The Candice Malcolm Show - February 26, 2025


Liberals SURGE in the poll


Episode Stats

Length

56 minutes

Words per Minute

188.09581

Word Count

10,576

Sentence Count

558

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

Candace Malan and David Knight-Lagg discuss the Liberal leadership debate, Chrystia Freeland's comments about a 4-year-old girl, and Trump's latest comments about Canada and the U.S.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace Malcolm Show. We are going to talk about the
00:00:12.240 Liberal leadership debate last night, break down who are the winners and who are the losers. We're
00:00:17.280 going to talk about the surge that's happening in the polls with the Liberal Party. Is it a mirage?
00:00:22.720 Is it media manufactured? Or is this legit? Is it the real thing? Are the Liberals actually
00:00:28.240 inching ahead of the Conservatives? Really unbelievable. And we're going to talk a little
00:00:32.720 bit about Trump's latest comments. I'm very pleased today to be joined for the entire show
00:00:37.600 by the very astute and brilliant David Knight-Lagg. He was a principal advisor to Premier Jason Kenney
00:00:46.160 in Alberta. He served as the first CEO of Invest Alberta Corporation and he advises governments
00:00:51.920 and firms in energy finance all over the world. Really, really interesting person and very
00:00:57.680 delighted to be joined here on The Candace Malcolm Show with David. Thank you so much
00:01:01.360 for joining us. Thanks, Candace. Good to be with you. So the leadership debate happened last night. It
00:01:07.440 was the last one. We had the French one happen the night before and then last night was the English
00:01:11.920 one. We did a live show last night. Let me just say it was a little underwhelming. It was a little
00:01:15.600 boring. Basically, all of the candidates more or less agreed on everything. And rather than really
00:01:20.240 talking about the issues that face Canadians, it seemed that they were obsessed with talking about the
00:01:25.200 states, talking about Trump, talking about this existential threat that we apparently now face.
00:01:30.960 And it was just sort of uninspiring, but we're going to go through it. I want to start right off the bat
00:01:36.320 with Chrystia Freeland because this is, I think, the third time that she's repeated this story. And I'm,
00:01:41.360 I think this is a dubious story. She talks about how she spoke to a four-year-old girl named Ari in
00:01:47.600 Saskatchewan. And the little girl asked whether, how, how Canada could stop the U.S. from evading.
00:01:55.120 She also shared the story on X a couple of days ago, and she also said it during the French debate.
00:02:00.400 As a mother of a four-year-old child, look, I get that some little kids are precocious and they
00:02:05.520 understand things far beyond their years. But I have a very hard time imagining my little four-year-old
00:02:11.440 asking such a question, unless maybe their parents have been, you know, laying on a little thick at
00:02:17.920 home and scaring their poor children on the idea that Canada might get invaded. Anyway, here is
00:02:23.600 Chrystia Freeland recounting the story last night. A few weeks ago in Saskatoon, I met a four-year-old
00:02:30.000 girl named Ari. She asked me, can you stop Trump from invading Canada? Ari is a smart girl,
00:02:39.200 and she's asking the right question. Asking the right question. I'm not really sure that
00:02:46.800 four-year, this is really something that four-year-olds should worry about. David, you had a criticism of
00:02:51.920 this post on X. So what did, what did you make of this making an appearance again in the debate last
00:02:57.200 night? Well, look, I, you know, obviously I'm skeptical. I think a four-year-old that's worried about
00:03:02.640 geopolitics is a pretty unusual person. And if she's, she's that bright, she would be bright enough
00:03:08.480 to know not to ask Chrystia Freeland for any help on the issue. I think that the biggest issue that
00:03:14.800 we have in this entire satellite, like the, first of all, it's just so obviously scripted, you know,
00:03:20.240 this is a classic PR campaign move. I've been involved in campaigns. They tell you to try and
00:03:25.680 familiar, familiarize yourself with your audience and make your position more appealing by, you know,
00:03:31.040 putting words in the mouth of a small child or a little old lady or a guy with a hard hat, right?
00:03:36.560 And so somebody says, you know, I was in this place and I spoke to this person. What that represents
00:03:40.720 is my perspective. And I think the punchline of what she's trying to say, which I find deeply
00:03:46.800 cynical and actually craven, is the idea that she is a solution to a fear factor and a victim ideology
00:03:55.360 that seems to have seized the liberal party of Canada in the absence of having any economic or
00:04:00.720 security plan for the country. And what they've done is they've tried to say, look, there's this huge,
00:04:04.720 scary external force called the United States of America and President Trump. We should all run around
00:04:10.160 in fear and I'm here to help save you. And, you know, I'm tired of that. That's the climate motif.
00:04:16.240 That's the COVID motif. And now it's the scary tariff motif. And the problem that I have in particular
00:04:22.400 with Chrystia Freeland being the one that's purveying this bizarre story is that she is probably
00:04:27.760 the single most damaging finance minister the country's ever had. She mixed financial literacy
00:04:33.680 on things like net debt to GDP with a horrific decision to misprice our COVID debt. Over $400
00:04:40.480 billion in COVID debt was completely mispriced at, I think at the time, sort of 80 basis points,
00:04:46.640 and now we're paying 5% on it. So she's had a series of cascading mistakes that have blown up.
00:04:52.080 The intergenerational theft of a debt that's now reached $1.3 to $1.5 trillion, depending on how
00:04:57.680 you want to count it. They have no plan for removing that debt. And so that means little
00:05:02.160 Ari, whether she's fake or real, is going to inherit a structural debt that is so destructive
00:05:08.240 that it is now already costing more in interest payments every year than the entire amount we spend
00:05:13.520 on all of our military. So if little Ari is actually worried about an invasion, she's asked
00:05:18.160 Krista Freeland why she's destroyed the ability of Canada to actually pay its bills, keep its
00:05:24.320 commitments to things like NATO. At the same time that, you know, she's one of the architects
00:05:29.200 in a whole series of hugely mistaken things that Mark Carney now wants to call investments. Like my
00:05:35.200 favorite investment has been the $50 billion that they blew on these EV battery plants that have all
00:05:41.200 gone bankrupt. You know, and they call that an investment. It's gross. When the market decides
00:05:46.240 that it won't put a single cent into something like peak EV technology to compete with Chinese
00:05:51.840 supply chains or massive American supply chains, it's because it's uninvestable. And this government
00:05:57.840 and its hubris and its arrogance has taken $50 million from Ari and all her friends and said,
00:06:03.120 we're going to spend it right now to try and score some votes for something that looks like jobs that
00:06:07.600 will cost about $3 million each in terms of the subsidies and blow up in two years. It's disgusting.
00:06:13.360 So the bigger problem that I have besides the obvious sort of craven nature of the PR driven
00:06:19.360 scripted campaigns is that this entire coronation of Mark Carney that's taking place
00:06:25.040 is taking place after nine years that have been the most destructive in terms of more than doubling
00:06:31.120 the entire national debt compared with all other governments combined, right? More debt. Increasing
00:06:38.320 the bureaucracy by over 70% in terms of cost. Stunning. The total decline of public services by this
00:06:45.040 massively obese sclerotic bureaucracy that is basically paid voters for the NDP liberal coalition
00:06:51.920 and the destruction of an opportunity society for our kids, including bizarrely, as they start to run
00:06:58.560 short on money, applying taxes to the worst possible places you would apply taxes if you want to create
00:07:04.160 a turnaround, you know, with like capital gains, it's just pure investment, risk investment capital,
00:07:09.840 which is something Canada desperately needs. We're trying to have worked very hard on trying to get it from
00:07:13.520 overseas. In Alberta, we've succeeded at that. But you know, we started succeeding at that because we cut
00:07:19.360 corporate taxes, we started to reduce red tape, we made a lot of very hard decisions. And Alberta
00:07:24.960 continues to fund the rest of the country to the tune of 20 to $25 billion a year as a result of hard
00:07:30.480 economic decisions we make in Alberta, that they refuse to make federally in and other provinces.
00:07:35.920 So, you know, I don't want to go on. But I think that the punchline of what's happening at this
00:07:40.400 debate is the debates are boring because for a nation, not an actual debate, there's no serious
00:07:45.200 differences of political opinions between these, these sort of characters. The, the entire thing is
00:07:52.240 scripted and constructed. Mark Carney is not being straightforward about things that he said very
00:07:57.040 explicitly in the past, right? He's very much a central planner leveler. He was, he has a terrible
00:08:04.640 track record politically in the UK. He, you know, he sat in, in, in architecture here that didn't
00:08:12.560 permit anything like the housing crisis, and he's tried to take credit for decisions that were way
00:08:16.640 above his pay grade. So I find him to be brittle, constructed, heavily scripted, and someone that's
00:08:25.120 unwilling to be straightforward about what we're facing. And, and that's a loss to Canadians, we should
00:08:30.400 have had a huge debate on what happened with the debt in the last nine years and what's going to,
00:08:33.680 what that means for little airing. So I am, you know, I'm troubled. I, you and I spoke earlier
00:08:41.040 about the fact that when you go overseas, you see the, the absolute decline of Canada's reputation
00:08:45.760 overseas on just about every front, you know, in, in, I'm in the investment world and people just don't
00:08:50.960 think Canada's investable right now, period. Well, it's one of the things that moved Brookfield
00:08:56.240 asset management. I mean, one of the most incredible things to me is to have a guy like Mark Carney
00:09:00.320 there and not have Christian Freeland say, why did you advocate for the movement of Brookfield
00:09:05.040 asset management from Toronto to New York? He's very clear why you advocated for it. It's because
00:09:09.840 there's deeper pools of capital for global capital markets for a great firm like Brookfield. But the
00:09:14.640 reason for that is people like Christian Freeland made Canada totally uninvestable. And it's the reason
00:09:19.840 why multiple large companies have moved down to the United States. So we have serious issues they
00:09:24.880 should be debating that they're actually accountable for having created in this country. And the public
00:09:29.600 just isn't seeing any of this. Stuck in that winter slump? Try Dove Men plus Care Aluminum Free
00:09:35.920 Deodorant. All it takes is a small change to your routine to lift your mood. And it can be as simple
00:09:41.040 as starting your day with the mood boosting scents of Dove Men plus Care Aluminum Free Deodorant.
00:09:45.920 It'll keep you feeling fresh for up to 72 hours. And when you smell good, you feel good. Visit Dove.com to learn more.
00:09:55.760 Well, that's one of the things I completely agree that watching the debate last night,
00:09:59.600 I do your point about hubris. I mean, there was so much sanctimoniousness. These four liberal
00:10:05.840 candidates who believe that, you know, they have been brought to us to save us from their own record,
00:10:12.560 from the things that they have done and just hearing them. I mean, they weren't held to answer for
00:10:18.720 all the mistakes we've made that they've made. So many of them you just laid out quite articulately.
00:10:23.520 Instead, they were given more opportunities to sort of double down on this idea that we need more
00:10:27.920 government, more government programs. We just need more spending on health care. You know,
00:10:32.480 it's not the structure that's the problem. It's just we need more money for daycare. We need more
00:10:36.560 money. I mean, they were even talking about a universal basic income. As if, you know,
00:10:41.360 we did try a version of that during COVID with the CERB. Part of it was, like you mentioned,
00:10:47.360 what led to record debt being racked up, and also the loss of productivity. Because who wants to go
00:10:53.360 work for a living when the government will pay you to sit at home? To me, the idea of a universal
00:10:57.440 basic income is completely non-starter. It has been a disaster. And to hear them talk about it last
00:11:02.640 night, it's like, it just seems so, so out of touch to me. David, I want to go through a few more
00:11:09.200 examples of these candidates last night fear-mongering over President Trump. Here we have
00:11:15.840 Mark Carney saying that President Trump wants to take our country, and that apparently Pierre
00:11:20.960 Pauly, the Conservative leader, worships Donald Trump. Let's play that clip.
00:11:25.440 We have to recognize that the Donald Trump of today is different than the Donald Trump of several
00:11:30.000 years ago. Then his objective was to take more of our market. Now he wants to take our country.
00:11:39.040 Let me finish by pointing out one other thing. Who's the worst person to stand up to Donald Trump?
00:11:44.160 It's Pierre Pauly, he worships the man. I've never seen Pierre Pauly even say nice
00:11:52.080 things about Donald Trump, so that's news to me. Next, we had Chrysia Freeland saying that America has
00:11:57.840 become a predator and that the United States is now a threat. Let's play that clip.
00:12:03.280 For the first time since the Second World War, rather than guaranteeing the rules-based order,
00:12:07.600 the US is turning predator. And so what Canada needs to do is work closely with our democratic
00:12:14.480 allies, our military allies. That's why I would start with our Nordic partners, specifically Denmark,
00:12:20.320 which is also being threatened, and our European NATO allies. I would be sure that France and Britain
00:12:26.320 were there who possess nuclear weapons. And I would be working urgently with those partners to build
00:12:33.360 a closer security relationship that guarantees our security in a time when the United States
00:12:39.760 can be a threat. So Christina Freeland, they're writing a whole new international diplomatic world
00:12:46.800 order. And she even said that she envisions building a new world order. Let's play that clip.
00:12:52.400 I don't think any of us wants to be the leader who was asleep at the wheel and didn't get Canada
00:12:59.840 defended, did not work with our democratic allies to protect our borders. They want to work with us.
00:13:07.440 It's time for us to step up at home, to urgently reach out to them and build a new world order
00:13:13.600 where democracy and Canadian sovereignty is protected. Seems like a bit of a pipe dream to me. But next,
00:13:20.160 we'll just play this final clip here, is that Mark Carney agreed with Freeland, which we saw a lot of last
00:13:24.640 night, but added that the United States would be exiting this new world order. Let's play that clip.
00:13:32.000 I'm going to associate myself, I'm going to agree with that. The only amendment I'm going to make is,
00:13:37.040 unfortunately, it won't be a world order. It will be a subset of the world order because the number
00:13:42.240 of like-minded countries is much smaller with the US exiting.
00:13:46.720 So it seems to me that they've just created this full distraction so that they don't have to talk
00:13:51.520 about the record. They don't have to talk about the things that they as liberals have done. I mean,
00:13:55.680 two of the four people on stage were part of the Trudeau cabinet. Mark Carney was an economic
00:14:01.520 advisor since 2020. These are liberal insiders in Ottawa, distancing themselves in record and
00:14:08.240 playing international relations and pretending to be professors at a university, rather than
00:14:14.320 potential leaders taking accountability for the things that they've done.
00:14:18.880 Yeah, look, I think the biggest problem that they have is that Canadians aren't hearing in any of that
00:14:25.840 language. What they're hearing again is what the Liberal Party has done with something like climate.
00:14:30.640 They've said there's a huge problem facing us. In this case, the United States previously was
00:14:35.040 climate, then it was COVID. And the way for Canada to be relevant on this issue is to adopt a bunch of
00:14:42.400 very high spending, self-defeating policies by the Liberal government, right? So Canada's done nothing
00:14:48.160 in the planet to reduce global emissions. They've made a series of self-destructive decisions to try to
00:14:54.640 reduce domestic emissions, including domestic emissions of the one cleaner fuel that would have
00:14:59.680 removed global emissions by being shipped into the Asian coal-fired grid, which is our LNG.
00:15:04.320 And having denied multiple projects and infrastructure initiatives and private market investment into
00:15:10.960 that have closed Canada for business, not only in that sector, but in dozens of other sectors where the
00:15:16.400 largest investment funds say, look, if you're that dumb, then we just don't have any need to try and put
00:15:22.320 ourselves in a position of the guys that tried to build Trans Mountain and had it picked up by the Trudeau
00:15:27.280 government. So we've had a flight of capital because there's a lack of vision.
00:15:31.760 What's happening in the United States is Trump has come in and he's and his national security
00:15:36.400 advisors and others have basically said there will be a hemispheric shift going on. We're going to shift
00:15:41.760 away from managing Europe and we're going to shift away from managing Asia. And we're going to focus,
00:15:47.120 first of all, deep priority on our hemisphere. They're dead serious about Greenland. I had some
00:15:53.600 conversations with a couple of guys in the State Department. It's one of the most fascinating
00:15:57.760 conversations I've had. They've had files in Greenland for years and they have an entire strategy
00:16:03.120 around Greenland. They have to have a strategy around the Canadian Arctic. They're deeply disappointed
00:16:09.120 with the total lack of seriousness by Canada in the Arctic. Russia's Russian subs and Russian ships
00:16:15.120 fly Canada's territorial waters at will right now. That's totally unacceptable. Canada stands up, you
00:16:21.920 know, doesn't pay its NATO dues, but pays an equivalent amount of money on failed EV battery
00:16:26.000 plants to compete with Tesla. I mean, you can't make this stuff up. It's totally provocative. So in a
00:16:31.600 moment where and one thing that I find interesting about this moment where we've got this faculty club
00:16:37.600 discussion amongst our four liberal sort of front-runner candidates is they're trying to play this game
00:16:43.520 like Canada has some sort of relevance in the observation that it's making that the United States
00:16:48.880 is becoming more America first. That's a 10 cent idea. It's got nothing to do with our national
00:16:54.720 politics or our failure to be relevant in the planet, which we are not at all. And that relevance has
00:17:02.080 been declining steeply in the last five years. And one of the reasons for it is that
00:17:07.440 if you look at the three biggest files that the Americans have open with us, right? Number one,
00:17:12.160 security. Back in May of last year, Marco Rubio, who was then Senator Marco Rubio and is now Secretary
00:17:19.200 of State Marco Rubio, wrote a letter that was signed by 24, 26 senators, bipartisan Democrat and Republicans,
00:17:26.480 saying we're actually done now on this conversation over you being deadbeat and freeloading on the American
00:17:32.320 taxpayers for NATO and NORAD. It's over. There will be consequences, right? That letter had a different
00:17:38.480 tone than any other letter because they'd said, look, we keep talking, we keep, you keep saying,
00:17:42.000 making commitments. That's over. And now Marco Rubio is leading the charge on what's going to happen
00:17:46.560 hemispirically. Canada is a series of, and we can talk about this later, but there's sort of eight or
00:17:51.280 nine major files open on the security issue of Canada. We saw the first one and the most prominent one,
00:17:56.640 obviously the first file they're going to deal with was fentanyl because it's a promise that they made,
00:18:00.960 particularly in the Midwest where it's been most destructive and it's, and fentanyl is created to
00:18:05.280 the trade, sort of connected to the trade crisis because it's a lot of the post-industrial areas
00:18:10.480 that have become the areas where they've had the worst, worst addictions, areas that have been
00:18:13.920 hollowed out by, uh, by their manufacturers have been hollowed out. The second big file aside from
00:18:19.440 security is economy. And there's just a series of things that it's like, we're not serious about
00:18:25.840 talking about them. We have a 200% tariff, three, two to 300% tariff on our dairy products in the
00:18:30.720 United States, right? So we can't, we can't continually pretend to be victims at all times
00:18:38.080 without acknowledging that there's two sides to a trade debate and an economic debate. And we have
00:18:43.040 to be serious about it. Canada actually has a $58 billion trade surplus with the United States when
00:18:48.160 you remove energy from the equation, but energy is more important to the United States than any other
00:18:53.520 component of what we trade with them because it's the lowest cost input into a huge supply chain,
00:19:00.000 Midwest refining and advanced materials and all kinds of refined products that they then go on and
00:19:05.280 sell around the world at profits. So if you just look at the bilateral relationship, you're spending
00:19:10.000 a lot more on energy than you're sending back. But if you look at the net profitability of that
00:19:14.640 relationship to the United States and its treasury, it's enormous. And these are great points that, you know,
00:19:20.320 Premier Smith was trying to make when she was being castigated by this weird team Canada crowd
00:19:24.880 that stayed home at the CBC studios in Ottawa over the inauguration, which I was at. And I saw her
00:19:31.120 working the room with different people, you know? And so I think that the problem that we've got is the
00:19:36.640 deep lack of seriousness in the liberal party of Canada right now. It's deep desperation to make this
00:19:43.200 an election against Donald Trump who, you know, who, you know, has a lot, there's a lot to talk
00:19:49.360 about there, but he's easy to caricature. What I think we need to do as a country is forget Donald
00:19:55.120 Trump for a minute and think about our own status as a nation and what we've done, you know, to, to
00:20:00.480 make the world a better place, a safer place, a place with lower global emissions, nothing, right?
00:20:05.920 What could we have done? We could be removing more emissions than our entire carbon footprint as a nation
00:20:10.400 with the LNG capacity into Asia, only four countries, right? We could be doing that. We
00:20:14.800 could be absolutely having an impact. That would also be a trillion and a half dollar trade for
00:20:19.040 Canada's economy. And it would make us deeply relevant to the United States on the security
00:20:24.000 constraints that us being a huge supplier of energy into China and India would create, right? So we have
00:20:29.200 these win-win-win opportunities as a nation and we have no seriousness over people that are saying we
00:20:33.920 want to lead the current version of the NDP liberals and potentially the liberal party, one of our two
00:20:39.120 biggest parties. And there's no serious debate happening around our economy, around our security
00:20:44.720 and our deadbeat freeloading status and security with our allies and the provocation that's creating
00:20:49.680 the Arctic that we simply don't seem to want to talk about as a nation. And the final issue that I
00:20:55.520 think is the most optimistic opportunity for us in the next few months and that I hope when Pierre's
00:21:01.600 prime minister he'll pick up on is the power of Canada as a dual use between security and economy.
00:21:09.120 Um, uh, principal relationship to the U.S. on critical minerals, oil and gas, advanced materials, all the
00:21:14.720 CFIUS related, uh, trade in technology, AI, etc. Canada has the, we are the luckiest country in the planet and we
00:21:23.840 have the biggest opportunity in the planet to have a deep, a much deeper economic and security relationship with the
00:21:31.360 United States. They have no intention of us being the 51st state, but Trump loves to troll this because
00:21:38.240 he feels like there's just a complete lack of seriousness here. And unless he trolls it, you know,
00:21:42.800 we did nothing but stay at home and, and be worried about Trump being a bad guy for two months. And then
00:21:49.120 in two phone calls in one day gave them everything they wanted on fentanyl on the border. It's embarrassing as a country.
00:21:55.680 Right. Uh, and, and so I think the big opportunity for us is to take security seriously, have a plan
00:22:01.360 for Canadians first, but also for America and NATO and NORAD, AUKUS. We need to take our economy
00:22:07.520 seriously and start building things. Again, all the things have been denied for nine years and open
00:22:11.520 ourselves up to global capital to build those things. And we need to take the opportunity, these, these
00:22:16.480 extraordinary dual use opportunities as, as the United States focuses on its hemisphere and replaces China
00:22:22.800 as a critical minerals, uh, supply chain, Canada can, can make a, again, another trillion dollars off of
00:22:29.520 that relationship. If we get it right, this is the biggest opportunity for us as a nation to quit acting
00:22:35.440 like victims and running scared and repeating this weird 51st state mantra, or this even more weird idea
00:22:40.960 that we can have a trade war. Right. We can't, we have no capacity for a trade war. I keep reading
00:22:46.240 these bizarre economic assessments. Right. Uh, or, or we could have a, you know, there's,
00:22:52.480 it's wild to see some, uh, you know, disenfranchised liberal hippies suddenly wanting to pick up guns and
00:22:57.200 fight the United States. But I did a note on NATO, you know, we're 67,000 people in our, in our forces
00:23:04.400 right now. I'm 16,000 people shy. We have a DEI obsessed, weird, woke general staff that is,
00:23:10.960 you know, destroying the, the current military and the U S have, uh, 1.3 million standing military
00:23:17.920 and 700,000 reserves. We haven't done. I'll just, I'll just jump in on that. Cause I did want to
00:23:22.560 share this clip. Um, we have a clip of Lieutenant General Lise Bourgeon last week, um, saying that the
00:23:28.880 priority of the Canadian armed forces is to streamline its recruitment of number one, non-citizens
00:23:36.080 and number two, racialized Canadians, whatever that means. And number three is women. So to, to
00:23:41.840 your point that they focus on prioritizing this woke agenda rather than the things that actually
00:23:47.600 matter. Let's play that clip. We are challenging outdated policies and practices to simplify security
00:23:54.960 process for, uh, applicants with ties to other countries. Therefore, most applicants included,
00:24:01.920 uh, permanent resident can begin basic training after, uh, receiving their reliability status clearance.
00:24:08.560 Right now, 26.4% of newly enrolled Canadian armed forces members identify as racialized Canadians.
00:24:17.440 18% are women and 5.2% identify as indigenous. To succeed,
00:24:24.080 we must continue to tap on all Canadians from all communities who want to serve.
00:24:31.120 And just further to that, the government of Canada website, uh, four armed forces has a
00:24:35.760 dedicated section for diversity, equity, and inclusion. Here's what that looks like.
00:24:40.320 So some of the resources included is, uh, resources to combat systemic racism and racial discrimination,
00:24:46.480 a positive space program to foster what it calls an inclusive environment for L,
00:24:52.080 sorry, 2SLGPTIQI plus individuals, gender-based analysis plus integration into policies, programs,
00:25:00.320 and services. And of course, a guide on inclusive language and terminology. Um, so David, to your point,
00:25:08.160 at a time where, you know, things are getting pretty serious around the world. And this idea that,
00:25:13.920 to your point, Trump is making these remarks about the 51st state, uh, regardless of how we interpret
00:25:18.960 them, we all are starting to realize that our military is the weak link here in North America,
00:25:23.520 that we're not, uh, pulling our own weight. And yet here is the things that the Canadian military
00:25:29.680 is focusing on, uh, what, what's your comment on that? Look, you know, my, my grandfather fought in
00:25:36.080 Burma in World War II. I've grown up around people that are in the military. Um, and you know, it's been
00:25:43.360 hijacked by this woke liberal NDP faculty club, DEI philosophy that goes nowhere. It does nothing for
00:25:51.360 combat readiness. No one that you saw on that platform, that dais has, is a combat, um, veteran,
00:25:58.320 you know, it's fake and we know that it's fake, you know, it's like, it's like, you know, wanting,
00:26:04.080 if, if your house is on fire and you're on the third floor, you don't want the DEI person. You
00:26:08.800 want the 230 pound linebacker guy who's a fireman that can haul you out in throwing you over his
00:26:15.520 shoulder. Right. I mean, this is, and that's not bias. That's simply saying there are certain
00:26:20.160 attributes that make some people extraordinary at what they do. And that's what we want. We want an
00:26:25.200 our forces that celebrates extraordinary bravery, extraordinary physical capacity,
00:26:31.680 extraordinary, uh, destructive capacity. And Canada made its name by punching way above its weight
00:26:39.360 on those factors in World War I, World War II, the Korean War, Vietnam War. We've always been next to
00:26:45.600 our American cousins in, in different war fighting scenarios. And we've always had an extraordinary
00:26:52.240 punch above our weight, uh, capacity because, uh, you know, you recruit young, mostly young men who
00:27:00.960 are deep believers in their country and see it as a mission because this is, this is a job that requires
00:27:07.360 you to die. Right. And, and we forget that at our peril as a nation, like there's a certain category of
00:27:14.400 person like my grandfather was that chooses to sign up and say, I know that in this job, there's a very
00:27:19.760 good chance I'll die because that's the entire intention of everybody. Oh, I'm going to fight
00:27:24.000 against. They want to kill me. Right. And they're going to figure out how, and so we have to put in,
00:27:28.400 it's, it's a deadly serious business. Russia laughs all the way to the bank of their shadow fleet. And
00:27:34.640 they're seeing situations like this. These people are a joke. They're deeply on serious people.
00:27:40.480 And, and Canadians that want to go and fight for their country to the point of risking their lives for it,
00:27:46.240 will not report to people that look like that or talk like that. Right. Like it's just, it's
00:27:52.400 implausible that we have a nation that is worth fighting and dying for. We have values that we
00:27:57.840 believe are worth fighting and dying for. And then we want to treat those the same way that we want to
00:28:02.720 treat some sort of DEI faculty club, um, you know, HR process at a university. Uh, now I think that what
00:28:12.240 happens, I mean, what my son plays for a soccer team is the most diverse strategy you've ever seen,
00:28:18.000 right? You don't need to worry about racialized Canadians that, you know, we've got a hugely
00:28:22.480 talented, uh, uh, our, our athletic community is hugely talented. The armed forces be the same way.
00:28:27.920 You don't need to worry about diversity. You commit to excellence and you create demanding,
00:28:33.040 uh, environment to create the best possible war fighters. You give them the best equipment.
00:28:38.160 So it's interoperable with all our NATO allies and American, uh, allies, you expand and extend
00:28:44.000 the strategic command function. And you, you provide a vision for what people can be and do in the world
00:28:50.240 that's worth dying for and worth living for. And you will see people sign up in droves to that because
00:28:56.000 that's a vision of what you can do and be in the world. It's not this dead, sad numbers game,
00:29:02.160 being counting people's race, being counting people's gender. It's embarrassing. And by the
00:29:07.920 way, you know, one of the things I find ironic is as soon as you, you say to someone on the left,
00:29:12.480 so you're a big fan of Tulsi Gabbard, you know, no, they're worried. So I, what I think has happened,
00:29:19.920 what I think is happening with our armed forces, what I think is happening, what happened with climate,
00:29:23.600 what happened with COVID, what's happening currently is they're politicizing something that should
00:29:28.000 actually exist for all Canadians. And it should exist on the basis of a vision of what it can do
00:29:33.040 and be in the world and what Canada needs to do and be in the world. And, and if that was the debate,
00:29:38.080 and if that was the presentation, if I saw somebody in our armed forces stand up and say, look, we have
00:29:43.200 a vision for what Canada needs to do and be in the world. And this is that vision. We are going to secure
00:29:48.400 the Arctic and make sure no Russian sub or ship ever gets through it. When it warms up enough to be the
00:29:53.680 Northwest Passage, we're going to be part of the global security force that maintains international
00:29:59.040 rule of law and rule of the sea. We are going to reestablish ourselves as the fifth largest Navy
00:30:04.320 in the planet. We are going to become fully interoperable with all NATO forces. We're going
00:30:08.640 to ship our gas to destroy Putin's control over European energy security. And to do all that,
00:30:14.240 we're going to need 150,000 deadly, dangerous war fighters supported by the best equipment,
00:30:21.280 with the best communications, fully interoperable with our European and our American allies.
00:30:27.040 And that's what we're going to do and be in the world. And we're going to fund it with three
00:30:29.920 trillion dollars worth of natural gas traded to Asia. And Russia is going to take us seriously.
00:30:35.520 And we want you to sign up if you want to be part of that. I think a lot of people sign up,
00:30:38.960 and I think they'll sign up from every possible corner and category that these sort of sad HR people
00:30:44.480 are trying to bean count. So when you, when you've got people just voting with their feet saying,
00:30:48.240 I don't share your vision. I don't want it being told that there'll be some sort of special category
00:30:53.280 that gets a special sort of, we really, really want you to join, right? This is pathetic. That's
00:30:58.720 not asking people. You don't have to ask my son's friends from every possible country in the world
00:31:02.960 that are playing soccer. If they want to sign up, they're lined up. They have to refuse more of these
00:31:07.920 kids every year than they can get, because there's a vision for what you can do and be. And that,
00:31:12.240 that that's what I think is lacking in this current liberal debate. I think it's lacking
00:31:15.680 generally in the country in some ways. And it's one of the things keeping us from making honest,
00:31:20.080 hard, straightforward decisions about who we are, what we want, what, you know, what our intentions
00:31:27.360 are, how we're going to make hard decisions to pay down the debts. Our kids have opportunities,
00:31:31.680 and we return to them the opportunity society that we inherited mostly from our parents. You know,
00:31:37.440 like, these are the things, I think my grandfather, I inherited a secure world in a safe country,
00:31:42.640 because he put his life on the line and lost some of his best friends in the worst corners of the
00:31:47.520 world, right? That was his challenge. Our challenge now is to get honest about what it's going to take
00:31:53.200 for Canada to be relevant in the world in that same way again, and it's going to look different this
00:31:57.520 time than it did that time. But, you know, that armed forces presentation and that liberal debate
00:32:03.440 both just show a poverty of ideas and a poverty of vision.
00:32:06.160 Well, all that being said, I mean, I agree with much of what you just said. It then seems remarkable
00:32:13.200 to, I'm going to tie this back to recent polls. A poll came out yesterday that has the Liberal Party
00:32:19.680 up ahead of the Conservative Party, 38% of the Liberals, 36% of the Conservatives. This is an Ipsos
00:32:25.600 poll. Ipsos is very credible. And this is the first time in four years that the Conservatives
00:32:31.040 have not been ahead. So, you know, against this backdrop of, you know, this woke mind virus that
00:32:37.920 has just completely taken over the bureaucracy to absurd extents, right? You have an economy that's
00:32:43.600 really just not working for us. And you laid it out really brilliantly with regards to just our
00:32:48.480 inability as a country to grow and be useful around the world in the ways that we should,
00:32:53.920 wasting money on things that don't matter, not investing in the things that do matter.
00:32:57.920 Like, I just, help me make sense of this all. I mean, I think that we have this black swan event
00:33:03.520 happening in Canada right now, which is that every time Donald Trump mentions the word 51st state,
00:33:08.640 Canadians get angry. They get angry, left or right, you know, regardless of your financial situation,
00:33:14.400 your social class or your income, Canadians don't like it. And so every time Trump says it,
00:33:20.800 it angers them. And instinctively, they run to the most anti-American party around, which is the Liberal
00:33:26.320 Party. And now we see in the last six weeks, a 26 point swing, David. It's unbelievable. To me,
00:33:33.280 it's terrifying that Canadians could have that short of a memory and could run back to the party that has
00:33:38.480 just absolutely destroyed our country. I don't know if it's real. I don't know if this is a media
00:33:43.360 manufactured thing that they're pumping up the numbers to make Mark Carney look good,
00:33:47.920 to make it seem like there's a chance so that maybe we'll have an election and we'll see what happens.
00:33:52.320 I don't know. But to me, it's really unbelievable. So can you help us understand what's happening here?
00:33:59.440 Yeah, look, I think that polls are snapshots in time. It's really important to remember that.
00:34:03.680 Ipsos is a terrific pollster, by the way. There's polls that are sort of, you know,
00:34:08.800 deeply funded by the federal government, ECOS and others. But Ipsos is hugely credible. I think that
00:34:15.920 we're in an unusual situation because, you know, the prime minister has suspended parliament.
00:34:21.280 So there's no normal, there's no normal parliamentary debate. There is no regular press
00:34:27.760 inquiry of Pierre Pauly ever what he thinks and how that can be distinguished. He's not on the stage with
00:34:32.320 the four people that are reading these scripted comments. So it's been sort of a press blackout of
00:34:37.920 any conservative ideas or responses to what's going on. And so in the absence of any sort of
00:34:45.680 platform for conservative ideas in opposition to liberal ideas, what you've got is three months of
00:34:52.560 no parliament, which is, I think, just extraordinary and anti-democratic. You've got the liberal party
00:34:59.760 basically, you know, in the public square right now. The debate is which liberal do you like better?
00:35:04.560 You know, it's sort of like, which flavor do you like better? This, you know, hard left
00:35:10.400 philosophy. And it's candy coated, it's presented and it's, the airways are full of it. You know,
00:35:16.400 so you've got a full campaign going with people spending a lot. You've got, the liberal party is
00:35:21.600 also very careful about scripting anything that could cause a problem that their, their Ruby Dalla
00:35:27.120 had pulled second. She was ahead of Freeland. You know, when they removed her, she was a danger to them
00:35:32.880 because her messages were contrarian to the accepted script. And so I think that when, when we,
00:35:41.040 there's a big debate going on right now, which is will Mark Carney, when he wins, call an election
00:35:45.040 right away? Or will he try and lead for a while before he calls an election?
00:35:48.800 Um, I think that there, you know, and I've, I thought that the, the, I chose kind of curtain number
00:35:55.440 two when a friend was asking me about, I said, I think he's going to lead for a while, because I think
00:35:58.640 that in an election where you actually draw a contrast between him and Pierre Polyev, I think
00:36:03.520 the polls will shift heavily. So I'm, I'm one, you know, I'm not, I'm not trying to be blithe about
00:36:09.680 it. I'm certainly not trying to, I've been through this. You know, I've studied polls a lot. I look at
00:36:14.640 a lot of things. I would want to dive deep into some of the crosstabs of geographically, where is that
00:36:21.520 shift taking place? And then also demographically, where's that shift taking place? My gut sense is that what
00:36:27.440 you're seeing is a lot of, um, uh, elderly people, uh, the, you know, the over 57, which is a very
00:36:34.640 strong voter base, liking Mark Carney and seeing him as middle of the road and, uh, given the options
00:36:41.280 of the other three candidates and, uh, and that that's kind of a response and that that's sort of,
00:36:46.720 you know, if you're, if you're constantly being shown four candidates, they're all liberals and you're
00:36:50.480 asked, how do you want to vote? I think it's, you know, it's not untenable that what's happening is
00:36:55.520 that's being reflected in a poll where they say, well, what about the conservatives?
00:36:59.920 Um, I don't know. I, one of the features of the poll that's very interesting to me
00:37:05.520 is that the NDP has lost a lot to the liberals in this current scenario. So I think if we go back
00:37:13.040 to whether Mark Carney tries to lead or calls a vote right away, one of the questions will be
00:37:17.120 what role will Jagmeet Singh play? Because he's changed his mind multiple times on this.
00:37:21.040 Yeah. Let's just show that quickly. So the Leger poll that also came out on February 23rd on Sunday,
00:37:27.360 uh, it shows that the liberal party are up seven points to 40%. Sean, if we could put this on the
00:37:32.400 screen, the conservative party is up 30, uh, up four points to 38. So the conservatives are actually
00:37:38.400 up. Oh, this isn't the one that, um, the recent Leger poll shows that the NDP are only at 11%
00:37:45.600 and that they are down 7% from previous polls. So, you know, this would be the liberals taking
00:37:52.560 entirely from the NDP and the conservatives actually doing, uh, better than, than they had
00:37:57.280 before, which is interesting. But anyway, you can carry on. Well, yeah, look, I think, I think
00:38:02.800 we've got to read the crosstabs on these things. I remember I wrote a, uh, posted a note on Twitter,
00:38:07.040 where a bunch of friends of mine said, you know, Harris is polling. And I said, her polls are all wrong.
00:38:11.040 The crosstabs don't help her at all. Right. And so you have to know how the distribution looks
00:38:16.240 in the case of the States, you could be a Democrat. You could have a hundred percent of California.
00:38:19.920 It doesn't move the voting, uh, outcomes at all. Uh, but it massively moves the, the, you know,
00:38:25.920 the public. Um, I, I just have a sense that, that this has been extremely well scripted from a tactical,
00:38:33.600 uh, point of view by the liberal party to suspend democracy in Canada, make tons of promises. You
00:38:39.840 know, I don't know how they're able to do this. Uh, you just, the prime minister just, um, you know,
00:38:45.520 said that they're going to give $5 billion to Ukraine and leave on the table, whether we put
00:38:50.560 troops. I mean, it's all, it's, it's embarrassing because no one's taking it seriously in Europe. But
00:38:55.600 the other thing is how, how are these commitments being made without a parliament sitting? This is,
00:39:00.240 this is democracy. And, and the fact that the press is paid off and that they're actually going out,
00:39:08.400 you know, this weird reminder that came from, um, Pascal Saint-Ange saying,
00:39:13.120 we need to double what we pay the CBC and CBC has become unwatchable and it has almost no,
00:39:18.000 no audience, but they're making these sort of tacit promises as they're, you know, you know,
00:39:23.920 you've got media outlets covering the liberal party and saying, what if we give you guys another
00:39:27.840 billion dollars, let's have that debate out loud, right? It's incredibly corrupt. It just looks like
00:39:32.320 a banana republic from the outside. Well, and Saint-Ange is, is saying not just that they want to give
00:39:36.560 CBC more money, but that they want to remove the decision-making away from the political realm
00:39:41.280 and basically try to find a way to guarantee their funding basically to protect them from future
00:39:46.160 conservative government that doesn't see the value and wants to defund it. We saw Justin Trudeau
00:39:50.640 announced a proposed $3 billion, uh, bullet train from Quebec city to Toronto. Um, you know,
00:39:56.960 California had a similar promise, uh, for a train half as long. Um, they said that it was going to
00:40:01.600 cost 25 billion. The tab is upwards of 150 billion today, and it's still, it's still not built. It's,
00:40:08.080 there's nothing built. And so this idea that Trudeau could build a bullet train for $3 billion is so
00:40:13.760 absurd. And yet I mean, you cover it. I want, I want to bring it back to the media though,
00:40:17.360 because I just don't understand from my perspective, no one's watching it and they're tuned
00:40:21.120 out specifically in the Gen Z and the millennial generation. People don't watch the legacy media.
00:40:26.240 So, so how is it that they can have such an outsized influence still in our country, um,
00:40:31.920 that, that they could cause such a, such a drastic swing in just a few weeks?
00:40:37.360 Well, you know, I think, I, I think there's a couple of things going on. I think the, the media,
00:40:42.960 uh, people still pull their information increasingly from social media and different
00:40:47.040 sources. Right. But there's, uh, when you, when you use people's tax dollars to fund an ideological
00:40:54.000 position that, you know, I saw this one CBC, I, I just thought about posting about this in light
00:40:59.040 of what Pascal St. Hans said, but I remember the CBC did a very high production, um, sort of Willy Wonka
00:41:04.480 mockery of the freedom convoy. Um, and I was disgusted by it, you know, outside of Canada,
00:41:10.960 the, uh, even the president was compelled to say that what Christian Freeland did with the truckers
00:41:15.600 was fascism. Right. Um, this is language that, you know, I, people in Europe found it bizarre and
00:41:22.480 it's like, it's extraordinary that a state owned broadcaster not only doesn't say, let's have a
00:41:30.880 question about civil rights and a decision that was found to be deeply unconstitutional, total violation
00:41:36.160 of the law. Uh, right. And instead we're going to create a musical mockery of people whose intention
00:41:44.000 was to confront the anti-scientific basis of a bunch of COVID mandates federally that were soon
00:41:48.480 dropped because they were totally out of line with what was going on everywhere else in the world.
00:41:52.080 And we're out of line with what was health best practice and we're killing these,
00:41:55.680 the business of these truckers. These guys were debanked, uh, you know, terror laws were invoked
00:42:02.080 against Canadians. We were told it was foreign interference. It was almost all Canadians that
00:42:08.160 backing these people and, and the one sort of, you know, news business of record that is supposed
00:42:16.880 to serve Canadians is entirely not just failing to defend the idea that there's something important
00:42:23.520 here that needs to be debated in terms of civil rights dissent, these decisions and how this was
00:42:27.840 handled. Beyond that, they're openly mocking it, sending this sort of like wink and nod, like,
00:42:32.560 aren't these people clowns? Aren't they dumb? Aren't they educated? Aren't they savvy? You know,
00:42:37.040 it was so disgusting. It was so pravda. And now we're dealing with a bunch of, you know, second tier,
00:42:43.680 you know, politicians, uh, who are using old Soviet terms like misinformation and disinformation.
00:42:50.880 And they're using them with a straight face against Canadians that want to have an open debate about
00:42:54.960 this kind of society they want to live in and they want to inherit. So I think that there's a lot to
00:43:00.240 play for right now. I think this is partly why the media is so desperate to appear to portray Pierre
00:43:06.160 as a Trump wannabe or a Trump supporter. I think it's painted the conservative party into a corner in
00:43:13.360 terms of the kind of messaging that you have to use in, you know, on the one hand, you've got to say
00:43:17.760 the people that are presenting themselves as defending Canada are actually the problem, you know, because for
00:43:22.160 nine years they've created a weaker, less resilient economy, a joke of the military and they've undermined
00:43:29.120 Canadians. We've got the worst productivity. We've got, you know, they want to do dollar for dollar
00:43:33.440 tariffs and it costs a dollar 43 to do a dollar for dollar tariff. Like, you know, this is, this is what
00:43:38.880 we're up against. And how do you, you know, it's, it's sort of like the narrative if it gets adopted wholesale by a media that doesn't want to,
00:43:46.800 uh, be critical of the government ends up bending, uh, people's sentiment and creating sort of, you know,
00:43:54.960 this idea of the Overton window where, you know, there's sort of a framing of ideas where certain
00:44:00.320 ideas become acceptable only when a crisis kind of opens that window up. I don't think Canadians have
00:44:06.160 yet seen how disastrous what's happened to the economy and our security has been, but I think they're
00:44:10.800 starting to see it. I think people are more and more frustrated, the extremism that they see in our
00:44:14.640 streets, the Bebas family in Israel, you know, um, you know, the strangulation, a little nine months old,
00:44:22.240 uh, barehanded by Gazans, Gazan civilians, you know, killed these, killed these kids in cold blood,
00:44:28.560 returned their bodies. Hamas used it as a parade. It was celebrated. Yeah. Foreign affairs people. Where,
00:44:34.640 where, where is Melanie Jolie now after repeating Hamas talking points about the fake bombing of a
00:44:40.720 hospital? Like where is Canada right now? There, there was, there was, uh, several hundred thousand
00:44:45.440 people in Buenos Aires the same day that we had militant Islamist supporters shouting murderous
00:44:54.400 slogans against Jewish people in downtown Montreal and Toronto. What has happened to Canada?
00:44:59.840 Canada. You know, it's beyond reckoning in our, in our, in our press, the fifth estate,
00:45:06.320 their job is to say, we've reached a point of moral blindness or darkness as a country
00:45:13.280 that must be addressed. The, the, the sickness and depravity of the things being said on our streets
00:45:20.560 by people sponsored by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp, which we only named a terrorist
00:45:26.400 entity in, in June of this year, by the way, we still have 600 of those guys trolling our streets
00:45:32.480 and they're all using our asylum laws to try and stay in Canada. And they're sponsoring things like
00:45:36.160 Samadu. You know, everybody that went to that Hezbollah funeral in Lebanon, every single person
00:45:42.800 that flies back in from Canada should be detained. And if they, if they have anything related to not
00:45:49.680 being a full citizen born here, deported, go live there, go live under Hamas and Hezbollah.
00:45:55.280 Let's stop the streets and quit turning us into this anti-Semitic extremist culture. And our press
00:46:02.080 is letting us down. Our law enforcement is letting us down and our, and our politicians are letting us
00:46:06.560 down. And this is not conservative liberal. This is the kind of society you want to live in. Most of my
00:46:11.040 Jewish friends are, have actually traditionally voted liberal and we have huge debates over that,
00:46:15.680 right? Because I think that's crazy, but, but what's happening, it doesn't have to be liberal
00:46:20.080 conservative. We need a society that has a vision for what it can do and be. And, and you see complete
00:46:26.080 hollowness and silence in a moment where Hamas has jumped the shark. Like if it was even possible to
00:46:32.320 think they were more depraved than we already thought they were, right? Well, I couldn't agree more. I
00:46:37.200 think it's so sick that people traveled from Canada to go to that funeral. And part of the problem is the
00:46:42.400 people I saw that were doing it were like white, far left activists, not even necessarily.
00:46:46.320 Of course, but we have terror laws for this reason. Right. I promise you this, if there was a right
00:46:52.560 wing funeral and we had a bunch of thugs with tats flying up then coming back, you bet they'd be
00:46:59.120 detained, right? Yeah, I completely agree. Here's this weird, again, you know, this very weird progressive
00:47:05.840 left instinct that wants to play, play softly. And again, I think we do this at our peril,
00:47:13.840 but we need to get our cities and our streets back and we need to end this, this fraud that's
00:47:19.440 being embedded by terror and criminal syndicates. I couldn't agree more. Well, I just want to,
00:47:23.360 we only have a minute left here, but I did want to play the latest Trump clip from President Trump.
00:47:29.040 This is pretty unbelievable. So Trump, again, doubling down on this 51st statehood thing,
00:47:33.600 you mentioned that you thought it was a joke. I tend to agree. So while signing executive orders
00:47:37.840 in the Oval Office, President Trump was asked a question about whether maybe the path to Canada
00:47:43.360 becoming American is through Western Canada, potentially Alberta. And so I wanted to specifically
00:47:48.320 get your thoughts on this. This is a bit of a longer clip, but here is President Trump on Tuesday
00:47:53.440 saying that a lot of people in Canada do want to join the Americans by that clip.
00:47:57.600 Last week, I spent some time with two government officials for Canada. I was asking them how
00:48:04.640 realistic is it that Canada would be the 51st state. And they told me there is a path. Alberta is
00:48:11.760 first. And if they sign on, Saskatchewan would follow. And then you go west to British Columbia.
00:48:18.480 There is a movement in Canada to join us. Want to get your thoughts on that and how that's proceeding.
00:48:24.160 So it's true. Thank you, Brian. It's true. A lot of people in Canada liking
00:48:30.960 becoming our beautiful, cherished 51st state. They'll have to pay much lower taxes. They'll have
00:48:36.800 the ultimate security. You know, they don't pay very much for security right now because they rely
00:48:41.120 on us, which is really unfair to us. So it's interesting. Actually, I had Bruce Pardy,
00:48:47.840 professor from Queens University on the show on Monday, and he, I think that the reporter might have
00:48:53.040 been talking about our interview because that's literally what he said. He thought that Alberta
00:48:57.040 would get a better deal. And I know Jordan Peterson made a comment like this in an essay
00:49:00.720 in the National Post that Canada has to offer something better for Alberta. Otherwise, Alberta
00:49:05.840 might be the one to look to the United States. I just want to get your comment. I know you're in Alberta
00:49:12.000 and you understand what the political culture there. You know, you would think as a conservative
00:49:16.560 province, that might be the case. Although I speak to many people in Alberta and it doesn't really seem
00:49:21.440 that way to me. What, what do you make of it? No, look, I think, I think President Trump's doing
00:49:26.320 what he always does. He's trolling what he perceives to be an extremely weak federal Canadian
00:49:33.360 government. He saw the weakness live in the way that they failed to respond to any of the questions.
00:49:41.280 You know, he, let's, let's, let's scroll back for a second, because I find this interesting,
00:49:45.440 because we don't seem to cover ourselves the way that we're covered overseas. I was,
00:49:49.440 I was in the States in December, then I was back during the inauguration.
00:49:54.160 And in the, in, in, in the US, people will play clips of people like Melanie Jolie supporting the,
00:50:00.880 the corrupt Islamist ICC judge against Netanyahu, right? That will actually play. It will be like,
00:50:06.160 this is bizarre. Trudeau gave a speech saying Americans were sexist because they didn't elect
00:50:12.720 a woman president for the second time. That was his speech in December, when we were
00:50:17.760 all worried here about being trolled as a 51st state. Um, Christian Freeland the same month was
00:50:24.960 saying, uh, maple syrup MAGA all the time, and then saying she stood up to Trump and Trump's a bully,
00:50:30.560 right? This is, this was like our, our chair, self appointed chairman of the US Canada relations
00:50:36.880 committee. Now I have some friends that are in the administration. They said they think she's a joke.
00:50:41.040 She was a disaster when she did USMCA. She was, people forget this. And again,
00:50:45.360 our press doesn't talk about it. She was totally missing in action. She got shut out entirely by
00:50:50.560 Bob Lighthizer after she went on stage saying that Trump was a dictator. She was on stage with Putin,
00:50:54.880 about Putin and Trump with some left wing activists. They did it. They did a bilateral deal with Mexico.
00:51:01.040 And then we were invited to come back and try and seal a deal in a few weeks, only a few weeks
00:51:05.520 remaining, but the bilateral deal with Mexico was concluded. She was out of the room. This is
00:51:09.680 somebody who's never stood up for anything except trying to get reelected with a left wing base.
00:51:14.720 And so what the US observe is a series of, uh, passive aggressive behaviors by people that are
00:51:21.920 extremely weak, don't know their files, don't show up, can't engage. Melanie Jolie was down there and
00:51:28.880 she posted stuff. She met with like the three most radical left senators that are totally peripheral in US
00:51:34.480 politics, right? What are we doing as a nation? Like it's deeply unserious. So when a reporter prompts
00:51:41.440 a guy like Trump and says, Hey, sounds like you're going to put these tariffs on on March 4 for Mexico
00:51:46.640 and Canada, what do you think of Canada just being the 51st States? He'd be like, you know what?
00:51:50.320 I think they'd like it. And here's what I think is happening in Alberta. In Alberta, we had this debate
00:51:55.920 where the reaction to the fact that we were so, uh, we lacked resilience was we need to build these
00:52:01.680 pipelines coast to coast again and start having alternative markets from the United States.
00:52:05.920 We have economic resilience right away. Quebec said, you know what? We don't have any social
00:52:10.160 license for your pipelines. And what happened in Alberta that I don't think it's covered nationally.
00:52:14.880 As I said, you know what? Quebec has taken from Alberta has contributed in the last 15 years,
00:52:21.680 about $300 billion net to the country. No one's even close. The next closest is BC at like 42.
00:52:28.480 And after that, it's a little bit from Ontario and then everybody else takes it. They just take the
00:52:34.160 money, right? And say, thank you. They don't say thank you. They just take the money. Quebec has taken
00:52:39.920 far more money in any one year than it would cost to build that pipeline, but they don't think there's
00:52:43.840 any social license for us to send cleaner burning liquid natural gas to our NATO allies in Europe.
00:52:51.760 That's starting to become untenable. The thing that people should be debating is not the 51st
00:52:55.920 state stuff that Trump is trolling. They should be debating what is the purpose to be in a Canadian
00:53:00.960 federation if one province is paying everybody's bills and it's basically sustaining soft socialism
00:53:07.280 in other provinces. It simply won't make the harder decisions that Alberta makes to have lower taxes,
00:53:12.320 less red tape, more trade, and to build an economy that, you know, used to be very oil and gas dependent,
00:53:17.920 but is now heavily diversified out of oil and gas. It's got the highest net income, the youngest
00:53:22.560 demographic, the highest educated workforce in the country, and the fastest growth in the country
00:53:26.560 for 20 years running, even through recessionary periods. Like, at the end of the day, conservative
00:53:31.680 politics aren't there to be sort of a blue jersey you wear. They're there to make people more prosperous,
00:53:37.520 more secure, more free. And if the politics don't do that, change your politics. Change the policies.
00:53:43.360 And when you do do that, and you do become more prosperous, and you do create higher debt income,
00:53:47.360 and you do support the federation, and you look at these provinces that refuse to do that,
00:53:51.520 and they continue to be welfare states, Quebec is now poorer. It just crossed the line from being
00:53:56.560 the 49th poorest U.S. state to being poorer than Mississippi this year. Our great province of Quebec,
00:54:03.520 I think Quebec's phenomenal, right? I love Quebec. But it has become an impoverished place because of
00:54:10.720 these sad policies. I don't care what the political party is. That has to change. And living off welfare
00:54:15.920 from Alberta isn't helping. So if people say you want to be the 51st state, I just say Canada has got
00:54:21.440 to quit focusing on being trolled by the President of the United States and figure out what is our vision
00:54:27.520 to be the first nation on a bunch of categories instead of last place in the OECD on our productivity,
00:54:35.280 last place in the G7 in terms of our economic growth, last place from where we've ever been
00:54:40.560 in terms of violent crime and sexual crimes, last place 50,000 fentanyl deaths since 2016 because of
00:54:47.360 our failed policies. We have to build our nation so that we get over the fact that the rest of the
00:54:54.000 world sees us as the 51st state in military and security concerns. The rest of the world sees us as
00:55:00.400 a vassal economic state that became more dependent on the United States the last nine years. That's how the
00:55:05.920 world sees us. We might not like it and we might not like being trolled about it and it might make
00:55:10.640 us feel proud to sort of say we're not going to be that 51st state. But what not being that 51st state
00:55:16.240 really means is policies that make Canadians more prosperous, more secure and have a better opportunity
00:55:22.560 society to pass to their kids. That's the hard stuff that has to happen. And I think when push comes to
00:55:27.600 Chevin Pierre and, you know, Mark Carney face off against conservative policies like the ones we
00:55:34.560 passed in Alberta that have made us the economic powerhouse of the country with 90% of all private
00:55:40.400 sector hires in the last 12 months in the nation and the failed policies of repeating what's been going
00:55:45.760 on in the Liberal Party, we're going to win. And that's going to be good. And that's the best response
00:55:50.080 to the 51st state BS from the president.
00:55:52.080 All right, David. Well, there you have it. Thank you so much for your insights. Really
00:55:56.240 enjoyed talking to you today. That's David Knight-Legg. Thank you.
00:55:59.600 Thanks a lot, Candice. Great to talk to you.
00:56:01.760 All right. That brings us to the end of the show. Thank you so much for joining us. We will
00:56:05.600 be back tomorrow with all the news. I'm Candice Malcolm. This is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:56:08.800 Thank you and God bless.