The Candice Malcolm Show - September 29, 2021


O’Toole’s Bait and Switch

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
The Trudeau Liberals are making a mockery of our immigration system The PPC are not to blame for O’Toole’s failure

Episode Stats


Length

17 minutes

Words per minute

198.96

Word count

3,464

Sentence count

179

Harmful content

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Candace Malcolm takes a deep dive into what went wrong in the Conservative leadership race, and why she believes there were many red flags along the way when it came to choosing a candidate to replace Aaron O'Toole as leader of the party.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.160 Conservative party members got duped by a bait-and-switch conservative.
00:00:03.120 It's happened before but it should never happen again. I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace
00:00:06.800 Malcolm Show. Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning in today. I hope you're enjoying our daily
00:00:16.240 installation of The Candace Malcolm Show. We started to do it every day during the campaign
00:00:19.840 and we're continuing to go on that momentum putting out a new show every single day. So
00:00:24.000 don't forget to like this page, like this episode, subscribe to this channel, and if you're watching
00:00:28.480 on YouTube hit the little notification bell so that you never miss an episode. Now today I want
00:00:33.280 to do a little bit of a deep dive into what happened in the election, what went wrong,
00:00:38.800 and how there were red flags along the way when it came to leader Aaron O'Toole. Now if you've been
00:00:44.000 watching the show you know that I am no fan of Aaron O'Toole. I believe that he misrepresented who
00:00:49.280 he was in the conservative leadership race. Remember, he told us that he was a true blue
00:00:54.240 conservative, he assured us that he would scrap the carbon tax, he told us that he would end
00:00:58.720 Trudeau's arbitrary gun ban, and he assured us that he would respect moral conservatives and allow
00:01:04.080 for free votes in the House of Commons, presumably that would include free votes on social and moral
00:01:09.600 issues like abortion. Now of course we now know that none of that was true. When the general election
00:01:15.760 came around, Aaron O'Toole took the exact opposite position on each of these issues when he was running
00:01:21.760 against Justin Trudeau. He flip-flopped, he showed weakness, and perhaps most damning of all, he was
00:01:27.680 dishonest about who he was, what he believed in, and what he wanted to do with the party. Now this comes
00:01:33.760 down to an issue of authenticity. We don't really know who the real Aaron O'Toole is. Is he the man with
00:01:40.240 a conservative vision who wanted to stand up to the radical left, stand up to woke cancel culture like
00:01:45.280 he told us he was in the leadership race, or is he the guy who embraced woke left-wing culture on the
00:01:51.360 campaign trail when running in the federal election? Remember, back when Aaron O'Toole was running for
00:01:56.800 leader of the Conservative Party back in early 2020, Aaron O'Toole warned us about another candidate,
00:02:02.720 another candidate named Peter McKay. O'Toole repeatedly warned conservatives that Peter McKay was
00:02:09.600 nothing but a red Tory, he was a centrist, he was a leftist, he was mushy, he was liberalite, and that if
00:02:16.800 Conservative Party members entrusted Peter McKay with the party leadership, that the party would
00:02:21.920 go down the wrong path, we would continue to go down the left-wing path of Justin Trudeau, and that
00:02:26.960 instead, by picking Aaron O'Toole, picking the true blue conservative option, that Canada would have a
00:02:33.840 real conservative party. That is how he positioned himself in the leadership race. And I think it's
00:02:38.400 interesting to revisit some of the specific attacks that Aaron O'Toole had against Peter McKay.
00:02:44.000 Recall that Peter McKay was the front-runner. He was the high-profile leader, he was the one that
00:02:48.400 the media loved, he's the one that everybody knows, he was key in creating the Conservative Party of
00:02:53.120 Canada. Back when the two parties merged, back when the Canadian Alliance merged with the Progressive
00:02:57.440 Conservative Party, Peter McKay was seen as a central figure in the Progressive Conservative Party. He
00:03:02.480 negotiated that deal with Stephen Harper, and he was really one of the fathers of the modern-day
00:03:07.280 Conservative Party. So again, he was sort of the apparent person who was going to lead the party,
00:03:12.000 and if it wasn't for an incredibly effective attack by Aaron O'Toole, Peter McKay probably would have
00:03:18.560 been the leader of the Conservative Party, and we might have had a different outcome in the last
00:03:22.880 election. So let's go all the way back to January 2020, when Aaron O'Toole made a campaign announcement.
00:03:29.120 This is the video he put out. I'm going to play you part of this video because it's really compelling.
00:03:32.880 Again, this is the Conservative version of Aaron O'Toole. This is the iteration of himself that he sold to
00:03:38.080 party members. That was quite compelling, quite appealing, and part of the reason that he won.
00:03:42.480 Again, he told Conservatives that he would respect Social Conservatives. He courted the Social 0.93
00:03:46.880 Conservative vote, and one of the key things he said in this video is that it's time we take the hyphen
00:03:53.280 out of being Conservative. It's time we had someone that can unite the Conservative Party. Let's play this
00:03:58.640 video and we can break that down. Who's going to fight for auto workers who just saw the last car roll off the line?
00:04:04.560 Who's going to fight for forestry workers who just watched another mill close? Who's going to stand up for
00:04:09.920 those who wear a uniform of service to protect us at home and abroad? Who's going to defend our history, our
00:04:15.680 institutions against attacks from cancel culture and the radical left? The stakes are high for Canada. The
00:04:21.920 country needs a strong Conservative Party. We need strong leadership to unite our party, take the hyphen out of being
00:04:28.560 a Conservative and ensure we grow our movement to win. We need to show more urban and suburban Canadians
00:04:35.440 that their values of liberty, family and equality are at the core of our party. It's time Canadians had a
00:04:42.640 government that fights for their needs instead of fighting for attention from global celebrities and
00:04:47.680 corrupt corporate insiders. I'm Erin O'Toole and I'm running to unite Conservatives on the path to victory.
00:04:54.240 I'm not a career politician. I'm not a product of the Ottawa bubble. I spent 10 years in the private
00:05:00.400 sector and 12 years in our military where you're judged by who you are and the work you do, not where
00:05:07.600 you came from or who you know. I'm asking for your support to take on and beat Justin Trudeau. I'm in
00:05:14.240 politics to fight for you and I need you to fight alongside me for Canada.
00:05:26.880 Now when he says take the hyphen out of being Conservative, presumably he's talking about
00:05:30.720 progressive Conservatives. So if you take a step back and you look at the Conservative Party, it's sort
00:05:35.120 of a coalition of a bunch of different types of Conservatives. So you kind of have the moral or
00:05:40.320 social Conservatives, the Christian Conservatives who want to have moral issues sort of front and
00:05:44.720 centre in politics and they strongly believe in taking a position for instance when it comes
00:05:49.200 to abortion. You also have the Libertarian part of the party who just believe in limited government,
00:05:54.720 low taxes, they want free markets, individual responsibility. Unfortunately those are some
00:05:59.440 of the people who ended up following Maxime Bernier to the People's Party. And then you have the Red 0.78
00:06:03.680 Tories as sort of centrists that believe in bigger government, that don't want to take a stance on
00:06:08.560 moral issues or if they do they're progressive or Liberal. The sort of people that come from
00:06:13.360 Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, that believe in the sort of Laurentian elite consensus about Canada,
00:06:17.920 that we're sort of this left-wing version of the United States and that you know they believe in big
00:06:22.880 government and everything that goes along with it. The distinction between them and the Liberals is
00:06:27.200 that perhaps they're not as woke left as the Liberals and that's a part of the party that Peter McKay
00:06:31.760 came from. So when Aaron O'Toole talks about taking the hyphen out of being Conservative, I think he's
00:06:36.000 talking about taking the progressive conservative, that title, which a lot of Red Tories really cling
