The Candice Malcolm Show - Mark Carney PLAGIARIZED his Oxford Thesis： Report (Ft. Northern Perspective)

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is the Candice Malcolm Show.

00:00:05.540 Happy Friday, everyone.

00:00:06.480 We have a great episode for you today.

00:00:08.620 We're going to talk about Mark Carney and the latest accusation of him being basically

00:00:12.840 a pathological liar. 0.88

00:00:14.420 This time, he's being accused of plagiarizing his Oxford thesis while in university, while 0.98

00:00:19.740 in grad school.

00:00:20.460 Over in the UK, we're going to talk about Donald Trump and the latest tariff threat,

00:00:24.200 which frankly, folks, I think is nothing but fake news.

00:00:27.120 And we're going to end the show talking about Pierre Polyev and his policy announcements

00:00:31.480 so far in the campaign.

00:00:32.440 I am very excited today to be joined by some of my favorite political commenters in Canada.

00:00:38.020 They used to come on the show quite frequently.

00:00:40.680 Now they're back on this Candice Malcolm Show.

00:00:43.260 Very pleased to be joined by the Northern Perspective couple, Ryan and Tanya.

00:00:47.960 Ryan and Tanya, welcome.

00:00:49.240 Thank you so much for being here.

00:00:50.820 Thanks so much for having us, Candice.

00:00:52.420 We're really excited to have the conversation.

00:00:55.000 Thanks, Candice.

00:00:55.540 It's an absolute pleasure.

00:00:56.480 Oh, great.

00:00:57.260 Well, I haven't talked to you guys in quite a while, so I want to know, how do you feel

00:01:01.780 about the campaign so far?

00:01:02.840 How do you think it's going?

00:01:04.240 Who do you think has momentum at this point?

00:01:06.060 I'll start with you, Tanya.

00:01:08.100 I think that Pierre Polyev has incredible momentum.

00:01:11.480 He was here in Hamilton the other night, and we went to a rally where there was over 5,000

00:01:15.580 people from what we heard.

00:01:17.280 We heard that he had upwards of 8,000 people trying to get in at the rally in North York

00:01:24.000 a few days before that, and then he had a rally in BC, I think it was last night, that had

00:01:29.040 upwards of 5,000 people.

00:01:30.880 I just don't think that Mark Carney is getting those kinds of numbers.

00:01:34.100 Well, Mark Carney certainly doesn't have the sort of charisma and the natural talents as

00:01:39.360 a politician, as Pierre.

00:01:40.400 Seeing his rally is really exciting.

00:01:42.040 Also, seeing him door knocking in the way that he has that sort of interpersonal skills,

00:01:45.720 he really is stepping up and painting a very positive vision for Canada.

00:01:49.580 Honestly, when I watch some of his videos, I feel inspired.

00:01:52.140 And usually political commentators like myself and probably like you two, you get a little

00:01:56.460 jaded, and you don't really feel inspired by political messages.

00:01:59.780 But I find that Pierre is really hitting the mark.

00:02:02.420 What do you think there, Ryan?

00:02:03.560 Yeah, so one of the things that we did recently is we went back to the 1984 leadership debate

00:02:11.420 during that election between Brian Mulrooney and John Turner.

00:02:15.560 And people have their opinion on the results of the election and what Brian Mulrooney did

00:02:20.920 and didn't do.

00:02:21.840 But in terms of the messaging during that election, we reviewed that right before the election was

00:02:28.840 actually called.

00:02:29.520 And we'd remarked on the fact that the messaging coming from Brian Mulrooney was very positive.

00:02:35.020 It was still somewhat critical of John Turner, but not overly so.

00:02:39.160 And he didn't go into name calling or anything like that.

00:02:43.660 And we had said that this is the messaging that Pierre needs to pivot to if he wants to really

00:02:49.940 gain some momentum in this election.

00:02:52.420 And lo and behold, it was almost overnight.

00:02:55.400 He transitioned from official leader of the opposition to prime ministerial candidate in

00:03:00.460 his messaging.

00:03:01.380 All new ads came out.

00:03:03.580 And it was the exact same style where he was talking about the failings of the liberals.

00:03:10.560 He was talking about the failings of Mark Carney, but not in such a way that would turn off

00:03:15.520 voters.

00:03:15.800 And then he spent the rest of his time really hammering out that hopeful message in a way

00:03:22.900 that, you know, you really felt energized at the end of it.

00:03:26.560 And that's the messaging that has been put out by the conservatives throughout this campaign.

00:03:31.300 And it's really starting to resonate with people across the country.

00:03:34.940 And I think that's evident in the rally numbers.

00:03:36.420 It's interesting because the liberals love to accuse the conservatives of being negative

00:03:40.920 and, you know, spreading division and hate.

00:03:44.120 And yet, objectively, in this campaign, what I do, I totally agree with you that

00:03:48.380 Poliev was very talented at pointing out Trudeau's flaws.

00:03:52.500 But since this campaign has already sort of risen above the fray, and he does keep things

00:03:56.800 positive.

00:03:57.260 And what I've seen more and more from Mark Carney is this sort of like cheap shots.

00:04:02.900 It's almost out of character for Mark Carney because he does seem like a very classy, accomplished

00:04:07.440 guy.

00:04:08.120 But then it's like someone's telling him to go after Poliev, and he's doing it in such 1.00

00:04:13.560 an awkward way.

00:04:14.400 I want to talk about this scandal that broke in the National Post this morning, a huge explosive

00:04:19.440 story in the National Post.

00:04:21.540 It says, exclusive, Mark Carney faces plagiarism accusations for his 1995 Oxford doctoral thesis.

00:04:29.480 And here we have Catherine Levesque going through it in detail, pointing out how there have been

00:04:38.160 three academics that have reviewed his thesis, and they have some serious problems with the

00:04:43.860 way that it was written.

00:04:44.960 Several instances being pointed out of Carney quoting other people's work verbatim, line

00:04:52.000 by line, but without quotations and without sources, which is, I mean, that is plagiarism.

00:04:57.800 That is textbook plagiarism, and to see it over and over and over it.

00:05:03.380 So let me just read a little bit from the National Post here.

00:05:05.800 It says, the National Post obtained a copy of Carney's 1995 thesis for his doctorate in

00:05:09.880 economics from Oxford University titled The Dynamic Advantage of Competition.

00:05:14.400 It shows 10 instances of apparent plagiarism, according to the judgment of three university

00:05:19.160 academics who reviewed the material.

00:05:21.380 In several sections of the thesis, Carney used full quotes, paraphrases, or slightly modified

00:05:27.940 quotes from four previous works without proper acknowledgement or attribution.

