The Candice Malcolm Show - CBC journalists COVER for Carney’s disastrous cabinet by BASHING Poilievre

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show. We have a great episode for you

00:00:06.000 today, folks. You probably saw the Circus the Clown Show in Ottawa yesterday. Prime Minister

00:00:10.520 Mark Carney was out with his new, shiny new cabinet, which happened to be basically the

00:00:15.380 exact same as the Justin Trudeau cabinet. We're going to go through all of it, including the

00:00:19.240 legacy media doing what they do, spinning and twisting the truth to try to promote their man,

00:00:24.580 Mark Carney. I'm very pleased today to be joined by one of my favorite guests on The Candace

00:00:27.940 Malcolm Show, talking about Jasmine Lane. Jasmine is a political news commentator and the host of the 0.66

00:00:33.320 over-opinionated podcast. Jasmine, great to have you on the show today.

00:00:37.580 Thank you so much for having me. Lots to talk about.

00:00:40.600 As usual, yes. Okay, so the news was Carney announced a new smaller cabinet, 28 minister

00:00:46.200 cabinet, and yes, more than half of them were drawn from Justin Trudeau's cabinet. Check out this piece

00:00:52.020 by Juno News. I love this headline. These ministers wrecked Canada, and Carney just promoted all of

00:00:57.540 them. And so you will see a lot of similar names that we saw that we lived through with Justin

00:01:03.020 Trudeau. I will just name a few. So Dominic LeBlanc is going to be the Minister of Trade,

00:01:08.580 Melanie Jolie, the Ministry of Industry, Francois-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance,

00:01:13.780 Anita Nan, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Patti Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families, Stephen Gilbeau,

00:01:18.960 Minister of Canadian Identity, Culture and Official Languages, Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice,

00:01:24.340 Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Transport and Internal Trade, many, many of the same names.

00:01:30.380 I could go on. There's a few newcomers. We have Evan Solomon, who is the newly named Minister of

00:01:35.860 Artificial Intelligence. Also, Gregor Robertson, who is a former hard left socialist mayor of

00:01:42.220 Vancouver, who's going to be the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure. My colleague over at

00:01:48.300 True North, Sue Ann Levy, pointed out that the new Minister of Immigration, well, she calls her a

00:01:53.940 Jew hater. Oh, my goodness. Lina Metleg-Diab, Sue Ann Levy says, very nice to see Mark Carney installed

00:02:00.600 this woman of Lebanese descent who hates Israel. And then she clarified, because at first she said

00:02:05.620 that she signed this Vote Palestine platform calling for basically the obliteration of Israel. She

00:02:10.780 apologized, saying that she didn't sign that one, but she did vote against, or she voted for an arms

00:02:16.060 embargo against Israel. Same difference. So, yikes. But I don't know, when it comes to what we

00:02:23.860 should expect from this government, I think it really does just seem like a continuation of Justin

00:02:29.300 Trudeau from, you know, open borders and mass immigration in that category, you know, promoting

00:02:35.700 Sean Fraser, who was, you know, sort of the disastrous housing and immigration minister and putting him in

00:02:43.200 there. It just really just seems like doubling down on the same failed approaches. What was your take

00:02:47.400 from this yesterday, Jasmine? You know, obviously, a lot of people failed upwards, which doesn't

00:02:53.180 typically happen in real life. But there were so many things. And it's one of those, it's such a

00:02:57.980 jarring difference in the, you know, Canadian ministers, if you want to go and compare them to

00:03:03.120 other nations, where there are quite literally people who are, for lack of better words, career

00:03:10.020 politicians and not the good kind that are actually trying to help you. But the kind to do it for the

00:03:16.500 money, for the most part, is kind of what I can, what I can see. You know, it's just bizarre. I mean,

00:03:22.800 if you even want to want to think about Evan Solomon, if you recall, there was that viral post from

00:03:28.520 the bus that was created by AI that he reshared. And now, of course, he is the the AI minister,

00:03:37.160 when, you know, his background, what is he? He's a former journalist. He he got fired from CBC after

