The Candice Malcolm Show - April 08, 2022


Arrogant Australian says Canadian Citizenship Process is “Problematic”

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
People in BC are still being fired over Covid vaccines (Ft. Harley Sims) Nothing “modest” about Trudeau’s ongoing spending spree (Ft. Franco Terrazzano)

Episode Stats


Length

35 minutes

Words per minute

195.18

Word count

6,961

Sentence count

369

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

13

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Libel elites get triggered by the word freedom and the sight of the Canadian flag. A legacy media organization nominates a fake news story for an excellence award, and the CBC continues to publish incoherent opinion pieces. To join me, as usual, we have Harrison Faulkner, who is a producer and journalist here at The Candice Malcolm Show.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Liberal elites get triggered by the word freedom and the sight of the Canadian flag.
00:00:04.260 A legacy media organization nominates a fake news story for an excellence award
00:00:08.300 and the CBC continues to publish incoherent opinion pieces.
00:00:12.080 It's Fake News Friday, I'm Candice Malcolm and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:25.020 Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning in.
00:00:27.080 Welcome to Fake News Friday, our favorite show on The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:30.740 We do it every Friday.
00:00:31.480 We do an analysis and we go through the fake news stories in the legacy media,
00:00:36.620 point out all of the various flaws and the ways that they do not uphold their own journalistic ethics.
00:00:42.120 To join me, as usual, we have Harrison Faulkner, who is a producer and journalist here at True North
00:00:46.880 and someone who actually went to journalism school.
00:00:50.580 You went to Ryerson, or I think you continue to go there, Harrison,
00:00:53.480 but you can tell us whether or not these journalists are following the guidelines
00:00:59.260 that you are taught in journalism school and whether they actually practice what they preach here.
00:01:03.720 So thanks for joining us.
00:01:05.080 Always happy to be here, Candice.
00:01:06.680 So this is like a reoccurring theme.
00:01:08.640 I think it's just like the latest thing to do on the political left is to talk about how
00:01:13.360 freedom is now a word that means something other than freedom
00:01:16.940 and the Canadian flag is something that we shouldn't feel proud about.
00:01:20.720 We shouldn't see it as a sign of unity or hope or freedom or any of those kind of things,
00:01:25.420 but we should all be ashamed of our Canadian flag and our Canadian symbols.
00:01:29.840 Harrison, so first I want to talk about this.
00:01:32.520 I've heard this so much since the Freedom Convoy.
00:01:36.280 Liberals and leftists sort of wrapping themselves into a pretzel
00:01:39.180 trying to explain how freedom is actually a bad thing.
00:01:42.180 So here we had liberal crony, former CBC talking head, Bruce Anderson.
00:01:47.380 He gets really upset by the word freedom.
00:01:49.180 So here he is on Twitter earlier this week saying that the battle cry freedom
00:01:54.000 seems increasingly like a Trojan horse.
00:01:56.580 Inside are ideas that undermine equal rights, threaten the planet, risk economic chaos,
00:02:02.120 undermine law and order, spirit of community, ability to manage a public health crisis,
00:02:07.060 fact-based news, etc.
00:02:08.200 This is how liberals and people on the left justify the fact that they have completely failed
00:02:13.160 to uphold the chart of rights and freedoms over the last two years, Harrison.
00:02:16.120 The fact that they have abandoned the basic tenets of liberalism.
00:02:19.640 Like these are big L liberals who hate small L liberalism.
00:02:23.420 And here he lays out exactly the ways that he sees that
00:02:27.240 the following things are more important than individual liberty.
00:02:31.380 So he thinks that equal rights, whatever that means, probably equity, equal outcome,
00:02:36.100 threatening the planet.
00:02:37.780 So therefore we should have a climate strategy that undermines individual liberty,
00:02:42.880 risk economic chaos, undermine law and order, spirit of community, and of course,
00:02:47.360 you know, the two main ones that the liberals obsess over these days, ability to manage a 0.96
00:02:51.520 public health crisis.
00:02:52.340 So therefore the government's power to try to manage a public health crisis is more important
00:02:57.600 than individual liberty.
00:02:58.960 And fact-based news.
00:03:00.780 All of this was just over, by the way, Mark Mulroney, son of former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney,
00:03:06.100 just tweeted out something about how, hey, if you don't like freedom, ignore it.
00:03:11.660 If you think that a politician's talking about freedom and you think we're already as free
00:03:16.320 as possible, then ignore it.
00:03:17.800 Then he also said there are no caveats to freedom.
00:03:20.300 That really triggered Bruce Anderson.
00:03:22.940 What did you make of this, Harrison?
00:03:24.780 Well, I just think this is all very, very odd.
00:03:27.760 Because again, when you have these liberal CBC talking heads saying that freedom really is
00:03:35.900 just undermining equal rights and it's threatening the planet, I mean, it's kind of heading in 1.00
00:03:42.900 a weird direction.
00:03:43.780 And then spirit of community, you've got that collectivism aspect in there too.
00:03:48.180 I really think it goes back to one of the themes, Candice, that we've talked about on this
00:03:52.820 show, which is the elites, the CBC talking heads, liberals, these people want you to try
00:04:00.500 and believe that the word freedom means something different when they say it to when someone that
00:04:06.400 they disagree with says it.
00:04:07.600 So if you're a working class trucker, for example, when you promote freedom, you're actually 0.84
00:04:12.820 promoting this dangerous Trojan horse.
00:04:15.240 But when someone like Bruce Anderson promotes freedom or when someone like that, when a
00:04:20.320 politician that Bruce Anderson supports talks about the need to protect freedom for Canadians,
00:04:25.760 it means something totally different.
00:04:27.500 So there's this contrast of definitions that I think is very dangerous and very just, it's
00:04:34.480 a very weird, it's a weird thing to witness.
00:04:37.660 It's a weird time to be alive when we're having these weird sort of definitional battles
00:04:43.500 about certain words like freedom.
00:04:45.240 But Candice, it goes on because not only is it about freedom, freedom means two different
00:04:52.600 things when the right person says it, it extends to the flag.
00:04:57.300 And there was this incredible Globe and Mail op-ed that was written at the end of March.
00:05:02.500 And it was written by an author named John Boyko.
00:05:05.200 And the headline of this op-ed is, Recapturing the Flag, Canada is Still Recovering from a Moment
00:05:10.500 of Darkness in Ottawa.
00:05:12.000 And he starts off his op-ed by saying that he cringes every time he sees a Canadian flag
00:05:17.560 and how he is repulsed whenever he drives by a rural home waving a large Canadian flag.
00:05:23.600 Notice that language there, Candice.
00:05:25.220 He cringes and he's repulsed by the sight of the Canadian flag.
00:05:28.200 I mean, how do you recover from that?
00:05:30.680 If that's your base, if that's your starting point on this, then there's some serious issues
00:05:36.940 you need to solve out because that's just a, that's, that's, starting at that point,
00:05:41.660 that is, that's crazy.
00:05:44.020 And then he goes on to say that he believes that our flag has been captured by those who
00:05:48.480 support the convoy and the negative anti-government, anti-science, anti-democracy population.
00:05:53.320 And, you know, uh, I made this point very clear.
00:05:56.360 Sometimes the Laurentian elite will make it very clear to you.
00:05:59.420 They'll, they'll, they'll spell it out exactly how they want you, uh, to read something.
00:06:04.320 And, you know, you can't wave the Canadian flag unless you hold the correct political
00:06:07.680 opinions.
00:06:08.320 You're not, you're, you're anti-government, anti-science and anti-democracy if you support
00:06:12.740 the trucker convoy.
00:06:13.980 And lastly, there are limits on your freedom that you have to accept.
00:06:16.880 That's, that's exactly what they want you to know.
00:06:19.000 And like I said, sometimes they just make it easy for you.
00:06:21.060 Well, they're kind of saying the quiet part out loud, right?
00:06:24.600 Like here's the idea that, that Canada was, was always based on this notion of individual
00:06:29.680 freedom, that, that, that was the founding principle of our country.
00:06:32.680 We have, you know, Wilfrid Laurier famously said that Canada is free and freedom is our
00:06:37.800 nationality.
00:06:38.360 We're not a country that is based upon one ethnic group.
00:06:41.740 We're not a country that's ever been homogenous in terms of our ethnicity, but we are a country
00:06:46.080 that has always rallied around this concept of freedom.
00:06:49.220 Well, interestingly, Harrison, over the last couple of years, the liberals have sort of
00:06:53.780 abandoned these uniting principles and united symbols that we've had that they used to
00:06:59.020 take claim over, right?
00:06:59.880 They used like the Canadian flag, this, this concept of, of, of the chart of rights and
00:07:04.140 freedoms, smaller liberalism.
00:07:05.800 Those used to be the brand of the liberal party.
00:07:07.740 And as the left is becoming more and more illiberal, as liberals start to feel ashamed and embarrassed
00:07:13.520 of Canada's history and they want to get away from that, they're embarrassed about it.
00:07:17.700 They, they, they want to fight against it.
00:07:19.580 We had Carolyn Bennett talking about how Canada needs to decolonize, whatever that means, 0.99
00:07:24.780 right?
00:07:24.980 They, they're deeply ashamed of Canada and, and you see it coming out that they don't,
00:07:29.000 you can no longer celebrate freedom.
00:07:30.380 That's bad.
00:07:31.060 Uh, having individual rights and freedoms, that's not what we want.
00:07:34.340 We have higher priorities now, like, like climate change and, uh, COVID.
00:07:39.400 Uh, and, and then, you know, the, the Canadian flag, again, it was liberals that created the
00:07:43.840 Canadian flag.
00:07:44.480 We used to have the red ensign, we used to have a British flag and, and, and they put together
00:07:49.140 this new flag that represented new Canada in the sixties.
00:07:51.880 And now, you know, as soon as conservatives rally around it and use it as a rallying point
00:07:56.940 for freedom, they no longer want anything to do with it.
00:07:59.800 So you're right.
00:08:01.100 Uh, just one more tweet here from Bruce Anderson.
00:08:02.900 He replied to Mark Mulroney, uh, saying that knowing that conservatives don't want attention
00:08:07.220 drawn to the subtext of the freedom mantra is more reason for people to scrutinize it.
00:08:12.300 Freedom to ignore climate change, to marginalize people of sexual orientation or faith, to avoid 0.99
00:08:17.560 paying taxes by hiding money.
00:08:19.640 So again, you know, for all the issues and all the problems that we have in our country,
00:08:23.740 Harrison, this is what the liberals are focused on.
00:08:25.920 They think that the biggest issues in our country right now are climate change, sexual
00:08:32.320 orientation, and like money laundering or hiding, hiding money, people hiding money from taxes.
00:08:37.960 Like these people are so incredibly out of touch.
00:08:41.220 And again, they're saying that there are values that are higher than freedom, which undermines
00:08:46.060 the entire Canadian experiment and also undermines national unity.
00:08:49.740 Because the good thing about freedom is that you can put your own image of what freedom
00:08:53.540 means.
00:08:54.360 Everyone can have their own idea of freedom.
00:08:56.940 Everyone can have their own idea of Canada and the good life in Canada.
00:08:59.900 And that's one of the great things both liberals and conservatives used to rally around this
00:09:03.280 word freedom.
00:09:04.160 And now you see the liberals moving away from it.
00:09:07.720 It's, it's, it's kind of, it's really dangerous territory that they're, that they're bringing
00:09:10.820 us into.
00:09:11.340 And I think that, again, when you have one side of the political aisle saying we don't
00:09:16.980 care about freedom anymore, we don't care about the flag, not good news for Canada.
00:09:20.760 There was a, this reminds me of this other piece I want to talk about, Harrison.
00:09:24.240 There's an opinion piece in the CBC.
00:09:26.380 Everyone knows my, my thoughts and my feelings about how CBC now runs these opinion pieces
00:09:32.040 where rather than just being subsidized to deliver the news, they also get subsidized to
00:09:37.560 deliver certain opinions, which are always the most extreme far left opinions that you can
00:09:41.280 find.
00:09:42.040 But here's one.
00:09:42.900 They found this individual who has become a Canadian.
00:09:45.540 So a new Canadian writing about his experience of going through the citizenship ceremony and,
00:09:51.640 and becoming a Canadian, usually a very happy, celebrated day in a person's life.
00:09:56.160 Usually they've escaped some kind of a tyrannical hell hole that they don't want to be in anymore.
00:10:01.700 They're so grateful and so happy to be living in a free and prosperous country like Canada.
00:10:05.740 Well, not this individual.
00:10:06.880 Uh, this, this, this guy says, Canada's citizenship process is a problematic piece of political
00:10:13.020 theater.
00:10:13.780 Here's why I did it anyway.
00:10:15.160 And he writes, in the end, I did the Canadian thing.
00:10:17.040 I used my privilege to benefit and protect myself.
00:10:19.920 Now, uh, some viewers know I have a background working in immigration.
00:10:23.700 I used to work in the immigration department.
00:10:25.320 So I'm pretty familiar with the process of citizenship, immigration, the various categories
00:10:31.360 and ways that you can become a Canadian.
00:10:33.440 And so basically we have this guy, he's an Australian.
00:10:36.420 He is a writer and author, born in Australia, decided to come to Canada.
00:10:41.920 And basically what, what he's talking about, he, he has a couple of, of problems with, uh,
00:10:48.080 with Canada.
00:10:49.120 His main thing, he was troubled by just how easy it is for him as a middle-class white
00:10:56.040 Australian compared to those from other countries, particularly agriculture workers.
00:11:00.080 So he assumes that Harrison, that part of the reason why he was able to come to Canada and
00:11:04.680 immigrate so easily is because of his skin color, even though that has absolutely nothing 1.00
00:11:09.400 to do with how our point systems work.
00:11:11.520 The fact that he is an English speaking person who has work experience in Canada means a lot
00:11:16.640 more.
00:11:16.940 We, we, we are a country, we use a point system.
00:11:19.220 Therefore, you know, if you're young, if you speak English and if you have experience working
00:11:23.800 in Canada, those are all things that help you, uh, to, to, to, to, to meet the qualifications
00:11:29.900 to come to Canada.
00:11:30.740 It has nothing to do with skin color.
00:11:32.620 And when he compares himself to agriculture workers, which he does throughout this piece,
00:11:36.700 he, he fundamentally misunderstands something, which is that agriculture workers are temporary
00:11:41.020 workers.
00:11:41.440 They come to Canada on a temporary basis.
00:11:43.340 He didn't do any journalism for this piece.
00:11:45.160 This is just solely opinion.
00:11:46.480 He didn't bother talking to the people who is claiming, um, to speak for, because he's,
00:11:51.020 he's sort of juxtaposing himself to people who work in the seasonal agriculture worker
00:11:54.700 program or the temporary for worker program.
00:11:56.400 The people who work in those programs, Harrison, opt to come to Canada on a temporary basis.
00:12:01.300 They don't apply through the same stream that he did.
00:12:03.940 They didn't try to become permanent residents.
00:12:05.660 They want to become seasonal agriculture workers.
00:12:07.600 I've spoken to many people who come through the seasonal agriculture program and the temporary
00:12:11.020 foreign worker program.
00:12:12.120 They don't want to become Canadian. 0.99
00:12:13.860 The whole purpose is that they come from countries, usually in Latin America, usually people with very 0.88
00:12:18.620 strong, uh, family ties, Catholic ties, strong ties to their own country.
00:12:22.660 They come up to Canada during the spring and summer to make money.
00:12:27.240 They send almost all of the money back to their kids, their wives, their families back home.
00:12:32.320 And then they go back and they join their families.
00:12:34.480 They have no interest in coming to Canada because if they did, they wouldn't come through this
00:12:38.160 program.
00:12:38.540 So, so the whole idea, then the whole motivation behind this program is for these people to make
00:12:43.360 money to send back to their families and then go and reunite with their families.
00:12:47.000 They don't want to become Canadian. 0.99
00:12:47.900 So this guy just, you know, he makes so many logical mistakes throughout this process.
00:12:52.420 He doesn't know what he's talking about.
00:12:54.300 He's just assuming that he knows everything, which is, which is very, uh, typical of, of
00:12:58.440 those on the political left.
00:12:59.960 They, you know, he's on his high horse.
00:13:01.540 He, everything he sees is problematic.
00:13:03.320 He's very upset that he had to pay $630 to, uh, for the citizenship application processing.
00:13:10.860 I guess he thinks that Canadian taxpayers should subsidize him as well. 0.78
00:13:15.560 Incredibly arrogant, incredibly entitled. 0.96
00:13:17.400 No sense of gratitude. 0.97
00:13:19.040 He's angry that he has to pledge allegiance to the queen.
00:13:22.220 He's angry.
00:13:23.260 Uh, this is kind of amusing.
00:13:24.800 He says, he's talking about the study material for the system test.
00:13:27.720 He says, the study material uses blanket terms like first nations to describe hundreds of
00:13:33.120 nations with different languages, cultures, and system of government.
00:13:36.100 So I guess in a, in a basic study guide, rather than saying first nations, he wants us to
00:13:41.220 what lists, list a hundred different nations.
00:13:43.580 Uh, like how is that going to help anybody study for a citizenship test?
00:13:47.840 This, this, uh, this guy is just so out of touch with, with, with how privileged he is
00:13:52.820 to get to become Canadian.
00:13:54.040 And, and of course there's the CBC, uh, paying this guy and publishing this total nonsense
00:13:59.200 where he just attacks Canada for no good reason after we've just offered him citizenship.
00:14:04.560 It's, it's really unbelievable, Harrison.
00:14:06.240 Well, exactly.
00:14:07.920 And the, uh, in the headline, you know, immediately what kind of piece this is going to, this is
00:14:12.060 going to be.
00:14:12.580 And not only just cause it's in the CBC op-ed section, which we know, uh, filters out anything
00:14:17.640 that's not a far left opinion, but to, to call our, our citizenship process problematic
00:14:23.460 using a term right out of the left's, the left's, uh, the, the, the, the left's vocabulary.
00:14:29.180 Um, you knew exactly what you were going to get, but it's always important to remember.
00:14:33.200 It's easy to forget because we see it so often.
00:14:35.480 These, these insane CBC stories, but you pay for these stories to be published.
00:14:40.860 These are coming, all of this is coming from Canadian taxpayers.
00:14:45.160 And as you said, Candace, this, this, this Callum, uh, character, he takes issue with the,
00:14:52.120 with the, with swearing allegiance to the queen.
00:14:54.240 He takes issue with the fact that our citizenship test requires him to know something about the
00:14:58.700 founder of our country, Johnny McDonald.
00:15:00.460 I mean, what, what, what other citizenship test doesn't require a test about the basics of
00:15:05.460 this country?
00:15:06.020 And if you didn't, if you don't like the, if you don't like swearing allegiance to the
00:15:09.780 queen, uh, to the monarchy, then, then leave, then go to the United States. 1.00
00:15:13.320 It's very simple.
00:15:14.940 Um, but here's the other thing too, is this, this entire piece is just basically designed
00:15:19.660 to bash Canada.
00:15:20.800 So Canadian taxpayers pay for an article that just bashes our system.
00:15:25.920 And I wonder if he bothered to ask anyone else that he took the citizenship test with
00:15:29.760 what they thought about swearing allegiance to the queen, what they thought about the
00:15:34.000 citizenship test.
00:15:35.080 If it was really that big of a deal for them, if they really felt that, uh, you know, the,
00:15:38.940 the citizenship test was, was undermining the role that first nations play in our country.
00:15:44.100 It might be Callum that the people you were taking the citizenship test were people who
00:15:49.320 had fought tooth and nail, who would be willing to give up limbs to ensure that they and their
00:15:54.700 family could make it to such a great country like Canada.
00:15:58.240 I do wonder if, if, if this Callum asked anyone else who took the citizenship test with, if
00:16:06.760 they felt proud after the fact, after they became a Canadian citizen, instead of bashing
00:16:10.720 our country right after becoming a citizen, maybe they, maybe they felt proud to be a Canadian.
00:16:15.220 Uh, it's just, it's another, it's another CBC piece.
00:16:17.540 It's another shocking op-ed.
00:16:19.280 And frankly, I don't know why, I don't know why the CBC continues to, to publish these Canada
00:16:25.660 bashing articles.
00:16:26.680 At some point it has to end.
00:16:28.700 People have to stop reading it or they have to, they have to come to their senses.
00:16:32.300 And it's not accurate.
00:16:34.120 Like, like this idea that, that somehow this guy, you know, it was easy for him because
00:16:38.240 he was middle-class and white.
00:16:39.420 Like there's, there's absolutely no data to back that up.
00:16:42.940 That's just, that's just a false accusation against a country, assuming, placing the underground
00:16:49.380 assumption that Canada is a racist country, that you get preferential treatment because
00:16:52.900 you're white, which is not true.
00:16:53.860 There's nothing about race or skin color.
00:16:56.140 So he's, he's putting that in on his own.
00:16:58.900 He is, it's basically like a paint by numbers piece.
00:17:01.640 It's like, uh, I'm super woke and I found this one institution in Canada that's not woke
00:17:06.740 enough.
00:17:07.240 Therefore, I'm going to write this like lazy, intellectually limited piece complaining about
00:17:13.300 it for not being woke enough.
00:17:14.920 And the CBC is going to publish it.
00:17:16.780 Like it's, it's, it's such a sad state where, you know, Canada, Canada is actually pretty
00:17:22.420 lenient.
00:17:23.260 Canada lets a lot of people into the country that we probably shouldn't let in. 1.00
00:17:27.120 And when you hear someone like this was so lacking in gratitude, uh, so spiteful and obviously
00:17:32.880 not at all loyal or committed to Canada.
00:17:35.840 It's like, yeah, you know what?
00:17:37.420 We should become more stringent in who we let in and who we don't.
00:17:40.400 People who have this kind of attitude should not be able to become Canadian.
00:17:43.760 It reminds me of a couple of years ago during the leadership race for the conservative party.
00:17:46.980 One of the candidates proposed bringing in a values test, uh, for people coming in.
00:17:52.220 I, I assume that this person with all of his hatred and all of his bitterness and, and anti
00:17:57.900 Canada sentiments that, that, that he would be the kind of person that would be screened
00:18:03.180 away.
00:18:03.680 And I, and, and again, I think the fact that the CBC publishes this nonsense is a total
00:18:08.600 disgrace, Harrison.
00:18:10.460 Well, that's not the only thing, uh, that the CBC, uh, publishes.
00:18:15.300 I want to jump to this other piece that the CBC wrote about, um, in their, uh, opinion section.
00:18:21.680 This one is written by a woman called Maria Glavine and she writes, I'm a new mom trying to keep
00:18:27.280 my baby safe in the pandemic.
00:18:29.580 Anger is my secret weapon.
00:18:31.240 Okay.
00:18:32.120 So here we have a lady who is a new mom and she is very angry about the end of the vaccine 1.00
00:18:39.940 passports and mass mandates, because in her estimation, the only way to keep her child 0.95
00:18:45.760 safe is to basically compel the entire Canadian public, um, to follow rules that don't make
00:18:53.600 any sense that didn't actually protect anybody from the pandemic for the last two years, um,
00:18:58.420 that have been abject failures.
00:19:00.400 And yet, uh, because she is an emotional new mom and anger is her secret weapon, Harrison, 0.97
00:19:07.320 she, she believes that everybody should be forced to follow these arbitrary rules.
00:19:12.200 Again, this is the kind of stuff that the CBC publishes angry, bitter, resentful leftists,
00:19:16.780 um, who, who hate freedom, who, who don't care about individual liberty at all, who want
00:19:21.880 to basically bend the world and conform it, uh, to, to, to, to fit their own needs.
00:19:27.140 What, what, what did you make of this piece?
00:19:29.080 Well, this piece is absolutely insane, Candace.
00:19:31.880 I mean, when you read through these, when you read through some of these paragraphs, it's,
00:19:36.260 it's incredible, really.
00:19:37.900 She goes off by saying that everyone should wear a mask for everything, outdoor activities,
00:19:43.520 given that she was able to wear a mask during labor.
00:19:46.440 That means that people, uh, this is a quote from the article, um, that surely people wouldn't
00:19:52.540 mind putting one on to run an errand or two, if it meant keeping, uh, safe those who couldn't
00:19:57.020 vaccinate or who were the most vulnerable.
00:19:58.940 So there's that.
00:19:59.880 Then she goes on to say that the only way Canada can exit out of the pandemic is if there's
00:20:05.000 a vaccine approved for, uh, for those who are under five years old for, so for her, her
00:20:10.400 child, um, then we can lift vaccine passports and mask mandates.
00:20:15.280 Um, and she says that unmasking before having everybody vaccinated, um, is, uh, is apparently
00:20:22.260 some very dangerous, uh, dangerous thing.
00:20:24.760 And then of course, she goes on to say that she's only using services that require or enforce
00:20:31.460 mask mandates and vaccine passports.
00:20:33.560 So again, you're never going to see a piece in the CBC that is at all, uh, contrary to
00:20:40.680 this, the super hard line stance of everybody must be, must follow draconian rules.
00:20:47.580 Those who step out of line are, uh, are, are these crazies who have a death wish and we all
00:20:53.940 need to basically, you know, fall in line behind the government orders and edicts.
00:20:59.320 Um, uh, it's just, it's, it's insane.
00:21:01.940 I don't really have much more to say about this other than that.
00:21:05.660 Well, it's not, it's not just that they don't even believe that they're, that they're crazies
00:21:08.860 with a death wish. 0.95
00:21:09.580 They think that they're out to kill you or out to kill in this case, her daughter, like
00:21:13.540 she even writes, I have to try to balance my daughter's safety and pacifying those who
00:21:17.620 are over it.
00:21:18.440 Again, just trying to compel other people.
00:21:20.140 Look, you're, you're a mom.
00:21:21.260 Um, if you have the, you have the right to keep your kid at home, you have the right
00:21:24.520 to try to protect your kid in any way you can.
00:21:26.440 And I understand that this woman, uh, her, her daughter has some kind of an auto immune,
00:21:30.580 uh, deficiency or, or, uh, bad kidney and that she, she, you know, she's extra worried
00:21:36.520 and cautious about it.
00:21:37.840 I totally relate to that.
00:21:38.540 I have two little kids and obviously your role as a parent is to do everything you can
00:21:42.140 to protect them.
00:21:43.200 Um, however, this idea that, you know, well, first of all, she's writing a piece in the CBC
00:21:49.360 about how angry she is.
00:21:51.000 That's, that's not exactly a productive solution, uh, to this issue, but she's clinging to these
00:21:57.080 methods that we know fail.
00:21:58.500 Like wearing masks doesn't do anything.
00:22:00.820 It doesn't stop the spread.
