The Candice Malcolm Show - CBC journalist HUMILIATED twice in ONE DAY, Carney Liberals SLAMMED in new press freedom report, will Alberta SEPARATE？

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show. We have a great episode for you

00:00:07.460 today. We are coming off the election. And let me just tell you, folks, the numbers here at

00:00:11.840 Juno News are spectacular. I want to share a few of them with you because I'm really excited and

00:00:15.860 really proud of what we have built together. I say together because we would not be here

00:00:19.760 without the audience, without viewers like you, without the people who are subscribers to Juno

00:00:24.140 News that pay us $10 a month for all of our news. You're the ones that have propelled this and kept

00:00:28.620 this going. So during the election, during the shortest election that you could possibly have,

00:00:32.320 only five weeks, we published 413 exclusive news stories at Juno News. We had 10 million plus page

00:00:39.940 views across social media, so just X and YouTube. Our videos were viewed 14.2 million times. Our

00:00:47.560 newsletter, which we send out every day, was opened 9.1 million times. It was viewed 9.1 million times.

00:00:53.960 And our premium subscribers grew by 30 percent, folks. So we are so excited to be part of the

00:01:00.820 movement of independent press and independent journalism in Canada. We are on a mission to

00:01:06.280 replace the CBC, and I think we're going to get there. I'm going to ask you just take a quick

00:01:10.640 second and like this video. It really helps us with the YouTube algorithm. But it's not all good

00:01:15.720 news because, as I'm going to report today, Canada has fallen in terms of world press freedom.

00:01:21.780 So you know this and I know this, that Canada is not as free as we used to be. We don't have free

00:01:27.040 speech like we used to. And now it's verified, not by a conservative group. This isn't just a

00:01:31.260 right-wing talking point. This is a factual statement based on the World Press Freedom Index. So to talk

00:01:37.980 about this a little more, I'm very pleased to be joined by my friend Sheila Gunn-Reed. Sheila is a

00:01:42.200 journalist at Rebel News, Rebel Media, and she's the president of the Independent Press Gallery of

00:01:47.140 Canada. Sheila, welcome to the program.

00:01:48.720 Candice, thanks for having me on the show.

00:01:51.480 Okay, well, I saw this on X, and it was really disappointing, but not surprising. So can you

00:01:56.480 walk us through this Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index?

00:02:01.220 Sure. Yeah, the Reporters Without Borders, they put out an analysis of press freedom every single

00:02:06.840 year. And it tracks government overreach, arrests of journalists, violence against journalists,

00:02:14.900 and government censorship. And Canada now ranks 21st in the world with a score of 78.75. Now,

00:02:24.380 the reason this is significant is that this is a huge drop from just 2024. In 2024, Canada was at 14th

00:02:34.580 place. And overall, now this is what I think is really significant, is that, you know, how people

00:02:39.640 used to talk about how mean Prime Minister Stephen Harper was to journalists. But journalists had a

00:02:44.060 really good under Prime Minister Stephen Harper because we've dropped 13 places since 2015 when

00:02:51.960 the Liberals took power. And that is post the Liberals dumping a pile of money on the mainstream

00:02:57.780 media, bailout after bailout. This is post the government overreach into journalism. So we have

00:03:04.480 to remember Bill C-11 that handed basic control of the internet over to the CRTC. So that's the

00:03:12.800 broadcasting bureaucracy. This is post C-18. C-18, as you know, forced tech companies to bankroll

00:03:20.120 failing legacy media outlets. And that prompted Meta to block Canadian news outright, right, where a lot

00:03:26.780 of people consumed their news, but also where a lot of independent journalists were seeing their reach

00:03:33.700 grow. And then now we've got Carney threatening to clean up online pollution, he says, is flowing our

00:03:40.080 way from the Americans, which of course, is a euphemism for purging any sort of dissenting voices. So this

00:03:46.040 is troubling. And this tracks with exactly the time the Liberals took power. Wow, I mean, it is scary. And

00:03:52.380 just for that context, right, like even us at True North, they built a company called True North. And we had a

00:03:58.420 huge audience on Facebook. That was our number one audience in terms of social media. Without warning,

00:04:04.520 they just completely shut it off. We had to migrate over to YouTube. And thankfully, we've been able to

00:04:09.180 build up a large audience on YouTube now. But it took a while, it took a few years of catching up. And,

00:04:15.800 you know, again, thankfully, we have an email list as well. But if you don't, I mean, it's so easy to get

00:04:19.560 cut off from your viewers. And that's the scary thing, right? Like when you have a government as

00:04:24.660 tyrannical and opposed to basic freedoms, as we see with the Liberals, you never know what they're

00:04:30.000 going to cut off next, never know what they're going to do next. I want to read what Mark Carney

00:04:33.840 has to say on Press Freedom Day. So it was on Saturday. And he writes this on X. He says,

00:04:38.700 a strong, independent and free press both defines and defends our values as Canadians. Now more than ever,

00:04:44.060 we need to protect our public forums and defend strong and reliable Canadian voices. So there's

00:04:49.880 so much you can read into that. Sheila, first of all, as we all know, Mark Carney banned independent

00:04:54.840 reporters from any of his events through the campaign starting in Edmonton with his campaign

00:04:59.380 launch. He even had the police get involved to do everything they could to stop independent

00:05:03.960 reporters from asking questions. The only time throughout the entire campaign that independent

00:05:08.620 journalists got to ask questions was at that leader's debate because we had a court order saying

00:05:13.220 that we're journalists and they had to let us in. And now he says, now more than ever, we need to

00:05:17.260 protect our public forums and defend strong, reliable Canadian voices. So all I read from that is he

00:05:24.340 wants more power to shut down his adversarial voices and defend, meaning publicly fund journalism,

00:05:32.360 which is pretty much exactly how we got into this mess. I also want to play from Mark Carney. This was a

00:05:38.880 brief surface clip. This came up during the election campaign, April 10th, 2025. And this is a clip of

00:05:45.320 Mark Carney basically saying the threat is from social media platforms. He says that they've become

00:05:51.840 a sea of racism, misogyny, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and hate. And he says, my government

00:05:57.420 will act. Let's play that clip.

00:05:58.440 Mark Carney. Large American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, anti-Semitism,

00:06:04.880 Islamophobia, and hate in all its forms. And they're being used by criminals to harm our children.

00:06:16.000 My government will act.

00:06:18.000 So that's terrifying. What do you think of that?

00:06:20.680 Well, I mean, he says large American platforms, but we know who he means. We know that he means

00:06:25.620 X, which is the one place where people can still freely speak their mind. And it's where a lot

00:06:30.400 of journalists are. So he's going to make sure that the journalists see exactly what he wants them

00:06:36.600 to see. But I also think it's interesting, his focus, right? We know that WeChat meddled in at least

00:06:44.880 the last two elections. And according to the site task force, this latest one, they were using it to

00:06:50.400 target conservative candidates. And yet, nary a word about WeChat ever. If you are looking for a

00:06:59.660 social media platform that is meddling in our democracies, targeting democracy voices, targeting

00:07:07.560 Canadians, you would crack down on WeChat. But it's very clear that Mark Carney is insistent on coming

00:07:14.680 down on X. And I'm worried about what that means. Because will that mean X is just going to say Canada

00:07:22.580 is just not worth the hassle and not allow access to Canadians? I wonder. We saw what Meta did.

00:07:29.320 Meta said, I'm not going to pay the shakedown. And so now Canadians are not allowed to post news

00:07:35.080 links there. So I wonder what this means for us. But this is, I think, hinting at a renewed

00:07:40.780 Online Harms Act. Well, it's interesting that they, you know, they talk, what we think about

00:07:45.500 as free speech, what we think about as independent journalism, they think as like a threat to the

00:07:50.000 democracy or like hate speech. And so they're literally, like, I can't imagine Canada, Canadian

00:07:55.140 political discourse without Twitter or X. Like, I actually can't imagine so much of the conversation,

00:08:00.520 so much of the dialogue, so much news is broken there. And it's almost like a collaborative form,

00:08:04.500 right? Like, I scroll through X every morning to figure out what to talk about my show.

00:08:08.260 I see, you know, tweets from you or tweets from other people in the space. And that's kind of how

00:08:13.080 I get up to speed and what I want to dig into, what I want to research, what I want to talk about

00:08:17.700 on my show. And the idea that that could just go dark because Mark Carney decides that, you know,

00:08:22.700 it's bad for us is truly, truly terrifying. Well, and again, look at Mark, what Mark Carney's

00:08:28.860 focusing on. Did he say that it was a direct attack on democracy, that the debates cancelled the

00:08:36.700 media scrums actually never said really anything about that. He never said, you know, that he never

00:08:43.840 had a problem with journalists having to fight the government to get into the debates. He, there's no

00:08:50.040 possible way he is completely unaware that his campaign kept calling the police on journalists

00:08:56.420 over and over and over again. And this isn't just targeting right-wing journalists or conservative

00:09:02.360 journalists. We saw Kareem Assad, who I don't really know where she falls down on the political

00:09:06.900 spectrum. And I kind of like it that way. She was basically persona non grata at Carney campaign

00:09:12.700 events. And I don't think that's going to change. We haven't really seen him be open and accessible to

00:09:20.940 independent journalists. They've had to shout their questions the way Chris Dacey has from the street

00:09:26.180 or Alexa Lavoie last week from the street. I can't imagine that things are going to change for the

00:09:32.240 better. Well, and there's, it's so tightly controlled, like folks might not understand

00:09:36.420 this. Even for the election night, right? We tried to send Sue Ann Levy. Sue Ann is a professional

00:09:41.840 journalist, a retired reporter for the Toronto Sun. I believe she wrote for the paper for some 30

00:09:46.820 plus years, right? She is by every definition, a mainstream media journalist. Now she works for True 0.96

00:09:53.980 North and they wouldn't let her in. They wouldn't let her in. And it really is like, if you're not

00:10:00.260 part of the government funded journalist clique, like if you're not part of either the CBC or one

00:10:07.740 of the other outlets that takes money from the government, they literally just won't let you in

00:10:12.260 the building. I mean, it's honestly, it's almost like a communist system, right? They say it's free

00:10:18.660 speech and premium of the press, but really it's controlled press because they only let people

00:10:23.780 that they've previously given money to or screened or decided that they're part of the Canadian

00:10:29.880 journalism establishment. They won't let anybody else in. And so it skews everything about Canadian 0.97

00:10:35.700 politics. Like the entire election campaign, the narrative was set by the reporters in the room

00:10:40.340 who were asking questions day in and day out. And you exclude half the country by excluding

00:10:44.980 independent press and all of the people who get their news from us. And you're not really fighting a

00:10:49.940 fair battle because they're fighting the issues. Both conservatives and liberals are fighting an

00:10:54.320 election based on the left wing issues, the issues that the left wing media decide are the issues. And

00:10:59.040 they're not talking about the issues that we care about and the things that we want to know about,

00:11:02.480 the things that we're uncovering and digging up. And so it's just fundamentally unfair. And it's funny

00:11:07.320 that they don't even recognize that.

00:11:09.500 Well, I think they do because I think they know they lose on the issues that normal people care

00:11:15.720 about. Crime, housing, immigration, cost of living, inflation. They know that if they are forced to

00:11:25.240 campaign or argue or defend the liberal positions on those issues, they lose every single time. So

00:11:30.380 how do you avoid talking about that? Well, you just make sure that the people who are going to ask

00:11:36.060 those sorts of questions are no longer in the room. And I think we're also missing a really

00:11:40.600 important part of this. And that is that the mainstream media, the taxpayer funded government

00:11:47.220 money contaminated journalists are the enforcers in all of this because the government knows they

00:11:52.900 can't enforce this directly a lot of times because that will result in a charter challenge. But you

00:11:59.260 know who can enforce the exclusivity and the boring questions asked by the mainstream media? Well,

00:12:04.320 that's the parliamentary press gallery. So they this is this little cabal of journalists who get

00:12:09.760 together and say, we need exclusive access to these politicians. And so we can't let our

00:12:16.740 competitors come in here and expose us for not doing the job that we're paid to do on behalf of

00:12:21.480 Canadians. So they keep journalists like those at Rebel News out of the parliamentary press gallery.

00:12:27.240 We don't get to ask the politicians questions. And the media continues to get worse and worse and worse.

00:12:32.940 It's like watching it slowly circle the drain of a toilet bowl because it's just they keep doing

00:12:38.600 things that reinforce just how bad they are. And the government keeps giving them money correcting

00:12:44.740 them from getting the I guess the market correction they so rightly deserve. So I mean, you have to

00:12:52.120 remember there's it's not just the government, there's this cabal of journalists that are acting as

00:12:56.440 enforcers on behalf of the government. Well, it's so the most obvious the time that this is the most

00:13:02.640 obvious, I think, is watching the CBC. I don't take any joy in watching the CBC. But when clips

00:13:06.920 circulate, I pay attention. And I want to point to this interview that was done with Andrew Scheer,

00:13:12.220 Conservative MP, and CBC's power and politics host David Cochran. This happened late last week,

00:13:17.900 where they're talking about monetary policy, right? And sure, there's two schools of thoughts when it

00:13:23.080 comes to monetary policy. There's sort of like the Keynesian liberal idea. And then there's more

00:13:27.080 like the free market conservative ideals, right? So Andrew Scheer is talking about it from a conservative

00:13:32.020 perspective. And David Cochran is fact checking him with false information. Okay, so this is a bit

00:13:37.720 of a longer clip. It's about a minute long. I'm going to play it. And then I'm going to take a second

00:13:41.460 to just reinforce again why David Cochran is just promoting liberal ideas. He's lying about what's

00:13:47.820 happened. And he's pretending that he's the arbiter of truth. And he's trying to fact check a

00:13:52.220 conservative MP. It's really unbelievable. Let's play that clip. I'm incredibly optimistic about

00:13:56.020 our ability to build off of our gains this time. And I'm optimistic that we'll be able to finish

00:14:01.800 the job in the next election. Right. But you're part of me not be able to rely on post-COVID

00:14:05.840 inflation crisis that was fueled by, you know, war in the breadbasket of Europe. No, no, no. David,

00:14:11.760 David, you know this. You know that inflation is caused when governments print money.

00:14:16.200 Well, okay. That's what the liberals did. The liberals flooded the economy with brand new cash.

00:14:19.660 There's nothing to do. They spent money. They didn't print money. The Bank of Canada did not

00:14:23.720 increase the number of banknotes in circulation in the economy. They used settlement balances.

00:14:27.820 They used settlement balances to buy government bonds to put liquidity. I'm not being dishonest.

00:14:33.660 They created money out of thin air. They massively expanded the money supply. You know this.

00:14:38.680 They did not permanently increase the money supply, Mr. Scheer. But anyway, I don't have an argument

00:14:41.660 on monetary policy. They used settlement balances to buy bonds to lower interest rates to put liquidity

00:14:45.740 into the banking system. And then they removed those settlement balances over time.

00:14:50.160 Are you denying that there is more currency, whether it's digital or real, in the Canadian

00:14:54.820 economy today? Are you denying it? I'm saying they use settlement balances and you're calling

00:14:57.960 out money for it. There may be a small marginal increase, but, you know, it is not the... Anyway,

00:15:03.300 everybody has... All right. Yeah.

00:15:05.680 Okay. So that sounded like a debate between a liberal MP and a conservative MP over monetary policy,

00:15:10.460 but it wasn't. CBC is actively out there pushing the liberal line. Okay. And it's a distinction

00:15:14.940 without a difference anyway. He's saying, oh, it was these settlements. So basically the idea is,

00:15:19.560 yes, the government of Canada pushed a whole bunch of money out, but they have a plan to retreat it and

00:15:23.700 pull it out eventually. So it's not the same as printing money, even though it has the same effect

00:15:28.580 as printing money. And that is exactly what has caused inflation. That is what we can all agree on.

00:15:32.740 And it was just so... To me, it was just so icky to see David Cochran just like really,

00:15:37.400 you know, putting his... Digging his feet in. And I swear he has liberal talking points in front of

00:15:42.520 him. He is repeating the lines that Mark Carney and Mark Carney's staff in office gave him to read.

00:15:48.300 So it's like, you know, what's the point of even having liberal MPs? Why don't we just have CBC

00:15:52.100 journalists debate conservatives on the issues? The idea that the CBC is any kind of, you know,

00:15:58.920 a neutral platform or the people who get to fact check anyone else, they have absolutely no business

00:16:04.060 fact checking because they don't have the facts on their side in the first place. What did you think

00:16:08.080 of that? You know, it's as much as I regret having to see Andrew Scheer go through that, it's nice to

00:16:15.720 see that we are not the only people that David Cochran lies about. As you know, David Cochran went on

00:16:22.440 national TV and said that Rebel News accreditation had been revoked from the post-debate scrums.

00:16:27.980 That was completely untrue. He maybe wasn't wise enough to keep his powder dry. I think that's

00:16:35.300 what he had hoped his conversations with the debates commission would turn into. But I mean,

00:16:39.940 this is what $1.4 billion and a promise to increase CBC funding by $150 million more buys you. It buys

00:16:50.300 you a network that acts as the communications arm of the Liberal Party of Canada. There was absolutely

00:16:57.520 no bias there. And you can, you can tell, you know, Andrew Scheer, or I'm sorry, there's absolutely

00:17:02.580 no balance there. And you could tell that Andrew Scheer, it's almost as though his audio was turned

00:17:07.680 down so that they weren't actually competing for the same set of years. It's so interesting. Yes. And

00:17:14.360 our audience will know David Cochran very well by this point, because we showed many, many clips of

00:17:19.060 him during the debates commissions and just the absolute hysterical meltdown that he had. I have one

00:17:23.180 more clip of him. I'm not trying to pick on him, but well, I kind of am because he's so terrible.

00:17:26.560 I am.

00:17:27.760 Yeah. He was speaking with Globe and Mail journalist Robert Fyfe. Robert Fyfe is supposed to be

00:17:32.220 like the grandfather of Canadian journalism. He's the one that gets all the scoops and he's so stoic.

00:17:38.000 And, you know, a lot of people on the conservative side like him because he'll break stories. He's an

00:17:41.880 equal opportunist when it comes to breaking devastating stories about liberals and conservatives. But here he

00:17:46.580 kind of like lets the masks slip a little bit. He's talking to David Cochran on the same show,

00:17:50.940 power and politics. I don't even want to repeat what he calls Pierre Pauliev. I'll just,

00:17:55.060 you can listen to it for yourself. Let's play this clip.

00:17:57.820 You have MPs that have told me that they found it really difficult going door to door because a lot 0.99

00:18:04.920 of people were saying, we like some of the policies you're doing, but we think your leader's a dick. 0.99

00:18:10.580 And we, really? And we think he is, you know, I'm sorry, but that's what they're telling me. 0.99

00:18:17.180 All right. I'm going to have some ombudsman's paperwork to fill out before I go home tonight.

00:18:22.460 But yes, not in such language, but I have heard similar sentiments expressed from conservative candidates.

00:18:30.540 Okay. So just first of all, the giddy laughing after laughing hysterically, right? Again,

00:18:35.320 how are we supposed to believe that this is fair and balanced? This is the state broadcaster. This

00:18:39.660 is why we have to pay $1.5 billion a year to get, first of all, foul language about the conservative

00:18:45.600 leader. And let me just say to Robert Fyfe, okay, that is not journalism. You're talking about a

00:18:50.280 secondhand account. He spoke to MPs who said that they were saying at the door that someone else

00:18:54.660 said it. So someone else said it, an MP heard it, an MP passed it along to Robert Fyfe. He doesn't

00:18:59.520 speak in specific enough terms for me to believe that that is a specific example, like saying,

00:19:05.120 I have a specific example. I have it on tape. No, he's just speaking broadly. They're basically

00:19:09.440 just mocking Pierre Pauliev, making fun of him, saying what they all say about him behind closed

00:19:13.640 doors. And it was so shocking to, well, not so shocking, but so titillating to the CBC host and

00:19:18.860 the other guests that they couldn't control their laughter. They're laughing like schoolgirls about 0.96

00:19:22.680 it. Sheila, could you imagine if, I know this wouldn't happen, imagine if you got invited on

00:19:27.560 the CBC and you said something like that about Mark Carney. I have a feeling that David Cochran

00:19:31.800 wouldn't be laughing like that. And I have a feeling that you would not be invited back on the

00:19:35.780 CBC if you did that about a liberal leader. What do you think? I think you could hear a pin drop

00:19:39.880 after I had said something like that. But I'm from the prairies. We call what we just saw there a hen

00:19:46.900 party. Usually involves middle-aged women with too much time on their hands, but apparently that's 1.00

00:19:52.340 what amounts to a CBC panel these days. I wonder would that all cost us. Now, again, they're gossiping.

00:20:00.540 This isn't news. This isn't journalism. This is gossiping. And again, I am skeptical now of

00:20:10.200 everything Bob Fyfe says. And that again goes back to the debates. Because he went on TV and he said

00:20:17.760 that independent journalists, yours and mine, were in the debates scrum acting up and acting wild. Instead,

00:20:24.420 we were the victims of ongoing workplace harassment at the hands of the CBC and the other journalists in

00:20:30.080 the room. But he went on TV and completely lied. Gossiped again. Didn't know anything firsthand.

00:20:35.920 Just went on TV and gossiped. So now I know that about Bob Fyfe. I'm skeptical that any conservative

00:20:42.780 MP actually talked to him about what they were hearing at the door. Because he just peddles in

00:20:48.440 gossip third hand. Right. And if you are an MP watching this and you're conservative, don't trust

00:20:53.920 the legacy media. What are you doing? Absolutely. Hopefully the conservatives will finally take the

00:21:00.480 cue and just stop talking to the legacy media. I think Pierre Polyev did a pretty good job of this

00:21:04.340 of just saying like, you know what, I don't need you. I'm going to go talk to other people. All right,

00:21:08.020 Sheila, I can't let you leave the show without just asking you very quickly about what's happening

00:21:13.600 in Alberta. Last week, Premier Danielle Smith made changes to the Citizens Initiative Act. And you hear a lot

00:21:20.140 of people online talking about referendum and independence for Alberta. So what's your take

00:21:25.400 on this whole thing? I think this is a long time coming. I've been around longer than I would like

00:21:34.100 to admit. And the separatist movement in Alberta, it sort of ebbs and flows. The tide comes in and then

00:21:42.600 the tide recedes. I know one of the biggest wet blankets on a separatist movement in Alberta was the

00:21:48.860 election of Stephen Harper. Actually, it all sort of went away. And then it was rising when in the

00:21:54.900 dying days of Rachel Notley's government. And then they got Jason Kenney and it all went away. And

00:21:59.300 then it sort of came back when Jason Kenney wasn't exactly what everybody thought he would be. And then

00:22:04.660 Daniel Smith came and it went away again. But you've got a lot of people in this province saying

00:22:11.380 something has to change. There's a structural inequity that has gone back to the very beginning

00:22:19.300 where in Alberta, we cannot vote blue any harder with the exception of a couple of historically left

00:22:25.700 leaning ridings. Can't get any more conservative. And yet it gets us nowhere. And they do feel

00:22:31.660 culturally incompatible with the rest of the country. They do feel like they are a distinct society out

00:22:39.140 here. And I wouldn't say that they are wrong. Danielle Smith, I think, has done the right

00:22:46.240 thing. She fixed a piece of legislation that was doomed to fail. It was a citizen-led initiatives

00:22:53.980 act that you had to overcome an absolutely insurmountable barrier within 90 days. She's

00:23:00.920 rolled that back to 10% of the last election's number of people who voted, which I think is

00:23:09.060 about 170,000 as opposed to 600,000 before, and extended the time to collect signatures from 90

00:23:15.980 days to 120. Now, I think this is fair. I think Alberta's future is whatever Albertans should so

00:23:22.880 choose it to be. And I think Danielle Smith, without conceding that she's a separatist, and I don't

00:23:28.620 think that she is, is, I think this gives people an opportunity to actually have their voice heard.

00:23:35.140 And when you see, it's like 30% of people are like, yeah, we're, we'll go right now, thank you very

00:23:40.860 much, without any overtures from the Americans to match our assets one for one. Once you start

00:23:46.140 talking like that, I think that number just keeps going up and up. I think people write it off as

00:23:53.320 fringe at their own peril. Wow. I think, I think, I think you're right. I've known Premier Smith for a

00:23:58.820 long time, and she's never struck me as a separatist in any way. However, she is someone with a lot of

00:24:03.740 integrity who really, truly cares about Alberta that will do whatever is best for Alberta, whatever

00:24:08.780 it may be. So that's the story that we are keeping an eye on very closely. All right, Sheila. Well,

00:24:14.400 thank you so much for your time and a great time to have you on the show. We'll have to have you on

00:24:18.060 again soon. Thanks so much. Thanks, Candace. All right, that's Sheila Gunn-Reed. I'm Candace

00:24:22.160 Malcolm. This is the Candace Malcolm Show. We'll be back again tomorrow with all the news. Thank you and God

00:24:25.980 bless. You're watching Juno News, Canada's fastest growing independent news network. Our team works

00:24:37.680 day and night to bring you nationwide coverage of the issues that matter. Honest reporting of the

00:24:45.440 stories that put Canadians first. From far and wide, Juno is doing the work to turn the dial in the right

00:24:54.840 direction, bringing you the news from the field and in the studio. Wherever it takes us, we get the job

00:25:03.420 done for you, for Canada. Subscribe today and help us replace the CBC. Go to junonews.com to join the fight.

The Candice Malcolm Show - May 05, 2025

CBC journalist HUMILIATED twice in ONE DAY, Carney Liberals SLAMMED in new press freedom report, will Alberta SEPARATE？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript