The Blueprint: Canada's Conservative Podcast - January 14, 2026


Bad idea “buyback” gun grab.


Episode Stats

Length

17 minutes

Words per Minute

184.55853

Word Count

3,196

Sentence Count

258

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

The Liberal Firearms confiscation program failed miserably in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, but they're moving it nationally as well. On today's show, we bring on Bob Zimmer, MP for Prince George, Peace River and Northern Rockies, to talk about why this should not be happening.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome once again to The Blueprints. This is Canada's Conservative Podcast. I'm your
00:00:13.260 host, Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton Corps of the Lakes, with new content
00:00:16.960 for you every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time. Don't forget to like, comment, subscribe,
00:00:21.800 and share this program. Tell your friends they can download it on platforms like CastBox,
00:00:25.940 iTunes, Google Play, and Spotify. You name it, it is out there. On today's show, the Liberal Firearms
00:00:31.560 Confiscation Program fails miserably in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, but they're moving it nationally as
00:00:37.960 well. The Liberals seem to fail upwards to talk about this and so much else. We bring on Bob Zimmer. He's
00:00:44.000 the Member of Parliament for Prince George, Peace River, and Northern Rockies, also the co-chair
00:00:48.940 of the All-Party Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus. Thanks for coming on the show. Thanks for having me again,
00:00:53.860 Jamie. It's good to be here. Good to be back. Unfortunately, it's about the same topic.
00:00:57.000 Yes. We keep litigating. Sadly, it just keeps going, doesn't it? The Liberals are just after the
00:01:01.560 law-abiding, licensed firearms owners again and again. Right. But they've done everything right.
00:01:11.400 I can understand why people want the shootings happening. Yeah, absolutely. Not all in urban
00:01:17.420 centres, but across Canada. They want them to stop. I do too. We all do. Right. Yeah, absolutely.
00:01:21.640 We all do. They're going about it wrong, as the headline says.
00:01:25.140 Yeah. Well, and one statistic that's from Gary Mauser, he's a former professor at Simon Fraser
00:01:30.800 University. This is from one of his articles. Between 2000 and 2020, an average of 12 PAL holders,
00:01:37.980 that's firearms license holders, per year were accused of homicide out of approximately 2 million
00:01:43.600 PAL holders. During that same 10-year period, the PAL holder firearms homicide rate was 0.63 per
00:01:50.860 100,000 firearms license holders, compared to 0.72 per 100,000 adult Canadians. That's 14% higher
00:02:00.180 than the rate for PAL holders. So what that says is that law-abiding firearms owners, they're not just
00:02:05.800 as safe as the average Canadian. They're actually safer.
00:02:08.360 They're safer. Yeah. I think proof is also- More law-abiding.
00:02:12.200 Yes, absolutely. Especially if you have a restricted firearms license, which allows you to, I guess,
00:02:17.480 possess a handgun now, you can't buy them or trade them. Your name is run through the police data bank
00:02:23.260 every single day. It's like being on parole every single day of your life.
00:02:27.360 Absolutely. So that's what we've said, and our leader, Pierre Poliev, has done a great job of just
00:02:32.320 logically explaining that to Canadians. We're winning on that. Most Canadians, you see it from
00:02:37.700 province to province to province, where they're pushing back on this because it doesn't make sense.
00:02:41.800 They're going to spend, right now, they're at about $746 million, and some quotes as high as $6 billion,
00:02:49.420 and I think it's even potentially going to be higher.
00:02:52.180 Wow. So liberals do.
00:02:53.600 While not doing anything to really change shootings in downtown Toronto.
00:02:58.200 Yeah. That's the thing, right? What is the outcome? What is the planned result other than
00:03:03.520 just taking away everyone's fire?
00:03:05.580 Right. Except the criminals.
00:03:07.180 Absolutely. So that's the problem that we see, too, is, you know, here you're, you know,
