The Ben Shapiro Show - May 30, 2024


Trump Found Guilty: Ben Shapiro Breaks Down the Verdict


Episode Stats

Length

49 minutes

Words per Minute

190.31053

Word Count

9,395

Sentence Count

591

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

A jury in New York City convicted Donald Trump on 34 felony counts, and now he faces up to 4 years in prison. What does this mean for the future of the Trump presidency? Is this a good thing or a bad thing? What will happen next, and what will the American people do now that Donald Trump is no longer the President of the United States? Alex Blumberg explains why this is a travesty of justice, and why Joe Biden should be a hero for bringing this case to trial in order to get Donald Trump behind bars. Alex also explains why he thinks this case was a political hit job on Donald Trump and why this should be seen as a victory for Joe Biden and why we should not be surprised that a man who is likely to be re-elected in November is the one most likely to take Donald Trump down as a criminal. Alex's full reaction to the verdict and what happens next, including the possibility of Donald Trump going to jail, and if so, how long he will serve time in prison, and whether it will be a good or bad thing for the President and the country. Alex's analysis of the verdict, and the implications for Donald Trump's future in this case, and how it could impact the upcoming sentencing hearing, and a possible appeal to the Supreme Court case, in this episode of Alex's new book, What's the Deal with Donald Trump? and much, much more. (Part 1 of a two-part series on the Trump v. Trump and the Trump case. Part 2 will be out soon, coming soon, part 2, coming up next, Alex's final thoughts on the case and much more! Subscribe to Alex's newest book, "Trump's New York Times article, "The Biggest Scandal," out soon! . and his new podcast, "Myths and Myths, Myths and Legends: The President's Most Powerful Man in America's Most Influenced by Trump's Most Successful Life in the 21st Century." Subscribe on Apple Podcasts Subscribe and Subscribe on Podchaser and Subscribe to his Insta-Friendship? Learn more about your ad-free version of The Five Guys podcast? Subscribe on iTunes and more! Subscribe on Audible Download MP3 and leave us a review on Podcoin? Subscribe in Podcasts & Shoutout to Tomahawk Subscribe & Share on Podcasts by Tomahawks on Podcrush?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Late on Thursday afternoon, American democracy came under extraordinary threat when a New York jury, 12 New Yorkers, decided to convict Donald Trump.
00:00:08.000 He's been found guilty by the jury on 34 separate felony counts.
00:00:15.000 If he is sentenced to jail time, that jail time could be up to four years of all the sentences run concurrently.
00:00:20.000 It's a travesty of justice.
00:00:22.000 This case was a joke from the very beginning.
00:00:25.000 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who set this entire thing up to become more famous and more powerful.
00:00:30.000 Judge Juan Merchant.
00:00:32.000 who basically gave every benefit to the prosecution, whose jury instructions were unprecedented
00:00:37.000 in their willingness to flout the law.
00:00:39.000 This was all set up to convict Donald Trump simply so that Democrats could either jail Donald Trump
00:00:45.000 or spend the next few months declaring Donald Trump a convicted felon for purposes of the election.
00:00:50.000 The actual methodology by which he was found guilty is utterly uncertain.
00:00:57.000 As we discussed a little bit earlier today, the reality is that there were two crimes alleged,
00:01:04.000 a misdemeanor falsification of business records, which would not have resulted in any possible jail time.
00:01:09.000 But that was reliant to become a felony on other, on other crimes, unspecified crimes.
00:01:18.000 And those crimes could have been a violation of federal finance law,
00:01:21.000 except that Donald Trump clearly did not violate federal finance law.
00:01:24.000 Not only that, the federal government never even bothered to charge him
00:01:27.000 with violating federal finance law, federal election law in 2016.
00:01:32.000 Check your calendar.
00:01:33.000 It is currently 2024, and the case that New York just made is effectively that Donald Trump violated election law in 2016, falsified business records in 2017, and somehow, despite the fact that the statute of limitations has run already, this is now a Class E felony in the state of New York, lengthening the statute of limitations.
00:01:56.000 The number of hoops they had to jump through in order to manufacture this case is extraordinary.
00:02:00.000 The number of pretzel-like contortions the prosecution had to drag the jury through was extraordinary.
00:02:06.000 But in the end, did any of that matter?
00:02:08.000 In the end, was this ever about the legality of the case or the evidence presented by a porn star, Stormy Daniels, or a convicted perjurer, Michael Cohen?
00:02:17.000 Was it ever about any of that?
00:02:18.000 Or was it simply this?
00:02:19.000 If you get Donald Trump in front of a jury of his supposed peers in New York City, one of the bluest places in America, and you charge him with anything, if you charge him with jaywalking, they will convict him.
00:02:30.000 We all know the answer to this.
00:02:32.000 This was, in fact, jury nullification, but it was also prosecutorial nullification and judicial nullification of the law.
00:02:38.000 The law has nothing to do with this verdict whatsoever.
00:02:42.000 This particular trial was certainly about getting Donald Trump.
00:02:47.000 So, did they get Donald Trump?
00:02:49.000 We have yet to find out.
00:02:49.000 I think the backlash on this is going to be extraordinary because this is so obviously a manufactured case.
00:02:55.000 It's so obviously a stupid case that has nothing to do with Donald Trump's supposed violations of law.
00:03:01.000 I don't think the American people are going to stand for this.
00:03:04.000 I think that if Joe Biden believes this is going to somehow redound to his benefit rather than appearing as a politically motivated hit job on his political opponent in an unprecedented prosecution of the man most likely to take him out of office in November, I think he's got another thing coming.
00:03:18.000 I think this makes Joe Biden a hero in his own mind.
00:03:20.000 I don't think the American people are going to react quite that way.
00:03:25.000 Now, as to what happens next, as to what happens next, there is a procedure and there is a process as to what happens next.
00:03:33.000 But it is quite possible that Donald Trump could end up in jail because Judge Merchen has been out to get Trump this entire time.
00:03:41.000 From the gag order to the allowance of evidence, Judge Merchen has made clear he wants Donald Trump convicted.
00:03:48.000 I think he's going to make clear he wants him behind bars.
00:03:51.000 So, what exactly happens next?
00:03:53.000 Well, there's now a sentencing hearing.
00:03:55.000 That sentencing hearing will be within two or three months of the verdict.
00:03:59.000 So we're going to get weeks and weeks of speculation about whether Donald Trump is going to go to jail.
00:04:04.000 Trump's attorneys presumably will attempt to appeal to the judge and hope to postpone the sentencing beyond the election.
00:04:11.000 Merchant is almost certainly not going to go along with that because obviously the reason that he has structured this trial in this way is to convict Donald Trump and put him behind bars or at least sentence him prior to the election.
00:04:22.000 Now Trump is going to be dragged to jail today.
00:04:24.000 That's not the way this works because it's a non-violent felony.
00:04:27.000 He will not be detained pre-sentencing or forced to post bail in all likelihood.
00:04:32.000 Instead, in the next few weeks, he'll be dragged over to the dingy probation office at the New York City courthouse.
00:04:39.000 According to the Washington Post, the probation office would put together a pre-sentencing report for Judge Murchin.
00:04:44.000 As part of that process, Trump would be required to participate in an interview with the probation officer, who would produce a biography of him of about four, five, or six pages, legal experts said.
00:04:53.000 Such documents are confidential, intended only for the judge and the lawyers.
00:04:57.000 The court could agree to state Trump's sentence pending an appeal, That process would last beyond the November 5th presidential election.
00:05:04.000 But again, I highly doubt that they're going to stay Trump's sentence pending the appeal.
00:05:09.000 The only plausibility there is that if there were a sentence that were so short, that it would actually be shorter than the appeals process itself.
00:05:16.000 Maybe you delay the sentencing until after the appellate process goes forward.
00:05:21.000 Merchant's not gonna do that.
00:05:23.000 Given everything we know about Judge Merchant, who again, was out to get Trump from the beginning on this one.
00:05:27.000 Trump is not lying when he says that.
00:05:30.000 It is highly likely the merchant will move forward with the sentencing hearing.
00:05:35.000 Merchant could impose a financial penalty, require him to do community service, undergo counseling.
00:05:41.000 He could also impose home confinement, which would mean that Donald Trump would basically be confined to doing events in and around Mar-a-Lago in Florida.
00:05:51.000 It's also possible that he could just throw him in jail.
00:05:55.000 And no one knows what the hell happens then.
00:05:57.000 According to Forbes, in New York, classy felony sentences for offenders who have not been convicted of a felony within the last ten years, which would be Trump's situation, are doled out concurrently in thirds, such as one to three years, meaning that Trump could theoretically even if sentenced to the maximum here, which would be about four years, be eligible for parole, but only after a year.
00:06:15.000 If you were sentenced to a year or less, you would serve out his sentence in a city jail like Rikers, and then he would be eligible for parole after serving two-thirds of the sentence.
00:06:23.000 If he's sentenced to more than a year, the State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision will determine which of the 44 facilities he is sent to.
00:06:30.000 Secret Service has been gaming out this possibility, apparently, for months, as the New York Times reported.
00:06:35.000 If he ends up in prison, Secret Service would, theoretically, have to keep him separate from all the other inmates that have to screen his food and his personal items.
00:06:41.000 There'd be a detail of agents on him 24 hours a day.
00:06:44.000 The agents would, in fact, be armed.
00:06:47.000 All of this is insane.
00:06:48.000 The fact that we are even considering this is totally and utterly insane.
00:06:54.000 Again, we keep being told by the media the merchant is unlikely to sentence him to any jail time because he wouldn't want to be the man who puts the chief Republican candidate in prison.
00:07:04.000 I think precisely the reverse.
00:07:06.000 I think Democrats truly believe that if they throw Trump in jail, that the American people will surrender to the Biden administration.
00:07:12.000 And if that's the case, this is in fact a thwarting of basic standards of democracy.
00:07:20.000 To take a political opponent on trumped up charges, find him guilty, and then throw him in jail for purposes of the election is insanity.
00:07:28.000 It is third world crap.
00:07:29.000 It is insanity.
00:07:31.000 And that's presumably what we are talking about right now.
00:07:35.000 When we talk about the idea that a Manhattan DA, a politically motivated Manhattan DA, could go into his job with the purpose of convicting Donald Trump, that's what we are talking about.
00:07:47.000 Third world nonsense.
00:07:49.000 Not only that, the sentencing is going to be at least partially dependent on Trump's attitude.
00:07:54.000 So in the probation hearing, there are a few different factors
00:07:58.000 that are gonna be brought to play.
00:08:00.000 His age, his health, his likelihood to recommit an offense.
00:08:03.000 But one of the factors is remorse.
00:08:06.000 Now you see why that is.
00:08:07.000 Normally in a criminal case, if somebody commits a really, really dire crime
00:08:09.000 and they show no remorse, you can see why people would want them to be in jail.
00:08:13.000 But in this particular case, it's a catch-22 for Trump.
00:08:16.000 If he shows remorse for a crime he did not commit, then Biden just hammers him on that
00:08:22.000 And if he doesn't show remorse, then Merchant says, he committed a crime, I had to put a gag order on him, and then he didn't show remorse, so I'm throwing him in jail.
00:08:32.000 There is a very real possibility here that come November 5th, Donald Trump is sitting in Rikers while the American people are voting.
00:08:42.000 And if that's the case, the American people should vote for him all the more.
00:08:47.000 Because once again, this was a politically motivated prosecution.
00:08:51.000 The evidence was not there to support a conviction.
00:08:55.000 In fact, the charges were not even there to support a conviction.
00:09:01.000 That's why Merchant had to come up with this bizarre theory whereby four jurors could vote for one underlying crime, four jurors could vote for another underlying crime, and the last four could vote for a third underlying crime, and they could combine all of those into one giant felony that would serve as the predicate for the Class E felony for falsifying business records.
00:09:22.000 There's a high probability that this will be reversed either in the state or in the federal system.
00:09:27.000 It's certainly a violation of law in the state.
00:09:30.000 It's probably a violation of law federally because using the Federal Elections Funding Act to convict a guy in state court is bizarre.
00:09:40.000 Whatever the case, the Democrats just set the country on fire.
00:09:43.000 Alvin Bragg just set the country on fire.
00:09:47.000 I'm absolutely astonished that this trial was ever allowed to go forward.
00:09:52.000 I'm not particularly astonished at the verdict, but the consequences of this are extraordinarily dire, because play this one all the way out.
00:09:59.000 Let's say for a second that Donald Trump is sent to jail by one merchant, and let's say That while he is in jail, the election goes forth.
00:10:11.000 And under those conditions, he then loses the election.
00:10:14.000 If you think he was claiming rigging back in 2020, wait until you hear about 2024, when the Democrats charged him with a bunch of garbage, and then got 12 like-minded jurors to throw him in jail under the auspices of a glory-seeking judge, and took him completely off the campaign trail, and smeared him as a felon in advance of the election.
00:10:37.000 I mean, all the same people who are crying about Trump will be a tyrant.
00:10:41.000 Trump will, he will undermine the rule of law.
00:10:43.000 We cannot have a country with Donald Trump who will certainly destroy democracy.
00:10:49.000 It is hard for me to think of anything less democratic than trumping up a charge on your political opponent to jail him during an election cycle where you are currently losing, which is what Joe Biden is doing right now.
00:11:02.000 It's utter and complete insanity.
00:11:04.000 There is no precedent for it, obviously.
00:11:06.000 The only precedent for this in any way at all is Eugene V. Debs running for president from prison in 1920.
00:11:14.000 But that's not remotely this.
00:11:16.000 He was a third-party candidate with no shot of winning.
00:11:17.000 Donald Trump is currently leading in the polls.
00:11:20.000 He's the most likely person in America to be president of the United States right now.
00:11:28.000 Where do we go from here as a country?
00:11:31.000 Well, what the polling shows, by the way, is that a huge percentage of Americans will not change their vote based on this.
00:11:36.000 Certainly, Trump is not going to lose any of the Trump vote based on this.
00:11:40.000 Nobody is going to start shifting their vote away from Trump if they were already voting for Trump based on this.
00:11:48.000 A conviction would likely change very little.
00:11:53.000 According to Fox News, a new poll shows That regardless of whether Trump is found guilty or acquitted, the verdict would have no impact on voters' perception of the 2024 rematch.
00:12:04.000 Two-thirds of registered voters nationwide questioned in an NPR-PBS NewsHour Marist National Poll released on Thursday said that a guilty verdict in the trial would make no difference to their vote in the presidential election.
00:12:15.000 17% said a conviction of Trump would make them less likely.
00:12:18.000 15% said they'd be more likely to support Trump at the ballot box.
00:12:24.000 Again, only 9% Said that even if he was acquitted, they'd be less likely to vote for him.
00:12:31.000 Now, this is a really narrow election.
00:12:32.000 That's what makes this so astonishing.
00:12:34.000 I mean, it's astonishing for a thousand reasons, but one of the things that makes it so unbelievably astonishing is that this is an election that's going to come down to tens of thousands of votes in a handful of swing states again.
00:12:45.000 Right now, Donald Trump is leading outside the margin of error in Nevada, which means all he has to do is win Michigan or Pennsylvania and the election is over.
00:12:55.000 This thing could easily come down to two, three, 4,000 votes in one swing state.
00:13:01.000 And if Donald Trump were to lose in November, while serving prison time on a trumped up charge, the response in the United States will be absolutely explosive.
00:13:12.000 You want to talk about an illegitimate president at that point?
00:13:14.000 The American people will see a Democrat elected under those auspices as illegitimate.
00:13:19.000 There's just no other way to do it.
00:13:21.000 There's no other way to even see that.
00:13:25.000 Honestly, Joe Biden is going to come out, I am sure, and presumably he is going to make comments about the law having been done, no one being above the law, while simultaneously the DOJ attempted to broker a deal to save his own son from jail.
00:13:43.000 He himself was spared a prosecution on mishandling of classified documents because he was supposedly a doddering elderly man.
00:13:50.000 And he's going to lecture us about how the justice system just worked?
00:13:53.000 It did not.
00:13:55.000 The reverse.
00:13:57.000 Judge Merchant, for what it's worth, has now set July 11th for the sentencing.
00:14:00.000 So they're moving quite quickly.
00:14:02.000 A probation interview will be set for Trump, according to Jonathan Turley, who's in the courtroom.
00:14:06.000 All motions must be filed by June 13th.
00:14:10.000 Merchant was asking about bail status.
00:14:12.000 There is no bail, and everybody has left.
00:14:15.000 We'll bring you comment from the Trump camp as that comes in.
00:14:19.000 Meanwhile, we have Daily Wire reporter Spencer Lindquist.
00:14:21.000 He is live from the courthouse.
00:14:23.000 Spencer, tell me what it's like over there.
00:14:27.000 We've got a loud and chaotic scene right here.
00:14:30.000 We're just outside of the courthouse at a park just across the street here in New York City.
00:14:35.000 And it's been a mix today.
00:14:36.000 We've seen a lot of people coming out here to support President Trump.
00:14:40.000 And now it's a lot of people, of course, who are very, very happy that he's been convicted.
00:14:45.000 People are calling it a victory for democracy.
00:14:49.000 But I think something that is unmistakable is that today is a We've got a moment in our history right now that I think we're going to look back on with a lot of significance.
00:15:03.000 And everybody's turning now towards November to see what will this mean for the election?
00:15:09.000 What will this mean in this matchup against Biden?
00:15:12.000 Of course, that question is still one that has yet to be answered, but we're seeing a mix of emotions here on the ground in New York.
00:15:21.000 So Spencer, are we expecting to hear from the Trump camp sometime in the near future here?
00:15:26.000 I would assume that the parties are variously leaving the courthouse.
00:15:29.000 Trump obviously was not arrested inside the courtroom.
00:15:31.000 They have a sentencing hearing that's happening in about six weeks is what we are hearing.
00:15:34.000 Has there been any word where you are on when Trump will emerge and if he's going to say something to the press, which I assume he will?
00:15:43.000 I haven't heard anything regarding the specifics of the Trump comment or what he'll say.
00:15:48.000 But we do know that he's been very vocal throughout the course of this case.
00:15:52.000 He's been very vocal on his social media platform, through social.
00:15:55.000 And I believe we can expect him to continue to be very vocal.
00:16:00.000 Now that this case has ended, I believe he'll be speaking, I'm sure, before long.
00:16:06.000 But we're still awaiting the specifics on exactly when that might be.
00:16:12.000 Well, Spencer, really appreciate it.
00:16:13.000 We will check back in with you as time goes on.
00:16:16.000 If Donald Trump emerges, thanks for being there.
00:16:19.000 We'll be back with you momentarily.
00:16:20.000 All right, so coming up in a little bit, we're gonna have Harmeet Dhillon, constitutional lawyer.
00:16:26.000 She's done work with the Trump campaign as well to comment on what happens next, the impact on the election, the nature of this particular case.
00:16:35.000 We are now in uncharted territory.
00:16:36.000 There's never been anything like this in American history.
00:16:41.000 Merchant has thanked the jury, as far as we are being updated.
00:16:45.000 The Biden campaign has now released a statement.
00:16:47.000 Quote, in New York today, predicted moments ago, we saw that no one is above the law.
00:16:53.000 Is that what we saw?
00:16:54.000 Is that what we saw?
00:16:56.000 Donald Trump has always mistakenly believed he would never face consequences for breaking the law for his own personal gain.
00:17:00.000 But today's verdict does not change the fact the American people face a simple reality.
00:17:04.000 There is still only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office, at the ballot box.
00:17:07.000 Convicted felon or not, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president.
00:17:10.000 The threat Trump poses to our democracy has never been greater.
00:17:13.000 He is running an increasingly unhinged campaign of revenge and retribution, pledging to be a dictator on day one, calling for our constitution to be terminated so he can regain and keep power.
00:17:20.000 A second Trump term means chaos, ripping away Americans' freedoms and fomenting political violence.
00:17:24.000 The American people will reject it in November.
00:17:27.000 That is the Biden campaign.
00:17:28.000 So definitely calming the waters right there by suggesting that tyranny is at hand if Trump is elected after Democrats, motivated by politics, jailed, are moving to jail.
00:17:39.000 The former president and possibly future president of the United States.
00:17:43.000 You want to talk about projection?
00:17:44.000 The Biden campaign suggesting that this is no one is above the law while Joe Biden sits there having been let off the hook by his own DOJ with his son.
00:17:54.000 They attempted to let his son off the hook, his DOJ.
00:17:58.000 Him sitting there and suggesting that Trump poses the threat to our democracy while a Manhattan district attorney pushes to jail This was a disgrace.
00:18:07.000 This was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who was corrupt.
00:18:10.000 that the threat to our democracy is from Trump is totally insane.
00:18:14.000 It's totally, utterly, completely insane.
00:18:17.000 We do have Donald Trump's immediate response.
00:18:20.000 Here is what President Trump had to say upon emerging from the courthouse.
00:18:24.000 This was a disgrace.
00:18:28.000 This was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who was corrupt.
00:18:33.000 It's a rigged trial, a disgrace.
00:18:36.000 They wouldn't give us a venue change.
00:18:39.000 We were at 5% or 6% in this district, in this area.
00:18:46.000 This was a rigged, disgraceful trial.
00:18:49.000 The real verdict is going to be November 5th by the people.
00:18:54.000 And they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here.
00:18:58.000 You have a sole respect DA and the whole thing.
00:19:03.000 We didn't do a thing wrong.
00:19:04.000 I'm a very innocent man and it's okay.
00:19:09.000 I'm fighting for our country.
00:19:10.000 I'm fighting for our constitution.
00:19:13.000 Our whole country is being rigged right now.
00:19:15.000 This was done by the Biden administration in order to wound or hurt an opponent, a political opponent.
00:19:24.000 And I think it's just a disgrace.
00:19:26.000 And we'll keep fighting.
00:19:27.000 We'll fight till the end and we'll win.
00:19:29.000 Because our country's gone to hell.
00:19:32.000 We don't have the same country anymore.
00:19:34.000 We have a divided mess.
00:19:36.000 We're nation in decline.
00:19:37.000 Syria's declined.
00:19:38.000 Millions and millions of people pouring into our country right now.
00:19:43.000 From prisons and from mental institutions, terrorists, and they're taking over our country.
00:19:49.000 We have a country that's in big trouble.
00:19:52.000 But this was a rigged decision right from day one with a conflicted judge who should have never been allowed to try this case.
00:19:59.000 Never.
00:20:00.000 And we will fight for our constitution.
00:20:02.000 This is long from over.
00:20:03.000 Thank you very much.
00:20:07.000 He ain't wrong.
00:20:09.000 Joining us online to discuss is Harmeet Dhillon.
00:20:11.000 She, of course, is the managing partner of Dhillon Law Group, and she's done work with the Trump campaign, particularly with regard to election law.
00:20:17.000 Harmeet, obviously this is an extraordinarily dark day in the history of the American Republic, unprecedented for a local prosecutor in Manhattan to pick up what really is a felony federal charge that was never tried, try to spin it into a state law charge, charge it 34 times, And then receive a conviction.
00:20:39.000 What do you make of the trial?
00:20:40.000 And then we'll get to what comes next.
00:20:42.000 Well, Ben, I'm almost at a loss for words.
00:20:44.000 This is an unprecedented day, as you've said, not just for our country, but for our legal system.
00:20:50.000 And what we saw in this case, this is the first time ever in New York state that falsification of records has been charged as a felony.
00:20:57.000 The statute of limitations is run.
00:21:00.000 The federal prosecutors, these state prosecutors previously, the FEC, Every agency that could have charged these crimes rejected them as not being crimes.
00:21:12.000 This is a Frankenstein case put together and life breathed into it by a judge who rigged it.
00:21:19.000 I'm not surprised when I heard that the jury came back with a verdict.
00:21:21.000 I knew what the verdict was going to be because the best case scenario here would have been that one honest juror would have looked at this steaming pile of dung and said, no, I cannot participate in this farce.
00:21:32.000 But the way the judge put blinders on the jury, the way the judge gave grossly improper jury instructions,
00:21:40.000 the way the judge refused to recuse himself, allowed prejudicial evidence to be had
00:21:45.000 and generally rigged this from day one.
00:21:48.000 This was a foregone conclusion almost.
00:21:50.000 And so, you know, what we have to do here is pray that the appeals process goes forward.
00:21:55.000 However, I do think that from a political standpoint, Ben, this has backfired bigly, as President Trump would say.
00:22:02.000 He is now more popular than he was at the beginning of this prosecution.
00:22:06.000 And I hope that the American people see this for what it is.
00:22:09.000 And we cannot let this stand in our country.
00:22:12.000 It reminds me of Pakistan.
00:22:14.000 It reminds me of the Middle East.
00:22:15.000 It reminds me of places where they don't have the rule of law.
00:22:18.000 And this is really a dangerous day for our country.
00:22:22.000 You know, Harmeet, this is obviously a kangaroo court situation.
00:22:25.000 We've all spent a lot of time following this trial.
00:22:28.000 The truth is that I personally didn't spend a lot of time on it because it's pretty clear as soon as they brought charges, no matter what it was, that Trump was going to get convicted.
00:22:34.000 I mean, this is simply picking a jurisdiction where people hate Donald Trump, bringing him up on literally anything.
00:22:39.000 Manufacturing some charge or another to spin it into a felony and then and then charging him with it.
00:22:44.000 And that was pretty clear from Judge Merchant's jury instructions, which when you go through in detail, I've never seen anything remotely like this.
00:22:49.000 I mean, you had a situation in which you had a misdemeanor that had run the statute of limitations with regards to falsification of business records.
00:22:57.000 That was kept alive by spinning the idea that that was a falsification on behalf of a second unspecified crime.
00:23:03.000 There were three theories that were put forward as to what that second unspecified crime was.
00:23:07.000 And Judge Murchin then informed the jury, they didn't even have to agree on what the underlying crime was, that the falsification of business records was supposed to be hiding, that they could actually divide 4-4-4 on those various crimes.
00:23:20.000 What I compared that to is that's sort of like saying that in a felony murder case where the murder is imputed to a person who didn't commit the murder based on the underlying felony that everybody was committing together, like robbing a bank, that there are actually like five felonies that are charged.
00:23:32.000 You don't have to agree.
00:23:33.000 The jurors don't have to agree on what the felony was.
00:23:35.000 It could be like one of five different felonies and they could vehemently disagree, but you could still charge somebody with felony murder.
00:23:40.000 I've never heard of unanimity by aggregation.
00:23:44.000 That seemed like a weird concept to me.
00:23:47.000 It's nonsense.
00:23:49.000 That's why you never heard of it.
00:23:50.000 Judges are ashamed to let such a thing pass, and prosecutors are ashamed to propose it.
00:23:54.000 I've never seen it proposed even.
00:23:56.000 And in a case, and there's a United States Supreme Court precedent that says that where there's a crime that requires a predicate act, the jury has to agree unanimously on what the predicate act is.
00:24:05.000 And in this case, there is no case, period, if there isn't a single felony that the jury agrees on unanimously.
00:24:12.000 What's also clear in this case, Ben, I mean, you know from being a lawyer yourself, that judges are normally embarrassed to be reversed.
00:24:21.000 That's one sort of social check that keeps them in place.
00:24:24.000 They're embarrassed that they might have a record that looks bad on appeal.
00:24:29.000 But in this case, the judge, I think, is fully aware that he's committed numerous acts of reversible error.
00:24:34.000 And he doesn't care.
00:24:35.000 I think the endgame for this judge is a lucrative book deal, TV slot with CNN, MSNBC.
00:24:42.000 His daughter continues to get big multimillion dollar payouts from her company.
00:24:47.000 And it's just upside for a political hack of a judge.
00:24:52.000 You know, that's the problem is that the normal breaks and social barriers that apply and speed bumps that apply in our country have been degraded over the last few years in this get Trump effort.
00:25:02.000 So, you know, I've been a lawyer for 31 years and I really question, you know, when you go into a court and you try to explain to a client how it's going to go, can you predict that anymore?
00:25:12.000 Because this is not a predictable outcome of a just legal system.
00:25:17.000 So, Harmeet, I think the big question on everybody's mind now is whether he's going to actually be sentenced by Judge Merchant to jail time.
00:25:23.000 I'd be shocked if he is not, considering the way that this trial has proceeded, considering what a mess the charges were in the first place.
00:25:29.000 It is obvious to me that if Merchant stops short of sending him to jail, he wouldn't be going all the way.
00:25:34.000 If he wants that lucrative book contract, he has to be the guy who sent Donald Trump to jail.
00:25:38.000 How do you think the sentencing goes?
00:25:39.000 Particularly because one aspect of the sentencing is that supposedly you get an easier sentence if you show remorse.
00:25:45.000 Trump literally cannot show remorse for a crime he did not commit because there's no crime alleged.
00:25:49.000 So how do you think that sentencing goes?
00:25:52.000 Yeah, I agree with you completely.
00:25:53.000 I think the judge's charter politically was throw the book at the sky, tie him up, embarrass him, humiliate him.
00:25:59.000 And by the way, hold the sentencing despite other cases that he's got going on.
00:26:05.000 week before the Republican National Convention to try to smear that as well.
00:26:10.000 And so the talking points from the Democrats, as they're going to be churning out in minutes,
00:26:14.000 will be the Republicans are nominating a convicted felon, you know, save our country, vote for
00:26:20.000 Joe Biden, who himself is, of course, in my opinion, guilty of many crimes that his DOJ
00:26:26.000 will never charge him or his son even for.
00:26:28.000 They're slapping them on the wrist with minor things with the son.
00:26:31.000 So, you know, we have to hope that the American voting public, first of all, will get out and vote and be outraged by this.
00:26:40.000 And be motivated.
00:26:41.000 As you pointed out in your intro, it's really not going to change.
00:26:44.000 If anything, it's going to strengthen the resolve of the MAGA voters.
00:26:48.000 But I think there are actually a lot more voters out there who are disgusted.
00:26:51.000 I've seen a lot of never-Trumper people I know in my social circles who say they're going to vote for President Trump as a result of this.
00:26:57.000 And so I think it may backfire.
00:26:59.000 But then you have to look at whether we have a fair election or not.
00:27:01.000 I don't think we had a fair election in 2020.
00:27:03.000 And so, you know, the rigging is going pretty deep here in our country.
00:27:07.000 I'm sorry to say that as an American, but I think I have very serious concerns about the justice system at this point.
00:27:13.000 And by the way, these judges at the state level are also the ones who determine elections.
00:27:18.000 And so if it happened in New York and Manhattan, you know that they're able to get to judges in other places as well.
00:27:26.000 So, Harmeet, what is the process for Trump's legal team now?
00:27:29.000 So, presumably there will be state appeals.
00:27:31.000 If this is a reversible error, I don't know what is.
00:27:33.000 There could be theoretical federal appeals based presumably on the idea that they charged a federal crime in a state court, which you're not supposed to do.
00:27:40.000 I mean, that's effectively what they convicted him based upon.
00:27:43.000 How do you see the appellate process playing out?
00:27:44.000 Do they try to go straight to federal court and try to get this to the Supreme Court?
00:27:47.000 Do they try to move through the state courts, which are typically rigged on behalf of Democrats in the state of New York?
00:27:53.000 Yeah, I mean, the normal process would be to go up to the Intermediate Court of Appeals in New York and then the Supreme Court of New York.
00:27:59.000 So there's two levels of appeal there.
00:28:01.000 We already have a hint from the fact that the campaign, the president rather, appealed the judge's failure to recuse himself, which he was statutorily required to do, given the personal financial interest of an immediate family member.
00:28:15.000 And the Court of Appeals let the case go forward under this judge.
00:28:18.000 So that's not a good sign for the intermediate level Court of appeals.
00:28:22.000 And typically, you're only able to take a federal appeal after you've exhausted your state remedies at the highest court, which is not going to happen, in my opinion, as a lawyer before the election.
00:28:32.000 You know, there are other things you could take extraordinary writs of habeas or such.
00:28:36.000 But, you know, until until they've got him in custody, I don't think they're going to be looking at that.
00:28:40.000 So, you know, I think it's going to wind its way through the system.
00:28:43.000 And eventually, if there are some honest judges along the way, this should get reversed on A dozen grounds.
00:28:50.000 I think that was I saw a reversible error on a daily basis following this trial.
00:28:54.000 So, you know, I think it makes him more popular, frankly, politically, putting back my political hat.
00:28:59.000 But this is a shameful day for American history.
00:29:03.000 And, you know, young people who are thinking about law school are going to look at this and say, do I want to be part of this system?
00:29:08.000 And, you know, so I think that's really degrading the rule of law and people's respect for law throughout the country, not just with respect to this case, because if you're willing to weaponize the entire That's Harmeet Dhillon.
00:29:19.000 She is a Dhillon Law Group.
00:29:21.000 Harmeet, appreciate the time.
00:29:22.000 Dark day for the country.
00:29:23.000 Thanks for your insight on all of this.
00:29:25.000 My pleasure.
00:29:25.000 in terms of level of magnitude of corruption.
00:29:30.000 And that's Harmeet Dhillon.
00:29:34.000 She is a Dhillon Law Group.
00:29:36.000 Harmeet, appreciate the time.
00:29:37.000 Dark day for the country.
00:29:38.000 Thanks for your insight on all of this.
00:29:41.000 My pleasure.
00:29:42.000 Thanks for having me.
00:29:43.000 Now let's talk about the political fallout of everything that is going on right here.
00:29:48.000 So, once again, the entire Biden campaign is predicated on the idea that Donald Trump cannot be allowed into high office.
00:29:57.000 Does this trial and the conviction, does that mean that Americans are more likely to see Trump as a threat to democracy?
00:30:06.000 I think the reverse.
00:30:07.000 I think that more people are going to look at this and see Joe Biden as a threat to democracy and his administration and Democrats.
00:30:13.000 Remember, Donald Trump in 2016 had crowds cheering, lock her up.
00:30:18.000 And you will remember that at the time the media and the Democrats suggested that this was tyrannical.
00:30:22.000 How could you say lock her up even though she had clearly committed crimes with regard to classified information?
00:30:27.000 How could you possibly say lock her up?
00:30:29.000 It was just tyrannical of Trump to suggest such a thing.
00:30:31.000 And then of course, Trump didn't do that.
00:30:33.000 Trump didn't move to lock her up.
00:30:34.000 He didn't, he didn't activate his DOJ to go after his political opponents.
00:30:40.000 And then, and by the way, that was after an election cycle in which the Obama FBI was literally investigating the Trump campaign.
00:30:48.000 Every weapon at the disposal of the federal government has now been launched at Donald Trump.
00:30:53.000 From the FBI in 2016, going after Carter Page, going after the Trump campaign, laundering Fusion GPS nonsense reports into the public eye, all the way up through the 2020 election cycle.
00:31:09.000 And now you have the justice system being mobilized by Democrats, motivated partisan Democrats to get Donald Trump.
00:31:18.000 Who's the threat to the democracy?
00:31:21.000 Who's the threat to America right now?
00:31:24.000 Is it the guy who has been targeted by all these institutions?
00:31:27.000 Or is it the people who have wielded these institutions and are wielding them in real time?
00:31:34.000 This is the insane.
00:31:36.000 We're now living in the insane asylum.
00:31:39.000 If you're waiting for politics to cool down, well, you picked the wrong time to be alive, apparently.
00:31:45.000 Joining us on the line is my quasi-friend Michael Knowles, who's been watching all of this with, I would say, a sufficient amount of outrage, given his Twitter account.
00:31:53.000 Michael, I've never, obviously, seen anything like this.
00:31:56.000 No one's ever seen anything like this.
00:31:58.000 It's truly a horrifying day for the country.
00:32:01.000 Horrifying.
00:32:01.000 On every possible level.
00:32:02.000 I have here on my desk a flag that was flying at Justice Alito's house, for which he got in trouble.
00:32:08.000 It's an American Revolutionary War flag.
00:32:10.000 It says, An Appeal to Heaven.
00:32:12.000 Supposedly, according to the left, to fly such a flag that was raised by George Washington and made by Jose de Camp, that makes us the insurrectionists and the threat to democracy.
00:32:23.000 You, of course, said it very, very well.
00:32:24.000 I think most people are going to look at this and say, the Democrats are the real threat to our political order.
00:32:31.000 And not just a threat.
00:32:32.000 They have impaled our political order.
00:32:36.000 We had a 234-year and four-month agreement not to prosecute presidents, former presidents, and major party nominees.
00:32:47.000 We just had never done that.
00:32:49.000 And so you got to ask yourself, why is it?
00:32:52.000 Did we not prosecute these people because they never commit crimes?
00:32:56.000 No, actually, they've committed plenty of crimes.
00:32:57.000 The current president has committed some crimes.
00:33:00.000 Two presidents ago, Barack Obama, he definitely committed some crimes.
00:33:03.000 So why have we not done it?
00:33:05.000 One of the reasons we've not done it is that it is not possible to have an impartial jury when you're talking about the top politician in the country.
00:33:14.000 Everybody has a view.
00:33:15.000 This is the chief executive.
00:33:16.000 This is a man who, in his person, represents the country and the spirit of the people.
00:33:21.000 So it can't happen, and it's always going to be kind of a kangaroo court, which is why, from the beginning, I think we all knew this was a kangaroo court.
00:33:30.000 It seemed very rigged.
00:33:31.000 The judge, Murshan in this case, seemed nakedly partisan and political.
00:33:36.000 The charges were basically incoherent.
00:33:39.000 One of them really should have been a federal charge.
00:33:42.000 One, is it a felony?
00:33:43.000 Is it a misdemeanor?
00:33:44.000 If it's a misdemeanor, it's actually past the statute of limitations.
00:33:47.000 But I didn't really care about any of the legal argument because of that fact that it's so obviously a political question.
00:33:54.000 So when I was looking at it this morning, We're all waiting for the results.
00:33:58.000 I said the only thing that is going to determine the outcome in this case is whether or not a secret conservative snuck onto the jury.
00:34:06.000 That's pretty much it.
00:34:08.000 If that person is pro-Trump, and I looked through, the New York Times did a little biography of each of the jurors, and I said, Well, that person says that she listens to religious podcasts.
00:34:17.000 Maybe?
00:34:17.000 I don't know.
00:34:18.000 This person, he lives on the Upper East Side, but he works in finance.
00:34:21.000 I don't know.
00:34:21.000 Maybe?
00:34:21.000 But there is no chance, right?
00:34:23.000 We're talking about Manhattan jurors.
00:34:25.000 I think Trump got about three votes in Manhattan in 2020.
00:34:29.000 The whole thing was a setup from day one.
00:34:31.000 And what's so sad about it is Trump might get a little political boost here in the sense that people are going to recognize this is unfair.
00:34:39.000 There was one poll on the federal case.
00:34:41.000 62% of Americans view the federal charges as being primarily politically motivated.
00:34:45.000 So people know what's up in America.
00:34:48.000 But from the historical perspective, you can't put the genie back in the bottle.
00:34:53.000 235 years almost of an agreement not to behave like a banana republic, a tin pot dictatorship that is out the window.
00:35:02.000 Democrats did it and it can't be undone.
00:35:07.000 Well, President Biden apparently will not address Trump's conviction tonight.
00:35:09.000 So apparently they weren't able to get a hold of enough Adderall to get him up and in front of a TV.
00:35:14.000 He has made a statement, as we mentioned earlier, in which he talked about how now everyone is being accountable before the law, which is an incredible statement from a man who clearly violated classified documents law himself and was openly held to have done so.
00:35:27.000 By the DOJ lawyer, Robert Herr, who literally said the only reason that he didn't prosecute him is because he's a senile old dodder.
00:35:33.000 That's literally what he says.
00:35:34.000 And now he's out there saying that, obviously, the real threat to democracy is the guy who is being convicted of crimes that don't exist in a Democrat courtroom.
00:35:43.000 This is the part that is truly astonishing.
00:35:46.000 And I think that you are going to see An enormous consolidation around Trump, certainly people who are lukewarm on Trump.
00:35:54.000 Maybe the people who supported Nikki Haley at the end of the primaries or people who are DeSantis supporters and we're still kind of waiting to jump all the way back on the Trump bandwagon.
00:36:01.000 That's over now.
00:36:02.000 You're going to get 100% adherence to Trump on the right.
00:36:05.000 But I think independents, too, are going to look at this and they are going to say that Donald Trump is being victimized here.
00:36:11.000 He's clearly being victimized here.
00:36:12.000 And a certain Weird political way.
00:36:15.000 I think this is quite good for Trump because one of the things is that Trump likes to talk about Trump.
00:36:19.000 I mean, that's just the reality of who Donald Trump is as a candidate.
00:36:23.000 Well, there were only really two topics on which he was speaking in the past few months.
00:36:28.000 One was the January 6th, 2020 election stuff, and two were the trials.
00:36:33.000 And the trials, it's fine for him to talk about.
00:36:35.000 That is a fine political thing for him to talk about because there you are talking about the serious issue of one party mobilizing the instruments of government in order to victimize members of the opposing party.
00:36:45.000 And that is a much better campaign for him to run than anything related to 2020.
00:36:49.000 I mean, if they get to a debate and Joe Biden says January 6th was a threat to democracy, Donald Trump should say, and I'm sure he will, you mobilizing every piece of the Justice Department from state to federal in order to convict your political opponent in advance of an election you're losing, that seems to be much more of a threat to democracy than anything that I've done.
00:37:07.000 I mean, I think the door is wide open on Biden and team because of this conviction.
00:37:13.000 I mean, this is the astonishing point here, is that they really thought that by convicting Trump, they were going to finish his candidacy.
00:37:21.000 And instead, all they've done is create just another label they can throw at him.
00:37:24.000 But what they've really done is shape Americans' perceptions of them.
00:37:27.000 Like right now, I want to get your take on this, Michael.
00:37:29.000 I'm hearing a lot of people out there on the right, and they're like, well, you know, Republican D.A.
00:37:32.000 should start immediately indicting Democratic politicians.
00:37:35.000 I don't think that's right.
00:37:37.000 Because I think the American people don't like what they're seeing.
00:37:39.000 If the American people were fine with what they're seeing, I think that that's totally right.
00:37:43.000 Because I think what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
00:37:45.000 But I actually think that this is a political win for Republicans in the sense that they're not the party tearing down democracy right now, it is the Democrats who are inciting their political opponents, dragging them up in blue areas where they don't even live, and then threatening them with jail time.
00:37:59.000 By the way, I think...
00:38:00.000 I think Murchin is going to sentence him to jail.
00:38:01.000 I think that you can't... I think Chekhov's gun must be used.
00:38:04.000 I think that if you get this far, if you're Murchin, you're going to go all this way.
00:38:08.000 I don't think you go all this way just to sentence him to probation.
00:38:11.000 If you come at the king, you best not miss, to quote The Wire, who is quoting more elegant sources.
00:38:17.000 Of course, of course Murchin has to sentence him to jail.
00:38:22.000 And I agree with you that...
00:38:24.000 Politically, this looks good.
00:38:26.000 The Democrats are stepping on a rake and Trump can be a martyr and sort of is a martyr now.
00:38:31.000 I think it's totally legitimate.
00:38:33.000 What worries me, though, is how brazen this is and how increasingly brazen the Democrats have become.
00:38:40.000 That can have a positive political effect for them as well, because it can demoralize conservatives.
00:38:46.000 So, yes, conservatives are going to rally around Trump, and independents are going to rally around Trump, and everyone's going to be outraged by this, but they did it.
00:38:53.000 They did it, and they're getting away with it, at least for now, just like they got away with changing a lot of election rules.
00:38:59.000 Uh, in some cases in contravention of state constitutions, let's say like in Pennsylvania.
00:39:04.000 Just like they got away with spying on the Trump campaign.
00:39:06.000 Just like they got away with undermining his administration and arresting some of his associates.
00:39:11.000 Just like they get away with this and that and this and that and they never pay a consequence for it.
00:39:15.000 We were talking about the crimes that Joe Biden has apparently committed.
00:39:19.000 Just two days ago, he visited Hallie Biden, the widow of his son and former mistress of his other son.
00:39:25.000 This was days before the Hunter Biden gun crimes trial.
00:39:30.000 Hallie Biden is going to be an important witness in the gun crimes trial because allegedly she seems to have helped him to commit those crimes.
00:39:40.000 Any reasonable person looking at that meeting says, that's witness tampering.
00:39:44.000 One of the things that you're accusing Donald Trump of doing, you, sitting President Biden, are doing yourself.
00:39:48.000 And what do they do?
00:39:49.000 They shrug their shoulders, he licks his ice cream cone, and they don't care.
00:39:53.000 So yes, this will mobilize public opinion against Biden.
00:39:57.000 The really demoralizing question is, how much does public opinion still matter in elections?
00:40:05.000 Yeah, Michael, as you say, you know, when it comes to the glass being broken, you can't unbreak this glass.
00:40:09.000 It is worth noting at this point that if Joe Biden does not win this next election, he will undoubtedly be prosecuted.
00:40:17.000 Undoubtedly.
00:40:17.000 I mean, we have now, but this is not glass that goes back in place.
00:40:21.000 I mean, the reality is that he is now running to basically keep himself and his son out of jail.
00:40:26.000 So you now have a political system in which people who are running for the presidency have to first consider whether they are going to be unfairly brought up on charges, and then they have to consider that if they lose, there's a good shot they go to jail.
00:40:40.000 I mean, that is where we currently sit.
00:40:42.000 Now, listen, there are other democracies around the world Where there have actually been sitting politicians who have ended up in jail after losing office, after being elected to high office or whatever it is.
00:40:53.000 But in those particular cases, those cases happen to be incredibly well-founded.
00:40:57.000 What makes this such a travesty is that it was so incredibly not well-founded from the very get-go, from the beginning.
00:41:03.000 This was the weakest of any of the cases being brought against President Trump.
00:41:07.000 And what it really says is that if you get the January 6th trial in Washington, D.C., he'll get convicted there.
00:41:12.000 Yeah.
00:41:12.000 If you're down in Florida in the classified documents trial, probably a hung jury.
00:41:16.000 If you're over in Atlanta, depending on the jury selection, probably gets convicted.
00:41:20.000 This is now a game of simple forum shopping.
00:41:23.000 This happens all the time in civil litigation.
00:41:25.000 You try to find the forum where the jury is going to be most available to you.
00:41:29.000 But if you're a national candidate like Donald Trump, and you're being brought up in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges, It's completely dependent on the nature of the population in the area in which you are being charged, which makes a mockery of justice.
00:41:44.000 That's not one standard for all.
00:41:46.000 That is, do they like you?
00:41:48.000 Essentially, it makes a referendum on you electorally, except if you lose the election, you go to jail.
00:41:53.000 Exactly.
00:41:54.000 You're talking about the chief skill and charge of a politician, which is to go out and get people to like them.
00:42:00.000 Well, we have a venue for that.
00:42:02.000 That takes place within the legislature and the elections for legislators and for the presidency.
00:42:09.000 That's not supposed to take place in the judicial branch.
00:42:12.000 You know, understood from a philosophical standpoint, the three branches of government are supposed to correspond to the tripartite soul.
00:42:20.000 The legislature is supposed to be the passionate, emotional, repetitive part.
00:42:25.000 The executive is supposed to be the spirited part, the thematic part of the soul.
00:42:29.000 But the judicial part of the government is supposed to be logical, disinterested.
00:42:34.000 Cool.
00:42:35.000 Lady Justice with a blindfold on.
00:42:37.000 And I don't think any person today, even the most partisan Democrat, would be able to look you in the face and tell you sincerely that Lady Justice still has her blindfold on.
00:42:47.000 Not a chance.
00:42:49.000 Well, Michael Mulls, go take a listen to The Michael Mulls Show.
00:42:52.000 Really, thanks for your commentary and terrible day for the country.
00:42:56.000 Try and have a Mayflower cigar and relax a little bit before you pop a blood vessel over there.
00:43:01.000 Yeah.
00:43:01.000 Appreciate the time.
00:43:02.000 Thanks, Ben.
00:43:04.000 Okay.
00:43:05.000 Meanwhile, the Trump campaign has dropped a new ad.
00:43:09.000 Presumably theorizing that they were going to be convicted, that Trump was going to be convicted in this case.
00:43:14.000 Here is the new Trump campaign ad on this basis.
00:43:17.000 Thank you for joining us here today.
00:43:25.000 you Earlier this afternoon, Donald Trump was arraigned by a Manhattan grand jury on 34 felony counts.
00:43:34.000 This case is an abomination.
00:43:36.000 You know, it's obviously political.
00:43:38.000 Seven years to try to come up with this case.
00:43:40.000 They're just wrong on the law.
00:43:42.000 The only crime that Donald Trump is being prosecuted for is the crime of running for president.
00:43:46.000 Political persecution at the highest level.
00:43:49.000 They've quite frankly given up on trying to beat him at the polls.
00:43:52.000 Either going to steal it or stop it by law firm.
00:43:54.000 A Democrat prosecutor elected on a get Trump platform.
00:43:58.000 What's going on here is a disgusting disgrace.
00:44:02.000 It is war on Trump.
00:44:04.000 It is war on the Republican Party.
00:44:06.000 And it is a war on the Republicans.
00:44:08.000 This case is the weakest case I've seen in 60 years of teaching, practicing, and writing about criminal law.
00:44:14.000 I doubt the New York indictment would have been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump.
00:44:20.000 This judge, I mean, you don't need a prosecutor if you have a judge like this.
00:44:24.000 This judge is not on the level.
00:44:26.000 It's a terrible case, but the judge has been pretty much a rubber stamp on everything that Bregg has wanted to do.
00:44:32.000 They're perverting the system of justice.
00:44:35.000 That's where the danger lies.
00:44:37.000 The corruption and subversion of our institutions by the left.
00:44:41.000 This is the Democrats' entire strategy to confine President Trump to a dirty criminal courtroom and keep him off the campaign trail.
00:44:47.000 And this is going to be the theme for Trump the rest of the election cycle.
00:44:50.000 So here's what you've got if you are Joe Biden.
00:44:52.000 You have a DOJ that has beclowned itself in a thousand ways.
00:44:57.000 You have two separate courts of law in the state of New York that have put forward absurd, absurd verdicts.
00:45:03.000 Absurd verdicts in this particular case and absurd verdicts in the civil case that was brought by the woman that he supposedly defamed and was sentenced to $500 million or something ridiculous in terms of defamation.
00:45:16.000 So you have those two.
00:45:18.000 You have three separate federal cases that are being brought by the DOJ in three separate jurisdictions.
00:45:23.000 And Joe Biden is sitting at the head, being the president, and being terrible at it.
00:45:27.000 You have baked into the cake inflation.
00:45:28.000 You have a giant fire in the Middle East.
00:45:30.000 You have a giant fire in Ukraine.
00:45:32.000 Total dissolution of the social fabric of the country.
00:45:37.000 And this is supposed to make things better?
00:45:40.000 What do you run on if you're Joe Biden?
00:45:41.000 You run on the fact that Donald Trump is a very bad man.
00:45:44.000 He's gonna do very bad things.
00:45:45.000 You just did the bad thing.
00:45:48.000 You and your friends just did the bad thing.
00:45:51.000 Letitia James, the AG in New York, literally ran for office, pledging that she would get Donald Trump.
00:45:56.000 Alvin Bragg pledged that he would get Donald Trump.
00:46:00.000 Judge Merchant is a political actor.
00:46:03.000 Merrick Garland is a political actor.
00:46:06.000 Joe Biden is obviously a political actor.
00:46:09.000 Governor of Rhonda Sands of Florida put out a statement He says, it is often said that no one is above the law, but it is also true that no one is below the law.
00:46:16.000 If the defendant were not Donald Trump, this case would never have been brought, the judge would never have issued similar rulings, and the jury would never have returned a guilty verdict.
00:46:22.000 That is obviously true.
00:46:24.000 Ironically, Donald Trump once bragged that he could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and get away with it.
00:46:29.000 Ironically, in the city of New York, he would be more likely to get away with murdering someone on Fifth Avenue than with a minor supposed business misdemeanor.
00:46:39.000 Because murder in New York is presumably okay.
00:46:42.000 You can throw somebody on the subway tracks in New York.
00:46:44.000 That won't be prosecuted.
00:46:46.000 Or they put you in jail for a moment, let you out without bail.
00:46:49.000 Or, theoretically, you could just be Donald Trump with business interests in New York, and they will come after you.
00:46:55.000 The Trump website is experiencing so much traffic right now that it has crashed.
00:46:59.000 So many people are attempting to give to the Trump campaign that the website has now timed out.
00:47:04.000 It has now crashed.
00:47:07.000 The top issue in this election has now become should administrations and political parties target their political opponents for destruction?
00:47:16.000 This is open Watergate is what this is.
00:47:19.000 Watergate is considered the worst scandal in American political history because the Nixon administration, the Nixon campaign, Greenland, the bugging, of the George McGovern offices in 1972.
00:47:30.000 What if Nixon had just said, I get to do whatever I want to George McGovern, include bringing him up on charges that are completely specious and then brag about how he's a convicted felon.
00:47:40.000 What about that?
00:47:43.000 You want to talk about impacting an election in dire and unforeseen ways.
00:47:46.000 This is that.
00:47:48.000 How do you not suggest that Joe Biden and his cronies are tyrannical in going after Donald Trump on a specious charge like this?
00:47:56.000 And it is utterly specious.
00:47:58.000 Again, they didn't even go after him on a January 6th charge on this one.
00:48:03.000 I mean, this isn't just playing with fire, it's playing with extraordinary fire, because either way this goes, it's a disaster area now.
00:48:10.000 If Donald Trump wins the election on this basis, he could very well be serving as president from a New York City jailhouse.
00:48:17.000 And if Donald Trump loses, if he loses, having been jailed by his political opponents, Man, oh man.
00:48:26.000 Things are going to get extraordinarily ugly.
00:48:28.000 Extraordinarily ugly.
00:48:31.000 It's truly a sad day for the country.
00:48:36.000 Truly, truly a sad day for the country.
00:48:40.000 How are people going to respond in the swing states?
00:48:42.000 I can't imagine that they are going to respond particularly well.
00:48:45.000 I cannot imagine that most Americans are going to look at this and feel like Donald Trump had this one coming.
00:48:52.000 And presumably, all the Republicans are thinking from here on in is that Donald Trump should lock her up.
00:48:57.000 That if Donald Trump becomes president, he should do exactly what Joe Biden just did.
00:49:02.000 If this is the new norm in America, that is not good for the country.
00:49:06.000 Alrighty, folks.
00:49:07.000 We'll be back here in short order to bring you more.
00:49:12.000 We will break more of this down as the news breaks.
00:49:15.000 An unprecedented day in the country.
00:49:18.000 Pray for the Republic because something truly terrible just happened in New York City.
00:49:22.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.