The full memo is out, and we are going to go through it as it comes out, piece by piece. But we have some interesting, interesting news about the memo, and it's not exactly a nothing burger. If what Byron York at the Washington Examiner says is true, if the memo itself is reflective of truth, then the FBI has some answers that it needs to be giving. We'll talk about all of that in just one second. First, I want to say thank you to our friends over at Dollar Shave Club. They don't just have shaves, they also have toothpaste, body soap, shampoo, and shaving cream. They have you covered head to toe in everything you need to keep your hair looking your best. And if you like that, you'll love the DDS Starter Set, which includes a travel kit for $5 and then replacement cartridges after that for a few dollars a month for just a few bucks a month. Get your DDS starter set for just $5, and you'll have a happier life! You'll feel cleaner, you will smell better, you won't be happier, you ll have happier life, and people will love you more. You can get yours right now, $5 exclusively at DollarShaveClub, exclusively at dollarshaveclub.com slash Ben Shapiro. Use the discount code: "DHS" at checkout to get 10% off your first month of your first pack! and you get 20% off for the rest of the month, plus free shipping and free shipping on your first box of boxes! You won't want to miss out on that includes shipping, free shipping, shipping, and a free shipping! you'll get a lifetime's worth of free shipping. and all kinds of goodies, plus an extra $5 shipping, plus you'll be set up to receive a $5 discount and an additional $5 to use that includes free shipping when you sign up for the DSC starter set. you choose what you like! It's all that and a lifetime of DSC Starter Set! Ben Shapiro is here to help you get your own DSCOTTERBOY! - Ben Shapiro - The Ben Shapiro Show Notes - Subscribe to the show! Subscribe to our new show on the show and get exclusive ad-free version of the show? Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, iTunes, Podcharts, Stitcher, and Stitcher?
00:00:34.000There was a lot of talk about how it was going to be a giant disappointment.
00:00:37.000If what Byron York at the Washington Examiner says is true, if what Fox News reporting is true, if the memo itself is reflective of truth, then the FBI has some answers that it needs to be giving.
00:00:46.000We'll talk about all of that in just one second.
00:00:48.000First, I want to say thank you to our friends over at Dollar Shave Club.
00:00:51.000So while you were waiting for this show to start, you grew a beard because we were a little bit late.
00:00:54.000Well, that means that you need my friends over at Dollar Shave Club to help you out.
00:00:59.000You've heard me talk about the amazing products at Dollar Shave Club.
00:01:01.000They don't just have their magical razors, they also have their Dr. Carver's Shave Butter, and right now, they have everything else.
00:01:12.000Now's a great time to give Dollar Shave Club a try.
00:01:14.000You can get your first month of their best razor along with travel size version of shave butter, body cleanser, and yes, even the magical butt wipes for just $5.
00:01:21.000After that, replacement cartridges ship for just a few dollars a month.
00:01:42.000Use that slash Ben again so they know that we sent you and also so you get that special deal for their travel kit for $5 and then replacement cartridges after that for just a few dollars a month.
00:01:51.000All right, so we do not have the entire memo.
00:01:53.000The entire memo is about to be released, but we don't actually have the entire text of the memo.
00:02:00.000If it comes out during the show, then I will just read the entire memo to you verbatim, because it's not that long.
00:02:10.000The memo suggests that the FBI, when it first gathered a FISA warrant on Carter Page—Carter Page was a Trump foreign policy adviser, and he was supposedly colluding with the Russians, right?
00:02:22.000This is why they went and got a FISA warrant on an American citizen who was a member of the Trump campaign.
00:02:27.000The question is, what was that warrant based on?
00:02:29.000When you submit an application to FISA courts, you have to say, here's why we have probable cause to believe that we need a wiretap on this guy.
00:02:36.000Well, according to the memo, the only thing that they used, and the central component that they used, was the Steele dossier.
00:02:43.000The Steele dossier was a piece of bad research compiled by a spy named Christopher Steele, who went over to Russia and talked to probably some paid Russian folks.
00:02:51.000And it was done on behalf of Fusion GPS.
00:02:56.000Originally, Fusion GPS was hired by the Washington Free Beacon to do OPPO research on Trump.
00:03:01.000They cut out of that project, but then Fusion GPS shopped around that intel, and Hillary Clinton decided that she was going to fund the OPPO research file.
00:03:08.000So she funded the Fusion GPS dossier, which was based on research from Christopher Steele, who was getting information from the Russians.
00:03:15.000That information was then funneled to the FBI, and the FBI, based on that unverified dossier, based on a piece of information they were unwilling to verify, went to the FISA courts.
00:03:34.000They're the only people who have access as Washington Examiner on Fox News at this point.
00:03:37.000According to Fox News, Christopher Steele, the guy who compiled the memo, the original dossier that the warrant was based on, admitted his feelings against then-candidate Trump in September of 2016 when he said that Steele was, quote, desperate that President Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.
00:03:54.000But that's not the only thing that's in the memo.
00:03:57.000According to the Washington Examiner, according to Byron York at the Washington Examiner, the Steele dossier formed an essential part of the initial in all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.
00:04:09.000The deputy FBI director who just resigned confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA court without the Steele dossier information.
00:04:18.000In other words, they used as the centerpiece of getting a warrant on an American citizen who was part of the Trump campaign an OPPO research hit from Hillary Clinton that was non-verified.
00:04:28.000What's even worse, the political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from FISA applications.
00:04:36.000So, by omission, they lied to the court.
00:04:38.000They went to the FISA court, and they said, we have information that all this stuff is happening with regard to Carter Page.
00:04:44.000But they didn't say, we got this from a Fusion GPS dossier compiled by Hillary Clinton.
00:04:48.000Because then the court might have said, well, have you checked any of this?
00:04:52.000Then the court might have thought, well, have you checked in?
00:04:54.000This raises some serious questions, by the way, about the operations of FISA courts, if they're not actually doing the research and asking the FBI to verify that the information they're being provided is actually true.
00:05:03.000If they're just putting things like the Russian pee tape—remember, the dossier was filled with a bunch of bad information, like the idea that Trump had gone to Moscow and then hired a hotel.
00:05:13.000He tried to get the room that Barack Obama and Michelle Obama had stayed in and hired Russian prostitutes to pee on the bed.
00:05:20.000Most of this stuff was nonsense, and nearly none of it has been verified.
00:05:23.000If they were using that unverified information to get a FISA warrant, and the FISA court went along with that without asking any other questions, that asks some broader questions about how FISA courts are actually putting out the warrants.
00:05:33.000Apparently, DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in summer of 2016, and that's when Steele told him that he wanted Trump not to be president.
00:05:41.000The FBI and Justice Department—this is all according to Washington Examiner Byron York—the FBI and Justice Department mounted a months-long effort to keep the information outlined in the memo out of the House Intelligence Committee's hands.
00:05:52.000Only the threat of contempt charges and other forms of pressure forced the FBI and Justice to give up the material.
00:05:57.000Once Intelligence Committee leaders and staff compiled some of that information into the memo, the FBI and Justice Department, supported by Capitol Hill Democrats, mounted a ferocious campaign of opposition, saying release of the memo would endanger national security and the rule of law.
00:06:10.000Now, if what these excerpts show is what's really the main point of the memo, I don't know how that endangers national security or the rule of law.
00:06:16.000That looks like that was a cover, if that's the case, by the FBI and by Democrats, because they didn't want the information getting out there.
00:06:22.000Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes was determined to make the information available to the public, and President Trump, of course, cleared it just today and sent it over to the House.
00:06:30.000Now, I'm rapidly updating my Twitter to see if they're actually releasing the full text at this point.
00:06:38.000They've only released excerpts so far, so we have not actually seen the full thing.
00:06:43.000We're also going to find out whether there's a Democratic response to the memo.
00:06:49.000We're going to find out what the Democratic response had to say, because they're, of course, saying that all of this is taken out of context.
00:06:55.000I'd like to hear how this is taken out of context or how this was gotten wrong.
00:06:59.000So, again, Fox News, Washington Examiner are basically accusing the FBI of the same thing and accusing the DOJ of the same thing, and that is essentially colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign, who, in essence, were working with a source who's relying on the Russians for information about Donald Trump.
00:07:14.000And then they were taking that information to open a FISA warrant on Carter Page.
00:07:18.000If this is the centerpiece, what does that mean?
00:07:22.000Well, it could mean one of two things.
00:07:23.000It could mean that the entire Trump-Russia collusion thing was based on a lie put out by the Hillary Clinton campaign, or bad info put out by the Hillary Clinton campaign, and therefore, fruit of the poisonous tree, the entire Russian collusion scandal was a bunch of nonsense from the very beginning, and that this entire investigation has been a sham and a fraud perpetrated at the highest levels of the American government by the Obama administration, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DOJ, and the FBI.
00:08:09.000Saying that the Russian government was trying to help out Donald Trump Jr.
00:08:12.000It does cast a new light on a lot of this.
00:08:14.000It makes some of the conspiracy theories about meetings like that a little bit more, I would say, easy to swallow.
00:08:22.000One of the conspiracy theories is that Fusion GPS, which was working with the Russian lawyers who were meeting with Donald Trump Jr., that Fusion GPS set this up as sort of a sting operation.
00:08:31.000I always thought that was a bit exaggerated.
00:08:33.000Maybe it's not exaggerated as much as I thought.
00:08:36.000So, all of this could be an excuse for Donald Trump to start firing people.
00:08:39.000It is quite possible that Donald Trump just starts firing people, that he ends the Mueller investigation on the back of this, and that the president of the United States says, listen, this whole thing was tainted from the very beginning.
00:08:49.000Nothing that the investigation comes up with can be true, because originally this was based on bad information from Hillary.
00:08:54.000We don't know the extent to which the DOJ and the FBI were colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign to get Donald Trump during the campaign.
00:09:01.000And therefore, I'm going to fire everybody.
00:09:03.000I think that it's going to take a few more steps to get there.
00:09:05.000So Paul Ryan was saying this yesterday.
00:09:06.000He, of course, has seen the memo already.
00:09:09.000He says that the memo is filled with some bad stuff, but that doesn't mean that Mueller should be fired.
00:09:19.000What this is not is an indictment on our institutions, of our justice system.
00:09:23.000This memo is not an indictment of the FBI, of the Department of Justice.