00:05:33.580 And so this is a big no-no in the academic world.

00:05:36.740 Like, I remember back to being a university student, and I can't tell you how many times

00:05:40.380 my advisor or the dean of the school or the head of the department would come and talk to

00:05:46.480 students, you know, talk to the class about the importance of not plagiarizing.

00:05:50.940 Like, in the academic world, this is just the absolute no-no.

00:05:55.480 And the fact that he apparently did this back then, you know, we just lived through several

00:06:03.280 examples in the United States of high-profile people being accused of plagiarism.

00:06:07.280 It is a very serious accusation.

00:06:09.180 And I think it just shows a lot about Mark Carney's character, that he would be willing to pass

00:06:14.300 off others' work.

00:06:15.940 Investing is all about the future.

00:06:17.980 So what do you think is going to happen?

00:06:19.960 Bitcoin is sort of inevitable at this point.

00:06:22.480 I think it would come down to precious metals.

00:06:25.060 I hope we don't go cashless.

00:06:27.160 I would say land is a safe investment.

00:06:29.760 Technology, companies.

00:06:30.880 Solar energy.

00:06:31.940 Robotic pollinators might be a thing. 1.00

00:06:34.500 A wrestler to face a robot?

00:06:36.200 That will have to happen.

00:06:37.440 So, whatever you think is going to happen in the future, you can invest in it at Wealthsimple.

00:06:43.540 Start now at Wealthsimple.com.

00:06:46.040 For his own, it's sort of reminiscent of some of the things that he's done on the campaign

00:06:49.580 so far, taking credit for saving Canada from the 2008 financial crisis, even though he was

00:06:54.320 just the Bank of Governor of Canada.

00:06:55.780 And it was obviously the Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, and the Prime Minister, Stephen

00:06:59.040 Harper, who had to make all the tough decisions.

00:07:00.920 He also claimed that he helped Paul Martin balance the budget, even though records show that

00:07:05.820 he wasn't involved in the government at all in the 90s when Paul Martin was the Finance

00:07:09.700 Minister balancing the budget.

00:07:11.940 So, I'll put this one to you, Tanya.

00:07:14.960 What is your takeaway of this entire story?

00:07:17.180 I think the important thing behind this story, at least what it implies, is that if he plagiarized

00:07:23.460 his doctoral thesis, then does that mean he didn't earn his doctorate?

00:07:29.480 I guess that's the question that we have to ask, because as you said, plagiarizing is

00:07:33.460 a huge issue within the academic world, and you can't do that.

00:07:37.960 So then, if you plagiarize the thesis that your doctorate is built on, what does that imply

00:07:43.060 about your doctorate?

00:07:43.860 I mean, I think it could have major career ramifications, and I don't know if you can

00:07:48.980 go back and have it revoked, have your doctorate revoked.

00:07:51.720 I don't know if these accusations are serious enough to warrant that.

00:07:54.680 I think it would probably require a much deeper academic review, but it seriously puts those

00:08:00.140 issues up on the table.

00:08:01.100 What do you think, Ryan?

00:08:03.300 Yeah, and there are cases where doctors have been revoked in those situations.

00:08:08.520 I know in the article that the person that was overseeing his doctorate defended him,

00:08:15.320 which is interesting.

00:08:17.060 I don't know if they've actually read the cases that have been cited, because it's very,

00:08:22.260 very blatant in terms of the passages that they're talking about.

00:08:25.740 And I think what it demonstrates is that even back then, Mark Carney thought he was smarter

00:08:30.940 than everybody else.

00:08:32.320 He thought everybody else was just a stepping stone for him, that he would step on the heads

00:08:37.440 of other people in order so he could reach higher up in society.

00:08:42.180 And you see that throughout his career.

00:08:45.600 And in our video, we raise the question, does he get that job at Goldman Sachs if he actually

00:08:50.960 didn't get his doctorate?

00:08:52.040 And if he didn't get the job at Goldman Sachs, does he then become governor of Bank of Canada

00:08:57.040 in the 2008 financial crisis?

00:08:59.000 Oh, no, we would never have made it out of the 2008 financial crisis if Mark Carney didn't

00:09:03.800 actually become governor of Bank of Canada, so he would have us believe.

00:09:09.040 And then it takes him all the way here.

00:09:12.160 But it really gives us a glimpse into the character and the business practices of this guy who doesn't

00:09:20.660 seem to be bothered that he can take credit for other people's accomplishments, take credit

00:09:25.860 for other people's work.

00:09:27.280 How many other situations in his career has he done that and made millions, if not billions

00:09:34.240 of dollars for himself and his companies that he's been involved with?

00:09:37.780 So now you see him on the campaign trail plagiarizing the entire conservative campaign.

00:09:43.160 Now, politicians have done this throughout many instances.

00:09:47.160 But in this case, it's even more egregious because the Liberal Party themselves have

00:09:51.580 been literally criticizing and demonizing the conservatives for the past two years just

00:09:56.200 on the carbon tax alone, that if you don't agree with the carbon tax, you are a climate

00:10:01.040 denier, you hate the environment, you're going to burn the planet.

00:10:04.040 And the first thing that they do in their announcement is, by the way, we're getting rid of the carbon

00:10:08.580 tax.

00:10:09.180 And all the things that we said before, don't worry, because Trump's here.

00:10:12.860 And that's where we want you to focus.

00:10:15.080 Well, isn't that interesting?

00:10:15.680 Okay, we have a couple of examples.

00:10:18.080 And I think, Ryan, just to touch on something you said, that this is based on hubris and

00:10:22.280 ego, like arrogance, the fact that he thinks that he's smarter than everyone and he wouldn't

00:10:26.200 get away with it.

00:10:26.780 Okay, to go back to myself, I wrote a thesis for my master's degree, right?

00:10:31.520 And it isn't that hard to just put quotes around something that you're getting from

00:10:35.720 someone else and put a citation at the bottom, right?

00:10:38.720 Like that's all it takes.

00:10:40.100 You are allowed to quote other people to your heart's content in a thesis.

00:10:44.080 Every single page can include dozens of quotes from other people's works.

00:10:48.980 All you have to do is just add a couple of punctuation marks and the footnote, like you

00:10:54.980 said.

00:10:55.700 And so it just seems almost lazy to me that someone would do this.

00:10:59.200 It's like, yes, they have to be arrogant to believe they can get away with it.

00:11:02.000 But also lazy.

00:11:02.640 I just want to go through for the audience a couple of examples here.

00:11:05.400 So as you can see right here, this is from a, so you can see on the screen over top of

00:11:11.780 one another.

00:11:12.220 So the first line is what he took from another person's work.

00:11:15.500 And then the second one is his own.