00:22:01.920 Okay.
00:22:02.560 The, the, the best way that you can protect your kid is, is actually to help build up
00:22:06.700 their immune system, get them outside, get them interacting with other kids.
00:22:10.100 Uh, you know, that, that's how you, that's how for generations, uh, for centuries, that's
00:22:14.600 how we built up children's immune system.
00:22:16.320 So this idea that we're going to just wrap ourselves into like a plastic bubble and stay
00:22:20.600 away from everybody, not going to, not going to turn out well in the long run.
00:22:24.040 And again, this is just the kind of drivel, uh, that we see in the CBC.
00:22:29.080 And, and Candace, I, one, one thing as well, you know, I kind of feel bad for some of these
00:22:33.240 people because they have been, they have been duped into being so afraid of this and it's
00:22:39.680 not their fault.
00:22:40.420 I mean, how many people do you, have you interacted with that are very scared about COVID?
00:22:44.640 They're, they're, they're paying attention to the latest wave, looking at all the, all
00:22:48.900 the numbers and, and, and worrying about their, their health and safety and their family's
00:22:52.840 health and safety when it's, it's overblown really, uh, they, they don't need to be as
00:22:57.260 afraid as they are.
00:22:58.000 But these people have been, have been, you know, whether it's, whether it's, they've been
00:23:03.480 duped or whether they've been, they've been pushed into it.
00:23:06.340 A lot of people, um, even today who still wear double masks, who are afraid to touch public
00:23:12.000 services, I mean, that is, that is something that are, we're going to have to reckon with,
00:23:15.800 uh, going into the future years past this.
00:23:18.580 Are we to believe that all these people who are so afraid of this virus that in several
00:23:23.700 years from now, they're not going to, they're not going to have some of that, some of that
00:23:27.400 same concerns from that same fear.
00:23:29.380 I think, I think, you know, we have to really come to terms with the fact that, uh, the mental
00:23:34.240 health that has, you know, been damaged across the board, it's taken a toll on both sides.
00:23:39.640 People don't want to be stuck in lockdown, but other people are being conditioned to be
00:23:44.800 so afraid of this virus that I think we're going to have to, we're going to have to deal
00:23:49.080 with this, um, in the future.
00:23:51.200 And it's going to become a part of, a part of how we end up dealing with things like regular
00:23:55.380 flus and, and different illnesses.
00:23:57.800 I think it's, I think it's kind of sad in a way too.
00:24:01.500 I agree.
00:24:02.360 And you're right.
00:24:03.300 We should, we should, uh, see, see these kinds of cases with, with compassion and recognize
00:24:07.560 that we have to figure out a plan to get everyone out.
00:24:10.180 It's, it's funny, uh, you just reading this piece again, for me, I also have little kids
00:24:14.540 and I think the exact opposite instincts as this lady, this lady is like, uh, you know, 1.00
00:24:20.180 I'm so afraid of COVID.
00:24:21.220 I don't know what the long-term consequences of COVID are.
00:24:23.500 Therefore I'm going to do everything to like, I got to wrap my child in bubble wrap and keep
00:24:27.280 them safe.
00:24:27.680 For me, uh, my perspective was, okay, what we see about COVID is that it doesn't really impact
00:24:33.700 little kids.
00:24:34.580 They, my, my son had COVID, he's three, uh, he, he had like a sore throat for a day and
00:24:38.900 then he was fine.
00:24:40.080 Uh, sure.
00:24:41.060 I don't know what the long-term impact is, but I also don't know what the long-term impact
00:24:44.560 of keeping kids isolated from their friends and peers.
00:24:47.780 That, that was not something I was willing to do.
00:24:49.940 Uh, I, the, the, the long-term impact of making little kids wear masks is insane.
00:24:54.580 And we know that it will have long-term impact in their ability to communicate, their ability
00:24:58.540 to socialize all these things that when, you know, when you have a little taller, that's
00:25:02.140 what you're trying to do is get them out to meet other people.
00:25:04.480 So, you know, there's, there's the adverse side of this as well.
00:25:07.620 And this idea that we should rush to get little babies and little kids vaccinated.
00:25:12.160 Well, what about the long-term impact of vaccines?
00:25:14.560 We don't know that as well, especially this vaccine, because it's novel and it's new.
00:25:18.840 So, you know, my, my instinct are almost exactly the opposite of this woman. 0.99
00:25:22.940 I wanted to make sure my kids still had some kind of a semblance of a normal childhood
00:25:27.540 that they could still go and play, that they could go to parks.
00:25:30.020 They could spend time outside.
00:25:30.860 They could spend time with other kids.
00:25:32.280 I go out of my way to make sure that the kids have playdates, that they interact with
00:25:35.780 people, they see the world, that, that it's not always just this like strange, uh, you
00:25:40.460 know, everyone wearing masks and everyone's so distant from each other.
00:25:44.000 Um, you know, I want to make sure my kids have a normal life.
00:25:46.840 And it's, it's, it's sort of sad that some people are so wrapped up and paranoid with fear
00:25:52.500 that they can't, they can't offer that to their kids.
00:25:55.380 And then again, the CBC is out there promoting this worldview to try to say, no, no, it's normal
00:25:59.780 for you to just try to completely isolate your child and not let them be around anyone, not
00:26:03.300 let them see anyone and just be counting the days until they have a vaccine available for
00:26:08.040 a zero year old baby.
00:26:09.420 Like it's, it's pretty wild.
00:26:11.380 Okay.
00:26:11.500 Harrison, I do want to get to this one final story because it's fake news wrapped in fake
00:26:15.660 news.
00:26:16.460 Um, true North reported on this a couple of weeks ago that this journal journalist organization
00:26:20.980 won't retract a false statement about a pipeline protest arrest.
00:26:24.920 So basically the, uh, the, the, the Canadian association of journalists, which bills itself
00:26:31.320 as a national voice for Canadian journalists, printed a statement statement in November, accusing
00:26:35.820 the police of making an illegal arrest.
00:26:38.400 So there is this reporter that worked for an outlet called the narwhal who was part of an 0.61
00:26:43.500 anti-pipeline protest, basically this, so this happened back in November in Northern British
00:26:48.060 Columbia.
00:26:48.380 There was a group of unlawful people who were unlawful protesters who were ignoring police
00:26:54.020 orders.
00:26:54.520 They were, they locked themselves up in a cabin protesting against a pipeline, ended up getting
00:26:59.220 arrested.
00:27:00.100 One of the people, one of the protesters, it turns out was a journalist who wrote about
00:27:03.520 her own story.
00:27:04.720 So, so, so, so even though she was part of the protest, part of the people who got arrested,
00:27:08.360 uh, she wrote about it, which I always thought that that was sort of unethical.
00:27:12.460 I mean, you're the one that went to journalism school.
00:27:13.820 Maybe you can comment on that, but she, she, she wrote about it herself.
00:27:17.280 Uh, unfortunately the facts that she got didn't, uh, didn't line up with, with what actually
00:27:23.800 happened.
00:27:24.200 The RCMP put out their own report, the department in the government department put out their
00:27:28.280 own report, basically refuting facts from her news piece.
00:27:31.720 And, and so not only did the narwhal, which is a government funded news organization, far left 0.50
00:27:37.460 focused on environmental, uh, catastrophe, uh, climate alarmism, all those kinds of themes.
00:27:44.120 Um, so, so they wrote a piece that was fake.
00:27:46.720 The Canadian association of journalists, uh, applauded them and put out a statement condemning
00:27:51.580 the police in it.
00:27:52.620 And then it gets even worse Harrison, because now the Canadian journalism foundation is, is,
00:27:59.360 is offering them an award.
00:28:00.460 They gave them an, uh, they nominated them for an excellence award for this same piece
00:28:05.480 that has been refuted and debunked by the RCMP and by a government, uh, report.
00:28:12.880 This shows how wildly out of touch these people are.
00:28:15.700 Like they can report something that didn't happen, that it's totally made up, pretend that
00:28:18.920 there was police brutality involved, pretend that they were illegally arrested.
00:28:21.760 And not only are they allowed to publish it with no consequence, when it turns out to
00:28:26.100 be fake, they actually get awards.
00:28:28.500 They're awarding, giving themselves awards and patting themselves on the back.
00:28:32.100 This is, this is one of the most, uh, remarkable stories I've seen in a while, Harrison.
00:28:37.180 Well, when I first read this, I have to admit, I thought this was a troll.
00:28:40.500 I thought it was, I thought it was them trolling, uh, the RCMP and basically everyone else because 0.56
00:28:46.320 of just how ridiculous it is to award themselves an excellency in journalism award.
00:28:51.760 for, uh, basically a story, uh, in which the journalist who inserts herself as an activist
00:28:58.400 into the story makes it all about her perspective.
00:29:00.920 Uh, and of course she makes it out to seem like she's this hero, like she's this, uh, very
00:29:06.280 brave, um, you know, activist who's fighting back against the RCMP.
00:29:10.660 And I just want to get into some of the, some of these things that I told about this article 0.71
00:29:14.580 because it's really, it's really ridiculous.
00:29:17.100 And first you, you talk, you chatted about the ethics behind putting yourself in the 0.59
00:29:21.740 story and being an activist.
00:29:22.780 I can tell you that in, in modern journalism school, the, the expectation is that you believe
00:29:30.100 as a journalist, you play a role as an activist.
00:29:32.540 I remember just as, as an, uh, as an example, one of the papers they asked us to write was
00:29:37.720 to, was to basically defend journalists being activists.
00:29:41.880 Can a journalist be an activist was the prompt of the art of the essay they had us write.
00:29:47.280 But just, just so we're, just so we're clear on this, the Canadian association of journalists,
00:29:51.200 which were, were the original, uh, the, the original organization to defend this journalist
00:29:55.880 after being caught lying, essentially in her piece, their, their, uh, their ethical, their
00:30:02.740 code of ethics states very clearly that they do not allow their own biases to impede fair
00:30:08.460 and accurate reporting. Accuracy is the moral imperative of journalists.
00:30:12.660 When we make a mistake, whether in fact or in context, and regardless of the platform,
00:30:16.780 we correct it promptly and in a transparent manner, acknowledging the nature of the error,
00:30:21.160 Candace. So I don't know how that code of ethics fits in with awarding themselves a
00:30:27.820 excellency in journalism, uh, award after being called out. Um, but again, you'll never see the
00:30:33.900 CAJ or the CJF, the two organizations, um, that are obviously just activist organizations
00:30:40.320 masquerading as, as journalism, uh, entities or those that defend journalists. You'll never
00:30:45.820 see them defend journalists that are actually, uh, in the, that are actually have their rights
00:30:52.440 stripped from them or are, uh, or are impeded by the government. For example, our own Andrew
00:30:56.600 Lawton, who was pepper sprayed at the freedom convoy protest. I didn't, I didn't hear anything,
00:31:01.100 uh, from them about defending Andrew and defending journalists like Andrew and Alexa
00:31:05.760 Lavoie from rebel. Did you, I, I, I didn't, didn't make it across my desk.
00:31:10.780 No, of course not. They don't care about, uh, journalists who work for Canadian organizations.
00:31:15.460 They only care about their own mostly government funded, mostly far left agenda driven activists
00:31:21.060 here. I mean, this, this woman was illegally, uh, they were occupying private property and present, 0.96
00:31:26.800 preventing people from doing their job. They got arrested. She didn't identify
00:31:30.880 herself as a journalist. She didn't say that she was there covering the story. The police
00:31:34.580 had no idea. They just arrested all the protesters after giving them ample warning saying, you
00:31:38.580 guys have to leave. You have to get out enough with your protests. It's time for these people
00:31:42.620 to be able to go to work. And, and, and, and, and it was written right here that Bracken
00:31:47.540 was detained by police and her ensuing report, which a federal memo found was one-sided and omitted
00:31:53.360 key information led to the arrest being labeled as unlawful by the journalists. So to your point,
00:31:59.060 Harrison, when you make a mistake, this woman, it wasn't a mistake, right? She, she knew what 0.84
00:32:03.660 happened. She left out key information on purpose, but you could, you could say, okay,
00:32:07.460 the Canadian association of journalists didn't know that. So when they issued the statement saying,
00:32:11.420 you know, condemning the police for this unlawful arrest, uh, they, they, they didn't have the full
00:32:16.100 picture. Well, then, then the full picture did emerge. You would expect the CAJ to reverse and,
00:32:22.420 and say, okay, we made a mistake. We didn't have the full information to your point. That's,
00:32:25.500 that's the, that's the duty of a journalist to focus on accuracy and truth. But here we see that,
00:32:32.120 you know, they put, they put their, they put their ideology and their belief in the righteousness
00:32:37.320 of these anti-resource, anti-natural resource development protesters. Um, and, and then it is
00:32:43.560 kind of a troll because they doubled down by nominating it for an award. Why would you nominate
00:32:47.080 that for an excellence awards? These, these people are just so out of touch, Harrison. They're so,
00:32:51.900 they have no idea what the public wants. They have no idea how bad they look. No wonder people
00:32:57.000 trust the media less and less. It's like, how can you trust these people? They, they're,
00:33:01.260 they're, they're congratulating themselves for lying essentially.
00:33:04.600 Yeah. And I want to read some of this excellent reporting. I mean, remember this report was,
00:33:08.940 it was nominated and this is what, this is what was in the report. Just so, just so we're all aware,
00:33:14.100 uh, this, this journalist writes, no one in Canada should tolerate police efforts to intimidate
00:33:19.600 journalists or limit news coverage. My arrest actually makes me a big part of a national
00:33:24.080 reckoning with press freedoms. So again, just inserting herself and making her a part of the
00:33:28.860 story, making her the hero. She goes on to say, police put me in handcuffs when I should have
00:33:32.620 been doing my job. I felt kidnapped having never been arrested before. It is the best word I can
00:33:38.040 think of to describe being taken so abruptly out of my life and work in violation of Canadian
00:33:42.760 charter rights, protecting freedoms of the press. Oh no, her charter rights. Almost as if Candace,
00:33:48.320 uh, the charter rights of journalists, uh, were severely violated as well in the freedom convoy.
00:33:55.560 Uh, but again, you just don't hear that there it's, it's not, if there's, there's no equal
00:34:00.220 standard, right? The charter rights were not violated. This journalist charter rights were not
00:34:05.060 violated. She refused police orders to leave an unlawful protest. Journalists at the freedom convoy
00:34:11.860 who were arrested for covering the news, who were pepper sprayed, who were, uh, who were beaten by
00:34:17.860 batons. Those journalists had their charter rights violated. That's the truth. We saw it all on
00:34:22.760 camera. It's just unbelievable. And again, like you said, it has to be a troll, right? I mean, this,
00:34:28.140 this, this has to be a joke that they're playing on us. And also like, just because you're a journalist
00:34:33.440 doesn't exempt you from laws, right? Like if you're part of a protest that the police are saying,
00:34:38.180 you can't do this anymore. We've given you ample warning. You now have to be removed. Unless you
00:34:43.440 identify yourself as a journalist, like it's not like RCMP just magically know who is a journalist
00:34:48.660 and who isn't, who's going to go write, uh, uh, an opinion piece for an art, uh, an outlet called
00:34:54.200 the Narwhal, which no one's ever heard of. Like you have to identify yourself as a journalist. And
00:34:58.560 that's what Andrew Lawton and Alexa Duarte did during their, during that it's on video. They identify
00:35:03.080 themselves as being journalists and yet they're still brutalized. But of course, no word from the
00:35:08.880 Canadian association of journalism, uh, on those assaults, not nothing at all. We don't fit into
00:35:13.920 the mold of, of, of a good leftist journalist who gets government funded. So, so we don't get the
00:35:18.500 same treatment. It's, it's all such a farce, such a sad state of journalism here in Canada. Well,
00:35:24.720 that's, that's the whole purpose of this show and fake news Friday. So thank you so much for
00:35:28.540 tuning in Harrison. Thank you so much for joining us. Happy to be here. Always. Right. That's Harrison
00:35:34.220 Faulkner. It's fake news Friday. I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is the Candice Malcolm show.
00:35:38.880 Thank you.