Trump's economic success rests on the passage of his one big, beautiful bill. Plus, what's in that on the House end? Does it pass in front of Congress? We'll get to all of it tomorrow night on Ben After Dark.
00:01:19.000So President Trump's economic success rests on the passage of his one big, beautiful bill.
00:01:24.000We've been talking about this for months.
00:01:26.000And the timeline on the big, beautiful bill is still...
00:01:29.000Somewhat in doubt, because obviously it has to pass through the House and then a version has to pass through the Senate.
00:01:33.000And then there's going to be reconciliation between the House bill and the Senate bill.
00:01:37.000And so whatever you see in the House bill might not end up in the final bill.
00:01:40.000However, massive controversy already breaking out in the House over where the cuts are going to come from.
00:01:45.000Many House Republicans are calling for cuts that are going to make up for the loss in revenue to the federal government that occurs when taxes are not increased.
00:01:55.000As you know from sort of conservative discussions for the last 50 years, there's something called the Laffer curve.
00:02:01.000The Laffer curve is a suggestion by the economist Art Laffer that if you're looking for sort of the proper rate of taxation, it can't be zero because then the government has no money to spend.
00:02:09.000And it also can't be 100 because then the government has no money to spend.
00:02:12.000No one will actually go out and do business if they are going to have all of their money removed by the federal government.
00:02:18.000So the Laffer curve is a suggestion that there is, in fact, a point at which if you tax people more...
00:02:24.000Then you will actually end up with declining government revenues as a result because people will simply work less in order to avoid the top tax bracket, for example.
00:02:33.000It's unclear where exactly the inflection point is with regard to the Laffer curve.
00:02:38.000However, it has been longstanding conservative economic dogma that if you increase taxes, you will end up quashing economic growth because you're taking money away from the more efficient private sector and sticking it in the public sector where it gets doled out by a bunch of politicians to their favorite pet projects.
00:02:54.000Also, how you look at government revenue differs between conservatives and people on the left.
00:02:58.000People on the left believe that the government basically owns your money and then allows you to keep some of it.
00:03:03.000Conservatives believe you own your money, and then you have to give some of it to the government in order to do public services, for example.
00:03:09.000So, when it comes to even the discussions of what government revenue looks like, the real discussion that should be had, and it's the discussion no one will ever have, is what is the proper role of government in our lives?
00:03:19.000Why is it that our government is spending $6, $7 trillion a year On the federal level.
00:03:24.000This was not the case when the original country was founded.
00:03:28.000When the United States was founded, the original expenditures by the federal government were absolutely minimal.
00:03:33.000And it stayed that way, except for times of war, like the Civil War, all the way up through, essentially, the end of World War I. And then government spending began to grow slowly.
00:03:42.000And then with FDR, it just exploded all out of proportion.
00:03:46.000And so now we have $7 trillion being spent every single year.
00:03:49.000That's what's racking up the national debt.
00:03:50.000And so there are a couple of sort of...
00:03:53.000Different takes on what should be done.
00:03:55.000A traditional, classical conservative might say, we need to cut massive reams of government spending.
00:04:00.000I push it all back down to the states.
00:04:02.000If the states wish to do things like Medicare and Medicaid, then the states can do that.
00:04:05.000But it shouldn't be up to a taxpayer from Montana to pay for the health care of a guy from California because he's 70 years old, for example.
00:04:12.000And then you have the sort of Republican Party position, which is, let's cut around the edges.
00:04:16.000And then you have the Democratic Party position, which is, let's never cut anything ever for the rest of time.
00:04:20.000The latter two positions are the ones the American people have opted for.
00:04:23.000The latter two positions are, let's spend all the money in the world and let's spend just slightly less than all the money in the world.
00:04:30.000And that's what a lot of the debate is with regard to this current GOP tax bill inside the Republican caucus.
00:04:36.000There are a bunch of Republicans who believe that cutting spending in any way, shape, or form is detrimental to Republican electoral chances.
00:04:45.000And by polling, basically, there's truth to that.
00:04:49.000By polling, the American people say they don't want the government to be so big and provide so many services.
00:04:54.000And then when you ask them which services they would like cut, they scratch their head and really have no idea of the answer to that question.
00:05:01.000Then you have sort of traditional Republicans who say, listen, if we're ever going to get to anything more like big restructuring of government, you have to start somewhere or we are going to plunge off the deck cliff.
00:05:10.000So all of this is manifesting in the debate over the current big, beautiful bill in the Republican House.
00:05:16.000There's no question spending is going to continue to increase.
00:05:23.000According to the Wall Street Journal, the Republican tax bill looks very different depending on your income and your political lens.
00:05:29.000For the top sliver of taxpayers, it gives a permanent extension and expansion of expiring tax cuts from 2017, coupled with some new limits.
00:05:36.000Middle income households would get permanent tax cut extensions as well.
00:05:39.000They would also gain temporary tax cuts, including a larger standard deduction and child tax credit and targeted benefits for senior citizens and people receiving tips and overtime pay.
00:05:49.000There's not much in the tax cut bill for people who are low income, mainly because people who are low income are not paying taxes in the United States.
00:05:55.000That's why whenever people say, this tax bill disproportionately benefits the rich.
00:06:00.000Well, I mean, I would assume because the rich absolutely overpay proportionally based on their income.
00:06:16.000The amount you pay to the government versus the services you get back from the government.
00:06:19.000A lot of middle-income people are paying taxes, but they're also receiving tremendous benefits back from the government in the form of various forms of welfare, social support, and all of the rest.
00:06:29.000Representative Blakemore of Utah said this is not a bill for billionaire relief, but Democrats are casting the bill as an unacceptable giveaway to well-off people at the expense of most Americans.
00:06:39.000So, there are a bunch of different provisions that are controversial here.
00:06:44.000And then one is the question of where some cuts are coming from.
00:06:49.000So if you look at the actual material in the bill, the Tax Foundation has a good rundown on the bill, taxfoundation.org.
00:06:55.000And what they find through their preliminary analysis is that the tax provisions would increase long-run GDP by 0.6%, which is a solid increase in GDP and national growth.
00:07:06.000It would reduce federal tax revenue by $4.1 trillion over the course of the next decade.
00:07:13.000It means the federal government will take in less money than it would have if it left the top tax rates at a higher rate.
00:07:18.000So you're increasing growth, but you're decreasing the revenue to the government, the amount of money that the government steals from the taxpayers.
00:07:24.000On a dynamic basis, the revenue reduction would fall by 19% to $3.3 trillion over 10 years before the added interest costs.
00:07:32.000So they're saying that basically that $4.1 trillion that you're missing, that's assuming a static level of economic growth.
00:07:38.000If you include the economic growth, Then you end up with more revenue back to the government, but you're still going to end up with, in addition to the deficit, of some $3.3 trillion.
00:07:48.000Overall, the bill would prevent tax increases on 62% of taxpayers that would occur if the Trump tax cuts were to expire.
00:07:55.000But there are other provisions that are being eliminated, like, for example, bonus depreciation and research and development expensing.
00:08:03.000So in some ways, this is a significantly more populist tax cut bill than the Trump tax cut bill the first time around.
00:08:10.000This is why, for example, there's no tax on tips included, but they're getting rid of bonus depreciation.
00:08:16.000The House passed budget resolution would allow a $4.5 trillion increase in the deficit from tax cuts over the next decade, so long as spending is also cut by $1.7 trillion.
00:08:25.000But if they don't cut the spending, if that spending never materializes, then the cap on the tax cuts gets reduced dollar for dollar.
00:08:32.000So the question is where those cuts come from.
00:08:34.000This is where most of the controversy is occurring, not with regard to the tax rates per se, but with regard to the cuts.
00:08:40.000Where are the cuts occurring to offset some of the loss in revenue to the federal government?
00:08:45.000And the answer is in restructuring of Medicaid particularly.
00:08:49.000We'll get to more on this in a moment.
00:08:50.000First, free online services like Google actually charge you.
00:09:00.000Your digital self is traded to unknown entities who might want to sell you products, influence your political views, or even manipulate your vote.
00:09:10.000Without a VPN, your internet provider can legally track and sell your browsing data in the United States.
00:09:15.000Meanwhile, data brokers collect your information across websites and apps, creating detailed profiles of you through your IP address.
00:09:20.000ExpressVPN solves this by routing all your activity through encrypted servers, preventing your ISP from seeing or selling your data while also hiding your IP address so brokers can no longer track you.
00:09:29.000Whenever I'm traveling, I've got ExpressVPN on because if I'm on public Wi-Fi, that means that somebody could be hacking me or grabbing my info.
00:10:16.000LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity.
00:10:19.000If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock U.S.-based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed, or your money back.
00:10:27.000Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the Million Dollar Protection Package.
00:10:30.000If you lose money due to identity theft, you cannot control how diligent others are with your personal information, but with LifeLock...
00:11:03.000So Medicaid has been a massive income suck.
00:11:07.000for the United States for an extraordinarily long time.
00:11:09.000It has basically become a massive welfare program, including for many people who don't want to work.
00:11:15.000So Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Mehmet Oz, Brooke Rollins, and Scott Turner, that'd be the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Administrator for CMMS, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
00:11:28.000They have an editorial in the New York Times talking about what exactly is going to happen to Medicaid.
00:11:33.000And the point they make is that there are a lot of people who are on Medicaid.
00:11:36.000Again, Medicare is for the elderly, and Medicaid is for people who are too poor, basically.
00:11:42.000They're very poor, and so they require government assistance on the federal level.
00:11:46.000Again, the United States, the idea of the United States is somehow mean to the poor is ridiculous.
00:11:50.000The United States has the most progressive tax system on planet Earth, meaning that the differential between what the top tax brackets pay and what the people at the bottom pay is the widest of virtually any OECD country.
00:12:04.000The United States also has massively generous welfare benefits.
00:12:06.000Whenever you see the so-called income gap in the United States, that is always ignoring the welfare benefits that go to people in the bottom half of income earners.
00:12:15.000Because when you include that, a lot of the income gap actually erodes pretty quickly.
00:12:19.000In any case, these administrators and secretaries over at the Trump administration point out, welfare programs have now deviated from their original mission, both by drift and by design.
00:12:29.000Millions of able-bodied adults have been added to the roles in the past decade, primarily as a result of Medicaid expansion.
00:12:35.000Many of these recipients are working-age individuals without children who might remain on welfare for years.
00:12:40.000Some of them do not work at all, or they work inconsistently throughout the year.
00:12:43.000The increased share of welfare spending dedicated to able-bodied, working-age adults distracts from what This should not be the American way of welfare.
00:12:54.000As leaders of the agencies, they say that oversee the largest welfare programs in the nation.
00:13:00.000We see the data, hear the stories, and understand that these programs are failing to deliver results.
00:13:08.000For able-bodied adults, welfare should be a short-term hand-up, not a lifetime hand-out.
00:13:13.000But too many able-bodied adults on welfare are not working at all, and too often we don't even ask them to.
00:13:18.000A recent analysis from an economist at the American Enterprise Institute examined survey data from December 2022, that's the most recent month available, and found that only 44% Of able-bodied, working-age Medicaid beneficiaries without dependents worked at least 80 hours in that month.
00:13:50.000And only 4 out of 10 Medicaid recipients were working 5 hours a day.
00:13:53.000That is not because of lack of job opportunity, by the way, folks.
00:13:56.000We still have more job openings in the United States than people applying for those jobs.
00:14:00.000Establishing universal work requirements for able-bodied adults across the welfare programs we manage, they say, will prioritize the vulnerable, empower able-bodied individuals, help rebuild thriving communities, and protect the taxpayers.
00:14:13.000And they point to the Clinton welfare reform as a model for this sort of stuff.
00:14:18.000They say it's true a work requirement protects taxpayer dollars as it provides income to the worker and lessens dependence on government funding.
00:14:27.000In other words, get off your butt and work.
00:14:29.000Now, the counter perspective is being provided by Josh Hawley.
00:14:32.000As I say, there is a debate inside the Republican Party between people who sort of side with Democrats, like we'll never cut any welfare spending ever, ever, forever because the American people don't like it, and people who say, we need to restructure some of this or we're going to hit the fiscal cliff sooner than humanly possible.
00:14:47.000And then there are sort of true believers in the Republican caucus, the people who believe that the federal government has no role in virtually any of this.
00:14:54.000And that would be people, Like, for example, presumably Chip Roy in Texas or Rand Paul in the Senate in Kentucky.
00:15:04.000And in a piece indistinguishable from that of any Democrat, he wrote in the New York Times just a couple of days ago, don't cut Medicaid.
00:15:11.000And he says, polls show Democrats down in the dumps at their lowest approval level in decades, but we Republicans are having an identity crisis of our own.
00:15:19.000You can see it in the tug of war over President Trump's one big, beautiful bill.
00:15:23.000Will Republicans be a majority party of working people or a permanent minority speaking only for the C-suite?
00:15:28.000So the question I have for Josh Hawley is, if to be the party of the working people means that you are supposed to basically allow tax increases and broader welfare spending, how does that distinguish you from the Democratic Party across the aisle?
00:15:41.000And if you're going to get into a battle of who spends more on blue-collar people in terms of other people's money, Democrats are always going to win that race because they have no principles at all that hold them off from just continuing to expand benefits.
00:15:52.000Howley says Mr. Trump has promised working class tax cuts and protection for working class social insurance like Medicaid.
00:15:58.000But now a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans, call it the party's Wall Street wing, is urging Congress to ignore all that and get back to the old-time religion, corporate giveaways, preferences for capital, and deep cuts to social insurance.
00:16:08.000Again, this sounds exactly like what Elizabeth Warren might write.
00:16:13.000So, again, he suggests that we should give more child tax credits, which, again, A child tax credit should be for people who pay taxes.
00:16:21.000Right now, child tax credits go to people who do not pay taxes, which means it is just a handout, basically.
00:16:27.000If you want to do a handout, by the way, a handout that actually works, there is a proposal in this bill that's quite great called Invest America.
00:16:33.000That proposal basically says the federal government for every child who is born, that child gets a savings account with the federal government that is essentially invested in the S&P 500, and then it's just left there.
00:16:44.000That, by the way, was actually the Social Security privatization plan.
00:16:48.000That George W. Bush proposed back in 2006, except this time it's $1,000 for every kid in the United States.
00:16:53.000That would actually be a smart investment play if you want the government investing in this sort of thing.
00:16:58.000Because then you actually have people who are invested in, say, the stock market, and you get the natural growth along with the economy of those funds, as opposed to most other social welfare programs or pyramid schemes like Social Security, where the government just tells you that they're taking your money and putting it in a lockbox and they spend it on some other dude.
00:17:15.000And then when you get real old, we tax somebody new to pay for you.
00:17:19.000So that is the debate inside the Republican Party right now.
00:17:22.000Again, the right side of that debate does include all of these secretaries in the Trump administration.
00:17:29.000The attempt to get people back to work is really important.
00:17:33.000Brad Wilcox, who does excellent work over at the Institute of Family Studies, he has statistics showing that before 1980, only about 5% Of able-bodied men age 25 to 40 were not looking for work.
00:17:55.000And the answer is because the federal government is paying for them.
00:17:58.000Nonetheless, this is creating an enormous amount of dyspepsia inside the Republican Party.
00:18:03.000Some Republicans, particularly in purple districts or purple states, are upset about this.
00:18:08.000They're afraid that maybe they're going to lose their seats if there are any sort of restructurings of Medicaid.
00:18:14.000Meanwhile, those same Republicans very often are arguing about state and local tax deductions.
00:18:19.000So the original Trump tax bill did not allow state and local tax deductions.
00:18:25.000So the so-called SALT deductions basically allowed you to take off the taxes for your state government before you paid your federal income tax.
00:18:33.000So if I was in California and I paid a 13% state rate on, say, a million dollars of income, just to make the statistics easy.
00:18:40.000So I'd take $130,000 off my income before I submitted my federal tax return.
00:18:44.000I paid the state tax first, and then I paid the federal income tax on the remaining income of $870,000.
00:18:51.000Trump got rid of that because what he said is, why is it that a person who's in a zero-tax state like Florida should essentially be subsidizing a person who lives in California?
00:19:00.000Why should the federal government be giving benefits to people who live in blue states that tax their citizens highly?
00:19:06.000Well, now a bunch of Republicans who are in those blue states have been pushing.
00:19:11.000The current plan, approved by the House Ways and Means Committee, includes a $30,000 cap for individuals and married couples that starts phasing down when the income reaches $400,000.
00:19:19.000That is a boost from today's $10,000, but it's still not high enough for some of the Republican lawmakers in places like New York, like Mike Lawler and Nick LaLoda.
00:19:27.000They're trying to push for more, an increase in the so-called SALT cap.
00:19:32.000But there are a bunch of Republicans in red states with zero tax rates who are looking at this and saying, why are we giving a bunch of tax breaks?
00:19:39.000to people who live in New York and California.
00:19:43.000According to the Wall Street Journal, it's a tables have turned moment inside the House GOP where the typical pattern is that hardliners draw red lines while moderates get in line.
00:19:51.000Salt is one of several concerns conservatives have with the latest version of the Big Beautiful Bill.
00:19:55.000They want faster repeal of clean energy tax breaks, a quicker start to Medicaid work requirements, and smaller federal support for the expanded Medicaid program created by Obamacare.
00:20:05.000Meanwhile, there's all sorts of Hubbub inside the Republican caucus over what to do with the Doge cuts.
00:20:11.000So Elon Musk and Doge have gone through.
00:20:14.000They found a bunch of cuts that they have identified as potential cuts.
00:20:18.000In order for those to become permanent, you need Congress, through a process called rescission, to actually vote on making those cuts in waste, fraud, and abuse permanent.
00:20:29.000Russ Vaught of the Office of Management and Budget, he says that that's one of the goals here, is to make those Doge cuts permanent.
00:20:35.000We intend to take the Doge agenda and the cuts and the momentum and the initiative and turn those into permanent savings.
00:20:45.000That's what we believe is our responsibility.
00:20:50.000There are a lot of Republicans in the House and the Senate who don't actually like many of those cuts.
00:20:54.000Now, we should again point out, a lot of the cuts that we are talking about, yes, they are sizable in sort of the absolute.
00:21:01.000In terms of comparison to the spending of the federal government, they are not, in fact, sizable.
00:21:06.000If you really wanted to prevent fiscal crisis in the United States over the course of the next 10 years, it requires moves much bigger than simple work requirements for Medicaid.
00:21:14.000Our Republicans, unless they have a broader majority, aren't going to be able to do any of that.
00:21:17.000That's why you are seeing incrementalism, even from the conservatives inside the Republican caucus.
00:21:22.000It's going to take, again, an act of political leisure domain, some political magic for Mike Johnson to pull this thing off.
00:21:28.000And even if he does in the House with this extremely narrow majority, in some ways, the narrow majority helps Johnson, right?
00:21:33.000That every Republican is going to be pressured in order to vote for the bill.
00:21:36.000If you had a broad majority, then you could see a bunch of people who weren't going to be identified as the problem who'd vote against it.
00:21:43.000But if you need everyone, then in the end, President Trump is going to put his boot down and force a bunch of reluctant Republicans to support whatever the big, beautiful bill is.
00:22:20.000If this tax cut does not happen, if somehow this whole thing falls apart, disaster area for the Trump administration, quite obviously.
00:22:26.000Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin on Wednesday, one of the more conservative members of the Republican caucus, He said that he's worried the House Republicans' reconciliation bill is going to go down.
00:22:36.000I think that other ship with the big, beautiful bill, I think that's the Titanic.
00:22:40.000I think that's going down because I think I have enough colleagues in the Senate that this has resonated with that are saying, yeah, we've got to return to a reasonable pre-pandemic level spending.
00:22:49.000But I always add this, plus a process to achieve it and maintain it.
00:22:59.000If somehow Trump pulls this off, major act of political magicing by the Trump administration and by Senator John Thune, the Senate Majority Leader, and by Mike Johnson in the House.
00:23:10.000It is pretty amazing that the United States is so addicted to spending that even talk about work requirements for welfare, this is incredibly controversial.
00:23:26.000That refuses to come to a reckoning with the reality that is, for example, our $37 trillion national debt that is not going to get smaller anytime soon.
00:23:35.000We'll get to more on this in a moment.
00:23:37.000When we started Daily Wire, I thought the hard part would be creating the show.
00:23:40.000Turns out, dealing with all the behind-the-scenes stuff, like the hiring, the HR policies, employee issues, that's the stuff that really eats up your time.
00:24:00.000They give you access to your very own dedicated HR manager at a fraction of what it costs to employ somebody full-time.
00:24:05.000And get this, Bambi costs just $29 a month, whether you have 10, 75, even 100 employees.
00:24:11.000If I had Bambi when I was first building this business, it would have saved me countless hours and headaches.
00:24:15.000Instead of getting bogged down with paperwork and compliance, I could have focused on growing my business and connecting with my audience even better.
00:24:20.000With Bambi's HR autopilot, you'll never have to waste your valuable time getting into the weeds of HR policies, onboarding, or terminations.
00:24:26.000Plus, Bambi is month-to-month, no hidden fees.
00:24:43.000Also, choosing SimpliSafe for this studio, one of the easiest decisions we've ever made.
00:24:47.000When we arm the system before leaving or calling it a day, My team and I know that we have peace of mind because our equipment and creative work are protected.
00:24:54.000With SimpliSafe Standing Guard, I can focus on my projects, rest easier, confident, and I'm covered if anything happens, especially while I'm out of the office and traveling.
00:25:01.000I would love for you to experience that same security in your home.
00:25:04.000With SimpliSafe, families enjoy the gold standard in home security and genuine peace of mind whenever they arm the system.
00:25:10.000Unlike traditional systems that only respond after a break-in occurs, SimpliSafe's active guard outdoor protection works to prevent intrusions before they happen.
00:25:17.000Their AI-powered cameras with live professional monitoring detect suspicious activity, allowing agents to intervene in real time, speaking to potential intruders, activating spotlights, contacting police before anyone enters your home.
00:25:28.000With no long-term contracts, affordable monitoring at about a buck daily, and a 60-day money-back guarantee, SimpliSafe delivers both protection and value for homeowners.
00:25:35.000Visit simplisafe.com slash Shapiro to claim 50% off a new system with a professional monitoring plan.
00:26:13.000So the big news of the week in D.C., outside of the Middle East, obviously, is the Trump Justice Department moving against transgender grants.
00:26:20.000Maybe you can tell us about what's going on on that score.
00:26:25.000So, of course, we know that since January, late January, February, the Trump administration has been taking steps to cut funding for things that they call like woke or ideological purposes, grants to things like transgenderism or DEI.
00:26:37.000And we've seen this in the Department of Transportation, Department of Education, and now in the Department of Justice, where we reported this week exclusively that the Trump administration is hacking away, slashing away grants to...
00:26:53.000We learned about this because Senator Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for clarification on these grants.
00:27:08.000There had been a big hubbub in the media about how the Department of Justice was slashing, I think, around $800 million in grants and retaking a look at those funds and if they weren't being And
00:27:37.000some of those included some very woke causes.
00:27:45.000For example, there was a massive amount of money going to the Washington State Department of Corrections to support that State Department of Corrections efforts to promote transgenderism in prisons where a young woman named Mozzie Clark had sued the state for allowing a man to sexually assault her in her woman's prison.
00:28:03.000So a variety of different issues like this, Ben, the Department of Justice is cutting the funding towards those issues and saying we're no longer going to be funding these types of things and instead we're redirecting those funds.
00:28:15.000And I think a lot of Americans, you know, we are very decidedly against these types of ideological purposes.
00:28:21.000I'm very excited about some of the things we're hearing about protecting the border and supporting our law enforcement.
00:28:27.000Mary Margaret, you've also been covering some of the stuff that's been happening in Congress.
00:28:30.000Obviously Republicans are trying to follow on this in Congress.
00:28:34.000They're trying to actually endorse what President Trump is doing via the executive branch in the so-called Big Beautiful Bill.
00:28:42.000Yes, Ben, so we've been reporting this week.
00:28:45.000My colleague Leif at the Daily Wire broke a big story yesterday on how Congressman Dan Crenshaw is taking steps to prevent any transgender surgeries, hormones, or puberty blockers to be funded by this reconciliation bill.
00:28:57.000He knows, like I was just saying, that this is a very...
00:29:00.000This is an unpopular issue for Democrats.
00:29:02.000It's something they've been pushing repeatedly.
00:29:04.000And he also pointed out that there has been no amendment introduced trying to block his measure here, which is really interesting and I think backs more than ever this understanding that this is an unpopular issue.
00:29:16.000We even saw multiple Democrats kind of flip-flop on this issue and on men and women's sports during the 2024 election cycle right before the elections and say we no longer support this type of thing because they recognize how unpopular it is.
00:29:29.000So Dan Crenshaw is taking steps in Congress to protect kids in this way.
00:29:33.000And we're seeing all over the country legislation introduced as well.
00:30:07.000President Trump backed off the most damaging aspects of his trade war, and now everything will be fine.
00:30:11.000That is not what the markets are saying right now.
00:30:13.000The markets are saying, we don't know where the hell this is going.
00:30:15.000And it turns out that the tariff rates that President Trump left in place are still wildly higher than they were before Liberation Day.
00:30:23.000As I said yesterday on the show, the removal of many of the provisions that Trump put in place Did not remove all of the provisions that Trump put in place, and the provisions he put in place leave the United States with an average tariff rate that is higher than any time since the 1930s.
00:30:37.000Well, Walmart apparently is now going to raise its prices.
00:30:39.000This is what people have been predicting.
00:30:41.000According to the Wall Street Journal, the retailer said on Thursday it plans to raise prices this month and early this summer, passing along some of the costs as tariff-affected merchandise hits store shelves.
00:30:50.000Walmart CFO John David Rainey said the magnitude and speed at which these prices are coming to us is somewhat unprecedented in history.
00:30:56.000He said sales rose steadily in the latest quarter as shoppers flock to deals and fast shipping.
00:31:00.000But the full impact of the trade war has yet to come.
00:31:02.000He said it's a dynamic and fluid environment.
00:31:05.000Already, for example, tariffs have driven up the price of bananas.
00:31:09.000The U.S., again, has agreed to temporarily lower the tariffs.
00:31:12.000But if we think that we are past the woods here, I do not think that that is, in fact, the case.
00:31:18.000And again, President Trump continues to make comments that are likely to lead to uncertainty in the markets.
00:31:23.000And uncertainty in the markets is its own form of damage.
00:31:27.000For example, yesterday, President Trump said that he has a disagreement with Apple's Tim Cook about the construction of the iPhone.
00:31:33.000So Tim Cook has been attempting to reshore manufacture of the iPhone away from China and toward India.
00:31:39.000That's a giant win for the Trump administration.
00:31:44.000India has been increasingly oriented toward the United States basically since the late 1990s.
00:31:49.000China is a geopolitical enemy of the United States, moving...
00:31:53.000The manufacture of the iPhone from China to India is a win.
00:31:57.000But President Trump said in Doha Qatar yesterday that he is interested in reshoring the manufacture of iPhones completely to the United States, which would only increase the price of the iPhone by, what, double?
00:32:09.000I mean, really, this sort of talk, just let Scott Besson talk about the economy.
00:32:13.000Please, Mr. President, just let the Treasury Secretary do his thing.
00:32:41.000And they've offered us a deal where basically they're willing to literally charge us no tariff.
00:32:49.000So we go from the highest tariff, you couldn't do business in India, we're not even a top 30 in India because the tariff is so high, to a point where they have actually told us, I assume you too, Scott, you were working on that also, that there will be no tariff, right?
00:33:50.000Treasury Secretary Scott Besson says a thing, and then it's immediately contradicted by Peter Navarro or Howard Lutnick or the president in this particular case.
00:33:58.000That is not going to make the markets any more sanguine.
00:34:02.000So what do we actually need if we want a successful economy?
00:34:05.000We need the tax cuts to be made permanent, obviously.
00:34:07.000If that doesn't happen, disaster area.
00:34:09.000We need the trade barriers to continue to come down.
00:34:11.00010% cannot be the minimum trade barrier.
00:34:14.000That will have some dire impact on, for example, pricing in the United States and small businesses in the United States that rely on imported goods.
00:34:22.000Screwing around with the free market system, it's a lot easier to screw up that system than people believe it is.
00:34:29.000It turns out that the basic theory of free markets, which is that diffuse knowledge is better and more efficient than centralized knowledge.
00:34:36.000If you ignore that rule, you are going to do damage.
00:34:38.000to the economic efficiency that the American people have come to rely upon.
00:34:43.000Meanwhile, President Trump was in Qatar yesterday.
00:34:46.000And President Trump did some good things.
00:34:48.000Like, for example, he cut a deal with Qatar, apparently to generate $1.2 trillion in economic exchange, according to the White House in a fact sheet.
00:34:57.000That agreement includes a $96 billion deal with Qatar Airways to buy up to 210 Boeing, 787 Dreamliners, and 777X airplanes with GE Aerospace engines, according to the fact sheet.
00:35:08.000Also, a statement of intent that would lead to $38 billion in investments at Qatar's Al-Udeid Air Base and other air defense and maritime security capabilities.
00:35:16.000Qatar, of course, wooed the hell out of President Trump.
00:36:00.000Purple peacocks, he's got 53. Yeah, that's what it was in Qatar.
00:36:05.000President Trump loves that kind of stuff.
00:36:07.000And then President Trump announced this sort of investment package, and Qatar itself announced that they would be purchasing a bunch of Boeing aircraft.
00:36:13.000Boeing purchase agreement signed on behalf of the state of Qatar by His Excellency, Bedram Hamad Almeer, CEO of Qatar Airways Company, and behalf of the United States, Kelly Ortberg, President and CEO of the Boeing Company.
00:38:09.000Whether it's buying politicians like Robert Menendez, or whether it is subsidizing an American airbase in Qatar so as to gain control over American foreign policy in the region.
00:38:19.000Whether it is subsidizing American universities to the tune of billions of dollars and subsidizing radicalism at those universities, or whether it is signing people on as foreign agents, which is literally what they do.
00:38:31.000That have included in the past a former Qatar lobbyist, Pam Bondi, the current attorney general who just signed off on this 747 arrangement.
00:38:57.000If by the Palestinians you mean the people, I'm sure many of the people do.
00:39:00.000If by the Palestinians you mean the leadership, like Hamas, clearly they don't.
00:39:05.000Hamas clearly does not actually want a deal.
00:39:07.000If they did, all they would have to do is go into exile, give up their aspirations to rule the Gaza Strip, and release the hostages, and the war would be over today.
00:39:14.000That was true October 8th, by the way.
00:39:17.000But here is Qatar trying to promote its agenda.
00:39:20.000And again, when you have your hands stuffing money into the pockets of Americans, it makes it a lot easier to make this sort of nonsensical play.
00:39:29.000It's good that you have mentioned the case of Edan Alexander, whom we are happily seeing him free finally.
00:39:38.000This took us like a long, you know, a lot of time and a lot of efforts and a lot of pressure without any exchange, which is basically something has never happened.
00:39:50.000Now, we wanted this to be also as a first step toward having a complete hostage deal, unfortunately.
00:39:58.000The next day being followed by a massacre on a hospital in Gaza.
00:40:06.000The Israelis obviously said they were going after senior Hamas.
00:40:10.000Yeah, but going after senior Hamas leader doesn't mean killing 70 people just as a collateral damage, which has just been the justification for the last year and a half.
00:41:08.000By the way, the only reason that any of these regimes continue to exist in the Middle East is because the United States props them up militarily.
00:41:21.000Otherwise, the Muslim Brotherhood would be in charge in most of these places.
00:41:24.000So it's good that these regimes are in charge.
00:41:26.000It also happens to be the case that all of these places would be dirt poor if it were not for the technological innovations.
00:41:33.000Of the West that built their entire oil industry, all of it, is deeply irritating to be lectured on foreign policy by people who support terrorism everywhere they can find it, particularly Qatar.
00:42:04.000If you want to make the case that we need to relieve sanctions on the Syrians temporarily to allow them to find some sort of more stable fiscal footing with actual strings attached, like, for example, all the things President Trump wants, normalization with Israel, expelling terrorists, allowing some level of religious diversity in Syria.
00:42:20.000If you want those things to happen, then what you gradually do is release the sanctions as you have proof of concept.
00:42:25.000What you don't do is relieve them all at once, and then meet al-Jelani, the new head of Syria, who is a terrorist.
00:42:35.000And then he broke away from them and created his own terrorist group called HDS, which is sponsored by the terror-backing Turkish government.
00:42:42.000But here is President Trump speaking in warm tones about a man who, just a few weeks ago, people were noting, was killing the Druze at an extraordinary rate and also possibly targeting Christians.
00:42:54.000And yet here we are with praise for al-Jawani.
00:42:59.000How did you find the Syrian president?
00:44:06.000The Druze are openly appealing to Israel to go in and try and protect them in southern Syria from HTS and from other terrorist groups in Syria.
00:44:15.000And you think there are no strings attached?
00:44:19.000I think President Trump is too smart to be played in this way.
00:44:21.000I think he is too intelligent to be played in this way.
00:44:23.000But certainly that's not what the Qataris think.
00:44:25.000And certainly not what the Iranians think either.
00:44:28.000Okay, speaking of people who think they can play the president of the United States, Iran clearly believes that they can outplay the president of the United States.
00:44:36.000Yesterday, a top Iranian official said to Richard Engel of NBC News that they are ready to sign a nuclear deal with certain conditions with President Trump.
00:44:44.000Ali Shamchani, a top political military and nuclear advisor to the Ayatollah, Ali Khamenei, is one of the most senior Iranian officials to speak publicly about the ongoing discussions.
00:44:54.000He said that Iran would commit to never making nuclear weapons.
00:45:03.000The Iranians have never lied to anybody.
00:45:04.000The Iranian regime, the ITIL has never lied to anybody.
00:45:06.000They are perfectly honest all the way across the board.
00:45:08.000And if you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that is for sale.
00:45:11.000He said Iran would commit to never making nuclear weapons, getting rid of its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium, which can be weaponized.
00:45:18.000Agree to enrich uranium only to the lower levels needed for civilian use.
00:48:10.000It turns out, putting on my lawyer hat for a moment, that when people structure the outline of deals, all the devil always is in the details.
00:48:20.000Because the deal he's talking about right there is the Obama-Iran deal.
00:48:24.000Congress has already said that's not going to fly, by the way.
00:48:26.000Congressional Republicans are saying, no, it's complete denuclearization.
00:48:29.000And President Trump himself has said consistently, Complete denuclearization.
00:48:33.000If somehow, his special envoy, Steve Whitcoff, or anybody else in the Trump orbit, tries to steer him in the direction of the JCPOA, it will be one of the most giant fails of Trump administration too.
00:48:44.000The Iranians are counting on their ability to play these people.
00:48:55.000And right now, right now, President Trump...
00:48:59.000Should make clear that he is not going to be played on all of this.
00:49:01.000This means conditions attached, for example, to the de-sanctioning of Syria.
00:49:05.000It means actual pressure on Turkey, which needs our F-35s to stop its support for terrorism.
00:49:12.000It means, for example, that Qatar should be cut off at the knees in its support for terrorism.
00:49:18.000And frankly, if Qatar wanted tomorrow, what they just showed by the release of Yidan Alexander, is that if Qatar decides to tell Hamas what to do, Hamas actually listens.
00:49:25.000If the United States actually wanted to end the conflict in Gaza, they could do it literally today.
00:49:30.000The Trump administration could just say to Qatar, here's the deal, the airbase goes away.
00:49:42.000But that would require seeing Qatar clearly for what it is.
00:49:46.000Which is a deceitful state that plays both sides and stuffs cash wherever it can find it.
00:49:50.000Oil cash that they're digging out of the ground.
00:49:53.000And meanwhile, In other non-saluatory news, Tulsi Gabbard, who is the Director of National Intelligence, she is consolidating control of the President's Daily Brief.
00:50:04.000Well, because the information that President Trump receives when it comes to intelligence matters an awful lot to his decision-making.
00:50:10.000So Tulsi Gabbard is now attempting to sort of centralize the power over the Daily Brief.
00:50:15.000And she's doing so in ways that seem to sort of be geared toward confirming the President's priors on a wide variety of issues.
00:50:24.000Gabbard's decision, according to the New York Times, comes as President Trump has openly mused to aides over time about whether the office she leads should actually continue to exist.
00:50:34.000Gabbard's office announced the decision internally on Tuesday.
00:50:37.000The memo said there was much to be worked out about the transition timelines and our own processes.
00:50:43.000Again, the goal here with regard to the daily brief is to take control away from, for example, the CIA, whose current director is John Ratcliffe.
00:50:53.000One of the reasons that she is doing that, presumably, is because there was a controversy that arose over Venezuela.
00:51:01.000So, for example, Gabbard removed the acting chair of the National Intelligence Council, Michael Collins, and his deputy.
00:51:10.000Well, because he had actually written, along with the rest of the council, that Venezuela is not, in fact, actively deploying members of Trenda Aragua, MS-13, into the United States.
00:51:22.000And President Trump has used that idea as a lever for using the Alien Enemies Act for deportations.
00:51:31.000If it's not true, then sure, fire them.
00:51:34.000But if, in fact, it is true, then simply censoring the intelligence that reaches the president because it doesn't match with his priors, that is not a good way to make policy.
00:51:42.000Reality continues to exist whether you like it or not.
00:51:46.000In February, the intelligence community circulated an assessment that reached the opposite conclusion.
00:51:51.000The administration asked the National Intelligence Council to take a second look at the available evidence.
00:51:55.000And the National Intelligence Council reaffirmed what the intelligence community was saying.
00:51:59.000And so Laura Loomer then attacked the National Intelligence Council as career anti-Trump bureaucrats who needed to be replaced if they wanted to promote open borders.
00:52:07.000Again, the job of the DNI, the job of the intelligence community is to provide best available intelligence.
00:52:13.000It is not supposed to be politically driven.
00:52:16.000If you are firing people not based on your belief that they are doing a bad job, but based on the idea that the facts that they are presenting to the president don't match with the things you want the president told, that is not a good thing.
00:52:26.000It turns out intelligence bubbles have had some pretty dire ramifications over the years, the most obvious being the invasion of Iraq, which was based on an intelligence bubble suggesting universal support for the idea that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
00:52:37.000What you want is the best available intelligence available to the president full-time, all the time, without some sort of political bias or censorship.
00:52:48.000The president, when given full information, makes good decisions.
00:52:51.000If you deprive him of full information, that is a problem.
00:52:54.000Meanwhile, on the foreign front, there were talks that were supposed to be happening in Turkey with regard to Ukraine.
00:53:00.000Vladimir Putin originally said that he was going to show up in Ukraine.
00:53:03.000Vladimir Zelensky said, I'd like a 30-day ceasefire, and then I'll show up.
00:53:15.000Instead, he sent a second-tier team of negotiators to hold peace talks with Ukraine.
00:53:19.000Spurning keeps challenged to go there in person to meet with Zelensky.
00:53:22.000Of course, the reason that Putin won't meet with Zelensky is he claims that Zelensky is an illegitimate leader, which is an amazing statement from a man who has consolidated his power over the course of the last two and a half decades by murdering nearly all of his political opponents or jailing them.
00:53:35.000In any case, President Trump Kind of changed his tune on this.
00:53:40.000Originally yesterday, he was saying that maybe he would fly to Turkey if Putin showed up to help broker this thing.
00:55:04.000And I don't believe anything's going to happen, whether you like it or not, until he and I get together.
00:55:09.000But we're going to have to get it solved because too many people are dying.
00:55:14.000Okay, so, you know, again, this sort of idea that too many people are dying, we need to get...
00:55:19.000So if Putin never shows up, what's the plan then?
00:55:23.000Russia continues to make outsized demands, by the way.
00:55:25.000Russia is demanding territory it hasn't even occupied yet in Ukraine, according to its newest round of proposals.
00:55:32.000According to the New York Times, Andrei Kartopelov, the head of the Defense Committee in the lower chamber of Russian parliament, reiterated his message on Tuesday, saying Ukraine needed to recognize that the Russian military was advancing in 116 directions.
00:55:44.000If Ukrainians did not want to talk, they must listen, quote, to the language of the Russian bayonet.
00:55:49.000And so Putin continues to sort of run around and...
00:55:54.000Not go to the negotiations while constantly maintaining a vigilant and increased military presence in eastern Ukraine.
00:56:05.000I mean, presumably it's going to be President Trump saying that we continue to support the Ukrainians to prevent them from collapsing.
00:56:12.000And to President Trump's absolute credit, he is recognizing what Putin is doing right now in some ways.
00:56:19.000So President Trump, in recent weeks, Asked advisors if they think that Putin has changed since his last time in office and expressed surprise at some of Putin's military moves, including bombing areas with children.
00:56:29.000That is according to the Wall Street Journal.
00:56:31.000So at least he's waking up to the reality.
00:56:35.000It also happens to be that he is, I think, becoming increasingly concerned with the simple fact that the Russians have kidnapped tens of thousands of Ukrainian children back into Russia for some sort of radical indoctrination.
00:56:47.000Now, all of that, again, reality just exists.
00:56:51.000And as I've said before, President Trump is very much attuned to reality.
00:56:55.000And so the more he is attuned to the reality, the better his policies will be.
00:56:58.000Here are some realities on the foreign front.
00:56:59.000Vladimir Putin is not going to come to the negotiating table unless he believes he has no other real alternative.
00:57:05.000Two, Qatar is attempting to manipulate the president of the United States and American foreign policy.
00:57:10.000Three, Iran is not going to denuclearize.
00:57:16.000They are not going to denuclearize in any way, shape, or form.
00:57:20.000That provides any sort of security for the Saudis, for the UAE, for the Israelis, or anyone else the Iranians are targeting.
00:57:27.000Four, Al Jelani in Syria needs to be held to account before you start shoveling money into his pockets.
00:57:34.000Five, Erdogan in Turkey is a disaster area, and trusting Erdogan in Turkey with American foreign policy is about as bad an idea as I can think of.
00:57:58.000Meanwhile, RFK Jr. headed over to the Hill for a grilling from lawmakers on a wide variety of topics.
00:58:04.000Actually, one of the people who was kicked out at the very beginning of his grilling on Capitol Hill was Ben& Jerry's co-founder, Ben Cohen, who was recently on Tucker Carlson spewing about his views of foreign policy, which obviously are trash, but you know, his ice cream is tasty.
00:58:19.000In any case, RFK showed up and made some really good points, and then he was grilled on some not-so-wonderful points.
00:58:26.000On the good points, RFK Jr. had been ripped by Rose DeLauro.
00:58:30.000She had the purple hair from Connecticut because she was upset with how grants were being held up or spent under HHS, and here is RFK slamming her back.
00:58:41.000Allow me to answer that by pointing out the absolute cataclysmic Disorganization of this agency under your oversight for 40 years.
00:58:54.000We had nine separate offices of women's health.
00:59:00.000When we consolidate, then the Democrats say we're eliminating them.
00:59:26.000Also, Democrats went after RFK Jr. for supposedly cutting into Medicaid, and he made the point that we were talking about earlier, which is that what they're actually attempting to do is get people who are on Medicaid to do the work that they are supposed to do to be eligible so that they're not engaging in Medicaid fraud.
00:59:42.000He also talked about some of the changes that he's been making that even some Democrats are happy with, especially concerning things like food dyes.
00:59:49.000Anybody thinks that we did gold standard medicine in this country from these institutions, look at our children.
00:59:57.000They're the sickest children in the world.
01:00:00.000Laura, you say that you've worked for 20 years on getting food dye out.
01:00:30.000Again, this is the stuff that makes RFK Jr. popular across the aisle, is the fact that he does talk in these sort of universalist terms.
01:00:36.000Now, where he did get himself in some hot water is he was talking about vaccines.
01:00:40.000And his comments on the COVID vaccine and whether it should be on the child vac schedule, of course the COVID vaccine should not be on the child vac schedule.
01:00:47.000As I've said before, I took the COVID vaccine originally because we were told by the Pfizer's and the White House, actually, that it was going to prevent transmission, which it turns out there was no data to support and was not true.
01:00:59.000But when it came to my kids, none of my kids were vaccinated because the statistics on vaccination for children were sketchy at best and damaging at worst.
01:01:10.000A lot of counterproductive data suggesting that.
01:01:13.000In fact, one of the people who we had on routinely during the pandemic, Dr. Marty McCary, is now one of the heads of President Trump's health division.
01:01:21.000Well, Senator Kennedy went beyond that.
01:01:22.000He was asked specifically about the measles vaccine, and he started talking about the problems with the measles vaccine.
01:01:27.000And here you get into hot water because some of the stuff he's saying here is not factually accurate.
01:01:32.000You also promised Chairman Cassidy that the FDA would not change vaccine standards from, quote, historical norms.
01:01:40.000But what happened as soon as you were sworn in?
01:01:42.000You announced new standards for vaccine approvals that you proudly referred to in your own press release as a radical departure from current practice.
01:01:51.000And experts say that that departure will delay approvals.
01:01:55.000You also said specific to the measles vaccine that you support the measles vaccine.
01:02:59.000And it's that sort of stuff that actually undermines a lot of the good stuff that I think RFK Jr. is attempting to do.
01:03:04.000Overall, Democrats really did not lay a significant glove on RFK Jr. in the end.
01:03:09.000Meanwhile, how much is President Trump winning on issues like immigration?
01:03:14.000He's winning so much that Gavin Newsom is now backwalking an enormous part of his own agenda.
01:03:19.000So he has now proposed scaling back health care for illegal immigrants, according to the New York Times.
01:03:25.000Governor Gavin Newsom on Wednesday called for California to scale back health care coverage for undocumented immigrants to help balance the state budget, retrenching on his desire to deliver universal health care for all.
01:03:34.000That move came two days after the Trump administration targeted a different state-funded program for immigrants in California and signaled it would continue to scrutinize benefits for undocumented individuals.
01:03:44.000Again, it's always the New York Times saying undocumented individuals.
01:03:48.000In a budget presentation on Wednesday...
01:03:50.000Mr. Newsom proposed freezing the enrollment of undocumented adults in the state's version of Medicaid, known as Medi-Cal, as soon as January.
01:03:56.000So he's backwalking a lot of this stuff, which, of course, is perfectly predictable for a man who wants to run in the sort of moderate lane for the Democratic Party for president.
01:04:05.000Fascinating to watch him revise all that.
01:04:07.000Speaking of his home state of California, the Daily Wire is now reporting on continued discrimination at UCLA Geffen School of Medicine.
01:04:20.000Apparently, according to the Daily Wire, on May 8th, 2025, Do No Harm sued the Geffen School of Medicine for racial discrimination in admissions.
01:04:29.000The Geffen Dean of Admissions has both publicly and privately said she uses race as a factor in making admissions decision.
01:04:36.000A white Do No Harm member was unfairly rejected by Geffen despite stellar academic achievements and whistleblowers describe how the Geffen Admissions Committee routinely gives Black and Latino applicants a pass for subpar metrics.
01:04:47.000Saying that whites and Asians need near-perfect scores to even be considered.
01:04:52.000They continue, by the way, not to produce MCAT scores in response to public records requests.
01:04:56.000So MCAT scores would be a great way of telling whether there are people getting in who should not be getting in.
01:05:00.000If there are a bunch of people who aren't getting in with high 30s MCAT scores, and a bunch of people getting in with 20s MCAT scores, so long as they have the right race, that's obviously racial discrimination.
01:05:09.000So I would presume this isn't going to stay a civil lawsuit.
01:05:13.000Obviously, if this sort of thing is happening at UCLA School of Medicine, That's a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
01:05:21.000So we will stay on top of that case, obviously.
01:05:24.000And meanwhile, in sort of the biggest nice news of the day, Klaus Schwab, who was the bizarre James Bond villain, mastermind of the World Economic Forum.
01:05:35.000It turns out that he may have been a scam artist.
01:05:38.000According to the Wall Street Journal, Schwab was seemingly headed for a graceful exit from the organization he founded more than a half century ago after a 2024 investigation by the Wall Street Journal exposed evidence of a toxic culture at the Forum for Women and Black Employees, which again, it's delicious to watch all of these people who push wokeness and DEI and all this nonsense now be eaten by the machine they created.
01:06:00.000By Friday, April 18th, the Trustees Audit Committee recommended opening a probe Instead, that letter,
01:06:29.000that threatening letter, backfired on Schwab.
01:06:32.000So again, he had handpicked executives at the forum and then fired employees who crossed him.
01:06:37.000And his wife was granted wide leeway as the head of a forum link foundation.
01:06:40.000But it turns out that probably there was intermingling of funds, or at least those are the allegations.
01:06:47.000There are allegations that he was using private flights, for example, that he was having enormous fees paid to people associated with him and all the rest.
01:07:00.000It is perfectly on brand that all of this is now backfiring on Klaus Schwab, that one of the great elitists of all time, who believe that basically the world should be remade from the top of Davos, is now falling apart.
01:07:15.000Behind the scenes, tensions ran high, and in August 2024 email to trustees, Schwab defended his legacies, quote, I could have created the forum as a commercial company.
01:07:24.000Since I carried the full entrepreneurial and financial risk when creating the forum, I would now probably be celebrated as a self-made Billionaire.
01:07:31.000However, again, the controversy continued to roil.
01:07:35.000There are 11 areas of complaints, ranging from allegations of misuse of forum resources to Klaus Schwab's behavior with female employees, including personal remarks and other communications that made the women uncomfortable, and his son Olivier Schwab's handling of the sexual harassment issue.
01:07:48.000It expounded on other alleged governance failures, including lavish spending on a luxury property called Villa Mundi, a project overseen by Hilda Schwab.
01:07:56.000The Forum spent $30 million on the mansion next to its headquarters overlooking Lake Geneva and launched into a roughly $20 million renovation, and Hilde steered the project.
01:08:05.000And she maintained control over how the World Economic Forum could use that property, limited an entire floor just for the Schwab's exclusive use.
01:08:15.000So, yeah, unsurprising, but delicious nonetheless.
01:08:20.000All right, meanwhile, a brand new poll shows...
01:08:23.000That the Democratic frontrunner, I've been saying this, the Democratic frontrunner for 2028 for the Democrats, AOC, according to a new poll taken by Coefficient from May 7th to May 9th, 26% of those surveyed say they think no one is the face of the Democratic Party, but 26% say that it's Alexander Ocasio-Cortez.
01:08:56.000He's going to shift that support over to AOC.
01:08:58.000So you could theoretically be talking of upward of 30% support for AOC going into the Democratic primaries in 2028.
01:09:05.000That is a disaster area for all of these other candidates.
01:09:08.000And it shows how wildly to the left the Democratic Party is swinging.
01:09:11.000Meanwhile, AOC continues to posture for the cameras.
01:09:14.000So she had a bit of a run-in in Congress the other day after Representative Randy Weber Accused AOC of grandstanding for the cameras, which is, of course, her M.O. Here she was responding.
01:09:28.000There are 13.7 million Americans on the other side of that screen right there.
01:11:06.000If you believe that higher taxes is the way to go, that a focus shouldn't be on securing the borders, if you believe those kind of things and that's where you stand ideologically, AOC is your candidate.
01:11:26.000And not to be literal, not to be taken literally, but she gives the impression that when you talk about universal health care and you talk about other things, if it equated to taxing Americans 70% of their income, she wouldn't be against it.
01:12:21.000So let's talk about the status of the dollar right now.
01:12:24.000There's been a significant amount of de-dollarization over the course of the last couple of months, but it's been going on for years at a time.
01:12:30.000First of all, why don't we talk about what that means?
01:12:32.000Why is the global reserve status for American currency important?
01:13:39.000Look, I think officially it's another working session between bureaucrats talking about economic cooperation.
01:13:46.000Unofficially, though, the BRICS leadership are expected to announce major advancements, essentially in a shadow financial system, a 21st century alternative to the existing dollar-denominated system.
01:13:58.000Inside sources are hinting now at a coordinated push to link the various systems that they've created over the last decade, things like Enbridge and Bricks Pay and commodity settled trade, with the goal of making dollar free international transactions.