The Ben Shapiro Show


When Tyranny Leads To Death | Ep. 524


Summary

Alfie Evans case continues to take priority in Great Britain, Parkland survivor Kyle Kashub is interviewed by the police for going to a gun range, and a feminist wants your 2nd grader to learn about transgenderism. No, I'm not joking. This is The Ben Shapiro Show, and it's a must-listen for anyone who wants to know what's going on with the British law enforcement system and why they should be focusing on other areas of the country where they need to be focusing their efforts. Today's special guest is Ben Shapiro, the host of The Daily Wire's "Ben Shapiro Show" and host of "The FiveThirtyEight" podcast, Ben Shapiro joins the show to talk about it all, including: The Alfie Evans Case in Britain, A guy who had a Nazi salute on his girlfriend s pug, and a guy who just gave his girlfriend's pug a Hitler salute on YouTube And much more! Ben Shapiro's full show is available wherever books are sold, including Audible, Audible and Barnes & Noble. Subscribe to the show and get 20% off your first month with discount code: BENSHEAPERS at checkout. That's right up to $99.99. If you don't have a Kindle, use discount code "BOOKS" at checkout at checkout, and you get 10% off the entire month, plus free shipping throughout the rest of the month! You'll get a copy of the entire service, plus a free course from Amazon Prime and VaynerSpeakeasy, and free shipping anywhere else, including the Kindle, and Audible too! Ben's newest book, "The Best Fiends, The Real Goodie Box, is available for free! Learn more about Ben's new book: "The Real Life Story" is available on amazon Prime and Kindle $99, plus shipping starts at $49.99, and they'll get 20 bucks off the first week of shipping starts starting at $99 and shipping starts are shipping starts from $99 after they get the deal starts after they ship you $99 or $49,99, they get 20GBRRP, they'll ship you a carton of the book is available in two months, plus they get free shipping starts after you get the book and two weeks of your first carton starts shipping free, free shipping, and two months of free, shipping starts will be shipping free.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 So, here we are, and the Alfie Evans case continues to take priority in Great Britain.
00:00:04.000 Parkland survivor Kyle Kashub is interviewed by the police for going to a gun range, and a feminist wants your second grader to learn about transgenderism.
00:00:12.000 No, I'm not joking.
00:00:13.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:19.000 So, we have a lot to get to today.
00:00:21.000 The Salphy Evans case in Britain truly is astonishing, and it is accompanied by British law enforcement focusing in areas where, let's just say, they probably should not be putting their law enforcement focus.
00:00:30.000 We'll get to all of that in just a second.
00:00:32.000 First, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Wing.
00:00:35.000 You know, you've taken a little bit of time to wring yourself out over the New Year's and now you're in the middle of the year and you're thinking to yourself, boy, I could really use something to relax.
00:00:43.000 Well, that's what Wink is for.
00:00:44.000 Also, it is great for when you have to go over to a family member's house and you don't know what bottle of wine to bring.
00:00:48.000 You don't know anything about wine.
00:00:50.000 All you know is that you need something better than Manischewitz grapes, grape juice with
00:00:55.000 Some sort of coughing syrup inside.
00:00:56.000 And so you need a good wine.
00:00:57.000 Well, that's what Wink is for.
00:00:59.000 Wink makes it easy to discover great wine.
00:01:01.000 Wink's wine experts select wines matched to your taste, personalized for you, shipped right to your door, starting at just $13 a bottle.
00:01:06.000 There's nothing like coming home to a box of delicious Wink wine selected just for you.
00:01:10.000 So here's how it works.
00:01:10.000 It is the best day of your month.
00:01:11.000 You go over to Wink, and then you try their palette profile quiz.
00:01:14.000 You answer simple questions that your average store clerk wouldn't ask or translate into a recommendation, like how do you take your coffee, and how do you feel about blueberries.
00:01:21.000 And then they send you wines curated to your taste.
00:01:23.000 The more wines you rate, the more personalized your monthly selections.
00:01:26.000 Each month, there are new delicious wines.
00:01:27.000 Right now, their popular wine is the Summer Water Rosé.
00:01:30.000 So go over and check it out right now at trywink.com slash ben and you get 20 bucks off your first shipment.
00:01:35.000 That's trywink.com, slash Ben, W-I-N-C, T-R-Y-W-I-N-C, dot com, slash Ben, for $20 off.
00:01:42.000 Again, trywink.com, slash Ben, so they know that we sent you.
00:01:45.000 All right, so, I have to say, the British law enforcement system, I think they have their priorities all screwed up.
00:01:53.000 So I'm gonna show you something that the British law enforcement system is cracking down on, and then I'm gonna show you something that the British law enforcement system is, something else they are doing,
00:02:02.000 And you'll see the difference right away.
00:02:04.000 So, they're obviously spending heavy amounts of time right now cracking down on people who violate traffic ordinances.
00:02:10.000 So, this has become a very popular clip online.
00:02:14.000 The local police in Britain tweeted out that this one guy who was speeding and violating the law and had a laser jammer, I guess, that was aimed at a traffic camera.
00:02:26.000 He was flipping off the traffic camera all the way.
00:02:30.000 This is North Yorkshire Police.
00:02:31.000 They tweeted out, top tip, if you want to stay out of trouble, don't do what this driver did and swear at our mobile safety cameras while driving past in a car fitted with a laser jammer.
00:02:40.000 Today, this guy is beginning eight months in jail for perverting the course of justice.
00:02:45.000 And then they released a video of this fellow who's driving with his finger up in the air, flipping off the camera.
00:02:52.000 So it's, so, you know,
00:02:54.000 This is where they're putting their focus.
00:02:55.000 Now what's amazing about this is that obviously they're not just mad that the guy had a laser jammer, which apparently is illegal.
00:03:01.000 It perverts the court of justice.
00:03:03.000 They're really upset that he was flipping off the traffic camera.
00:03:07.000 So this is where they're putting heavy focus.
00:03:09.000 Other places where the Brits are putting heavy focus right now.
00:03:11.000 So they just gave an 800 pound fine to a guy who had his girlfriend's pug make a Nazi salute on YouTube.
00:03:19.000 Yeah, so here's the story.
00:03:20.000 There's this guy in Britain who is a YouTube kind of lols guy.
00:03:24.000 All he does is make funny YouTube videos.
00:03:26.000 And he doesn't like his girlfriend's pug dog.
00:03:28.000 And so his girlfriend is constantly going on and on about how cute this pug dog is.
00:03:31.000 So while she was out of town, he trained the pug dog to give a Nazi salute every time he said, gas the Jews.
00:03:37.000 Okay, so it's ridiculous.
00:03:38.000 It's comedy.
00:03:39.000 Maybe it's funny to some, not funny to others.
00:03:42.000 The Brits fined this guy 800 pounds.
00:03:44.000 He barely escaped a jail sentence for training a pug dog to do a joke Nazi salute.
00:03:49.000 So that's what the British authorities are focused on.
00:03:51.000 Here's what they are not focused on.
00:03:53.000 They're not focused on rape gangs in Britain.
00:03:55.000 According to the UK Independent, grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around Newcastle with arrogant persistence.
00:04:01.000 After police appeared to punish victims while letting the perpetrators walk free, a case review is found.
00:04:06.000 The report into the response by authorities to child sexual exploitation found that before a large-scale police operation was launched in 2014, officers' actions were sending an unhelpful message to perpetrators.
00:04:16.000 Investigators said the abuse could not be stopped without work to understand the profiles, motivations, and cultural influences of perpetrators after finding similarities with grooming in Rotherham, Rockdale, and Oxford.
00:04:27.000 In Oxford.
00:04:28.000 Here is the reason why they've been so soft on these grooming gangs.
00:04:31.000 It's because these grooming gangs are largely Muslim men.
00:04:33.000 And so every time they're in the press, they're referred to as South Asian men.
00:04:37.000 The religion is never mentioned.
00:04:39.000 We're supposed to pretend that unassimilated radical Muslim immigration into various European societies has no impact.
00:04:45.000 But the Brits are not focused on that.
00:04:47.000 No.
00:04:47.000 Instead, they're ensuring that a child must die.
00:04:50.000 So, the big story out of the UK today is actually the story of Alfie Evans.
00:04:54.000 And this is very similar to the case you'll remember of Charlie Gard.
00:04:57.000 Charlie Gard was an 11-month-old baby who had a degenerative brain condition.
00:05:01.000 And the British courts ruled that the hospital could trump his parents' wishes.
00:05:05.000 His parents wanted to bring him to the United States for experimental treatment, and the British court system ruled that the hospital, which had testified that it would be against the child's interests for him to be moved to the United States for the possibility of further treatment, they ruled instead that the kid had to be removed from life support and the parents had to watch him die.
00:05:20.000 Well, now they're doing the same thing to Alfie Evans, who's two years old, suffers from an undiagnosed brain condition that has left him in a semi-vegetative state, and he's been ordered removed from life support by the British government over the wishes of his parents.
00:05:31.000 His parents want to ship him to Italy and put him under the care of the Vatican Hospital.
00:05:35.000 His parents wanted to move him there to pursue palliative measures, but the British court ruled that that would not be in Alfie's best interest.
00:05:40.000 Instead, it would be in Alfie's best interest to die.
00:05:43.000 Which is an amazing ruling, right?
00:05:45.000 The ruling that it would be better for you to die does not seem like a medical ruling.
00:05:48.000 It seems like a values ruling.
00:05:50.000 It seems like a ruling in favor of euthanasia as opposed to a ruling in favor of the possibility of a medical miracle or in favor of the possibility that maybe some doctor knows something that you don't.
00:06:01.000 So they removed him from life support, pursuant to the order of a British court.
00:06:05.000 And then Alfie continued to breathe on his own for 15 hours after being disconnected from life support.
00:06:09.000 They didn't think that was going to happen.
00:06:10.000 They thought he'd die as soon as he was removed from life support.
00:06:12.000 The hospital still has not reconnected him to oxygen machines, even though he's lived for 15 hours without the oxygen machines.
00:06:18.000 There's supposed to be another court hearing today.
00:06:21.000 And Alfie Evans' dad has talked to the media about all of this.
00:06:25.000 As you all know, I'm still here now, and Alfie's still here.
00:06:28.000 Because I'm still fighting.
00:06:28.000 Why?
00:06:30.000 I'm still fighting, and so is Alfie.
00:06:32.000 I've been in touch with the ambassador of Italy.
00:06:34.000 If these doctors dare to remove my son's life, they're going to be done for murder by the Italians.
00:06:38.000 I've got a private prosecution case right now in front of the chief judge.
00:06:42.000 The chief judge will now decide if these are murder of my son, and I'm confident he will decide that.
00:06:48.000 I've been Alfie's side every minute of every day.
00:06:50.000 I've been with them all day today and all they've done is try to do what they've been given the mission to do and that's murder my son in a straight up execution.
00:06:57.000 Straight up execution.
00:06:59.000 What I wanted to speak down on camera and say now that my son's life lies in Jeremy Hunt's hands and he's a member of Italy.
00:07:04.000 My son belongs to Italy and I'm not stopping this fight until Alfie tells me to.
00:07:09.000 Alfie ain't telling me to fight.
00:07:11.000 I love this army.
00:07:12.000 I love Alfie and I love Kate.
00:07:15.000 Okay, so the Italian government gave Alfie Italian citizenship so that they could issue an effort to save his life in the European High Court.
00:07:25.000 You know, the United States government tried to do that, I believe, with Charlie Gard.
00:07:28.000 Something I was encouraging Congress people to do is give him honorary citizenship so they could make a case that he ought to be removed from Britain and headed over to the United States.
00:07:36.000 Pope Francis has tweeted,
00:07:40.000 I renew my appeal that the suffering of his parents may be heard and that their desire to seek new forms of treatment may be granted.
00:07:44.000 Again, all this comes down to is in Britain, they believe that in a conflict between the parents and the hospital, in a case of controversy, not in a case where clearly, you know, the parents are refusing a life-saving treatment for example, but in a case where the parents want to save the life,
00:07:57.000 And the hospitals want the kid to die.
00:07:59.000 They're saying the hospitals still have full range over what exactly should happen to the kid.
00:08:04.000 Which is just an amazing, amazing argument.
00:08:06.000 An amazing anti-life, bureaucratic argument.
00:08:09.000 You know, evil comes in a lot of forms in terms of government.
00:08:12.000 Evil comes in the form of tyranny.
00:08:14.000 Evil comes in the form of communism.
00:08:16.000 Evil comes in the form of governments that take a hands-off position with regard to murder.
00:08:21.000 Evil also comes in the form of bureaucratic niceties.
00:08:24.000 Bureaucrats who sit atop the world in their little offices in Britain and decide whether a child should live or die because they know more than the parents do or because hospital administrators say they know more than the parents do.
00:08:34.000 The British government actually had to place 30 officers around the hospital to prevent protesters from attempting to move the baby.
00:08:40.000 Those protesters were attempting to storm the hospital and remove the baby.
00:08:43.000 And by the way, this father, I believe, under natural right, has every right to grab that baby and make a break for it and push everyone out of his way.
00:08:50.000 It's his baby.
00:08:51.000 It's his kid.
00:08:52.000 And he's not attempting to kill the kid.
00:08:53.000 He's attempting to save the kid.
00:08:54.000 The hospital is attempting to kill the kid.
00:08:56.000 It's just an amazing thing.
00:08:57.000 Now, here's my question.
00:08:58.000 Where is the American left in all of this?
00:09:00.000 So the American right is saying, you've got to save this kid's life.
00:09:02.000 You've got to do everything possible to save this kid's life.
00:09:04.000 Where is the American left in all this?
00:09:06.000 And the American left that suggests that abortion is fine because it's just a cluster of cells.
00:09:09.000 But once the baby is born, it's no longer just a cluster of cells.
00:09:12.000 Where are they for all of this?
00:09:14.000 The American left that cheered.
00:09:15.000 I remember there's a movie called John Q. It came out in 2002.
00:09:18.000 It was a movie with Denzel Washington.
00:09:20.000 And the movie was about a black kid who had an enlarged heart and they didn't have the money to pay for his heart surgery.
00:09:26.000 And so John Q took over the hospital with a gun and tried to hold the doctors hostage to perform the surgery on his son.
00:09:32.000 And this movie was praised to the skies by liberals because liberals said, this is what the American health system is like.
00:09:38.000 Well, in this particular case, this is not about who's paying for what.
00:09:41.000 The parents aren't asking the British government to pay for anything.
00:09:44.000 In this particular case, you've got a father who is trying to remove his son from a hospital to save the son's life.
00:09:49.000 And the American left is utterly silent.
00:09:50.000 So when it comes to free market economics in the health care system in the United States, then they're very upset.
00:09:54.000 But when it comes to actual bureaucratic murder,
00:09:57.000 happening in the UK, then the American left just goes completely silent.
00:10:01.000 Which says to me that this has a lot less to do with how they think the healthcare system should be run and a lot more to do with how they value human life.
00:10:08.000 That if the baby has some sort of degenerative brain condition, that this is a baby that is not deserving of life.
00:10:13.000 You can see the short leap from here to the eugenics of the left in the early 20th century.
00:10:17.000 It is not a long leap by any means whatsoever.
00:10:20.000 It really is horrifying.
00:10:22.000 And to show how horrifying it is, just remember, this week, the British royal family, Princess Kate and her husband, Prince Harry, they had a baby this week, and the entire nation of Britain celebrated.
00:10:34.000 And this is a beautiful thing, of course.
00:10:36.000 Imagine if, God forbid, God forbid, one of the members of the royal family had a child like Alfie Evans.
00:10:42.000 Do you really think, do you really think the royal family would allow the hospital to kill the child in violation of the will of the parents?
00:10:49.000 Do you really think that would happen?
00:10:51.000 Or is there a class differentiation, even in a system where we pretend there is no class differentiation?
00:10:56.000 Is there a difference between royal and rich in Britain, and being poor and in the clutches of the National Health Service?
00:11:01.000 The answer is, of course there is.
00:11:03.000 Once the government gets to say what sort of care you deserve and what sort of care you must be provided, they also get to say what sort of care you don't deserve and what is best for the child.
00:11:11.000 So there are folks who say this has nothing to do with nationalized healthcare because it isn't a question of rationing.
00:11:16.000 But inherently, it is a question of how a rationed system considers the value of human life.
00:11:21.000 Because they do have to make calls as to what is best for particular human lives.
00:11:25.000 And they also have to decide whether they think a human life is worth living at a particular point.
00:11:29.000 And they've decided this kid is suffering and that his suffering is not worth trying to preserve his life, which isn't their decision in the first place.
00:11:34.000 It really is horrifying.
00:11:36.000 It really is disgusting.
00:11:37.000 And it's demonstrative of the difference in value held between the right and the left when it comes to saving human lives, even kids like Alfie Evans.
00:11:44.000 It's just, it's devastating.
00:11:45.000 It's devastating.
00:11:46.000 This kid is the same age as my own kid.
00:11:48.000 And the thought of a hospital trying to do this to me with regard to my own kid is so horrifying.
00:11:53.000 I can't imagine a situation in which I would not bring a gun and try to break my kid out just because... I mean, I don't know what the hell right the hospital has to tell a parent what is best interest for their child when it comes to trying to kill the child.
00:12:04.000 Again, it's one thing to say that the kid...
00:12:06.000 Should we?
00:12:23.000 You know, the fact is that if you were an astronaut right now, you'd want to be talking to Mission Control on a regular basis.
00:12:28.000 Well, when you are traveling, you also want to be talking to Mission Control on a regular basis, or at least you want to have access to Mission Control if something should go wrong.
00:12:34.000 Well, that's what Upside.com is for.
00:12:36.000 Upside.com, the folks at Upside are your Mission Control.
00:12:39.000 They're looking out for you every step of the way, handling any problems that might pop up.
00:12:42.000 They've got a team of specialists working 24-7 to make sure your flight, hotel, and car rental all go off without a hitch.
00:12:47.000 They monitor your trip around the clock.
00:12:49.000 They proactively keep you posted on everything from if it's going to rain to alternative return flights home in case you want to squeeze in one more meeting.
00:12:56.000 You don't get that level of service from any of these other travel sites.
00:12:58.000 I've used them.
00:12:58.000 I know.
00:12:59.000 Upside has the best service.
00:13:00.000 I promise.
00:13:01.000 We use it here at the office.
00:13:02.000 For easy booking, competitive prices, and a team that always has your back, book your next business trip at Upside.com.
00:13:07.000 And for a limited time, when you book that first business trip with Upside, you'll get a minimum $100 Amazon.com gift card.
00:13:12.000 Just go to Upside.com slash Ben to book your first business trip.
00:13:15.000 That's Upside.com slash Ben.
00:13:17.000 And you get at least a $100 Amazon.com gift card when you book that first trip.
00:13:21.000 Again, $600 minimum purchase required.
00:13:23.000 $600 minimum purchase required while supplies last.
00:13:25.000 See the site for complete details.
00:13:26.000 Go to Upside.com slash Ben.
00:13:28.000 It lets them know we sent you.
00:13:28.000 And you get a $100 Amazon.com gift card when you book your first trip.
00:13:32.000 So go check it out.
00:13:33.000 There's no reason not to and every reason to do so.
00:13:35.000 Upside.com slash Ben.
00:13:37.000 All right.
00:13:39.000 Speaking of authorities that have overreached in incredibly dramatic fashion.
00:13:44.000 So, Kyle Kashuv, who I've become friendly with, the Parkland student who is pro-gun, right?
00:13:48.000 Pro-Second Amendment.
00:13:49.000 Yesterday, he called me up, and he told me that he had been called by school administrators to sit before school security and be grilled.
00:13:58.000 What exactly did Kyle do that required school security, the armed resource officers, the armed school resource officers, to actually sit across from him and grill him?
00:14:05.000 Well, he went to the gun range with his dad.
00:14:07.000 Which, last I checked, in America is not only perfectly legal, but highly recommended.
00:14:11.000 People should learn to shoot with their parents.
00:14:13.000 They should learn to shoot.
00:14:14.000 They should learn how to use a gun.
00:14:15.000 They should know what gun safety looks like.
00:14:17.000 And Kyle is a kid who has met with a multiplicity of senators on both sides of the aisle.
00:14:21.000 He's gone to the White House in an attempt to push solutions to gun violence.
00:14:24.000 He was called by administrators down to the office, and then he was grilled
00:14:29.000 For 10 to 15 minutes over pictures of him at a gun range.
00:14:49.000 Obviously, this sounds like the words of a deeply violent human being, right?
00:14:52.000 Obviously, Kyle is a threat to public safety.
00:14:54.000 It wasn't a threat to public safety when 30 times, 30 times, the police were informed about the shooter in Parkland and weren't able to remove his guns from him.
00:15:02.000 It wasn't a threat to public safety when the FBI ignored two separate red flag warnings about the shooter in Parkland.
00:15:07.000 But Kyle, he's a real threat because he went to a gun range with an instructor and his father and then tweeted about the value of the Second Amendment under the Constitution.
00:15:15.000 It really is an unbelievable thing.
00:15:17.000 The fact is, here's what Kyle told me yesterday.
00:15:21.000 What he said was this, quote,
00:15:31.000 Okay, so, in a second, I want to continue with this account from Kyle Kashuv because it really is just amazing.
00:15:35.000 Here's what he says.
00:15:35.000 He says, These officers.
00:15:54.000 Then a third officer from the Broward County Sheriff's Office walked in.
00:15:57.000 Remember, this is the same Broward County Sheriff's Office that had armed resource officers on the grounds when the shooting was happening, and they didn't charge in because supposedly that would have been too dangerous.
00:16:06.000 So they let the kids get shot inside while they did nothing outside.
00:16:09.000 A third officer from the Broward County Sheriff's Office walked in and began asking me the same questions again, says Kyle.
00:16:14.000 At that point, I asked whether I could record the interview.
00:16:17.000 Right?
00:16:17.000 Which is perfectly within his rights to ask whether he could record the interview.
00:16:21.000 And they said no.
00:16:22.000 Which is always weird to me.
00:16:23.000 It's always weird to me when police officers say that you can't record a particular interaction.
00:16:27.000 Because this is somehow going to be a serious problem.
00:16:29.000 If you're doing your job, you shouldn't be worried about recording interactions in the middle of doing a job that is paid for with public dollars.
00:16:35.000 He said, I asked if I had done anything wrong.
00:16:37.000 Again, they answered no.
00:16:38.000 I asked why I was there.
00:16:39.000 One said, don't get snappy with me.
00:16:40.000 Do you not remember what happened here a few months ago?
00:16:42.000 I mean, obviously, not only does Kyle remember what happened there a few months ago, he's been stumping for legislation by working with Bill Nelson, a Democrat, and Marco Rubio, a Republican, in the state of Florida.
00:16:50.000 Not only does Kyle know what happened at Parkland, the reason that he went to the range to learn how to use a gun is because he believes that guns can be used in self-defense and defense of others.
00:16:59.000 But the idea, of course, here, is that now that he's touched a gun, the gun has infected him with the sickness that caused what happened at Parkland, which is just an insane idea.
00:17:06.000 And all these folks on the left who act like touching a gun is the same as getting bubonic plague is ridiculous.
00:17:11.000 Anyway, Kyle continues, they continued to question me aggressively, though they could say nothing I had done wrong.
00:17:16.000 They kept calling me the pro-Second Amendment kid.
00:17:18.000 I was shocked and honestly scared.
00:17:20.000 It definitely felt like they were attempting to intimidate me.
00:17:22.000 I was treated like a criminal for no other reason than having gone to the gun range and posted on social media about it.
00:17:27.000 So I've talked to Kyle again today.
00:17:29.000 He says that the situation at the school is not particularly great for him, not only because the administrators are relatively unfriendly, but there are a lot of other students who are pro-gun control who are very upset with him for speaking out on these issues.
00:17:44.000 Demonstrating once again the leftist tolerance only extends to people who agree with you, but the fact that government bureaucracy in the United States, government bureaucracy in Britain, government bureaucracy in Canada, the government bureaucracy has gone so far that basic freedoms are now being ruled out of bounds by bureaucrats, and we're all supposed to sit here and take it for the sake of our safety.
00:18:04.000 So in Britain, obviously these two cases are not similar except for the bureaucratic incompetence at issue, or the bureaucratic malice at issue.
00:18:10.000 Now obviously in Britain you have this case with a kid who's now being left to die by the bureaucrats, and in the United States you have bureaucrats from the county sheriff's office who are now grilling a kid for having exercised his Second Amendment rights.
00:18:21.000 Up in Canada, of course, they have bureaucrats who will prosecute you for speech violations if you say things that they don't like.
00:18:27.000 We are living in an era when freedom is going by the wayside in favor of particularly approved politically correct views.
00:18:33.000 Those views range from guns are bad to a kid doesn't deserve to live if the kid is suffering or if the kid has a degenerative brain condition to if I don't like what you say I simply get to shut it down.
00:18:46.000 This sort of bureaucratic overreach
00:18:48.000 is demonstrative of a worldview that says that expertise resides in a select few who sit at the top of government.
00:18:55.000 It is untrue.
00:18:55.000 That is a lie.
00:18:56.000 Unfortunately, it is also the outgrowth of a 250-year project in the West to remove decision-making possibilities from the common man and take it up to the top level again.
00:19:06.000 And one of the amazing things about the Enlightenment is what the Enlightenment said is basically everybody should have a say in how the government is run.
00:19:12.000 Everybody should have a say in how society functions.
00:19:15.000 And then, there was a counter-enlightenment that happened, or part of the enlightenment itself.
00:19:19.000 I don't want to call it the counter-enlightenment.
00:19:21.000 It was part of the enlightenment itself, the Comtean idea, the Auguste Comtean idea, that there was a select group of people at the top of a society who knew better than you how society ought to run, and those people were more enlightened, they were more logical, they were more reasonable, they knew the social science better, and therefore they should get to make the rules.
00:19:38.000 That mentality, whether it is applied to economics, or whether it is applied to social life, or whether it is applied to speech, is a dangerous mentality.
00:19:45.000 It is a mentality that threatens your freedom in an extraordinarily serious way.
00:19:48.000 And it threatens your freedom also because those authorities, again, are willing to make political compromises that damage your rights in every conceivable way.
00:19:57.000 They're willing to make compromises for their own political betterment.
00:20:01.000 They're willing to say and do things in order to gain votes and gain public credit that they wouldn't do if it affected their own family.
00:20:10.000 It's truly an amazing and sort of horrifying thing, honestly, that they're constantly willing to make these sorts of decisions at the bureaucratic level that affect your life.
00:20:21.000 And I'm going to tell you about some of those bureaucratic decisions in just a second.
00:20:24.000 We're not allowed to talk about the bureaucratic decisions I'm about to tell you about, but they are pretty astonishing.
00:20:29.000 First, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Tommy John's.
00:20:31.000 So Tom Patterson was just a normal dude who became so frustrated with the fit and feel of his undergarments, he decided to do something about it.
00:20:37.000 He went home, and he sketched up some smarter designs, had a tailor sew some prototypes, and voila, the revolutionary Tommy John underwear was born.
00:20:43.000 That was 10 years ago, and since then, Tommy John has sold over 5 million pairs of underwear, and more than half a million dudes have made the switch to Tommy John.
00:20:50.000 So let me tell you, I have Tommy John underwear.
00:20:52.000 They are spectacular.
00:20:53.000 They are on my butt right now, and they are phenomenal.
00:20:56.000 I have several pairs of them.
00:20:58.000 Not only are they great, they also go through the wash and they come out just the same as they were when they first came out of the packet.
00:21:03.000 They're worth every penny.
00:21:04.000 Tommy John uses proprietary fabrics and innovative designs to make sure the legs never ride up, the waistband never rolls down.
00:21:10.000 It's impossible to get a wedgie with Tommy John's.
00:21:12.000 Tommy John's horizontal quickdraw fly can change your life as well.
00:21:15.000 Look, even if you don't believe anything that I've said, it doesn't matter because bottom line is if you buy it and you don't like it,
00:21:20.000 Then they have a best pair you'll ever wear or it's free guarantee.
00:21:23.000 So, you can try them for yourself and you have nothing to lose.
00:21:25.000 Join the revolution against uncomfortable undergarments.
00:21:27.000 Make the switch to Tommy John.
00:21:28.000 No adjustment needed.
00:21:29.000 Hurry to tommyjohn.com now and use promo code SHAPIRO for 20% off your first order.
00:21:34.000 That's tommyjohn.com.
00:21:35.000 Use promo code SHAPIRO for 20% off your first order.
00:21:38.000 Again, promo code SHAPIRO, 20% off.
00:21:40.000 And again, today only, all customers actually get an extra 10% off all Tommy John limited edition anniversary prints.
00:21:46.000 So check that out.
00:21:47.000 Tommyjohn.com.
00:21:48.000 Pretty spectacular deals they're handing out to our customers.
00:21:50.000 Tommyjohn.com.
00:21:51.000 Use promo code Shapiro for that special deal and to let them know that we sent you as well.
00:21:55.000 Okay, so speaking of bureaucratic incompetence and the effect thereof, I have to talk about this story from Germany.
00:22:02.000 So,
00:22:03.000 In Germany, Europe is really on the brink here.
00:22:05.000 And you can see that the United States is going to follow if we are not careful.
00:22:09.000 So on Tuesday, a guy named Joseph Schuster, he's the head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, told German Jews they should avoid wearing kippahs on the street.
00:22:16.000 Kippah is a yarmulke thing I wear on the top of my head right here.
00:22:18.000 After an Arab-Israeli was assaulted for wearing a yarmulke just days ago in a social experiment.
00:22:23.000 So the Arab-Israeli walked around town in Germany, in Berlin, and he was wearing a yarmulke because he didn't believe all of the talk about anti-Semitism spreading in Europe.
00:22:32.000 Again, an Arab guy, not Jewish.
00:22:34.000 He was walking around, wearing the amikah, and he got beat up.
00:22:37.000 He was hit with a belt buckle.
00:22:39.000 The suspect who beat him up was shouting Yahudi, which means Jew in Arabic.
00:22:44.000 The suspect in the assault is a 19-year-old Syrian refugee of Palestinian origin.
00:22:48.000 So Joseph Schuster explained that people should stop, quote, showing themselves openly with a kippah in a big city setting in Germany and wear a baseball cap or something else to cover their head instead.
00:22:57.000 So listen, as an Orthodox Jew, there are certain times when I'm traveling where I will wear a baseball cap specifically because I know that I'm going into a more anti-Semitic area.
00:23:04.000 When I was in France with my wife a few years ago, I would not wear my kippah openly in France because of all the anti-Semitism in France.
00:23:11.000 There have been cases of people wearing yarmulkes who were beaten in the streets in Paris.
00:23:15.000 That was particularly true.
00:23:16.000 I remember there was one subway ride that my wife and I had to take to the, I think it was the 19th arrondissement, the 19th district.
00:23:25.000 And my wife was wearing a necklace that had a Star of David on it.
00:23:27.000 And as we went into the 19th district, you could see that the population was changing.
00:23:32.000 It became a very heavily young Muslim male population.
00:23:36.000 And for safety reasons, for risk assessment reasons, my wife took her necklace and stuffed it inside her shirt.
00:23:40.000 Did that mean that she was being racist?
00:23:42.000 No, because the crime rate against Jews in particular areas of France is much higher than in other areas.
00:23:46.000 You have to make a basic risk assessment, and that is not discrimination.
00:23:49.000 That is using the data that is available to you to make a risk assessment.
00:23:52.000 In any case, Schuster explained that people should stop showing themselves with a kippah.
00:23:56.000 They should wear a baseball cap.
00:23:57.000 According to the Associated Press, Schuster suggested three years ago Jews should not wear skull caps in areas with large Muslim populations.
00:24:03.000 OK, so here's the thing.
00:24:05.000 This is one of the things you're not allowed to talk about.
00:24:06.000 So if you're a member of the bureaucracy in Europe, you're supposed to pretend that the large increase in Muslim immigration into Europe has had no cultural impact.
00:24:13.000 This is obviously untrue.
00:24:14.000 Jamie Kerchick has written about it in his book, The End of Europe.
00:24:17.000 Douglas Murray has written about this in his book, I believe it's called The Death of Europe.
00:24:21.000 The change in the culture in Europe, thanks to Muslim immigration, is obvious.
00:24:27.000 It is obvious.
00:24:27.000 And this is not suggesting that all Muslim immigrants into Europe are bad people or anti-Semites.
00:24:32.000 It is suggesting that the percentage of people who are immigrating to Europe from Muslim lands who are anti-Semites is higher than in the natural born population.
00:24:38.000 And I am not saying this on the basis of no evidence.
00:24:42.000 Johannes Duenstad of the University of Oslo writes, quote, in a June 2017 study, quote,
00:24:50.000 Available data on perpetrators suggests that individuals of Muslim backgrounds stand out among perpetrators of anti-Semitic violence in Western Europe.
00:24:57.000 Attitude surveys corroborate this picture insofar as anti-Semitic attitudes are far more widespread among Muslims than among the general population in Western Europe.
00:25:05.000 Hey, Paulina Neuding wrote in the New York Times last year, quote,
00:25:29.000 Just like my wife.
00:25:30.000 Or as spokesman for the Göteborg Synagogue put it, According to this writer in the New York Times, fully 51% of all anti-Semitic attacks in Sweden were perpetrated by Muslims, as opposed to 5% perpetrated by right-wing extremists and 25% perpetrated by left-wing extremists.
00:25:51.000 Let's be real about this.
00:25:52.000 The threat to Jews in Europe right now is highest from Muslim immigrants to Europe.
00:25:56.000 End of story.
00:25:57.000 It is not coming from these homegrown right-wing groups.
00:26:00.000 There are problems there.
00:26:01.000 I'm not a fan of a lot of these far-right nationalist groups.
00:26:03.000 But let's not pretend that those far-right nationalist groups are presenting the same level of risk and threat to Jewish citizens of Europe as new Muslim immigrants are if you're talking about just the group data.
00:26:13.000 Again, this does not mean every individual Muslim immigrating to Europe is an anti-Semite who is a danger.
00:26:17.000 It does mean that the increased Muslim immigration unvetted from areas like Syria is going to have a marked impact on how Jews are treated, on how gay people are treated, on how non-Muslim citizens are treated in Europe, which is why you're seeing such a blowback in terms of Europeans reacting to Angela Merkel importing so many folks from these areas into Europe.
00:26:37.000 These are serious cultural questions that have to be tackled.
00:26:39.000 And when you have an entire society that has decided that assimilation is a mistake, this is what you get.
00:26:46.000 All these folks who keep claiming diversity and tolerance.
00:26:49.000 Diversity and tolerance are fine so far as they go, but it can't be tolerance for bad behavior.
00:26:52.000 It can't be tolerance for violent behavior or for anti-Semitism, for example.
00:26:57.000 It's amazing.
00:26:58.000 But the bureaucrats in Europe have made hay over this multicultural issue for years.
00:27:02.000 Now, it's hilarious that every so often, even the same officials who push the multicultural ethos are forced to admit that it's not working.
00:27:09.000 Angela Merkel a few years back said multiculturalism was not working, and that was about the time she decided to import hundreds of thousands of more people from an area of the world that had a very poor history of assimilation.
00:27:19.000 This is David Cameron, the former Prime Minister of Great Britain.
00:27:22.000 He did a whole speech a few years back about how multiculturalism had failed in Britain.
00:27:26.000 But all these authorities, all these bureaucrats believe they know better than you, they believe they know better than their own citizenry, and they believe that they can change society simply by wishing that it would be so.
00:27:36.000 And this is a serious problem.
00:27:37.000 And ignoring this problem is not going to make it go away.
00:27:40.000 Well, one of the kickbacks from the multicultural left on this is that if you talk about the problem, that you are somehow exacerbating violence.
00:27:46.000 So, I hesitate even to mention it because it's so stupid, but there's a shooter named Alexander Bissonnette, who is up in Canada, he's in Toronto, and this was in 2017.
00:27:58.000 And I announced that his name was Alexander Bissonnette, who had shot up a mosque.
00:28:02.000 I did that.
00:28:02.000 The reason I mention his name is because he's been convicted and because it's relevant to the particular story.
00:28:06.000 I generally don't mention the names of mass shooters on the program, regardless of who they are.
00:28:11.000 In this particular case, it matters a little bit because the left is trying to claim that I am responsible for the shooting.
00:28:16.000 So the left is claiming I'm responsible for the shooting, particularly one reporter for a far-left publication in Toronto, because this human piece of garbage who shot up a mosque had viewed some of my videos apparently.
00:28:28.000 He watched my Twitter.
00:28:30.000 Now what's funny about this is that he watched a lot of people's Twitter accounts.
00:28:33.000 He apparently had retweeted or liked 93 of the posts on my Twitter account.
00:28:38.000 I don't know what those posts were.
00:28:40.000 I don't know if they had to do with feminism.
00:28:41.000 I don't know if they had to do with economics.
00:28:43.000 I'm not aware that they had to do with Muslims in particular.
00:28:45.000 But in any case, the idea here is that because I say
00:28:49.000 That a higher percentage of the Muslim population is radicalized than, for example, a percentage of the Christian population, or the European percentage at large, that this is somehow promoting violence against Muslims.
00:28:58.000 This is insane.
00:29:00.000 This is insane.
00:29:00.000 Okay?
00:29:01.000 You have to recognize the fact on the ground in order to talk about the best way that we can all live together in a society.
00:29:08.000 But those facts have to be fact.
00:29:10.000 Okay?
00:29:10.000 And just citing facts does not mean that you are promoting violence.
00:29:13.000 If you go out and you shoot a Muslim because you're worried about the impact of radical Islam on the world, you are a piece of crap.
00:29:19.000 You're a bad human being.
00:29:21.000 I've said this 1,000 times.
00:29:23.000 I've said in this particular rant about the impact of Muslim immigration into Europe that I'm not talking about individual Muslims and whether they're anti-Semitic or not.
00:29:31.000 I'm talking about the data that is being demonstrated in Europe and what that means for government policy.
00:29:36.000 But what the left has decided to do is if you mention these facts because they don't like these facts being mentioned because it cuts against their worldview, which is that there are no such thing as Western values and that everyone from anywhere should be imported into any country with no impact on how the prevailing culture operates.
00:29:49.000 They believe that if you mention these facts, you should be cast out of polite society, or you should be blamed for violence.
00:29:53.000 Now, I have been incredibly consistent on this particular point.
00:29:57.000 If you say something, if you make a political argument, and you are not calling for violence, if somebody does violence in your name, you are not responsible for that violence.
00:30:04.000 I said this about Bernie Sanders and the congressional baseball shooting.
00:30:06.000 Go and look it up.
00:30:07.000 I talked about this with regard to President Obama's rhetoric with regard to cops before the Dallas police shooting.
00:30:12.000 I said this with regard to Black Lives Matter.
00:30:14.000 I said their arguments are bad.
00:30:15.000 Their arguments are creating more conflict with police officers.
00:30:18.000 But at no point did I suggest that the President of the United States, Obama, was responsible for the shooting of Dallas cops.
00:30:25.000 Because he had not called for the shooting of cops.
00:30:28.000 And the same thing is true here.
00:30:29.000 But the left fails to make that connect deliberately.
00:30:32.000 Because what the left wants to do is shut down speech.
00:30:34.000 Their whole goal here is to shut down speech, is to prevent rights, because they believe that the citizens' exercise of the citizens' rights is more of a danger than the bureaucrats' shutdown of the citizens' rights.
00:30:44.000 It's an amazing thing.
00:30:45.000 It's an amazing thing.
00:30:46.000 So they'd prefer to shut down free speech and blame free speech for the sins of evil human beings, rather than make arguments against the arguments that I'm making.
00:30:55.000 Or make arguments against the arguments that Kyle Kashuv is making with regard to guns.
00:30:59.000 Or make arguments with regard to the arguments that are being made about the value of life in Britain.
00:31:04.000 Better to shut all that down.
00:31:06.000 Better not to have the conversation at all.
00:31:07.000 Better to ignore it.
00:31:08.000 Better to pretend none of this is happening.
00:31:10.000 Okay, so I want to talk about the expansion of the bureaucracy in the United States with regards to economics in just a second.
00:31:16.000 First, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe.
00:31:18.000 So for $9.99 a month, you can get a subscription to Daily Wire.
00:31:21.000 When you do, you get the rest of our show, you get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live, you get the rest of Michael Knoll's show live, and if you get the annual subscription, you get this, the very greatest in all beverage vessels, the Leftist Tears hot or cold tumbler.
00:31:33.000 I think time may be running out to get one of these, so you should probably do it right now.
00:31:36.000 So go and check it out right now at the annual subscription.
00:31:38.000 $99 a year, cheaper than our monthly subscription.
00:31:40.000 If you just want to listen later for free, go over to YouTube, go over to SoundCloud, go over to iTunes, subscribe and leave us a review.
00:31:47.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:31:47.000 We always appreciate it.
00:31:55.000 So speaking of the growing bureaucracy in the United States, this is an amazing story.
00:31:58.000 Bernard Sanders, Bernie Sanders, the socialist Vermont loon bag, he has now announced his new plan.
00:32:05.000 His new plan is to give every American a job.
00:32:08.000 Apparently after reading some Marx, smoking some dope, eating a pudding cup while watching the movie Dave, he decided that we would now give every American a job.
00:32:15.000 So what is his plan?
00:32:16.000 The Washington Post reports, quote,
00:32:16.000 I love this.
00:32:18.000 Senator Bernie Sanders will announce a plan for the federal government to guarantee a job paying $15 an hour in health care benefits to every American worker who wants or needs one, embracing the kind of large-scale government works project that Democrats have shied away from in recent decades.
00:32:32.000 So it's easy, right?
00:32:33.000 We just give everybody a job.
00:32:34.000 You know, this isn't going to change anything.
00:32:36.000 Adding a massive layer of government bureaucracy to just hand people jobs to make work projects, you know, dig a hole, fill the hole back in, like FDR, it won't do any damage.
00:32:44.000 Sure, exactly that kind of policy led to a lengthening of the Great Depression by seven years, according to economists from UCLA.
00:32:50.000 But if we do it now, it won't make any difference.
00:32:52.000 I mean, come on.
00:32:53.000 We'll just tell people, we'll go out on the street, and if you want a job, come in here, we'll pay you 15 bucks an hour for doing something completely useless, and it'll just be awesome.
00:33:00.000 It'll just be terrific.
00:33:02.000 On the best part of the Washington Post report, I do love this line, quote, Of course.
00:33:13.000 Of course they hadn't done a cost estimate for the plan.
00:33:16.000 Because if you are hiring tens of millions of American workers, it's going to cost a fortune, and you don't have the money for that.
00:33:22.000 Yeah, I love that they haven't decided how it'd be funded.
00:33:24.000 They know how it's gonna be funded.
00:33:26.000 It's gonna be funded by taxing the crap out of people who actually earn in the private sector, so we can pay for an ever-growing, ever-present public sector.
00:33:33.000 If full employment were this easy, the Soviet Union would have been a paradise.
00:33:37.000 The Washington Post, I love this.
00:33:38.000 They show for the plan, even though Bernie Sanders says he has no way to pay for it and he has no idea how much money it's gonna cost, but it's a great plan.
00:33:44.000 Let me tell you, the best plans, all of the best plans are for fairness.
00:33:48.000 Fairness guaranteed by an amount of money I will not tell you about, paid for by people who might be you, but I will pretend not for purposes of this conversation so we can pretend that I am full of charity and largesse.
00:34:01.000 So here's how the Washington Post pushes this stupid plan.
00:34:03.000 So the logic here, apparently, is that the government will offer you a job that you get paid more than you would in the private sector, so the private sector has to pay you more to compete.
00:34:22.000 That will drive up wages.
00:34:24.000 It will also create massive unemployment.
00:34:26.000 Because what happens when the businesses can't afford to compete?
00:34:29.000 Either they go out of business, or they have to fire their workers.
00:34:33.000 You stupid idiots.
00:34:34.000 That's exactly what happened during the Great Depression.
00:34:37.000 It's from that UCLA study.
00:34:38.000 In the three years following the implementation of FDR's policies, wages in 11 key industries averaged 25% higher than they otherwise would have done, the economists calculate.
00:34:46.000 Wouldn't that be great, according to Bernie Sanders?
00:34:48.000 But unemployment was also 25% higher than it should have been, given gains in productivity.
00:34:53.000 Meanwhile, prices across 19 industries averaged 23% above what they should have been, given the state of the economy.
00:34:59.000 Because when you drive up the cost of labor, you also drive up the cost of the product.
00:35:03.000 With goods and services that much harder for consumers to afford,
00:35:06.000 So, apparently Bernie Sanders' idea is, let's copy that.
00:35:08.000 That was awesome.
00:35:16.000 Also, the Washington Post says that Bernie Sanders' plan will reduce racial inequality because black workers face unemployment at about twice the rates of white workers, as well as gender inequality because many iterations of the plan call for the expansion of federal child care work.
00:35:29.000 So again, this is the soft bigotry of low expectations.
00:35:31.000 If you think that black workers can't compete with white workers because of their color, or women can't compete with men because of their femalehood, this is stupid.
00:35:38.000 It's stupid, it's the soft bigotry of low expectations, and it's a welfare program for particular segments of the population that are politically powerful.
00:35:46.000 But again, this is all about growing the government at the expense of the private citizen, because remember, the private citizen is going to have to pay for all of this.
00:35:52.000 Bernie Sanders doesn't want to mention that part, because it's awkward.
00:35:55.000 If they actually mention that you have to pay for all of this, then people might push back on the idea that everything in the world is free.
00:36:00.000 Now, Cory Booker and Kirsten Gillibrand have both embraced Bernie Sanders' plan, because Bernie Sanders now runs the Democratic Party.
00:36:06.000 Whatever you think of the chaos inside the Republican Party at any given point, at least they're not proposing full employment plans from the movie Dave.
00:36:13.000 At least they're not thinking of Bernie Sanders as a thought leader.
00:36:16.000 My God, that dude... I wonder if he has two brain cells to rub together.
00:36:20.000 And now meanwhile...
00:36:22.000 The French are visiting the United States and things are weird.
00:36:25.000 So apparently President Trump and the Prime Minister of France, the President of France rather, Emmanuel Macron, they planted a tree together.
00:36:35.000 A really kind of pathetic tree that they planted together over at the White House.
00:36:40.000 And it made for some weird pictures.
00:36:42.000 So here's what that sounded like.
00:36:44.000 They're actually going out to plant a tree.
00:36:48.000 It's a tree that the French president brought over to the White House, a European sisal oak, a tree from France.
00:36:56.000 The tree comes from the Belleau Wood in France, the site of a World War I battle.
00:37:02.000 So that's weird.
00:37:03.000 The French have really scaled back their gifts.
00:37:05.000 They used to give us the Statue of Liberty.
00:37:07.000 Now they give us a branch.
00:37:08.000 So thanks for that, guys.
00:37:10.000 So that's pretty amazing.
00:37:12.000 And the pictures are pretty hilarious.
00:37:14.000 But one of the reasons the French are over here is because they want to make the case that Donald Trump should maintain the
00:37:20.000 Horrible, awful, no good, very bad Iran deal.
00:37:22.000 So the Iran deal, of course, was signed by President Obama and the Europeans, and it essentially gave a crapload of money to the Iranians in exchange for a promise that they would not go nuclear for 10 years.
00:37:32.000 They presumably have been using all of that money for terrorism throughout the Middle East, in Syria, in Lebanon.
00:37:37.000 They've been handing some of that money to Hamas.
00:37:40.000 And they have been expanding their reach all across the Middle East with the money handed to them by the Europeans and by President Obama.
00:37:46.000 Meanwhile, they've been developing all of the predicates for nuclear technology.
00:37:49.000 And after 10 years, they can go nuclear anytime they want.
00:37:52.000 John Oliver, for some reason, was making the case on HBO that the Iran deal should remain in place.
00:37:57.000 I'm not sure why John Oliver is seen as some sort of political know-it-all, considering the amount he knows about politics could fit inside a shoebox.
00:38:04.000 But here he is trying to explain why the Iran deal should stay.
00:38:06.000 He makes as good a case as anyone in the Democratic Party.
00:38:08.000 Unless Congress or our European allies figure out something they can sell to Trump as a fix, it seems that Trump is going to reimpose sanctions on May 12th.
00:38:17.000 And if he does that, this deal could collapse.
00:38:19.000 And the damage of that would be long-term and potentially irreversible.
00:38:23.000 Just set aside the fact...
00:38:25.000 You would alienate a whole generation of younger Iranians who support this deal.
00:38:28.000 Just think about what this would do to America's credibility.
00:38:31.000 Why would North Korea consider signing a nuclear agreement with us if we just broke the agreement we signed only three years ago with Iran?
00:38:39.000 And if this deal dies and Iran resumes its nuclear weapons program, it could then start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.
00:38:46.000 And the problem here is, I can't offer you much hope.
00:38:50.000 There is not really a write-your-congressman solution to this.
00:38:53.000 We could be in serious trouble.
00:38:55.000 Okay, this is so stupid.
00:38:57.000 First of all, the younger generation of Iranians are not in favor of the Iran deal because they don't like the mullahs.
00:39:01.000 They want anything that gets rid of the mullahs.
00:39:02.000 They may be in favor of a little bit more economic growth in Iran, but they're certainly not in thrall to the mullahs the same way that the American left seem to be, or the British left seem to be, or the European left seem to be.
00:39:11.000 It's a pretty incredible argument.
00:39:12.000 Also the argument that it shreds our credibility when we sign a nuclear deal with Iran if we get rid of the nuclear deal.
00:39:17.000 No, it actually reimposes our credibility given the fact that we know that they're going to develop nuclear weapons and we're putting the threat of sanctions and military force back on the table.
00:39:26.000 That would be us saying to the North Koreans, listen guys, we're not going to sign a fake deal with you.
00:39:30.000 We're not going to do with you what we did with Iran.
00:39:32.000 We're not going to pay you off so you can go and cheat again.
00:39:36.000 But again, the left is so in favor of anything that President Obama did, and so against anything Trump does, that they're willing to ignore the fact that this Iran deal was garbage at the start.
00:39:44.000 The same left that's complaining about human rights atrocities in Syria, funded with Iranian dollars, is now complaining that we shouldn't pull out of a deal that's giving those dollars to Iran to go to Assad to be used for genocide against people in Syria.
00:39:57.000 It's an amazing, amazing thing.
00:39:59.000 So the French are over here making that case.
00:40:01.000 I don't think that that case is going to go particularly well.
00:40:03.000 Thank goodness President Trump has around him a very good national security team at this point.
00:40:07.000 John Bolton is his national security advisor, obviously.
00:40:10.000 He's got his new Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, or soon-to-be Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo.
00:40:14.000 So all of that is really good.
00:40:17.000 The left's hysteria with regard to everything Trump's done is so overwhelming that it's leading them into this box canyon of politics where they're suddenly on the same side as the mullahs, which is just an amazing thing.
00:40:28.000 But it just goes to show you that there are too many folks on the left who are more willing to make common cause with some of the worst people on earth rather than acknowledging that fighting the worst people on earth might force them to make common cause with people like President Trump from time to time.
00:40:39.000 Okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate.
00:40:43.000 I think so.
00:41:07.000 Probably the best Western since Unforgiven, I think that's fair to say.
00:41:10.000 It's really dark.
00:41:12.000 It is also kind of hopeful about the nature of the human condition.
00:41:16.000 It's very honest about what happened between Native Americans and white Americans in the West.
00:41:22.000 It's honest about the treatment of Native Americans, and it's also
00:41:25.000 I don't know how you've done it all these years.
00:41:27.000 Seeing all the things you've seen, doing all the things you've done.
00:41:29.000 Makes you feel inhuman after a while.
00:41:56.000 Captain, you do know Chief Yellowhawk?
00:41:59.000 The Army wants to be certain that the Chief gets home to Montana safely, without incident.
00:42:06.000 You have any idea what he's done?
00:42:10.000 He's a butcher.
00:42:12.000 Then the two of you ought to get along just fine.
00:42:14.000 I've killed savages, because that's my job.
00:42:26.000 I have reasons to hate him.
00:42:28.000 This will be done.
00:42:29.000 And it will be done by you.
00:42:34.000 Parade's over.
00:42:35.000 Put him in chains.
00:42:39.000 So the movie's really effective, and I think that it does, again, a really good job of trying to draw out all sides of the conflict here.
00:42:47.000 And it does generate a fair bit of sympathy for everyone involved.
00:42:52.000 And it does demonstrate that there is bad blood on every side and bad people on every side in this particular conflict, which is really good.
00:42:58.000 Well worth remembering, and that people do bad things, but sometimes strive to overcome the bad things that they've done.
00:43:03.000 So, again, I really like the movie.
00:43:04.000 I thought the movie was really, really good.
00:43:05.000 I'm surprised that it didn't get more play in the press, but I guess that anytime you make a movie that isn't Dances with Wolves about Native Americans, where it turns out that the white guys are universally bad and the Native Americans are universally good, then I guess that you get a lot of flack for that.
00:43:18.000 So, check out the movie.
00:43:20.000 It's really an interesting watch, I think.
00:43:22.000 Okay, time for a couple of things that I hate.
00:43:28.000 So the radicalism of the Democrats is on full display.
00:43:31.000 Kamala Harris, my senator from California, she is now making statements like assault weapons need to be banned across the country, but she says this in probably the least articulate way that I've heard in quite a while.
00:43:43.000 To address the fact, again, another false choice.
00:43:46.000 I'm in favor of the Second Amendment.
00:43:47.000 Me too.
00:43:47.000 And I also want, I want smart gun safety laws.
00:43:50.000 Absolutely.
00:43:51.000 Assault weapons shouldn't be walking the streets of a civilized country.
00:43:54.000 Okay, number one, assault weapons aren't walking the streets because people have to be carrying them.
00:43:54.000 I agree.
00:43:57.000 Second of all, you generally can't carry a rifle around in public.
00:44:01.000 And third, when she says that she's in favor of the Second Amendment, but quote unquote assault weapons should be banned, everybody acknowledges that when people talk about banning assault weapons, they really mean removing virtually all operative rifles in the United States.
00:44:13.000 It's really amazing that the left keeps... They're just being dishonest.
00:44:17.000 They're just being dishonest at this point.
00:44:18.000 What the left really wants is a full gun ban.
00:44:19.000 They should just argue for a full gun ban because that's actually what they want.
00:44:22.000 That's what they think would be effective.
00:44:24.000 And so if that's what they think would be effective, let's have that conversation.
00:44:27.000 But they're not willing to have that conversation.
00:44:28.000 Instead, they want to have these little ancillary conversations around the edges that will have no impact on gun violence and will simply be the predicate for a further encroachment on American liberties.
00:44:36.000 That's really what's going on here.
00:44:38.000 Folks on the left, listen to this show.
00:44:40.000 You want to know why people on the right think that you're going for a gun grab?
00:44:43.000 Because the conversation always starts off like this.
00:44:45.000 Folks on the left say, we don't want your guns.
00:44:46.000 And you say, well, you kind of do.
00:44:48.000 They say, well, we just don't like assault weapons.
00:44:50.000 You say, well, assault weapons are ill-defined.
00:44:53.000 What do you mean by that?
00:44:53.000 They say, well, semi-automatic weapons.
00:44:55.000 You say, well, that's virtually every weapon in circulation in the United States.
00:44:58.000 And they say, well,
00:44:59.000 You know, that's OK.
00:45:01.000 You know, we can take the ones that will make it harder for people to get them.
00:45:03.000 You say, well, what about the ones already in circulation?
00:45:05.000 And they say, well, we'll have to probably take some of the ones away from you people in the end anyway, because we have to get them out of circulation.
00:45:11.000 Then you say, well, what about revolvers?
00:45:12.000 Because those basically operate the same way.
00:45:15.000 They just don't automatically load the next round in the chamber.
00:45:17.000 They say, well, yeah, revolvers probably have to go, too.
00:45:19.000 And by the end of the conversation, you've come around to the idea that there should be a full gun ban.
00:45:23.000 Because they believe, in the end, they believe that guns are responsible for the violence.
00:45:27.000 They don't believe that some types of guns are more responsible than other types of guns.
00:45:30.000 Because there's no data to support that, anyway.
00:45:32.000 So, just pointing out the stupidity here.
00:45:34.000 But, you know, the radicalism of the Democrats is of course a feature, not a bug, for so many on the left.
00:45:38.000 Al Sharpton.
00:45:40.000 Says that he wants to endorse Kamala Harris.
00:45:41.000 Shock of shocks.
00:45:43.000 The demonstrative intersectionality of the left continues every single day.
00:45:48.000 Al Sharpton, a legitimate piece of debris.
00:45:51.000 I mean, Al Sharpton is a bad, bad guy.
00:45:53.000 I mean, this is a guy who has participated in racial hoaxes.
00:45:56.000 This is a person who has helped legitimately incite violence.
00:45:59.000 I mean, when we talk about speech inciting violence, this is a guy
00:46:01.000 I've
00:46:16.000 I felt a real passion from Kamala Harris about really fighting for issues like criminal justice as well as the economy and other things.
00:46:27.000 And we made it clear, she was a prosecutor, we may not agree on everything.
00:46:31.000 Right.
00:46:31.000 But I think she really wanted that audience who's from around the country, civil rights activists.
00:46:38.000 Okay, so great.
00:46:39.000 Al Sharpton and Kamala Harris on one wing of the party, and the radicalism of the party is only being united by their hatred for President Trump.
00:46:45.000 It's one of the reasons why the Democrats lost election after election, all the way up to the point where Trump won the presidency.
00:46:51.000 We'll find out whether uniting around hatred for Trump is strong enough to actually create solidarity within the party.
00:46:56.000 We'll be back here tomorrow.
00:46:56.000 Okay.
00:46:57.000 Tomorrow I will be speaking in Lynchburg, Virginia at Liberty University at Convocation.
00:47:02.000 Really looking forward to that.
00:47:03.000 Looking forward to seeing all the students there.
00:47:05.000 Should be a blast.
00:47:05.000 But we'll see you here again tomorrow.
00:47:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:47:07.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:47:12.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Mathis Glover.
00:47:15.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:47:16.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:47:18.000 Our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:47:20.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:47:21.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Coromina.
00:47:23.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:47:24.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Forward Publishing production.
00:47:27.000 Copyright Forward Publishing 2018.