00:03:44.140 an art dealing with Mark Carney. He then that's an important point. I just want to zoom in on that

00:03:49.880 one for a minute, because folks might not remember this. Evan Solomon was sort of a mainstream

00:03:54.060 mainstay CBC journalist. He was the one that hosted power and politics and interviewed all of

00:03:59.260 the cabinet ministers. He was always you could tell he was a partisan liberal. But back then,

00:04:03.560 he pretended to be a journalist. And he got fired in disgrace for basically selling art,

00:04:09.140 like being the middleman in peddling art to get big commissions to the people that he was

00:04:14.120 interviewing. The main person that was in a lot of headlines was Jim Basile, one of the founders

00:04:19.260 of BlackBerry at the time, one of the wealthiest Canadians. But one of the other people involved

00:04:23.360 in that scandal was none other than Mark Carney. Mark Carney himself was one of the people that

00:04:28.500 Evan Solomon was dealing art to behind the scenes, kind of in conflict of the CBC's ethics

00:04:33.760 policies. And then get this, Jasmine, when he was fired in disgrace, he, I guess, again,

00:04:40.140 failed upwards. But he got involved with the Eurasia Group, where Mark Carney's wife is involved.

00:04:45.800 She works there. And where Mark Carney's advisor, Gerald Butts, who's Justin Trudeau's best friend,

00:04:50.120 also worked there. So they're all involved in this like risk consultant management,

00:04:54.260 global finance company or think tank called Eurasia Group. And Evan Solomon was the publisher

00:05:02.360 of this magazine that they that they that they had internally. So, you know, really, really just

00:05:07.880 like a very much like an insider's web in this sort of like globalist world. But really, really

00:05:13.420 interesting that he's kind of considered outsider in this cabinet.

00:05:16.860 It's I'm I don't want to go off too much, but, you know, I just flashing back to even just

00:05:21.400 his skills and being, you know, the AI minister. He's never even worked in the tech industry. He was

00:05:26.880 a he was a fired journalist for essentially in terms of art commissions, like insider trading,

00:05:33.200 basically. And then if you just compare that to, you know, Donald Trump's team and to David Sachs is,

00:05:39.080 and he's the guy who's in charge of all of the AIs, their AIs are. And he helped build PayPal. He

00:05:45.180 he's done so many things, had so much success when it comes to tech entrepreneurship

00:05:50.280 in comparison. And then you have Evan Solomon. Like, it's like, wow, Canada just has some of the

00:05:55.640 most underqualified people that exist in our parliament. And it just makes absolutely no

00:06:01.020 sense to me. And, you know, I really do think this is something so many of us have been talking

00:06:05.300 about and speculating on for quite some time. But in terms of Mark Carney's cabinet, it's just filled

00:06:11.160 and just Mark Carney as a whole and the people, the company that he keeps, you know, you have this

00:06:15.480 issue that happens with Evan Solomon. And then all of a sudden he starts working for the Eurasia group.

00:06:20.180 Why would he do that? I wonder why he would do that. Like, think about that. Right. And then,

00:06:24.000 oh, just kidding. I'm I'm actually going to now jump into politics for the first time in my life,

00:06:29.540 win by a landslide. And now I'm a minister. It's just, you know, and I have no I have no shade at all

00:06:35.540 in people who are first time ministers. Of course, everybody starts from somewhere. But my goodness,

00:06:39.400 at the very least, I would like for you to have some sort of past expertise in the areas of which

00:06:44.760 you are ministering. So when it comes to this entire cabinet, it's just it really is just to

00:06:53.020 me, it's rewarding a lot of people, 50 percent roughly of which have have failed and have done

00:06:59.380 a really bad job. And, you know, another detail there, too, is Mark Carney had said that he wanted

00:07:04.360 50 percent of his cabinet to be female, 50 percent to be male. And I'm just personally

00:07:09.600 kind of over that, you know, like, don't get me wrong. There's plenty of incredibly capable

00:07:14.040 women. However, 50 percent of them, I'm sure not every single one of them is absolutely 1.00

00:07:19.240 qualified for the positions of which they were promoted to. And I'm just really over that

00:07:23.260 type of hiring. And I think that that type of promotion and rewarding is what has gotten

00:07:27.940 Canada into such a mess? Because, you know, our government for many, many years now has

00:07:32.960 prioritized DEI standards over people who are just really good at their job.