00:09:30.000It does not impugn the Mueller investigation or the Deputy Attorney General.
00:09:35.000What it is, is the Congress's legitimate function of oversight to make sure that the FISA process is being used correctly, and that if it wasn't being used correctly, that needs to come to light and people need to be held accountable, so that we do not have problems again, because this does infect our civil liberties.
00:09:55.000Okay, so does Trump now fire everyone?
00:09:58.000That's the big question that's going to be asked next.
00:10:00.000And we'll get to that in just a second.
00:10:02.000First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Legacy Box.
00:10:05.000So, it's coming up on Valentine's Day.
00:10:07.000You know, Mother's Day and Father's Day are coming up relatively soon, actually.
00:10:11.000And now it's time for you to start getting gifts for family members.
00:10:13.000One of the best gifts you can get for a family member is ensuring that all of your photos, videos, old films, all of that is available to watch and access at any time.
00:10:24.000Right now you can look at all of your photos and your videos on your phone, but if you have anything old, you have stuff in the garage that's just been sitting there moldering for years, well, now you can have Legacybox.
00:10:33.000Legacybox, you take all that stuff, you put it in a box, you send it to our folks at Legacybox.com, and they take all of those outdated formats, camcorder, VHS tape, Super 8 film, old photos, and they convert them into perfectly preserved digital files.
00:10:45.000So again, you load it up with all your old tapes, films, pictures.
00:10:47.000They have stickers they put on each piece so you can trace where it is in the process.
00:10:52.000And we've used it in the Shapiro household.
00:12:25.000OK, so, you know, the president was also asked about what should happen to Rod Rosenstein, who's the deputy attorney general, who was working in the DOJ at the time that all this happened.
00:12:36.000And he said that he had no answers on that, that he was not going to talk about what would happen to Rod Rosenstein.
00:12:41.000So the real question here is, now does Trump start firing everybody, saying the entire thing was a ruse from the beginning?
00:12:46.000Now, as I say, now we're down to two possibilities.
00:12:49.000Right, we're down to two possibilities.
00:12:50.000One is if the memo is accurate, and if it is not exaggerated, if it's not taken out of context, if it's not lying, we haven't seen any of the underlying applications or materials, which Trump could declassify but has not.
00:13:00.000If, let's say, that that was the centerpiece of Trump-Russia collusion, that's all they had,
00:13:05.000Was this FISA warrant on Carter Page and this Russian dossier that, in essence, all this is going to come down to is the dossier, then I think Trump has an excuse to say, listen, we're done here.
00:13:49.000Or maybe there's information that we haven't heard about yet.
00:13:52.000So, we'll find out in short order because the Democrats, I'm sure, will respond to this, the FBI will start leaking materials, and we'll find out whether Devin Nunes' memo is just partisan hackery on behalf of the Trump administration in order to shut down the Mueller investigation, or whether it is something else entirely.
00:14:07.000But bottom line is, here's what it looks like.
00:14:08.000Barack Obama's DOJ spied on his political opponent.
00:14:11.000That's really what it looks like here.
00:14:14.000Chuck Todd is complaining because so far we've only seen excerpts, and those excerpts have been leaked to friendly media outlets like the Washington Examiner and Fox News.
00:14:20.000I'm desperately trying to load the memo right now, and it's crashed the House website because our government sucks at everything.
00:14:25.000So they can't even put up a damn memo so that we can actually read the memo.
00:14:29.000But when people run around this weekend with their hair on fire, I think there's a reason for people to run around.
00:14:33.000Again, this opens up a whole can of worms.
00:14:35.000Why did the FBI and DOJ try to hide this from Congress?
00:14:38.000Number one, they were subpoenaed in order to get this material.
00:14:41.000Number two, why were Democrats trying to shut down the memo?
00:14:44.000I assume they'll come out today and talk about which parts of this were out of context, but we haven't heard exactly what was out of context yet.
00:14:51.000If nothing was out of context, this is really bad.
00:14:59.000So there are just a bunch of questions that are unanswered here, and the reason that I'm hesitating is because I really don't want to say anything out of line about what exactly has happened.
00:15:24.000This memorandum provides members an update on significant facts relating to the committee's ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation and their use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act during the 2016 presidential election cycle.
00:15:37.000Our findings, which are detailed below, raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the FISA court and represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.
00:15:52.000On October 21, 2016, the DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA Probable Cause Order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISA Court.
00:16:03.000citizen who served as volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign.
00:16:06.000Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application first had to be certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI.
00:16:11.000It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, that would have been Rod Rosenstein, or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.
00:16:21.000The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC.
00:16:29.000As required by statute, a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISA court every 90 days, and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause.
00:16:37.000Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI.
00:16:41.000Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one.
00:16:43.000Then DAG, that's Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, and then Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Buente, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of the DOJ.
00:16:57.000Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions, including renewals before the FISC, are classified.
00:17:03.000As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard, particularly as it relates to the surveillance of American citizens.
00:17:12.000However, the court's rigor in protecting the rights of Americans reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders is necessarily dependent on the government's production to the court of all material and relevant facts.
00:17:22.000This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government.
00:17:28.000In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the court to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts.
00:17:36.000However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.
00:17:40.000OK, so what they're saying is that the FBI and the DOJ essentially lied by omission to the FISA court.
00:17:45.000OK, number one, the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, the Steele dossier, on behalf of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign, formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application.
00:17:55.000Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump's ties to Russia.
00:18:07.000Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party or campaign in funding Steele efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.
00:18:22.000The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S.
00:18:25.000person, but does not name Fusion GPS or Principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S.
00:18:30.000law firm representing the DNC, even though that was known by the DOJ at the time.
00:18:34.000The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of and paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
00:18:45.000So that's the big point here, right, is that the dossier was the basis for the FISA warrant, and that was the basis for launching the entire investigation.
00:18:52.000Two, the Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016 Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page's July 2016 trip to Moscow.
00:19:02.000This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier, because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News.
00:19:09.000The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News.
00:19:14.000Steele has admitted in British court filings he met with Yahoo News and several other outlets in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS.
00:19:20.000Perkins Coy was aware of Steele's initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington, D.C.
00:19:25.000in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.
00:19:28.000So, they're knocking down the assumption that there was other information used for the Carter Page warrant.
00:19:33.000Right, because the Carter Page application originally included this Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, but that was coming from the same place, namely Christopher Steele.
00:19:40.000Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations, an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI, in an October 30, 2016 Mother Jones article by David Corn.
00:19:52.000Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September before the FISA application, before the page application was sent to the court in October, but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.
00:20:06.000So they're now suggesting that Steele should be prosecuted for lying to the FBI.
00:20:10.000Steele's numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling, maintaining confidentiality and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.
00:20:19.000Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with the DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein.
00:20:31.000Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Orr, documenting his communications with Steele.
00:20:35.000For example, in September 2016, I'm reading directly from this fabled four-page memo put out by Devin Nunes, Steele admitted to Orr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he was, quote, desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.
00:20:51.000One, Steele thought that Trump was actually in bed with the Russians and didn't want him to be president.
00:20:54.000Or two, he hated Trump and therefore trumped up all this stuff against Trump.
00:20:58.000This clear evidence of Steele's bias was recorded by Orr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files, but not reflected in any of the page FISA applications.
00:21:07.000During this same period, Orr's wife, the Deputy Attorney General, was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump.
00:21:14.000Orr later provided the FBI with all of his wife's Apple research paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS.
00:21:19.000The Orr's relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISA court.
00:21:27.000All of this is super, super dirty stuff.
00:21:30.000And in just a second, we're going to go through the rest of the memo, and then we're going to get Trump's reaction to all of this.
00:21:34.000It sounds like he's preparing for mass firings, so things are about to heat up in a serious way.
00:21:39.000We'll get to all of that in just one second.
00:21:41.000First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Helix Sleep.
00:21:43.000So, if you're losing sleep lately, then you may need to catch up over the weekend, because let's face it, this is going to light up Twitter and Facebook and the media for the rest of the day.
00:21:53.000You're going to need some sleep over the weekend.
00:21:54.000That's why you need the best mattress.
00:21:55.000And that's what Helix Sleep does for you.
00:21:57.000We have a Helix Sleep mattress in our bedroom.
00:22:43.000So we've already established, according to this memo, a couple of things.
00:23:08.000We have established that the FISA warrants originally taken out on Trump campaign member Carter Page was taken out based on a dossier compiled by Christopher Steele on behalf of the DNC.
00:23:18.000That information was never revealed to the FISA court.
00:23:20.000There was apparently no other confirming information that was used.
00:23:23.000We also know now that Steele had an agenda against Trump and openly admitted such, and that he worked with the Deputy Attorney General, whose wife was busy compiling this information on behalf of the DNC and the Hillary campaign for Fusion GPS.
00:23:36.000According to the head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its infancy at the time of the initial Page-FISA application.
00:23:45.000After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele's reporting as only minimally corroborated.
00:23:52.000In early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was, according to his June 2017 testimony, salacious and unverified.
00:24:02.000While the FISA application relied on Steele's past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations.
00:24:11.000Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISA court without the Steele dossier information.
00:24:20.000So that's an amazing admission by McCabe, that the Steele dossier was the only thing that allowed this investigation to start.
00:24:25.000And then we conclude, the FISA—the Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos.
00:24:35.000The Papadopoulos information triggering the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Peter Strzok
00:24:43.000Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel's Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page, no known relation to Carter Page, where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated.
00:24:56.000The Strzok-Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigations, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an insurance policy against President Trump's election.
00:25:13.000I'm reading this in real time, so here's my real-time take.
00:25:15.000If you think that the Nunes memo is the completion, is the entirety of all of the information in the Trump-Russia collusion case, then the whole thing is not only an empty vessel, it is a sting operation by the Clinton operation, working in cahoots with the FBI and the DOJ, if there is nothing else there, if they can show nothing else there.
00:25:33.000And all this obstruction stuff, all of this Trump firing Comey, all of this Trump asking Rosenstein whose side he was on, all of this,
00:25:40.000Seems to fall by the wayside because, let's face it, if there's nothing there, and Trump is saying there's nothing there, why won't you guys side with me?
00:25:47.000That's not the same thing as him attempting to obstruct justice.
00:26:05.000The memo endangers national security, which is what Democrats have been proclaiming, has been pretty much blown out of the water now that we've seen the memo.
00:26:11.000There's nothing there, by the way, that we hadn't already supposed.
00:26:13.000When I was asked about why—when I talked on the show about why the memo—what the memo said, I speculated the memo said exactly this, right?
00:26:22.000If you go back and listen to the shows, I speculated, I hadn't read the memo, that what the memo said was this.
00:26:28.000And I said, if that's the case, how does this endanger national security?
00:26:31.000And yet, the Democrats were out there saying this over and over and over, like Jeff Merkley, the senator from Oregon.
00:26:36.000He came out and he said that if the memo were released, the intel community would stop talking with the House.
00:26:41.000That also goes to the heart of the manipulation of very sensitive national secrets, highly classified information that is given to the Intelligence Committee with the understanding that it will not be released in a fashion that endangers the United States or in a fashion that manipulates the information for political purposes.
00:27:00.000And so that understanding goes to the heart of how the Committee is able to get sensitive information in the first place, why the government is willing to share it with the Committee.
00:27:09.000So this really threatens to blow up the whole contract between the branches of government over sensitive information.
00:27:17.000OK, it's just ridiculous that this was the suggestion.
00:27:21.000First of all, Congress oversees this agency.
00:27:54.000So this isn't about Joe McCarthy at this point.
00:27:55.000This is about you oversaw an FBI that was seeking FISA warrants against American citizens based on shoddy intelligence, and you refused to even turn over that information to the FISA court.
00:28:08.000Speaking of insanity, members of the media, Al Sharpton, Chris Matthews, they're saying that this turns the Constitution on its butt, right?
00:28:55.000So we'll have to see what the response is from Democrats.
00:28:58.000We'll have to see if they can bring forward more information.
00:29:00.000Again, the memo doesn't answer everything.
00:29:02.000It doesn't answer why the Donald Trump Jr.
00:29:03.000meeting happened, why he was showing willingness to collude with the Russians.
00:29:07.000It doesn't show why George Papadopoulos was lying to the FBI.
00:29:11.000It doesn't cover everything, but it raises some pretty serious questions about how the FISA court does its business, and whether the FBI and DOJ were lying in order to gain a FISA warrant, and whether they have an agenda against Trump.
00:29:20.000Now, again, does that necessarily kill the Mueller investigation?
00:29:24.000But it does set some pretty rigorous questions in front of, particularly, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, who went forward with these FISA applications if all they were—but remember, Carter Page has not been indicted.
00:29:34.000When all these indictments were about to come down, my understanding, my thought, was that it was going to be Paul Manafort and Mike Flynn and Carter Page.
00:29:41.000There's been no indictment of Carter Page.
00:29:43.000So as far as we know, Carter Page was not involved in criminal activity.
00:29:46.000He's just an idiot who wanders around Russia looking for cash.
00:29:48.000This doesn't actually mean that Carter Page was a criminal.
00:29:51.000So that means that you launch this entire investigation on the back of the only guy who hasn't been indicted that we thought would be indicted.
00:29:56.000The Manafort indictment, by the way, has nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
00:30:00.000The Manafort indictment has to do with him lying to the FBI.
00:30:02.000The George Papadopoulos indictment is the only one that has to do with the Trump campaign, because he apparently lied to the FBI about meetings that he had in London with a Russian cutout.
00:30:11.000But it's not clear that Papadopoulos was working on behalf of the Trump administration or the Trump campaign.
00:30:15.000Trump campaign basically disowned Papadopoulos in the middle of the campaign.
00:30:19.000So all of this calls into serious question the entire investigation.
00:30:22.000Does it mean the investigation should be killed?
00:30:25.000Does it mean that the entire investigation should die?
00:30:29.000But, you know, it's also important—no, Papadopoulos was—the counterintelligence investigation began before the FISA application on Page, but it was on Papadopoulos.
00:30:40.000So, this is an important point, right?
00:30:42.000So, this is—it's an important point.
00:30:44.000So, again, this is all weird and somewhat confusing, right?
00:30:53.000They've been surveilling the members of the Trump campaign.
00:30:57.000Carter Page has been surveilled by the FISA back in 2014.
00:30:59.000There are a lot of sketch characters working for all of this.
00:31:02.000But Papadopoulos was under investigation first.
00:31:04.000So while there are serious questions to be raised about the warrant on Carter Page, I'm trying to set out the timeline in my own head as we go along here.
00:31:13.000Devin Nunes just confirmed the New York Times narrative that Papadopoulos was actually under investigation first.
00:31:17.000So one of the things that the investigation is covering here is, I want to clarify and I want to backtrack.
00:31:25.000Again, I'm doing this all in real time.
00:31:27.000So, the original FISA application that was taken out against Carter Page,
00:31:31.000It's now clear from this timeline that that is not what actually launched the investigation, because—paragraph 5, let me reread that, OK?
00:31:55.000What's interesting about that—it's sort of buried in there and a little biased, and I had to read it twice because I'm getting texts from lawyers who are friends—is that if the page FISA application mentioned information regarding Papadopoulos, that means that the investigation was already on regarding Papadopoulos.
00:32:10.000So it doesn't kill the entire Mueller investigation.
00:32:12.000What it does do is call into question how the FBI and the DOJ were pursuing that investigation.
00:32:17.000So, that means that there should be serious consequences inside the FBI and the DOJ for the alacrity with which they sought to go after Carter Page, but it doesn't necessarily kill the entire investigation.
00:32:27.000So, that may be the happy medium that we are coming to here.
00:32:31.000If that is the case, then that means that if Trump starts firing people in the Mueller investigation, that is probably a bad move.
00:34:13.000You got to see my entire thought process as it happened, right?
00:34:16.000So, here is the short summary of the memo.
00:34:19.000FISA application on Carter Page may have been gotten by ill gains.
00:34:23.000Carter Page application is not the entirety of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, nor was it the launching point of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, which means it's very hard for Trump to fire Mueller and just kill the investigation outright.
00:34:34.000Or to say that this is the only thing that was being investigated.
00:34:36.000However, it does demonstrate FBI and DOJ working with the Hillary campaign, presumably, and acting in corrupt fashion, particularly with regard to Carter Page.
00:35:04.000I think we need to calm down, so let's listen to some Bach.
00:35:08.000So, we've been doing Bach pieces all week long.
00:35:10.000This is a piece that you'll know, you may not recognize that it is Bach, because nobody knows music anymore, but it's Bach's maybe most famous piece.
00:35:17.000You probably heard it when you were in church at one point.
00:35:19.000This is Bach's Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring.
00:35:55.000And listen, it would have been okay anyway.
00:35:57.000You know, regardless of how this went, facts are facts.
00:35:59.000And so we'll have to see how all of this plays out.
00:36:01.000But let's get to another thing that I like.
00:36:03.000So I have to play you what I think is the funniest thing that I have seen in a very long time.
00:36:09.000There is a guy who attempted to break into a car, and a guy who I'm friendly with, John Curley over at Cairo Radio in Seattle, very nice guy, good sportscaster.
00:36:19.000They recorded him doing a play-by-play, like a sports play-by-play just in time for the Super Bowl for a guy trying to break into a car, and it's pretty spectacular.
00:38:45.000Because they don't even fact-check the people they use for fact-checking.
00:38:47.000So, yesterday, they released information that Alan Grayson, a representative from Florida, who is a complete nutjob—I mean, a complete and utter nutjob—thinks Ted Cruz was not eligible to be president, compared the Tea Party to the KKK.
00:38:59.000He's just—he's a complete crazy person.
00:39:42.000For getting in my face and being a fool and pushing me as I was trying to lead this event.
00:39:46.000Sir, why do you think your ex-wife is asking you and making these allegations?
00:39:50.000You know, I'm hoping that somebody comes here and arrests you.
00:39:53.000I mean, he's a crazy person, Alan Grayson.
00:39:55.000So PolitiFact hired this idiot to actually be a fact checker for them.
00:39:58.000He was going to be the voice of the people.
00:40:00.000They hired a Republican congressman who's anti-Trump, and they hired Alan Grayson to be the fact checkers for PolitiFact.
00:40:04.000And then they had to fire him later that afternoon when it came out, as everyone who follows politics even minutely knows, that he is a complete nutbag.
00:40:11.000Okay, so it just demonstrates that PolitiFact isn't all that it's cracked up to be.
00:40:40.000The memo basically suggests that a FISA warrant was gotten on a U.S.
00:40:45.000citizen, Carter Page, who's a member of the Trump campaign, and was gotten at the behest of the Hillary campaign.
00:40:50.000It was gotten at the behest of the Hillary Clinton campaign, working through Fusion GPS, and that the DOJ and the FBI basically took a piece of OPPO research put together by Hillary Clinton and then used that as a basis to surveil Trump.
00:41:01.000Now, the implication is that this is sort of the poisonous tree, the root of the poisonous tree, and that should destroy the entire Mueller-Russia collusion investigation.
00:41:12.000The Nunes memo includes, sort of buried in there, information that suggests that the investigation predated the Carter Page-FISA warrant issue.
00:41:29.000That the investigation is more than just Carter Page, and that this doesn't kill the investigation.
00:41:33.000But that's the really short story here.
00:41:35.000OK, Christopher Martin says, while it is obvious the Democrats have painted themselves into an ideological corner with regard to the president, do you see an opportunity for them to seek common ground with Republicans in Congress?
00:41:44.000I think it's highly unlikely, because any common ground they find with Republicans in Congress will end up being common ground with Trump.
00:41:49.000They've obviously decided they would rather not legalize 1.8 million illegal immigrants than even conceive of making some sort of deal with Trump.
00:41:57.000So that's sort of an astonishing political move on their part, because Trump either is going to pass good proposals or he won't.
00:42:04.000If he's unable to pass good proposals, because Democrats stymie it, and he puts forward a bunch of friendly, bipartisan proposals, and Democrats just keep pushing back, it's not going to redound to their benefit.
00:42:15.000I'm a South African citizen who recently immigrated to the United States because I, like you, believe America is the greatest experiment in human history.
00:42:20.000My question is regarding the latest Republican immigration proposal, especially as it relates to chain migration.
00:42:25.000Since I, like you, believe in limited government and that people should rely on their family, friends, and local churches for help, how does it make any sense to forbid people from bringing their family with them?
00:42:32.000The current system demands the person sponsoring their family member has to be financially capable of supporting said family member.
00:42:38.000Could we not simply create a means by which we limit the amount of government assistance immigrants can obtain, rather than simply banishing them from coming at all?
00:42:45.000I mean, I'd be very much in favor of that.
00:42:47.000I mean, I do think that the idea of limiting government assistance to immigrants, ensuring that they are culturally assimilated, then I'm fine with open immigration.
00:42:55.000I don't have a problem with the number of people coming in.
00:42:57.000I think that a lot of people like Tom Cotton and Jeff Sessions have made the case that it hurts the country economically to bring in new people who want to work.
00:43:03.000I don't think that's the case at all, by any stretch of the imagination.
00:43:15.000There's not a lot of counterpoint in big band jazz.
00:43:17.000They'd probably think that it was relatively rudimentary, because it is.
00:43:21.000I mean, when you compare it to classical music, big band jazz is relatively rudimentary.
00:43:24.000With that said, I think that they would enjoy the work of Gershwin, probably, because Gershwin is creative and also has classical temperament.
00:43:32.000I enjoy big band jazz, by the way, but it is a simplified version of music.
00:43:35.000I mean, it's a simplified form of classical music.
00:43:37.000So they may have been impressed by the emotion of Big Band Jazz, but they certainly would have been impressed by the intellect in Big Band Jazz, even though I enjoy it.
00:43:51.000So I'm not, by nature, a procrastinator.
00:43:53.000I tend to think—I'm very good at delayed gratification, so I tend to think that if I get something done now, I won't have to deal with it later.
00:44:04.000Make a list of the things that you want to get done, and then take the things that are easiest to do and strike those off the list first so you feel like you have momentum.
00:44:10.000Because if you start with the really big thing, you're going to want to put that off because it's too intimidating.
00:44:14.000But if you knock all the little things off your list, you'll actually get them done.
00:44:17.000So that's the easiest way to avoid procrastination.
00:44:20.000Cody says, Habit, my wife and I are huge fans.
00:44:22.000As evangelical Christians, we really appreciate your stance on abortion.
00:44:25.000We're wondering what the likelihood of Roe v. Wade ever being repealed would be and what it would take to do so.
00:44:29.000Well, it takes five votes for Roe v. Wade to be repealed.
00:44:31.000That would not, in fact, make abortion illegal across the nation.
00:44:33.000It would just say that states have the capacity to pass laws on abortion.
00:44:38.000So the idea that Roe v. Wade goes away and suddenly abortion is illegal across the country, that's not correct.
00:45:05.000It seems to me that most of the good classical music is actually being written for film at this point.
00:45:10.000If you listen to the scores of Elmer Bernstein or Jerry Goldsmith, or if you listen to the scores of John Williams, then you're listening to some pretty solid classical music, actually.
00:45:20.000I've been hearing a lot about Chelsea Manning's attempt to run for Senate.
00:45:39.000The third section has barred a man named Victor Berger from his congressional seat for violating the Espionage Act, the self-same act that Manning himself committed.
00:45:46.000It is worth noting that Bergman was acquitted due to biases of the judge on the trial against him.
00:45:50.000Lastly, I don't think the sentence commutation would save him, as the amendment states that only Congress can absolve you.
00:45:54.000Fun fact, only two people have been absolved, Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee.
00:46:00.000Off the top of my head, my answer is no, simply because I believe that there are other considerations as far as state considerations that come into account, not just the constitutional issue.
00:46:12.000So, you know, I want to do a little bit more research on that.
00:46:15.000Newsweek suggests, at least, that Chelsea Manning is capable of running.
00:46:20.000So, the reason for that, apparently, is that the Constitution allows U.S.
00:46:23.000citizens to have a criminal record to run for Congress, but state laws can be different.
00:46:26.000The only qualifications to run for U.S.
00:46:28.000Senate is you have to be 30 years old to have citizenship in the U.S.
00:46:31.000for at least nine years and live in the state at the time of the election.
00:46:33.000It does not state on their website anyone who has a criminal record can't run for U.S.
00:46:43.000Daniel says, I'm stuck between two worlds.
00:46:44.000I've been going to school for music, but I have a passion for writing philosophy and history as well.
00:46:48.000How do I reconcile the artistic with the political?
00:46:50.000Well, I don't think that you necessarily have to reconcile them, but what I would suggest is that the same natural law that undergirds a belief in reason as making possible the discovery of higher truths makes possible the discovery of better music.
00:47:07.000This is a view that was held by Bach, held by Beethoven, held by Mozart, held by Brahms.
00:47:10.000The idea that there are natural laws to the human ear, natural laws to the human mind, that make certain music better than other music on an objective level.
00:47:17.000I think that is true, and I think that is also true in philosophy and history as well.
00:47:22.000Also, I think that, you know, one of the beautiful things about the way that our current free market system works is that if you became a very prominent musician, suddenly people actually care about your opinion.
00:47:31.000I mean, or at least they're supposed to, according to the Grammys.
00:47:36.000I'm concerned that technology like CRISPR is going to expand beyond foundations of medicine from treatment to intentional body modifications.
00:47:42.000Examples of normal muscle growth for sports, or possibly genetic sex changes, or live extensions, or physical characteristics.
00:47:47.000When is altering your God-inspired vessel allowed?
00:47:49.000My view is that if you are correcting a flaw, that is one thing.
00:47:52.000If you are simply trying to better yourself through genetics, that's another.
00:47:56.000I think that carries serious risks of essentially eugenics.
00:48:00.000Brad says, I want to learn about Israel.
00:48:03.000Not just old history, but modern as well.
00:48:05.000Now, the one that I recommend for people is a book by a guy named Eli Bard.
00:48:08.000He's the editor called Myths and Facts About Israel.
00:48:11.000It's 300 pages, but they're each kind of bite-sized questions.
00:48:14.000It's a bunch of questions that are answered about Israel.
00:48:17.000Benjamin Netanyahu back in the 90s wrote a book called A Durable Peace, which is quite good about the history of Israel and how modern Israel operates today.
00:48:24.000So the argument for atheism is that there is no free will, we are just balls of flesh wandering through the universe.
00:48:27.000I don't find that completely implausible.
00:48:52.000Not more plausible than the explanation that we have free will, we are capable of changing in our own lives, that our action is in our own hands, that we are endowed with reason that extends beyond just neuronal firing.
00:49:04.000That, I think, is a more compelling case.
00:49:08.000Belief in God does not have to be certainty to be probability.
00:49:11.000And so, I believe that God exists and that He controls the universes involved in our lives, and that He has handed to us a set of precepts that help guide our lives and make better civilization.
00:49:21.000One of the reasons for that is almost utilitarian, which is that the only great civilization in the history of the world, in my viewpoint, is the Judeo-Christian civilization springing from those foundations.
00:49:30.000But the atheist argument, which is that basically everything happened through accident, I don't find it supremely compelling, but I find it at least plausible.
00:49:37.000I mean, it's plausible, the idea that the universe is eternal, that we've gone through a billion iterations of the universe, that eventually we hit on the
00:50:05.000I would suggest that the... I find the Aristotelian-Aquinas argument the best.
00:50:11.000The ontological argument I don't find quite as compelling.
00:50:13.000The argument, you know, the ontological argument is usually expressed as St.
00:50:18.000Anselm said, that if you can imagine God, that God therefore must exist.
00:50:22.000That's the sort of very simplified and non-correct version of the ontological argument.
00:50:27.000Now the Aquinas argument, which is that in the infinite regress of causes has to
00:50:32.000Terminate in a first cause, an unmoved mover, or at least an unactualized actualizer.
00:50:39.000I find that a compelling, rational explanation of why things exist the way that they do.
00:50:44.000I also think that if you believe that, as Kant does, I like the Kantian argument as well, the Kantian argument suggesting that we have an innate moral sense and that was placed by something like God, I think that's right.
00:50:56.000But the only argument that actually gets you to a God who is perfect, good, and all-knowing is the Aquinas argument, not necessarily the Kantian argument.
00:51:18.000And there's a whole group of folks with whom I may disagree on substantial issues that I like personally, because I think that they are interested in asking questions and like talking about facts and first principles.
00:51:28.000To me, that's the mark of somebody who's interesting to talk to, somebody who likes talking first principles.
00:51:32.000So, for example, I've criticized Sam Harris's views because I disagree with him.
00:51:38.000Eric Weinstein is somebody who I disagree with, but I have fun talking to him because we can talk first principles and examine each other's thoughts and make them sharper.
00:52:24.000So there are some of these songs that are catchy, but I don't remember who did them, nor do I care.
00:52:27.000Toby says, Ben, what is going to happen in the last season of Game of Thrones?
00:52:30.000What's going to happen in the last season of Game of Thrones is that they're going to all decide on a democracy that is led by Tyrion after Dany dies.
00:52:38.000She's going to be cast as the all-perfect, all-knowing, all-wise person.
00:53:22.000I mean, what I would suggest is that, I mean, if you're joining the military and you're joining a line of work that involves possibly killing people, that that's a serious consideration.
00:53:33.000Obviously, I think that there are people who need to be killed.
00:53:48.000The word for kill in Hebrew is taharog.
00:53:51.000So it would be lo taharog if they didn't want you to kill.
00:53:53.000Patrick says, hey Ben, I figure you have a pretty negative view of prostitution and pornography.
00:53:57.000Given your general sentiment that people should generally be left alone, how do we balance the laws concerning these activities and leaving people alone to do what they will?
00:54:03.000So public pornography, public displays of pornography, I think can be regulated because you're talking there about things that affect the community.
00:54:11.000Prostitution is another thing that affects public commerce.
00:54:16.000I tend to be in favor of legalization of prostitution, leaving aside the exploitation of women, which of course should be illegal.
00:54:23.000That said, my feeling is that a social bulwark is necessary and that if law is the only bulwark between you and the abyss, then law is not going to save you.
00:54:32.000We'll be back here next to one more one more Kate says my fiance and I can't pick a honeymoon location suggestions So the places that I love Hawaii Hawaii is just fantastic And it's also relatively affordable if you can afford it Italy is a fantastic honeymoon location Italy is just phenomenal France is great
00:54:53.000But if you just want a relaxed place, you're just going to go and lie back and not have to rush around seeing things, then Hawaii is the place to be.