Reintroduce mandatory minimum sentences
Episode Stats
Words per minute
149.39877
Harmful content
Misogyny
2
sentences flagged
Toxicity
5
sentences flagged
Hate speech
2
sentences flagged
Summary
In this special Wednesday edition of The Brock Prince, host Jamie Schmael is joined by Larry Brock, the Critic for Justice and MP for Brantford-Brant South-Six Nations, to talk about the Trudeau government's $78B budget, the Supreme Court's ruling against mandatory minimums for child predators, and more.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello and welcome to a special Wednesday edition of The Brock Prince. I'm your host,
00:00:14.340
Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton-Cortha Lakes, with new content for you,
00:00:18.980
usually every single Tuesday at 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time, because yesterday was Remembrance Day,
00:00:24.380
we're doing it on Wednesday. So thank you to all that served, whether at home or abroad,
00:00:29.420
in peacetime or conflict. Thank you very much for your service, and lest we forget,
00:00:33.680
to those who have fallen in the service of their country. On today's show, we're talking about
00:00:38.700
the budget, $78 billion in the whole this fiscal year, my goodness. Also, the Supreme Court says
00:00:47.000
no mandatory minimums for child predators. To talk about this and so much more, we bring on
00:00:52.860
a little hint from the beginning, Larry Brock, the Member of Parliament for Brantford, Brant South,
00:00:57.300
Six Nations, also the Critic for Justice. Thanks for coming back on once again.
0.90
00:01:01.760
Thank you, Jamie. Always a pleasure to be back on The Blueprint.
00:01:04.720
You are the most requested person, the brockinator. They say, bring on the brockinator.
0.99
00:01:12.100
All right. So crazy week in Parliament last week. My goodness, what a week. So $78 billion in the
00:01:19.880
whole, says the Finance Minister. The Liberals are pretty proud of this number. So right now,
00:01:24.620
everything we collect, the government collects on GST, goes to pay interest on our debt. Every
00:01:30.920
single cent. And we're actually spending more on servicing that debt than we are transfers to the
00:01:37.620
provinces for health care. Make that make sense. I can't. It's absolutely shameful. They've doubled
00:01:44.580
up the projection of last year's fall economic update. We thought Justin Trudeau was bad in terms
00:01:52.340
of his spending appetite. But this is just a recipe for disaster. Nowhere did I read any aspect of how
00:02:01.340
they're going to make immediate changes to the lives of Canadians to make it more affordable for
00:02:07.460
them. There is nothing there. Pie in the Sky promises that somehow, somewhere down the road,
00:02:14.420
all of these changes that they're making and putting in all these billions of dollars is going to net
00:02:19.720
result some great economic opportunities for Canadians. Job opportunities, investment opportunities.
00:02:26.660
Again, it's all speculation. Canadians want relief now. This budget doesn't deliver.
00:02:33.180
We'll do a deeper dive into the budget next week. I believe we have Philip Lawrence coming on,
00:02:38.300
who's been analyzing the budget. Give us a bit more nuanced conversations in regards to where money
00:02:45.400
will be wasted, which there is so much. $78 billion. It still boggles my mind. $78 billion.
00:02:51.200
But one thing I wanted to talk to you about, I mentioned the firearms because I know you are
00:02:56.280
dog on a bone when it comes to that issue and protecting those legal licensed firearms owners
00:03:03.520
who are following the law. But the other thing I want to talk to you about is something that
00:03:07.320
kind of bubbled a little about a week or so ago was the Supreme Court decision saying that
00:03:13.660
mandatory minimums do not apply when it comes to child predators.
00:03:25.540
Like, third time for today. Make it make sense, Larry Brock.
00:03:31.240
I guess the only thing that can be made sense, this was a 5-4 split.
00:03:36.060
Setting aside the majority opinion, which I thought was completely illogical, they relied upon
00:03:43.720
an unrealistic, unreasonable hypothetical to make the point that a broad-based mandatory
00:03:53.520
minimum penalty for possession and accessing child pornography could leave vulnerable people,
00:04:00.640
depending on a scenario, subjected to cruel and unusual punishment under Section 12.
00:04:08.080
That was the majority's opinion. And in their hypothetical, they talked about an 18-year-old
00:04:15.360
and a 17-year-old, where the 18-year-old somehow acquires an image of a 17-year-old naked female
00:04:27.380
whose boyfriend had sent that picture to the 18-year-old.
00:04:32.660
Now, technically, I suppose that person could be charged with possession of child pornography.
00:04:39.680
It meets the definition in the code. And that was the hypothetical that the majority of this highest
00:04:47.160
court said it would be inappropriate for that individual to receive a one-year mandatory minimum
00:04:53.660
penalty in jail. That may or may not be correct. But what the court seems to forget is the high
00:05:02.660
degree of discretion that police services have and the discretion that Crown attorneys have before the
00:05:11.700
case even gets to court. So in that crazy, illogical, unreasonable scenario, it would be probably very
00:05:20.680
unlikely that the police would even charge a possession of child pornography. There may be other avenues
00:05:29.160
that they could pursue under the criminal code. But it also, even if they did proceed the police and it got to
00:05:36.360
the hands of a Crown attorney, such as my former self, you know, I would not take a look at the most serious
00:05:42.680
aspect of how to proceed under the criminal code and say, I'm going to proceed by indictment because I think
00:05:49.240
that 18-year-old should deserve one year in jail. We've got tools to minimize the impact that penalties
0.65
00:05:56.120
have in the code, completely forgotten by the Supreme Court of Canada. The minority offered a beautiful
00:06:03.000
dissenting opinion that talked about and criticized the unrealistic and unreasonable hypothetical that the
00:06:10.600
majority of the court did. Again, also reiterating that mandatory minimum penalties do not automatically
00:06:18.280
violate Section 12 of the Charter. And I know this Liberal government loves talking about the
00:06:23.720
dangerousness of mandatory minimum penalties. They need to be aware of the language coming from that court.
00:06:29.480
Absolutely. Let's queue up cut one where our leader Pierre Polyev mentions exactly what you had just
00:06:38.040
Some of the reasoning from the justices was that they could see a scenario where two 18-year-olds
00:06:44.760
exchange images and then have a mandatory minimum imposed on them. I don't know what you make of
00:06:51.480
that reasoning. I think the Supreme Court needs to get away from these imaginary scenarios. The scenario
00:06:58.200
before them was two men in possession over a long period of time of hundreds of images and videos that
00:07:05.240
were made by torturing innocent children. And with that those facts in front of them, their conclusion
00:07:11.640
actually should have been that the sentence should have been met much more than the one year and nine months that the two
00:07:17.960
dirtbag offenders received. They should go away for a very long time. Frankly, if I had my way as a father, I would lock
00:07:23.960
them up and throw away the key. As a father, I agree 100%.
00:07:30.680
I prosecuted child exploitation law for a significant period of time. I have no sympathy for these dirtbags.
0.88
00:07:38.200
I call them pedophiles. It's absolutely deplorable anyone who has an interest and acquires and builds
0.98
00:07:47.800
on a collection of this filth. It is absolutely reprehensible as a society that we do not come down
00:07:55.560
as hard as we can on these pedophiles. Let's cut two because this is you in the house and I think it
00:08:04.120
is pretty eye-opening when you look at the government's response because they will say,
00:08:10.440
yeah, we agree with what we're saying, which is this is a horrible decision by the Supreme Court,
00:08:16.600
but they never follow it up with any action. It's basically to imply, well, like anything they do
00:08:22.920
that keeps going wrong, what are we going to do about it? We'll get to it. Yeah, maybe we'll find
00:08:27.320
someone who's in charge to fix this, right? So play cut two. Mr. Speaker, on Friday, the Supreme
00:08:32.440
Court struck down mandatory jail time for predators convicted of possessing child sexual abuse material.
0.55
00:08:38.840
That decision is disgusting. These offenders weren't caught with a few files. They had hundreds
00:08:44.040
of images and videos of children as young as three being tortured and abused. Yet instead of standing up
00:08:50.680
for victims, this Liberal government stays silent. Why is this Prime Minister more interested in protecting
00:08:56.120
pedophiles than protecting Canada's children from monsters? Child abusers should face the
00:09:02.280
toughest penalties under Canadian law. Should face the toughest penalties under Canadian law.
00:09:12.280
Why does it take yet another example of a very serious, heinous crime for this government to say,
00:09:20.280
yeah, these individuals deserve the strictest and harshest punishment and then do nothing about it?
00:09:27.160
That's the thing, right? They have been in power for 10 years. There has been no increase in the
00:09:35.080
penalty when it comes to child exploitation laws in the criminal code. If anything, they are doing their
00:09:42.760
best to limit its impact, to criticize the use of the notwithstanding clause, to be completely silent.
00:09:51.160
The fact that our Prime Minister was more interested in displaying photo ops of his Asian trip from last
00:10:01.640
Friday when that decision was, Friday, October the 31st, when that decision was released all weekend long,
00:10:09.480
all the following week. And it wasn't until a couple, three, four days ago, that we actually heard from
00:10:17.160
our Justice Minister, who actually finally put something out to comment on whether or not he would use the
00:10:25.880
notwithstanding clause. Apart from that, it was crickets. That is reprehensible. When you had our leader, you had
00:10:33.720
myself, you had other colleagues speaking out against this outrageous decision. And it spread like wildfire across the country,
00:10:42.840
because we had premiers as well calling this out for what it was, including the Justice Minister
00:10:50.040
in Sean Fraser's home province of Nova Scotia. So why does it take such a public outlash of disappointment
00:11:02.360
and concern and outrage before this government acknowledges that there is a problem that needs to be addressed?
00:11:09.320
Same thing can be said for bail. Yep. You know, we've been arguing about this for four and a half years.
00:11:14.760
And told we were, you know, we were crazy. We were crazy. It was in our minds. Yeah, everything's fine.
00:11:19.880
It's not the wild west out there, right? Exactly. Okay, it's crazy, illogical, liberal reasoning.
00:11:27.000
Yeah, it's almost like, I said it before, like, we bring up an issue because we're hearing it from our
00:11:32.920
constituents, and the liberal reaction is, no, it's not happening. You guys are off your rockers, right?
00:11:38.520
It's not happening. Then it gets to the point where it keeps happening, and more and more people
00:11:42.440
are cluing into, wait a second, this doesn't seem right. So the liberal response is, oh, okay,
00:11:47.000
well, maybe it's happening a little, but nothing to be concerned about. And then when it really heats
00:11:52.440
up, like the people being executed in the streets in York Region, just north of Toronto, they're like,
00:11:58.680
okay, it's happening, but don't talk about it. Yeah. Right? This is their usual game plan, all the time.
00:12:04.200
They never want to be proactive. They are completely reactive to fires and crises across
00:12:12.680
this country. That is not how a federal government should be operating. They should be, you know, moving,
00:12:20.120
I know government, you know, the old joke is, you know, government doesn't move very fast at all. And
00:12:25.320
in many cases, it's actually quite true. But they should be pushing their department to be reacting to
00:12:31.480
what is actually happening on the ground. And that is concern from constituents, whether they re-bail.
00:12:37.080
But in this case, Prime Minister Carney never issued mandate letters. No, that's true too.
00:12:42.920
To the Public Safety Minister and the Justice Minister. So they're literally flying by the seat of their
00:12:48.760
pants, reacting to crises that we amplify, that Canadians amplify, that stakeholders amplify across this country.
00:12:57.880
This, a classic example, this outrageous decision from the Supreme Court of Canada calls for decisive
00:13:04.920
leadership from the government. And that means re-establishing, sending out the clearest message
00:13:12.520
of all, that Parliament is supreme. I was just about to go there. Absolutely supreme.
00:13:17.480
That's why the notwithstanding clause is there. That's why the notwithstanding clause is there.
00:13:19.480
To every single court in this country, including the Supreme Court of Canada. We don't need activism.
00:13:27.640
We need them to follow the laws that you and I pass. Because if we have a bunch of unelected judges
00:13:33.880
making these kinds of decisions, what do they need Parliament for, right? Precisely.
00:13:38.120
This is why Parliament, the law-making body in this country, has to have the final say because we are
00:13:46.360
then representative of the people and the will of the people. We are. And the people are outraged at this decision.
00:13:55.160
And the fact that we have our Justice Minister, probably the most important portfolio in all of government,
00:14:04.520
completely misconstruing the tests under the Supreme Court of Canada's use of the notwithstanding clause.
00:14:11.160
He actually came out numerous times saying he wasn't prepared to override the Charter with the use of the
00:14:20.280
notwithstanding clause. He completely forgets that section 33 is part of the Charter. He's not overriding anything.
00:14:28.600
He's using a tool in the tool chest. Precisely, which he refuses to do.
00:14:33.240
Yes, because I think based on C5, the piece of legislation that passed a number of years ago that
00:14:39.480
reduced sentences for a whole whack of pretty serious crimes, including urging house arrest at some point,
00:14:47.160
which, you know, the drug dealers getting house arrest for selling drugs in their home,
00:14:51.080
and then they get to, you know, sell more drugs. But I think this goes along the lines which they want,
00:14:56.840
right? They seem to want to go light on criminals, but go heavy on those who follow the law in the
00:15:03.800
terms of law-abiding firearms owners, among many others. In addition to putting on limitations to
00:15:11.480
freedom of expression. Yes. Censorship laws that we have to deal with in this country. Absolutely.
00:15:15.880
That's the flavor of pretty much of the day. And it's a priority that we've seen in numerous bills.
00:15:21.960
So they fund- They'll take every opportunity to restrict our constitutional rights.
00:15:26.680
Oh, absolutely. While funding the media outlets of their choice. Right.
00:15:31.800
Right? CBC, what are they up to? $1.2 billion, something like that. Then, of course,
00:15:35.960
you have the $400 million to the parliamentary precinct. And then the budget gave them another $150
00:15:40.440
million. Because they were so short. Because they want Canada to be part of Eurovision,
00:15:46.040
whatever that means. I'm not even sure what that means. But obviously, it's a pet project because
00:15:51.160
Carney's obviously not just a Canadian, he's a European as well. Well, I'm assuming there's friends
00:15:56.200
that need to, you know, get their fill too. But unbelievable. Yeah. Pretty much out of time,
00:16:02.520
the guests get the last word. As you know, because you've been on here this show a million times,
00:16:06.520
the floor is yours. Let's restore sanity in this country. Let's put these dirtbag pedophiles away,
0.86
00:16:14.760
as our leader said, for as long as we can. Throw away the key because that's what Canadians want.
0.99
00:16:22.360
These are sick individuals that need to rot in jail. And it's also important that we continue to
0.96
00:16:29.640
to impress and establish as loudly as we can that Parliament is supreme, not the courts.
00:16:37.720
Larry Brock, I love it when you come on the show. Thank you much.
00:16:40.920
The Member of Parliament for Brantford, Brant South, Six Nations, also the Shadow Minister,
00:16:48.280
Always appreciate when the Brockinator comes on the show. Appreciate your time as well on this special
00:16:53.480
Wednesday edition. Don't forget, new content for you next Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern time.
00:16:58.840
Don't forget to like, comment, subscribe, and share this program. Tell your friends too.
00:17:02.840
Get it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, and Spotify. You name it, it is out there.
00:17:07.720
Until next week, remember low taxes, less government, more freedom. That's the blueprint.