00:07:39.260 One hundred percent. I mean, this is one of the downfalls of the Trudeau government is that

00:07:42.520 they were obsessed with putting out these like gender balanced budgets. Everything had

00:07:46.400 to be looked through a gendered lens or wasting their time on this nonsense. Meanwhile, the real 0.99

00:07:50.780 issues of the country are being neglected. And in many ways, they're throwing gasoline on the

00:07:54.780 fire. And yes, when Justin Trudeau announced that 50 percent of his cabinet would be women, 0.71

00:07:59.620 it was the women by and large that ended up basically a lot of them getting fired and getting 1.00

00:08:05.160 thrown under the bus and not being properly qualified for the roles in the first place.

00:08:09.900 And that was part of the damage of Justin Trudeau. OK, well, here is Mark Carney speaking yesterday

00:08:15.020 outside of Rideau Hall. He told reporters that his government will deliver its mandate for

00:08:19.800 change. This is what change looks like, according to our prime minister. Let's play that clip.

00:08:24.780 Everyone needs help with something. If investing is your something, we get it.

00:08:29.540 Cooperators Financial Representatives are here to help with genuine advice that puts your needs

00:08:34.100 first. We got you. For all your holistic investment and life insurance advice needs,

00:08:38.920 talk to us today. Cooperators, investing in your future together.

00:08:44.940 Mutual funds are offered through Cooperators Financial Investment Services, Inc. to Canadian

00:08:47.820 residents, except those in Quebec and the territories. Segregated funds are administered by

00:08:50.580 Cooperators Life Insurance Company. Life insurance is underwritten by Cooperators Life Insurance Company.

00:08:53.760 Our government will deliver its mandate for change with urgency and determination.

00:09:01.980 We're going to deliver that mandate with a new team purpose built for this hinge moment in Canada's

00:09:09.460 history. Now, to her credit, CTV's Vashi Capellos grilled Mark Carney, basically saying, you know,

00:09:17.180 these are the same people that you had that we saw under Justin Trudeau. So let's play that clip.

00:09:22.840 Even when you point to the experience of those who are in the sort of biggest roles, the reason

00:09:28.780 why I highlight them is because they were at the forefront of the decisions that the previous

00:09:33.140 government made. They were. I mean, Melanie Jolie, Francois-Philippe Champagne, he led the industrial

00:09:38.080 policy. Now he'll be in charge of finance. Dominic LeBlanc led a lot of those files as well. We are used to

00:09:43.720 hearing from them justifying and explaining the decisions that Justin Trudeau made. So now we're

00:09:48.580 going to hear from them again. Well, first off, now you're hearing from me. I'm a new prime minister.

00:09:52.240 I'm the 24th prime minister of Canada. I've got very clear set of objectives, which I laid out in the

00:09:58.580 course of my initial government from that cabinet table. Cancel the carbon tax right there. I mean,

00:10:03.500 there were so many differences. As I say, half of the cabinet is different. Big change in terms of

00:10:08.900 priorities. Big change in terms of speed. This is one of the fastest swearing in in Canadian history.

00:10:15.580 It will be one of the fastest returns in parliament in Canadian history. I like how he wants credit for

00:10:21.020 moving things along so that he can very quickly, very hastily move through his agenda. You know,

00:10:26.300 he got sworn in the first time as prime minister. It took him a week or two to actually trigger an

00:10:31.800 election, which he should have done immediately. But he wanted to get a few trips into Europe under his

00:10:35.820 belt before he called an election. And he called the shortest election period possible. So he's out

00:10:41.520 there looking for points and expecting to be patted on the back by the legacy media. Well, we'll get to

00:10:45.660 the fact that CBC actually did pat him on the back and they do repeat him, his talking points. But it

00:10:50.900 was nice to see CTV's Vasily Capello's kind of push back on the nonsense a little bit. And it's always

00:10:56.080 amusing to see how Mark Kearney reacts when he gets a journalist with a bit of a backbone. He clearly

00:11:02.020 doesn't like he doesn't like the line of questioning there. What did you make of it?

