The Ben Shapiro Show - March 24, 2021


The Left’s Lies About “Whiteness” And Gun Control | Ep. 1222


Episode Stats

Length

45 minutes

Words per Minute

209.84445

Word Count

9,443

Sentence Count

605

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

In the aftermath of a mass shooting in Colorado, the left trots out its usual propaganda about gun control and whiteness, but the evidence just isn t there. Plus, Joe Biden pushing massive change. But just how fast is too fast? Ben Shapiro explains why the gun control call from the left is based on emotional appeals, not logic and reason, and why there is no evidence that gun control works in a country that already has 300 million guns in circulation. The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. You have a right to privacy. Defend your rights. At ExpressVPN, you can get a free, secure VPN service that allows you to access your most private information, including passwords, banking, and other sensitive data, at no extra fee. Use the promo code: PGPodcasts to get 20% off your first month with discount code PGPUNIVERSAL at checkout. PGP is the most popular VPN service in the entire world, and is the best way to access the most up-to-date and comprehensive library of all of the latest and the latest privacy tools, including the latest in the newest technologies and privacy tools available to protect your most precious data, including your favorite apps and social media platforms. If you don t already use PGP, you ll save $200 by becoming a patron patron! and get 10% off the entire PGP membership when you sign up for PGPardless! You ll get 15% off for the first month, plus an additional $5,000 when you upgrade your membership gets $50 or more, plus a FREE 3 months of PGP gets you get an ad-free version of the service, and a FREE 7GB of the PGPOSSIBLE, and PGPONION gets $25,000 gets you a year, plus I ll get $50,000, and I ll give you an extra $10,000 off my first month gets you an ad discount when you become a patron gets an ad on the entire course gets a course that gets me a course starting in the course gets $4, plus $4 VIP membership, I ll also get $4 GB gets a $4MB, and they get $5MB gets you $4 MB gets $5 GB4 VIP gets an entire course, and you get a $5 MB gets a FREE PRIVATE PROFESSIONAL PROMO, AND I ll receive an ad, AND a FREE FIBERPRODE?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 In the aftermath of a mass shooting in Colorado, the left trots out its usual propaganda about gun control and whiteness.
00:00:06.000 But the evidence just isn't there.
00:00:07.000 Plus, Joe Biden pushing massive change.
00:00:10.000 But just how fast?
00:00:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:11.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:18.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:20.000 You have a right to privacy.
00:00:21.000 Defend your rights at ExpressVPN.com.
00:00:23.000 Slash Ben will get to all the news of the day in just one second.
00:00:26.000 First, the word is out.
00:00:27.000 People are abandoning their overpriced wireless carriers and flocking to PeerTalk for the same coverage, but at a fraction of the price.
00:00:33.000 That's right.
00:00:33.000 If you're with Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile, switching to PeerTalk could save your family over $800 a year.
00:00:38.000 And switching is easy.
00:00:39.000 You can keep your phone, keep your number, or get huge discounts on the latest iPhones and Androids.
00:00:43.000 I got the iPhone 12.
00:00:44.000 I love it.
00:00:45.000 I'm getting the same great coverage, but for half the price.
00:00:47.000 Right now, you can get unlimited talk text and six gigs of data for just 30 bucks a month, which is a fantastic deal.
00:00:53.000 See, here's the thing.
00:00:54.000 The other wireless carriers, they're going to charge you up the wazoo because they're going to say that you need unlimited data.
00:00:59.000 You don't need unlimited data.
00:01:00.000 What you actually need is the deal that Pure Talk is about to give you.
00:01:03.000 Unlimited talk text, six gigs of data, because if you go over on the data, they're not even going to charge you for it.
00:01:08.000 There's a reason Pure Talk is the highest rated wireless company by Consumer Affairs.
00:01:11.000 Stop giving your money to overpriced wireless carriers.
00:01:14.000 Start saving money today.
00:01:15.000 From your cell phone, dial Pound 250.
00:01:17.000 Say Ben Shapiro.
00:01:18.000 You'll save 50% off your very first month.
00:01:20.000 That is Pound 250.
00:01:21.000 Say Ben Shapiro.
00:01:22.000 Dial Pound 250 right now.
00:01:24.000 Say keyword Ben Shapiro and you will get 50% off your first month and save hundreds of bucks down the road.
00:01:29.000 Pure Talk is simply smarter wireless.
00:01:31.000 Alrighty, so in the aftermath of this horrific shooting in Colorado, the left went into An almost mechanistic call for gun control.
00:01:40.000 Just like clockwork.
00:01:41.000 Every time there is a mass shooting, and that mass shooting particularly is a mass shooting that cannot be blamed on white supremacy, they make it about gun control, right?
00:01:52.000 So there's a certain formula the left likes to use.
00:01:54.000 If a mass shooting is performed by a person who is not white, they talk about gun control.
00:01:59.000 If the mass shooting is performed by a person who is white, they talk about white supremacy with like a little taste of gun control.
00:02:05.000 Well, right now, it turns out that the shooter in this particular case was not white.
00:02:08.000 He was apparently a Syrian immigrant who had serious mental illness problems.
00:02:13.000 And so this became immediately a call for gun control.
00:02:17.000 And understand that the call for gun control for the media is based on emotional appeal.
00:02:22.000 It is not based on a factually reasoned argument in favor of gun control, why gun control would work in a country that already has 300 million guns in circulation.
00:02:29.000 It is not a case that makes any sort of logical sense, any evidentiary sense.
00:02:34.000 Instead, it is a case that is solely and completely driven by a desire to cram down a moral premise on the rest of the world, which is that if you disagree with the left, then this means that in some way you're morally deficient.
00:02:45.000 This is the case members of the media make, and the way they make it is by getting very emotional on TV.
00:02:50.000 Now, I'm not denying that people on TV, the people you watch every night, get emotional about stories.
00:02:55.000 All I'm pointing out is that they only get emotional about certain stories, right?
00:02:59.000 They don't get emotional every time they talk about violence in Chicago over the weekend, which they barely talk about at all.
00:03:04.000 And there's ongoing violence in Chicago every weekend.
00:03:07.000 Dozens of people shot every single weekend in Chicago, and they don't seem to care very much about that.
00:03:11.000 You don't see people welling up on TV over that.
00:03:13.000 But every time there's a mass shooting, That is not to be blamed on sort of the regular dose of violence that you see in America's major cities.
00:03:20.000 If we're not talking about the increased murder rate around America's major cities, that is largely driven by lack of police, then they start to get very emotional.
00:03:28.000 So you'll see anchors get very emotional about the George Floyd situation, but you won't see anchors get emotional about small children being shot in the middle of gangland wars in Chicago or Washington DC or Los Angeles.
00:03:39.000 And you won't see anybody mourn the folks who are dying because there's lack of police in these cities.
00:03:44.000 So the emotion is part of the agenda.
00:03:46.000 Again, the emotion can be genuine and also part of the agenda.
00:03:48.000 I'm not questioning the genuineness of the CNN anchors when they get very sad about mass shootings, because we should all be very sad about mass shootings.
