The Blueprint: Canada's Conservative Podcast - May 11, 2023


The Great Gaslighting.


Episode Stats


Length

19 minutes

Words per minute

184.49913

Word count

3,589

Sentence count

258

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Conservative MP Michelle Rempel-Garner joins us to discuss C-11, the new internet censorship law brought in by the Trudeau government, and the work being done by Conservative MP's across the country to fight it.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome once again to The Blueprints. This is Canada's Conservative Podcast. I'm your
00:00:17.520 host, Jamie Schmael, Member of Parliament for Halliburton, Kawartha Lights, Brock, with new
00:00:20.820 content for you every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time. We ask that you like, subscribe,
00:00:25.420 comment, and share this program. Of course, as always, if you can't listen to this program its
00:00:30.720 entirety right this second, please download it, listen to it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes,
00:00:35.140 Google Play, and Spotify, you name it, it is out there. Another great show lined up for you today,
00:00:39.580 and remember, we did ask you to share this program. We do that because C-11, the internet censorship
00:00:44.200 law brought in by the Liberal NDP government, is now in effect, and to talk about that and much,
00:00:50.140 much more, we have Michelle Rempel-Garner, Member of Parliament, Calgary, Nose Hill. Thank you so
00:00:54.860 much for coming. Thanks for having me. It's great to be here. It's great to have you on. I'm pretty
00:00:58.760 excited about that. Yeah, me too. All right, so internet censorship is in full effect here. We're
00:01:03.940 dealing with the ramifications. We need to share this program, but also you're doing your own work
00:01:08.640 as well. You're reaching out to platforms like Substack, kind of getting the conservative message
00:01:13.420 out in different forms. Yeah, so I'm so glad you raised this. I think Canadians really need to
00:01:19.400 understand what's happened. So just a couple days ago, there's this headline in the Canadian press
00:01:26.200 where it says MEDA, so Facebook's parent company, that they're starting to actually prepare to block
00:01:33.340 news as Liberal Censorship Bill C-18 prepares to pass. That's just crazy, right? But I think the message
00:01:41.000 that we need to send to people who are listening to this is that conservative members of parliament,
00:01:45.300 we're working, as you said, as you're doing right here, to get the message out, to talk about the
00:01:50.580 work that we're doing in ways that the Liberals maybe haven't thought of as part of their censorship
00:01:57.220 bills. And so yeah, I'm writing long form pieces on a platform called Substack. The link for people
00:02:03.500 who are interested is just my name, michellerempelgarner.ca. And the reason I'm doing that is exactly what you
00:02:10.960 said, is that we're facing these censorship bills, and we need to inform Canadians about what's
00:02:17.260 happening here, even though, like at the Liberal Party convention this weekend, they passed this
00:02:22.020 resolution. Basically, we had the CBC come out against the Liberal Party resolution. That's how
00:02:27.160 bad it was, where they said that essentially they were going to censor journalists in so many
00:02:33.760 different ways. And like, you kind of think like, oh, this is too crazy to happen, except then you look
00:02:37.940 at C18, C11. So yes, Substack, michellerempelgarner.ca. I'm writing long form pieces about what's
00:02:44.440 happening in Ottawa, an amazing uptake. 33,000 people have subscribed to date. And I think we need
00:02:51.460 to have more people subscribing to your, like your show that you're doing today here. These other forms
00:02:57.060 where we know that we can not necessarily have to apply to those rules that they want to see us
00:03:03.460 adhere to. Absolutely. And that's why we need to subscribe to these, like the Substack, 1.00
00:03:08.000 this program, and many others, because you are notified when things go live and new content is
00:03:13.580 put on. And that way you're able to share in their social media network, right? That's how you grow the
00:03:18.340 message. It's such a great point. So I think for people who are watching to understand, even before
00:03:23.260 these bills came into play, right, Facebook, Twitter, you know, they had these algorithms that
00:03:29.800 downvoted, upvoted, certain types of content. Now this is codified in Canadian legislation with C18,
00:03:37.640 C11. And so it's so important to be part of things called subscriber networks, right? So we have social