00:11:17.020 So a 1990 paper by someone with the name Porter writes, first, government intervention can impede

00:11:23.180 international competition and artificially support domestic profits.

00:11:26.620 And you can see word for word, verbatim, Carney had that in his own thesis.

00:11:31.020 Again, how hard is it to just put quotes around it and a footnote?

00:11:34.460 And then again, here it is again, another one by the same person, Porter in a 1990 paper.

00:11:40.060 And it says, you can see, you know, line by line, second in an industry or economy.

00:11:44.740 And it goes on.

00:11:45.780 Here's another, a third example, social norms, values, and affect the nature of home demand.

00:11:51.720 And you can see just over and over again, there's 10 of these examples where he just

00:11:55.940 uses the exact same phrase from someone else's paper.

00:11:59.480 You know, in 1995, maybe the internet wasn't as readily available and we didn't have AI

00:12:03.460 tools that could easily find this kind of thing.

00:12:05.620 He wasn't expecting technology to catch up this way.

00:12:08.240 But these kinds of things have a way of catching up to you and really hitting an opportune time

00:12:13.440 here.

00:12:13.680 Sorry, Ryan, to go back to what you were saying.

00:12:16.200 Sure.

00:12:16.720 And the other thing that it calls into question, this is where it'd be really interesting to

00:12:20.820 understand the complete context of the paper, because if, if he is not quoting and plagiarizing

00:12:27.320 these specific ideas, my question to the three professors that have reviewed this is in terms

00:12:34.960 of the, the content that he wrote before and after this is all of that content prefaced on

00:12:41.140 these, these plagiarized passages, because if so, then potentially none of this is his idea

00:12:47.140 at all.

00:12:47.740 And it calls the entire, the entire paper into question.

00:12:51.520 And people may say, well, who cares?

00:12:54.180 He, he, he forgot to, forgot to, um, cite specific passages in a paper that was written,

00:13:00.440 you know, 20 years ago.

00:13:01.340 Well, it matters because a, a thesis is supposed to be your idea.

00:13:07.200 The citations are supposed to be passages that support what you're trying to say.

00:13:11.620 Um, I, I went to school for philosophy and I'll wait for everybody to make their jokes

00:13:16.680 now.

00:13:17.080 But, um, when it comes to philosophy, that's all you're writing is, is, is papers and you

00:13:22.600 have to be very careful on that.

00:13:24.120 So if all I'm doing is taking ideas from other people, five or six different sources, and then

00:13:29.820 stitching them together and passing it off on as my own, that's not my work.

00:13:35.000 That's everybody else's work, no matter how I write it. 0.88

00:13:37.340 Well, he seems to have a history of taking credit for other people's work.

00:13:42.020 Uh, but to that point again, right?

00:13:43.680 Like all of the career success that he has had based on getting this doctorate degree,

00:13:49.540 being an Oxford graduate, being a scholar, being a very bright, intelligent man.

00:13:54.160 I mean, this does call it all into question, you know, would he have gotten the job at Goldman

00:13:58.040 Sachs had he not had the PhD?

00:14:00.140 Well, we don't know, but if he had had a PhD and then had it revoked for plagiarism, uh,

00:14:05.800 I bet very much that he would not have become the governor of the Bank of Canada or the

00:14:09.720 governor of the Bank of England.

00:14:11.420 Uh, what do you think about all this, Tanya?

00:14:13.520 Yeah, I, I mean, we can't go based off what could have happened or should have happened,

00:14:19.100 et cetera, et cetera.

00:14:19.720 But it's probably a good supposition that, again, if you're disgraced by having your

00:14:26.240 doctorate revoked, I don't think you're going to be getting those prestigious jobs.

00:14:30.560 Exactly. Okay. I want to move on. This is, this is a story that I almost think I would

00:14:36.080 sum up as fake news Friday because the media just want to attach this storyline that Donald

00:14:42.520 Trump is somehow the greatest enemy that is ever known to Canadians and that he is trying

00:14:47.620 to destroy us as a country. So anytime they have the opportunity to insert him back into 0.50

00:14:51.520 the campaign, they will. I'm reluctant to even talk about it, but obviously it is a big

00:14:56.280 story in the news. So I'll cover it with the asterisk that I think it's fake news.

00:15:00.300 And I will explain why in a moment, but the story out of CBC news, um, this week and big

00:15:05.720 story yesterday was that Trump is going ahead with the 25% tariffs on auto. Um, here we have

00:15:12.740 a clip of president Trump in the Oval Office talking about this 25% tariff that will be applied

00:15:19.060 on all finished vehicles imported into the United States starting on April 3rd. Let's play that clip.

00:15:24.940 What we're going to be doing is a 25% tariff on all cars that are not made in the

00:15:30.240 United States. If they're made in the United States, there's absolutely no tariff. We started

00:15:34.660 off with a two and a half percent base, which is what we were at. And we go to 25%. And basically,

00:15:42.100 as you know, and as you've been seeing, not reporting as accurately as it should be reported

00:15:46.600 because it's a massive story. Uh, business is coming back to the United States.

00:15:51.420 Okay. So one of the things that's quite clear there is he says that the tariffs apply, um,

00:15:58.640 on imported vehicles in the United States, obviously vehicles made in the United States

00:16:01.580 would not be subject to this tariff. And if you go on to the White House website, there

00:16:06.860 is a fact sheet on there. And I'm going to fact check the storyline that says that this

00:16:12.300 is a huge tax on Canadians and that we have to insert Trump back into the center of the campaign.

00:16:16.920 If you go to this fact sheet, it says right here that importers of automobiles under the

00:16:24.080 Canada, Mexico, United States agreement, sorry, the United States, Mexico, Canada agreement,

00:16:28.780 the UM, US MCA agreement will be given the opportunity to certify their US content and

00:16:34.600 systems will be implemented such that 25% tariff will not apply on the value of the US content.

00:16:40.600 Then it also says the US MCA compliant automobile parts will remain tariff free until the secretary

00:16:48.220 of commerce in consultation with the US border protection establishes a process to apply tariffs

00:16:53.620 to the non-US content. So Trump isn't even saying that all of the cars that come from Canada

00:16:59.520 and the United States will be taxed. He's just saying that the portion, because as we know,

00:17:03.460 the, the, the, the manufacturing corridor is such that an automobile will be made in part

00:17:08.880 in the US and part in Canada, parts will go back and forth across the border as much as

00:17:12.560 like a dozen times before the piece is complete. And so there's going to be a formula that exempts

00:17:17.460 the American parts. And so it'll only be a portion. So it's not like they're slapping

00:17:20.780 a 25% tax on all cars. It's just a portion of the cars that come from Canada. And there's

00:17:26.160 going to be an exemption possibly for US MCA, uh, uh, parts that have been made in Canada.

