Matt Taibbi has been a brilliant, sharp, often satirical journalist for 15 years at Rolling Stone. But as we ve seen, the left has fractured, castigating any liberal who doesn t accept their orthodoxy without questions. In this episode, Ben and Matt discuss what's left for liberalism and journalism now, plus some stories from his time on the presidential campaign trail and what happened after Matt committed the egregious sin of reviewing Matt Walsh's What Is a Woman. This show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. Protect your online privacy today by becoming a member of ExpressVPN and getting 25% off your first month with discount code: PGPUNIVERSAL. You ll have access to all of the full conversations with everyone and access to access to the full conversation with everyone. The only way to get access to that part of the conversation is to become a member, and the only way you can access the full series of conversations is to join Dailywire. Subscribe to Dailywire today! Use code BONUS to get 25% all year long off your monthly membership plan when you sign up! Use the discount code "PODCAST" at checkout to receive 25% of your entire annual membership when you become a patron! If you don't already have a membership, you'll get 20% off for the entire year, plus an additional 15% discount when you upgrade to the Dailywire membership! You'll get 10% off the entire month, plus a FREE 30-day trial when you buy a copy of his new book, "The New York Times print edition of his newest book "The Best of the New York Review and subscribe to his new podcast "The Other Side of the Times Square" starts shipping from Amazon Prime and Vimeo! starting on January 1st, starting on September 1st! Subscribe here! Learn more about the book, The Other Side Of: How to be a Progressive in 2020: What's a Progressive by Matt and I'm a Progressive? The New Side Of It All? by Matt's Book Recommendation: How To Be A Progressive by Ben Shapiro and I'll Tell Me How to Be a Progressive, How to Get It All About It All by Matt, How To Write It's Not Like That by Matt Does It? by Ben and How To Think Like That's Not a Conservative by Matt Talks About It by Matt & I'll Be That's a Good Person by Matt And I'll See It by Ben And I'm Not a Bad Guy by Ben & I Can't Say That by Ben Is a Good Guy?
00:00:00.000Our job as journalists, the way I see it, is not to make a pronouncement, not to convince people to think one way or the other, but to explain why things happen.
00:00:10.000Suddenly they're telling us as reporters, we can't include something that's true because it goes against some kind of narrative.
00:00:18.000Colorful, sharp, liberal, often satirical, journalist for 15 years at Rolling Stone with famous articles like The Great American Bubble Machine, in which Matt Taibbi refers to Goldman Sachs as a, quote, vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity.
00:00:32.000Yet, Matt and I are finding a rather large common ground in the year 2022.
00:00:35.000Matt Taibbi writes across the board in finance, sports, international policy, presidential campaign trails, and everything else.
00:00:42.000He started overseas, specifically in Uzbekistan, until being deported for a piece at the Associated Press that was critical of the country's president.
00:00:49.000Then in Russia, Matt edited The Exile, an irreverent newspaper for Moscow's expatriate community.
00:00:54.000His time there is told in his first book, The Exile, Sex, Drugs, and Libel in the New Russia.
00:00:59.000His entire career is branded by this highly subjective, often brazen journalism, and it's done well for him.
00:01:04.000But as we've seen, the left has now fractured, castigating any and every liberal who doesn't accept their orthodoxy without questions.
00:01:12.000In 2020, Matt announced the majority of his work would no longer be published at Rolling Stone.
00:01:16.000He planted his own flag at Substack, continuing journalism independently.
00:01:20.000In this episode we discuss what's left for liberalism and even journalism now, plus some stories from his time on the presidential campaign trail, and what happened after Matt committed the egregious sin of reviewing Matt Walsh's What Is A Woman.
00:02:12.000So what, why don't we start with the obvious here, Matt, which is that it's super weird that we're talking to each other.
00:02:16.000So like 15, 15 years ago, this would have been almost unthinkable, right?
00:02:19.000I was working at Breitbart circa about 2012, 2013, and you were writing for Rolling Stone and it was, you know, pitched battles in the streets and all the rest.
00:02:32.000Do you think that it's now made conversations like this possible on the one hand and forbidden on the other?
00:02:38.000Well, I think there's been a significant changing of what the mentality is on what used to be my side of the aisle.
00:02:45.000I mean, people like me, I'm basically like a middle-of-the-road, ACLU, old-school liberal.
00:02:52.000You know, I believe in free speech, civil liberties, due process, all those things.
00:02:58.000People like me are really Kind of dinosaurs are no longer welcome on the new left, which has taken this dramatic turn towards censoriousness and toward a more authoritarian approach to some problems.
00:03:14.000I think there's a belief that the old leftist approach or the old liberal approach is ineffective.
00:03:24.000And so, you know, we've all been sort of kicked out of the club, basically.
00:03:28.000So without changing any point of view at all, really, suddenly people like you and me are, you know, media bedfellows.
00:03:37.000Yeah, Matt, this is something that I find just utterly bewildering.
00:03:39.000Because if you watch sort of the progress of American politics since the 1960s, there's no question that liberalism was winning.
00:03:44.000I mean, on nearly every front, social front, fiscal front, maybe even the foreign policy front, maybe.
00:04:01.000We need to lock this stuff down to avoid offending people.
00:04:04.000Where do you think this is coming from?
00:04:06.000I have no idea, but I totally agree with you.
00:04:09.000When I was growing up, there would have been no thought at all of conservatism as an attractive ideology for a young person.
00:04:17.000That was completely out of the realm of possibility.
00:04:21.000I think you see it very significantly with something like humor.
00:04:25.000There's just no sense of humor on the political left now, and that used to be the exclusive province of the political left once upon a time.
00:04:33.000I mean, I grew up listening to Richard Pryor albums.
00:04:38.000Sam Kinison, that was my education growing up.
00:04:41.000And those were our people, we thought.
00:04:44.000And now, all of a sudden, there's no joking allowed on this side of the aisle.
00:04:49.000And that's one of the things that's funny, incidentally, about Matt Walsh's movie, is that it's done with a kind of sense of humor and a satirical bent.
00:05:00.000That's sort of taboo on our side of the aisle now, which I find really strange because that shift happened almost overnight and imperceptibly.
00:05:11.000So Matt, you mentioned Matt Walsh's movie, What is a Woman, which is a massively successful documentary for us.
00:05:16.000I mean, it's an unbelievable business.
00:05:17.000It hasn't received a single mainstream review.
00:05:19.000And of course, when we sent out the movie for review to all of the reviewers, we got back just nasty notes, cursing, people saying they definitely would not watch it.
00:05:27.000Even the prospect of having received the email was apparently some sort of Digital form of bubonic plague to even have been reached out to meant that you are now infected and you had to be quarantined for a particular period of time.
