The Candice Malcolm Show - Fake News Friday

00:00:00.700 Searchlight Pictures presents In the Blink of an Eye on Hulu on Disney+.

00:00:04.800 A sweeping science fiction drama spanning the Stone Age, the present day, and the distant future.

00:00:10.800 About the essence of what it means to be human, regardless of our place in history.

00:00:15.180 The film is directed by Oscar-winning filmmaker Andrew Stanton and stars Rashida Jones, Kate McKinnon, and Daveed Diggs.

00:00:21.820 Stream In the Blink of an Eye now only on Hulu on Disney+.

00:00:25.420 Sign up at Disneyplus.com.

00:00:30.000 Hello everyone and welcome to you all.

00:00:43.280 Happy New Year just about.

00:00:45.200 It is December 30th, the anti-penultimate day of the year.

00:00:49.900 And this means that we have to wrap up some loose ends before we can head into 2023.

00:00:56.020 And one of them is a biggie.

00:00:58.400 We have to sift through 365 days.

00:01:01.980 Well, I guess, what, 363 days.

00:01:04.160 But we hope there's not going to be a big bombshell CBC first-person story about the racism of power tools or whatever in the next two days.

00:01:12.980 You never know.

00:01:13.420 But we have to sift through almost 365 days of fake news and find the very best that are befitting of the annual Fake News Awards, which has become very much a favorite of ours here at True North.

00:01:28.000 And also a favorite of those of you watching this show, as we know, because the Academy of Fake News is a democratic institution.

00:01:35.940 We don't just decide this as some autocratic Emergencies Act-esque dictatorship.

00:01:41.060 No, what we do is put it out to the people to decide what the best of our fake news stories of the year are.

00:01:49.380 We have a top 10 list, and we are going to do the countdown right up till number one.

00:01:55.280 And our number one fake news story this year actually is something I'm not going to tell you until we get there, because that's how a countdown works.

00:02:02.640 So, oh my goodness, I just did real-time clickbait.

00:02:05.580 Anyway, I'm Andrew Lawton, joined, as always, by Harrison Faulkner.

00:02:09.760 And we have a doozy to get us started here.

00:02:12.640 What was number 10 this year, Harrison?

00:02:14.200 So, we talked about this just a couple weeks ago.

00:02:16.540 This was A Mask.

00:02:18.340 This was an article written by A Mask.

00:02:21.380 Get it, Andrew?

00:02:22.300 You see what they're trying to do there, right?

00:02:23.660 Very clever stuff.

00:02:24.780 Very, I mean, just the height of journalism.

00:02:28.120 Pulitzer-worthy quality writing here.

00:02:30.620 So, it's written by A Mask to talk about some, you know, talk about the love lost between a mask and its partner.

00:02:38.140 That being us.

00:02:39.280 Very cringeworthy stuff.

00:02:40.560 I mean, just to read you a quick excerpt from the article.

00:02:43.560 It starts off with this, Andrew.

00:02:45.140 It's me, your mask.

00:02:46.580 I'm here in between the cushions of your couch.

00:02:48.660 Or maybe I'm under the bed.

00:02:50.020 It's difficult to tell.

00:02:50.940 It's so dark.

00:02:51.840 I just want to know what happened.

00:02:52.900 Where did our love go?

00:02:54.380 So, there you can see.

00:02:55.060 This is from the Ottawa Citizen.

00:02:57.520 They tried to get their fake news story up the ranks.

00:03:02.000 They come in at number 10.

00:03:03.120 So, all things considered, with the number of fake news you have to deal with, Andrew, this year,

00:03:06.680 number 10 is not bad for the Ottawa Citizen.

00:03:09.380 Yeah, and I mean, having been around some people in the last few weeks, since this article was written,

00:03:14.200 I don't think many people read or at least heeded Mr. or Mrs. A Mask's work,

00:03:20.140 because there still is a fair bit of masklessness out there.

00:03:23.040 But, you know, so it's just like a Heather Malick column, really.

00:03:25.200 You can write it, but no one actually reads it or listens to it.

00:03:27.900 Okay, let's move along to number 9 here, which is a bit of a big one,

00:03:32.280 and one I suspect will escalate a little bit into 2023.

00:03:36.880 Journalists raising issues with mean tweets.

00:03:40.580 Now, the Canadian Association of Journalists has done this campaign.

00:03:44.900 They've talked about how there's a, quote,

00:03:46.820 coordinated campaign of hate against female journalists, mostly, quote, of color.

00:03:51.500 The president of the CAJ said to CTV News,

00:03:54.780 this is an organized campaign to threaten and intimidate journalists into silence

00:03:59.180 and undermine the freedom of the press in Canada.

00:04:01.720 And this was, of course, written about by some of those journalists, evidently, from CTV News.

00:04:07.080 Now, when we talked about this in the past,

00:04:09.100 I said I don't want to diminish the nastiness that is leveled towards some journalists on Twitter.

00:04:14.500 I see it directed at some.

00:04:16.060 I also see it directed at me.

00:04:17.440 There is just, in general, a fair bit of nastiness on Twitter directed to anyone who sticks their neck out for anything,

00:04:23.560 whether it's in politics and media, and I don't think it's right.

00:04:27.540 But I also don't think this victim complex has really been doing anyone any favors,

00:04:32.140 because you've got some people that just say,

00:04:34.300 I'm going to ignore it, I'm going to block it, I'm going to move on.

00:04:37.140 And then you get other people that seem to really revel in it,

00:04:40.740 and that only fuels it, because people see they're getting a reaction.

00:04:43.920 That doesn't make it right, but it's just what happens.

00:04:46.180 Well, no, exactly, and this is just so transparent.

00:04:49.120 It's all about trying to demonize the convoy.

00:04:51.700 It's another level of demonizing the Freedom Convoy.

00:04:53.980 Yeah, we can say mean tweets are bad, nasty things online are not great.

00:04:58.320 No one wants to do that, no one wants to see that.

00:05:00.600 But when the CAJ, who, like I said, they purport to stand up for journalists,

00:05:05.380 but they rarely ever stand up for independent journalists.

00:05:07.480 They're only really there for mainstream journalists.

00:05:09.600 But the CAJ says that from the Freedom Convoy,

00:05:12.620 it's a coordinated campaign of hate,

00:05:15.560 specifically targeting female journalists of color.

00:05:18.100 I mean, this is just another recycled version of Freedom Convoy bad,

00:05:22.620 the rest good.

00:05:23.760 This is just another classic example of what they're trying to do, Andrew.

00:05:26.340 And I think a lot of Canadians see right through it.

00:05:28.560 No wonder it got its way on our top 10 list.

00:05:32.320 Yeah, number nine, not exactly winning, but still in the running.

00:05:36.700 Still a nominee and finalist on the short list, so to speak.

00:05:40.020 And as I said, though, I think this story is not yet over.

00:05:43.780 I think there's probably going to be another similar version of this in the 2023 list.

00:05:48.980 So all I can say to people is to stay tuned.

00:05:52.420 Number eight, I know it's your turn, but can I do this one?

00:05:55.120 Oh, no, I was going to give the floor to you.

00:05:57.100 So, Andrew, it's all yours.

00:05:58.280 Go ahead with it.

00:05:59.640 So I am the, I forget the name, actually.

00:06:02.460 There's like an ologist or whatever for someone who does crosswords,

00:06:05.760 which I should know because that sounds like the type of thing

00:06:07.800 that would be in a crossword.

00:06:08.900 But this is a one that is near and dear to my heart

00:06:12.200 as the token crossword doer of True North.

00:06:15.920 Crossword puzzles, CBC says, are not inclusive enough.

00:06:20.480 Crossword puzzles are everywhere,

00:06:21.760 but how inclusive are the bylines and the clues?

00:06:25.580 Okay, so CBC's issue here in the author's perspective

00:06:31.780 is that too many white people are making crosswords

00:06:34.580 and the clues themselves even are only representing straight white men.

00:06:40.280 So if you look at a crossword,

00:06:42.400 you're not going to find anything about anything that's not white.

00:06:45.220 So when you look in and it tells you,

00:06:47.140 oh, you know, one across is a, you know,

00:06:51.820 an alternative to butter that's margarine,

00:06:53.740 that's actually not inclusive.

00:06:54.940 Or when, you know, four down is saying actor Tom Blank

00:07:00.320 and you put in Cruz,

00:07:02.140 well, that actually is just a cis-normative,

00:07:05.100 heteronormative, white supremacist trope

00:07:07.280 because Tom Cruise is a straight white male actor

00:07:10.300 and this is all you get.

00:07:12.040 So you need to do like, you know,

00:07:14.080 Marvel movie Blank Panther,

00:07:16.200 which has been in crosswords actually.

00:07:18.560 So I don't know how we can say they're not inclusive enough.

00:07:20.560 It's just, if you're looking for something,

00:07:22.620 you're going to find it here.

00:07:23.740 But this one was like going after crossword puzzles

00:07:27.460 and the people that do them

00:07:28.880 and the people that write them.

00:07:30.360 And then like, just you fast forward a few weeks later

00:07:33.480 and there was this controversy

00:07:35.240 where the New York Times crossword

00:07:36.860 on the first day of Hanukkah

00:07:38.420 had this design on your screen there,

00:07:41.680 which looks a lot like a swastika.

00:07:44.580 So maybe this CBC article was onto something.

00:07:47.780 You know, when you read this,

00:07:49.480 so this is our eighth place story

00:07:51.680 and the seventh place story coming up after it, Andrew,

00:07:54.400 you read these two stories

00:07:55.740 and you think to yourself,

00:07:56.880 now not even the Babylon Bee would come up with this.

00:07:59.780 Or when they saw the headlines in the CBC,

00:08:02.280 when they saw the headline in the next story,

00:08:04.300 they must have thought to themselves,

00:08:05.280 wow, we really have to step up our game, guys.

00:08:06.960 Because, I mean, reality is sort of picking up

00:08:10.840 and taking over parody at this point.

00:08:13.560 Crosswords aren't diverse enough.

00:08:15.560 The people who design the crosswords aren't diverse enough.

00:08:19.520 I mean, where do you come up with this stuff?

00:08:21.460 It truly is, could only be the product of the CBC.

00:08:25.200 Just incredible stuff.

00:08:26.740 I mean, I'm surprised it only came in at eighth place, Andrew.

00:08:30.660 I thought maybe this one was going to make a bit of a run

00:08:32.580 closer to the top of the charts.

00:08:34.480 But hey, I mean, like I said,

00:08:35.800 I said this before with the last story.

00:08:37.680 We're talking about top 10 examples of fake news

00:08:40.440 in Canada throughout 2022.

00:08:41.820 There are probably 100 examples of fake news.

00:08:45.580 So you've got to think to yourself,

00:08:46.500 to make it in the top 10,

00:08:47.580 this is the upper echelons.

00:08:49.520 This is sort of the elite level of fake journalism,

00:08:52.660 fake news in this country.

00:08:53.740 So again, eighth place, not bad.

00:08:56.180 Yeah, this isn't a recap of every story.

00:08:58.220 This is only the top 10.

00:08:59.380 Remember, we do probably three or four stories a week,

00:09:01.580 52 weeks of the year.

00:09:02.580 Maybe we skip a couple for holidays.

00:09:04.160 So there were like 150 stories at a minimum

00:09:07.580 that we had to go through here.

00:09:09.360 And it's only the creme to the creme of the creme.

00:09:12.740 I was going to say the creme of the crop.

00:09:14.040 I was going to do a mixed metaphor thing.

00:09:15.840 The creme de la creme, the cream of the crop,

00:09:17.960 the cat's pajamas out of the cat's...

00:09:20.100 No, the cat's meow.

00:09:21.380 See, I'm mixing metaphors left, right, and center.

00:09:23.340 I'm about to secure the number four spot

00:09:25.120 on the list or something.

00:09:26.500 So let's move on from crosswords.

00:09:28.580 Although with the swastika one of the New York Times,

00:09:31.120 I will say crosswords are on notice.

00:09:33.420 You guys can't pull any of this nonsense anymore

00:09:35.360 or I'll have to eat a bit of crow.

00:09:37.220 There we go.

00:09:37.600 I got a metaphor right.

00:09:39.360 Let's go on to number seven.

00:09:40.780 What do we have?

00:09:41.560 Well, for number seven,

00:09:42.400 we are going to the Washington Post.

00:09:45.500 We're kind of expanding our borders here.

00:09:47.960 But this story, I have to say,

00:09:48.900 it did get picked up in the CBC,

00:09:50.260 so it kind of counts.

00:09:51.560 Shark Week, Andrew,

00:09:52.340 that famous Discovery Channel programming

00:09:55.360 during Shark Week

00:09:56.340 where I guess you watch a lot of TV about sharks.

00:09:59.280 No kidding?

00:10:00.180 Could you guess?

00:10:01.360 That the problem with Shark Week, Andrew,

00:10:02.760 is not that there's...

00:10:03.800 You know, it's not biodiverse enough.

00:10:06.320 We're not talking about only sharks.

00:10:08.340 No, no.

00:10:09.060 It's the fact that the people are too white.

00:10:11.740 There's too many men named Mike.

00:10:13.700 And it's too focused on...

00:10:15.600 What is it?

00:10:16.280 It's too negative about sharks.

00:10:18.380 Truly incredible stuff.

00:10:19.700 So the Washington Post deployed a team of researchers,

00:10:22.600 as they usually do.

00:10:23.460 They're not busy doing journalism.

00:10:25.020 So they deployed a team of journalists

00:10:26.700 to uncover a startling revelation

00:10:29.380 that apparently in Shark Week,

00:10:31.400 this Discovery Channel program,

00:10:33.320 there's too many white guys named Mike

00:10:35.180 who talk about marine biology.

00:10:37.780 And no kidding,

00:10:39.200 the description of sharks is too negative.

00:10:42.460 We have to try to paint these sharks, Andrew,

00:10:44.260 as lovely creatures of the sea.

00:10:47.620 Things you could go swimming with

00:10:49.040 and things you could, you know,

00:10:50.100 have a fun little swim beside.

00:10:52.720 Not like they'll eat you in the ocean

00:10:54.520 if you look like good food.

00:10:57.760 Again, this, just like the crossword puzzle story,

00:11:01.140 is truly better than what Babylon Bee could come up with.

00:11:05.320 It is better than Babylon Bee, Onion, whatever.

00:11:08.580 Insert parody account here.

00:11:10.040 It's better than that.

00:11:10.960 It is unbelievable stuff.

00:11:12.800 Again, seventh place,

00:11:14.400 pretty solid showing for the Washington Post.

00:11:16.340 Yeah, I mean, I remember we did a little thing

00:11:19.640 a few weeks ago

00:11:20.760 where I tried to get one of those AI chatbot generator things

00:11:25.120 to generate a fake news story.

00:11:27.120 And I had it give me a column

00:11:29.620 in the style of the Toronto Star

00:11:30.980 about why power tools are racist.

00:11:32.560 That was the reference at the beginning of the show.

00:11:34.820 And then at a certain point,

00:11:36.160 I'm like, I don't think I could have come up

00:11:37.900 with a prompt bizarre enough

00:11:40.100 to meet the reality of this whole story

00:11:43.100 about Shark Week not being diverse enough.

00:11:45.240 Because I was thinking like,

00:11:46.340 what's some absurd juxtaposition I could frame

00:11:49.500 to get a made-up column

00:11:51.040 about something being racist?

00:11:52.100 And I wouldn't have even thought,

00:11:53.340 you know, shark work is not diverse.

00:11:55.000 I wouldn't have even thought of that.

00:11:56.140 So at a certain point,

00:11:56.980 the reality is more ridiculous

00:11:58.880 than what could pass as satire

00:12:01.340 or even like AI nonsense.

00:12:03.820 So the whole thing about the guys named Mike

00:12:07.040 is a bit of an amusing observation.

00:12:09.040 But they're trying to say,

00:12:10.660 is there enough representation?

00:12:12.120 My question is,

00:12:12.920 is the representation of marine biologists

00:12:16.000 an accurate reflection of the marine biology community?

00:12:18.880 Because if the marine biology community

00:12:20.960 is overwhelmingly white and male,

00:12:23.440 then any sampling of marine biologists you interview

00:12:26.800 is also going to be.

00:12:27.880 But that's not a journalism problem.

00:12:29.640 That's not a media problem.

00:12:31.180 That's just the facts of biology

00:12:33.500 and marine biology in particular.

00:12:35.640 Well, we all know, Andrew,

00:12:36.700 that that sort of diversity,

00:12:39.060 the diversity that is accurate

00:12:40.500 of a particular group

00:12:41.940 is not really what we're going for these days.

00:12:43.580 It's not really,

00:12:44.140 it's not really in fashion in 2022,

00:12:45.920 is it?

00:12:46.520 It won't be in 2023.

00:12:47.980 It's all about trying to,

00:12:49.600 you know,

00:12:50.320 apply diversity standards

00:12:51.820 that aren't representative

00:12:53.040 to all of these different areas.

00:12:55.200 One thing I did find funny

00:12:56.240 about this Shark Week story

00:12:57.620 was that the story about Shark Week being too white,

00:13:00.280 the study,

00:13:01.040 was headed by a woman named Lisa Whitenack,

00:13:04.540 which I just had a little,

00:13:05.840 I thought was a little amusing to me,

00:13:08.300 given that, you know,

00:13:08.860 we're talking too negatively

00:13:09.860 about great white sharks.

00:13:11.280 We're talking too,

00:13:12.300 we're promoting too many mics,

00:13:13.920 too many white guys.

00:13:15.100 Okay, Lisa Whitenack,

00:13:16.220 thanks for that wonderful piece

00:13:17.740 of scientific research.

00:13:20.960 Yeah, if they put her in a crossword,

00:13:22.660 that would not be diverse enough.

00:13:24.440 But that is the number seven entry.

00:13:27.240 We move along to number six.

00:13:29.200 Now, we're getting into

00:13:29.780 some heavier terrain here.

00:13:31.740 But as we've noticed

00:13:33.340 in the last few years,

00:13:35.480 everything there is possibly

00:13:37.740 going to be in journalism

00:13:38.960 has to have a COVID angle

00:13:40.460 or a vaccine angle in some way.

00:13:42.640 It just seems to be

00:13:43.340 the way of the world,

00:13:44.220 the way that researchers

00:13:45.200 are taking their cues.

00:13:47.400 And this particular one

00:13:48.620 from the Washington Post,

00:13:49.920 regular exercise may improve

00:13:51.820 the effectiveness

00:13:52.600 of coronavirus vaccines.

00:13:55.200 They talked about the fact

00:13:56.840 that exercisers who were vaccinated

00:13:58.800 were 25% less likely

00:14:00.420 to be hospitalized with COVID

00:14:01.780 than sedentary people

00:14:03.340 who received the same vaccine.

00:14:04.700 But the studies didn't look

00:14:06.700 at whether active people

00:14:07.940 gain additional benefits

00:14:09.500 from their coronavirus

00:14:10.720 shots and boosters.

00:14:12.060 So it was the epitome

00:14:13.640 of the media taking a correlation

00:14:15.860 that even the researchers

00:14:17.560 were not saying was causation,

00:14:20.040 which is like,

00:14:21.160 you know,

00:14:21.440 university level 101 here

00:14:23.740 about correlation

00:14:25.140 doesn't equal causation.

00:14:26.560 But evidently,

00:14:27.260 the Washington Post

00:14:27.900 didn't get that memo.

00:14:29.360 I mean,

00:14:29.620 I don't think they were

00:14:30.140 really looking for that.

00:14:31.220 Of course,

00:14:31.540 what they were trying to do

00:14:32.340 is find a way

00:14:33.500 to promote the shot

00:14:35.440 and do whatever they could

00:14:38.080 to make that the case.

00:14:39.680 Oh, who could have guessed,

00:14:40.580 Andrew,

00:14:40.800 that exercise,

00:14:43.000 whether you have the shot

00:14:44.360 or not,

00:14:45.060 actually is better for you.

00:14:46.360 It's like,

00:14:47.120 okay,

00:14:47.380 we really needed

00:14:48.120 a Washington Post article

00:14:49.300 to try and spin it

00:14:50.120 about the shot

00:14:50.700 to come to the conclusion

00:14:51.580 that exercise is good

00:14:52.660 and being sedentary is not.

00:14:54.540 I mean,

00:14:55.080 this is just classic example

00:14:56.380 of journalists digging

00:14:58.880 and reaching.

00:15:00.080 It's when there's two,

00:15:00.820 it's when there's like,

00:15:01.980 the impetus on them

00:15:03.500 to write X number

00:15:04.620 of articles a day

00:15:05.540 becomes sort of

00:15:07.300 the reality for them.

00:15:08.340 They go,

00:15:08.800 oh,

00:15:08.900 we have to come up

00:15:09.500 with a story tonight

00:15:10.280 or otherwise,

00:15:11.020 we haven't reached

00:15:11.820 our quota for stories.

00:15:12.780 My deadline's at six

00:15:13.780 and I haven't done anything yet.

00:15:15.660 We got to quickly

00:15:16.460 put something together

00:15:17.260 and whip it up

00:15:18.040 so we find this study

00:15:18.940 and find a way

00:15:20.120 to make our editors

00:15:20.940 very proud

00:15:21.540 by making it

00:15:22.660 an angle about the shot.

00:15:24.040 I mean,

00:15:24.180 it's just classic,

00:15:25.520 classic legacy media

00:15:27.720 and Washington Post

00:15:28.780 getting in twice

00:15:29.920 on the top 10 list

00:15:30.880 for Fake News Friday.

00:15:31.880 I mean,

00:15:32.580 goodness gracious,

00:15:33.380 that deserves a round

00:15:34.000 of applause

00:15:34.380 for them alone.

00:15:35.800 Well,

00:15:36.260 we haven't even gotten

00:15:37.040 to the top half now.

00:15:38.180 We are at the midway point

00:15:39.540 through the top 10 list.

00:15:41.360 Who knows

00:15:42.000 who lurks

00:15:42.860 on the other side

00:15:43.940 of it here,

00:15:44.500 but we do go

00:15:45.560 to Global

00:15:46.600 for number five.

00:15:48.620 So the Washington Post

00:15:49.520 gets a bit of a reprieve here.

00:15:51.820 Harrison,

00:15:52.320 this was a big one

00:15:53.340 in your wheelhouse.

00:15:54.200 Take it away.

00:15:55.040 Yeah,

00:15:55.340 so you know,

00:15:55.900 Truth and Reconciliation Day.

00:15:57.420 The first day,

00:15:58.340 the first year we had it,

00:15:59.920 it was Trudeau's

00:16:00.580 National Surfing Day vacation.

00:16:02.920 So that was sort of

00:16:03.640 setting the tone

00:16:04.300 for how we should all feel

00:16:05.800 about Truth and Reconciliation Day.

00:16:07.680 This year,

00:16:08.240 however,

00:16:08.920 we got an even more

00:16:10.000 somber,

00:16:10.940 reflective opportunity

00:16:11.940 when Global News

00:16:13.900 highlighted drag artists

00:16:16.360 called Indigiqueer

00:16:18.860 drag artists

00:16:20.080 to celebrate

00:16:21.260 Truth and Reconciliation Day.

00:16:22.520 Just in case

00:16:23.040 any of us were,

00:16:24.460 you know,

00:16:24.820 feeling like

00:16:25.380 we didn't get the most

00:16:26.820 out of it last year

00:16:27.620 when our Prime Minister

00:16:28.220 went surfing.

00:16:29.180 This year,

00:16:29.940 we know we got the most

00:16:30.860 out of it.

00:16:31.200 We know we had the most

00:16:32.040 reflective and somber day

00:16:33.980 when Indigiqueer

00:16:35.640 drag artists

00:16:36.660 Ella Lamoureux

00:16:38.320 and Rez Daddy

00:16:40.340 did their

00:16:41.700 drag queen dancing

00:16:43.640 for Truth and Reconciliation Day.

00:16:47.180 Just incredible stuff.

00:16:49.160 No real sort of

00:16:50.600 journalism going on here

00:16:51.800 from Global News

00:16:52.440 to say,

00:16:52.780 wait a second,

00:16:53.340 how does this exactly

00:16:54.320 benefit

00:16:55.900 those who are

00:16:57.280 survivors,

00:16:58.380 those who have been

00:16:59.260 impacted by

00:17:00.040 residential schools?

00:17:01.700 No, no,

00:17:02.040 it wasn't about that.

00:17:02.960 It was just sort of,

00:17:03.920 hey,

00:17:04.140 how can we tack on

00:17:05.320 the message?

00:17:06.300 How can we tack on

00:17:07.500 the sort of

00:17:08.700 the woke message du jour

00:17:10.000 to this Truth and

00:17:11.260 Reconciliation Day?

00:17:12.160 Oh, I know the best

00:17:12.940 way to do it.

00:17:13.700 Let's combine drag queens

00:17:15.200 and let's combine

00:17:16.420 Truth and Reconciliation Day.

00:17:17.680 I'm sure no one

00:17:18.900 was offended

00:17:19.400 by that performance.

00:17:21.260 Just an absolutely

00:17:22.040 ridiculous thing

00:17:22.920 for Global News

00:17:23.560 to write.

00:17:24.300 And no criticism

00:17:25.460 either, Andrew.

00:17:26.100 No one said,

00:17:26.940 hey, wait,

00:17:27.520 how does this sort of,

00:17:28.540 how does this advance

00:17:29.320 Truth and Reconciliation?

00:17:30.500 Does it do anything

00:17:31.420 at all to advance it?

00:17:32.560 Or does it actually

00:17:33.260 just sort of mock it

00:17:34.220 and make it look ridiculous?

00:17:35.920 Again,

00:17:36.320 what a surprise.

00:17:36.940 Didn't come from

00:17:37.460 Global,

00:17:38.000 none of those questions

00:17:38.960 came from Global News,

00:17:39.880 but the journalism

00:17:40.760 itself did.

00:17:41.640 That's why they're

00:17:42.060 on the list.

00:17:43.200 Yeah, when Justin Trudeau

00:17:44.640 on the first National Day

00:17:46.240 for Truth and Reconciliation

00:17:47.260 went out surfing

00:17:48.120 in Tofino,

00:17:48.880 one of the big criticisms

00:17:50.440 was that it wasn't

00:17:51.500 spent in somber reflection

00:17:53.100 and he wasn't talking

00:17:54.660 to Indigenous leaders.

00:17:56.400 But again,

00:17:57.120 I also don't think

00:17:57.840 that going to

00:17:58.400 an Indigiqueer drag show

00:17:59.800 would have constituted

00:18:00.820 somber reflection

00:18:01.700 or talking to

00:18:03.020 Indigenous leaders.

00:18:03.840 I mean,

00:18:04.020 in one sense,

00:18:04.580 yes,

00:18:04.840 it's members

00:18:05.800 of the community,

00:18:06.920 but I don't see

00:18:08.120 how this helps

00:18:08.960 anyone atone

00:18:09.940 for residential schools

00:18:11.140 when they see

00:18:12.020 Rez Daddy

00:18:13.280 and Ella Lamoureux

00:18:14.880 grinding on stage.

00:18:16.420 Again,

00:18:16.800 I could be wrong.

00:18:17.600 I haven't read

00:18:18.160 the TRC report

00:18:19.620 in a while,

00:18:20.180 but I don't think

00:18:21.100 that helps us

00:18:21.880 with reconciliation.

00:18:23.220 No, exactly.

00:18:23.840 It might have been

00:18:24.280 tacked onto the back

00:18:25.080 of the report.

00:18:25.660 It might have been

00:18:25.980 one of the last

00:18:26.620 recommendations.

00:18:27.380 You know,

00:18:27.520 you got to throw in

00:18:28.060 a couple of Rez Daddy

00:18:29.880 drag queen shows,

00:18:32.640 but I didn't catch

00:18:33.740 that as well,

00:18:34.320 Andrew,

00:18:34.720 and it's just

00:18:35.180 another example,

00:18:36.120 like you said,

00:18:36.680 like,

00:18:37.100 how do we take this,

00:18:38.020 how do we take

00:18:38.700 this idea

00:18:39.580 that I think

00:18:40.380 was sort of created

00:18:41.440 with good intentions

00:18:43.840 in mind

00:18:44.280 to have a day

00:18:45.300 where Canada

00:18:46.100 can actually reflect

00:18:47.140 on things

00:18:47.760 that did go horribly wrong,

00:18:49.640 how do we take that

00:18:50.780 and just completely

00:18:51.460 denigrate it?

00:18:52.340 You go surfing

00:18:53.160 on the first day

00:18:53.960 and then you put up

00:18:55.080 these sort of,

00:18:55.760 these sort of bizarre,

00:18:58.320 very strange,

00:18:59.800 weird performances

00:19:01.220 the next day,

00:19:02.780 the next year.

00:19:03.460 It's embarrassing,

00:19:05.240 it's sad,

00:19:05.700 and I think

00:19:06.000 they've really

00:19:06.360 sort of set the bar

00:19:07.200 very low for

00:19:08.560 what's going to be

00:19:10.200 hopefully something

00:19:11.220 that I think

00:19:11.660 keeps going on,

00:19:12.360 but it's just ridiculous.

00:19:14.300 You know,

00:19:14.860 one thing I noticed,

00:19:15.680 we have not had

00:19:16.480 a lot of,

00:19:17.080 actually we haven't

00:19:17.600 had any Trudeau content

00:19:19.000 really on the list

00:19:20.840 so far.

00:19:21.660 I guess all of the voters

00:19:22.920 thought that he deserved

00:19:23.860 to be in the upper echelons

00:19:25.180 of the top 10 list

00:19:26.880 because we are now

00:19:27.560 down to number four.

00:19:29.580 So we're getting

00:19:30.060 to the final three here,

00:19:31.300 getting to the big

00:19:32.420 fake news story

00:19:33.240 of the year.

00:19:34.200 And number four

00:19:35.180 is a story

00:19:36.260 that is a bit worldly

00:19:37.300 in nature.

00:19:38.120 You may remember

00:19:38.800 when Justin Trudeau

00:19:40.560 went to Her Majesty

00:19:42.160 the Queen's funeral

00:19:43.660 in London,

00:19:44.700 he decided that

00:19:45.600 it was an opportunity

00:19:46.400 for a bit of his own

00:19:47.820 form of entertainment.

00:19:49.200 And yes,

00:20:04.020 by the way,

00:20:04.460 that is real life.

00:20:05.820 That's not fantasy.

00:20:07.600 That is what we're caught in

00:20:09.020 and I'd rather be

00:20:09.680 in a landslide.

00:20:10.540 That was Justin Trudeau

00:20:12.020 singing the Queen song,

00:20:14.280 although other Queen,

00:20:15.480 Bohemian Rhapsody.

00:20:16.800 Well,

00:20:17.500 in the bar

00:20:18.480 of the Savoy,

00:20:19.960 I believe it was,

00:20:20.680 in London

00:20:21.140 and doing this well,

00:20:23.260 spending ridiculous amounts

00:20:24.840 of money we learned

00:20:25.560 on this overseas

00:20:26.860 funeral trip

00:20:27.800 for the Canadian delegation.

00:20:29.260 And it was an award-winning

00:20:30.620 pianist on the piano.

00:20:32.340 Great.

00:20:32.700 That doesn't change

00:20:33.700 the fact that it was

00:20:34.580 a time and place situation.

00:20:36.180 And this was mocked

00:20:37.320 around the world

00:20:38.020 by the press,

00:20:38.860 especially in Britain.

00:20:40.020 But the Canadian media

00:20:41.440 took a very different view

00:20:43.520 of these things.

00:20:44.540 And there were

00:20:45.400 a few examples here.

00:20:46.780 Global just reported it

00:20:48.200 and played it a bit straight.

00:20:49.740 But they fact-checked

00:20:50.960 the person who quoted it

00:20:52.420 oddly and started

00:20:53.540 trying to correct,

00:20:54.340 well, it wasn't this hotel

00:20:55.840 and it, you know,

00:20:56.640 it was not in D minor.

00:20:58.120 It was like,

00:20:58.580 it was just ridiculous

00:20:59.480 sort of stuff.

00:21:00.520 But then the best one

00:21:02.360 was CP24,

00:21:04.060 which said,

00:21:05.280 P.M. Trudeau

00:21:06.180 sings Queen's

00:21:07.280 classic ballad,

00:21:08.260 Bohemian Rhapsody,

00:21:09.460 in tribute

00:21:10.280 to late Queen Elizabeth II.

00:21:13.020 So they said that

00:21:14.120 this was actually done

00:21:15.360 for the Queen,

00:21:16.500 which even Justin Trudeau

00:21:17.500 didn't say.

00:21:18.080 So some of the media

00:21:19.320 were actually out there

00:21:20.400 doing their own spin

00:21:21.640 just to soften the blow

00:21:23.200 of this global embarrassment.

00:21:24.900 I mean,

00:21:25.140 it takes a lot of courage,

00:21:28.080 I think,

00:21:28.640 to be that person

00:21:30.500 in the CP24

00:21:31.620 and think to yourself,

00:21:33.000 oh, how are we going

00:21:33.900 to do this?

00:21:34.500 I'm just going to throw in

00:21:35.440 that little in-tribute line

00:21:36.760 and we're just going

00:21:37.520 to get away with this.

00:21:38.220 I'm sure that there were

00:21:39.180 lots of applause,

00:21:40.620 lots of thanks

00:21:42.140 coming from the Trudeau team

00:21:43.920 when that article came out,

00:21:45.080 but even the CTV article

00:21:46.840 on this,

00:21:47.720 classic, right, Andrew?

00:21:49.020 It's a total sort of

00:21:50.320 sound barrier

00:21:51.240 from the Canadian legacy media

00:21:52.560 to the rest of the world.

00:21:53.620 The rest of the world

00:21:54.380 just mocking him for it.

00:21:55.700 I'm pretty sure CNN

00:21:56.720 had stories that were negative.

00:21:58.280 I mean,

00:21:58.500 even lefty outlets

00:22:00.560 around the world

00:22:01.440 in the UK

00:22:01.940 and in the US

00:22:02.740 were mocking him for this

00:22:04.020 because, look,

00:22:04.840 it wasn't just,

00:22:05.460 as you saw in the video,

00:22:06.180 it wasn't just Trudeau singing.

00:22:07.580 It was Trudeau

00:22:08.100 very dramatically,

00:22:10.120 very flamboyantly

00:22:11.420 getting into his

00:22:12.920 Freddie Mercury persona

00:22:14.700 and belting it out

00:22:16.160 after a long night

00:22:17.320 sitting by the piano.

00:22:19.120 But even CTV

00:22:20.500 tried to do this

00:22:21.020 long-form article

00:22:21.780 about how,

00:22:22.680 you know,

00:22:22.860 do world leaders

00:22:23.520 have the right to sing

00:22:24.620 or party?

00:22:25.300 How come Justin Trudeau

00:22:26.600 can't sing a little bit?

00:22:27.940 And then they compared it

00:22:28.920 to Stephen Harper

00:22:30.580 singing a Beatles song

00:22:32.220 with Yo-Yo Ma

00:22:33.100 in 2009.

00:22:34.800 Again,

00:22:35.420 I'm pretty sure

00:22:36.100 one was intentional,

00:22:37.940 one was on a stage,

00:22:39.300 the other was

00:22:40.340 when he was sitting

00:22:41.280 by a piano

00:22:42.000 when he was supposed

00:22:43.040 to be at the Queen's funeral.

00:22:44.500 I mean,

00:22:44.640 it's just classic, right?

00:22:45.980 They'll go to any way.

00:22:46.820 Now, in fairness,

00:22:47.500 he did go to the funeral.

00:22:49.280 This was in the

00:22:49.920 after-hours show,

00:22:51.140 but I certainly agree

00:22:52.380 the whole trip

00:22:53.200 was about the funeral.

00:22:54.760 Right,

00:22:55.080 the whole trip

00:22:55.520 was about the funeral.

00:22:56.300 It was not supposed

00:22:57.100 to be Justin Trudeau's

00:22:58.740 great Freddie Mercury

00:22:59.940 moment, right?

00:23:01.180 But it ended up

00:23:02.380 basically becoming that

00:23:03.400 and we're supposed

00:23:04.460 to sort of say,

00:23:05.820 oh,

00:23:06.160 political marketing expert

00:23:07.820 Clive Veroni

00:23:08.640 says Trudeau's singing

00:23:10.020 in London

00:23:10.340 was blown out of proportion.

00:23:12.580 Well,

00:23:12.780 I wonder why people

00:23:13.280 thought that.

00:23:13.840 I wonder why people

00:23:14.520 thought that it might

00:23:15.120 have been maybe

00:23:15.860 not the best look

00:23:17.020 for Canada.

00:23:17.680 I mean,

00:23:17.840 it's just ridiculous.

00:23:19.980 And it was a team effort

00:23:21.460 as well,

00:23:21.860 by the way.

00:23:22.520 It was CP24

00:23:23.500 at the end tribute,

00:23:24.240 but they all get a little

00:23:25.900 in on the action here.

00:23:27.140 CTV,

00:23:27.700 CP24,

00:23:28.500 congratulations.

00:23:29.480 I don't think

00:23:29.940 CP24 gets a lot

00:23:30.960 of recognition

00:23:31.500 these days,

00:23:32.080 Andrew.

00:23:32.360 So,

00:23:32.840 you know,

00:23:33.160 for them,

00:23:34.080 getting number four,

00:23:35.280 that's a pretty good deal

00:23:36.800 for them.

00:23:37.360 Congratulations to CP24.

00:23:39.560 And this brings us

00:23:41.120 to the top three.

00:23:42.800 Now,

00:23:42.940 these are some

00:23:43.500 of the heavy hitters.

00:23:44.440 And remember,

00:23:44.940 I go back to the beginning.

00:23:46.040 This was a list

00:23:47.140 that was compiled

00:23:47.800 by you,

00:23:48.620 True North insiders,

00:23:49.540 who had the chance

00:23:50.180 to vote

00:23:50.760 and get your favorite

00:23:52.420 fake news stories

00:23:53.400 of 2022

00:23:53.980 up to the top.

00:23:55.340 And we are now

00:23:55.860 in the final three.

00:23:57.740 And we've got some

00:23:58.420 heavier content here,

00:23:59.580 but number three

00:24:00.620 is a bit interesting

00:24:02.040 because this is more

00:24:02.680 of a general category

00:24:03.920 because if we were

00:24:05.220 to like break down

00:24:06.020 every individual story

00:24:07.100 in this category,

00:24:07.900 I think it would

00:24:08.460 probably be

00:24:08.900 the entire list here

00:24:10.080 as evidenced

00:24:11.100 by the fact

00:24:11.720 that it did make it

00:24:12.520 to the top three.

00:24:13.940 But what do we have

00:24:14.660 in third place,

00:24:15.600 Harrison?

00:24:16.020 We have

00:24:16.720 Polyev derangement

00:24:18.260 syndrome.

00:24:18.620 And of course,

00:24:19.300 it had to be

00:24:19.760 on this list.

00:24:20.460 I mean,

00:24:21.180 what a great year

00:24:22.820 of journalists

00:24:23.600 just completely

00:24:24.620 melting down,

00:24:26.120 embracing their own

00:24:27.000 little CNN,

00:24:28.380 MSNBC reaction

00:24:29.640 to Trump

00:24:30.100 for their own

00:24:31.660 opportunity to

00:24:33.020 kind of turn that

00:24:34.200 into their own

00:24:34.760 reaction to Polyev.

00:24:35.820 So they broke out

00:24:36.480 the Polyev derangement

00:24:38.420 syndrome.

00:24:39.080 And I mean,

00:24:39.560 again,

00:24:39.820 like I said,

00:24:40.280 we could have a whole

00:24:41.060 top ten list

00:24:41.860 of best examples

00:24:42.800 of this,

00:24:43.240 but why don't we

00:24:43.960 just go through

00:24:44.360 the list?

00:24:44.820 I mean,

00:24:45.000 we had op-eds

00:24:46.300 and columns

00:24:47.020 in the Globe and Mail

00:24:47.900 talking about

00:24:48.980 the dangerous rage,

00:24:50.880 Andrew,

00:24:51.220 from Polyev's

00:24:51.940 leadership campaign,

00:24:52.820 the dangerous rage

00:24:53.940 Polyev is channeling.

00:24:55.800 Or,

00:24:56.420 as another Globe and Mail

00:24:57.420 op-ed wrote,

00:24:58.240 the corrosive campaign.

00:25:01.200 I mean,

00:25:01.520 truly breaking out

00:25:02.460 the,

00:25:03.340 going in with all

00:25:04.280 the synonyms

00:25:04.860 for how you can

00:25:05.420 try and write,

00:25:06.200 you know,

00:25:06.740 bad,

00:25:07.440 right?

00:25:07.760 They're trying to

00:25:08.540 take Orange Man

00:25:09.580 bad and turn it

00:25:10.620 into Pierre Polyev.

00:25:11.480 They did their

00:25:11.840 absolute best.

00:25:13.260 So we had

00:25:13.820 dangerous rage,

00:25:14.520 we had corrosive

00:25:15.140 campaign,

00:25:15.800 two Globe and Mail

00:25:16.400 op-ed headlines,

00:25:17.400 embarrassing

00:25:17.780 stuff.

00:25:18.720 But then also,

00:25:19.560 we had what I

00:25:20.120 thought was the

00:25:20.580 best example of

00:25:21.440 Polyev derangement

00:25:22.120 syndrome,

00:25:23.200 was when Global

00:25:23.840 News,

00:25:24.800 Rachel Gilmore

00:25:25.660 was a journalist,

00:25:26.900 when they took

00:25:27.860 the picture,

00:25:29.160 the handshake

00:25:30.340 between Jeremy

00:25:30.860 McKenzie and

00:25:31.900 Pierre Polyev,

00:25:33.040 and they took it

00:25:33.800 as some sort of

00:25:34.620 grand endorsement

00:25:35.980 of the far right,

00:25:36.920 the radical far

00:25:37.680 right,

00:25:38.000 because someone

00:25:38.960 in the Diagalon,

00:25:40.540 the meme country,

00:25:41.440 by the way,

00:25:42.300 took a picture

00:25:43.220 with Pierre Polyev,

00:25:44.660 who unknowingly

00:25:45.440 took the picture

00:25:46.020 with him,

00:25:46.420 and then that

00:25:47.300 was basically

00:25:47.760 the news cycle

00:25:48.460 for a whole week.

00:25:49.840 So there was that,

00:25:50.820 there was the handshake,

00:25:52.260 there was also the

00:25:52.840 meltdown of the

00:25:53.360 Anglo-Saxon language,

00:25:54.900 Andrew.

00:25:55.020 I mean,

00:25:55.180 where do you start?

00:25:55.900 It's just a whole

00:25:57.060 collection of fake

00:26:00.360 news examples that

00:26:01.220 really deserve their

00:26:02.000 entire show

00:26:03.160 onto themselves.

00:26:03.840 Yeah,

00:26:05.660 and when Pierre Polyev used

00:26:07.200 the term Anglo-Saxon

00:26:08.520 words,

00:26:08.980 what he was talking

00:26:09.720 about was that

00:26:10.360 we need to use,

00:26:11.580 politicians and

00:26:12.600 governments need to

00:26:13.220 use simple,

00:26:14.120 clear language

00:26:15.140 in legislation

00:26:16.300 and in general

00:26:17.120 so the Canadians

00:26:17.840 know what's being

00:26:18.600 discussed.

00:26:19.120 So the fact that

00:26:19.680 that was taken,

00:26:20.820 plucked out of like

00:26:21.580 a 90-minute interview

00:26:22.900 with Jordan Peterson

00:26:23.840 and held up as

00:26:24.600 something offensive

00:26:25.260 is absurd.

00:26:26.540 I think my favorite

00:26:27.600 is the

00:26:28.440 MGTOW

00:26:30.180 controversy

00:26:32.120 which was like

00:26:33.520 this hidden meta

00:26:34.660 tag that was in

00:26:35.840 YouTube videos

00:26:36.840 that apparently

00:26:38.340 were got there

00:26:39.540 and no one knows

00:26:40.280 and this was a

00:26:41.100 dog whistle to the

00:26:42.220 far right or to the

00:26:43.200 incels or whatever

00:26:44.000 and the hilarious

00:26:45.100 thing was Global

00:26:45.940 did a report about

00:26:46.760 this and in the

00:26:47.680 hashtags they included

00:26:49.100 the hashtag

00:26:50.160 MGTOW

00:26:51.000 which was the

00:26:52.360 exact hashtag

00:26:53.260 that they were

00:26:54.140 taking aim at

00:26:54.980 Pierre Polyev for

00:26:55.820 and again it's

00:26:57.060 really this

00:26:57.960 perspective of

00:26:59.160 if you are

00:26:59.920 looking for

00:27:00.540 something

00:27:00.960 you will find

00:27:02.460 it and the

00:27:03.120 media already

00:27:03.780 decided this

00:27:04.560 guy's far right

00:27:05.460 so every step

00:27:06.680 he took

00:27:07.120 especially early

00:27:07.840 on they had to

00:27:08.560 filter through

00:27:09.140 that but I

00:27:09.820 think the best

00:27:10.280 one might be

00:27:11.040 this one from

00:27:12.380 Pierre Polyev's

00:27:13.420 first media

00:27:15.080 briefing as

00:27:16.440 leader of the

00:27:17.220 Conservatives.

00:27:18.800 Thank you very

00:27:19.440 much.

00:27:19.900 I appreciate it.

00:27:21.200 I appreciate

00:27:21.640 your presence here

00:27:22.700 today.

00:27:23.600 Before I begin

00:27:24.500 let me just

00:27:25.460 say that

00:27:26.040 thank you

00:27:29.840 very much

00:27:30.300 I'm being

00:27:31.400 heckled here

00:27:32.320 by the

00:27:33.580 thank you

00:27:34.760 very much

00:27:35.120 for your

00:27:35.360 congratulations

00:27:36.060 thank you

00:27:37.540 very much

00:27:37.920 for your

00:27:38.200 questions

00:27:38.520 I'm going

00:27:39.680 to begin

00:27:39.960 my remarks

00:27:40.500 now

00:27:40.800 Justin Trudeau

00:27:43.940 is out

00:27:44.940 of touch

00:27:45.480 and Canadians

00:27:46.580 are out

00:27:47.280 of money

00:27:47.600 the cost

00:27:48.760 of government

00:27:49.460 is driving

00:27:50.400 up the

00:27:51.260 cost of

00:27:51.720 living

00:27:52.000 a half

00:27:53.100 a trillion

00:27:53.640 dollars

00:27:54.140 of

00:27:54.660 inflationary

00:27:55.900 deficits

00:27:56.520 have bid

00:27:57.560 up the

00:27:57.840 cost of

00:27:58.420 the goods

00:27:58.860 we buy

00:28:00.180 and the

00:28:01.280 interest

00:28:02.020 that Canadians

00:28:02.840 pay

00:28:03.380 the cost

00:28:04.660 for workers

00:28:05.280 and businesses

00:28:06.560 to produce

00:28:07.520 the goods

00:28:07.960 that we buy

00:28:08.500 on top

00:28:09.820 of that

00:28:10.320 Trudeau

00:28:10.980 proposes

00:28:11.540 yet more

00:28:12.200 spending

00:28:12.640 to bid

00:28:13.060 up costs

00:28:13.700 even further

00:28:14.660 the more

00:28:16.120 things

00:28:16.420 the more

00:28:17.140 he spends

00:28:17.860 the more

00:28:18.560 things cost

00:28:19.480 it is

00:28:20.600 just

00:28:21.220 inflation

00:28:21.780 their homes

00:28:22.880 and

00:28:23.900 to buy

00:28:24.660 a home

00:28:25.000 in the

00:28:25.300 very first

00:28:25.800 place

00:28:26.120 the reason

00:28:27.260 that

00:28:27.720 we have

00:28:32.540 basically

00:28:34.680 a liberal

00:28:35.720 heckler

00:28:36.180 who snuck

00:28:36.700 in here

00:28:37.100 today

00:28:37.420 I'm a liberal

00:28:37.920 heckler

00:28:38.640 I'm the chief

00:28:41.520 political correspondent

00:28:42.200 of that organization

00:28:43.080 you may remember

00:28:44.100 me from the guy

00:28:45.280 who actually reported

00:28:46.100 first on the prime

00:28:47.320 minister breaking

00:28:47.900 the law

00:28:48.180 we'd just like

00:28:49.480 to ask a question

00:28:50.400 I've never

00:28:51.480 I've actually

00:28:51.960 never seen you

00:28:52.880 heckling

00:28:53.480 the prime minister

00:28:54.500 look

00:28:56.980 bottom line

00:28:57.700 is this

00:28:57.920 I'm going to

00:28:58.280 take some

00:28:58.580 questions

00:28:58.920 at the end

00:28:59.360 of this statement

00:28:59.820 yes I'm

00:29:00.220 taking two

00:29:01.100 questions

00:29:01.500 at the very

00:29:01.860 end

00:29:02.060 thank you

00:29:02.560 very much

00:29:02.840 so I'm

00:29:04.520 going to

00:29:04.640 start my

00:29:04.980 statement

00:29:05.260 again

00:29:05.660 yeah he

00:29:06.820 wasn't going

00:29:07.320 to take

00:29:07.580 questions

00:29:08.060 then he

00:29:08.380 said he

00:29:08.660 would

00:29:08.780 take

00:29:08.960 some

00:29:09.120 questions

00:29:09.500 and then

00:29:09.980 one

00:29:10.240 journalist

00:29:10.640 David

00:29:10.980 Akin

00:29:11.220 decided

00:29:11.600 to use

00:29:12.000 his

00:29:12.160 question

00:29:12.520 to demand

00:29:13.220 more

00:29:13.560 questions

00:29:14.080 and as a

00:29:15.160 result

00:29:15.480 just proved

00:29:16.560 exactly

00:29:17.200 why

00:29:17.800 Pierre

00:29:18.480 Polyev

00:29:18.900 might not

00:29:19.300 have had

00:29:19.740 the most

00:29:20.440 friendly

00:29:20.900 relationship

00:29:21.660 with

00:29:22.500 journalists

00:29:23.080 so do

00:29:23.660 you think

00:29:24.040 2023

00:29:24.620 will bring

00:29:25.380 more of

00:29:25.760 the same

00:29:26.160 100%

00:29:27.500 absolutely

00:29:28.140 and I

00:29:28.440 just want

00:29:28.680 to make

00:29:28.900 it clear

00:29:29.240 you know

00:29:29.520 we have

00:29:30.440 we have

00:29:31.040 we're going

00:29:31.620 to give

00:29:31.820 out our

00:29:32.120 top three

00:29:32.800 our bronze

00:29:33.240 medal

00:29:33.520 silver medal

00:29:34.060 gold medal

00:29:34.680 will give

00:29:35.280 a little

00:29:35.520 trophy

00:29:35.940 for number

00:29:36.360 one

00:29:36.660 but you

00:29:37.320 know

00:29:37.420 there's

00:29:37.760 so many

00:29:38.040 great

00:29:38.320 examples

00:29:38.720 of

00:29:38.920 Pierre

00:29:39.140 Polyev

00:29:39.880 derangement

00:29:40.340 syndrome

00:29:40.720 but I

00:29:41.440 think

00:29:41.580 if we

00:29:41.800 have to

00:29:42.100 give it

00:29:42.380 to one

00:29:42.900 outlet

00:29:43.300 in particular

00:29:43.800 because

00:29:44.160 to me

00:29:44.660 that's

00:29:44.900 sort of

00:29:45.100 how we

00:29:45.340 should

00:29:45.500 do it

00:29:45.740 one

00:29:45.940 outlet

00:29:46.180 should

00:29:46.360 get to

00:29:46.820 take home

00:29:47.640 the award

00:29:48.060 it's got

00:29:48.560 to go

00:29:48.740 to Global

00:29:49.080 News

00:29:49.360 right

00:29:49.580 they spearheaded

00:29:50.300 the MGTOW

00:29:50.940 thing

00:29:51.240 the MGTOW

00:29:52.160 they

00:29:53.040 you know

00:29:53.480 David Akin

00:29:54.100 the Global

00:29:55.120 News

00:29:55.480 Chief

00:29:55.880 Ottawa

00:29:56.220 Correspondent

00:29:56.760 or whatever

00:29:57.060 his title

00:29:57.520 is

00:29:57.800 it's got

00:29:59.020 to go

00:29:59.260 it's got

00:29:59.540 to go

00:29:59.700 to Global

00:30:00.020 News

00:30:00.280 Rachel

00:30:00.620 Gilmour

00:30:01.040 with the

00:30:01.420 with the

00:30:01.980 Jeremy

00:30:02.240 McKenzie

00:30:02.700 Diagalon

00:30:03.180 reporting

00:30:03.620 I mean

00:30:03.880 they really

00:30:04.720 did

00:30:05.100 spearhead

00:30:06.340 Polyev

00:30:07.000 derangement

00:30:07.360 syndrome

00:30:07.480 they put

00:30:07.800 the team

00:30:08.080 on their

00:30:08.300 back

00:30:08.620 and for

00:30:09.160 that

00:30:09.340 they are

00:30:09.660 the

00:30:09.820 rightful

00:30:10.260 owners

00:30:10.620 of the

00:30:11.080 2022

00:30:11.860 third

00:30:12.340 place

00:30:12.860 bronze

00:30:13.460 medal

00:30:13.880 fake

00:30:14.920 news

00:30:15.120 Friday

00:30:15.380 awards

00:30:15.780 I mean

00:30:15.980 congratulations

00:30:16.540 to Global

00:30:16.980 News

00:30:17.340 which brings

00:30:19.480 us to

00:30:20.100 second

00:30:20.620 place

00:30:21.120 and I

00:30:21.400 think

00:30:21.560 still

00:30:21.920 very

00:30:22.300 much

00:30:22.660 along

00:30:23.020 that

00:30:23.260 same

00:30:23.620 vein

00:30:24.020 of

00:30:24.360 trying

00:30:24.680 to

00:30:24.880 see

00:30:25.180 far

00:30:25.820 right

00:30:26.100 boogey

00:30:26.600 men

00:30:26.860 or I

00:30:27.400 guess

00:30:27.660 that's

00:30:27.900 a bit

00:30:28.080 cis

00:30:28.320 normative

00:30:28.720 boogey

00:30:29.120 people

00:30:29.460 everywhere

00:30:30.220 you go

00:30:30.740 and

00:30:31.500 second

00:30:31.880 place

00:30:32.260 are

00:30:32.740 the

00:30:33.180 freedom

00:30:33.740 convoy

00:30:34.520 hate

00:30:34.920 hoaxes

00:30:35.420 now

00:30:35.580 this

00:30:35.820 is

00:30:35.980 a

00:30:36.200 split

00:30:36.780 award

00:30:37.280 as

00:30:37.480 they

00:30:37.640 say

00:30:37.940 there

00:30:38.160 are

00:30:38.280 two

00:30:38.480 contenders

00:30:39.060 in

00:30:39.820 this

00:30:40.040 category

00:30:40.620 number

00:30:40.980 one

00:30:41.340 is

00:30:41.680 the

00:30:41.860 infamous

00:30:42.200 arson

00:30:42.740 host

00:30:43.060 and

00:30:43.200 number

00:30:43.360 two

00:30:43.660 is

00:30:43.980 the

00:30:44.220 less

00:30:45.020 infamous

00:30:45.480 but

00:30:45.780 I

00:30:45.900 think

00:30:46.020 still

00:30:46.280 significant

00:30:46.920 poster

00:30:47.560 hoax

00:30:48.260 and

00:30:48.440 the

00:30:48.960 arson

00:30:49.380 hoax

00:30:49.680 I

00:30:49.800 think

00:30:49.900 a lot

00:30:50.160 of

00:30:50.260 people

00:30:50.460 know

00:30:50.700 by

00:30:50.900 now

00:30:51.220 was

00:30:51.560 jumped

00:30:52.000 on

00:30:52.280 by

00:30:52.660 members

00:30:53.080 of

00:30:53.280 parliament

00:30:53.660 it

00:30:53.860 was

00:30:54.000 jumped

00:30:54.240 on

00:30:54.520 by

00:30:54.800 people

00:30:55.320 in

00:30:55.480 the

00:30:55.620 media

00:30:55.960 it

00:30:56.180 was

00:30:56.300 jumped

00:30:56.540 on

00:30:56.820 by

00:30:57.200 journalists

00:30:57.820 and

00:30:58.020 activists

00:30:58.420 that

00:30:58.700 someone

00:30:59.220 in

00:30:59.360 the

00:30:59.480 convoy

00:30:59.920 supposedly

00:31:00.500 tried

00:31:01.080 to

00:31:01.280 lock

00:31:01.660 people

00:31:02.020 in

00:31:02.240 their

00:31:02.420 apartment

00:31:02.900 building

00:31:03.340 and

00:31:03.900 set

00:31:04.220 fire

00:31:04.660 to

00:31:04.960 it

00:31:05.100 now

00:31:05.320 someone

00:31:06.040 did

00:31:06.340 do

00:31:06.660 this

00:31:06.940 but

00:31:07.120 it

00:31:07.260 was

00:31:07.500 a

00:31:07.920 person

00:31:08.440 that

00:31:08.660 had

00:31:08.880 nothing

00:31:09.280 to

00:31:09.520 do

00:31:09.660 with

00:31:09.800 the

00:31:09.940 convoy

00:31:10.480 whatsoever

00:31:11.200 no

00:31:12.100 connection

00:31:12.620 was

00:31:12.900 known

00:31:13.200 to

00:31:13.400 police

00:31:13.860 had

00:31:14.680 some

00:31:14.940 mental

00:31:15.200 health

00:31:15.500 issues

00:31:15.820 I

00:31:16.020 believe

00:31:16.340 but

00:31:16.580 literally

00:31:17.080 zero

00:31:17.780 connection

00:31:18.300 to

00:31:18.520 the

00:31:18.700 convoy

00:31:19.140 at

00:31:19.280 all

00:31:19.520 but

00:31:20.080 this

00:31:20.400 story

00:31:21.080 has

00:31:21.700 been

00:31:22.040 adopted

00:31:22.720 and

00:31:23.160 fueled

00:31:23.740 by

00:31:24.040 people

00:31:24.400 who

00:31:24.580 have

00:31:24.740 never

00:31:25.000 apologized

00:31:25.660 for

00:31:26.500 getting

00:31:26.880 it

00:31:27.100 wrong

00:31:27.580 and

00:31:27.800 it

00:31:27.960 still

00:31:28.220 remains

00:31:28.780 if

00:31:28.980 you

00:31:29.080 talk

00:31:29.320 to

00:31:29.440 some

00:31:29.620 people

00:31:29.860 that

00:31:30.020 haven't

00:31:30.300 followed

00:31:30.580 the

00:31:30.780 corrections

00:31:31.220 where

00:31:31.840 they

00:31:32.080 think

00:31:32.440 that

00:31:32.680 yeah

00:31:32.900 the

00:31:33.120 freedom

00:31:33.380 convoy

00:31:33.920 tried

00:31:34.300 to

00:31:34.480 commit

00:31:34.700 an

00:31:34.840 arson

00:31:35.240 on

00:31:35.900 a

00:31:36.060 downtown

00:31:36.440 ottawa

00:31:37.040 apartment

00:31:37.980 building

00:31:38.380 and

00:31:38.580 again

00:31:38.860 it's

00:31:39.060 that

00:31:39.180 old

00:31:39.360 line

00:31:39.640 about

00:31:39.820 how

00:31:40.060 quickly

00:31:40.500 a

00:31:40.680 lie

00:31:40.880 travels

00:31:41.300 around

00:31:41.540 the

00:31:41.700 world

00:31:41.920 while

00:31:42.120 the

00:31:42.260 truth

00:31:42.460 is

00:31:42.600 putting

00:31:42.780 its

00:31:42.940 pants

00:31:43.220 on

00:31:43.500 well

00:31:44.100 exactly

00:31:44.440 this

00:31:44.640 is

00:31:44.740 the

00:31:44.840 entire

00:31:45.220 strategy

00:31:46.280 right

00:31:46.640 journalists

00:31:47.800 have

00:31:48.320 lost

00:31:48.840 a lot

00:31:49.260 of their

00:31:49.480 credibility

00:31:49.960 I'm

00:31:50.240 talking

00:31:50.480 particularly

00:31:50.980 of course

00:31:51.420 about

00:31:51.660 legacy

00:31:52.060 media

00:31:52.400 journalists

00:31:52.920 and one

00:31:53.640 of the

00:31:53.860 things

00:31:54.080 that

00:31:54.200 they

00:31:54.340 do

00:31:54.740 this

00:31:55.300 is

00:31:55.400 a

00:31:55.520 time

00:31:55.800 old

00:31:55.980 tradition

00:31:56.460 but

00:31:57.040 it

00:31:57.140 was

00:31:58.060 specifically

00:31:58.460 weaponized

00:31:59.020 during

00:31:59.160 the

00:31:59.260 freedom

00:31:59.440 convoy

00:31:59.920 Andrew

00:32:00.160 which

00:32:00.360 is

00:32:00.460 basically

00:32:00.820 to

00:32:01.220 write

00:32:02.200 a

00:32:02.360 story

00:32:02.680 and

00:32:03.780 if

00:32:04.020 you

00:32:04.100 get

00:32:04.220 it

00:32:04.340 wrong

00:32:04.640 you

00:32:05.140 can

00:32:05.320 quietly

00:32:05.840 change

00:32:06.540 it

00:32:06.660 you

00:32:06.740 can

00:32:06.880 quietly

00:32:07.240 edit

00:32:07.580 the

00:32:07.760 article

00:32:08.040 without

00:32:08.220 letting

00:32:08.440 anybody

00:32:08.700 know

00:32:08.900 that

00:32:09.040 you've

00:32:09.180 edited

00:32:09.360 the

00:32:09.560 article

00:32:09.880 but

00:32:10.640 you

00:32:10.780 can

00:32:10.940 write

00:32:11.140 the

00:32:11.320 story

00:32:11.660 and

00:32:12.140 as

00:32:12.300 long

00:32:12.500 as

00:32:12.600 it

00:32:12.680 gets

00:32:12.840 published

00:32:13.320 for

00:32:13.820 about

00:32:14.020 a

00:32:14.180 day

00:32:14.460 as

00:32:14.940 long

00:32:15.100 as

00:32:15.220 it

00:32:15.320 gets

00:32:15.500 picked

00:32:15.780 up

00:32:15.980 by

00:32:16.120 a

00:32:16.280 politician

00:32:16.720 and

00:32:17.020 then

00:32:17.160 repeated

00:32:26.460 about

00:32:26.700 the

00:32:26.820 freedom

00:32:27.000 convoy

00:32:27.380 which

00:32:27.520 turned

00:32:27.720 out

00:32:27.840 to

00:32:27.900 be

00:32:28.020 mostly

00:32:28.340 false

00:32:28.780 was

00:32:29.560 driven

00:32:29.800 it

00:32:29.920 was

00:32:30.020 just

00:32:30.180 by

00:32:30.420 basically

00:32:30.900 journalists

00:32:32.000 rushing to

00:32:32.880 put out

00:32:33.140 news

00:32:33.520 rushing to

00:32:34.260 put out

00:32:34.440 an article

00:32:34.820 not having

00:32:35.620 the facts

00:32:36.000 to back

00:32:36.300 it up

00:32:36.540 but

00:32:36.680 hey

00:32:37.120 we're

00:32:37.300 just

00:32:37.400 going to

00:32:37.540 get it

00:32:37.720 out

00:32:37.860 there

00:32:38.100 and

00:32:38.720 by

00:32:38.920 the

00:32:39.040 time

00:32:39.240 it's

00:32:39.400 out

00:32:39.560 there

00:32:39.740 for

00:32:40.800 about

00:32:41.100 less

00:32:42.120 than

00:32:42.240 a

00:32:42.320 day

00:32:42.540 12

00:32:43.040 hours

00:32:43.480 as

00:32:43.860 long

00:32:44.060 as

00:32:44.500 it

00:32:44.580 goes

00:32:44.740 out

00:32:44.860 on

00:32:44.980 social

00:32:45.200 media

00:32:45.440 politician

00:32:45.820 shares

00:32:46.200 it

00:32:46.340 well

00:32:46.480 it

00:32:46.600 becomes

00:32:46.840 the truth

00:32:47.800 and

00:32:56.460 will

00:32:56.600 have

00:32:56.780 to

00:32:56.900 say

00:32:57.180 at

00:32:57.800 face

00:32:58.080 value

00:32:58.340 if

00:32:58.480 they

00:32:58.580 read

00:32:58.800 it

00:32:58.960 it

00:32:59.300 must

00:32:59.460 be

00:32:59.600 true

00:32:59.880 and

00:33:00.340 that's

00:33:00.600 the

00:33:00.700 problem

00:33:00.980 and

00:33:01.100 these

00:33:01.260 journalists

00:33:01.560 know

00:33:01.820 it

00:33:01.940 and

00:33:02.060 they

00:33:02.200 weaponize

00:33:02.700 that

00:33:02.940 all

00:33:03.220 the

00:33:03.340 time

00:33:03.600 and

00:33:04.940 the

00:33:05.120 other

00:33:05.380 part

00:33:05.720 of

00:33:05.840 this

00:33:06.040 category

00:33:06.660 stars

00:33:07.360 fan

00:33:08.000 favorites

00:33:08.380 the

00:33:08.600 Canadian

00:33:09.060 anti-hate

00:33:09.720 network

00:33:10.040 does it

00:33:10.320 not

00:33:10.560 it

00:33:11.060 certainly

00:33:11.380 does

00:33:11.760 so

00:33:12.040 the

00:33:12.640 head

00:33:13.400 of

00:33:13.720 the

00:33:13.920 anti-hate

00:33:14.340 network

00:33:14.640 Bernie

00:33:14.960 Farber

00:33:15.440 who

00:33:16.040 has

00:33:16.240 been

00:33:16.440 you

00:33:16.560 know

00:33:16.720 been

00:33:17.920 receiving

00:33:18.300 money

00:33:18.540 from

00:33:18.760 the

00:33:18.920 taxpayer

00:33:19.420 been

00:33:19.640 receiving

00:33:19.920 money

00:33:20.120 from

00:33:20.280 the

00:33:20.420 government

00:33:20.720 to

00:33:21.040 assist

00:33:21.860 on

00:33:22.300 anti-hate

00:33:23.900 legislation

00:33:24.580 well he

00:33:25.300 took a

00:33:25.720 photo

00:33:26.040 or he

00:33:26.500 posted

00:33:26.860 a photo

00:33:27.340 of an

00:33:28.400 anti-semitic

00:33:29.220 flyer

00:33:29.780 which he

00:33:30.420 says

00:33:30.780 was found

00:33:31.580 by a

00:33:31.980 friend

00:33:32.320 in Ottawa

00:33:32.920 and

00:33:33.700 it took

00:33:34.100 about

00:33:34.340 an hour

00:33:34.920 until

00:33:35.500 John Kaye

00:33:36.240 who

00:33:36.420 came to

00:33:37.060 the rescue

00:33:37.480 here

00:33:37.740 he's a

00:33:38.100 very

00:33:39.000 very

00:33:39.380 strong

00:33:40.520 on

00:33:40.840 Twitter

00:33:41.100 he's

00:33:41.380 always

00:33:41.580 on

00:33:41.840 this

00:33:42.000 stuff

00:33:42.300 he

00:33:42.900 came

00:33:43.120 to

00:33:43.220 the

00:33:43.320 rescue

00:33:43.620 and

00:33:43.840 he

00:33:43.920 basically

00:33:44.200 just

00:33:44.420 did

00:33:44.520 a

00:33:44.620 reverse

00:33:44.900 image

00:33:45.220 search

00:33:45.580 very

00:33:46.180 simple

00:33:46.580 strategy

00:33:47.060 everyone

00:33:47.660 can

00:33:47.880 do

00:33:48.080 it

00:33:48.320 Bernie

00:33:48.860 Farber

00:33:49.160 however

00:33:49.400 didn't

00:33:49.740 before

00:33:49.960 posting

00:33:50.360 this

00:33:50.600 anti-semitic

00:33:51.340 flyer

00:33:51.660 he supposedly

00:33:52.080 found

00:33:52.460 in Ottawa

00:33:52.980 John Kaye

00:33:54.060 took the

00:33:54.380 poster

00:33:54.680 found out

00:33:55.580 that

00:33:55.760 actually

00:33:56.140 the

00:33:56.700 exact

00:33:57.120 same

00:33:57.440 picture

00:33:57.820 with

00:33:58.380 the

00:33:58.500 exact

00:33:58.840 same

00:33:59.240 backdrop

00:33:59.880 of

00:34:00.260 the

00:34:00.400 poster

00:34:00.760 and

00:34:01.220 the

00:34:01.340 poster

00:34:01.640 of

00:34:01.800 course

00:34:02.060 was

00:34:02.720 also

00:34:03.120 found

00:34:03.620 at

00:34:04.100 a

00:34:04.300 Miami

00:34:04.860 rally

00:34:05.860 of

00:34:06.100 some

00:34:06.300 sort

00:34:06.680 the

00:34:07.540 month

00:34:08.080 before

00:34:08.500 so

00:34:08.820 could

00:34:09.260 it

00:34:09.380 be

00:34:09.580 Andrew

00:34:09.800 that

00:34:09.960 the

00:34:10.180 exact

00:34:10.780 same

00:34:11.080 poster

00:34:11.380 with

00:34:11.560 the

00:34:11.680 exact

00:34:11.980 same

00:34:12.260 backdrop

00:34:12.660 and

00:34:12.820 the

00:34:12.920 exact

00:34:13.160 same

00:34:13.360 angle

00:34:13.600 was

00:34:13.820 found

00:34:14.320 at

00:34:14.460 both

00:34:14.620 the

00:34:14.800 Freedom

00:34:15.100 Convoy

00:34:15.540 and

00:34:15.880 Miami

00:34:16.320 one

00:34:16.880 month

00:34:17.080 apart

00:34:17.400 possibly

00:34:18.320 but it

00:34:18.660 turns out

00:34:18.980 that it

00:34:19.160 was a

00:34:19.440 complete

00:34:19.940 falsehood

00:34:20.820 it was a

00:34:21.160 complete

00:34:21.500 hoax

00:34:22.000 Bernie

00:34:22.580 Farber

00:34:22.960 shared

00:34:23.380 the

00:34:23.560 poster

00:34:23.920 accusing

00:34:24.600 the

00:34:24.780 Freedom

00:34:24.980 Convoy

00:34:25.340 of being

00:34:25.620 anti-semitic

00:34:26.320 when in

00:34:26.820 reality

00:34:27.140 that was

00:34:27.760 a

00:34:27.940 fake

00:34:28.540 poster

00:34:29.080 that was

00:34:29.420 not

00:34:29.680 actually

00:34:30.040 in

00:34:30.400 Ottawa

00:34:31.840 and

00:34:32.740 it

00:34:33.040 was

00:34:33.180 used

00:34:33.420 to

00:34:33.640 once

00:34:34.000 again

00:34:34.300 bludgeon

00:34:35.120 the

00:34:35.280 Freedom

00:34:35.500 Convoy

00:34:35.840 over it

00:34:36.220 politicians

00:34:36.820 picked

00:34:37.140 it up

00:34:37.440 shared

00:34:37.840 it

00:34:37.940 on

00:34:38.040 social

00:34:38.340 media

00:34:43.160 it

00:34:43.400 becomes

00:34:43.720 the

00:34:43.880 truth

00:34:44.160 it

00:34:44.520 becomes

00:34:44.820 the

00:34:44.980 truth

00:34:45.160 and

00:34:45.360 that

00:34:45.540 is

00:34:45.680 exactly

00:34:46.060 how

00:34:46.300 this

00:34:46.500 whole

00:34:46.660 thing

00:34:46.860 works

00:34:47.080 so

00:34:47.300 two

00:34:47.900 Freedom

00:34:48.380 Convoy

00:34:48.860 hate

00:34:49.140 hoaxes

00:34:49.640 coming in

00:34:50.420 at number

00:34:50.680 two

00:34:50.960 coming in

00:34:51.580 in the

00:34:51.720 second

00:34:51.900 place

00:34:52.360 which is

00:34:53.820 a very

00:34:54.240 formidable

00:34:54.780 place

00:34:55.320 so I

00:34:55.860 mean

00:34:56.100 even

00:34:56.260 though

00:34:56.420 you

00:34:56.520 had

00:34:56.700 to

00:34:56.860 share

00:34:57.180 it

00:34:57.400 with

00:34:57.900 the

00:34:58.540 arson

00:34:59.380 thing

00:34:59.780 congratulations

00:35:00.720 Bernie

00:35:01.100 Farber

00:35:01.480 I believe

00:35:01.800 this is

00:35:02.200 a

00:35:02.660 debut

00:35:03.120 appearance

00:35:03.580 for the

00:35:03.980 Canadian

00:35:04.260 Anti-Hate

00:35:04.760 Network

00:35:05.020 on the

00:35:05.740 Fake News

00:35:06.280 Friday

00:35:06.640 award

00:35:07.560 so

00:35:07.880 we wish

00:35:08.800 them

00:35:08.940 very

00:35:09.140 well

00:35:09.360 maybe

00:35:09.560 next

00:35:09.820 year

00:35:09.960 they

00:35:10.120 can

00:35:10.320 crack

00:35:10.580 number

00:35:10.860 one

00:35:11.160 we'll

00:35:11.360 see

00:35:11.600 but

00:35:11.860 this

00:35:12.660 brings

00:35:13.020 us

00:35:13.320 to

00:35:13.740 number

00:35:14.280 one

00:35:14.760 now

00:35:15.020 in

00:35:15.680 some

00:35:16.060 ways

00:35:16.440 I

00:35:16.780 actually

00:35:17.180 think

00:35:17.500 this

00:35:17.720 is

00:35:17.880 a

00:35:18.060 smaller

00:35:18.560 story

00:35:19.100 than

00:35:19.300 some

00:35:19.480 of

00:35:19.560 the

00:35:19.660 other

00:35:19.840 ones

00:35:20.080 on

00:35:20.200 the

00:35:20.320 list

00:35:20.560 but

00:35:20.820 it's

00:35:21.420 also

00:35:21.680 I

00:35:21.880 think

00:35:22.020 a lot

00:35:22.320 more

00:35:22.560 symbolic

00:35:23.100 because

00:35:23.500 it

00:35:23.640 involves

00:35:24.020 CBC

00:35:24.580 it

00:35:25.400 involves

00:35:25.840 the

00:35:26.060 liberals

00:35:26.420 and

00:35:26.980 it

00:35:27.100 involves

00:35:27.620 multiple

00:35:28.140 layers

00:35:28.600 this

00:35:28.900 is

00:35:29.080 like

00:35:29.320 the

00:35:29.520 fake

00:35:29.780 news

00:35:30.120 inception

00:35:30.660 here

00:35:31.100 where

00:35:31.380 it's

00:35:31.560 like

00:35:31.760 fake

00:35:32.060 news

00:35:32.360 being

00:35:32.660 used

00:35:33.040 to

00:35:33.460 justify

00:35:33.900 other

00:35:34.240 stuff

00:35:34.560 which

00:35:34.740 is

00:35:34.840 then

00:35:34.980 reported

00:35:35.380 in

00:35:35.560 the

00:35:35.660 news

00:35:35.920 for

00:35:36.500 number

00:35:36.840 one

00:35:37.200 this

00:35:37.460 year

00:35:37.740 I

00:35:37.940 don't

00:35:38.100 know

00:35:38.220 if

00:35:38.320 we

00:35:38.420 have

00:35:38.600 the

00:35:38.720 drum

00:35:38.920 roll

00:35:39.120 sound

00:35:39.440 effect

00:35:39.800 but

00:35:40.040 liberals

00:35:41.840 used

00:35:42.320 fake

00:35:42.860 CBC

00:35:43.500 story

00:35:44.020 to

00:35:44.220 justify

00:35:44.720 freezing

00:35:45.560 bank

00:35:46.040 accounts

00:35:46.440 you

00:35:46.560 remember

00:35:46.780 this

00:35:47.040 happened

00:35:47.360 in

00:35:47.560 February

00:35:48.020 when

00:35:48.720 the

00:35:48.940 emergencies

00:35:49.380 act

00:35:49.780 came

00:35:50.040 into

00:35:50.300 effect

00:35:50.740 in

00:35:51.100 response

00:35:51.520 to

00:35:51.740 the

00:35:51.900 freedom

00:35:52.200 convoy

00:35:52.780 and

00:35:53.460 the

00:35:53.700 liberals

00:35:54.120 cite

00:35:54.720 an

00:35:54.980 analysis

00:35:55.700 by

00:35:56.340 CBC

00:35:57.040 as

00:35:58.020 part

00:35:58.360 of

00:35:58.500 their

00:35:58.640 justification

00:35:59.320 for

00:35:59.860 freezing

00:36:00.360 bank

00:36:00.980 accounts

00:36:01.440 in

00:36:01.620 a

00:36:01.820 14

00:36:02.620 page

00:36:03.080 document

00:36:03.660 tabled

00:36:04.060 in

00:36:04.180 the

00:36:04.280 house

00:36:04.460 of

00:36:04.620 commons

00:36:05.100 the

00:36:05.780 government

00:36:06.440 found

00:36:07.280 that

00:36:07.520 there

00:36:07.680 was

00:36:07.940 no

00:36:08.140 need

00:36:08.400 to

00:36:08.600 cite

00:36:08.920 a

00:36:09.040 departmental

00:36:09.700 report

00:36:10.100 there

00:36:10.340 was

00:36:10.520 no

00:36:10.780 RCMP

00:36:11.580 intel

00:36:12.140 they

00:36:12.700 cited

00:36:13.140 a

00:36:13.440 story

00:36:14.060 from

00:36:15.000 CBC

00:36:15.780 from

00:36:16.260 three

00:36:16.660 CBC

00:36:17.260 reporters

00:36:17.920 and

00:36:18.520 this

00:36:18.800 was

00:36:19.040 enough

00:36:19.580 to

00:36:20.160 freeze

00:36:20.700 people's

00:36:21.520 bank

00:36:21.960 accounts

00:36:22.400 like

00:36:22.600 can

00:36:22.760 you

00:36:22.880 get

00:36:23.140 more

00:36:23.460 fake

00:36:23.800 news

00:36:24.080 Friday

00:36:24.440 award

00:36:24.840 worthy

00:36:25.180 than

00:36:25.420 this

00:36:25.740 no

00:36:26.100 it's

00:36:26.480 it's

00:36:26.780 truly

00:36:27.300 unbelievable

00:36:28.500 reads

00:36:28.620 the

00:36:28.760 CBC

00:36:29.120 knows

00:36:29.560 that

00:36:29.780 they

00:36:30.060 try

00:36:31.020 to

00:36:31.300 coax

00:36:32.300 their

00:36:32.520 opinion

00:36:32.940 articles

00:36:33.400 in

00:36:33.700 two

00:36:33.900 sections

00:36:34.940 they

00:36:35.140 have

00:36:35.380 opinion

00:36:36.100 where

00:36:36.360 they

00:36:36.560 allow

00:36:37.240 just

00:36:37.580 completely

00:36:38.220 unhinged

00:36:39.360 opinions

00:36:39.820 to

00:36:40.060 end up

00:36:40.460 on

00:36:40.560 the

00:36:40.680 CBC

00:36:40.960 front

00:36:41.260 page

00:36:41.480 never

00:36:41.680 conservative

00:36:42.120 of course

00:36:42.560 like

00:36:43.100 crosswords

00:36:43.560 or racist

00:36:44.120 or whatever

00:36:44.580 yeah

00:36:45.100 exactly

00:36:45.540 they have

00:36:46.080 the

00:36:46.160 opinion

00:36:46.460 page

00:36:46.780 and then

00:36:47.040 they

00:36:47.140 have

00:36:47.320 the

00:36:47.480 analysis

00:36:48.020 section

00:36:48.500 which

00:36:48.740 also

00:36:49.480 is

00:36:49.900 opinion

00:36:50.380 it

00:36:50.960 is

00:36:51.120 the

00:36:51.260 exact

00:36:51.600 same

00:36:51.900 thing

00:36:52.100 as

00:36:52.200 opinion

00:36:52.540 but

00:36:53.020 the

00:36:53.200 analysis

00:36:53.680 falls

00:36:54.400 under

00:36:54.680 people

00:36:55.280 who

00:36:58.500 of a

00:36:59.480 higher

00:36:59.700 standing

00:37:00.120 in

00:37:00.300 society

00:37:00.660 gets

00:37:00.880 to

00:37:01.000 write

00:37:01.120 an

00:37:01.320 analysis

00:37:01.800 piece

00:37:02.140 so

00:37:02.360 basically

00:37:03.100 journalists

00:37:04.280 are allowed

00:37:04.880 to write

00:37:05.260 analysis

00:37:05.700 pieces

00:37:06.080 a CBC

00:37:06.560 journalist

00:37:07.020 is not

00:37:07.420 allowed

00:37:07.620 to write

00:37:07.920 an

00:37:08.060 opinion

00:37:08.340 column

00:37:08.700 but

00:37:08.860 they

00:37:08.980 can

00:37:09.120 write

00:37:09.320 an

00:37:09.560 analysis

00:37:10.100 right

00:37:10.700 exactly

00:37:11.160 so

00:37:11.440 really

00:37:12.120 what

00:37:12.280 we're

00:37:12.380 talking

00:37:12.600 about

00:37:12.760 here

00:37:12.920 is

00:37:13.120 the

00:37:14.300 liberals

00:37:14.660 the

00:37:14.860 government

00:37:15.180 relying

00:37:15.820 on

00:37:16.100 a

00:37:16.460 CBC

00:37:16.960 opinion

00:37:17.700 piece

00:37:18.280 to

00:37:18.980 justify

00:37:19.520 freezing

00:37:20.100 bank

00:37:20.420 accounts

00:37:20.780 to

00:37:21.300 give

00:37:21.620 to

00:37:21.840 MPs

00:37:22.620 to

00:37:23.040 say

00:37:23.440 wait

00:37:23.960 so

00:37:24.180 the

00:37:24.640 MPs

00:37:24.980 had to

00:37:25.180 vote

00:37:25.360 on

00:37:28.500 given

00:37:28.800 the

00:37:29.320 14

00:37:30.040 page

00:37:30.340 document

00:37:30.700 included

00:37:31.180 the

00:37:31.440 CBC

00:37:31.940 opinion

00:37:32.520 piece

00:37:32.820 as

00:37:32.940 justification

00:37:33.360 and yet

00:37:34.460 the

00:37:34.620 government

00:37:34.840 was still

00:37:35.320 carried

00:37:35.720 in the

00:37:36.160 emergencies

00:37:36.500 act

00:37:36.760 vote

00:37:37.060 it's

00:37:37.880 truly

00:37:39.340 worthy

00:37:39.760 of

00:37:40.120 the

00:37:40.240 winner

00:37:40.500 again

00:37:41.020 maybe

00:37:41.260 not

00:37:41.440 the

00:37:41.620 biggest

00:37:42.000 fake

00:37:42.400 news

00:37:42.600 story

00:37:42.860 but

00:37:43.020 again

00:37:43.260 like

00:37:43.480 you

00:37:43.600 said

00:37:43.740 it

00:37:43.980 just

00:37:44.600 paints

00:37:44.920 the

00:37:45.080 image

00:37:45.280 for

00:37:45.460 you

00:37:45.560 it

00:37:45.740 tells

00:37:46.140 you

00:37:46.260 all

00:37:46.420 you

00:37:46.500 need

00:37:46.600 to

00:37:46.700 know

00:37:46.880 Andrew

00:37:47.160 about

00:37:47.660 this

00:37:47.880 government

00:37:48.260 about

00:37:48.680 the

00:37:48.840 decisions

00:37:49.260 that

00:37:49.420 they

00:37:49.520 made

00:37:49.880 during

00:37:50.560 the

00:37:50.760 freedom

00:37:51.000 convoy

00:37:51.480 the

00:37:51.820 decisions

00:37:52.180 they

00:37:58.500 ride

00:37:59.140 on

00:37:59.340 them

00:37:59.460 the

00:37:59.560 decision

00:37:59.820 to

00:38:00.000 freeze

00:38:00.220 bank

00:38:00.480 accounts

00:38:00.740 will

00:38:00.900 ride

00:38:01.260 on

00:38:01.400 them

00:38:01.520 forever

00:38:01.940 I

00:38:02.180 think

00:38:02.420 it'll

00:38:02.620 be

00:38:02.800 their

00:38:03.040 legacy

00:38:03.420 and

00:38:04.220 to

00:38:04.540 do

00:38:04.760 so

00:38:05.120 they

00:38:05.520 relied

00:38:05.800 on

00:38:05.960 a

00:38:06.160 CBC

00:38:06.600 opinion

00:38:07.120 piece

00:38:07.580 truly

00:38:08.820 emblematic

00:38:10.000 I

00:38:10.180 think

00:38:10.480 Andrew

00:38:10.780 of

00:38:11.120 where

00:38:11.520 we

00:38:11.700 are

00:38:11.880 right

00:38:12.120 now

00:38:12.400 where

00:38:12.600 the

00:38:12.780 government

00:38:13.080 is

00:38:13.540 sort

00:38:14.140 of

00:38:14.260 the

00:38:14.400 capacity

00:38:15.300 that

00:38:15.520 our

00:38:15.640 government

00:38:15.900 has

00:38:16.460 to

00:38:16.960 justify

00:38:17.440 their

00:38:17.680 decisions

00:38:18.160 if

00:38:18.640 they're

00:38:18.760 relying

00:38:19.040 on

00:38:19.200 the

00:38:19.320 CBC

00:38:19.720 well

00:38:20.580 I

00:38:20.700 think

00:38:20.840 we're

00:38:21.000 in

00:38:21.440 for

00:38:21.640 a

00:38:21.920 pretty

00:38:28.500 of

00:38:28.980 you

00:38:29.160 who

00:38:29.380 are

00:38:29.620 supporting

00:38:30.080 True

00:38:30.320 North

00:38:30.620 and

00:38:30.780 the

00:38:30.900 insiders

00:38:31.340 clubs

00:38:31.720 who

00:38:32.420 voted

00:38:32.940 in

00:38:33.320 this

00:38:33.660 poll

00:38:34.000 and

00:38:34.280 perhaps

00:38:34.640 even

00:38:34.900 helped

00:38:35.220 run

00:38:35.640 that

00:38:35.840 story

00:38:36.160 up

00:38:36.340 to

00:38:36.480 number

00:38:36.660 one

00:38:36.920 but

00:38:37.060 whether

00:38:37.300 it

00:38:37.780 was

00:38:37.940 the

00:38:38.120 indigiqueer

00:38:39.040 drag

00:38:39.920 performance

00:38:40.520 or

00:38:41.060 the

00:38:41.460 op-ed

00:38:42.060 from

00:38:42.280 a

00:38:42.460 mask

00:38:42.860 or

00:38:43.440 even

00:38:43.760 our

00:38:44.060 top

00:38:44.400 three

00:38:44.680 we

00:38:44.940 thank

00:38:45.420 and

00:38:45.700 congratulate

00:38:46.260 all

00:38:46.800 of

00:38:47.020 our

00:38:47.200 contenders

00:38:47.700 very

00:38:48.060 well

00:38:48.380 done

00:38:48.680 very

00:38:49.180 well

00:38:49.440 done

00:38:49.620 indeed

00:38:49.920 perhaps

00:38:50.660 all

00:38:50.960 of

00:38:51.080 you

00:38:51.180 can

00:38:51.380 continue

00:38:51.780 the

00:38:52.040 fake

00:38:52.260 news

00:38:52.560 into

00:38:53.200 2023

00:38:54.120 this

00:38:54.600 has

00:38:54.800 been

00:38:55.000 an

00:38:55.200 absolutely

00:38:55.780 fantastic

00:38:56.580 year

00:38:57.000 I've

00:38:57.540 enjoyed

00:38:57.880 being

00:38:58.220 able

00:38:58.500 to

00:38:58.820 pinch

00:38:59.340 it

00:38:59.520 for

00:38:59.820 Candice

00:39:00.260 Malcolm

00:39:00.620 in

00:39:01.280 fake

00:39:01.620 news

00:39:01.860 Friday

00:39:02.260 this

00:39:02.640 year

00:39:02.840 as

00:39:03.000 well

00:39:03.220 and

00:39:03.380 who

00:39:03.500 knows

00:39:03.720 what

00:39:03.880 the

00:39:04.000 next

00:39:04.200 year

00:39:04.380 brings

00:39:04.700 Harrison

00:39:05.520 Faulkner

00:39:06.020 happy

00:39:06.320 new

00:39:06.540 year

00:39:06.680 to

00:39:06.840 you

00:39:07.040 happy

00:39:07.700 new

00:39:07.880 year

00:39:07.980 to

00:39:08.100 you

00:39:08.220 Andrew

00:39:08.500 and

00:39:08.680 happy

00:39:08.880 new

00:39:09.040 year

00:39:09.140 to

00:39:09.260 everyone

00:39:09.500 who's

00:39:09.700 watching

00:39:10.060 thank

00:39:10.380 you

00:39:10.500 guys

00:39:10.740 very

00:39:11.040 much

00:39:11.340 for

00:39:11.560 helping

00:39:11.880 us

00:39:12.100 out

00:39:12.320 and

00:39:12.520 congratulations

00:39:13.320 to

00:39:13.820 the

00:39:13.960 CBC

00:39:23.200 good

00:39:23.980 day

00:39:25.000 good

00:39:25.640 you

The Candice Malcolm Show - December 30, 2022

Fake News Friday ｜ The Fake News Awards

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript