The Ben Shapiro Show - June 23, 2021


You Don’t Have To Solve Problems If Everything Is Racist | Ep. 1282


Episode Stats

Length

48 minutes

Words per Minute

208.5744

Word Count

10,022

Sentence Count

674

Misogynist Sentences

9

Hate Speech Sentences

25


Summary

The Washington Post concludes that higher numbers of black traffic deaths are the result of infrastructure racism, before the People Act dies an ignominious death to the whiny, teeth-gnashing media, and Don Lemon declares himself bias-free. Plus, a look at the results of the New York City mayoral primary, and the Washington Post's "Racial Take of the Day." Subscribe to my new show, "The Ben Shapiro Show," wherever you get your shows, and don't miss it! I buy my gold from Birch Gold, because they have an A+ rating with the BBB, a 5 star rating, and countless 5 star reviews. When you make a purchase before June 30th, they will send you a signed copy of my new book, How to Destroy America, in 3 easy steps for free. You have a right to privacy. Defend your rights at ExpressVPN.org/DefendYourRights at expressvpn/defendyourrights. Ben Shapiro is a writer, comedian, podcaster, and podcaster. He's been in the business for over 20 years and is a regular contributor to many publications, including The New York Times, The Huffington Post, The Daily Beast, and The Weekly Standard. His work has been featured on CNN, CBS Radio, NPR, and many other media outlets. His music is also available on SoundCloud, and his music is available on Amazon and other streaming services. If you like what you hear, please consider becoming a patron of his music streaming service, Ben Shapiro Podcast. . You can be reached at Ben Shapiro on Soundcloud.org and Ben Shapiro on Insta- . . . Ben is a friend of the show on and Ben is on Instapod on , and Ben has a book called "How To Destroy America? on his podcast called by Ben Shapiro's new book "How to Destroy It All? is out now on Amazon on Podchaser on my insta-podcast on the podcast on the podcast, , and on the pod is if you like it? and also on Podcoin, on PODCAST on . You can also listen to Ben Shapiro s newest album, How To Destroy It? is on all of his social media platforms on Instafeed, and much more! on insta: .


Transcript

00:00:00.000 The Washington Post concludes that higher numbers of black traffic deaths are the result of infrastructure racism, before the People Act dies an ignominious death to the whales and teeth gnashing of the media, and Don Lemon declares himself bias-free.
00:00:12.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:12.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:22.000 You have a right to privacy.
00:00:23.000 Defend your rights at expressvpn.com slash Ben.
00:00:26.000 Now before we start, if you love the content, you need to turn on your YouTube notifications right now.
00:00:31.000 Ding that bell.
00:00:32.000 Seriously, you need to do that because if you don't, you're never going to be notified when the new videos come out.
00:00:36.000 So make sure you ding that bell right now.
00:00:37.000 We're gonna get to all the news in just one moment.
00:00:39.000 First, let us talk about the simple fact That right now you are watching the government spend more money than has yet been created in the history of man.
00:00:47.000 I mean, it's really unbelievable.
00:00:48.000 And this would be a great time to diversify at least a little bit into precious metals with my friends over at Birch Gold.
00:00:54.000 In April alone, consumer prices increased by 4.2%.
00:00:57.000 That's the biggest bump since 2008.
00:00:58.000 Higher fuel prices, higher food prices, construction costs, housing prices.
00:01:01.000 Inflation is here.
00:01:03.000 Have you protected your savings, your investments?
00:01:05.000 If you haven't yet diversified a portion into precious metals, the answer is you have not.
00:01:09.000 So I'm going to tell you again, if you haven't reached out to Birch Gold to diversify part of your IRA or 401k into a precious metals IRA, do it today.
00:01:15.000 Text BEN to 474747.
00:01:18.000 Get a free information kit on protecting your savings with gold.
00:01:21.000 I buy my gold from Birchgold because they have an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, countless five-star reviews, over 10,000 happy customers.
00:01:26.000 Talk to them, ask all your questions, get informed, and then decide if you want to put some of your money into precious metals to work with Birchgold.
00:01:32.000 Text BEN to 474747.
00:01:33.000 When you make a purchase before June 30th, Birchgold will send you a signed copy of my book, How to Destroy America, in three easy steps for free.
00:01:42.000 Again, text Ben to 474747 and protect your savings today.
00:01:42.000 Well, supplies last.
00:01:47.000 Again, text my name, Ben, to 474747.
00:01:51.000 Alrighty, we're gonna get to the Washington Post's bizarrest racial take of the day, and there is one pretty much every day.
00:01:57.000 First, I gotta give you the update on what just happened in the New York City mayoral primary.
00:02:01.000 There is a Republican side of the aisle where Curtis Slowa just won the Republican nomination.
00:02:06.000 But let's be real about this.
00:02:07.000 Whoever wins the Democratic nomination in the city of New York is going to end up as mayor of New York.
00:02:12.000 Because New York has now engaged in what it calls ranked choice of voting, that means that you can win the most votes in the first round, but you may not end up as the overall winner.
00:02:19.000 Because let's say that somebody who had 10% loses and the second choice on that person's ballot was the person who came in second.
00:02:27.000 Well, then the vote shifts to the person who is second.
00:02:30.000 Now, Realistically, this race is pretty much over because the number of ranked-choice voting situations in America where somebody has a 10-point lead after the first round, where that person ends up losing, is pretty much zero, according to Harry Enten over at CNN New York Times.
00:02:45.000 Eric Adams appears to be the winner at this point.
00:02:48.000 Eric Adams, who of course is the former police officer and a rather moderate candidate, at least so far as New York City goes.
00:03:00.000 He is leading right now in the clubhouse about 30%, coming in second.
00:03:04.000 Somewhat shockingly is Maya Wiley, who until recently was considered sort of an also-ran.
00:03:08.000 She was the only member of de Blasio's administration to actually run.
00:03:11.000 She was occupying the left lane, so I guess it's not really that big a surprise that about 20% of voters showed up for Maya Wiley, since everybody else was trying to crowd each other out of the technocratic moderate lane.
00:03:20.000 So Adams ended up at about 30%, Wiley ended up at about 21%, Catherine Garcia ended up at about 20, and Andrew Yang ended up at about 11.
00:03:27.000 Now, you assume Andrew Yang's votes are going to shift over?
00:03:30.000 Now he's out and he's acknowledged he's out.
00:03:33.000 You assume that Andrew Yang's votes are now going to shift over to Catherine Garcia, which would jump her up into the low 30s.
00:03:39.000 But you would also assume that in the second round, Maya Wiley's votes are probably going to be split between the rest of the candidates.
00:03:47.000 And what that means is that Eric Adams is not gonna stick around at 30%.
00:03:50.000 Presumably many of the people who voted for somebody else first on their ballot voted for Eric Adams second on their ballot.
00:03:57.000 So I think it is a fair presumption that Eric Adams is likely to emerge as the mayor of New York, which once again demonstrates the complete rejection of the defund the police strategy.
00:04:05.000 Adams was very open about wanting to refund the police.
00:04:09.000 Adams was pretty strenuous in his position that crime had to be stopped inside New York City.
00:04:15.000 It was only Maya Wiley who took the far left position that the police were really the problem.
00:04:19.000 According to the New York Times, 82% of the results in Adams, the Brooklyn Borough President, was the first choice of 31.6% of those who voted in person on Tuesday or during the early voting period, as New Yorkers chose a leader to steer the city's reopening and economic recovery.
00:04:31.000 Maya Wiley was in second with 22.3%.
00:04:33.000 Catherine Garcia was in third with 19.7%.
00:04:38.000 Adams led in every borough except Manhattan, where Ms.
00:04:40.000 Garcia held a commanding edge.
00:04:41.000 Because Adams seemed unlikely to earn more than 50% of the vote, the contest will now be decided under that ranked-choice voting system.
00:04:47.000 And New Yorkers were allowed to rank up to five candidates in order of preference.
00:04:51.000 Absentee ballots also must be counted, so it could take until mid-July before a Democratic primary victor is actually declared.
00:04:57.000 And then there's the actual general election, where the Democrat, of course, is favored.
00:05:01.000 New Yorkers also render judgment on other vital positions in primary races that will test the power of the left in the nation's largest cities.
00:05:07.000 The city comptroller race, Manhattan district attorney's race, a slew of city council primaries, among other contests, offer imperfect but important windows into democratic attitudes and engagement levels.
00:05:17.000 But, of course, the mayor's race is at sort of the top of the slate, and the reality is that this is a pretty ringing rejection of the de Blasio rule in New York City.
00:05:25.000 Because it turns out that the sort of radicalism that the Democratic Party has fallen for does not offer solutions.
00:05:31.000 It just does not.
00:05:32.000 And this goes to the deeper point.
00:05:34.000 The deeper point here is that when you attribute everything in the world to miasmatic forces of racism, it makes it very, very difficult to solve problems.
00:05:41.000 Which, of course, is the whole point.
00:05:42.000 When you make problems difficult to solve, and then you implicate the entire system, The notion is that you're going to have to tear down the entire system in order to solve the problems.
00:05:51.000 Everything has to be nuked.
00:05:52.000 You have to just tear down everything.
00:05:54.000 And then finally, once we have salted the earth and burned the remains of the old system, then we can build the new.
00:06:00.000 Except that that doesn't actually solve problems.
00:06:02.000 That makes things a lot worse in the near term.
00:06:03.000 So perfect example today in the Washington Post.
00:06:06.000 There's an article in the Washington Post, it's at the top of their website today, titled, Traffic Deaths Increased During the Pandemic.
00:06:11.000 The Toll Fell More Heavily on Black Residents, Report Shows.
00:06:15.000 A new analysis found that even before 2020's increase, black people were killed on roads at a rate almost 25% higher than white people.
00:06:22.000 Now, let's just say that you read that stat, right?
00:06:26.000 That for a very long time, black deaths on roads outpaced white deaths on roads.
00:06:31.000 Your first thought might be, who's speeding?
00:06:35.000 I mean, that might be your first thought.
00:06:35.000 Right?
00:06:37.000 That would be a natural thought in the same way that if you read a statistic that said that black people are being murdered at a rate far higher than white people.
00:06:44.000 And we know that the vast majority of murder is intraracial.
00:06:47.000 It is black on black or white on white.
00:06:50.000 But black people are being murdered at a way higher rate.
00:06:51.000 You might think to yourself, well, that's probably the reason is that a lot of black people are murdering a lot of black people.