00:05:57.000I try to avoid issues that I don't know a whole lot about.
00:06:01.000But I had done a couple of stories that touched on this basically from the speech angle.
00:06:07.000And I'd had a really unusual experience.
00:06:09.000I mean, I've been a reporter for 30 years now, and it's always the same method.
00:06:14.000You call around a whole bunch of people, you ask them all what they think, and then at the end, you kind of aggregate all the opinions and figure out where the story is.
00:06:23.000But with the trans issue, what I found is I would call some people and they would talk to me.
00:06:27.000And then there'd be this other group of people who would be furious that you even called, would refuse to have any kind of discussion, would call you a transphobe for even asking certain kinds of questions.
00:06:37.000And this is before you even have a point of view on the subject.
00:06:41.000So I was, you know, I thought that was odd.
00:06:44.000And then I had done an interview with a woman named Kara Dansky, who is a feminist, a gender critical feminist.
00:06:52.000And it's not that I purposely shelved it.
00:06:56.000I just didn't want to deal with the blowback that I knew was going to come.
00:06:59.000I kept telling myself it wasn't the right time.
00:07:02.000So I felt guiltier and guiltier about that as time progressed.
00:07:07.000And when Matt's movie came out, when When as a Woman came out, I realized I thought this was an opportunity to kind of fix that problem of having, you know, not run that interview.
00:07:48.000I have, you know, people who I'm friendly with on the left, people like Jessie Singel, who used to write for New York Magazine, and Jessie's had exactly the same issues.
00:07:54.000Katie Herzog, who is a lesbian, has had exactly the same issues.
00:07:57.000Emily Bazelon recently wrote a piece for New York Magazine that I think was actually fairly friendly toward the trans agenda, and she was ripped up and down on that.
00:08:06.000I'm gonna get some more on this in just one second.
00:08:08.000First, let's talk about life insurance.
00:08:11.000You need life insurance because this is what makes you a responsible person.
00:08:14.000Having life insurance through your job might actually not be enough.
00:08:17.000Most people need up to 10 times more coverage to properly provide for their families.
00:08:21.000Whether you're graduating from school, planning a wedding, welcoming a baby, or switching jobs, now is the time to protect your family's finances.
00:08:27.000PolicyGenius is your one-stop shop to find the insurance you need at the right price.
00:08:31.000Head on over to PolicyGenius.com to get started.
00:08:33.000In minutes, you can compare personalized quotes from top companies and find your lowest price.
00:08:37.000You could save 50% or more on life insurance by comparing quotes with PolicyGenius.
00:08:41.000The licensed agents of PolicyGenius are on hand throughout the entire process to help you understand your options and make decisions with confidence.
00:09:13.000It's just the responsible thing to do.
00:09:15.000Head on over to PolicyGenius.com today to get started and secure the life insurance you and your family require.
00:09:21.000So, unfortunately, I think that what you went through is not a unique experience.
00:09:25.000It seems like a lot of what's happened in politics, and maybe this is the big difference between traditional liberals and the new left movement, is a question of how people identify.
00:09:34.000And I don't mean identify in terms of gender.
00:09:35.000I mean, what people see as the core of them.
00:09:38.000So when people feel that the core of them is their politics, that the politics is who I am, and then there's an attack on their politics, it's an attack on core identity, it's an attack on me, and that must never be allowed, and to even sit down with anybody who would attack my politics means that you are trying to erase me.
00:09:53.000A lot of the language that's now applied, that used to be applied on issues that are immutable, like issues of biology, now it's applied to political viewpoint.
00:10:04.000You don't see me unless you just agree with me.
00:10:06.000And to sit down with somebody who disagrees is somehow seen as a mark of, as you say, phobia.
00:10:11.000Yeah, and that's especially problematic in my job, right?
00:10:14.000If you're a reporter, I mean, your job is to sit down with all types of people, and we're not supposed to render judgment.
00:10:21.000We're supposed to understand, primarily.
00:10:24.000One of the first moments when I realized something really dramatic had changed on our side of the aisle came in the 2016 election, and I was doing a campaign story.
00:10:34.000I had covered the presidential elections for Rolling Stone for Um, five election campaigns.
00:10:42.000And I interviewed a guy from Wisconsin who said, uh, you know, my whole family was Democrat.
00:11:02.000And I got all this blowback from colleagues who were saying, you're validating the economic insecurity argument.
00:11:10.000You know, Trump is entirely about race.
00:11:12.000It's entirely about racism and xenophobia.
00:11:14.000And, you know, I understood where they were coming from.
00:11:20.000Our job as journalists, the way I see it, is not to make a pronouncement, not to convince people to think one way or the other, but to explain why things happen.
00:11:30.000And I think Trump was a phenomenon that had a lot of explanations.
00:11:34.000And one of them was the one that this guy in Wisconsin was talking about.
00:11:49.000I had never seen that in journalism before.
00:11:51.000And that was a signal to me that something big was going on.
00:11:57.000Yeah, Matt, and this is sort of a broader theme that you've been writing about for years, but it's really been exacerbated, I think, on all sides of the political aisle, and that is just institutional distrust.
00:12:04.000Now, the left had a sort of congenital institutional distrust with regard to, say, corporate America, and the right was more trusting, and now the right is not trusting with regard to corporate America.
00:12:11.000Or the right had a congenital trust of, say, the FBI, and now the right is not trusting of the FBI.
00:12:17.000And it feels like there's now sort of a consensus position over the last several years.
00:12:20.000That's an anti-establishment consensus.
00:12:23.000It's now a consensus that the institutions have dramatically failed us and that the people who continue to promote those institutions are sort of whistling past the graveyard.
00:12:32.000And it's creating some very weird political undercurrents and dynamics.
00:12:36.000Absolutely, and if you didn't see that as a primary driver of what was going on in 2016, you were in a very good campaign report, I don't think.
00:12:47.000I think it was very obvious in 2016 that what drove both the Bernie Sanders movement and the Trump movement was this enormous groundswell of distrust towards institutional America.
00:13:00.000And Trump picked up on it very early, whether he went after NATO or the intelligence services and especially us.
00:13:27.000And I, you know, a lot of the reporters didn't understand it.
00:13:30.000I totally got it, you know, because I what I saw was these are people who felt that the press and all these other institutions had betrayed them, you know, especially after 2008.
00:13:43.000But I think to a lot of other people, it doesn't that they still don't get it, that this is out there, that middle America has feels this way.
00:13:51.000And I'm flabbergasted that there are still people who don't see it.
00:13:57.000It really is kind of amazing because I think that the blinders have really come off to the idea that the people who purport to speak for particular institutions are really just speaking for themselves.
00:14:06.000And that the institutions in which we place our trust are a guise for their own power.