00:17:32.700 So again, I think that the media is blowing this all out of proportion because they know

00:17:37.320 that liberal voters, left wing voters and baby boomers, particularly voters over 60 are

00:17:42.720 very worried about Trump. And this is a very motivating factor for them. So I think that

00:17:46.480 the media is inserting this into the election to try to derail the conservatives and peer

00:17:50.780 poly of Orion. What do you think?

00:17:53.940 Yeah, it's, it's very disappointing to see how the mainstream media is jumping on this.

00:18:02.080 It seems that whenever peer poly of makes a very good policy announcement, all of a sudden,

00:18:06.320 they will come up with a major Trump story to try and distract from it. And this is a prime

00:18:12.180 example, because if a, you know, if Ford sends a part up to Canada, uh, and then Canada does

00:18:20.940 something with it, and then it sends it back, um, by this definition, that doesn't seem to be

00:18:27.620 subject to this tariff because a, the original part came from the United States, Canada worked

00:18:31.860 on it and then it came back. And, and I think a lot of Canadians that aren't involved in the

00:18:36.080 auto sector, they may not, they may know anecdotally, yes, they're, you know, they're

00:18:41.060 very integrated, but they may not know how much they are integrated. Like parts are constantly

00:18:46.180 moving between factories across the border, back and forth. Um, like, it's not like, you

00:18:52.000 know, half the car is made in the U S and then they ship it up to Canada and then the other

00:18:54.880 half is built and then it's done. That's not how it works. Um, it's, they, they treat

00:19:00.680 it as if there's no border at all. And they're just, you know, sending it down the road to

00:19:04.800 the next factory in order to actually build the rest of this. So, um, the majority of,

00:19:11.500 of the car isn't even going to be subject to the tariff. But if you listen to Mark Carney,

00:19:16.080 hundreds of thousands of people are going to lose their jobs. And the media is just picking

00:19:20.080 this up and running with it. It's, it's actually disgrace that they are fear-mongering this

00:19:24.640 badly. They are amping up the anxiety for these Canadians and it's completely unnecessary

00:19:29.580 and it's completely fictitious. Well, speaking of amping up the fear, uh, I think that Mark

00:19:35.260 Carney really went over the top. Uh, this is how he was responding. Speaking at a press conference

00:19:41.620 in Ottawa, he said that Canada's relationship with the United States as we know it is over.

00:19:47.280 Uh, let me play that clip. The old relationship we had with the United States based on deepening

00:19:52.920 integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperations is over.

00:19:59.820 Seems a little dramatic. What do you think, Tanya?

00:20:02.680 Yeah, absolutely. We, uh, actually commented on this video recently and, uh, we were appalled.

00:20:07.340 Uh, Mark Carney is the head of the Liberal Party and therefore the Prime Minister right now,

00:20:12.860 but he doesn't have a seat in the House of Commons. So he's what's considered a caretaker

00:20:16.340 prime minister. And for somebody who's supposed to be a caretaker, he's not doing a very good job

00:20:20.880 of taking care of our relationship with the United States. After making a comment like that,

00:20:26.200 um, you know, he hasn't been down to the States to visit with Trump. It sounds like

00:20:30.580 the office of President Trump had tried to contact the prime minister's office and, and was told,

00:20:36.620 well, we'll talk to you later kind of thing. Um, he doesn't really seem too intent to repair

00:20:42.740 that relationship or help foster that relationship. Um, it, he really is trying to make Trump out to

00:20:49.140 be the boogeyman. Well, and the reason for that is because that's the only way that the liberals are

00:20:54.000 going to be able to try to win this election. And they know it. The only reason that, that, um,

00:20:59.060 you know, the election is allegedly as close as it is, if you believe the polls is because they are

00:21:05.320 scaring the bejesus out of everybody, um, or trying to, in regards to the, uh, in, in guard,

00:21:12.060 in regards to Trump. Now, you know, we've, we've said on record, we don't believe, uh, or we don't

00:21:18.200 agree with a lot of what Trump does, but is he the existential threat to, to Canada? No. And neither

00:21:24.160 is the United States and neither are Americans, which all Carney seems to be saying, talking about

00:21:29.960 division and fear is, well, we need to stand up to the Americans. I'm sorry, but the majority of

00:21:34.760 Americans are wonderful people. They are, you know, our neighbors. We we've enjoyed a long and

00:21:42.380 fruitful relationship. This is the, um, the most secure and prosperous relationship in world history.

00:21:50.380 Um, when it comes to two nations working side by side and for him to come out and say that he's

00:21:55.580 essentially implying that our alliance with the United States is over. Okay. What does that

00:21:59.880 mean if tomorrow China decides to send a bunch of drones or a bunch of troops over the Arctic?

00:22:05.680 Does that mean the U S is going to look at what Carney said and said, well, you, you said

00:22:09.440 you don't need our help anymore. Well, and further to that, um, the, hold on, sorry. I lost my

00:22:16.000 train of thought. Well, let me just jump in there because one of the things that, uh, we did a deep

00:22:19.460 dive on earlier in the week is this idea that Carney does have this affection towards China. He does

00:22:25.480 have this relationship, this friendship, you know, the news broke, I believe it was from the CBC

00:22:29.560 that he took, uh, that after he became Trudeau's advisor, his company took a $274 million loan from

00:22:37.880 the state bank of China. And there was also a report from 2024 where he talked about how he wanted the

00:22:44.100 Chinese UN to be the global reserve currency. He said it already was a global reserve currency,

00:22:49.960 and that is a good thing. And so when you think about the world that we live in and, you know,

00:22:54.700 if he wants to move past the relationship with the United States, you know, we, we, we've benefited

00:22:58.860 from a incredibly secure and peaceful time in human history because America has been the superpower,

00:23:05.840 the sole superpower. And this idea that we should turn our backs on America, pivot towards China. I

00:23:11.960 mean, China does not share our values. Let's just put it that way. And this idea that he believes that

00:23:17.100 their green economy, that their, um, you know, willingness to play along with a lot of his sort

00:23:24.100 of net zero carbon fund ideas and initiatives is, um, is a, is a fact that we should be aligning

00:23:31.380 ourselves. I don't think most Canadians think about that. I don't think most Canadians would agree if

00:23:36.020 you were to ask, even the sort of elbows up crowd. I, I mean, I give a hard time to the older boomers. 1.00

00:23:42.480 I know a lot of our viewers are boomers. I don't think they're all bad. I think most of them are 1.00

00:23:45.760 incredibly wonderful, hardworking people, but the people who have fallen for this line that

00:23:49.900 America is an existential threat to Canada and that we have to turn our backs to them, like 0.95

00:23:55.120 take the proposition. Would you rather be closely aligned with the United States who shares our

00:24:00.100 values, who we've had this peaceful relationship for since the beginning of our country, or would you

00:24:04.300 rather have a relationship and be closer aligned and be giving away our sovereignty to China? I don't

00:24:10.260 think that most Canadians would choose China. I don't think any would. And the fact that Mark

00:24:13.760 Carney speaks warmly about China to me is almost disqualifying. Uh, Tanya, what do you think?

00:24:19.880 Yeah, I, I agree with you completely, Candace. Um, as you said, China does not share our values. Um, 1.00

00:24:26.180 they do not share our Western values and they don't share our democratic values. I personally would

00:24:32.340 rather be aligned with the United States who has been our friend for many, many years. And we have

00:24:39.180 grown our countries together, our economies. And, you know, we've really flourished together as partners

00:24:46.680 instead of just turning our back on the States and going and buddying up with China. I know many 0.67

00:24:54.200 Canadians do not like Donald Trump as a president and that's fine, but I don't think that we need to

00:24:59.760 throw the baby out with the bathwater. Well, just to, uh, to turn it around, we didn't have,

00:25:04.740 you know, all of the conservative voters saying that, you know, Joe Biden was an existential threat

00:25:09.960 to the United States and that, you know, we need to break off. And then, you know, people on the

00:25:14.720 other side would say, well, he never threatened to annex, uh, Canada. And I would say, neither did

00:25:18.740 Trump. That was a joke because he was pointing, you know, uh, he was humiliating Trudeau because all

00:25:24.180 Trudeau and his government was doing for the last four years is trash talking a former president of the

00:25:28.020 United States in the house of commons. What do you expect to happen? Um, and as for, as for China, 0.64

00:25:34.780 the, the issue is that the vast majority of Canadians don't, don't seem to know how much of

00:25:40.020 a disregard for our way of life and our democracy that China actually has. They have been working 1.00

00:25:46.060 to undermine our democracy for over 25 years. They started in British Columbia. They've been

00:25:52.280 bankrolling underground casinos to try to manipulate the diaspora community. People who've 0.66

00:25:57.960 tried to escape China and come here, they're trying to, um, position themselves to annex Taiwan

00:26:04.100 in the middle of everything going on over in Asia. They're telling the Philippine government to stay

00:26:10.060 out of it, to let them like, like there is so many things that, that are going on that Canadians are

00:26:14.880 just not aware of because CBC, CTV, global, uh, global mail, all of these, uh, mainstream media,

00:26:22.140 let's, they've just fallen prey to, well, what do we need to do in order to get Mark Carney

00:26:27.720 elected so we can continue to receive our government handout of 1.3 billion to the CBC

00:26:33.540 and 800 million to the rest of the media? It's so short-sighted and it's so disappointing. I want

00:26:38.360 to move on to this story that I did a deep dive on earlier this morning. The video is up on YouTube

00:26:42.800 and you can find the article on Juno News. The Eurasian group president, Ian Bremmer, wrote an

00:26:48.940 article where he said that he predicts that Canada will quietly fold to the Americans after the election

00:26:55.440 campaign. Okay. So why does this matter? Ian Bremmer is the head of the Eurasia group. And if the

00:27:01.020 Eurasia group sounds familiar, it's because that is where Mark Carney's wife, Diane Fox Carney, that's

00:27:06.500 where she works. She started working there in 2021. Who else works for the Eurasia group? Gerald Butts.

00:27:11.700 Gerald Butts was Justin Trudeau's primary secretary, his best friend, his policy architect. He is a hard

00:27:17.820 left environmentalist who was very much behind the carbon tax. Of course, he got thrown under the bus

00:27:24.180 by Justin Trudeau over the whole SNC-Lavalin scandal. And then he picked up a cushy job with,

00:27:29.760 you guessed it, the Eurasia group. So he was there. And Evan Solomon, who was a star liberal

00:27:35.760 candidate, who was a CBC journalist, he got kicked out of his role as a journalist because he was

00:27:42.040 selling art illicitly without disclosing it to the CBC for commissions that he wasn't telling

00:27:48.880 anybody about. So he was interviewing people for his job as a CBC journalist. And then he was selling

00:27:54.180 them art and getting a commission. Very unethical. The CBC fired him. Well, guess who he was selling

00:27:58.880 his art to? He was selling his art to Mark Carney, as was reported in the UK Guardian. So it's all kind

00:28:04.320 of twisted together. Evan Solomon publishes the website, GZero Media, which is where this article

00:28:12.440 was published. And again, Ian Bremmer is a president. So he is like an insider in the know.

00:28:17.180 He's a political risk analyst. And his job is to analyze political risks and then advise his

00:28:26.040 clients on them. So he is in the know. He understands. He talks to people in Carney's team,

00:28:32.160 Carney's wife, Carney's policy advisor, and one of Carney's star candidates. Presumably,

00:28:38.160 he's friends with Mark Carney as well. And he is saying in a blog post, I don't know why he would

00:28:43.620 publish this, but you can read it for yourself. He's literally talking about how everybody is

00:28:50.000 afraid of Donald Trump and his tariffs. The tariffs, you know, because the United States' economy is so

00:28:55.300 big, the other players don't have a bargaining chip. So both Canada and Mexico can sort of like

00:29:00.440 pretend that they're going to fight against Trump. But at the end of the day, everybody knows that

00:29:04.320 they're going to cave. And he literally writes, I expect Ottawa will quietly fold after the vote

00:29:09.720 to ensure the ongoing relations with the US remain functional. So to me, Ryan, this is all fake.

00:29:17.660 This is all pretend. The whole tough talk, the relationship is over. We're going to fight back

00:29:22.420 against Trump. Elbows up. It's all a charade. It's all a show. And there, the truth is written right

00:29:28.500 there that as soon as the campaign is over, Mark Carney will just fold to the Americans and will carry

00:29:34.300 on. To me, it's so insanely frustrating that this is exposed right here and that this isn't getting

00:29:40.640 as much attention. What do you think? Well, if Canadians need any proof of what you just talked

00:29:46.300 about, they just need to do one thing. Remember what has happened to this country between 2016

00:29:53.420 and December of 2024. Look what the Liberals did. They've completely divided everybody. They told

00:30:00.780 everybody that this is a post-national state. We're not even, you know, technically a country

00:30:04.760 anymore. We don't have a Canadian identity. Be ashamed of your past. Be ashamed of all of our

00:30:09.560 symbols. We're taking them off the passport. We're ripping down statues. And you need to be afraid and

00:30:16.740 ashamed of who you are. And by the way, please continue to pay your taxes accordingly. So you have all

00:30:23.860 of that. And then all of a sudden, when the Liberals are 20, 27 points down, you have Donald Trump make

00:30:32.040 one remark and the entire mainstream media falls into line. And all we hear about is Donald Trump.

00:30:40.640 He's a threat. And then the media starts telling everybody he's a threat. He's a threat. He's a threat.

00:30:46.280 Then they go on the street to talk to the people that were listening to them and say,

00:30:49.900 what do you think is the most important part of this election? And then they regurgitate what

00:30:54.520 they've been told for the last six weeks. Well, I think it's Donald Trump. And then they have the

00:30:58.100 audacity to then come on the air and say, Canadians are telling us that Donald Trump is the biggest

00:31:03.340 ballot question in the next election. So when you create this feedback loop and pretend it doesn't

00:31:09.540 exist, that's the crazy part about it. But yes, the worst thing that could happen to the Liberal

00:31:15.580 campaign right now is if Donald Trump just said, you know what, I'm taking all the tariffs away,

00:31:21.340 we're going to focus on other things. I'll talk to you later. That would be the absolute worst thing

00:31:25.380 that could happen to the Liberal campaign because their fear machine would be very difficult to keep

00:31:32.000 going. And if Mark Carney was any type of leader, he would have already met with Donald Trump,

00:31:38.620 worked out what the issues are going to be, and then come to an agreement. And then he would be

00:31:43.400 able to go into the election. But this is the problem. He didn't do that. It's in their best

00:31:49.060 interest for this to continue. And I agree. As soon as the election is called, if, you know,

00:31:54.900 heaven forbid that the Liberals win, within a week, this will be gone.

00:31:59.480 So it's so frustrating. And it really does feel like we're being manipulated by the media and the way

00:32:05.160 that they, anytime Donald Trump says anything that can be relevant to Canada anyway, that is a top story.

00:32:11.800 That is what's plastered all over the papers. Tanya, I'm going to get you to comment, but I want to

00:32:16.560 draw your attention to this graph. This was posted by Kirk Lubmov on X. And I think it really says it

00:32:22.360 all because it says, what is the most important factor when deciding your vote by age? And so you

00:32:28.780 can see that the two top issues are either reducing your cost of living or dealing with Donald Trump.

00:32:34.560 And for Canadians over the age of 60, God love them, 50% of them say that Trump is the top issue.

00:32:41.100 And then all other age demographics, 18 to 29, 30 to 44, 45 to 59, they all say that reducing your

00:32:49.500 cost of living is the number one factor. And then you can look at how it translates into votes. Every

00:32:54.960 age demographic has the Conservatives leading, except for the Boomers, 60 plus, 50% of them will be voting

00:33:02.640 for the Liberals. To me, this shows media consumption, right? It's like younger people, 1.00

00:33:08.740 anyone under 60, especially anybody under 45, I think mostly gets their information and their news

00:33:15.740 from independent journalists and independent content creators on social media. Whereas the

00:33:20.540 older generation are the ones that are still glued to the CBC, still watching CTV, still reading the

00:33:27.080 newspaper that gets delivered to their door every day. What do you think, Tanya?

00:33:31.540 For us here at Northern Perspective, a vast majority of our audience is 55 and older. I think it's

00:33:37.680 almost two thirds of our audience fits that age demographic. So I'm not sure that Northern

00:33:42.660 Perspective exactly lines up with that. But I know that the people in our lives, like family members and

00:33:49.120 friends who are in that age demographic, many of them do still get their news from like cable news.

00:33:54.660 So things that they see on TV, CBC, CTV, global news, etc. And I'm wondering if that's because

00:34:03.160 they're being bombarded with these messages that Trump bad, Trump bad. But also, I think the older

00:34:08.360 demographic may be a little bit better insulated from the cost of living crisis than people our age or

00:34:14.620 people who are younger, like just starting out like 18 to 24. Again, the people in our lives, some of them

00:34:21.580 own multiple properties, most of them, at least their primary residence is paid off. They're not

00:34:28.080 in debt, you know, they've got their RSPs lined up, they're, for all intents and purposes, very well

00:34:35.060 off. So I don't think they're being hit by this cost of living crisis the way that young people with

00:34:41.340 families or even young people fresh out of school are. So to them, when they're being bombarded with

00:34:47.220 these messages day in and day out from cable news being told that while Trump is such a problem,

00:34:51.440 and they're not actually feeling the cost of living crisis the way the rest of us are,

00:34:56.740 then yeah, I can see why they're responding in this manner.

00:34:59.400 Well, and that's the thing, right? It's the people that are voting liberal, are liberal supporters that

00:35:05.140 watch the CBC that are insulated from this. As you said before, Candace, this is not to discount

00:35:10.900 everybody else in that demographic that has essentially aligned with the conservatives,

00:35:15.500 because they are feeling this, or they have friends or family that are feeling this, and

00:35:20.420 they're getting news from multiple sources across the spectrum, so they can be more objective about

00:35:26.380 this. And yeah, you know, should we all be concerned with the tariffs coming to Canada? Yes, we would

00:35:33.360 be irresponsible not to. However, we have to look at how did Canada get into this position where we're

00:35:41.500 this week that we can't do anything in the first place. That is 10 years of liberal mismanagement,

00:35:47.420 ineptitude, and they have just completely irresponsibly run our country.

00:35:53.380 Well, that's absolutely right, and I'll applaud you. I'm glad that you're reaching an older audience,

00:35:58.500 and hopefully, you know, that 30% of the 60-plus generation that still is voting for conservative,

00:36:05.180 hopefully those are the ones that are watching your show and my show, and they can spread the word to

00:36:09.240 their friends and people in their peer group that there is an alternative, that you don't have to

00:36:13.380 get your information from the CBC. There are incredibly skilled, well-researched, responsible,

00:36:19.520 fact-based journalists and commentators out there. I'm speaking to two of them right now with Northern

00:36:24.240 Perspective, a fantastic channel that you should go check out if you haven't already, where you can get

00:36:28.480 the news every single day. Ryan and Tanya break down the stories. They give you a very informed,

00:36:34.080 very well-researched perspective on what is happening in Canada, and it is not the same

00:36:39.420 thing that you'll hear regurgitated from the legacy media who gets paid by the Trudeau government,

00:36:45.560 by the Liberal government, I should say, because presumably Mark Carney will continue that. Okay,

00:36:49.680 I want to quickly move on to talk about immigration, because this is a story I've been wanting to talk

00:36:53.940 about all week and haven't had time to, and I just think it's so important. So we learned that

00:36:58.240 Liberal leader Mark Carney has added the Century Initiative co-founder Mark Wiseman to his advisory

00:37:04.780 council to Canada-U.S. relations, and so for folks who don't know, the Century Initiative is a pro-immigration

00:37:11.200 lobby, and their sole purpose, their sole advocacy is to get Canada to grow its population to 100 million

00:37:19.280 people by 2021. So if you thought that Canada was really overcrowded now, that cities were getting too

00:37:25.660 big, too congested, that the roads and the infrastructure aren't keeping up with the

00:37:29.280 population growth, well basically we would have to have the population, the massive increase in

00:37:34.760 population that we had over the last two years, the one that Trudeau actually had to walk back and say

00:37:38.980 it was a massive mistake, we would have to have that level of growth every single year to reach this

00:37:44.180 target. Really unbelievable that there is a group that is seen as sort of like a blue chip

00:37:49.380 initiative, you know, they're sponsored by the Globe and Mail, and they do these panels and

00:37:54.780 roundhouse roundtables advocating for a massive growth through immigration, not through supporting

00:38:00.780 Canadian families and getting Canadian women to have more children, but by just importing the third 0.98

00:38:04.960 world basically. So Pierre Polyev has slammed this appointment on mass immigration, we have a clip of

00:38:12.120 him talking about it, let's play that now. The Liberals destroyed our immigration system in their first 0.94

00:38:17.540 three terms in power. They followed a radical globalist ideology of massive uncontrolled population

00:38:26.320 growth that put strain on our housing market, our health care, and our job market.

00:38:35.140 And so I think Pierre Polyev is sort of hitting the nail on the head there, and I want to show this

00:38:40.780 clip that Maxime Bernier, the leader of the People's Party, has posted. He writes on X, red alert,

00:38:46.360 Mark Carney has hired Mark Wiseman of the Century Initiative, an organization that wants to grow

00:38:50.840 Canada's population to reach 100 million by the end of the century. And then the clip that I'm about

00:38:54.960 to show has Mark Wiseman talking about how we could facilitate this growth. He literally just says that

00:39:01.440 we should stop screening, that we shouldn't do security screening of immigrants to Canada. We should 0.81

00:39:08.260 just basically, anyone who wants to come, we should let them in. Honestly, this is crazy. This is so extreme.

00:39:14.060 Here is Mark Wiseman in his own words.

00:39:17.540 Let the private sector move to bring people in and facilitate them being able to do that. And,

00:39:24.440 you know, a lot of the screening and other stuff that we do, frankly, is just bureaucracy. It's a

00:39:30.540 waste of time. Let's let people in by and large. And if we have to do the screening ex post, that's fine.

00:39:37.520 To screen them once we're already in the country, what could possibly go wrong? Ryan, what do you think

00:39:43.040 of this? Well, we, yeah, we're quite familiar with the Century Initiative. We did it. We did our own

00:39:49.680 deep dive last year on this. And it was so disturbing to us to see this, especially when

00:39:58.460 we started taking a look at what the Century Initiative's main platform was. And then we took

00:40:04.860 a look at Trudeau's 2021 Liberal Party platform. And the hair on our necks started standing up because

00:40:11.500 you can line them up and they are point for point for point. So essentially what looks like happened

00:40:17.520 was a bunch of elites, a bunch of rich people got together and said, hey, let's get rich. And here's

00:40:24.080 a good way that we can do that. We can bring in a whole bunch of people, take advantage of all of

00:40:27.920 those tax dollars and all of the homes that are going to have to be built for these people because

00:40:32.800 some of their their founders are members or CEOs of the largest lumber companies in Canada. Well,

00:40:39.060 we all know that lumber is used in housing and other people have different interests in health care or

00:40:45.260 any of the other services that are going to be essentially needed to be used by 100 million people

00:40:51.580 over the next 70 odd years. So you have all of this coming together. And their main premise is the

00:41:00.000 quality of life is determined by the number of people in the country. Well, we actually completely

00:41:04.660 agree with that, because what we've seen is the massive amounts of people that have been

00:41:10.660 influxed into Canada over the last four or five years has had a significant decline on our quality of

00:41:18.400 life. And it's not the type of people, it's not the people themselves, that's the problem. It's the

00:41:23.440 fact that the policies that we've been using in Canada, they haven't bothered to keep up with

00:41:28.660 housing, they haven't bothered to keep up with hospitals, and they haven't bothered to keep up

00:41:32.060 with education or any of the other systems in there. So what we end up having is a net poor society.

00:41:39.740 And if you don't care where these people come from, or what happens, this results in all of these

00:41:45.840 protests on the streets that go unchecked now by police, and you have anti-Semitism rampant across

00:41:51.840 the country, reminiscent of the 1930s, it is, it is just an insane, an insane type of type of approach.

00:42:01.320 You'd think it was a conspiracy theory if it wasn't out in the open.

00:42:05.040 Well, it's so interesting, because you're right, it is like it's like a shortcut, like a cheating,

00:42:09.420 a way to cheat the economy, right? Because it's like Canada is having a major issue with

00:42:14.040 productivity. So much of the capital, so much of the investments that people have are not being

00:42:19.000 invested into Canadian companies to help them grow. They're doing what Mark Carney did, which

00:42:23.040 is move their headquarters to New York City, invest in the American stock market, put your money in

00:42:28.400 funds in Bermuda, and just investing anywhere other than Canada, because the Canadian economy

00:42:32.920 is stagnant, it's not growing. It's like these guys got into Trudeau's ear, and they said, hey,

00:42:38.180 here's a hack, a way that you can grow your GDP is just grow the population. More people means more money

00:42:44.040 economy, boom, snap your finger, and it's done. You don't even have to worry about the more tricky

00:42:49.720 parts of actually encouraging people to start businesses and reinvest in their businesses.

00:42:54.520 Because the budget will balance itself.

00:42:56.000 Right, making a pro-business environment. It's like you can just cheat by bringing all these

00:42:59.500 people in. And because it's the liberals, they put absolutely no effort into any of the sort

00:43:04.800 of infrastructure that you're talking about. On a deeper cultural level, they put no effort

00:43:09.160 into thinking about whether the population can properly absorb this new influx of people,

00:43:15.840 people from other countries, people who have other values, people that might not share Canadian values.

00:43:21.240 And for the last decade, if anyone even dares to say that there's such thing as Canadian values,

00:43:27.080 they get slammed as being a racist and a bigot and xenophobic, right? We weren't even allowed to talk

00:43:32.560 about what our shared Canadian values were. And so the outcome of this is you have a whole bunch of

00:43:37.400 people in Canada who may or may not even like Canada. They may have bought into the liberal

00:43:42.920 narrative that Canada is a racist, genocidal country, that the white people in this country 0.97

00:43:47.200 have committed atrocities against the environment and against the local people who are here. 0.97

00:43:53.380 And so they have like no love and no affinity for Canada. And you see a fractured, fraying culture.

