The Candice Malcolm Show - July 22, 2025


“Guilbeault will be gone by Christmas” + absurd media coverage of Danielle Smith’s Alberta townhalls


Episode Stats

Length

36 minutes

Words per Minute

191.10454

Word Count

6,942

Sentence Count

443

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

Brett Wilson is an investment banker, entrepreneur, and philanthropist. He's also hosted Risky Business on Slice and is a regular contributor on the Dragon's Den. In this episode, Brett shares his thoughts on Alberta's new town hall style town halls, Prime Minister Mark Carney's trip to Ontario, and the upcoming by-election in Alberta.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candice Malcolm and this is the Candice Malcolm Show. Well, folks, it is the middle of
00:00:07.380 summer. I hope everyone is having a wonderful time. Hopefully you're spending lots of time
00:00:10.960 outdoors and family and friends, maybe out at a cottage or a cabin or wherever you might go and
00:00:16.300 do it in the summer. But given that we're in the middle of summer, I mean, it is mid-July,
00:00:20.420 usually it's quite quiet this time of year. There is a lot going on news-wise. We have these Alberta
00:00:24.820 Next Town Halls happening across Alberta. We're going to cover those and talk about those. And
00:00:29.500 then we have the premiers meeting in Muskoka, Ontario, and Prime Minister Mark Carney is out
00:00:35.420 joining them today. So we've got some clips and some updates from us. We have a by-election coming
00:00:39.580 up in Alberta where we will see whether Pierre Polyev, the leader of the Conservative Party,
00:00:44.220 can regain his position as a member of parliament and become the official opposition again. And to
00:00:49.660 talk about these topics and more, I'm pleased to be joined by one of my favourite guests here on the
00:00:52.900 Candice Malcolm Show. I'm talking about Brett Wilson. Brett is an investment banker, entrepreneur,
00:00:56.540 and a philanthropist. You probably know him from his days as the Dragon's Den star. And
00:01:01.340 he also hosted Risky Business on Slice. So Brett, welcome to the podcast. Thank you so much for
00:01:05.900 joining us. I'm proudest of being a grandpa, but keep going. Okay, well, I'll add that into the bio for
00:01:11.960 the next time around. I want to get your thoughts on these Alberta Next Town Halls. So Alberta Premier
00:01:17.920 Danielle Smith has been hosting Alberta Next Town Halls. They've done two so far, and there will be
00:01:24.280 eight done in the future. So we saw her last week, first in Red Deer on Tuesday, and then Sherwood
00:01:30.580 Park. And they're certainly generating a lot of media, a lot of discussions about the tour itself
00:01:36.640 and, you know, the purpose of it, whether it's fulfilling a necessary role. We know that former
00:01:42.260 Alberta Premier Jason Kenney held similar town halls. And so there are six key questions that are being
00:01:48.020 posed to Albertans during these town halls, getting feedback from the public, basically discussing
00:01:55.060 things related to Alberta's autonomy. So the six questions that are being posed are, one, should
00:02:00.840 Alberta push for equalization reform? Two, should Alberta withdraw from the Canada pension plan and
00:02:06.860 create its own pension system? Three, should Alberta replace the RCMP and have its own
00:02:12.200 provincial police service? Four, should Alberta lead efforts with other provinces to amend the
00:02:17.060 constitution, strengthen provincial rights? Five, should Alberta take greater control over immigration
00:02:22.560 to counter Ottawa's open border approach? And finally, six, should Alberta collect personal income taxes
00:02:28.700 directly rather than through the CRA and have its own system of taxation? So all of these are really
00:02:35.460 interesting questions, certainly interesting in wake of the Liberal government getting re-elected again,
00:02:40.740 right? Like, it's hard to overstate this fact. But typically, in a democracy, you have a sway from
00:02:47.440 left to right, left to right. And it's a course correction, right? And so after 10 years of liberal
00:02:51.760 governments, and we had one of the most left wing liberal government in Canadian history with you just
00:02:57.660 known for its excesses in every area of life. It's like it's time for a shift back. And in a normal
00:03:03.340 democratic system, you would have eventually a shift back to the right. Except for in Canada, we didn't get
00:03:07.980 that. We got another liberal government under Mark Carney. So, you know, of course, there's a lot
00:03:12.300 of frustration bubbling up on the surface, especially in a conservative province like
00:03:16.200 Alberta. So before we get into any of the details of these, the first two town halls and how they went
00:03:21.860 for premiers, I'm wondering, like, what are your thoughts on the state in Alberta and whether you
00:03:26.280 think these town halls are a productive approach to sort of talk about a lot of the issues that are
00:03:31.080 bubbling up? Investing is all about the future. So what do you think is going to happen? Bitcoin is
00:03:36.780 sort of inevitable at this point. I think it would come down to precious metals. I hope we don't go
00:03:42.200 cashless. I would say land is a safe investment. Technology companies. Solar energy. Robotic
00:03:48.520 pollinators might be a thing. A wrestler to face a robot. That will have to happen. So whatever you
00:03:55.560 think is going to happen in the future, you can invest in it at Wealthsimple. Start now at
00:04:00.680 Wealthsimple.com. I think one of the most important things that Danielle is trying to do is raise the
00:04:05.940 profile of the conversation as opposed to limit it to the social media, limit it to legacy media,
00:04:13.220 and the noise that, to be blunt, it's just not as professional or thoughtful as it could be.
00:04:19.840 The coverage is so biased and it's very frustrating. Let's go back to the big picture. How many
00:04:25.540 questions of those six are, could be rephrased as, can we live the way Quebec lives? In terms of CPP,
00:04:34.740 in terms of RCMP, in terms of collecting tax, in terms of the equalization structure. I mean,
00:04:41.180 so much of what we're asking is, can we not operate and function just like Quebec? And so for people to
00:04:48.640 come out, especially in the media, legacy media, criticizing the fact that we're questioning whether
00:04:54.820 or not the RCMP should be on our budget or part of a, or the Alberta police should be part of our own
00:05:00.800 budget, or should we be paying the RCMP as part of a federal initiative, there's virtually nothing on
00:05:07.560 this list that doesn't tie to the question, if Quebec has these rights, why can't we? And it's that simple. I
00:05:14.200 just don't understand the debate. Now, I've got several friends on the Alberta Next Committee. They were
00:05:20.340 delighted to be asked. They were provoked to be thoughtful and engaging. And please make sure if
00:05:27.240 you're in, you're in for every event. And a couple of my friends, I spoke with them last night,
00:05:33.280 were literally accosted because they were leaving the Red Deer site in an almost bullying way,
00:05:41.020 like saying, you've got to support separation, or you don't serve any purpose here. And some fairly,
00:05:46.540 again, animated, not physically violent, but certainly attempting to be emotionally abusive
00:05:52.880 conversations. And it just didn't make sense. The disappointment from a couple of my friends, again, who
00:05:59.440 attended these, was that the participation of younger people is very low. We kind of laughed and said it was
00:06:06.840 50 to 70, or you're not getting in. And whether that's absolutely true or not, the bias was to a much
00:06:13.900 older age group. And again, my hope, if anyone that thinks that Danielle Smith is the separatist
00:06:20.040 is delusional, misguided, misinformed, or stupid, any of those work.
00:06:27.020 Right. Right. Like one of the criticisms, certainly from legacy media and people on social media,
00:06:31.240 is that Premier Smith is stoking the separatist sentiment and that she's using these as a preference
00:06:37.620 to push the separatist idea. I actually see it as the complete opposite, right? She's like,
00:06:42.920 you know, there are legitimate concerns that are out there. And to your point, like,
00:06:47.940 there's already precedent in this country. We are a decentralized federation. There's precedent for
00:06:53.560 a provincial government to have more control over their own resources and over their own destiny.
00:06:58.780 And so if one province can do it, why couldn't another? I mean, it's almost absurd that that would
00:07:03.960 even be a controversial question. And so I do want to get to some of them. And oh, and just one other
00:07:09.260 thing, Brett, I will say that for young people, you know, it's the middle of summer. I don't blame
00:07:13.660 them, right? We get like two, three months of nice weather a year in this country. And, you know, if
00:07:19.040 you're young, you're going to be out with your friends. You're going to be out enjoying life,
00:07:22.100 maybe with your kids at home and not going to a political town hall. So I don't begrudge the young
00:07:28.200 for not going. Although I will say, you know, each of these, it seems that there's been 400 to 500
00:07:32.800 people attend in person, but then another, you know, couple hundred thousand online. So people
00:07:38.020 are still engaging with these town halls online rather than perhaps in person. So we'll start with
00:07:43.760 the Red Deer event, which happened last Tuesday, July 15th. Some 450 people showed up, according to
00:07:50.000 Global News, to put questions to Premier Smith and the 15 other members on the panel. This is sort of
00:07:57.100 what you expect. People go because they're animated, because they're worked up, rather that they really
00:08:02.600 believe in Alberta separation, or perhaps that they really oppose it or that they really oppose
00:08:07.640 what Premier Smith is doing and they're going to heckle her personally or just to show their
00:08:12.540 frustration with the system. I'm here for it. I think these town halls are a great exercise in
00:08:16.620 democracy. But I'll show you one clip from an attendee that I think captured a lot of the sentiment
00:08:21.000 that people were feeling around these panels. So a woman is said, look, sorry, I don't know if it's
00:08:27.620 actually a woman or a man, but an attendee argues that Alberta separation is basically the only choice
00:08:32.820 here. And that if you're not talking about separation, like what are we even doing here?
00:08:36.560 So let's play that clip.
00:08:37.560 Your video said it's, uh, uh, Ottawa continues or has ignored us and will continue to ignore us.
