In this episode, Candice and Harrison discuss the biggest fake news hoaxes of the year, and how they were uncovered by debunking the legacy media narratives that have been peddling them throughout the past decade. They also talk about the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and the Freedom Convoy, the group that uncovered the truth about a group called Diagalon.
00:00:00.140Does climate change really cause wildfires? Did Danielle Smith's office really try to meddle in a criminal investigation in Alberta?
00:00:07.700Does anything the legacy media tell you ever turn out to be true?
00:00:11.100Well, it is Fake News Friday, and today we are going to announce the biggest fake news hoaxes of 2023.
00:00:16.300I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.
00:00:18.160Hi, everyone. Thank you so much for tuning into the podcast.
00:00:30.640Don't forget to like this video. Subscribe to the Trin Earth channel if you're not already.
00:00:33.980Leave us a five-star review if you enjoy this podcast.
00:00:36.700Head on over to our website, tnc.news, to sign up for our newsletter.
00:00:39.820And if you want to support our journalism, please consider hitting that donate button.
00:00:43.340Okay, so today on Fake News Friday, we are going to announce the winners of our Fake News Friday 2023 awards for the biggest fake news hoaxes of the year.
00:00:53.580And once again, I am joined by Trin Earth journalist and host of Ratioed Harrison Faulkner.
00:01:02.260Okay, so we have each chosen our top fake news story of the year.
00:01:06.220But before we get to that, we have a couple of honorable mentions.
00:01:09.300So both of the stories that we're going to talk about first are about debunking an earlier narrative.
00:01:15.300And so if I think of this decade so far, the 2020s, and I think of probably the most damaging, the most egregious narratives that legacy media have been peddled.
00:01:27.140Number one, the unmarked grave story, the idea that Canada committed genocide at the residential schools.
00:01:32.560And the second, I mean, there's so much to do with COVID.
00:01:34.600There are so many fake news narratives to do with COVID.
00:01:36.740But when you finally saw a group of citizens stand up and fight against the COVID totalitarianism, the legacy media smeared them as being far right, radical, extremists, racists, and even Nazis.
00:01:49.900So, of course, here at True North, we've known from day one that both these narratives were wrong.
00:01:54.040But unfortunately, many Canadians, most Canadians probably, believe them to be true.
00:01:58.180Well, I think 2023 was another year of vindication, another year where we uncovered facts to further discredit and destroy these two fake news narratives.
00:02:07.480So, Harrison, why don't we start with you?
00:02:08.840Why don't you start and tell us about how that narrative of the trucker convoy being a hate group sort of really fell apart in 2023?
00:02:17.940Well, there was a major story that broke a few months ago from a journalist whose name is Karima Saad.
00:02:23.320Now, she wrote a story called Hategate, a big investigation into this organization, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, a group that I know our audience knows very well, unfortunately all too well.
00:02:35.340You see, the reason for this is that the Anti-Hate Network has been pumping out fake news, propaganda, targeting a group called Diagalon.
00:02:43.980Again, if you've been paying any attention to news over the past few years, you've heard of this group, Diagalon.
00:02:48.780Diagalon is essentially a fan club for Canadian podcaster Jeremy McKenzie.
00:02:54.320But for whatever reason, the Anti-Hate Network has been focusing in on this group, labeling them as a violent, dangerous, militant, even going so far as to describe it as a neo-Nazi organization.
00:03:07.200Well, sure enough, Candice, during the Freedom Convoy, the federal government were relying on Anti-Hate Network stories,
00:03:15.060which turned out to be fake, by the way, which turned out to be single-source, open-sourced intelligence,
00:03:20.760describing this group as a dangerous, violent, extremist organization.
00:03:24.840Through access to information, Karima Saad was able to uncover that during the Freedom Convoy,
00:03:31.280the day that the Emergencies Act was invoked,
00:03:34.740officials inside of Justin Trudeau's office were scrambling to try and find any intelligence they could get their hands on
00:03:41.540that would make the case that, in fact, there were violent, dangerous groups inside Ottawa during the Freedom Convoy.
00:03:48.460Sure enough, they had nothing except for a bunch of legacy media articles which sourced one source,
00:03:56.640a source from the Anti-Hate Network, describing this group as a dangerous, violent, militant organization.
00:04:02.620It's absurd that the legacy media would rely on the Anti-Hate Network, but it's even worse, Candice,
00:04:09.400that the federal government relied on those legacy media reports to justify the single worst attack on our freedoms
00:04:16.480ever since, well, Pierre Trudeau invoked the War Measures Act.
00:16:22.180Climate change must have just paused for 2020.
00:16:24.440And furthermore, the Alberta Wildfire Database says that more than half of the wildfires this year were the cause of humans.
00:16:34.540It's just ridiculous that they tried to ratchet up the fear this way.
00:16:38.220But again, the legacy media didn't do any journalism.
00:16:40.660They discredited reporters like myself who called into question the possibility that this was arson.
00:16:46.040And they just kept going on and on about how, of course, it has to be climate change.
00:16:50.780Well, Harrison, I want to commend you for your reporting on this topic because basically, you know, you put out these great reports just pointing out the truth, pointing out the facts.
00:16:59.340And all of a sudden, the legacy media started attacking you, which you always know you've done something right.
00:17:04.840But they were really bothered by the fact that you were pointing this out and they were trying to debunk you.
00:17:08.820But then it turned out that they were wrong.
00:17:11.020And, you know, as soon as because you're out there telling the truth and you've got a big audience and people are watching and it's like you're threatening the monopoly that legacy media have to just spread lies to fit their propaganda because they support liberals.
00:17:24.760Liberals support carbon taxes. Carbon taxes are justified over this complete fear mongering and, you know, almost conspiracies about climate change.
00:17:33.640We talked about conspiracy theories in the last show on Fake News Friday.
00:17:36.960This is kind of like a left wing conspiracy, isn't it?
00:17:39.400And you had the temerity to point it out.
00:17:42.600And so they came after you, which was pretty amusing.
00:17:46.600I remember doing the research for that show and realizing, like, I was sort of half interested in it.
00:17:52.180And I thought maybe there's something here.
00:17:54.160And I just kept looking at the data from the federal government, from the provincial government, seeing these stories of the police investigating arson.
00:18:00.900And I thought, this is ridiculous here.
00:18:48.580And it was an excuse for, you know, the nanny state to come back out and tell us all to wear our masks again and, you know, wag the finger, try to bring that thing back.
00:18:59.900All right, Harrison, I want to announce what I thought was the top fake news story of the year.
00:19:03.620The winner came courtesy of our friends over at the CBC.
00:19:07.240So let me walk you through this story.
00:19:08.580In the middle of the 2023 Alberta election campaign, in the middle of the campaign, the CBC drops a bombshell of a news story with an incredible accusation against the sitting Premier Danielle Smith.
00:19:20.400So the CBC, citing anonymous sources, of course, claimed that Danielle Smith and her office were personally trying to meddle and interfere in a police investigation.
00:19:31.640The accusation was that some members of the Premier staff had sent emails directly to the Crown prosecutors, ordering them to let up on COVID rule breakers, specifically the investigation into the border blockade during the Contraker convoy in Coutts, Alberta.
00:19:48.960So huge, huge accusation, almost reminiscent, Harrison, of what Justin Trudeau did to his Attorney General trying to pressure his Attorney General at the time to drop charges against SNC-Lavillon, which happened to be a big liberal donor.
00:20:04.020So they were kind of taking this story of what Trudeau had done a couple of years ago and accusing Danielle Smith of doing the same thing.
00:20:11.780Well, this reading from the National Post here, they say this accusation, the story, it created a nasty suspicion that the Premier's office was interfering directly in individual criminal prosecutions.
00:20:22.020And it rightly led to an investigation by the province's ethics commissioner.
00:20:26.800And in the meantime, the CBC stood stubbornly by its story.
00:20:29.520So Danielle Smith, to her credit right off the bat, said, no, this didn't happen.
00:20:33.120She ordered that the bureaucracy have a full review of all the emails that were sent between her office and the Crown prosecutor.
00:21:02.100And then eventually the investigation came back once again with no evidence, no evidence of alleged emails being sent, no evidence of Danielle Smith or anyone from her office doing what the CBC alleged to do.
00:21:14.360Well, it didn't matter despite their best efforts.
00:21:16.840Danielle Smith still won the election.
00:21:18.240So CBC tried to smear her, tried to tell Albertans this person can't be trusted because she's, you know, whatever, a threat to democracy or interfering or whatever.
00:21:26.320Well, of course, Danielle Smith was vindicated.
00:21:48.380CBC is retracting report alleging someone in Premier Smith's office emailed Crown prosecutors to question and challenging the handle of cases involving COVID-19.
00:21:56.620CBC made an announcement Wednesday in an unsigned editor's note atop an amended online version of the January 19th story.
00:22:04.700They said, our sources have insisted that Crown prosecutors felt political pressure regarding the Coutts, Alberta cases, but they are not able to confirm that the emails they originally described were sent directly from the Premier's office to the Crown.
00:22:19.400So, I mean, Harrison, this is so ridiculous.
00:22:21.840The CBC didn't even see the emails, right?
00:22:23.740They put out this bombshell in the middle of election.
00:22:26.400Like, what kind of controls do they have over at the CBC that they would put out this story without even seeing it?
00:22:32.220They were just relying on someone else who was telling them that these emails existed.
00:22:36.800But you would think, like, you know, I've been in this business for a while.
00:22:42.800If you're going to put out a bombshell, if you're going to put out a story with unnamed sources, you better have at least seen, personally seen those emails.
00:22:49.960One of your reporters should have seen those emails to verify that they are true.
00:22:53.500Instead of taking someone's word for it, someone with a vendetta, obviously, I mean, the CBC just lost.
00:22:58.600This is seriously one of the worst examples of a news organization losing credibility.
00:23:03.880They really risked their credibility with going after the Premier during an election.
00:23:15.440I don't know how anyone can ever trust the CBC.
00:23:18.360This story alone is a reason why the CBC should be defunded.
00:23:21.820And no one in Alberta, no one in the Alberta government should ever do an interview with this outlet again because it has just completely burnt any shred of credibility that they ever had in Alberta.
00:24:02.280They rarely have to issue a full retraction.
00:24:04.460And to do it in the middle of an election, obviously, and we also talked about this too, to do it in the middle of an election without having the sources spot on is clearly interfering, in my opinion, in the election.
00:24:15.660In my opinion, Candace, this is clear election interference.
00:24:18.740If you're going to publish a story like that in the middle of an election and not have it absolutely on the money, that is interfering in the election.
00:24:25.760Furthermore, once a story is published, it is accepted by the public.
00:24:31.380Even if you retract it months later, which they obviously did, it doesn't have any impact because the news cycle is gone.
00:25:13.520Honestly, Harrison, you're completely right that this wouldn't happen against a left-wing professor, a left-wing politician.
00:25:19.660But just, you know, the CBC just doesn't have any credibility.
00:25:22.300Like, I don't understand how anyone can take them seriously after this entire back-and-forth.
00:25:27.800They clearly have a political axe to grind against Daniel Smith because she's an independent thinker, because she's not going to be controlled by, you know, the forces that the CBC is behind.
00:25:40.220They dug their heels in, only to be proven wrong.
00:25:44.020Really, really, you know, whenever, I hope, whenever Pierre Polyev gets elected and defunds this despicable organization, no one will miss it.
00:25:52.780It is because of stories like this and actions like this that they deserve to lose every cent of government funding that they have.