00:03:54.000 All I'm pointing out is the performative sadness that you see on your nightly newscast is in fact connected to a political agenda.
00:04:02.000 What they choose to air in terms of their own emotional vulnerability is deeply connected to the idea that if you don't agree with them on policy, it's because you aren't caring.
00:04:12.000 And that's what happened last night on CNN.
00:04:14.000 You had Brianna Keller of CNN and Stephanie Elam near tears on CNN over the mass shooting.
00:04:20.000 Again, I'm not doubting the sincerity of their emotion.
00:04:22.000 I'm just pointing out that the emotion only appears on TV with regard to particular kinds of stories because it is being used as a wedge in order to suggest that if you don't agree with CNN's preferred solutions, you just don't care enough about bad things happening.
00:04:37.000 You know, Stephanie, as I'm hearing you report this, I just wonder, can you count how many times you've covered a story like this?
00:04:48.000 Have you lost count?
00:04:50.000 I don't know anymore.
00:04:50.000 I don't.
00:04:52.000 And it makes me sad.
00:04:53.000 It makes me sad to even sit here and think about that, Brianna, that there's been so many times that we have had to go out and cover these stories and talk to people who are devastated.
00:05:04.000 Okay, so here's the thing.
00:05:06.000 In the United States every year, there are over 19,000 homicides in the United States every single year.
00:05:10.000 The number of people who are killed in mass shootings in the United States every year Is generally, I mean, any number, any one of these is obviously a tragedy.
00:05:18.000 It should never happen.
00:05:19.000 We all agree.
00:05:20.000 OK, but the number of people who are killed in mass shootings of this kind, these sort of spectacular on TV blanket coverage mass shootings, it's probably not even 100 a year in terms of these kinds of shootings.
00:05:32.000 Okay, but the way that the media treat these shootings, as opposed to the other 19,000 homicides that happen every single year in the United States, does tell you something about their approach to these issues.
00:05:44.000 So the left will tell you, for example, that the right focuses, when there's a terror attack, the right will focus far too much on the terror attacks because your risk of actually dying in a terror attack is pretty low.
00:05:52.000 Your risk of dying in a mass shooting in a country of 330 million people is actually quite low.
00:05:58.000 Okay, your risk of being killed in a generalized homicide is higher.
00:06:01.000 Even that is pretty low in the United States, which is overall a pretty safe country.
00:06:06.000 But the way the media cover this stuff is to suggest that these particular shootings are a grave threat to every single American citizen.
00:06:14.000 This is anecdotal data being presented as systemic data, in the same way that the George Floyd death was presented as systemic police violence, even though we don't know that it actually was racist, even though we still have to find out whether it was, in fact, a homicide or not.
00:06:32.000 That was presented as systemic, even though the data don't support that.
00:06:36.000 Mass shootings are presented as systemic, even though the data really don't support that.
00:06:40.000 And not only that, because they are presented as systemic, the idea is that this is a high priority for the United States, and it requires massive restrictions.
00:06:47.000 In order to massively restrict the individual rights of Americans to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment, you have to say that this is such a grave threat to the life and liberty of Americans that it justifies an encroachment on one of the fundamental rights held by 330 million Americans.
00:07:01.000 And so you have to say that the threat is supremely grave.
00:07:04.000 Not just that these incidents are acts of evil, that the people who commit them should be punished, that we should take every measure available without invading individual rights in order to stop them.
00:07:12.000 That's not enough.
00:07:13.000 Because what the left wants to do here is to invade your rights.
00:07:17.000 And so what you have is the media attempting to play up the idea that this stuff is happening like all the time in the United States.
00:07:23.000 So you have a piece from Philip Bump over at the Washington Post that says, the mass shooting in Colorado is probably only one of scores that have occurred during your lifetime.
00:07:31.000 He says it is with some grim irony that the United States had relatively few mass shootings last year.
00:07:35.000 The country had been averaging about seven such events annually since 2012, using the Washington Post's relatively conservative definition of such incidents as those in which four or more people are killed.
00:07:44.000 In 2020, there were only five, but then much of the country spent a decent part of the year isolated from one another and out of school because of the COVID pandemic.
00:07:51.000 Okay, so, number one, if a country averages seven incidents annually, this is according to the Washington Post, since 2012, in a country of 330 million people, that does not present a systemic risk to every American sufficient to justify a gun seizure on hundreds of millions of Americans, obviously.
00:08:07.000 So instead, what you'll see is playing with the data.
00:08:09.000 Because there are certain places the media can't go here.
00:08:11.000 If they were to talk about the generalized homicide problem in the United States, which actually is a broader risk to Americans, they would have to talk about the need for more police.
00:08:18.000 That's not a solution they want to talk about.
00:08:20.000 If they were to talk about where the risk of homicide is highest, they would have to talk about the fact that it is not being driven by quote-unquote Trumpian white supremacy, but that it is being driven by gangland violence and broken families and real problems that exist in America's major cities and that are exacerbated by lack of police.
00:08:36.000 That gun control in the middle of rural America would not actually stop this stuff.
00:08:39.000 So they pick a specific subset, a certain type of shooting, and then they declare that that type of shooting is the highest priority to stop for some yet-to-be-explained reason, as opposed to the other 19,000 homicides that occur every year in the United States.
00:08:51.000 And then they say that you are bad and unsympathetic if you don't agree with their solution to a problem that, on the list of problems facing everyday Americans, is not number one, it's not number two, it's probably not number ten.
00:09:03.000 Okay, it is, again, every one of these incidents is a tragedy.
00:09:07.000 That does not mean that the tragedy is sufficient to justify the seizure of guns from some hundreds of millions of Americans or banning the ability of Americans to obtain weapons to defend themselves, their rights, and their families.
00:09:18.000 So, you will see a couple of tricks that are played here.
00:09:20.000 One is the idea that Europe doesn't have stuff like this.
00:09:23.000 That Europe doesn't have mass shootings like this.
00:09:25.000 The United States is the only place on Earth that has mass shootings like this.
00:09:31.000 There is some level of truth to that, but not as much truth as the left would have you believe.
00:09:36.000 The idea here is that somehow gun control is the real solution here.
00:09:41.000 Well, I mean, that's not true.
00:09:42.000 The reality is that some of the safest states in America have extraordinary levels of gun ownership.
00:09:46.000 Vermont has extraordinary levels of gun ownership, very lax gun laws.
00:09:50.000 And yet Vermont happens to have pretty much no murder.
00:09:53.000 Chicago has extremely onerous gun regulations and very high levels of murder.
00:09:57.000 Washington DC has extremely onerous gun regulations.
00:09:59.000 Baltimore has extremely onerous gun regulations and very high levels of murder.
00:10:04.000 So the correlation just doesn't even hold as far as that goes.
00:10:08.000 But the Washington Post, I mean, by the way, Philip Bump will even acknowledge this in paragraph, what, six of this piece?
00:10:15.000 He says, it's important to maintain perspective.
00:10:17.000 Mass shootings are the cause of only small percentages of death in the United States, and only a small percentage of gun deaths, most of which are suicides.
00:10:24.000 No other country experiences such incidents at the same rate as the United States, and the shootings play a disproportionate role in our culture, both because of the fear they invoke and the complicated systems we've developed to prepare for them.
00:10:34.000 Okay, well, but that's being driven by the outsized media coverage.
00:10:38.000 One of the things we do here at The Daily Wire is we don't cover the names of shooters because we don't actually want to incentivize shooters who believe that they're going to get famous off the back of this sort of stuff.
00:10:46.000 I wish members of the media would do the same.
00:10:49.000 But it is, I mean, Bump here is acknowledging that this is the number one story at The Washington Post, right, is the importance of gun control, this particular shooting.
00:10:59.000 And the reason for that is because they want these shootings to play a disproportionate role in our culture because they justify the kinds of policies that they're looking for.
00:11:06.000 Again, if they were to focus on the broader murder problem in the United States, they would recognize heavy gun controls in major cities have not stopped the murder problem.
00:11:12.000 You know what stops the murder problem in America's major cities, which is predominantly where these murders happen?
00:11:17.000 More cops.
00:11:17.000 They don't want more cops.
00:11:18.000 They want to defund the cops.
00:11:19.000 So they've got a couple of priorities.
00:11:21.000 One, you can't have any sort of reportage that leads to the Objectively true conclusion that we need more cops?
00:11:30.000 You can only have reportage that leads to the conclusion that happens to be wrong, that gun control is justified.
00:11:36.000 And you need an emotional response that is broadcast on the air by pretty much everybody, because that emotional response is an attempt to say to everybody that if you disagree with us, it's because you just don't care enough.
00:11:47.000 Again, two things can be true at once.
00:11:48.000 The emotion can be genuine on the part of the left, and also, the genuine emotion is rather selective in its application to particular circumstances.
00:11:57.000 So as Philip Bump says, he says, let's conduct an experiment.
00:12:00.000 If you had to guess, how many mass shootings would you estimate have occurred in your lifetime?
00:12:04.000 See how close you were to the actual number.
00:12:04.000 Have your guess now.
00:12:06.000 The phenomenon is pervasive, both geographically and across time.
00:12:09.000 Except that, I'm sorry, in a country of 330 million people, seven incidents according to the Washington Post per year.
00:12:15.000 That is not extraordinarily pervasive.
00:12:17.000 It's a country of 330 million people.
00:12:21.000 You cannot say that incidents that happen seven times a year on average since 2012 are quote-unquote extraordinarily pervasive across time in a country of 330 million people.
00:12:30.000 This is not to downplay the evil at all.
00:12:33.000 This is to point out the statistical rarity of events like this, which is why they make the front pages.
00:12:39.000 Hey, and this is all part of a broader agenda, right?
00:12:41.000 Because the Washington Post has a piece today by Adam Taylor and Amanda Coletta, same day as the Philip bump.
00:12:46.000 I mean, they're right next to each other on the Washington Post website that says, here's how other countries have responded to mass shootings.
00:12:52.000 And of course, the answer is they banned a bunch of guns because this is what the media would like.
00:12:56.000 The media are pushing this stuff extremely, extremely hard.
00:13:00.000 In Britain, they decided that they were essentially going to collect firearms.
00:13:08.000 The 1997 Firearms Act ended up restricting ownership of almost all handguns.
00:13:12.000 The Washington Post isn't just reporting on this, because that's not New Reportage.
00:13:15.000 It happened in 1987.
00:13:16.000 If it happened in 1997, it is by definition not news.
00:13:16.000 Or 1997, rather.
00:13:22.000 So now they're just reporting what other countries have done to remind you that we could do the same here.
00:13:26.000 And presumably that would lead to this giant decrease in mass shootings, except for the fact that the baseline level of mass shootings in these countries was also rare.
00:13:33.000 You hear this about Australia.
00:13:35.000 Well, look at Australia's had a drop off in the number of mass shootings since their massive gun buyback program.
00:13:39.000 One, only one third of people actually turned in their guns in the buyback program.
00:13:42.000 And two, the number of actual mass shootings in Australia was statistically marginal in the first place.
00:13:47.000 So any decline in the number of mass shootings cannot be attributed directly to gun confiscation.
00:13:52.000 Okay, but this entire Washington Post piece is all about basically why gun seizures are a good idea.
00:13:57.000 They cite Britain, they cite New Zealand, they cite Australia.
00:14:01.000 They cite Canada, but the idea is that in the United States, we just don't have the moral wherewithal to do all of this.
00:14:07.000 It's not about the moral wherewithal.
00:14:08.000 We have a different calculation of risk, reward, and rights in the United States than they do in many of these other countries where the government is overbearing or public safety is, in some cases, much more problematic.
00:14:19.000 For example, the rape rates in Great Britain are apparently significantly higher than they are in the United States.
00:14:25.000 In part, because in the United States, a lot of women own guns.
00:14:27.000 You wanna know the great equalizer for women in the United States?
00:14:30.000 It's amazing.
00:14:30.000 The same people who will say that America has a deep and abiding rape culture in which women are in constant danger of men, wants to take guns away from women.
00:14:36.000 You're gonna have to explain that one to me.
00:14:38.000 It also happens to be statistically untrue that the United States leads the world in mass shootings.
00:14:44.000 According to John Miltimore, writing for the Free Enterprise, for the Foundation for Economic Education, He says, the dominant narrative is that we as a country have to reckon with the fact that mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries.
00:15:01.000 But that is not right.
00:15:03.000 John Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center shows that the U.S.
00:15:06.000 trails many other advanced nations in mass shooting frequency as well as death rate.
00:15:10.000 If you compare the annual death rate from mass public shootings between the United States and other countries from January 2009 to December of 2015, Norway ranks one, then Serbia, France, Macedonia, Albania, Slovakia, Switzerland, Finland, Belgium, Czech Republic, and then the United States.
00:15:24.000 And when it comes to the frequency of mass public shootings, the ranking goes Macedonia, Albania, Serbia, Switzerland, Norway, Slovakia, Finland, Belgium, Austria, Czech Republic, France, and then the United States.
00:15:35.000 So yes, the U.S.
00:15:36.000 rate is still high, and it's nothing to be extremely proud of, as Investors Business Daily noted.
00:15:41.000 But the reality is that mass shootings do happen in other places.
00:15:47.000 And a lot of this is definitional.
00:15:49.000 So the way that you increase the bar for how many mass shootings happen in the United States is by decreasing the number of people who are shot in a mass shooting.
00:15:57.000 But the problem is once you do that, you then have to go into the type of crime that is actually being committed.
00:16:02.000 If you set the numbers for mass shootings at like two or three people, you're going to include a lot of gangland violence.
00:16:08.000 And then that completely screws up the left's narrative, because the left's narrative is that it is basically white people with long guns who are committing a huge number of these mass shootings.
00:16:15.000 And on the homicide rate, that actually is just not true, which ties into the second narrative, which we are going to get to in just one moment.
00:16:20.000 And the media jumped into this one, I mean, completely unprepared for the reality of the situation.
00:16:25.000 And that is every mass shooting is a white guy.
00:16:27.000 Okay, that is the other part of this.
00:16:29.000 So the media has a dual narrative when it comes to mass shootings.
00:16:32.000 One, it's guns' fault.
00:16:34.000 Two, it's whiteness' fault.
00:16:36.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:16:37.000 First, let us talk about safety and security at your front door.
00:16:42.000 This time of year, you got a lot of people stopping by that front door.
00:16:44.000 You got people working on your house.
00:16:46.000 If you got people who are delivering packages.
00:16:48.000 If you have people who are delivering groceries.
00:16:49.000 You got a lot going on on that front porch.
00:16:51.000 Well, here's the thing.
00:16:52.000 If you're out of town or if you're at the office, you have no idea who's at your front porch.
00:16:54.000 You want to know.
00:16:55.000 This is why you need your Ring devices.
00:16:58.000 A lot happens at our front door.
00:16:59.000 That's one thing that definitely has not changed.
00:17:01.000 At my house, I'm getting a lot more grocery drop-offs, restaurant drop-offs, friends and family for the kids.
00:17:07.000 I need to know who's at the front door.
00:17:08.000 And this is why I have Ring devices on the home.
00:17:10.000 In fact, when we moved from California to Florida, first thing my wife said is, get the Ring device on the front door.
00:17:14.000 Also, we have Ring devices around our house because I have three children.
00:17:17.000 There's only one of me.
00:17:18.000 They wake me up at ungodly hours and then run around as I basically sack out on the couch.
00:17:23.000 How am I supposed to keep an eye on all three of them?
00:17:25.000 The answer is Ring.
00:17:26.000 I love having the Ring video doorbell.
00:17:28.000 I've actually added those Ring security cameras around the house as well.
00:17:30.000 You can see and speak to whoever is at your door from anywhere with video doorbells.
00:17:33.000 You can keep an eye on every corner of your house with easy to install indoor and outdoor cams.
00:17:37.000 You can protect your whole home with Ring Alarm, a powerful, affordable whole home security system you can easily install yourself.
00:17:42.000 Right now, get a special offer on the Ring Welcome Kit at ring.com.
00:17:45.000 It comes with the Ring Video Doorbell 3 and the Chime Pro.
00:17:48.000 It's the perfect way to upgrade your front door and start your Ring experience.
00:17:52.000 Head on over to ring.com.
00:17:53.000 Again, that is ring.com.
00:17:56.000 To get started.
00:17:57.000 Okay, so in the aftermath of this particular shooting in Colorado.
00:18:00.000 And remember, this comes in the aftermath of this awful shooting in Atlanta, where a white guy shot eight people, including six Asian Americans.
00:18:07.000 And the media immediately, without any evidence, declared this as evidence of broader Trumpian white supremacy.
00:18:12.000 Again, evidence that this is a hate crime?
00:18:14.000 Still completely absent in that particular case.
00:18:16.000 Maybe it'll be found.
00:18:17.000 Haven't been found yet.
00:18:19.000 You'd figure you probably have found it by now, if you were looking for it.
00:18:23.000 But the media immediately jumped to the conclusion, after the Colorado shooting, the identity of the shooter was not immediately released to the media.
00:18:30.000 Now, there's a pattern in the media.
00:18:32.000 And the pattern in the media tends to be that when the shooter is white, this is why conservatives held off on this.
00:18:37.000 When the shooter is white, the identity is immediately released to the media, generally.
00:18:43.000 Almost immediately, like within a couple of hours.
00:18:45.000 Because once the guy's in custody, you got the guy in custody.
00:18:48.000 So then it's just a question of when the police decide to reveal the identity of the person in custody.
00:18:52.000 When the person is non-white, not only will the police wait on actually breaking the news, the media will then downplay exactly the race or ethnicity of the person.
00:18:59.000 Because again, all of this plays into broader narratives about what the country should do, not with regard to things like immigration or things like race, God forbid, but what the country should do with regard to things like more policing, what sort of measures should be taken.
00:19:11.000 But for the left, because every problem in America can be attributed to quote-unquote white supremacy and whiteness, they immediately jumped into the story and got the story completely wrong.
00:19:19.000 You have to understand that for the left right now, whiteness is what atheists say about religious people.
00:19:25.000 They call it the god of the gaps.
00:19:26.000 So atheists will frequently say about religious people that religious people Can't prove God.
00:19:30.000 They can't prove that God exists.
00:19:32.000 So what they'll do is they'll look at the universe, and then if there's something unexplained, they'll say, ah, God.
00:19:36.000 Right?
00:19:36.000 So quantum mechanics happens, and it completely throws off some Einsteinian theories about how the universe works, and religious believers will go, ah, God.
00:19:45.000 And atheists will say, no, that's not God.
00:19:47.000 You just don't understand how that works.
00:19:49.000 And God doesn't necessarily fill in that gap, right?
00:19:51.000 That's the God of the gaps.
00:19:52.000 Okay, well, for the left, They have whiteness and white supremacy of the gaps.
00:19:56.000 If there is a story they don't like, they just explain it with regard to whiteness.
00:20:00.000 We saw this with regard to discrimination against Asian Americans.
00:20:04.000 If black Americans are beating up Asian Americans in disproportionate numbers, that is because of white supremacy and America's systems of power.
00:20:09.000 If Asian Americans are succeeding too well in the system, that's because Asian Americans are buying into systems of white supremacy.
00:20:15.000 And if white people are targeting Asian Americans, that's also because of white supremacy.
00:20:19.000 So no matter what, the grand unifying field theory of American politics for the left is white supremacy.
00:20:23.000 So they tried to apply this without evidence to the Colorado shooting.
00:20:26.000 This was their immediate jump.
00:20:27.000 They immediately jumped into this was a white guy because there was a picture released and the guy looked white.
00:20:32.000 Well, it turns out the guy's not white.
00:20:33.000 The guy's actually Syrian.
00:20:35.000 And it turns out that mass shooters are not always white.
00:20:37.000 In fact, according to Statista, of the 120 or so mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and March 2021, about half of them are done by white people.
00:20:47.000 But the other half are not done by white people, which is roughly the racial distribution of the United States generally.
00:20:56.000 And so that myth is just not true in the first place, that all mass shooters are white.
00:20:59.000 And that is something that is promulgated by the media because the media wishes to suggest that white people with guns present the true threat to the United States.
00:21:08.000 And blue checkmarks jumped into this immediately.
00:21:12.000 They started jumping into this, like, right away.
00:21:13.000 They started tweeting out over and over and over that the shooter was white, and this just demonstrates that America is a white supremacist country.
00:21:19.000 And also, because the police arrested this guy after wounding him, as opposed to just shooting him dead, that's because they liked him.
00:21:25.000 The police were racist.
00:21:27.000 It doesn't matter that a cop was actually shot to death by the guy.
00:21:29.000 The police were racist because they like the white guy, but they never take the black guy alive, which is just a lie.
00:21:33.000 It is just overtly untrue, okay?
00:21:35.000 But you have some comment, some blue check, Julie DeCaro, who wrote, extremely tired of people's lives depending on whether a white man with an AR-15 is having a good day or not.
00:21:45.000 Okay, again, untrue.
00:21:45.000 We have Alex Cole tweeting out, a white man walked into a grocery store in Boulder, not true, killed 10 people and was apprehended by the police and walked out of the building completely unharmed.
00:21:54.000 Right down the street, police killed Elijah McClain while he apologized for not doing anything wrong.
00:21:59.000 Okay, again, untrue.
00:22:01.000 They thought that he was, they thought that they had to give him a drug because he was responding in incoherent ways to their commands.
00:22:09.000 It may, in fact, be a homicide case.
00:22:11.000 I believe it's being brought as a homicide case right now.
00:22:13.000 But what these two things have to do with each other, the answer is nothing.
00:22:16.000 Kasim Rashid, Esquire, another blue check, he tweeted out, Beyond infuriating that the Colorado terrorist killed a cop but was arrested alive while cops shot Tamir Rice dead for holding a toy because the cop feared for his life, how is an unarmed black child more frightening than a grown white male mass murderer?
00:22:31.000 Reckless.
00:22:32.000 I don't understand.
00:22:33.000 Were you there?
00:22:34.000 Did, like, what?
00:22:37.000 What?
00:22:38.000 Okay, so this is just the narrative that builds up every time, right?
00:22:40.000 When the shooter in Charleston Well, the police tried to arrest a lot of people without killing them.
00:22:55.000 If the police killed everybody who presented a general threat to the public, there'd be a lot more dead people in the United States, of all races.
00:23:01.000 But that doesn't matter.
00:23:02.000 The narrative has to be promulgated.
00:23:04.000 The narrative is always again.
00:23:05.000 White supremacy is the answer, even if it's clearly not white supremacy, as we'll see in a second.
00:23:09.000 Michael Harriot of The Root, who's just awful, he tweeted out, pointing out how white suspects get the benefit of the doubt without being stopped, frisked, beaten, shot, or killed is not a call for harsh treatment.
00:23:17.000 It simply means we know cops are capable of treating people humanely, just not us.
00:23:22.000 Y'all could use a few more ass whoopings, though.
00:23:26.000 He's just a bad person.
00:23:27.000 I'm sorry, just a bad person.
00:23:28.000 First of all, there is tape of white people being beat to death by police officers unjustifiably or shot unjustifiably by the police.
00:23:36.000 In fact, there are studies done, it says that actually police tend to disproportionately shoot white suspects in dangerous situations as opposed to black suspects in situations.
00:23:46.000 And that does not matter apparently at all.
00:23:48.000 Not only does that not matter, it does not matter that the suspect in this case was not white.
00:23:54.000 The suspect, Kamala Harris' niece, tweeted out about this and actually had to delete her own tweet about the white shooter.
00:23:59.000 She tweeted out, the Atlanta shooting was not even a week ago.
00:24:01.000 Violent white men are the greatest terrorist threat to our country.
00:24:04.000 Violent white men are the greatest terrorist threat to our country.
00:24:07.000 And then she tweeted out, I deleted a previous tweet about the suspect in the Boulder shooting.
00:24:11.000 I made an assumption based on his being taken into custody alive.
00:24:13.000 And the fact that the majority of mass shootings in the United States are carried out by white men.
00:24:17.000 Okay, so in other words, you made an assumption about some shooting based on general racial statistics?
00:24:24.000 Interesting.
00:24:26.000 Interesting you should do that.
00:24:28.000 If you're on the left, you can get away with anything.
00:24:31.000 Anything!
00:24:32.000 By the way, solid apology right there.
00:24:34.000 That is not even an apology.
00:24:35.000 That's like, well, you know, I made an assumption.
00:24:37.000 First of all, you know what?
00:24:38.000 The majority of people who live in this country are white, which means that for virtually any stat you can choose, the majority of people who do it are white.
00:24:45.000 Okay, like, so?
00:24:48.000 The majority of people who eat hot dogs in the United States are white.
00:24:51.000 So, I saw a guy eating a hot dog.
00:24:52.000 What color was he?
00:24:53.000 Well, he's probably white because, like, what?
00:24:56.000 What are you even talking about?
00:24:58.000 It's statistical, statistical incompetence.
00:25:03.000 Okay, so as it turns out, all of this immediately fell apart because, unfortunately for the left-wing narrative about how whiteness is the greatest threat to America, This particular gunman happened not to be white.
00:25:14.000 He was a Syrian-born person.
00:25:16.000 And not only that, he ranted about Islamophobes hacking his phone.
00:25:20.000 He was apparently suffering from mental illness.
00:25:24.000 The person's brother told the Daily Beast he was very antisocial and has been paranoid since high school.
00:25:29.000 The brother described him as mentally ill, said he'd been bullied in school and it was not politically motivated.
00:25:34.000 His sister-in-law said she'd seen him playing with a gun recently but did not suspect him of violence.
00:25:38.000 And also, he tweeted out a bunch of stuff that was kind of supportive of ISIS over the past few years.
00:25:44.000 He tweeted out about how Trump was terrible.
00:25:48.000 This seems like a mentally ill person.
00:25:51.000 He ranted about Trump, he ranted about refugees.
00:25:55.000 He happens to have been a Muslim, although we don't know that Islam was actually the motivation in the shooting.
00:25:59.000 Looks more like mental illness.
00:26:01.000 But in any case, this does not comport with the fact pattern that the left would like to promulgate.
00:26:06.000 But that does not matter.
00:26:08.000 And the left never acknowledges its own hypocrisy on this score.
00:26:11.000 Ilhan Omar had just the best set of tweets on this.
00:26:13.000 So Ilhan Omar tweeted out two things, right?
00:26:16.000 So, a week ago, after the Atlanta shooting, Ilhan Omar tweeted out, And then, like, a week later, Ilhan Omar tweeted out, The shooters race or ethnicity seems front and center when they aren't.
00:26:34.000 They aren't white.
00:26:35.000 Otherwise, it's just a mentally ill young man having a bad day.
00:26:38.000 Narratives drive our responses to awful crimes committed against innocent people.
00:26:41.000 Pay attention to these responses and who is targeted.
00:26:43.000 Literally a week ago, she was targeting the Atlanta shooting as race-based and talking about the race of the shooter.
00:26:51.000 Now, you can't mention the race of the shooter because if you do, then you're targeting people based on race.
00:26:56.000 It's unreal.
00:26:57.000 So, notice something here, okay?
00:26:59.000 Notice that when the left uses racism as a charge, or when they bring up white supremacy as a charge, all of this seems to be politically motivated.
00:27:09.000 Pretty much all of it.
00:27:11.000 It is a tool.
00:27:12.000 They can charge their opponents with racism and then be as racist as they could possibly want to be, even if the evidence doesn't back the position.
00:27:19.000 This is twice in the course of two weeks that the left got the narrative completely wrong, and it's still gonna be rammed down America's throat.
00:27:25.000 In Atlanta, the narrative was that it was white supremacy that was behind the shooting and that it was connected to Trump and the Wuhan virus and all of this kind of stuff.
00:27:31.000 And it wasn't true.
00:27:32.000 There's no evidence of it.
00:27:33.000 And then the entire media jumped on the idea that this guy was treated in Colorado with kid gloves because he was white.
00:27:37.000 And it turns out he wasn't even white.
00:27:41.000 Again, it's all about power.
00:27:42.000 Whatever is the brick bat at hand, you have to use it.
00:27:45.000 And because it's all about power, and because the Democrats want transformational change, they are now, of course, calling, like clockwork, for gun control.
00:27:51.000 Alright, we're gonna get to the actual call for gun control, which was inevitable.
00:27:54.000 It was going to happen.
00:27:55.000 It's like clockwork.
00:27:56.000 Every time something happens, the left immediately twists it to their advantage and to push their agenda.
00:28:02.000 We'll get to that in just one moment.
00:28:03.000 First, if you haven't heard by now, But honestly, if you listen to the show, you would have heard Candace Owens has a brand new talk show with us exclusively at DailyWire.com.
00:28:11.000 The full show might be available to DailyWire members only, but Candace is also a podcast you can listen to on Apple, Spotify, anywhere else you get your podcasts.
00:28:19.000 The Candace podcast features several breakout segments from the full-length show.
00:28:22.000 It includes interviews, panel discussions, her advice corner.
00:28:24.000 The podcast is so good, it reached number two on the Apple podcast chart just after the first episode.
00:28:29.000 If you need some Candace Owens in your podcast feed, look no further.
00:28:32.000 Head on over to Apple Podcasts or Spotify, subscribe today.
00:28:35.000 Be sure to leave a five-star review if you like what you hear.
00:28:38.000 you're listening to the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:28:41.000 So naturally the Biden administration is calling So naturally, the Biden administration is calling for gun control.
00:28:49.000 Understand, this is all part of their broader pitch, which is that Joe Biden needs to rule the world.
00:28:54.000 This man who is falling apart, This administration that has 50-plus Kamala Harris in the Senate is going to try to ram everything they possibly can through.
00:29:04.000 Axios is reporting that now Joe Biden, you know, Captain Propriety, you know, the lion of the Senate, this longtime institutionalist, he's now looking at nuking the filibuster.
00:29:14.000 According to Axios, President Biden recently held an undisclosed East Room session with historians that included discussion of how big is too big, how fast is too fast, to jam through once-in-a-lifetime historic changes to America.
00:29:25.000 Four things are pushing Biden to jam through what could amount to a $5 trillion-plus overhaul of America and vast changes to voting immigration and inequality.
00:29:33.000 One, his full party control of Congress.
00:29:34.000 Two, his party activists egging him on.
00:29:36.000 Three, he has strong gathering economic wins at his back.
00:29:39.000 And four, he is popular in the polls.
00:29:41.000 Naturally, presidential historian Michael Beschloss, who's a big government hack, told Axios that FDR and LBJ may be the closest analogs to Joe Biden.
00:29:51.000 People close to Biden say he is feeling bullish on what he can accomplish.
00:29:54.000 He is fully prepared to support dashing the Senate filibuster rule to allow Democrats to pass voting rights and other trophy legislation for his party.
00:30:01.000 One, because he loves the narrative that he is bigger and bolder than Obama.
00:30:05.000 It's making him happy.
00:30:06.000 The Obama administration is ticked about this, by the way.
00:30:08.000 Obama is unhappy at this because he wants to be Captain Transformation, but it turns out that it is Biden, the old man, who is coming in and just showing him up.
00:30:17.000 Mitch McConnell says this will create such a fissure between the parties that it will be Nuclear winter.
00:30:22.000 But that's basically right.
00:30:24.000 By the way, that is really not the risk.
00:30:25.000 The risk is not that nothing gets done in the Senate.
00:30:27.000 The risk is that a bunch of stuff gets done in the Senate and that state governors just say, we are not going to go along with any of this.
00:30:32.000 You want to exacerbate the country's national divides.
00:30:34.000 You want to make sure that red states just stop helping out the federal government.
00:30:38.000 You want to make sure that the country starts to fracture at all of its seams.
00:30:42.000 Do exactly what Joe Biden is doing right now.
00:30:44.000 And by the way, do it on the issue of gun control.
00:30:46.000 If Joe Biden tries to nuke the filibuster in order to cram down federal gun control, In complete contravention of the Constitution of the United States?
00:30:55.000 Good luck.
00:30:56.000 If you think that citizens of Texas or Alabama or Tennessee or Florida are going to sit still and let the federal government tell them what to do with their guns, the federal government's going to have another thing coming.
00:31:05.000 You want to exacerbate conflict to the point of possible violence, that is the exact way to do it.
00:31:10.000 See, here's the thing that the left needs to understand about gun ownership for people who are not of the far left in the United States.
00:31:16.000 It is a fundamental right in the United States to be able to protect yourself, including with guns.
00:31:22.000 The reason to own guns is to stop people from violating your fundamental rights.
00:31:26.000 And the first sign that your fundamental rights are about to be violated is when someone comes to your door and demands your guns.
00:31:31.000 Okay, so this is a completely self-defeating proposal.
00:31:33.000 Nonetheless, this is exactly what Biden is apparently pushing for.
00:31:36.000 And now he's talking about nuking the filibuster in order to do all of this stuff.
00:31:40.000 So Jen Psaki announced yesterday that Biden is considering executive action on guns.
00:31:45.000 She apparently said, putting in place common sense gun safety measures has been a passion of the president since he was in the Senate.
00:31:50.000 By the way, common sense gun safety measures, that is a euphemism for gun control measures that have no evidentiary backing, right?
00:31:58.000 Like the 1994 assault weapons ban, which studies demonstrate did nothing to stop mass shootings or to decline the rate of homicide in the United States.
00:32:05.000 Apparently, according to Jen Psaki, Position on the filibuster has not changed as of yet, but we are considering a range of levers, including working through legislation, including executive action that has been under discussion, will continue to be under discussion.
00:32:18.000 Joe Biden himself came out and called for gun control yesterday.
00:32:20.000 Of course he did.
00:32:22.000 I don't need to wait another minute, let alone an hour, to take common sense steps that will save the lives in the future and to urge my colleagues in the House and Senate to act.
00:32:35.000 We can ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines in this country once again.
00:32:42.000 I got that done when I was a senator.
00:32:44.000 It passed.
00:32:45.000 It was law for the longest time.
00:32:47.000 And it brought down these mass killings.
00:32:50.000 We should do it again.
00:32:52.000 No, it did not bring down the mass killings.
00:32:54.000 The evidence on that is scanty to nil.
00:32:56.000 Okay, and again, watching this incoherent president try to push forward a massive gun grab is pretty impressive stuff.
00:33:03.000 Now, by the way, the first notion that you should have that the government is about to invade your rights is when they tell you they're not about to invade your rights.
00:33:10.000 When they assure you that they're not about to come for your wallet, they're coming for your wallet.
00:33:12.000 And when they assure you that they are not coming for your gun, pretty good time to start buying rifles from Bravo Company Manufacturing before the government tries to make it illegal to do so.
00:33:21.000 So when Vice President Kamala Harris says, don't worry, you know, they keep saying we're coming for your guns.
00:33:26.000 Yes, because you keep saying you're coming for our guns.
00:33:28.000 That would be why.
00:33:29.000 I remember when Hillary Clinton said this in 2016.
00:33:32.000 In the 2016 campaign, she was like, they keep saying that I want to come for your guns.
00:33:35.000 I don't want to come for your guns.
00:33:36.000 I just want an Australian gun buyback program.
00:33:38.000 Oh, you mean the mandatory gun buyback program in Australia?
00:33:40.000 Where they came for the guns?
00:33:41.000 Like that?
00:33:42.000 Here's Kamala Harris saying, you don't need to feel threatened.
00:33:45.000 All we're going to do is, you know, massive gun legislation.
00:33:49.000 And I believe that it is possible, it has to be possible, that people agree that these slaughters have to stop.
00:33:59.000 And this is, again, reject the false choice and stop pushing it for sure.
00:34:03.000 Stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody's trying to come after your guns.
00:34:07.000 That is not what we're talking about.
00:34:09.000 Then who's, and I love the report there, yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:34:13.000 No, but then whose guns are you coming after?
00:34:16.000 Like whose?
00:34:17.000 Whose guns?
00:34:18.000 That should be the question.
00:34:19.000 Not what kind of guns.
00:34:20.000 Whose guns?
00:34:21.000 Because what I've noticed is that you are not targeting criminals.
00:34:25.000 Right now, they want felons to vote, but they want you, the law-abiding citizen, not to be able to get a gun.
00:34:29.000 This is the Democratic agenda at this point.
00:34:32.000 Again, the evidence that the 1994 assault weapons ban did a damn thing is just not there.
00:34:38.000 According to the Foundation for Economic Education, These studies demonstrate that there is no evidence assault weapons ban reduced the homicide rate.
00:34:49.000 Between 1994 and 2004, the federal government banned the manufacture, sale, or transfer of assault weapons in large capacity magazines.
00:34:55.000 A DOJ study found no evidence the ban had any effect on gun violence and stated it should be renewed, that should it be renewed, the ban's effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for a liable measurement.
00:35:06.000 Because again, if you're going to look at the kinds of guns that are most frequently used in homicides, they are not long guns.
00:35:10.000 They are not rifles.
00:35:12.000 And they are certainly not rifles that are used in mass shootings.
00:35:15.000 The number of mass shooting homicides involving assault weapons between 2007 and 2017, that's a 10-year period, was 253.
00:35:18.000 The number of total homicides in the United States was 150,000.
00:35:21.000 The number of gun homicides in that period was 104,000.
00:35:22.000 The number of total homicides in the United States was 150,000.
00:35:26.000 The number of gun homicides in that period was 104,000.
00:35:31.000 253 mass shooting homicides involving assault weapons happened during that period.
00:35:36.000 So your notion is that you're going to take the 100 million right.
00:35:39.000 There are 100 million long guns in circulation in the United States, and that's what you're gonna target?
00:35:44.000 It doesn't even make any sense!
00:35:47.000 Again, the notion that assault weapons bans somehow generated an impact on the frequency of mass shootings, it's just not there.
00:35:59.000 The prior to the ban, on average, five people were killed with assault weapons in the mass shootings per year.
00:36:04.000 During the ban, the number went down to four.
00:36:06.000 Post-ban, it rose to 22.
00:36:07.000 But mass shootings with assault weapons didn't rise until 2012.
00:36:09.000 That was eight years after the ban ended.
00:36:13.000 In the seven years after the ban, there was an average of four people killed in mass shootings with assault weapons every year.
00:36:17.000 So maybe it turns out it's not the kind of weapon that is the problem.
00:36:19.000 Maybe it turns out that it is a bunch of different factors that are the problem.
00:36:24.000 Okay, but they have to lie, okay?
00:36:26.000 They have to lie about how easy it is to get a gun.
00:36:28.000 They have to lie about the threat of mass shootings in American society generally.
00:36:31.000 They have to lie about the efficacy of gun control generally.
00:36:33.000 Because again, if you actually told the truth about the efficacy of gun control, you know where you might be looking.
00:36:38.000 Chicago, Washington DC, New York City, LA.
00:36:42.000 And it turns out gun control there has not been wildly successful.
00:36:45.000 The only thing that has tamped down homicide is heavy policing.
00:36:49.000 It is precisely the opposite of the policy proposals the left likes.
00:36:53.000 Okay, so instead, they just have to maximize the way that they talk about the problem.
00:36:56.000 So you'll have Chuck Schumer talking about the epidemic of gun violence.
00:36:58.000 First of all, gun violence is not an epidemic.
00:37:01.000 We actually have been through an epidemic in the last year.
00:37:03.000 An epidemic is defined by the contagiousness and transmissibility of something.
00:37:09.000 Gun violence is not transmissible.
00:37:10.000 It is not an epidemic.
00:37:11.000 It is an act of individual evil.
00:37:14.000 Those can be tamped down by adding more police force to places that are high crime.
00:37:20.000 But what Democrats are basically trying to say is that the gun infects you.
00:37:23.000 The gun does not infect you.
00:37:24.000 It is a piece of machinery.
00:37:26.000 It is a tool.
00:37:27.000 But here's Chuck Schumer saying we're going to address the quote-unquote epidemic of gun violence.
00:37:31.000 Republicans seem averse to even wanting to talk about the epidemic of gun violence.
00:37:37.000 Like the start of the COVID epidemic, their strategy is to downplay and hope the problem goes away.
00:37:47.000 This Democratic-led Senate will be different.
00:37:50.000 The Senate is not going to hide.
00:37:53.000 We're going to debate and address the epidemics of gun violence in this country.
00:37:58.000 Okay, but here's the thing.
00:37:59.000 If you look at the number of homicides in the United States over the past 30, 40 years, we've had an unprecedented drop in the murder rate.
00:38:07.000 An unprecedented drop in the United States murder rate since basically 1994.
00:38:13.000 And yet, the idea is that we're now experiencing this mass epidemic of gun violence.
00:38:18.000 The national murder rate in the United States, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, the national murder rate in the United States in 1992 was 9.3 per 100,000 population.
00:38:27.000 Okay, it reached its highs in about that period.
00:38:35.000 It was really high in the late 70s, and then kind of stabilized, and then its modern high was 1991.
00:38:41.000 9.8 murders per 100,000 residents.
00:38:44.000 Currently, in about 2016, 2017, the lowest it hit was about 2014.
00:38:48.000 4.5 murders.
00:38:49.000 It went in half.
00:38:50.000 In half!
00:38:52.000 Okay, but the idea is that now it's an epidemic.
00:38:54.000 And, again, it is not an epidemic.
00:38:57.000 That's not how epidemics work.
00:39:00.000 But it's all a power grab.
00:39:01.000 And so they have to lie.
00:39:02.000 So Senator Padilla, he says, in a majority of states, this is Alex Padilla, Democrat of California.
00:39:09.000 He says, in a majority of states, it is easier to obtain a gun than to vote.
00:39:12.000 This is just an overt lie.
00:39:13.000 There's not a single state in the United States where it's easier to obtain a gun than to vote.
00:39:17.000 I mean, do these people know a damn thing about how you obtain a gun?
00:39:21.000 You actually have to go in to a federally licensed firearms dealer, and then you have to show ID, and then they have to run a federal background check on you.
00:39:28.000 And if there's a backlog, you might have to wait a couple of days while they actually run the federal background check on you.
00:39:33.000 That's at a minimum.
00:39:33.000 Okay, when you go to register to vote, you show an ID and you're registered to vote, and that's the end of it.
00:39:39.000 Here's Alex Padilla just overtly lying.
00:39:40.000 There won't be a Media Matters fact check on this guy.
00:39:43.000 In 25 states, voters must be registered and have specific forms of ID in order to cast a ballot.
00:39:50.000 But those same states allow people to buy rifles without permits and require no background checks for some sales.
00:39:59.000 Additionally, in a majority of states, new voters are able to obtain a rifle quicker than they're able to cast their first ballot.
00:40:10.000 It seems to me that we have our priorities entirely backwards when it comes to this, when we make it easier to buy a gun.
00:40:20.000 These geniuses, let's put them in charge of whether you can defend yourself.
00:40:23.000 Meanwhile, Dick Durbin, who once called American soldiers akin to pole pot, Dick Durbin said loopholes make it easier for felons and abusers to get weapons.
00:40:31.000 Okay, again.
00:40:34.000 The proof that these felons and abusers are getting weapons because of quote-unquote loopholes is extremely scanty.
00:40:43.000 Very, very scanty.
00:40:44.000 Doesn't matter.
00:40:44.000 Don't need evidence.
00:40:45.000 You just make assertions because assertions are all the left cares about.
00:40:48.000 Here's Dick Durbin making the case.
00:40:50.000 There are well-known gaps in the federal gun background check system, the gun show loophole, the internet loophole, and more.
00:40:59.000 These gaps make it too easy for felons, abusers, and mentally unstable people to get their hands on guns and harm others.
00:41:08.000 Okay, so first of all, there is no gun show loophole.
00:41:10.000 If you go to a gun show, they have to be a federally licensed firearms dealer.
00:41:13.000 The so-called gun show loophole is not gun shows.
00:41:16.000 Okay, that's me conveying a gun to my son.
00:41:20.000 In order for the government to prevent that, they would have to have full-fledged gun registries for every gun in the United States, which is something that no advocate of individual liberty should be in favor of.
00:41:30.000 Well, let's be real about this.
00:41:31.000 This is basically, in the end, just an emotional appeal.
00:41:34.000 This is why you have victims of mass shootings going on TV and saying that the NRA is a terror organization, and that every member of the NRA is apparently a terrorist.
00:41:42.000 Here's Fred Guttenberg, who's an anti-gun activist.
00:41:45.000 He's Parkland's dad, saying this on MSNBC.
00:41:48.000 They are a terror organization that is making us less safe.
00:41:52.000 You can't make up these things.
00:41:55.000 I mean, literally six days ago, the NRA achieved its goal, and they called it Victory for Colorado.
00:42:03.000 That's what they called it.
00:42:05.000 And here we are, 10 people dead, including a police officer, because of what they believe was victory for Colorado.
00:42:13.000 Okay, except that Colorado already... Stop it.
00:42:15.000 Colorado already has universal background checks, red flag laws, the city of Boulder for two years, it only expired six days ago, which is what the NRA was talking about.
00:42:22.000 They had an assault weapons ban.
00:42:24.000 They had all of those things in place.
00:42:26.000 Again, the evidence doesn't matter.
00:42:27.000 It's the emotional appeal.
00:42:29.000 And why don't we just wreck it?
00:42:31.000 We'll wreck the filibuster and we'll ram through gun control.
00:42:33.000 That's what Julian Castro is now saying.
00:42:35.000 He's saying filibuster reform to ram through gun control because the democratic agenda is the only thing that matters.
00:42:39.000 And if you don't have evidence to back it, you just say that people who oppose you don't care enough and don't have sympathy for people who have died in mass shootings.
00:42:47.000 I actually think this is going to be another indictment of the filibuster.
00:42:50.000 How do you not call something strongly bipartisan in this country When almost 90% of Americans support it.
00:42:58.000 And yet, mainly one political party stands completely against it.
00:43:04.000 It doesn't make any sense.
00:43:06.000 And this is one more example of why, in the least, we need significant filibuster reform that makes it possible for effective, meaningful legislation like this to actually get enacted.
00:43:20.000 I mean, this is, I'm sorry, these people are so, it's so ignorant.
00:43:25.000 I mean, unbelievably ignorant.
00:43:26.000 Alison Camerota just asked this morning on CNN, quote, how onerous would it be to have a gun shop owner just say, by the way, are you hearing voices?
00:43:32.000 Do you think people are chasing you?
00:43:33.000 Do you think everybody is watching you?
00:43:34.000 It would have weeded out possibly this guy.
00:43:37.000 Yes, I'm sure that if you want to weed out criminals, all you have to do is ask them whether they're mentally ill.
00:43:41.000 That would totally do it.
00:43:42.000 By the way, you know what gun shops have to do?
00:43:44.000 I know because I just purchased a gun the other day.
00:43:46.000 You know what gun shops have to do?
00:43:47.000 They ask you about your recent mental illness history.
00:43:50.000 It's a thing they ask you on the forums.
00:43:54.000 Evidence is unnecessary here.
00:43:55.000 All that matters is that they are morally right and very emotional about it, and therefore you are bad if you oppose their evidence-free agenda, which suggests that all the problems in America are based on individual rights and apparently on white supremacy or whiteness or something.
00:44:07.000 All righty, we have reached the end of today's show, but we'll be back here later today with an additional hour of The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:44:12.000 In the meantime, go check out The Michael Knowles Show.
00:44:14.000 He's discussing Krispy Kreme offering free donuts for the vaccinated.
00:44:17.000 You can hear more details about that story over on Michael's show.
00:44:19.000 That's available right now.
00:44:20.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:44:20.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:44:23.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by...
00:44:28.000 by Elliot Feld, executive producer Jeremy Boren, our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our assistant director is Pavel Lydowsky. Editing is by Adam Sajovic, audio is mixed by Mike Coromina, hair and makeup is by Fabiola Cristina, production assistant is Jessica Kranz.
00:44:43.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:44:47.000 A terrible shooting in Colorado raises bad faith debate.
00:44:53.000 A breakfast company gaslights a man who found shrimp tails in his cereal.
00:44:57.000 And a Democrat senator won't vote for white nominees.