EV Mandate Fails, CBC Cashes In
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
182.0929
Summary
In this episode, Candice talks about the ongoing battle between the Canadian government and opposition to government funding for media and the CBC, and how that money is being squandered on lavish executive salaries, perks, and fancy equipment.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to The Candace Malcolm Show. I'm Chris Sims. I'm the Alberta Director for the Canadian
00:00:07.860
Taxpayers Federation. I'm filling in for Candace a few times over the summer, so thank you so much
00:00:13.060
for making us a part of your day. Be sure to remember to like and share this video,
00:00:18.560
and if you're not already a subscriber, make sure you fix that. Okay, so much to talk about
00:00:23.520
today. As we know, Conservative leader Pierre Polyev is in the middle of his by-election today.
00:00:29.580
That is happening in Battle River Crowfoot, so stay with us for more information on that as the
00:00:34.940
week rolls on. And there's a big fight brewing. It's been ongoing now on media payments. I wanted
00:00:42.260
to do a little bit of a nerdy deep dive with you right now. So something came up with the State
00:00:48.340
Department in the United States where U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is in power. They
00:00:53.220
came out and said basically that the Online News Act is causing problems for people accessing news.
00:00:59.580
It was then twisted. The language was twisted like crazy from the Canadian side of things saying it
00:01:07.840
was Orwellian for the Trump administration to be commenting like this. Canadian press labels U.S.
00:01:15.320
government Orwellian for criticizing Canada's censorship laws. Okay, so if your head is spinning,
00:01:22.560
you're not the crazy one. That is a backflip of Newspeak in order for them to call that Orwellian.
00:01:29.980
What's happening right now is a few things. On one hand, we've got crazy censorship laws. Okay,
00:01:36.960
Bill C11 went through and we got a bunch of other censorship laws that are coming down the pipe.
00:01:41.140
People often refer to it as the online harms thing going on. In a nutshell, the Canadian government
00:01:48.020
wants to be able to regulate and thus control what the average Canadian can see, hear, and share
00:01:55.840
online. They're doing this behind the fig leaf of Canadiana as if this is all about maple syrup and
00:02:02.320
Anne Murray. Okay, it's not. Okay, do not give the government power to control what you can see
00:02:08.300
here and share on the internet, folks. So they're trying to push through a bunch of censorship laws
00:02:12.520
on one side. And the other side is what I want to talk about right now. And that is government funded
00:02:18.840
media. Okay, let's start off with the CBC. As you know, the CBC is taking $1.4 billion from Canadians
00:02:30.240
this year alone in its funding. To put that money into perspective, that kind of money could otherwise
00:02:38.140
pay the full-time salaries of 7,000 cops plus 7,000 paramedics. Full-time salaries. But instead,
00:02:48.760
you're paying for the CBC. If you don't like using that example, picture any profession that makes
00:02:53.820
around $100,000 per year, there's your math for you. Okay, so the CBC is taking that kind of money.
00:03:01.500
Further, they just announced their new CEO a few months ago. They're paying her at the same rate
00:03:07.660
that the former CEO, Catherine Tate, was getting paid. That's about half a million dollars per year,
00:03:14.600
like $500,000 per year. And the CBC has dismal ratings, okay? Their ratings are now getting down
00:03:23.240
to the rounding error level, actually, for local newscasts. Like if you're tuning in at 6pm
00:03:28.380
in Calgary, or even places like Toronto, it's dismal. If you go national, you look at their
00:03:34.940
CBC News Network, their primetime rating share is 1.8. That means that more than 98% of TV viewing
00:03:44.240
Canadians at that time are choosing to watch something else. Even for their fiction programming,
00:03:50.020
if you try to say, oh, well, people are getting bummed out by the news, they want to be
00:03:52.880
entertained. Okay, look at their entertainment. Their top-rated show is the Murdoch Mysteries,
00:04:00.080
which they do not produce, okay? Still, 98% of Canadians are choosing to watch something else.
00:04:07.940
So, you're paying through the nose for the CBC, okay? They are not being accountable when it comes
00:04:13.660
to things like bonuses, because all they did was jack up their salaries at the same time.
00:04:17.260
They're paying their CEO the same amount, and next to nobody's watching them. And then they put out
00:04:23.260
really interesting stories like this. If we can pull up the graphic here, this just hit the news.
00:04:28.100
If you go to the CBC website, it's showing what they're pushing here. And they're pushing the
00:04:32.760
narrative that because of climate change, you shouldn't even really own a pet dog. Look at that
00:04:38.540
cute beagle. I'm sorry, my grandma had beagles when I was a kid, and it's just adorable.
00:04:42.360
People often miscalculate the impact of climate choice, like owning a dog, study says.
00:04:49.580
Why would the CBC pick that story? Why would they try to be guilting you and shaming you for owning
00:04:55.160
a dog because of climate change? Remember when, like last week, everybody who was fighting against
00:05:03.200
the carbon tax was being called a climate change denier, and we had members of parliament saying
00:05:08.940
that because you want to take a family road trip, you wanted the planet to burn down. And now all of
00:05:14.540
a sudden, we have liberal MPs showing themselves at gas pumps, patting themselves on the back for
00:05:20.180
getting rid of the carbon tax. The point here is, folks, is to not give up the fight, okay? The point
00:05:26.180
here is, is to make sure you're always pushing back, including on things like government-funded media.
00:05:31.680
Now, back to what the State Department was talking about in the United States, the Online News Act.
00:05:36.320
You notice how on Facebook that you can't post links? The reason why that happened is this.
00:05:43.600
It goes something like this. The print companies in Canada, okay? Some of the print companies in
00:05:48.560
Canada that would often be referred to as newspaper companies were like, hey, we need a new revenue
00:05:53.900
stream. Let's figure out how to do it. Let's go to the government for help. That's a really bad idea
00:05:59.360
because the government is going to screw up a two-car parade, but they did, okay? And this is the
00:06:04.000
result. So the government then said, oh, great idea. Let's charge Facebook and Google a link tax.
00:06:12.920
So every time anybody posts a link to a Canadian news site on the Facebook machine,
00:06:20.240
Facebook has to pay for that link. This is like charging the delivery boy for your newspaper
00:06:29.060
to be distributed. It's the weirdest thing. And then, of course, predictably, news traffic plummeted
00:06:36.120
on all sorts of these sites. All of a sudden, all of their clicks are going down. Why? Because human
00:06:41.640
beings can't see your stuff anymore on Canada's most popular social media site. Who could have
00:06:47.080
predicted this would be a disaster? Anybody with a little bit of common sense. So that's what the link
00:06:51.940
tax is or the Online News Act. Google eventually caved and they worked out some deal with the government.
00:06:58.140
They are getting a little bit of money flowing through it now. Guess what? The CBC is taking
00:07:02.920
a big chunk of that money. So at the end of the day, the print guys in Canada still got screwed.
00:07:09.020
Now, the reason why the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is fighting this is for two reasons.
00:07:13.860
One, the government should never pay journalists. Journalists should never be on the payroll of
00:07:20.000
government because it costs so much money. This is the first reason. It isn't just the CBC
00:07:26.100
that is getting taxpayers' money. No. A huge portion of the mainstream media is now dependent
00:07:35.220
on government funding in Canada. That includes the Canadian press. That includes CP, which is why
00:07:44.300
that story about Trump being Orwellian or the administration being Orwellian is so salty.
00:07:50.520
Let's pull up a quick graphic here. I'll explain it. It shows the same headlines around the Canadian
00:07:57.100
media landscape. Okay, let's take a look here. You can see it where it says Canada's economy is
00:08:02.420
showing resilience against U.S. tariffs. Why? Notice how it's the same story all the way through there
00:08:08.260
over and over and over again. So we've got the same headline in what looks to be CTV News,
00:08:13.420
Toronto Sun, Toronto Star, CP24, National Post, and CBC. So for folks who don't work in media,
00:08:22.340
that might look weird. It might look as if there's some, you know, globalist entity that is phoning all
00:08:27.960
these newsrooms and getting the editor to say, hey, this is your headline. No. Pull the graphic back up
00:08:33.560
really quick there. There's a little byline there and a little tag you need to look for. You see that
00:08:38.560
little Canadian flag where it has the quote marks around it? Canadian press. Okay, it's all Canadian
00:08:44.800
press. Now what the Canadian press is, is basically what I would call the the wire service for the
00:08:50.820
mainstream media in Canada. Now usually it's just straight up and down work. This isn't even about
00:08:55.980
politics. I'm just talking about the functionality of sharing news. Okay, the Canadian press also gets
00:09:02.200
funding from the Canadian media. But that is why you are seeing almost uniform coverage in many
00:09:08.500
cases across the mainstream media landscape. It's because they are subscribing to the Canadian
00:09:15.180
press. Because there is next to no journalists organically in a grassroots fashion in those
00:09:21.900
newsrooms anymore. So it is right click and fill. And unfortunately, a huge chunk of that is now
00:09:29.460
government funded. Lastly, this is why this is so important. A free press does not mean a bunch of
00:09:38.260
free rolled up newspapers at like a subway station somewhere. That's not what a free press means.
00:09:44.560
A free press is supposed to be free from government. Free from government influence. Free from government
00:09:54.200
interference. And free from government funding. And guess what? If you're an average reporter, and you
00:10:02.680
know in the back of your head that now it's close to $30,000 of your funding for your paycheck is
00:10:09.980
reliant on the federal government, how are you able to function as a journalist? How, for example,
00:10:17.060
would you be able to cover an election where candidate A is saying, I will increase funding to your employer
00:10:24.880
as a journalist? And candidate B is saying, I'm going to completely defund your employer as a
00:10:31.980
journalist. No human being would be able to cover that game straight, because it is a direct and obvious
00:10:39.360
conflict of interest. And it's one of the reasons why a lot of folks who support the Canadian Taxpayers
00:10:45.700
Federation, who watch Juno, who watch other alternative media are noticing that not a lot of
00:10:52.580
news is getting out about how much something like the forcing of battery powered cars on everybody is
00:10:59.320
going to cost you. When was the last time you heard a big mainstream media headline saying,
00:11:04.680
oh my goodness, this huge mandate on EVs is going to cost Canadians $300 billion. This is going to cost
00:11:14.120
people a huge amount of money. Why are we punishing people for buying a used car, punishing them with
00:11:20.520
PST hikes versus giving a whole bunch of money to rich people who are buying electric vehicles? Why
00:11:27.480
aren't we hearing news on that? It could just be a coincidence, to be honest, because they just don't
00:11:32.040
have the bodies to cover stuff like this, or it might have something to do with government influence
00:11:37.400
based on how they're funded. Let's find out some answers. Let's find out from Dan McTague. He's the head
00:11:43.840
of affordable energy. Joining us now is Dan McTague. He is, of course, with Canadians for
00:11:49.340
Affordable Energy. I've known Dan for a long time. The poor gentleman, every time I need to figure out
00:11:54.620
what the second carbon tax cost is in British Columbia, I'm DMing him saying, can you please
00:11:59.540
figure this out? And he always has the best answers. And he is really spearheading this fight against this
00:12:05.520
mandate coming down from the federal government saying, you must own an EV or to the car dealerships,
00:12:12.940
you must sell this number of EVs off of your lot. And again, it is starting in like four months
00:12:20.380
time. In four months time, they're going to have to sell 20% as EVs, battery powered vehicles. So Dan,
00:12:28.680
thank you so much for joining us today. I wanted to throw you a pretty fresh clip. This is conservative
00:12:35.440
leader Pierre Polyev, who is of course running for the seat in Battle River Crowfoot, which is just up
00:12:42.440
the road from me. His by-election is today. And he was asked about this EV mandate. And I wanted us
00:12:48.980
to listen to it together. So let's roll it. Well, there's not even the electrical infrastructure,
00:12:53.420
it would cost $300 billion to put in place the electrical charging stations and transmission
00:13:01.880
networks to actually do that, which would be thousands of dollars of costs in higher taxes
00:13:07.840
prices and prices for consumers for every single family. And not only would it eliminate rural
00:13:14.760
communities, it would eliminate our auto sector. Wanted to know what you thought about that last
00:13:21.200
part there, which I found interesting because of course, Ontario Premier Doug Ford just finished
00:13:26.440
chatting with Prime Minister Mark Carney. And interesting what Polyev said there is that this would really hurt
00:13:33.400
Canada's auto industry. There's so much to unpack here when it comes to this mandate saying that you
00:13:39.940
must own a battery powered car and they want to phase out gas and diesel. Where do you want to go
00:13:44.860
with this? Well, it's bad for consumers, obviously. It's going to hit everyone's pocketbooks. We can't
00:13:51.280
afford it. And you guys know with the Canadian Tax Periods Federation, just how serious the debt
00:13:55.500
situation is in this country. It's far worse than 1997 when we panicked. No one knows that yet.
00:14:00.580
But for the automotive sector, it is truly the death knell. And you know, Chris, I'm not talking
00:14:04.900
through my hat here. I served as a media relations officer for Toyota Canada before I was elected as an
00:14:08.800
MP. I know what's going to happen when five of the biggest companies plus a six in Mercedes is now
00:14:14.400
saying, we just can't proceed with this kind of agenda over this timeline. It seems pretty clear to me that
00:14:22.640
if the auto manufacturers are going to be ignored, and consumers are going to be ignored, there really
00:14:27.960
isn't much left for the federal liberals and their friends of the NDP and the bloc to stand on. This
00:14:32.180
is a policy that is going to dramatically impact our economic outlook. And now with the United States,
00:14:38.860
forget the terrorists, having not gone down the road of EV mandates, 90% of the vehicles that we make
00:14:43.480
in Ontario, I'm looking right now from where I can see the Ford plant smokestacks, you know, we're not
00:14:49.320
going to be able to sell our vehicles if we all put, we have EVs. Americans aren't going to buy them
00:14:52.840
anymore. And frankly, we shouldn't be going that route either. You mentioned not talking through your
00:14:58.020
hat. I just wanted to back up what Pierre Polyev was saying there in his clip. He's not talking through his
00:15:02.700
hat either when it comes to the $300 billion price tag. What he was referencing there was a report that is
00:15:09.520
posted on the Government of Canada website. Natural Resources Canada says it's going to cost us upwards of
00:15:17.840
$300 billion with a B to transition over to battery powered vehicles. And I just, I quickly did some
00:15:26.940
math. It was a few months ago where I'm like, you know what, where is that number coming from? And I
00:15:31.740
did really raw math of let's say that Santa Claus magically changed everybody's personal vehicle that
00:15:37.360
we own right now in our driveways. Okay. Into an electric vehicle, not a hybrid. I'll point this out.
00:15:43.420
All battery powered electric folks here with the mandate. Let's say they were all electric. We
00:15:48.700
would need like 14 new huge can do reactors just, just for personal driving. I'm not even touching on
00:15:58.060
our, our transport trucks or any of our commercial fleet or any of that. So yeah, that's where those
00:16:04.860
hundreds of billions of dollars of the price tag is coming from. And to your point that we mentioned
00:16:09.360
with the CTF, the Taxpayers Federation, we've got un-money right now. We are in a massive debt
00:16:15.120
crisis. We do not have the cash to do this. So I'll get to the end game here soon, but I wanted to
00:16:22.120
pick up a little bit on what's happening with tariffs because of course we've got these terrible
00:16:26.380
tariffs that are happening actually between Canada and China right now. And it's hurting our canola
00:16:31.140
growers out here out West. And are you hearing anything from China saying we want access with our cheap
00:16:37.660
battery powered cars to flood the Canadian market? Are you hearing any rumblings in that way?
00:16:43.140
Oh, they want to do it and they can do it. And one way or another, they're going to do it.
00:16:47.020
They're going to do either by the US or they're going to do it via other means through other
00:16:51.460
countries. So the soft belly won't be Canada saying yes or no and destroying the very product that it
00:16:57.280
made. It's number one agricultural export, which is now up in the air. It, by the way, signed a
00:17:01.680
permanent agreement with Australia because we were so, you know, we were so insistent on backing
00:17:07.460
something that can only be made with lots of money, as you've pointed out. But I sense that where we're
00:17:11.540
going here is the government is going to have to have a significant, you know, ice dumping bucket
00:17:18.780
on the head in order for it to get to finally move because this is a recipe for disaster with tariffs
00:17:23.900
now firmly on their way, now starting to impact. I think the next budget is going to be an absolute
00:17:30.820
disaster. Unless, of course, Mark Carter tries to play games and try to split the budget and make
00:17:35.440
it all sorts of things that it isn't. It's going to take a lot of creative financing in order to get
00:17:40.640
rid of what's about to hit Canadians. If they think it's bad now, they have no idea what's in store.
00:17:45.740
There is nothing redeemable about the economy going forward, especially given because the Liberals
00:17:53.000
I wanted to stress this, that people are going, you mentioned it's 2015, if only, if we, if only it were 2015.
00:17:58.860
Um, just anyway, it makes you upset actually thinking about it because the debt has been doubled,
00:18:04.680
right? So, and he did, and Trudeau did that in nine years, so less than a decade. It's almost as
00:18:11.320
if it was deliberate or on purpose because they did such an amazing job driving up the debt. Um, what we,
00:18:16.740
what we spend on the debt here, folks, is a billion dollars a week just on the interest payments.
00:18:23.280
So for people to envision this, okay, building a new hospital costs about a billion dollars, okay?
00:18:31.680
So imagine all of Canada gathering around the TV station on Saturday nights, and instead of the
00:18:37.260
old hockey game, we burn down a hospital. That's what we're doing with our interest payments alone
00:18:43.400
on the debt. Our stress here is that we do not have the money, taxpayers don't have the money,
00:18:48.420
to fund this thing into happening. Do you think there's a chance that Carney, that Prime Minister
00:18:56.640
Carney is a pragmatist and that he could simply say, you know what, this was a Trudeau era liberal
00:19:02.500
government thing. I'm dusting my hands off and walking away from it because we're hitting a
00:19:07.220
mathematical wall where people don't want it. I think we have a poll here from Leger that we can
00:19:11.840
pull up where Canadians are opposed to, here we go, the EV mandate. Canadians are opposed to it.
00:19:18.380
You can see it right there. They say that this target is unrealistic and will cost too much.
00:19:23.120
It should be rolled back. 71%. That's a really strong poll. Okay. Don't, do you think there's
00:19:30.220
a chance that Carney, the pragmatist, if he's in there, will say, you know what, this is a Trudeau mess.
00:19:35.580
I'm walking away from it and I'm getting rid of it.
00:19:38.200
Well, he'd be renouncing everything he's stood for the past 10, 15 years. And unless he's like
00:19:44.220
the old commercial of the seventies and eighties, Oil of Olay, keep them guessing. I mean, the reality
00:19:48.860
is that Mark Carney is going to have to recognize that it's TikTok time. It's time for him to fish
00:19:54.800
or cut bait. And it's time for him to make a decision one way or another. He's leaning very
00:20:00.340
heavily towards what he's always been. And if he's going to change his colors dramatically like that,
00:20:05.200
I think it's going to leave a lot of his friends at Brookfield, a lot of his European friends and
00:20:09.580
allies, and those he's rubbed shoulders with over the past few years, scratching their heads about
00:20:14.780
Mark Carney, the politician, as opposed to Mark Carney, the green, you know, the green wizard,
00:20:20.740
basically trying to undermine economies around the world. And by the way, GFANS is not over it.
00:20:25.940
The United States Antitrust Division is still going to look at what GFANS did to try to block
00:20:29.740
energy production and energy investments in the United States. It's awfully funny to see the United
00:20:34.440
States Department of Justice summons, once again, Mark Carney as Prime Minister to say,
00:20:40.940
your companies, Brookfield and other, are going to be subject to triple damages,
00:20:44.760
which actually is a reality in the United States, unlike Canada's
00:20:47.120
Limp-Risted Competition Act. Can you expand a little bit
00:20:50.860
for our viewers on GFANS and what went down there?
00:20:53.840
Yeah, Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, a few years ago, Mark Carney thought it'd be a great idea
00:20:58.320
to have all companies in the name of sustainability. And before the 2023 CONFAB decided that it would be a
00:21:06.320
great idea to, you know, get banks, investment companies, brokers not to invest any money in
00:21:11.520
fossil fuels, oil and gas, or any of the energies that the world is currently using and continues to
00:21:16.180
use in even greater sense. What he did is he targeted the United States. And of course, as the
00:21:22.620
Senate inquiry under the Biden administration, Senate committee started to look into this, they
00:21:26.540
realized that this is a case, it is a classic case of monopolization, of price fixing, and of course,
00:21:36.540
of cartelization, which I think is what the word they use. So basically said, if you were a bank in the
00:21:41.100
United States, think of State Street, think of Vanguard, think of BlackRock, any of these big ones, and you're
00:21:47.180
now engaged in saying, we're not going to invest in oil and gas, because Mark Carney and his friends say so, well, you're not
00:21:52.140
subject to triple damages. In other words, if the effect of what you did in the United States was to
00:21:56.860
deny 10 to $20 billion in economic activity to the oil and gas sector, you're not going to be
00:22:02.860
punished by $60 billion. So you know what, in a word, they short-arsed it out of there, they got out of
00:22:08.320
the G fans, and left Mark Carney looking rather sheepish, because they actually have strong integrity in their
00:22:15.820
institutions to go after this kind of gamesmanship in which they were trying to block the economy. And so
00:22:20.860
I think it's going to be very interesting to see. No wonder there's a gulf between Canada and the
00:22:24.300
United States. It's a little strange that Donald Trump thought Mark Carney was the best person to
00:22:28.060
deal with. I think we know now why. He does have no deal with him and doesn't have to worry about him,
00:22:33.660
just like Trudeau. Yeah, that was a, that was one of the strangest elections I've ever observed.
00:22:38.940
Just got to say, there was so much strange head games going on. And the comments about the 51st state,
00:22:44.380
it was such a tailspin that it caused within the parliamentary press gallery, set people off.
00:22:49.340
I'd be curious to know what's going on in Washington or if they're even thinking about
00:22:53.180
Canada when it comes to these sort of problems. Probably not. We do have an integrated auto
00:22:57.420
market though. And with your experience with automobiles, how this is going to sound silly,
00:23:04.780
like a school child asking you, if we have an integrated like auto manufacturing system, which we do,
00:23:11.500
right? I've read that a car part can cross the Canada-US border for one maker model of vehicle,
00:23:17.260
like 10 times. So it's all integrated. How could we force people to purchase only EVs or start
00:23:26.940
increasing the quotas? It starts at 20% in four months time. How can Canada do that if the United
00:23:35.180
States isn't? Well, again, it's just hoping that we can maybe trade with the Americans,
00:23:42.700
or rather with the Europeans and forget the Americans. Our trade relationship with the United
00:23:47.820
States is 15 times greater than that, which we trade with in Europe. So if we think we can turn
00:23:52.620
that overnight, it's taken 100 years to develop. Good luck. But this is truly political virtue
00:23:58.540
signaling. And the elbows up crowd that thought it was cool and trendy to be able to tell the
00:24:02.220
Americans to go take a hike, you may not like Trump, but you sure as hell can't agree disagree
00:24:06.780
with why he did it. He knows it was going to hurt Americans. He's standing up for their economy.
00:24:10.860
He's not prepared to allow someone to impose an arbitrary deadline that says you have to have 100%
00:24:17.420
vehicles by such and such time and spend $2 to $3 trillion to obtain that. Canada doesn't have
00:24:23.100
that kind of ability and that we do rely on the American market. As I mentioned, 90% of what you
00:24:28.220
produce in Ontario, so that'd be the Toyota factories, the Stellantis factories, the Ford factory,
00:24:33.500
the GM factories, all of those have to sell to the United States. If the Americans are not buying EVs and
00:24:39.820
not being told that they have to buy EVs, now that there's a new president and a new administration,
00:24:44.860
new EPA in town, it means that there's no market for this kind of stuff. So forcing this on Canadians,
00:24:50.220
I don't know why they want us to drive all these over glorified electric golf carts, because frankly,
00:24:55.020
they're not practical, especially in Canada, which is a hell of a lot colder in the United States,
00:24:58.780
and for which we don't have the, as you pointed out very correctly, we don't have the electrical
00:25:03.180
infrastructure, nor the money to back it up. No, we don't have the power for this. We don't have the
00:25:09.340
money for this. And we don't have the cash to keep on handing out rebates and stuff for this.
00:25:14.780
I wanted to pull up a quick graphic here from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, which I found
00:25:19.340
was a really interesting compare and contrast. Now, across some Western provinces and places like
00:25:24.220
British Columbia and Manitoba in particular, there's this disgusting thing that the provincial
00:25:28.940
government does. And that is they charge provincial sales tax, a PST on used vehicles. So it doesn't
00:25:36.460
matter how old the thing is, doesn't matter how many times it's been bought and sold and they've
00:25:39.980
gotten their pound of flesh before, they still take a PST. It's a great experiment here. If you
00:25:46.140
look here on the right, okay, a used Toyota Corolla that somebody has saved up money for in order to
00:25:51.740
get to work, they spend 8,500 bucks. That's a pretty good price for a used Corolla. They will be hit
00:25:58.540
with a PST bill from the NDP Manitoba government for close to 600 bucks. Same place, same province. If
00:26:08.060
you are got good money and you spend 55 grand on some fancy electric Mustang, you're going to get a
00:26:17.020
$4,000 check from the government. Now, of course, we all know the government doesn't have money.
00:26:24.620
They're taking taxpayers' money, including from that person saving up for the Toyota Camry,
00:26:30.060
and they're giving it to that much more financially better off person who's buying that electric
00:26:35.500
Mustang. Oh, and we have stats. Yes, indeed. The average person spending money on something like
00:26:41.500
an electric Mustang, they're making well over $100,000 per year. So I will point this out that
00:26:47.580
this is also, it's a tax on the working poor in this country. And it seems to be an all out attack.
00:26:54.380
I would say on normal vehicles, Dan. Yes. Chris, it's really getting,
00:27:01.100
going from the sublime to the ridiculous when you consider what we're trying to tax. And
00:27:06.140
trying to get a resale PST on a used electric vehicle, there's none, because they're sitting,
00:27:11.500
the car lots in this country are filled with electric vehicles, they can't sell them. So they
00:27:15.180
can't sell them now. And especially without incentives, the federal government has removed its
00:27:19.020
incentive. How are they going to be able to get it 20%, 30%, 40%, all the way to 100%
00:27:23.980
by 2035, and penalize every single car dealer for not reaching that? I can tell you, I've spoken to
00:27:29.820
a number of car salesmen in the past month, they've been talking to me openly, they are very worried
00:27:35.660
about this. And they, they're like the people I remember in 1984, who, when the federal liberals of
00:27:41.020
my party decided to be a good idea to tax insurance plans came out knocking on doors and nailed us badly
00:27:47.500
in 1984. I think the same thing is going to happen here, but not until the damage is done.
00:27:52.620
20,000 dollars per vehicle as a penalty, if you go over that ratio of four, of five to one,
00:27:58.860
and it'll be four to one, three to one, two to one, then all of them have to be that way.
00:28:02.620
I suspect this is a recipe for political, but most importantly, economic damage, the likes of which
00:28:08.380
it won't just damage the sales of vehicles, it's going to damage the entire automotive sector.
00:28:14.060
So Doug Ford, I hope this morning when you met with Mark Carney, you gave that message to him,
00:28:18.540
because there isn't, you don't have enough money, you don't have enough debt that you can incur
00:28:22.540
to make up the difference of what's about to happen, especially if these auto plants decide to
00:28:26.700
rightly pack up and leave. Yeah, he better have, he better have. I will say I'm not impressed.
00:28:33.260
The amount of debt that Premier Doug Ford is saddling provincial Ontario taxpayers with is gross.
00:28:40.380
So just, I talked about the interest on the federal debt. The interest on the provincial debt for
00:28:45.740
Ontario costs Ontario taxpayers 300 million dollars a week. I couldn't believe that math,
00:28:54.780
I checked it four times, it's true. The Ontario provincial debt, now it's not all Doug Ford's fault,
00:29:00.460
but a big chunk of it is, okay? That interest is costing taxpayers 300 million dollars a week.
00:29:06.300
To put it another way, picture burning down or deleting 300 homes per week. That's how much
00:29:14.540
your interest is costing you on your provincial debt. So he better pull his socks up and he better
00:29:18.700
be standing up to Prime Minister Mark Carney on this. Two quick questions to finish this off. One,
00:29:25.020
I've noticed something in the regulations and in the language that the government is posting online in
00:29:30.620
regards to this EV mandate. And I've noticed that they've sprinkled in the word availability a lot
00:29:37.500
now. That was not the case when they were first talking about this. They were talking about sales
00:29:43.580
quotas. So starting in four months time, 2026, you're right, 20% had to be EV. Now my understanding all
00:29:52.700
this time was that was a quota. Meaning if you don't have 20% of sales and you're a car dealership,
00:29:58.460
you're going to start incurring the penalties that you were just mentioning. Now I'm noticing some
00:30:02.940
squishy language that is in through there saying, oh, it has to have 20% availability for sale.
00:30:08.860
Are you noticing any softening language coming from the government on this?
00:30:12.620
Well, yeah, maybe they're trying to soft pedal it because they've taken a hard line up to now,
00:30:16.140
but it's, uh, you know, thankfully, Pierre Polyev will be elected tonight. I don't care by what
00:30:20.620
percentage. I'm not sure if he needs 130% to make some of the lefty media happy, but the reality is that,
00:30:26.380
uh, he's, uh, he's going to be able to hold the government's feet to the fire. This is like the
00:30:31.100
carbon tax one, which you and I, Chris fought against, which the liberals finally had to throw
00:30:35.820
in the towel in order to get reelected. This is going to be the next one. If they don't do this,
00:30:40.380
the CTF, the Canadians for affordable energy are going to be on them like a hungry dog on a brand new
00:30:45.580
fresh steak bone. I think it's in Gone with the Wind where they say it's a duck on a dune bug.
00:30:51.100
Yeah. I love that term. So lastly, I just wanted to stress this for anybody who's thinking, oh,
00:30:57.020
that's a 2035 problem. I don't need to focus on that right now. No, the mandate starts kicking in.
00:31:03.260
The screws start tightening on these auto sellers in 2026, which is in four months time. Can you just
00:31:11.900
briefly explain to people like to me, as if I'm six personally, how this affects the market or the
00:31:18.860
ability for someone to be able to make a sale? Because it'll start skewing the supply, right?
00:31:24.860
It will big time. And it means that, you know, if you, the competition for internal combustion
00:31:30.140
engines will increase by 20%. In other words, you know, if car dealers are being forced to sell one
00:31:37.260
in five have to be EVs and no one buys them, which is likely the case or very few, then you're going to
00:31:43.260
wind up in a situation where in order to go and to buy, be one of the 80% this year, 70% the year
00:31:50.700
after who wants an internal combustion engine, you're going to have to pay a premium for it
00:31:54.700
because the demand will be super hot, especially when it comes to replacement vehicles. And by the way,
00:31:59.420
Chris, vehicle sales last month were extraordinary. People are buying their internal combustion engines.
00:32:04.940
They know what's coming. And so on January 1st and throughout the year, 2026, those car dealers and
00:32:11.260
those companies don't make that, don't make that target. Then they're going to pay massive penalties
00:32:16.380
and consumers are going to wind up holding the bag as they do for everything else. And, you know,
00:32:19.660
we talked about the second carbon tax, the clean fuel standard, you know, a lot of that money is
00:32:24.620
already there. It's four or five cents a litre already being charged. You have 15%, you know,
00:32:28.780
ethanol being added to gasoline, which is crap for a lot of vehicles. But most importantly,
00:32:32.940
they have to now, as refineries, go out and buy chargers for vehicles in order to get the
00:32:38.060
carbon credits so that the, if you will, it's an indulgence payment that they have to make,
00:32:42.220
which you and I as consumers have to make. We are slowly but surely strangling our economy
00:32:48.220
and our ability to make ends meet. Well done, Canada. That's why it takes 138 pennies to buy
00:32:52.300
a US dollar and your purchase power is going out the window. That is perfectly said. And for people who
00:32:56.860
don't understand why Dan called it an indulgence, look it up. Look up what indulgences were
00:33:02.140
back through human history. That's also why we call it a sin tax, okay? Because they're just
00:33:06.620
trying to punish you for living your life. Dan McTig, Canadians for Affordable Energy. Briefly,
00:33:11.180
where can people find your work? Affordableenergy.ca is the work we're doing. We try to stay on this
00:33:15.820
every week and of course, work with CTF and others. We're all organizations heading towards the same
00:33:20.300
direction, trying to protect consumers. And we've got a damn good reputation between all of us in doing
00:33:25.100
that. Dan, thank you so much for joining us today. Good to be here, Chris. Thanks for having me.
00:33:29.820
You bet. That, once again, was Dan McTig. He is the head of Canadians for Affordable Energy. Folks
00:33:36.780
might remember him from Gas Buddy. So he was the guy that was always able to tell you what the gas
00:33:42.140
price is going to be tomorrow because he knows the market. He knows the industry that well that he'd be
00:33:47.740
able to predict, almost like magic, that it was going to go up or down even by a few cents. I will
00:33:52.940
also point out one of the reasons why Dan is so knowledgeable is because he was a long time
00:33:57.660
member of parliament for the Liberal government. Yes. Back in the day when then Prime Minister Jean
00:34:04.620
Chrétien was the head of the Liberal government, things were different. They weren't perfect, but
00:34:10.140
they were different. Back then, you might remember that Paul Martin was the finance minister. The
00:34:15.580
Canadian Taxpayers Federation gave him an award because he balanced the budget. He stopped deficit
00:34:23.100
spending. So this is why it's super important to talk to people like Dan McTig, who's a veteran of
00:34:29.340
the political arena, but is nonpartisan. He was one of the lead fighters against the Trudeau government's
00:34:34.780
stupid moves on things like carbon taxes, as you heard him just mention, and the electric vehicle
00:34:40.620
mandate. So definitely a good resource there. Folks, this is really important because it may not be
00:34:46.940
affecting your car right this second in your driveway, but the government has no business in
00:34:52.220
the garages of the nation. If we let them say that now 20% of sales must be this certain kind of
00:35:00.380
vehicle and it's going to cost taxpayers an arm and a leg, we're talking hundreds and hundreds and
00:35:06.060
hundreds of millions and billions of dollars that we do not have, they'll just be able to get away with
00:35:10.940
anything. So make sure that you call up your member of parliament, no matter which party they're in,
00:35:17.100
especially if they're within the Liberals, and tell them that this electric vehicle mandate
00:35:23.100
is a non-starter. Folks, thank you so much for joining us. It's really important to share
00:35:28.780
conversations like you just heard with your friends and family who are open to waking up. Okay,
00:35:34.940
they might be tuning into the mainstream media every night at six o'clock, one of the eight people who are
00:35:39.420
still doing that. Okay, but it's really important that you get them to support things like independent
00:35:45.020
media. That's why you should make sure if you're not a subscriber yet to Juno News that you make that
00:35:50.780
change. Get in there, subscribe to Juno News, go onto YouTube, like these videos, and share them with your friends.