00:03:45.380 media. Subscriber networks are when you subscribe to somebody's content. And then to your point, you get
00:03:51.220 a notification, either an email or on an app or something, that you're not just being dependent on
00:03:56.280 a algorithm to see the content or the government, as is the case. And we laugh, but it's just, it's so
00:04:02.840 mind-boggling. It's mind-boggling that's happening, right? So it is. It is really important to have that
00:04:07.200 direct contact with the person that you're, you know, you're interacting with. And that's why I'm
00:04:12.080 writing more on Substack. I think that's a fabulous idea. And just to go back quickly to what the hell was
00:04:17.840 happening at the Liberal Convention in this past weekend, which was surprising, and many people
00:04:22.440 brought attention to it, that there wasn't many people pushing back against this ever-moving
00:04:28.520 censorship crawl that we get. Liberals used to stand for liberty, for crying out loud.
00:04:32.320 I know. I think that there's this, you know, the Liberal Party, they think people are dumb, 0.99
00:04:37.040 right? That they're too dumb to think for themselves, that they can't evaluate information, 1.00
00:04:41.600 and that somehow the government has to have a role in this and in determining what's truth. 0.99
00:04:48.540 You know, they go into it with these sort of, like, noble overtones, like, oh, we're protecting
00:04:53.820 you from yourselves. But in reality, and what we've seen in practice with this government,
00:04:58.100 because, like, you know, even the CBC are talking about how this is the most, the least
00:05:02.580 transparent government in Canadian history. They censor these things. And this isn't a noble
00:05:07.880 purpose. This is a direct attempt by the government to control what journalists can say, what you
00:05:15.140 and I and people who are watching can see. And it's so important that Canadians of all political
00:05:19.960 stripe push back against this. But, and, you know, you know, I'd ask you, I don't know, did you see
00:05:24.420 Liberal Minister Seamus O'Regan tweets after this convention? Yes, about that. It was a freedom
00:05:30.320 of the press day, too, or freedom of the press week, or, yeah. Nothing to see here. That's right,
00:05:34.340 we got this. Don't worry. And literally, you know, you just see the ratio on that tweet of people
00:05:38.380 of all political stripe being like, sure, buddy. You know, like the big wink. But it's not a laughing
00:05:46.280 matter. This is, they really do have an agenda to hide information from the public. You see it in
00:05:51.280 question period, they don't answer questions you ask. You can't get information out of access to
00:05:55.600 information requests. Even our parliamentary order paper questions, these formal legislative tools,
00:06:01.120 they completely ignore. So we have to fight back against this, because it really does erode our
00:06:05.560 democracy. I'm so glad you're talking about this. I think it's really important. Well, I'm glad you're
00:06:08.980 able to come. I love what you're doing on Substack, too. I think that's very important. So this endless
00:06:13.540 gaslighting that we keep getting, right? Okay, let's talk about this question period. Anybody that's
00:06:17.700 watched question period knows what we're talking about. The, all the scandals, SNC-Lavalin, all the way
00:06:25.040 to what we're dealing with now, potential interference in our elections with Beijing, intimidation of a
00:06:29.840 member of parliament's family back in Hong Kong. The gaslighting is absolutely unreal.
00:06:35.560 Well, and to your point about what Seamus O'Regan said, basically, we're censoring the internet.
00:06:40.240 Some of our policies are leaning in the direction of actually censoring journalists and what they
00:06:44.620 can publish. But hey, let's celebrate Press Freedom Day. Like, it's absolutely incredible.
00:06:49.740 It's, I love that term, because it's so accurate gaslighting. That's actually what they do,
00:06:55.200 right? Like, you'll get up in the House of Commons, ask a question, and then they try to deflect with
00:06:59.860 some sort of lie about whoever's asking the question or whatever, because they just want
00:07:06.480 to, you know, change the channel because they've usually messed up so badly. The problem with this,
00:07:12.960 it's really serious. Like, this isn't a game. First of all, it erodes trust in public institutions,
00:07:19.580 right? Like, anybody, no matter how they vote, would look at that behavior and go, what do they
00:07:24.420 have to hide? And, you know, at a time when we're seeing so much instability, unaffordability, like,
00:07:32.620 where Canadians do need to band together and trust, you've got this government that's doing
00:07:36.140 everything to divide Canadians and to... Again.
00:07:39.660 And it's, that's exactly what happens. And these are, you know, as you talked about,
00:07:44.360 this foreign interference issue, these have major ramifications on Canada's pluralism,
00:07:49.920 on our unity as a country, and they transcend partisanship. And for them to just, again,
00:07:56.000 gaslight, it's such an accurate term. I think it just, it's so dangerous. And certainly, I know our
00:08:02.700 party, you know, all of our colleagues, they've been working so hard to hold the government to
00:08:07.400 account. And again, it's hard with the Liberal NDP coalition, but, you know, it still is a noble
00:08:14.860 and important cause for us to fight, and we are making progress.
00:08:19.000 Did you ever think there'd be a point in Canada, in Canada, when members of Parliament doing their
00:08:24.480 work on the floor of the House of Commons, their most important task is voting on behalf of their
00:08:28.080 constituents, potentially being threatened with family living elsewhere, in this case of Michael
00:08:33.320 Chong, back in Hong Kong, the government knowing about it, and not actually doing anything about
00:08:40.100 it, to maybe warn the individual that this is potentially going on. That, in Canada.
00:08:45.220 Like, like, how did you feel when you heard that? Because, like, I was just, I was speechless,
00:08:50.260 but then I got angry. Yeah. Because you're right, it's supposed to be non-partisan. We're all supposed
00:08:55.000 to be in that House of Commons working together. We may not always agree, but at the same time,
00:08:58.400 we're elected to do the job of representing our constituents, and to be potentially facing
00:09:04.160 intimidation from foreign governments or threats to your family back home, it's hard to do your
00:09:09.520 job when you've got that on the back of your mind, too. You know, I love that, I think you and I
00:09:14.300 shared the same reaction, anger. So, I think the first story that came out about this was about a
00:09:19.060 week and a half ago. It's this really long, detailed article by Bob Fyfe and Steve Chase of the
00:09:24.980 Globe and Mail, which, ironically, they wouldn't have been able to publish if the amendment that
00:09:29.640 the Liberals proposed this last weekend was in place. That's a very good point. But I'll just
00:09:34.460 share, like, a very personal story about this. So, I read that article and embedded in it was a line
00:09:39.740 that said that the Calgary Consulate of the government in Beijing had tried to influence a
00:09:47.940 prominent Calgary MP through a third party, and it was just one line like that, and my first response
00:09:53.380 was, is that me? Did this happen to me? How would I know? Who would it have been? And then you start
00:09:59.500 going through in your head, like, you know, conversations that you have with people. And in
00:10:03.760 that moment, I felt anger, and I felt shame, because I'm having to wonder about people that I've
00:10:09.700 interacted with that are Canadian citizens, that are part of my community. And I don't think that 1.00
00:10:15.420 that's been talked enough about, is the fact that the Liberals not being on top of this, ignoring it,
00:10:21.060 pretending it's not a problem, being weak on it. It actually, like, we are a diverse country.
00:10:28.060 My writing, you know, 20% of my community identify with Chinese heritage. To not have things like a 1.00
00:10:36.440 foreign agent registry, where there's rules, like corporate lobbying, on how people can engage
00:10:41.240 with legislators, what that does is it leads to, like, a witch hunt, right? And it actually destroys
00:10:47.340 our pluralism. It actually erodes that trust we have within our community, that you and I are
00:10:51.900 entrusted to protect. And for the Liberals to ignore that, and then purport to stand for Canadian unity,
00:10:58.560 for diversity, it's actually disgusting. And I feel, I feel ashamed that, like, in that moment, 1.00
00:11:04.540 I had, like, that thought, like, who did I talk to? Was it me? All these things.
00:11:08.120 And that's exactly what our foes abroad want us to do. That's what they want us to do, is they want
00:11:15.940 us to have this divisive... Questioning each other, not trusting. Yeah, yeah. Of course, because when
00:11:20.800 we're divided, we're not united. We're not focused on our sovereignty. We're not focused on advancing
00:11:25.720 our interests as a country. And for the Liberals to say, no, they voted against a motion yesterday,
00:11:31.040 that foreign agent registry, shameful. Absolutely shameful. Shameful.
