The Ben Shapiro Show - October 05, 2018


The Greatest Whine Of All | Ep. 632


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per Minute

197.30623

Word Count

12,940

Sentence Count

997

Misogynist Sentences

43

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Ben Shapiro reacts to the cloture vote on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanuagh, and explains why the vote is likely to be close, and why it's a good thing there was only one Democratic vote. He also explains why Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) voted no on cloture and why she should be fired if she s a closeted serial killer. Ben Shapiro is the host of the conservative podcast "The Weekly Standard" and host of "The Ben Shapiro Show" on Fox News Channel. He is also host of The Weekly Standard's "Politics with Ben Shapiro" and is a regular contributor on CNN's "The Situation Room" and the New York Times' "Meet the Press." He's also a frequent contributor on ABC's "Good Morning America" and CBS' "The Early Edition of CBS Radio's Morning Joe" and hosts the conservative radio show "The FiveThirtyEight" on CBS Radio in Washington, D.C. and CNN Radio in Los Angeles, and on NPR Radio in Boston, MA and NPR in New York City, NY and in the District of New York, NY, among other places around the country, and gives his thoughts on all the latest news and notes from the past 24 hours in Washington and elsewhere in the world. Also, he talks about the latest on the Alabama Roy Moore pick-up truckers and what's happening in Alabama. and gives you the inside scoop on what he's been up to in his life in Alabama on the past week in Alabama and the latest in his new book, "Alabama Joneses' new novel, "The Good, the Good, Bad, the Bad, The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly, the Beautiful, the Great, the U.S. Good, and The Ugly and the Beautiful... and the Rest, the Worst, the Real, the Most Beautiful, The Real, The Great, The Best, the Best, The Worst, The Most Beautiful... the Real and the Most Authentic, the Really Good and the Realest, the Greatest, the REALEST, the MOST REAL ESTEPSYCHOLOGY! and much, much, MUCH, MUCH MORE! and more! -- including the fact that he's not even joking about it all of that! -- and much more! -- on this episode of The Ben Shapiro's thoughts on Brett's new book "Kavanaugh's Confirmation hearing, "KAVNER'S BUMP"


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Republicans and one Democrat vote for cloture on Brett Kavanaugh, leftists take to the streets, Kavanaugh defends himself, and Chuck Grassley unleashes.
00:00:09.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:09.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:15.000 Oh man, do we have plenty of news for you today, plenty of commentary.
00:00:20.000 Wow.
00:00:20.000 I mean, let's just say that lots of stuff is happening and tomorrow is going to be fascinating because the vote is now set on Brett Kavanaugh for Saturday.
00:00:29.000 We'll get to all of that news in just a second.
00:00:31.000 First, a couple of quick reminders.
00:00:33.000 First of all,
00:00:33.000 We truly appreciate you tuning in and sharing the podcast with your friends.
00:00:36.000 If you enjoy what we do, please subscribe to The Ben Shapiro Show on iTunes.
00:00:39.000 While you're there, leave us a five-star review.
00:00:41.000 Only five-star reviews, no four-stars, no three-stars, certainly no one-stars, guys.
00:00:44.000 If you like the show, do it.
00:00:46.000 If you don't, don't do it.
00:00:47.000 It only takes a second.
00:00:48.000 It does indeed help us out in those iTunes rankings, which is a lot of fun, so go check that out.
00:00:52.000 Also, let's say you need to upgrade your business.
00:00:54.000 Let's say that you are unhappy with your employees for any reason under the sun.
00:00:58.000 Let's say that your producer is a closeted serial killer, and you find that out, and then you actually have to let her go.
00:01:03.000 Senya, let's say that all that happens.
00:01:05.000 Well, if that were to happen, then you'd need to replace said person with a person who was not a serial killer, as much as she's competent.
00:01:12.000 You know, serial killers probably shouldn't have them in your company.
00:01:15.000 That's why you need ZipRecruiter.com.
00:01:17.000 ZipRecruiter.com has powerful matching technology, which scans thousands of resumes, identifies people with the right skills, education, and experience for your job, and actively invites them to apply.
00:01:26.000 So you get qualified candidates fast.
00:01:28.000 No more sorting through the wrong resumes.
00:01:30.000 No more waiting for the right candidates to apply.
00:01:32.000 It's no wonder ZipRecruiter is rated number one by employers in the United States.
00:01:36.000 And right now, my listeners can try ZipRecruiter for free at this exclusive web address.
00:01:40.000 ZipRecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:01:43.000 That's ZipRecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:01:46.000 ZipRecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:01:47.000 And D-A-I-L-Y-W-I-R-E.
00:01:50.000 ZipRecruiter is indeed the smartest way to hire.
00:01:52.000 And for legal purposes, Senya's not a serial killer.
00:01:55.000 And even if she were, snitches get stitches, man.
00:01:56.000 I'm not going to tell anyone.
00:01:57.000 Anybody about where she puts those bodies?
00:01:58.000 It's not a thing.
00:01:59.000 All right.
00:01:59.000 So let's jump into today's news.
00:02:03.000 There is a bunch of it.
00:02:04.000 So we begin with the fact that Republicans and one Democrat just passed Brett Kavanaugh through a cloture vote.
00:02:11.000 So thank you once again, Harry Reid.
00:02:12.000 Let me just begin with a big thank you to Senator Harry Reid, who killed the filibuster on judicial nominees way back in 2013.
00:02:20.000 And Mitch McConnell, cocaine Mitch,
00:02:22.000 In his prescient, turtle-like fashion, said at the time, you will come to regret this sooner than you think.
00:02:28.000 And oh boy, do Democrats regret it right now, because all it takes is 51 votes, not 60 votes, in order to elevate someone to the Supreme Court.
00:02:36.000 The vote on Brett Kavanaugh was closer than expected, and that is because of the politically traitorous behavior of Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.
00:02:44.000 Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted no on cloture.
00:02:46.000 Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who wishes to retain his seat in the Senate, voted yes.
00:02:51.000 That means that it is now bipartisan opposition because of one vote.
00:02:55.000 It's bipartisan opposition to Kavanaugh and also bipartisan support for Kavanaugh because of one vote.
00:02:59.000 Basically, one Democrat voted yes, one Republican voted no on cloture.
00:03:04.000 But this thing is too close for comfort.
00:03:06.000 Wouldn't it be nice right about now if the Alabama GOP had not nominated Roy Moore to fill a Senate seat?
00:03:11.000 That would give me a little bit more breathing room.
00:03:13.000 I think I'd feel a little bit happier about life right now.
00:03:16.000 Suffice it to say, the odds are very much
00:03:18.000 I'm Brett Kavanaugh's side in terms of being confirmed.
00:03:20.000 Jeff Flake voted yes on cloture.
00:03:22.000 Susan Collins voted yes on cloture.
00:03:24.000 In order for Kavanaugh to go down right now, basically both those people have to switch their votes or Joe Manchin has to switch his vote between cloture and a final vote.
00:03:31.000 The final vote is designed to take place on Saturday.
00:03:35.000 That is the goal.
00:03:37.000 It's supposed to take place tomorrow.
00:03:39.000 And Lisa Murkowski obviously is in the crosshairs because Lisa Murkowski, who lost her primary in 2016 and then won a write-in vote and won about 44% of the vote in her election before that in 2010 against a libertarian candidate, she's not wildly popular in Alaska or anything like that, but she feels pretty secure because she's not up for re-election until 2022 and now she gets to burnish her feminist bona fides
00:04:02.000 It would not be particularly surprising if the Democrats at some point win back the Senate, say in 2020.
00:04:07.000 It would not be particularly surprising to see somebody like Lisa Murkowski switch to independent a la Jim Jeffords and then caucus with the Democrats in order to preserve her seat.
00:04:14.000 That would not be a giant shock.
00:04:16.000 So Murkowski votes the wrong way on this.
00:04:18.000 Susan Collins votes the right way on cloture.
00:04:21.000 She has in the past voted for cloture on particular measures and then voted against the nominee.
00:04:25.000 If she were to do that,
00:04:27.000 If she were to vote in favor of cloture and then vote against the actual measure being taken, then you would see a 50-50 tie in the Senate broken by Vice President Pence, which is about the thinnest margin that you could put somebody on the court by.
00:04:40.000 But hey, almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, and this is neither.
00:04:44.000 So as long as he gets confirmed, that's all that matters in the end.
00:04:47.000 Joe Manchin, of course, has a lot of pressure on him, but he also understands that if he votes against Kavanaugh, he loses his seat.
00:04:53.000 He is up for reelection in five minutes here.
00:04:55.000 And the folks in West Virginia are not going to go along with Joe Manchin if he were to undercut Brett Kavanaugh on this matter.
00:05:04.000 Also, in other breaking news this morning...
00:05:07.000 This is an insane story that underscores the vagaries of the allegations against Brett Kavanaugh in the first place.
00:05:13.000 Christine Blasey Ford was the woman who made those allegations.
00:05:16.000 There's a new story from the Wall Street Journal that is truly a shocking story and is getting undercovered, of course, by a lot of folks in the mainstream.
00:05:23.000 They're saying, well, a lot of people in right-wing media, they're picking up on it.
00:05:26.000 Everyone should be picking up on it because it's a kind of crazy story.
00:05:29.000 Here's the story from the Wall Street Journal.
00:05:31.000 Quote.
00:05:31.000 A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford's allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say she believed but couldn't corroborate Dr. Ford's accounts, according to people familiar with the matter.
00:05:49.000 Let me be clear what that means.
00:05:50.000 That means that people close to Christine Blasey Ford called up Leland Kaiser, who was the only witness that essentially Ford brought forth, and who had denied that she knew anything about the party or knew Brett Kavanaugh at all.
00:06:03.000 And Ford's people called up Kaiser and tried to get her to change her story.
00:06:08.000 They pressured her to change her story in order to go after Brett Kavanaugh.
00:06:13.000 That's fully crazy.
00:06:14.000 And if it happened on the other side, if it was Brett Kavanaugh calling people up saying, I need you to change your story and say that you denied it, people would be saying, wow, that guy is evil, okay?
00:06:25.000 To try and pressure somebody to change a story in order to convict someone, either in the court of public opinion or in court, may in fact be criminal activity, right?
00:06:32.000 I mean, to get somebody to change their story for the FBI, that's putting pressure on an actual witness.
00:06:38.000 That's witness tampering, maybe.
00:06:40.000 That's pretty dicey stuff.
00:06:43.000 Here's what the story says.
00:06:44.000 Now, it is worth noting that Monica McLean has only come up in one other context in this case so far.
00:06:47.000 So it turns out that Monica McLean went to Ford's actual testimony.
00:07:05.000 Why else do we know Monica McLean's name?
00:07:07.000 Anybody remember?
00:07:07.000 Quick quiz on whether you've been up on the news and listening to the show.
00:07:10.000 Monica McLean was the woman who was mentioned by Christine Blasey Ford's ex-boyfriend in his letter when he said that Christine Blasey Ford trained somebody to pass a polygraph.
00:07:21.000 That would have been Monica McLean.
00:07:23.000 Monica McLean, when she was trying out for a job with the federal government,
00:07:27.000 She then said that that had never happened.
00:07:30.000 It also turns out that Monica McLean is probably the quote-unquote beach friend that Christine Blasey Ford was talking about who urged her to approach Democrats.
00:07:38.000 So Monica McLean, who's a Democratic activist, was involved in this thing basically from inception.
00:07:44.000 The statement to the FBI offers a glimpse into how Dr. Ford's allies were working behind the scenes to lobby old classmates to bolster their versions of the alleged incident, as were Judge Kavanaugh's.
00:07:54.000 Judge Kavanaugh, whose Supreme Court nomination will be debated in the Senate Friday, has denied the allegations of sexual misconduct.
00:07:59.000 On Thursday, a day after sending to the White House the report on its investigation into the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, the FBI sent the White House and Senate an additional package of information that included text messages from Ms.
00:08:10.000 McLean to Ms.
00:08:11.000 Kaiser, according to a person familiar with the matter.
00:08:13.000 Ms.
00:08:13.000 McLean's lawyer, David Loffman, said in a statement, quote,
00:08:16.000 Any notion or claim that Ms.
00:08:17.000 McLean pressured Leland Kaiser to alter Ms.
00:08:19.000 Kaiser's account of what she recalled concerning the alleged incident between Dr. Ford and Brett Kavanaugh is absolutely false.
00:08:25.000 Ms.
00:08:26.000 Kaiser's lawyer, on September 23rd, said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee she had no recollection of attending a party with Judge Kavanaugh.
00:08:32.000 That same day, she told the Washington Post she believed Dr. Ford.
00:08:35.000 On September 29th, two days after Dr. Ford and the judge testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
00:08:41.000 Ms.
00:08:41.000 Kaiser's attorney sent a letter to the panel saying his client wasn't refuting Dr. Ford's account and that she believed it but couldn't corroborate it.
00:08:48.000 A person close to the former classmate said it was her understanding that mutual friends of Dr. Ford and Ms.
00:08:53.000 Kaiser, including Ms.
00:08:54.000 McLean, had contacted Ms.
00:08:56.000 Kaiser after her initial statement to warn her that her statement was being used by Republicans to rebut the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.
00:09:02.000 The friends told Ms.
00:09:03.000 Kaiser that if she had intended to say she didn't remember the party, not that it had never happened, she should clarify her statement, the person said, adding that the friends had not, in fact, pressured Ms.
00:09:11.000 Kaiser.
00:09:12.000 No, it wasn't any pressure at all.
00:09:14.000 So good stuff happening there from the from the politically oriented legal team and friends of Christine Blasey Ford.
00:09:22.000 This is not obviously good for her account.
00:09:26.000 And obviously Chuck Grassley is taking this stuff very seriously.
00:09:29.000 So Chuck Grassley
00:09:31.000 Who is the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee on behalf of the Republicans.
00:09:35.000 He actually sent a letter to Christine Blasey Ford's legal team.
00:09:38.000 And this letter is pretty explosive stuff for Christine Blasey Ford.
00:09:42.000 He basically said, why aren't you turning over any of your records?
00:09:46.000 You testified about your psychiatrist's records, and then you won't turn them over to us.
00:09:51.000 You'll show them to the Washington Post, but you won't show them to us.
00:09:54.000 You testified about a bunch of material that you won't turn over to us.
00:09:58.000 So why?
00:09:58.000 Why won't you turn over any of that stuff?
00:10:00.000 Here's what Chuck Grassley wrote to Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers, quote, You have repeatedly refused to produce this evidence to the Senate.
00:10:06.000 In doing so, you are preventing the Senate from considering the evidence most crucial to Dr. Ford's allegations.
00:10:11.000 I don't know what other interference we should draw from inference we should draw from your refusal, but that the withheld evidence does not support Dr. Ford's allegations in quite the way you have claimed.
00:10:20.000 I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with the Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence.
00:10:30.000 And here's where it starts to get real dicey for Legal Team Ford.
00:10:33.000 In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2nd letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives in any of the following.
00:10:45.000 One, U.S.
00:10:46.000 Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27th hearing.
00:10:55.000 In other words, were you coordinating with Democrats in order to trot out a particular PR line?
00:11:00.000 Two, the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford, Leland Kaiser, Mark Judge, and Patrick Smith.
00:11:06.000 In other words, we think that you've been corresponding with witnesses, including Leland Kaiser, about what they ought to be saying on this.
00:11:14.000 In other words, were you coordinating with other people making allegations against Judge Kavanaugh?
00:11:22.000 Chuck Grassley does not actually release that letter unless he's got something in his back pocket.
00:11:26.000 Chuck Grassley is a very cautious senator, and this is not a guy who's going to go out there on a ledge and then suggest that
00:11:34.000 All this is some giant conspiracy without some evidence.
00:11:37.000 If he is, then that's inappropriate.
00:11:39.000 So we will see what arises from all of that.
00:11:43.000 By the way, Grassley's office did release an executive summary of the FBI findings.
00:11:48.000 The FBI findings basically said that there was nothing.
00:11:51.000 So they talked to 11 different individuals, 10 of whom agreed to be interviewed.
00:11:54.000 That includes Mark Judge, PJ Smith, and Leland Kaiser, as well as two other individuals included on Judge Kavanaugh's July 1st, 1982 calendar entry.
00:12:02.000 Remember, Democrats were suggesting that on
00:12:05.000 On Kavanaugh's calendar, there was a party for July 1st, 1982, in which he listed some people.
00:12:10.000 Some of those people had crossover with some of the people mentioned by Blasey Ford.
00:12:14.000 Even Blasey Ford's lawyers are now saying it wasn't the July 1st party.
00:12:17.000 Funny how they only say that after the FBI interviews all these folks.
00:12:21.000 The FBI interviews all these folks, and then, and then, Ford's lawyers come out and say, she would never have said that it was July 1st as a possible date.
00:12:28.000 Some of the people listed on his calendar, she knew well and would have remembered.
00:12:32.000 Interesting, interesting how all of that works.
00:12:34.000 So again, I've never suggested, not once, that she was lying or making this up.
00:12:39.000 I don't know the answer to that.
00:12:40.000 I do know that suspicious political activity around an allegation makes me more suspicious of the allegation than it otherwise would.
00:12:46.000 In just a second, we'll get to the chaos that is happening
00:12:50.000 On the hill right now.
00:12:51.000 But first, let's talk about the quality of the air that you breathe.
00:12:54.000 So there's a new study that just came out of China.
00:12:56.000 It discovered that air pollution causes a huge reduction in intelligence.
00:12:59.000 This in addition to the well-known impacts on physical health.
00:13:03.000 So if you're wondering why the country is stupid lately, maybe it's because people haven't changed their air filters.
00:13:08.000 High pollution levels led to significant drops in test scores with language and arithmetic.
00:13:12.000 The average impact equivalent to having lost an entire year of education.
00:13:15.000 So now we know why those protesters were out there at USC last night.
00:13:18.000 This is all especially important with 95% of the global population breathing unsafe air.
00:13:23.000 So what you need to do right now is go to Filteredby.com.
00:13:25.000 It's America's leading provider of HVAC filters for homes and small businesses.
00:13:29.000 Choose from over 600 sizes, including custom options that ship free within 24 hours plus.
00:13:34.000 They support working Americans.
00:13:35.000 They manufacture all of their filters right here in the United States.
00:13:38.000 Save 5% when you subscribe for auto replacement so you will never forget to change your filters ever again.
00:13:43.000 Filterbuy will save you time and money.
00:13:45.000 You will breathe better.
00:13:46.000 And apparently, you'll become more intelligent in the process, which you need.
00:13:49.000 I mean, come on.
00:13:50.000 You're listening to this show.
00:13:50.000 How can you keep up if you don't actually change your air filters?
00:13:53.000 Go to Filterbuy.com and tell them that we sent you.
00:13:58.000 Okay, so.
00:13:59.000 We'll get to the chaos that's been happening in Washington, D.C.
00:14:02.000 in just one second.
00:14:03.000 First, I think it is worthwhile noting that having lost on all counts here, the Democrats have turned to their final gambit.
00:14:08.000 They said that Brett Kavanaugh was a perjurer, and then they said that Brett Kavanaugh was a rapist, and now they are saying Brett Kavanaugh cried, and that makes him a baby.
00:14:17.000 This is, I'm serious.
00:14:18.000 This is an article in the New Yorker by a person named Michael Lista, who apparently is kind of a, well, a person who repeats garbage on a regular basis.
00:14:27.000 Here's what he says.
00:14:28.000 Brett Kavanaugh's cheers make a kind of sense.
00:14:30.000 From a single phrase by Thomas Jefferson, that public life is about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the fulfillment of the white American man's atomized desires assumed the force of a fiat and became the ultimate purpose of this country's society.
00:14:44.000 So, if you don't understand what he's talking about, that's because you have a brain.
00:14:47.000 What he's trying to say here is that the phrase, pursuit of happiness, means that white men get to pursue happiness, but everybody else is a giant victim.
00:14:56.000 And therefore, if you believe in the Declaration of Independence, it's because you're a racist, which is an insane statement.
00:15:02.000 And then he says, if a white man didn't get what he wanted, it was nothing short of a constitutional crisis in his body and his body politic both.
00:15:10.000 Really?
00:15:10.000 That's weird because it seems to me that rape laws have been on the books since forever.
00:15:14.000 Since all of human history.
00:15:16.000 Written into America's founding document is the franchise for a man like Kavanaugh to weep when he isn't fulfilled.
00:15:22.000 That isn't really in the Constitution.
00:15:26.000 That not really.
00:15:27.000 Have you read it?
00:15:28.000 He says, in this, he's less a citizen of his society than one of its disgruntled customers who are always right.
00:15:33.000 There's an originalist argument to be made for being a crybaby.
00:15:36.000 So it's bad that Brett Kavanaugh got emotional.
00:15:38.000 Now, what I would love is a reverse article from this guy on Christine Blasey Ford, right, who was considered credible largely because she was emotional during her testimony.
00:15:49.000 This is really sick stuff.
00:15:51.000 And this is the most common argument that I'm seeing is that Brett Kavanaugh's judicial temperament is the real problem here.
00:15:55.000 We're going to get to more of that argument in just a second.
00:15:59.000 There's a — John Paul Stevens, who hasn't been relevant for years and years and years and years, thank God, because he was appointed by a Republican, but he was the most liberal justice on the court.
00:16:09.000 Well, he now said — he's 98 years old — he was speaking to a crowd of retirees in Boca Raton, and he said that Brett Kavanaugh's performance during a Senate confirmation hearing suggested that he lacks the temperament for the job.
00:16:23.000 And here's what he said.
00:16:24.000 He said, At the time, I thought Kavanaugh had the qualifications for the Supreme Court should he be selected.
00:16:29.000 I've changed my views for reasons that have no relationship to his intellectual ability.
00:16:33.000 I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind.
00:16:37.000 He said that there's merit to the criticism that he has political bias.
00:16:41.000 And I'm seeing this a lot this morning.
00:16:42.000 This is the last stand.
00:16:43.000 Brett Kavanaugh cried.
00:16:45.000 Brett Kavanaugh got emotional.
00:16:46.000 And Brett Kavanaugh was partisan.
00:16:47.000 I saw that today.
00:16:48.000 It doesn't matter even that he was emotional.
00:16:49.000 It matters that he was partisan.
00:16:50.000 Because he said the Democrats were out to get him.
00:16:53.000 Or, alternatively, Brett Kavanaugh was saying something that is implicitly true, that Democrats were out to get him.
00:17:00.000 Remember, the original opposition to Brett Kavanaugh is that he was a textualist.
00:17:03.000 Then it became he was a gang rapist.
00:17:06.000 Let's say that you had spent the last 40 years of your life in public service, and that somebody you never knew came forward with an allegation against you, accusing you of gang rape.
00:17:16.000 And that people who opposed you politically, the same people who said that they opposed you because you're a textualist, then came forward and said, we think that you are also a gang rapist.
00:17:25.000 Might you say, wait a second, this feels like a partisan hit job.
00:17:29.000 Might you say that?
00:17:30.000 Or does that make you too partisan?
00:17:32.000 It's amazing.
00:17:32.000 It really is amazing.
00:17:33.000 All these folks who say judicial temperament.
00:17:35.000 First of all, these folks have never met a judge.
00:17:37.000 There are lots of judges who are angry.
00:17:38.000 There are lots of judges who have personality issues.
00:17:41.000 This idea that all judges are sort of saintly coddies on the hill who dispense justice from beneath the palm tree.
00:17:48.000 It's just not true.
00:17:49.000 It's just not true.
00:17:50.000 But the question of judicial temperament is how do you approach cases when you're on the bench?
00:17:54.000 So we have 12 years.
00:17:56.000 Well, 14 years, I guess, of Brett Kavanaugh on the federal bench.
00:18:00.000 12 years?
00:18:01.000 12 years of Brett Kavanaugh on the federal bench.
00:18:04.000 No indicator that there was any problem with his judicial temperament.
00:18:07.000 He was a moderate to moderate conservative on the bench.
00:18:10.000 And then, he went through a full Senate hearing.
00:18:13.000 You remember?
00:18:13.000 Remember, there was a whole set of Senate hearings before this whole garbage news cycle began.
00:18:18.000 There's a whole set of Senate hearings where he went through silly questions from Senators, and you had the grandstanding by Kamala Harris and Corey Potato Head Booker, and they went through the entire hearing, and he was placid, right?
00:18:30.000 He was dull.
00:18:30.000 That was the rip on him.
00:18:31.000 He was too dull.
00:18:32.000 He was too robotic.
00:18:34.000 And then, he was 12 years on the bench, placid.
00:18:38.000 A full hearing.
00:18:39.000 Poised.
00:18:40.000 Placid.
00:18:41.000 And then, shockingly, people accused him of gang rape, and he got a little mad.
00:18:46.000 And then it was, oh my god, how dare he be mad?
00:18:48.000 Look at that.
00:18:49.000 That's a failure of judicial temperament.
00:18:50.000 It turns out that people react differently to different stimuli.
00:18:53.000 If you give me a massage, that is a different thing than you clocking me in the back of the head with a 2x4.
00:18:57.000 I react slightly differently.
00:19:00.000 If you massage me and you're a masseuse, and I consent to your touch, then I am probably going to be placid and happy.
00:19:06.000 If, however, you clock me in the back of the head with a 2x4, I might be justifiably angry, and I might be, you know, miffed enough to turn around and try to clock you back in the face.
00:19:16.000 That's what happened to Brett Kavanaugh, but apparently that's no good.
00:19:19.000 Showing who Brett Kavanaugh really is, he wrote a piece for the Wall Street Journal.
00:19:24.000 Trying to defend his behavior and apologizing for being too emotional.
00:19:27.000 As I said at the time, he owes no apology to anyone on any of this.
00:19:31.000 None.
00:19:31.000 If I had been Brett Kavanaugh and people had accused me of that, I would have gone into that room and I would have said, let me be clear.
00:19:37.000 I want this read into the congressional record.
00:19:40.000 I'm going to state, I want you to spell this correctly.
00:19:44.000 Okay, all of you Democratic Senators accusing me of sexual assault on women I've never met, go F yourselves.
00:19:52.000 And let me explain what I mean by F yourselves.
00:19:54.000 I mean, I want you to go perform an anatomically impossible function upon yourself in the back room.
00:20:00.000 Use whatever pretzeling mechanisms you need to in order to achieve exactly that sort of apotheosis.
00:20:09.000 And never stop doing it.
00:20:10.000 Do it for the rest of your lives.
00:20:11.000 Go in the back room and go... And I would spell it out so I can make sure, and I would say it very slowly.
00:20:17.000 I want to make sure the stenographer can get this down.
00:20:20.000 Okay, that's what I would have said.
00:20:23.000 Brett Kavanaugh just went in there and he said, you guys are partisan hacks.
00:20:25.000 Okay, that's a really nice way of saying what these folks actually are and what they actually did here.
00:20:31.000 But who is Brett Kavanaugh?
00:20:32.000 He's a guy who then wrote a full op-ed for the Wall Street Journal apologizing for his brutish behavior.
00:20:37.000 I'll read you some of it in just a second.
00:20:39.000 But first, let's talk about your window covering.
00:20:41.000 So, are there days when you feel like you just want to shut out the world?
00:20:44.000 Days when you look out the window and you say, everyone's crazy?
00:20:48.000 Let's say you work in a congressional office, and right now there are a bunch of protesters outside your office shouting that you're pro-rape because you think the due process should still apply.
00:20:55.000 And all you really want to do is just shut those blinds.
00:20:57.000 But unfortunately, you have government-era 1982 blinds.
00:21:01.000 Well, that's because you need better window coverings, okay?
00:21:03.000 And this is true in your home as well.
00:21:05.000 You really want to elevate the look of your home, go check out blinds.com.
00:21:08.000 Now, taking the time to pick out and buy blinds, it's expensive, it's kind of boring, and selling them yourself sounds harder than you want to admit.
00:21:15.000 But blinds.com makes it easy for you because not only
00:21:18.000 Do they help you pick out your blinds?
00:21:19.000 You get a free online design consultation, which you send them pictures of your house.
00:21:23.000 They send out custom recommendations from a professional for what'll work with your color scheme.
00:21:27.000 They even send you free samples to make sure that everything looks as good in person as it does online.
00:21:32.000 Every order gets free shipping.
00:21:33.000 And here's the best part.
00:21:34.000 You screw up?
00:21:34.000 You mismeasure?
00:21:36.000 You picked the wrong color?
00:21:37.000 Blinds.com will remake your blinds for free.
00:21:39.000 So they made it really easy for you.
00:21:40.000 There's no excuse for you to have those crappy blinds anymore.
00:21:43.000 For a limited time, get 20% off everything at Blinds.com when you use promo code Ben.
00:21:47.000 That's Blinds.com promo code Ben for 20% off everything.
00:21:50.000 Faux wood blinds, cellular shades, roller shades, and more.
00:21:53.000 Blinds.com promo code Ben.
00:21:54.000 Rules and restrictions do indeed apply.
00:21:56.000 So here is Brett Kavanaugh.
00:21:59.000 Trying to make amends for his uncouth behavior after being called a gang rapist by sitting United States Senators.
00:22:07.000 Here's what he said.
00:22:18.000 My mom, Martha, one of the first women to serve as a Maryland prosecutor and trial judge, and my inspiration to become a lawyer, sat in the audience with my dad, Ed.
00:22:25.000 That night, I told the American people who I am and what I believe.
00:22:27.000 I talked about my 28-year career as a lawyer, almost all of which has been in public service.
00:22:31.000 I talked about my 12 years as a judge on the U.S.
00:22:34.000 Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, often called the second most important court in the country, and my five years of service in the White House for President George W. Bush.
00:22:42.000 I talked about my long record of advancing and promoting women, including as a judge,
00:22:45.000 A majority of my 48 law clerks have been women and as a longtime coach of girls' basketball teams.
00:22:50.000 As I explained that night, a good judge must be an umpire, a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no political party, litigant, or policy.
00:22:58.000 As Justice Kennedy has stated, judges do not make decisions to reach a preferred result.
00:23:02.000 Judges make decisions because the law and Constitution compel the result.
00:23:06.000 And he talks about how he has ruled in the past.
00:23:08.000 And then he says, And then he gets into his sort of mea culpa.
00:23:29.000 He says, During the confirmation process, I met with 65 senators and explained my approach to the law.
00:23:34.000 I participated in more than 30 hours of hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and I submitted written answers to nearly 1,300 additional questions.
