The Blueprint: Canada's Conservative Podcast - November 02, 2022


Bill C-11 The Liberals plan to rush the Broadcasting Act with Senator Housakos

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Trudeau’s misuse of the Emergencies Act Remembering all of the veterans

Episode Stats


Length

19 minutes

Words per minute

182.74

Word count

3,577

Sentence count

217

Harmful content

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Sen. Leo Housakos (D-Quebec) joins the show to fight against Bill C-11, which seeks to regulate what you can see on the internet and which you can't see on it.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome once again to the Blueprints. This is Canada's Conservative Podcast. I'm your
00:00:24.160 host, Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton Corps with Alex Brock with
00:00:27.460 new content for you every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time. We ask that you like,
00:00:32.600 comment, subscribe, share this program together. We can push back against that ever-moving liberal
00:00:37.960 agenda. And of course, if you can't listen or watch the program in its entirety, right this second,
00:00:42.760 download it, listen to it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, you name it,
00:00:47.820 it is out there because I know you have two friends. They will tell two friends about it.
00:00:51.200 We'll make sure Pierre Polyev is the next Prime Minister of Canada. A great show lined up for
00:00:55.460 you today. We brought on a few guests in the past. We had Rachel Thomas, we had Kevin Wong,
00:01:00.740 we were talking about censorship, specifically Bill C-11. And we're going to bring on one of the
00:01:06.620 fighters of this bill, this terrible piece of legislation that talks about regulating what
00:01:11.480 you can see, what you can watch on the internet, C-11. We have Senator Leo Houssakos from the
00:01:17.320 island of Montreal, the beautiful province of Quebec. Thank you so much for joining us,
00:01:20.880 first time on the show. Thank you for having me on, MP Schmael. Good to be with you.
00:01:24.280 That's an oversight on my part. I apologize. All right, C-11, lots of interest. And we're going
00:01:30.620 to share on our social media as well, some of the work you did on committee, you really pushed back,
00:01:35.380 you really brought to light what C-11 is all about. So for the guests joining us for the first
00:01:39.440 time today, what is C-11 and why is it so horrible? Why are people raising alarm bells about it?
00:01:45.920 In a nutshell, C-11 will determine for Canadians what they can post on their platforms,
00:01:50.480 what they can watch, what they can read. And at the end of the day, in 2022, with all these new
00:01:55.340 digital platforms and technologies that are out there, it's the way of how Canadians communicate,
00:02:00.320 particularly young Canadians like yourself, people younger than my generation.
00:02:04.320 I appreciate it.
00:02:05.540 Some of us were used to just sitting in front of that TV box to get our news and to get our
00:02:09.380 information. But today you can get it on Google, you can get it on Twitter, you can get it on YouTube.
00:02:13.660 There's so many platforms out there that have opened up the world to Canadian artists,
00:02:19.400 to Canadian broadcasters, to Canadian freelance reporters for that matter. And essentially what
00:02:24.740 this bill does, it's an attempt on the part of the Trudeau government to take the old broadcasting
00:02:29.880 system of regulation and determining what you can broadcast, where you can broadcast it,
00:02:35.480 and trying to bring these new platforms into line. And it's just incompatible. It's incompatible
00:02:40.300 to create that alignment. The reality is these new platforms have given Canadians the opportunity
00:02:46.320 to explore, expand, and export our culture around the world. They've created tremendous businesses.
00:02:52.800 There's a number of independent content producers across this country who are selling Canadian content
00:02:58.720 around the world and distributing it around the world at volumes never seen before. And on the other
00:03:03.440 side of the equation, on the left side of the equation, we have the CBC and Bell Media and all these
00:03:08.460 corporations, legacy media that we love and adore because we put in billions of dollars of taxpayers'
00:03:13.980 money directly into the CBC, into the Canadian media fund. And these are organizations that Canadians
00:03:19.880 are just watching at lesser and lesser numbers. Less eyeballs means less revenue. So C11 right now
00:03:26.720 is trying to put a square into a circle and it just doesn't work.
00:03:30.440 I think this is also the very clear divide on how conservatives view the world and some liberals
00:03:35.400 view the world, right? Conservatives like the free market, right? And abundance of choice.
00:03:40.100 Abundance equals peace. People can choose what they like, right? Because what I like as music,
00:03:44.600 what I think is good music, is totally different than what you think is good music. And it's definitely
00:03:49.620 very different than what the government think is good music, right? If the government decides what
00:03:53.920 you see and watch, you get what the government decides. It doesn't matter if you like it or not,
00:03:57.720 right? So the liberals by this bill are picking winners and losers in the marketplace instead of
00:04:03.820 realizing that the world is changing. People are getting their information from different sources
00:04:08.960 because they want a variety of ways they get information. It could be through a podcast like
00:04:15.340 this. It could be another YouTube channel. The world is open right now. And right now the government
00:04:21.920 will see this bill, this piece of legislation is closing it down. That's exactly the point. It's a
00:04:27.240 question of consumer choice. And in this country, we've seen that liberalism has brought us to the
00:04:32.720 point where they want us to have less choice. They want a narrow cast. They want you to pay more than
00:04:37.820 ever before. The truth of the matter is Canadians pay more for web connectivity than any other country in the
00:04:44.220 world. And we have in regions of the country where you can't even get good connectivity. And in terms of the
00:04:49.080 broadcasting situation right now, like I said, they essentially want to take a new platform, a new way of doing
00:04:55.620 things that has become prosperous. We've created millions of Canadian success stories that are
00:05:00.560 generating revenue for themselves, for our Canadian coffers, for that matter, even for the Canadian
00:05:05.120 media fund. And who benefits is the old legacy platforms who, like I said, are not being successful.
00:05:11.080 And it's ironic that it seems to be not enough. It's almost the liberal Trudeau way of doing things.
00:05:16.600 We're going to pick winners and losers. We're going to have the CRTC and other gatekeepers in Ottawa
00:05:21.320 to determine what platforms are appropriate, what aren't appropriate. And in this bill, let's be
00:05:27.180 clear, the whole challenge here in the debate for us is we have the chairman of the CRTC who came before
00:05:33.080 the Senate Committee on Communications and confirmed that this bill would allow him to manipulate
00:05:38.400 algorithms and to force platforms to manipulate algorithms, which in essence determines what will
00:05:44.600 be pushed up the technological ladder for you and I to watch and what will be pushed down.
00:05:50.140 That is so dangerous from a perspective of privacy, free speech, and like I said, consumer choice.
00:05:56.440 So if the CRTC determines what you get to see or determines something is wrong, that means what
00:06:04.040 tends to happen is anything that criticizes the government is then becomes hate speech or something
00:06:09.800 else. And I think that is so concerning to have a bunch of bureaucrats deciding what is available to
00:06:16.860 Canadians. And like you said earlier, like, you have entrepreneurs without government permission,
00:06:24.320 without government grants, creating content that others want to see on their own free will.
00:06:30.800 A hundred percent. At the end of the day, we have Canadians producing content. They're downloading it
00:06:36.000 on YouTube. They're putting it out there on various platforms, getting millions of hits, hits that you
00:06:41.160 would not get in our small market. Canada is a small market. We don't have an economy of scale. So we need
00:06:45.960 the world at our feet. And these platforms have provided that. Essentially, the old way of doing
00:06:50.680 things is where Mr. Trudeau wants to stay, is they want through regulation, through the CRTC, through
00:06:55.800 Heritage Canada, to determine these Canadians, they have to go through that little narrow pipeline called
00:07:02.120 the Canadian Media Fund, the Canadian, all the various organizations, gatekeepers, unions, broadcasting
00:07:09.060 corporations that will give them permission to essentially be heard and be seen. At the end of the day,
00:07:15.220 nothing good comes out of narrowing a market of choice. Nothing good. The only thing that comes of it is you get
00:07:20.700 less content, you get to pay exponentially more for it, and you muzzle the creativity of artists in this country and
00:07:27.600 singers and producers and writers. It's just a terrible bill. We have to have confidence in our
00:07:34.400 artists and Canadian culture to punch above our weight and to really be dominant around the world
00:07:39.360 and to use these platforms as we have been. The artistic community, the cultural community in Canada,
00:07:44.800 has never been more vibrant than it has in the last decade. And the number one change has been these
00:07:50.320 platforms that have exposed them to the world. So instead of embracing it and allowing it to continue to
00:07:56.480 grow and to prosper, we want to put regulations and laws in order to muzzle them and to allow
00:08:03.280 the traditional gatekeepers, these giants that were created artificially by government laws,
00:08:09.280 to run the show. I think it's wrong. I know that our party thinks it's wrong. We believe in free
00:08:13.840 enterprise. We believe in consumer choice. If you look at the internet itself, you look at the
00:08:19.120 companies that run it, you have the big ones, telecommunications, you have a few big companies,
00:08:24.560 massive companies, some small ones. We can go into the spectrum auction and all that stuff, which is
00:08:29.840 absolutely incredible how we still do it here. You look at how the liberals like it. They like a few
00:08:36.400 big players and that's it. Because I guess if you're in government, it makes sense. It's very easy to deal
00:08:42.000 with four or five big players in the marketplace, the big corporations, rather than having a whole bunch
00:08:47.440 in a free market, a whole bunch of small players, medium players, making up a whole slew of ideas
00:08:52.880 that anyone can choose from because there is so much abundance. To that point, what the liberals love
00:08:58.080 is to have the government master, right? When you have two or three large giants, those giants have the
00:09:04.880 capacity to afford lobbyists, to afford big law firms, to come to Ottawa and to wine and dine and to spread the
00:09:11.600 shrimps and the caviar around in order for them to have influence. Where what we've done on the
00:09:17.920 House side, and now we're carrying that fight over to the Senate side, we're fighting for those
00:09:21.840 independent content producers, those Canadians who have the small business owners who have become
00:09:28.080 successful using these platforms. And I'm tired of this liberal argument. We have these large
00:09:33.440 international conglomerates coming here and benefiting from the marketplace. No, they're offering a platform
00:09:39.280 where their success is incumbent on Canadian content producers and artists and Canadian singers to be
00:09:45.760 successful. So if they're not successful, these platforms aren't successful. It's a happy marriage.
00:09:52.160 Where these Canadian content producers in the current form have very minimal number of avenues to go and
00:09:59.120 present their case, minimal resources, and the vast majority of those resources are coming at the expense
00:10:04.720 of taxpayers. Taxpayers who aren't watching those legacy broadcasters. It's such a simple formula and
00:10:11.120 Canadians are catching on. And I'm glad to see in the course of our Senate hearings that individual
00:10:16.400 content producers and Canadian users of TikTok and Twitter and Google, and God knows now it's the vast
00:10:23.360 majority, it's young people. They're starting to realize that we in the Conservative Party are their voice
00:10:28.960 for freedom, for consumer choice, and we will continue to be because we cannot allow gatekeepers in this
00:10:34.800 town to determine what you watch, what you express, and pay extraordinary amounts of money for it.
00:10:41.280 Absolutely, and you're talking free marketing. You said it perfectly, right? If you're producing content
00:10:46.160 nobody watches in a free market, you either change the way you're doing business or you go out of business,
00:10:50.480 right? But if you're continually getting government subsidies, you are censoring all the other voices
00:10:56.240 trying to make a startup. You really don't have to improve your content all that much. You might
00:11:00.880 make minor tweaks here and there, but in the overall picture of things, the product is not getting
00:11:07.440 better like it would in a true free market system. And we also live in a world right now where
00:11:12.480 productions of films, for example, documentaries, they cost, in cases, hundreds of millions of dollars to
00:11:19.120 produce. And back to what I said earlier, when it comes to the economy of scale, we don't necessarily
00:11:24.800 have the resources to compete on the world level. But what's wrong with international
00:11:29.840 production companies coming to Canada and hiring Canadian writers, Canadian directors, Canadian
00:11:35.920 actors, filming in Canadian centers like Vancouver, Toronto, and some of our rural parts of Canada.
00:11:41.360 And again, we've seen an explosion in the marketplace here in Canada. We're benefiting from a weaker dollar
00:11:48.400 in this particular area. And we're producing Canadian content at massive amounts. But instead of the
00:11:53.360 government, for example, saying to these international investors, come to Canada and we're going to
00:11:58.640 actually open up the ancient CanCon rules in this country, ancient CanCon rules. So to the point,
00:12:06.000 take a hand, Handmaid's Tale written by an iconic Canadian writer, filmed in Canada, Canadian actors,
00:12:13.280 Canadian directors and producers. Yet the Trudeau government says this isn't Canadian content
00:12:18.480 because some production company who put in the money is a company out of London or a company out
00:12:23.840 of California. So imagine we're telling foreign investors who believe in Canadian culture,
00:12:28.560 in Canadian artists, don't come and invest here because we're going to make your life a miserable
00:12:32.880 existence. It's ludicrous. We have to open ourselves up to the world, embrace these platforms. It's the 0.99
00:12:39.200 Trudeau government picks and chooses when they want to embrace the world and be open. They pick and
00:12:45.040 choose. And it's funny how when it comes to messaging and controlling what we see and watch, controlling
00:12:51.440 propaganda, controlling culture, which is the most dangerous thing in society. They're all for that.
00:12:57.200 They're all in on that. And we need to push back. As long as they're doing it. As long as they're doing
00:13:01.040 and then they control the levers to get that done. And you talk about the economic scale of it. You
00:13:06.080 mentioned about the boom that could be happening. That has happened. Even in Northern Ontario, there are some
00:13:11.120 cities that were having trouble figuring out their economic future. And then the movie and
00:13:16.560 television industry came in and completely transformed some of the towns and cities up
00:13:21.680 there. It is absolutely remarkable what has been done. And that's because these companies are seeing
00:13:28.160 the environment that's correct. It allows them to do it. It's financially viable. There's a whole bunch
00:13:32.800 of other pieces to that puzzle. But at the end of the day, if we chase these people away, we chase these
00:13:37.920 producers away. That content never gets done. We don't see that economic impact that happens afterwards.
00:13:43.520 And what do you need after that? Well, another government program to fix the problem that government
00:13:48.160 created in the first place. Look, I'm a former businessman. I've been in business, so I understand
00:13:53.520 balance sheets. And in the last decade, we've seen an explosion in investment in our artistic film
00:14:00.080 industry. Never seen before. And it's been driven by Netflix, by Disney Plus, by all these streaming
00:14:06.880 platforms and corporations around the world, which the Trudeau government is trying to penalize and
00:14:12.000 try to align them with traditional legacy media in this country, which for all intents and purposes
00:14:18.160 is bankrupt. And the problem is the model. So if we can encourage through these streamers and new
00:14:23.360 platforms billions of dollars of investment, and you're absolutely right, the activity, we see it. You go
00:14:28.880 through any town and major city in Canada, you've never seen more film production on site than ever
00:14:35.680 before. Yet we want to go back to the good old days where we were forcing people to watch Canadian
00:14:41.600 content within the confines of our Canadian marketplace. So it makes no sense. We have to open the market,
00:14:49.760 deregulate the market, allow for more streaming, allow for more platform and more content producers in
00:14:57.040 this country. So we can export and continue to benefit from the reach. Let's export Canadian 1.00
00:15:01.680 content. A hundred percent, which we've been doing. Yes. And we should do more of that. And by the way,
00:15:05.440 we've seen also a spike in our tourist industry, even pre COVID and now post COVID, like never seen
00:15:11.440 before. And in large part, if you talk to people in the tourist industry, because of our presence on
00:15:16.880 these platforms, people around the world are discovering what Canada is all about, what small towns are all
00:15:22.240 about, what our Rockies are all about, what small regions of the country that otherwise weren't
00:15:26.960 covered by the, you know, Radio Canada International or CBC or Canadian Film Board, they're being, they're
00:15:34.720 exposing the beauty of Canada. And we've seen a spike, which has helped our economy, our hospitality
00:15:40.880 industry, our travel industry, and so on and so forth. Theoretically, if this bill becomes lost,
00:15:46.080 so the second reading of the Senate, we're going to third reading at some point, we're not sure when,
00:15:50.000 I'm assuming. If it does pass, how, how soon, I don't know if this question has come up, how soon
00:15:57.760 could we start to see the ramifications of this bill, noticing that content that we used to watch
00:16:03.920 or listen to isn't popping up as much as it used to? Is it going to take a few months after that?
00:16:09.120 Well, the good news is there's a few steps here. We're in committee right now with the bill in the Senate.
00:16:14.720 It's probably going to get through clause by clause in by the end of this month and get to third reading
00:16:21.040 in the Senate chamber. We hope that we can be successful in passing a number of amendments
00:16:26.640 and trying to mitigate the dangerous elements of this bill. After that, there has to be public hearings
00:16:33.280 with the CRTC in order to put in place the regulatory framework of this bill, which is very important.
00:16:40.160 So my call to citizens who are watching us is get out there and write and call and speak to your senators,
00:16:46.720 particularly those that are sitting on the Senate committee and will have a say on this on third reading.
00:16:53.600 Let them know how concerned you are. Also, when the public hearings come around in 2023,
00:16:59.280 because this bill invariably will pass, the Senate is there to make amendments, to make suggestions.
00:17:04.480 By no means do we think as an appointed body we have the right to defeat legislation, even though if there
00:17:11.040 was a piece of legislation that deserves to be defeated, it's this one. We feel that we will make
00:17:16.400 some amendments, but when it gets to the CRTC, we need to also make sure that the Canadian voices are heard.
00:17:22.240 And ultimately sometime between now and the next 18 months when there's a federal election,
00:17:27.280 make sure you go and you cast ballots for members of parliament who believe in freedom,
00:17:31.520 who believe in consumer choice. And I know, Jamie Schmael, you're one of those candidates and a
00:17:36.640 strong advocate. I've seen you at National Caucus of the Conservative Party stand up with tremendous
00:17:42.000 energy for those values and principles. And we both know that a government led by Pierre Polyeb will
00:17:47.360 never waver when it comes to freedom of speech and consumer choice. So these are the steps and that
00:17:53.760 last one is the most important. Let's have a change in government that will safeguard our traditional
00:17:58.880 freedoms and freedom of speech. I love how you said that. I usually give the guests the floor to
00:18:04.160 end the program. I don't know how you're going to beat that ending. But if you want, the floor is yours
00:18:08.640 for closing remarks. Look, thank you for inviting me and having me on. And thank you for the work you
00:18:12.880 do in the House of Commons. At the end of the day, in the Senate, we're just an additional body to help
00:18:19.120 push along the work of the House of Commons. And thank you for the work you do as a candidate in your
00:18:25.280 region of the country. You're one of our strong voices. And I'm so excited about what's around the
00:18:30.560 corner. I think Canadians are finally starting to realize that you can't have Ottawa dictate your
00:18:36.400 everyday life and choose for you what you watch, what you post, how much taxes you pay, what you can
00:18:43.120 buy, what you can't buy. We've seen in this city and in this government, they spend more, they hire more
00:18:49.840 bureaucrats and they give Canadian citizens less. Makes no sense. I think out of this economic
00:18:55.040 recovery, the last article I saw, nine out of 10 jobs recovered went to government. So it shows you
00:18:59.840 the size and scope, the depth and breadth is what is happening at the government scale. Senator Leo
00:19:05.040 Houssakos, island of Montreal, province of Quebec. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you for
00:19:09.920 your time as well. New content every single Tuesday, 1 30 p.m. Eastern time. Please remember,
00:19:15.200 like, comment, subscribe, share this program. We do appreciate your time. And until next
00:19:20.640 Tuesday, we say low taxes, less government, more freedom. That's the blueprint.