The Ben Shapiro Show - November 30, 2022


Social Leftists Get Mugged By Reality | Ep. 1620


Episode Stats

Length

44 minutes

Words per Minute

223.7589

Word Count

9,961

Sentence Count

619

Misogynist Sentences

26

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

On this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Ben talks about the Democratic Party's failure to elect a presidential candidate in 2016 and why it's time to diversify your savings into gold and precious metals. He also discusses the new Disney CEO Bob Iger declaring his return to political neutrality, the Washington Post finally admitting it's okay to talk about rising crime, and New York City admits it is time to involuntarily commit a severely mentally ill person. Ben Shapiro is the host of the popular conservative podcast, "The Weekly Standard" and is a regular contributor to the Financial Times, USA Today, and the Wall Street Journal. He is also a frequent contributor to The Weekly Standard and has been featured on CNN and the New York Times, among other media outlets, and is one of the most influential people in the conservative media. Ben is also the author of the best-selling book, "American Idiot: How to Succeed in a Post-Civil War World," which is available for purchase on Amazon for only $99.99. Subscribe today using the promo code SHAPIRO for 50% off your first month of service. If you haven't gotten a VPN yet, use ExpressVPN, get ExpressVPN right now at ExpressVPN.org for $50 off your very first month, and get 5% off for the rest of the month! Get a FREE trial offer when you sign up for ExpressVPN! Subscribe to Express VPN, use the discount code SHARPTALKER, use discount code: PODCAST, and save 50% on your entire months of service, and receive 50% of the entire month for a year, plus an additional $5,000 in free trial offer, plus a FREE 2-day shipping when you shop using Express VPN membership offer! FREE FASTESTIMATE PRICING when you become a member of ExpressVPN becomes available in January 2020, and a FREE 7-day trial offer starts in May 2020! Learn more about the show, use promo code: SHARPOTTERYEARLY BONUS CONTENT: $50 OFF $99, $25, FREE PRICED TO BUY $10, $27,000 OFF $29,000, $50,000 gets you get a VIP PACKAGE AND FREE FIBERBERBERTHOLDING AND VIPIZED IN PRODUCED IN A MONTH AND VIP SUPPORTING VIP SUPPORTED INCLUSION AND PATREON PRODCAST?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 New Disney CEO Bob Iger proclaims return to political neutrality.
00:00:03.000 The Washington Post finally admits it's okay to talk about rising crime.
00:00:07.000 And New York City admits it's time to involuntarily commit a severely mentally ill.
00:00:11.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:12.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:13.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:21.000 I talk about them every single show.
00:00:22.000 Why haven't you gotten a VPN yet?
00:00:23.000 Get ExpressVPN right now at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:00:27.000 We'll get to all the news in just one moment.
00:00:28.000 First, you notice that red wave that actually didn't happen?
00:00:31.000 That's going to have a pretty dire effect on the economy.
00:00:33.000 Democrats are going to continue to try and spend a lot of money.
00:00:35.000 In fact, As we speak, they're trying to ram through a new child tax credit extension, which means more money going out the door, which means more inflation.
00:00:43.000 And that's just what's on the agenda for like this month.
00:00:45.000 Joe Biden would love to continue the spending and spending big, which is one reason why you might want to diversify at least a little bit into precious metals.
00:00:52.000 If you're unsure how the next two years will unfold, talk to Birchgold Group about protecting your savings with gold.
00:00:57.000 Birchgold makes it easy to convert your IRA or 401k into an IRA in precious metals so you can own gold and silver in a tax-sheltered account.
00:01:03.000 Here's what you need to do.
00:01:04.000 Text Ben to 989898 to claim your free info kit on gold, then talk to One of their precious metal specialists, they'll hold your hand throughout the entire process.
00:01:11.000 With an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, thousands of happy customers, and almost 20 years of experience converting IRAs and 401ks into precious metals IRAs, Birch Gold can help to protect your savings as well.
00:01:20.000 Text Ben to 989898.
00:01:22.000 Protect yourself with gold today.
00:01:24.000 Again, text Ben to 989898 to get started with my friends over at Birch Gold.
00:01:29.000 Also, There's no reason to pay Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile over 80 bucks a month for wireless service when you can get the same service on the same network at PeerTalk for half the price.
00:01:37.000 Like, why would you do that?
00:01:38.000 With PeerTalk, you get talk, text, and data that's just as fast for 30 bucks a month.
00:01:41.000 The other guys, they're making you pay for thousands of retail stores you actually don't go to or perks you don't use.
00:01:45.000 Massive profits to keep their own shareholders happy.
00:01:48.000 PeerTalk, on the other hand, wants to keep you happy, and that's why they've invested in a U.S.-based customer service team.
00:01:53.000 It's also why they give you so many more data options, because why would they charge you for data you don't actually need?
00:01:57.000 Everybody tells you you need unlimited data.
00:01:58.000 Are you using unlimited data?
00:01:59.000 No one has ever used unlimited data.
00:02:00.000 So why don't you actually check out the data options available over at Pure Talk.
00:02:03.000 I actually switched to Pure Talk because I like supporting veteran owned U.S.
00:02:06.000 based companies that have my best interests at heart.
00:02:08.000 It took me less than 10 minutes to make the switch.
00:02:10.000 I'm saving a lot of money.
00:02:11.000 You will be too.
00:02:12.000 Go to puretalk.com, enter code SHAPIRO to save 50% off your very first month.
00:02:15.000 Again, that's puretalk.com, promo code SHAPIRO for 50% off your very first month of coverage.
00:02:21.000 No reason to give all your money to the big guys.
00:02:22.000 Instead, give it to puretalk, puretalk.com, promo code SHAPIRO for 50% off your very first month of coverage.
00:02:28.000 Well, back in the 1960s, there was a group of people who were called the neoconservatives.
00:02:32.000 This is not like how we talk about neoconservatives today, meaning people who are just sort of hawkish on foreign policy and pretty vague about the terminology.
00:02:38.000 They're a group of people who had decided that they were conservative mainly because they were liberals who had been mugged by reality.
00:02:43.000 They didn't shift their social policy.
00:02:45.000 What they really realized is that their policies with regard to crime and foreign policy had been a gigantic fail.
00:02:50.000 Well, we are about to see a wave of people who are returning to reality because it turns out that the left has been mugged by reality and continues to be mugged by reality.
00:02:58.000 And we're seeing it all over the spectrum.
00:03:00.000 We are seeing it in the media.
00:03:01.000 We are seeing it in politics.
00:03:03.000 We are seeing it with regard to places like Disney.
00:03:06.000 So yesterday, Chris Ruffo, who's done just yeoman's work in exposing the political indoctrination that has now become part and parcel of the Disney brand, Rufo released tape that he had obtained of an all-hands Disney meeting reintroducing old and now new CEO Bob Iger.
00:03:22.000 Now, Iger is very much to the left, so much so that there was talk a few years ago about the possibility that Bob Iger might actually throw his hat into the ring for the Democratic presidential nomination.
00:03:30.000 There's only one problem for Bob Iger and his wild left perspectives on life, and that is that in taking over Disney again, the stock price of Disney has dumped completely.
00:03:39.000 So, Disney stock was about 183 bucks.
00:03:44.000 47 cents.
00:03:45.000 September 17th, 2021.
00:03:46.000 Today, it is at $94.69.
00:03:49.000 So it has been sliced in about half over the course of the last year and a half or so.
00:03:56.000 Not even a year.
00:03:57.000 About a year.
00:03:58.000 is really when it started to dump.
00:04:00.000 And one of the reasons for this is because Disney decided to go woke.
00:04:04.000 So part of this has to do with the dynamics of streaming and the fact that as the economy starts to slow down and people spend less money on entertainment and people go back to work that they are picking up less streaming services, sure.
00:04:14.000 But that does not explain why Disney has disproportionately been slapped directly across the chops by the American public.
00:04:21.000 The reason for that is because Disney has made clear that its priorities are not your priorities.
00:04:25.000 Now, there is no bigger old Disney fan than I. I am an enormous old Disney fan.
00:04:32.000 We owned all the tapes growing up.
00:04:33.000 We used to listen in my house.
00:04:35.000 I shared a room with three of my siblings.
00:04:37.000 And my parents, to put us to sleep, would put on like a small cassette tape of the music from Beauty and the Beast like every single night.
00:04:43.000 The goal was to fall asleep before you hit the Gaston song where he sings about killing the beast.
00:04:49.000 Right, that was the goal.
00:04:51.000 We were huge Disney fans.
00:04:52.000 And that meant that the biggest treat in the world when I was a kid was mom and dad take us out of school and they take us to Disney.
00:04:57.000 And that was like the best thing.
00:04:58.000 And then when I became an adult and I had kids of my own, we became Disney annual pass members over in California.
00:05:03.000 And then when we moved to Florida, one of the big draws was, okay, we still have Disneyland two and a half hours away, which is awesome.
00:05:11.000 It's just fantastic.
00:05:13.000 And again, I love all the old Disney product.
00:05:15.000 I love the music.
00:05:17.000 I love the movies.
00:05:19.000 This is one of the great American companies of all time, Disney.
00:05:23.000 But it became clear over the past few years that they were now attempting to inject woke politics into what they were doing, particularly with regard to LGBT issues.
00:05:31.000 And just a few months ago, Chris Rufo revealed in All Hands Disney meeting in which people were openly bragging about injecting a quote-unquote not at all secret gay agenda into Disney content.
00:05:42.000 And that followed hard on Disney injecting itself directly into politics in Florida for no apparent reason.
00:05:46.000 Florida passed a bill that was designed to prevent the sexual indoctrination of children under the age of eight.
00:05:52.000 The media immediately labeled it the quote-unquote don't say gay bill, but that of course is not what the bill says.
00:05:56.000 The bill says you're not allowed to teach sexual orientation or gender identity to children under the age of eight.
00:06:01.000 That is what the bill says.
00:06:02.000 It's designed to prevent the indoctrination of kids into left-wing sexual values while they are very, very small children.
00:06:07.000 And Disney originally had nothing to say about this.
00:06:10.000 And then the media did what they usually do.
00:06:11.000 They started calling up Disney and trying to pressure Disney because they recognize that the top executives at Disney are Democrats, and they recognize that a huge base of the Disney creatives are Democrats, and they recognize that a huge percentage of Disney employees are either gay or straight who are in favor of same-sex marriage, for example.
00:06:28.000 And are all like sexually liberal, at least in their value system.
00:06:33.000 And so they pushed Disney and Disney came.
00:06:35.000 And Disney decided that they were going to inject themselves directly into politics.
00:06:38.000 And they came out swinging against Governor Ron DeSantis and the Republican legislature condemning the bill.
00:06:43.000 And this prompted Governor DeSantis and the Republican legislature to say, well, hold up a second.
00:06:48.000 You guys have special tax districts.
00:06:50.000 You have special tax giveaways.
00:06:51.000 You don't get to inject yourself into state politics and basically try to stump against the political party in power for your own benefit.
00:07:00.000 Well, at the same time, expect us to continue granting you all sorts of largesse.
00:07:04.000 That's not something that we are willing to do.
00:07:06.000 Now, you can make the argument that Governor DeSantis shouldn't have done that.
00:07:08.000 You can make the argument that Republican legislature should have left it alone, that basically corporations get to say whatever they want without any sort of consequence.
00:07:14.000 There's only one problem with that.
00:07:15.000 If that rule only applies with regard to the right, then all the corporations will be left wing.
00:07:20.000 And that is precisely what's been occurring over the course of the last 10 or 15 years.
00:07:23.000 If you had said 15 years ago, the biggest corporations in America would be reflecting the most wild left social policies, Everybody would laugh at you.
00:07:31.000 These were capitalistic corporations.
00:07:33.000 Why exactly would they betray their audience that way?
00:07:35.000 Not only that, many of these corporations were headed up by people who were business savvy and tended to be kind of conservative.
00:07:40.000 So why would they do all of that?
00:07:41.000 And the answer is that we had a wild asymmetry in terms of who was pressuring these major companies.
00:07:46.000 The left was pressuring these companies.
00:07:47.000 These companies were responding to the left and the right was not answering in any way, shape or form.
00:07:51.000 Well, now the right has responded.
00:07:52.000 And one thing that has happened is that not only have people like me and my family essentially disassociated from Disney, We are not annual pass holders at Disneyland anymore.
00:08:03.000 We used to subscribe to Disney Plus.
00:08:04.000 We do not subscribe to Disney Plus anymore.
00:08:06.000 That is not where my kids watch their entertainment because frankly I don't trust Disney with my kids.
00:08:11.000 Disney used to be a place for innocence and childhood magic and now Disney is a place where you go to see a lesbian couple in light year or you go to see a 16 year old boy hit on another boy in the new Disney movie that came out last week.
00:08:24.000 Well, unsurprisingly, there are a lot of parents who feel about this stuff the way that I feel about this stuff, the way my wife feels about this stuff, and so Disney has been taking it absolutely on the chin, which necessitated that Bob Chapek, who'd been the sort of interim director, he'd been brought in to replace Iger when Iger stepped down, he has now been ousted, and Iger is back.
00:08:40.000 So Iger did an all-hands meeting, and in this all-hands meeting, he said, it's time to quiet things down and move back to political neutrality.
00:08:47.000 Now, do I trust that Disney's actually going to do this?
00:08:50.000 Do I trust that Disney isn't going to continue to inject its politics into what it does?
00:08:56.000 I don't think they're going to stop.
00:08:57.000 I think they're going to continue to inject the politics.
00:08:58.000 I think they're going to do it in slightly more subtle fashion.
00:09:01.000 I think they're going to try to raise a few less hackles because after all, doing it very publicly and very openly is what has brought about this state of affairs for Disney financially.
00:09:09.000 But the fact that Disney is feeling the pressure is once again a sign that when the right rears its head, not even the right, when mainstream parents rear their heads and say, we are not interested in products that try to sell this garbage.
00:09:21.000 Many cast members had wished that Disney stayed out of politics.
00:09:23.000 Will Disney stay out of making political statements?
00:09:25.000 back to neutrality.
00:09:54.000 I don't think when you are telling stories and attempting to be a good citizen of the world that that's political.
00:10:02.000 Okay, so you can already hear that he is reluctantly dissociating.
00:10:06.000 So this is why I say I don't trust Disney at all, because what he's saying is it's not really political.
00:10:10.000 When we inject LGBTQ messaging into children's film, that's not political, guys.
00:10:15.000 That's just the way the world works.
00:10:16.000 And this is the left-wing echo bubble that exists in Hollywood and in the media, is that no matter how far left they push, they're just reflecting reality.
00:10:24.000 That's why you're evil.
00:10:25.000 This is why the typical imbalance in politics has been that the right has suggested that the left is wrong, and the left has suggested that the right is evil.
00:10:31.000 Because the right says, we have an opinion about a thing, and you have an opinion about a thing, and we think your opinion is wrong.
00:10:35.000 And the left has said, we reflect the facts.
00:10:37.000 We reflect the world.
00:10:38.000 And you oppose the facts and the world, and therefore you are evil and you are bigoted.
00:10:42.000 You can hear that sort of language from Bob Iger, and you can hear the deep sigh when asked if they're going to get out of politics.
00:10:48.000 Even Bob Iger understands market necessities.
00:10:50.000 He was asked about the situation in Florida and he says, yeah, we kind of regret that we put our foot in that water.
00:10:54.000 The alligator bit it off.
00:10:55.000 Bob, have you given any thoughts on how to tackle the Reedy Creek situation in Florida?
00:11:01.000 No.
00:11:05.000 I have to get up to speed on that completely.
00:11:07.000 Obviously, I followed the news.
00:11:08.000 That development occurred after I left the company.
00:11:12.000 I was sorry to see us Dragged into that battle and I have no idea exactly what its ramifications are in terms of the business itself.
00:11:26.000 What I can say is the state of Florida has been important to us for a long time and we have been very important to the state of Florida.
00:11:34.000 That is something I'm extremely mindful of and will articulate if I get the chance.
00:11:39.000 But I don't have the details at all yet about what the ramifications are of the decision that was made by the state of Florida and whether we intend to do anything about it.
00:11:49.000 Well, good for Bob Iger for at least recognizing reality, even if through a glass darkly.
00:11:53.000 You can see that he's not particularly happy about having to acknowledge that Disney shouldn't have gotten involved in Florida.
00:11:58.000 Don't believe him, by the way, when he says he's not informed on this.
00:12:00.000 Of course he's informed on this.
00:12:01.000 He's the incoming, I mean, I know about it and I'm not the CEO of Disney.
00:12:05.000 So he clearly knows about it.
00:12:06.000 But again, reality is a two by four and it clocked Mickey Mouse across the head.
00:12:11.000 Bob Iger didn't stop there.
00:12:11.000 He was asked specifically about the so-called don't say gay bill.
00:12:14.000 And once again, he sort of punted.
00:12:17.000 All right, another virtual question.
00:12:18.000 What is your stance on the don't-say-gay situation?
00:12:24.000 Well, first of all, our LGBTQ employees are very important to us and we care deeply about them.
00:12:32.000 That is a given.
00:12:34.000 We also, when you tell stories, it's a delicate balance.
00:12:36.000 You're talking to an audience, but it's also important to listen to an audience.
00:12:41.000 It's important to have respect for the people that you're serving, that you're trying to reach, and not have disdain for it.
00:12:47.000 not have disdain for them.
00:12:49.000 Wow, it seems as though the message is actually getting in.
00:12:52.000 Now, again, it's a message that Bob Iger and Disney don't want to receive, but they're beginning to receive it.
00:12:57.000 And the left is gonna continue to receive these messages as they run directly off the rails over and over and over socially, people are going to deliver that message over and over and over if there are interest groups, if there are parents, if there are citizens who are willing to stand up and just say, no, we're not going to consume the product that you're using in order to inject politics We're just not going to do that.
00:13:17.000 If you do that, corporations will listen.
00:13:19.000 Now, again, Hollywood is still Hollywood.
00:13:21.000 HBO apparently is now going to premiere a documentary next month, according to The Hill, that chronicles the congressional career of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
00:13:29.000 Who's gonna film it?
00:13:30.000 Her daughter, Alexandra.
00:13:32.000 This would make, I believe, the second major documentary that has premiered on a major network filmed by the daughter of a politician.
00:13:40.000 And Hillary had gutsy, and it was Chelsea who was essentially the producer on that particular film.
00:13:44.000 And it was all about how Hillary was the most gutsy person as filmed by her daughter.
00:13:47.000 I can't remember the last time there was a Republican politician who was given the privilege of a documentary by his child or her child premiering on a major network.
00:13:55.000 So now we have two.
00:13:57.000 So Alexandra Pelosi is now going to put out a documentary titled Pelosi in the House.
00:14:02.000 It will debut on December 13th on HBO and HBO Max and WarnerMedia, the parent company of HBO, announced on Monday.
00:14:07.000 Alexandra Pelosi is an award-winning documentarian.
00:14:09.000 She produced and directed the film.
00:14:12.000 HBO said the younger Pelosi offers a candid behind-the-scenes chronicle of the life of her mother and Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi through her career milestones leading up to the inauguration of President Joseph Biden in January 2021.
00:14:24.000 Of course, there's going to be a lot of footage, I'm sure, about January 6th, but...
00:14:27.000 Just goes to show you, Hollywood is still going to Hollywood, which means that if you would like Hollywood to stop this, continue to push.
00:14:33.000 Continue to pressure, because pressure does work.
00:14:35.000 By the way, one way that you can actually pressure Disney is by creating viable, competitive alternatives.
00:14:39.000 This is why we encourage people to go to Daily Wire Plus and subscribe, so we can make Children's content that you can trust.
00:14:45.000 You don't have to worry about whether Baba Iger has gotten the message or not.
00:14:48.000 You can just trust that you can put your kids in front of the TV for 15 minutes and get some good, clean family content without having to worry about the quote-unquote not at all secret gay agenda pushed by the Mouse House.
00:14:58.000 Okay, meanwhile, speaking of being clocked by reality, I guess now that the election's over, the media are starting to be able to tell the truth about the fact that there is a pretty serious crime problem in the country.
00:15:07.000 Remember, we were told by the New York Times that Republicans were pouncing on the crime problem.
00:15:10.000 There was no crime problem.
00:15:12.000 Most of the crime was happening in rural areas or something.
00:15:15.000 It wasn't really happening in America's big cities.
00:15:17.000 That was all just a lie put out by Republicans for electoral purposes.
00:15:19.000 Well, now the election is over, and it seems that the media are finally able to say the truth.
00:15:23.000 And so you have a piece over at the Washington Post titled, These Are Nine Stories from America's Homicide Crisis.
00:15:29.000 Wait.
00:15:30.000 There's a homicide crisis?
00:15:30.000 What?
00:15:32.000 You don't say.
00:15:33.000 You don't say.
00:15:34.000 Almost as though reality has begun to seep in.
00:15:36.000 Now that it's safe, they can say the true part.
00:15:38.000 Quote, During the last three years, homicides nationwide have reached their highest levels in decades.
00:15:42.000 The deadly spike coincided with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.
00:15:45.000 The rate of killings rose nearly 30% in 2020 and remained high through the following year, according to a Washington Post database created to track the toll.
00:15:52.000 Even now, as the bloodshed has slowed, the homicide rate outpaces pre-pandemic levels.
00:15:56.000 This gun violence tends to grab headlines when it occurs in horrific public spasms.
00:16:00.000 At Walmart in Virginia, a nightclub in Colorado, an elementary school in rural Texas.
00:16:03.000 But the focus on mass shootings obscures the totality of the American ailment.