00:14:10.000Now this struck me pretty forcibly in the last few weeks actually.
00:14:13.000when I was looking at what was going on at the World Economic Forum.
00:14:15.000You had people like Klaus Schwab who was out there saying, we have the power in this room to remake the world in our own image.
00:14:22.000And I was thinking, wait, hold up a second.
00:14:23.000You a second ago were talking about the power of laissez-faire economics and the power of capitalism.
00:14:27.000And as a person who's conservative libertarian minded on economics I was like, OK, well, that part sounds good.
00:14:34.000But then you immediately shift into, OK, but we and our friends, we who are answerable to no one, can now decide what policies ought to be purveyed to the vast majority of the globe.
00:14:45.000What you're basically saying to me right now is that you want to use the power of institutions you didn't create in order to ram down an agenda that none of us approved.
00:14:52.000And it feels like that's happening in institution after institution.
00:14:56.000And this may be something that I had a little bit of a sneak peek look at because I lived in Russia for 10 years before I moved back to the States in the early 2000s.
00:15:07.000And those meetings at Davos, where officials who were close to the Yeltsin administration, there were lots of backroom deals that were done.
00:15:17.000you know, in Switzerland that had an enormous impact on the future of Russia at the time.
00:15:23.000And I had to pay a lot of attention to that.
00:15:25.000That was not something that I think the average American had to think about ever until very recently.
00:15:31.000But now we know we do have to think about these sort of unaccountable international institutions or whether, you know, domestically here in the United States, institutions like the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, you know, the sort of permanent bureaucracies, you know, they do have an impact on politics.
00:15:50.000I think we've seen this very graphically and, uh, the ordinary American is now, I think, more attuned to that than they ever have been before.
00:15:59.000So what do you think that the solution to some of that stuff is going to be?
00:16:02.000Because there's one mentality which is, okay, burn it all down, get rid of all these institutions, start ground up, or don't start over at all.
00:16:09.000And the other is we can kind of correct within the institution.
00:16:12.000It seems like the natural inclination for people within the institutions is to do neither of those.
00:16:20.000Just go into the shell, claim that everybody who opposes you is obviously some sort of extremist.
00:16:24.000You see this from big tech, which is trying to shut down opinions they don't like, or you see it from, for example, during COVID, the CDC, which would immediately declare that their public health opinions were the science.
00:16:35.000And then five months later, they would realize that they were wrong, and that became the new science.
00:16:39.000But how do you think that that's going to shake out?
00:16:42.000Because, and what we're talking about in terms of the reaction could be quite dangerous.
00:16:46.000I mean, some of these institutions are still kind of necessary, and they do need a serious Yeah, it's an enormous societal problem when the public doesn't trust institutions, you know, beginning with the media, frankly.
00:17:00.000I think it's a huge problem when people don't trust the news that they get over the airwaves.
00:17:09.000Walter Cronkite was voted the most trustworthy person in America twice, once at the beginning of the 70s and once in the middle of the 80s.
00:17:33.000I think the inclination of the people who are sitting in those chairs right now is not to fix the problem or not to recognize the problem.
00:17:41.000The only solution, from where I sit, is they have to govern better.
00:17:44.000They have to do a better job of providing for the population.
00:17:48.000And that seems to be the last thing that occurs to them.
00:17:51.000They all want to get into power through some kind of political machination, whether it's impeaching the people in the other party or using some kind of messaging campaign that they think will temporarily get them over.
00:18:16.000Yeah, I mean, it is one of the big mysteries is watching as, for example, the Biden administration, which pursues ideological goals over stuff that clearly works, is kind of insane.
00:18:27.000I'll get to that with you in just one second.
00:18:29.000First, let's talk about recruiting at your company.
00:18:31.000So there are a lot of things to do this summer.
00:18:33.000You want to free up as much time as possible to enjoy them.
00:18:35.000So that means if you're a business owner, the last thing you want is to sort through a lot of unqualified candidates resumes when you could be You know, actually having a good time with your kids this summer, like going out on the boat, having a barbecue.
00:18:45.000This is why you need ZipRecruiter to do the work for you.
00:18:49.000They will make sure that you get the best employees.
00:18:51.000You can try it out for free at ziprecruiter.com slash benguest.
00:18:54.000ZipRecruiter uses its powerful technology to find and match the right candidates up with your job.
00:18:59.000You can easily review these recommended candidates and invite your top choices to apply.
00:19:03.000Additionally, ZipRecruiter has a complete suite of tools that makes it easy to filter, review, and rate your candidates.
00:19:07.000Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within day one.
00:19:11.000No wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site based on G2 satisfaction ratings as of January 1, 2022.
00:19:18.000So, soak up all that summer has to offer and let ZipRecruiter do all the work for you.
00:20:19.000He's going to completely remake where we are in terms of foreign policy by both pulling out of Afghanistan and then getting us involved in a pretty protracted conflict in Ukraine.
00:20:28.000And Americans are looking at all this and going, I don't understand what you are doing or why you are doing it.
00:20:33.000What could Joe Biden do, do you think, to pull out of the tailspin?
00:20:36.000Or do you think this was sort of baked into the cake that the establishment politics are just such that this was going to happen no matter what?
00:20:42.000I think this is going to happen no matter what.
00:20:45.000You know, I covered Biden's campaign until, of course, he stopped campaigning.
00:20:51.000And, you know, the obvious idea behind Joe Biden was they looked at what happened in 2016 and they saw Hillary Clinton ran as an insider.
00:21:02.000Like, her whole pitch to America was, I've been in Washington for 25 years, I know how things work.
00:21:08.000You know, you can trust me at three o'clock in the morning when there's a crisis.
00:21:13.000But, you know, that's classic Democratic Party.
00:21:16.000They had no sense that the entire population, the one thing they hated most at that time, was the political insider.
00:21:22.000So of course that was a disastrous philosophy.
00:21:25.000The whole idea behind Joe Biden is he has, like, This sliver of credibility as an ordinary person through his Scranton Joe persona, this idea that he's, you know, he comes from a family that, you know, in some distant way is working class.
00:21:42.000But he hasn't, he of course hasn't governed that way, right?
00:21:46.000And he's governed essentially through this I think they're in a lot of trouble.
00:21:52.000I don't know exactly what they're going to run on.
00:21:55.000most of America and it doesn't translate well on television and it particularly doesn't translate when the guy is basically a corpse who doesn't understand what he's saying on TV.
00:22:05.000So I think they're in a lot of trouble.
00:22:07.000I mean I don't know exactly what they're going to run on.
00:22:11.000The midterms already look like they're a disaster that is going to happen, but what happens in the next presidential election is an even bigger mystery.
00:22:20.000I have no idea where they're going with that.
