The Ben Shapiro Show - October 30, 2026


Why the Midterm Polls Don't Add Up

The Alaska 'Decoy Candidate' Scandal, Explained

Episode Stats


Length

13 minutes

Words per minute

181.31

Word count

2,357

Sentence count

163

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Ben Shapiro Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 So, where are we right now?
00:00:01.000 So, let's take a look at sort of where we are in this election cycle.
00:00:04.000 Well, the CalCHE markets, of course, they're our sponsors.
00:00:07.000 They point out that the Democratic Party currently apparently has a 70% shot of taking the Senate.
00:00:12.000 Those odds have been rapidly rising since essentially the end of the summer.
00:00:18.000 It'll be interesting to see, you know, how that actually materializes.
00:00:21.000 43 million votes have already been cast nationally in early voting, about half mail in and half in person.
00:00:26.000 Turnout is up across the board compared to 2022, except in Iowa.
00:00:30.000 In the battleground states for the Senate, 46% of early votes are registered Democrats, 40% are GOP, 14% are independent.
00:00:38.000 If you go state by state, you can see where Republicans still have a sort of built in advantage.
00:00:44.000 So, states that are going to be really, really just serious battles, Maine, right now, Democrats lead Republicans by about 74,000 early ballots.
00:00:56.000 Probably in this state, when it comes to final voter turnout, somewhere between 375,000 to 475,000 votes are still outstanding.
00:01:04.000 Either will be voted absentee or will be voted day of.
00:01:08.000 Republicans probably need to win somewhere around 60% of the remaining votes in order to win that election. 1.00
00:01:13.000 Can Susan Collins pull that off? 1.00
00:01:14.000 She certainly could.
00:01:15.000 It's not outside the realm of possibility, but you can see why some people think that's an uphill battle.
00:01:19.000 Michigan is actually a slightly better story for Republicans.
00:01:23.000 Right now, Democrats lead Republicans by about 241,000 early ballots.
00:01:29.000 About 1.7 million ballots have been cast so far.
00:01:32.000 They lean Democrat by a 14 percentage point margin.
00:01:36.000 Right now, there's somewhere between 2.8 million and 3.3 million votes remaining.
00:01:41.000 The GOP needs to win 54% or above of the remaining vote.
00:01:45.000 Could that happen?
00:01:46.000 I mean, considering the day of balloting tends to shift heavily Republican, absolutely.
00:01:51.000 In Ohio, Democrats lead Republicans right now by about 70,000 in the early balloting, but there's still between 2.9 and 3.4 million votes remaining.
00:02:00.000 The GOP needs to win probably a bare majority, about 52% or above of the remaining votes, in order to hold that Ohio seat.
00:02:08.000 In Iowa, Democrats lead Republicans by about 52,000 early ballots.
00:02:14.000 However, again, the GOP only needs to win 52% of the remaining ballots in order to win that election.
00:02:23.000 In Texas, James Tallarico has a really uphill battle.
00:02:27.000 Republicans are actually leading Democrats by 61,000 early ballots right now.
00:02:32.000 Somewhere between 2.9 and 3.9 million votes are remaining.
00:02:37.000 On the low end, Theoretically, the Republicans could even slightly lose the remaining outstanding vote and still win.
00:02:42.000 Because again, Texas is extremely, extremely Republican.
00:02:45.000 So this brings us to the latest polling.
00:02:47.000 So CNN released a batch of polls and let's just say these polls are dicey at best.
00:02:53.000 First of all, each one of these polls is a very, very high margin of error, like a five point margin of error minimum.
00:02:58.000 The sample size is pretty small, 700, 900.
00:03:00.000 So to understand how polls work, you have to understand margin of error.
00:03:03.000 Margin of error just means the more people you sample, the more chance it is that that is representative of a broader population.
00:03:10.000 Obviously, if you could sample the entire population, your margin of error would basically be zero because now you know what everybody thinks.
00:03:16.000 The question is how you build the representative population.
00:03:18.000 So that has two components.
00:03:19.000 One is the size of the sample, the larger the sample, the closer you're going to get to representation.
00:03:24.000 But that relies on a given, which is that you are composing your actual voting base properly.
00:03:30.000 So you have to estimate what you think the final voting base is going to look like in order for it to be representative.
00:03:35.000 So, for example, if you have a poll of 7,000 Republicans and it shows 7,000 people voting for Susan Collins in Maine, That does not mean that 100% of people in Maine are going to vote for Susan Collins, right?
00:03:46.000 Your sample has been poorly drawn.
00:03:48.000 So you have to draw the proper sample, and then you have to have a big sample size to have a really, really well drawn poll.
00:03:53.000 CNN makes mistakes on both these grounds.
00:03:55.000 And this is why, again, just assume that all the following states are within margin of error because they basically are.
00:04:01.000 So in Michigan, the Real Clear Politics polling average has El Sayed up by about 3.2 points.
00:04:06.000 CNN has El Sayed up seven.
00:04:10.000 The current sample is 50% Democrats and 43% Republican.
00:04:17.000 Now, CNN attributes the El Sayed plus seven finding to that lead rests on worsening views of Rogers as well as consolidated support among Democrats following the state's contentious August.
00:04:28.000 Primary.
00:04:29.000 But we should point out that the sample is only 768 voters and the margin of error is five points.
00:04:36.000 So theoretically, this thing could easily be a tie or Rogers could be up.
00:04:43.000 Now, fascinatingly, that same CNN poll shows for Mike Rogers supporters, they say they're voting to stop El Sayed, not to support Rogers.
00:04:54.000 Okay, now, what does that sort of indicate?
00:04:57.000 Well, there could be a sort of buried lead there.
00:05:00.000 So, for El Sayed supporters, they've already moved from supporting, from opposing Rogers to supporting El Sayed.
00:05:09.000 Right in August, September, 31% of the people supporting El Sayed said they were doing it to oppose Rogers.
00:05:15.000 Today, only 24% do.
00:05:17.000 Among Rogers supporters, the opposite.
00:05:19.000 41% said in August, September they were voting for Rogers to support, to, to, to oppose El Sayed.
00:05:26.000 Today, almost 6 in 10 say they're doing it to oppose El Sayed.
00:05:29.000 That seems to me a bit of a buried lead because That means a lot of the Mike Rogers support, I'll bet, is coming from independents and Democrats who are crossing over.
00:05:38.000 Again, that chart is coming from a 7.4% margin of error. 0.98
00:05:42.000 So the CNN polling is, I would say, a little bit garbage in, garbage out. 0.98
00:05:48.000 Same with regard to Texas. 0.98
00:05:50.000 CNN poll says Tallarico is up six against Ken Paxton, but the Real Clear Politics polling average has Tallarico up 2.1.
00:05:58.000 The sample is more Democratic than GOP.
00:06:02.000 Which is a little strange considering that, again, Texas is a heavily Republican state.
00:06:09.000 In Maine, CNN has Troy Jackson up four.
00:06:12.000 That is tripling RCP's average.
00:06:16.000 In Kansas, they've Adam Hamilton, the Democrat, up four, which is well above the Real Clear Politics polling average.
00:06:22.000 So let's take a look at sort of how this breaks down more specifically.
00:06:28.000 So we're going to look at some of the factors that.
00:06:33.000 Require us to see how much sort of these states are moving.
00:06:36.000 So if we use the current real clear politics polling averages for 2026 elections as the actual outcomes of each race, Texas, Iowa, and Maine are polling kind of where history would predict.
00:06:47.000 Republican incumbent races in Alaska, Kansas, Ohio, South Carolina are polling significantly more Democratic than what history would predict.
00:06:53.000 So this right here is a graph.
00:06:56.000 It shows how big a swing each poll requires compared to prior president to midterm swings, meaning Presidential election happens, then there's a midterm.
00:07:05.000 Usually the party in power loses some points between the two.
00:07:09.000 But the swing in most states is of moderate size.
00:07:13.000 So, for example, right now, Michigan is pulling within sort of a normal variance.
00:07:18.000 Maine is also pulling within a normal variance.
00:07:20.000 But the normal swing that would be required here by the polling is a 16 point swing in Kansas, a 16 point swing in Texas, a 16 point swing in South Carolina, a 15 point swing in Ohio, a 14 point swing in Alaska, and a 13 point swing in Iowa.
00:07:36.000 So that means that's how much of a swing you would need away from the 2024 result for today's polls to be correct.
00:07:43.000 And swings of that size historically are rare.
00:07:46.000 It doesn't happen that much.
00:07:49.000 And as you can see on this chart, the dots show how often this happens.
00:07:54.000 So, you know, there are a lot of six point swings, a lot of eight point swings, not a lot of 16 point swings.
00:07:59.000 There are a few 14 point swings, not a ton.
00:08:02.000 Most of the swings are within that zero to 4% range.
00:08:06.000 Okay, so again, you need a real outlier election for the Democrats to win Kansas, Texas, South Carolina, Ohio, Alaska, or Iowa.
00:08:16.000 Okay, now here is one more graph.
00:08:19.000 This one uses a regression analysis to show how each race might end up based on the 2024 presidential vote, Trump's approval rating and incumbency.
00:08:28.000 In Ohio, Kansas, Alaska, and South Carolina, the polls, in other words, are running significantly more democratic than historical trends in each state would suggest.
00:08:35.000 There would have to be a massive shift.
00:08:40.000 So, to take an example, Texas, 2016 to today's polls.
00:08:45.000 Okay, so in 2016, Trump was plus nine over Clinton.
00:08:51.000 In 2018, Cruz beat Beto O'Rourke by 2.6.
00:08:57.000 In 2020, John Cornyn won by almost 10 points.
00:09:01.000 That same year, Trump won by about six points over Joe Biden.
00:09:05.000 So, you know, fairly close mirroring.
00:09:08.000 In 2024, Cruz beat Colin Allred by about nine points and Trump won by about 14 points.
00:09:14.000 So, what you would sort of expect is that this would stick in the normal Texas range.
00:09:20.000 Democrats would need to experience a massive, unprecedented swing in order to win that state.
00:09:26.000 So, this is why I say when you look at the polls that are coming out right now, one thing that you ought to understand is that many of the polling outfits, number one, are grouping because they want to be part of the narrative.
00:09:33.000 But, number two, Polls affect how people vote.
00:09:37.000 This is why it used to be pretty common, you know, 25 years ago, for various companies to release their exit polls the day of elections.
00:09:45.000 And then in many countries, it became illegal to do that because it affects how the actual voting is going to go.
00:09:50.000 Well, understand that's happening with the polling right now.
00:09:52.000 Do not be discouraged from voting because the CNN polls say a thing.
00:09:57.000 They are very likely to be in error.
00:10:00.000 They are very likely, even if they're not in error, to be within the margin of error.
00:10:03.000 So just don't do all of this.
00:10:06.000 By the way, It just shows you where the media are more generally speaking.
00:10:10.000 In the media story of the day, it really is pretty astonishing.
00:10:14.000 In the media story of the day, Fox News is reporting that Barry Weiss is facing significant resistance inside CBS News.
00:10:21.000 Why?
00:10:22.000 Well, because she keeps asking them to do things like do news.
00:10:25.000 According to Fox News, CBS News editor in chief Barry Weiss faced, quote, significant resistance from staff at Thursday's 9 a.m. meeting about the growing Alaska ballot controversy, network insiders told Fox News Digital.
00:10:36.000 Weiss pointed out that what's happening in Alaska is a scandal.
00:10:38.000 Now, remember, we did a lot of the show yesterday on this.
00:10:41.000 What happened in Alaska?
00:10:42.000 Basically, the Democratic Party recruited a person with the same name as the Republican candidates to run in the very, very tight Alaska Senate race. 0.57
00:10:49.000 Draw away a few thousand votes, cause Dan Sullivan, the actual real Dan Sullivan, to lose because some other schlub named Daniel J. Sullivan is also on the ballot. 0.85
00:10:57.000 That was the entire goal.
00:10:58.000 And Weiss said, This is a scandal.
00:10:59.000 You should investigate it.
00:11:01.000 And her staffers went crazy, apparently.
00:11:03.000 Many on the call shrugged it off as routine politics and said Republicans have also engaged in similar scheming.
00:11:10.000 When Weiss asked for other examples of ballot confusion, Face the Nation moderator Margaret Brennan pointed to New Hampshire Senate candidate John Sununu, suggesting that midterm voters might confuse him with his brother, former New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu. 0.97
00:11:22.000 Well, that's an incredibly dumb example, Margaret Brennan. 0.95
00:11:25.000 I'm so confused. 0.98
00:11:26.000 Is John Sununu not running?
00:11:27.000 Is he not a legit candidate?
00:11:29.000 That's like saying that Bobby Kennedy running for president might confuse people because John F. Kennedy was once the president.
00:11:36.000 What the hell? 1.00
00:11:37.000 That is not the same thing by any stretch of the imagination and shows you where Margaret Brennan is politically. 1.00
00:11:42.000 I promise you that if Republicans.
00:11:44.000 Found another candidate named Sherrod Brown to run in Ohio and put that guy on the ballot.
00:11:50.000 Democrats would be screaming bloody murder and the media would be up in arms.
00:11:54.000 CBS News political correspondent Ed O'Keefe said nothing was new.
00:11:59.000 Earlier that morning, O'Keefe stressed to viewers that what happened in Alaska, quote, could be a dirty trick, but it's not illegal, adding, this has happened before, kind of.
00:12:07.000 Funny how fast do they run to it's happened before, kind of, when it clearly has not really happened very much before, like at all.
00:12:14.000 But the point here is that Barry Weiss is just asking her team to do news and they are very mad about it.
00:12:18.000 They are very, very angry that Barry Weiss is asking them to do news.
00:12:21.000 Every time, in fact, Barry Weiss asks for teams to do news, they get pissed and then they leak it to somebody.
00:12:27.000 Which is why, you know, again, if I had been advising Barry Weiss when she took over CBS News, she should have gone in there with a hatchet and fired three quarters of the staff.
00:12:35.000 Because it turns out an enormous number of these people are just hacks.
00:12:37.000 Let them go to Substack and build their own constituency if they're that good at the news.
00:12:43.000 But legacy media going to legacy media.
00:12:45.000 And even when you put somebody in there to correct it, they're still going to face some fairly strong systemic obstacles.
00:12:50.000 What an amazing video you just watched!
00:12:52.000 Wasn't that amazing?
00:12:53.000 Well, you know, if you think so, head on over to dailywire.comslash subscribe to watch the full show ad free or check out this crazy story here.