00:08:44.360 It doesn't matter what we do here tonight or what the outcome of this is. They will continue to ignore
00:08:49.740 us. There's one question, one question only that needs to be on, on a referendum. And that is,
00:08:55.760 do you support Alberta exiting Canadian Confederation and becoming a sovereign nation?
00:09:01.880 At that point, at that point, then you'll be able to negotiate with Ottawa. Then you'll be able to
00:09:08.520 negotiate with Quebec. Without that, they will continue to ignore us.
00:09:13.200 So that's an interesting point because you could tell the crowd was mostly in agreement with that
00:09:17.820 gentleman there. He's not even necessarily saying that we need to separate, but he's saying that we
00:09:22.920 need to have a clear question on separation that we could take to the feds that we can take to Quebec
00:09:26.740 and have a better bartering chip. So I think that's an interesting perspective. What do you make of
00:09:31.640 that one?
00:09:32.480 Well, so I appreciate that. And in fact, that's the one part of the conversation that is important.
00:09:37.140 It's just, I kind of make fun. I've been on stage a few times in the last several months
00:09:40.540 talking about separation. And I asked the question, do you want a wall like Trump for put up between
00:09:46.460 Mexico and the US? Or do you want just a chain link fence? Or should we just build a moat between
00:09:52.200 Alberta and Saskatchewan? And people look at me like that's some of the stupidest thought process.
00:09:56.720 Imagine when I go acknowledge. Absolutely. Because the reality is that separation involves one thing.
00:10:02.400 That's paperwork. We got to get better paperwork. It's all the elements of the deals we've done
00:10:07.280 with the feds. And if we can use the separation noise, the leverage of the people saying enough is
00:10:14.500 enough is enough. And we need to change relative to call it sovereignty. I happen to be a little
00:10:20.800 biased. I've been asked to put money up and play a more active role in separation. My polite response
00:10:27.020 is, I believe in collaboration. Let's work as the West. And again, there's a group of provinces in
00:10:33.440 Eastern Canada, imaginatively called Atlantic Canada. Well, let's collaborate and become Western
00:10:40.600 Canada in a working way. Wob Canoe has expressed an interest in the idea of a northern corridor
00:10:46.560 coming from Churchill and maybe ultimately across into Alberta. And then Alberta goes all the way
00:10:53.940 out to Prince Rupert. I mean, there's so many great options embedded in doing things better.
00:10:59.400 But it's paperwork. And what's really interesting is Bill C-5, approved by the Conservatives and the
00:11:05.280 Liberals is in favor, is promoting the acceleration of projects. And the acceleration of projects creates
00:11:13.040 jobs. It creates royalties. It creates income. It creates wealth. And if we're doing that collaboratively
00:11:20.820 in the West, we win automatically. So let's keep those thoughts alive. Anyone thinking that Alberta
00:11:27.940 on a standalone basis is better off is misguided. I believe we need better rapport with the feds.
00:11:35.880 I'm with that person totally in the context of, can we do better with federal Canada? Well, yes. But
00:11:42.500 right from 1907, we've had that problem. Right. Well, I want to add in another element of this,
00:11:48.060 which seems to be that the media in Alberta are out to get Premier Smith and they want to paint this as
00:11:54.200 a train wreck and it as a disaster. So I'll point you to the Edmonton Journal, who was covering the
00:12:00.400 second event, which happened just outside of Edmonton. And so the headline that they put up
00:12:04.020 was, Smith hears mixed reviews from Edmonton crowd on Alberta next pitches. Smith's opening remarks
00:12:09.000 were interrupted by heckles and laughter on Wednesday in contrast to the friendly response
00:12:13.000 she and the panel received the night earlier in Red Deer. And so you would kind of think like,
00:12:18.380 oh, OK, maybe she got like booed off the stage or, oh, that sounds like pretty confrontational,
00:12:23.140 the way that the Edmonton Journal described it, that she was interrupted by heckles. So we went
00:12:27.500 and we watched her opening remarks to try to find the heckling and the laughter. But we had to watch
00:12:33.060 it a few times because you could you could be forgiven for missing it. It was very minor. It
00:12:36.800 was a very small group of people. You could tell. So we're going to play the clip of what happened.
00:12:40.980 And then, you know, the audience can decide for themselves whether Smith was really heckled and
00:12:45.220 laughed during her opening statement. Let's play that clip. Alberta has an Ottawa problem. For the last 10
00:12:51.020 years, Ottawa, led, it must be said, by successive liberal governments, has taken direct aim at
00:12:56.580 Alberta's core industries from it's the truth. If Alberta is to be a strong and unified country,
00:13:04.840 it has to include a strong and sovereign Alberta within a united Canada able to pursue our own
00:13:11.560 potential. So, yeah, there was one or two guys heckling and then it sounded more like there were
00:13:17.560 counter hecklers, like people telling the one or two hecklers to be quiet. And you could tell by the
00:13:22.240 time Smith finished her sentence that she had won over the room again. They were all cheering for her.
00:13:25.620 So it wasn't exactly contentious the way that the Edmonton Journal was making it seem. You know,
00:13:30.900 a handful of people, you know, if you were to say the statement that Ottawa has been getting in the
00:13:35.620 way of Alberta's resources, like 95 percent of people in Alberta would probably agree. And it just so
00:13:40.440 happened that the five percent that disagree happened to be in the audience and they heckled and then they got
00:13:43.880 counter heckled. And that's kind of the nature of these town halls. Right. That's the point. It's
00:13:47.840 like democracy in action. And it's great. And Daniel Smith handled himself incredibly well. But that's
00:13:54.060 not the way that the headline writes it. What do you make of it, Brett? Well, I certainly intend to
00:13:58.600 attend. So that's one. I want to see the noise and get a sense because I think there's an immediate bias
00:14:05.140 that there's a lot of call it. The noisemakers are attempting to attract other noisemakers to this sort of
00:14:12.120 situation. And again, I talked to a couple of the members of the next panel. They were delighted with
00:14:18.440 the engagement at a very professional level. One of them shared the experience leaving, being bullied
00:14:26.340 effectively by a couple of guys who were pro pro separation only, didn't understand the difference
00:14:33.560 between sovereignty and separation. And again, I get back to do we need independence within the country
00:14:39.540 of Canada? Well, yeah, there's an example. It's called Quebec. I mean, I just don't get why we
00:14:44.680 can't parallel what Quebec has done, other than the fact that we're one of the greatest resource
00:14:49.680 based nations. And I've been when I talk about nations, I'm talking about Western Canada,
00:14:55.320 Manitoba, Alberta, Saskatchewan, BC, you've gone in Northwest territories, what we have collaboratively,
00:15:00.420 every product we have as a nation, maybe no lithium, I don't know. But there's got to be a little bit
00:15:06.640 of everything and especially the uranium, especially all the copper and coal and gold and oil and gas
00:15:15.600 and, and trees and, and cows and, and farming. I mean, we've got everything. And if we can work
00:15:22.940 collaboratively, become a little more sovereign, absolutely. But sovereign doesn't mean that we
00:15:28.320 leave Canada. And I can tell you that the bias I hear amongst my own followers is, again, 98%.
00:15:37.740 Let's improve where we are in Canada. But let's not pretend we're leaving Canada.
00:15:44.720 Yeah, well, it's funny that you make the comment about how there was a couple of loud
00:15:47.560 people aggressively sort of pro American type. It's funny, because I hosted an event in Calgary
00:15:53.160 a few years ago, True North Nation, you were there, Brett. And there were a couple guys with
00:15:57.100 51st state hats. And this was way before Trump even said the thing. And it was kind of the same
00:16:03.320 thing. They were like aggressively interrupting and following me around at some point with a camera,
00:16:08.100 basically just trying to get me on record whether I would support the idea. And it's like,
00:16:11.480 that's not what we're even talking about. But I feel like the people who are really gung-ho about
00:16:15.400 that idea aren't exactly the polite types that go to a conference to sit quietly and listen.
00:16:21.200 They're usually there to cause a bit of a spectacle.
00:16:24.140 You know, what I really wish is that we could have one session for each of Kearney,
00:16:31.360 Polav, Mo, Smith, and Ford to start with, with Joe Rogan. Let's get them down and let Joe
00:16:41.860 pull them apart. Let Joe and his followers. I genuinely believe that if Pierre had been able
00:16:47.440 to swing time with a couple of the, call it the podcast kings of the United States, and there's
00:16:54.500 four or five, not just one, but Joe Rogan being the most obvious, I think he could have picked up
00:16:59.860 in the voting panels the two or three percent needed to have swung dozens of ridings, dozens
00:17:08.580 of ridings could have swung.
00:17:10.800 That's an interview because I've been talking about this with some people kind of behind the
00:17:14.600 scenes on the Poliav campaign. They basically just said, look, Poliav was painted as being
00:17:19.800 too pro-American and too right-wing, right? And so if he showed up on one of those podcasts that
00:17:24.400 the media deem as American right-wing, it would just, they would just have a field day. Like,
00:17:28.560 like the thing that Pierre was trying to win over was those like suburban boomers. And, and those were
00:17:33.940 the people that would pearl clutch the hardest overseeing. And, but I agree, I would love to hear
00:17:38.980 the thoughts, you know, I would like to have a debate, imagine a debate on Joe Rogan between
00:17:44.180 Mark Carney and Pierre Poliav. That would be amazing, way better than anything that the Debates
00:17:48.520 Commission could have presented. And I hope that, you know, in the future we have those kind of long
00:17:53.540 form conversations. And speaking of a couple of the names that you, you mentioned that you'd like to
00:17:57.540 see, a bunch of them were here in Muskoka, Ontario, just a bit north of where I am, having discussions.
00:18:03.920 The premiers all met in Muskoka, Ontario, on Monday. And Prime Minister Mark Carney is there today,
00:18:10.360 mostly just discussing trade, the latest from President Trump and the looming deadline on
00:18:16.440 tariffs that are coming. So I think we have a quick clip of Prime Minister Carney saying that,
00:18:21.920 you know, we're going to do what we can, but the best thing we can do for Canada is just to improve
00:18:26.680 our own economy. Let's play that clip. We are looking for the best deal for Canada. We're only going
00:18:33.040 to accept the best deal for Canada. That is very much informed by our discussions. We understand
00:18:39.340 as well that we all understand that the global trade environment is changing. And there are some
00:18:46.340 countries that are pulling back that are restricting market access. What we collectively can most control
00:18:53.420 is building a stronger economy.
00:18:57.000 So what do you make of how Prime Minister Carney is handling all this, Brett?
00:19:02.300 Well, to start with, the fact that the Fence and the provincial leaders are meeting regularly.
00:19:09.180 I mean, two weeks ago in Prince Edward Island, every energy minister met with Hodgson and team.
00:19:15.220 So they're meeting and meeting regularly. Why? Because talk is talk, action is action.
00:19:20.000 But you've got to start with talk. You can't just start building projects. You've got to get the
00:19:24.580 engagement to happen. And let's not forget for a moment that the Liberal Party hasn't used the
00:19:29.280 word Trudeau for any purpose whatsoever in three or four months. It's pretty clear that they're
00:19:35.600 abandoning what Trudeau attempted to do in terms of abusing our nation for his misguided beliefs in
00:19:42.980 climate and, you know, destroying the Canadian economy will improve the planet for everyone.
00:19:47.720 That was Trudeau's approach. Obviously, the Liberals are very, very conscious.
00:19:53.300 Bill C-5 tells the whole story from my perspective. There's some that argue that it's got too much
00:19:57.740 power. Some of my First Nations friends are upset with their First Nation friends for abusing the
00:20:04.160 fact that C-5 is going to accelerate all of this. C-5 doesn't override anything Indigenous.
00:20:09.460 It overrides some of the noise of Bill C-48, C-69, things that the federal government imposed
00:20:15.660 without logic or reason. All we're doing is trying to accelerate. And so the First Nations
00:20:20.300 are rightfully saying, look, we've got to be part of this. You can't ignore us. Well,
00:20:24.420 that was never the intent. And that's the beauty, I think, of C-5, if we can get that moving. So
00:20:28.680 just going back to the big picture, you asked, I mean, they're meeting in Huntsville.
00:20:32.520 The leaders are meeting regularly. And that's obvious because, pardon me,
00:20:38.240 I mean, Donald Trump is forcing them to meet.
00:20:40.840 Well, it's really interesting. There's a couple of different dynamics, right? Like one of them was
00:20:44.500 the premiers were all asked about an East-West pipeline, right? And it seemed like a few years
00:20:48.100 ago, this was like a lost battle. It was off the table. And now here we are revisiting it. And it
00:20:52.560 seems like nobody wants oil that goes through the United States when you're in a trade war with
00:20:57.720 America. So it seems like there is more of an appetite to build an East-West pipeline.
00:21:01.660 I want to zoom in a little bit on just the Trump tariffs, though, because I want to point this
00:21:07.040 to people's attention in a CBC article that, to their credit, goes in depth. It says many Canadian
00:21:12.740 exports can avoid Trump tariffs if they're, and then I don't know why, but the CBC calls it C-U-S,
00:21:20.240 I think the Americans call it USMCA, the next iteration of NAFTA, if they're compliant. And so
00:21:26.460 what does that mean? Well, basically, this story says that companies can be exempt from the tariff
00:21:34.180 as long as they are compliant with the trade deal that they've already signed and that some 86%
00:21:40.920 of the value of Canada's exports to the US have the potential to qualify for one of the exemptions
00:21:46.320 just as long as they adhere to the trade agreement that we've already ratified and signed. And so all
00:21:54.960 of this makes me just think, like, this is all just much ado about nothing. Like, this is a bunch of,
00:21:59.340 you know, people getting really concerned in the media drumming this up, like, tariffs more,
00:22:03.300 tariffs are coming. It's going to start the Canadian economy. And then it turns out, well,
00:22:05.940 we already have a trade deal. And as long as they're compliant with the trade deal that exists,
00:22:09.460 they actually won't be subject to these new tariffs. So again, this almost feels a little
00:22:15.280 bit like a manufactured crisis here. What do you think, Brett? It sounds like Canadian media
00:22:20.380 taking control of the nonsense. I'm not as convinced that Trump has a real vision and plan
00:22:28.660 for what Trump's tariffs will look like. He wants a better deal. And that's where, again,
00:22:34.060 there's lots of reasons to disrespect Trump. But when you think about the big picture, protect the
00:22:39.800 border, ruin, get rid of bad guys, try and stop the wars on a global basis. I mean, the previous US
00:22:47.020 government did nothing that was apparent in terms of attempting to make the world a better place.
00:22:52.860 Trump's trying to do it in the style of his own, again, rhetoric, which is, you know, he'll promise
00:22:57.940 one thing on Monday and by Tuesday, he's forgotten. But he's asking for better deals. And the idea of
00:23:03.740 letters, trade agreements, tariffs, all that stuff, his team's working hard. I was really impressed by
00:23:09.660 the way, slight distraction with those four senators that came to Canada to say, look, let's not forget,
00:23:15.260 we're friends. Well, exactly. And I think that, you know, we have a lot more in common than the
00:23:22.820 things that divide us. And I mean, there's a reason why we have these trade agreements, right?
00:23:26.820 It's like we all have industries that we want to focus on, that we want to protect. I mean,
00:23:32.780 Canada's certainly very guilty of doing that with our dairy industry. And, you know, it makes sense
00:23:37.100 that the Americans will say, look, the whole purpose of trade is based on reciprocity. So if you
00:23:42.000 want to subsidize one of your industries, you're going to have to get hit with tariffs. And that's
00:23:46.180 just the way the trading world goes. It's not something that Trump invented himself. And I
00:23:50.400 think that we would all be better off if we remembered that, you know, our economies are
00:23:54.540 very intertwined. Our cultures are very intertwined. Our communities are intertwined. Many of our
00:23:58.860 families are intertwined across both sides. So, yeah, I don't like the drumming of the anti-American
00:24:05.100 sentiment that has been being pushed in Canada last year. I really, really don't like it at all.
00:24:10.700 Now, to jump on your point, I don't want to be the 51st state, but paperwork is paperwork. And if
00:24:17.240 we can get a better deal done with the Americans, for example, just Western Canada trading North,
00:24:23.040 South, then East, West, well, that's a Canadian problem, but it's a win for a, for call it Western
00:24:29.400 Canada or the, I keep calling it the collaboration, but we, so much we can do. By the way, in the
00:24:35.340 background, I'm starting to move into the coal industry, all hands in, all hands on deck, so to
00:24:41.440 speak. I'll be writing checks, I'm going on boards, and I'll play a more active role in raising the
00:24:46.900 profile of steelmaking for export-only underground coal. I mean, there's absolutely no objection,
00:24:55.380 potential, possible, legitimate, for saying no to steelmaking coal being shipped to the world.
00:25:01.680 One of the greatest ways of making money for Canada. And it's going to be interesting because
00:25:06.060 there's, we've got environmental groups opposed to any coal, any coal. Well, where does that come
00:25:12.660 from? Anyway, just share some of the noise that's in the background that we all have to deal with.
00:25:17.520 Well, it's one of the frustrating things in Canada generally is that there is a large
00:25:22.380 environmentalist group. And look, I love the environment. I love the natural environment. I
00:25:25.660 take time with my kids and spend time in nature every day. But, you know, there is a contingent
00:25:31.740 of the population. It's very small and very fringe, but they're very active. And, you know, any project,
00:25:36.800 any pipeline, any natural resource development, they will get in front of it. You know, they have
00:25:42.980 knowledge of things that are happening. And it's like they have an outsized impact, partially because
00:25:47.920 the media allows them to, partially because our legal system and police sort of treat them with kid
00:25:52.840 gloves. But I think, I think Canada, I mean, that, that's a, that's a whole other. It's an ongoing
00:25:57.480 charge. Yeah. Okay. I want to, a final topic that I want to cover with you today is the longest ballot
00:26:03.060 initiative, because this, again, it's just out of control, right? Like during the federal election
00:26:06.540 in Pierre Polyev's home riding of Carleton, there were some 120 or 160 people on the ballot. It was
00:26:13.360 ridiculous and embarrassing for Canada. And you would think that Elections Canada would do something
00:26:17.500 about it. No, they have not. And now in the upcoming by-election that Pierre Polyev is running in,
00:26:22.840 there are, sorry, there's 132 people on the ballot, 132 people on the ballot. So the longest ballot
00:26:32.860 initiative record of 91 candidates was broken when it reached 100. It's now, okay, sorry, 138.
00:26:39.060 I mean, this is absolutely absurd. We have Pierre Polyev speaking at a town hall in Stetler,
00:26:44.800 Alberta, just saying that this is a total scam. Let's play that clip.
00:26:47.940 If you can fix this, we can simply, for example, say that everybody who gets on the ballot should
00:26:53.140 have to have a thousand unique signatures from residents in the community, and that no one can
00:26:58.460 sign such a petition twice. That would make it impossible for 200 people to go out and have
00:27:05.580 their names piled onto the list. There are a number of other things that you could do that would make
00:27:09.820 it so that only real candidates who are truly running to put their name forward in our democracy
00:27:14.480 are on that list. But either way, we have to take action because this is, this is a scam.
00:27:20.220 It is unfair. It is unjust and it must stop.
00:27:23.480 Like, I get that the point that people are trying to push is that they
00:27:26.380 believe in proportional representation. So they want to draw attention to the fact that
00:27:31.480 the candidate's vote doesn't necessarily relate to how many seats are in order or whatever.
00:27:37.620 But like, like, why are they allowed to do this, right? Like they can make that point through,
00:27:42.360 I don't know, like an advocacy campaign and writing op-eds in the Globe and Mail or something.
00:27:46.420 Like, why do they have to do it by flooding Pierre Polyev everywhere he goes with all of these
00:27:51.380 candidates? It just makes it confusing. And again, it makes Canada look like an absolute joke.
00:27:56.060 What do you make of this, Brett?
00:27:57.640 Well, there's certainly nothing to be said that these people are claiming advocacy for the benefit of
00:28:03.120 Canada. They're just disturbing or whatever the right term is offline. But, you know, I'm aware
00:28:09.460 that something like 50 or 60 of the names that were in Ottawa are now in Alberta. Well, how did
00:28:15.320 that qualify? How did that happen? I mean, obviously, didn't they say, oh, well, Pierre moved or Polyev
00:28:20.780 moved. So it's okay. Well, let's be crystal clear. There's, and Polyev has said, and I, I agree with
00:28:28.600 them for the most part, I actually like the idea of requiring a $5,000 deposit. And if you don't get
00:28:33.600 1% of the votes, you're out. Too bad. So sad. But Polyev's approach, which was let's get a thousand
00:28:39.060 signatures, legitimate, local, dedicated, single purpose only support for a nomination. That's
00:28:47.300 fine. You can vote for whoever you want, but let's get the nominations properly organized. And the fact
00:28:52.100 that Canada hasn't got that organized, it's an embarrassment in terms of stupidity. And now
00:28:56.920 Elections Canada can just bow their head and say, well, too bad. I mean, the solutions are so simple,
00:29:04.020 a deposit or minimum names, number of names for, for the nomination. It's so simple.
00:29:09.480 Exactly. Like, it's not like they need to pass whooping legislation to fix this. It's like a
00:29:13.080 procedural thing. Just like, make them put a deposit down or make, make them have proof of
00:29:16.820 address in the writing. How about like, even something very simple like that. It's like, they just,
00:29:21.240 they were humiliated and then they did nothing. And now it's happening again.
00:29:24.420 I know. It's madness. And I mean, I actually talked to a lawyer a while ago and said,
00:29:29.400 is there anyone I could sue over this? And again, just the goal was to pot disturb in terms of what's
00:29:35.920 going on, but it served no benefit. So there's no one particular group. There's a group of people
00:29:41.880 seem to be collaborating, but they don't belong as a group. They aren't the undermine Canada group.
00:29:47.660 Well, and it's also, it just seems a little misguided, right? Because it's like,
00:29:51.860 Pierre Polyev is the leader of the opposition, right? So if this is a group that's trying to
00:29:56.100 get the attention of, I don't know, the liberal government, like, why wouldn't they go after
00:30:00.540 liberals? Why wouldn't they go after Mark Carney or previously Justin Trudeau? No, it's because
00:30:04.480 these, these, all of these advocates, it's always, they have like a secondary motive, which is just
00:30:09.460 that they hate conservatives and they have like an anti-conservative bias. So they're trying to
00:30:13.120 humiliate him. And then they're also supposedly making this other point about direct democracy.
00:30:18.320 Last word to you, Brett. Well, I get a lot of noise on social media. I've learned a long time
00:30:23.980 ago to stop reading it. I get the odd piece I like and I'll compliment it. So reinforce the positive,
00:30:29.580 ignore the negative, but that's hard for people to do on social media. And I even deleted a couple
00:30:35.300 of tweets that I put out on Nahid Nenshi a couple of weeks ago when I had a private moment with him at a
00:30:41.860 social event and realized I was pushing him a little too hard. So I backed off a little bit,
00:30:47.020 but the noise and the way we use social media, and again, go back to legacy media, the two just
00:30:53.240 don't really give us democracy. And these open houses, which is where we started this conversation,
00:30:59.120 aren't really a, it's a great element of the process. So Daniel can look back and say,
00:31:04.460 I visited eight country or eight cities, eight regions, eight areas. And I did so with 10 or 15
00:31:09.660 qualified business leaders, people who have legitimate investments in Alberta. They're not
00:31:15.700 just one vote. Yes, we're all just one vote, but they influence other outcomes because of their,
00:31:20.820 of their role in, uh, in the business world. And I like what she's trying to do. And again,
00:31:25.200 I appreciate that 450 people coming out to rant and who knows what the next six will be.
00:31:31.560 Legacy media is trying to fill the rooms with, um, with rhetoric and, uh, and noise.
00:31:36.460 Right. Well, just final thought is that I remember talking to Preston Manning during COVID and we were
00:31:41.960 talking about the 2021 election and how hard it was for those politicians because everything was
00:31:46.560 done via zoom. They weren't allowed to do big, uh, rallies and conferences and stuff like that.
00:31:51.420 And one of the things that you get from being in a physical room full of people is you get immediate
00:31:56.400 feedback, right? Like when you're online and you're tweeting, you get like your eco chamber. So you get
00:32:00.800 like your trolls that hate you and then your fault, your legion of fans that love you. And, and you don't
00:32:05.040 really get the middle. Right. But if you, if you're forced to go out and go to these kinds of events
00:32:09.380 in like Daniel Smith is doing, right? Like she goes to a friendly place like Red Deer, but then she'll
00:32:13.740 also go to Edmonton where she may not have gotten very many votes or where there may be more people
00:32:17.100 that oppose her. And she, she, she tests different ideas. She says different things. She sees, you know,
00:32:22.360 which one gets a positive response, which her doesn't. And she owns her message and it impacts her.
00:32:26.040 It has an impact. And that is what you want of your leaders. You want them to be out there
00:32:29.700 meeting Canadians, hearing different perspectives and different voices so that they can go back
00:32:34.040 and decide the best course. And so, you know, I didn't have a lot of good things to say about
00:32:39.260 Justin Trudeau, but I did like the fact that he would go out and do these town halls because it
00:32:42.900 shows that he has confidence in his ideas to go and debate them. Although it didn't always go very
00:32:47.740 well for Justin Trudeau when he was doing that, but for Daniel Smith, certainly she has the ability
00:32:52.040 to stand on her feet. Someone hackles her. She takes it in stride. She goes and by the time she finishes
00:32:56.420 her sentence, the room is behind her and cheering her. And so I think it shows a very confident
00:33:00.240 politician that is able to take all that feedback in real life, but also, you know,
00:33:05.460 stand on their ideas and work through even though there may be, you know, what the media
00:33:11.920 pushes, heckling and laughing and cheering, which was pretty mild. But still, I think these are
00:33:16.800 great exercises. I want more politicians to do them.
00:33:19.460 Well, the fact that we've got the federal leadership and the provincial premiers meeting on a much more
00:33:28.460 frequent basis than ever occurred under Trudeau, and I ain't even using his word or his name.
00:33:33.680 But the fact that we're trying to move forward and get things done, actions, I mean, the objections are,
00:33:41.740 again, First Nations, for example, it's okay for them to object. It's not okay for them not to come to
00:33:48.300 the table and have true, thoughtful, ongoing conversations. And so there's so much still to be
00:33:53.900 done. And whether you voted Liberal, Conservative, or the odd NDPer, basically, the parties have said,
00:34:00.860 let's get rolling. And that's what excites me for Canada. Would I rather that Paul Lowe was in the
00:34:05.960 driver's seat? Yeah. Would I wish that he had gone to visit Joe Rogan? Yeah. I mean, there's lots of
00:34:10.880 things that we wish we could have done differently. But moving forward, I'm excited that we're actually
00:34:15.720 in conversation. Again, Bill C-5 was one of the most pivotal bills that I've ever seen in all of my life,
00:34:22.780 watching activity proposed. Without C-5, it would be pointless. It'd be a waste of time.
00:34:30.780 Yeah. I mean, it would have taken a long time to undo all of the disastrous bills that
00:34:34.460 Trudeau is pushing. And let's just make it be known that Mark Carney was behind the scenes
00:34:38.740 pushing those kinds of bills as well. So it is good to see.
00:34:41.660 Right. Yeah, you're not supposed to say that.
00:34:46.340 It's annoying that Carney could move from such an extreme. But again, they blocked Trudeau. We talked
00:34:52.860 about this before. They put him in a cupboard. They've deadbolted the door. They're not killing
00:34:56.620 him. But they're taking him out of the picture completely. And I'm hopeful. I mean, I really do
00:35:02.900 believe that we can get some things done. It's going to take forever to unwind any of those. I mean,
00:35:07.160 let's go back to the big picture as well. EV mandates. Telling us all we have to buy 20,
00:35:11.900 35 cars. I've pitched Hodgson and others saying, instead of an EV mandate, why don't you celebrate
00:35:17.600 what hybrids can do and make it interesting, make it exciting. But stop telling us what we have to do
00:35:23.680 to encourage us in terms of what we could, should, and might want to do. And that's just one example.
00:35:29.020 The CER regulations. I think Deebo is going to be out of the room. We haven't heard
00:35:32.940 the word Deebo in a month. He gets no profile now. He's been blocked by a party called the Liberal
00:35:40.300 Party. So I think he's going to lose his role in cabinet in the next three to six months because
00:35:47.500 he's irrelevant. And the only way they can really get rid of the noise that he created under Trudeau
00:35:53.360 is to get rid of Deebo as well. And that's my bet right now. I'm putting three to one odds
00:35:58.020 on him being gone by Christmas. Wow. Well, I don't want to bet you against you because I hope
00:36:03.180 you're right. And I hope that that is the direction that the Kearney government takes us in. Well,
00:36:07.280 Brad, that's an optimistic note to end the podcast. And so thanks so much for joining us. That is
00:36:11.500 Brett Wilson, investor and entrepreneur. That's all the time we have for today, folks. We'll be back
00:36:16.300 again tomorrow with all the news. I'm Candace Malcolm's Candace Malcolm Show. Thank you and God bless.