00:22:24.000I mean, it looks as though what they really want to run on is Trump because Biden beat Trump.
00:22:28.000And so if he just keeps running against Trump, then he thinks that he's going to win.
00:22:32.000I think that what he fails to recognize a couple of things.
00:22:34.000One, Trump actually is not on the ballot in 2022 and who knows whether he'll be on the ballot in 2024.
00:22:38.000That's becoming more and more of an issue.
00:22:40.000But, you know, beyond that, the referendum is now on you.
00:22:43.000You're the President of the United States, and you're not just the guy who gets to sit outside and critique the guy who's tweeting on the toilet.
00:22:49.000You're the one who actually is in charge of things.
00:22:51.000And Joe Biden seems to have this tendency to treat his presidency as though he were an observer to his own presidency.
00:22:57.000He'll say things, And it appears that he's just been made aware of them, or he'll yell at gas companies.
00:23:04.000He'll be like, why don't you guys just produce more?
00:23:06.000I don't know how you think government works, but you yelling at people is not typically how government works or how policy works.
00:23:13.000And so I wonder, you know, they really are doubling down on a lot of the January 6th kind of stuff.
00:23:17.000I wonder how you think that's playing or what you think that impact has.
00:23:41.000They spent four years of Trump's presidency essentially doing the Russiagate thing and trying to run against that.
00:23:48.000And then it was Ukrainegate, and they tried to run against that.
00:23:52.000And they never came out with a positive plan for what their theory was of how they were going to get ordinary America back on its feet, how they were going to restore Jobs in places that had lost them.
00:24:10.000They still think it's a political, you know, there's some kind of easy political fix to the question of getting elected.
00:24:18.000I think they just lucked out, frankly, that the pandemic hit.
00:24:22.000Had it not been for that, they might even have lost in 2020.
00:24:28.000And, you know, going forward, if they think they're going to win because of January 6th, Regardless of what I might think about that or anybody else might think about that, I think they're deluded.
00:24:38.000It's the same delusion that got them into trouble in 2016.
00:24:43.000One of the fascinating things that I think has happened in democratic politics is, as we started off the conversation with, the kind of unwillingness to run on a broad populist message.
00:24:54.000his basic idea, which was this broad kind of socialistic populism, was that it is equally appealing to all racial groups. I'm not going to campaign, he made this pretty clear in 2016, for example, I'm not going to campaign on the basis of race-specific policies. I'm just going to say that a rising tide lifts all boats, and so if we redistribute the way that I want to redistribute, everyone will be helped. My solution to racial inequality is going to be effectively a socialist redistributionism.
00:25:18.000It's an economic populist message that is not racially specific.
00:25:22.000And he was hit so hard by the racialized left that he then went woker in 2020.
00:25:48.000And by 2012, he had basically stopped with a lot of the unifying rhetoric on things like race.
00:25:52.000And it was about how Trayvon, his son could have been Trayvon Martin.
00:25:56.000And what happened in Ferguson, Missouri was indicative of broader national trends with regard to race.
00:26:01.000And the Democratic Party fell in love with this theory that they could replicate what Obama did in 2012, which was actually Not a replicable phenomenon.
00:26:09.000In 2012, he cobbled together this heavily multiracial, college-educated white ladies coalition.
00:26:14.000And the Democratic Party, I think, figured from there on in, this was going to be the coalition.
00:26:18.000And they failed to recognize a couple of things.
00:26:20.000One, Barack Obama was a unique candidate.
00:26:22.000And two, that was a unique point in time.
00:26:24.000And maybe a third thing, which is that when you create a racialized population, there's going to be a backlash.
00:26:29.000And that backlash includes a huge percentage of white Americans and maybe people who don't want to identify as racially essential members of a group, as you're seeing with Hispanics now, who are going to say, well, I'm not really interested in this kind of politics.
00:27:06.000In 2016, he was drawing blood on Hillary Clinton early in that race.
00:27:10.000And when he started going after her about her connections to these big banks that were paying her these massive amounts of money for speaking fees, and a lot of these were the same banks that had gotten, you know, people into trouble in 2008, the Democratic Party tried all these responses and none of them worked until Hillary did this thing that I think was Brilliant, but it radically changed the direction of the Democratic Party.
00:27:37.000She said, well, if we broke up all the banks today, would that end racism?
00:27:43.000And it just deflected the conversation.
00:27:46.000And I think for somebody like Bernie, and I don't want to psychoanalyze him, but somebody who's grown up in kind of the left liberal ecosystem, the worst thing in the world is to be accused of being like racially regressive to be or being a bigot.
00:28:03.000I think it was paralyzing to his campaign.
00:28:05.000I think he struggled with it throughout the rest of 2016 and he definitely struggled with it in the 2019-2020 race.
00:28:14.000And it took him away from that message that I think was working.
00:28:18.000You know, he was saying a lot of the same things, oddly enough, that Donald Trump was saying that year.
00:28:26.000I remember listening to Donald Trump saying, you know, Bernie and I, you know, we have a lot in common.
00:28:30.000We're saying a lot of the same things.
00:28:33.000And, you know, there's, I think the media is trying very hard to prevent people from realizing that that populist message If somebody were to try it, it would really work, you know?
00:28:46.000And Bernie made a big mistake, I think, tactically, by going away from that.
00:28:50.000So in a second, I'm going to ask you about that sort of populism and the populist message and whether horseshoe theory is real or it's just that the critique is the same, but the solutions are very, very different.
00:29:13.000matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you.
00:29:17.000Why would you buy a mattress made for somebody else? With Helix, you're getting a mattress you know will be perfect for the way you sleep. Everybody's unique, Helix knows that. They have several different mattress models to choose from. They've got soft, medium, and firm mattresses.
00:29:27.000Mattress is great for cooling you down if you sleep hot.
00:29:29.000Even a Helix Plus mattress for plus-size folks. I have a personalized mattress for myself. And let me tell you, it is firm, it is breathable.
00:29:37.000These mattresses are so good, I got one for my sister, then I got one for my other sister, then I got one for my parents.
00:29:41.000If you're looking for a mattress, you take the quiz, you order the mattress you're matched to, the mattress comes right to your door, shipped for free.
00:29:46.000You don't ever need to go to a mattress store again.
00:29:49.000You don't need to take my word for it.
00:30:17.000Hurry on over to helixsleep.com and slash Ben.
00:30:19.000Okay, so I want to talk about that sort of populist message, because you're exactly right.
00:30:23.000I mean, and you see it across the board, right?
00:30:25.000You see Donald Trump praising, for example, Bernie Sanders, or Tucker Carlson praising Elizabeth Warren's economic plan, right?
00:30:31.000That actually has happened on the air at Fox News.
00:30:34.000And you start thinking to yourself, okay, well, that's an interesting sort of horseshoe, or is what we're really seeing just Kind of back to what we were talking about before that the critique of the institutions is clearly correct.
00:30:44.000It's just that everybody has wildly variant solutions to the critique on the institutions, meaning that I look at Wall Street and I say, listen, I love capitalism.
00:30:53.000Wall Street is not engaging in capitalism.
00:30:55.000They're engaging in a sort of predatory practice whereby they work hand in glove with the government and then use their power to promote ESG ideals within the corporations in which they invest.
00:31:05.000And people on the left say, well no, the corporations are the bad guys, and if there were more government control to break up those corporations, then this would somehow foster greater fairness.
00:31:14.000I wonder whether, in fact, sort of the temporary agreement is false, is I guess what I'm asking.
00:31:32.000I covered a foreclosure court in Jacksonville, Florida.
00:31:35.000If you remember, they were foreclosing on so many people, they had to bring judges out of retirement to do these things called rocket dockets, where they were—essentially, you would go into a conference room, and a judge would would throw somebody out of a house every three minutes or so, and there would be these old, doddering, 80-year-old judges.
00:31:55.000Well, the people in those rooms, they weren't left or right.
00:31:57.000They were both Republicans and Democrats.
00:32:00.000The victims of the 2008 crash, and I think you, I actually agree with your analysis.
00:32:07.000I think it was a perversion of capitalism.
00:32:09.000Most of my sources back then were Wall Street people.
00:32:13.000They were people who were saying the real problem is that the bailouts are picking winners and losers.
00:32:22.000They're giving unfair advantages to these gigantic too-big-to-fail banks, and they're letting these mid-sized regional banks fail.
00:32:31.000And that's not really capitalism, right?
00:32:35.000We should let failures fail and let the chips fall where they may.
00:32:41.000But it's definitely true that people on both the left and the right, poor people, middle class people, working class people, They've both gone through the same things.
00:32:53.000They've both been affected in the same ways, and they have a lot of the same common interests.
00:32:57.000The critique and the answers may be different according to whatever politicians they follow, but I think they have a lot in common.
00:33:04.000And I think there's one of the main motives of kind of the divisive media model that we have today is to keep people from realizing it, that they have those common interests.
00:33:17.000So let's talk about the media for a second because I mean I totally agree obviously with your critique of the media.
00:33:23.000I do wonder whether when we talk about you know media figures being widely trusted it may be that that's impossible simply because the internet basically ended that era.
00:33:29.000That it was it was easy to say I trust Walter Cronkite when he was one of three people on TV who was talking about news.
00:33:35.000It's a lot harder to say here is a guy I trust when you have a hundred different sources and they're all critiquing each other and usually There's something to many of the critiques.
00:33:44.000And so, you know, listen, we have Daily Wire.
00:33:46.000We are obviously a right-wing company.
00:33:49.000At the bottom of every one of our articles, literally every one, we have a disclaimer at the bottom saying we are a conservative media company.
00:33:55.000Everything that we do is through the lens of our values, which frankly, I think is significantly more honest than most of the other media companies that claim that they have no bias whatsoever, but that they are just speaking the pure, unadulterated truth.
00:34:06.000And then you have like Brian Stelter promoting whatever on CNN.
00:34:10.000That, the breakdown in the media, I agree with you that it's, it is so important that there's not even a common, they always say there's not a common set of facts, but there really is not a common set of facts.
00:34:22.000I mean, and that is not because people on the right are lying about the facts invariably.
00:34:28.000That is because very often the mainstream sources are obscuring the actual facts in paragraph 17 of a New York Times article where the headline is actually wrong.
00:34:35.000They'll put the facts in, but it's buried in paragraph 17.
00:35:25.000And it's a signal telling you what the organization thinks about the subject.
00:35:30.000However, I do think we lost something when those companies went away from the Let's just say the objectivity as an aspiration.
00:35:40.000I think that was important when news companies tried at least a little bit to be down the middle, to present both sides of an issue, to not care so much about what the impact of a news story was.
00:36:16.000I think in the modern media landscape, that doesn't exist anymore, and that's a big problem.
00:36:22.000Yeah, I think one of the analogs in the modern media landscape where there actually is, you know, open bias, is one of the things that I say on my show all the time, and I literally say this, I would say at least once a week, is I'll get a question from somebody, how do I ascertain the truth about a particular story?
00:36:35.000What I say is I want you to listen to my podcast, and then I want you to listen to Pod Save America.
00:36:39.000And where we agree on the facts, that's gonna be the common core of facts, and everything else is gonna be the opinion that is drawn therefrom.
00:36:45.000And that seems like a fairly, you know, okay, where the lines intersect, that dot is gonna be the common core of facts.
00:36:51.000The problem is, Dan Pfeiffer goes on MSNBC, and he literally says on MSNBC that Facebook should shut down all of our traffic to Daily Wire.
00:36:58.000So, well, so the feeling that I get is, like, well, I'm trying to say, you know, fine, listen to anything, you know, I'll talk to any, I'll go on Bill Maher's show, and Bill Maher will come on my show, and it'll be great.
00:37:07.000There's a whole side of the aisle that's like, no, it is a false objectivity to even promote the idea that there is another idea.
00:37:16.000And so whatever we say goes, and if you controvert that narrative, then you are immediately barred from the club.
00:37:21.000Yeah, and that's just a losing argument with most audiences.
00:37:25.000I mean, people implicitly distrust anyone who doesn't want you to listen to someone else's argument, right?
00:37:32.000And that used to be something that attracted me, frankly, to, you know, liberalism, was this idea that, I don't care what that person says, I believe what I believe, and you can Watch that or listen to that if you want.
00:38:02.000I think it has a tendency to inspire audiences to trust People in the opposite direction, if you do that.
00:38:10.000So this censoriousness, this new idea of kind of stamping out the other side completely in the hope that you'll be the last opinion standing, that's a losing strategy, I think.
00:38:23.000And it's incredible to me that it's been adopted.
00:38:47.000I mean, I think if you go back, I think there was a moment in history in the mid-70s when, you know, you had the church committee hearings, you had Seymour Hersh doing that extraordinary story about a domestic surveillance program that was being cooked up, and Americans for a long time had this incredible distrust of the intelligence agencies because of what they heard at the church committee hearings.
00:39:11.000And then, There was another moment after the Iraq war when all these revelations started to come out about illegal surveillance programs, about the NSA's Stellar Wind program, you know, the Snowden revelations.
00:39:27.000You had heads of the intelligence agencies perjuring themselves openly in testimony before Congress.
00:39:34.000And if you remember, it wasn't that long ago, just before Donald Trump got elected, there was tremendous animosity across the board in America and distrust towards those institutions.