00:11:06.040 Oh, gosh. I mean, I just it is so disappointing to me to see the way that Mark Kearney talks over people

00:11:12.840 when he doesn't like what they're saying. I think that that is oh, you know, people will say, well, he's not a

00:11:16.620 politician. And it's like, yeah, that's so great. You actually don't have to be a politician to actually just be a

00:11:21.200 decent human being. But it is really fascinating to me to see him and just how frequently he will interrupt to try to

00:11:28.340 course correct without even letting people finish their thoughts. That's something that I just I

00:11:32.200 dislike so much whenever I see it doesn't matter what party is is doing it. And I will say it's it

00:11:39.480 was quite laughable. Even Mark Kearney being like, oh, well, you're hearing it from me now. It's like,

00:11:44.620 OK, cool. That doesn't make a difference at all. I don't care if we're hearing it from you. You are the

00:11:50.400 same party. You have like 50 percent of the exact same ministers. This is the exact same team.

00:11:56.300 So, yeah, you deserve to be questioned and called out, especially in terms of all of these people who

00:12:02.100 who you decided to stick with when they do have failed track records. And, you know, I think that

00:12:08.720 I think that Mark Kearney could have had a much better likability, maybe even thrown some conservatives

00:12:14.180 for a bit of a loop had he had he actually made some of those big changes. And I think if there's

00:12:19.820 anything at all that we can tell, it's that there's no big changes. He's going to keep telling us that

00:12:24.340 there are, but they're just simply are not. Right. Well, this is something that conservative

00:12:29.380 leader Pierre Polio pointed out. Here is a clip of him reacting to Kearney's cabinet picks,

00:12:35.180 basically highlighting the failed record of the ministers that Mark Kearney has just promoted.

00:12:40.240 Let's play that clip. The first disappointment is, unfortunately, his cabinet. He appointed Trudeau's

00:12:46.300 old team and Trudeau's old advisers. Stephen Gilbeau, whose radical green agenda would shut

00:12:53.300 down all future developments in our resource industry. He is still the minister responsible

00:12:58.140 for Quebec. Sean Frazier is the immigration minister. It was the immigration minister who

00:13:04.140 caused the immigration crisis. The housing minister who gave us the housing crisis. And now he's the 0.59

00:13:09.940 minister responsible for addressing the liberal crime crisis. It seems like he is the master at failing

00:13:16.220 upward. Then there's Francois-Philippe Champagne, Trudeau's minister of everything, who never really

00:13:22.100 managed to do anything. Then there's Jolie, LeBlanc, Haidu, Annan. Annan was the president of the

00:13:29.100 secretary of the treasury board, during which time the bureaucracy and the consultant bills blew out of

00:13:35.920 control. In all, 14 Trudeau ministers are now in Kearney's cabinet. It's more of the same when Canada

00:13:42.600 needs real change. So, Polyev doing what he should do. He's the opposition minister. Now,

00:13:48.800 you pointed this out on X, Jasmine. You write this in two minutes. CBC insults Pierre Polyev,

00:13:54.460 mocks him, defends Kearney's cabinet picks, and reminds us how biased they are. Let's play,

00:14:00.220 I don't know if we have the whole clip, but let's play this clip and you can point out your favorite

00:14:04.280 parts of it. Cabinet is broken, is essentially what he said, right? It's no longer Canada's

00:14:09.420 saying this cabinet is not changed. A silent approach for Mr. Polyev, Rosie, that would

00:14:15.260 suggest that it's almost as if he won the election rather than lost the election and lost his own

00:14:18.920 seat. You know, talking about how he's going to stand there in defense of Canadians, he'll only be

00:14:25.020 able to stand there, actually in the chamber behind him, because of the goodwill of the prime

