The Ben Shapiro Show - July 20, 2018


Trump vs. The Intelligence Community | Ep. 585


Episode Stats

Length

56 minutes

Words per Minute

206.90265

Word Count

11,690

Sentence Count

802

Misogynist Sentences

16

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

Ben Shapiro is back with a brand new episode of The Ben Shapiro Show! This week, he's talking about a disturbing story about a conservative judge who was denied a seat on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and why it happened. Plus, Robert Mueller offers a very special deal, President Trump prepares for a second Putin meeting, and we check in on the mailbag. Thanks to our sponsor, Skillshare, for sponsoring this week's show. Skillshare is an online learning platform with over 20,000 classes in business, design, technology, and more. You can take classes in everything from social media marketing and illustration to data science and mobile photography. And all their classes are like 45 minutes long, taught by experts. Whether you're trying to deepen your professional skill set or start a side hustle, or just explore that new passion, you'll want to start your two months of Skillshare right now. Go to Skillshare.co/BenShapiroShow and start your 2-month membership for just $0.99! To sign up, go to skillshare.com/benjaminshapiro and use the promo code "Ben Shapiro Show" to get 20% off your first month for two months! You'll get unlimited access to all new courses and up to $99.99 in total of 20, plus two months for the rest of the course! If you're looking for a FREE trial, you can sign up for 2 months of the show! Learn more about the show on Skillshare here: bit.ly/ben ShapiroShow and learn more about how to become a supporter and get 10% off for the entire course, plus a discount on the first month of the second month of your membership, plus an additional 2 months for an additional month for the third month! Want to sponsor the show? Sign up for the full course? Click here to get 15% off of the entire show starting next month, only $99, plus free shipping and shipping starts starting in September! FREE shipping throughout the summer, plus all kinds of perks and perks, including 3 months of VIP access to the show, including the ability to access all of the best deals, including early signups, and a free shipping, shipping, and early on the next month and early-bird pricing, and an ad-only pricing, plus early sign-up access, and much more! Thanks again, and thanks for supporting the show starts next week!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Robert Mueller offers Tony Podesta a very special deal.
00:00:03.000 President Trump prepares for a second Putin meeting.
00:00:05.000 And we check the mailbag.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:07.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:13.000 What a week, folks.
00:00:14.000 Gotta tell you, a lot went on this week, and there's a lot more to come on today's show.
00:00:18.000 But first, I want to remind you that the job that you currently hold, in ten years you're not going to be holding it.
00:00:22.000 In five years, if the studies show what they show, then you probably won't be holding it either, which means that you need to be constantly revising and updating your resume.
00:00:29.000 Skillshare is the place that allows you to do this by adding new skills every single day to your skill set.
00:00:35.000 Skillshare is an online learning platform with over 20,000 classes in business, design, technology, and more.
00:00:39.000 You can take classes in everything from social media marketing and illustration to data science and mobile photography.
00:00:44.000 You name it, they've got it.
00:00:45.000 And all their classes are like 45 minutes long, taught by experts.
00:00:47.000 Whether you're trying to deepen your professional skill set or start a side hustle, or just explore that new passion, Skillshare is there to keep you learning and thriving.
00:00:54.000 I've taken classes from them in both social media marketing and watercolors.
00:00:57.000 I'm diverse that way.
00:00:58.000 Go check it out.
00:00:59.000 It's really awesome.
00:01:00.000 Join the millions of students already learning on Skillshare today with a special offer just for my listeners.
00:01:04.000 Get two months of Skillshare for just $0.99.
00:01:06.000 Right now, Skillshare is offering Ben Shapiro show listeners two months of unlimited access to over 20,000 classes for just $0.99 to sign up.
00:01:13.000 Go to skillshare.com slash Shapiro.
00:01:15.000 That's skillshare.com slash Shapiro to start your two months right now.
00:01:19.000 Again, skillshare.com slash Shapiro.
00:01:20.000 Use that slash Shapiro to let them know that we sent you.
00:01:23.000 OK, I want to talk today a little bit about a story that no one is talking about.
00:01:27.000 And it really is a disturbing story because it suggests where the right in the country is headed.
00:01:31.000 And I don't mean the Trumpian right.
00:01:33.000 The evil right.
00:01:34.000 I'm talking about the pansy right.
00:01:36.000 I'm talking about there are folks on the right who will run from any controversy because they are deeply afraid of being miscast as a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe.
00:01:43.000 As someone who's frequently miscast this way, I gotta tell you, the only way to stand up to the social justice mob is to simply stand up to them and say, I'm not those things, and you're full of crap.
00:01:51.000 It's the only way to do it.
00:01:52.000 But with that said, there's a story that really went unnoticed this week that is pretty disturbing to me.
00:01:58.000 Here is the story.
00:01:58.000 It's from Oregon Live.
00:02:00.000 It says this.
00:02:00.000 The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is the most liberal circuit court of appeals in the country, and this replacement was for a pretty conservative judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
00:02:20.000 The move came about 45 minutes after a Senate vote had been scheduled to confirm bounds.
00:02:24.000 McConnell offered no explanation, but Oregon senators later said it became apparent the Republicans didn't have the vote.
00:02:29.000 So what did this judge do that prevented his nomination to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?
00:02:33.000 He's 44 years old.
00:02:35.000 And he had an opportunity to be sitting on this court for a very, very long time.
00:02:39.000 So what did he do that was just so terrible that Republicans could not support him?
00:02:42.000 Well, according to Oregon Live, he hadn't disclosed inflammatory college writings about sexual assault, the rights of workers, people of color, and the LGBTQ community to the Oregon committee when questioned about his thoughts on diversity or if there was anything embarrassing from his past.
00:02:56.000 Perhaps because he's 44 and he wrote this crap when he was 18 or 19.
00:02:59.000 In a second, we're going to go through those writings and we'll try to determine what, if anything, that he said is so offensive that literally 25 years later, he should not be allowed to sit on one of the nation's courts.
00:03:10.000 Both Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley of Oregon repeatedly warned their Republican colleagues that a confirmation of bounds would signal an end to bipartisan cooperation in judicial nominations
00:03:18.000 Okay, first of all, there is no bipartisan cooperation in judicial nominations.
00:03:23.000 Republicans have simply been voting by straight majority to confirm all of these nominees.
00:03:27.000 It was Harry Reid who ended the policy of judicial confirmations as a bipartisan exercise during the Bush years.
00:03:33.000 And then it was Harry Reid who, again, decided it would be a wise and brilliant idea to end the filibuster for judicial nominees.
00:03:40.000 So this idea that there's been judicial nomination, confirmation, bipartisanship is just nonsense.
00:03:46.000 It hasn't been true for a very long time.
00:04:00.000 Biden said, I think this is going to affect other nominees and strengthen the whole advice and consent rule for members of the U.S.
00:04:04.000 Senate.
00:04:05.000 It's going to be good for the nominees being truthful.
00:04:06.000 I think it's a win for the Oregon way.
00:04:08.000 He says it wasn't a complete surprise because several Republicans were looking carefully at this.
00:04:12.000 But on the other hand, we knew a lot of pressure we brought to bear.
00:04:14.000 This was a nominee from the Fed Society, the Federalist Society, which has extraordinarily huge leverage in driving through nominees.
00:04:19.000 So according to my sources in the Judiciary Committee, as well as Senator Tim, as well as this this open report from Oregon Live, Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, who's
00:04:28.000 Normally a really good senator.
00:04:30.000 The Republican caucus's lone black senator appears to have been a pivotal no vote.
00:04:33.000 In a statement, Scott said he couldn't support Bounds if his name went to a vote Thursday after meeting with him.
00:04:37.000 He said,
00:04:44.000 So does Scott actually believe this nominee was a racist?
00:04:47.000 Does this mean that he was a racist?
00:04:49.000 So according to the reports, Merkley said he had heard that Bounds would be defeated by about 70 votes, including the 49 Democratic senators if his nomination had been put to a vote.
00:04:58.000 Why exactly was he shut off?
00:04:59.000 Now let's look at the text of what he said all the way back when he was at Stanford University in 1995 when he was 19 years old.
00:05:07.000 So here are some of the excerpts that were cited by the Alliance for Justice, which is a far-left group attempting to get this guy to prevent him from sitting on a court.
00:05:13.000 Again, this was written 25 years ago, and this is the stuff that prevented a guy from sitting on a federal court because Republicans were too pansy to actually just confirm the guy.
00:05:21.000 So here's what he wrote.
00:05:22.000 During my years in our multicultural Garden of Eden, again this is 1995 at Stanford, I've often marveled at the odd strategies that some of the more strident racial factions of the student body employ in their attempts to heighten consciousness, build tolerance, promote diversity, and otherwise convince us to partake of that fruit which promises to open our eyes to a PC version of the knowledge of good and evil.