00:06:57.000 So if you see a stat in which it says that a lot of black people are dying in traffic accidents, you might think to yourself, What is the behavior of the drivers?
00:07:05.000 Right, because you would think that that's literally your first question.
00:07:08.000 Forget about groups with regard to individuals.
00:07:11.000 Right, if you hear that anybody has died of anything, your first question is what were the circumstances surrounding their death?
00:07:17.000 Right, this is true for anybody's death.
00:07:18.000 If somebody you know dies in a car accident, your first question is how?
00:07:22.000 Right, you don't ask questions typically about the roads.
00:07:25.000 You don't ask questions typically about the lights.
00:07:26.000 Typically, you ask, OK, were they speeding?
00:07:28.000 And if somebody says, oh, they were speeding, you go, oh, OK, well, you know, that's terrible.
00:07:31.000 But you're speeding, right?
00:07:32.000 Like you should probably pay attention to the traffic signs.
00:07:35.000 This entire Washington Post piece is designed specifically to ignore the question of who is doing the speeding.
00:07:41.000 Because if it turns out that black drivers are speeding more often than white drivers, that at least partially explains the discrepancy between black and white death statistics with regard to traffic accidents.
00:07:50.000 Instead, the entire Washington Post article is dedicated to the proposition that it's institutional racism that causes higher levels of black deaths.
00:08:00.000 So here's what the Washington Post wrote.
00:08:02.000 And again, what this means is that solutions become a lot more difficult.
00:08:05.000 Because let's say, for example, that the problem really is disproportionate speeding inside the black community.
00:08:10.000 And the reason I say that is because we have fairly good evidence from the past that there is, in fact, disproportionate speeding inside the black community.
00:08:16.000 So to take an example, in the early 1990s, there was a big hubbub during the Clinton administration about supposed racial profiling on the New Jersey Turnpike.
00:08:24.000 There's a lot of focus on this.
00:08:25.000 Look at these terrible cops.
00:08:26.000 They're pulling over black drivers.
00:08:28.000 Even though it was at night, it's kind of hard to see the color of the person who's driving, but they're pulling over black drivers at a rate higher than white drivers.
00:08:34.000 That must be the latent racism of the New Jersey state.
00:08:39.000 They're just pulling black people over.
00:08:40.000 Then, finally, there was a study.
00:08:43.000 And the study was put out only about almost a decade later.
00:08:48.000 And what the study found is that a very high percentage of the speeders were black.
00:08:53.000 It turns out that black drivers were just driving faster as a general rule than white drivers were, according to this particular study.
00:09:00.000 It was an actual Justice Department study in conjunction with the state offices of New Jersey.
00:09:07.000 And what they found, it was leaked to the New York Times, what they found is that while black drivers were making up about 16% of the drivers on the New Jersey Turnpike, 25% of the speeders in the 65 mile per hour zone, where profiling complaints were the most common, were black.
00:09:21.000 Black drivers sped about twice as much as white drivers and sped at reckless levels even more.
00:09:26.000 In fact, according to that particular Justice Department study, blacks were actually stopped less than their speeding behavior would predict.
00:09:31.000 They're about 23% of those stopped.
00:09:32.000 Okay, so all of this is to not make any linkage between genetic skin color and how fast you drive.
00:09:39.000 But if the question is, which groups of people are driving the fastest in American life and how does that link to traffic stops?
00:09:45.000 You might think that that might be like a consideration in the Washington Post piece.
00:09:47.000 No, they weren't even going to consider it.
00:09:50.000 In fact, and especially they weren't going to consider it because if that were in fact a problem, if the problem were a disproportionate number of people are speeding in a particular area, therefore a higher number of people are dying in that particular area.
00:10:00.000 More people are driving recklessly in this particular area, therefore more people are dying.
00:10:04.000 The answer to that, right, the very easy policy answer to that is, okay, so you set up a speed trap, right?
00:10:10.000 You get a bunch of cops, you put them in the area, and you have them sign a lot of traffic tickets because you create an incentive structure where it makes no sense to speed.
00:10:19.000 That is the perfect, obvious policy solution.
00:10:22.000 The Washington Post does not want that policy solution.
00:10:24.000 So they go out of their way to find alternative explanations that are far less explained.
00:10:29.000 They literally do not even posit the possibility that people are speeding at higher rates on a correlative level with regard to race.
00:10:38.000 Even though they're saying that you can measure traffic deaths on the basis of race, but you can't measure traffic behavior on the basis of race.
00:10:45.000 Which seems like you're ignoring kind of a rather large factor, are you not?
00:10:49.000 It's sort of like the move that people in the media are constantly making where they look at big tech and they're like, well, there's just not enough engineers who are in big tech who are black.
00:10:58.000 You're like, right, but how many qualified applicants are coming from the black community who are qualified engineers to be in big tech?
00:11:04.000 And they just ignore that.
00:11:05.000 They won't even put that in the story, even though that is the vast majority of the explanation.
00:11:09.000 It's not the big tech is going around like, well, I have an equally qualified black person and white person, I'm picking the white person.
00:11:14.000 No one in big tech is doing that.
00:11:15.000 They're doing precisely the opposite.
00:11:18.000 So here's how the Washington Post tries to explain this discrepancy.
00:11:21.000 A new analysis of deaths on U.S.
00:11:22.000 roads found that Black people were killed in traffic crashes at a rate almost 25% than white people in recent years, a disparity that appears to have worsened during the coronavirus pandemic.
00:11:31.000 Last year was especially grim on the roads.
00:11:32.000 The number of miles driven decreased as many people stayed home, yet traffic deaths rose 7%, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in large part because of people driving faster on empty highways.
00:11:43.000 Okay, so right off the bat, they're acknowledging that when people drive faster, you end up with more people dead, right?
00:11:50.000 So this is true across the broad population, but we cannot even measure the traffic behavior differential between groups when trying to explain the traffic death differential between groups, because to do so would imply a solution they don't want, and would also imply that racism isn't the problem, and so you don't have to tear down the entire system.
00:12:08.000 The number of black people killed according to the Washington Post climbed 23%.
00:12:10.000 The reason for the spike in black deaths is not noted in the federal report, but experts say, ah, the experts.
00:12:17.000 Mm-hmm.
00:12:18.000 Experts say, just as the virus itself spread more readily through communities of color, the increase was probably a result of existing inequities being compounded.
00:12:26.000 Or possibly it was a result of the differential in behavior being compounded.
00:12:33.000 Because if you have more people who are speeding on the roads during this time generally, you're going to end up with more people who speed as a percentage of that being killed.
00:12:41.000 Researchers have previously concluded that black communities tend to be crisscrossed by more dangerous roads.
00:12:45.000 During the pandemic, people of color were more likely to be employed in essential jobs without the option to stay home.
00:12:50.000 People were driving faster amid lower traffic levels meant crashes were more likely to be deadly.
00:12:54.000 Okay, so.
00:12:56.000 The basic premise here is that the roads are racist, right?
00:12:59.000 The roads, because they're in poor communities, and because these are bigger roads with fewer trees and people tend to speed more on those roads, that this is the real rationale.
00:13:06.000 So presumably we should have traffic bottlenecks in these areas, which I'm not sure how that would solve many other problems having to do with the economy, having to do with transport.
00:13:14.000 If you're living in a poorer area with fewer businesses, you need to get to work.
00:13:17.000 You actually don't want fewer lanes on the roads.
00:13:19.000 But, put all that aside, the basic notion that this has to do with race as opposed to with class is another confound.
00:13:26.000 It turns out that poorer areas very often are crisscrossed with more dangerous roads.
00:13:29.000 I mean, those poorer areas generally exist around, for example, highways, because people who are richer don't want to live next to highways.
00:13:35.000 People who are richer don't want to live next to big roads with lots of traffic, which is why people who are richer tend to move out to the suburbs, for example.
00:13:42.000 The NHTSA estimated that 38,680 people were killed in crashes nationwide last year, said 7,494 of them were black.
00:13:50.000 A new study released Tuesday by the Governor's Highway Safety Association highlights the disparities.
00:13:54.000 It analyzed data from 2015 to 2019, right, so not including the pandemic.
00:13:58.000 And found that in different types of traffic crashes, black people were killed at rates higher than white people.
00:14:02.000 Black pedestrians were killed at a rate twice as high.
00:14:05.000 So who is driving the cars?
00:14:08.000 And what levels of speed were they attaining while they were driving the cars?
00:14:12.000 And by the way, what was the behavior of the pedestrians?
00:14:13.000 These are all relevant factors to whether people are being killed in traffic accidents or not.
00:14:18.000 And none of these factors are taken into account in the Washington Post.
00:14:21.000 Charles Brown, professor at Rutgers University School of Planning and Public Policy, said the figures leave at transportation officials facing a simple question, quote, we've all been socialized in a way to believe that black death is due to black behavior, when instead we know infrastructure influences behavior. If that is true, we need investments in quality infrastructure in black communities. How many more black people do we have to lose before that is the number one priority? Okay, so it can't be that we focus on lowering rates rates of reckless driving, lowering rates of speed,
00:14:21.000 None.
00:14:51.000 following traffic laws.
00:14:52.000 No.
00:14:53.000 We have to restructure all the roads to what?
00:14:55.000 Reduce the number of lanes?
00:14:57.000 To lower the speed limit?
00:14:59.000 That people are apparently ignoring?
00:15:01.000 The GHSA represents state agencies that administer federal money to tackle problems such as drunken and distracted driving.
00:15:07.000 Again, we don't know the rates of that.
00:15:08.000 This story does not include any of that data.
00:15:10.000 How many of these accidents included drunk driving?
00:15:12.000 How many included reckless driving?
00:15:12.000 We don't know.
00:15:13.000 We don't know.
00:15:14.000 How many included pedestrians walking out into traffic?
00:15:16.000 We don't know.
00:15:17.000 We don't know any of those things.
00:15:18.000 The only thing that we know is more black people than white people on a percentage level are being killed.
00:15:23.000 Therefore, racism.
00:15:24.000 Therefore, roads.
00:15:26.000 Hey, now, what's kind of amazing about all of this is that then you look at some of the statistics that are sort of buried down in here, right?
00:15:33.000 First, you get the typical equity speak from the Biden administration of Pete Buttigieg, issuing a statement that the administration is now proposing a $20 billion, yeah, we're gonna spend 20 billion bucks on this, traffic safety proposal to reduce crashes and road deaths as part of its infrastructure plan.
00:15:47.000 Buttigieg said, last year's traffic fatality rates and the racial disparities reflected in them are unacceptable.
00:15:52.000 This reflects broader patterns of inequity in our country, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
00:15:56.000 Okay, so then you get to the actual differences among racial and ethnic groups.
00:16:01.000 Now what's fascinating about this is who is getting killed in these traffic accidents because it turns out that it is not solely income-based.
00:16:10.000 Hispanics as well as Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders were killed at rates slightly lower than whites.
00:16:10.000 Right?
00:16:17.000 Weird, because on a household income level, Hispanics do pretty significantly worse right now than white Americans do.
00:16:23.000 Not only that, they tend to live in lower income areas because of that.
00:16:27.000 Presumably, many of the same lower income areas that are crisscrossed with the same kind of roads that are being blamed for higher black fatalities.
00:16:34.000 American Indians and Alaska Natives were killed at much higher rates, more than twice the rate of black residents.
00:16:41.000 Guillermo Narvaez, a lecturer at the University of Minnesota who has studied traffic safety in tribal areas, said American Indian communities are often remote and suffer from unsafe road designs.
00:16:50.000 So it must be the unsafe road designs.
00:16:52.000 Now, nowhere in here is contemplated the possibility that there are higher levels of reckless driving in American Indian reservations, for example.
00:17:01.000 Or higher levels of DUI in American Indian reservations, for example.
00:17:04.000 Like that's not like these possibilities are never taken into account.
00:17:07.000 Human behavior is of no consequence because equal outcome is the supposed norm, except that it's not the supposed norm.
00:17:13.000 Again, in any human endeavor, you can take groups of people, you can take this office and the office next door, and there will be complete disparities and differentials between the two offices, not based on race.
00:17:23.000 Because equal outcome among groups is not human norm.
00:17:26.000 It doesn't exist anywhere on Earth at any time, in any place.
00:17:29.000 Okay, but what does this all cover for?
00:17:31.000 I'll tell you that in one second, because it really is, they kind of give away the game late in this article from the Washington Post.
00:17:36.000 And the reason that this is so important is because when you insist that equal outcome must be the goal, regardless of behavior, and then you militantly refuse to look at individual behavior or how behavior agglomerates in groups, You are dictating unfairness, injustice, and violation of individual rights, and making life worse for the people who actually aren't engaging in the behavior.
00:18:01.000 Hey, first, let's talk for a second about your investment strategy.
00:18:06.000 Wall Street has been telling you for many, many, many years that 7% is a great return on your stocks.
00:18:10.000 Well, there are some folks who say that it is not.
00:18:13.000 Okay, trading does not have to be particularly complex.
00:18:15.000 There are people who are making 30, 50%, even 100% a year on their money trading stocks, even when the market is tough.
00:18:20.000 Carnivore Trading is an anonymous team of elite Wall Street strategists They're legends among Wall Street heavy hitters, and now they've gone a bit rogue because they're allowing everyday folks like you, like me, to see and mirror their amazing trades.
00:18:31.000 If that sounds pretty amazing, that's because Carnivore is going to let you see the trades they are making right now for free, like full transparency in what exactly they're doing.
00:18:38.000 You're not just taking your money and giving it to a stockbroker.
00:18:40.000 You're actually able to see what they're doing on a day-to-day level.
00:18:43.000 Go to GetOurTrades.com, use promo code Ben, and get two weeks for free.
00:18:47.000 If you join Carnivore Guarantees, you will get five times your subscription fee or double your money back.
00:18:52.000 Go to GetOurTrades.com.
00:18:54.000 Promo code Ben.
00:18:55.000 GetOurTrades.com.
00:18:56.000 Promo code Ben.
00:18:57.000 See website for guarantee terms and conditions.
00:18:59.000 Past performance is not a guarantee of future earnings.
00:19:02.000 Go check them out right now.
00:19:04.000 GetOurTrades.com.
00:19:05.000 Promo code Ben.
00:19:05.000 And see how these expert Wall Street traders are trading today so you can mirror those trades with Carnivore.
00:19:10.000 See website for guarantee terms and conditions.
00:19:12.000 And again, past performance, not a guarantee of future earnings.
00:19:14.000 Alrighty, so.
00:19:16.000 Here's where the Washington Post goes with this.
00:19:19.000 They first try to say that it's about the roads, that because minority communities are bisected very often by many lanes, long distances between stoplights, few trees, this signals that drivers can go fast.
00:19:31.000 It signals that drivers can go fast.
00:19:33.000 We're not going to talk about, again, racial differentials and speeding.
00:19:37.000 We're going to talk about what the roads signal.
00:19:40.000 Okay, this is where, okay, buried all the way down to the bottom of the article is the actual solution to this, okay?
00:19:46.000 Traffic stops, okay, the GHSA study says, enforcement of traffic laws is an effective way to improve safety.
00:19:53.000 Now, remember, Very early on in this article, the Washington Post said the GHSA offers no opinion as to the cause of these traffic accidents.
00:20:03.000 None.
00:20:04.000 But they do offer a possible solution.
00:20:07.000 Enforce the traffic laws.
00:20:08.000 The GHSA study says enforcement of traffic laws is an effective way to improve safety, but acknowledges that police stops of black people are under renewed scrutiny, saying they should be conducted only in a way that has the support of local communities.
00:20:20.000 Traffic stops sometimes involve police confronting black drivers to pursue criminal investigations not related to road safety.
00:20:26.000 The GHSA analysis also found that black people were killed in crashes involving a police pursuit at a rate four times higher than white people.
00:20:33.000 Wait, um, excuse me?
00:20:35.000 So now the big problem is that the police are enforcing the traffic laws because, again, note again, it's amazing, it's a consistent rule.
00:20:42.000 Never look at the rationale for the disparity.
00:20:46.000 Only blame some sort of miasmatic discrimination.
00:20:50.000 Again, black people were killed in crashes involving a police pursuit at a rate four times higher than white people.
00:20:54.000 Do we know who is running away from the police at the highest rates of speed?
00:20:58.000 Have we seen each of those individual circumstances?
00:21:00.000 What are the base numbers there?
00:21:01.000 Because really, like how many people are killed in crashes involving a police pursuit total?
00:21:05.000 You may be looking at a differential of like eight versus two, right?
00:21:08.000 It's not like thousands of people are killed every year in crashes involving a police pursuit.
00:21:13.000 Again, refusal to look at individual behavior is the basic media frame here.
00:21:20.000 It is what they insist upon.
00:21:22.000 And what does this result in?
00:21:23.000 It results in more dead black people, just like with crime.
00:21:27.000 Okay, when you don't police crime, you end up with more dead black people.
00:21:29.000 You don't police traffic, you end up with more dead black people.
00:21:33.000 Because if it turns out that the underlying rationale for the disparity is individual behavior and you won't police the individual behavior, you get more of the individual behavior.
00:21:40.000 So here's the natural outcome.
00:21:42.000 AP, Portland, Oregon.
00:21:43.000 Today, police in Oregon's largest city are being advised to no longer pursue low-level traffic infractions, including expired plates and broken headlights, unless related to an immediate safety threat.
00:21:52.000 Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler announced Tuesday.
00:21:55.000 In addition, if police do stop a driver, they must receive recorded consent before searching the vehicle and clearly inform the person they have the right to refuse.
00:22:02.000 Wheeler said both changes are an attempt to refocus on immediate threats and are also occurring in response to data showing a disproportionate impact on Black drivers for traffic stops and vehicle searchers.
00:22:11.000 Searches.
00:22:12.000 While 6% of Portlanders are Black, he said they account for 18% of traffic stops in the city.
00:22:17.000 Is this going to make the city safer?
00:22:19.000 Is it?
00:22:20.000 The answer, of course, is no.
00:22:22.000 But when you buy into the lie that equal outcome is the natural state of things and that equal behavior is happening across every group, you are going to pursue bad policy that results in really, really bad results.
00:22:33.000 We'll get to more of this in just one second.
00:22:34.000 First, let's talk about leading a healthier life.
00:22:38.000 Man, a healthier life doesn't mean sticking to somebody else's strict rules.
00:22:40.000 It means having more knowledge to build smarter, more sustainable habits.
00:22:43.000 Here's the thing about diets, right?
00:22:44.000 You go on a diet, then you lose some weight, and then five seconds later, like, this diet is terrible.
00:22:47.000 And you stop dieting, and then you blow up again, like a balloon.
00:22:50.000 Instead, what you need is a change of your mindset, a change of lifestyle that is sustainable.
00:22:56.000 Noom.
00:22:57.000 They will help you do it.
00:22:57.000 Noom's cognitive behavioral approach focuses on why instead of what and helps you change your relationship with food.
00:23:03.000 Everybody's journey looks different.
00:23:04.000 Noom customizes a program for you based on your personal goals.
00:23:07.000 80% of Noom users finish the program.
00:23:09.000 Over 60% have stuck with their goals for at least a year.
00:23:11.000 With Noom, taking care of your health is empowering instead of stress inducing.
00:23:15.000 There's no need to fear ruining the whole program with one day off because Noom will help you get back on track.
00:23:19.000 And all you need is 10 minutes a day.
00:23:21.000 Noom is gonna fit into your life on your terms.
00:23:23.000 No grueling early mornings or huge chunks out of your day.
00:23:26.000 Instead, you're building better habits with Noom.
00:23:28.000 And my wife has been using Noom.
00:23:29.000 I've been using Noom.
00:23:30.000 My parents have been using Noom.
00:23:31.000 All of this to change your daily habits.
00:23:32.000 It makes it a lot easier to think about why you're doing what you're doing.
00:23:34.000 And if you think about it for just one moment, you're likely to pursue better individual behavior.
00:23:39.000 Start building better habits for healthier long-term results.
00:23:41.000 Sign up for your trial at Noom.com slash Shapiro.
00:23:43.000 That is N-O-O-M dot com slash Shapiro today.
00:23:47.000 Go check it out right now.
00:23:48.000 Okay, so.
00:23:50.000 When you pursue the lie that equal outcome is the natural state of things, regardless of behavior, and when you do as Ibrahim Kendi says, and you say, well, if there is a differential in behavior, then you're implying racial inferiority.
00:24:04.000 I'm not implying anything.
00:24:06.000 I'm saying that there are differences in human behavior across a wide variety of human interactions and activities.
00:24:13.000 That's just a fact.
00:24:15.000 Hey, forget about rationale for a second.
00:24:16.000 That is a simple fact.
00:24:17.000 And refusal to acknowledge simple facts on the ground means you're going to end up not only in la-la land, but in dangerous la-la land.
00:24:24.000 Like, for example, undermining the police and suggesting that the police are responsible for these disparities.
00:24:29.000 Because if it's not individual behavior that agglomerates in communities at different rates, well then it must be the police who are really the problem.
00:24:35.000 It also leads you to lie.
00:24:36.000 So here's Mayor Lori Lightfoot in Chicago, for example, boasting of decline in crime in her city while the murder rate is up 30% this year.
00:24:43.000 The reality is, June over June, so from last year to this one, what we've seen is a downward trend in both homicides and shootings.
00:24:52.000 And if you look at where we were in January to where we are now, we're also seeing a downward trajectory in both homicides and shootings.
00:25:02.000 We're different than other cities across the country.
00:25:05.000 Every major city in the United States last year and this year has seen an unprecedented rise in violence.
00:25:13.000 We're down on every other major category, but particularly in shootings and homicides related to gun violence.
00:25:21.000 Okay, so I mean, it's amazing.
00:25:23.000 She's like, well, we're down from last year.
00:25:25.000 Oh, you mean when there was no cop anywhere to be seen?
00:25:29.000 So your baseline is last year.
00:25:31.000 Hmm.
00:25:32.000 Interesting.
00:25:33.000 I've also noted that dozens of people are being shot every weekend in Chicago, Mayor Lori Lightfoot.
00:25:38.000 And you've declared racism a public health problem.
00:25:41.000 So murder, not a public health problem in Chicago.
00:25:44.000 Racism, a public health problem in Chicago.
00:25:46.000 And again, you can fill in any gap with racism.
00:25:48.000 If you say, OK, well, the murder rate is higher in the black community in Chicago, so maybe we should focus in on, you know, what we can do to stop that.
00:25:55.000 Like, for example, putting more police in the community.
00:25:56.000 Then you'll get from Lori Lightfoot that racism is responsible for the higher murder rate in the black community.
00:26:01.000 OK, but if you're using racism as an excuse not to solve the problem, you are just making life worse for everyone.
00:26:08.000 You see the same thing from the Biden administration all the damn time.
00:26:12.000 So police are now complaining of lagging morale.
00:26:14.000 Well, no bleep.
00:26:15.000 I mean, you've basically said across the United States that the police are the bad guys in every major metropolitan area and that every racial discrepancy is not the result, again, of basic stats.
00:26:24.000 It is instead the result of evil cops.
00:26:27.000 So there's a report on MSNBC, of all places, in which police departments are talking about how they have lagging morale, which of course they do.
00:26:35.000 Morale, I think, is at an all-time low now.
00:26:37.000 We're being held responsible for the actions of an officer that's across the country, and I don't think that's fair.
00:26:44.000 We're dealing with rioting at a level and a sustained violence that we've never seen before.
00:26:48.000 Nonviolence in a city like we've never seen before.
00:26:51.000 We're looking at the most catastrophic staffing levels we've ever seen before.
00:26:54.000 It all boils down to these three main concepts of being underfunded, understaffed, and undersupported.
00:27:01.000 Okay, and that is in Portland.
00:27:02.000 Again, the same city that just declared we're not going to do minor traffic stops anymore.
00:27:06.000 So, Jen Psaki, the White House spokesperson, was asked about this.
00:27:09.000 You know, we've got falling police morale.
00:27:11.000 Of course, it's Peter Doocy, the only reporter in the room, asking him this question.
00:27:15.000 Or asking her this question, rather.
00:27:16.000 And here is Jen Psaki's unbelievable answer about falling police morale.
00:27:19.000 Remember, the White House says that it has the capacity to control everything in your life, from toilet flow and electricity use, all the way to Whether your child should learn about transgenderism in third grade.
00:27:33.000 Like all of this should be federal policy.
00:27:35.000 All of this should be controlled by the government.
00:27:37.000 But they have nothing to say about falling police morale.
00:27:41.000 Why does the president think that there's low morale with police officers on the beach?
00:27:47.000 I don't think we're the right entity to give an assessment of that.
00:27:49.000 I'd certainly look to the police departments to give that assessment.
00:27:52.000 But what I would say to you is that the president has never supported defunding the police.
00:27:57.000 Oh, well, they have no opinion on that.
00:27:58.000 Nothing.
00:27:59.000 Nothing to say about that.
00:27:59.000 None.
00:28:00.000 And look to the police when that's the problem.
00:28:02.000 Weird, because they wouldn't do this about any other issue in American public life.
00:28:06.000 If you said that there's underperformance in black communities with regard to high school graduation, and somebody said, what does the president say about that?
00:28:12.000 I would suggest you look to those communities and ask what they think about that.
00:28:16.000 He would never do that.
00:28:17.000 Instead, he would give a high-flown answer about systemic American racism, of course.
00:28:20.000 We all know this.
00:28:21.000 We all know this.
00:28:22.000 Because One of the great avoidance strategies for members of government is to blame problems bigger than themselves, so they don't actually have to take the easy measures that are available for them on the ground.
00:28:34.000 Meanwhile, it's also politically palatable to say that everything is racist, because when you call things racist, it means you get to condemn your political opponents.
00:28:39.000 Which brings us, of course, to the death of Senate Bill 1.
00:28:42.000 This was the For the People Act.
00:28:44.000 Senate Bill 1 died an ignominious death yesterday.
00:28:48.000 When Republicans did not vote for the advancement of the bill in a procedural vote, they didn't kill the filibuster just to move along with this thing.
00:28:56.000 It was a 50-50 split, by the way.
00:28:57.000 It was a 50-50 split in the Senate, and you require 60 votes in order to advance the bill.
00:29:02.000 According to Axios, Senate Republicans filibuster Democrats' signature voting rights bill on Tuesday, denying it the 60 votes needed to advance the bill and start debate.
00:29:10.000 First of all, let me just point this out with the media.
00:29:12.000 The media always call this a quote-unquote voting rights bill.
00:29:14.000 It is not a voting rights bill.
00:29:16.000 It is a federalized voting procedures bill.
00:29:20.000 They just use propaganda terms straight from the Democratic playbook.
00:29:23.000 And Democrats will say, well, this is a voting rights bill.
00:29:25.000 And immediately, the media will start parroting that this is a voting rights bill.
00:29:29.000 And if there is a bill that suggests that boys be allowed to compete with girls in girls sports, they will call it a transgender rights bill.
00:29:36.000 They won't call it a reclassification of sex in sport bill, which is far more informational.
00:29:43.000 They always just take whatever is the Democratic euphemism for the thing, and then they just call it the thing.
00:29:46.000 So if you were just a normal reader who doesn't follow this stuff very closely, you'd be like, oh my God, the Democrats were pushing a voting rights bill, and Republicans opposed that.
00:29:53.000 They must hate voting rights.
00:29:55.000 This is why the media are just garbage at their jobs.
00:29:59.000 According to Axios, it's an expected but significant blow to Democrats' hopes of passing a sweeping federal elections overhaul to combat a wave of new voting restrictions in Republican-led states.
00:30:07.000 Again, wave of new voting restrictions includes things like, we're not going to extend our early voting period for a month because it's voting day, not voting month.
00:30:13.000 You should have voter ID, which is a widely popular measure across the United States.
00:30:17.000 We're not going to allow ballot harvesting, which basically puts it in the hands of party activists to go door to door and pick up ballots from people, which creates not only the incentive for voter fraud, but also for packing the ballot box.
00:30:27.000 The far-reaching bill was co-sponsored by every Democratic senator except for Senator Joe Manchin, who called it too partisan and introduced his own compromise bill, which was promptly rejected by Republicans.
00:30:36.000 Manchin ultimately voted yes to move forward and allowed debate on the bill, even though he opposes the original legislation, by the way.
00:30:42.000 So this was H.R.1.
00:30:44.000 S.1 is likely to go down to the same defeat, rather.
00:30:47.000 H.R.1 is far more far-reaching than S.1.
00:30:50.000 So S.1 is the Manchin compromise bill.
00:30:52.000 This is the sort of predicate to That bill, H.R.
00:30:56.000 1, is wild.
00:30:57.000 H.R.
00:30:58.000 1 federalizes ballot harvesting.
00:31:00.000 It requires public funding for a campaign, so your taxpayer money would now go to candidates that you don't support.
00:31:05.000 It's a crappy piece of legislation.
00:31:07.000 And Mitch McConnell explained why exactly he was opposing it.
00:31:12.000 Later today, the Senate will vote on whether to advance Democrats' transparently partisan plan to tilt every election in America permanently in their favor.
00:31:22.000 By now, the rotten inner workings of this power grab have been thoroughly exposed to the light.
00:31:29.000 We know that it would shatter a decades-old understanding that campaign finance law should have a bipartisan referee and turn the Federal Election Commission into a partisan majority cudgel for Democrats to wield.
00:31:42.000 I mean, the number of bad provisions in this bill, it's insane, right?
00:31:46.000 What he's talking about is the FEC.
00:31:47.000 The FEC normally has a three-Republican, three-Democrat bipartisan board, okay?
00:31:52.000 The Democrats wanted to remove one of the seats.
00:31:53.000 They could have a majority on the FEC and then presumably beat the crap out of Republicans with it.
00:31:57.000 It's just a bad piece of legislation.
00:31:58.000 Naturally, Democrats are portraying the failure to advance this bill as some sort of defeat for democracy and also a giant victory for, you guessed it, Racism!
00:32:10.000 We'll get to more of that in just one second.
00:32:11.000 First, a lot going on this month, the month of June.
00:32:15.000 Thankfully, Policy Genius makes it easy to cross life insurance off your list so you can get back to all the things you have to do.
00:32:20.000 If you're a responsible citizen, you need to make sure that your family is insured in case, God forbid, you get hit by a train or something.
00:32:25.000 God forbid something should happen to you.
00:32:27.000 It'll be hard enough to lose you.
00:32:28.000 Losing your stream of income for your family could be absolutely devastating.
00:32:31.000 Get life insurance now through Policy Genius.
00:32:32.000 Why use Policy Genius?
00:32:33.000 Well, they make it easy to compare quotes from over a dozen top insurers all in one place.
00:32:38.000 Why compare?
00:32:38.000 Well, you can save 50% or more on life insurance by comparing quotes with PolicyGenius.
00:32:42.000 You could save $1,300 or more per year on life insurance by using PolicyGenius to compare policies.
00:32:46.000 The license experts at PolicyGenius work for you, not the insurance companies, so you can trust them to help you navigate every step of the shopping and buying process.
00:32:53.000 That kind of service has earned Policy Genius an excellent rating on Trustpilot.
00:32:56.000 Getting started?
00:32:57.000 First, head on over to policygenius.com slash Shapiro.
00:32:57.000 Super simple.
00:33:00.000 In minutes, you can work out how much life insurance coverage you need.
00:33:03.000 You can compare personalized quotes to find your best price.
00:33:05.000 When you're ready to apply, the Policy Genius team will handle the paperwork and the scheduling for free.
00:33:09.000 They're not going to sell your information to other companies, and they're not going to add on extra fees.
00:33:12.000 Policy Genius, they are the best at what they do.
00:33:14.000 Head on over to policygenius.com slash Shapiro.
00:33:16.000 Get started right now.
00:33:18.000 Policy Genius.
00:33:18.000 When it comes to insurance, it's nice and super important to get it right.
00:33:21.000 OK, in just a second, we'll get to the media's overwrought reaction to the defeat.
00:33:25.000 of the For The People Act.
00:33:27.000 First, I have some excellent news for everyone today.
00:33:29.000 Michael Moulse's new book with words!
00:33:31.000 It's called Speechless, Controlling Words, Controlling Minds.
00:33:33.000 It's finally available everywhere you buy books.
00:33:35.000 If you haven't already picked it up, you should.
00:33:37.000 Speechless masterfully covers the topic of political correctness and thoroughly examines it through the lens of history.
00:33:43.000 It really is a good book.
00:33:44.000 So, if you don't understand the dangers and relevance of PC, it's about time you do.
00:33:47.000 Go pick up Speechless, Controlling Words, Controlling Minds, now available everywhere.
00:33:51.000 Also, if you haven't been to the bookstore lately, now would be the time because, again, Speechless is available everywhere now, Wednesday, June 23rd.
00:33:58.000 If you don't feel like making a trip, it's available on Amazon in hardcover and Kindle edition.
00:34:02.000 Also, another month has passed.
00:34:04.000 I'm sure you are well aware that the further left the left goes, the quicker it begins to collapse in on itself like a dying star, but it's not just going to do that naturally.
00:34:10.000 We have to push it.
00:34:11.000 That is why conservatives must get together, join together.
00:34:14.000 So tomorrow night, join me, Jeremy Boring-Michael Knowles, and Andrew Klaben for another cigar-packed session of Backstage.
00:34:20.000 I'm sure they will all be smoking cigars and I will be suffering in their presence.
00:34:23.000 It streams tomorrow, Thursday, June 24th at 7 o'clock p.m.
00:34:26.000 Eastern, 6 p.m.
00:34:27.000 Central on dailywire.com.
00:34:29.000 And on our YouTube channel, Daily Wire, you're listening to the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:34:34.000 All righty, so the media response to the defeat of the For the People Act is, of course, predictably overwrought and insane.
00:34:46.000 So Joe Biden put out a statement.
00:34:47.000 Notice he didn't actually come out and say anything, but he will.
00:34:50.000 He just calls everything Jim Crow.
00:34:52.000 No, that's a lie.
00:34:54.000 Okay, just let's put it where it belongs in the lie category.
00:34:57.000 Now, very often people say things and it's out of ignorance.
00:35:00.000 Joe Biden is not ignorant that defeating the Florida People Act is not Jim Crow.
00:35:05.000 Everyone knows it's not Jim Crow because you know what Jim Crow was?
00:35:07.000 An actual specific regimen of law by which black people were discriminated against in law in the South by the state.
00:35:15.000 Is there anything remotely like that in defeating the For the People Act?
00:35:18.000 All of that crap has been illegal since the mid-60s.
00:35:21.000 It is now, and I checked my calendar today just to make sure, 2021.
00:35:25.000 We are three generations removed from a time when it was legal in the United States to discriminate in law.
00:35:31.000 A fully 60 years since this has happened, or almost 60 years, 57 years since the Civil Rights Act.
00:35:37.000 And the notion here is that this is a restoration of what was going on in 1962 in Alabama to defeat the fourth of the people.
00:35:46.000 This isn't even we are repealing a bunch of laws that protect black people.
00:35:50.000 This is we are failing to pass a law that completely transforms the nature of how voting is done in the United States and sucks it up to the federal level.
00:35:58.000 So Joe Biden put out this statement.
00:35:58.000 He said, in supporting the For the People Act and defending the rights of voters, Democrats stood united for democracy.
00:36:03.000 They stood against the ongoing assault of voter suppression that represents a Jim Crow era in the 21st century.
00:36:08.000 OK, let me put it this way for you in the media.
00:36:11.000 When you say that Donald Trump lied when he said that the election was stolen, fine.
00:36:16.000 When you say that voter suppression is an ongoing threat in the United States, you are lying.
00:36:19.000 It is untrue.
00:36:20.000 There is no evidence of widespread voter suppression in the United States, period.
00:36:24.000 End of story.
00:36:25.000 You cannot demonstrate any evidence of systematic voter suppression in the United States at all.
00:36:30.000 The notion that showing a voter ID is voter suppression is nonsense.
00:36:33.000 The notion that if you get rid of drop boxes that have never existed in American elections before, up until an actual active pandemic, And then you get rid of those drop boxes because you don't have a way of supervising them properly.
00:36:43.000 That this is Jim Crow, voter suppression.
00:36:45.000 You're a damned liar.
00:36:47.000 OK, but they just keep trotting this crap out.
00:36:48.000 It's not true.
00:36:50.000 There is, if you are, the pervasive myth that voter suppression is an ongoing threat in the United States is significantly more held by Americans because of the media than the notion that Donald Trump legitimately won the election.
00:37:03.000 But I see that you only care about one untruth about the election.
00:37:06.000 The other untruth, you just keep promulgating over and over because it pushes your political regime.
00:37:12.000 Says Joe Biden, unfortunately, a democratic stance protect our democracy met a solid Republican wall of opposition.
00:37:18.000 Senate Republicans even opposed a debate, even considering legislation to protect the right to vote and our democracy.
00:37:23.000 Well, no, they said that they were going to filibuster the bill, which is something that you guys do regularly.
00:37:30.000 I'm old enough to remember last year when you filibustered Tim Scott's police reform bill.
00:37:35.000 It was the suppression of a bill to end voter suppression, another attack on voting rights that is sadly not unprecedented.
00:37:40.000 The creed we shall overcome is a longtime mainstay of the civil rights movement, says Joe Biden.
00:37:46.000 I'm sorry, Joe Biden singing from the hymnal of We Shall Overcome is like a little nauseating.
00:37:51.000 And I love that Kamala Harris goes right along with it.
00:37:52.000 Five seconds ago, she was calling him a vicious racist who was trying to keep her out of school.
00:37:56.000 Little girls like her out of desegregated schools.
00:37:59.000 By coming together, says Joe Biden, Democrats took the next step forward in this continuous struggle and a step forward to honor all those who came before us.
00:38:05.000 People of all races and ages who sacrificed and died to protect the sacred way.
00:38:09.000 OK, so just to be straight about this, No one sacrificed and died so that the election procedures of the United States would be federalized, ballot harvesting legalized, and public funding of elections made law.
00:38:09.000 Right.
00:38:20.000 No one in America has sacrificed and died for that particular procedure.
00:38:24.000 No one.
00:38:25.000 Amazing how the conventional wisdom shifted so fast on the left from America's democracy will survive and thrive under Barack Obama to, if we don't pass this bill right now, American democracy is dead and we're finished.
00:38:36.000 Amazing.
00:38:38.000 But says Joe Biden, the fight is far from over.
00:38:40.000 Nope, it's over.
00:38:40.000 Here is VP Harris declaring that the fight is not over.
00:38:43.000 It's over.
00:38:43.000 Spoiler alert.
00:38:45.000 This is about the American people's right to vote unfettered.
00:38:50.000 It is about their access to the right to vote in a meaningful way, because nobody is debating, I don't believe, whether all Americans have the right to vote.
00:38:59.000 The issue here is, is there actual access?
00:39:03.000 The fight is over.
00:39:05.000 And are you serious?
00:39:05.000 impeded.
00:39:06.000 And the bottom line is that the president and I are very clear.
00:39:11.000 We support S1.
00:39:12.000 We support the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
00:39:15.000 And the fight is not over.
00:39:16.000 The fight is over.
00:39:17.000 And are you serious?
00:39:19.000 The ticket that she is on won 80 million votes in the last election cycle.
00:39:26.000 80 million votes.
00:39:28.000 And she's talking about voter suppression?
00:39:29.000 You want to talk about election lies that undermine election credibility and confidence?
00:39:33.000 This would be it!
00:39:34.000 Because guess what?
00:39:34.000 Next time Democrats lose a presidential election, you know what they're going to claim?
00:39:38.000 Voter suppression!
00:39:38.000 They were planning to do it if Trump had won last time!
00:39:41.000 Make no mistake, Democrats were openly preparing the narrative that if Trump won last time, it was because of voter suppression.
00:39:47.000 Remember the whole crap about how Louis DeJoy over at the post office was secretly removing and burning post boxes?
00:39:52.000 Remember this?
00:39:53.000 They were pushing this crap months in advance of the election.
00:39:55.000 Then it turned out, as the polls shifted, heavily in Biden's favor, it went to, well, you know, probably the big threat is that Joe Biden, that Donald Trump won't accept the outcome of the election.
00:40:06.000 This is going to be the cleanest election ever run.
00:40:07.000 It's amazing how fast they shifted from this election is probably going to be dirty to this election is the cleanest election ever run, completely dependent on the polls.
00:40:14.000 So, the whole goal here, of course, is to not push forward good legislation.
00:40:19.000 The point is to polarize the American electorate along the lines of race.
00:40:22.000 And MSNBC helped out.
00:40:23.000 Here is Mara Gay on MSNBC.
00:40:25.000 She, of course, writes for the Washington Post.
00:40:27.000 And she said, this is the darkest hours of American history coming to life.
00:40:32.000 The darkest hours of all the hours.
00:40:34.000 Sorry, she works for the New York Times.
00:40:35.000 The darkest hours Now, I don't know.
00:40:39.000 I feel like there have been some pretty dark hours in American history.
00:40:41.000 I mean, in fact, I seem to recall that we were honoring one a couple of weeks ago with like, you know, there was Juneteenth because slavery was kind of a bad hour in American history.
00:40:52.000 Also, there was like the Tulsa race massacre where the president went to Tulsa and talked about it.
00:40:55.000 And that was a pretty dark hour in American history.
00:40:58.000 Seems like You know, the darkest days of World War One, World War Two, pretty bad hours.
00:41:02.000 Seems like we just went through a kind of rough one with the pandemic.
00:41:04.000 That was pretty bad.
00:41:05.000 We had the Great Depression.
00:41:06.000 We had a vast spate of terrorist attacks in the 1960s and 70s.
00:41:11.000 We had, you know, 9-11 was a pretty dark, like in the pantheon of dark hours in American history.
00:41:16.000 Failure to pass.
00:41:18.000 I think this is historic for actually a much darker reason today.
00:41:20.000 state does not compute.
00:41:22.000 OK, this is not on the list.
00:41:23.000 Here's Mara Gay again in New York Times editorial board member.
00:41:26.000 They just work for the Democratic Party. Here's Mara Gay just being an idiot.
00:41:30.000 I think this is historic for actually a much darker reason today, and that's that we have not seen access to the ballot debated in this way and turned into this partisan issue since, in fact, the 1960s and 1970s.
00:41:45.000 So if you're an American who grew up with parents who lived through Jim Crow, as I did, this is your history books, some of the darkest hours of your history books coming to life.
00:41:58.000 What in the- And reminding us that progress is not inevitable.
00:42:03.000 Mara Gay is on the editorial board of the New York Times and she is a black woman speaking on MSNBC about how this is a return to the dark ages?
00:42:11.000 And she's comparing the plight of black Americans today to black Americans in 1960?
00:42:16.000 These people are delusional!
00:42:18.000 They're out of their damn minds!
00:42:19.000 That wasn't all on MSNBC.
00:42:21.000 I love Ari Melbridge sitting there nodding as though this makes any sort of sense.
00:42:24.000 I guess when your head is so far up your ass that it's coming out your head again, it makes it very difficult to do anything other than nod.
00:42:29.000 Here is another MSNBC guest explaining, the same show, that this is actually a form of apartheid.
00:42:35.000 This is not a democracy.
00:42:37.000 This is a minority that is controlling this.
00:42:41.000 And, you know, at the risk of making a controversial metaphor, I mean, we know what minority rule is.
00:42:50.000 And there's a term for minority rule, and that's called apartheid.
00:42:53.000 We fought against that as well.
00:42:55.000 This is history made tonight, Ari, on your show.
00:43:00.000 A minority of Americans representing a minority of Americans Can I just point something out real fast?
00:43:11.000 If we're going to go along pure majoritarian lines and we're going to break Americans up by race, that is a very, very dangerous thing.
00:43:17.000 That is a very dangerous thing.
00:43:18.000 And you know who should know that?
00:43:19.000 A lot of black Americans.
00:43:21.000 Seriously.
00:43:21.000 Because the history of America is replete with majoritarianism in states directed by white people against black people.
00:43:28.000 The amazing switch in time to majoritarianism.
00:43:30.000 Pure majoritarianism is a great idea.
00:43:33.000 It was never a great idea.
00:43:34.000 Protection of individual rights is a good idea.
00:43:36.000 Pure majoritarianism is a garbage idea.
00:43:38.000 It has always been a garbage idea.
00:43:40.000 That is why we have checks and balances in the Constitution of the United States.
00:43:43.000 It's why we're a republic, not a pure democracy.
00:43:46.000 It's so frustrating.
00:43:47.000 But again, don't expect members of the media to know things.
00:43:49.000 That's silly.
00:43:50.000 Here's PBS's Yamiche Alcindor explaining that the Voting Rights Bill, which is not a voting rights bill.
00:43:56.000 It is a voting It is a voting fraud bill, effectively.
00:44:00.000 The voting rights bill is about the founders and what the founders wanted America to be.
00:44:04.000 You know, here's the amazing thing, Yamiche.
00:44:06.000 If I want to know what the founders think about a thing, I could do this thing like I could actually read the documents they wrote.
00:44:11.000 They wrote many of them.
00:44:12.000 I could read, like, the Federalist Papers.
00:44:14.000 I could read the actual Constitution.
00:44:15.000 The Constitution of the United States, by the way, is actually real short.
00:44:18.000 It's like 5,000 words.
00:44:19.000 Okay?
00:44:19.000 It would take you not even an hour to read the Constitution of the United States.
00:44:22.000 And then you actually know what the founders thought about things like voting procedures, because it's in the Constitution.
00:44:27.000 But here's Yamiche Alcindor explaining that unless the federal government completely takes over voting procedure, provides public funding to candidates, taxpayer funding to candidates, Promotes ballot harvesting, gets rid of voter ID.
00:44:37.000 The founders would have been so upset about it.
00:44:39.000 By the way, I do love the switch also from the left.
00:44:42.000 From, the founders were a bunch of rich, white, slave-holding racists who must be ignored about everything to, I can't believe that they're not upholding the legacy of the founders who definitely wanted pure majoritarianism.
00:44:53.000 What in the world?
00:44:55.000 I'm sorry, the stupidity here and the outrageous race baiting here on display is truly astonishing.
00:45:03.000 In talking to activists and talking to White House officials, this is going to be a debate about what whether or not we want America to be the place that the founders flaunt as they may have been.
00:45:12.000 The founders wanted it to be, which is a place where people could vote and people could have access to who were the elected officials.
00:45:20.000 Oh, is that that's what the founders wanted?
00:45:22.000 And we know that because it's not true.
00:45:26.000 I'm sorry, it's so ridiculous.
00:45:30.000 But here's the thing.
00:45:31.000 So much of what we've covered in today's particular episode is about the effect of the media on how we think.
00:45:38.000 How the Washington Post covers race, how the New York Times covers race, how MSNBC covers all these issues.
00:45:43.000 Okay, and we all know what they are.
00:45:44.000 They're just propagandists.
00:45:45.000 But here's the thing.
00:45:45.000 They don't view themselves as propagandists.
00:45:47.000 They don't even know they're propagandists.
00:45:48.000 Perhaps my favorite clip of the last 24 hours comes courtesy of Don Lemon.
00:45:52.000 So Don Lemon was asked by Margaret Hoover of the Hoover Institute.
00:45:57.000 He was asked by her about the fact that he's a biased person, right?
00:46:01.000 And here was his answer to allegations of bias.
00:46:04.000 When I say that the President of the United States is a fraud and a con, that was looking at his taxes.
00:46:10.000 And how he and his history of litigation and not paying people.
00:46:16.000 These are all facts.
00:46:17.000 I don't do opinion.
00:46:18.000 And I know that the difference for me is I do point of view.
00:46:22.000 So I'm giving my point of view as an American, as a black man who happens to be gay.
00:46:27.000 But I'm through that lens, but I'm also I'm also I also represent CNN.
00:46:32.000 And so I must tell the truth.
00:46:34.000 OK, so understand this is the way leftists view the world.
00:46:37.000 Their view, their opinion is not opinion.
00:46:40.000 It's fact.
00:46:40.000 So they get to shut you down.
00:46:41.000 They can lie as much as they want and call it fact, because after all, it's coming from a point of view.
00:46:47.000 That sort of bubble mentality leads to the spread of untruth.
00:46:51.000 They know it.
00:46:52.000 You should know it, too, every time you see what they are saying about bills.
00:46:55.000 Make sure you actually read the underlying material, because at least 50% of the time, they are lying to you.
00:47:00.000 All righty, we'll be back here later today with an additional hour of content.
00:47:02.000 In the meantime, go check out the Michael Moll's show today.
00:47:04.000 He discusses more on the trans olympic athlete, a biological man now competing against women.
00:47:09.000 By the way, the oldest I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:47:11.000 athlete in female weightlifting history, 43.
00:47:15.000 Incredible achievement for a woman who is a man.
00:47:18.000 You can hear more details about that story over on Michael's show that is available right now.
00:47:22.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:47:23.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:47:29.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Elliot Feld, executive producer Jeremy Boren, our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our assistant director is Pavel Lydowsky.
00:47:37.000 Editing is by Adam Sajewicz.
00:47:39.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:47:41.000 Hair and Makeup is by Fabiola Christina.
00:47:43.000 Production Assistant is Jessica Kranz.
00:47:45.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:47:47.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:47:51.000 Republicans shoot down the Corrupt Politicians Act.
00:47:53.000 Great news.
00:47:54.000 A U.S.
00:47:55.000 Olympian fantasizes about burning the American flag on the Olympic podium.
00:47:59.000 And the Chief of Naval Operations defends critical race theory in the military.