00:43:59.080 You know, you mentioned anti-Semitism on the rise. Yes, that's true. That's like one of a dozen

00:44:04.000 cultural clashes that are happening in Canada. I mean, look at what's happened with Chanda Arya

00:44:08.640 being disqualified from the Liberal Party. And he said it was over his advocacy for Hindu

00:44:14.180 values and against extremism within the Kalistani Sikh movement. So you have these clashes that also

00:44:20.900 exist and happen in places like Brampton and in places like Surrey, where Hindus and Sikhs are openly

00:44:26.540 fighting each other on the streets. You have the same kind of thing in the Chinese diaspora community,

00:44:31.240 where there's so-called police stations, Chinese monitored police stations, where they are 0.91

00:44:36.840 tracking down dissenting voices against the communist Chinese regime, people who might

00:44:41.720 advocate for a free and independent Hong Kong or Taiwan. And they're being intimidated and who knows

00:44:47.000 what else by these Chinese state-sponsored gangsters. All of this is happening in Canada. To me, 0.77

00:44:53.420 it shows a broken society, frankly. And I think that we need a real solution. Like,

00:44:58.680 I think this is an opportunity for Pierre Polyev to say, no, like, we're not going to put up with

00:45:03.800 this. We don't like the direction that the Liberals have taken our country with immigration. They have 1.00

00:45:07.600 broken the system. And they've broken Canadians' trust in immigration. I think that a bigger and 0.98

00:45:12.980 bigger percentage of Canadians have just had enough of mass migration. We want our country back. We want 0.99

00:45:18.560 secure borders. We don't want illegal immigration. And we want to be able to celebrate the things that

00:45:23.200 make us Canadian. Not in this sort of artificial, elbows-up, Team Canada, just merely defined as being

00:45:29.800 anti-American. But actually, something deeper. Like, the deeper bonds that hold us together as Canadians

00:45:35.680 are values. And I think that Pierre has an opportunity. I don't know that he's really stepping up to it. But I

00:45:42.560 have heard him at least talking about the issue of immigration and how we need to change from what Trudeau is

00:45:48.360 doing. Tanya, I'll bring you in on this one. Yeah, I don't think Pierre can go too hard on it because

00:45:53.620 then he'll get criticized by the Liberals. And if you believe the polls, the Conservatives are currently

00:45:58.420 down slightly in the polls. So he doesn't want to go down any further. I think that we do need

00:46:05.100 someone to come in and unify the country. We had a interview with Lieutenant Colonel David Redmond

00:46:11.360 earlier this year. And that was one of the major things that he was talking about in terms of how we're

00:46:17.000 going to get Canada back. We need unity across this country. It's not enough just to have a bunch of

00:46:20.960 people from all over the world living in the same geographic space. We all need to be working

00:46:25.300 towards a common goal. We all need to have common values and beliefs. You don't have to believe the

00:46:32.640 exact same thing. You know, we celebrate Christmas. Our neighbors down the street might celebrate

00:46:37.500 Hanukkah. But the fact is that we're all working towards a common goal of Canada, a common

00:46:43.940 prosperity, and that we want to get along and live peacefully together.

00:46:49.720 Well, and, you know, the one thing that Pierre has said about immigration is he said he wants to

00:46:54.460 revert our immigration system back to the way it was, which both Liberal and Conservative governments

00:46:59.580 agreed upon and they didn't change it for decades because it was a merit-based system. And we approached

00:47:06.380 people coming into Canada as it was a, you know, a privilege and not a right. You had to actually 0.99

00:47:13.440 be able to show that you're going to contribute something positively to Canada. You're going to

00:47:17.880 fit within the culture and you're going to, you know, help build a better Canada.

00:47:24.480 So he has said that, you know, the Liberals have completely broken the immigration system and that

00:47:29.200 we need to move back to that. You know, a lot of people have talked about the fact that, well,

00:47:33.780 you know, Pierre hasn't, you know, said that he's going to, you know, go with mass deportations. Well,

00:47:37.460 you can't just start deporting people that, unfortunately, the new system let in properly.

00:47:43.340 You can deport people that have, have come in illegally. And I think that's what everyone is, 0.98

00:47:48.440 is, is for. But that's the other thing that Mark Kearney has kind of waffled on, on his campaign side,

00:47:54.540 because, you know, he is for the Century Initiative. He is for more taxpayers and he, he doesn't care at

00:48:02.480 all how bad things get in Canada, because by all accounts, most of his investments aren't even in

00:48:07.800 Canada anymore. So if the Canadian economy tanks, his investments are insulated. I mean, how shocking

00:48:12.820 is that, that we still don't even know where his money is invested? You know, he says that he has a

00:48:16.780 blind trust and that someone else is handling it. We don't know who. It's kind of alarming that the

00:48:21.620 Prime Minister, we, you know, we know that he takes advantage of tax havens. We know that he used the

00:48:26.460 Bermuda, as well as like a dozen other countries to manage his funds and to make sure that they didn't

00:48:31.240 have to pay Canadian taxes until the very end. And yet, you know, this is a person that is, well,

00:48:37.180 he is the Prime Minister. I mean, sure, he technically, he should be a caretaker Prime

00:48:40.740 Minister. He's not really acting like that. He's acting like he's already elected. And if you do

00:48:44.320 trust the polls, it looks like Canadians could head that way. I'm hoping not. I'm so optimistic that

00:48:49.240 Pierre is running such a good campaign so far that the momentum is on his side. The polls show one

00:48:53.660 thing, but my own eyes watching the, the rallies, watching him, watching the excitement around him

00:49:00.020 is really showing something, something else. So I'm hopeful that that's the way that the

00:49:05.360 election will go. Tanya, Brian, great to have you on. Thank you so much for joining the show today.

00:49:10.360 It's been such a fun conversation. Thanks for having us. Right. Check out the Northern

00:49:14.620 Perspective. They do wonderful analysis over there. All right, folks, that's all the time we have for

00:49:19.180 today. Thank you so much for tuning in. I'm Candace Malcolm. This is the Candace Malcolm Show.

00:49:22.640 Have a wonderful weekend, everyone. We'll be back again on Monday. Thank you and God bless.

00:49:30.020 Thank you.

The Candice Malcolm Show - March 28, 2025

Mark Carney PLAGIARIZED his Oxford Thesis： Report (Ft. Northern Perspective)

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript