Carney FLIPS on supply management, Food Professor explains why food inflation is going UP in Canada
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
167.25339
Summary
Candice Malan talks about the new chief of staff for the Prime Minister, Marc-Andr Blanchard, and why she thinks he s a good fit for the job. She also talks to food economist Sylvian Charlebeau about the impact of food inflation on the economy.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hi, I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is The Candice Malcolm Show. Thank you so much for tuning
00:00:06.520
in. We have an excellent episode for you today. I hope everyone had a wonderful weekend.
00:00:11.860
So over the weekend, Prime Minister Mark Carney was in Calgary, and he was there to
00:00:17.160
meet with energy industry leaders. I've heard this from several people, including Brett
00:00:21.700
Wilson, who was on the show with us last week. And he said that Mark Carney plays a good
00:00:26.880
game, talks a good game about developing energy, developing oil and gas. While he's
00:00:31.160
in Calgary, he's positive about pipelines. And then as soon as he leaves, he sort of strikes
00:00:35.100
a different tone. So we're going to keep an eye on that. Of course, Mark Carney today is
00:00:39.040
in Saskatoon, and he's at the First Minister's meeting. So he's having a meeting with all
00:00:43.400
of the premiers. We're going to keep an eye on that, and we're going to dive into it a
00:00:47.440
little later in the week. But I did want to point out one interesting thing. So we did
00:00:52.800
learn, like I said, Carney was in Calgary yesterday talking about how he wants to make Canada
00:00:56.780
an energy superpower, not really specifically saying oil and gas or pipelines, but energy
00:01:01.480
broadly. And then he also quietly appointed a new chief of staff on Sunday. And now I know
00:01:08.100
personnel issues aren't the most interesting things to talk about, but this individual,
00:01:12.620
Marc-André Blanchard, will serve as chief of staff. And this is only interesting because
00:01:17.580
of his own background and what it signals, right? There are two flanks in the Liberal Party.
00:01:21.500
There is a sort of pro-business, business as usual side that Mark Carney tries to represent,
00:01:26.680
like a departure from Justin Trudeau and the sort of radical anti-oil agenda that he had.
00:01:33.980
And then that other side, which is sort of the Gerald Butts flank of the Liberal Party. Well,
00:01:38.540
Marc-André Blanchard very much comes from that Gerald Butts flank of the party. And don't just
00:01:43.500
trust me. I mean, when Gerald Butts stepped down in 2019, Marc-André profusely thanked him for his
00:01:50.940
service and his deep commitment. And he said that he was, you know, an idol and his leadership in
00:01:56.020
fighting against climate change and inequalities was inspiring to others. His background is that
00:02:01.500
he was the executive vice president and global head of sustainability at the CDPQ Global, which is a
00:02:07.160
Quebec-based institutional investment firm. And he was very much on board with the net zero. He's a net
00:02:12.260
zero investor. And he previously said that it's essential to not increase oil and gas and coal
00:02:18.520
production and focus on renewable and transitional energy. So that is where we're coming from with
00:02:25.140
this chief of staff. And what that is signaling to Canadians is not exactly the same kind of thing
00:02:31.480
that Carney was saying yesterday in Calgary. Okay, I want to introduce our guests. I'm very pleased to
00:02:37.000
have this guest. We had him on the election show, which was great to talk to him. I'm talking about
00:02:40.960
Dr. Sylvian Charlebeau. He's not online as the food professor. He runs an excellent, excellent
00:02:46.260
ex-account. He leads the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University. And he's host of the
00:02:52.580
Food Professor podcast. So Sylvian, thank you so much for joining the show.
00:02:57.580
Hi, great to have you. So I want to talk a little bit about the food inflation that's happening in
00:03:03.440
Canada. Specifically, we learned today or yesterday that Mark Carney is endorsing the dairy cartel
00:03:11.300
protectionist bill that's put forth by the blog. This is Rebel News reporting that Mark Carney
00:03:15.340
backed a Quebec war dairy bill amid the ongoing trade disputes with Donald Trump's supply management
00:03:21.640
will never, never be on the negotiating table, Mark Carney told the House of Commons supply
00:03:26.600
management will be protected according to Blacklock's reporter. So I'm wondering what you make of this
00:03:33.280
bill and Mark Carney agreeing to back it. Well, I'm not surprised. So you're talking about
00:03:39.760
Bill C-282 coming from Parliament No. 44. It has survived. And politically, I would say that no one in
00:03:50.500
Parliament has any choice. The dairy lobby in particular is incredibly powerful. And they know
00:03:57.620
how to destroy political careers. Just talk to Maxime Bernier about that. I mean, they are incredibly
00:04:03.820
influential. And the dairy lobby is advocating for a system that very few people understand. Even I would
00:04:11.480
say that many politicians don't understand. But what they do understand is that if they actually go against
00:04:17.160
it, they will pay the price. As a scientist myself, my job is to make sure that people understand what the
00:04:25.880
system is all about and how costly it can be for an economy. So, yes, we are stuck with Bill C-282.
00:04:35.120
And I testified before Senate in December against Bill C-282. I think Senate listened. We were going to be
00:04:45.540
successful. But now, of course, we all know what happened next. We went into an election, a leadership race,
00:04:52.260
an election, and here we are. Well, it's interesting because during the election campaign, Mark Carney,
00:04:58.420
he affirmed that he had unwavering support for the dairy supply management system in the face of
00:05:05.520
President Trump. So I'm going to play this clip, but I'm going to play another clip that showed
00:05:09.420
something slightly different. So first, here's a clip of Carney saying that he had unwavering support
00:05:13.760
of supply management. We will never have discussions with respect to supply management. It's off the
00:05:20.120
table. So that's sort of the typical Canadian politician response. But then a few days later,
00:05:25.640
speaking on a panel with Radio Canada journalists, this is the French language. Mark Carney said that
00:05:30.920
there isn't a need to pass a law to protect supply management, saying it's not necessary to make new
00:05:35.620
laws for negotiating positions, adding, I know how to negotiate. So this was sort of an interesting,
00:05:41.160
I felt like maybe opening the door to possibly just saying that it's time to evolve the system. So
00:05:46.440
let's play this clip. It's French, but I believe it's dubbed in English, and then I'll get you to
00:05:51.960
You refused today to committing to legislation to protect supply management for people in agriculture.
00:05:57.960
Why? In my opinion, it's not necessarily to make laws for negotiation positions. It's not about
00:06:07.840
legislation to have a negotiation with you, say, as a European and with regards to critical minerals.
00:06:18.140
So to me, that's the interesting point here, because he's saying that when you're negotiating
00:06:23.920
with a foreign country, you don't want to be bound by legislation that could hurt your negotiating
00:06:28.320
position. And so that, again, that was sort of applying that maybe he would have some room to
00:06:33.020
negotiate. And he was pretty adamant there saying that it's not necessary. And then yet here we are
00:06:37.980
seeing him go ahead and back the very bill that he said wasn't necessary. So what do you make of that?
00:06:42.400
Yeah. So the second version, the French debate, what he was saying is accurate. I don't think you need
00:06:52.340
to do this. And honestly, I think it would position, it would put Canada in a very weak position moving
00:06:59.760
forward with any country, to be honest. Because typically, when you start negotiating with another
00:07:08.080
country, you will put on the table sensitive sectors. And so there would be an automatic for Canada. Do you need
00:07:15.740
a bill? Do you need a law to protect that sector? I don't think so, to be honest, because eventually, we're
00:07:23.740
probably going to have to make some compromises along the way, as we did with the United States-Mexico-Canadian
00:07:30.340
deal that was ratified in 2020. And of course, we all know what happened next. We all had to pay
00:07:36.280
a $1.2 billion bill given back to dairy farmers as compensation, if you will, even though, Candace,
00:07:46.640
I'm not sure if you were aware, but dairy farmers don't lose a cent with these deals at all. I mean,
00:07:53.040
when you actually look at how much money they're losing, they're not losing at all. They recalibrate
00:07:58.780
quotas, which indicates how politicians poorly understand the system. It's all about theater.
00:08:07.800
It's about artifacts. So I think what Prime Minister Carney is understanding now is that he needs to
00:08:13.880
go ahead with this bill only to show that he cares very much about supply management. But it doesn't
00:08:19.860
mean that there aren't going to be compromises made along the way. Okay. So you're saying that maybe
00:08:25.720
this is just posturing because- Oh, absolutely. I mean, he just won an election. It's not like
00:08:30.440
we're heading into another election anytime soon. So I don't really understand why he has to do this.
00:08:36.240
To me, the one sort of silver lining of being in a trade war with our closest friends and allies
00:08:41.240
is that maybe it would be a time for introspection and reflection upon our own policies so that we can
00:08:46.820
go ahead and get rid of the protectionist policies that really severely benefit a small, small group of
00:08:52.760
people and harm the rest of Canadians. And we're talking about this in light of crippling food
00:08:57.460
inflation as it is. The cost of dairy is more expensive in Canada because of this system. The
00:09:03.980
system was designed, I think, in the 1950s. Maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong.
00:09:09.040
Okay. 1970s. It seems like it's quite out of date and maybe we should adapt and have a sort of more
00:09:14.740
modern laissez-faire free market system. And yet that seems to be completely off the table. I want to read
00:09:19.460
a tweet that you posted because I love this. You said, for Canada to truly have a thriving agri-food
00:09:24.960
economy, provincial dairy boards that manage quotas must be eliminated, but don't hold your breath. If
00:09:30.120
anything, the 45th parliament is likely to repeat the same mistakes as the last one, doubling down on
00:09:34.620
protecting dairy. It's interesting because I remember when Stephen Harper was the prime minister and the
00:09:38.640
conservative government got rid of the wheat board and that was a huge victory. And I thought, you know,
00:09:42.420
next will be the dairy board. And yet that was, preferably, you know, no pun intended, but the sacred cow
00:09:48.020
of Canadian politics. And it seems like it still is. So what do you make of all that?
00:09:52.860
The monopsony that impacted barley and wheat, I was actually in Saskatchewan at the time and it was really a
00:10:00.600
different system and it was easier to dismantle because, to be honest, a lot of farmers were discontent,
00:10:05.820
were unhappy with the system. They were able to trade better than the Canadian wheat board based out of
00:10:11.560
Winnipeg. And that's why it was easier for Chuck Strahl at the time. He was the minister of agriculture
00:10:16.480
to get rid of it, really, through a plebiscite. The supply management system is much more complicated.
00:10:23.080
There's a lot of fiscal baggage here. You have a quota system, first of all. Secondly, you have
00:10:30.420
provinces managing quotas. And that, of course, would include Quebec. And Quebec, with only 20% of the
00:10:37.660
population, produces almost 40% of all the milk we have in Canada. So you can tell that Quebec has a
00:10:45.020
lot to lose, which makes it a very political, well, hot potato. I was asked by many politicians over the
00:10:53.300
years, if I were to have superpowers and eliminate or at least make supply management better, what would
00:11:02.500
you do? If there's one thing I would do right now would be to harmonize the allocation of quotas
00:11:10.140
nationally, not provincially, but nationally. And that's where you're going to start seeing more
00:11:16.380
efficiencies. And to your point about costs, you would probably reduce the cost to produce milk and
00:11:21.220
butterfat in Canada because the money will go where efficiencies are built in Alberta, in Saskatchewan,
00:11:29.380
in BC. So the money would actually flow west. And Quebec and Ontario, both provinces absolutely
00:11:36.700
know this. That's why they're adamant in protecting the status quo.
00:11:40.500
Well, I'm guessing that's part of the reason why those changes aren't being seriously discussed,
00:11:44.960
because if the benefit is in Ontario and Quebec, the system is going to be protected to keep it that
00:11:51.520
way. I want to tie this into food inflation and what many Canadians are experiencing when they go to
00:11:57.880
the grocery store, which is just that the prices continue to go up. So this was a report that came
00:12:02.920
out over the weekend. Food inflation continues to rise. Here's what it means for your fridge.
00:12:07.080
According to Loblaw's company, May food inflation report, grocery prices rose 3.8 percent per year
00:12:13.720
over year from last April, surpassing the general consumer price index. This marks the third consecutive
00:12:18.740
month where food inflation has outstripped overall inflation noted by Statistics Canada. You had an
00:12:25.140
article over in Troy Media about a week and a half ago saying, blaming the U.S. won't cut it.
00:12:30.400
Canada's food inflation crisis is largely the result of Ottawa's poor policy choices. So can you help us
00:12:40.720
So 3.8 percent is the highest food inflation rate amongst G7 countries, with the exception of Japan.
00:12:47.320
Okay. So it's got to be policy driven. Absolutely. And right now, food inflation is 2.1 percent above
00:12:55.160
inflation, which means that if you and I want to go to the grocery store, when we see high prices,
00:12:59.960
we'll notice. That's really what it means. And so what's going on right now, counter tariffs have not
00:13:07.400
helped. So in March, from March the 3rd to through March, April and beginning of May, we actually,
00:13:15.460
a lot of importers had to deal with counter tariffs. But the one thing that you may not know, Candace,
00:13:21.960
is that during the election, Mark Carney decided to pause counter tariffs affecting the food industry
00:13:29.220
effective May 7th, a few weeks ago, until October. So Loblaw came out a few weeks ago saying,
00:13:38.880
well, we're going to have 6,000 products affected by counter tariffs. It's terrible. Well,
00:13:43.920
not quite, because as of May 7th, which is the day after Mark Carney met with President Trump,
00:13:50.580
by the way, no coincidence, tariffs were paused. And so counter tariffs aren't going to be a problem
00:13:58.120
for May, June. So we are expecting the food inflation rate to actually drop. But the troubling part of all
00:14:05.520
this is that no one has actually talked about it. And the first person I would point to is Prime
00:14:11.440
Mr. Carney, he should have said during the elbows up campaign that perhaps
00:14:16.560
implementing counter tariffs actually will penalize Canadians first. He knows that. And so he did it
00:14:25.300
very quietly in a very subtle way and let Sean Pine do the dirty work.
00:14:30.440
Well, it's interesting because one of the things you note in your piece is that food inflation is going
00:14:36.220
down in the United States. So they're the ones that are implementing tariffs on just about absolutely
00:14:40.260
everybody. And yet their inflation is going down. It was 2 percent, 2.1 percent. And Canada's is almost
00:14:46.640
double that. And there's a really simple reason for that. The American economy can absorb
00:14:52.300
geopolitical shocks like tariffs. Absolutely. That's what it says. In Canada, we have a less
00:14:59.260
competitive food industry. So when you implement counter tariffs, it will hurt Canadians. When President
00:15:06.020
Trump said to Walmart, well, with tariffs, you can eat it up. He's absolutely right. Walmart can eat
00:15:13.140
up the tariffs because it's such an efficient company. We don't have a company like Walmart in
00:15:18.400
Canada. Well, possibly because we don't have the same kind of competition. So they are a little bit
00:15:24.820
complacent. And when it comes to that, you had another interesting concept in this article I hadn't
00:15:29.320
really heard or really understood. Although you see it when you go to the grocery store and that was,
00:15:33.640
you call it maple washing, where companies overstate or exaggerate a product's connection
00:15:38.300
to Canada. I noticed when I go to the grocery store, it's almost obnoxious, Sylvain, because
00:15:42.380
a Canadian product, you know, they put like a huge maple leaf on it. They really want you to know that
00:15:46.640
this product is Canadian. And they kind of like try to hide the non-Canadian products, even though the
00:15:52.260
Canadian ones often are more expensive. So could you help us understand what you mean by maple washing?
00:15:57.300
Yeah. If you've been following my work over the last few years, you'll know that I always give the
00:16:02.240
benefit of the doubt to business. But sometimes businesses tend to make stupid decisions.
00:16:10.580
The bread price fixing scandal is certainly one. The maple washing is another one. I actually do
00:16:16.720
receive pictures from readers almost daily. And one time I got a reader sending me a picture of
00:16:23.480
Canadian naval oranges, Candice. Canadian naval oranges. Yeah. Unprocessed. So you can tell that
00:16:33.180
something was going on. So the person actually went to management and said, listen, you have a problem
00:16:37.740
here. You can't have Canadian oranges. They rectified the situation. He came, he went back the next day,
00:16:45.440
the next day, same store, same shelf, only to discover that those naval oranges were in fact from
00:16:51.480
Egypt. And they were 12.5% less expensive. Now that is maple washing.
00:16:59.760
Interesting. Interesting. Well, I, there was a funny political cartoon during the campaign and it was
00:17:04.060
all these Canadians, it was, it was a picture of a whole bunch of Canadians lining up to go into
00:17:08.620
Walmart. And yeah. And they were all saying, elbows up, buy Canadian, you know, and like shopping.
00:17:13.860
Right next door, there's the bankrupt Bay, the Bay Hudson Bay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's, that's
00:17:19.840
typically, and of course, Nelson IQ last week. So for the last few months, we've seen several
00:17:25.300
surveys telling us, oh, Canadians are buying Canadian. They're buying Canadian elbows up.
00:17:29.940
They're boycotting America at the grocery store. But last week we heard from Nelson IQ. And again,
00:17:35.620
this is something that hasn't been reported overly by, by, by legacy media. Sales for Canadian food
00:17:43.300
products are up in the last few months by 4.4%, not 10%, not 20%, 4.4% with inflation. When you look at
00:17:55.540
American food products, they're down of course, but by 4.1%. So we're talking about a shift of about 4%,
00:18:02.860
which is actually important, but we're not talking about a huge boycott, a huge shift towards
00:18:09.820
Canadian products here because people have budgets. People, uh, only have so much money to spend on
00:18:15.580
food. Right. And at the end of the day, if the, you know, imported American, uh, blueberries or half
00:18:22.220
a price or even just to get blueberries at this time of year, uh, people are at the end of the day,
00:18:26.780
they're going to do that. Uh, if, if, if you were advising Mark Kearney, or if you could advise
00:18:31.340
one, one thing to do to help lower the costs of food and groceries in Canada, what, uh, what would
00:18:36.860
that be? Well, the one thing that we haven't discussed yet is the Grocer Code of Conduct. It's
00:18:41.580
actually, uh, going in, uh, it's going to be implemented as of January 1st. I would, I would make
00:18:47.420
sure that this code works for all to, uh, the liberals actually didn't make a promise investing
00:18:54.300
more in food processing. I'd make sure it happens. So they've committed to a $200 million fund,
00:19:00.620
which is not a whole lot. Uh, I certainly would like to see more, but it is the only,
00:19:06.140
only platform during the election that actually did promise to give some attention to processing.
00:19:11.900
And if we want to build a stronger agri-food sector, if we want to gain some ability to
00:19:18.220
support our farmers and innovate more, we need a stronger food processing sector.
00:19:24.380
Interesting. Interesting points. Well, Dr. Charlebois, I really appreciate your time,
00:19:28.460
uh, and insights. Thank you so much. That's Dr. Sylvan Charlebois of, uh, Dalhousie University.
00:19:33.340
Thank you. My pleasure. All right, folks, this is all the time we have for today. We'll be back
00:19:37.980
again tomorrow with all the news. I'm Candace Malcolm. This is Candace Malcolm Show. Thank you and God
00:19:41.500
us. You're watching Juneau News, Canada's fastest growing independent news network.
00:19:53.020
Our team works day and night to bring you nationwide coverage of the issues that matter. Honest reporting
00:20:01.260
of the stories that put Canadians first. From far and wide, Juneau is doing the work to turn the dial in
00:20:10.540
the right direction. Bringing you the news from the field and in the studio. Wherever it takes us,
00:20:28.540
Subscribe today and help us replace the CBC. Go to JuneauNews.com to join the fight.