00:06:41.120 to. They don't want to be seen as conservative, they want to put the progressive in there because
00:06:44.560 then everyone knows that they are not social conservatives, that they have the liberal left-wing
00:06:48.880 approved social views and that none of those sort of thorny issues that have sometimes dogged
00:06:54.320 conservatives will get in the way. So Aaron O'Toole is saying no to that, no to being a Red Tory,
00:06:58.560 no to being a progressive conservative, he's just going to be a conservative that unites the party.
00:07:03.440 Okay, so he continues on this line of thinking. In February 2020, he sent out an email blast. So
00:07:09.120 this fundraising email, O'Toole takes a shot at his rival, Peter McKay. So he's saying that Peter
00:07:14.800 McKay is insisting on a solid caucus front on so-called conscience votes, accusing him of behaving,
00:07:21.440 quote, just like Justin Trudeau does, unquote. So O'Toole said in the email blast that he would allow
00:07:26.320 both caucus members as well as potential cabinet ministers in a government led by him to vote their own
00:07:32.320 conscience on moral issues. So presumably that means that if there were votes on abortion,
00:07:37.360 he wouldn't whip caucus. He would allow everyone to vote how they feel, based on their conscience,
00:07:42.080 based on their morals, and that he would allow social conservatives to have their say, to make
00:07:47.680 their peace, to champion the issues that they feel are incredibly important in our society. So O'Toole
00:07:52.560 was already carving himself out as being different than Peter McKay, saying Peter McKay would punish social
00:07:58.080 conservatives and not allow them to speak their peace, whereas he would enable social conservatives
00:08:02.880 and give them a platform. Of course, we know that once the federal election rolled around,
00:08:06.880 O'Toole took the exact opposite position halfway through the campaign. He said that MPs who don't
00:08:11.600 fully support his platform and every aspect of it would not be able to sit in his caucus. So if you
00:08:16.720 were pro-life and you wanted to talk about it, you didn't want to just parrot O'Toole's pro-choice,
00:08:22.160 liberal talking points, you couldn't even sit with a conservative caucus. You couldn't even be a
00:08:26.880 conservative. So back to 2020 when O'Toole was running for leader. So Aaron O'Toole continued on
00:08:32.080 this path of attacking Peter McKay, saying that Peter McKay wasn't conservative enough. On March 24th,
00:08:37.600 2020, Aaron O'Toole said this, quote, this is really a struggle for the identity of the conservative
00:08:43.040 party in 2020. Do we go back to be the mushy middle party or do we have conservative
00:08:48.160 principled ideas for the issues of the day? So again, saying that he doesn't want to be
00:08:52.960 part of the mushy middle. He wants to have principled conservative ideas. So presumably,
00:08:58.160 again, this means the liberal party is on the left. He doesn't want to be part of the mushy middle.
00:09:02.240 He wants to be on the right. He wants to have principled conservative issues. And then here he is
00:09:07.680 on June 18th, 2020, again, really just laying it all out against Peter McKay. He says,
00:09:12.800 Peter McKay has begun this campaign by dividing our party, by attacking social conservatives.
00:09:17.840 That's exactly what the liberals want. They want us divided. We don't need liberalite. We need a real
00:09:24.000 conservative with the uniting vision to win. So here you have it. This is why Aaron O'Toole won.
00:09:29.920 He successfully courted social conservatives. Remember, he won because of the second and
00:09:34.320 third ranked ballots from the actual social conservatives who ran Lesley Lewis and Derek
00:09:38.800 Sloan. Those votes went over to Aaron O'Toole, giving him enough to surpass Peter McKay,
00:09:44.080 even though Peter McKay had the most votes in the first round of voting. And so Aaron O'Toole won by
00:09:48.960 courting the social conservatives, assuring them that they would have a space in his party,
00:09:52.720 that he would have room for them, that he would respect them. And also attacking Peter McKay,
00:09:56.800 attacking the front runner, saying, this guy's a red Tory. This guy's a centrist. This guy's liberal
00:10:00.960 light. This guy's part of the mushy middle. Forget him. I'm going to be the principled conservative.
00:10:05.280 I'm going to go after the radical left. I'm true blue. Get on board. Here, here I am. I'm the real
00:10:10.640 deal. I'm the conservative. And so again, we know how this played out. We know we got duped. We know
00:10:15.920 that this wasn't who Aaron O'Toole really was, or maybe it is who he really is. But then he presented
00:10:20.800 a new version of Aaron O'Toole when it came to running in the federal election. This is the bait and
00:10:25.600 switch. We were sold one thing and then we got another. And this is why we're at such a crossroads in
00:10:31.120 the conservative movement. This is why the party sees itself as such a crossroads because you do
00:10:35.760 have the voices saying, look, just keep Aaron O'Toole on as leader. He'll learn his lesson
00:10:40.000 and he'll go on and perhaps do better in the next election. And then you have the other side
00:10:44.960 of the party who feel deeply betrayed, who feel completely excluded from the party. And not just
00:10:49.760 that, but they feel like we have a charlatan running things. They feel like Aaron O'Toole,
00:10:54.320 they see Aaron O'Toole and they don't know what he stands for. He is totally inauthentic.
00:10:59.280 He presented two completely different visions of who he was, what he believes in and what he wanted
00:11:04.800 for the country. And it's hard to get past that duplicity, that fundamental lack of authenticity
00:11:11.920 that we see with Aaron O'Toole. But I want to remind viewers that this is not the first time
00:11:16.720 that this has happened to the conservative party. This is not the first time that a conservative
00:11:21.360 leadership nominee has presented themselves as part of the right wing of the party, as a social
00:11:26.160 conservative, as a true blue Tory, only to gain power and become leader of the party and completely
00:11:31.920 change course, completely rebrand as a liberal. And I'm talking about the former MP and the former
00:11:36.880 leader of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, Patrick Brown. Now, I want to talk a little
00:11:41.360 bit about Patrick Brown. Patrick Brown became leader of the Ontario PCs in 2015, and then he stepped down
00:11:47.760 and resigned in disgrace in January 2018. So he never ran in an election as a conservative leader,
00:11:54.080 and it's a good thing that he didn't because this guy was a total disaster as leader of the party.
00:11:58.640 So before Patrick Brown got into provincial politics, he was a long-serving member of parliament
00:12:03.280 up in Barrie. He was a really popular MP. He was seen as young, ambitious, super hard-working,
00:12:07.840 and really in touch with the base, really socially conservative, and just, you know,
00:12:12.400 someone who had a lot of potential in conservative politics. So I want to go back and talk a little
00:12:16.880 bit about his record. So back in 2012, as a conservative MP under the Harper government,
00:12:22.560 he voted in favor of a bill to study when life begins. And this was seen, especially by the media,
00:12:28.640 as a sort of reopening of the abortion debate, something that a lot of, again, the red Tories
00:12:33.760 and the centrist in the party really didn't want. A lot of libertarians too, a lot of people who just
00:12:37.920 don't really want to talk about this issue anymore. And even Stephen Harper voted against this bill,
00:12:42.000 voted against studying when life begins because he just didn't really want to get into the thorny
00:12:46.640 abortion debate. So back then, he was, he was so committed to being a pro-life MP that he was even
00:12:51.440 willing to break ranks with the prime minister and the leader of the country because he was so
00:12:55.680 committed to his morals and to this idea of creating some kind of a law, some kind of regulation
00:13:01.120 around abortion. And so fast forward to when he was running for leader of the PC party. It's sort
00:13:07.680 of well known that, that Patrick Brown just sort of outworked the competition. He was running against
00:13:12.000 Christine Elliott, the widow of the former finance minister, Jim Flaherty. And she was sort of seen as
00:13:17.360 more of an establishment red Tory conservative, and he was seen as the grassroots social conservative
00:13:22.240 alternative. And everyone knew that he won this leadership race because he just outworked and
00:13:26.080 out hustled Christine Elliott. He was out there signing up new members, doing outreach, encouraging
00:13:30.560 people to join the party, to vote for him as leader, growing the party base. And a lot of the places,
00:13:35.440 let's be, let's be honest, a lot of the ways that he was able to do this was by going to houses of
00:13:39.680 worship, going to churches, painting himself as a true social conservative, and encouraging people to sign up
00:13:44.960 for votes that way. Likewise, he was also able to get the endorsement from the campaign life
00:13:50.560 coalition, which is an influential pro-life group. So speaking to pro-life advocates from the campaign
00:13:56.400 life coalition, he said, look at my voting record. That's who I am. And then he says he has a 100%
00:14:03.200 pro-life voting record in the house of commons, which led to the endorsement from the campaign
00:14:09.120 life coalition. Well, fast forward. And just like Aaron O'Toole, once he was leader of the party,
00:14:13.840 he told the Globe and Mail, I will not change the status quo and I will oppose any effort to do so.
00:14:19.520 Later adding, we're not going to change the status quo we have in Ontario today in any fashion. And
00:14:25.600 then when he was specifically asked about how he voted for a pro-life bill, get this, he actually
00:14:30.640 pretended that he didn't know what they were talking about. He said this, he said, we probably have
00:14:34.960 four or 500 votes a year in the house of commons. I think it would be difficult to analyze every vote.
00:14:40.880 So he just pretended that he doesn't even remember voting for pro-life bills and that he just couldn't
00:14:46.880 even be asked to try to defend it because he votes on so many things. Then in 2017, he told the National
00:14:52.720 Post that any policy put forth during the PC party convention regarding social conservative issues
00:14:58.160 would be off limits. Any policy that attempts to limit a woman's right to choose, so he's already
00:15:03.120 using the left-wing terminology when it comes to abortion. Limit a woman's right to choose or the
00:15:09.520 ability of same-sex couples to marry are off limits, period. Brown endorsed same-sex marriage and also
00:15:15.520 endorsed the Liberals' changes of the sex ed curriculum once he won the PC leadership race. Also on the
00:15:21.680 issue of carbon taxes, much like Erin O'Toole, Patrick Brown didn't mention anything about a carbon tax when
00:15:27.360 running for PC leader. He basically implied that he was against it and that he wouldn't bring in any
00:15:32.320 kind of carbon tax. But then again, much like Erin O'Toole, he shocked the Tories when he announced that
00:15:37.440 he would support a carbon tax at the PC convention in Ottawa in March 2016. Patrick Brown misrepresented
00:15:44.880 himself when he was running for leader. He ran as a social conservative. Once he was leader, he basically
00:15:49.520 turned into a liberal and started pushing liberal talking points, pushing liberal ideas,
00:15:53.360 and abandoning any sense of principle. And that's why in early 2018, when he was faced with really a
00:15:58.960 ratchet job of a MeToo accusation that totally fell apart under scrutiny, it didn't matter. The entire
00:16:04.560 base had already abandoned him. His core inner circle also kind of stabbed him in the back, threw him
00:16:10.400 under the bus. And just like that, Patrick Brown resigned. This should have been a cautionary tale to
00:16:15.280 conservatives. This should have been a tale not to do what Patrick Brown had done to the PC voters
00:16:21.440 in Ontario. But here we are a few years later, and it seems like Erin O'Toole has taken Patrick
00:16:27.040 Brown's exact playbook. And much like Patrick Brown's own fate, Erin O'Toole has not been successful.
00:16:33.360 It is not a good strategy. It is not a winning playbook. Look, in today's era of social media
00:16:39.120 and direct mass communication, what Canadians want is authenticity. They want a politician and a candidate
00:16:45.680 who they can trust, who they feel like is being real and being authentic. The terrible,
00:16:50.640 terrible strategy as running as one thing. And then as soon as you become leader,
00:16:55.120 turning and doing something different, it doesn't even matter what side you're going for,
00:16:58.880 which way you're going. It is a failed tactic. It's bait and switch. We've seen it too many times,
00:17:04.400 and we've had enough of it. Conservatives should make sure that the Erin O'Toole's and the Patrick 0.71
00:17:08.880 Brown's of this world are never entrusted to lead a conservative party again. I'm Candace Malcolm, 1.00
00:17:14.160 and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.