00:23:42.000 I was grateful for the opportunity.
00:23:43.000 After all those meetings and after my initial hearing concluded, I was subjected to wrongful and sometimes vicious allegations.
00:23:49.000 My time in high school and college more than 30 years ago has been ridiculously distorted.
00:23:53.000 My wife and daughters have faced violent, violent threats.
00:23:56.000 Against that backdrop, I testified before the Judiciary Committee last Thursday to defend my family, my good name, and my lifetime of public service.
00:24:03.000 By the way, this is worth noting.
00:24:04.000 He's right about this.
00:24:05.000 People who say this was a job interview, I ask you, have you ever been on a job interview?
00:24:09.000 When was the last time you went on a job interview?
00:24:11.000 You walked through the door and some random woman popped out of a door and said, you raped me 36 years ago.
00:24:16.000 And then the employer says, hmm?
00:24:18.000 Hmm?
00:24:19.000 It's never happened to you on a job interview, because that's not a job interview.
00:24:22.000 That's an actual prosecution, in all likelihood.
00:24:24.000 My hearing testimony was forceful and passionate.
00:24:27.000 That is because I forcefully and passionately denied the allegation against me.
00:24:30.000 At times, my testimony, both in my opening statement and in response to questions, reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly accused without corroboration of horrible conduct, completely contrary to my record and character.
00:24:41.000 My statement and answers also reflected my deep distress at the unfairness of how this allegation has been handled.
00:24:46.000 I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been.
00:24:49.000 I might have been too emotional at times.
00:24:51.000 I know my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said.
00:24:54.000 I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband, and dad.
00:24:57.000 I testified with five people foremost in my mind.
00:24:59.000 My mom, my dad, my wife, and most of all, my daughters.
00:25:01.000 And then he talks about going forward.
00:25:03.000 I can always be counted on to do what I've always done.
00:25:06.000 He owes no apology.
00:25:08.000 He was not too emotional at times.
00:25:10.000 His tone should have been sharp.
00:25:12.000 And the fact that people on the left, you know, the creature, by the way, the left, the same people who suggest that I should not be allowed to speak at UCLA or USC or Berkeley because I might hurt people's feelings, these are the same people who are saying that feelings are unjustified when accused of rape.
00:25:26.000 So in other words, feelings are justified, anger is justified, protest is justified when I say a man is a man and a woman is a woman, but feelings are not justified if I were to accuse you of gang rape in a public setting.
00:25:40.000 This is all insanity.
00:25:42.000 Obviously.
00:25:43.000 And that's why I pray to God that tomorrow the Republicans do the right thing.
00:25:47.000 I'm talking to you, Susan Collins.
00:25:49.000 I'm talking to you, Jeff Flake.
00:25:51.000 Lisa Murkowski, it's too late for.
00:25:53.000 And so chaos has now taken over the Senate buildings.
00:25:56.000 They've already set up barricades outside the outside the Senate.
00:25:59.000 Because of protesters that are expected tomorrow.
00:26:02.000 I will note something.
00:26:03.000 It is pretty amazing.
00:26:04.000 It's pretty amazing that we've reached this point in American public life with regard to Supreme Court seats.
00:26:08.000 This did, in fact, start with the Democratic left that decided that the court was a tool for the promulgation of public policy and not merely an impartial arbiter of constitutional meaning.
00:26:18.000 The reason that the stakes are so high is because the court became something it never was before during the Warren era and afterward.
00:26:25.000 And that was an actual political institution dedicated to a specific set of policy goals.
00:26:32.000 The reason people care about the Supreme Court, the reason that the people think that the Supreme Court matters, is because of things like Roe v. Wade, when the court decided that it was going to make national policy on the basis of left-wing viewpoints, having nothing to do with the Constitution.
00:26:47.000 And the left believed that the court was going to be its final bastion of leftism.
00:26:50.000 No matter what happened, they could always count on the court to step in and defend leftist policy priorities.
00:26:56.000 And for a long time, that was basically correct.
00:26:59.000 And now it turns out that when Republicans want to restore the judiciary to its proper role, namely reading the Constitution as it is written, as it was meant, then the left says, wait, hold up a second.
00:27:10.000 Hold up a second.
00:27:11.000 That's why people are so passionate.
00:27:12.000 Because let's face it, nobody cares about the local dog catchers race.
00:27:16.000 None of this would have happened if we were talking about a branch of government like a bureaucratic branch of government.
00:27:20.000 Nobody would have cared about that.
00:27:22.000 They care about the Supreme Court because they think the Supreme Court is important.
00:27:25.000 The only people the only reason people think the Supreme Court is important is because the left has turned it into a political tool and has used it as a club to beat senseless people who actually believe in the text of the Constitution for the last
00:27:38.000 Sixty-odd years?
00:27:39.000 Fifty-odd years?
00:27:40.000 I think it's fair to say fifty-odd years.
00:27:42.000 Since the 1960s?
00:27:43.000 Since maybe Griswold versus Connecticut?
00:27:45.000 Although, you can certainly cite cases like Wickard v. Filburn.
00:27:48.000 And the court has outstripped its boundaries many times before that.
00:27:51.000 Obviously, Dred Scott, Korematsu.
00:27:53.000 I wrote my entire Harvard Law School third-year paper on the idea that judicial review should be significantly curtailed because the founders never intended for the Supreme Court to be a superior political branch, and yet that's exactly what's happened.
00:28:05.000 In any case, the passions were running high yesterday and today.
00:28:09.000 Marco Rubio was talking about Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination in the halls of the Senate, the Senate Hart building, and he was drowned out immediately by protesters because this is the way our politics goes now.
00:28:20.000 The way everybody's reacting to this now, you know, every Supreme Court Justice hearing coming forth that's going to be going on after this.
00:28:29.000 Well, we had one a few months ago and it didn't work out that way.
00:28:32.000 You know, they're all different.
00:28:33.000 Okay, and that's just, I mean, that was a normal day for the Senators.
00:28:36.000 They had to be escorted in by police.
00:28:38.000 I will note something.
00:28:39.000 Remember that time when people said that the right wing was really crazy and really radical?
00:28:43.000 Remember the Tea Party in 2010?
00:28:45.000 How dangerous the right wing was?
00:28:47.000 You know what they never required?
00:28:48.000 Police presence to escort members of Congress to and from things.
00:28:52.000 They didn't actually require that.
00:28:54.000 And...
00:28:55.000 Let's be frank about this.
00:28:56.000 I don't recall a Republican staffer trying to dox members of Congress and release their children's health records, which is a thing that actually happened.
00:29:03.000 An intern for Representative Sheila Jackson Lee tried to reveal senators' children's health information.
00:29:10.000 That's what he allegedly threatened.
00:29:13.000 That would be Jackson-Costco 27.
00:29:16.000 It works for Sheila Jackson Lee.
00:29:18.000 And protesters didn't stop, of course, in Marco Rubio.
00:29:20.000 Here's a protester berating Joe Manchin of West Virginia.
00:29:23.000 They're going to just try to do the same thing they did to Senator Flake, buttonhole somebody in an elevator and then yell at them about how they obviously hate women because they believe in due process.
00:29:30.000 Ben Sasse was kind of ripped up and down by the right the other day for a speech that he gave on the floor of the Senate.
00:29:35.000 And that's because people were taking one line kind of out of context when he said he would have preferred Amy Coney Barrett.
00:29:41.000 So would I. My original pick was Amy Coney Barrett, if you recall.
00:29:45.000 But the bottom line is that Ben Sasse is voting for Kavanaugh.
00:29:48.000 The point that he made is this false dichotomy that's being drawn by the left, particularly, between this case and the MeToo movement, in which they say that if you support Brett Kavanaugh, you therefore hate MeToo.
00:30:00.000 If you support Brett Kavanaugh's due process and presumption of innocence, therefore you don't take women seriously.
00:30:04.000 He said that's garbage and that's nonsense.
00:30:06.000 And he's exactly right.
00:30:07.000 Of course, that's exactly right.
00:30:09.000 So I'll show you how the left has been playing this anyway in just one second.
00:30:13.000 But first, let's talk about how you preserve your memories.
00:30:16.000 So, there's some of us who say that memories tend to fade over time.
00:30:20.000 There's some of us who tend to say that memory may not be the most reliable source, but you know what helps preserve your memories?
00:30:25.000 Legacy box, because you have a bunch of old pictures, you have a bunch of old stuff in your garage, a bunch of old videos.
00:30:30.000 We're good to go.
00:30:51.000 Because otherwise, if there's a fire or a flood, you're basically going to lose all your memories.
00:30:55.000 That's the way this works.
00:30:56.000 That's where Legacy Box comes in.
00:30:57.000 Here's how it works.
00:30:57.000 You load Legacy Box with your old tapes, film pictures, audio recordings, send it back.
00:31:01.000 You get them back in a couple weeks on DVD or a convenient thumb drive.
00:31:04.000 They're ready to watch, share, and relive.
00:31:06.000 I think it's actually a really, really important service.
00:31:08.000 There's nothing more important than preserving your memories because that's your life.
00:31:13.000 Legacy Box takes care of everything.
00:31:14.000 I've worked with Legacy Box before.
00:31:16.000 It's definitely worth the price, and it is certainly an amazing, amazing gift.
00:31:22.000 350,000 families have used Legacy Box, and for a limited time, go to LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:31:27.000 Enter my code, Ben.
00:31:27.000 Get a 40% discount on your order.
00:31:29.000 That's LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:31:31.000 Again, LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:31:34.000 We use Legacy Box in my family.
00:31:35.000 We loved it.
00:31:37.000 I can't think of a better gift that you can get somebody.
00:31:39.000 Go check it out.
00:31:39.000 Legacybox.com slash Ben.
00:31:41.000 Get that 40% discount on your order right now.
00:31:44.000 Okay, well, we are going to get into more of all of this in just a second.
00:31:47.000 Plus, we got the mailbag today, and I'm sure that we will have some good questions.
00:31:50.000 But for all that, you have to be a subscriber.
00:31:52.000 When you subscribe for $9.99 a month, you get the rest of the show live, you get the rest of the mailbag, you get to see the video.
00:31:57.000 It's all sorts of goodies.
00:31:58.000 Plus, this coming Monday, Daily Wire is launching the next chapter in Andrew Klavan's podcast series, Another Kingdom, performed by the exquirable Michael Knowles.
00:32:06.000 A better actor than he is a man.
00:32:07.000 If you aren't caught up on the first season, it is available on the website today.
00:32:11.000 It will be available today on the website when you subscribe, and you can check it out there and listen to the first season.
00:32:16.000 It really is entertaining and fun.
00:32:18.000 Subscribers to The Daily Wire each get early access to every weekly episode.
00:32:21.000 This season, we've also added a dramatic visual component you're not going to want to miss.
00:32:24.000 It's pretty awesome.
00:32:25.000 We have a lot of great artists who work here, like really terrific artists.
00:32:28.000 Head on over to dailywire.com and subscribe.
00:32:30.000 It's something new that we're trying.
00:32:31.000 I think you're really going to enjoy it.
00:32:32.000 Check it out over at dailywire.com.
00:32:34.000 Also, you get all of those aforementioned goodies.
00:32:36.000 Because right now, it is calm.
00:32:37.000 But tomorrow, and as the day continues, the turbulence in our political system will cause it to miraculously overflow
00:32:56.000 With the eyedroppings of folks on the left.
00:33:00.000 So go check it out right now.
00:33:02.000 For 99 bucks a year, you get all those things.
00:33:03.000 Plus you get this.
00:33:04.000 This piece of genius come up with by the gods.
00:33:08.000 You get all of that.
00:33:09.000 And when you subscribe, please make sure that you go over and subscribe at iTunes, YouTube.
00:33:13.000 Leave us a review as well.
00:33:13.000 It helps with the iTunes rankings, for example.
00:33:15.000 And we always appreciate your viewership.
00:33:17.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:33:25.000 All righty, so these protesters are not stopping.
00:33:28.000 They are berating people like Joe Manchin, trying to buttonhole people.
00:33:30.000 And we'll see if the protesters have their desired impact tomorrow, because this is a razor-thin margin.
00:33:36.000 Remember, it was a 51 to 49 vote.
00:33:39.000 That 51 includes a Democrat, Joe Manchin.
00:33:41.000 Republicans have a two-vote cushion here.
00:33:43.000 If Joe Manchin were to switch his vote, if Susan Collins were to join Lisa Murkowski, there is no Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
00:33:49.000 He goes down to failure.
00:33:51.000 And it's a disaster for Republicans in the midterms.
00:33:53.000 Because a lot of voters just say to their own party, you know what?
00:33:56.000 You guys are awful.
00:33:57.000 Go screw off.
00:33:58.000 Just leave.
00:33:59.000 We're not interested in you.
00:34:00.000 Anymore.
00:34:01.000 But this is the protesters sort of story.
00:34:04.000 It is worth noting, you know, there are there's a lot of hubbub today because President Trump tweeted out that some of these protesters are being paid.
00:34:09.000 That is undoubtedly true.
00:34:10.000 There are a lot of these protesters who are members of groups that actually will pay you to be out there for the day.
00:34:16.000 I'm sure many of them are spontaneous.
00:34:18.000 It's not all of them.
00:34:19.000 It is true that one of the women who buttonhole Jeff Flake in an elevator is an actual Democratic
00:34:24.000 Operative.
00:34:25.000 I mean, there's a person who works for a 501c3 Center for American Democracy, I believe.
00:34:30.000 And that center is funded by George Soros.
00:34:31.000 He's not the main funder.
00:34:32.000 People are saying, oh, well, it's Soros funded.
00:34:34.000 Look, let's not use George Soros as, like, the stand-in for all human evil.
00:34:38.000 George Soros is a guy who I really disagree with in a lot of ways.
00:34:40.000 I don't think he's a good guy, per se.
00:34:42.000 I think he's stood for a lot of bad things.
00:34:44.000 But you don't have to, like, use George Soros as the bogeyman.
00:34:48.000 Okay?
00:34:48.000 He's not the bogeyman.
00:34:49.000 But there are a lot of leftist protesters out there who had their lunch paid for them by groups that are trying to astroturf this.
00:34:54.000 Okay, that I think is eminently true.
00:34:56.000 Here's a protester, I don't know about this protester, maybe this protester is genuine, berating Joe Manchin.
00:35:01.000 You're listening to me as a survivor.
00:35:03.000 I don't understand how you can't look me in the eye.
00:35:06.000 Why are you going to vote yes on this?
00:35:11.000 Can you tell me where you're going to vote?
00:35:14.000 How are you not listening to us as survivors?
00:35:17.000 Are you?
00:35:17.000 You're going to get in this elevator?
00:35:19.000 How are you going to vote?
00:35:21.000 Tell me.
00:35:21.000 Folks, step back.
00:35:24.000 Okay, it's not his job to tell her how he's going to vote.
00:35:26.000 And, of course, what he should say is, I'm happy to listen to your story as a survivor.
00:35:30.000 Also, do you have corroborative evidence?
00:35:33.000 It's amazing.
00:35:33.000 There's an article in The New Yorker today, or yesterday, saying that rape does not require corroboration.
00:35:40.000 Because most crimes don't require corroboration.
00:35:43.000 What the legal standard means by that is that if I were to allege that I witnessed a murder, there's not a second witness that has to corroborate my story.
00:35:52.000 However, you do need other evidence.
00:35:53.000 If I just say, I witnessed a murder, I walk into a police station, I say, someone in this room, this very room killed someone.
00:36:00.000 Right, let's say that, I won't name names, but if I were to walk into a police station and say that, the police would say, okay, is there a body?
00:36:07.000 Is there a weapon?
00:36:08.000 Do you have any evidence of this?
00:36:09.000 Is someone dead?
00:36:10.000 Is someone missing?
00:36:11.000 You need corroborative evidence.
00:36:13.000 Evidence.
00:36:14.000 Okay, there doesn't need to be a second person in the room for a rape to watch it and then tell you, yep, it was a rape.
00:36:19.000 There has to be some sort of corroborative evidence, which is why there are so many cases that the police simply does not take up because there is no corroborative evidence.
00:36:27.000 By the way, Michelle Malkin has a terrific video today about the number of cases of sexual assault and rape that are either falsely reported or misremembered.
00:36:35.000 It is not 2%.
00:36:36.000 It is somewhere between 8 and 41%.
00:36:39.000 It depends on the metric that you're using.
00:36:41.000 In any case, the protesters also took over the Senate Hart building and hundreds of them taking over the very floors of the building.
00:36:50.000 I'm not sure why this is allowed, frankly.
00:36:51.000 It seems like kind of a dangerous thing.
00:36:53.000 But here it was yesterday.
00:37:03.000 Okay.
00:37:03.000 Now, I will say that all of this is driving the most Republican unity I've ever seen in my lifetime.
00:37:08.000 There are some new polls out that are just astonishing, because there's a poll about Republican female enthusiasm.
00:37:13.000 There's a gap in Republican female enthusiasm, and what it shows is that the Democratic enthusiasm gap, which was at a massive high.
00:37:22.000 In July, there was a 10-point gap between the number of Democrats and Republicans, saying the November elections were very important.
00:37:28.000 After Kavanaugh,
00:37:30.000 It's down to a statistical tie.
00:37:31.000 A 10 point advantage for Democrats just evaporated.
00:37:35.000 Evaporated over two weeks.
00:37:37.000 By the way, it's not just a bunch of animated Republicans.
00:37:41.000 Women are not happy with this.
00:37:43.000 The great lie is that women, all women, hate
00:37:47.000 Judge Kavanaugh and think that no corroborative evidence is necessary.
00:37:51.000 Look at this Quinnipiac ballot.
00:37:53.000 This is a generic ballot among white women.
00:37:54.000 This is unbelievable.
00:37:56.000 Among white women, okay?
00:37:57.000 July 22nd, D plus 14 among white women.
00:38:00.000 A massive gender gap.
00:38:01.000 A massive gender gap.
00:38:03.000 September 9th, D plus five.
00:38:05.000 September 30th, D plus one.
00:38:09.000 A 14 point gender gap among white women disappears over the course of these allegations.
00:38:16.000 That's amazing.
00:38:17.000 That's amazing.
00:38:17.000 That's not among Republican women.
00:38:18.000 That's among white women.
00:38:20.000 All white women.
00:38:21.000 White women don't love President Trump.
00:38:23.000 They don't.
00:38:24.000 They're not huge Republican fans.
00:38:26.000 That is because there are a bunch of people who still have an iota of sanity in this country and recognize you can't destroy people's lives based on non-corroborated allegations.
00:38:36.000 All of which is driving Republicans to actually find a spine for the first time in a long time.
00:38:41.000 It's pretty incredible.
00:38:43.000 So we'll get to that in just a second.
00:38:46.000 I have to say, I love Lindsey Graham 2.0.
00:38:48.000 So, Lindsey Graham 2.0, this is the best software update ever.
00:38:51.000 I don't know where this Lindsey Graham came from.
00:38:54.000 Sassy Lindsey Graham.
00:38:55.000 I don't know where this came from, but it's pretty spectacular.
00:38:57.000 So, Bob Menendez, who is the Democratic Senator from New Jersey, he's had some of his own allegations brought against him.
00:39:05.000 I remember that there were allegations against Bob Menendez that he was flying out to, I think it was Puerto Rico, and that he was making time with prostitutes, and they'd investigated the allegations, and they really couldn't come up with anything.
00:39:15.000 Well, Bob Menendez is very upset with the FBI report on Brett Kavanaugh, and here's what Bob Menendez had to say about it.
00:39:21.000 Okay, and then Lindsey Graham 2.0 shows up.
00:39:23.000 And Lindsey brings the hammer.
00:39:24.000 Here is Lindsey Graham.
00:39:25.000 My goodness, Lindsey Graham.
00:39:26.000 Where'd you come from, buddy?
00:39:27.000 This is awesome!
00:39:28.000 Keep it going, dude!
00:39:29.000 Enjoying it!
00:39:30.000 Okay, so here's Lindsey Graham 2.0.
00:39:49.000 So here's what the three Senators asked for.
00:39:51.000 That the people named by Dr. Ford be interviewed by the FBI, just not the committee.
00:39:57.000 And Ms.
00:39:57.000 Ramirez be interviewed by the FBI.
00:39:59.000 That was done, plus five other witnesses.
00:40:02.000 The results are in.
00:40:03.000 Senator Collins and Senator Flake said they thought it was thorough, they thought it was fair.
00:40:09.000 And these two people, who are my friends, have no idea what they're talking about.
00:40:12.000 And let me tell my friend Bob, what y'all have done is bull****.
00:40:17.000 Yes!
00:40:19.000 Lindsey Graham!
00:40:20.000 Woo!
00:40:21.000 Kinda lovin' it!
00:40:22.000 Okay, and then Orrin Hatch, who's become the fun, grumpy old man in the Senate.
00:40:26.000 It's just fantastic.
00:40:28.000 Orrin Hatch, he has a fantastic social media team.
00:40:30.000 Whoever does his Twitter is just great, but Orrin Hatch has basically turned into Walter Matthau, and it's spectacular.
00:40:38.000 So here is Orrin Hatch.
00:40:39.000 He's walking the halls, and a protester comes up to him, and Orrin Hatch just deconstructs the guy.
00:40:47.000 I mean, he just tears the guy limb from limb.
00:40:49.000 It's spectacular.
00:40:52.000 Why aren't you, why aren't you brave enough to talk to us and exchange it with us?
00:40:57.000 Don't you wave your hand at me!
00:41:00.000 I wave my hand at you!
00:41:01.000 When I grow up!
00:41:03.000 You and I grow up!
00:41:04.000 How dare you talk to women that way!
00:41:08.000 How dare you!
00:41:10.000 If you missed it...
00:41:14.000 If you missed it, Senator Graham, Senator Hatch, this woman's like, don't you wave your hand at me?
00:41:25.000 As she's screaming at him.
00:41:26.000 And he goes, I'll be ready to talk to you when you grow up.
00:41:29.000 And she goes, you grow up!
00:41:30.000 Senator Hatch is 1,000 years old.
00:41:33.000 He grew up a long time ago.
00:41:36.000 I mean, and then Senator Hatch, as he's getting in the elevator, if you can't see this, Senator Hatch, he just starts waving at them, right?
00:41:45.000 Bye, see you later, because the elevator door's gonna close.
00:41:48.000 See you later, bye bye.
00:41:49.000 The Republicans finding a spine, and boy is it enjoyable when Republicans actually have a spine.
00:41:53.000 I have to say, I'm really getting a kick out of it.
00:41:56.000 That's pretty great.
00:41:57.000 Just to show you where the media are on all this, the media have totally undercut their credibility on all of this.
00:42:02.000 And CNN, particularly, has just been absolutely god-awful on this issue.
00:42:06.000 Just astonishingly bad.
00:42:07.000 Alison Camerata, who I used to have more respect for as a reporter, she's really, I mean, she's like the Titanic that hit the iceberg on this story.
00:42:15.000 Here she was, talking on CNN last night.
00:42:18.000 Wouldn't it just be easier to go with a different nominee?
00:42:20.000 You know, after all of this, after we've, you know, gone after this guy, and made a bunch of unverified allegations, and reported Julie Swetnick as a real story, and put Michael Avenatti on this network every five seconds, and set up a pup tent for him in the green room.
00:42:31.000 You know, after all that, wouldn't it just be better if you guys, you know, just did what we wanted and got rid of Kavanaugh as a nominee?
00:42:36.000 Allison Camerata, Objective Reportering.
00:42:39.000 At worst, he sexually assaulted someone, as Christine Blasey Ford accuses.
00:42:46.000 Wouldn't it be easier at this point to go with a different nominee who doesn't have any of these problems?
00:42:52.000 You have time before January.
00:42:53.000 Just start over.
00:42:54.000 This process has gotten too tainted.
00:42:56.000 Start over and do a more clean process with a different nominee.
00:43:00.000 So much journalisming!
00:43:02.000 Wow, did you hear all the journalism in that question?
00:43:05.000 All the journalism where why won't you just do what we want?
00:43:07.000 We've been trying to trump up this story for months here.
00:43:10.000 Why won't you just do what we want you to do?
00:43:13.000 And then I love this from Jim Sciutto, who's another reporter, another objective reporter over at CNN, saying, you know, when people accuse people of gang rape, that's just politics.
00:43:21.000 That's just how politics works.
00:43:23.000 Oh, really?
00:43:23.000 OK, here's some more journalism from CNN.
00:43:27.000 Here's the difference, Scott.
00:43:28.000 But this is a person running for a lifetime, not running, but being considered for a lifetime position.
00:43:32.000 The fact is, this is Washington, this is politics, but political candidates have been accused of horrible things for years.
00:43:39.000 And it becomes a test, really.
00:43:43.000 How do you respond to that?
00:43:44.000 And trust me, I'm not taking issue with responding when your character has been.
00:43:47.000 He's got a 12-year record.
00:43:47.000 It's a fair question.
00:43:49.000 Okay.
00:43:49.000 No, that's just how politics works, according to CNN.
00:43:51.000 And reporter Jim Sciutto.
00:43:53.000 Yep.
00:43:54.000 Wonder why we can't trust the media these days.
00:43:55.000 All right.
00:43:56.000 Meanwhile, the celebrities have been sounding off.
00:43:57.000 So there are a bunch of celebrities showed up in Washington, D.C.
00:44:01.000 yesterday to do some sort of big protest.
00:44:03.000 Amy Schumer got herself, quote unquote, arrested.
00:44:07.000 So Benny Johnson over at IJ Review, and I think now he's a daily caller.
00:44:11.000 So Benny Johnson went down there.
00:44:14.000 She wasn't arrested.
00:44:15.000 Amy Schumer did not get arrested.
00:44:16.000 She got herself quote-unquote arrested because the police came up to her and said, would you like to be arrested?
00:44:20.000 And she said, absolutely.
00:44:22.000 And then they gave her a $50 fine and she walked away.
00:44:24.000 So less than I pay for a parking ticket.
00:44:26.000 Okay, she got, she got, and then, I love it, she gave like, she gave a fist pump to the cameras as she's being walked out.
00:44:32.000 The best acting she's done before the cameras in years, Amy Schumer.
00:44:35.000 So that was pretty solid.
00:44:36.000 Emily Ratajkowski, is that, Ratajkowski?
00:44:39.000 Ratajowski?
00:44:40.000 I don't know who she is.
00:44:42.000 She's a model?
00:44:43.000 Actress?
00:44:43.000 Eh?
00:44:44.000 She showed up, and she did exactly the same thing because, women must be arrested for no apparent reason!
00:44:50.000 So, they decided to make a fuss.
00:44:53.000 I am amused, I will say, by Alyssa Milano.
00:44:55.000 Because Alyssa Milano has been going hard after Brett Kavanaugh.
00:44:59.000 But, as I showed you, as I talked about yesterday on the program, Alyssa Milano also was a big fan of Bill Clinton.
00:45:05.000 And talked about how much she loved Bill Clinton.
00:45:07.000 And then that came out.
00:45:08.000 And then things got awkward.
00:45:09.000 Because now she comes out and she says, you know what?
00:45:11.000 Maybe we should have investigated Bill Clinton after all.
00:45:14.000 Oh really, Alyssa Milano?
00:45:17.000 Why, how convenient that you suddenly discovered that Bill Clinton was a credibly accused rapist.
00:45:24.000 How convenient that you finally figured out after like 25 years that maybe it would have been a good idea to, you know, look at like the stuff Bill Clinton did.
00:45:34.000 Weird how that just occurred to you now in the last 24 hours after people discovered one of your old tweets.
00:45:40.000 Here she is on CNN rewriting her own history.
00:45:43.000 Pretty spectacular.
00:45:44.000 No, and I don't think Bill Clinton should have gotten that benefit of the doubt in hindsight.
00:45:49.000 I think that as a nation we were in a different time.
00:45:52.000 I think that women were continually being silenced and I think we gave him the benefit of the doubt and we probably should have investigated the allegations against him as well.
00:46:07.000 Oh, oh, that.
00:46:08.000 Oh, weird.
00:46:10.000 Why did you change your mind?
00:46:11.000 I can't.
00:46:11.000 What could have changed your mind?
00:46:12.000 Who knows?
00:46:13.000 It's a mystery.
00:46:15.000 Pretty amazing.
00:46:16.000 Also, Bette Midler sounded off.
00:46:17.000 So, Bette Midler, who is a very, very wealthy woman, who's worked a very long and productive career in Hollywood.
00:46:25.000 Last relevant when she did, what is it?
00:46:27.000 Witches of Eastwick, she's in?
00:46:29.000 Is that correct?
00:46:30.000 Or, she's in Beaches, correct?
00:46:33.000 Hocus Pocus, thank you, is another witch movie.
00:46:35.000 So, Hocus Pocus.
00:46:36.000 So, Bette Midler, she tweeted this out.
00:46:39.000 Women are the N-word of the world.
00:46:43.000 Hmm.
00:46:44.000 Really?
00:46:45.000 Like we eat animals?
00:46:46.000 So, I'm gonna go with no on that one.
00:47:04.000 Like, I had a hamburger last night.
00:47:07.000 I also had a fish burger for lunch.
00:47:09.000 I'd say those are probably slightly more disrespected creatures than women.
00:47:12.000 They're the n-word of the world.
00:47:13.000 Like, black people have had it slightly harder than women.
00:47:18.000 I think historically it's fair to say that
00:47:20.000 You know, millions of black people shipped over from Africa to South America and to North America and then forcibly enslaved and then used as chattel.
00:47:29.000 Probably a little worse than that time that Bette Midler didn't get a job in Hollywood at an audition.
00:47:37.000 And I love that, I love when she says, for thousands of years, women have been treated as chattel.
00:47:40.000 For thousands of years, people died at 35 too, okay?
00:47:42.000 Can we talk about, like, things that have been relevant in the last, say, couple generations?
00:47:47.000 Just insanity.
00:47:49.000 Then she was forced to apologize because, of course, she had violated the tenets of intersectionality.
00:47:52.000 So she tweeted out,
00:48:08.000 Pretty spectacular.
00:48:10.000 Well, I've been told that Woman is the N-Word of the World is a song written by John Lennon and Yoko Ono, the songwriting duo most responsible for, imagine, the worst atrocity ever perpetuated against art in the history of mankind.
00:48:22.000 In any case, Bette Midler.
00:48:24.000 I love this.
00:48:24.000 When she says that she tweeted angrily without thinking.
00:48:27.000 She doesn't have judicial temperament, Bette Midler.
00:48:29.000 Just gonna put that out there.
00:48:30.000 And also, I love when she says that black women suffer doubly by both being women and by being black.
00:48:35.000 There's a really interesting study actually from, I think it was Harvard University, talking about disparities.
00:48:40.000 Income increases over time.
00:48:43.000 And what I found is that black girls actually have significantly, that black girls who are raised in the same situation as white girls actually have exactly the same sort of income trajectory.
00:48:51.000 Black boys, if you're going to talk about who actually has it worse in American society for whatever reason, and there are probably some good ones and some bad ones, black boys have it a lot worse in American society than black girls do.
00:49:01.000 Just by income statistics from Harvard University.
00:49:04.000 Okay.
00:49:05.000 Well, you know, enough of that.
00:49:06.000 Let's do a little bit of mailbag.
00:49:07.000 I know we're going long today, but we'd be remiss if this week we skipped the mailbag.
00:49:10.000 So let's do a couple of questions.
00:49:12.000 Amir says, Ben, I have a very Islamic name.
00:49:14.000 I want to have my name legally changed to something more American, but people have accused me of trying to run for my ethnicity.
00:49:18.000 I was wondering what your take on this was.
00:49:20.000 Well, you know, Amir, in the Jewish community, it's not uncommon and it hasn't been uncommon for generations for Jews to have two names, basically.
00:49:30.000 One that you have in Hebrew and one that you have in English.
00:49:33.000 That's not rare at all.
00:49:34.000 My family, we all have the same name because my name is Benjamin.
00:49:36.000 It's Benjamin in Hebrew.
00:49:39.000 There are a lot of Jews in the community who will go by like, it's Yechezkel in Hebrew, and then it's Ezekiel in English, which sounds very different.
00:49:46.000 Or you have folks whose name is actually completely, completely different.
00:49:50.000 Like my mom's name in Hebrew is Kayla, her English name is Cynthia.
00:49:52.000 So I think there's a, if you have the name for religious reasons, then I think maintaining that name for religious reasons and in religious contexts is acceptable.
00:50:02.000 You can choose whatever name you want, obviously.
00:50:04.000 You should ask your parents how they feel about it, honestly.
00:50:07.000 I think that your parents gave you a name for a reason, and as a tribute to someone or something that's meaningful, I think names have power.
00:50:14.000 I wouldn't change my name just out of outside pressure, honestly, if I could avoid it.
00:50:18.000 Instead, I'd be calling out people who treat you in discriminatory fashion because of your name.
00:50:21.000 I think that changing names in order to avoid discrimination
00:50:25.000 I would rather work on calling out folks who are discriminating against you because of name.
00:50:35.000 I'm a 15-year-old conservative from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
00:50:37.000 My question is a moral dilemma I've been faced with.
00:50:39.000 I was actually inspired by you to become more active in politics, and I joined the debate team at my school.
00:50:44.000 When I joined, I found that you don't always get to pick which side of an argument you're supposed to argue for.
00:50:47.000 What I want to know is whether or not it's morally acceptable to attempt to argue a point I do not agree with.
00:50:51.000 I'm a huge fan of the show, thanks for your time.
00:50:53.000 So, yes, the answer is yes, because these are all mock debates.
00:50:56.000 So, when I was at Harvard Law School, we actually had this exact situation.
00:50:59.000 We had mock trial, we had like a moot court.
00:51:02.000 And I was assigned for the criminal defense.
00:51:05.000 And I remember that the professor knew who I was and came up to me like, I'm so sorry, you gotta sign this.
00:51:08.000 I was like, no, it's totally fine.
00:51:09.000 Like, this is a moot trial, right?
00:51:11.000 It's a mock trial, it's a moot court.
00:51:13.000 It's good.
00:51:14.000 It allows you to actually get inside the other thinking and makes you a better thinker about your own positions, which is a useful thing.
00:51:20.000 Mathis says, Ben, do you prefer your leftist tears hot or cold?
00:51:22.000 Also, what the heck was that tan colored beverage you were drinking on Wednesday?
00:51:25.000 I know a lot of people had questions about that.
00:51:26.000 That was heavily creamerized coffee.
00:51:31.000 I've said before, I don't drink man drinks, okay?
00:51:33.000 I don't drink, like, whiskey, because it tastes like turpentine.
00:51:36.000 I don't drink vodka, straight.
00:51:39.000 I'll take vodka with orange juice.
00:51:41.000 I'll have a screwdriver or something.
00:51:43.000 I like things that taste good.
00:51:45.000 Coffee on its own.
00:51:46.000 Black coffee.
00:51:46.000 Anybody who says black coffee tastes great to them has some sort of actual brain imbalance.
00:51:51.000 Black coffee is not good.
00:51:54.000 Coffee with cream and sugar is delicious.
00:51:56.000 So that's what that was.
00:51:58.000 So that...
00:51:59.000 Yeah, it was not actually the blood of my enemies.
00:52:02.000 It says, Seth, with the recent events and resultant response from Republicans, what do you think are the chances in November, Republicans gain in the House and win a supermajority in the Senate?
00:52:10.000 It's unlikely they win a supermajority in the Senate.
00:52:12.000 I feel they will pick up probably three to four seats.
00:52:15.000 I think Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota is done, done-zo, gone.
00:52:18.000 I think Claire McCaskill in Missouri is in serious trouble.
00:52:21.000 I think that there are some other seats that are really on the verge, and I think the Democrats have really destroyed themselves here.
00:52:27.000 And I think there is now a significant possibility that Republicans retain the House.
00:52:32.000 I would not have thought that possible even three weeks ago.
00:52:34.000 I think that is much more of a possibility now.
00:52:36.000 He's not going to get impeached.
00:52:38.000 Everybody's going to let it go.
00:52:40.000 This is all a bunch of temporary BS.
00:52:41.000 They're not effective.
00:52:42.000 They should be scrapped.
00:52:56.000 Should employers be allowed to use them on employees?
00:52:58.000 Well, I mean, if you sign a consensual form saying that you're okay with it, then sure.
00:53:02.000 I mean, if your employer decides to give you an implicit bias test and you sign on to that, then they should be allowed to do whatever they want.
00:53:11.000 It's a free country.
00:53:12.000 But if my employer were going to polygraph me, I probably wouldn't want to work there.
00:53:15.000 Steven says, hi Ben, if Kavanaugh's nomination is defeated tomorrow, what should the Republicans' new strategy be?
00:53:19.000 Renominate Kavanaugh, like Graham suggests, or pick someone new?
00:53:23.000 Well, I mean, at that point, they're basically done.
00:53:24.000 You're not going to get any more Republicans to vote for him.
00:53:27.000 So I assume that at that point, they move on and they pick Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court.
00:53:31.000 But it really undercuts a lot of Republican enthusiasm.
00:53:34.000 Right, because, yeah, actually were vote tickets for people who said they were going to disturb it.
00:53:37.000 And the question is to be surprisingly respectful.
00:53:46.000 How was your experience there inside and outside the auditorium?
00:53:48.000 It was great.
00:53:48.000 I thought the USC team did a fantastic job.
00:53:51.000 I think their security did a really great job.
00:53:52.000 I thanked them repeatedly from the podium.
00:53:55.000 The USC did what they're supposed to do.
00:53:56.000 And the protesters got to protest outside and chant whatever they want to chant.
00:54:00.000 I always prefer that people come and confront me with the ideas.
00:54:03.000 My favorite thing is that, I promise you, 90% of the protesters have no idea who I am.
00:54:08.000 None.
00:54:08.000 They've never listened to an episode of the show.
00:54:10.000 They've never read a thing I've written.
00:54:11.000 I promise you.
00:54:12.000 But, you know, they can do what they want to do if that's how they want to spend a Thursday night.
00:54:16.000 Well, I guess you can't get a date.
00:54:23.000 That's what you do.
00:54:24.000 Well, apparently on Twitter she was saying beforehand she was going to take a shot at Israel.
00:54:28.000 Ariel Gold, I believe, has been banned from the state of Israel because she supports boycott of the state of Israel.
00:54:33.000 And so she decided to raise that for no apparent reason.
00:54:36.000 Which is bizarre to me, because obviously I am Zionistic and pro-Israel, and obviously I'm an Orthodox Jew, but since I wasn't discussing the topic, it felt very out of context, to say the least, for this, you know, winged topic to fly in from left field.
00:54:49.000 It was very bizarre.
00:54:54.000 Well, I'd say unwarranted and uncalled for.
00:54:57.000 As I say, I'm happy to discuss the issue.
00:55:00.000 The issue is wrong and lying about Israel's status as a state, but that's that.
00:55:03.000 I talked about that one today.
00:55:04.000 All of economic history confirms this.
00:55:18.000 America is the most powerful economy in world history.
00:55:21.000 The fact that hundreds of millions of people no longer live under dictatorship, that would be thanks to the United States.
00:55:27.000 Also, the principles of the United States are not, it's not statistical, okay?
00:55:31.000 The principles that the United States is based on, is rooted on, God-given rights protected by a limited government,
00:55:37.000 It's a moral argument.
00:55:39.000 It's not a statistical argument.
00:55:40.000 But if you want to talk about the reduction of global poverty by half in the last 30 years, that is due almost solely and completely to the rise of free trade principles in conjunction with a powerful American engine driving that car.
00:55:53.000 As I might say to my children.
00:55:55.000 I think probably not.
00:55:57.000 I think that this thing is over by Monday, in all likelihood.
00:55:59.000 And then everybody goes on to the next battle, which presumably will be making tax cuts permanent or whatever stupid thing we decide to fight about tomorrow.
00:56:19.000 Last question here.
00:56:19.000 Okay, so, one of the problems with Game of Thrones is that all my favorite characters are basically dead.
00:56:34.000 So what's the name of the Tywin Lannister fan?
00:56:39.000 So Tywin Lannister was the best.
00:56:42.000 Tywin Lannister was the greatest.
00:56:43.000 And he would have made the best leader of Westeros because that dude knew real politics.
00:56:46.000 I mean, that guy was like Henry Kissinger of Westeros.
00:56:50.000 He gave no craps about how things were going in other parts of the country.
00:56:56.000 He knew what his interests were.
00:56:57.000 He pursued them.
00:56:58.000 Plus, the actor who plays him, I'm trying to remember who plays him, he's just fantastic.
00:57:03.000 He was the best thing on the show.
00:57:04.000 He was just spectacular.
00:57:06.000 And when he was killed, that was very sad.
00:57:08.000 Spoiler alert.
00:57:09.000 Retroactively.
00:57:11.000 Also, I was a big fan of Rababa Stark, so I call him Rababa because there are two Bs at the end of his name.
00:57:19.000 I'm one of the people who's actually read the books, so I will admit that when they hit the Red Wedding, there's a great gif that shows, I think it's from Survivor, where there are a bunch of women who get some news and they're all crying, they put their hands to their face.
00:57:32.000 And behind them, there's a guy who just breaks into a massive grin.
00:57:35.000 That was everybody who read the Game of Thrones books versus everybody watching the Game of Thrones series when they got to the Red Wedding, because we all knew what was coming.
00:57:42.000 But the killing of Rob was really messed up, right?
00:57:46.000 I mean, these are all based on real historical circumstances.
00:57:49.000 The assassination of princes at weddings and all this stuff.
00:57:53.000 There were actual real historical antecedents for this.
00:57:55.000 Basically, R.R.
00:57:56.000 Martin took that into a fantasy context.
00:57:58.000 That's why the best part of the books and the best part of the show is all of the non-magical stuff.
00:58:03.000 All of the non-dragon stuff.
00:58:05.000 All that stuff.
00:58:07.000 And I will say that I liked early, pre-Child Sacrifice Stannis Baratheon.
00:58:11.000 So I had a sneaking fondness for him because I too am a religious prude.
00:58:17.000 And although Stannis, you know, making time with the Red Woman, not my favorite, but I thought that he was at least an interesting character and I feel that he sort of got short shrift.
00:58:26.000 So that sort of gives you where I stand.
00:58:28.000 I'm not a Daenerys fan.
00:58:29.000 I think Jon Snow, well, okay is dummy.
00:58:34.000 And Tyrion talks a lot.
00:58:37.000 I mean, that's his character, right?
00:58:39.000 He talks a lot and he drinks.
00:58:40.000 That's his actual line in the show.
00:58:45.000 My great hope was that Hodor was eventually going to take over the country and run things as they ought to be run, just as we would in the United States.
00:58:54.000 But that is what it is.
00:58:58.000 So who would play those people?
00:59:00.000 Well, I think that Tywin Lannister, Mitch McConnell,
00:59:07.000 Cocaine Mitch for Tywin Lannister.
00:59:08.000 Is that fair?
00:59:09.000 I think that's not bad.
00:59:10.000 He's not quite as charismatic as Tywin Lannister, but Cocaine Mitch knows what he's doing out there.
00:59:15.000 And Robobus Stark.
00:59:20.000 So Robobus Stark sort of reminds me of Marco Rubio.
00:59:23.000 Like, well-intentioned, but bound to get stabbed one million times before this is all over.
00:59:30.000 And who was the last character that I mentioned there?
00:59:33.000 I'm trying to remember.
00:59:35.000 Sorry.
00:59:36.000 No, it wasn't Hodor.
00:59:37.000 Oh, it was Stannis?
00:59:44.000 I hate to do this to Senator Cruz, but I really like Senator Cruz, but there is something to the guy who actually has a legit claim on the throne and then just gets short shrift and gets increasingly frustrated by life.
01:00:02.000 I think there's maybe some of that going on.
01:00:04.000 I think Senator Cruz will take that well.
01:00:06.000 He likes himself some fantasy TV, so I think that's fine.
01:00:09.000 That's all fine.
01:00:10.000 Okay, so, all right.
01:00:14.000 That's harsh, dude.
01:00:15.000 Mike piping in with Cory Booker as Hodor.
01:00:20.000 Not totally unfair.
01:00:21.000 I have to say, not bad, Mike.
01:00:23.000 Not bad, producer Mike.
01:00:24.000 We killed you at the beginning of the show, but he has risen once again.
01:00:28.000 For those who don't, you don't get the pre-show.
01:00:29.000 At the very beginning of every show, we have to kill the producer's Mike.
01:00:33.000 We have a producer named Mike.
01:00:35.000 And so, every show, they say, kill producer Mike.
01:00:37.000 I say, sorry, Mike.
01:00:38.000 He goes, ahh.
01:00:39.000 That's a little behind-the-scenes knowledge for you there.
01:00:42.000 Okay, time for a thing I like and then a thing that I hate.
01:00:45.000 So, things I like today.
01:00:47.000 There's a kind of popular historian named John Julius Norwich.
01:00:50.000 He doesn't do a lot of footnotes.
01:00:51.000 He doesn't do a lot of breaking new ground in history, but he does a great job of summing up how history has worked and he tells a great tale.
01:00:59.000 He has a book about the history of the papacy called The Absolute Monarchs.
01:01:03.000 And it is well worth the read.
01:01:05.000 It's fun.
01:01:05.000 I'm in the middle of it right now.
01:01:06.000 It kind of gives you a history of the ups and downs of the papacy.
01:01:09.000 Whether you're Catholic or non-Catholic, tends to be more skeptical of Catholicism, this particular book, but it is worth checking out.
01:01:14.000 Absolute Monarchs, A History of the Papacy.
01:01:16.000 I picked it up because my favorite thing, I should actually do this as a separate thing I like, my favorite thing legitimately
01:01:22.000 One of my favorite things in the world is on Shabbat, my parents bring over the Wall Street Journal and I read the review section cover to cover because it is the best section in journalism.
01:01:29.000 It's just great.
01:01:30.000 It is all book reviews and a couple of kind of overarching op-eds about key issues like AI.
01:01:36.000 It's just fantastic.
01:01:37.000 If you have a chance, I wish I could only subscribe to the review section of the Wall Street Journal because I would do that, really.
01:01:41.000 I don't get a newspaper because the news moves too fast, but the review section of the Wall Street Journal is the best thing in print media.
01:01:47.000 It is so good.
01:01:48.000 So I saw they reviewed his latest book on the history of France, and so I picked up several of his books.
01:01:52.000 This is where I get a lot of my book recommendations.
01:01:54.000 So go check out the Wall Street Journal review section for an impromptu thing I like.
01:01:57.000 Okay, things that I hate.
01:02:02.000 So a story that is getting just very little coverage, but actually is kind of important, is that China has apparently been infiltrating U.S.
01:02:10.000 companies with a tiny spy chip.
01:02:12.000 And this is why when President Trump says that for national security reasons he's tariffing China, I have a lot less problems with that than him saying that he's using national security to try and start trade wars with the EU or Mexico or Canada, which I think is silly.
01:02:24.000 Him talking about China as a national security threat, that's an actual real thing.
01:02:27.000 In 2015, according to Bloomberg, Amazon began quietly evaluating a startup called Elemental Technologies, a potential acquisition to help with a major expansion of its streaming video service, known today as Amazon Prime Video.
01:02:40.000 Its technology had helped stream the Olympic Games online, communicate with the International Space Station, and funnel drone footage to the CIA.
01:02:47.000 So, they were looking at this particular company to help with due diligence.
01:02:51.000 AWS, which was overseeing the prospective acquisition, hired a third-party company to scrutinize Elemental's security.
01:02:57.000 The first pass uncovered troubling issues, prompting AWS, that's Amazon's web services, to take a closer look at Elemental's main product, the expensive services that customers installed in their networks to handle video compression.
01:03:10.000 These servers were assembled by a company called Supermicrocomputer.
01:03:13.000 It's one of the biggest suppliers of server motherboards.
01:03:16.000 In late spring of 2015, Elemental staff boxed up several servers, sent them to Ontario, Canada for a third-party security company to test.
01:03:23.000 Nesting on the server's motherboards, the testers found a tiny microchip
01:03:27.000 Not much bigger than a grain of rice that wasn't part of the board's original design.
01:03:30.000 Amazon reported the discovery to U.S.
01:03:32.000 authorities, sending a shutter through the intelligence community.
01:03:35.000 Elemental's service could be found in DOD Department of Defense data centers, the CIA's drone operations, the onboard networks of Navy warships.
01:03:43.000 Elemental was just one of hundreds of Supermicro customers.
01:03:46.000 During the ensuing probe, investigators determined the chips allowed attackers to create a stealth doorway into any network that included the altered machines.
01:03:54.000 Multiple people familiar with the matter say investigators found the chips had been inserted at factories run by manufacturing subcontractors in China.
01:04:02.000 So China was putting little, essentially, these tiny microchips in virtually every piece of technology that was being sold in the United States, or at least a huge percentage of technology sold in the United States, and it allowed them to basically hijack the technology.
01:04:18.000 It's a stealth doorway.
01:04:20.000 China... The government of China is not a friendly government.
01:04:23.000 The China of government is not our friend.
01:04:25.000 They're quite unfriendly and they figure that they are fighting a long war against the West.
01:04:29.000 This is something we ought to be keeping an eye on.
01:04:31.000 The fact that it's been undercover shows that our priorities are really screwed up.
01:04:34.000 Okay, well, we will be back here on Monday with all of the latest.
01:04:37.000 Plus, we'll be there on Sunday, so go check out Fox News Sunday, 5 p.m.
01:04:40.000 Pacific, 8 p.m.
01:04:41.000 Eastern, for our latest Fox News election special.
01:04:44.000 We will have plenty to talk about because, of course, the big vote is coming up tomorrow.
01:04:48.000 I'm Brett Kavanaugh.
01:04:49.000 We'll have an outcome for you then.
01:04:50.000 You're just a content factory over here.
01:04:53.000 Go check us out over there.
01:04:54.000 By the way, we appreciate you watching.
01:04:55.000 Our ratings last week blew it out.
01:04:56.000 Blew it out the week before.
01:04:57.000 We had one of the top rated shows on Fox News.
01:04:59.000 Please, this Sunday, check us out.
01:05:01.000 TVO it, if you're not going to.
01:05:02.000 DVR it.
01:05:03.000 And watch it later.
01:05:05.000 We really appreciate it.
01:05:06.000 We'll see you here on Sunday and next week.
01:05:09.000 So go check all that out.
01:05:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
01:05:11.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:05:16.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
01:05:22.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
01:05:26.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
01:05:27.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Karamina.
01:05:29.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
01:05:31.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
01:05:34.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.