00:11:34.280 So, you know, I think it's just going to be so important for Canadians to unite around this
00:11:39.380 issue, regardless of how people vote. They need to be holding their government to account. And 0.59
00:11:44.180 frankly, I think the Liberal members, you know, they lost an opportunity this weekend at their
00:11:47.840 convention to hold their leader to account, to demand better within their party. So, you know,
00:11:54.120 a really, I think, a sobering week. Absolutely. And they finally, thankfully, the government
00:12:01.140 finally kicked out that diplomat, kind of tied into all of this. Finally, after years, potentially
00:12:07.240 two years of knowing about this, finally, I want to get your reaction. I've asked a few people about
00:12:11.520 this, but I want to get your reaction because you've served in cabinet under Harper. Reverse the
00:12:15.840 headline for a second. Harper knew two years ago about Chinese interference. Potentially nine Liberal
00:12:22.840 seats were lost because of Chinese interference. A Liberal member of Parliament, their family was
00:12:28.060 threatened elsewhere because of potential interference from another country, Beijing. What do you think
00:12:33.440 the reaction would be? You know, Jamie, I hope that the reaction, no matter what, would be equal.
00:12:41.120 Well, that's the way it's supposed to be. That's why I wanted to ask you. That's the way it's supposed to be.
00:12:44.680 It should be because, like, again, like, this isn't, you know, we're always going to have our partisan
00:12:49.740 fights in the House and disagreements about policy. But our country, we lose our sovereignty when we lose
00:12:55.680 that integrity in our democratic institutions. And that's really what's at stake here. You know,
00:13:00.300 I don't, the government has been through seven foreign ministers. I think seven, right?
00:13:04.740 Pretty darn close.
00:13:05.460 Six, seven. Like, it's bad that we don't know.
00:13:08.320 They don't have a consistent foreign policy. You had Justin Trudeau coming out, you know,
00:13:15.140 time and time again saying that, you know, he can't, there is no national identity. We do have a national
00:13:20.640 identity as Canadians. We are a sovereign nation where, you know, we're united in our pluralism.
00:13:25.940 We're united in so many different things. But the fact that he can't even muster the courage to say
00:13:30.260 we don't have a national identity, seven foreign ministers, how, how, of course, we can't be
00:13:35.320 expected. He can't be expected to defend any of those things. So yeah, like, I love the question.
00:13:40.340 What would the reaction be? It, you know, this should be bigger than politics.
00:13:46.360 And this was a, actually, like just speaking as a pundit, this was a moment for him as a leader
00:13:52.120 to rise to the occasion. And instead, he just, like when we roofed, like flopped, like caved. And
00:13:59.360 I think, I think it was actually a moment where a lot of liberals, you could see it in, did you see
00:14:04.120 their back bench? Yeah, they, they didn't look up very much. They were, they weren't clapping.
00:14:08.640 They weren't energized. So I hope they find their, their backbones. Yeah, that would be kind of nice.
00:14:13.800 That's kind of nice. One thing I also want to talk about, because I know time is getting short,
00:14:18.280 is your speech, I guess, last week in the House of Commons. You're talking about the affordability
00:14:23.140 issue, something everyone is talking about. It's hitting in every quarter of the country. I don't
00:14:27.300 care where you live. You're talking about paying more and getting less, which I think is a theme I
00:14:34.840 think is, is coming home to roost for this, for this government. The bureaucracy has gotten bigger,
00:14:40.240 the results are getting slower. And yet people are being asked to pay even more to subsidize
00:14:46.480 all of this. Yeah. Where's the value for money? It's a great question, right? Like, I think,
00:14:52.720 you know, if you reached across our caucus, and you talked to people,
00:14:58.380 the one thing that really unifies us is a care for Canadians, and like an understanding that like,
00:15:03.740 they're going through some really trying times with regard to cost of living, rent, mortgages,
00:15:09.980 paying for groceries, fuel. And where the Liberals are at on that issue is they come out and they're
00:15:16.940 announcing spending, like, well, we're spending all of these extra tax dollars. We're spending more.
00:15:22.480 That's the measure for success. We're spending more. But yet, Canadians are getting less service.
00:15:28.120 And the same thing is happening in their homes, right? You know, people are spending more
00:15:33.920 and getting less. And that stress, that anxiety from that, from that, like, decreasing ability to
00:15:42.540 make ends meet. I like, you know, wages are increasing. People aren't like, like, the cost of
00:15:50.660 housing isn't decreasing. It's, it's really hard. I mean, in my community, I have seen
00:15:56.520 so many people, like, they're just right on the edge, Jamie, I'm sure it is the same with you,
00:16:02.740 like, can barely afford to pay the mortgage. You know, I was talking to someone who's pretty close
00:16:08.020 to me about friends that they have that, you know, they just managed to buy a house, but like,
00:16:12.900 they can't go out, like, they went to a friend's birthday party and like, couldn't even afford to buy a
00:16:17.760 soda. You know, and I, that hits home. Like, that's the reality for many Canadians. And I just,
00:16:25.120 this liberal fallacy that we should be paying more to get less, and somehow be excited, like,
00:16:30.720 excited, like, oh, we're spending more. Paying more taxes is moral. Yeah. I don't think they
00:16:35.940 understand that anxiety. And you know, I think the one thing that has really united us as a caucus is
00:16:41.220 that, that feeling, like, understanding that feeling, and then trying to really push back
00:16:47.200 against it with positive policies, like, you know, some of the housing affordability policies we've
00:16:51.640 put forward, skilled trades training, I could go on and on. But we've got a lot of work to do.
00:16:57.860 Well, this government decries people's wealth, and you know, we want everyone to obviously do the
00:17:03.140 best they can and have equal opportunity. But they're the ones that always want all the wealth,
00:17:07.400 right, to squander it away. And we saw that. They have no problem spending, what, billions on
00:17:11.760 McKinsey and these guys. Absolutely. Yeah. The nice cocktail parties. Nice. Absolutely. They love
00:17:17.880 being seen at the reward ceremony. The vacations. They went to New York City to hang with Hugh Jackman
00:17:21.620 and others. Who doesn't want to be with Wolverine on a free vacation? It's kind of cool. Right. In New York
00:17:26.100 City. But that's not their job. That's not your job. Absolutely. But to the same point, to your neck of
00:17:30.980 the woods has been decimated under this, this liberal government. We have company, countries like Japan
00:17:36.860 and Germany that are coming to Canada asking for energy and then being told there's no
00:17:41.860 business case. That's crazy. Like we had the German government like in Canada didn't make 0.84
00:17:49.760 any news. Barely, yeah. Like, like, what did we get out of that? We had a state visit from
00:17:56.320 one of the world's biggest economies. Japanese prime minister was here. That's like everyone's
00:18:00.660 what? Yeah. It's crazy. Right? Crazy. And then they go to, I think it was Japan, or no, sorry, 0.72
00:18:05.300 Germany went to Qatar and had a multi-billion dollar contract to supply that energy. So
00:18:10.420 another way to lower prices is to add supply. Yep. Add supply. And then we have hindered our
00:18:16.920 ability to do just that. There's just, you know, it's time for a change. Like, I think,
00:18:22.300 you know, we've gone through so many elections. You and I have gone through a lot of elections
00:18:26.420 together. And this one is just so, it's for all the marbles. You know, Trudeau says he's going to
00:18:33.560 run again. He does not deserve to cover in again. It's time for a change. I always give the guests
00:18:40.440 the last word, but it's hard to really come back from that. But the floor is yours if you can top
00:18:45.480 that. That was pretty good. Just thanks for having me, Jamie. Thanks for all the work you do to get
00:18:49.200 the work out. And to those who are listening today, thanks to them for listening and being open to
00:18:54.320 hearing beyond what the liberals would have them hear through their censorship bills.
00:18:59.080 Always great to have you here. Thanks. Michelle Rimpel-Garner, member of Parliament for Calgary
00:19:02.680 Nose Hill. We appreciate her time. We appreciate your time as well. Please, as Michelle just mentioned,
00:19:08.080 as we just mentioned, like, comment, and subscribe, and share this program. Of course,
00:19:12.940 you can download it, listen to it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, and Spotify.
00:19:16.800 Remember, tell your friends about it because there's new content every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m.
00:19:20.840 Eastern Time. Until next week, we say remember, it's low taxes, less government, more freedom.
00:19:26.500 That's the blueprint.