00:16:07.000 People killed on city streets and inside their homes.
00:16:09.000 Deaths that seldom attract national attention and cases that rarely involve high-profile prosecutions.
00:16:14.000 In many, an arrest has yet to be made.
00:16:16.000 Oh, we're allowed to talk about the mass killing of people in America's major cities that disproportionately targets minorities now, are we?
00:16:24.000 Weird!
00:16:25.000 Why were you covering that up for so long?
00:16:27.000 It used to be that if you covered up the killing of people of minority status, this made you a racist.
00:16:31.000 So what does it make the Washington Post that they've been covering this stuff up or downplaying it for months and months and months until just after the election and now they're talking about it?
00:16:37.000 it. Quote, gun crime disproportionately impacts people of color, especially black men.
00:16:41.000 Victim data collected from each city profile to your show, black people made up more than 80% of the total homicide victims in 2020 and 2021. And while data show gun deaths have surged around the country, a number of cities lead the way. Oh, you don't say. Wait, I thought that it was I was told that it was, you know, a bunch of white people in Vermont who were shooting each other.
00:17:00.000 Or that the real crisis, in terms of violence in America, was probably happening in these mass shootings.
00:17:05.000 Now you're telling me that the vast crisis in homicide is actually people killing each other in major cities and they are disproportionately of minority victimhood?
00:17:13.000 No.
00:17:14.000 No!
00:17:15.000 Why, it's almost as though you held this story until just after the election, Washington Post.
00:17:18.000 The Post visited nine of these places, which have seen some of the nation's highest recent murder rates.
00:17:22.000 They are spread mostly across the South and Midwest.
00:17:24.000 Some have been long in the spotlight for their homicide numbers.
00:17:26.000 Others have not.
00:17:28.000 In each place, monuments have sprung up to commemorate those lost, some informal and fleeting, others lasting, some public, some private.
00:17:34.000 So now they're allowed to report on the homicide crisis across the United States that disproportionately targets black men, particularly.
00:17:41.000 The cities, by the way, that they label are Cleveland, St.
00:17:43.000 Louis, Columbus, New Orleans, Memphis, Birmingham, Alabama, Baton Rouge, Jackson, and Baltimore.
00:17:48.000 I believe every single one of those cities has a Democrat mayor, so far, as I'm aware.
00:17:52.000 So I'm glad that we can now talk about this openly.
00:17:55.000 Speaking of talking about things openly, New York City is now going to involuntarily remove mentally ill people from the streets.
00:18:02.000 But I was told that it was just a housing crisis.
00:18:04.000 I was told that what was happening, at least during the election, was that housing prices were out of control.
00:18:09.000 What we really needed was more rent control.
00:18:10.000 What we really needed was more publicly available subsidized housing.
00:18:14.000 Now you're telling me That reality has clocked you in the face in New York City?
00:18:17.000 You're telling me that a spate of homeless, mentally ill people pushing people in front of subway trains has caused you to rethink what you might want to do with the mentally ill who are living on your streets, living in their own feces and vomit?
00:18:29.000 My God!
00:18:30.000 Why, it's almost as though reality continues to exist no matter how much you preach that it's bad.
00:18:36.000 According to the New York Times, acting to address a crisis we see all around us toward the end of a year that has seen a string of high-profile crimes involving homeless people, Mayor Eric Adams announced a major push on Tuesday to remove people with severe untreated mental illness from the city's streets and subways.
00:18:49.000 Who's been calling for this for literally years?
00:18:51.000 I mean, who could it be?
00:18:53.000 I don't know.
00:18:54.000 I don't know.
00:18:55.000 It's a great mystery.
00:18:56.000 Mr. Adams, who has made clearing homeless encampments a priority since taking office in January, said the effort would require involuntarily hospitalizing people who are a danger to themselves, even if they pose no risk of harm to others, arguing the city had a moral obligation to help them.
00:19:09.000 My goodness, the intolerance, the pure bigotry, I'm sure will disproportionately harm people of color.
00:19:14.000 Isn't that the way we're supposed to play this game?
00:19:16.000 Because if a conservative says this, then it's cruel and bigoted.
00:19:18.000 But if Erica Adams says this, this means she's open-minded and public safety oriented.
00:19:23.000 Adams said, quote, the common misunderstanding persists.
00:19:25.000 We cannot provide involuntary assistance unless the person is violent.
00:19:28.000 Going forward, we will make every effort to assist those who are suffering from mental illness.
00:19:32.000 Again, it should be worth noting here that the typical Democratic line here has been that living on the street as a mentally ill homeless person is actually a right.
00:19:39.000 That it's a good thing.
00:19:41.000 The ADL has sued cities to prevent people from actually involuntarily committing people who desperately need help.
00:19:47.000 If you've ever dealt with somebody who's severely mentally ill, and I certainly have, if you've ever dealt with people like this, they need help.
00:19:54.000 These are not people capable of taking care of themselves.
00:19:56.000 And yet we have so fallen into the trap of subjective individualism that we believe that if a person is severely mentally ill, they get to adjudicate not only their own status, but the status of how the rest of the world ought to treat them.
00:20:08.000 Well, that runs up directly against people with samurai swords on the subway system.
00:20:13.000 The mayor's announcement comes at a heated moment in the national debate about rising crime and the role of police, especially in dealing with people who are already in fragile mental health.
00:20:19.000 Republicans, as well as tough-on-crime Democrats like Adams, have argued the growing disorder calls for more aggressive measures.
00:20:24.000 Left-leaning advocates and officials who dominate New York politics say that deploying the police as auxiliary social workers may do more harm than good.
00:20:32.000 By the way, this is now becoming a typical Democratic policy.
00:20:34.000 In California, Governor Newsom recently signed a law that could force some homeless people with disorders like schizophrenia into treatment.
00:20:40.000 Why, almost as though, again, reality is beginning to set in.
00:20:43.000 We'll get to more on this in just one second.
00:20:45.000 First, the holidays are an exciting time of the year, and maybe you're staying up late wrapping those presents, or maybe you're planning a vacation.
00:20:50.000 Whatever you are doing, when you actually get in bed, you actually do need to sleep, and that's why you should be getting bull and branch sheets.
00:20:56.000 By the way, you should get them for all your friends as well.
00:20:57.000 This is an amazing holiday gift.
00:20:59.000 Bull and branch sheets are made from the finest 100% organic cotton threads on Earth.
00:21:03.000 They're signature hemmed sheets.
00:21:04.000 They're made with threads so luxurious, three US presidents have slept in them, as have I.
00:21:08.000 Bull and Branch sheets actually soften with every wash cycle.
00:21:10.000 They come in nine neutral colors in all mattress sizes.
00:21:12.000 Their signature sheets come wrapped in a beautiful holiday gift box.
00:21:15.000 Bull and Branch gives you a 30-night risk-free trial with free shipping and returns on all orders.
00:21:18.000 You're not gonna want to return them.
00:21:20.000 No one's ever wanted to return them.
00:21:21.000 Give the gift of a better night's sleep this holiday season with Bull and Branch.
00:21:24.000 Take advantage of their Cyber Week sale.
00:21:26.000 25% off site-wide, plus free shipping when you use promo code SHAPIRO at bullandbranch.com.
00:21:31.000 That's bullandbranch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D, branch.com, promo code SHAPIRO, Offer ends December 4th.
00:21:37.000 Go check them out right now.
00:21:38.000 That's bullandbranch.com.
00:21:40.000 Use promo code Shapiro.
00:21:42.000 Get 25% off site-wide.
00:21:44.000 It's an amazing, amazing deal.
00:21:46.000 Also, you should be checking out, right now, life insurance.
00:21:48.000 Because, let's face it, you know, in the wintertime, you start to think about dark things.
00:21:53.000 It's a darker time of the year.
00:21:54.000 The days get a little bit shorter.
00:21:56.000 The light starts to fade.
00:21:57.000 You might be thinking to yourself, well, All of this puts me in mind of death.
00:22:01.000 Well, if it does, then probably you should solve for that with life insurance.
00:22:04.000 At the very least, make sure that your family does not go hungry like Tiny Tim.
00:22:07.000 If, God forbid, something should happen to you, head on over to Policy Genius right now.
00:22:10.000 Life insurance through your workplace might not offer enough protection for your family's needs.
00:22:13.000 It's not going to follow you if you leave your job.
00:22:15.000 Since life insurance typically gets more expensive as you age, now would be the time to buy.
00:22:19.000 And also now, and like now, like that's true for every moment until you actually buy life insurance.
00:22:23.000 PolicyGenius gives you a smarter way to find and buy the right coverage for you and your family.
00:22:27.000 PolicyGenius was built to modernize the life insurance industry.
00:22:29.000 Their technology makes it easy to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and find your lowest price.
00:22:33.000 With PolicyGenius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just 17 bucks per month for 500 grand in coverage.
00:22:39.000 Policygenius has licensed agents who can help you find options that offer coverage in as little as a week and avoid those unnecessary medical exams.
00:22:44.000 These agents are not incentivized to recommend one insurer over another.
00:22:47.000 You can trust their guidance.
00:22:48.000 Your loved ones deserve that financial safety net and you deserve a smarter way to find and buy it.
00:22:52.000 Head on over to policygenius.com slash Shapiro or click the link in the description.
00:22:55.000 Get your free life insurance quotes.
00:22:56.000 See how much you could save.
00:22:57.000 That's policygenius.com slash Shapiro.
00:23:00.000 Now, it is amazing that all the same people who have failed with regard to homelessness and crime insist that we continue to vote for them.
00:23:05.000 Lori Lightfoot, who has been a complete failure in every respect in the city of Chicago, she says that the only solution for Chicago's massive crime wave is that she needs to return to office.
00:23:17.000 Now that crime spree, as you mentioned, went on for five hours.
00:23:20.000 The suspects are described as late teenagers, African-American, wearing surgical masks.
00:23:24.000 This, while Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot filed her paperwork for re-election.
00:23:28.000 And as she did that, Lightfoot made the statement that Chicago is the safest big city in the United States.
00:23:35.000 Reach voters all across the city to remind them not only what we've done over the last three and a half years, but what our vision is for the next four, and why the only rational choice is to return me to office.
00:23:49.000 She is a horrible mayor.
00:23:51.000 But again, one of the threats of politics is that maybe there will be consequences.
00:23:56.000 If Chicago provides no consequences, then I guess you guys will just keep sliding into the abyss right here.
00:24:00.000 It is just amazing to me that now New York, LA, they're beginning to realize, hey, wait a second, maybe we shouldn't leave these very, very ill schizophrenic people on the streets to live in their own filth.
00:24:10.000 Maybe that's actually an act of cruelty.
00:24:11.000 Maybe we should do something about the open needles on the street.
00:24:13.000 Welcome to reality, gang.
00:24:16.000 It's fun to see you here.
00:24:17.000 I hope that you enjoy this day.
00:24:20.000 Meanwhile, the New York Times has an article today that is absolutely astonishing.
00:24:24.000 Again, this is what happens when you don't accept reality.
00:24:26.000 You end up pushing pieces like this one.
00:24:27.000 The New York Times has a piece, New York Times Magazine.
00:24:30.000 It is titled, She Wasn't Ready for Children.
00:24:32.000 A Judge Wouldn't Let Her Have an Abortion.
00:24:35.000 The big problem with pro-choice pieces like this one, again, over at the New York Times Magazine, is that they end up being pro-life.
00:24:40.000 Every single one of them.
00:24:41.000 Every story is about some young woman who gets pregnant by accident.
00:24:45.000 And when I say by accident, I mean that she has unprotected sex in some way and then she gets pregnant.
00:24:49.000 And then we're supposed to feel super, super bad for her that she can't kill the unborn child.
00:24:52.000 And then at the end, because she couldn't kill the unborn child, the child lives.
00:24:56.000 And then you are faced with the ugly prospect, if you're the New York Times Magazine, of making the case that retroactively, these very beautiful live babies should have been murdered in the womb.
00:25:04.000 It's very, very awkward.
00:25:05.000 It's a perfect example of the genre.
00:25:06.000 When you refuse to recognize reality, it tends to clock you in the face.
00:25:10.000 And this is exactly what's happening over in this New York Times piece.
00:25:12.000 It really is an astonishing piece.
00:25:14.000 Quote, on a hot Texas morning in 2020, Giselle, who goes by G, slipped her arms into a borrowed blazer, flipped up the nose ring in her septum so it couldn't be seen, and walked into the Coriole County Courthouse.
00:25:23.000 It was the first time she'd ever been to court.
00:25:24.000 She was 17, 11 weeks pregnant, already beginning to show.
00:25:27.000 She was going to ask a judge for authorization to seek an abortion.
00:25:30.000 Her lawyer had explained that she needed to prove she was mature enough to make this decision.
00:25:34.000 She squeezed her lips around her braces, reminding herself not to smile.
00:25:36.000 She didn't want the judge to see her as a child.
00:25:38.000 Because she was a minor, her access to an abortion was governed by the state's parental involvement law.
00:25:43.000 She could have either notified her mother or father and gotten consent, or she could have filed a petition in her home county, asking for what's known as a judicial bypass hearing.
00:25:49.000 She had chosen to petition.
00:25:51.000 In the carpeted courtroom, G explained she didn't know her father, who was investigated by Child Protective Services after being accused of molesting her when she was a toddler.
00:25:57.000 Though the case was inconclusive and he denies abusing her, he eventually gave up his parental rights.
00:26:01.000 She didn't trust her mom, who she viewed as unreliable and volatile.
00:26:04.000 They had bounced among houses and boyfriends for stretches of G's life.
00:26:06.000 A year before, G packed up her things and left.
00:26:08.000 When she discovered she was pregnant, she traveled to an abortion clinic in Austin, about 60 miles south of where she lived.
00:26:13.000 A clinic referred to to Jane's Due Process, an organization that helps minors navigate judicial bypass.
00:26:18.000 Ten days later, its staff found Gee, a trained attorney.
00:26:20.000 It took Gee a week to schedule a ride to meet with the lawyer, who asked about her grades, extracurricular activities, babysitting experience, and which birth control method she would use in the future.
00:26:28.000 Then, before her court date was scheduled, a district court judge assigned to the case recused himself.
00:26:32.000 Although he didn't say why, many judges choose not to take a case in which they might have to approve an abortion.
00:26:37.000 The clerk needed to book a visiting judge.
00:26:40.000 So the judge had a hearing with her to determine whether she could adjudicate for herself whether to get an abortion or not because she is a minor.
00:26:48.000 She talked to the judge about this.
00:26:50.000 She said, I don't feel like I can grow something in my body for nine months and then physically hand it away, which is, by the way, an amazingly immoral statement.
00:26:57.000 So you'd rather kill it?
00:26:59.000 So those are the two choices.
00:27:01.000 I don't feel like I can grow something in my body for nine months and then physically have... Okay, no one is telling you you must, but the solution to your inability to parent your child is not to kill the child, is sort of a general rule.
00:27:12.000 When her lawyer asked her what she expected after the abortion, she regurgitated warnings from a Woman's Right to Know, a Texas Health and Human Services pamphlet, her lawyer told her to study in preparation for the hearing.
00:27:22.000 She said that she would have cons, killing something growing inside of me, guilt, constant guilt from others, pros, continue life without being pushed back, freedom, By the way, here's one thing that she said in the middle of this hearing.
00:27:37.000 She suggested that an abortion would be, quote, in the best interest of the fetuses.
00:27:45.000 In the best interest of the fetuses.
00:27:47.000 Plural.
00:27:48.000 She was pregnant with twins.
00:27:50.000 She wanted to kill both of them.
00:27:53.000 G said, it's 2.
00:27:55.000 The judge wanted to know if she had received counseling at the abortion clinic.
00:27:57.000 Did they give you, for instance, any statistics about how many women regret or don't regret at 5, 10, 12, 20 years from now?
00:28:02.000 They had not.
00:28:03.000 The judge said, I'm basically standing instead of your parents by making this decision.
00:28:06.000 In doing so, I want to make sure I would treat this as if you were my daughter.
00:28:09.000 G tried to control the muscles in her face.
00:28:11.000 She didn't want to reveal her frustration that this gray haired man with deep set eyes was imagining himself as her father, whom she had feared since she was a child.
00:28:18.000 The judge explained he wanted to take the long view, focusing on her health.
00:28:22.000 The judge said he didn't want her to rule.
00:28:23.000 He didn't want to rule immediately.
00:28:25.000 First, he wanted G to visit a crisis pregnancy center and have an ultrasound.
00:28:28.000 He recommended two Christian organizations that counsel women to keep their pregnancies.
00:28:31.000 G replied she had tried to go to one in town, but it was closed because of COVID.
00:28:34.000 So she went to another.
00:28:36.000 The next morning, G caught a ride 50 miles south to a crisis pregnancy center where a woman displayed her ultrasound on a large screen and turned up the volume of the fetal heartbeats, which sounded like galloping hooves.
00:28:44.000 The woman read off the supposed risks of abortion and printed photos titled Baby A and Baby B. G left the center frightened and angry and immediately called her lawyer to file an affidavit.
00:28:55.000 I'm walking into the situation, thankful for all the information and care I have received.
00:28:58.000 The document read, I'm asking the court to sign an order allowing me to have an abortion.
00:29:02.000 The judge refused her capacity to have an abortion.
00:29:05.000 So, she had to have the babies.
00:29:07.000 And as it turns out, G is kind of a mess of a human being, which is not particularly surprising given her childhood, given her history, and given her activities up to this point.
00:29:17.000 Well folks, you've heard me talk about Jeremy's Razors, our answer to companies that hate your values but will gladly take your cash.
00:29:23.000 I'm here to tell you, we're more than just a razor company now.
00:29:26.000 Introducing Jeremy's Razors Men's Staples.
00:29:29.000 Behold!
00:29:30.000 We're talking hair, body, skincare, and beard care products.
00:29:33.000 I have the hair and the body line with me right now.
00:29:36.000 And let me tell you, these aren't just great products that align with your values.
00:29:38.000 They are high quality.
00:29:39.000 They are made with natural ingredients.
00:29:41.000 100% sulfate-free, paraben-free, woke-free, and made right here in the United States of America.
00:29:47.000 Head on over to jeremysrazors.com to kick woke companies out of your bathroom.
00:29:51.000 And right now, you can get 30% off all Jeremy's products.
00:29:54.000 Don't wait.
00:29:55.000 Stop giving your money to woke corporations today.
00:30:01.000 After Hodge's ruling, she did not know where to turn.
00:30:02.000 She had told her friends she was set on becoming the opposite of her mother who had become pregnant with her unintentionally at 19.
00:30:07.000 She grew up depending on government assistance for food and didn't believe it would be fair to bring children into the world without financial security.
00:30:13.000 Well, one choice there would have been not to get pregnant with the children in the first place.
00:30:17.000 But, beyond that, perhaps the idea here would be not to kill the child.
00:30:22.000 I keep coming back to this because by the end of the story, by the end of the story, this young woman has had the baby, She's having a difficult time holding down a job.
00:30:32.000 She doesn't seem like a particularly responsible person by any stretch of the imagination.
00:30:37.000 She seems to have a difficult life, but you know what the babies have?
00:30:40.000 They are alive.
00:30:41.000 Not only are they alive, actually, this girl at least made the correct moral decision, which is to allow another couple to take care of the kids.
00:30:50.000 In fact, there is a couple who are friends of the family.
00:30:54.000 The parents of a friend who offered to watch the babies at their home on the weekends.
00:30:58.000 And eventually, they came to her and they said, we'd like to watch the babies full time.
00:31:02.000 And there is a picture in the New York Times piece of the two beautiful children.
00:31:07.000 And so again, the New York Times refusing to acknowledge the obvious, which is that it is bad to kill children, ends the piece by sort of suggesting that it would have been better if the babies were not alive.
00:31:19.000 Despite G's fear that the Borregos wanted to take the twins from her, she couldn't deny she felt relief.
00:31:23.000 I'm not ready to give the girls up, G told the Borregos.
00:31:24.000 She usually speaks with a flat affect, but Rachel noticed her eyes tearing.
00:31:27.000 She wanted to move out for a trial.
00:31:29.000 She packed her bags and she left.
00:31:31.000 She was torn between her desire to say the truth, that she was angry at herself and the government that made her have children, and the expectation she would love being a mother, and the similarly strong desire to deflect so she wouldn't be seen as a bad mom.
00:31:41.000 Self-destructive, dependent on the state, doomed to failure.
00:31:44.000 These are the stereotypes that have come to characterize teenage mothers since the moral panic of the 1970s.
00:31:48.000 By the way, that is not a moral panic.
00:31:50.000 I'm sorry, it is not a moral panic that single motherhood is horrible for children.
00:31:53.000 It is.
00:31:53.000 You know what's even worse for kids?
00:31:55.000 Not being alive.
00:31:57.000 And that is the bottom line of this story.
00:32:00.000 Here is how this story concludes.
00:32:03.000 Her six-month trial with the Borregos ended in August, but she still wasn't prepared to make a decision.
00:32:07.000 Instead, she extended the trial, signing a new power of attorney.
00:32:09.000 The Borregos have moved to a larger house 30 minutes away.
00:32:11.000 Every few weeks, she visits her children, though it's painful to see them.
00:32:14.000 When she walks through the door, the girls no longer run up to hug her.
00:32:16.000 Their distance stings, but she knows that it stems from her absence.
00:32:19.000 She keeps missing more firsts, she told me.
00:32:20.000 Their first steps, their first sentences.
00:32:21.000 The first time one of them texted, asked, what's up?
00:32:25.000 Well, I mean, I can tell you which one is worse.
00:32:26.000 The kids not existing.
00:32:26.000 Dead kids.
00:32:27.000 She could give up her parental rights as her father did, or she could raise her children without the stability or the warmth they deserve as her mother did. In her own experience, both left her feeling abandoned and unloved. She didn't know which one was worse.
00:32:38.000 Well, I mean, I can tell you which one is worse. Dead kids.
00:32:40.000 The kids not existing.
00:32:41.000 So once again, the premise of the New York Times piece, pieces like this, this is the big problem with the pro-choice movement, is that in the end, you have to make the affirmative case that it is better for the world for children not to be alive. And once the kids are born, that becomes an extraordinarily difficult case to make.
00:32:56.000 Again, the picture tells the whole story in this particular story.
00:32:59.000 When you see two beautiful small children, toddlers, and you say, well, maybe mommy should have aborted you and her life would be marginally better because this does not seem like a young woman who makes wonderful decisions as general rule.
00:33:11.000 That is not a strong case for why children do not deserve to live.
00:33:16.000 And meanwhile, speaking, by the way, of the New York Times' complete unwillingness to look reality in the face, there's an entire article in the New York Times today titled, When High Fashion and QAnon Collide, trying to defend the Balenciaga campaigns that include children posing with teddy bears in bondage gear, and another photo campaign that includes actual child pornography decisions from the Supreme Court.
00:33:37.000 It's all about QAnon and Republicans pouncing and all of that.
00:33:41.000 And then the New York Times bubble is so thick and it's so bad, but eventually it does end up being penetrated and it ends up collapsing in on itself.
00:33:48.000 And that will happen with all of these issues, because again, the left, they're not used to making cases for their own feelings, for their own politics.
00:33:54.000 And when they're confronted with reality, their case tends to collapse.
00:33:58.000 Okay, meanwhile, speaking of people who are collapsing, Republicans in the Senate, 12 of them voted in favor of the same-sex marriage bill.
00:34:05.000 Despite the fact that it does not include sufficient protections for religious freedom and the idea that it is supposed to enshrine into federal law same-sex marriage as the law of the land.
00:34:14.000 Now, it's already in federal law because of the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell, but this is a senatorial designation that same-sex marriage is the law of the land, approved by 12 Republicans, including the oh-so-very moral Mitt Romney.
00:34:27.000 As well as Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, Rob Portman of Ohio, Todd Young of Indiana, Richard Burns-Hontellis of North Carolina, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Susan Collins, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Cynthia Loomis.
00:34:42.000 There were a couple of people who did not vote.
00:34:45.000 On this, that would be Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, both of whom are retiring.
00:34:49.000 In a second, we'll get into what exactly this bill means and why Republicans are so damn spineless.
00:34:53.000 If, as I say, reality eventually sets in, and one of the realities of life is that traditional marriage is a fundamental building block of any Any sort of durable society?
00:35:04.000 If that is a reality and if it is going to set in, why are Republicans going along with denial of reality?
00:35:08.000 We'll get to that in just one moment.
00:35:09.000 First, let me just tell you, I rely on Black Rifle Coffee.
00:35:12.000 It is that simple.
00:35:13.000 My kids get me up at all hours in the night and then again in the morning.
00:35:17.000 And as I'm preparing for the show every morning, I need my Black Rifle Coffee.
00:35:20.000 Black Rifle Coffee Company is helping you knock out your holiday shopping too with a lot of awesome new products this year.
00:35:25.000 Shop the best brewing gear, thermoses, mugs, and apparel designed for folks who love a country and coffee.
00:35:29.000 Black Rifle sources the most exotic roasts from around the globe.
00:35:32.000 All coffee is roasted here in the United States by veteran-led teams of coffee experts.
00:35:35.000 Stuff your Christmas stockings with the latest roasts from America's Coffee for 10% off with my code SHAPIRO.
00:35:40.000 Better yet, sign your Secret Santa up for a Coffee Club subscription.
00:35:43.000 Imagine the joy of a pre-scheduled coffee delivery.
00:35:45.000 We're talking your favorite roast when you need the most.
00:35:47.000 It is the gift that keeps on giving.
00:35:48.000 Black Rifle Coffee Company is veteran founded and operated.
00:35:51.000 They take pride in serving coffee and culture to people who love the country.
00:35:54.000 Every purchase you make with Black Rifle helps support veteran and first responder causes.
00:35:57.000 Head on over to BlackRifleCoffee.com, use promo code Shapiro for 10% off coffee, coffee gear, apparel, or when you sign up for a new coffee club subscription.
00:36:04.000 That's BlackRifleCoffee.com with promo code Shapiro for 10% off Black Rifle Coffee, supporting veterans and America's coffee.
00:36:10.000 Also, the Dailywares post-production team is expanding.
00:36:13.000 We are in need of new talented video editors to help with the ever-increasing volume of Daily Wire Plus content.
00:36:17.000 Our video editors work on a variety of content, including our daily podcasts, long-form interviews, and original YouTube videos, as well as shows like My Show to Bunk, a series from Jordan Peterson, and a host of other Daily Wire Plus content.
00:36:27.000 We are looking for highly creative people.
00:36:29.000 who possess strong technical knowledge of the video editing process.
00:36:32.000 At least two years of previous professional video experience is required for this opportunity.
00:36:36.000 Be sure to have your real or work samples prepared that are required for consideration for this position.
00:36:40.000 It is a National Tennessee-based position.
00:36:42.000 For details and to apply, visit dailywire.com slash ben.
00:36:45.000 Click on careers.
00:36:46.000 That's dailywire.com slash ben today.
00:36:47.000 Okay, so Republican cowardice is one reason why the left keeps winning at the social battles, despite the fact that the population is not all in on everything that the social left wishes.
00:36:56.000 Now, the polls show that there is widespread public support for same-sex marriage.
00:36:59.000 What there is not widespread support for is the idea that you as a religious person ought to be forced in your life to accept same-sex marriage in the way that you do business, in the way that you send your kids to school, and the idea that society has a duty to force individuals to acknowledge things they don't believe to be moral.
00:37:17.000 That is not something the vast majority of Americans are willing to go along with.
00:37:20.000 And that is the biggest problem with the so-called Respect for Marriage Act.
00:37:23.000 It essentially says that only bigots and fools, based on their silly religion, would object to the idea that a man, woman, and child is the basic fundamental building block of society.
00:37:32.000 And then further, it says, well, here are a few religious exemptions that we'll put out there.
00:37:36.000 We'll sort of suggest that in your own church, we're not going to take away your tax-exempt status.
00:37:41.000 But it doesn't actually enshrine those protections strongly at all for religious people outside of their church.
00:37:46.000 So let's say that you're a religious person, and let's say that you run a cake shop in Colorado, and let's say you get sued every two seconds.
00:37:51.000 There are no protections in this bill.
00:37:52.000 What did Republicans win in this bill precisely?
00:37:55.000 What did Republicans get in this bill precisely?
00:37:57.000 The answer is they got pretty much nothing.
00:37:59.000 They went along with it anyway because there are a lot of weak-kneed Republicans who are unwilling to have a headline that says that they oppose same-sex marriage.
00:38:07.000 Well, if that's the case, if you don't have an affirmative case for why you are either in favor of same-sex marriage or why you believe that the protections of religious people here are sufficient, then I'm not sure why you're voting for the thing or why you should be in the Senate, as I've said before.
00:38:22.000 There was a solution available here, by the way, that would have pleased even some members of the social left, you would think, if they were honest about what they're saying.
00:38:30.000 What the left is saying today is, we're not going to get in your business.
00:38:32.000 This has always been the lie.
00:38:35.000 Every step of the way here has been, this doesn't affect you.
00:38:39.000 We just want you to leave us alone in our bedrooms.
00:38:42.000 And everyone, okay, sounds fair.
00:38:43.000 And they're like, well, all we want really is civil unions.
00:38:45.000 We just want to be able to like put people in our will or have a living will or have people visit us in the hospital.
00:38:51.000 And we're like, oh, okay.
00:38:52.000 And then it was like, well, what we really want is marriage.
00:38:55.000 We want it to be like the exact same word.
00:38:57.000 And people start to say, wait, hold up a second.
00:38:58.000 It's not the same thing.
00:38:59.000 Nope.
00:39:00.000 That's all we want.
00:39:00.000 How does our marriage affect you?
00:39:02.000 And people are like, okay, well, now we want to teach it to your kids in school.
00:39:05.000 Like, kids need to know this.
00:39:06.000 I mean, obviously, if marriage is marriage and love is love, then kids who are five can't be brought up in a cis-normative, heteronormative society.
00:39:13.000 We have to teach your small children this in order to protect your small children from you and from your religious-based allies.
00:39:18.000 And people are like, wait, hold up a second.
00:39:20.000 Now what are you talking about?
00:39:21.000 Oh yeah, and also, by the way, we have to force your business to engage in activities that it finds to be, that you find to be immoral.
00:39:26.000 We need to make you do these things, you know, for the good of society and all.
00:39:30.000 So now the left is saying, we're not going to do all those things, right?
00:39:32.000 We're not going to force you to engage in these businesses.
00:39:35.000 Well, if that were true, you know what would have happened last night?
00:39:37.000 Well, what would have happened is that some of the Republicans would have voted in favor of Senator Mike Lee's amendment.
00:39:42.000 So Mike Lee had an amendment to this bill.
00:39:44.000 All the Republicans had to do was say, we will still vote for the bill.
00:39:47.000 Three of them.
00:39:47.000 All they had to say was, we will still vote for the bill.
00:39:50.000 You just have to add Mike Lee's amendment.
00:39:52.000 So what did Mike Lee's amendment do?
00:39:53.000 It enshrined protections for individual conscience in the bill.
00:39:58.000 Individual conscience throughout your life.
00:39:59.000 Meaning, that if you run a business, you're a religious person, you're a baker, you're a photographer, you're a lawyer, you are allowed, under Mike Lee's amendment, to still live your religion in public life.
00:40:09.000 Which is, by the way, what it means to be a religious person.
00:40:11.000 This idea that religious people stop being religious when they leave their front door, or when they don't go to church or synagogue, is absurd.
00:40:16.000 Religion pervades your life.
00:40:17.000 You're a religious person, it is your core identity, it is your relationship with God, if you're a religious human being.
00:40:22.000 And so Mike Lee was making that clear in the amendment, and couldn't get three Republicans to threaten to sign off the bill.
00:40:29.000 Which demonstrates that Republicans are cowards, the people who voted for this.
00:40:32.000 Here's Mike Lee trying to push his amendment.
00:40:36.000 In the spirit of compromise, I've publicly stated, and I reiterate here again today, that I will support the legislation if my amendment is adopted.
00:40:47.000 My amendment simply prohibits the federal government from discriminating against schools, businesses, and organizations based on their religious beliefs about same-sex marriage.
00:40:58.000 That's all it does.
00:41:00.000 My amendment prevents the Internal Revenue Service, among other things, from revoking the tax-exempt status of these charities and organizations simply because they act according to their beliefs about the divine purpose of marriage.
00:41:17.000 Mike Lee continues along these lines talking about his amendment.
00:41:20.000 And again, this is a very easy win for Republicans.
00:41:22.000 All they would have to do is go along with Lee's amendment.
00:41:25.000 There's another amendment by Marco Rubio that was also fairly good, not quite as good as Lee's, but that would've been good too.
00:41:28.000 They didn't vote.
00:41:29.000 These Republicans, you want to talk about cowardly Republicans?
00:41:32.000 Cowardly Republicans who will not even stand up for an amendment that actually enshrines religious freedom in the face of left-wing social predations.
00:41:39.000 These are Republicans who are cowards.
00:41:40.000 Here's Mike Lee again, explaining his amendment.
00:41:43.000 Why wouldn't anyone want to deny the federal government the authority to retaliate against individuals, non-profits and other entities based on their sincerely held religious beliefs?
00:42:00.000 Think about that for a minute.
00:42:02.000 Why wouldn't they want to deny that very power from a government that may wield it in a way that is categorically abusive?
00:42:15.000 Okay, he of course is exactly right.
00:42:17.000 So why Republicans didn't go along with it?
00:42:19.000 The answer, once again, it can only be put in terms of they want to be seen as moderate.
00:42:23.000 They are cowards.
00:42:24.000 More than 7 out of 10 Republican senators did vote against the bill, underscoring how the party has continued to cater to religious conservatives who oppose same-sex marriage long after large majorities of the American public have come to support it, according to the New York Times.
00:42:35.000 Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was among the opponents, despite hopes from Democrats and Republicans that he might vote yes on final passage.
00:42:41.000 But again, this isn't about that.
00:42:44.000 The truth is that you could be in favor of same-sex marriage and still not like same-sex marriage being enshrined into law as equivalent to heterosexual marriage, specifically because of all of the side effects and downstream effects and intended effects of a bill like this one.
00:42:58.000 The fact that many of the Republicans went along with this Man, this party needs an overhaul.
00:43:04.000 It needs an overhaul in a very, very serious way.
00:43:08.000 Speaking of which, by the way, the Republican Party, I said it yesterday, I will repeat it again today, the Republican Party, the Republican National Committee needs new leadership.
00:43:16.000 I do not understand the logic that Ronna McDaniel should maintain leadership of the RNC.
00:43:21.000 She was appointed head of the RNC in January of 2017.
00:43:23.000 2017. She's proceeded to lose the elections of 2018, 2020, 2021, and 2022.
00:43:30.000 That is not the kind of record that suggests that you should remain in charge of the party.
00:43:35.000 In other words, if Republicans keep running directly into the teeth of losing strategy, then I don't know what they are good for.
00:43:42.000 They're not standing for principle, and they're also not winning.
00:43:44.000 So which, like, what are the things that you guys stand for precisely?
00:43:49.000 If you're going to make the case that you have to lose because it's better to stand on principle and lose than lose your principle and win, okay, then what's your principle?
00:43:55.000 But if you're going to not stand on principle and you are going to lose, then I don't understand what you are for.
00:44:01.000 What exactly is it that you would say that you do around here?
00:44:05.000 The RNC is, in fact, announcing an advisory council to assess what happened in the last election cycle.
00:44:10.000 But suffice it to say that because it's being headed up by the current leadership of the RNC, I have a feeling that they might ignore some of the more important aspects of just why things went south for them in the last election cycle.
00:44:20.000 Alrighty, guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now.
00:44:22.000 You're not going to want to miss it.
00:44:23.000 We'll be getting into the White House targeting Elon Musk while basically patting Apple on the head, despite Apple actually coordinating with the Chinese government.