00:03:12.360 I think every mother, like I have four children, and I know you have kids. We all want to see safer
00:03:19.300 streets for our families and their families, right? We all want to see that. But when the government is
00:03:25.120 spending so much of their efforts and using so many police resources, as we just heard in the INN
00:03:29.620 Committee many times, Jamie, is that the resources, police already are lacking the resources to tackle
00:03:36.920 crime, and they're going to be asked now to use their resources to go after law-abiding firearms
00:03:41.380 owners' firearms. It's ridiculous. It's backwards, and we wish the government would focus on what
00:03:45.880 the real problem is, and that's illegal firearms getting in the hands of criminals and killing kids
00:03:50.480 on our streets.
00:03:51.480 Yeah, exactly. Well, I find it also interesting that the crowd that doesn't seem to like the police
00:03:56.500 very much now wants them to carry out their bidding in terms of, yeah, going out to law-abiding
00:04:01.300 firearms. So let's hit the other headline here, because the program did go ahead as a pilot in
00:04:08.020 Nova Scotia. You have some numbers on this.
00:04:10.660 Yeah. So tell us about these. How many firearms did they get? What was the cost? Tell us that.
00:04:15.140 So this is right from CBC. Cape Breton Police prepared to start firearm buyback pilot project
00:04:20.300 program, and it went on to actually announce what it was going to fund this. So the federal
00:04:27.260 government, this is right from the article, the federal government is paying the Cape Breton Police
00:04:31.580 Service $103,000 to administer the pilot project. Now, that's what they're paying. We don't know what
00:04:36.860 the final number is. And what we found out was they only collected 22 firearms, and we just did the math.
00:04:43.180 Per firearm, that's $4,681 per firearm collected.
00:04:50.060 That will not make anyone any safer.
00:04:51.740 No.
00:04:52.140 Any community better off in terms of avoiding shootings or gang activity.
00:04:56.140 Right.
00:04:56.540 None of that.
00:04:57.180 And I've actually argued it makes us more unsafe, because that same police force that really should
00:05:01.100 be tackling crime is now distracted by this new program that they're being directed to perform,
00:05:08.300 and this gun confiscation by the Prime Minister Mark Carney.
00:05:11.180 Yeah.
00:05:11.580 So it actually, I think, in many ways makes us more unsafe.
00:05:14.380 Let's queue up cut one here. We have, of course, the Public Safety Minister talking about
00:05:18.780 how the program is apparently voluntary. Apparently.
00:05:21.660 Funny.
00:05:22.300 Play cut one.
00:05:23.580 During the election campaign, we committed to moving ahead with implementing an efficient
00:05:29.020 gun buyback program for assault-style firearms, such as the AR-15s. Today, we're here to talk about
00:05:36.620 our government's next steps in making good on that promise to Canadians. The assault-style firearms
00:05:43.820 compensation program provides a way for firearm owners to safely dispose of and or deactivate
00:05:51.660 their assault-style firearm and receive compensation in return. This program is voluntary. Nobody's having
00:05:59.100 their weapon confiscated.
00:06:01.500 Does anyone believe that? You're told to bring it in. If you don't, some things might happen,
00:06:06.140 but hey, it's voluntary.
00:06:07.420 Right. Well, we had the ministering committee, and we asked them that exact question, or I did.
00:06:11.660 And I asked about, you know, whether this program is voluntary. And it's only voluntary
00:06:16.540 if you stop to give the firearm back or you have to decommission it, but you have to do it. I said,
00:06:22.860 well, voluntary actually means that what if you choose not to?
00:06:25.500 Right. Exactly.
00:06:26.140 That's what really voluntary means. So we all know this isn't voluntary. It's a gun
00:06:30.780 confiscation scheme by the federal government. And just because they call it voluntary doesn't make
00:06:36.220 it voluntary.
00:06:36.860 No, exactly. And that's the key of it all, right? We're still waiting for the outcome. What
00:06:43.020 is the outcome? Safer streets? Probably not. You know, like, here's, let's cut two. We have
00:06:47.740 another cut, again, with the public safety minister going on about the voluntary program.
00:06:52.700 Blake, cut two.
00:06:53.340 For a gun backpack, sir, is there a next step for you if this government does not engage
00:06:59.660 or walks away from anybody? We will continue to work with all the provinces and territories,
00:07:05.980 as well as law enforcement, to ensure that the compensation program is implemented in an equitable
00:07:12.220 way. For any jurisdictions that are preventing the compensation program to move forward, they're
00:07:17.660 really hurting their own citizens. As you're aware, there are funds available as part of the
00:07:25.500 program for individual firearms owners who have prohibited weapons from getting compensation. So
00:07:31.660 if they're disallowing their citizens to attain that compensation, they're really hurting their own
00:07:36.460 people. So in this clip, the public safety minister was talking about the reluctance of some
00:07:40.940 provinces to jump on board this problem, this, this, the federal scheme to disarm law-abiding
00:07:46.780 firearms owners. And, and the provinces, some of them have said, no, we're not right. We got better
00:07:51.180 things to do, basically is what they said, right? To your point earlier. Yeah. So I find it interesting
00:07:56.380 use of language by the public safety minister about hurting its own citizens. Right. How?
00:08:02.620 Yeah. Well, it's quite the opposite because we heard even just at I-9 committee for the last,
00:08:07.340 I think several weeks. And we asked, uh, various police chiefs, various of first nations, uh,
00:08:13.900 communities, um, and chiefs of first nation communities. And, and without almost exception,
00:08:19.900 I think there was one chief that said otherwise was that they do not want to waste police resources
00:08:25.100 that are already very sparse. They're already not dealing with the crimes in community. Now they do
00:08:29.980 not want to use those sparse resources to go after law abiding first nations and Inuit firearms owners.
00:08:36.700 And some are saying we're not going to do it. And you've seen even the past, uh, a couple of weeks
00:08:42.140 and months where Saskatchewan has said, we're not going to do it, participate in the federal program.
00:08:46.540 Alberta has said the same. And I think Ontario has given signals to that effect as well. And, and I think
00:08:52.540 the, the bottom line of it all is because it's not going to work and that's what they see. It just isn't
00:08:57.260 going to work. So why would they spend those resources on something that isn't going to work?
00:09:00.700 Exactly. Doesn't make sense. No, it doesn't. Especially when recruitment's down for policing,
00:09:05.100 to your point earlier, they're, they're having a tough time filling the, responding to the calls
00:09:09.820 that need to be responded. They don't need to be creating more work that will solve no crime,
00:09:14.380 that will solve the, the, the, the increase in gang activity, et cetera, et cetera. So cue up cut three.
00:09:20.460 Now we have a liberal MP. She does have some provost. Yeah. That's her. Okay.
00:09:25.260 Yeah. She does have some personal trauma. Um, so she, she's not a huge fan of firearms in general.
00:09:31.820 Right. Um, so, but, but her response to this question was very interesting play cut three.
00:09:37.500 All of the people in possession of, uh, of one of the weapon that has been banned since 2020,
00:09:44.540 and will not participate in the compensation program will, will have an illegal gun in its position.
00:09:52.140 And that's a criminal act. All right. Thank you very much.
00:09:55.100 So that's what I find, find interesting. So right now we have these illegal firearms that are smuggled
00:10:00.460 across the border that are making their way into the hands of criminals and they're using them. And
00:10:06.060 there's lots of video evidence to show the shootings that are going up. And it's quite scary considering
00:10:11.820 this never used to be a massive issue. Um, so now she's saying we will buy back, confiscate
00:10:19.260 these firearms that are on the list and, and anyone that doesn't comply will then have an illegal firearm.
00:10:26.460 So like she's making more criminals, the government's making more criminals of law abiding
00:10:33.340 citizens. Are they actually going to act on that as well? Maybe they'll probably act on that and just
00:10:37.740 ignore the, the, the, the criminals that are rampaging our communities.
00:10:41.260 Well, I'll ask you a question, Jamie, what she just said there, does it sound like a voluntary
00:10:44.780 program?
00:10:45.180 Yeah, that's right. If you don't, that's true. That's actually a good point. If you don't do it,
00:10:49.340 you're a criminal.
00:10:49.900 Right. And the minister just said in the previous clips that it was, uh, it was a voluntary program.
00:10:54.780 And she, uh, said quite the opposite. And I think we all know what the government's intent is
00:11:00.380 and it really isn't a voluntary program, but they're trying. And again, uh, the pushback is, uh,
00:11:05.180 warranted by, uh, provincial governments. They're seeing that it just isn't going to work. And
00:11:09.420 again, we we've seen it firsthand from, uh, you know, from police forces across the country that
00:11:14.300 have really said, look, um, we'd rather go after the bad guys instead of the good guys. Again,
00:11:19.020 we've just said statistically that, uh, a licensed firearms holder in Canada is safer than the average
00:11:25.100 Canadian. So why would then resources be spent to take away those, uh, law abiding Canadians firearms?
00:11:31.020 It doesn't make sense. No. And I think, uh, a good point of that is, uh, your writing and my writing,
00:11:36.380 right? I would say there are a very high number of legal, responsible, licensed, trained firearms
00:11:44.700 owners. And our writings would be a, you know, a war zone. Right. If, if your true stats were untrue,
00:11:51.820 right? Like, right. And what's happening, we're actually seeing this because of the rise in crime.
00:11:57.100 It's the criminals now are, we're seeing set up shop because of other issues around
00:12:01.740 safe supply and other drug issues and, and, uh, this, uh, revolving door of, uh, you know, uh,
00:12:08.140 bail, not, uh, jail. Uh, we're seeing crime increase, but it's not from legal firearms. It's,
00:12:13.820 it's, it's all from the illegal criminal activity. That's right. Let's, let's address the real issue
00:12:18.220 is the criminal not come up with some scheme to give the illusion. They're actually doing something,
00:12:22.940 but really nothing's going to change while wasting billions in the process. Right. And
00:12:26.700 we know, uh, you know, the term that, that I created was grandpa Joe. And, uh, you know,
00:12:32.300 this is somebody that everybody has a grandpa that's hunted maybe as a firearm. They might
00:12:36.220 not have one themselves, but they don't want grandpa Joe or, or, uh, you know, you know,
00:12:41.660 grandma Jane to be affected by this particular law to take away their farms. They've been the greatest
00:12:46.860 citizens, taxpayers for many years. All they want to do is be able to go and hunt once a year and
00:12:52.380 and keep their firearms. But this government wants to take their farms away. And it's sad.
00:12:55.900 It is very sad, especially if you go two steps ahead too, right? Like there are people hunting,
00:13:00.700 groceries are insanely expensive. Like I believe, uh, this is in 2026, people will be paying $900
00:13:08.540 above and beyond what they paid last year. That's above what they pay. It's all compounded, right?
00:13:13.660 So you're talking thousands in the last few years in grocery. So if someone wants to go hunt to fill
00:13:18.380 their freezer and hopefully get them through the season or reduce the grocery bill, you're getting
00:13:22.860 that taken away from you. Absolutely. And then it goes to dependence on government.
00:13:26.620 Right. And it's even more accentuated in the north because food is so expensive in the territories.
00:13:32.060 And, uh, and, and, and people that live in the territories really rely on hunting for sustenance
00:13:37.100 and to provide food for their families. And, uh, this is exceptionally, uh, damaging for northerners.
00:13:43.100 It's absolutely. And, and of course the government loves it when you're dependent on that, right?
00:13:48.380 Instead of looking after yourself, the personal responsibility, which we all enjoyed, we all
00:13:53.340 love and conservatives like to, to promote, um, they're basically taking away another level
00:13:59.820 of that independence and say, don't worry, government will take care of you.
00:14:03.420 Well, and, and I'll speak to this is, uh, I went up to Cambridge Bay, which is in, in Nunavut.
00:14:08.060 Uh, it's on the Northwest Passage and, uh, you know, met with this group, Canadian Rangers,
00:14:13.340 Inuit, uh, uh, people, just great individuals, uh, these beautiful smiles.
00:14:18.540 And I thought, well, the first issue might be something else around national security, maybe.
00:14:22.940 And that was an issue later on. Their number one issue when we spoke was they were concerned
00:14:27.340 that the federal government was going to take away their, their law, their lawfully obtained firearms,
00:14:32.540 and namely the SKS, which is, uh, is all across the North because it's, it's fairly inexpensive
00:14:38.300 to buy. And the ammunition is, is, uh, pretty cheap to buy as well. And they use it for hunting
00:14:42.700 all the time. And so that was the first issue they came to me with concerns around it and warranted as
00:14:47.500 well, because the government really does want to come and take away their hunting firearms.
00:14:51.580 We're pretty much out of time, but as you know, the guests get the last word, maybe you can talk
00:14:55.420 about whatever you want, but maybe you can maybe highlight some of the things that we as conservatives,
00:14:59.820 not only proposed in the last election, but based on the advancements in the liberal agenda,
00:15:05.180 what we're, we're hoping to do to combat what the liberals are up to.
00:15:08.780 Sure. So I'll maybe say this, uh, we had the parliamentary budget officer just at INE committee
00:15:14.220 and I'd asked him a question around firearms, what the total cost of this confiscation plan is going
00:15:19.100 to be. And he said it hadn't been fully costed. He hadn't seen a number where it actually was a total,
00:15:24.860 but this is again from, uh, Gary Mauser. The federal government recently said the program's
00:15:32.060 administrative costs, safe storage, destruction of hundreds of thousands of firearms, et cetera,
00:15:37.020 would reach an estimated $1.8 billion. That's 1.8 billion with a B. This is Gary Mauser's,
00:15:44.540 my estimate based on the similar program in New, my estimate based on a similar program in New Zealand
00:15:50.940 in 2019 is closer to $6 billion just for collection and compensation. So this thing without any other
00:15:59.020 numbers to prove that it's going to be otherwise, uh, and you know how things in Ottawa usually are
00:16:04.460 bigger than what they say. It's not a good sign of things to come and it's not, we don't believe a
00:16:09.660 good use of taxpayer monies to go after the wrong people. Again, we want to tackle, uh, criminals
00:16:15.020 and again, that's our focus. And thankfully we have, we've got a great leader that wants to really
00:16:18.940 tackle what the real issue is. And that's, uh, criminals getting their hands on illegal guns and,
00:16:24.380 uh, you know, hurting our kids. So I appreciate the opportunity again, Jamie, appreciate your support
00:16:29.500 for the law abiding firearms community. And, uh, we'll just keep going. I really appreciate coming
00:16:34.860 on. Someday I'd love to get you here on a different topic. If the liberals would just
00:16:39.740 come to their senses, maybe we won't have to keep re-litigating this over and over again.
00:16:44.460 Well, we hope they do. Yeah, absolutely. Bob Zimmer, thanks for coming on.
00:16:47.580 Thanks for having me. Thank you for your time. Member of Parliament for
00:16:49.580 Prince George, Peace River in Northern Rockies. Also the co-chair
00:16:52.780 for the all-party Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus. Thank you for his time. Thank you for yours.
00:16:58.140 Don't forget we will have new content every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern time. If you're a firearms
00:17:03.100 owner, you know someone who is, please like, comment, subscribe, and share this program
00:17:07.740 and tell them to listen to it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, and Spotify.
00:17:12.380 It's all out there. It's even on YouTube as well. Until next week, remember low taxes,
00:17:16.780 less government, more freedom. That's the blueprint.