00:14:31.720 minister who's going to call an early by-election for Mr. Polyev so he can run in one of his MP seats

00:14:37.060 in Alberta at the cost of close to two million dollars to have a by-election, all while he

00:14:41.580 stays in Stornoway throughout this. So it's interesting that given that sequence of events

00:14:45.420 and given those series of factors, that it was that kind of approach and response to things there

00:14:49.860 from Mr. Polyev. Going after Stephen Gilboa, talking of the radical environmental agenda,

00:14:55.360 blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, which is, Sean Frazier's, I don't think he's 40 yet,

00:15:01.960 or he's just 40. I don't think he caused the housing crisis in Canada. There's a whole bunch of

00:15:05.940 layers and effects of that. But, you know, wanting to fight the same political battles

00:15:10.900 we've just endured during the five weeks of the campaign and for the two years leading up to that.

00:15:15.300 Now, I get that the CBC is mostly funded by taxpayers, and that is mostly because of the

00:15:20.860 Liberal government, who keeps doubling down and increasing their budget. But the CBC hosts don't

00:15:25.680 have to act like they work for the Liberal Party of Canada. Like, it's okay for them to at least

00:15:30.060 pretend to be moderate. They don't even try. I mean, David Cochran there sounds like Mark

00:15:36.080 Kearney's press secretary. It sounds like he's out there just towing the party line and defending

00:15:40.620 his team. What are your comments? Oh, boy, do I ever have a lot. First and foremost,

00:15:48.960 you know, it's fascinating to hear the deflection of, oh, well, you know, Sean Frazier, he's only 40,

00:15:53.800 so he definitely didn't cause that crisis. And you have Rosemary Barton. No, probably not. It's like,

00:15:59.180 okay, well, so if ministers have no involvement and no accountability when things go wrong,

00:16:04.840 and if you look at the data from when they were hired and assigned to certain portfolios

00:16:08.620 and the downward trend that has existed, but if they can't be held accountable and they,

00:16:14.040 according to CBC, have absolutely no influence, why are they ministers? Why do we have any of those

00:16:19.180 positions to begin with? If that's the case, then maybe we should just have a prime minister

00:16:23.060 and everybody else is just a waste of taxpayer dollars. So they kind of bit themselves with that one

00:16:28.040 because it just doesn't make logical sense. But whatever, you know, deflect, defame,

00:16:33.860 defend at all costs. I'm also wondering if David Cochran plans to complain as much about the

00:16:42.040 by-election in Terrebonne, which is due to the Elections Canada issue, as he has been complaining

00:16:48.200 about the by-election in Battle River Crowfoot with Pierre Polyevre. I won't hold my breath for that

00:16:53.460 one, but there's just so many things about this where the bias is so unreal, and it's okay to have

00:16:58.720 a bias. We all do. We're human beings. But when you work for, you know, the public broadcaster,

00:17:04.020 essentially, and you present news as though you don't have a bias and then proceed to tell everybody

00:17:11.340 what your bias is and everything that you do and say, it's just very disingenuous. It's misleading,

00:17:16.460 and I'm quite tired of it. And myself as well, you know, I worked in mainstream media for 11 years of

00:17:23.480 my career before going independent, and I absolutely believe that the CBC should be defunded. I don't

00:17:29.720 want to see people lose their jobs, but I want them to be defunded for reasons like this, where it is,

00:17:34.560 it's not honest at all. And it's just very disappointing, and it's no wonder why so many Canadians 1.00

00:17:40.800 have no idea how the political system works, because clips like this go viral, and people

00:17:46.820 share them, and people do watch. It's a low percentage, but they do. And it just, you know,

00:17:52.480 to sit there and mock kind of the role of the leader of the opposition, like, I'm sorry, so what do you

00:17:57.760 want him to do then? You want Pierre Polyevre to be the prime minister? That would make sense,

00:18:02.000 because you're very supportive of all of Carney's ideas that he's taken from Mr. Polyevre. But

00:18:06.700 it just, there's so many people out there who, they have a lot to say, a lot of opinions,

00:18:11.900 and they actually have no idea what the roles of a minister, of a prime minister, of a premier,

00:18:17.920 of a mayor, like, they just don't actually understand the levels there, and that's fine.

00:18:21.760 I don't blame them. It's confusing, and it's a lot to understand. But when it comes to CBC,

00:18:26.420 I am just, oof, I'm starting to get very tired of them.

00:18:31.100 Well, it's so true that the role of the official opposition is to criticize the government.

00:18:35.320 That is your job. And Pierre Polyevre, actually, in his speech, if we had played a longer bit,

00:18:39.520 you know, he said, look, I am going to stand with the government when I believe in what they're

00:18:44.060 doing is right. You know, if I agree with the approach they're taking to defending Canada

00:18:47.540 national security, I will come out and say it. However, when they make big mistakes, when they,

00:18:51.880 you know, do things that harm the economy, harm the health of the market, I'm going to be there

00:18:56.400 to hold them accountable. And to me, it was David Coggeron. I mean, sure, I would probably prefer it if

00:19:01.420 he just came out and said, look, everyone, you know, you probably could tell by the way that I talk,

00:19:04.640 but I do vote liberal. I love the Liberal Party of Canada. I have, you know, I have the party card

00:19:10.720 in my pocket, right? Whatever he's going to say, I would actually have a bit more respect for him

00:19:14.780 than that. And I would maybe question why the CBC would have like four card carrying members of the

00:19:19.840 Liberal Party who host all of their shows. But, you know, that's kind of a conversation for the day.

00:19:23.800 It's like, at the end of the day, though, like you're on the public broadcaster. Your job is to

00:19:28.220 report the news to Canadians. Why the snark, right? Why doesn't he have to go, you know,

00:19:32.480 oh, there's Pierre Polyev who lost his own seat. He's acting like he won, but he actually lost his

00:19:37.260 own seat. And like later in the broadcast as well, they were talking about how he should really be

00:19:42.500 showing some gratitude to Mark Carney because Mark Carney is allowing him to have a by-election.

00:19:47.460 You know, he didn't have to do that. Democracy!

00:19:48.840 Yeah, exactly. Mark Carney didn't have to let Pierre Polyev have a seat back in the House of

00:19:54.520 Commons. Like he's the king. He's the monarch now. He has utter control over everything. So he could

00:19:59.500 have, he could, yeah. Okay, fine. He could have blocked Mark Carney, Pierre Polyev from having a

00:20:04.220 seat. He could have said, we're not going to do a by-election until September. But he would have had

00:20:08.260 so much pushback and criticism on him. And then same thing that, yes, I guess, according to the

00:20:14.360 official rules, Pierre Polyev shouldn't be living in Stornoway. Stornoway is the home of the official

00:20:19.480 opposition, which is a role in parliament, right? And technically, Pierre Polyev is not the leader

00:20:25.080 of the official opposition right now because he's not a parliamentarian. Once he has a by-election,

00:20:28.640 he gets a seat back, then he will become it. So technically, Mark Carney could have evicted him

00:20:32.740 from Stornoway. He could have had him move out for the summer. And then as soon as by-election happened,

00:20:37.320 he could have moved back in. But that would have been incredibly petty, first of all,

00:20:40.400 and incredibly costly to taxpayers. So the CBC wants to give Carney credit for these really

00:20:46.100 trivial things. And they want to criticize Pierre Polyev for, again, very trivial things. Like,

00:20:51.480 I was critical of the party. I was critical of Polyev's team for allowing him to lose his seat

00:20:55.620 in Carleton. I think that they could have done a lot more to make sure that he got that seat because

00:20:58.700 it was quite embarrassing for him to lose that seat. But there's the CBC really kind of putting salt

00:21:05.040 in the wounds, like, rubbing it in. Oh, it's going to cost $2 million of taxpayer money for

00:21:10.800 this by-election. So Pierre Polyev, you should, like, be apologizing for that. Like, just everything

00:21:15.840 about that segment and that piece is just, like, the epitome of why, like, half the country hates

00:21:20.580 the CBC and why they just absolutely need to be defunded.

00:21:24.120 It really blows my mind, too, because at the end of the day, when it comes to details like that,

00:21:28.520 you know, it's one thing to criticize somebody because they spent, you know, millions of taxpayer

00:21:32.980 dollars funding somewhere in, you know, Aruba, how beneficial it would be to eat bugs.

00:21:40.140 But it's another thing to criticize a party because the taxpayers are funding for democracy.

00:21:48.520 Like, wasn't that what you kept telling us the conservatives and Donald Trump was going to take

00:21:52.340 away? Oh, OK, weird. And, you know, at the end of the day, I really, truly, I just like to try to

00:21:59.080 flip the script, you know, like, hmm. Well, I wonder what they would say if Pierre Polyev had

00:22:04.540 won the election and Mark Carney was now moving out of Canada again because he had no interest to

00:22:09.520 actually be here because none of his business is here. I wonder how they would then try to defend

00:22:14.800 it because these types of things, it really is. It's such a nothing sandwich. It is. And it's just

00:22:20.300 these there's so many weak points that have no merit that, you know, are very loose in how they

00:22:27.920 are described. They're very misleading that people, particularly the left, go off of to try to insult

00:22:35.000 the conservatives. And the only thing that ever comes to mind for me whenever I hear things like

00:22:39.280 that is, number one, you're mean and I probably wouldn't have been friends with you in high school.

00:22:43.920 And number two, you literally have nothing to go off of here. Like, you don't. Like,

00:22:48.520 you have so little to go off of to try to push out Supreme Leader Mark Carney that you have to go

00:22:54.840 and criticize democracy in Canada and promote, oh, wow, he's so great for allowing that to happen.

00:23:02.600 It's like, what? Duh. Like, it's just it's such a nothing sandwich. And it's just very frustrating

00:23:10.300 to hear on the daily. And I have also noticed, I don't know if you have, that CBC, they've always

00:23:16.760 been left leaning. I would say they've been particularly left leaning since probably like

00:23:20.520 1997, roughly. Then they were a little bit more central. And then when Justin Trudeau was running

00:23:27.580 against Stephen Harper, similar to this election, Harper had said that he was going to be cutting some

00:23:31.780 of their funding. And Justin Trudeau said he was going to be increasing it. And we saw the tides turn

00:23:35.980 with how they reported. That should be a wake up call to anybody. But then with this election campaign

00:23:41.540 and with how hard Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives were saying we should defund them,

00:23:46.100 I certainly noticed just a newfound confidence of CBC broadcasters to push out as much smear as they

00:23:55.940 can, to push out as much narrative as they can. And it's been really disappointing and just gross.

00:24:02.440 I don't know how else to explain it to witness. Well, it's true. It's like they're feeding their base,

00:24:06.640 they know that the base of the Liberal Party is the same as the viewers of the CBC. And they actually

00:24:12.340 love it when they go low and they take cheap shots at Polyev. And they're helping to further the 0.86

00:24:19.200 partisan divide in this country. It's sad. They watch Pierre Polyev and they just hate him. And so

00:24:25.100 it's very easy for them to point out all of his little flaws. And they don't realize that when they

00:24:29.760 attack him, they're not just attacking him, right? Because regular people in Canada who identify with

00:24:35.900 Pierre Polyev and like him, they also feel like they're being attacked when the CBC does this

00:24:41.020 routine. And you're right, they do it all the time. Okay, folks, we are going to be back. We're

00:24:44.880 going to take a little break. And then we're going to do another segment with Jasmine Lane. We're going

00:24:48.020 to talk about election integrity. We're going to talk about that seat that she just mentioned

00:24:52.320 and the potential by-election that's going to happen in Terrebonne, Quebec. So we will be

00:24:56.140 right back for that one.

00:25:05.900 Thank you.

The Candice Malcolm Show - May 15, 2025

CBC journalists COVER for Carney’s disastrous cabinet by BASHING Poilievre

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript