00:00:00.000Hello and welcome once again to The Blueprints. This is Canada's Conservative Podcast. I'm your
00:00:07.620host, Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton. Co-author likes Brock with new
00:00:10.960content for you every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time. We ask that you like, comment,
00:00:15.840subscribe, share this program. We know there's someone in your social media network that would
00:00:20.400be open to hearing this message. And of course, if they can't listen or watch this broadcast in
00:00:25.620its entirety right this very second, you can have them downloaded on platforms like CastBox,
00:00:29.580iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, you name it, it is out there. Another great show lined up for you
00:00:34.780today. We are going to talk about Bill C-11, internet censorship. Very important topic.
00:00:40.520We're going to bring on a good friend of the show, Rachel Thomas, Member of Parliament for Lethbridge,
00:00:44.260also the Heritage Critic, to talk about it. Thanks very much. Thanks, Jamie. It's good to be here.
00:00:47.920All right. We have the bill going to the Senate. It had a bunch of amendments made. It's now coming
00:00:51.980back to the House of Commons, not to bore people with too much procedural wrangling, but it has to
00:00:57.440come back to the House of Commons. So maybe I'll just turn it over to you, give us a brief update,
00:01:01.260then we can get into the other stuff. Sure. Super briefly here. It was sent over to the Senate.
00:01:05.400They looked at it at committee. And then, of course, they looked at it in their chamber in the form of
00:01:09.120debate. And so it underwent some change. It took on 26 amendments and the removal of Clause 7.
00:01:15.860You know, I guess I would summarize it this way. I would say C-11 overall is a terrible bill.
00:01:22.220We need to kill it. I think I agree with that. Yeah. I think most Canadians who are paying attention
00:01:26.500to this understand that there is something very dangerous about this bill and the hindrance it
00:01:32.880will be to their free speech and their opportunity to choose what they consume online. Nevertheless,
00:01:38.780those amendments do make a bad bill slightly better. I'll acknowledge that. But still a terrible
00:01:45.340bill. Still a bill that needs to be killed. So it's exited the Senate now and it's been sent over
00:01:50.100to the House of Commons. The government now has to sift through those amendments that have been made
00:01:53.960and determine which amendments it will accept and which amendments it will reject.
00:01:58.020There was an article in the National Post about a week or so ago, if going by memory,
00:02:02.860the government still hadn't decided whether or not it's going to accept any amendments.
00:02:07.360Exactly. I think the heritage minister said they're looking, but it doesn't look good.
00:02:12.400Any indication you're getting from your sources? Yeah, exactly. So, you know, Minister Rodriguez,
00:02:17.520the heritage minister who of course oversees this bill and the entire file, you know, he has indicated
00:02:22.700that if there are any amendments that bring about substantial change to the bill, he will be rejecting
00:02:27.180those. That is one thing that he has said. And so that being the case, we certainly expect the
00:02:32.860government to reject at least some of the amendments, but the government could also reject
00:02:36.840all amendments. They could say that they simply want the bill returned to its original state
00:02:41.640before it got sent to the Senate. If that were the case, then of course, you know, we'd be entering
00:02:46.480into debate around that in the House of Commons. And that's where we as the Conservative Party have an
00:02:51.260opportunity to speak to this bill and to make our points with regards to the concerns we have.
00:02:56.380We still believe that the government should be nowhere near the internet. They should not be
00:03:00.260deciding what you can and cannot see, what you can and cannot listen to. And this is the fundamental
00:03:07.340principle of freedom of speech. It doesn't matter if you agree with the person saying it, it's the
00:03:13.920person's ability to say it. And I think that is very important, not to mention all the new content
00:03:20.780creators that have been up and comers, out of nowhere. They didn't need to go through the traditional
00:03:25.920methods going through the CBC or other places to get their start. They actually created something
00:03:31.520out of their own free will, out of their own abilities, and are actually making a living because
00:03:37.540of it. Yeah, I think you're hitting the nail on the head. Look, you know, things that are illegal
00:03:43.260in this reality, if they are illegal according to the criminal code, they should then be illegal online.
00:03:50.920Absolutely, 100%. I think all Canadians would agree. I would think so. This bill isn't, it isn't touching that.
00:03:58.680It has nothing to do with those gross, disgusting things that would take place online. This bill
00:04:04.860simply has to do with what can be posted online in a legal form and what cannot, based on government
00:04:12.780dictation. In other words, the government has determined that there is going to be this definition
00:04:18.440of Canadian-ness. And it is, and all content, as it stands right now, will be assessed as to whether
00:04:25.020or not it's Canadian enough to appear on page one toward the top of your screen. Or if it's not so
00:04:31.140Canadian, then it needs to be bumped down maybe to page 453, where it'll be boosted into oblivion and no
00:04:36.640one will ever see it. Ultimately, it will be the government determining that through its regulatory arm,
00:04:42.360the CRTC. Minister Rodriguez has already been really clear that he does have the ability to tell the
00:04:48.940CRTC the way that it should regulate. And he has already stated that he has intended or has the intention to do so.
00:04:58.840Canadians should be alarmed by that. Absolutely. They should absolutely be alarmed by that. That means that the material that they are able to post online
00:05:05.620could be taken down or put aside, where it can't be discovered, based on what this current liberal government wants.
00:05:14.420It also means that the content that I might want to view, you might want to view, Canadians will want to view, may or may not be accessible to them,
00:05:21.940depending on whether or not the government wants them to be able to see it. So, from a viewership level, it has huge ramifications.
00:05:28.340But also, we're hearing from digital-first creators, those that are, you know, the YouTubers of the world, the TikTokers of the world,
00:05:35.060those individuals who have, you know, gone above and beyond to make a go of it for themselves within the virtual sphere.
00:05:43.860And they are knocking it out of the park. They are so incredibly successful here in Canada in reaching a global audience.
00:05:50.740What this bill will do is it'll actually prevent them from being able to go outside of our gates.
00:05:56.180It'll actually hem them in or wall them in. And so it'll actually, it'll hinder their ability to reach a global audience
00:06:04.260and therefore thwart their success as digital-first-graders.
00:06:07.460Well, that is the thing that puzzles me and really frustrates me is that Canadian content, when it's good,