The Blueprint: Canada's Conservative Podcast - June 16, 2021


Canada’s Housing Affordability Crisis


Episode Stats

Length

19 minutes

Words per Minute

175.72725

Word Count

3,407

Sentence Count

197

Misogynist Sentences

1


Summary

Brad Viss is the Shadow Minister for Housing in the House of Commons of Canada. He is also the Member of Parliament for Mission, Matsquee, Fraser Canyon in beautiful British Columbia. In this episode, Brad talks about the housing affordability crisis in Canada and why the government needs to do more to address it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome once again to The Blueprints. This is Canada's Conservative Podcast. I'm
00:00:14.560 your host, Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton Corps, the likes Brock, and
00:00:18.520 we're here each and every Tuesday, 1.30pm Eastern Time with new content because we are
00:00:23.980 working very hard to become Canada's number one Conservative Podcast. And it's because
00:00:27.980 we have such great content. I like to say that myself. We want you and we ask you kindly
00:00:33.520 to like, comment, share, subscribe to this program. Ensure that someone in your social
00:00:39.880 media network that is open to hearing that Conservative message has the opportunity to
00:00:44.180 do so. And by doing that, we'll ensure that Aaron O'Toole is the next Prime Minister of
00:00:48.800 Canada. As always, if you can't watch it or listen to it right this second live, you can
00:00:53.600 download it later on on platforms like Google Play, Spotify, iTunes, you name it. It is
00:00:58.880 out there. Our guest today, we're back by popular demand. Brad Viss, the Member of Parliament
00:01:03.180 from Mission, Matsquee, Fraser Canyon in beautiful British Columbia, is also the Shadow Minister
00:01:07.680 for Housing. And this is a topic that is extremely top of mind for, I think, everybody these days.
00:01:12.980 Welcome, Brad.
00:01:14.420 Jamie, great to be on again.
00:01:16.140 Now, you kicked off a motion, I think it was last week, on the housing debate. Maybe you
00:01:20.300 can tell us a bit about that. Yeah, so I put forward a motion, talking about the cost of
00:01:27.900 housing, that the cost of housing continues to rise out of reach for everyday Canadians,
00:01:35.160 and that the current government has failed to provide sufficient supply of housing, despite
00:01:42.840 touting time and time again, that they're spending billions and billions and billions of dollars
00:01:48.100 to address the housing crisis in Canada, yet they have nothing to show for it. And under
00:01:54.300 their watch, affordability has gone down the chute, and young people are wondering whether
00:02:00.820 they're ever going to be able to own a home again. And that's a big problem. And that's
00:02:06.180 something we need to look closely at. And that's something that we need to put reasonable solutions
00:02:11.880 forward to keep the dream of homeownership alive. So I think there's two tracks here. There's
00:02:17.640 one that the government's doing, they're spending all this money to create housing units. So that's
00:02:23.380 kind of the not on the ownership side, that's on the more of the providing supply for those
00:02:29.260 that can't afford it or need a leg up, I guess, if you will. The other side is the affordability
00:02:34.900 side, which if you're selling, life's pretty good. If you're trying to buy, life is very tough. And
00:02:43.700 that has to do come back to the fact that we continue to print and borrow money at a high rate.
00:02:50.860 And we saw with the budget, we have billions of extra spending, all couched in COVID, right has
00:02:57.420 nothing to do with COVID. But they say we need to spend this and that infrastructure because of COVID.
00:03:02.000 And this is causing that problem that we're trying to identify and talk about today.
00:03:07.520 No, absolutely. And I've spoken about this a few times in the House of Commons.
00:03:14.040 And I'll put it out there. I'm not an economist, but you look at when the government started
00:03:19.540 printing money, and you look at the correlation with the rising cost of housing, there's something
00:03:26.720 there. And really what it comes down to, one of the big reasons why there's an affordability crisis
00:03:33.800 in Canada is that the government of Canada is spending too much money right now. And in the end,
00:03:38.700 that's hurting the people they're purporting to help. And that's a big problem. And frankly, we just
00:03:46.260 have, in some cases, the government's outdone itself, and people are hurting because of that.
00:03:52.500 And it's really, really scary for millennial parents that last year had been saving up for
00:03:59.880 five, seven, 10 years to finally get that first condo, which I might add where I live probably
00:04:05.640 costs over $500,000, or that first house, which a year ago could have been $750,000, which
00:04:12.460 is now a million bucks a year later. And they're left wondering, why did the government do this?
00:04:18.880 And why am I being left in the lurch with no pathway forward? And that's, and that's why I'd
00:04:25.400 really, really begun pushing the supply issue, for example, because no matter who I talk to across the
00:04:32.260 political spectrum, including the new president of CMHC, whom I asked directly, what's the biggest
00:04:39.400 impediment to affordability in Canada? And she said, it's supply. And I asked her again, just to make sure
00:04:43.980 that I was getting this right. What's the biggest impediment to affordability? Supply. We're not
00:04:49.640 building enough in Canada. And then at the same time, we've got a government that's printing money
00:04:54.260 and making the cost of everything go up and up and out of reach of the people they're purporting to
00:04:58.940 help. So Canada has lots of land, lots and lots of land. What is the problem? Why are we not building?
00:05:06.380 Why are we not meeting the laws of supply and demand? Yeah, well, you know what, I will say at some
00:05:12.760 level, it is, and I'm not going to bash in any way on municipalities and the provinces. But a big a big
00:05:19.420 part of the issue we we lack enough supply is that our municipal processes aren't quickly enough.
00:05:26.780 Where the federal government comes in, though, is that we fund a lot of municipal infrastructure,
00:05:31.060 we have the gas tax, we have direct transfers. We did this when when the conservatives were in power
00:05:36.040 too. But we don't see enough approvals for projects. And we see, in some cases, we have
00:05:43.300 nimvious bylaws where there's neighborhoods or communities that don't want to see more densification,
00:05:47.560 for example, or don't have the wherewithal or the ability to, to plan ahead for a major development
00:05:54.300 because they wouldn't know how to go about that process. And that's where the federal government
00:05:58.720 comes in. Because this liberal government continuously, if you speak to parliamentary
00:06:03.920 secretary Adam Vaughn, he says, the government is coordinating its major infrastructure spending
00:06:09.980 with developing new neighborhoods and getting more supply built. And I say prove it and they and they
00:06:16.260 can't, they're just they're just saying that. And the proof, though, is in the spring auditor general
00:06:21.940 reports, which outlines that the government of Canada basically can account for the Canada
00:06:27.040 infrastructure plan. They don't know where they don't know how 1000s of projects are going.
00:06:32.240 If it weren't for the pandemic, I think we'd be hearing a lot more about report nine in the in the
00:06:37.580 spring reports of the auditor general. But basically, the liberal government has a big massive F
00:06:43.320 when it comes to infrastructure spending, which does relate to building more homes and building the
00:06:50.340 neighborhoods and communities that all Canadians want to see. But it's not happening under their watch.
00:06:55.120 Yeah, I think I think also, and I wish I had it in front of me. But there was an article just out
00:07:01.840 this week, I read that in the world rankings, Canada is in the top 10, in terms of crippling
00:07:08.780 bureaucracy when it comes to actually building anything. And we can talk about a subdivision to
00:07:14.260 a major infrastructure project. It's, it's the the rules, the regulations, the red tape, which is in
00:07:20.520 according to this article in the world rankings, just crippling any development, job creation,
00:07:25.800 and progress in a lot of our parts of our country. And that should be extremely concerning.
00:07:32.520 Yeah, I think I might have read the same article. It was based on some reports from Scotiabank in the
00:07:38.260 Globe and Mail. And the president of Scotiabank said, and they outlined that of all developed countries,
00:07:43.620 Prime Minister Trudeau was at the G7 over the weekend. Of all G7 nations, Canada, Canada is the
00:07:50.640 country with the worst record of getting anything built. And as it relates to new housing, we have
00:07:55.620 the worst record as well of any G7 country, we were just really bad at getting things done in this
00:08:00.140 country right now. And the Scotiabank was calling on the federal government to address the supply crisis
00:08:06.580 to work with the private sector, to bring the federal government, municipalities and provinces
00:08:11.080 together at this critical time when homeownership is way, way out of reach for so many people
00:08:16.540 to find a solution because our social well-being, our economic well-being in this country is predicated
00:08:25.200 on the ability of someone to own a home. Like Habitat for Humanity is building a new subdivision in my
00:08:32.420 riding just up the road from my office in Mission British Columbia. And they keep telling me, Brad,
00:08:38.580 when we get people that have never owned a home, their children do better, their children
00:08:44.040 make more money. It is the biggest predictor of how well you're going to do socially and
00:08:50.180 economically in this country. And the liberals are chasing that dream away for new immigrants and
00:08:56.420 young people who just want to have what their parents had. It's not a lot. They just want a place
00:09:02.620 that they can call home and that they can raise their kids in a safe environment. And that's scary that
00:09:08.700 that's being lost.
00:09:10.560 But it's also not that. It's that and more. I think for those on the left, they are quite
00:09:16.320 comfortable with the fact that people become dependent on government. And we all know what
00:09:20.680 happens when you don't have the ability to, perhaps if you choose to get the home that you want
00:09:27.980 and transfer that wealth, whether you sell it, whether you rent it out or whatever, if you're
00:09:33.320 renting forever at the end of that term, you know, you can say you have mortgage for 30 or 35 years
00:09:39.760 at the end of it. Unfortunately, you don't have anything to show for it. You don't have any transfer.
00:09:44.640 And I think that's what the left quite likes is that if they keep people in these in these units,
00:09:51.020 make it so unaffordable for for the average Canadian to buy a house, they will become dependent on
00:09:56.740 government. And and you don't have that, as you say, the ability to kind of climb up the economic
00:10:02.760 ladder. Yeah. And you know what, and it's really, really troubling to see the federal liberals go
00:10:07.820 down that path. Because numerous times in question period last week, numerous times in committee,
00:10:14.240 I've been saying to Minister Hussain, I've been saying to the Prime Minister, what are you doing
00:10:18.720 about the supply crisis in Canada? And time and time again, they refer back to their national housing
00:10:25.480 strategy $70 billion. And I'm thinking, well, what are you doing on the economic side to get more
00:10:31.240 built? What are you doing about productivity? And their answer is, no, everyone, you can depend on
00:10:36.400 the government of Canada for a social housing unit. And that's ludicrous. And it's wrong. And it's not
00:10:42.160 even feasible. And Rami Bowers, that committee, the new CMHC president, and I'm sorry, I keep referring
00:10:49.200 to her. But she said, if without the federal government engaging the private sector, we're going to
00:10:55.780 continue to face the affordability crisis we're facing right now in Canada. But under Justin Trudeau,
00:11:02.480 the liberals refuse to engage the private sector on housing. And that is really, it's erasing the
00:11:09.560 ability of a generation to own a home, and to have that financial and social security that home
00:11:15.900 ownership provides. And it is dangerous what we're doing right now. And not to mention, as you talked
00:11:22.440 about before, the inflationary pressures that we are continuing to face, you know, the value of a
00:11:28.860 dollar isn't the same as it was a couple of years ago. And again, we go back to what the government is
00:11:34.240 doing. They are borrowing and printing money at an outstanding rate without the economic development
00:11:40.860 side behind it, causing that value of the dollar to go down, and the assets to go up. And and it is
00:11:48.740 extremely troubling, because they continue to spend on things that have nothing to do with COVID. But
00:11:55.160 they are saying it has to do with COVID. So example, Brad, you just mentioned infrastructure,
00:12:00.580 Canadian municipalities and provinces get an annual transfer of money for infrastructure,
00:12:05.640 that liberals decided to transfer more money that was printed to those provinces and municipality for
00:12:13.420 infrastructure. But that's not the problem. The problem is with these lockdowns, because the
00:12:17.580 government failed on three things, borders, vaccines and rapid tests, that we weren't able to reopen the
00:12:22.940 economy. So it's government with its boot on the neck of the economy, that's stopping this activity. It's not the
00:12:28.420 financial crisis of 2008.
00:12:29.880 No, no, no. And that's, that's a really good point. And I can, I can, when you're just saying
00:12:36.000 that I'm thinking of so many people in the tourism business in British Columbia right now, who are just
00:12:41.980 so scared about their future. The government of Canada hasn't been engaged, cruise ships are a
00:12:47.660 multi billion dollar industry where I live. And people that come on cruise ships from United States,
00:12:52.800 they travel quite extensively throughout the lower mainland and all of these entrepreneurs that have
00:12:58.360 invested their, their lives into their businesses are questioning whether they're even going to be
00:13:03.000 able to move forward after the pandemic, because the government's been slow, so slow to respond to the
00:13:10.280 very, very unique challenges they're facing. I'll also point out like on the inflationary effect,
00:13:16.040 like I got a lot of people in my riding who worked in, in the, in the trades, who are part of the
00:13:22.220 steelworkers or the Christian Labour Association in Canada, these people make good six figure incomes,
00:13:27.440 and they're telling me with the cost of gas at 145, a head of cauliflower at five bucks after
00:13:33.600 childcare and their mortgage, they got nothing left at the end of the month. And these, these are the
00:13:37.280 people that we, we need to be spent, that need to spend money to keep our economy going. But because
00:13:42.600 of the inflationary effect of this government, of the, of this government's policies, their, their,
00:13:47.540 their life is becoming less and less affordable. And there's long-term and ripple, there's long-term
00:13:52.640 consequences. And there's a ripple effect when, when people have to spend more of their money on
00:13:57.760 certain things and not on others that prop up the economy. So we often hear the Liberals talk about
00:14:02.760 their first time home buyers program. And, and for those that don't know what it is, it is, it's a bit
00:14:08.680 of a disaster because the government's in terms of helping you out with your down payment owns a chunk
00:14:14.980 of your property. And that depending on the value, which in this case, it goes up, the government then
00:14:21.540 owns a bigger piece of your home. So when you sell it, you actually will owe them in many cases,
00:14:27.460 probably a lot more than what you borrowed. Brad, maybe you could tell us a bit about that
00:14:31.900 colossal failure. Yeah. You know what? I'm, I'm baffled by, by this program. You know, some,
00:14:37.820 some private sector companies are starting to look at shared equity mortgages, which help people get
00:14:41.940 into the market. I understand the value of that, but the way the government of Canada program works,
00:14:46.800 it's just ludicrous. First off, you have to qualify. And that's what the stress test and
00:14:51.920 everything else, you got to qualify for a mortgage. And if you do qualify, so the bank and the bank and
00:14:57.820 CMHC have already indicated, according to all the rules and regulations we have, that you can afford
00:15:02.400 this property. Then you can choose whether or not you want to partner with the government of Canada
00:15:06.380 Canada for up to 10% equity share in your home. But the liberals ran on this policy and they,
00:15:14.320 they, I think they first announced it in budget 2019. And they said that it was going to help
00:15:20.040 200,000 people or so in its first two or three years. We're in year three now, and the programs
00:15:26.700 help 10,600 people, according to the most recent report. So whatever the government says they're doing
00:15:34.960 to help first-time buyers, it's not working because people hate the program. Mortgage brokers
00:15:39.880 hate the program. Real estate agents hate the program because people don't want the government
00:15:44.120 of Canada to have a stake in one's primary asset and that's your home. So I think the government's
00:15:50.260 completely missed the mark on this. Canadians have responded and said, hey, it's not working.
00:15:55.840 And I think we need to look at other ways of maybe reducing mortgage costs, extending terms
00:16:04.040 and amortizations to help first-time home buyers. And I should say it wasn't 200,000, it was 100,000.
00:16:10.760 So they've helped like just over 10% of the people they purported to help.
00:16:14.440 Okay. So I think some of our solutions here. Sorry, that was a mouthful.
00:16:19.020 That's okay. We are running out of time. So I think some of the solutions here,
00:16:23.740 stop printing money, stop spending it on programs that have nothing to do with COVID relief. Again,
00:16:28.720 we saw very little in terms of healthcare and long-term care increased spending. A lot of things
00:16:34.640 like the daycare program, the infrastructure above and beyond what was already budgeted,
00:16:39.060 nothing to do with COVID, but they're just spending and spending on pet projects that they feel
00:16:43.820 are necessary. Start building. Let's reopen the economy as quickly and as safely as possible.
00:16:52.620 That means vaccines, first and second shot. We're doing quite well as a country in first shot. Second
00:16:58.700 shot, we dropped down considerably. And so we need those things to all come into play to get people
00:17:05.080 back to work and our economy back on track. Is there anything else you want to add, Brad? I always
00:17:09.500 give the guests the last word. Yeah, no, first off, thanks for having me, Jamie. And you're right.
00:17:13.360 We need a data-driven plan to reopen our economy. What people want is their livelihood. They want
00:17:20.420 their purpose found through gainful employment. And the government's not giving us a jobs plan.
00:17:26.460 And then just going back to housing for a second, the government needs to work with the private sector
00:17:31.180 to get housing built. It's not a fast solution, but it's the best solution to address some of the
00:17:38.600 affordability crisis that we're facing. And I'm happy to be on your show again and look forward to
00:17:44.740 coming on again soon. And yeah, we got a serious problem related to housing. And as a young dad,
00:17:51.300 as a millennial, I know what people are facing right now in this country listening. I know that young
00:17:57.260 families have done everything right. They followed all the rules and the system's failing them.
00:18:03.140 Because the system's failing them, I get that. And I'm working night and day to bring forward
00:18:10.500 policies. And Erin O'Toole's working night and day to bring forward policies that are going to give
00:18:15.280 you the dream of home ownership again, that are going to give you that foundation of success
00:18:21.000 to go forward in life. And that's our big priority right now. And we got to defeat this Trudeau
00:18:28.560 government. They're destroying our economy. And people are at a loss and we got to keep fighting,
00:18:34.240 Jamie.
00:18:35.620 I couldn't have said it better myself. Well done. Brad Viss, the Member of Parliament for
00:18:39.040 Mission, Matsquee, Fraser Canyon and beautiful British Columbia. Also the Shadow Minister for
00:18:44.600 Housing. We appreciate him coming on the show once again. We do appreciate you for joining us.
00:18:49.900 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time. Every single Tuesday, we will have new content right through the summer
00:18:54.820 because if you are here, we are here. And we will give you that content. And we ask that you like,
00:19:01.140 comment, subscribe, share this program. Help us push back against that ever-moving liberal agenda.
00:19:06.780 Again, if you can't watch this whole thing right now, download it later on or even tell your friends
00:19:10.820 about it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, you name it. It is out there.
00:19:16.340 We will see you again next week. As always, low taxes, less government, more freedom. That is
00:19:22.440 the Blueprints.