The Candice Malcolm Show - February 04, 2023


Fake News Friday | An outrageous week for the CBC


Episode Stats

Length

14 minutes

Words per Minute

178.75104

Word Count

2,642

Sentence Count

187

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

In this week's episode of Fake News Friday, Andrew Lawton and Harrison Faulkner discuss the growing problem of monopolization in Canadian media, and how government intervention might be the answer. They also discuss a new piece from the CBC op-ed piece "Is Monopoly Capitalism Plundering Canadian Newspapers?" and a call for government intervention.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, and welcome along to another edition of Fake News Friday.
00:00:14.000 Yes, it is Friday, February 3rd, sifting through the blizzard of lies, staying afloat in the
00:00:19.260 whirlpool of deception and dishonesty.
00:00:22.020 I am Andrew Lawton, here to navigate the week that was through the lens of debunking the
00:00:26.800 Fake Rejoined, not as always, but as usually, with Harrison Faulkner.
00:00:31.480 Harrison, how has the week been good, sir?
00:00:33.320 The week's been pretty good, and I have to say, the Fake News Friday intro just keeps
00:00:36.920 getting honed in on, and it keeps getting better.
00:00:39.420 I will say, though, my week was going well, Andrew, until I woke up this morning and it
00:00:42.980 was negative 18 in Toronto.
00:00:45.480 I could really use some climate change these days.
00:00:47.760 I saw someone say that whenever it's cold out, it's always the weather.
00:00:51.500 Whenever it's too hot out, it's always climate.
00:00:53.380 Well, seriously, this is getting a bit ridiculous at this point.
00:00:56.520 I could really use a little bit of climate change this morning.
00:01:00.000 Yeah, I'd actually hoped that the weather forecast was going to be fake news, but alas, my car
00:01:05.060 this morning had several inches of snow, so that was how I started my day.
00:01:09.780 But let's get right into the thick of it here.
00:01:13.100 One thing you could always rely on is media wanting more government money.
00:01:18.160 This is the perennial story of subsidy.
00:01:20.500 Once you subsidize something, it will never have a life for itself outside of that subsidized
00:01:25.980 regime.
00:01:27.140 Canadian newspapers are being threatened, we hear.
00:01:30.760 So what do we have to do?
00:01:31.860 Bring on the government.
00:01:33.100 This is an op-ed that was in CBC that says,
00:01:36.720 Monopoly capitalism is plundering Canadian newspapers.
00:01:40.900 It's actually about the Competition Bureau that needs to step in and start breaking up some
00:01:45.720 of these big chains.
00:01:47.080 Part of this is, of course, that Post Media, the largest newspaper company in Canada,
00:01:51.000 just announced it's going to be doing several staff cuts.
00:01:54.600 I don't want to understate it here.
00:01:56.440 It's actually quite a significant workforce reduction after this company has already had
00:02:00.880 to do this time and time again in recent years.
00:02:03.400 They're also going to be selling off properties.
00:02:05.640 But the answer to this is that, well, monopoly capitalism is the problem, not an old business
00:02:11.100 model.
00:02:11.860 Yeah, Andrew, you can always count on the CBC.
00:02:13.960 Whenever they discuss stories like the failing local media, right, the fact that Canadians
00:02:18.760 can no longer get accurate news about where they live, wherever it is in the country, the
00:02:23.760 answer, the antidote to this problem is always more regulation, more government.
00:02:28.260 It's not just more funding from the government.
00:02:30.240 It's actually demanding that the government steps in and engages with these companies and
00:02:34.800 stops them from getting bigger or stops them from monopolizing.
00:02:38.280 I think everyone can get behind that message.
00:02:39.980 But it is funny, Andrew, how it always comes back to wanting more money from the taxpayer
00:02:44.580 and wanting more government regulation.
00:02:47.420 Like, that's the problem with Canadian media here.
00:02:50.420 The fact that we don't give enough of our money to journalists, it's laughable, especially
00:02:54.740 coming from the CBC.
00:02:55.940 Yeah, and when I mentioned the call for subsidy here, I should mention that Patricia Elliott's
00:03:01.080 primary goal here is to break up the so-called monopolies.
00:03:05.420 But the other side of this is that she's talking about the importance of Bill C-18, which is
00:03:10.520 the bill that forces the social media companies to subsidize news, a government-mandated subsidy.
00:03:16.980 She heralds the Local Journalism Initiative, again, another program where the government bankrolls
00:03:21.960 individual reporters.
00:03:24.000 And she says that, yeah, all of that's fine.
00:03:25.980 We need it.
00:03:26.560 But the media concentration problem is there.
00:03:29.520 So I think the challenge is that they have a very narrow conception of what media is supposed
00:03:35.180 to be.
00:03:36.080 And let's face it, you have independent media organizations like Rebel, like True North,
00:03:40.540 even like Canada Land.
00:03:41.760 It's not exclusively for media that has a more conservative editorial bent are growing.
00:03:48.260 It's the traditional business model, the legacy media that right now is in such dire
00:03:54.340 straits.
00:03:54.920 So I think that the answer to this is not going to come from some government bureaucrat
00:03:59.500 stepping in.
00:04:00.340 It's going to come from innovation.
00:04:02.120 And I don't know why no one who wrings their hands about the state of media actually entertains
00:04:07.700 that discussion.
00:04:08.660 And even in this CBC article, Andrew, Elliott, the author of this piece, talks about, and I
00:04:14.220 think she's a journalism professor.
00:04:15.560 She talks about how good independent journalism is actually being done.
00:04:19.980 Good local stories is, they're being done.
00:04:22.980 And they're not being done by these large corporate media giants like the National Post,
00:04:27.720 Post Media, Toronto Star, all of these big outlets that we know are failing.
00:04:31.860 So she admits that that is happening from independent small outlets.
00:04:36.240 Yet, of course, the antidote is just having the government step in and force social media
00:04:41.780 giants to pay these smaller companies.
00:04:44.780 There's no recognition in this article, of course, as you mentioned, Andrew, about the
00:04:48.680 success of independent outlets.
00:04:49.860 Like us at True North, we rely on donors to fund our journalism, and that journalism is
00:04:53.560 getting better and better.
00:04:54.680 We're breaking exclusive stories, it feels like, all the time now.
00:04:58.740 Like always, Andrew, the antidote from the CBC is more government, more regulation.
00:05:03.440 Who could have guessed?
00:05:05.200 Yeah, I mean, there is this weird impulse.
00:05:07.560 And sometimes people on the right are all okay with going in and busting up so-called monopolies.
00:05:12.080 But I think the big challenge here is that Post Media is not a monopoly.
00:05:16.520 There is actually a quite diverse media landscape in this country.
00:05:20.460 And sure, it's consolidated into a few different players.
00:05:24.320 But there's no barrier to entry, apart from capital, of someone else saying,
00:05:28.620 we are going to start a newspaper chain.
00:05:30.360 We are going to buy off a title.
00:05:31.800 And again, taking aim at a monopoly, or a so-called pseudo-monopoly, whatever they're
00:05:37.420 calling Post Media here, doesn't actually make sense when that company is not being
00:05:42.380 successful.
00:05:43.480 So it's not like you're going after Standard Oil, which is just so giant, it's raking in
00:05:47.800 all the profits.
00:05:48.540 It's like, it's not working.
00:05:49.940 So right now, I think that's proof that the problem is not monopoly capitalism.
00:05:54.400 So in any case, we will move on from there for now.
00:05:58.120 But let's talk about why media needs to innovate.
00:06:01.040 And we look no further, of course, than our old friends at the CBC, the paramount public
00:06:06.260 broadcaster, so significant, so integral to our lives, deserving of $1.4 billion a year
00:06:12.020 in taxpayer money, and without whom we would never know about the dietary habits of New
00:06:17.060 York vegans.
00:06:18.620 Yes, a fridge too far, living sustainably in New York City by unplugging appliances, a CBC
00:06:25.100 pickup of an Associated Press story about a Manhattan vegan named Josh Spodek, who has
00:06:32.640 decided to get rid of his refrigerator in his Greenwich Village apartment and go packaging
00:06:38.940 free and living virtually grid free.
00:06:41.640 And all of this is well and good.
00:06:43.140 And you may be wondering, why is this of interest to Canadian consumers?
00:06:47.060 And why should Canadian taxpayers have to pay for this?
00:06:50.240 And I still, after reading this, do not know anything apart from how Josh Spodek decides
00:06:55.780 to eat his vegetables.
00:06:57.440 $1.4 billion, Andrew.
00:06:59.480 It's like the number keeps going up almost monthly.
00:07:02.240 Last, I swear, almost last episode, we were talking 1.2.
00:07:05.520 But the reason CBC gets the money is because they have a mandate.
00:07:08.760 They have a mandate given to them by Parliament for this money.
00:07:11.840 And let me just read what that mandate says, and then we can see how this story about New
00:07:15.940 York City sustainable living from one hipster in New York City matches up with this mandate.
00:07:21.560 The mandate for the CBC, the reason why they get $1.4 billion from us, is to inform,
00:07:28.080 enlighten, and entertain, to contribute to the development of a shared national consciousness
00:07:32.880 and identity, to reflect the regional and cultural diversity of Canada, and to contribute
00:07:37.840 to the development of Canadian talent and culture.
00:07:40.060 This story has absolutely nothing to do with the CBC mandate.
00:07:45.900 And yet it just gets put out there, and it's like, oh, you know, we're just trying to reach
00:07:50.040 our daily quota of articles, Andrew.
00:07:51.460 We're just going to talk about this New York City hipster without a fridge, because that
00:07:55.900 is exactly what Canadians pay us to do.
00:07:58.520 It's hilarious, really.
00:08:01.080 I mean, I'm not even going to get upset about this.
00:08:04.140 It's just funny at this point.
00:08:05.340 I pointed this out on Twitter a few days ago, and I was like, you know, why would we at all
00:08:10.820 care about this, was basically the subtext of my tweet.
00:08:13.980 And a few people pointed out something that I had missed initially, which is that keeping
00:08:18.180 up on all the latest trends in New York is probably tremendously relevant to the CEO of
00:08:23.080 CBC, Catherine Tate, who you may recall lives in New York.
00:08:27.480 She has a $5.4 million home in Brooklyn, a little bit of a ways from Greenwich Village,
00:08:33.040 but not too far if you take the Metro.
00:08:34.940 So perhaps the New York City coverage is just to keep Catherine Tate happy over in the remote
00:08:41.120 head office in New York City there.
00:08:43.020 Yeah, that's great.
00:08:43.720 Just a little bit of top-down editorial control by Catherine Tate saying, you know, we're not
00:08:48.840 covering my local stories enough, guys.
00:08:51.240 We're covering all of your local stories.
00:08:53.100 What about my local journalism?
00:08:55.000 This is my local journalism initiative.
00:08:56.580 That's what Catherine Tate is saying.
00:08:58.100 We need to get these hipsters in New York City more coverage for their refrigerator-less,
00:09:02.880 sustainable living.
00:09:04.080 Incredible.
00:09:05.040 You know, and for those who wanted to know, I guess we have to do the story justice here
00:09:09.040 and bring it to completion.
00:09:10.440 What appliances does he have if not a fridge?
00:09:12.920 I know all Canadian news consumers care about this.
00:09:15.800 He cooks with an electric pressure cooker, occasionally a toaster oven, but fear not, he powers them with
00:09:21.860 a portable solar panel and a battery pack.
00:09:24.980 Although he has to bring it up and down 11 flights of stairs to recharge it on the roof
00:09:30.500 of his building every day because the sun don't shine on whatever floor he's on.
00:09:34.640 So now you know.
00:09:35.900 This is, we can all go about our days there.
00:09:38.320 You know what?
00:09:38.880 We have kind of a good CBC theme going on here.
00:09:41.280 So let's bring it back to Canada, but keep the CBC commentary running here.
00:09:46.120 There was a bit of an interesting exchange in the House of Commons foyer this morning when
00:09:52.540 Pierre Polyev, the leader of the Conservatives, was commenting on the withdrawal by the Liberals
00:09:58.960 of their amendment banning hunting and farming rifles and shotguns.
00:10:04.480 And Pierre Polyev was commenting on this and he had this rather unique exchange with a CBC
00:10:09.860 reporter.
00:10:10.340 I'll let it speak for itself.
00:10:15.860 Because we know his agenda.
00:10:17.080 He said it right here.
00:10:18.820 There are some guns, yes, that we're going to have to take away from people who are using
00:10:23.440 them to hunt.
00:10:24.480 Do you feel he's going to reintroduce guns?
00:10:27.260 Oh yes.
00:10:27.980 He'll reintroduce this either in this parliament or he'll dream that, God forbid, if he ever
00:10:33.400 got a majority, he would ram it through.
00:10:34.980 And that's why the only way law-abiding hunters and farmers will be able to protect their way
00:10:42.060 of life is to elect a conservative majority government led by Pierre Polyev.
00:10:46.620 It shows good faith that maybe he heard what you were saying and heard what people are saying.
00:10:52.000 Good faith.
00:10:53.300 Good faith.
00:10:53.860 You are definitely with the CBC.
00:10:55.800 You think that anything about this process has been good faith.
00:10:58.700 No, I would have to...
00:10:59.660 No, like, I mean, you've got to ask, obviously you're from the CBC, you're trying to help
00:11:04.540 them out of a bad situation, but the reality is this.
00:11:07.500 He introduced, he introduced this amendment, he, he, no, it's, it's CBC is trying to carry
00:11:12.880 Trudeau's water again.
00:11:13.900 I'll give an answer to the question.
00:11:15.500 He introduced this amendment with hundreds and hundreds of firearms owned by law-abiding,
00:11:22.800 lawful, licensed people.
00:11:25.020 He then attacked anyone who disagreed.
00:11:28.520 He tried to use fear and divide and conquer as he always does.
00:11:32.140 And he reiterated his plan in December to ban hunting rifles.
00:11:36.300 The only reason Trudeau has put his tail between his legs and paused this plan is because my
00:11:42.800 team and I forced him to do it.
00:11:45.960 But if he ever got the chance, make no mistake, he will ban hunting rifles.
00:11:49.720 And the only way to prevent that is with a conservative majority government.
00:11:52.240 So, Andrew, it's good to see that we have some politicians now calling out the CBC, especially
00:11:56.860 on the conservative benches, because for a while they were just kind of going out there
00:12:01.620 berating conservatives, clearly doing the government's bidding and never really getting
00:12:07.180 called out for it.
00:12:08.000 And it is really refreshing to hear Pierre Polyev take a CBC journalist to task.
00:12:12.580 And he's right, too.
00:12:13.700 The idea that this whole, that any part of this process was conducted in good faith by the
00:12:18.660 government is an absurdity.
00:12:20.820 It's a joke.
00:12:21.300 Look, there's no way that they can possibly claim that unless, of course, you're on the
00:12:25.340 take from the government, unless, of course, you receive $1.4 billion from the government
00:12:29.840 and the opposition are now saying they want to defund you.
00:12:32.960 That then would make sense for the journalists like this to be talking this way.
00:12:36.820 But really, it's an absurdity for them to be saying that this was conducted in good
00:12:40.540 faith.
00:12:41.480 And thankfully, Pierre Polyev put this journalist in his place.
00:12:45.260 Yeah, and I've long said that politicians in Canada in general, certainly conservative
00:12:50.900 politicians, need to stop accepting the premises of bad questions.
00:12:55.000 And I literally said on my show many months ago that Pierre Polyev should be available
00:12:59.440 to the media, but he should take a page out of Ron DeSantis' book and actually flip the
00:13:03.880 script.
00:13:04.220 And I'm not saying he was taking my advice, because I think he has a bit of that instinct
00:13:08.140 on his own.
00:13:08.900 But I was glad he did that and brazenly, blatantly said, yeah, they're carrying water for the
00:13:13.520 Liberals right now.
00:13:14.320 Well, it's exactly what Pierre Polyev, I think, needs to do.
00:13:16.820 As the year goes on, as we get closer to 2025, the journalists inside the House of Commons,
00:13:24.240 the Parliamentary Press Bureau, are going to continue to get sharper and sharper with Polyev.
00:13:28.820 And until such time as conservatives have a leader that is going to actually fight them
00:13:33.420 on these issues, then it's going to be a bloodbath for conservatives.
00:13:37.500 The journalists are never going to give them an inch.
00:13:39.960 They're certainly not going to treat them the way they treat the Liberals right now.
00:13:43.040 So it's good to see it.
00:13:44.380 It's good to see that the leader of the opposition isn't hiding away from the parliamentary press,
00:13:50.240 but instead is taking the fight right to them.
00:13:52.440 It's a good thing to see.
00:13:54.320 Yes, very well said.
00:13:56.360 Let us know what you think in the comments.
00:13:58.460 Make sure to subscribe.
00:13:59.520 And if you support the work that True North does, not just on Fridays where we let our,
00:14:04.400 well, metaphorical hair down, but throughout the week as well.
00:14:07.700 Please do head on over to donate.tnc.news.
00:14:11.140 I'm Andrew Lawton.
00:14:12.080 My thanks to Harrison Faulkner.
00:14:13.800 Have a wonderful weekend, everyone.
00:14:15.780 And we will see you next time.
00:14:17.180 Bye.
00:14:17.520 Bye.
00:14:17.720 Bye.
00:14:18.360 Bye.
00:14:31.800 Bye.
00:14:32.940 Bye.
00:14:33.380 Bye.
00:14:33.980 Bye.
00:14:34.820 Bye.
00:14:35.040 Bye.
00:14:35.520 Bye.
00:14:35.940 Bye.
00:14:36.340 Bye.
00:14:37.300 Bye.
00:14:41.340 Bye.
00:14:43.260 Bye.
00:14:43.440 Bye.
00:14:43.780 Bye.
00:14:44.380 Bye.
00:14:44.900 Bye.