ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Blueprint: Canada's Conservative Podcast
- May 31, 2022
Parliamentary report on spending
Episode Stats
Length
18 minutes
Words per Minute
178.67409
Word Count
3,315
Sentence Count
203
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
5
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Hello and welcome once again to The Blueprints. This is Canada's Conservative Podcast. I'm your
00:00:15.760
host, Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton Corps with Alex Brock with new content
00:00:19.740
for you every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time. A great show lined up for you. It's something
00:00:25.020
you're probably not hearing about in the mainstream media, so we ask that you like,
00:00:28.520
comment, subscribe, share this program. Together we can push back against the ever-moving liberal
00:00:33.020
agenda and of course if you can't watch the entire episode right now and you want to listen to it
00:00:36.660
later on, download it. On platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, you name it, it is
00:00:42.320
out there. That's what we do. So as I mentioned, a great show lined up for you today. We're going to
00:00:46.900
talk about some Indigenous issues and of course the Parliamentary Budget Officer came out recently
00:00:50.980
with a pretty scathing report saying that the government is spending more than ever but
00:00:55.140
their results just aren't keeping track with that spending. So to talk about that, we have
00:00:59.880
Gary Vidal. He's the Member of Parliament for Disnethe, Mrs. Nippy, Churchill River and beautiful
00:01:05.240
province of Saskatchewan. Did I get that right? Pretty close, Jamie. Pretty close. Okay. He's also the
00:01:09.560
critic for Crowded Indigenous Relations and right beside him is Martin Shields from Bow River in Alberta,
00:01:15.800
beautiful part of the country. He is the Deputy Critic for Indigenous Services. Welcome, gentlemen.
00:01:21.180
Thank you. Thanks, Jamie. All right. Gary, you're the accountant and I promise we'll keep it light.
00:01:26.720
He is an accountant, folks. Do forgive him. Now, the Parliamentary Budget Officer does talk about
00:01:32.080
the government and of course they separated the Indigenous departments from Northern Affairs
00:01:37.620
into two separate ones, Crown Indigenous Relations and Indigenous Services. But the Parliamentary Budget
00:01:42.580
Officer took a peek at the books and came back with some pretty interesting results.
00:01:47.300
Yeah, they did. Jamie, we requested this report in a motion at the INAN Committee because it seemed over
00:01:54.820
the last two and a half years, every time we asked one of the ministers a question about a challenge on
00:01:59.280
Indigenous issues, the answer we always got, well, look how much money we spent. And so we always came back
00:02:03.960
with, okay, but what outcomes did we improve by spending this money? And so we asked the Parliamentary Budget
00:02:09.560
Officer to do this study and do this report and they very willingly did that for us. And then came back with the
00:02:15.180
conclusion that we kind of suspected that with very significant increases in spending, we were not
00:02:23.120
getting the commensurate increases in outcomes or in what they call department results indicators
00:02:27.960
or performance indicators. So I believe it was a pretty scathing report that we spend more and we get
00:02:34.660
less. And that's not what we want to do for Indigenous people in our country. We want to improve the outcomes.
00:02:39.880
So Martin, have you seen an increased movement of the goalposts, so to speak? The departments start to
00:02:46.500
fail on an issue or the ministers start to fail on an issue and they just push out the deadline. Say,
00:02:50.980
we'll complete it a few more years down the road and we'll get to it eventually.
00:02:54.040
And the other part of that is in this report, you will find that they make the statement that they
00:02:59.560
made their budget. But what people don't understand is they've almost thrown in $4 billion more.
00:03:05.540
So the government officials say, well, within budget, not people not realizing they've increased
00:03:12.120
the amount by almost $4 billion. But again, it comes back to Gary's point is they keep pushing
00:03:19.760
the goalposts out. They keep throwing more money in it. And what we're finding is, as we met with many
00:03:24.820
witnesses in our studies, things haven't improved in many areas. So it's great for a minister to say,
00:03:32.160
hey, we're within budget, but they threw in almost $4 billion more. And the parliamentary budget officer,
00:03:39.000
although he says they have stayed within budget in his report and they can use that, but he also
00:03:45.160
talks about the failures, the number of failures in categories for both departments. And what's
00:03:50.860
interesting is it didn't matter pre-18 when they were one department to two, where you might get the
00:03:59.240
excuse, well, we're having two departments. So we have to spend a lot more money and resources to
00:04:03.900
staff two departments versus one. He said, they weren't any better before 2018 when they had one
00:04:09.200
department. So like you say, they use different phrases to cover up what is you're saying, moving
00:04:15.620
the goalposts, not getting the results they should be.
00:04:19.080
So basically what it's doing is keeping the Ottawa's knows best approach when it comes to Indigenous
00:04:23.360
communities. Very much so. If you look at, if you look at some of the specific details in the charts
00:04:29.140
and the graphs. Okay, you can get into it. I know that makes you really happy. You can. No, no. If you get into
00:04:34.320
some of the specific details, like Martin alluded to, there's very significant increase in spending.
00:04:38.940
There's also a significant increase in what they call FTEs or full-time equivalent employment in the
00:04:45.120
departments, right? And I mean, for example, in ISC from 2018 to 2020, that number went up 51 percent.
00:04:52.520
2,100 people. So that's more department officials, more bureaucrats within the department.
00:04:57.940
Exactly. Now, to be fair, the number of employees or FTEs at Crown Indigenous Relations went down
00:05:04.320
part of that. So some of that shifting between the departments in the post-2018 world. But if you
00:05:11.140
actually drill into the numbers, there's still over 800 more employees. And if you drill further into that,
00:05:16.520
I think you will find in the departmental reports and the results and those details that a significant
00:05:21.740
amount of those people are actually on what they call internal services. And so if you dig into the
00:05:27.180
details in one of the charts where they have their nice graphs, the one item that is the greatest
00:05:32.720
percentage or number above what they planned was on internal resources within ISC. And so you're right,
00:05:41.940
Ottawa knows best. We build the bureaucracy in Ottawa. That doesn't necessarily translate into
00:05:47.580
improving the outcomes or the services to people on the ground out in the communities.
00:05:52.020
So if we're not getting better results on the ground, isn't it time for a different approach,
00:05:56.740
a different view on things?
00:05:58.480
I would suggest so, because as Gary said, the money has gone into more staffing HR here in the
00:06:05.520
bureaucracy. And as we hear from many different witnesses, what they're looking for is the opportunity
00:06:11.640
to use that money at the grassroots level where they know what they need to do. And I think that's
00:06:17.500
the missing piece when you're talking about changing direction. Spending a lot of money here in Ottawa,
00:06:23.100
hiring more people, as you say, and that, and you know, they talk about the HR in those reports and
00:06:28.020
saying the outcomes haven't changed. So if the outcomes haven't changed, you've gone from one to two,
00:06:35.040
outcomes haven't changed, then you're not monitoring the right thing, monitoring how many more people
00:06:41.040
you've got and monitoring how much money you spent has nothing to do with the results at the end. And
00:06:45.620
if you don't evaluate the results, then what's the point of what they're doing?
00:06:51.260
That's a very good question. So what ideas do you have, Gary?
00:06:53.880
Well, I just want to jump in on that quickly first, Jamie. The other thing, when you look at the details
00:06:59.360
in the charts, one of the other items that I think jumps out is that even though the FTEs on
00:07:06.120
internal services was higher than what was planned, greater than what was planned,
00:07:11.880
the one line item that was significantly lower than what was planned was on a category called
00:07:16.740
self-determination. And so what we've heard from this minister over the years, and I'm talking
00:07:21.700
specifically Minister Miller because he was Indigenous Services and now Crown Indigenous
00:07:24.800
Relations, is that their ultimate goal is to not exist at the end of time, right? This is supposed to be a
00:07:30.560
journey to self-determination where the department doesn't exist. Well, if you actually measure that
00:07:36.240
against what we're talking about where internal resources are going up, but the actual under-commitment
00:07:42.400
relative to planning on self-determination, it doesn't paint the picture of putting the control
00:07:48.780
into the hands of the people at the ground level like Martin was talking about. I think that's an
00:07:52.940
additional thought on that that's significant and relevant.
00:07:56.540
Didn't Ronald Reagan say the closest thing to life on earth was a government program?
00:08:02.180
I think it was something like that. I probably misquoted him, but...
00:08:04.900
But you're absolutely right in the sense of programs because the funding is often program funding,
00:08:10.680
program funding, which means that bureaucrats have to design the program, they'll send it out,
00:08:16.640
and people try to figure out how to apply for it, then they apply for it, bureaucrats have got to
00:08:20.880
approve it, and then they got to send the money out, and by then it's years over and the program's
00:08:25.740
start, and the next cycle starts over again.
00:08:27.460
Summer winners, summer losers, and...
00:08:29.500
Yeah, and it's a cyclical process with just program funding because it's very cyclical in
00:08:34.600
the sense of designing a program, applying for it, getting the money, and you've got to start
00:08:40.160
over again before it's done anything. And so, as you would say, to eliminate if the goal is to
00:08:46.420
remove this and move it to the grassroots level, they need to make the decisions about how that money
00:08:52.340
goes rather than applying or trying to figure out which program they've designed, and how do I apply
00:08:58.160
to get it, and how do I use the money, and then it gets that problem. So, devolving it down to the
00:09:04.700
grassroots to making that decision, getting away from bureaucratic program funding.
00:09:10.980
Yes.
00:09:11.860
Can I jump again?
00:09:12.780
Absolutely.
00:09:13.480
Just to build on what Martin said, the other thing that emphasizes that point is what we saw
00:09:18.800
in the most recent budget, right, where we have some opportunities to actually advance self-determination
00:09:25.400
and advance independence, economic reconciliation through many of the organizations that we've met
00:09:31.680
with that have put some very good ideas forward. You know, the FMB and the Roadmap Project and
00:09:36.380
the FNFA and some of the work they're doing, and these are all non-partisan organizations that
00:09:44.120
were chartered under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act back in, what, 2006, I think,
00:09:48.860
in a non-partisan support at that time, and they've offered some really relevant solutions
00:09:53.940
that would lead to independence, that would lead to self-determination, and not one of those
00:09:59.280
things showed up in the last budget, and I think that's a telltale sign as well.
00:10:03.760
So, what does that look like? Where do you think that looks like? Where does the conversation
00:10:06.900
go? The independence, the self-governing?
00:10:09.280
You mentioned it, and it's critical. It's the economic reconciliation. We have sharp
00:10:15.860
indigenous people. They're business people. They know how to get things done, but they're
00:10:20.260
very frustrated with what they have to deal with, and the paperwork, the red tape. If we
00:10:26.480
can empower them with economic reconciliation, this not only works for them, but it works for
00:10:32.100
our economy in general, because they can be a powerhouse in our economy, but we hold them
00:10:38.540
back with the way it's funded, and the way we distribute the money paternalistically.
00:10:45.220
If we empower them in economic reconciliation, that is the answer, in my opinion.
00:10:51.900
So, basically backing Ottawa off and starting to have more direct funding.
00:10:56.900
Probably not as cyclical as the programs.
00:10:59.760
There is many, many indigenous leaders out there that get this concept very well, and
00:11:07.300
they want to be part of that solution. They want to be part of economic reconciliation.
00:11:11.500
They want to be given the opportunity to participate in a prosperous economy. We heard a story this
00:11:17.180
morning at the National Prayer Breakfast about a gentleman that went in and worked in his
00:11:21.780
First Nation and turned it into a very successful First Nation based on capitalizing on the opportunity
00:11:28.600
that was there for them. That story can be replicated across the country in so many places.
00:11:34.060
We just have to actually provide them the opportunity and not hold them back to advance on those
00:11:41.060
initiatives that they know very well, the initiatives they need to advance on to be successful.
00:11:46.440
And relatively speaking, a lot of communities, whether it be First Nations, Métis, Inuit, a lot
00:11:52.580
of their population is young with people that want to enter the workforce, and that's a key part
00:11:56.540
when we talk about labor shortages all over the country, no matter where you're from.
00:12:01.300
That's a group that has kind of been left out of the conversation, in my opinion.
00:12:07.200
Their age, as you would know in the sense in the studies, the average age of indigenous is
00:12:11.980
significantly lower in the population.
00:12:14.680
The other part that people don't understand, they have an entrepreneurial history in the sense
00:12:20.160
of developing, trading, their societies were based on the cultures of making things and
00:12:26.680
trading. They understand that concept, but we have kept them from doing it. We need to
00:12:32.380
release that power back because innately they want to do this. This is something that makes
00:12:37.260
sense to them. But if we keep them in this paternalistic mechanism of funding, it deteriorates
00:12:44.120
into how many people do we have indigenous in our prison system. That's wrong. We need
00:12:49.160
to unleash the economic spirit they have. They understand it. They just need the opportunities.
00:12:54.700
And when you say we, it's been 150 years of successive governments that have created this
00:12:59.120
model and just kept the same thing going with little tweaks here and there.
00:13:03.560
Right. Exactly right. Thank you for saying that.
00:13:06.620
I think a part of that journey as well, and I'll share a story from my own writing in northern
00:13:11.280
Saskatchewan is the, you know, the economic reconciliation comes with the opportunity to
00:13:17.600
make equity investments in good projects. Whether it's natural resources, I mean, oil
00:13:22.680
and gas, mining, forestry, agriculture, there's so many opportunities that we're seeing for
00:13:27.940
First Nations people or other indigenous people across the country. In my own writing, I spent
00:13:32.540
almost two years trying to find a mechanism for a local initiative to invest in a forest industry
00:13:39.440
project. And that forest industry project is going to be very successful. And the partners
00:13:45.140
on the project very much wanted to ensure that there was a more than 50% indigenous ownership.
00:13:51.860
And so they were working towards that. But we went through every hoop and jumped through every,
00:13:57.760
you know, challenge that the government put before us to try to find that equity investment
00:14:02.180
and the opportunity, which would have got paid back so quickly. And in the end, it never happened. Now,
00:14:09.640
it is going to happen, but it's going to happen through a provincial government instead of through
00:14:12.200
the federal government. So fortunately, the project is going to go ahead. Right. But the success of that
00:14:16.480
was going to be years and years and years of future dividends to invest back into the social issues
00:14:21.400
in their communities. Right. I think there was it was like 750 jobs and 12 First Nations included in
00:14:26.700
this project and millions of dollars of dividends over the years that we're going to be invested
00:14:32.960
back into these communities. Right. Well, I think that's an ongoing problem with most government
00:14:37.180
programs. And Martin alluded to it as well as you just did. It's it's, you know, getting that
00:14:42.200
square peg into the round hole, trying to figure out, OK, how do I tweak my idea, which I think is
00:14:48.320
amazing, into what the bureaucrats and the government and the politicians think is a good idea? And can I
00:14:53.260
make it work? And if you can't, then you're at a bit of a disadvantage almost. And it's interesting
00:14:58.600
because we met last week with a very successful indigenous on a nation in his business. And he
00:15:07.460
talked about his business. It's a he's got a store, but he has a huge embroidering business in the store.
00:15:12.680
I mean, the many machines that they produce stuff for lots of people. He also has a couple of white
00:15:19.240
bison there, which is attraction. But we asked him about his social media platforms. And he says,
00:15:25.960
I don't use them. He says, I use the moccasin telegraph. He says, people beat the path to my
00:15:33.020
doorway. I don't need social media. And it was really interesting how successful he's been using
00:15:40.680
the traditional methods of communication. And people find him. They find the store on this
00:15:46.820
indigenous nation in my writing. And he is very successful. And he understands entrepreneurial.
00:15:53.280
But it's interesting that he doesn't use social media. He uses indigenous communication of what
00:15:58.760
moccasin telegraph. And that's how he described it. And he says, people are beating the pathways to
00:16:04.140
his door. Well, I always give the guests the last word. We are pretty much out of time. So if Gary,
00:16:10.660
you want to kick it off, whatever you want, the floor is yours.
00:16:13.880
You know, I would probably just add a little pitch for some of the stuff we had in our platform in
00:16:19.440
the last election. A couple of examples of things. We had a significant component in there about
00:16:24.820
economic development on a regional basis and investing in capacity and regionalizing some of
00:16:30.660
the opportunity to promote economic development in communities, in regions. And then the second thing
00:16:37.320
that was very significant in my mind was the Canadian Indigenous Opportunities Corp that we
00:16:42.660
proposed, which was going to be a loan or a guaranteed loan kind of mechanism that would allow
00:16:51.800
these entrepreneurs to make equity investments in successful businesses. And I think that is a huge
00:16:57.400
part of what we have to do if we're going to be successful going forward and gain that
00:17:01.900
independence, the economic reconciliation, ultimately self-determination.
00:17:06.500
And it almost reduces the barriers between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, right? We
00:17:11.840
meld some of that. Martin.
00:17:14.640
No, I thank you for the opportunity. Gary, you understand it well. A lot of the information, you can go
00:17:21.920
through the numbers, but it comes down to we have a strong population in our country that needs to be
00:17:28.780
the people making decisions about what works for them, not the bureaucracy, not the bureaucracy. We've got to
00:17:35.080
change that. I couldn't agree more. Well, thank you, gentlemen, for that conversation. There are many more questions, but
00:17:40.420
personally, we only have so much time. We'll leave the fax machines issues to another day. There we will. We'll talk about fax
00:17:45.760
machines. And that is something, believe it or not, is still being used to communicate with the government in some
00:17:51.560
Indigenous communities. And I kid you not, they have not got around to email yet. So thank you very much for your time. 1.30 p.m. Eastern
00:17:59.760
Please like, comment, subscribe, share this program. Before I go, want to thank and
00:18:05.100
Gary Vidal from the riding of...
00:18:07.100
Does nothing miss a nippy Churchill River? I think I was pretty close. You're pretty close. Yeah, you did.
00:18:11.680
Critic for Crown Indigenous Relations, Martin Shields from Bow River. He has a nice, easy one to pronounce. Also the
00:18:16.940
Deputy Critic for Indigenous Services. We appreciate your time. And remember, if you didn't catch it all,
00:18:22.660
download it, platforms.castbox, iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, you name it. It is out there. We will see you
00:18:27.620
next week. Remember, low taxes, less government, more freedom. That's the blueprint.
00:18:31.200
We'll see you next week.
Link copied!