone's handwriting telling the president that she will ask the first question.
00:27:07.000 Again, unbelievable.
00:27:10.000 And all of that was just the way things worked.
00:27:13.000 That's the way things worked.
00:27:13.000 And so, again, your objective journalism press missed, they totally missed the actual stories.
00:27:20.000 For the last eight years in the country, minimum.
00:27:23.000 They totally missed BLM.
00:27:24.000 They totally missed COVID.
00:27:27.000 They totally missed Joe Biden being senile and obscured it.
00:27:30.000 And we're supposed to believe that these are the fighters for your freedom.
00:27:33.000 These are the people where if they don't get White House press pool access, then suddenly we have all been wronged.
00:27:40.000 Again, Democrats are fine with regulating media.
00:27:43.000 They would love to regulate media, like truly regulate it, like actually stop outlets from publishing.
00:27:48.000 And here was Senator Chris Murphy suggesting the government should regulate social media.
00:27:52.000 Outright said outlets he doesn't like will just be like actually banned.
00:27:55.000 Okay, that's a different thing.
00:27:56.000 That's way worse than anything that Trump is doing.
00:27:59.000 Trump is not talking about actually shutting down CNN.
00:28:02.000 Chris Murphy is actively talking about shutting down outlets he does not like via social media regulation.
00:28:08.000 So, government should build a set of rules in which people feel more powerful.
00:28:13.000 That's why the minimum wage is so important, and people feel so more connected.
00:28:18.000 That's why rebuilding healthy institutions in your town should be a project that government is involved in.
00:28:25.000 That's why regulating the internet so that you're spending less time alone on Instagram should be an important government project.
00:28:31.000 And if people are feeling more powerful and less lonely, then they are going to be less likely to fall for a bull demagogue like Donald Trump.
00:28:40.000 Regulate social media so that you won't fall for Donald Trump.
00:28:45.000 The Democrats have always been in favor of this sort of regulation.
00:28:47.000 Let us be clear.
00:28:48.000 We've experienced this at Daily Wire.
00:28:50.000 We've experienced this.
00:28:51.000 Okay, the combined focus of the media, people at the New York Times, people at CNN, people who actively spent their days about a decade ago going after the Daily Wire for being successful on Facebook, the combined pressure from the White House and from those institutional outlets caused Facebook to literally shut down their entire political algorithm just to prevent criticism of Facebook.
00:29:14.000 For dissemination of journalistic information that the left didn't like, they tried to destroy our business by going after the social media companies through a form of soft censorship.
00:29:25.000 Okay, that's what they actually tried to do.
00:29:26.000 So, am I going to cry for them right now?
00:29:29.000 Am I going to cry for CNN and Politico and MSNOW because they don't get to go to the vaunted White House press office?
00:29:35.000 Let's just be clear.
00:29:36.000 Very few actual headlines break from there.
00:29:38.000 It's all leaks anyway.
00:29:40.000 But, am I going to weep for them?
00:29:42.000 Not one single solitary moment, not for a single solitary moment.
00:29:48.000 So, again, all Trump is doing here is the quiet part out loud.
00:29:50.000 Now, is it going to be upheld in court?
00:29:52.000 Probably it'll end up being stopped because the courts have their own bizarre standards.
00:29:55.000 So, back in 1977, there was a decision called Sherrill versus Knight from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.
00:30:01.000 And they held that Robert Sherrill, who was a correspondent for the left wing news outlet The Nation, was denied a White House press pass after the Secret Service actually investigated him.
00:30:10.000 They said that for security reasons, he was denied the press pass.
00:30:13.000 And the DC Circuit held the First Amendment does not give every reporter an absolute right to enter the White House.
00:30:18.000 Once the government establishes press facilities and makes them available to journalists, you can't deny access arbitrarily or for less than compelling reasons.
00:30:26.000 So, the idea is that if you check the box, if you come up with some neutral criteria for banning CNN, MSNBC, whatever, then you could do it.
00:30:34.000 But if you just say, I don't like them, I'm banning them, then you can't do it.
00:30:37.000 Now, again, I think that this is a nonsense decision.
00:30:41.000 I do, because I think it all amounts to the same thing.
00:30:43.000 I promise you, I promise you, if a Democrat wins office in 2028, they will come up with some nonsense way to ban all the allies that are currently sitting in the White House.
00:30:52.000 Press room right now, including the Daily Wire.
00:30:54.000 They will do that.
00:30:55.000 And then the entire press that is going insane right now will pretend that that's just neutrality.
00:31:01.000 That's just neutrality.
00:31:02.000 When Daily Wire gets banned from the White House press office and when it gets replaced by MS Now, they will claim that that's just neutrality at work.
00:31:11.000 And we'll all know that isn't true.
00:31:13.000 Because again, the complicity is in the fake neutrality.
00:31:18.000 So, no, I'm not going to play this game with them.
00:31:21.000 I'm not going to play this game.
00:31:22.000 Now, Trump.
00:31:23.000 Isn't really playing a game.
00:31:24.000 He's just doing what he wants to do pretty overtly.
00:31:26.000 Now, is that smart?
00:31:27.000 Well, again, I think they should have thought out how they rolled this out a little bit better if they were going to do it.
00:31:31.000 The press can fight back, and they did yesterday.
00:31:33.000 So, yesterday, President Trump was doing a presser, and the press pool just decided to absent itself.
00:31:39.000 And so he started talking, and essentially, there was no one there to cover it.
00:31:44.000 So, all it came out, it sounded like Charlie Brown's teacher.
00:31:53.000 Yeah, there.
00:32:02.000 But again, as for the outlandish alarmism, death of the free press, death of the First Amendment.
00:32:06.000 Who will cover the president now?
00:32:07.000 This is outlandish alarmism.
00:32:09.000 The American people don't really care about this.
00:32:11.000 No one really should care about this.
00:32:12.000 This is not the end of democracy or anything like that.
00:32:15.000 It is just a recognition of a reality that pre existed Trump.
00:32:18.000 Okay, now, by the way, it is likely this will be adjudicated in court, according to our friends and sponsors over at CalSheet at the CalSheet Market, on when the White House will announce an end to its press ban.
00:32:29.000 So before October 1st, 2026, people are saying 21% chance.
00:32:34.000 Before November, 56% chance.
00:32:37.000 So, again, people think that it's going to get adjudicated in court.
00:32:39.000 All right.
00:32:40.000 The biggest problem for the press is not President Trump.
00:32:43.000 Honestly, he's kind of their market solution given the fact that when they cover him, their ratings go up.
00:32:47.000 The biggest problem for the press is that they have been lying for literally decades that they are objective journalismers when they all have a narrative to push, which is why they have an approval rating that is currently lower than the president's.
00:32:57.000 They're ripping on President Trump and their approval rating is lower than President Trump's.
00:33:02.000 Again, there's a reason for that.
00:33:03.000 There's a reason for that.
00:33:04.000 What an amazing video you just watched.
00:33:06.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:33:07.000 Well, you know, if you think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out this crazy story here.
00:33:15.000 Every significant movement in history has started with protesting.
00:33:17.000 Now it's traitor!
00:33:18.000 Uncle Tom!
00:33:18.000 This is our generation's civil rights!
00:33:20.000 I have no idea what the protest is about.
00:33:22.000 Bingo!
00:33:23.000 Given the current climate, should a figure as polarizing as Clay Saunders even be allowed on campus?
00:33:28.000 Ah, can you hear me okay?
00:33:30.000 Saunders is a close personal friend of Chancellor Friedman.
00:33:32.000 This is a decision I cannot fight. 1.00
00:33:34.000 Islam will conquer the West. 1.00
00:33:37.000 Assalamualaikum. 1.00
00:33:38.000 Are we paying attention?
00:33:43.000 They've taken over the building.
00:33:44.000 They're downstairs and they've blocked the doors.
00:33:47.000 I seek forgiveness from Allah the Almighty.
00:33:51.000 We cannot run and hide.
00:33:53.000 Muhammad is the messenger of God.
00:33:56.000 There is no God but Allah.
00:33:59.000 What do you say? 1.00
00:34:01.000 We turn those SOBs into a fine red mist. 0.99
00:34:06.000 As we move, one man will cover while the other guys go. 1.00
00:34:09.000 They call that leapfrogging.
00:34:10.000 Stretch them out and listen.
00:34:13.000 You need a course in safe weapons handling.