The Johnston Affair
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
199.52625
Summary
Former Governor General David Johnson testifies before committee to answer questions about what he knew or did not know in his report to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Greg Mclean, MP for Calgary Centre, joins us to talk about the hearings and the questions being asked.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello and welcome once again to The Blueprints.
00:00:12.240
I'm your host, Jamie Schmael, member of Parliament for Halliburton Court,
00:00:14.980
the likes Brock with new content for you every single Tuesday, 1.30 p.m. Eastern Time.
00:00:19.140
We ask that you like, comment, subscribe, and share this program.
00:00:23.040
Of course, if you can't watch or listen to this program in its entirety,
00:00:26.960
right this very second, download it and listen to it on platforms like CastBox, iTunes, Google Play, and Spotify.
00:00:34.560
We have Greg McLean to join us today, the member of Parliament for Calgary Centre,
00:00:38.800
to talk about a whole range of issues, but most importantly, David Johnson,
00:00:42.320
the Governor General, former Governor General, testifying before committee right this very second
00:00:47.140
to answer questions about what he knew or did not know in his report to the Prime Minister.
00:00:53.280
And of course, a few new developments since we last talked on this show.
00:00:56.220
We had a vote in the House of Commons asking for David Johnston to step aside.
00:01:00.360
He refused to do so because he says he answers to the government and not Parliament,
00:01:05.080
which is a very important distinction to make, where Parliament, in our opinion, should always be supreme.
00:01:13.220
Parliament is supposed to be your group that holds the government and council, cabinet, if you will,
00:01:18.640
the government, to account for everything they're doing.
00:01:20.800
Now, David Johnson, the thing about this that I think a lot of people are seizing onto is
00:01:27.760
In fact, I think what they're looking at is saying,
00:01:29.960
this really isn't that democratic a process at the end of the day,
00:01:32.960
if the only person he responds to is the Prime Minister, who's the head of cabinet,
00:01:37.360
the head of the government, and yet that's who's appointing him,
00:01:40.280
and who is really apparently might be in a bit of a conflict here.
00:01:43.320
So if the only person you report to is the person who might be in conflict,
00:01:47.000
is it really a democratic, open examination of the issues that we need to look at here?
00:01:53.020
Well, I would say no, especially when they are known Trudeau Foundation members.
00:01:58.120
David Johnson, he was a former governor general, served honorably,
00:02:03.080
but yet I'm not sure why he allowed himself to be put into the situation
00:02:07.460
where his integrity is questioned based on his history with the Trudeaus,
00:02:11.860
based on the fact that David Johnson watched Justin Trudeau grow up
00:02:17.040
and spent time at their cottage and they were ski buddies, all that kind of stuff.
00:02:20.920
Tons of footage that shows interview after interview with both Justin Trudeau
00:02:26.040
and David Johnson saying what great friends they all are.
00:02:28.660
He did this to himself, unfortunately, but I also blame the Prime Minister primarily
00:02:33.240
because he made that decision to appoint David Johnson the special rapporteur.
00:02:37.620
And there's a point in time when my staff and I were putting together a letter
00:02:40.800
to David Johnson himself when he was being appointed by the Prime Minister,
00:02:48.960
Whether you look at it as a conflict of interest from your perspective or not,
00:02:55.700
A perception of a conflict of interest is a conflict of interest by definition.
00:02:59.920
So if anybody had advised him, anybody from the private sector,
00:03:04.040
anybody that wasn't just part of the government circle that he seems to be reporting to right now,
00:03:09.640
he should have picked up the phone, called a friend, and actually got some advice on
00:03:14.280
Am I potentially in a conflict of interest here?
00:03:17.300
The problem for David Johnson is it really has changed a lot of perceptions about him personally on this.
00:03:23.340
And that's a shame because he was a good Governor General.
00:03:25.840
But that book he wrote now about trust, I think a lot of people are looking at it going,
00:03:31.440
you're asking us to trust, and yet the institutions that seem to govern us as a country
00:03:39.560
Funny you should say that because just before the show started,
00:03:42.560
I was watching a bit of the committee goings-on,
00:03:46.260
and Michael Cooper, a Member of Parliament, St. Albert Edmonton,
00:03:50.840
was questioning the former Governor General, the rapporteur, David Johnson,
00:03:54.500
about how the final report to the Prime Minister was made
00:04:02.820
aside from Michael Chong and the threats being made,
00:04:05.620
but also the interference in the last election, 2021,
00:04:09.920
where the meeting with Johnson and former leader Aaron O'Toole took place,
00:04:13.140
but it became evident during that meeting that the report was in translation,
00:04:16.620
so the printing presses were already being fired up.
00:04:19.640
So what's the point in asking the former leader what his thoughts on the whole thing,
00:04:24.580
what did he experience in interference in our elections,
00:04:30.200
Like, I don't understand J. David Johnson's line of thinking here.
00:04:34.360
Yeah, there seemed to be a lack of, you know, end result versus process here.
00:04:39.260
Usually you go through the process to get the result.
00:04:41.880
In this case, you're right, they were already printing the report
00:04:44.320
before they met with our previous leader, Aaron O'Toole,
00:04:48.840
And I think that that is another red flag where people are saying,
00:04:53.900
What was the process he had to go through to determine his outcome?
00:04:57.280
And did he actually go through the proper process to get that done?
00:05:01.380
Well, now we have, we talked about it last week with Larry Brock,
00:05:04.540
that David Johnson asked for advice from a lawyer,
00:05:12.760
Turns out David Johnson, who also had to hire Crisis Communications
00:05:17.680
and a firm known to handle those that are, you know,
00:05:28.960
that David Johnson's lead counsel on foreign interference probe
00:05:38.340
and it shows that she's attended many fundraisers,
00:05:42.000
contributed about $7,500 to the Liberal Party between 2006 and 2022,
00:05:48.980
Is it the fact that nobody outside the Liberal Party is smart enough
00:06:00.500
Yeah, well, look, in order for Canadians to have faith in this process that has been gone through here,
00:06:05.880
but it seems to have been rushed through and, you know, corners cut, if you will,
00:06:10.780
in order for Canadians to have this trust going forward,
00:06:13.140
there's going to have to be an open process that has some really solid people
00:06:17.920
that aren't connected with the decision involved in making the decision.
00:06:23.620
Get beyond the Ottawa bubble and all the people that are contributing to the noise around Ottawa
00:06:29.080
and get somebody from outside this realm, if you will,
00:06:32.620
to actually take a look at this and determine what we need to do.
00:06:36.520
And continue to engage all your friends and supporters
00:06:38.960
is not leading Canadians toward a stronger impression of trust in this government.
00:06:44.600
And that's where any government has to get towards.
00:06:49.800
And does the Canadian people trust the government anymore?
00:06:56.480
The more we fail at this, and we fail as an institution,
00:07:00.140
and the government and council right now is doing that to us,
00:07:05.420
Canadians need to have faith in democracy, have faith in this institution,
00:07:11.160
Well, one thing they can do to make their lives better
00:07:13.680
is not past the Liberal budget that's up for debates.
00:07:16.440
Actually, this whole week, we're supposed to be debating it today.
00:07:20.240
It looks like closure, and that's a parliamentary term.
00:07:22.660
They're going to cut off debates on the budget bill,
00:07:39.320
But the budget itself, of course, is more money throwing at a wall.
00:07:44.340
It's going towards a whole bunch of pet projects without accountability.
00:07:48.600
that has no accountability mechanisms in it whatsoever.
00:07:51.920
Their new spending and a new fund they're going to have up,
00:07:54.940
the Canada Fund, you know, the Canada Growth Fund,
00:08:03.700
This is going to be run on the back of a napkin
00:08:09.180
It's like, okay, you know, this is supposed to be a high-risk investment.
00:08:12.520
High-risk investing and pension investing are the opposite
00:08:20.320
Number one, get a board together, get a mandate,
00:08:23.020
understand what this new group is supposed to do
00:08:32.340
So again, trying to work around that accountability mechanism
00:08:43.220
I'm going to suggest that this is just another slush fund.
00:08:45.740
There's a lot of slush funds this government has set up,
00:08:52.220
is going to be decimating for the country at the end of the day.
00:08:56.920
and the next generation is going to pay a huge bill.
00:09:00.680
that we pass on a country that has some strength in it,
00:09:04.500
both financially and, of course, infrastructure,
00:09:07.120
institutions that will continue to govern us going forward.
00:09:15.040
from a private sector perspective is down about 10%.
00:09:18.080
So we're down to 90% of what our contributed capital
00:09:21.540
to the country was since this government came into power.
00:09:28.500
of our infrastructure of the value of the country
00:09:37.580
These debts are mounting at every level of government.
00:09:40.360
We need to make sure we have a great health care system,
00:09:50.200
with a great opportunity to build a great life,
00:10:01.820
when mortgages that were bought at inflated prices
00:10:16.500
And with the cost of living now out of control,
00:10:20.960
is just out of control right now through the roof.
00:10:47.000
And the issue is, of course, with mortgages as well.
00:10:49.220
It's after-tax money you pay your mortgage with.
00:10:52.380
So if you think, if you're making $100,000 a year,
00:10:57.280
But just for round numbers, say $100,000 a year,
00:11:13.680
So your mortgage payment comes out of that residual number,
00:11:18.580
which, as you know, is going up 11% over the last year.
00:11:49.020
and maybe a bit more of a home than they can afford,
00:12:02.660
As a result, you're going to lead towards inflation
00:12:13.800
Shouldn't my salary go up in the same trajectory?
00:12:24.760
And energy has gone through the roof in Canada,
00:12:32.280
and it's chosen to go the way in the carbon tax,
00:13:47.260
that's going to affect Canadians' lives the most.