The Candice Malcolm Show - April 18, 2025


Mark Carney LOST the election last night


Episode Stats

Length

40 minutes

Words per Minute

191.51839

Word Count

7,721

Sentence Count

498

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

In this special Good Friday edition of the podcast, host Jordan Peterson is joined by Wyatt Claypool, founder of the National Telegraph and host of the YouTube channel The National Telegraph, to discuss the Canadian election debate.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Mark Carney has three passports, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland, a globalist with options.
00:00:10.700 He hasn't seen Canada in a decade, calls himself a European, not a Canadian.
00:00:20.300 Told U.S. Congress last year, he's a Brit, he's back to lord over you.
00:00:26.560 No, Canada's not his home, it's his throne.
00:00:56.560 Yes, we will get to the shenanigans, the complete and utter breakdown of the legacy media, of the debates commission,
00:01:04.060 cancelling the scrum to try to stop, I think, try to stop Kian Bextie from asking another devastating question of Mark Carney,
00:01:11.980 or maybe trying to stop Alex Dalton from doing the same.
00:01:14.540 So we're going to get to all of that today.
00:01:16.060 I'm very pleased to be joined by a great new guest.
00:01:18.920 I've never had him on the show today, but I'm quite excited.
00:01:21.060 His name is Wyatt Claypool.
00:01:22.580 He's a political commentator and founder of the National Telegraph.
00:01:26.220 He has a YouTube channel.
00:01:27.420 His videos are so insightful.
00:01:28.760 He's a very smart person, so very pleased to have him on the show.
00:01:32.120 Wyatt, thank you for joining us today.
00:01:34.820 Absolutely.
00:01:35.580 I would want to be doing nothing else but analyzing the debate for the next 24 hours,
00:01:40.480 even if it is Good Friday, because, I don't know, I'd live for it.
00:01:43.600 I'd crawl the walls if I tried to do anything else.
00:01:45.760 Well, I feel that way, too, although I am trying to give my children, like, a religious education,
00:01:52.320 and I think Good Friday is supposed to be the most somber day of our Christian year,
00:01:56.400 and so I try to use this day to teach them and, obviously, to go to church and all that kind of thing.
00:02:01.520 But I just, I couldn't not record a show today, just given what happened last night,
00:02:05.580 and I do think it will have an impact on the election.
00:02:08.440 I think that Pierre Polyev may have saved his campaign last night.
00:02:11.400 I think he may have won the election last night.
00:02:13.440 I don't want to be too overconfident because this tends to happen with conservative commentators.
00:02:17.840 Myself, I do lean conservative.
00:02:19.200 I do lean to the right.
00:02:20.000 I don't always vote conservative, but I will be this time.
00:02:22.940 I think Pierre Polyev absolutely knocked it out of the park.
00:02:26.140 That was the strongest that I have seen him.
00:02:28.320 I don't think that he's run a perfect campaign.
00:02:30.680 I don't think he's run, I'm not one of those people that say, like, he's run a flawless campaign.
00:02:34.000 I think he has made some errors and mistakes.
00:02:35.800 I won't dwell on them now.
00:02:36.640 I'll talk about them after the campaign ends, but last night I think he redeemed himself.
00:02:41.620 I think that he came out swinging.
00:02:44.440 He looked confident.
00:02:45.640 He looked poised.
00:02:46.640 He looked prime ministerial, and he did what he needed to do.
00:02:50.160 I'm curious, what were your takeaways and what were your thoughts on the debate, Wyatt?
00:02:54.400 Well, first off, it actually did confirm something I had said about the French debate the previous night,
00:03:00.160 that Polyev, I gave him, if we're giving letter grades, I gave him a B- in the French debate.
00:03:06.040 He didn't come off abrasive like the media tries to paint him,
00:03:08.880 so he would have just, you know, proven people wrong in Quebec that he's this abrasive Trump-like figure.
00:03:14.720 He had some good answers, had a couple good jabs, but it wasn't brilliant.
00:03:18.480 And I thought he was saving himself for the English debate.
00:03:21.280 Why telegraph a bunch of your best attacks in French that Marc Carney and the liberal crew can then write up good answers for,
00:03:28.180 for the, frankly, the real debate?
00:03:30.360 Because the conservatives don't have that much to gain.
00:03:32.560 They don't have that many seats they could win in Quebec.
00:03:35.580 They can really just hold on to their incumbents and maybe grab up a Montreal suburb or Mount Royal,
00:03:41.400 and that's pretty much it.
00:03:42.760 This debate, Pierre Polyev may want to lock up murderers for the rest of their lives,
00:03:49.280 but he committed a murder on stage of Marc Carney.
00:03:52.340 And I'm not trying to be, like, a cheerleader here.
00:03:56.000 I gave him a B- the previous night.
00:03:58.920 To this night, he basically did everything he needed to do.
00:04:03.120 He would wallop Carney, and then he'd go back to looking, like, right down the barrel of the camera,
00:04:08.460 and then turn into positive Pierre, and that I have a positive vision for the country,
00:04:13.520 and this is how we fix our problems.
00:04:14.760 It was very well handled.
00:04:16.560 I know some people are even saying he should have gone more aggressive.
00:04:19.940 No, he was perfect with his amount of aggression because he needed to snake it always back into
00:04:25.400 I have a positive vision so that he doesn't play into the unfair media narrative again
00:04:31.600 that he is an abrasive, pugilistic, Trump-like figure who you cannot vote for
00:04:37.360 if you believe in Canadian values or whatever.
00:04:39.780 You know, I agree because I think that what the liberal plan was, what the strategy was,
00:04:45.220 was to paint Pierre Polyev as mini-Trump, as Canada-Trump.
00:04:49.120 And from a fair-minded view of a fair-minded Canadian watching that debate, there was just no comparison.
00:04:55.800 Like, you cannot watch Pierre Polyev and see any comparison to Trump.
00:05:00.160 And I think that that line of argument was just absolutely eviscerated last night.
00:05:03.700 Like, they didn't even try, right?
00:05:05.040 Like, you could see that Polyev's strategy, especially towards the end, was to try to tie Mark Carney to Justin Trudeau
00:05:11.460 and try to say this is just a continuation of Trudeau's government.
00:05:14.840 He was an advisor.
00:05:15.940 He was there.
00:05:17.020 And this is a fourth liberal term.
00:05:19.080 That was the comparison that really stuck and really stood out.
00:05:22.680 I didn't even hear them trying to compare him to Trump.
00:05:25.060 I feel like the Trump angle of this election has become moot.
00:05:29.480 It's no longer relevant.
00:05:30.720 It's no longer the driving issue of the campaign.
00:05:34.260 It was hardly even really the focus of the debate last night.
00:05:37.380 I thought that the Liberals and the NDP were going to really go hard on President Trump.
00:05:42.740 We saw that a bit more in the French debate.
00:05:44.540 But you could see after two hours on stage, the focus of the debate, as it rightly should have been,
00:05:49.420 and I give the moderator, Steve Pakin, a great deal of credit for this.
00:05:52.700 It was on life in Canada, on the issues of the day-to-day issues for everyday Canadians, cost of living, housing, crime, even immigration.
00:06:01.000 Those are the important issues of our country, and that was the focus.
00:06:04.560 And so any kind of line of argument to say that the Conservatives are like Trump, it just didn't work and it fell flat.
00:06:10.760 So, Wyatt, I want to show we put together a little montage of what I thought were the highlights of the debate.
00:06:16.720 It's a bit on the longer side. It's three and a half minutes, but we are going to see the highs and the lows.
00:06:23.060 I would say that most of the lows were around Jagmeet Singh and his annoying habit of just interrupting everybody nonstop.
00:06:29.980 But I also, I think from this montage, you can see how Polyev was shining his confidence.
00:06:35.480 And you can see Mark Carney was just sort of flat, sort of stale, boring, dry.
00:06:40.500 I don't know if they were trying to make him come across as just like a boring person.
00:06:44.940 Like, you want the Prime Minister to be boring, especially after nine years of Justin Trudeau.
00:06:49.960 But I think that that is another takeaway.
00:06:51.980 So, let's play this clip, and if at any point you want to pause it, just let us know and we will pause it and talk about it.
00:06:59.480 So, let's play that clip.
00:07:00.840 You claim to be very different from Mr. Trudeau.
00:07:04.900 Now, the point is to show that you are any better than Mr. Trudeau.
00:07:08.840 The no-new development law, C-69, guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the government of Canada to actually duplicate the same project.
00:07:21.380 Have no rules, have no regulation.
00:07:22.200 Have one-stop shop over any energy development.
00:07:25.400 Mr. Trudeau, we just got to let him finish the sentence.
00:07:26.460 That thing that is pollute.
00:07:27.100 Let's just let him finish the sentence.
00:07:28.180 It takes now 17 years to get a major project approved in this country.
00:07:36.540 In the entire G7, we cannot afford a fourth liberal term.
00:07:42.020 Keystone, which is the pipeline which has helped to increase oil and gas exports by 50% in this country, that is an asset of the people of Canada.
00:07:52.820 We own it.
00:07:53.320 Keystone is not owned by Canada.
00:07:56.140 That's an American pipeline.
00:07:58.240 And the question of what to do is, so it's not a subsidy that has disappeared, it's actually an asset of Canada.
00:08:02.100 Mr. Carney, Justin Trudeau's staffers are actually here with you at this debate in Montreal, writing the talking points that you are regurgitating into the microphone.
00:08:11.300 How can we possibly believe that you are any different than the previous 10 years of liberal government?
00:08:18.220 That was the moment in the debate where Mark Carney directs permanently.
00:08:23.400 25 seconds left in this segment for you to respond to that.
00:08:26.740 Look, I do my own talking points.
00:08:29.040 Thank you very much.
00:08:29.820 You say you are a great negotiator.
00:08:32.500 What have you negotiated but fiscal paradises in Bermudas or Cayman Islands?
00:08:38.060 You have to prove something and you have to reveal what you own in those companies if you want people to believe you.
00:08:46.180 Since you've had the opportunity to get your top secret security clearance and you've refused, why?
00:08:53.180 Well, first of all, I have got my security clearance when I was a minister.
00:08:58.720 I got top secret clearance at the time, so there's no problem getting that.
00:09:02.160 But when the government made this recent offer, they said that if I got the secret security clearance briefings,
00:09:09.120 that I would be gagged under the security law and I could be prosecuted if I spoke freely about matters of foreign interference.
00:09:17.820 Now, given that Canada has experienced Chinese interference by Beijing, the government of China,
00:09:25.480 in two consecutive elections, I needed to do my job to speak freely without fear of prosecution.
00:09:32.540 And that was not something I would be allowed to do.
00:09:34.840 Even Thomas Mulcair, the former leader of the NDP, said that when he was the leader of the opposition,
00:09:40.680 he never would have accepted the kind of gag order that your government and Mr. Trudeau's government was attempting to impose on me.
00:09:48.080 And it's good that I'd made that decision because it has allowed me to speak freely.
00:09:51.860 At all my rallies, even when they're really big, I would stand in front of a flag and greet every single person
00:09:57.320 and hear their stories and learn their struggles.
00:10:02.960 And that was always touching to me, that they would put their faith in me or in any of us.
00:10:07.820 But we've been in such a rush because we have to get off to the next event, so we haven't been able to stop and do that.
00:10:13.720 And I want you to know, out there, I haven't forgotten about you.
00:10:17.820 So those were, I thought, the key moments of the debate.
00:10:21.400 Wyatt, what did you think?
00:10:23.000 Even then, we had to be pretty selective with what we played because you could just, frankly,
00:10:27.640 watch every single response Pierre Pauly have had, especially when directed at Mark Carney,
00:10:32.160 and it could be considered a highlight.
00:10:33.960 Mark Carney there, and I really, really liked Pauly's attack on him for all of the liberal staffers
00:10:41.020 who are just holdovers from Justin Trudeau to him,
00:10:44.540 that Mark Carney literally does not have a different government than Justin Trudeau in any way, shape, or form.
00:10:50.140 Even the people that are writing scripts for him are the exact same.
00:10:53.660 That was the moment, I think, that Mark Carney's debate basically wrecked hard permanently.
00:10:59.080 Even in that clip, if people go back and they listen to it, you can literally hear Yves-Francois Blanchet saying,
00:11:05.140 oh, oh, ouch, that's bad, because he's on hot mic reacting to how, like, just nasty of an attack that is.
00:11:13.300 And again, every time Mark Carney would start getting attacked by Pierre Pauly,
00:11:17.080 he would just look like such a sourpuss for the next couple of minutes.
00:11:20.640 Like, he'd start gripping the podium really hard, looking down his notes,
00:11:24.620 or just looking forward like he's some disappointed lizard.
00:11:27.040 It was just...
00:11:29.040 Some say the bubbles in an aero truffle piece can take 34 seconds to melt in your mouth.
00:11:33.500 Sometimes the very amount you're stuck at the same red light.
00:11:36.860 Rich, creamy, chocolatey aero truffle.
00:11:40.000 Feel the aero bubbles melt.
00:11:42.040 It's mind bubbling.
00:11:44.100 The optics were bad.
00:11:45.880 Mark Carney's answers did not give any confidence to the soft liberal supporters
00:11:50.320 that the liberal party is currently relying on.
00:11:52.780 Now, I think many of the pollsters have a problem oversampling urban liberal areas,
00:11:58.000 but even when you pull liberal supporters and conservative supporters
00:12:01.600 on how likely they are to show up and vote for their chosen party,
00:12:05.920 conservatives are at, like, an 80% rating for confidence,
00:12:09.220 whereas liberals only had around 63%, 65% saying they're definitely voting liberal.
00:12:14.400 There is a large chunk of liberals who, watching that debate,
00:12:18.620 they may have, you know, had things confirmed about Mark Carney
00:12:23.160 that were making them not super confident to show up,
00:12:25.760 and now they might not at all.
00:12:27.700 Yeah, I think that's right.
00:12:29.160 Like, I sometimes do wonder, like, how much of an impact do these debates really have?
00:12:32.840 We were talking about this before we went to air,
00:12:34.760 that I think the debates were scheduled way too late in the election cycle.
00:12:38.600 I think that we're talking about the final week here,
00:12:40.780 we're going into the long weekend, the Easter long weekend,
00:12:43.300 and I'm not sure how much these debates will really move the needle.
00:12:46.900 I think it would have been more helpful to have the debates
00:12:49.180 at the beginning of the campaign so people could see the clips,
00:12:52.320 they could think about it, it could inform their decision early on
00:12:55.120 before they've really set their mind in stone.
00:12:58.020 But your point about how, you know, conservatives are reliable voters,
00:13:02.620 and the people who vote conservative are really fired up about it,
00:13:05.600 and I think that Pierre Polyev represents certainly the best candidate
00:13:09.020 that the conservatives have had in the last decade.
00:13:11.640 You could even argue that he is more conservative than Stephen Harper.
00:13:16.120 And I think that there is a lot of excitement around him,
00:13:19.320 whereas Mark Carney, it's hard to get excited about him.
00:13:22.080 He comes across as just very out of touch and very flat.
00:13:26.820 Like, I really thought he was low energy last night.
00:13:29.000 He was boring.
00:13:30.120 He just didn't really have the fire in his belly that Pierre Polyev had.
00:13:35.160 I have been hearing from people around the GTA that have been campaigning
00:13:39.580 for the conservatives saying that it's rough out there,
00:13:42.120 like that when you go door knocking, it seems like a lot of people in and around,
00:13:47.060 especially the 905, are going to be voting based on the Trump tariff issue.
00:13:53.100 That didn't really seem to be the central issue of the debate last night.
00:13:56.540 To me, it seems like that moment is over, that the news cycles have moved on,
00:14:01.480 and that Trump is not front and center in the campaign anymore.
00:14:04.740 As much as Mark Carney tries to make it, like, I don't know if you noticed this last night, Wyatt,
00:14:09.640 but Mark Carney used the word crisis about 100 times.
00:14:12.980 Like, everything was a crisis.
00:14:14.640 It was the tariff crisis, the climate crisis.
00:14:18.200 Fundamentally, we need to catalyze this crisis in Canada.
00:14:21.500 Right.
00:14:21.960 And it's like, that was like the one thing that he was coached on.
00:14:24.780 Like, just keep using the word crisis.
00:14:26.280 When Canadians are in fear, when they're nervous, when they're afraid,
00:14:29.600 that's when they're going to vote Liberal.
00:14:31.280 And so that was like his one thing that he kept going back to.
00:14:34.700 But it just didn't seem to work.
00:14:36.520 I don't think it broke through last night.
00:14:38.360 I think that there is a cost of living crisis in Canada.
00:14:41.800 And I think that that can very plainly be drawn to the Liberals.
00:14:45.980 And so I guess I just want to know, like, do you think that this debate will have an impact?
00:14:50.600 Will it move the needle?
00:14:51.300 And was it enough?
00:14:52.280 It definitely will, because people, when they think about, did this debate matter,
00:14:57.860 they're wondering if it's going to be kind of a cavalry charge moment where the Conservatives
00:15:02.740 go from being at 39% in the polls, they overtake the Liberals, and they hit 52.
00:15:08.800 Elections aren't won like that.
00:15:10.860 The Conservatives need, in my estimation, if they can beat the Liberals in the popular vote
00:15:15.240 by a point and a half or so, they have a minority government.
00:15:17.760 The Conservative Vote Act over the past four years has actually become more efficient than
00:15:21.940 it used to be, because it used to be a very regional party, where in Alberta you would
00:15:26.840 win rural ridings by Saddam Hussein numbers, you get 89% of the vote, but in the GTA you're
00:15:33.140 dropping ridings and you're only getting, you know, 25%, and the Liberals are able to pull
00:15:37.640 out 35% victories over you.
00:15:40.360 I think that in this election, the Liberals have actually gained vote in places like Saskatchewan
00:15:46.180 and in Alberta, especially with, you know, not to stereotype, but with older boomer voters
00:15:51.400 who watch a lot of legacy media and don't like Donald Trump very much, but the Liberals
00:15:55.700 are also gaining a lot of votes in places that they just don't need it or it's not useful
00:15:59.400 to them.
00:16:00.040 They're gaining votes in Montreal.
00:16:01.960 Cool, Montreal was already the reddest place on the planet.
00:16:04.900 And then you go to Saskatchewan, and when, yeah, the Liberals have gained votes, and maybe
00:16:10.060 they have a chance at one riding.
00:16:11.500 Whereas the Conservatives, their gains that they've made have mostly been in working-class
00:16:16.560 neighbourhoods all around the country.
00:16:18.720 So the Conservatives could potentially, obviously, lose this election, or they could win big,
00:16:24.100 winning Hamilton ridings they never thought they were going to get, winning the southwest
00:16:27.540 of Ontario, sweeping it, winning actually ridings in the Ottawa area.
00:16:33.740 I've been door-knocking in the Ottawa area, and there was a chance to win Nepean.
00:16:37.720 There's absolutely a chance to win Canada.
00:16:39.960 I was in a few polls in Canada yesterday, and I would say the sign ratio between the
00:16:45.220 Conservative candidate, Greg Kung, and the Liberal, Jenna Suds, is like two to one or
00:16:50.540 three to one.
00:16:51.720 Wow, that's interesting.
00:16:53.100 One thing I heard you say on your YouTube channel, Wyatt, was that you thought that from
00:16:58.240 these debates, and particularly the French one, that you saw what could potentially be
00:17:04.120 two different coalitions forming.
00:17:05.760 Something along the lines of, you know, Jagmeet Singh is obviously there for the Liberals,
00:17:10.620 and that's his purpose.
00:17:11.620 I don't know that he'll win his seat.
00:17:12.600 I kind of think his career is finished.
00:17:14.740 But that you potentially saw that Blanchett and Pierre Poliev could form a minority coalition
00:17:21.340 government together.
00:17:22.360 Did I get that right?
00:17:23.180 Is that what you said?
00:17:24.080 And tell us about that.
00:17:25.600 Yeah.
00:17:25.780 So the reason why the Bloc Québécois and the Conservatives would go well together almost
00:17:31.000 has nothing to do with ideology.
00:17:32.640 On many issues, the Bloc are to the left of both the Liberals and the NDP.
00:17:37.320 They're anti-nuclear energy.
00:17:39.260 They're quite to the left when it comes to issues around business taxes and equalization
00:17:44.660 and whatnot.
00:17:45.640 A very pro-equity type party.
00:17:47.980 The way that they define Quebec culture tends to be very left.
00:17:51.220 At the same time, the problem is the Bloc Québécois' long-term survival as a party relies
00:17:57.600 on the Liberals basically being defeated.
00:18:00.720 If the Bloc Québécois upholds the Liberals again, they'll run into the same problems that
00:18:05.480 Jagmeet Singh and the NDP currently have, where what's the point of voting for you if
00:18:09.920 I can get the same thing by just voting for the Liberals, and they usually have a better
00:18:13.500 chance of winning the election anyways.
00:18:15.680 So the Bloc need to effectively box the Liberals into the Montreal area and hold the
00:18:21.220 onto all those semi-rural suburban ridings in the Montreal kind of a donut.
00:18:27.300 If they don't, well, the Bloc are going to be back in the woods like they were in 2011
00:18:32.120 with Gilles Duceppe.
00:18:34.500 Interesting.
00:18:35.100 Yeah, that is interesting.
00:18:36.200 And I can see that there is more overlap when it comes to the policy issues, particularly
00:18:41.240 around immigration.
00:18:42.660 I saw that there was, like, both Yves Blanchet and Pierre Polyev were hitting Mark Carney on
00:18:48.920 the Century Initiative stuff.
00:18:50.320 We heard that in both debates.
00:18:51.580 And I think that there could be some commonalities there.
00:18:54.580 It would be interesting if Polyev formed a minority government and actually teamed up with
00:18:58.520 the Bloc.
00:18:58.880 I think that that might, you know, blow up some minds on the prairies to try to understand
00:19:03.920 that coalition.
00:19:04.680 But it might be interesting.
00:19:05.840 OK, let's move to the...
00:19:07.000 It's an old social credit alliance.
00:19:10.680 Yeah, I can see that.
00:19:11.940 OK, let's move to the juicy stuff that happened at the debate last night.
00:19:16.900 So this is all just a total sideshow.
00:19:19.060 It is so ridiculous, but it's really telling.
00:19:21.040 And so as folks know, after the French debate, our own Kian Bexty and Alex Sultan managed to
00:19:27.960 get at the front of the line.
00:19:29.000 And they asked two of the four questions to Prime Minister Mark Carney.
00:19:32.480 Their questions were good.
00:19:34.040 They were tough, but fair.
00:19:35.480 And wow, did those clips of those questions ever go viral, overtook the Internet.
00:19:40.440 And what we saw was basically a huge reaction from the legacy media.
00:19:44.760 They did not like it.
00:19:45.740 They were not happy.
00:19:46.880 They could feel their monopoly over the news and what they think to be arbiters of the truth.
00:19:51.820 They could feel that slipping away.
00:19:53.500 And so what you saw during the day yesterday before the debate was the CBC basically trying
00:19:58.400 to lobby to have us removed from the debates.
00:20:01.860 Here is David Cochran on his show with the debates commissioner basically complaining and saying,
00:20:08.720 how could you let non-government approved, basically, journalists get out there and ask
00:20:14.620 these questions?
00:20:15.540 I actually thought the debates commissioner did quite a good job here defending press freedom
00:20:20.120 in Canada.
00:20:21.140 Kind of wild that you have a CBC interview like this.
00:20:24.540 But anyway, let's play this clip.
00:20:25.700 Will they be able to do what they did?
00:20:27.280 Like, you know, Rebel News got as many questions as I think CBC, Radio Canada, Press Canadian
00:20:31.300 and CTV or Global combined last night.
00:20:33.740 There were almost 50 percent of the questions.
00:20:36.580 And some of them ventured into territory that really are not issues in this election campaign,
00:20:40.360 were not issues in that debate.
00:20:42.040 And I'm not saying reporters should be restricted in terms of what they ask.
00:20:45.080 But, you know, if the debate commission is going to organize these things, it didn't
00:20:49.140 seem to have control on it last night, sir.
00:20:52.620 Well, we're learning from what happened last night.
00:20:55.700 And you'll see, hopefully, a fair representation tonight.
00:21:00.300 But didn't the same thing happen in 2021?
00:21:02.880 Like, I remember vividly at the museum in Gatineau that the same sort of thing happened
00:21:08.500 with people stacking the microphones and the questions is going in a totally different direction.
00:21:12.720 Well, there's only so much we can do to control free speech, you know.
00:21:15.540 I understand that.
00:21:16.360 You understand that?
00:21:17.220 I just thought, you know, lifeguards got to look after the pool, right?
00:21:19.380 And, you know, the debate commission was set up for this.
00:21:22.560 And people are now calling for it to be completely scrapped because of what we saw last night.
00:21:26.400 I just wonder if you think there's a loss of public trust in the function of this organization.
00:21:32.200 I think the public will judge us on the debates themselves.
00:21:37.240 Yeah, OK.
00:21:37.660 So you could see that they were setting it up to say that these people shouldn't be here.
00:21:41.080 And we knew, I knew, I predicted this, that they were going to try to pull something.
00:21:44.060 I thought that they were going to try to remove our credentials or something that we'd have to go
00:21:47.220 to a federal court.
00:21:48.040 Again, like we did in 2019, the reason that True North, Juno News, and the Rebel are allowed
00:21:52.460 in the first place is because we sued and we won.
00:21:54.700 The federal court ruled in our favor.
00:21:56.360 So anyway, let's fast forward to the event itself.
00:21:59.480 And so the journalists are all in a room.
00:22:01.340 They're watching the debate on a screen.
00:22:03.420 And they're sort of getting ready for their part when they get to scrum the leaders afterwards.
00:22:08.280 And what unfolded was just pure chaos.
00:22:10.880 Like, I was doing a live broadcast, so I couldn't really pay attention to this stuff.
00:22:14.200 I just kept getting these clips being sent in by our reporters.
00:22:16.940 Like, you guys won't believe it.
00:22:17.960 This guy's having a temper tantrum.
00:22:19.640 Here we have, this is a bit on the longer time.
00:22:21.680 This is a reporter from the Hill Times.
00:22:23.520 And he's just not happy with Kian Bextie.
00:22:27.180 He overheard Kian talking about the question that he was going to ask to Mark Carney tonight.
00:22:31.500 He took major issue with that, defending a liberal candidate who had said some really
00:22:36.140 awful things on social media that Kian was able to get a hold of.
00:22:40.460 Anyway, then the Hill Times reporter turns his ear at Ezra LeVance, which is yelling.
00:22:46.000 Ezra, this is sort of just like unhinged behavior behind the scenes.
00:22:49.180 So let's play that clip, please.
00:22:50.800 I have respect for the industry and the profession.
00:22:53.460 Sure you do, yeah.
00:22:54.400 Your little chattering class.
00:22:56.380 Sure.
00:22:56.820 Third party advertisers that you work for.
00:22:59.240 Who are you?
00:22:59.880 Who do you work for?
00:23:01.220 Rebel News.
00:23:02.280 Who do you work for?
00:23:03.260 Rebel News, owned by Ezra LeVance, is a different company.
00:23:07.000 Why are you screaming?
00:23:08.260 So they can stop spreading misinformation.
00:23:10.160 Um, so.
00:23:12.760 Also, can you ask this question?
00:23:14.480 Why are you screaming, by the way?
00:23:16.820 Well, I want to make sure the guys filming it over there get the good audio.
00:23:20.080 Good.
00:23:20.800 Do you hear me okay?
00:23:22.580 Am I enunciating properly?
00:23:24.680 Do you want to put a level here, by the way?
00:23:26.460 Do you want, do you have one set up?
00:23:28.020 You got the levels ready for me?
00:23:29.900 Because you're clearly not doing any actual journalism while you're here.
00:23:32.680 You're supposed to maintain respectful discourse.
00:23:35.480 It's right here in black and white.
00:23:36.600 Why?
00:23:37.140 When you guys started gaming the rules and threatening to sue because you didn't get your way,
00:23:40.880 I assumed the rules were out the window.
00:23:42.980 He has third-party advertising trucks driving around this venue right now.
00:23:48.640 That's not a Rebel News ad on there.
00:23:50.760 You're lying.
00:23:51.500 Why are you lying?
00:23:52.820 It's owned by Rebel.
00:23:53.140 It's owned by you.
00:23:54.520 Oh, sorry, sorry.
00:23:55.540 The truck is for Canada, which is owned by you.
00:23:59.100 No, you're lying again.
00:23:59.460 Which is separate from Rebel News, which is also owned by you.
00:24:03.240 You're crazy.
00:24:03.680 You've got to control your emotions.
00:24:07.840 So, you know, basically, it was just chaos back there.
00:24:12.620 You know, it was a quiet room.
00:24:13.460 Everyone was trying to listen to the debate.
00:24:14.480 And this one reporter is just yelling at Kian, yelling at Ezra, can't really control his emotions,
00:24:20.940 saying, well, you guys game the system, and therefore, I don't have to follow the rules anymore.
00:24:25.700 And so I'm not sure why, if it was that kind of escalation of emotions,
00:24:30.180 or it was just simply because of the questions that we asked last night.
00:24:34.040 But shortly after that exchange that we just showed,
00:24:37.160 the debates commissioner came out in front of the journalists
00:24:40.380 and announced that, yes, the rumors are true.
00:24:42.840 The scrum has been canceled.
00:24:44.900 Let's play that clip.
00:24:46.120 I'm Michel Camus, the executive director of the Leaders of the States Commission.
00:24:50.800 And I'm sorry to announce that there will be no scrum tonight with the leaders
00:24:55.420 because we don't feel that we can actually guarantee a proper environment for this activity.
00:25:02.180 Hello, comme je vous le disais.
00:25:04.080 The press room will be open until 11, so you can finish filing.
00:25:09.900 And I invite you to call the campaign.
00:25:12.700 If you're not in this message, you're not in this message.
00:25:17.580 Is there a problem?
00:25:18.940 Yes.
00:25:19.700 That's why.
00:25:20.880 She deserves a problem.
00:25:21.960 That's fine.
00:25:22.980 And so they would rather cancel the entire scrum
00:25:28.560 than have to worry about the question that Alex Sulton and Kian Bextie
00:25:33.380 may ask and may get to Mark Carney.
00:25:35.880 I see this as entirely the old guard protecting themselves, right?
00:25:40.080 They didn't want to be outshined again.
00:25:41.620 They didn't want to be embarrassed again by having independent journalists
00:25:44.680 ask better questions, ask more interesting questions, and really dominate.
00:25:49.800 And I think that what happened after the French debate
00:25:51.420 was that independent media showed, we proved, that we are here to stay.
00:25:57.620 We're not going anywhere.
00:25:58.640 Our questions are interesting.
00:26:00.120 Our clips got way more views than anything else.
00:26:03.140 I think that our clips probably eclipsed the number of views of the entire French debate.
00:26:07.940 They couldn't let that happen again.
00:26:09.360 They couldn't allow the legacy media to lose their grip,
00:26:12.560 and they couldn't allow Mark Carney to be humiliated once again by a question.
00:26:16.580 So they just had to eliminate the entire thing.
00:26:19.280 What did you make of all of that, Wyatt?
00:26:20.620 Well, it was a vote of non-confidence in Mark Carney's debate performance.
00:26:25.560 If it was just the fact that they didn't like your guys' questions about Mark Carney
00:26:29.620 did pretty well in the debate, I think they would have let him proceed to the Q&A.
00:26:33.100 It was the combination of the fact that they hate your guys' guts,
00:26:36.240 and Mark Carney just looked pathetic on stage,
00:26:39.240 that they couldn't have the humiliation continue,
00:26:42.580 both for Mark Carney and the legacy media being boxed out by the independent media.
00:26:46.720 And I like how they're pretending like you're gaming the system by, you know,
00:26:50.400 showing up, being on time, standing in line at the microphones.
00:26:55.260 They could do that same thing to you guys.
00:26:57.500 There's like 150 of them in the room, and there's about, you know, 15 independent media people.
00:27:03.460 Well, what makes it so difficult for them to do what you guys are doing?
00:27:07.940 The thing is that they don't like that the independent media has invaded the Friends Club.
00:27:13.400 Because the Friends Club, oh, you can take a question, then I'll take a question.
00:27:16.480 How about we both, like, ask Jagmeet Singh about the same stupid thing about climate change?
00:27:21.240 Everyone thinks it's...
00:27:22.140 So, like, these people would think it's clownish that Alex Sultan got up there
00:27:26.160 and asked his question about gender, but it's a good question.
00:27:31.080 It seems, oh, it's not on the topic of the debate.
00:27:33.580 Yeah, but it's something that people like Mark Carney have been dodging for years.
00:27:38.280 He sent his daughter to the Tavistock Institute.
00:27:40.720 It bears asking the question if he actually lives in material reality when it comes to gender.
00:27:46.900 Well, and the fact that they asked Pierre Polyev, like, in January, a reporter for CP24
00:27:52.640 asked Pierre Polyev if he thought there were two genders, right?
00:27:55.380 And last year, in February, after Danielle Smith announced her ban on these life-altering medications
00:28:01.980 and surgeries, sex change surgeries for children, they asked Pierre Polyev, they scrummed him.
00:28:06.640 Every member of what you call the Friends Club were pressing him, rightfully so.
00:28:11.660 It's their job as journalists trying to find out where he stood on this issue,
00:28:15.420 but they refused to do that for Mark Carney.
00:28:17.740 They refused to.
00:28:18.380 So we have to do the job that they refused to do.
00:28:20.900 And so, again, like, they believe that we are right-wing.
00:28:25.440 You know, the talking points that have come out from the media today is that we are right-wing agitators
00:28:32.300 and that we are conservative and that we have an agenda and that we're trying to raise money.
00:28:36.700 But the reality is that we're simply doing the job that they refuse to do.
00:28:40.080 We are, like, the mirror image of the legacy media.
00:28:42.680 They come out with bad faith questions against Pierre Polyev all the time.
00:28:46.020 I don't believe our questions were bad faith.
00:28:47.460 I think that they were genuine.
00:28:48.780 But the way that they see us is the same way that millions of Canadians view them.
00:28:52.800 And they can't cope with that.
00:28:54.580 They can't deal with it.
00:28:55.660 So the shenanigans continued because outside of the event, well, first of all, we had a liberal
00:29:02.360 staffer assaulting David Menzies of the Rebel on camera.
00:29:06.380 I'm going to play that clip.
00:29:07.060 You can see very clearly that he knocks the camera out of the journalist's hand and he
00:29:13.420 knocks another camera out.
00:29:14.980 Let's play that clip and I'll get your reaction.
00:29:19.120 Oh, Terry Gillan!
00:29:20.840 Hey!
00:29:22.040 What the hell?
00:29:23.060 Terry Gillan!
00:29:24.400 What are you going to...
00:29:25.720 You guys are out.
00:29:27.360 You touched me with that.
00:29:28.980 I did not touch you, sir.
00:29:30.240 You're a liar.
00:29:31.200 You're a goddamn liar.
00:29:32.840 You're a liar.
00:29:33.460 Oh, yeah.
00:29:33.720 Nice try, guys.
00:29:34.580 You just hit me.
00:29:35.480 So he did it twice.
00:29:39.620 Look, that is not the attitude of a winning campaign.
00:29:42.880 Like, if you were feeling good about your candidate, that was Mark Carney's media person
00:29:46.680 there, Terry Gillan.
00:29:49.640 And to me, he was raging out of control.
00:29:51.880 He hit David Menzies quite clearly twice there on that tape.
00:29:56.340 That's not a confident campaign manager.
00:29:58.740 That's not a campaign that is winning.
00:30:01.220 Those people are flailing out of control because they know they're losing their grip on
00:30:04.740 the narrative, on the media, and they know that their candidate had a very bad night.
00:30:08.620 And it only had to do with Mark Carney having a bad night that he was acting like that.
00:30:13.020 Because if he had a good night and the Q&A got canceled, hey, it's Mark Carney's birthday
00:30:17.120 because he wants to have a good debate and not be asked any questions about it afterwards,
00:30:21.200 unless it's from, like, you know, Katie Simpson or somebody like Stuart Benson from the Hill
00:30:26.020 Times. So he was only raging because of the bad debate performance.
00:30:31.320 And it's like, hey, guys, number one rule of politics, don't make, don't show what you're
00:30:36.160 thinking, like, through your emotions. Do not do that because it's going to be very easy to
00:30:39.980 exploit it. The conservatives are going to just keep drilling on these debate clips.
00:30:44.580 They're probably going to turn them into advertisements, as they should.
00:30:47.820 There are so many people who don't actually watch the debate live like we were talking about
00:30:52.000 before, but they consume them through clips. So when we see abacus data coming out and saying
00:30:57.180 that, like, 47% of people who watched the whole debate thought Polly have won, fantastic.
00:31:02.980 That means if you can get more people to watch the debate clips, they'll eventually come to the
00:31:07.500 same conclusion, which it's pretty difficult to get people to agree that the conservative
00:31:11.800 won a debate because since Canada has so many lefty parties, there's a lot of other people
00:31:17.020 who might say, oh, Jagme Singh won, or I think Carney won because I'm voting for him.
00:31:20.540 So you can get nearly 50% of people to say he won. That's pretty big.
00:31:25.060 I completely agree. And even the CBC had to admit that the conservatives and Pierre Polly have
00:31:31.200 won the debate. Here is a clip of the Ad Issues panel where Andrew Coyne admits that Pierre
00:31:36.920 Polly have had a great night.
00:31:38.300 I think Pierre Polly ever made some yards. I think he had a good night. He looked focused.
00:31:42.600 He was confident. He was fluent. He presented his case well. He was not just a critic, but also
00:31:47.340 outlining his own plan. So I think by the normal standards of how you judge these debates,
00:31:52.020 I think he had a good night.
00:31:53.020 And I do agree with Andrew that Pierre Polly have had a good night.
00:31:56.240 His goal was to sound more prime ministerial and look less like an attack dog that we've
00:32:00.700 come to know in the House of Commons. And I do think that he succeeded in that.
00:32:03.580 Wow. That feels good. What do you think, Wyatt?
00:32:08.080 Oh, especially coming from Chantal Hubert, who has made it her life's work to never say
00:32:13.000 something nice about Polly. I remember early on when Polly had first become the conservative
00:32:18.180 party leader, because I have to bring this up. She wrote an article like a month after
00:32:21.740 he became leader. It's like, see, look at his approval polling. He's not very well liked.
00:32:25.700 He's going to be like a terrible conservative leader. They should go back to O'Toole.
00:32:29.440 It's like, tell us you want the liberals to win. Just tell us. It's just sad. And Andrew
00:32:36.560 Coyne, too. He was the main person I saw online yesterday raging about Rebel News and the True
00:32:42.880 North Wire service and Juno News being at the debate. I don't know if Andrew Coyne even considers
00:32:50.120 himself a conservative anymore. The man is somebody who I guess would, he considers himself conservative
00:32:55.420 because he wants to conserve leftist institutions and orthodoxies. He would be one of the people saying,
00:33:01.680 don't break up the Soviet Union in Russia in the 1990s because we've had it for a very long time.
00:33:08.000 I think that's probably right. I don't think that, it's interesting because I think people
00:33:12.460 who, like for me, I used to read Andrew Coyne when I was in university and he was one of the people that
00:33:18.020 helped inform my view in becoming a conservative in the first place. And so I think of him as someone
00:33:24.240 on the political right, which makes me even more disappointed to hear his takes night in and night
00:33:28.240 out. But it's interesting because my young staff, like my staffers who are in their 20s and like the
00:33:34.300 Gen Z cohort, they don't connect him with the right at all. They just consider him like a hard left
00:33:39.820 Justin Trudeau fan boy in the Globe and Mail and on CBC. And so it's interesting that you said that
00:33:45.780 he's conservative because I don't think that people even put him in that category anymore.
00:33:49.400 And it's an attitudinal conservatism. It's again that, well, we should preserve our institutions.
00:33:55.400 So if the CBC has been around for a very long time, well, we should keep the CBC funding going on.
00:34:01.040 And I call him what I call some people. He is an aesthetic moderate. He doesn't like supporting
00:34:08.660 people who sound outside of the normal, even if they're entirely right. I know that this actually
00:34:14.000 happens with Donald Trump a lot, where you'll get kind of like the never Trump Republicans in the U.S.
00:34:18.620 who, in fact, actually agree with all of Trump's policies, but they don't like Trump because he's
00:34:22.820 not normal. And I see that with people. They're like, well, if you take a photo of, or if you take
00:34:27.760 a video clip of Polly of talking, he seems very rambunctious and populist, and that's not normal.
00:34:32.440 And then you cut to Mark Carney, and he's boring and consistent, which means that he's the conservative
00:34:36.940 choice in the mind of someone like Andrew Coyne.
00:34:39.760 It's interesting. We live in such a strange country where you have leftist conservatives,
00:34:44.920 or like basically, yeah, people that they, if you want to conserve Canada's order, you are a leftist
00:34:51.140 because Canada's institutions and Canada's order. I mean, it's a country, sadly, the last 50 years
00:34:57.180 has been built around like socialism and hard left ideas. And so anyone trying to conserve that
00:35:02.360 is actually on the left. I think that when it comes to Andrew Coyne, I think Donald Trump broke
00:35:07.120 his brain. And when I just, when I see him, when I hear him, I, I think, I think he just like lost
00:35:13.240 his ability to be insightful because he's so angry and full of rage. Even yesterday, like Stephen
00:35:18.240 Taylor, who's a conservative commentator shared a clip of him. I don't want to play it, but he
00:35:22.220 basically was predicting the death of independent media. He said that last night was the nail in the
00:35:27.880 coffin for us. And then Taylor posted that on X and accurately quoted him. And then in the replies,
00:35:35.660 Andrew Coyne was like raging and like accusing Stephen Taylor of working for Ezra. Like you took
00:35:41.060 my quote out of context. How dare you? Like, anyway, just a very angry, bitter person. And I sort of,
00:35:46.720 in some ways feel sorry for him. But I do think that last night, all those shenanigans were all based
00:35:52.740 and rooted in the fact that they are trying to silence us. They could not handle the independent media
00:35:57.100 out there running circles around the legacy media, asking real questions, getting more clicks and
00:36:02.700 more views. And our clips were going viral. And the, the, the whole, the whole episode was just them,
00:36:09.120 like their last gasp, like raging against the changes happening in this country. The fact that
00:36:14.940 the independent media is overtaking the legacy media in terms of relevancy and influence. And that was
00:36:20.520 just them like, like losing grip on their power. This will be the last election that the legacy media
00:36:26.860 has an impact in my, in my estimation. Well, they were, they were upset that they weren't there to
00:36:31.040 spin the, spin the debate exclusively. And if the conservatives win, and especially if the legacy
00:36:37.980 media at least starts getting their subsidies reduced, you will see wall to wall columns about
00:36:43.620 how independent media is what has turned Canada into a fascist state or whatever the narrative is
00:36:49.180 going to be. Exactly. There is going to be independent media hysteria over the next two years about how
00:36:54.520 independent media did all this to us, even as, you know, everything's fantastic potentially, because we
00:37:00.520 might have lower taxes. All these are like the most dour people you've ever met in your lives. Everything
00:37:05.160 could be sunny, warm birds chirping around them. And they'd be like, how can I survive this hellhole that I'm in
00:37:11.760 right now? Because we don't have Rosemary Barton on television 24 seven. It's so, it's so true. Although they
00:37:18.820 won't call us independent media, they'll call us extreme media and right wing media. And it's, it is
00:37:24.920 like, they live in a different universe. I noticed that outside the debates yesterday, there was a
00:37:28.880 feminist protest group that were wearing like handmaid's tail gowns, like as if we're going into
00:37:34.120 some kind of like a Christian fascism state. And I'm like, which, which party are they referring to?
00:37:38.860 Because last I checked all, like even the conservatives, it's, it's a very moderate centrist party that
00:37:44.900 is left wing on social issues, more or less, especially on abortion. So it was just like,
00:37:49.560 so out of touch. It's like, what, what are they talking about? It's like, are they reacting to
00:37:52.640 the American election? Because yes, in the U S you know, Trump had a hand in over overturning Roe
00:37:57.560 versus Wade, which didn't ban abortion. It just put it back to the States. But it's like, it does feel
00:38:02.700 like they're living in a fever dream. A lot of people like to live vicariously through American politics.
00:38:08.820 And when something interesting in Canada happens, I think these people get very excited because now I
00:38:14.740 get to LARP as if I'm in a fascist state, even though that's not even what's happening in the
00:38:19.600 U S at all. I've never seen a fascist cut the size of government in my life before.
00:38:24.600 But anyways, with many of these people though, that's why like Polly did such a good job of the
00:38:31.820 debate with the Trump question. He set the tone at the start that in fact, if you actually deeply
00:38:38.020 fear Donald Trump, you should be voting conservative because I'll make the country less weak and vulnerable
00:38:43.120 to the predations of the Americans. And now I don't think, I don't agree that that's what's even
00:38:48.740 going on. I disagree with tariff policies from Trump. At the same time, it's not like he's trying
00:38:53.700 to take over the country. The 54 state rhetoric is insane. But if that is your top issue, do you want
00:38:59.140 the people in who have been making the economy weaker per capita incomes going down, who have been
00:39:04.960 making sure that our military has been basically turned into a DEI HR department? Or do you want the
00:39:11.400 people who are going to, you know, cut your taxes and actually, you know, arm up the military if you
00:39:16.480 are deeply afraid that the Americans are going to run over the Montana border to start taking over
00:39:20.980 Alberta? 100%. Well, I can't wait. I really hope this all happens. I hope that Polyev wins and then
00:39:28.300 the media lose their minds and blame it on independent journalists. I can't wait for that. I'm here for it.
00:39:33.480 And if that happens, it's going to be a fantastic two to four years.
00:39:38.420 It's great for SEO.
00:39:41.360 Good. Good for Juno News. So, all right, Wyatt, thanks so much for joining the show. I always
00:39:45.780 appreciate the discussion. And folks, thank you so much for joining us. Have a wonderful and blessed
00:39:51.160 Easter weekend. I hope you have some time to reflect on some gratitude and just, you know,
00:39:58.600 our country is not perfect. But God has given us an amazing world and he's given us his son, which
00:40:05.400 was sacrificed so that we could live eternally. So, thank you so much for joining the show. We'll
00:40:11.920 be back again with the final week of the campaign next week. I'm Candace Malcolm. This is Candace
00:40:17.400 Malcolm Show. Thank you and God bless.