The Ben Shapiro Show


They’re Gonna Spend, Spend, Spend Until Daddy Takes The T-Bird Away | Ep. 1345


Summary

Debt ceiling crisis continues to rage on. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says it s time to get rid of the debt ceiling once and for all. And Joe Manchin continues to crush progressive dreams. Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. Thousands of my listeners have already secured their internet access at ExpressVpn. Join them at expressvpn.org/joinnow to get 20% off your first month with discount code SHAPIRO. You will get $5 off the first month and 50% off the second month if you upgrade to ExpressVPN, which is free and includes a 30-day, risk-free guarantee, so you literally have nothing to lose! You can get a $5 credit when you upgrade, and you ll save hundreds of dollars in the long-term. If you don t already have an ExpressVPN membership, you can get 10% off for as little as $99.99 when you become a patron! You ll get access to all of ExpressVPN's features, including the features and features you ve been asking for, like the fastest growing VPN service in the world, and get a FREE 3-month VIP membership trial when you sign up for $99! The best deal on the entire service is $29.99, which includes 3-months of unlimited fast-tracking, unlimited, unlimited and fast-track Prime membership, plus a 3-day credit and 2-months free! Allowing you to use ExpressVPN to access the fastest-only version of the service, which means you get 25% off, up to $99,99 a month, and a maximum of $99 a year, and 5% off a maximum, plus an additional $5,99 gets you an annual credit plan! Want to upgrade to a 5Gigabyte of 3GB of data and unlimited access to the fastest 4GB of service? You get 15GB of storage, unlimited 3GB, unlimited Wi-fi, and unlimited 3G and 1GB of 2GB of 3Gigare? Subscribe to PureTalk? Learn more about your ad-free version of The Ben Shapiro's newest podcast, The Daily Mail? Subscribe and comment on the show on Apple Podcasts, The FiveThirtyEight? Subscribe to my new podcast, Rate, review and subscribe to my podcast, become a friend on iTunes, and become a supporter of my podcast! I'm listening to my show on Audible, Podcoin, and more!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says it's time to get rid of the debt ceiling once and for all.
00:00:05.000 And Joe Manchin continues to crush progressive dreams.
00:00:08.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:08.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:10.000 Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:17.000 Thousands of my listeners have already secured their internet.
00:00:20.000 Join them at expressvpn.com.
00:00:23.000 Before we get to the news, here is your note for the day.
00:00:26.000 You're paying way too much for your cell phone coverage.
00:00:29.000 Stop paying for Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile social initiatives.
00:00:32.000 Stop paying for their thousands of retail stores across the country you never actually go to.
00:00:35.000 Stop paying for those added perks that you never actually use.
00:00:38.000 Instead, just get what you need with PureTalk.
00:00:40.000 PureTalk does not charge you for any of that crap.
00:00:42.000 Instead, they give you killer 5G coverage on the same 5G network as one of the big guys for about half the cost.
00:00:48.000 These are the exact same cell towers as one of these big companies, but they're going to charge you half.
00:00:51.000 The average family is saving over $800 a year by making the switch.
00:00:55.000 I made the switch.
00:00:55.000 You can keep your number, you can keep your phone, or you can get huge discounts on the latest iPhones and Androids.
00:01:00.000 Get unlimited talk, text, six gigs of data for just $30 a month, and if you still want unlimited data, you can get that and still save a bunch of money over what the other guys would be charging you.
00:01:09.000 Head on over to puretalk.com, shop for the plan that's right for you.
00:01:12.000 They have a 30-day risk-free guarantee, so you literally have nothing to lose.
00:01:15.000 Go to puretalk.com, enter promo code SHAPIRO.
00:01:18.000 You will save 50% off your very first month and hundreds of bucks down the road.
00:01:21.000 That is puretalk.com.
00:01:23.000 So, last night the Democrats were supposed to bring up the bipartisan infrastructure bill for a vote.
00:01:31.000 They did not because they could not get the progressives on board.
00:01:33.000 And they couldn't get the progressives on board because they couldn't get the Senate moderates on board for their $3.5 trillion boondoggle.
00:01:40.000 Meanwhile, speeding down the tracks is the debt ceiling.
00:01:43.000 So the debt ceiling is supposed to be hit in approximately the next couple of weeks.
00:01:47.000 Democrats are trying to get Republicans to sign on to a debt ceiling increase.
00:01:50.000 Republicans are saying, we are not going to allow you to take out a second credit card knowing that you're about to blow out the spending.
00:01:55.000 And so why would we allow you to do that?
00:01:57.000 We need a sort of restructuring deal here.
00:01:59.000 We need to make sure that we get some sort of spending concessions from you at this point, which has led the Biden administration to make the argument that we should get rid of the debt ceiling once and for all.
00:02:08.000 So to understand why the debt ceiling is kind of important, you have to understand the history of how spending has been done in the United States historically.
00:02:15.000 So if you go all the way back to the founding for basically the first 130 years of the existence of the United States, any time Congress wanted to authorize the government to take out debt, they had to pass a specific bill that authorized exactly how that debt was to be taken out.
00:02:28.000 Which seems like a pretty good idea, right?
00:02:29.000 It puts the responsibility where the responsibility ought to be, with the legislature.
00:02:33.000 Congress would actually have to authorize a loan, or they'd have to allow Treasury to issue bonds, for example.
00:02:39.000 But it would be up to Congress.
00:02:40.000 Congress would actually have to authorize the executive branch to do this, which makes sense.
00:02:44.000 They are the legislative branch.
00:02:45.000 The executive branch is the executive branch.
00:02:47.000 And then, in about 1917, Congress decided they were going to abdicate responsibility on this thing by creating the debt ceiling.
00:02:54.000 The debt ceiling, the idea was that they would just tell the executive branch how much debt they were authorized to take out.
00:03:02.000 Right now, attached to a war, it makes a certain amount of sense, you would assume, because the executive branch is running the war.
00:03:07.000 The executive branch needs to take out more debt on a short-term basis because, obviously, there are battle contingencies.
00:03:12.000 But in the middle of a not-war, getting rid of the specific authorization for taking out debt is really just a way for Congress to kick the can down the road without actually having to be held responsible for doing any of this stuff.
00:03:23.000 Like, imagine that every time Congress passed a spending bill, they also had to pass a bill saying, we authorize the Treasury Department to take out this amount of debt on the open market.
00:03:33.000 It would make everybody think for just a second, is this actually worth it?
00:03:36.000 Congress doesn't want you to think, is it actually worth it?
00:03:39.000 So instead, they pass these giant blunderbuss packages and they raise the debt ceiling at the same time.
00:03:44.000 Hey, well, that was the rule up until about the 1970s.
00:03:49.000 Okay, then in the 1970s, there was a problem, which was that the government kept running up against the debt ceiling.
00:03:58.000 So Dick Gephardt created, Dick Gephardt was a former congressperson from Iowa.
00:04:03.000 Gephardt imposed the so-called Gephardt rule.
00:04:06.000 Hey, this was a rule that suggested the debt ceiling was automatically raised anytime a budget was passed.
00:04:11.000 You didn't actually have to pass a separate debt ceiling bill.
00:04:13.000 You would just pass the budget, and that itself would be the authorization for the government to take out additional debt.
00:04:19.000 Then, during the Gingrich Revolution of the 90s, this was reversed.
00:04:22.000 In 1995, Congress said, no, we're not doing it this way anymore.
00:04:25.000 We are not going to simply pretend that every time we authorize spending, The federal government has the ability to go out and take debt.
00:04:31.000 Instead, we do have to take some of the blame or credit for raising the debt ceiling.
00:04:35.000 So we're going to bring back the debt ceiling debate.
00:04:38.000 Now, in reality, we've got to go back to the original system.
00:04:40.000 Congress ought to have to specifically authorize precisely what sort of debt instrument needs to be used by the executive branch every time they spend.
00:04:47.000 The reason they really shouldn't have to do that is because again, they should be forced to consider the consequences of the spending that they do.
00:04:53.000 But we have both a legislative branch and an executive branch that seem to want to just spend without any sort of end at all.
00:05:01.000 And a lot of this is sort of a riff on modern monetary theory, which is this idiotic idea that the federal government can spend as much money as it could possibly want for literally the rest of time because nobody is ever going to see the full faith and credit of the United States as endowed.
00:05:17.000 We are always going to be the world's strongest economy.
00:05:19.000 We are always going to be the world's strongest currency.
00:05:21.000 And if we aren't, well, we'll deal with that when we come to it.
00:05:24.000 Jenny Yellen, who, remember, was the head of the Federal Reserve.
00:05:28.000 The Federal Reserve was supposed to be a non-partisan, non-political board.
00:05:32.000 It is their job to see that the inflation rates remain low and that employment remains high.
00:05:37.000 So Jenny Yellen was supposed to be this non-partisan person.
00:05:39.000 Of course, that Chinese fence, that Chinese screen between the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve was obliterated long ago, but Janet Yellen has made clear just how fast that was obliterated.
00:05:49.000 She moved directly from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury Department, where she has been now advocating to get rid of the debt ceiling entirely.
00:05:55.000 The idea being that any time Congress just passes something, it should automatically raise the debt ceiling so we can go out and we can borrow for it.
00:06:02.000 And there will be no leverage to lower spending any time in the future.
00:06:05.000 Remember, the debt ceiling instrument has been used a couple of times in the past 10 years in order to lower spending or in order to jar certain political items loose.
00:06:14.000 And it's not just a Republican thing.
00:06:15.000 In 2006, Nancy Pelosi actually held up the debt ceiling in order to try and pry concessions from the Bush administration.
00:06:22.000 But most famously, the debt ceiling debate was hit during the Boehner time as Speaker of the House.
00:06:29.000 And the result was sequestration, which was a lowering of the rate of increase in government spending in the federal government.
00:06:35.000 It was pretty controversial because Barack Obama insisted that half the cuts come from defense if there were going to be any cuts because Barack Obama hated the Defense Department.
00:06:42.000 But it was at least an instrument for attempting to lower the amount of money we spend.
00:06:45.000 Now we have the executive branch saying we want to spend without end and we don't want any sort of congressional check on how much we can take out in order to pay for your spending.
00:06:55.000 So this is breaking down a long partisan line.
00:06:58.000 Frankly, you know, I'm at least mildly pleased that even Republicans are not on board with getting rid of the debt ceiling entirely.
00:07:03.000 But here's Janet Yellen making the case.
00:07:06.000 Would you support simply eliminating the debt ceiling so that we don't have to deal with this in the future and can focus on real crises?
00:07:15.000 Yes, I would.
00:07:16.000 If, to finance those spending and tax decisions, it's necessary to issue additional debt, I believe it's very destructive to put the President and myself, the Treasury Secretary, in a situation where we might be unable to pay the bills that result from those past decisions.
00:07:44.000 Okay, the debt ceiling is a natural constraint on the growth of government.
00:07:47.000 It at least provides a leverage point for reducing the growth of government.
00:07:50.000 Janet Yellen wants it gone.
00:07:51.000 And this is the entire theory of the Biden administration.
00:07:54.000 There should be no limits on spending.
00:07:55.000 It's spend, spend, spend until daddy takes the T-Bird away.
00:07:59.000 When daddy takes the T-Bird away, we hit austerity measures.
00:08:01.000 We have to radically increase taxes.
00:08:03.000 We have to cut benefits.
00:08:04.000 And this has happened across Europe.
00:08:05.000 So it's not as though this is unforeseeable.
00:08:06.000 It is completely and utterly foreseeable.
00:08:08.000 Not only that, when you ratchet up the spending, and at the same time you ratchet up the taxes and regulation, which is exactly what the Biden administration is seeking to do, all you end up doing is blowing money into an economy that is stagnating.
00:08:19.000 That's how you get stagflation.
00:08:21.000 That's how you get the 1970s.
00:08:23.000 You can get economic stagnation without inflation, that's Japan in the 1990s, when regulation and lack of entrepreneurship basically destroyed the Japanese economy for more than a decade.
00:08:34.000 That is, I think, a high probability at this point, and even Biden is recognizing that.
00:08:38.000 He's forecasting over the course of the next decade less than a 2% rate of growth to the American GDP, which is a really rotten rate of growth.
00:08:46.000 But you get stagflation if you have that rapid, that terrible stagnation, plus the federal government attempting to pour money into the system via forced subsidies.
00:08:56.000 The Wall Street Journal has a piece today titled Stock Market's September Slump Exposes Messy Underside.
00:09:01.000 And again, the economy is not doing well right now.
00:09:05.000 It should be blowing the doors off.
00:09:06.000 It really should be.
00:09:08.000 Again, we now not only have the COVID vaccines, but now we have reports that Merck is coming out with a once a day pill that reduces the possibility of hospitalization and death from COVID even if you get infected by 50%.
00:09:21.000 So we're coming up with excellent new therapeutics.
00:09:24.000 We already have a vaccine that is highly effective.
00:09:26.000 This pandemic from a public policy perspective is now over.
00:09:30.000 But the Biden administration can't let it go.
00:09:32.000 And not just that, they are firmly committed to this fiscal policy which is really about the reorganizing of American life along social democratic lines, which has a cost.
00:09:41.000 Even Sweden, which embraced the so-called Third Way, this vast spending, vast taxation initiative in the 1970s, they had to get rid of a lot of those taxes and a lot of that spending, specifically because it didn't pay for itself.
00:09:52.000 They had to free up their economy.
00:09:53.000 I mean, there are studies by which the Nordic countries actually have freer business regimens and business markets than the United States does.
00:10:00.000 They have more ease in beginning a business in many of these countries than the United States does at this point.
00:10:00.000 They have less regulations.
00:10:05.000 So the United States is going down a really bad path right here, says the Wall Street Journal.
00:10:08.000 Markets tumbled to end the quarter, sending the S&P 500 to its worst monthly pullback since the pandemic-fueled selloff of March 2020.
00:10:16.000 Stocks began the day higher, only to slump in the following hours.
00:10:19.000 The S&P 500 wound up falling 1.2% to 4,307.54 on Thursday, nearly erasing the entirety of its gains for the entire quarter.
00:10:28.000 The DJIA, the Dow Jones, it shed 1.6%.
00:10:31.000 As well, it suffered its first quarterly loss since the first three months of 2020.
00:10:35.000 Now remember, this was the year when everything was supposed to just be guns blazing, gung-ho, no holds barred growth.
00:10:43.000 Not really.
00:10:45.000 Central bankers who were thinking this year's rise in inflation would wind up being a short-term phenomenon aren't sure how long transitory pressures will persist.
00:10:52.000 Strategists who had predicted another strong quarter of economic growth are cutting estimates because of supply chain bottlenecks and the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19.
00:11:00.000 Economic data have also been falling short of expectations.
00:11:02.000 Citigroup's Economic Surprise Index, which tracks how much U.S.
00:11:05.000 reports have been exceeding or undershooting estimates, fell this month to its lowest level since June 2020.
00:11:10.000 The month proved a major setback for stocks, with all but one of the S&P 500's 11 sectors finishing lower in September.
00:11:16.000 The S&P 500 is still up 15% for the year and managed to squeeze out a sixth straight quarter of gains.
00:11:21.000 The index is just a few percentage points away from its record close hit in early September.
00:11:27.000 Not everything is moving together.
00:11:29.000 The stock market is probably going to continue to gain, but not nearly as fast as people thought it was going to.
00:11:34.000 The bond market has also caught many investors off guard.
00:11:36.000 The yield on the 10-year U.S.
00:11:38.000 Treasury note flitted above a narrow range for much of the quarter, only to stage a six-day rise above 1.5% between last week and Tuesday.
00:11:45.000 That was the biggest such advance since June 2020.
00:11:47.000 The move came after the Federal Reserve indicated it was ready to begin reversing its pandemic stimulus programs as early as November and considering raising interest rates next year, given a jump in inflation.
00:11:58.000 Lizanne Saunders, Chief Investment Strategist for Charles Schwab, says even though there's all this discussion about the market being resilient, the churn under the surface has shown more weakness.
00:12:07.000 Saunders attributes the swift rotations taking place in the market to a bevy of investor worry.
00:12:10.000 She says you have concerns about the virus, you have concerns about the debt ceiling, you have mixed economic data, and you've got uncertainty about monetary policy.
00:12:17.000 She says, I don't know that we're going to get out of this mode anytime soon.
00:12:21.000 And then there's inflation, which is also hitting and not going away.
00:12:24.000 Remember, we were told this was transitory.
00:12:26.000 We are now in October.
00:12:27.000 This is not transitory inflation any longer.
00:12:29.000 This has been continuous.
00:12:31.000 Month-on-month inflation since the beginning of the year.
00:12:33.000 Heavy month-on-month inflation since the beginning of the year.
00:12:36.000 Now, are we in full crisis mode at this point, given the fact that the debt ceiling is about to be hit and all of this?
00:12:44.000 No, Democrats can pass the debt ceiling anytime they want.
00:12:47.000 They can pass it as a clean bill.
00:12:48.000 If they just brought up a debt ceiling increase, And voted along reconciliation lines without any Republican support to raise the debt ceiling they could.
00:12:56.000 The reason that they won't do that is because they want to save that bullet.
00:12:59.000 Understand, the reconciliation process can only be used three times a year.
00:13:03.000 If they use it on the debt ceiling, they can't use it on some other piece of boondoggle legislation they would like to push.
00:13:08.000 What they did do is they passed a short-term spending bill that averted a government shutdown.
00:13:13.000 That extends for another couple of weeks.
00:13:15.000 That was bipartisan.
00:13:16.000 The Senate voted 65-35, the House 254-175.
00:13:20.000 Lawmakers reached a deal, according to the New York Times, on the spending legislation after Democrats agreed to strip out a provision that would have raised the federal government's ability to continue borrowing funds through the end of 2022.
00:13:31.000 The legislation keeps the government fully funded through December 3rd, which gives lawmakers additional time to reach consensus over the dozen annual spending bills that dictate federal spending.
00:13:41.000 So, we are not going to get a government shutdown, at least for the next couple of months.
00:13:46.000 But meanwhile, the underlying worries continue because the underlying economic theory of this administration is very, very wrong and very, very bad.
00:13:53.000 And it's being driven by the progressive left, which has no understanding of economics, like none at all.
00:13:59.000 So Nancy Pelosi is ripping Mitch McConnell.
00:14:01.000 She says he's playing Russian roulette by not raising the debt ceiling.
00:14:04.000 Is he though?
00:14:04.000 Because you guys can pass the debt ceiling anytime you want.
00:14:06.000 You have a majority in the Senate of the United States.
00:14:11.000 As Mitch McConnell himself has said about the need to address the debt limit, this is what he said last time.
00:14:18.000 Don't play Russian roulette with our economy.
00:14:21.000 Quote.
00:14:22.000 Yet that is exactly what he is doing, playing Russian roulette, interesting that he's playing Russian roulette, with our economy and with the financial security and the well-being She's so crazy.
00:14:36.000 She's so crazy.
00:14:37.000 Okay, notice, Russian.
00:14:39.000 She does this now with everything, right, ever since the Russian collusion crap.
00:14:43.000 Every time she says the word Russian, she's like, interesting that it's Russian, isn't it?
00:14:47.000 Every time she goes to a restaurant, and the waiter's like, well, we do have this Caesar salad with Russian dressing, she's like, interesting, Russian, what mean you by this?
00:14:57.000 Okay, but again, what this has to do with is an overall spending package and feeling toward how the economy ought to work, not in conjunction with reality.
00:14:57.000 So crazy.
00:15:07.000 That is going to lead to some pretty dire economic consequences.
00:15:11.000 We'll get to more of that in just one second.
00:15:13.000 First, Let's talk about a way that you can save money, particularly for a small business.
00:15:17.000 You spend a lot of time at the post office.
00:15:18.000 You spend a lot of money on your postage.
00:15:20.000 Why not do all of that from the ease and comfort of your office and save a bunch of money while you're doing it?
00:15:24.000 I am talking about stamps.com.
00:15:26.000 With stamps.com, you can send letters and packages for less with discounted rates from USPS, UPS, and more.
00:15:32.000 Here at Daily Wire, we've been using stamps.com since 2017.
00:15:35.000 No more wasting our time.
00:15:37.000 Since 1998, stamps.com has been an indispensable tool for nearly 1 million businesses.
00:15:41.000 Stamps.com brings the services of the U.S.
00:15:43.000 Postal Service and UPS shipping directly to your computer.
00:15:46.000 Whether you're an office sending invoices, a side hustle Etsy shop, or a full-blown warehouse shipping out orders, Stamps.com will make your life easier.
00:15:53.000 All you need is a computer and a standard printer.
00:15:55.000 No special supplies or equipment.
00:15:56.000 Within minutes, you're up and running printing official postage for any letter, any package, anywhere you want to send it.
00:16:01.000 And you get exclusive discounts on postage and shipping from both USPS and UPS as well.
00:16:06.000 Save time and money, no risk, with my promo code SHAPIRO.
00:16:09.000 Get a special offer.
00:16:10.000 It includes a four-week trial, plus free postage and digital scale.
00:16:13.000 No long-term commitments or contracts.
00:16:14.000 Again, that's stamps.com.
00:16:16.000 Click on the microphone at the top of the homepage.
00:16:17.000 Type in SHAPIRO, stamps.com.
00:16:19.000 Promo code SHAPIRO, stamps.com.
00:16:21.000 Never go to the post office again.
00:16:22.000 We here at Daily Wire, we've been using stamps.com since like 2017.
00:16:24.000 We've been saving a bunch of time and a bunch of money.
00:16:27.000 You can do it too.
00:16:27.000 Stamps.com.
00:16:28.000 Type in promo code Shapiro to get started.
00:16:31.000 Alrighty, so again, the economic policy here makes no sense.
00:16:34.000 Jerome Powell of the Federal Reserve, he says, yeah, the inflation is going to continue into next year.
00:16:38.000 Remember, they said that this was going to be transitory.
00:16:40.000 Not so transitory anymore.
00:16:43.000 It is frustrating to acknowledge that getting people vaccinated and getting Delta under control 18 months later still remains the most important economic policy that we have.
00:16:56.000 And it's also frustrating to see the bottlenecks and supply chain problems not getting better.
00:17:03.000 In fact, at the margin, apparently getting a little bit worse.
00:17:07.000 And that's what has, we see that continuing into next year probably and holding inflation up longer than we had thought.
00:17:16.000 Whoops.
00:17:17.000 All these experts.
00:17:18.000 We don't expect inflation when you just blow money into the economy.
00:17:20.000 Who would have thought that?
00:17:22.000 Shocker.
00:17:23.000 But again, all of this has to do with a generalized Biden administration and democratic overlook, which is that spending money is an inherent good.
00:17:30.000 Spending money is an inherent good and private investment is an inherent bad.
00:17:35.000 The most obvious example of this perspective is something that I've talked about over the past couple of weeks, and that is the person that Joe Biden is trying to suggest as comptroller of the currency.
00:17:45.000 According to the Wall Street Journal, President Biden checked off another progressive identity box last week by nominating Saúl Omarova as comptroller of the currency.
00:17:53.000 Some Trump appointees were ridiculed for having supported the elimination of their agencies.
00:17:57.000 Ms.
00:17:57.000 Omarova wants to eliminate the banks she's being appointed to regulate.
00:18:01.000 The Cornell University Law School professor's radical ideas might even make Bernie Sanders blush.
00:18:05.000 She graduated from Moscow State University in 1989 on the Lenin Personal Academic Scholarship.
00:18:11.000 30 years later, she still believes the Soviet economic system was superior and that U.S.
00:18:14.000 banking should be remade in the Gossip Bank's image.
00:18:18.000 Until I came to the U.S., I couldn't imagine that things like gender pay gaps still existed in today's world.
00:18:22.000 Say what you will about the old U.S.S.R., there was no gender pay gap there.
00:18:26.000 Market doesn't always know best, she tweeted in 2019.
00:18:28.000 In 2019, it's true, there was no gender pay gap in the U.S.S.R.
00:18:33.000 because everyone was poor!
00:18:36.000 Because it was a communist country, where people didn't have jobs and lived in penury.
00:18:40.000 That would be why.
00:18:42.000 Also, it seems that Soviet women were not exactly operating at the same exact level as Soviet men.
00:18:49.000 The suggestion that everybody's operating at perfectly equal levels in the Soviet Union is rather ignorant of history and economics.
00:18:55.000 Then she said, I never claimed women and men were treated absolutely equally in every facet of Soviet life.
00:18:59.000 But people's salaries were set by the state in a gender-blind manner and all women got very generous maternity benefits.
00:19:04.000 Both things are still a pipe dream in our society.
00:19:07.000 Sure.
00:19:08.000 Sure.
00:19:09.000 Every so often they would take you and they would throw you in jail.
00:19:14.000 And they might kill members of your family.
00:19:16.000 And sure, your uncle had to float in a car from Havana to Miami.
00:19:21.000 But they have great, great basic healthcare.
00:19:24.000 You gotta give them that.
00:19:25.000 Literacy.
00:19:26.000 Omarova thinks asset prices, pay scales, capital, and credit should be dictated by the federal government.
00:19:31.000 In two papers, she's advocated expanding the Federal Reserve's mandate to include the price levels of systemically important financial assets as well as worker wages.
00:19:39.000 She doesn't just want the Federal Reserve.
00:19:41.000 Again, remember, it's the executive branch, not the legislative branch.
00:19:44.000 First of all, the legislative branch should not have any power to do this either.
00:19:48.000 Price and wage controls are not in the purview of the federal government.
00:19:51.000 Frankly, they shouldn't be in the purview of the state government either, but they certainly are not in the purview of the federal government.
00:19:55.000 Constitutionally speaking, nothing in the federal government's mandate of power, the Constitution of the United States, gives them the power to federally set wages or prices.
00:20:02.000 That is not a thing.
00:20:04.000 But even if you thought it were a thing, it would reside at the legislative level, not at the executive branch level.
00:20:09.000 She wants it to reside inside the Federal Reserve, which is not even answerable to the executive branch.
00:20:13.000 It's an independent agency.
00:20:16.000 This is crazy stuff.
00:20:17.000 And this is who Biden is selecting.
00:20:19.000 Moderate old Joe Biden is selecting this person to lead the effort.
00:20:24.000 In a recent paper, The People's Ledger, she effectively proposed the Federal Reserve take over consumer bank deposits, end banking as we know it, and become the ultimate public platform for generating, modulating, and allocating financial resources in a modern economy.
00:20:36.000 So the Federal Reserve would now become the lender to the American people.
00:20:39.000 Want a mortgage?
00:20:40.000 You go to the Federal Reserve.
00:20:41.000 Want a business loan?
00:20:42.000 You go to the Federal Reserve.
00:20:43.000 Now, if you think that the Federal Reserve has a great history of this sort of stuff, I suggest that you take a look at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from, eh, say 1999 to 2007.
00:20:48.000 See how well that went.
00:20:52.000 It turns out that when the government runs the lending programs, they bias toward the people who are more likely to be politically beneficial to them, and their top priority is not, in fact, profitability or any measure of the durability of the lending instrument.
00:21:05.000 Instead, the only thing they care about is what it gets done politically.
00:21:09.000 Which is disastrous, obviously.
00:21:12.000 She wants the U.S.
00:21:12.000 to create a central bank digital currency, FedCoin, to redesign our financial system and turn the Fed's balance sheet into a true people's ledger.
00:21:19.000 She also believes that there should be a national investment authority with members overseen by an advisory board of academics to finance a big, bold climate agenda.
00:21:28.000 So, you know, a giant infrastructure bank, green infrastructure bank.
00:21:32.000 She wants a public interest council of highly paid academics with broad subpoena power to supervise financial regulatory agencies, including the Fed, without any constraints or requirements of the administrative process.
00:21:44.000 If she were appointed comptroller, she would supervise about 1,200 financial institutions.
00:21:49.000 She could punish banks that did not follow her diktat.
00:21:51.000 Even Janet Yellen was like, this is too much for us.
00:21:54.000 And Biden was like, well, I'm going to do it anyway.
00:21:57.000 Biden is going to do it anyway.
00:21:59.000 Genius.
00:21:59.000 Genius is in charge.
00:22:01.000 Speaking of which, in just one second, we have to discuss this $3.5 trillion plan, which is going to go down to flaming defeat at this point.
00:22:08.000 At the very least, it's going to be cut down to size, whittled down about half.
00:22:11.000 We'll get to that in just one moment.
00:22:12.000 First, let's talk about your safety and security.
00:22:15.000 So when I'm on the road, I like to make sure I know what's going on at my property.
00:22:17.000 This is why I love my Ring devices.
00:22:19.000 When we moved from California to Florida, First thing my wife said, let's get the Ring devices on the house.
00:22:23.000 And so we did.
00:22:24.000 Got them.
00:22:24.000 I installed them myself.
00:22:25.000 They make me feel a lot safer because I can tell what's going on on my property at all times.
00:22:30.000 With my Ring Alarm security system, I'm much more at ease when I'm on the road or away from home.
00:22:34.000 My Ring Alarm equals peace of mind.
00:22:36.000 Protect your home with Ring Alarm.
00:22:37.000 Ring Alarm is a powerful, affordable, whole home security system you can easily install yourself.
00:22:41.000 It works seamlessly with other Ring products in one simple app.
00:22:44.000 For a special offer, go to Ring.com slash Ben.
00:22:46.000 It is the perfect way to start your Ring experience.
00:22:49.000 You can keep an eye on every corner of your house with indoor and outdoor cams, see what is happening directly from your phone.
00:22:54.000 Protect your home anytime from anywhere with Ring Alarm.
00:22:57.000 Head over to Ring.com slash Ben for a special offer on Ring Alarm Security Kit today.
00:23:01.000 You can build a system right for your home, have it up and running in just minutes.
00:23:04.000 That is Ring.com slash Ben.
00:23:06.000 Once more, Ring.com slash Ben.
00:23:09.000 Go check them out right now.
00:23:12.000 Okay, so one of the things that's fascinating to watch with regard to this debate over the $3.5 trillion spending bill, right?
00:23:23.000 There's the infrastructure bill and there's the spending bill.
00:23:24.000 The infrastructure bill is being held up right now by progressives in the House who want some sort of commitment from Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema that they will vote for Joe Biden's $3.5 trillion package.
00:23:33.000 Manchin and Sinema are like, no, we're not doing that.
00:23:35.000 So the progressives are like, okay, well, we will hold up the infrastructure bill until you do that.
00:23:40.000 That's not going to work.
00:23:41.000 The reason that's not going to work is because Joe Manchin is from West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema is from Arizona.
00:23:46.000 Kyrsten Sinema only won by about 3% in the last election cycle.
00:23:48.000 The only chance she has of holding that seat is being a Maverick-style Democrat in the same way that John McCain was a Maverick-style Republican.
00:23:54.000 Joe Manchin is in the reddest state in America.
00:23:56.000 Donald Trump won West Virginia by 40%.
00:23:58.000 I don't mean he won 40%.
00:24:00.000 I mean the margin of victory was 40% for Donald Trump in West Virginia, and yet they have a Democratic senator in Joe Manchin, which means that Manchin's actual political Sort of future rests on him standing in the gap and saying to Democrats, no, we are not going to spend this kind of money so he can go back to his constituents and say, listen, if you elect a Republican, they'll just be one more Republican among the rest of the Republicans.
00:24:21.000 If you keep electing me, then I'm part of the Democratic coalition and I will stand up against the more rapacious aspects of the Democratic financial plan.
00:24:30.000 And so this is a real holdup for the Democrats, no question.
00:24:33.000 But I want to point something out, and that is how this debate is going.
00:24:36.000 It's really quite fascinating.
00:24:37.000 So normally, when you have a giant bill that is on the table, the details of the bill are what gets debated.
00:24:43.000 When it was Obamacare, there were significant talks about exactly what was the mandate going to be?
00:24:48.000 What were the penalties going to be?
00:24:50.000 What kinds of plans were going to be available?
00:24:52.000 Would there be a public option?
00:24:53.000 Would there not be a public option?
00:24:55.000 What would be encompassed in terms of what insurance companies were forced to cover?
00:25:00.000 How would you deal with pre-existing conditions, right?
00:25:02.000 These were all policy debates that were happening over Obamacare.
00:25:04.000 By the way, Obamacare was projected to cost like a trillion dollars.
00:25:07.000 It'll cost about two trillion dollars after all is said and done.
00:25:11.000 This, right now, what we're talking about is at least twice that size.
00:25:13.000 It's probably five trillion dollars.
00:25:16.000 From the list price to the actual price price, you're talking about probably a 5x differential from Obamacare.
00:25:24.000 Okay, but put aside the price.
00:25:26.000 That is the only thing that anyone can... Like, do you know what's in the bill?
00:25:29.000 You might know what's in the bill a little bit because I've talked about what's in the bill, right?
00:25:32.000 Namely, a bunch of child tax credits that are not means-tested, which is basically just a government giveaway.
00:25:39.000 They also have a marriage penalty attached.
00:25:41.000 We've talked about the community college funding.
00:25:44.000 We've talked about the attempt to essentially make Head Start universal.
00:25:47.000 There's a bunch of stuff.
00:25:48.000 The climate change proposals.
00:25:50.000 I've talked about it.
00:25:51.000 But that is not what you hear in the media.
00:25:52.000 What you hear in the media is just the top line number.
00:25:55.000 All that matters is the top line number, not the content of the bill.
00:25:57.000 Now, normally, the way that you'd make a case for a bill like this is, here's a bunch of good stuff we want to do, and here's how much money it's going to cost.
00:26:03.000 If you don't like the cost, it's because you want to stop the good stuff we want to do.
00:26:05.000 No one is talking about that bill in these terms.
00:26:08.000 They are just talking about that bill in terms of, if you want $3.5 trillion, you are good.
00:26:14.000 If you want less than $3.5 trillion, you are bad.
00:26:16.000 It is all about the top line number.
00:26:18.000 Why?
00:26:18.000 Because the bottom line democratic idea here is that all that matters is the spending.
00:26:23.000 It doesn't matter where you spend it.
00:26:24.000 It doesn't matter how you spend it.
00:26:25.000 It doesn't matter what programs are involved.
00:26:26.000 The only thing that matters is that you blow money out.
00:26:29.000 That you make people more dependent.
00:26:31.000 You could just helicopter this cash over the center of the United States and the Democrats would be happy. It does not matter what programs are actually effectuated with the cash, which is why there are not any negotiations that are really happening between the progressives and the moderates, where the moderates say, listen, we got to curb this particular plan right here because we don't think it's good enough. And the progressives are like, well, if you're going to do that, we need to up the game right here because here's what we're trying to accomplish.
00:26:52.000 Nobody's talking about what they are trying to accomplish because the dirty secret is everyone knows what they're trying to accomplish and that is the maximization of government intrusion into your life via either subsidies or regulation.
00:27:03.000 That is what they are trying to accomplish.
00:27:05.000 So they never discuss the details.
00:27:06.000 The numbers are just a proxy for we want to run all aspects of your life and we want to fund all aspects of your life or we want to fund slightly less of your life.
00:27:16.000 Slightly fewer aspects of your life.
00:27:18.000 That is why they only talk in terms of the top line.
00:27:20.000 It really is fascinating, isn't it?
00:27:22.000 Again, normally when you talk about a bill, you talk about the contents of the bill.
00:27:24.000 No one's talking about the content of the bill.
00:27:27.000 Number one, because the formal bill has not yet been proposed.
00:27:29.000 And number two, because no one cares about the content of the bill.
00:27:32.000 Hillary, for example, is Ilhan Omar talking about how much money she wants.
00:27:35.000 Again, it's all about how much money they want, not what they want to do with the money.
00:27:39.000 We remain fully committed to passing the President's entire Build Back agenda and delivering on that transformative change that the President ran on and that helped deliver the House, the Senate, and the White House.
00:27:54.000 Now, as you remember, the Senate sent us a budget resolution that had the 3.5 price tag.
00:28:04.000 What do they want to cut?
00:28:05.000 Do they want to cut child care for families that desperately need it?
00:28:09.000 Do they want to not address the climate crisis for a future generation?
00:28:15.000 Do they not want to have hearing, vision and dental care for the elderly?
00:28:23.000 Do they not want to, okay, that sort of blackmail is not going to work.
00:28:26.000 Because again, there is all this stuff available for all these people already.
00:28:32.000 If you think that elderly people in the United States don't have any sort of way to get dental care, I don't know what world you are living in.
00:28:39.000 Private means exist for dental care.
00:28:41.000 That has been a thing for quite a while in the United States as it turns out.
00:28:44.000 It's not that there are a bunch of old gummers walking around all toothless.
00:28:48.000 The notion that the elderly population in the United States is in complete lack of dental and vision care, and that we need to pay for it with the federal government.
00:28:55.000 But that's not the point.
00:28:56.000 The point is the spending.
00:28:57.000 The spending is the point.
00:28:58.000 This is what Joe Manchin understands, right?
00:29:00.000 The spending is the point.
00:29:02.000 And this is why you end up with headlines like, from David Brooks, this is why we need to spend $4 trillion.
00:29:07.000 $4 trillion!
00:29:10.000 Look how he increased it by like, $0.5 trillion.
00:29:12.000 Just, you know, it's $500 billion.
00:29:14.000 David Brooks of the New York Times, who's being retweeted by Ron Klain.
00:29:17.000 If you want to know what Biden is thinking, Biden's brain is not Biden, it is Ronald Klain, who's on Twitter basically tweeting out, a la Donald Trump, all of his interior monologues.
00:29:27.000 So he tweeted out David Brooks' column today.
00:29:30.000 David Brooks, who is one of the supposed in-house Republicans over at the New York Times, which is hysterical.
00:29:35.000 He says, Have we given up on the idea that policy can change history?
00:29:39.000 Have we lost faith in our ability to reverse or even be alarmed by national decline?
00:29:43.000 More and more, I hear people accepting the idea that America is not as energetic or youthful as it used to be.
00:29:47.000 I can practically hear the spirits of our ancestors crying out, the ones who had a core faith that this would forever be the greatest nation on the planet, the new Jerusalem, the last best hope of earth.
00:29:56.000 My ancestors were aspiring immigrants and understood where the beating heart of the nation resided, with the working class and the middle class, the ones depicted by Willa Cather, James Agee, Ralph Ellison, or in the honeymooners, the best years of our lives and on the waterfront.
00:30:08.000 There was a time when the phrase the common man was a source of pride and a high compliment.
00:30:12.000 Over the past few decades, there has been a redistribution of dignity upward.
00:30:16.000 From Reagan through Romney, the Republicans valorized entrepreneurs, CEOs, and Wall Street.
00:30:20.000 The Democratic Party became dominated by the creative class who attended competitive colleges, moved to affluent metro areas, married each other, and ladled advantages onto their kids so they could leap even further ahead.
00:30:29.000 There was a bipartisan embrace of a culture of individualism, which opens up a lot of space for people with resources and social support, but means loneliness and abandonment for people without.
00:30:39.000 Four years of college became the definition of the good life, which left roughly two-thirds of the country out.
00:30:43.000 And so came the crisis that Biden was elected to address.
00:30:46.000 The poisonous combination of elite insularity and vicious populist resentment.
00:30:52.000 The Democratic spending bills are economic packages that serve moral and cultural purposes.
00:30:57.000 They should be measured by their cultural impact, not merely by wonky analysis.
00:31:01.000 Okay, bottom line is, if we spend lots of money, this is going to make people feel good, is David Brooks' basic argument.
00:31:06.000 You will feel better if we spend lots of money.
00:31:08.000 I also enjoy the notion that the Founding Fathers would have been all on board with the federal government taxing us at exorbitant rates to fund every form of social welfare benefit they could possibly imagine.
00:31:18.000 You know, precisely the stuff that they were rebelling against the British Empire for doing to them.
00:31:23.000 I mean, they were literally rebelling against the British Empire because their taxes were too high and because they were concerned that their rights as Englishmen were being invaded because they did not have proper representation.
00:31:32.000 What do you make of an executive government that basically regulates every aspect of your life without any input from you, as well as tax rates that would have made the British Empire blush?
00:31:40.000 What do you make of that?
00:31:42.000 But he's not going back to the Founding Fathers, obviously, David Brooks.
00:31:44.000 He's going back to the FDR vision of what the United States should be, namely a quasi-socialistic enterprise.
00:31:52.000 Well, I mean, you can make that argument, but that's not going to be a very good argument.
00:31:57.000 So anyway, Joe Manchin is standing in the breach because, again, his political motive here is to stand in the breach.
00:32:01.000 If he does not stand in the breach, he loses his seat in West Virginia.
00:32:04.000 So Joe Manchin came out yesterday, said my limit is $1.5 trillion, not $3.5 trillion, not $4 trillion, $1.5 trillion.
00:32:12.000 No, no, my top line has not been. My top line has been 1.5 because I believe in my heart that what we can do and what the needs we have right now and what we can afford to do without basically changing our whole society to an entitlement mentality.
00:32:27.000 Um, so, yep. Right.
00:32:33.000 I mean, he's correct about this.
00:32:35.000 This has made him persona non grata inside the Democratic Party.
00:32:37.000 Manchin then crushed more progressive dreams.
00:32:39.000 He said, there will be no deal linking both bills.
00:32:41.000 I'm not going to, I'm not going to hold up the infrastructure bill so that they can ram through $3.5 trillion of spending.
00:32:47.000 Not going to happen.
00:32:49.000 Senator, progressives feel, though, you're not dealing in good faith.
00:32:51.000 They felt that there was a deal made beforehand.
00:32:55.000 I never knew about that.
00:32:56.000 Never heard of it.
00:32:57.000 So you were never part of a deal that linked the two bills together?
00:33:00.000 Never heard about that.
00:33:00.000 About two of them are going to be together?
00:33:02.000 Yeah.
00:33:02.000 Why do you think we worked so hard to separate it?
00:33:07.000 Um, that is correct.
00:33:08.000 Okay, and then Manchin went even further.
00:33:10.000 He said, you want 3.5 trillion bucks?
00:33:12.000 Elect more liberals.
00:33:13.000 I'm not one of those.
00:33:14.000 Again, remember, his incentive structure here is to be a conservative Democrat, of whom there are very few left in the Democratic Party.
00:33:23.000 I've never been a liberal in any way, shape, or form.
00:33:27.000 There's no one who's ever thought I was.
00:33:29.000 I've been Governor, I've been Secretary of State, I've been State Legislator, I've been a U.S.
00:33:33.000 Senator, and I have voted pretty consistently all my whole life.
00:33:37.000 I don't fault any of them who believe that they're much more progressive and much more liberal.
00:33:42.000 God bless them.
00:33:43.000 And all they need to do is we have to elect more, I guess, for them to get theirs, elect more liberals.
00:33:50.000 Ouch.
00:33:51.000 Ouch.
00:33:51.000 I mean, that is Joe Manchin just smacking down the squad.
00:33:55.000 And then Joe Manchin dropped a bomb yesterday just directly on Chuck Schumer's head.
00:33:58.000 So Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi have been playing this game where they're like, oh no, we never, well, it was always 3.5.
00:34:03.000 It was not always $3.5 trillion.
00:34:05.000 Joe Manchin actually just dropped a PDF of a framework deal signed by Chuck Schumer and Joe Manchin for $1.5 trillion in spending, not $3.5 trillion in spending.
00:34:19.000 And by the way, again, Joe Manchin has already signed off this year on $1.9 trillion in spending earlier this year.
00:34:24.000 This would be $1.5 trillion in spending.
00:34:25.000 There'd be another $1 trillion in supplemental spending.
00:34:28.000 By the time you get to the end of Joe Manchin's spending, the conservative guy, this year, you'd be at $5 trillion.
00:34:32.000 OK, but he actually got Chuck Schumer to sign on to this.
00:34:35.000 So Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi were going around being like, oh, that Joe Manchin, he's terrible.
00:34:39.000 You signed this at the end of July, Chuck Schumer.
00:34:43.000 So what does exactly this document say?
00:34:44.000 It says the top line would be $1.5 trillion.
00:34:48.000 The funds in the new legislation would not be dispersed until all funding from COVID legislation and ARP, the American Recovery Plan from earlier this year, has been spent.
00:34:55.000 And one of the conditions was that the Federal Reserve would end quantitative easing.
00:34:59.000 In other words, stop inflating the currency.
00:35:02.000 It would require needs-based, means-tested guardrails and formulas on new spending, targeted spending caps on existing programs, no additional handouts or transfer payments, On climate, it would require spending on innovation, not elimination.
00:35:17.000 So in other words, it would not be about eliminating coal because the man is from West Virginia.
00:35:22.000 Also, any revenue exceeding $1.5 trillion would be used for deficit reduction.
00:35:26.000 It would not be used for further spending.
00:35:28.000 It would set the corporate tax rate not at 39% or 30%, it would set it at 25%.
00:35:33.000 It would raise the top rate on ordinary income to 39.6%.
00:35:35.000 That's the only area where there's broad consensus in the Democratic Party what they want it to be.
00:35:40.000 It would raise the capital gains rate to 28% all in, right?
00:35:44.000 Not 39%, which is what Biden was looking for.
00:35:47.000 It would end the carried interest tax so-called loophole.
00:35:52.000 And then it says, Senator Manchin does not guarantee he will vote for the final reconciliation legislation if it exceeds the conditions outlined in this agreement.
00:35:59.000 He just dropped that bombshell directly on the head of Chuck Schumer.
00:36:02.000 So yesterday was just Joe Manchin day, ripping the Democratic progressives apart.
00:36:07.000 And he was pointing out correctly that inflation has real downstream effects for the person in the middle class.
00:36:11.000 This is something David Brooks doesn't seem to understand.
00:36:14.000 And neither does the entire Democratic Party, except for Joe Manchin.
00:36:17.000 Inflation hurts the little guy the most.
00:36:19.000 If you're a rich person, and you have lots of wealth and savings, you know what you're doing with that stuff investing in.
00:36:25.000 If you're the person who's spent their entire life building up a little bit of a bankroll, and then the government just keeps inflating, All those savings are less are worth less than they were yesterday.
00:36:34.000 Let's say that you're a retiree on a fixed income.
00:36:37.000 What does inflation do to you?
00:36:38.000 Here's Joe Manchin pointing this out.
00:36:41.000 I asked for the strategic pause because after that, then we basically had COVID coming back at us and we have all the unknowns right now, especially with what the financial fallout might be or the geopolitical fallout, excuse me, the geopolitical fallout that might come from the Uh, from the Afghanistan departure.
00:36:59.000 And also inflation.
00:37:00.000 I'll give you a perfect example.
00:37:02.000 In West Virginia, I just saw the day to where the, uh, to where the one dollar, uh, what do we call it?
00:37:07.000 General Dollar Store?
00:37:08.000 Dollar General?
00:37:09.000 They're not one.
00:37:10.000 They're no longer Dollar General.
00:37:12.000 They're a dollar and a quarter, a dollar fifty cent general.
00:37:15.000 That's hard for West Virginia.
00:37:16.000 A lot of people do shop there.
00:37:17.000 That's all they have.
00:37:18.000 We have to take all this into consideration.
00:37:22.000 So, um, that is, um, bad, according to the Democrats.
00:37:26.000 Okay, remember, this is all about the common man.
00:37:28.000 I promise you, Joe Manchin represents the common man far more than Chuck Schumer does.
00:37:32.000 That is certainly true.
00:37:34.000 In just one second, we'll get to the media response to all of this, which is just screaming into the void.
00:37:38.000 First, let us talk about how you save money on auto parts.
00:37:41.000 So, do you really want to be waiting in line at the auto parts store?
00:37:44.000 Is that really something you'd like to do?
00:37:45.000 And then you get to the front of the line, and for some odd reason, Beto O'Rourke's behind the counter, he's like, dude!
00:37:50.000 I haven't seen you in a while.
00:37:51.000 Got that Nissan Altima, do ya?
00:37:53.000 Well, I don't have the part here, bruh.
00:37:55.000 But I can order it for you and upcharge you by 20%.
00:37:57.000 It'll come in three weeks, what do you say?
00:37:59.000 Does that sound great?
00:38:00.000 Or you could just go online and skip beta completely and get the part for the correct price with rockauto.com.
00:38:06.000 They always offer the lowest prices possible rather than changing prices based on what the market will bear like airlines do.
00:38:11.000 Why would you spend up to twice as much for the same parts?
00:38:13.000 Furthermore, prices at rockauto.com are always the same for professionals and do-it-yourselfers.
00:38:17.000 They're a family business serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.
00:38:21.000 Head on over to rockauto.com.
00:38:22.000 Shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers.
00:38:25.000 The catalog is unique.
00:38:25.000 It's remarkably easy to navigate.
00:38:27.000 You can quickly see all the parts available for your vehicle and choose the brands, specifications, and prices you prefer.
00:38:32.000 Head on over to rockauto.com right now.
00:38:34.000 See all the parts available for your car or your truck.
00:38:36.000 Write Shapiro in their How Did You Hear About Us box.
00:38:38.000 So they know that we sent you.
00:38:40.000 Alrighty, we'll get to more in just one moment.
00:38:42.000 First, it is that glorious time of the week when I give a shout out to a Daily Wire member.
00:38:45.000 Today, it is TL Coolo on Twitter who has reason to believe not all high school students are completely lost.
00:38:51.000 In the pic, TLC is smiling at her desk and proudly displaying the world's greatest beverage vessel.
00:38:55.000 The caption reads, Here I am with my Leftist Tears Tumblr, maskless, substitute teaching at a local high school.
00:39:00.000 I've actually gotten compliments from the students.
00:39:02.000 There is hope yet for the next generation.
00:39:03.000 Hashtag LeftistTearsTumblr.
00:39:05.000 Glad to hear it.
00:39:05.000 Keep up the good work.
00:39:06.000 Thanks for the pick.
00:39:07.000 Thanks for being a Daily Wire member.
00:39:09.000 Also, good news for you.
00:39:10.000 If you are a video editor who has dreamed of joining the Daily Wire team, now is your big chance.
00:39:15.000 At fame, fortune, and glory, we are searching for a new video editor to join our post-production department in Nashville, Tennessee.
00:39:22.000 Ooh, beautiful Nashville.
00:39:22.000 This person will cut and assemble raw video footage using compelling storytelling skills to creatively support and emphasize subject matter in videos for various Daily Wire projects and shows.
00:39:31.000 Like this one.
00:39:32.000 So, all the comedy-eating bros, they're all universal in their hatred for Joe Manchin.
00:40:02.000 See, you know that you are in line with the common man when the folks at the top of the comedy hierarchy, your late-night hosts, who earn millions of dollars, are very angry at Joe Manchin, the senator from West Virginia.
00:40:13.000 Is why, listening to David Brooks, who once suggested that he liked Barack Obama because of the way he pleaded his pants.
00:40:19.000 I'm not kidding you, that's a thing David Brooks actually said back in 2008.
00:40:23.000 David Brooks, who is like, the yuppie of all yuppies.
00:40:26.000 Listening to David Brooks about the morality of spending this much money, while ripping on Joe Manchin, is just, it's peak democratic elitism.
00:40:34.000 So, here you have the Daily Show ripping at Joe Manchin.
00:40:38.000 Introducing Manchin, the politics game where everyone works together.
00:40:44.000 Almost.
00:40:46.000 We're gonna pass an infrastructure bill.
00:40:48.000 You play as the Democratic majority in the Senate, but watch out, one player is the Manchin.
00:40:55.000 I have concerns over the partisan nature of this legislation.
00:40:59.000 Uh-oh.
00:41:00.000 Looks like someone's the mansion.
00:41:02.000 But Kyle, we're all on the same team.
00:41:05.000 You know, America.
00:41:07.000 This bill cannot move forward without the support of at least one Republican colleague.
00:41:11.000 But there are no Republicans here.
00:41:13.000 They didn't want to play.
00:41:15.000 With Mansion, you can feel the excitement of a narrow majority held hostage by one sanctimonious d***head.
00:41:25.000 Seth Meyers doesn't.
00:41:26.000 One's a sanctimonious, you see?
00:41:28.000 Uh-huh, it's funny, it's funny.
00:41:31.000 Man, really pushing the boundaries of comedy.
00:41:35.000 Remember that time when comedy used to make you laugh?
00:41:37.000 Seth Meyers doesn't.
00:41:38.000 Here's Seth Meyers being not funny.
00:41:40.000 You've got two senators, Joe Manchin, who's been called a kingmaker by fossil fuel executives and personally profits from the coal industry.
00:41:47.000 And Kyrsten Sinema, who's raked in hundreds of thousands in donations from big pharma and has been raising money from business groups, holding up a bill that would tackle climate change and establish paid family leave, make community college tuition free, transform child care, and expand access to health care, among many other things.
00:42:04.000 Name one thing He's so funny.
00:42:15.000 I am enjoying the notion from Democrats that if you don't vote the way that they want you to vote, it's because you're being bribed.
00:42:22.000 Joe Manchin is doing this because of the bribery.
00:42:24.000 And so is Kyrsten Sinema.
00:42:24.000 That's why.
00:42:25.000 Because they are being bribed.
00:42:26.000 That's clearly the issue here.
00:42:29.000 So, a few things.
00:42:30.000 One, if we're going to talk about open bribery, the Democratic Party is so in hock to places like the teacher's unions that they will literally rewrite CDC standards in order to please the teacher's unions.
00:42:40.000 Second of all, as a typical rule, you take donations from groups that are politically aligned with you.
00:42:46.000 And if Chris and Sinema were presumably aligned the other way, you should be receiving donations from other groups.
00:42:52.000 I mean, that's how politics typically works.
00:42:54.000 But really, good on you guys.
00:42:56.000 Good on the elite media for deciding that anyone who disagrees with them, it's because they're attempting bribery.
00:43:01.000 All the while ignoring the fact that the entire Democratic program is an attempt to bribe voters with their own money.
00:43:06.000 Take money from, in some cases, not their own money, in some cases, from their next-door neighbor.
00:43:11.000 We'll take your next-door neighbor's money, we'll give it to you, and then you'll vote for us, seems to be the Democratic pitch here.
00:43:17.000 But they're all for the common man.
00:43:18.000 It's all the common man.
00:43:20.000 It's all the common good.
00:43:21.000 Again, their basic idea here is we spend endless amounts of money forever, and there's no downside ever.
00:43:27.000 And all we gain is more and more control over your life.
00:43:31.000 Now, I would be remiss if I did not note that there is a new standard with regard to immigration.
00:43:37.000 I mean, this administration is a bleep show in so many ways.
00:43:41.000 The DHS has issued new arrest and deportation guidelines to immigration agents, right?
00:43:45.000 This comes just a week after the DHS lied about its own agents by suggesting they were whipping immigrants, illegal immigrants, at the border.
00:43:51.000 The Biden administration said that.
00:43:52.000 Biden said it.
00:43:53.000 Harris said it.
00:43:54.000 Mayorkas said it.
00:43:55.000 It was all a lie.
00:43:56.000 Now, the DHS is issuing new regulations.
00:43:58.000 What do these regulations do, according to the Washington Post?
00:44:01.000 Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas issued broad new directives to immigration officers on Thursday, saying the fact that someone is an undocumented immigrant, quote, should not alone be the basis of a decision to detain and deport them from the United States.
00:44:14.000 Oh, that's not.
00:44:16.000 But aren't you like the immigration sort like border patrol?
00:44:21.000 So your job is to patrol the border.
00:44:23.000 But if someone crosses the border illegally, that is not alone the basis to detain or deport them from the United States.
00:44:31.000 Hmm.
00:44:32.000 I wonder why people think there's an open border here.
00:44:34.000 It's bewildering to me.
00:44:35.000 Who could have predicted such a thing?
00:44:38.000 The same time these people are releasing... There are 15,000 people under the bridge in Del Rio, Texas.
00:44:43.000 10,000 to 12,000 of them, according to Mayorkas, entered the United States.
00:44:46.000 I wonder why everyone thinks there's an open border here in the United States.
00:44:49.000 Maybe because there's an open border here in the United States thanks to these tool bags.
00:44:53.000 So now you're not just combining bad economic policy With inflationary policy and bad fiscal policy, you got bad economic policy, bad fiscal policy, endless welfare benefits, and an open border.
00:45:02.000 I can't see how anything here is gonna be bad.
00:45:05.000 It's all probably gonna be great.
00:45:07.000 Even Bernie Sanders used to be in favor of a closed border.
00:45:09.000 He was in favor of a closed border because he made the perfectly plausible and rational argument that if you offer endless welfare benefits to people and leave the border open, you won't be able to pay for everyone.
00:45:18.000 So much for that, we've got an administration that wants endless welfare benefits for pretty much everybody, and also an open border.
00:45:25.000 An amnesty program is on the way for those who say, well, you know, illegal immigrants can't receive things like federal welfare benefits.
00:45:30.000 First of all, they can receive in some states state welfare benefits.
00:45:33.000 They receive free public education for their kids.
00:45:35.000 But beyond that.
00:45:37.000 The administration would very much like to make all these people citizens as fast as humanly possible.
00:45:42.000 Does this look like a recipe for the success of the United States, or does it look like an attempt to gain ultimate power for the rest of time by the Democratic Party?
00:45:51.000 Endless welfare benefits, endless bribery, endless spending combined with open borders is one hell of a combo.
00:45:57.000 Alrighty, we'll be back here later today with an additional hour of content.
00:45:59.000 First, you can't forget to end your week by checking out The Andrew Klavan Show.
00:46:02.000 Drew's show is every Friday.
00:46:03.000 He's got an exciting evening planned for you.
00:46:05.000 Head on over to dailywire.com at 7 p.m.
00:46:07.000 Eastern, 6 p.m.
00:46:08.000 Central.
00:46:08.000 Tune in.
00:46:09.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:46:09.000 Shapiro, this is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:46:10.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Elliott Feld.
00:46:18.000 Executive Producer Jeremy Boring.
00:46:20.000 Our Supervising Producer is Mathis Glover.
00:46:22.000 Production Manager Pavel Lydowsky.
00:46:24.000 Associate Producer Bradford Carrington.
00:46:26.000 Post Producer Justin Barber.
00:46:28.000 The show is edited by Adam Sievitz.
00:46:30.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:46:32.000 Hair and Makeup is by Fabiola Christina.
00:46:34.000 Production Assistant Jessica Kranz.
00:46:36.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:46:38.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:46:41.000 Hey everybody, this is Andrew Klavan, host of The Andrew Klavan Show.
00:46:44.000 You know, some people are depressed because the republic is collapsing, the end of days is approaching, and the moon's turned to blood.
00:46:51.000 But on The Andrew Klavan Show, that's where the fun just gets started.