00:39:45.000And then what happened was I think Donald Trump got elected and a lot of the people in those institutions presented themselves as the defenders of democracy.
00:39:53.000We're the ones who are going to save you from Donald Trump.
00:39:55.000And suddenly they got all this great press.
00:39:59.000It was kind of this amazing media comeback story in a way.
00:40:04.000But I think what we've seen is that the rot goes pretty deep.
00:40:07.000To me, that's the headline story from Russiagate, is this sort of casual corruption that pervaded the entire system throughout that narrative, which ought to have been shocking, I thought, to reporters across the spectrum.
00:40:29.000I think most of America, especially on the right now, they have no belief in those institutions anymore.
00:40:37.000I will admit that I feel like I was late on the Russiagate story, not because I didn't think that there was something fishy going on.
00:40:43.000I said very early on I thought there was something fishy going on.
00:40:46.000I didn't actually believe that the rot could possibly go as deep as it ended up going.
00:40:51.000I mean, when there were allegations, for example, that the FISA court had not even been informed that the Carter Page stuff was basically a scam, or that the Steele dossier was basically a bit of OPPO research, and they went ahead and they signed this FISA warrant for Carter Page, or when I was when I was being told that the entire FBI infrastructure, all the way up to James Comey, was basically attempting to oust Donald Trump by jerry-rigging together a crap dossier and then laundering it into the media
00:44:07.000It was the wokest virus in all of human existence.
00:44:09.000At that moment, I think a lot of people just broke.
00:44:12.000Yeah, there were a lot of things that made no sense about that story from the very beginning.
00:44:18.000You know, I think for me as a journalist watching it, I was in shock.
00:44:22.000Pretty early on, you know, an important characteristic, I think, of any good reporter is to have humility about any story that you're covering, particularly a technical or a scientific story, you know, where your knowledge level is zero going in, right?
00:44:38.000So, you're completely relying on your sources to tell you the truth about something.
00:44:45.000Well, when they ruled out instantaneously the idea that this could possibly have originated in a lab before they had a definitive idea of how it actually had originated, that told me something significant had changed in the media landscape.
00:45:03.000Like, if you don't have humility about the possibility that it could have Could have occurred this way.
00:45:09.000And you're absolutely sure that it didn't happen that way, and it must have been this other thing.
00:45:14.000You know, that doesn't work with audiences.
00:45:18.000You can't just be absolutely certain all the time before you have a definitive answer in front of you.
00:45:25.000And that was a pattern throughout COVID.
00:45:28.000They would tell you something with absolute certainty, and then a few months later they would You know, turn around and say, oh yeah, actually, we were wrong about that.
00:45:41.000That's after we told you they didn't work and you don't need them, or ventilators are necessary, then they're unnecessary.
00:45:48.000And I think that stuff was all unhelpful, right?
00:45:51.000I think if you were trying just to be an honest promoter of good health habits, You would at least leave some doubt in your recommendations, saying, this is our best guess right now, right, as to what you should do.
00:46:07.000They essentially commanded people to behave a certain way, and that tone was very off-putting and resulted in a lot of negative outcomes.
00:46:18.000It was also maddening because, I mean, some of us could just read basic statistics.
00:46:22.000You didn't have to be, like, it's true, none of us were epidemiologists, but you could see from the first few weeks of the pandemic that this was killing old people and it was doing nothing to young people.
00:46:29.000And you could see, you could read basic stats and then you'd have public experts who are just contravening the stats.
00:46:34.000They'd just be out there saying, no, no, no, it's a serious risk to everybody.
00:46:39.000You got to make sure that the schools are closed.
00:46:40.000And not only are the schools closed, you as a young, healthy person, you are definitely not allowed to, you know, go outside and walk literally where we were in California.
00:46:49.000The rule was that you had to walk six feet apart from other human beings when you were literally outside.
00:46:54.000They poured sand over the skate parks in Venice while we were in California.
00:47:00.000Meanwhile, I remember, you know, May, June of the pandemic.
00:47:04.000This is basically what caused us to move to Florida.
00:47:07.000This triple whammy of, okay, well, we are going to shut down all of human society.
00:47:12.000Also, we're going to confine you to your home because there are riots outside.
00:47:14.000We're not going to do anything about those.
00:47:16.000And then also, we're going to make sure that we do nothing about the massive homelessness problem that has now destroyed quality of life in Southern California.
00:47:24.000And I just thought to myself, this is all nonsense.
00:47:26.000I can't in all good conscience pay taxes to a state that does this.
00:47:30.000My wife, who is way less politically active than I am, when all this broke, she was like, I don't know how we're supposed to raise kids under these circumstances.
00:47:39.000And yet you were being told that if you asked any of these questions that social media would Would prohibit you from asking any of these questions.
00:47:46.000Like I said, I think it led to a level of madness in politics that, frankly, you know, I think we're suffering with today.
00:47:53.000Everything is now so reactionary that if somebody says something, you don't even try to ascertain whether it's true or not.
00:47:57.000You just immediately react based on who they are and say it's false.
00:48:00.000Or if it's somebody who's giving you this sort of counter narrative, you immediately assume that because everything was a conspiracy, this is also a conspiracy.
00:48:08.000Yeah, and we saw, you know, there were a couple of reporters at the New York Times who tried to do some, I think, earnest and good reporting about the fairly minimal risks to children that the disease posed.
00:48:21.000And then there were some other reports where they tried to talk about, you know, basically how safe you were being outside and that you didn't really need to wear a mask.
00:48:34.000But you can't be wrong about those things and tell people we're the people who believe science, you know what I'm saying?
00:48:40.000You can't be in the middle of what's clearly a mania and then denounce everybody else as being anti-science.
00:48:50.000There were people clearly on the right who had some other ideas, I think, that were not right about the virus.
00:48:58.000The messaging from the mainstream media was inconsistent at best, I thought, condescending, and contradictory, often.
00:49:10.000So I think this drives into a larger conversation about the simple fact that now, you, Matt Taibbi, you're a right winger, and you didn't know it.
00:49:20.000But this is how it seems to work these days, is Joe Rogan, who I know well and is definitely not a right winger, is a right winger, because he was telling people during COVID, maybe you should think about exercising.
00:49:31.000This makes him a right winger, or because he took Ivermectin, which is apparently a horse dewormer, not the human kind, the horse dewormer.
00:49:38.000And this means that he is obviously a right winger.
00:49:40.000I mean, frankly, the fact that he even has me or Jordan Peterson on his show means he's a right winger, according to The Left.
00:49:45.000You're a right winger now because you're going on shows like this one or because you've been on Tucker's show.
00:49:49.000This means that you're a right winger.
00:49:55.000Number one, Don't understand how that happened, but number two, I don't understand why anybody on the left thinks that it is a winning strategy to wish literally everyone except yourself outside into the cornfield, and then you're surprised when you're alone in the house and everybody outside has a pitchfork.
00:50:08.000Well, it's clearly a propaganda tactic to try to dismiss any legitimate criticism from within your own tent by essentially saying these people are, you know, they're not one of us, they're right-wingers, they're Trumpers, really, in disguise.
00:50:27.000The seminal moment for me came when Rogan endorsed Bernie Sanders.
00:50:33.000And there were these stringent calls, even from Sanders supporters, for Bernie to reject the endorsement.
00:50:39.000Remember, he was trying to win the election at this point.
00:50:42.000And Joe Rogan's one of the most influential media figures in the country.
00:50:46.000And they said, y'all, you have to reject that endorsement because Joe once said something about MMA fighters, maybe, who were born male, not Not being a good idea that they fight natal females, right?
00:51:04.000Joe Rogan is to the left of probably 80% of this country, and if he's too extreme for you, that's probably an indication that there's something going on in your own political bubble that's awry.
00:51:41.000And that's, again, I just think it's a losing strategy.
00:51:44.000And one of the things that they always say about Joe is that they're always saying, well, you know, he has people on and they purport to be experts, and then he doesn't ask them questions from a position of expertise.
00:52:24.000And it's always like, I can find five experts in the country who say almost anything.
00:52:28.000Who you choose as your base for an article, I mean, you talked earlier about the fact that when you know nothing about a topic as a reporter, you try to go get a wide variety of sources, and then you try to figure out what is the common thread or where is the battle happening.
00:52:41.000But it seems like very often in the media, instead, there's a preset narrative.
00:52:44.000I'm going to go find five people who agree with that narrative and have a PhD next to their name.
00:52:48.000And then it's experts say X, when it's really I say X, and I just found these experts to back me up.
00:52:53.000Right, and it's also a school of journalism that's just rapidly disappeared.
00:52:58.000I mean, I think there's a variety of interview techniques.
00:53:04.000Once upon a time it was pretty standard for somebody like Charlie Rose to do this this style of interview where the whole idea was to build a rapport with somebody, make them feel comfortable, and let them express to you what they're all about in their own words so that they would be understandable to a mass audience. It wasn't your job to pin them down or to prove them wrong or to score points against them or to own them, right?
00:53:31.000So that you could put a little video up on Twitter.
00:53:34.000This is where I got this person, right?
00:53:38.000The job was, it's an informational job.
00:53:40.000You're trying to learn what this person is all about.
00:53:43.000That's why we, that's why Mike Wallace interviewed the Ayatollah Khomeini, right?
00:53:46.000Like, he did ask tough questions, but part of it is just trying to understand the phenomenon, right?
00:53:52.000And that journalistic curiosity has kind of been replaced by this new phenomenon of it's a mix of advocacy and I would call it almost like performative journalism where you're trying to show that your side is winning.
00:54:16.000It doesn't do a whole lot for audiences in terms of educating them about a subject.
00:54:20.000So, you know, I want to talk about kind of the futures of both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
00:54:25.000So people who are conservative, people like me, will look at the Democratic Party and will say, it looks frankly like they're in a heap of trouble.
00:54:33.000It looks like the people who are the supposed moderates are falling to the wokes.
00:54:36.000I mean, Joe Biden being just a perfect example of this.
00:54:38.000He's just saying things from his face all that he clearly does not understand, but he has been told by his advisors who are very online that this is stuff that he should say.
00:54:46.000It feels like the older guard of the Democratic Party is now kind of squiring around a far more radical young guard that is kind of using them in order to achieve mainstream status.
00:54:57.000And then, you know, people on the left, they'll look at the right and they'll say, you guys are becoming ever more extreme.
00:55:02.000You're a party that refuses to acknowledge the results of elections.
00:55:05.000Do you think that there is... Let's go party by party.
00:55:08.000What do you think the future of the Democratic Party is?
00:55:10.000Do you think that there is going to be any sort of backlash here?
00:55:12.000A rising wave of people who say, you know, enough is enough.
00:55:15.000Let's get back to the brand of sort of almost John Edwards-esque mainstream populism that was the bread and butter of Bill Clinton or the Democratic Party for years and years.
00:55:24.000Well, I think one of the major underreported stories in politics in the last 20 years or so has been the dramatic shift in the makeup of the Democratic Party, where their base is.
00:55:36.000If you look at the last time I looked at this, I think 41 of the 50 wealthiest Congressional districts in America had Democrats in those seats, and I think it was all of the top 10.
00:55:49.000And if you go back as recently as 1992, it probably would have been more like a 50-50 split or even a 60-40 split in favor of Republicans.
00:56:01.000This idea that you're affluent, upper-class suburb is now You know, somewhere between a 70 and 90 percent Democratic vote in most places.
00:56:13.000That's a dramatic shift in the composition of the Democratic Party.
00:56:18.000I think this goes back even before Clinton.
00:56:20.000I think it goes back to 84 after Walter Mondale, when the DLC stepped in and said, we can't have unions being the main supporters of the party anymore.
00:56:33.000We have to have more of a pro-growth strategy.
00:56:35.000And they lost touch with people who were shipbuilders or who had manual labor jobs or work construction.
00:56:43.000There are no people like that who rise within the Democratic Party anymore.
00:56:47.000They don't know what ordinary people think about, what they're like, you know?
00:56:53.000And so I think that's a huge problem for the party, that there's no feeder system that brings in people who, you know, in the past might have come from unions.
00:57:05.000You know, those people just, they're not there anymore.
00:57:09.000I mean, one of the things that that brings up is the fact that it seems like when you look at it economically, it makes no sense, right?
00:57:14.000From an economic perspective, if supposedly Republicans are the party of free markets and big business and all the rest of this, why are all these affluent areas going blue?
00:57:24.000And all of the lesser affluent areas are starting to trend red, even including in many Hispanic districts now.
00:57:29.000Even the black vote is starting to move a little bit.
00:57:32.000from the Democratic Party. It used to be like a 90 to 95 percent black vote for the Democratic Party. Now it seems to be moving into sort of like the 85 to 90 percent range. And a lot of these polls, maybe even 80 to 85 percent, which is just the death knell for the Democratic Party, demographically speaking. You know, if you look at it from a pure sort of either Marxist perspective or a pure, you know, economically conservative perspective, the economics don't tell the whole story. There is a culture war here that is happening. And I think people in the media refuse to acknowledge the culture war because there are
00:58:01.000such participants in it that the other side doesn't exist. But it shows you that like what Trump really was, the giant middle finger to the institutions. But he was also saying to a bunch of people who had been attacked by the cultural institutions as regressive and non-tolerant and bitter clingers. He was saying to them, no, there are a lot of people out there who are exactly like you. And look at me. I'm a New Yorker. I don't even agree with a lot of the stuff that you guys believe socially, but I'm going to treat you with a certain level of baseline respect as a human being.
00:58:26.000And a lot of people went, wow, that's kind of a refreshing prospect. I mean, you're not even like Mitt Romney from Bain Capital telling me this. You're somebody who has that. It was such a weird thing to get it from Trump because he is an elite by every standard, by every economic standard, by every educational standard, but he didn't play like that. He He played like Archie Bunker more than he played like Mitt Romney did, even though he's much more like Mitt Romney in terms of, you know, personal, you know, economic lifestyle than Archie Bunker.
00:58:52.000That social battle, that seems to be the most telling part of the modern political discourse.
00:58:58.000And maybe the current conflict is not predominantly about economics, it's about levels of respect for people who actually have different values than your own.
00:59:09.000Another major underreported story was one you just referenced, which was the fact that in 2020, the constituency that really elected Joe Biden was white guys.
00:59:21.000Donald Trump actually outperformed his expectations from 2016 with every other demographic, including women, including black women, black men, especially Hispanics.
00:59:38.000That tells you that, you know, that there's something that's more important to these voters than what the traditional mainstream media would have you believe.
00:59:48.000I mean, I think there's a widespread belief among people in the press that if you're black, you just automatically are going to vote Democratic because that's what you do, right?
01:00:00.000Like civil rights issues or, you know, George Floyd, that's the most important thing to you.
01:00:14.000You know, when I covered Trump, I had people who were.
01:00:19.000far to the right who said things that were, you know, kind of deeply offensive to me, you know, on the race front.
01:00:25.000And then I had other people who said, who were like just elderly ladies from Cincinnati who said, yeah, I really like this TV show, you know.
01:00:31.000And like there are different reasons why people vote for people.
01:00:37.000And when you see those statistics, I think there is something going on there where, you know, there's a battle between sort of ordinary people, working class people, middle class, formerly middle class people who just don't see their values reflected in like the mainstream press and from prominent Democratic Party politicians.
01:02:29.000Some of these responses to CRT and to trans care, I think there are different approaches that they could take that would allow them to still be champions of free speech and to also stand up for their values there.
01:02:47.000But yeah, I think that's a major dividing line within the Republican Party, is do we want to be kind of traditional libertarians and laissez-faire capitalists, or do we want to be something else?
01:03:01.000And I don't think they've settled on the formula yet.
01:03:04.000I'd be interested to hear what you think.
01:03:06.000Yeah, I mean, I think that there is a lot of appetite for the culture war right now by the right because the left is pushed so far.
01:03:13.000And so things that were not even considered remotely controversial five seconds ago are now considered wildly controversial.
01:03:21.000I also am not in favor of public schools Teaching kids sexual orientation at the age of five.
01:03:28.000I just don't think that that's an appropriate thing.
01:03:29.000And so, you know, I think that that's the left by pushing so far.
01:03:33.000My theory basically here is that liberals got so successful in the culture war that they didn't know when to just say, OK, we got most of what we wanted.
01:03:40.000and now we're just gonna sit here for a little while.
01:03:42.000It turned into, what's the way that we get our base out?
01:03:44.000And the way we get our base out is we have to have the next civil rights movement.
01:03:48.000We had black Americans, excellent civil rights movement.
01:03:52.000That's the next round of the civil rights movement.
01:03:53.000And then it turned into men who believe that they're women.
01:03:56.000And people started to go, well, hold up just one second.
01:03:58.000Now you're running up against some actual hard realities.
01:04:01.000And when you start saying that, it's not just that we want gay and lesbian Americans to be able to live as they wish to live in a free society.
01:04:09.000We want to mandate that your children learn about that value system from a public school teacher and that your business have to basically enforce anti-discrimination laws that we feel are appropriate.
01:04:22.000I think you're now entering, it went from leave us alone in the privacy of our home to you will do what we want or we will burn you to the ground.
01:04:29.000And when that happened, I think the right was suddenly left with this huge swath of land that it could claim, which was we'll leave you alone, but you guys got to leave us alone.
01:04:37.000And the fact that you haven't left us alone means that we can now fight back.
01:04:39.000Now, I think there's a danger that the right will go too far and that the right will start saying, okay, we're going to carry this flag all the way back to the top of that hill.
01:04:45.000I don't think that's where things are going.
01:04:47.000But the fact that the left has become so wildly radical on this stuff.
01:04:51.000So many of the predictions that a lot of people were making about where same-sex marriage would end up, which were seen as completely outlandish when these predictions were made in 2004, 2005, are now being effectively advocated by the White House.
01:05:03.000And that's, you know, I think, given a lot of ground to conservatives and to moderate people.
01:05:11.000I mean, a lot of, listen, the so-called Don't Say Gay Bill in Florida is widely popular with Democrats in the state of Florida.
01:05:24.000So I think that that's going to be fertile ground until it isn't.
01:05:26.000And I think that may be the message of the politics right now.
01:05:28.000Everything is fertile ground until the moment you push too far, in which case it becomes incredibly inhospitable.
01:05:33.000Yeah, and just quickly, I covered the Virginia governor's race and the election of Glenn Youngkin.
01:05:41.000And Democrats traditionally have held anywhere from a 20 to 30 point lead on the education issue.
01:05:48.000It's one of the reasons that they've always done so well in congressional races, because this was an issue where they were overwhelmingly trusted more than Republicans were.
01:06:00.000You know, what I saw just in that one county in Virginia, Loudoun County, was this dramatic change in where people felt that the politicians were that they could trust.
01:06:16.000They saw the local Democratic Party infrastructure as being on the side of this Sort of non-transparent cabal that was trying to impose something.
01:06:27.000And the fastest way to lose support is to get between parents and their kids.
01:06:33.000I think you see that in places all over the country where, you know, now if you look at the polls, that once 30-point lead, and that wasn't that long ago, that was in the Obama years, it's evaporated to three or four points.
01:06:47.000And I think it's going to keep going in that direction unless they fix it.
01:06:51.000So Matt Taibbi, I want to ask you a few final questions, starting with you live in New Jersey, so how's that treating you?
01:06:57.000And when are you moving to a better state?
01:06:59.000Plus, I also want to ask you about 2024 and Trump versus Biden redux and all the rest of it.
01:07:03.000Well, if you'd like to hear Matt Taibbi's answers, you have to be a Daily Wire member.
01:07:06.000Head on over to dailywire.com slash Sunday.
01:07:09.000You can click that link in the episode description.
01:07:11.000Use code BEN for 25% off to hear the rest of our conversation there.