On today's show, Tucker and Matt discuss the new documentary, "M.I. Racist," and the latest on the latest censorship efforts by the New York Times and the Washington Post against conservative media outlets, including Tucker Carlson's show on Fox News and Sean Hannity's new show on CNN. They also discuss a new study from the Media Matters organization, and whether or not racism is inherent in whiteness. Finally, a new piece from NBC News claims that President Trump referred to Democrats as "ballot harvesters" in an interview with Alex Castellanos, a former White House correspondent for the Daily Wire, and why that's a bad thing. And a new report claims that the Democratic National Committee is using mail-in voting to try to delegitimize Donald Trump's 2020 re-election campaign. Subscribe to Daily Wire Plus and get 35% off your new annual membership when you become a member! Use code DEI and save 35% on new annual memberships! Subscribe today using the promo code DEIDI. at checkout to receive $35 off your first month of DEI membership! M.I Racist is streaming now, streaming only on Daily Wire PLUS, and is the number one documentary of the decade, streaming now exclusively on DAILY WRITER PLUS. streaming on all major streaming platforms. Enjoy! and remember to tell a friend about the movie and share it on social media! so you can be apart of the conversation! Subscribe, share, and spread the word about the film! about racism, sexism, and everything else going on in the world! Matt, Matt, and all that good stuff! . Matt and Tucker, and much more! - The Daily Wire - Matt, the Racist. - -- ...and much, much more. -- THE RACIST! -- click here! (featuring the movie, including the movie Am I Racist? (coming soon, coming soon! ) , featuring the movie "Racist?!? (Coming soon! ... ) and much, MUCH MORE! , . . -- The Racist, coming in 2020, coming out soon! -- coming soon, featuring M. , coming soon? -- will be out on Amazon Prime Video, coming SOON! -- -- and so much more!!
00:00:00.000Well folks, five days until the biggest election of our lifetime will bring you all the news in a moment.
00:00:04.000First, your reminder, not only is M.I. Racist the number one documentary of the decade, it is streaming now exclusively at Daily Wire Plus.
00:00:11.000If you're not a DW Plus member, you need to go check it out right now at dailywire.com slash subscribe.
00:00:17.000Use code DEI and save 35% off your new annual membership.
00:00:21.000Take a look at the trailer for M.I. Racist right now.
00:00:23.000What do you feel in your body when you hear the term white people?
00:01:36.000So, I informed you a little bit earlier this week that I got a message from the New York Times in which they essentially were attempting to pressure YouTube into censoring We're good to go.
00:02:05.000Yesterday, I received the following email from the Washington Post.
00:02:08.000Again, when I say that there is a Democratic media human centipede, it's because there is.
00:02:15.000And the entire goal of that Democratic legacy media human centipede is to shut down anyone who disagrees with them.
00:02:21.000Anyone and everyone who disagrees with them.
00:02:24.000So Media Matters have brought out this study, apparently, behind closed doors, and they fed it to the New York Times, who then attempted to get comment from people like me, from Tucker Carlson, from a bunch of other people on the right, in which they were essentially attempting to elicit the response suggesting that we are all election deniers and engaged in misinformation so YouTube could shut us down.
00:02:41.000The Washington Post literally within 48 hours sent me this email yesterday.
00:03:28.000And this is what The Washington Post reporter is saying.
00:03:30.000Quote, Our analysis is based on your October interview with former President Trump, where you referred to Democrats as professionals at ballot harvesting, and Trump referred to them as cheaters.
00:03:44.000Could you please let me know if you have any comment?
00:04:05.000Quote, Democrats, for their part, have long enjoyed successes in mail voting, fueled in part by ballot collection where it is legal.
00:04:12.000The Democratic National Committee said it plans to spend tens of millions of dollars in support of voting programs like mail and early voting.
00:04:35.000They believe that it is some sort of informational crime for me to have on the former president of the United States and likely future president of the United States.
00:04:47.000And again, the claim is, again, that we are supposed to censor President Trump, that I can't say things that are perfectly true about ballot harvesting, which is one of the most corrupt practices in America.
00:05:15.000Now, the Washington Post has become a joke, so much so that Jeff Bezos had to issue an editorial just a couple of days ago titled The Hard Truth, Americans Don't Trust the News Media, in which you recognize that, according to Gallup, Americans just think the news media stink.
00:05:30.000Well, maybe if Jeff Bezos actually wants to correct things at the Washington Post, it's not enough to stop them from endorsing Kamala Harris on the editorial pages.
00:05:37.000Maybe he ought to look to his reporting staff who are now doing the bidding of places like Media Matters and coordinating, obviously, with the Democratic apparatus to unleash two separate stories that came out almost simultaneously, one from the New York Times and one from the Washington Post, today.
00:05:53.000And both of these stories say the same thing.
00:05:55.000They say that conservative media ought to be destroyed.
00:05:59.000So that New York Times piece finally dropped.
00:06:01.000And the New York Times piece has, of course, a big graphic.
00:06:05.000And the graphic includes people ranging from Tim Pool to Rudy Giuliani to Tucker to Michael Moles to me talking in the background.
00:06:12.000And the title is Election Falsehoods Take Off on YouTube as it looks the other way.
00:06:18.000YouTube is not censoring things the way the New York Times would like YouTube to censor things.
00:06:21.000Just think for a second how sick this is.
00:06:25.000You have members of the media, members of the press, people who are supposed to be about the dissemination of speech, actively asking YouTube to shut down people they don't like.
00:06:36.000And again, this is not about election misinformation, because included in their litany of sins is me saying things that Like, for example, Democrats set the rules on ballot harvesting and mail-in voting, which is true.
00:06:49.000It was reported by the New York Times.
00:06:53.000They quote me saying that Democrats rigged voting rules in 2020.
00:07:20.000So, here is what Nico Grant, the ridiculous reporter at the New York Times writes, quote, So, again, the theory here is that YouTube is making money off election denial.
00:07:47.000Now, Why would you quote me in that context?
00:07:52.000Because I never said that Trump won the 2020 election.
00:07:56.000I've said repeatedly that Joe Biden won the 2020 election, at least by the counted ballots, by the state certification procedure.
00:08:02.000In fact, I challenged between November and January Trump's claims that he had the legal capacity to overthrow the election or that Mike Pence did.
00:08:11.000And yet they include me in the article anyway, because it's not about election misinformation.
00:08:14.000It's about destroying everyone on the right.
00:08:16.000That's what the New York Times wants to do.
00:08:18.000The New York Times writes, While Media Matters is a partisan organization that regularly criticizes conservatives, reporters and academics frequently cite it as a source on YouTube misinformation because it devotes significant resources to tracking the vast platform.
00:08:30.000The New York Times independently verified the research, examining all of the videos identified by Media Matters and determining whether YouTube placed ads or fact-check labels on them.
00:08:39.000So this is them attempting to justify precisely why they just cribbed Media Matters' work.
00:08:44.000My favorite part of this story from the New York Times is, as you know, I put up a thread on X. That thread received tens of millions of views at this point, I believe.
00:08:53.000And Tucker Carlson also released a screenshot of his replies to the New York Times reporter basically telling him to F himself, which coincidentally is what I told the New York Times reporter.
00:09:06.000Shapiro did not directly respond to a series of questions but attacked reporting from the New York Times.
00:09:11.000Well, I did notice that when I put up the thread and then I sent this reporter the thread, it was an extensive thread.
00:09:20.000He could have quoted that thread, but he can't quote the thread, because if he quotes the thread, it totally debunks his entire stupid story and shows the underlying motive.
00:09:27.000Okay, if you thought that that was just a one-off, it was not.
00:09:30.000Hours apart, literally hours apart, the Washington Post put up their piece, quote, In the podcast election, top shows cast doubt on integrity of 2024 vote.
00:09:39.000Claims aired on the free-flowing and beloved medium could undercut trust in the results of a razor-tight election, experts say.
00:09:46.000Experts is always, they just go and they find somebody who works at like Brookings Institute and get them to say the thing the reporter wants to say.
00:09:52.000Experts say is just a guise for the writer wants to write a thing.
00:09:56.000I didn't find an expert to say anything in America.
00:11:23.000Protect your online privacy today by visiting expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:11:27.000That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N.com slash ben to get three extra months for free with my exclusive link expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:11:35.000Also, maybe the number one question I get from my listeners is, how can I help the conservative fight?
00:11:40.000Well, it's critical to know where your bucks are going.
00:11:42.000Most credit cards are funneling millions to left-wing clauses and candidates, and they hope you don't notice, but now you actually have a choice.
00:11:48.000Coin is America's conservative credit card.
00:12:50.000What was the big problem with anything that I said?
00:12:53.000They can't identify the thing that I said that's a problem because it doesn't exist.
00:12:56.000Instead, they just say, during October appearances on the Shapiro and Joe Rogan shows, Trump said that Democrats were cheating and that the media was interfering with the election.
00:13:14.000Asked for comment, Shapiro in a post on X cast this story as part of the legacy media's coordinated attempt to destroy conservative media.
00:13:20.000Yes, because that's what it clearly is when you come out with a story at the same exact time as the New York Times, and both of you are cribbing from the work of media matters, and both of you are lying about the purpose of your story.
00:13:30.000Of course it's an attempt to destroy conservative media one week out from an election.
00:13:35.000Now, I'm sorry I thwarted your little stupid plans to get YouTube to shut down shows like this one five days before an election.
00:13:41.000I'm sorry that your little October surprise has fallen flat.
00:13:45.000YouTube, by the way, to its credit, has said this stuff isn't election misinformation.
00:15:27.000Community Notes allows the tweet to stay up and then the corrections to appear below it, which is quite good.
00:15:33.000But the Washington Post is very angry because what they would really like is for the old Twitter regime to be in place where they just shut down anything they don't like, where they banned Jordan Peterson for the crime of saying that boys are not girls.
00:15:46.000Where they shut off the reach of particular conservatives because they just don't like what those conservatives are saying.
00:15:51.000That's what the Washington Post wants.
00:15:53.000They want back their informational monopoly.
00:15:56.000It's the most important thing to them because that informational monopoly grants them also a market monopoly.
00:16:01.000If social media allows for the dissemination of alternative viewpoints and these people are busy blowing the trust of the American people, they lose the game.
00:16:09.000And so the only way to restore their profitability and to restore their business success is to shut down the opposition.
00:16:21.000I mean, they're trying to destroy X and its credibility.
00:16:24.000The Washington Post says, Musk has touted the crowdsourcing program called Community Notes as the best source of truth on the Internet.
00:16:30.000But the majority of accurate fact checks proposed by users on political posts are never shown to the public, according to research from the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate and a separate data analysis by The Washington Post.
00:16:41.000You can notice what the Washington Post is doing now.
00:16:44.000They're going to left-wing interest groups.
00:16:45.000They're just cribbing their research and then duplicating the research as the newspaper.
00:16:50.000The consequences are potentially profound, says the Washington Post.
00:16:53.000False posts on the service were recently blamed by federal officials for hindering hurricane relief.
00:16:57.000And exit is poised to play a prominent role in the U.S. presidential election.
00:17:01.000Now, I noticed that the Washington Post was never particularly interested in policing social media when social media was shutting down the Hunter Biden laptop story at the behest of intelligence agencies and lying intelligence officials.
00:17:15.000I noticed they didn't care so much about that.
00:17:17.000They're busy dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story themselves.
00:17:20.000So this is not a pursuit of the truth.
00:17:22.000This is a way of ripping Elon Musk and then blaming him preemptively should Kamala Harris fail.
00:17:26.000And a lot of these stories are set up for that too.
00:17:29.000A lot of these stories are set up for who do we blame if Kamala loses?
00:17:41.000It used to be, when I was growing up, and I think for most of American history before that, if a candidate lost, that candidate lost because they were considered worse than the other candidates.
00:17:52.000If Al Gore lost to George W. Bush, it's because Al Gore had failed because he was not a sufficient candidate.
00:17:58.000In 2004, John Kerry lost because he was a bad candidate, a worse candidate than George W. Bush.
00:18:03.000In 2008, John McCain was a worse candidate than Barack Obama.
00:18:06.000And yes, in 2012, Mitt Romney was a worse candidate than Barack Obama.
00:18:10.000And then 2016 happened and it broke brains because Donald Trump was so widely considered a worse candidate than Hillary Clinton by members of the legacy media, by so many in Because of that, when she lost, everybody, including the legacy media, decided she had not, in fact, lost because she was a worse candidate than Trump.
00:18:30.000Even though she certainly was a worse candidate than Trump.
00:18:33.000They simply decided that it had to be some extraneous source that caused her to lose.
00:18:37.000And so we've been living in that bizarre world for the last three election cycles.
00:18:41.000And so already, the Democrats are prepping their narrative.
00:18:43.000If Kamala loses, it can't be that she was worse than Trump.
00:19:15.000And it's gross and it's wrong and it's really dangerous for the country.
00:19:19.000Because it turns out that if you blame the sources of the dissemination of information for the failure of your candidate, if you do that, you end up cracking down on free speech.
00:19:30.000Turns out when the Washington Post says democracy dies in darkness, they're the ones turning out the light.
00:19:35.000Meanwhile, as for the state of the race, the answer right now is nobody knows.
00:19:39.000Anybody who's telling you that Donald Trump is clearly going to win this election...
00:19:58.000Even if you're not in a swing state, you should vote.
00:20:00.000I mean, if you think that Donald Trump will make a better president because he was a better president than Kamala Harris, you should go vote.
00:21:09.000The signs all along will have been obvious.
00:21:11.000We would look at the right direction being very low, Joe Biden's approval rating being very low, and Republicans really registering numbers.
00:21:21.000Okay, so Harry Anson's saying it's quite plausible that Trump wins based on the data that he's seeing.
00:21:26.000However, it is worth noting here, and again, I put out these points of caution just so that you don't have bad election information.
00:21:31.000Nate Silver, who again, I think is the best elections analyst in the business, he says that when you look at the early voting numbers, he says that doesn't reliably predict results.
00:21:38.000You're seeing a lot of this online right now.
00:21:40.000You're seeing a lot of people say, hey, look at those Nevada early voting numbers.
00:21:42.000Republicans are killing it in the Nevada early vote.
00:21:44.000Or you're saying, look at those Pennsylvania early voting numbers.
00:21:47.000They're doing better than they did in 2020.
00:21:48.000Okay, but we don't actually know what that means.
00:21:51.000We don't actually know what that means.
00:21:53.000Because it turns out that the early voting procedures are really new.
00:21:57.000It used to be we had election day in this country.
00:21:59.000You only voted the day of the election, unless you were a veteran overseas or something.
00:22:03.000If you are living in the modern era, however, like the last two election cycles, mail-in voting now constitutes an extraordinary percentage of the vote.
00:23:15.000For a complimentary consultation, call today 1-800-958-1000 or visit their website at tnusa.com slash Shapiro.
00:23:22.000That's 1-800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash Shapiro today.
00:23:27.000Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
00:23:28.000Get the help you need with Tax Network USA.
00:23:30.000Also, you may have noticed that while we are facing a pivotal moment in American history with the election next week, there is something legacy media won't tell you.
00:23:39.000And that, of course, is that Israel is fighting for its very survival right now.
00:23:41.000It's facing attacks from enemies on literally all sides.
00:24:52.000As Nate Silver says, these are not good baselines, especially coming after a COVID election.
00:24:57.000He says in 2016, the last non-COVID election, Michael McDonald was able to track down a partisan breakdown of early voting data in 13 states.
00:25:33.000Also, it may be that all of this is accounted for by polls, because it turns out that early voting is not a poll.
00:25:38.000It is just a count of a select group of people who are voting early.
00:25:43.000And we also don't know who anyone actually voted for.
00:25:46.000Like when they say there's an early vote, what they are looking at is the number of registered Republicans who voted early versus the number of Democrats who voted early.
00:25:53.000But that doesn't mean they necessarily voted Republican or Democrat.
00:25:56.000They could have switched parties, for example.
00:25:57.000So it's not totally clear that party ID totally correlates with who you voted for.
00:26:03.000And finally, as Nate Silver points out, predictions based on the early vote have a really, really bad track record.
00:26:11.000So he says, you're probably better off ignoring the early vote almost entirely, with the possible exception of John Ralston in Nevada.
00:26:17.000So he mentioned the Nevada early vote.
00:26:19.000Republicans are doing better in the early vote than they were expected to, by far.
00:26:23.000But he says, generally, don't look at the early vote as predictive.
00:26:33.000I just warned you not to look at the early vote.
00:26:34.000Now I'm going to look at the early vote a little bit.
00:26:35.000So, Politico has a piece today saying that Democrats are fretting over the early vote in North Carolina.
00:26:40.000They say that early vote numbers in North Carolina show the electorate skewing older and whiter compared to the state's voter registration.
00:26:46.000A red flag for Democrats who need black voters to turn out in heavy numbers if Kamala Harris is going to flip the state.
00:26:51.000By the way, if that's indicative of national trends, that's a serious problem for Kamala Harris.
00:28:16.000And I say that jokingly because there is a segment of the population that actually has that thought right now.
00:28:22.000And it's hard to think for those of us who are in the bubble and we do and think about this every day and we live and breathe politics to think that there are Americans who have decided to pick their head up and say, oh, I guess there is a race going on and I should pay attention to this.
00:28:38.000And they're not an insignificant group of the population.
00:28:42.000Our recent national poll It showed that it's about 6% of Americans fall within this category.
00:28:48.000And so when people say everything's going to come down to turnout, what they actually mean is, are those people going to show up or are they not going to show up?
00:28:56.000Because many folks, and we just did a focus group with y'all in the two most important counties in Pennsylvania that have picked the correct election winner going back to Obama's first election, And that was the sentiment on that group of persuadable voters.
00:29:12.000It was not necessarily like, I'm definitely going to vote for this candidate.
00:29:16.000It's like, if I decide to show up, I'm going to vote for that candidate.
00:29:20.000So I know that's a long intro to it, but I think that people don't think about that enough of these individuals who may or may not show up.
00:29:30.000And If you're looking at some of this early vote data, it definitely looks good for Republicans.
00:29:34.000But what we've seen is that there's also a large chunk of young male moderate voters who would vote for Trump if they show up too.
00:29:41.000So my long-winded answer is I would say it's a complete toss-up still with a slight Trump edge.
00:29:50.000Yeah, so when you look at all of that, you know, it is kind of amazing how the narrative has been built up on the right, that Trump is for sure going to win, the narrative has been built up on the left, that Harris is almost certainly going to win.
00:30:00.000What's weird about this election is that typically the line from Republicans has been that if it's a low turnout election, Republicans do better, and if it's a high turnout election, Democrats do better.
00:30:07.000And it seems like this year that's completely reversed, that Trump really needs low propensity voters to show up, and Democrats are really counting heavily on high propensity voters, and the question really is who's going to show.
00:30:19.000Yeah, I would say the narrative is probably actually somewhere in between there, where if it was a very low turnout, it would actually benefit Democrats.
00:30:25.000If it was a super high turnout, it benefits Democrats.
00:30:28.000And Trump actually needs it to land somewhere in the middle, but further up the right end of that curve.
00:30:34.000And so the perfect scenario for him is somewhere in between 16 and 20 turnout levels.
00:30:43.000So when you look at the swing states, and obviously this thing is going to come down to just a handful of states at this point, it looks like Trump has enough momentum in Georgia and Arizona that he likely carries it over to the finish line in those particular states.
00:30:55.000North Carolina, Harris seems to have more hopes in North Carolina, although, again, I'm a little more skeptical.
00:30:59.000So that means that If you had to gamble at this point, you'd probably say it comes down once again to the blue wall states, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan.
00:31:06.000Each one of those isn't just close in terms of the presidential race.
00:31:10.000They're very, very close in terms of the Senate races.
00:31:12.000One of the questions I have about the polling here is how much are the pollsters grouping?
00:31:16.000You're not seeing any outlier polls, which is weird to me.
00:31:20.000Why is every top line result the same with widely variant polls?
00:31:25.000With widely variant breakdowns, you have a widely different breakdown of what the likely voter screen looks like, and then the top line looks exactly the same.
00:31:34.000Are these just pollsters who are sort of grouping because they're trying to be careful not to give an out-of-the-box answer and then get blamed if they're wrong?
00:31:41.000I've had the exact same question of why is everything coming in 47, 46, 46, 47?
00:31:46.000And then when you go look under the hood, which is what I always recommend people do on public polling first, is start at the bottom.
00:31:54.000If they asked who you voted for in 2020, like, does that make sense?
00:31:57.000And they have similar top-line numbers, and you're exactly right.
00:32:01.000The under-the-hood doesn't look the same.
00:32:04.000And I can't remember an election where there has been so much grouping and this, like, race-tied where everybody wants to say the race is tied so they can say that they're all correct.
00:32:15.000You know, we're currently in the field in six of the battleground states to get our own answer on that, because we just don't understand how these races are so close in states that historically have not polled close.
00:32:27.000You know, Wisconsin was a slight Trump loss last time.
00:32:33.000Like, I just don't believe any poll that comes out that has him up by four or down by four.
00:32:38.000But I also don't believe that it's like net even tied because there's been no polling scenario in Wisconsin, which has a trash voter file that has ever showed it tied.
00:32:48.000And so it seems like they're pulling these levers to make it look a certain way.
00:32:51.000And again, it does come to turnout and people are making assumptions in the turnout audiences for their polls.
00:32:58.000But I just I can't for the life of me fathom why you have all this grouping, like you said.
00:33:04.000So when it comes to election night, and I know you're gonna be with us election nights, help us break it down.
00:33:09.000What are the early things that people should be looking for as indicators as to how the election is going?
00:33:13.000I know Democrats seem to be worried a little bit about the early voting stats for black voters in North Carolina.
00:33:17.000If those come in really low, is that an indicator for black turnout in places like Philadelphia?
00:33:22.000What are your early sort of flags as to which way the election is going?
00:33:26.000I think too much is being read into early vote statistics already.
00:33:31.000The only thing that we can take away from the early vote numbers thus far is that more Republicans have voted earlier than they have in the past.
00:33:41.000Because what normally happens is older, more educated people vote early.
00:33:46.000And those are also the most likely people to defect.
00:33:49.000They're a Republican, but they're going to vote for Harris.
00:33:52.000And so we're trying not to read too much into it, though, following it.
00:33:57.000So what we're going to be looking for Is who are the states that report early and even?
00:34:02.000And I think Georgia is going to be one of our best indicators this year.
00:34:07.000Secretary of State Raffensperger has said that they're not going to do ballot dumps, which was a really frustrating part of trying to follow the 2020 election in a lot of states, but Georgia specifically, where it looked like Trump was up by three and then you'd have 400,000 ballots be counted and added to the total.
00:34:25.000So there's a lot of states that have also had changed their laws and allowed for more pre-processing of ballots prior to Election Day.
00:34:32.000So I expect we're going to have a bit smoother, you know, first couple hours of the election.
00:34:38.000But I'm definitely going to be watching Georgia.
00:34:40.000I'm going to be looking at Northampton and Erie counties in Pennsylvania.
00:34:44.000What are the numbers looking like there?
00:34:48.000Because they, again, have picked the right winners for going all the way back to Obama's first term as the race swapped back and forth to Republican and Democrat.
00:34:57.000But the biggest thing is that the out West states have such heavy mail voting and MAIL and they don't pre-process those ballots.
00:35:10.000I mean we may be sitting on pins and needles at two o'clock in the morning waiting on like some of the first data from Arizona as an example.
00:35:32.000Well, because this race is so unbelievably tight, and it really, really is tight, every small mistake makes a difference at this point, which is why Joe Biden the other day, obviously and clearly saying that Trump supporters are garbage, which is what he said.
00:36:10.000So that is a turnout machine for Republicans.
00:36:12.000That Biden comment is a turnout machine for Republicans, which is why Democrats are freaking out over the fact that old Joe said it.
00:36:20.000So yesterday, here was Kareem Jean-Pierre lying from the podium of the White House, explaining that he didn't actually call Trump supporters garbage.
00:36:42.000So a couple of things, couple of things.
00:36:44.000So just to clarify, he was not calling Trump supporters garbage, which is why he put out, this is why he wanted to make sure that we put out a statement that clarified what he meant and what he was trying to say.
00:36:58.000And so just want to make that very clear for folks who are watching.
00:37:00.000And I just want to read that out to folks.
00:37:05.000So he was regarding to the comedian, and I quote, I refer to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage.
00:37:29.000I'm not sure what Kamala Harris' compulsion has been since the start of this election cycle where she was kind of tossed in place of Joe Biden.
00:37:36.000I don't understand why she's been unable to simply dissociate from Biden.
00:37:40.000That would have been the easiest move in politics.
00:37:42.000They should have asked her, and many people did ask her, what differentiates you from Biden?
00:37:45.000She said, listen, I agree with Joe on a lot.
00:37:47.000I'm privileged that he made me as vice president.
00:37:49.000However, I thought that we got it wrong on the border, and that is something that I've worked hard to correct and will work hard to correct as president.
00:37:56.000I mean, she could do that, and she could throw Joe under the bus.
00:37:59.000She's avoided doing so thus far, probably because she thinks Joe's going to throw her under the bus.
00:38:04.000So here she was yesterday trying to dissociate from the Biden garbage comments.
00:38:10.000I think that, first of all, he clarified his comments.
00:38:14.000But let me be clear, I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for.
00:38:23.000As you heard my speech last night and continuously throughout my career, I believe that the work that I do is about representing all the people, whether they support me or not.
00:38:37.000And as president of the United States, I will be a president for all Americans, whether you vote for me or not.
00:38:42.000That is my responsibility, and that's the kind of work that I've done my entire career, and I take it very seriously.
00:38:50.000Okay, the last part of that is a total lie.
00:38:53.000The work that she has done is to unify Americans.
00:39:22.000Do you sympathize with any voters who do feel offended by or insulted by the garbage comments?
00:39:29.000I am running for president of the United States.
00:39:32.000I will be traveling to three states today to do what I have been doing throughout.
00:39:38.000She's going to do what we have always been doing throughout and for the future and for all of time in the context of that which we most believe.
00:39:49.000The big problem for Kamala Harris is that no one believes, truly, no one believes that the modern Democratic Party, which has labeled Donald Trump a Nazi and has labeled his supporters Nazis, is actually sympathetic to Donald Trump supporters.
00:41:23.000Here, for example, is Charlemagne the God, who two days ago was interviewing Kamala Harris, saying, well, if you support Trump's rhetoric, you are garbage.
00:41:31.000I don't understand why he's walking that back because, I mean, based off the examples he gave, if you are a person who supports those examples that he gave, you are garbage.
00:41:44.000Okay, well, I mean, nobody supports the examples that he gave, the Tony Hinchcliffe example, including Donald Trump.
00:41:50.000So who are you talking about, precisely?
00:41:54.000And, of course, it's not unique to Charlotte.
00:43:16.000Take the kids trick-or-treating, grab some of their candy for yourself, watch Matt Walsh's cultural phenomenon, MI Racist, now at Daily Wire Plus.
00:43:23.000If you're not a Daily Wire Plus member, we've got another treat for you.
00:43:25.000Take 35% off new Daily Wire Plus memberships with code DEI at miracist.com.
00:43:31.000Go to miracist.com, use code DEI for 35% off your new annual membership.
00:43:36.000So, you gotta say that Donald Trump, this is a dude who's having fun on the campaign trail.
00:43:39.000So, yesterday, after Joe Biden's Trump supporters are garbage comment.
00:43:45.000I don't know who was in the room to set this up.
00:43:47.000Trump will tell us the story in a moment.
00:43:49.000But he decided to get a garbage truck, slap a Trump label on the side of it, get on an orange garbage man vest, and then do a presser from a garbage truck in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
00:44:38.000All the stuff that you consider cheesy because we live in an ironic era and a post-authenticity era, because of all of that, Trump, he totally counter-programs that, right?
00:44:47.000The original MAGA hat, I remember commenting on this at the time, Here's the thing about the MAGA hat.
00:45:14.000There is nothing that says Donald Trump more than America.
00:45:16.000Here he was, this is like perfect American Donald Trump, inside the truck, wearing the garbage man vest, doing a presser, explaining why he likes Americans.
00:46:09.000Nobody believes that Donald Trump gave up his job as the presidential candidate and as the head of the Trump organization, all of that, to be a garbage man.
00:48:09.000The final point for Trump on this is the right one, which is the reason that he can get away with this is because he actually likes people.
00:50:08.000I've seen a lot of politicians, particularly this election cycle, and you gotta go and you gotta tell the same story over and over and over.
00:50:13.000But if you're doing these big rallies, you should be able to mix it up.
00:50:17.000She's a totally phony, inauthentic politician.
00:53:23.000Yeah, no, well, you've drawn a lot of us here.
00:53:25.000And I want to talk about that, you know, your governance style and the fact that you've been able to change things here.
00:53:30.000But there are two big amendments on the ballot this year in the state of Florida.
00:53:33.000They do have sort of national ramifications because Whether Florida becomes a swing state or not, again, that's obviously been a Democratic dream.
00:53:39.000Things have changed pretty radically down here in terms of voter registration.
00:53:42.000These two amendments are an attempt by Democrats, largely in the state, to regain some sort of mojo.
00:53:48.000Let's talk about the amendments on the ballot.
00:53:50.000Amendment 4 is an attempt to claw back the heartbeat bill that you pass in the state legislature that essentially guarantees the right to life of kids beyond fetal heartbeat.
00:54:17.000And what they're doing is they provide a very opaque amendment, no definitions on any of this stuff.
00:54:22.000So we really don't know what some of this stuff will do.
00:54:25.000They obviously will want to have a very aggressive left-wing posture.
00:54:29.000No limits on when an abortion could be performed.
00:54:32.000It says viability, which they say would be about 26 weeks, which would mean six months in, you can have a fully formed baby, can feel pain, sucking its thumb, heartbeat, and for no reason at all can just be snuffed out.
00:54:45.000But if you read beyond that the way the amendment's written, it really has an exception that swallows the rule because it says an abortion can be performed at any time if the, quote, health care provider deems it's necessary to protect patient health.
00:54:57.000They do not define patient health, and we know the left would include things like mental health, which would basically mean a non-physician could green light an abortion at any moment of birth.
00:55:08.000It also eliminates parental consent for minors, and they do it in a very underhanded way because they say nothing can infringe on the right of the legislature to require parental notification.
00:55:18.000So people see that, oh, parents' rights.
00:55:20.000But that claws back what we have in law now, which is consent.
00:55:24.000So you'll have this odd thing in Florida where they can send you a notice and say, oh, yeah, your kid is at an abortion clinic across the state.
00:55:31.000There's a non-physician that's recommending a late-term abortion.
00:55:35.000Just thought you'd like to know that without any parent involvement.
00:55:40.000You would not be able to prescribe a Tylenol to a minor without parental consent, but somehow a minor could get a late-term abortion without parental consent.
00:55:48.000And then the final thing that's tricky about this, it doesn't say it in there, but they did the similar thing in Michigan.
00:56:10.000It's ideology, but it's also a business.
00:56:12.000Southeast part of the United States, all the states from Texas to South Carolina have pro-life laws in place.
00:56:18.000So if this passes in Florida, we will be the epicenter of abortion nationwide.
00:56:24.000And we would have one of the most radical pro-abortion regimes, not just in the United States, but in the world.
00:56:29.000And in fact, I think it would be worse than California, Colorado, some of the nine-month states, because this health care provider, people that aren't pro-life, and I have a lot of friends who aren't, what they will say is, look, they don't like abortion.
00:56:41.000They think it should be rare, but they don't support legal protections for the unborn because they think that that should be resolved by the woman, mother, and the doctor.
00:57:11.000And they'll be bringing people in from Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, all converging in Florida so that they can prop up a failing business model.
00:57:19.000It's important for people also to know groups like Planned Parenthood, they're not only involved in abortion on demand, they're doing the gender surgeries.
00:57:27.000That's a big part of their business model now.
00:57:30.000So all this money and potentially taxpayer money will go into that.
00:57:34.000So if you're pro-life, this is an easy no vote.
00:57:36.000But even if you're not, I haven't met very many people who think that there should be no limitations at all and that parental consent should be revoked and that non-physicians should be empowered to greenlight abortions up until the moment of birth.
00:57:50.000As you mentioned, the overreach is so dramatic in Amendment 4, but they've really been obscuring what Amendment 4 says.
00:57:55.000I originally characterized it as a clawback, but as you say, it's not a clawback.
00:57:58.000It is moving way beyond the boundaries of where prior Florida law was, even before the state legislature issued new rules on abortion.
00:58:13.000Well, because I just think that they would never do anything more modest.
00:58:17.000But it's interesting because they have a certain playbook that they run around the country, and usually they overpower the airwaves with ads.
00:58:37.000And then they'll say if someone has a miscarriage, they would be denied care.
00:58:41.000To the contrary, not only is that obviously not prevented in Florida, a doctor would be committing malpractice if he said they couldn't treat you because of a misunderstanding of Florida law.
00:58:50.000So everything they're doing to attack Florida law is actually not in our law.
00:58:56.000They're not even running ads saying a heartbeat is too short a time.
00:59:01.000That would be at least a debate that was based in fact if that was their position.
00:59:07.000They're running on all these things that are not in Florida law just because they know those would be unpopular if they are, but they're not.
00:59:20.000And you mentioned, look, This is just wrong.
00:59:23.000I mean, it's wrong to take away parents' rights.
00:59:25.000It's wrong to have a fully formed baby snuffed out for no reason, six months, eight months, nine months.
00:59:31.000And the thing is, is the media doesn't like to acknowledge this, but there are tens of thousands of late-term abortions that happen in this country, and the majority are elective.
00:59:42.000And so that would happen in Florida, and people think it's wrong.
00:59:46.000But I also, from the political perspective, because you did mention it, When I got elected governor in 2018, we had 300,000 more registered Democrats in Florida than Republicans.
01:00:02.000We had 300,000 more registered Republicans in the 2022 election than Democrats.
01:00:07.000Obviously, we had a big red wave that year.
01:00:10.000Interesting, since at that time when we did the heartbeat bill, we've gone from 300,000 more to 1.1 million more.
01:00:18.000And so what's happened, I think, is people that are moving here, they're drawn because we have conservative policy that works.
01:00:26.000Some of the liberals may not like that because we have conservative policy that works, which is fine, but we've really created a situation.
01:00:33.000So if Amendment 4 passes, you have taxpayer-funded abortion on demand, that is going to start to turn Florida in the other direction politically.
01:00:43.000Governor DeSantis, I would be remiss for the week before the national election if I didn't ask you about what you think is going to happen in the national election on Tuesday.
01:00:51.000What are the big obstacles you see to a Trump victory?
01:00:54.000And do you think that President Trump is on track right now to win?
01:00:57.000So I think that we have an administration that has failed.
01:01:51.000Whoever it is, they're going to get showered with money.
01:01:54.000And she's raised more money than anyone's ever raised.
01:01:57.000But the media is going to do hundreds of millions of dollars in positive press.
01:02:01.000And so to me, the election would ultimately hinge on that is going to be the biggest gaslighting operation in American history.
01:02:10.000And the question is, is that going to be enough to get her or will people start to see who the real Kamala Harris is?
01:02:18.000And I think that every interview she gives, every time she can't, when she does her word salads, more and more people say, you know, she's just not up to the job.
01:02:27.000And so I think in terms of the commander-in-chief test, you know, they throw all these invectives at Trump, but he was president.
01:02:34.000Like, it's one thing if he hadn't been president and you're going to try to say he's going to be the second, you know, coming of Adolf Hitler.
01:02:40.000I mean, obviously that wouldn't be credible, but He was president for four years.
01:02:43.000Okay, people can look at the record, and there's a lot of Americans that think that's better than what we've had.
01:02:48.000And if you don't like it, that's fine.
01:02:50.000But they're missing the mark, I think, on some of this criticism.
01:02:53.000So I think the fundamentals are in our favor.
01:02:56.000I think that Trump has proven to be a better candidate than Kamala.
01:02:59.000I would say the concern would just simply be, you know, to win.
01:03:04.000He can't just win Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and North Carolina.
01:03:10.000He's got to win one of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
01:03:13.000Those did not perform well for us in the midterms, different than a presidential election.
01:03:18.000But what was going on in those states that we did so bad as Republicans, and are we going to be able to get the turnout to be able to win one of those?
01:03:26.000You know, I think ultimately he's in a good position to do that.
01:03:29.000But that was really what the election is going to come down.
01:03:32.000I really doubt she's going to be able to win states like North Carolina and Georgia.