ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Candice Malcolm Show
- March 19, 2022
Justin Trudeau’s ‘edgy’ diplomatic efforts embarrass us all
Episode Stats
Length
33 minutes
Words per Minute
193.16058
Word Count
6,411
Sentence Count
347
Misogynist Sentences
10
Hate Speech Sentences
8
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's diplomatic efforts are a complete embarrassment, but of course the
00:00:04.640
legacy media cheer them on. The ultimate fake news story, the Hunter Biden laptop story,
00:00:09.560
turns out to be true, and Canada's Governor General projects her insane left-wing politics
00:00:14.960
onto the Queen. It's Fake News Friday. I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.
00:00:30.000
Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning into the program. I'm joined as always on Fridays by
00:00:35.000
my producer and journalist here at True North, Harrison Faulkner. Harrison, how are you doing
00:00:38.560
this morning? Pretty good, pretty good. Excited to get into this. Yeah, so the first story we wanted
00:00:43.280
to cover today, it's not exactly news other than just the way that the legacy media portrays. It's
00:00:47.980
not fake news, but this is sort of the embarrassing attitude and way that our government carries
00:00:54.280
itself when it comes to foreign policy and diplomacy. So I'm sure you saw this circulating
00:00:58.780
online. The Canadian embassy in Ukraine tweets out a letter sent to them by the Russian government
00:01:04.680
with their own edits in red. So this is a kind of juvenile, kind of like smack back, you know,
00:01:11.300
own your enemies, kind of just very immature behavior that you see on social media. Usually it's,
00:01:16.920
you know, done back and forth between political adversaries, young people, not serious people,
00:01:24.100
you know, someone trying to troll someone else. And yet this is what our diplomacy has come to,
00:01:29.820
trolling Russians and editing a document. So basically what we see here is a letter that was
00:01:36.600
sent, which was like a fairly serious matter. You can read part of it. He says,
00:01:41.440
Your Excellency, I'm reaching out to you with regard to an urgent matter related to the dire human
00:01:46.180
rights situation in and around Ukraine. And then the Canadian response here adds in an insert saying,
00:01:53.580
which we have caused as a result of our illegal war of aggression. So I won't go through the whole
00:01:58.580
letter because it's just so immature and incoherent and silly. But the idea is that they're, you know,
00:02:05.460
owning the Russians by changing their words to admit guilt. And the craziest thing is that this
00:02:14.140
tweet garnered huge amounts of attention, lots and lots of retweets, 27,600 at the time of recording
00:02:21.440
with 66,000 likes Harrison. I mean, this is what our diplomacy has come to. And again, rather than
00:02:27.900
the media kind of saying, wait a second, guys, this is really immature. This is like the public image of
00:02:33.120
Canada on the world stage, trolling and behaving very juvenile. Instead, we see the legacy media
00:02:39.420
cheering them on, reporting it like, wow, look at this great story of the Canadian embassy hitting back
00:02:46.440
on social media. Our friend Ben Woodford had a great tweet that pretty much, you know, my opinion
00:02:53.260
exactly is already here. It says, he says, this may rack up the likes and retweets, but surely I'm not
00:02:58.800
the only one who is deeply uncomfortable with this kind of edgy, but completely pointless online behavior
00:03:03.840
from government organizations in the face of a catastrophe. It makes a serious and tragic situation
00:03:10.020
seem like a joke. I agree with that 100%. Harrison, what did you think about this?
00:03:14.540
Right. Well, you know, this is not the first time we have seen Canada be embarrassing on the world
00:03:20.320
stage. And we wonder why under Justin Trudeau, Canada's place in the world has fallen. We've
00:03:25.960
been left out of these security organizations. We've been left out of these important meetings
00:03:32.140
because this tweet is kind of symbolic of this larger sort of attempt to try and make Canada this
00:03:39.480
weird. I don't know, like, like Ben said, this sort of edgy and pointless diplomatic behavior. This
00:03:45.720
is, this just goes to show you that Melanie Jolie is no Pearson, certainly not. And, and this, this just
00:03:52.920
sort of, like I said, this is symbolic of, of Canada's, of Canada's diplomatic presence. I mean,
00:03:58.940
in the, earlier in the week, Melanie Jolie even admitted that Canada's role on the world stage is to
00:04:03.800
bring people to the table or to try and, to try and encourage diplomacy, which is just a nice way
00:04:08.940
of saying that we don't do anything. And this is quite obviously why this is the case. Well, and,
00:04:14.780
and it's the opposite, Harrison, of what this would be doing. If Canada's role is to bring people to the
00:04:18.500
table, mocking them on Twitter doesn't accomplish that at all. No, exactly. And, and I want to read
00:04:25.060
what the, what the Russian UN ambassador wrote back, because I think it's, it, it kind of is,
00:04:31.980
it points at the point, the problem of this tweet. He says, um, thank you Canada at UN for this
00:04:39.120
kindergarten level russophobic libel. It only shows that your diplomatic skills and good manners are at
00:04:44.540
the lowest ebb and gives an idea why your country's bid for a non-permanent seat in the Security Council
00:04:49.180
was voted down twice in 20 years by UN membership. So he digs right at the UN Security Council,
00:04:55.060
um, loss. He, he digs right to the point. And I think, you know, one thing I wanted to pull was
00:05:00.460
that was a tweet by a political coordinator for Canada's UN mission, who kind of, I think maybe
00:05:06.700
came out to try and do damage control on this tweet. He wrote on Twitter, he said, for naysayers out
00:05:12.080
there, this was done in-house by a creative member of the team who is responsible for protecting
00:05:17.220
civilians, took 30 minutes, only one draft, then published no back and forth with HQ. The aim was
00:05:24.620
transparency for this blatant Russian disinformation, which they sent to all UN members. So the, the
00:05:30.420
actual UN Canadian employee comes out and says, this was one draft. It took 30 minutes to do,
00:05:36.520
and there was no back and forth and HQ didn't even know about this. So, I mean, it kind of paints a
00:05:42.080
picture that Canada's UN mission is, you know, totally without direction and that they're, what they put
00:05:48.680
out on social media is done by a creative member of the team without, without HQ even knowing about
00:05:54.580
it. So, yeah, Candace, this was just, this was just another, another kind of embarrassing moment
00:05:59.340
for Canada's foreign policy.
00:06:00.980
Well, also they go right to process, right? Because I'm sure that some journalists out there may say,
00:06:05.360
okay, let's, let's A-tip this. Let's, let's find out, like, let's put in an access to information
00:06:09.420
and find out how long this took them, how many man hours. And so they're already trying to do damage
00:06:13.600
control saying there is no back and forth. Don't worry. Don't, don't try to investigate this. It
00:06:17.920
only took half an hour. Okay. It was a press release from a government. You, you may say,
00:06:21.920
like, I disagree with the content that they put out, but this is where we, where we've come in
00:06:26.280
our society that if you disagree with something, then it becomes blatant disinformation. It's not
00:06:30.780
just like, you know, we, we, we didn't like the content. We didn't think that they put enough
00:06:35.460
emphasis on the fact that they invaded and that they initiated this war. They just call it blatant
00:06:40.800
disinformation. And again, this, this whole idea that somehow the Canadian government are the
00:06:46.540
arbiters of truth and that there are these super serious diplomats out there with a noble aim,
00:06:52.280
which is to like expose Russian disinformation. It's, it's all just so stupid. And again, it,
00:06:57.520
it projects such an embarrassing image onto Canada. Like this is, this is what we stand for in the world
00:07:03.120
stage now. Pretty, pretty pathetic. Talking about pathetic disinformation, actually. This is a
00:07:10.640
huge, huge story from back in 2020. So, uh, we'll, we'll take you back to the presidential election
00:07:16.340
2020, uh, something we, we in the media call an October surprise, which is a big bombshell that
00:07:22.280
breaks just weeks before the election and could have an impact on the election. That was the Hunter
00:07:27.180
Biden story. So the New York post, which is the oldest running newspaper in the United States. It was
00:07:33.020
started in 1801 by Alexander Hamilton, the person, uh, the founding father, one of the founding
00:07:37.940
fathers of the United States, one of the authors of the federalist papers, started this newspaper.
00:07:42.340
It's been running in existence since it's sort of now more of a conservative tablet, um, newspaper.
00:07:48.040
However, it still had this very, this, uh, very real report that came out in October of 2020,
00:07:53.260
right before the election on Hunter Biden. So Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden is this sort of sketchy,
00:07:58.760
um, ne'er do well, uh, you know, son of a, son of a rich, uh, famous politician who uses his
00:08:05.900
father's, uh, power, uses his own last name as his own currency to do deals with adversarial and
00:08:12.160
nefarious government regimes. That's his whole shtick. That's what Hunter Biden does for a living.
00:08:16.760
And so this, this, this, this individual Hunter Biden, he drops off his laptop at a repair shop
00:08:22.200
in Delaware in April, 2019, because he is locked out and he just kind of leaves it there. And so the,
00:08:26.540
the laptop repair shop eventually turns it over to the FBI and the FBI, someone at the FBI,
00:08:32.280
I guess, leaked it over to the New York times and the content of the laptop was incredibly
00:08:37.080
incriminating. It, it included, um, you know, not, not, not just, uh, information emails about
00:08:42.500
his corrupt business dealings and, and all the money that he was making by trading off of his
00:08:46.200
father's name, but also, uh, personal images of him smoking drugs, smoking crack, doing all kinds
00:08:51.820
of incredibly awful and illegal things. Anyway, the, the New York post story got completely censored
00:08:57.600
at the time we were told that this was Russian disinformation, that it wasn't true. Uh, there
00:09:01.760
were all kinds of experts out there telling us that, that it has the hallmarks of, of, of a Russian
00:09:06.280
disinformation theme. And therefore the story was completely discredited. It wasn't taken serious
00:09:12.660
by legacy media and even worse, uh, social media sites and social media giants like Twitter and
00:09:17.660
Facebook prevented people from sharing it. They even locked the account of the New York post.
00:09:21.820
Well, uh, so, so that was all, that all happened nearly two years ago. And part of the reason why
00:09:26.840
I think, uh, Joe Biden was elected was because the story was completely suppressed. Americans weren't
00:09:31.580
able to know the truth about his, his family and his son's business dealings. Uh, and, and the
00:09:36.740
business dealings also included Joe Biden as well in the laptop, uh, in the emails, uh, Hunter Biden
00:09:42.360
made it pretty clear that his dad was involved in some of these deals. Anyway, uh, fast forward to this
00:09:46.900
week, Harrison and the New York times validates the, the, uh, authenticity of this story. So
00:09:56.000
a comprehensive report about the ongoing federal probe into Hunter Biden's tax filings published
00:10:01.460
by the New York times on Wednesday night confirmed the existence of Joe Biden's first son's infamous
00:10:06.460
laptop in October, 2020. The post exclusively reported on the content of Hunter Biden's laptop
00:10:11.840
that he ditched at a Delaware repair shop in April, 2019. The laptop's hard drive contained a
00:10:16.820
trove of emails, text messages, photos, and financial documents between Hunter Biden, his
00:10:20.780
family and business associates detailing how the president's son used his political leverage
00:10:25.940
in his overseas business dealings. The repair shop owner reported laptop to the FBI, which
00:10:31.040
seized the device and its hard drive. So, and, and, and again, you know, uh, Facebook and
00:10:35.520
Twitter both restricted the story. They wouldn't allow people to post it. You couldn't share
00:10:39.980
it. Um, and surely that had an impact. So, so, so this, this is like the ultimate fake
00:10:45.260
news story because legacy media and the social media giants suppressed it, telling us that
00:10:49.240
it was fake news. In reality, Harrison, it was real. So, so the stories that the legacy
00:10:54.060
media tell you are real are fake. The stories that they tell you are fake are real. This
00:10:57.620
is truly incredible.
00:10:59.640
Yeah, we're heading in that direction, certainly. And this, this story about the laptop is, is
00:11:05.020
infamous. It'll go down in history. Uh, as you said, Candace is one of the, one of the
00:11:09.480
worst examples of big tech and legacy media, um, working together to influence an election.
00:11:16.700
Now, this story, as, as people know now was incredibly damaging for Joe Biden's campaign.
00:11:23.300
It outlined how throughout Joe Biden's vice presidency, Hunter Biden used his father's
00:11:29.520
position to gain positions on board, such as the Burisma, uh, energy and gas company in
00:11:35.500
Ukraine. And also how he used, how he, how he was able to get money from, for example,
00:11:41.280
the Moscow mayor's wife at the time. And there's a famous line in all of this between the, between
00:11:46.980
Hunter Biden and some of the Burisma dealings, about 10% for the big guy. That was Joe Biden
00:11:52.480
and how they were basically using their political positions to make money and profit for themselves.
00:11:58.240
Now it's, it's, it's crazy because you hinted at this users on social media on Facebook and
00:12:04.280
Twitter couldn't even share the article in private messages. So do we think for one moment that if
00:12:10.600
there was an article this damaging to, uh, to Donald Trump's campaign, that it would be suppressed
00:12:16.340
because it would be seen as Russian disinformation? Did we see any of the fake articles that turned out
00:12:21.920
to be fake about the Trump campaign's collusion with Russia or the Steele dossier be slapped as
00:12:28.000
disinformation? Of course not. This is, this is political. This is interference. Real journalists,
00:12:34.200
should be very concerned about this. They should be doing their jobs and, and, and doing the job
00:12:38.200
that Miranda Devine at the New York post did in, in originally publishing this story and,
00:12:42.800
and doing their jobs to tell the truth because we're heading in a very dangerous direction where
00:12:46.960
if the, if big tech likes a candidate in a race, they, they, they pick one of the horses in the,
00:12:52.480
uh, in the horse race, they're going to do everything they can. And they're going to wield incredible
00:12:56.320
power to influence that election and to protect their guy. So it's, it's really dangerous. I think
00:13:02.260
we're going to see something like this in Canada if we're not careful about it. And it, it's,
00:13:06.660
it should be a warning. It should be a warning to all journalists to pay attention to this sort
00:13:10.900
of thing, do your job and don't get caught up in the horse race. If you might prefer one candidate
00:13:15.360
over the other. Well, absolutely. And the fact that they did this clearly to, to take down Donald
00:13:21.300
Trump, to, to protect Joe Biden, uh, it's having a catastrophic effect because look at the way America
00:13:26.960
is being run right now, um, by someone who it doesn't really seem fit, uh, for the position.
00:13:32.740
And just, just the fact that, that social media has that kind of power, uh, really you're right,
00:13:38.380
should, should scare every, every journalist. Well, bringing it back to Canada here, Harrison,
00:13:43.420
uh, this was one of these really strange, strange stories. It was like, um, you know,
00:13:49.240
parody becoming reality or something like that. Uh, Dean Blendell, who is a former radio host
00:13:54.280
in Toronto, uh, went on social media to attack conservative leader, Candace Bergen,
00:13:59.420
apparently for not clapping enough. So Dean Blendell has this whole deranged, uh, Twitter
00:14:04.560
thread, uh, attacking Candace Bergen. He writes this, the only person not clapping after his
00:14:11.480
speech to the Canadian parliament, Candace Bergen. So just a bit of background, uh, Vladimir
00:14:15.460
Zelensky, the president of the United States addressed the Canadian parliament, basically doing
00:14:18.980
his best war cry, trying to encourage the West, Canada, the United States, NATO, uh,
00:14:24.180
to join in and, and take part in this war to, to, to escalate it and to turn a conflict between
00:14:29.040
Ukraine and Russia into basically a world war. And, and so he gave this speech and in response,
00:14:35.180
and this is fairly typical when a, when a world leader addresses parliament, uh, unanimous standing
00:14:40.780
ovation from, uh, parliamentarians in the house of commons, they gave a long extended, uh,
00:14:46.820
standing ovation round of applause. So what did Dean Blundell do? He found an eight second clip
00:14:51.800
of, uh, zoomed in on Candace Bergen. You can see it. We'll show it on the screen here where she's
00:14:57.000
just, you know, taking a little break from clapping or whatever. You could, you could see that there's
00:15:00.380
other people who are also taking a break. This was, this was like a few minutes into the standing
00:15:03.480
ovation. I mean, these things are very ridiculous and a lot of them are just for show. Uh, I can,
00:15:07.520
I can look at three or four other MPs here who have stopped clapping because like I said,
00:15:11.160
this was quite a ways into the standing ovation, but still, uh, Dean Blundell's, uh, initial tweet
00:15:17.760
there got plenty of retweets and attention, even though this is fake news. This is fake news because
00:15:23.040
we can see that Candace Bergen was indeed giving a standing ovation and clapping regardless Dean
00:15:28.320
Blundell taking it all out of context. He goes on to say, uh, this is one of those incoherent rounds.
00:15:33.120
I don't, I don't think Dean Blundell is quite, um, in his comfort, comfort zone talking about foreign
00:15:38.060
policy because the words that he's going to say here just don't make any sense. So this isn't
00:15:42.800
something you half-ass. She started to clap, stopped with a few other cons, no Ukraine ribbon,
00:15:48.960
words of support on behalf of just conservatives, not Canadians. She's really not good at hiding her
00:15:54.320
theocratic self. Okay. So first of all, he's piling on saying that she's not even wearing a Ukraine
00:15:59.060
ribbon. What I guess next he's going to say, like, she doesn't have the Ukraine flag in her Twitter
00:16:02.860
profile. She, she's not, she's not, you know, supporting the latest thing with, with us good liberals
00:16:07.740
over here and accuses her of being a the, a theocratic self. I don't think he knows what
00:16:12.320
the word theocratic means because, um, I don't think that this in any way, shape or form shows
00:16:17.940
what Kenneth Bergen is some kind of a Christian fundamentalist who wants to impose Christianity
00:16:23.300
onto others. I mean, that's typically what a theocrat means. Someone who governs by religion.
00:16:28.180
Uh, that's not what Kenneth Bergen is doing by not clapping at Zelensky. That's not what Vladimir
00:16:33.380
Putin does. So I don't think he quite knows what that word means. He goes on to say, I don't care
00:16:38.340
what side of the aisle or the color of the party, my disdain for the political commerce and the power
00:16:44.600
centers that run it are effing intense. I'm sorry. I don't really understand. So he's now talking about
00:16:50.740
his disdain for political commerce. I don't know what that has to do with Kenneth Bergen not clapping.
00:16:56.920
Uh, regardless, he, he goes, we have but one choice. We are Canadian. We stand with Ukraine
00:17:03.300
and our support is unilateral. I think he might have meant to say unconditional, uh, unilateral
00:17:09.000
means that one person dictates it to everyone else. Again, this guy like, okay, yeah, he, he made a,
00:17:15.080
he made a point here. Kenneth Bergen wasn't clapping for that eight second clip out taken out of a two
00:17:19.360
minute, uh, clip out of context. And then he just, uh, keeps going and digresses into an insane
00:17:25.760
political rant showing how, uh, clueless and, uh, basically politically illiterate he is.
00:17:31.860
Harrison, what did you think of this one? Well, it was a nice try by Dean, uh, to sound all very
00:17:37.960
grand and, and very, you know, sound on foreign policy, but I think it was a bit of a failure
00:17:42.760
because if you watched the, the speech from Zelensky to the Canadian parliament, what became
00:17:49.140
very clear was, as you said at the beginning, everyone in the house was clapping. Everyone was trying
00:17:53.920
to, you know, engage in the sort of the performative acts that you would do for any sort of speech
00:17:59.340
given to the Canadian parliament. But one thing, one thing when I read this that didn't, didn't make
00:18:04.760
much sense to me was that Kenneth Bergen's speech was actually more, almost more passionate than
00:18:11.360
Justin Trudeau's. She actually called for a no fly zone over part of Ukraine, which is more than
00:18:17.260
Trudeau did and not something I think would be a wise decision. Um, but nonetheless, she was very,
00:18:23.500
very passionate about, um, Canada's defense of Ukraine and it's her job to project the
00:18:29.060
conservative position, not to, not to speak on behalf of the country. That's the job of the prime
00:18:33.880
minister. So again, this just shows a lack of understanding, uh, from Dean Blundell. And I can
00:18:39.880
only think of that, that line in the princess bride about how, uh, you know, you keep using those
00:18:45.120
words, but I don't think they mean what you think they mean. And that's what I, that's what I thought
00:18:49.040
of when I, when I saw this, this ramble, um, this Twitter ramble. And I want to pull quotes from
00:18:54.340
Bergen, from Bergen speech really quick, because I just want to show you exactly what she said. She
00:18:58.880
says, we must stand with Ukraine. It's not a choice. It's a moral duty, which is pretty much in
00:19:03.780
line with, with, um, Dean's final tweet. And then she says, we must do more to work with our allies to
00:19:09.660
secure Ukrainian airspace, which is a rallying cry around, around declaring a no fly zone, at least
00:19:16.560
partially in the areas, um, of the humanitarian corridors, as she said, over Ukraine. So again,
00:19:22.400
this just misses the mark totally. Well, and a, a no fly zone is a euphemism. Uh, a no fly zone
00:19:28.360
means American jets fighting and shooting down Russian jets that would turn this from a war,
00:19:34.440
a conflict between Ukraine and Russia into a hot war between two global superpowers, or at least
00:19:40.620
American superpower and a nuclear armed country, Russia. So, so anyone calling for a no fly zone
00:19:47.420
is, is calling for huge escalation and the involvement of NATO and American planes, which
00:19:52.720
again, would turn this into a very different kind of conflict. I know, I know this, this reference is
00:19:57.320
a little old for you, Harrison, you're, you're a little young for the Seinfeld references, but
00:20:01.600
immediately when you see someone, you know, calling someone out, uh, trying to embarrass them,
00:20:07.500
saying, how, how dare you not wear the Ukraine ribbon? Uh, this, this goes right back, uh, to
00:20:12.880
Seinfeld for those of us who, who, who watched it. You know, we used to say that there's a Seinfeld
00:20:17.040
reference for everything. The brilliant, uh, Larry David, uh, you know, has a great understanding
00:20:21.700
of various situations. So I'm going to play this clip cause I, I, I like Seinfeld and Kramer is my
00:20:27.100
favorite character. So here is an old, old reference. Um, but for those of you that remember Seinfeld,
00:20:31.940
uh, this pretty much exact same thing happened. So, um, we can, we can see in this scenario,
00:20:37.600
Candace Bergen is, is like the Kramer character and everyone yelling at her for not, not being
00:20:41.600
supportive enough for, uh, Ukraine is like the AIDS ribbon. Here's that clip.
00:20:49.320
Okay. You're checked in. Thank you. Here's your AIDS ribbon. No, thanks. You don't want to wear an
00:20:53.860
AIDS ribbon. No, no, but you have to wear an AIDS ribbon. I have to. Yes. Yeah. See, that's why I don't
00:20:59.600
want to. But everyone wears the ribbon. You must wear the ribbon. You know what you are? You're a
00:21:06.200
ribbon bully. Hey, hey you, come back here. Come back here and put this on. Hey, where's your ribbon?
00:21:17.780
Oh, I don't wear the ribbon. You don't wear the ribbon? Aren't you against AIDS? Yeah, I'm against
00:21:22.420
AIDS. I mean, I'm walking on it. I just don't wear the ribbon. Who do you think you are? Put the ribbon
00:21:28.320
on it. Hey, Cedric, Bob, this guy won't wear a ribbon. Who? Who doesn't want to wear the ribbon?
00:21:36.780
I love Seinfeld. It's just a classic, uh, timeless reference there. And it's pretty much playing out,
00:21:42.060
uh, in front of us. And, and it's not just Candace Bergen, Harrison. There was a Russian
00:21:46.200
tennis player who has been banned from playing at Wimbledon, um, unless he comes out and explicitly
00:21:51.400
condemns Vladimir Putin. So we're talking about, uh, Daniel Medvedev. Apparently, uh, you know,
00:21:57.920
we saw this and I talked about it earlier in the week with Rupa Supramania, um, that,
00:22:02.000
you know, anyone who's Russian is now open season and fair game for harassment, intimidation,
00:22:07.360
uh, Facebook even changed their policies. So they now allow, uh, incitement of violence
00:22:12.320
against the Russians. Well, we're seeing now that it's not enough if you, if you condemn
00:22:17.200
Russia, it's not enough if you condemn, uh, Putin, they want you to like stand up on a,
00:22:21.660
on a pulpit and, you know, disavow your entire country and culture, uh, saying that somebody,
00:22:26.920
someone can't even play tennis now, um, unless they provide assurances that they do not support
00:22:31.960
the Russian, uh, president. This is politics is seeping into every aspect of our life. And this,
00:22:37.560
this, this treatment of Russian, uh, players, Russian performers is, is just, uh, it's so
00:22:43.640
illiberal Harrison. I, it's just, it's something that doesn't belong in a Western liberal society.
00:22:48.760
What do you think? No. And, and you know what, we, we've seen this in sports coming for a long
00:22:53.120
time. We've seen it, um, where, you know, athletes are expected to, you know, pass the purity test to
00:22:58.900
meet the political standards of the people that own the teams or the people that run the leagues.
00:23:05.040
And this is another example of that. This, this tennis player was, um, was, or is currently the
00:23:10.440
number one tennis player in the world. And he won't be able to compete in the number one tennis
00:23:15.600
tournament, which is Wimbledon. I don't know much about tennis, but I think that might be the number
00:23:19.340
one. And unless, unless he comes out and condemns the leader of his country, which may or may not be
00:23:25.480
a dangerous thing for him to do as a Russian when he returns back to his country and not, not to say
00:23:31.240
that it's, it's right or wrong, but it's not just an easy thing to do. The UK sports minister said,
00:23:38.080
this is, I want to say this because this is, this is important to note. The UK sports minister
00:23:41.560
minister said, absolutely nobody flying the flag of Russia should be allowed or enabled. We need what,
00:23:47.600
we need some potential assurance that they are not supporters of Putin. And we are considering what
00:23:52.040
requirements we may try to get some assurances along those lines. And then, you know, you compare
00:23:58.780
that statement to the statement of, of this guy, this tennis player Medvedev, who just says, it's tough
00:24:05.180
to talk on this subject because I want to play tennis, play in different countries. Uh, my message
00:24:09.980
is always the same. I want peace in all the world, all countries. I mean, the guy is just a tennis
00:24:14.260
player. He's not, he's not, he's not part of the, part of the, the plot in this war. And it just shows
00:24:20.540
a direction that we're heading in, which I think is really disappointing. Sports should be an escape
00:24:24.860
from politics. It should not be dominated by, um, what seems to be very partisan political engagement.
00:24:32.620
And I think in general, we should all just be, we should all just want to have some separation.
00:24:38.280
Politics shouldn't dominate every single aspect of our lives, but we're getting to that point and it's
00:24:42.920
quite disappointing. Well, and the whole point behind international competition is to build
00:24:47.320
bridges and to make inroads and to understand each other. Right. And so the idea that if you don't
00:24:53.060
have the exact same line of thinking and you don't say the exact same things condemning different
00:24:57.800
countries, you can't participate. I mean, that's, that's completely the opposite of the idea of these
00:25:02.940
international sport competitions. So, uh, you're completely right. One final story I want to talk
00:25:06.920
about here, Harrison, this just drives me absolutely crazy. The politicization of the position
00:25:12.500
of the governor general and the cheerleading and stenography that happens over at the CBC. So I'm
00:25:17.780
talking about this headline, governor general, Mary Simon says she and the queen discussed
00:25:21.660
reconciliation and Canada's real history. Okay, here we go. So, so, so we are basically told here
00:25:27.700
that we're going to rewrite Canada's history books, um, to include all the latest woke talking points,
00:25:33.860
um, basically saying that all the English people, all the British people who settled Canada,
00:25:37.880
the, the pioneers of this country, the people who came and put together our liberal democracy
00:25:43.040
or tradition, our great tradition that we got from the British, uh, that that's all out, um,
00:25:48.340
out with that in with this idea that we are nothing but a group of the Canadians are nothing
00:25:53.160
but, uh, colonial settlers, um, imperialists who, who came and committed genocide, basically.
00:25:59.420
That's, that's the idea. So, so governor general, Mary Simon is, is basically coming back
00:26:04.200
and telling the CBC what her and the queen talked about in a private meeting.
00:26:08.400
So much for the idea, um, that the governor general is a figurehead head of state and that
00:26:13.380
they don't get into the fray. I'll just say, I love Queen Elizabeth. I think she's a tremendous
00:26:17.100
individual, incredibly strong woman in her nineties, still the monarch. Uh, she's set an incredible
00:26:22.040
example for the Royal family as to how not to engage and, and, and put herself in the middle of
00:26:27.660
the politics of the day. She's stayed completely out of the fray for the most part. She's incredibly
00:26:32.400
classy woman who, who really represents the elegance of the crown. Mary Simon could learn
00:26:37.140
a lot from the queen except for instead of going to meet the queen and trying to learn
00:26:40.140
from her, she's trying to lecture the queen and, and, uh, purport her own worldview onto
00:26:45.460
the queen. So, so this story Harrison is not based on what actually happened during that
00:26:49.700
meeting. Cause we don't know what happened. It's a private meeting. It's based on what Mary
00:26:53.600
Simon, the governor general reported back to the CBC about the conversation. So let me just
00:26:58.380
read a few lines here. I, you know, the whole thing about how we're going to rewrite
00:27:01.600
our history books is just appalling. Uh, but that's sort of what we've come to expect
00:27:05.000
from the woke left today. Uh, she says that she, uh, so this is from the CBC piece. It
00:27:10.100
says Simon said she felt that the queen was well informed on issues affecting Canada, including
00:27:14.680
the recent occupation of Ottawa by anti-vaccine mandate protesters. So that's the CBC's own
00:27:19.400
editorialization, um, classifying the protest, uh, freedom convoy as an anti-vaccine mandate
00:27:25.140
protest and calling it an occupation. Now this is what Simon said. She said, I think she
00:27:29.820
found it difficult to understand. Simon said of the queen's reaction to the blockades.
00:27:34.420
It's like the Ukraine crisis. She finds it difficult to understand. See, I, I interpret
00:27:38.660
that Harrison as the queen's diplomatic way of saying that she thinks that the situation
00:27:43.300
is far more complicated than the way that the media paints it and the way that Justin Trudeau
00:27:46.980
paints it, then probably the way that Mary Simon paints it. Again, this is her not getting
00:27:51.500
involved in the frame, not validating the sort of politicized way of describing the freedom
00:27:57.780
convoy and just saying that she, she thinks it's more complicated and that it's difficult
00:28:01.660
to understand. Again, um, this, this, this is the queen taking the high road and Mary
00:28:07.260
Simon continuing to push her own ideology onto the queen. So it goes on, it says, Simon said
00:28:11.620
the queen told her she knows what it's like to live in a city under siege with the air raid
00:28:16.380
sirens going off at all hours. So the queen's trying to be empathetic and saying, oh, it must
00:28:20.720
have been hard for you to be in Ottawa when all those horns were honking. Um, I, I can relate
00:28:25.660
because of this, um, situation that I lived through world war two when the Nazis were actually
00:28:31.240
bombing Britain during the, um, during the air raids, um, and the battle of Britain there.
00:28:37.300
So, so here we have the governor general comparing the truckers to Hitler's war during the second
00:28:44.740
world war and projecting it and saying that it was really the queen that was saying that.
00:28:48.180
So, so this is a quote, it says during the years of the Hitler regime, I guess she was very
00:28:52.580
much affected by that. And she said, I think I could almost see some similarities happening.
00:28:58.120
And she talked about that. So again, look at how many times that the governor general couches
00:29:03.600
her words here. I think she could almost see some similarities happening. So, so this is,
00:29:09.120
this is not the queen saying that there are similarities. This is Mary Simon saying that she
00:29:13.540
thinks there are some similarities to some things like three removed again, putting words into the
00:29:19.400
queen's mouth, making the queen sound like she's the one politicizing this. No, this is,
00:29:23.480
this is the governor general of Canada comparing freedom loving truckers to Nazis in the CBC and the
00:29:29.640
CBC just publishing it like it's no big deal. There's so much wrong here, Harrison. There's layers
00:29:35.020
and layers and layers of just incompetency and corruption. Um, but this is sort of what we've
00:29:39.740
come to expect from our state broadcaster and our embarrassment of a governor general.
00:29:44.180
Well, under Justin Trudeau, the position and the institution of the governor general, which used
00:29:49.360
to be this, this great thing in our country, at least in my, my opinion, it used to be great has
00:29:55.220
now become a total joke. You know, we went from, we went from scandals with Julie Payette as
00:30:00.860
governor general now to a far left political activist filling the role in Mary Simon. And I don't
00:30:07.540
like to, I don't like to say those things about the institution, but we're really getting to that
00:30:11.220
point. And when you read articles like this, it, it really makes me angry because it shows just how,
00:30:17.620
just how, how much of an embarrassment, um, that, that institution has become the idea that the
00:30:23.180
governor general could go to, uh, could go to meet with the queen and even make the insinuation that
00:30:29.700
there is some sort of comparison to what happened in Ottawa to the blitz is totally insulting. It's,
00:30:36.140
it's, I mean, there are other words to describe it, but I won't get into them here. Um, it's just,
00:30:41.220
it's really, really disappointing to see this. And I think you, you touched on this Candace when,
00:30:46.200
when the queen said that, or supposedly said that she didn't understand the, the, the way that the,
00:30:52.960
the story was being pushed or, or she just said that I think that's because frankly, the queen knows
00:30:59.000
better. She has been around to experience everything from the second world war up to now. And she knows
00:31:04.860
better than to just accept the CBC line regarding what happened in Ottawa. And she knows better than to
00:31:10.740
just accept the, uh, the, the message being pushed about what's happening around the world.
00:31:15.960
She's clearly very wise. She, she knows exactly what's going on. And it, it shows the, the complete,
00:31:23.560
the complete contrast between the queen and the queen's representative in Canada, which couldn't
00:31:29.520
be further from the truth. Frankly, after reading this, I don't believe Mary Simon represents the
00:31:33.440
queen at all. I don't believe Mary Simon at this point is, is, is a, is a reasonable representation of
00:31:39.880
the queen, which is what the governor general should be. So it's really disappointing to read this and
00:31:45.200
it's, it's a sad state really how far the institution has fallen. Right. A governor general should be seen
00:31:51.340
and not heard. I don't think that she's a cabinet minister. Her position isn't to go out there and
00:31:55.600
spout off her opinion on things, uh, or to go lecture the queen and then turn around and boast to
00:32:01.140
the CBC about it, getting them to write a news story. It's a complete abomination of the title and
00:32:06.300
the role. And again, good for the queen for not falling into the traps, even in Mary Simon's own,
00:32:12.520
you know, reenaction of, of what happened. I mean, she's the one that's recounting this to the CBC. Uh,
00:32:18.680
she, she, she lets it be known that the queen wasn't going along with her leftist ideology, ideological
00:32:24.000
nonsense. Uh, but, but again, this story does not reflect well on Mary Simon, does not reflect well on the
00:32:30.520
CBC. There's not an ounce of critical thinking or skepticism whatsoever. The way that the CBC covers
00:32:36.880
this, it's just really promoting Mary Simon and her ideology, not taking any account of the fact
00:32:42.580
that this is a symbolic role. She's representative of the queen. She's not a cabinet minister. She
00:32:47.800
doesn't get to spout off her own opinions. Um, and yet that's all we see from this piece. So I would,
00:32:53.160
I would chalk this up as a, uh, all in days work over at the CBC, a typical failure of our media,
00:32:59.360
as well as our institutions. But that's, uh, that's what the show is all about Harrison. So
00:33:03.600
thanks so much for joining us today. It's been a fun to have you on the show.
00:33:07.520
Thanks for tuning in. It's fake news Friday. I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is the Candace Malcolm show.
Link copied!