00:05:41.000 I am mystified because these tactics seem always to contribute more to restricting consciousness, aggravating intolerance, and pigeonholing cultural identities than many a Nazi bookmurning.
00:05:50.000 That's bad?
00:05:50.000 I'm confused.
00:05:51.000 That's true.
00:05:52.000 Okay, that part's actually true.
00:05:54.000 Multiculturalism on campus is a way for people to pigeonhole each other into various racial categories and then to shut down free thought.
00:06:00.000 So that's not wrong, even if you think it's mildly overstated.
00:06:03.000 You're going to keep them off a court for that?
00:06:05.000 How about this one?
00:06:06.000 I submit that the multiculturalistas, when they divide up by race for their feel-good ethnic codons, engage in nearly all of the fundamental behaviors of groupthink.
00:06:15.000 Because they do.
00:06:17.000 Okay?
00:06:17.000 I've been on college campuses.
00:06:18.000 This is what happens.
00:06:20.000 It is groupthink.
00:06:21.000 Okay?
00:06:32.000 Again, I'm confused.
00:06:33.000 This is why Republicans wouldn't vote for this guy?
00:06:35.000 For the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?
00:06:37.000 Because he said true things about multiculturalism?
00:06:39.000 He said,
00:06:48.000 Okay, he's making the case against an Aryan student union.
00:06:50.000 That's not a case in favor of an Aryan student union.
00:06:52.000 He's saying that when you divide people up by ethnicity, what you are actually doing on college campuses is preventing everybody from seeing each other as equals and as Americans.
00:07:00.000 Again, true.
00:07:01.000 Okay, so none of those things should rule this guy off the court.
00:07:04.000 What else?
00:07:05.000 Well, he said there's nothing really inherently wrong with the university failing to punish an alleged rapist regardless his guilt in the absence of adequate certainty.
00:07:12.000 There's nothing the university can do to objectively ensure that the rapist does not strike again.
00:07:16.000 So the case that he was making in this particular argument is not in favor of rapists.
00:07:20.000 He was saying that the university is not responsible for jailing people.
00:07:24.000 The police are responsible for jailing people.
00:07:26.000 And that if somebody alleges rape on a college campus, we shouldn't have these sort of campus witch hunts where people are immediately deemed guilty and then tossed out of school.
00:07:34.000 This has become a serious problem on America's college campuses.
00:07:36.000 So again, he's not completely wrong here.
00:07:39.000 He says, expelling students is probably not going to contribute a great deal to a rape victim's recovery.
00:07:44.000 There's no more imperative to risk egregious error in doing so.
00:07:46.000 Again, the case that he's making here is the same.
00:07:48.000 He is essentially saying that throwing people off of campus in the absence of an actual court trial that would land them in jail is going to be a serious problem.
00:07:56.000 You're going to have kangaroo courts determining whether people are guilty or not based on lack of evidence.
00:08:01.000 And you have had this happen, right?
00:08:02.000 Mattress Girl over at NYU or Columbia, rather.
00:08:05.000 This is still a thing where people
00:08:07.000 We're good to go.
00:08:23.000 She is still upheld by the left as a sign of the campus rape epidemic that's happening on campuses.
00:08:29.000 And this guy sued the university because Columbia punished him.
00:08:31.000 He sued the university and he won a couple million dollar settlement from the university.
00:08:34.000 This sort of stuff does happen on campuses.
00:08:36.000 So this is the writing that this guy got thrown off a court for?
00:08:40.000 That Republicans said they wouldn't vote for him for?
00:08:43.000 And Bounds even gave them the Stalinist apology, right?
00:08:45.000 He even gave them an email.
00:08:47.000 The judicial nominee, he even gave them an email apologizing for all this stuff.
00:08:51.000 He said,
00:09:09.000 Please know that my commitment to our shared mission will only be redoubled by this unpleasant reminder of my errors of nearly a quarter century ago.
00:09:15.000 Okay, that's just, I'm sorry.
00:09:18.000 It's a bunch of crap.
00:09:18.000 It's a bunch of crap.
00:09:19.000 Like the stuff that you wrote in college, well, not bad.
00:09:21.000 Even if you think it was that bad, it was back in college.
00:09:23.000 And unless you have anything to show me from the last 25 years demonstrating the guy's a secret member of the KKK, I'm gonna go, this is idiotic.
00:09:30.000 This is idiotic.
00:09:31.000 It's idiotic.
00:09:32.000 People do change from the time they're 17 years old.
00:09:34.000 I should know, I was writing a syndicated column when I was 17 years old.
00:09:37.000 Do I stand by everything I ever wrote when I was 17?
00:09:39.000 No, because I'd be an idiot if I did.
00:09:41.000 If you've changed no opinions you ever held since you were 17 years old, it's because you haven't been doing any thinking.
00:09:46.000 So there's that element of this.
00:09:47.000 We have to, oh man, let's go through his college writings and determine whether he's secretly a segregationist.
00:09:52.000 And then, it turns out the stuff this guy wrote wasn't even that bad.
00:09:55.000 The stuff this guy wrote is largely true.
00:09:58.000 And he's kicked off a court for that?
00:09:59.000 Now, what's hilarious about this is that the left does not have the same sense of composure.
00:10:03.000 The left does not have the same sense that we have to be above the fray when it comes to these political battles.
00:10:09.000 The left is not cowardly this way.
00:10:11.000 There are leftists who were members of Occupy during college who will sit on our nation's federal courts.
00:10:16.000 And the left, the left worships at the altar of people who are actual legitimate terrorists.
00:10:23.000 People like Assad al-Shakour.
00:10:24.000 They're actual people.
00:10:26.000 And we are told that the left is going to heroize those people.
00:10:35.000 William Ayers is a professor at a major university after being a legitimate domestic terrorist during the 1970s.
00:10:40.000 And so is his wife, Bernadine Dorn.
00:10:43.000 All of this stuff, according to the left, is totally fine.
00:10:46.000 It's totally fine.
00:10:47.000 The left is never shy about this stuff.
00:10:49.000 And I promise you, all the people who are writing extreme stuff today in their student newspapers about how Donald Trump is the worst person in the world, all those people will be sitting on federal courts in 30 years.
00:10:58.000 Mark my words.
00:10:59.000 And no one on the left will care.
00:11:01.000 It is only the right that is so shy about its own viewpoint with regard to multiculturalism that they run away when something as mild as these writings from a prospective judge come up.
00:11:10.000 It's really absurd.
00:11:11.000 It's truly absurd.
00:11:11.000 I'll talk a little bit more about that in just a second.
00:11:13.000 First, let's talk about that weak coffee you've been drinking.
00:11:15.000 You ever found yourself wincing at the weak taste of the coffee from one of these left-leaning corporate brands?
00:11:19.000 You probably thought, listen, I wish they spent less time on meaningless bias training and bathroom policy reform and letting homeless people pee in their toilets.
00:11:26.000 Well, this is why you need Black Rifle Coffee.
00:11:28.000 Founded by former special operations vets, Black Rifle delivers the best roast-to-order coffee right to your door.
00:11:33.000 This guarantees you are getting fresh, premium coffee with every order.
00:11:36.000 In addition to great coffee and gear, Black Rifle Coffee Company has a coffee club that makes things easy.
00:11:41.000 No lines, no running out, just great coffee shipped right to your door every month, hassle-free.
00:11:44.000 Plus, when you join their coffee club, you'll receive discounts and offers not available to other customers.
00:11:49.000 Not only does Black Rifle Coffee Company make one hell of a cup of coffee, they also give a portion of their sales to vets and first responder causes.
00:11:55.000 When you choose Black Rifle, you're choosing a company that supports our veterans and serves coffee and culture to those who love America.
00:12:00.000 Visit BlackRifleCoffee.com slash Ben and receive 15% off your order.
00:12:05.000 That's BlackRifleCoffee.com slash Ben for 15% off.
00:12:08.000 BlackRifleCoffee.com slash Ben.
00:12:11.000 Go check it out.
00:12:12.000 Awesome guys.
00:12:12.000 They do awesome work.
00:12:13.000 BlackRifleCoffee.com slash Ben.
00:12:15.000 Okay, so back to this judge, this prospective Judge Bounds, who was shut down by Senator Tim Scott, who
00:12:21.000 Couldn't apparently say that he thought that this guy was a racist.
00:12:24.000 He just felt uncomfortable with him.
00:12:25.000 Just because you feel uncomfortable with somebody doesn't mean that person shouldn't sit on a federal court.
00:12:30.000 It depends on how sensitive you are.
00:12:33.000 I believe that there are levels of discomfort that pass beyond discomfort into outright antagonism.
00:12:37.000 And sometimes that's justified.
00:12:39.000 But if you're just uncomfortable with the way somebody phrased something back in college, even though you agree with the underlying message, maybe you ought to think about the stuff that you wrote back in college and thought back in college and think, wow, do I agree with the way I phrased everything way back when?
00:12:52.000 OK, Bounds apologized before the Judiciary Committee for his often high-handed and overheated tone of his Stanford commentary about campus politics.
00:12:59.000 He says the intentions behind those articles were always to see greater tolerance and mutual understanding on campus.
00:13:04.000 That was always my aim.
00:13:06.000 The Judiciary Committee voted 11 to 10 in June along party lines to forward Bounds' nomination to the Senate floor.
00:13:11.000 Democrats blasted their Republican colleagues and President Trump's administration for trying to pack courts with extremist judges.
00:13:17.000 Ron Wyden, who's a socialist idiot, accused Bounds of misrepresenting and covering up disturbing, intolerant writings from his past.
00:13:24.000 It's not a cover-up, and they're not disturbing, and they're not intolerant.
00:13:27.000 He says what really outraged and shocked me was his comparison of organizations that promote multiculturalism and tolerance here in America to Nazi rallies.
00:13:34.000 So that was that quote that I read you a little bit earlier, where he said that a lot of these ethnic groups do more to shut off thought than a Nazi book burning would.
00:13:41.000 Honestly, that's not completely wrong.
00:13:43.000 Having been on campus, having spent an enormous amount of time on campus, I've been protested by exactly these groups who have stood outside theaters where I'm speaking, shouting, speech is violence, and attempting to shut down the speech and prevent people from entering.
00:13:54.000 Hey, I was at Cal State Los Angeles when many of these student groups were calling out their friends to block people from entering the room.
00:14:03.000 Hey, that is a shutdown of free speech by these exact campus groups.
00:14:06.000 And we're supposed to believe it's just terrible?
00:14:08.000 This guy wrote this at Stanford in 1995?
00:14:11.000 It's just it's absurd.
00:14:12.000 So I don't blame Democrats for doing this.
00:14:14.000 They don't want a conservative sitting on the court.
00:14:15.000 Shocker.
00:14:16.000 They don't want somebody who is going to interpret the Constitution according to its original meaning sitting on the court.
00:14:20.000 Shocker.
00:14:21.000 What I am embarrassed by, really embarrassed by, is the Republicans, including senators that I like.
00:14:26.000 I like Tim Scott.
00:14:27.000 I'm embarrassed by senators in the Republican Party who will not stand by a prospective judicial nominee because they are, quote unquote, embarrassed by some of the things that that person said back when they were 19 years old at Stanford University.
00:14:38.000 Things that are objectively non-embarrassing.
00:14:41.000 It demonstrates the level to which all of these Republicans have been bullied and cowed.
00:14:46.000 It demonstrates how fast they run for the hills.
00:14:48.000 And here's the thing.
00:14:48.000 They think this is going to buy them some sort of love from the left.
00:14:51.000 They think that the left is going to somehow treat them nicely.
00:14:54.000 Doesn't work that way.
00:14:55.000 John McCain was treated really nicely by the left up until the point where he ran for president.
00:14:58.000 In 2008, he became a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe.
00:15:00.000 Mitt Romney was supposed to be a favorite of the left up until the point when he ran against Barack Obama, at which point he became a guy who wanted to put black people back in chains, strap dogs to the top of his car, and hated women.
00:15:12.000 All you people in the Republican Party, including you, Senator Scott, if you think you're going to get off easy with the left by shutting down the nomination of people like this guy Bounds, you are out of your mind.
00:15:21.000 They will come after you just as hard and twice as badly because they know that you can be cowed.
00:15:25.000 This sort of stuff has got to stop on the part of Republicans.
00:15:28.000 It really has to end.
00:15:29.000 It's just egregious.
00:15:31.000 Okay, meanwhile...
00:15:33.000 There's a lot of fallout now from the Trump-Putin meeting earlier this week.
00:15:38.000 And there's some disturbing stuff coming out of the Mueller investigation.
00:15:40.000 And I don't mean disturbing about President Trump.
00:15:42.000 I mean disturbing in the way that the Mueller investigation is approaching President Trump and members of Trump's campaign.
00:15:48.000 So this is a report from The Daily Caller.
00:15:50.000 It was reported also on Tucker Carlson's show last night.
00:15:54.000 Basically, the report is that Tony Podesta
00:15:57.000 Well, tonight we can report exclusively, based on two separate sources we spoke to today, that Tony Podesta has been offered immunity by Robert Mueller to testify against Paul Manafort.
00:16:25.000 In other words, for a near-identical crime, Bill and Hillary's friend could skate and emerge completely unscathed, while Paul Manafort may rot in jail.
00:16:34.000 Only one of them made the mistake of chairing Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
00:16:38.000 Okay, and it's hard not to read it the way that Tucker is reading it here.
00:16:40.000 Now, the counterargument would be this, just to be fair.
00:16:43.000 The counterargument is that Tony Podesta blew the Foreign Relations Act, the Foreign Actors Relations Act.
00:16:49.000 It's called FARA.
00:16:50.000 I'm trying to remember what it actually stands for.
00:16:53.000 The basic idea is that he didn't register as a foreign agent, and then he registered late as a foreign agent, which is another thing that Paul Manafort did.
00:16:59.000 So they had the same crime there.
00:17:01.000 It is fair to say, however, that Paul Manafort is also being charged for tax evasion in a way that Tony Podesta is not.
00:17:07.000 So maybe you say, OK, well, we flip the lesser crime for the greater crime.
00:17:10.000 The reason that they are giving Podesta immunity is because if they don't give him immunity, he can plead the fifth.
00:17:15.000 This is the way that it works legally, is that you cannot plead the fifth just because you feel like pleading the fifth.
00:17:19.000 So let's say that you are called as a witness in a criminal trial, but there is no actual chance that you are going to be prosecuted, and you plead the fifth, the judge will force you to testify.
00:17:27.000 He'll say,
00:17:28.000 There's no self-incrimination issue here because you're not prosecuted.
00:17:31.000 If you offer Tony Podesta immunity, now he can't plead the fifth.
00:17:34.000 Okay, so they're trying to get him to testify against Manafort.
00:17:36.000 So one read is, this is Mueller attempting to roll up all the members of the Trump campaign by flipping a bunch of Democrats like Tony Podesta.
00:17:44.000 By giving them immunity.
00:17:46.000 If that's the case, then Mueller is politically biased and this is a bad, it's a bad look.
00:17:50.000 It's just a bad look.
00:17:51.000 The other way to read this is that Tony Podesta didn't commit the same crimes as Paul Manafort, and so him flipping Podesta against Manafort is really just normal criminal procedure.
00:18:01.000 I don't know the answer to that.
00:18:02.000 All I can tell you is that it doesn't look great.
00:18:05.000 Podesta's lawyers have responded by hitting Carlson with a cease and desist order because Carlson had previously reported details of Podesta's involvement in the Mueller probe.
00:18:13.000 He reported in October that Podesta was in the special counsel's crosshair.
00:18:17.000 Podesta's lawyers had hit Carlson with a cease and desist and the Daily Caller co-founder ignored all of that.
00:18:24.000 It's not good news for the Mueller probe that they had to do that.
00:18:28.000 And again, it's sort of lending credence to the idea that Trump is putting out there that the Mueller probe is a get Trump probe as opposed to something that is objectively trying to go about the prosecution of criminals in the United States.
00:18:40.000 Now, with that said,
00:18:42.000 I'm lending more, I think, credence to some of Trump's complaints.
00:18:46.000 There's this article in Reuters that is really sort of disturbing.
00:18:49.000 There's an article from Tim Weiner over at Reuters, and here's what he says.
00:18:53.000 He says, The foundations of American national security are under assault.
00:18:56.000 The battle lines are drawn.
00:18:57.000 On one side stand the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency.
00:19:04.000 On the other, the Commander-in-Chief of the United States.
00:19:07.000 Donald Trump's appalling performance in Helsinki was a subversive act.
00:19:10.000 He rejected the conclusion of American intelligence that his election was aided by a hydra-headed act of political warfare controlled by the Kremlin.
00:19:17.000 He did so with a wink and a smile for the smirking autocrat who led the attack.
00:19:21.000 And then this Reuters columnist continues by ripping into Trump.
00:19:25.000 And then he says about the intelligence community, they have the power to strike back.
00:19:29.000 For two years now, high-ranking veterans of American intelligence have sounded the alarm about Trump in the starkest language possible.
00:19:35.000 And then he quotes a bunch of members of the intel community who have been warning about Trump.
00:19:38.000 Intelligence officers already have provided reams of information to Mueller under the ambit of the law.
00:19:42.000 In little more than a year, Mueller has brought to court overwhelming evidence that Russian military intelligence carried out the covert operation.
00:19:48.000 While Trump emphatically denies collusion, signs suggest that Mueller can and will show that the Russians were aided and abetted by Americans.
00:19:55.000 Mueller has won guilty pleas in cooperation.
00:19:56.000 In the coming months, a noose around Trump, whose lawyers keep setting new conditions for an interview with the president, will likely tighten as the special counsel closes in on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
00:20:05.000 These cases never could have been made without the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA.
00:20:09.000 If the House of Representatives slips from Republican to Democrat in November, impeachment hearings may open in January.
00:20:14.000 Again, American intelligence officials will provide the information fueling these investigations.
00:20:18.000 Now, in just a second, I want to talk about why this sort of angle is really, really wrong-headed and really, really dangerous.
00:20:24.000 And this columnist for Reuters isn't the only one who's taking this particular attack.
00:20:29.000 But first, I'm going to talk about your air filters.
00:20:31.000 I know, exciting stuff.
00:20:32.000 But here's the reality.
00:20:33.000 You are probably breathing air that is not as clean as it should be right now.
00:20:37.000 And you're probably spending too much on your electric bills.
00:20:39.000 According to the Department of Energy, the most expensive utility for most Americans is that electric bill, making up roughly 9% of their annual housing expenditure.
00:20:46.000 That number is aggravated depending on where you live.
00:20:48.000 So in California, we get absolutely destroyed in energy.
00:20:52.000 I mean, I just, I spend a fortune every month on my energy bills.
00:20:54.000 But one of the ways that you can prevent this is by having air filters that actually work.
00:20:58.000 Adding insult to injury, this allergy season is one of the worst.
00:21:01.000 Well, you can help lower the bill and make sure that your air system is making your air clean by going over to my friends at Filter By and getting a new set of filters.
00:21:08.000 America's leading provider of HVAC filters for homes and small businesses.
00:21:12.000 It's Filter By.
00:21:13.000 They carry over 600 sizes.
00:21:14.000 If you're one of those difficult people, they can even make them custom for you.
00:21:17.000 Plus, they ship free within 24 hours and they're manufactured right here in the United States.
00:21:21.000 So there is no excuse.
00:21:23.000 And the easiest thing, by the way, just set up auto delivery.
00:21:25.000 It makes your life easier and you save 5%.
00:21:27.000 Additionally, extend the life of your system.
00:21:29.000 It's getting hotter outside.
00:21:30.000 The last thing you need is a busted HVAC system on top of the allergy.
00:21:33.000 So go check it out.
00:21:34.000 Save money.
00:21:34.000 Breathe better with Filterbuy.com.
00:21:37.000 Exciting stuff.
00:21:38.000 Filterbuy.com.
00:21:40.000 Tell them I sent you because you need a new filter.
00:21:42.000 Just get it done and you don't have to worry about it anymore.
00:21:44.000 Filterbuy.com.
00:21:46.000 Go check it out right now.
00:21:49.000 It is not just this Reuters columnist who is praising the Deep State today, on the same day that Mueller apparently is using Tony Podesta to go after Paul Manafort in what looks like a non-decent arrangement.
00:22:01.000 It's Eugene Robinson, who's a lefty columnist over at the Washington Post.
00:22:04.000 He has a column today called God Bless the Deep State.
00:22:07.000 And his main contention, his main objection, is he suggests that the administration is so dangerous that we need all of these bureaucrats in place to stop the administration from being dangerous.
00:22:18.000 So he says,
00:22:26.000 The term itself is propaganda intended to cast a sinister light upon men and women whom Trump and his minions find annoyingly knowledgeable and experienced.
00:22:33.000 They are not participants in any kind of dark conspiracy.
00:22:36.000 Rather, they are feared and loathed by the president and his wrecking crew of know-nothings because they have spent years, often decades,
00:22:42.000 Mastering the details of foreign and domestic policy.
00:22:44.000 God bless them.
00:22:45.000 With the supine Congress unwilling to play the role it is assigned by the Constitution, the deep state stands between us and the abyss.
00:22:51.000 And then he talks all about how the deep state is basically leaking to the media all this information and talking to Robert Mueller and building a case against the President of the United States.
00:23:01.000 He says, Democrats in Congress are powerless.
00:23:03.000 The Republican leadership's spineless.
00:23:04.000 Experienced government officials know that their job is to serve the president.
00:23:07.000 But what if the president does not serve the best interests of the nation?
00:23:10.000 In this emergency, the loyal and honorable Deep State has a higher duty.
00:23:13.000 It's called patriotism.
00:23:15.000 Do you understand how dangerous this is?
00:23:17.000 So basically, you have the president of the United States who accuses the intelligence services of being politicized.
00:23:22.000 And the response of the left is, good!
00:23:24.000 I'm glad they're politicized because the president is just that dangerous.
00:23:27.000 Now, imagine if the situation reversed.
00:23:29.000 Barack Obama were pursuing his awful, awful Iran deal and people inside the so-called deep state were leaking all sorts of information about the Iran deal and making a criminal case that the members of the Obama administration were lying to the American public, for example.
00:23:42.000 Do you think the left would be quite so sanguine about the deep state?
00:23:44.000 Or would they say, listen, Obama was elected to do a job.
00:23:46.000 If Congress wants to check him, Congress can check him.
00:23:48.000 That's the way our government works.
00:23:50.000 Unelected bureaucrats do not get to play their own role out here.
00:23:54.000 I think that would have been the better case and the stronger case and the more intelligent case.
00:23:59.000 You cannot have an executive agency that is not subject to the purview of the president because then you do have a rogue agency that is subject to no one.
00:24:06.000 Congress can't curb them.
00:24:07.000 The president can't curb them.
00:24:08.000 Do you really want a state in which those with the greatest power over surveillance and intelligence also have the most power over our politics?
00:24:15.000 Is that really what you want?
00:24:16.000 Put aside the president for a second.
00:24:18.000 Lefties, put aside how much you hate President Trump for just a second.
00:24:21.000 Do you really want the most powerful agencies of the country, the NSA, the CIA, and the FBI, to have so much power that it's their job now to curb and topple the President of the United States?
00:24:31.000 Those are the people who also have power over your emails and your call data.
00:24:34.000 Those are the people who you suddenly trust.
00:24:36.000 The same leftists who five seconds ago were ripping into the Patriot Act, suggesting it was unpatriotic.
00:24:41.000 Those same leftists today are deeply excited about these members of the so-called Deep State checking President Trump's excesses.
00:24:48.000 If you don't like President Trump, there's a very, very easy thing you can do about it.
00:24:51.000 Vote out Republicans in November.
00:24:53.000 If you think that he's so dangerous, then get out there and give money to your local Democratic candidate.
00:24:58.000 But if you think the solution to this is a bunch of bureaucrats appointed at the highest levels and left in power for years on end without any sort of serious oversight, I don't know what kind of country you want to build.
00:25:09.000 It does suggest the anti-democratic tendencies of some folks on the left that they hate Trump so much they are willing to go along with the so-called deep state.
00:25:16.000 Pretty amazing.
00:25:17.000 The same people who should have learned their lesson after J. Edgar Hoover and Martin Luther King, suddenly they believe that the deep state are people who are worthy of our insane
00:25:26.000 Now, do I really think the people in the FBI, CIA, NSA, these are all bad people?
00:25:29.000 Of course not.
00:25:30.000 I've been very strongly defending all of these people from what I think is the unfair assault of President Trump on their capabilities with regard to the Russian investigation.
00:25:38.000 But two things can be true at once.
00:25:39.000 I can like that the FBI, CIA, and NSA are doing their job investigating Russian election interference, and I can also be wary of unelected bureaucrats in any branch of the federal government
00:25:49.000 Overriding their constitutional boundaries and impinging into normal, everyday electoral politics.
00:25:56.000 I don't want the FBI interfering in the election any more than I want the Russians interfering in the election.
00:26:01.000 The Russians are a foreign power.
00:26:02.000 The FBI is an unelected bureaucracy.
00:26:05.000 They should not be interfering in the election outside of their normal processes of criminal adjudication.
00:26:11.000 Once you start turning this into a political branch, why should I possibly trust that I can trust these people with additional power?
00:26:17.000 Why would I possibly trust that these people are looking out for me and not looking out for their own political interests?
00:26:21.000 Remember, these are government agencies.
00:26:23.000 Government agencies have a couple of different interests, maximizing power and maximizing their own money.
00:26:28.000 That means that these are folks who are going to manipulate the system, or at least they have an interest in manipulating the system, into giving us more surveillance power and funding us better.
00:26:36.000 At the very least, that's a problem.
00:26:38.000 And that's why we have Democratic elected officials, small-D Democratic elected officials, who are going to provide a check against this sort of apparatus.
00:26:47.000 But cheering on the apparatus is a mistake.
00:26:48.000 And by the way, it lends all sorts of credibility to Trump when he rips into the apparatus.
00:26:52.000 When he says there is a deep state, it's hard for you to claim there's not a deep state while you're cheering for the deep state.
00:26:57.000 If Trump says, the deep state's out to get me, and you say, there is no deep state, but also, I'm glad that the deep state is out to get you, you gotta pick one of those things.
00:27:07.000 The excitement to get President Trump has led people to lose their basic notion
00:27:12.000 They lose their basic idea of how government ought to work.
00:27:16.000 OK, meanwhile, in breaking news that is not great for President Trump, The New York Times is now reporting that Michael Cohen has secret tapes of President Trump.
00:27:24.000 So perhaps this is the reason why the Mueller investigation was essentially trying to raid the Cohen offices.
00:27:31.000 We still don't know why that happened, by the way.
00:27:32.000 You remember that Michael Cohen, President Trump's personal lawyer, his office was raided by the FBI.
00:27:37.000 And there are questions as to what exactly was the criminal activity at issue.
00:27:40.000 And the suggestion was that he violated campaign finance law by paying off Stormy Daniels or some such.
00:27:45.000 It's still very unclear to me that it's legitimate that the FBI raided Michael Cohen's office.
00:27:49.000 We're going to have to see what the prosecution looks like, but...
00:27:51.000 The New York Times is reporting today that President Trump's longtime lawyer, Michael Cohen, secretly recorded a conversation with Mr. Trump two months before the presidential election in which they discussed payments to a former Playboy model who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, according to lawyers and others familiar with the recording.
00:28:06.000 The FBI seized the recording this year during a raid on Mr. Cohen's office.
00:28:10.000 The Justice Department is investigating Mr. Cohen's involvement in paying women to tamp down embarrassing news stories about Mr. Trump ahead of the 2016 election.
00:28:17.000 Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws.
00:28:21.000 Any conversation with Mr. Trump about those payments would be of keen interest to them.
00:28:24.000 So I guess that they're going to now claim that because Trump actually had a clear conversation with Michael Cohen about the election and then about Stormy Daniels, that Cohen paying off Stormy Daniels and getting reimbursed by Trump was actually a form of campaign finance violation.
00:28:38.000 Now again, this comes from the deep state.
00:28:41.000 How does the New York Times find out about this?
00:28:43.000 How does this?
00:28:44.000 Well, according to lawyers and others familiar with the recordings, that's very deep background, right?
00:28:48.000 There's the way that it works in journalism, by the way, just so folks know, is that when you talk with a reporter, you can use a couple of different designations.
00:28:54.000 There's off the record, which means that the reporter cannot report it, but can use the information that you are giving them to go look for other leads.
00:29:01.000 And then there is on background, which is to say you can quote me, but not by name.
00:29:04.000 There's deep background, which is to say you can you can use the information that I'm giving you without attributing it to me.
00:29:10.000 And then there is the and then there's on the record, which means that you can just quote me.
00:29:14.000 So these are people who are speaking on deep background, which means they're probably pretty close to the investigation and probably is actual members of the Justice Department talking to the New York Times.
00:29:22.000 And all these people are trying to get Trump.
00:29:24.000 I mean, again, the fact that all this stuff leaks on a consistent basis is not good for either the intelligence apparatus or the Department of Justice or for President Trump.
00:29:33.000 The recording's existence further draws Mr. Trump into questions about tactics he and his associates use to keep aspects of his personal and business life a secret.
00:29:39.000 It highlights the potential legal and political danger Mr. Cohen represents to Mr. Trump.
00:29:43.000 Once the keeper of many of Mr. Trump's secrets, Mr. Cohen is now seen increasingly as willing to cooperate with prosecutors.
00:29:50.000 Giuliani, Rudy Giuliani, who's Trump's lawyer on this stuff now, he says the recording is less than two minutes and demonstrates the president did nothing wrong.
00:29:57.000 Nothing in that conversation suggests he had any knowledge of the payment in advance.
00:30:01.000 He says in the big scheme of things, it's powerful exculpatory evidence.
00:30:04.000 We'll have to see what exactly is on the tape.
00:30:06.000 Again, these leaks are devastatingly bad for the Department of Justice.
00:30:10.000 It's really not good for trust in the system, for sure.
00:30:14.000 So,
00:30:15.000 Yeah, again, all of this is to suggest that when President Trump complains about the deep state, he's not completely, completely off base.
00:30:20.000 OK, in just a second, I want to talk about the insanity that's happening on The View with Jeanine Pirro.
00:30:25.000 I also want to talk.
00:30:28.000 A little bit more about Trump's relationship with his own intelligence community.
00:30:31.000 First, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com.
00:30:33.000 So, you go over to dailywire.com.
00:30:34.000 When you do, you get the rest of this show live.
00:30:36.000 You get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live.
00:30:37.000 The rest of Michael Knowles' show live.
00:30:38.000 You get to be part of our mailbag.
00:30:39.000 Ask me live questions today.
00:30:41.000 Subscribe right now and you can ask me questions live.
00:30:43.000 I will answer them for you and make your life inestimably better.
00:30:46.000 So, go check that out.
00:30:47.000 For $99 a year, you get this.
00:30:49.000 The Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Tumblr.
00:30:51.000 Go check it out.
00:30:51.000 It's a great deal.
00:30:52.000 Also, make sure that you subscribe at YouTube and iTunes.
00:30:55.000 Make sure you hit the little bell on YouTube so that you're notified every time we bring out a new video.
00:30:59.000 We have a great Sunday special episode that is coming out this Sunday with Eric Weinstein.
00:31:02.000 You'll love it.
00:31:03.000 Really intelligent guy.
00:31:04.000 Man of the left.
00:31:06.000 A liberal who disagrees with me about many issues.
00:31:08.000 Agrees with me about some.
00:31:09.000 I love those conversations because, unlike others, I'm not intolerant of people across the aisle when it comes to having political conversation.
00:31:15.000 But, go check that out.
00:31:17.000 Also, we are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:31:26.000 So as I've been saying, I'm deeply skeptical of the intelligence community leaking about Trump or the Democrats who say that the intelligence community going after Trump is a good thing for the country.
00:31:34.000 I think the Department of Justice leaking stuff to The New York Times is deeply troubling, obviously, and I suspect that that leak about Michael Cohen is coming from the Department of Justice.
00:31:43.000 With that said, the President of the United States should treat his actual intelligence community well when they are doing their jobs.
00:31:48.000 And one of the big problems here is that he leaves them out of the loop on a fairly regular basis.
00:31:52.000 So the most obvious example of this is yesterday, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who was basically thrown under the bus by President Trump this week.
00:31:59.000 He was appearing at some event with Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, and he is told that Donald Trump plans a second meeting with Vladimir Putin.
00:32:06.000 Now, I'm not sure why we would have a second meeting with Putin when the first meeting obviously was such a mess.
00:32:12.000 But I guess Trump wants to do that as sort of a doubling down.
00:32:15.000 Anyway, Dan Coats is told about this on stage.
00:32:17.000 His reaction says something about Trump's relationship with his own intelligence community at this point.
00:32:22.000 I do want to say we have some breaking news.
00:32:25.000 The White House has announced on Twitter that Vladimir Putin is coming to the White House in the fall.
00:32:32.000 Say that again?
00:32:38.000 Vladimir Putin coming to the- Did I hear you?
00:32:41.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:32:43.000 Okay.
00:32:46.000 So clearly, he's been blindsided by the fact the president wants now Putin to come to the White House.
00:32:52.000 Yeah, the president, look, the president is a man of many passions.
00:32:55.000 And he does things on the spur of the moment and at whim.
00:32:58.000 And his comms office tends to repeat those things on the spur of the moment and at whim.
00:33:02.000 All I can say is it would be better for the Trump administration if they would coordinate these things a little bit in advance so you don't have embarrassing moments quite like this.
00:33:09.000 Okay.
00:33:10.000 Meanwhile, the left demonstrates that they do, in fact, have complete Trump derangement syndrome.
00:33:14.000 So Jeanine Pirro of Fox News was on The View.
00:33:16.000 How does Jeanine Pirro get to be on The View and I don't get to be on The View?
00:33:18.000 What is the deal here, guys?
00:33:20.000 OK, what is this?
00:33:21.000 I've been begging you to book me on The View for literally years at this point.
00:33:24.000 Now, I understand you don't want to have me on The View.
00:33:26.000 I get you don't want to have me on The View because it's going to get weird and ugly.
00:33:29.000 But that's the whole point.
00:33:29.000 Don't you want it to be good TV?
00:33:31.000 So anyway, they have Jeanine Pirro on and it does get weird and ugly.
00:33:34.000 So Jeanine Pirro says to Whoopi Goldberg that she has Trump derangement syndrome, which is clearly true.
00:33:38.000 And things get wild.
00:33:40.000 Here's my question for you, because you talk about... I am not.
00:33:47.000 Did you just point at me?
00:33:48.000 Yes!
00:33:48.000 Listen, I don't have Trump derangement.
00:33:51.000 Let me tell you what I have.
00:33:53.000 Okay, and then she gets crazier from there.
00:33:55.000 Whoopi eventually goes so nuts that she essentially throws Jeanine Pirro off the set, because Jeanine Pirro says that Whoopi Goldberg has Trump derangement syndrome, which she clearly does.
00:34:03.000 Here's Whoopi Goldberg losing her mind, saying, I'm done, and then bringing this nutty segment to a crashing halt.
00:34:09.000 Okay, and so it ends like that, but then it gets even worse.
00:34:25.000 So Jeanine Pirro was on Sean Hannity's radio show the other day, and Jeanine Pirro explains what happened directly after that little tiff.
00:34:34.000 When I went off the stage, Sean,
00:34:37.000 I was walking downstairs, and I said something like, Whoopi, I've fought for victims my whole life, and she came at me as I was leaving, and she said, F you, in my face, literally spitting at me, F you, get the F out of this building.
00:34:56.000 Okay, so obviously she does not have Trump Derangement Syndrome, Whoopi Goldberg.
00:34:59.000 Obviously she's a completely sane person, having normal political discourse.
00:35:03.000 This is the level to which things have sunk.
00:35:05.000 Okay, the level to which, I think Whoopi Goldberg is representative of a hardcore base of leftists.
00:35:10.000 That this is how they feel.
00:35:11.000 That anyone who disagrees with them is an evil, evil human being.
00:35:14.000 And you can't even have a discussion about the issues.
00:35:16.000 Now look, Jeanine Pirro is a very pro-Trump guest.
00:35:18.000 There's no question.
00:35:19.000 But they knew that when they booked her.
00:35:21.000 If you're going to have Jeanine Pirro on, you at least have to let her talk.
00:35:24.000 This idea that you bring on a guest and you don't let them talk is so beyond absurd to me.
00:35:27.000 I don't understand it at all.
00:35:29.000 When we do our Sunday specials here on The Ben Shapiro Show, one of the things that I do is I bring in people who disagree.
00:35:33.000 I brought in Sam Harris.
00:35:34.000 I brought in Eric Weinstein.
00:35:36.000 I bring in people from the left all the time.
00:35:37.000 We invite tons of leftist guests who won't even come because they don't want to do an interview.
00:35:41.000 And I let them talk for like 15 minutes at a stretch because you want to know what they think so then you can critique what they think.
00:35:47.000 But the left has decided that even having these conversations is to grant credibility to a side so evil that they must not be heard.
00:35:54.000 You know, Whoopi Goldberg has a slot on that show every single day.
00:35:56.000 Everybody in the audience knows what Whoopi Goldberg thinks about these things.
00:35:59.000 Wouldn't it behoove Whoopi Goldberg and the folks on The View to at least let Jeanine Pirro make her point of view known?
00:36:04.000 Especially because you know the audience is going to laugh at Jeanine Pirro anyway.
00:36:07.000 Because it's a View audience.
00:36:09.000 It's just, it demonstrates real cowardice.
00:36:10.000 You know, props to Bill Maher.
00:36:12.000 Props to Bill Maher.
00:36:12.000 Bill Maher had me on a couple of weeks ago.
00:36:14.000 And props to Bill Maher who actually let me talk.
00:36:16.000 We had a reasonable conversation.
00:36:18.000 We disagreed about nearly everything.
00:36:20.000 His audience was against me.
00:36:21.000 He acknowledged that at the very beginning, and then we had a reasonable conversation.
00:36:24.000 Good for people like Bill Maher.
00:36:25.000 Really.
00:36:26.000 Because there are very few of these folks left in American discourse, and Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar on The View demonstrate it pretty much every day.
00:36:32.000 It's really, really quite pathetic.
00:36:34.000 Okay.
00:36:34.000 So, let's get into the mailbag.
00:36:36.000 Let's jump right in.
00:36:37.000 So, Neil says,
00:36:39.000 Excellent first question, Neil.
00:36:40.000 The answer is, no, I want to go on it more than ever because I think I can have a good discussion with Whoopi if she will allow us to have such a good discussion.
00:36:55.000 Especially because I think that so many folks on the left want to box everybody on the right into the, you're an evil, mangy, terrible, horrible human being.
00:37:03.000 And people on the left have a surprisingly hard time doing that with people who are not terrible, horrible human beings.
00:37:08.000 I don't consider myself in that category, so.
00:37:11.000 I'm happy to have, anytime, a reasonable conversation about these issues.
00:37:15.000 I think that's exactly the reason why some folks on The View don't want to have me on.
00:37:18.000 Well, listen.
00:37:19.000 I'm not of The View.
00:37:19.000 That if your family members are espousing viewpoints that you think are bad for your kids, you have to have your family members around your kids.
00:37:40.000 I'm not of that view.
00:37:41.000 Now, I don't know, your sister, maybe she's a very nice person, maybe she's good for the kids overall, maybe you can talk to her and say, listen, you espouse viewpoints that I don't like in the house about politics, so we're just gonna stay away from politics when we're hanging out.
00:37:51.000 Like, I love you, I want you to be here, but I can't have you inculcating values in my kids that I don't want my kids to learn.
00:37:56.000 Maybe that's a conversation you can have, but I'm not a person who believes that your relationship with your sister trumps your relationship with your kids or your capacity to teach your kids.
00:38:04.000 If it turns out that your sister is bad for your kids, keep your sister away from your kids.
00:38:08.000 Your kids are more important than your sister.
00:38:09.000 Thanks, Dave.
00:38:25.000 Jonathan Haidt talks a lot about this in The Happiness Hypothesis.
00:38:28.000 He has a chapter on love, and he talks about why it is that cohabitation before marriage tends to lead to higher rates of divorce.
00:38:33.000 There are a couple reasons in my view.
00:38:34.000 Number one is that the longer you cohabit, the longer you start to realize the real reason you're cohabiting and not getting married is so you don't have skin in the game, so you're not locked down.
00:38:43.000 The real reason that you're living together in sin, as they used to say, the reason that you are doing this is because both of you want a window ajar, just in case you feel like escaping.
00:38:52.000 Without actually having to have any legal entanglements that get in your way.
00:38:56.000 That's just reality.
00:38:58.000 That's one of the reasons that you are doing that.
00:38:59.000 Because otherwise you would just go down and get a piece of paper that says you're married and be done.
00:39:03.000 You want to leave that door or window ajar.
00:39:04.000 That's why you're doing it.
00:39:05.000 And ladies, if you think that you're locking down a guy by getting him to cohabit with you, got bad news for you.
00:39:10.000 You really, really, really are not.
00:39:12.000 Okay.
00:39:28.000 And then there is companionate love.
00:39:30.000 So, passionate love is what you have for the person that you meet in the first six months, really.
00:39:34.000 First six months, year of your meeting.
00:39:36.000 And this is where you want to be with the person every minute.
00:39:39.000 You want to find out every single thing about them.
00:39:40.000 You can't be apart from them.
00:39:42.000 You are passionately in love with this person in the sense that you want to be physically intimate with them like every minute of every day.
00:39:47.000 This happens a lot when the person is new to you and then over time you get used to the person.
00:39:51.000 And as you get used to the person, you begin to love them in a different way, which is a companionate way.
00:39:55.000 You're grateful to that person for the fact that that person stays with you despite all your flaws.
00:39:58.000 You know all of the little chinks in their armor.
00:40:00.000 You know all of the good things about them and all the bad things about them.
00:40:02.000 Makes you that much more grateful to be in this battle with them together.
00:40:05.000 That's a different kind of love.
00:40:07.000 Right?
00:40:07.000 You barely know the person you marry, typically.
00:40:09.000 You get to know that person over the course of your life.
00:40:11.000 Like, I didn't know, compared to what I know about my wife now, I knew nearly nothing about her when we got engaged.
00:40:16.000 Like, really, nearly nothing.
00:40:17.000 I just made a bet.
00:40:18.000 And that bet was a good bet.
00:40:19.000 And I think that the reason that bet is worth taking when you're in the middle of that passionate love stage, as opposed to when you're in the companionate stage, which is what happens if you cohabit for a very long period of time.
00:40:28.000 It's because if you don't understand how marriage works, then what you tend to think is that marriage is what turns passionate love into companionate love.
00:40:36.000 That it's marriage itself that got rid of the passion.
00:40:38.000 And this is what you hear from all these guys who get it wrong.
00:40:40.000 They say, oh, you know, when she was my girlfriend, man, we were at each other all the time.
00:40:44.000 And then we got married and now we don't do any of that stuff.
00:40:46.000 Why did you get so boring?
00:40:48.000 And the answer is, no, that's not what happened.
00:40:50.000 It wasn't marriage that did that.
00:40:52.000 What actually happened is what happens in every relationship, whether you are married or not.
00:40:55.000 The reason you should get married when you're passionate is because marriage should continue to have that element of passion.
00:41:00.000 But you should move into companionate love when you are already committed to the person.
00:41:05.000 Because if you move into companionate love when you are not already committed to the person, you're going to go searching for the passionate love again with somebody else.
00:41:11.000 Because, and inevitably, whatever passionate love you pursue will turn into companionate love.
00:41:14.000 This is not me speaking, this is social science speaking.
00:41:17.000 Okay, Brandon says, Hey Ben, I'm a little down this week and in my thoughts over the loss of my sister.
00:41:20.000 Well, I'm so sorry to hear that happened, Brandon.
00:41:22.000 Really, my heart breaks for you.
00:41:24.000 That's awful.
00:41:24.000 I would like to better understand the Jewish perspective of grief and how to deal with it properly.
00:41:28.000 Thank you.
00:41:29.000 So Jews have a very interesting way of dealing with grief.
00:41:31.000 Everything in Judaism is somewhat ritualized.
00:41:33.000 So we have something called sitting shiva.
00:41:35.000 Sitting shiva is where you basically
00:41:38.000 As soon as you hear that someone... I'll give you the whole spiel.
00:41:40.000 So when you hear that a relative is dead, a close relative, like a sister or a brother or a parent or a child...
00:41:45.000 Then the first thing you do is you tear your clothing as a sign of mourning.
00:41:50.000 And you say, which means blessed is the true judge, meaning that God's justice is not ours and he gets to make the decisions about the world.
00:41:59.000 And then you go into a period of mourning.
00:42:00.000 That period of mourning is basically a period of comfort.
00:42:03.000 It's sitting Shiva.
00:42:04.000 Shiva means seven.
00:42:05.000 For a week, you sit in your house and you don't go out of your house.
00:42:08.000 Like literally, you don't go out of your house.
00:42:10.000 And people come and they bring you food and they pray with you.
00:42:12.000 They come and they actually bring prayers to the house.
00:42:14.000 Like they'll bring a Torah to the house so you can do Monday and Thursday services at the house.
00:42:18.000 And they will come and they will visit.
00:42:19.000 It's one of the greater mitzvahs that we have is to visit Beit She'oeva, to visit somebody who's mourning.
00:42:26.000 And you sit and you talk about the person and you comfort the person.
00:42:29.000 You talk about, you know, the person who's been lost.
00:42:32.000 And then for 30 days after that, for Shloshim, then you are supposed to
00:42:37.000 Do you?
00:42:54.000 Uh, and experience it so that by the time you finish those seven days, you're ready to get out in the world again because you're so cooped in and because you've been so kind of ensconced in this, in this basket of love, basically, that now you're ready to go out into the world again.
00:43:05.000 And then you say Kaddish for a year.
00:43:07.000 So you say Kaddish is this prayer that we say repeatedly during the morning, afternoon, evening services that basically suggests that God is holy and knows what he's doing and also is very based around the idea that there are distinctions between life and death, good and evil, et cetera.
00:43:20.000 So, Judaism says that you are supposed to really be in the morning.
00:43:25.000 Now, a lot of people want to push off morning.
00:43:26.000 A lot of people want to just, I'll deal with my morning by going out and working more.
00:43:30.000 I'll go out and I'll deal with it by ignoring it.
00:43:32.000 The problem is that it's going to hit you even harder.
00:43:34.000 I think that the Jewish way of morning is one of the more beautiful parts of my religion, actually.
00:43:37.000 So, you can buy some books on it.
00:43:39.000 There's a good book called The Jewish Way in Death and Morning that I think is worth reading.
00:43:43.000 Jordan says, Hey, Ben, my older brother is a classic American rags to riches story.
00:43:47.000 He lives like a conservative and has conservative values, but is liberal politically.
00:43:50.000 How is that even possible?
00:43:51.000 The reason it's possible, Jordan, is because most liberals live conservative lives if they're successful, because the rules that make you successful in life tend toward conservatism, like get married, get a job, save your money, make good decisions with your life.
00:44:04.000 These are all based on certain conservative values.
00:44:06.000 The fact that your your brother
00:44:09.000 We're good to go.
00:44:32.000 And so people are very easily able to ignore the way they live in their own life in order to pursue political values they think are important.
00:44:49.000 That's a pretty complicated question there.
00:44:52.000 There's a lot to unpack.
00:44:53.000 But the Fourth Amendment, I don't know why you'd have to have a generalized right to privacy in order to make an argument against the NSA.
00:44:59.000 I mean, the Fourth Amendment is not, is withstanding.
00:45:01.000 The Fourth Amendment says that there shall not be unreasonable search and seizure.
00:45:05.000 That's a Fourth Amendment consideration.
00:45:07.000 OK, that has nothing to do with abortion, but it does have to do with the government's ability to search and seize your records, as it always has had to.
00:45:13.000 That's why there's a real balance that has to be drawn between the needs of the national security community and keeping the country safe and protecting our data.
00:45:19.000 I think that balance has largely been drawn too much in favor of the NSA and not enough in favor of individual privacy.
00:45:26.000 No, I don't agree with that.
00:45:27.000 I think that big is not inherently bad.
00:45:28.000 I think big is sometimes bad, and small is sometimes bad, and bad is sometimes bad.
00:45:31.000 Bad is always bad, in fact.
00:45:32.000 So, the idea that a company is bad because it is big
00:45:46.000 No, it was good to get big.
00:45:48.000 Then the question is, do they deal with market consequences?
00:45:51.000 And here's the truth.
00:45:52.000 Unless they are skewing the system, unless they are acting in corrupt fashion, big is not inherently bad.
00:45:57.000 I think big is, in many cases, quite good.
00:45:59.000 I mean, it's the reason that you get economies of scale and cheaper products, for example.
00:46:02.000 It depends how you define disease.
00:46:03.000 So I tend to think addiction is not a disease in the sense that it's not transmissible.
00:46:05.000 When I think of disease, I think of a transmissible disease.
00:46:15.000 Right?
00:46:16.000 I guess that you could say maybe cancer is a disease, although usually you would say that cancer is more of like a medical condition.
00:46:23.000 I guess you could say it's a disease.
00:46:25.000 Is it a disease in the sense that it is naturally occurring?
00:46:28.000 Sure.
00:46:29.000 I think in that sense, it absolutely is.
00:46:32.000 But it is also a disease that can be fought with willpower, which is different than a lot of other diseases.
00:46:37.000 Addiction is something that not always, but sometimes can be fought with compassion.
00:46:41.000 This is why the 12-step program has been so successful for Alcoholics Anonymous.
00:46:44.000 I mean, that's an active act of self-control.
00:46:47.000 So unlike other diseases that can't be fought, like you can't not have cancer just because you determined that you are not going to have cancer.
00:46:53.000 It's beyond your control.
00:46:55.000 Addiction is partially beyond your control and partially not.
00:46:57.000 And one of the things about addiction is that one of the ways you control addiction is acknowledging that you have an addiction and then creating prophylactic rules to avoid getting into areas that put you in a problem.
00:47:05.000 So if you're an alcoholic, you stay away from liquor stores.
00:47:08.000 If you are a drug addict, you stay away from parties where you know people are going to be smoking pot, for example.
00:47:12.000 If you're a porn addict, you put porn blockers on your computer specifically so that you're never tempted to click on things.
00:47:19.000 Thanks.
00:47:21.000 Well, George Orwell is fantastic.
00:47:29.000 I think he would have considered himself a socialist, but he also understood the problems with Marxism.
00:47:33.000 So it would be more fair to call him sort of a democratic socialist in the sense that, like, the Europeans see it.
00:47:39.000 I'm not sure that he believed in large-scale nationalization of industry.
00:47:43.000 I think he probably believed in more redistributionist programs.
00:47:45.000 So he'd be more in line with sort of
00:47:47.000 Norwegian socialism, sort of the Nordic states, which, as I've explained before, is sort of a mix of capitalism and socialism.
00:47:55.000 But his best essay, the best essay ever, is something that's not even about socialism or capitalism.
00:48:00.000 It's a 1940 essay that he wrote specifically about the appeal of Nazism.
00:48:03.000 It is just spectacular, I quote it all the time, because his basic argument is that the failure of both right and left in modern society is to acknowledge that people need meaning.
00:48:11.000 And so the reason that the Nazis had succeeded in twisting so many people's minds is because while both right and left were focused on capitalism makes us rich or Marxism makes us more materially prosperous.
00:48:21.000 The Nazis were focused on what gives people spiritual meaning, and they found an evil way of giving people spiritual meaning, and people resonated to that.
00:48:28.000 His essay basically says, people do want flags, people want cannons, people want guns, people want marches, people want a feeling of solidarity.
00:48:35.000 That's what people are looking for.
00:48:36.000 It's something that I think we've neglected in our society that has become so materialistic.
00:48:40.000 I've been writing an entire book about this.
00:48:41.000 I talk about the book a lot.
00:48:42.000 It really is good.
00:48:43.000 I just finished the manuscript on it, which I am very, very excited about.
00:48:47.000 I may try to push up the pub date with the publisher.
00:48:51.000 I don't want to be immodest here.
00:48:53.000 I think it's the best thing I've ever written.
00:48:54.000 I think it's really, really good.
00:48:55.000 And I think it'll help a lot of people, help me clarify my own thoughts.
00:48:58.000 I think it'll help a lot of people clarify their own thoughts about Western civilization, what it means, and how we fight for it.
00:49:03.000 I consider it better because I don't think it's any of the government's damn business what kind of money I earn.
00:49:14.000 Like, why do I have to tell the government how much money I earn?
00:49:17.000 I'm exactly the same person that I was before.
00:49:19.000 Now, the government,
00:49:21.000 We're good to go.
00:49:37.000 Pathetic class warfare system income tax, where a sales tax really does not.
00:49:41.000 All right.
00:49:42.000 David says... Well, Thomas has a quick one.
00:49:46.000 I'm a huge fan of the show.
00:49:47.000 Well, I appreciate it.
00:49:48.000 Waffles is obviously the answer.
00:49:49.000 Waffles are certainly... I love both, because who doesn't love... I mean, carbs are amazing.
00:49:54.000 They're amazing.
00:49:54.000 They're God's worst punishment on us, carbs.
00:49:56.000 They're unbelievable.
00:49:57.000 But waffles are definitely better.
00:49:59.000 They have pockets for butter and syrup.
00:50:02.000 OK, they're just made for deliciousness.
00:50:04.000 Put some whipped cream on top of that stuff, some caramel.
00:50:06.000 Oh, my goodness.
00:50:07.000 Is it a dessert?
00:50:08.000 Is it a breakfast?
00:50:09.000 Who knows?
00:50:10.000 It's just unbelievable.
00:50:11.000 David says...
00:50:12.000 This is a question I've held for a long time.
00:50:14.000 Since I respect your opinion, I agree with your assertions most of the time.
00:50:17.000 I know you have a personal understanding about the subject.
00:50:19.000 Here's my symbol.
00:50:20.000 Here's my question.
00:50:20.000 Can you please explain the Star of David?
00:50:22.000 How or when was it seen as the symbol of Israel?
00:50:24.000 And most importantly, where did it come from its origins?
00:50:26.000 Thanks for your reply in advance.
00:50:27.000 My understanding is that the first use of that was, I believe, during the early part of the first millennia.
00:50:35.000 First millennium?
00:50:36.000 I'd want to check this out and get back to you, honestly.
00:50:38.000 I don't want to give you the wrong historical answer on the history of the Star of David, but I know that, you know, it's been part of Jewish prayers for a long time.
00:50:46.000 The Magen David.
00:50:49.000 Sometimes they say Magen Avraham, meaning the Star of Abraham.
00:50:53.000 All right, let's see.
00:50:55.000 Let's do a quick thing I like and a thing I hate, because we are past our expiration date here, and we're beginning to smell.
00:51:00.000 So things that I like.
00:51:02.000 Sorry, what was it?
00:51:02.000 Michael...
00:51:18.000 This is a gated community.
00:51:20.000 You can see who comes in and who goes out.
00:51:21.000 See you later.
00:51:21.000 Not too late.
00:51:22.000 Okay.
00:51:52.000 Jenny, it's dad again.
00:51:53.000 Where are you?
00:51:56.000 This man wants to know if you've seen his daughter.
00:52:00.000 Okay, so it's well made.
00:52:01.000 I'm only about halfway into the series, but I'm enjoying it.
00:52:04.000 There are a couple others.
00:52:05.000 If people have recommendations on other series that they think I should watch, then send them to me because my wife and I are always looking for good series to watch.
00:52:12.000 I've heard that there's this one on Netflix also that's about terrorism that's supposed to be pretty good.
00:52:16.000 So I'll check that out and I'll see if it's worth a recommend.
00:52:18.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:52:23.000 So the media has a grand interest in turning idiot parents into a trend.
00:52:28.000 Their latest trend that they like is what they're calling theybes.
00:52:31.000 And of course, not rabies, theybes.
00:52:33.000 What are theybes?
00:52:34.000 Okay, this is that you are raising your children without gender, which is idiocy because you're supposed to teach your kids about things that make them healthy, not things that make them unhealthy.
00:52:42.000 Okay, the fact is that if you are confusing your two-year-old about gender, then you are being an idiot.
00:52:47.000 Like, this is my great question about this stuff.
00:52:50.000 How do you think you're helping your kid?
00:52:51.000 Like really, do you think it helps your kid not to give them any guidance at all?
00:52:53.000 Would you let your kid not go to school because your kid doesn't know anything about reading?
00:52:56.000 And maybe your kid is better off not reading.
00:52:58.000 Maybe reading is a societal construct.
00:53:00.000 And we know there are lots of bad things that come from reading, like being on Twitter.
00:53:04.000 We know there are terrible things that come from education, like a certain sense of non-equality with others.
00:53:09.000 You're an elitist.
00:53:10.000 But now we've got parents who have decided to raise their kids without a gender designation, which, again, how does this help the kid?
00:53:16.000 Nobody the hell knows.
00:53:18.000 So this is from Cambridge, Massachusetts, because of course it is.
00:53:20.000 Of course, the home of Harvard is the center of stupidity in the universe.
00:53:23.000 They say three-year-old twins, Zyler and Caden Sharp,
00:53:26.000 Or biology.
00:53:51.000 Or we could alternatively look at their genitals.
00:53:53.000 How you think this is good for your kid is beyond me.
00:53:55.000 I have a four-year-old and a two-year-old, so I know a fair bit about raising kids of precisely this age.
00:53:58.000 And listen, I've said on this program,
00:54:11.000 When my daughter was two years old, you know what she really liked?
00:54:13.000 Trucks and buses.
00:54:14.000 Did I care?
00:54:14.000 Not at all, because I don't think that it is a natural indicator of masculinity or femininity for a two-year-old to like trucks or buses.
00:54:20.000 And you know what?
00:54:21.000 Now she's four and she only wants to wear princess dresses.
00:54:23.000 It's the only thing she wants to do.
00:54:25.000 You know why?
00:54:26.000 Because that's what girls typically want to do.
00:54:29.000 That said, my two-year-old son, right, he also likes trucks and buses.
00:54:33.000 If he started wanting to wear princess dresses, you know what I would say to him?
00:54:35.000 I would say, no, that's a girl thing.
00:54:37.000 That's what your sister does.
00:54:38.000 You know what you do?
00:54:39.000 You do fun boy things, like you play baseball.
00:54:41.000 That's not a bad thing.
00:54:43.000 I'm not saying my daughter can't play baseball.
00:54:45.000 I am saying that my son cannot wear dresses because I want my son to be secure in his own masculinity.
00:54:50.000 And it turns out that being a man means accepting some of the societal constraints around manhood.
00:54:57.000 Hey, now it doesn't mean when he's 18 or 20 he can't make his own decisions.
00:55:00.000 That's when you're 18 or 20.
00:55:01.000 But when he's 2, I get to make those decisions.
00:55:03.000 And I want to inculcate in my son a feeling that he is a boy, a strong boy, who's going to grow up to have manly responsibilities for taking care of women and children.
00:55:11.000 Manly responsibilities for defending a civilization that makes important distinctions between men and women.
00:55:16.000 I think there is a good reason that the Bible says that boys should not dress as girls and girls should not dress as boys because every society in human history has made distinctions between how males dress and females dress.
00:55:25.000 And don't give me the Scottish wear kilts.
00:55:27.000 That's correct.
00:55:28.000 Men wear kilts and women wear dresses.
00:55:30.000 Every society in history has had distinctions and those distinctions are deeply important because they inculcate different responsibilities that are indeed rooted in biology.
00:55:38.000 The idea that all of gender is a construct is simply not backed by science, nor is it healthy for society or even for individuals.
00:55:46.000 If there are people who are confused, then we have to figure out how to deal with that.
00:55:48.000 But to inculcate the confusion as a point of politics is an evil thing to do to a child.
00:55:53.000 OK, well, we will be here tomorrow.
00:55:55.000 Well, no, we won't.
00:55:55.000 You know, it's going to be a Saturday, so we're not going to be here tomorrow.
00:55:58.000 Why would I be here tomorrow?
00:55:59.000 I can't even do that.
00:56:00.000 It's Sabbath.
00:56:00.000 We'll be back here on Monday with much, much more and the Sunday special, which is coming up on Sunday.
00:56:04.000 So go check that out.
00:56:05.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:56:06.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:56:10.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:56:16.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:56:21.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:56:22.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
00:56:24.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:56:26.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
00:56:28.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.