The Ben Shapiro Show


The Hit On Hannity, And Much Much Moore | Ep. 416


Summary

Shannon Hannity is in the middle of another boycott, and we will discuss how to fight it. Plus, Roy Moore, guilty or innocent, we will go through all of the details on the latest on the accusations against him, and President Trump sends the best tweet of his career, bar none. Ben Shapiro is the host of The Ben Shapiro Show on Fox News Radio and host of the conservative podcast The Weekly Standard, and is a regular contributor to the New York Times, CNN, and other media outlets. He is also a frequent contributor to The Daily Wire and has been featured on CNN and other major news outlets, including The Daily Caller, The Huffington Post, and The Daily Mail. His latest book, is out now and is available for pre-order on Amazon Prime and Vimeo worldwide. If you don t already have a Prime membership, you can get 20% off your first month with discount code: CRIMINALS at linktr.ee/TheBenShannonShow. The show is now available in Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover, and Hardcover. It is also available on Audible, Audible and Podchaser. and is coming soon to Audible. Subscribe to our new Audible podcast, where you get 10% off of the entire purchase price of $99.99, including shipping and handling fees, plus a free shipping, and a 20% discount when you sign up for Audible Prime membership and Audible membership gets it. You get an ad-free version of the show with the discount code CRIMELINE! and an Audible discount code . We are giving you access to all the latest releases, plus the ability to watch the show and access to the show, and get access to our socials, and access all the best vids, including all the newest episodes throughout the world. FREE PRICING, including the Audible platform, and all the ad-only versions of the podcast, and they get the best listening experience in the world, all for free on the best of the internet and social media platforms. access and socials including Apple Podcasts, VSCO, and VRLs, the Vimeo app, and TikTok, wherever else they choose to connect with you get the most powerful and fastest you can access the most amazing listening experience on the most influential podcast in the best places on the planet.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 So, Sean Hannity is in the middle of another boycott.
00:00:02.000 We will discuss how to fight it.
00:00:04.000 Plus, Roy Moore, guilty or innocent, we will go through all of the details.
00:00:09.000 And President Trump sends the best tweet of his career, bar none.
00:00:12.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:12.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:19.000 So, every week is an adventure around here.
00:00:21.000 I mean, really an adventure.
00:00:23.000 And if you were wondering, yes, I still have my cold.
00:00:25.000 That's why I sound so deep-voiced and masculine today.
00:00:28.000 But in any case, there's so much to discuss.
00:00:30.000 I want to talk about a New York Times column, which is one of the worst columns I have ever seen, in which the author, a professor at Yeshiva University, suggests that his black child should not be allowed to play with white children.
00:00:41.000 No, I am not kidding.
00:00:42.000 We'll go through the Keurig.
00:00:43.000 Boycott.
00:00:44.000 There are a lot of people who are breaking their Keurig coffee machines, and I'll explain why to you.
00:00:48.000 Plus, we'll look at the latest on the Roy Moore accusations.
00:00:50.000 Breaking news that Gloria Allred, the famed gadfly and media hound, is supposed to show up in about two hours here and make some announcements.
00:01:00.000 She's supposed to have a press conference, I guess.
00:01:02.000 In which she announces that there is a second accuser who says that when she was underage, Roy Moore, the Senate Republican candidate in Alabama, sexually assaulted her.
00:01:09.000 We'll discuss all of this in just a second, but first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Legacy Box.
00:01:14.000 So, I think that one of the most important things that you can do, especially as you get older, is ensure that your family memories are preserved.
00:01:20.000 This is particularly true for your parents.
00:01:22.000 You know, your parents are getting older, they've got boxes and boxes of crap in their garage.
00:01:25.000 All the old photos, all the old reels, all these things that you'll never be able to watch because they're not even on VHS tapes, let alone on DVD.
00:01:32.000 Well, what you need to do is go over to Legacy Box.
00:01:34.000 They send you a box in the mail, you take all of these items, you pack them up, you send it back to them, and Legacy Box puts them all together, and they send it back to you on a DVD or a thumb drive.
00:01:42.000 So all of those family memories are no longer in these waterlogged boxes in your infested garage.
00:01:48.000 Instead, they're in your house, and you can take them out, you can look at them whenever you want, and when there's a fire, you just grab the thumb drive instead of trying to schlep 37 pounds of photos on your back out of the family garage.
00:01:59.000 So, that's what Legacy Box is for.
00:02:01.000 So, Legacybox.com slash bed, you get a 40% discount on your order.
00:02:06.000 250,000 families have used them, and they take care of everything.
00:02:08.000 They provide updates at every step of the way, so you know that they've got your materials.
00:02:11.000 They put individualized barcodes on every one of your items, so you can trace it all the way through the process.
00:02:16.000 Again, it's Legacybox.com slash bed to get a 40% discount on your order.
00:02:20.000 That's Legacybox.com slash bed, Legacybox.com slash bed.
00:02:25.000 Okay, so...
00:02:38.000 We begin today with the Keurig boycott.
00:02:40.000 So this is going crazy online.
00:02:42.000 I want to talk a little bit about the tactic of it and why I think sometimes it is useful.
00:02:46.000 So we have to begin with an interview that Roy Moore did with Sean Hannity.
00:02:51.000 So Sean Hannity, I think, has been probably the strongest Donald Trump defender in the media.
00:02:56.000 He's also been a big Roy Moore defender.
00:02:57.000 However, when these allegations arose against Roy Moore, Sean Hannity went through them and
00:03:03.000 Media Matters basically decided that they were going to target Hannity.
00:03:05.000 Now, Media Matters is a left-wing agitprop group run by David Brock.
00:03:09.000 They've targeted Rush Limbaugh before.
00:03:10.000 They've targeted Sean Hannity before.
00:03:12.000 They've targeted virtually every major right-wing host has been targeted at some point by Media Matters.
00:03:16.000 And Media Matters is a Clinton agitprop organization.
00:03:19.000 They were co-founded, essentially, by the Clintons and the Podestas.
00:03:22.000 And their entire goal was to defend the Democratic agenda from the outside.
00:03:26.000 What they do is they, in some cases, take quotes out of context or make up allegations.
00:03:31.000 And then they call up all the advertisers on programs like Sean Hannity, and then they convince them that there are tons of people who are super outraged at these advertisers for advertising on Hannity, and they get them to pull their advertisements.
00:03:43.000 So, what they alleged is a couple of things.
00:03:44.000 They said that Sean Hannity had said that it was consensual, the allegations about Roy Moore, that he had taken a 14-year-old girl out, that he'd taken her from her home, that he'd stripped her down, that he'd touched her, and then made her touch him.
00:03:58.000 They said that Hannity had said that was consensual.
00:04:00.000 Hannity never said any such thing.
00:04:02.000 We went through that tape last week, if you recall.
00:04:04.000 Then, they said that his interview with Roy Moore was basically propaganda for Roy Moore.
00:04:08.000 It certainly wasn't.
00:04:09.000 Here's some clips from the interview with Roy Moore.
00:04:11.000 You should remember these clips, because these will also become relevant when we discuss the actual allegations against Roy Moore in the Senate, Republican candidate in Alabama.
00:04:19.000 At that time in your life, let me ask you this, you do remember these girls.
00:04:22.000 Would it be unusual for you as a 32-year-old guy to have dated a woman as young as 17?
00:04:28.000 That would be a 15-year difference or a girl 18.
00:04:31.000 Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?
00:04:35.000 Not generally, no.
00:04:36.000 If I did, you know, I'm not going to dispute anything, but I don't remember anything like that.
00:04:41.000 But you don't specifically remember having any girlfriend that was in her late teens even at that time?
00:04:47.000 I don't remember that, and I don't remember ever dating any girl without the permission of her mother.
00:04:53.000 And I think in her statement, she said that her mother actually encouraged her to go out with him.
00:04:59.000 These allegations are completely false and misleading, but more than that, it hurts me personally because, you know, I'm a father, I have one daughter, I have five granddaughters, and I have a special concern for the protection of young ladies.
00:05:12.000 Okay, so Moore, you know, there was not good responses by Moore, but it was pretty good interviewing by Hannity.
00:05:17.000 Hannity went through each of the charges individually.
00:05:19.000 He discussed them at length with Roy Moore.
00:05:21.000 It was a good interview.
00:05:23.000 Doesn't matter, Media Matters decided they were gonna target Sean anyway, so they go after Keurig by having, by astroturfing a bunch of people to tweet at Keurig, and Keurig responds with this tweet.
00:05:30.000 So Keurig responds by saying, Angela, so Angela Carusone is the, is the head of Media Matters.
00:05:35.000 She says, Good afternoon, Keurig.
00:05:37.000 You are currently sponsoring Sean Hannity's show.
00:05:38.000 He defends Chow-Molester Roy Moore and attacks women who speak out against sexual harassment.
00:05:42.000 Please reconsider.
00:05:43.000 Okay, he can't name how Sean actually defended Chow-Molester Roy Moore.
00:05:48.000 And he also can't explain exactly how Sean attacked women who spoke out against sexual harassment.
00:05:52.000 Like he doesn't actually have any evidence of that.
00:05:53.000 This is all nonsense.
00:05:54.000 But Keurig responds because advertisers get afraid of controversy.
00:05:58.000 So Keurig responds by saying, So they pulled their advertisements.
00:06:08.000 Well, this drove a lot of Sean's fans to basically pull a reverse boycott and say, okay, we're not going to buy Keurig products anymore.
00:06:13.000 If you're going to pull stuff based on media matters going after Sean Hannity, well, then we're not going to sponsor you, right?
00:06:19.000 You won't sponsor Sean, we won't sponsor you.
00:06:20.000 Now, there are a couple of things that are right about this, and maybe one thing that I think is a problem.
00:06:25.000 But here's some video of people destroying their Keurig machines.
00:06:28.000 So this one has gone viral.
00:06:30.000 This is a fellow who decided to go golfing against his Keurig machine.
00:06:33.000 He tweeted, guys, MAGA Twitter is drilling Keurig machines with 10-pound practice drivers.
00:06:37.000 Let's see what we can do with this thing.
00:06:45.000 And there goes the Keurig machine.
00:06:46.000 I believe we have one here at the office.
00:06:47.000 We have not yet shattered it.
00:06:49.000 The reason we haven't shattered it yet is because if you shatter a machine that you already bought, that doesn't actually involve a boycott.
00:06:55.000 Right?
00:06:55.000 Like if I shatter something I've already bought, all that means is that I don't have the thing anymore.
00:07:00.000 So I'm not really sure how that is effective.
00:07:03.000 But the idea that you're going to boycott a place like Keurig for pulling out advertising, it's not completely wrong-headed.
00:07:09.000 I think that a lot of people who are making fun of it today, this is not the only example of somebody destroying a Keurig machine.
00:07:13.000 Here's another example of somebody doing it.
00:07:15.000 Wait.
00:07:15.000 Oh boy.
00:07:17.000 And boom, there it goes from the second story.
00:07:19.000 Somebody broke the Keurig machine.
00:07:20.000 Again, I don't see the point of buying a product and then breaking the product.
00:07:23.000 That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
00:07:24.000 If you want to boycott Keurig, just don't buy more K-Cups.
00:07:26.000 But here's sort of the logic.
00:07:29.000 When I was at Truth Revolt, we launched boycott campaigns against people like Al Sharpton, against Martin Bashir on MSNBC.
00:07:36.000 We launched a boycott campaign against Alec Baldwin.
00:07:38.000 We helped get Alec Baldwin kicked off the air at MSNBC.
00:07:40.000 The point of those was not because we thought that boycotting advertisers that sponsor programs politically is wrong.
00:07:45.000 In fact, we obviously love that.
00:07:47.000 The reason we did that is because we were trying to prove to the left that this is a bad tactic.
00:07:50.000 We wanted mutually assured destruction.
00:07:52.000 The idea here is that whenever the left gets angry, they pressure advertisers to pull advertising from political programming.
00:07:58.000 And that's really dangerous because what that ends up doing is creating a market vacuum where people refuse to advertise on places like Fox News.
00:08:05.000 You want to know why Fox News is constantly running, you know, catheter ads?
00:08:09.000 And why MSNBC, which has lower ratings, is constantly running car ads?
00:08:12.000 The reason is because nobody is boycotting the cars, but a lot of people are boycotting cars if they appear on Fox News.
00:08:17.000 So long as the left insists on playing this game, playing the game in reverse seems to be justified as a mutually assured destruction scenario.
00:08:24.000 It shouldn't be something that we embrace wholeheartedly.
00:08:26.000 It shouldn't be something where we say, yeah, boycott advertisers.
00:08:28.000 I don't like boycotting advertisers.
00:08:29.000 I think that it's generally wrong.
00:08:31.000 But if the idea here is that you have to teach advertisers, number one, that you can astroturf a call on pretty much anything, and number two, teach the left that this
00:08:39.000 This has the same effect on the left that it has on the right, and everybody should put down their guns.
00:08:45.000 That seems to me like that would be a worthwhile thing.
00:08:47.000 The bottom line here is that Media Matters is a really despicable organization, and they're making up allegations in order to go after Sean.
00:08:52.000 There are plenty of things that Media Matters could go after Sean after if they wanted to, but that's not exactly what they decided to do instead.
00:08:57.000 They decided to take Sean out of context deliberately in order to go after him, and it's pathetic that advertisers fell prey to that.
00:09:03.000 Speaking of taking out of context, there's an article in Time Magazine today that I just want to correct.
00:09:07.000 Time Magazine ran an allegation by a girl who was 16, I guess, when she met George H.W.
00:09:12.000 Bush, H.W.
00:09:13.000 was 79 at the time, and apparently H.W.
00:09:17.000 grabbed this girl's ass.
00:09:19.000 Apparently he, this is the allegation anyway, is that H.W.
00:09:22.000 grabbed this woman's butt, and she was shocked by it.
00:09:27.000 Here is the piece from Time Magazine.
00:09:29.000 Her name, I guess, is Rosalind Corrigan,
00:09:32.000 I just couldn't sit with that.
00:09:32.000 I can't.
00:09:32.000 I can't sit with that.
00:09:33.000 I can't sleep anymore because that's not true and it's not an excuse.
00:09:34.000 Well...
00:10:00.000 That's not what I said on the show.
00:10:01.000 And I actually don't think that's what Corrigan is saying.
00:10:03.000 To give her credit, I really don't think that this particular lady is saying that I said on the show that H.W.
00:10:09.000 Bush did it because he was senile.
00:10:11.000 What I said on the show is if he did it because he's actually senile, that's a different story than if he did it not being senile, in which case he deserves to be punched, right?
00:10:19.000 If somebody grabbed my wife's ass, I would punch them.
00:10:22.000 At the very least, I'd push them around a little bit.
00:10:25.000 The idea that it's okay if you're not senile but you're old is just ridiculous.
00:10:29.000 The idea that old guys can do this stuff, I said it on the show two weeks ago.
00:10:32.000 You can go back and listen to the show, but Time Magazine reports that out of context as though I was defending Bush and saying he was senile.
00:10:38.000 I wasn't saying that at all.
00:10:39.000 I was saying if he's senile, that changes the scenario, but if he's not senile, then that's obviously disgusting behavior.
00:10:45.000 I, you know, not to toot my own horn here, but I've been pretty damn consistent on the sexual harassment front here.
00:10:50.000 I've been pretty consistent on the sexual assault, sexual harassment front, and that's why I'm trying to, you know, on the Roy Moore stuff, be as objective as possible.
00:10:57.000 So today, one of the things that I want to do here is
00:10:59.000 Go through what I think are five various perspectives that are all being lumped together with regard to the Roy Moore allegations.
00:11:06.000 The latest on the Roy Moore allegations, as I say, is that Gloria Allred is saying that she wants to present another accuser who's underage and Roy Moore sexually assaulted her.
00:11:15.000 That's the accusation, apparently, according to the mainstream media.
00:11:20.000 And Breitbart News also is going out of its way.
00:11:23.000 They're sending a couple of different reporters down to Alabama to try and discredit the story about the 14-year-old girl
00:11:29.000 Uh, who is, uh, who has accused, now she's, you know, in her fifties, uh, who accused Roy Moore of, uh, of taking her home and then sexually assaulting her, essentially.
00:11:40.000 So here are the five perspectives on the Roy Moore saga.
00:11:44.000 So you listen to the audio already.
00:11:45.000 Okay, listen to the audio of Moore.
00:11:47.000 I don't find it particularly a compelling defense.
00:11:49.000 Saying, I always talk to their mothers first is not really an excuse for dating underage girls.
00:11:54.000 The idea that when he says, I can't remember dating some of these women, and then he says, well, there's one of these women and I remember being friends with her.
00:12:00.000 If you want to call it a date, I guess it's a date.
00:12:02.000 None of this speaks well to his recollection of events.
00:12:05.000 He was very careful in that interview to say he'd done nothing illegal, but he did not really deny knowledge of anything except this 14-year-old girl.
00:12:12.000 Now, the reason the 14-year-old girl, her allegations are credible is because there are supporting details that are credible, right?
00:12:18.000 So she says that she met him in court and more basically recruited her outside a courtroom.
00:12:22.000 Her mom was in the court.
00:12:23.000 And Roy Moore said, I'll wait out here with your 14-year-old daughter.
00:12:26.000 And then he started hitting on her and got her phone number and all of this.
00:12:29.000 Moore was at the court at the time.
00:12:30.000 She was at the court at the time.
00:12:32.000 Her mom was at the court at the time.
00:12:34.000 There are multiple witnesses who say that this woman has told the story over and over.
00:12:38.000 And then she was sought out by the Washington Post, right?
00:12:40.000 She wasn't looking for glory.
00:12:41.000 She wasn't looking for a settlement.
00:12:42.000 She wasn't looking for cash.
00:12:43.000 Instead, the Washington Post had to basically push her into testifying.
00:12:47.000 Now, the way that Breitbart pushes that, Breitbart News has pushed this in the sense that, well, look at the Washington Post.
00:12:52.000 They're politically motivated.
00:12:53.000 Right, we know they're politically motivated.
00:12:54.000 That's true.
00:12:55.000 That doesn't mean the underlying facts are not true.
00:12:58.000 It's politically motivated when Andrew Breitbart goes after Andrew Wiener.
00:13:01.000 I know, I know Andrew.
00:13:02.000 You know, that's it, but that doesn't mean that what he was saying was false.
00:13:05.000 And I think we have to separate these things out.
00:13:07.000 Politically motivated does not always mean false.
00:13:09.000 Okay, so here are the five perspectives, I think, on Moore and what to do about him.
00:13:13.000 So, perspective number one is turnabout is fair play.
00:13:16.000 There are a lot of people I'm seeing on the right who are looking around and they're saying, listen,
00:13:21.000 The left is not willing to throw anyone out, no matter what the standard.
00:13:24.000 We can't play, we can't disarm ourselves.
00:13:26.000 This is the prisoner's dilemma I was talking about last week.
00:13:30.000 I don't think it's necessarily a moral perspective, but it's a politically advantageous one, I guess.
00:13:33.000 This is the idea that the left is not going to throw out people like Bob Menendez.
00:13:36.000 So why would we throw out Roy Moore without an actual conviction?
00:13:39.000 And even if he were actually convicted, the Democrats are not going to throw out Bob Menendez, right?
00:13:42.000 Dick Durbin, the senator from Illinois, was asked about Bob Menendez, who is currently on trial for corruption, the senator from New Jersey.
00:13:47.000 And he's asked, if he's convicted, will you move to kick him out of the Senate?
00:13:51.000 And Durbin won't even answer the question.
00:13:52.000 If your colleague, Senator Bob Menendez, New Jersey Democrat, is convicted on the corruption charges, he's on trial right now, the jury is still deliberating, will you vote to expel him?
00:14:03.000 I'm not going to get into the hypotheticals on either of these situations.
00:14:07.000 As I said, several steps removed.
00:14:09.000 I'm hopeful that when all is said and done that Bob Menendez will be returning to the Senate representing the state of New Jersey.
00:14:15.000 Okay, so this idea that the Democrats are somehow moral players here is obviously not true, and a lot of Republicans are responding to this by basically saying, well, fine, if you're not gonna get rid of Menendez, why would you get rid of Moore, right?
00:14:26.000 Amy Klobuchar, who's the Democrat senator from Minnesota, she says that maybe if Moore is elected, maybe we'll expel him.
00:14:33.000 But I don't remember her saying anything like this about Menendez, who's actually on trial right now.
00:14:37.000 But you're in favor of starting the expulsion process, potentially, if he is elected?
00:14:42.000 That's one way we can do it, but the other way is for the people of Alabama to look at these two candidates.
00:14:47.000 And yes, I have faith that they're going to look at what happened and these allegations and the fact that there's 30 witnesses and make a decision on someone else.
00:14:55.000 Then again, on the hypocrisy front, Lawrence O'Donnell, who has not said one word as far as I'm aware about expelling Bob Menendez, he asks Mitch McConnell, he says, what are you going to do about Moore?
00:15:04.000 What are you going to do about more?
00:15:04.000 And a lot of people on the right are like, well screw you, you won't do anything about your own people, why should we do anything about our people?
00:15:09.000 Again, I'm not saying this is a moral perspective, and I'm going to explain my own perspective further, but I think that it's worthwhile elucidating the various perspectives.
00:15:15.000 Before I go any further here, I first want to say thank you to our sponsors over at MyPatriotSupply.
00:15:20.000 So, you've seen a lot of natural disasters on the news lately.
00:15:22.000 You've seen natural disasters in California, and Texas, and Florida, and Puerto Rico.
00:15:26.000 You've seen natural disasters, a big earthquake yesterday in the Middle East.
00:15:29.000 When this stuff happens, it should be a reminder that natural disasters can happen, and there may be a time when you can't actually get to the grocery store, but you're out of supplies.
00:15:37.000 The government can't get to you for a couple of days.
00:15:38.000 That's why you need MyPatriotSupply.
00:15:40.000 The government recommends that you have a certain amount of food on hand in case bad things happen.
00:15:43.000 That's what MyPatriotSupply is for.
00:15:45.000 I don't know.
00:16:01.000 If these allegations are true,
00:16:26.000 And how will Mitch McConnell decide if they are true?
00:16:29.000 Will he question Roy Moore about it?
00:16:32.000 He has the power to do that.
00:16:33.000 Will he bring Roy Moore right back to Washington to sit with his potential future Republican colleagues?
00:16:41.000 And allow those colleagues to question him about this.
00:16:44.000 Again, this all this pressure from the left.
00:16:46.000 It makes a lot of people on the right.
00:16:47.000 We can stop it there.
00:16:48.000 It makes a lot of people on the right feel as though this is a political partisan hit job.
00:16:54.000 And then if the situation were reversed, they would be defending their Democrats, which probably is true, right?
00:16:57.000 Jeffrey Goldberg says the Washington Post is neutral on Moore.
00:17:00.000 Jeffrey Goldberg is the editor of the Atlantic.
00:17:02.000 That's obviously laughable.
00:17:03.000 The Washington Post is not neutral on Moore.
00:17:05.000 Their editorial board endorsed his opponent in Alabama.
00:17:07.000 So obviously they have some feelings on the issue.
00:17:09.000 Now,
00:17:10.000 Does that mean that the allegations are not credible or the reporting is bad?
00:17:13.000 No, it doesn't.
00:17:14.000 But when people keep insisting that the Washington Post has no agenda with regard to the election, two things can be true at once.
00:17:19.000 They can have an agenda and the allegations can be true.
00:17:21.000 But people seem to be able to take only one perspective.
00:17:24.000 If they have an agenda, that means the allegations are false, or the allegations are true and they have no agenda.
00:17:28.000 Here's Jeffrey Goldberg saying that Washington Post has no agenda, which obviously is not true.
00:17:32.000 So on the one hand, we do have an intolerance for this across different fields and industries.
00:17:37.000 On the other hand, you can still succeed in America pretty easily with some really nasty stuff in your background.
00:17:44.000 Well, especially if you believe that the other side is making this stuff up or doing it only for partisan reasons.
00:17:49.000 I mean, this is why so many people are sticking with the party because they believe that the other side is lying about what really... They're trying to cast the Washington Post as oppo research and the Washington Post is actually neutral.
00:18:00.000 Okay, this idea when you have all these media people who hate Trump, hate Moore, sitting around going, we're neutral arbiters.
00:18:05.000 No wonder so many people are reacting this way.
00:18:07.000 There's a poll out today showing that 37% of evangelicals said that they are more likely to vote for Roy Moore in the aftermath of the allegations.
00:18:14.000 That's not because they actually believe he raped a 14-year-old or tried to, right?
00:18:18.000 That's because they believe that the media is out to get him.
00:18:21.000 Right?
00:18:21.000 It's that simple.
00:18:22.000 That's obviously what's going on here.
00:18:23.000 So this perspective, I think, has become the default perspective for a lot of Republicans and a lot of Democrats.
00:18:28.000 Because next time there's a Bill Clinton character who goes around sexually assaulting women, Democrats are going to say, well, you guys were fine with Trump and Moore.
00:18:34.000 That's the way this is going to go.
00:18:36.000 And it has been going this way for the last 20 years.
00:18:37.000 I think that Trump and Moore are just the culmination of that effect.
00:18:40.000 Right?
00:18:40.000 Here's Chuck Todd.
00:18:41.000 Chuck Todd says, did Trump get a pass from voters because of Bill Clinton's behavior?
00:18:45.000 Well, the answer is sort of yes, right?
00:18:47.000 I mean, I think there's some truth to that.
00:18:49.000 What do you say to voters who say, um, boy, all these people that were upset about Donald Trump, they weren't upset about Bill Clinton.
00:18:57.000 Do you think that one of the reasons why Donald Trump got a pass from voters is because of what happened in the 90s to Bill Clinton?
00:19:03.000 Okay, the answer to that question is obviously yes.
00:19:05.000 We don't need her answer.
00:19:06.000 The answer to that question is obviously yes.
00:19:08.000 This has become the predominant perspective.
00:19:09.000 So, perspective number one.
00:19:11.000 Not one I think is particularly moral, but it certainly is prevalent.
00:19:14.000 Is turnabout is fair play?
00:19:16.000 If nobody's gonna have any standards on this, why should we?
00:19:18.000 Okay, perspective number two is, I think, maybe the most honest and also the most immoral perspective.
00:19:23.000 This is the David Horowitz perspective, which is, okay, so he molested a 14-year-old girl, who cares?
00:19:28.000 Seriously, this is actually David Horowitz's perspective.
00:19:30.000 He tweeted out, in my view, more is guilty as accused, but one, it happened 30 years ago, which, um, so.
00:19:37.000 Two, he can't be removed from the ballot, again, um,
00:19:40.000 So, this is the binary perspective that literally Donald Trump could have shot someone on Fifth Avenue.
00:19:44.000 Really.
00:19:44.000 Like, literally done it.
00:19:45.000 And David Horowitz would have supported him because he doesn't want Hillary Clinton to be president.
00:19:59.000 So this does raise a question that we're all going to have to deal with.
00:20:02.000 What are you willing to accept in a candidate to defeat the other side?
00:20:05.000 If you believe the other side is so deeply evil that every seat is worth electing a child molester, then we may as well kiss goodbye to any standards for our candidates at all.
00:20:14.000 Because some of our candidates will probably be good people, but some of them may be absolute crap-fests.
00:20:19.000 And to be honest, this seems like, again, a very common perspective that no one actually wants to articulate, right?
00:20:25.000 This seems almost like the underlying perspective for a lot of people who say the turnabout is fair play.
00:20:29.000 There are a certain number of them, a subset, who say, who cares?
00:20:32.000 Okay, fine, let's say he did it.
00:20:34.000 The other side's still worse.
00:20:35.000 They're still worse.
00:20:36.000 Still worse is a very good excuse for you embracing something really, really bad.
00:20:40.000 This was one of the logics that I found utterly non-compelling and actually quite off-putting during the last election cycle.
00:20:46.000 It exists on the left, however.
00:20:47.000 The left still maintains that JFK is some sort of halcyon of decency and wonder.
00:20:52.000 Right?
00:20:53.000 JFK, his Camelot.
00:20:54.000 Here's what we know about JFK, right?
00:20:56.000 We know that there was a woman named Mimi Alford who was an intern at the White House.
00:21:01.000 She was 18 when she started there.
00:21:03.000 She wrote a book called Once Upon a Secret, My Affair with President John F. Kennedy and Its Aftermath.
00:21:07.000 She was at the White House intern, a 19-year-old rising sophomore at Wheaton College, and JFK used her as basically a drug mule and apparently as a whore.
00:21:17.000 I mean, that's basically her allegation.
00:21:33.000 And apparently he was also dallying with Fiddle's close friend Faddle, a secretary in the press office.
00:21:36.000 I mean, JFK was just a scumbag.
00:21:38.000 Apparently he led Mimi into his wife's bedroom, unbuttoned her blouse, touched her breasts, pulled down her underwear, dropped his pants, climbed on top of her, and had sex with her.
00:21:46.000 When she told him she was a virgin, he became more compassionate, but neither in that sexual encounter nor any other did he kiss her on the lips.
00:21:52.000 And then...
00:21:53.000 There was one incident where there was a guy named Dave Powers who worked for Kennedy, who was sitting poolside while the president and I swam lazy circles around each other, splashing playfully.
00:22:02.000 Remember, she's 19, JFK at this point is in his 40s.
00:22:04.000 The allegation's about more that he was 33 and the girl was 16 or 17 or 18, except for the 14-year-old, which is another allegation.
00:22:11.000 Dave had removed his jacket and loosened his tie in the warm air of the pool, but he was otherwise fully clothed.
00:22:15.000 He was sitting on a towel with his pants leg rolled up and his bare feet dangling in the water.
00:22:19.000 The president swam over and whispered in my ear, Mr. Powers looks a little tense.
00:22:21.000 Would you take care of it?
00:22:22.000 It was a dare, but I knew exactly what he meant.
00:22:25.000 This was a challenge to give Dave Powers oral sex.
00:22:27.000 And then JFK basically manipulated this young girl into doing this.
00:22:32.000 And the left still celebrates him.
00:22:34.000 So there's a group of people on the left who say the same thing.
00:22:36.000 Well, JFK was better than his opposition.
00:22:37.000 He was better than Tricky Dick Nixon.
00:22:39.000 So who cares?
00:22:41.000 I'll give you another example of the who cares phenomenon.
00:22:43.000 Harvey Milk, considered a hero by many on the left.
00:22:46.000 Harvey Milk is considered just a wonderful, wonderful man, a hero, a sexual hero.
00:22:51.000 Okay, Harvey Milk
00:22:55.000 statutorily raped a 16-year-old boy, okay?
00:22:57.000 The guy's name was John Galen McKinley, and he was 16 years old, and Milk, who was then 33, right, very similar to the allegations, began living with this kid, this 16-year-old kid.
00:23:08.000 They moved into Harvey Milk's Upper West Side apartment, according to a biography by Randy Schiltz.
00:23:12.000 It says, they bought a dog named Trick, a cat they called Trade, and settled into a middle-class domestic marriage.
00:23:17.000 At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him.
00:23:23.000 Okay, his lover at this age was 16 years old.
00:23:25.000 Does the left have anything to say about that?
00:23:27.000 Again, the answer is no, because who cares?
00:23:29.000 Harvey Milk was a hero, and so we have to bury all of this stuff.
00:23:33.000 We can't imagine that people are multifaceted, and so we have to bury all this stuff.
00:23:36.000 So perspective number one is the other side does it, so who cares?
00:23:39.000 I think that's wrong, and I'll explain why in a minute I think that's wrong.
00:23:43.000 I've really explained it already a little bit, which is just because the other side does it doesn't mean it's moral for you to do it.
00:23:48.000 If the other side is electing a bunch of murderers, that doesn't mean it's moral for you to elect a bunch of murderers to fight them.
00:23:52.000 Number two is the other side is so evil that we have to do everything possible to stop them, including siding with terrible people.
00:23:59.000 That shows very little faith in humanity.
00:24:01.000 It also shows very little faith in God, really.
00:24:04.000 That God always has to use the most imperfect vessel.
00:24:07.000 And it really shows little faith in human beings because the fact is that Roy Moore, if he dropped out today, there'd be a writing campaign for Luther Strange or for Mo Brooks, and that person would likely win the seat.
00:24:16.000 Right now the polls show that Moore is down about four points to the Democratic challenger in freaking Alabama.
00:24:22.000 Okay.
00:24:22.000 Perspective number three.
00:24:24.000 is one that I'm hearing a lot.
00:24:25.000 It's sort of a legalistic perspective that I think is really just, again, a facet of the first two.
00:24:30.000 The other side does it, and who cares?
00:24:32.000 And that is, he wasn't convicted in a court of law.
00:24:35.000 I'm hearing this a lot.
00:24:36.000 I know that there's a guy online named Jacob Wohl, and he's been saying this.
00:24:39.000 He wasn't convicted in a court of law.
00:24:40.000 That's true.
00:24:41.000 You know who else was not convicted in a court of law?
00:24:42.000 Hillary Clinton.
00:24:44.000 Hillary Clinton was not convicted in a court of law of anything, and yet we treated her as a criminal because she was committing criminal activities no matter what James Comey said, and we didn't vote her into the office of the White House because of that.
00:24:55.000 Right, so the bottom line is that, you know, in your own mind, you don't get to beg off just because the person wasn't convicted unless this is a consistent rule you uphold.
00:25:02.000 If your consistent rule is, I will vote for anyone so long as they weren't convicted, then you'd vote for OJ Simpson for higher office so long as he voted the right way on abortion.
00:25:10.000 But acknowledge that this is what you're doing.
00:25:12.000 The reality is that's not how people vote.
00:25:13.000 That's not true.
00:25:15.000 So all I'm asking from people is that they uphold a consistent standard.
00:25:17.000 If your standard is you don't care because the other side does it, or if your standard is you don't care because the other side is so evil, or if your standard is the person has to be legally convicted in order for me to care, then at least uphold that standard on all sides, but you don't get to pick and choose which people you're going to use the new standard for.
00:25:31.000 Senator Tim Scott, I think, has this exactly right.
00:25:33.000 He says, listen, in the end, it is not the judge that's gonna be the judge.
00:25:37.000 It's gonna be the voters who are the judge, just as they were with Hillary Clinton.
00:25:40.000 In this case though, if the allegations are true, he's denying them.
00:25:44.000 How do you find proof?
00:25:45.000 There's no doubt that the case is compelling.
00:25:48.000 The judge and the jury in this case will be the people of Alabama, the voters of Alabama.
00:25:53.000 They will have an opportunity to weigh in very clearly and decisively and very shortly.
00:25:58.000 But this current situation will have to be solved by the people of Alabama.
00:26:02.000 The voters will be the judge and the jury.
00:26:04.000 Okay, so that being the case, this brings up the final two perspectives, and these are the ones that I think are really the most interesting and honest.
00:26:10.000 These are the ones that I think matter the most.
00:26:12.000 Okay, the first perspec- you know, I'll give you those in one second.
00:26:14.000 These are the perspectives that matter the most.
00:26:16.000 But, before that, I first want to say thank you to our sponsors over at stamps.com.
00:26:19.000 So, you don't want to go to the post office and wait in line.
00:26:22.000 You just don't.
00:26:22.000 Okay?
00:26:23.000 You may love the post office.
00:26:23.000 It may be your favorite place.
00:26:24.000 You don't have time for that.
00:26:25.000 You have work to do.
00:26:26.000 That's why you need to go over to Stamps.com.
00:26:27.000 We use it here at the office.
00:26:29.000 Stamps.com allows you to print out postage directly at your office.
00:26:32.000 You can print it directly onto the envelope.
00:26:33.000 You can print it onto a sticker.
00:26:35.000 You can print it onto a piece of paper and tape it to the envelope.
00:26:37.000 They will give you a digital scale so that you don't have to worry about what kind of postage you're using, if it's the right amount of postage, and if it's going to come back to you.
00:26:44.000 Stamps.com is everything that you need from the post office except it's right here at your office.
00:26:49.000 They bring all the amazing services of the postal service to your fingertips.
00:26:52.000 Again, buy print official U.S.
00:26:54.000 postage for any letter, any package, any class of mail.
00:26:57.000 We're good to go.
00:27:19.000 Which is pretty great, right?
00:27:20.000 You get all those things and you never have to go to the post office again.
00:27:22.000 Again, that's stamps.com.
00:27:24.000 Promo code Shapiro.
00:27:25.000 There's a reason that we use it here at Daily Wire.
00:27:27.000 Okay, so.
00:27:28.000 Finally, the last two perspectives.
00:27:29.000 So the first three perspectives all have something in common.
00:27:31.000 They're basically saying, he could have done it, and I'm still not sure that I would do anything about it.
00:27:35.000 Right?
00:27:36.000 Then, there's the perspective of the people who believe that this sort of thing makes a difference.
00:27:40.000 Right, who believe that if he actually did it, then he should not be running for Senate, and we should not elect him to the Senate.
00:27:46.000 And this brings up where I think most people actually are, right?
00:27:49.000 I think most people actually are here... Okay, let me rephrase.
00:27:52.000 Most people may be in the first category, but they like to think they're in this category.
00:27:55.000 Right, most people may be in the category where they don't really care whether Moore did it, they just want to know whether he's going to be a senator they like.
00:28:01.000 But where most people want to believe in their heart they are is that it would make a difference if a guy molested a 14-year-old in their vote.
00:28:08.000 Okay, so this breaks down into two categories.
00:28:12.000 The allegations against Moore are credible.
00:28:13.000 The allegations against Moore are not.
00:28:14.000 So what we've been hearing consistently from Republicans is if this is true, he should step down.
00:28:18.000 The problem is there's no way really to prove it's true because it's a he-said-she-said situation.
00:28:23.000 Which means that you have to use your brain and determine whether you think the allegations are credible.
00:28:27.000 And I'm not going to decide that for you.
00:28:29.000 I happen to think the allegations are credible.
00:28:31.000 I think they're credible because there are multiple witnesses who are contemporaneous who back up the account because they weren't there to see the thing but she apparently told them about it at the time.
00:28:39.000 It's credible because apparently, according to a former DA who worked with Moore, it was common knowledge she used to hang out at the high school and pick up chicks.
00:28:46.000 All of this seems credible to me, but you can certainly make the case it's not particularly credible.
00:28:50.000 You can make that case.
00:28:51.000 So, Pat Toomey, the senator from Pennsylvania, he's saying that.
00:28:54.000 He's saying, you know, I'm not sure I find these allegations particularly credible.
00:28:57.000 Again, you can hold this perspective for sure, and what you may think is that this is a political hit job, it's an opal research piece that's not well substantiated, designed to take out Moore,
00:29:06.000 And so the motivation combines with the lack of credibility of the story to mean that it's all BS.
00:29:10.000 Okay, so here's Pat Toomey sort of making that case.
00:29:13.000 Look, I've said I don't find the denial terribly credible, but when someone waits 40 years before they make an accusation, you know, that raises a question itself.
00:29:22.000 So it's probably not knowable, but there seems to be enough there that it's very disturbing.
00:29:30.000 Okay, so, you know, again, it's not credible, it's not knowable.
00:29:33.000 Waiting 40 years raises questions.
00:29:35.000 Waiting many years to talk about this stuff, as I discussed last week, really is not the key issue.
00:29:41.000 Really.
00:29:41.000 If you know women who have been sexually assaulted, many of them never reported it, but they'll tell you about it.
00:29:47.000 The reason they didn't report it is because they were 14 or 15 and they felt adrift.
00:29:52.000 They felt like they may have been guilty.
00:29:53.000 They felt like the cops weren't going to listen to them.
00:29:55.000 They felt like people were going to attach that stigma to them the rest of their lives and they'd rather hide it and try and deal with it themselves.
00:30:03.000 Not rare in the slightest.
00:30:05.000 There are people trying to call into question the credibility of the count.
00:30:08.000 I think bottom line is you're either going to have to believe the woman who says that she was assaulted when she was 14 or you're not going to because Breitbart has been trying to take this apart and they're doing a terrible job of it.
00:30:16.000 So Breitbart obviously is very invested in this particular race because Steve Bannon wanted to claim credit for his primary win, Moore's primary win, even though he really had nothing to do with it.
00:30:25.000 But he's tied himself to Moore's leg, and so now he's assigned two reporters.
00:30:29.000 One of them, actually, is the Jerusalem bureau chief, Aaron Klein, who's done a good amount of good reporting in the Middle East, but hasn't done much here.
00:30:35.000 There's a piece here saying, I like Aaron, but this is not a particularly revelatory report.
00:30:40.000 This was the lead at Breitbart yesterday.
00:30:46.000 So that sounds pretty damning, right?
00:30:48.000 Sounds like the story's falling apart, right?
00:30:50.000 That a key detail is falling apart.
00:30:52.000 Here is the key detail.
00:30:53.000 This is a direct quote from the story.
00:30:55.000 Corfman, the woman's name is Leigh Corfman.
00:30:57.000 Is that a real inconsistency?
00:31:24.000 That she said she was talking on her phone in her bedroom?
00:31:27.000 Okay, first of all, it's possible that the Washington Post should have put a comma after her phone, comma, in her bedroom.
00:31:32.000 Second of all, I know that all the young kids today don't remember actual phones with wires attached to them, but
00:31:39.000 Every person who remembers a phone attached to a wire remembers taking a phone and stretching it all the way to their bedroom.
00:31:46.000 Every single person.
00:31:47.000 Okay, if you ever look at the old phones that have cords on them, all of the cords are stretched out of recognition.
00:31:52.000 Right, they have the curly cords, you know, they're all curled like a pig's tail.
00:31:56.000 You know, if you pull, if you go look, go look at, and you'll go to your grandma's house and look at the phone that has on the wall that cord.
00:32:02.000 That cord is stretched out of recognition.
00:32:03.000 It's all, it's all messed up.
00:32:05.000 The reason it's messed up is because kids take the phone and they pull it all the way in their room and then they talk there.
00:32:09.000 If this is Breitbart's great hope to discredit the story, that's weak tea.
00:32:12.000 Okay, here's another Breitbart headline.
00:32:14.000 Weak tea, more weak tea from Breitbart.
00:32:16.000 And the headline was exclusive.
00:32:18.000 Mother of Roy Moore accuser.
00:32:19.000 Washington Post reporters convinced my daughter to go public.
00:32:22.000 Now, if they really think that that's actually a slap against the credibility of the woman, it's precisely the reverse.
00:32:29.000 Right?
00:32:29.000 If you were a publicity whore and you were looking to get into the papers by giving a false allegation, wouldn't you be seeking out the Washington Post?
00:32:36.000 I mean, this is what reporters do.
00:32:37.000 Reporters call up people and try to convince them to go on the record.
00:32:40.000 That happens on a routine basis.
00:32:41.000 It's happened to me many times.
00:32:42.000 I've done it several times.
00:32:43.000 I mean, there's nothing wrong with that.
00:32:45.000 That's how people go on the record.
00:32:46.000 So again, this is a bit of a stretch.
00:32:48.000 Again, you may find that the allegations are not credible.
00:32:51.000 You may think the timing means that the allegations are not credible.
00:32:54.000 I don't quite buy that, but that's at least a case.
00:32:57.000 That's the case that you're going to make.
00:32:58.000 If you say child molestation is enough to keep you out of the Senate, you need to make the case the woman's not credible.
00:33:02.000 Finally, there's perspective five, and that is that this is credible.
00:33:06.000 I'll tell you who thinks this is credible.
00:33:07.000 Senate Majority Leader McConnell said today that he thinks it's credible.
00:33:10.000 The Trump administration is saying they think it's credible.
00:33:12.000 Okay, Kellyanne Conway went out yesterday and basically said she thinks it's credible.
00:33:15.000 The Trump administration said if it's true, more should step down.
00:33:18.000 Steve Mnuchin, the Treasury Secretary, who's a lackey for Trump, here's what he had to say about it yesterday.
00:33:23.000 I'm not an expert on this issue, but what I would say is people should investigate this issue and get the facts.
00:33:29.000 And if these allegations are true, absolutely.
00:33:31.000 This is incredibly inappropriate behavior.
00:33:34.000 Do you believe the allegations?
00:33:35.000 Again, I just watch what I see on TV.
00:33:37.000 I know, but you have an opinion.
00:33:38.000 Do you believe them?
00:33:40.000 It appears that there is a significant issue here that needs to be addressed.
00:33:45.000 Okay, so that's basically his way of saying, yes, they're credible.
00:33:48.000 So, the reason that I'm spending so much time on this is because I think that we all need to, as moral human beings, as people who are trying to do the right thing, I think we need to examine in our own minds what our standards are, so that we know for the future.
00:33:58.000 Like, let's be honest about our own standards here.
00:34:00.000 It's the dishonesty that bothers me, not actually your standard.
00:34:02.000 Your standard may bother me, but the dishonesty bothers me more.
00:34:06.000 My standard is people who sexually abuse children at 14, or about whom there are credible allegations, should not be sitting in the Senate.
00:34:14.000 That's my standard.
00:34:15.000 And then I determine that I think these allegations are credible or not.
00:34:18.000 I tend to think that they're credible, at least according to what I've seen so far.
00:34:21.000 Then there are people who say they're not credible.
00:34:23.000 Okay, again, if that's what you come up with, if you think that these are not credible allegations, explain why, and maybe we can have a conversation about that.
00:34:29.000 Then there are the other perspectives.
00:34:30.000 One, it doesn't matter.
00:34:32.000 Because the other side is so terrible.
00:34:33.000 If you think that, we shouldn't live in a country with other people who are called Democrats.
00:34:36.000 We should actually go to war with them.
00:34:37.000 If you believe that people are so evil, that in order to fight them, you need to elect child molesters to the Senate, then I would suggest that we ought to be in a state of open war, rather than pretending that we live in the same country.
00:34:48.000 Then there's the perspective that the other side does it, so it's okay for me.
00:34:51.000 This is a way that you have a race to the bottom on politics.
00:34:53.000 I talked about this last week.
00:34:55.000 I object to the prisoner's dilemma logic, because prisoner's dilemma does not carry a moral burden.
00:35:00.000 That's just a question of game theory.
00:35:02.000 But when it carries a moral burden, there is a moral burden to you when you say, I care more about losing the Senate seat in Alabama than electing an alleged child molester to that seat.
00:35:10.000 I think that's immoral as well.
00:35:12.000 And then there's the final perspective, which is that he wasn't convicted by a jury.
00:35:17.000 If that's been your consistent standard, fine.
00:35:18.000 If it hasn't been, then just recognize that you're full of it.
00:35:20.000 Okay.
00:35:21.000 Time for... I want to talk about the greatest tweet that Trump has ever sent.
00:35:24.000 So here is the greatest tweet that Trump has ever sent.
00:35:28.000 It's one of the reasons that Trump supporters love him.
00:35:30.000 His approval rating is back up to 46%.
00:35:31.000 This demonstrates every time Trump goes abroad and he can't stay at home, fulminating about domestic issues and bothering everyone, everyone likes him.
00:35:38.000 When he's overseas...
00:35:40.000 And I shouldn't say everyone.
00:35:41.000 His approval rating is at 46% right now.
00:35:43.000 That's the highest it's been in a long time.
00:35:45.000 The reason is because he's overseas and he's kind of slapping people around overseas and we sort of like that.
00:35:49.000 So apparently Kim Jong-un called Trump old.
00:35:52.000 So Trump responded this way.
00:35:55.000 This is the greatest single tweet of my lifetime.
00:35:57.000 It's so good.
00:35:57.000 He said, why would Kim Jong-un insult me by calling me old when I would never call him short and fat?
00:36:05.000 Oh wow.
00:36:06.000 I try so hard to be his friend and maybe someday that will happen.
00:36:10.000 Spectacular.
00:36:11.000 Spectacular.
00:36:12.000 Pete Trump.
00:36:13.000 Okay I gotta admit like there are a bunch of people who are getting all exercise about this.
00:36:16.000 I love it.
00:36:16.000 I think it's hilarious.
00:36:18.000 Like trolling Kim Jong-un.
00:36:19.000 Okay maybe we'll all die in nuclear hellfire tomorrow.
00:36:22.000 Possible.
00:36:23.000 You know, in the history books we'll read, World War III began when a Twitter storm ran out of control and Kim Jong-un fired a nuclear-tipped missile at California based on Donald J. Trump calling him short and fat.
00:36:34.000 I don't think that's what's going to happen, so who cares?
00:36:35.000 I think it's hilarious.
00:36:36.000 It's really, really... Like, no, they have a sense of humor, people.
00:36:39.000 That's some funny stuff.
00:36:40.000 Okay, so...
00:36:41.000 I want to talk a little bit about Trump abroad.
00:36:43.000 That was the good of Trump abroad.
00:36:44.000 Then I want to talk about some of the other things he said, plus this horrible column from the New York Times.
00:36:48.000 But first, you're going to have to go over and subscribe at dailywire.com.
00:36:51.000 For $9.99 a month, you can subscribe at dailywire.com.
00:36:54.000 When you do, you get the rest of my show live on video, you get the rest of Michael Knowles' show live on video, you get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live on video, you get to be part of my mailbag,
00:37:01.000 And you also get to be part of the mailbag on The Conversation.
00:37:05.000 So the next episode of The Conversation is happening tomorrow, Tuesday, November 14th, 5 p.m.
00:37:10.000 Eastern, 2 p.m.
00:37:10.000 Pacific, featuring Michael Moll's God Help Us.
00:37:13.000 Michael's Conversation will stream live on The Daily Wire website, Facebook page, and YouTube channel.
00:37:17.000 It'll be free for everyone to watch, but only subscribers can ask the questions.
00:37:20.000 That's why you should subscribe.
00:37:21.000 Subscribe today and ask Michael questions and join The Conversation tomorrow, and you can watch it no matter what, but you can only ask questions if you're a subscriber.
00:37:28.000 If you get the annual subscription instead of $9.99 a month, it is $99 a year, which is actually cheaper.
00:37:33.000 And it comes with this, the most wonderful vessel for beverage drinking ever created, the Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Mug, currently filled with soothing tea.
00:37:43.000 And let me tell you, it holds tea like no other vessel.
00:37:45.000 It is just spectacular.
00:37:46.000 So go over and check that out.
00:37:48.000 If you want to listen later, please subscribe to our channel over at YouTube.
00:37:51.000 Go over to iTunes and SoundCloud, subscribe there.
00:37:53.000 Leave us a review, we always appreciate it.
00:37:54.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:38:02.000 Okay, so Trump Abroad sends that tweet, which again, I think it's just, it is a spectacular tweet.
00:38:07.000 I mean, that is a 10 out of 10 for Trump.
00:38:09.000 And then he sent some other things that were not so great.
00:38:12.000 He continues to make weird noises about Russia, about how he wants to be best friends with Putin.
00:38:16.000 Here's what he said about getting along with Russia.
00:38:18.000 Now, at the same time, I want to be able, because I think it's very important, to get along with Russia, to get along with China, to get along with Vietnam, to get along with lots of countries, because we have a lot of things we have to solve.
00:38:34.000 And frankly, Russia and China in particular can help us with the North Korea problem, which is one of our truly great problems.
00:38:41.000 So, I'm not looking to stand and start arguing with somebody when there's reporters all around and cameras recording and seeing our conversation.
00:38:51.000 I think it was very obvious to everybody.
00:38:53.000 I believe that President Putin really feels, and he feels strongly, that he did not meddle in our election.
00:39:00.000 Okay, so who cares if you feel strongly they didn't meddle in the election?
00:39:03.000 What difference does that make?
00:39:04.000 A lot of people were upset with Trump for saying this.
00:39:07.000 Again, this is typical Trump, but the reason people on the right aren't so upset is because on the other side of the national security aisle are a bunch of people on the left who pretended that Russia was no threat at all back in 2012, when Mitt Romney was calling him the lead geopolitical threat on planet Earth, and Barack Obama was saying that the 1980s called and wanted their foreign policy back.
00:39:23.000 John Brennan and James Clapper, both of them political hacks, they were out there ripping Trump saying, well, it's a badge of honor to be called political hacks by Trump.
00:39:29.000 Well, they are political hacks.
00:39:32.000 I mean, James Clapper went in front of the Congress of the United States and lied openly about NSA programs.
00:39:38.000 The president also called both of you and FBI Director Comey political hacks.
00:39:43.000 All three of you worked in senior levels in the Obama administration, although you also worked during the Bush administration.
00:39:50.000 How do you respond to the charge?
00:39:51.000 Well, first of all, he was referring to us as political hacks because he was trying to delegitimize the intelligence community assessment that was done.
00:39:57.000 Jim Clapper, Jim Comey, and John Brennan did not write that assessment.
00:40:00.000 It was written by the professional intelligence officers and law enforcement officers of this great country.
00:40:06.000 Secondly, I feel very honored to be associated with Jim Clapper and Jim Comey in the same category.
00:40:12.000 And considering the source of the criticism, I consider that criticism- Okay, the problem is they destroyed their own credibility, and then Trump goes after their credibility.
00:40:20.000 This is their own fault.
00:40:21.000 If you destroy your own credibility, and then Trump goes after your credibility, even on behalf of silly causes, then that is really the fault of these people.
00:40:29.000 Trump is saying a lot of things I disagree with on the foreign policy front, but the bottom line is, so long as he's attacking people like Clapper and people like Brennan, he's gonna get away with it because they destroyed their credibility long before Trump ever touched them with a 10-foot pole.
00:40:40.000 Okay, time for some things I like, things I hate, and then we'll go through a Federalist paper.
00:40:44.000 We go through one of those a week.
00:40:45.000 So, things I like.
00:40:46.000 Over the weekend, I got to see Thor Ragnarok.
00:40:49.000 I loved it.
00:40:50.000 I thought it was, love is a little strong.
00:40:51.000 I strongly liked it.
00:40:53.000 I thought it was really, really, really funny.
00:40:55.000 You have to go in knowing that it is just funny.
00:40:57.000 Right?
00:40:58.000 It's not going to be meaningful.
00:41:00.000 It's not going to be moving.
00:41:00.000 It's not going to be deep.
00:41:01.000 You're not going to feel anything.
00:41:02.000 But you're going to laugh, because it's really funny.
00:41:05.000 Chris Hemsworth is a very talented comic actor.
00:41:08.000 Mark Ruffalo is fine.
00:41:09.000 I don't think he was particularly funny, but I think that Hemsworth was a good comic actor.
00:41:13.000 Tom Hiddleston, who plays Loki, is a fine comic actor.
00:41:18.000 There are a lot of very, very funny moments in this.
00:41:20.000 The best thing in it is actually a character who is made of rocks and is voiced by the director, who's really, really funny as well.
00:41:28.000 So, go in and enjoy yourself.
00:41:30.000 It's a really enjoyable film.
00:41:32.000 Jeff Goldblum gives a bizarre, fully... I mean, he goes full Goldblum.
00:41:35.000 Like, there is no half Goldblum.
00:41:37.000 He goes full Goldblum in this one.
00:41:39.000 And it's very enjoyable.
00:41:40.000 Here's a little bit of the preview.
00:41:45.000 So much has happened since I last saw you.
00:41:49.000 I lost my hammer, like, yesterday, so that's still pretty fresh.
00:41:53.000 And then I went on a journey of self-discovery.
00:42:00.000 Where I met you.
00:42:03.000 Where are we?
00:42:13.000 You have no idea.
00:42:19.000 Okay, so the movie basically has no plot.
00:42:21.000 Okay, the plot of the movie is almost irrelevant.
00:42:24.000 What's funny is all the jokes, and it starts right off the top.
00:42:26.000 I mean, the very first five minutes of the film has a very, very funny visual sight gag that's very funny.
00:42:32.000 Go and enjoy it.
00:42:32.000 It's just a good time.
00:42:33.000 It's not going to be something that you sit around contemplating at the end of days, but it is something where if you just need a break and you need to laugh, then it'll... By the way, this is my favorite kind of Marvel movie.
00:42:42.000 Let's go straight to some things that I hate.
00:42:57.000 It is amazing how, depending on where you are politically, you can get away with certain things.
00:43:00.000 So, George Takei went after President Trump, as you remember, for the P-word tape, saying that if you're famous, you can grab women by the bleep and get away with it.
00:43:09.000 Here's George Takei on Howard Stern's show, being asked about sexually assaulting men.
00:43:15.000 And the Fuhrer is non-existent.
00:43:16.000 It doesn't exist.
00:43:17.000 Listen to what Takei says here.
00:43:19.000 All your years involved with c**t, you never hassled anybody or grabbed their c**t?
00:43:22.000 I never c**t anybody by the c**t. Yeah.
00:43:24.000 Did you ever grab anyone by the c**t against their will?
00:43:28.000 Uh-oh.
00:43:30.000 Oh, no.
00:43:30.000 Well, they were different times.
00:43:32.000 You never sexually harassed anyone.
00:43:34.000 Hey, boner.
00:43:37.000 Have you?
00:43:37.000 Oh, my goodness.
00:43:41.000 You've got such a beautiful car.
00:43:44.000 It's some people that are kind of skittish.
00:43:50.000 Right.
00:43:51.000 Or maybe afraid.
00:43:55.000 And you're trying to persuade.
00:43:57.000 But, you know, do we need to call the police?
00:44:02.000 The answer is yes, you do need to call the police.
00:44:03.000 But Takei gets away with it.
00:44:04.000 And then what does Takei says?
00:44:05.000 He blames the Russians.
00:44:06.000 He literally tweeted out yesterday that this is only an issue because the Russians were making an issue out of it.
00:44:10.000 He said, a friend sent me this.
00:44:11.000 It is a chart of what Russian bots have been doing to amplify stories containing the allegations against me.
00:44:15.000 It's clear they want to cow me into silence.
00:44:17.000 But do not fear, friends.
00:44:18.000 I won't succumb to that.
00:44:20.000 Succumb to what?
00:44:22.000 First of all, there's nothing there about Russian bots.
00:44:24.000 People are talking about you because you said you grabbed dudes by the wiener.
00:44:28.000 Okay, that's literally what you said on Howard Stern's show in order to encourage them.
00:44:32.000 If you're a straight man doing that to a woman, you might be arrested.
00:44:36.000 Okay, but if you're on the left, I guess you get away with this kind of nonsense.
00:44:39.000 Okay, other things that I hate.
00:44:40.000 So I mentioned there's this New York Times column that's just astonishingly awful.
00:44:44.000 It's by a professor over at Yeshiva University, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law.
00:44:49.000 And this professor has written a piece basically saying that he doesn't want to teach his kids to be friends with white kids.
00:44:53.000 It starts off, the professor's name is Ikao Yanka.
00:44:57.000 And it says, my oldest son, wrestling with a four-year-old's happy struggles, is trying to clarify how many people can be his best friend.
00:45:02.000 He says, my best friends are you and mama and my brother, Ann, but even a child's joy is not immune to this ominous political period.
00:45:08.000 This summer's images of violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, prompted an array of questions.
00:45:12.000 Some people hate others because they are different, I offer lamely.
00:45:14.000 A childish but distinct panic entered his voice.
00:45:16.000 But I'm not different.
00:45:17.000 It is impossible to convey the mixture of heartbreak and fear I feel for him.
00:45:21.000 This thing continues for like 900 words?
00:45:38.000 about why you can't, if you're a black person, you can't have meaningful friendships with white people.
00:45:42.000 He says he wants to teach his child to distrust white people.
00:45:45.000 He says Martin Luther King's famous dream of black and white children holding hands was a dream precisely because he realized that in Alabama, conditions of dominance made real friendship between white and black people impossible.
00:45:54.000 Well, no, that's not what he said.
00:45:56.000 He said that he had a dream that one day that would be possible, and this guy is fighting against that.
00:46:01.000 He said, I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible.
00:46:04.000 It's a direct quote.
00:46:05.000 Imagine the races were reversed, and think about how Richard Spencer would write this, or John C. Calhoun.
00:46:10.000 He actually says, I mean it's astonishing, he says, I will teach my sons that their beautiful hue is a fault line.
00:46:17.000 Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside.
00:46:20.000 So I guess we're not all the same on the inside.
00:46:21.000 I mean, this is baseline racism being run in the op-ed page of the New York Times, but if you're on the left, you can get away with it.
00:46:26.000 Just astonishing stuff.
00:46:28.000 Again, I don't know if they're in a competition to run the worst editorial of all time every day, but each day they seem to be topping themselves over at the New York Times editorial page.
00:46:35.000 Okay, quick note.
00:46:36.000 Federalist 3, so we can do this one really quickly because this is one of the more famous Federalist papers.
00:46:41.000 We've been going through one of the Federalist papers each week.
00:46:43.000 We did Federalist 1 and 2 the last couple of weeks.
00:46:45.000 Now it's Federalist 3, this one written by John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.
00:46:49.000 This is long before that, of course.
00:46:50.000 So in this Federalist paper, Jay is trying to make the case that we should have one united country instead of a bunch of little countries, right?
00:46:58.000 Why we should be one country instead of a bunch of states that have their own foreign policy and borders.
00:47:02.000 He says that we need one united country to prevent foreign invasions.
00:47:05.000 He said local governments won't be able to follow sectional foreign policies because we'll have a national government instead.
00:47:12.000 And he makes this point.
00:47:12.000 He says it is of high importance to the peace of America that you observe the law of nations toward all these powers.
00:47:17.000 And to me, it appears evident that this will be more perfectly and punctually done by one national government than it could either be done by 13 separate states or by three or four distinct confederacies.
00:47:25.000 The idea being, if you want to bring war to the continent, all you have to do is have three or four different places on the continent each declaring war in their own good time, which of course is true.
00:47:33.000 And then he makes the point, he says, And this is true historically.
00:47:45.000 If you look at a lot of the conflicts with Native Americans, they were not driven by the federal government.
00:47:48.000 They were driven by various state governments seeking to enlarge their territory and mistreat Native Americans.
00:47:53.000 In many cases, the federal government was called in to militate against those states.
00:47:56.000 So this was the case that John Jay was making.
00:47:58.000 You need a national government because a series of smaller governments would generate more conflict and more.
00:48:03.000 That's certainly been true throughout American history.
00:48:06.000 Okay, so we will be back here tomorrow with all of the latest updates.
00:48:09.000 I'm speaking at UCLA tonight.
00:48:10.000 I believe it's sold out.
00:48:12.000 Maybe you can find some tickets online that you can find scalped or something.
00:48:15.000 But it's happening tonight at 6 p.m.
00:48:17.000 at UCLA, so I look forward to seeing you there.
00:48:18.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:48:19.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.