The Candice Malcolm Show - The biggest fake news HOAXES of 2023

00:00:00.000 Do conservatives really believe in conspiracy theories?

00:00:02.960 Did Pierre Polyev really lie about terrorism at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara?

00:00:06.700 And did Israel really level and bomb a hospital in Gaza?

00:00:10.640 Well, the liberal-funded legacy media told you so, so it must be true, right?

00:00:15.140 Well, it's Fake News Friday, and today we're going through the top fake news stories of 2023.

00:00:19.660 I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.

00:00:30.000 Hi, everyone. Thank you so much for tuning into the podcast today.

00:00:34.220 Don't forget to like this video.

00:00:35.280 If you're new around here, subscribe to our channel, True North.

00:00:37.900 If you're listening to this podcast and you enjoy it, don't forget to leave us a five-star review.

00:00:42.420 And head on over to our website, tnc.news, to sign up for our newsletter.

00:00:46.080 And if you want to support our journalism, you can hit the donate button there

00:00:48.780 and consider becoming a True North Insider.

00:00:51.620 Well, today I am joined by journalist Harrison Faulkner, host of Ratioed here at True North,

00:00:56.740 and we're going to walk you through some of the most egregious lies told by the legacy media.

00:01:02.080 That's what Fake News Friday is all about, exposing the agenda, exposing the lies from the legacy media.

00:01:07.920 We each picked a few of our favorite fake news stories of the year, so let's jump right to it.

00:01:13.020 Harrison, why don't you start?

00:01:15.100 So the first story we have here, Candace, as our audience will know,

00:01:18.460 is the hysteria over Christine Anderson, the German-European politician

00:01:23.500 who has become one of the loudest critics against Justin Trudeau over the past few years.

00:01:28.640 She's made numerous trips to Canada, and at the beginning of this year,

00:01:32.380 on one of her trips to Canada, she went and visited with three conservative MPs,

00:01:36.800 one of them being Lesley Lewis.

00:01:38.820 Now, of course, the legacy media jumped on this because, in their opinion,

00:01:43.800 anyone who is opposed to mass immigration,

00:01:46.080 anyone who calls out the Islamization of their country 0.99

00:01:49.460 must be some sort of racist, hateful, xenophobic, awful person. 0.98

00:01:55.380 And, of course, that is exactly what the legacy media did. 0.98

00:01:57.940 Doing what they usually do, Candace,

00:01:59.220 which is giving the liberal government opportunity to run their own opposition attack ads.

00:02:04.500 That's basically what this was, right? 0.97

00:02:05.840 To try and say that conservatives were meeting with this vile, racist, Nazi politician. 0.94

00:02:11.680 Now, we don't need to get into all of the details 0.93

00:02:13.800 because our audience knows this story already,

00:02:16.040 but the reality is, one, you can't be a Nazi in Germany.

00:02:19.580 It is against the law.

00:02:20.880 Two, Christine Anderson has repeatedly said that she is not a racist, not a Nazi, obviously.

00:02:28.120 When she comes to Canada, she's met with Holocaust survivors.

00:02:31.460 It's absurd to say that Christine Anderson is anything close to a racist.

00:02:36.080 She just tells the truth.

00:02:37.460 She tells the truth about mass immigration. 0.95

00:02:39.760 Now, here's the part where it gets difficult

00:02:41.260 because, of course, the legacy media jumped on this,

00:02:44.780 labeled Christine Anderson as a Nazi,

00:02:46.400 said that the conservatives who met with her were doing something very naughty, very bad.

00:02:51.760 But then, to make matters worse, Candace,

00:02:55.080 Pierre Paulyev himself, in response to the legacy media,

00:02:59.020 basically crucified his own party 0.74

00:03:01.400 and said that Christine Anderson was a vile racist 1.00

00:03:03.820 and that she should never have come to Canada in the first place.

00:03:06.560 I also want to show our audience this clip of a liberal MP

00:03:10.400 basically taking the exact line the legacy media gave them

00:03:13.640 and saying in the House of Commons that Christine Anderson was a known Nazi.

00:03:19.000 Listen to this.

00:03:20.060 I'm just curious if she thinks there should be consequences

00:03:23.260 or, uh, or retromand for members of this House

00:03:28.880 who meet with known Nazis

00:03:31.380 who spread, uh, misinformation, disinformation,

00:03:35.100 glorify the Holocaust, 0.98

00:03:36.960 who speak against, uh, uh, anti-Muslim rhetoric.

00:03:42.040 Uh, I'm just curious if she's talking about online hate

00:03:45.020 and privacy of Canadians and regulation.

00:03:47.660 Does she condemn her actions by meeting with a known Nazi?

00:03:51.140 So, Candace, it's predictable programming, really,

00:03:54.020 from the legacy media, right?

00:03:55.420 They just did anything they could to make conservatives look bad,

00:03:58.820 even lying, basically lying.

00:04:01.100 I don't know if we can say that. Hold on.

00:04:02.940 So, Candace, it's predictable programming from the legacy media,

00:04:05.560 doing anything they can to make conservative MPs look bad,

00:04:08.860 even though they just had dinner

00:04:10.660 with a very loud critic of Justin Trudeau.

00:04:13.580 It's unbelievable.

00:04:14.600 Well, it's too bad that you see Pierre Paulyev

00:04:16.560 falling to the media narrative on this.

00:04:18.200 One of the things that people love about Pierre Paulyev

00:04:20.140 is that he fights back and he doesn't cower.

00:04:22.480 And this behavior, you know, saying like,

00:04:24.140 oh, we're so sorry. Yes, you're right.

00:04:25.360 She's not bad and we don't like her.

00:04:27.240 Uh, you know, that's, that's kind of like

00:04:28.600 Andrew Sheeran, Aaron O'Toole, uh, conservatism.

00:04:31.580 And that's not what we really expect from Paulyev.

00:04:33.660 Sometimes it takes an outsider, um, uh, you know,

00:04:36.020 a foreign observer of Canada to really say the things

00:04:38.360 that people in Canada don't say or afraid to say.

00:04:40.860 And I think that's why Christina Anderson's voice

00:04:42.820 has been refreshing.

00:04:43.980 Obviously, you know, you don't have to agree

00:04:45.180 with every single thing a person says just to, you know,

00:04:47.700 go to an event with them.

00:04:48.680 I'm sure there's things, uh, that you say, Harrison,

00:04:50.460 I don't agree with.

00:04:51.020 There are things that, of course, another politician,

00:04:53.520 politicians say things all the time, so do journalists.

00:04:56.100 Um, but yeah, this whole line that if you criticize

00:04:58.800 mass migration, if you criticize extreme radical Islam,

00:05:02.240 uh, you're beyond the pale is just total nonsense. 0.73

00:05:04.440 And I think Canadians are had enough of it. 0.89

00:05:07.100 I think that's part of the reason the legacy media

00:05:08.640 doesn't have the same credibility they used to.

00:05:11.040 Uh, this is kind of like a sad example of like everything

00:05:14.440 slipping back to the way it was like five, 10 years ago.

00:05:17.600 Yeah, absolutely.

00:05:18.640 There's no reason for Polyev to fall to the legacy media's

00:05:22.120 fake news narratives about a German politician.

00:05:25.680 Canadians support what Anderson has to say.

00:05:27.860 That's why she keeps coming back here. 0.95

00:05:29.260 That's why she has such a, a large Canadian following. 0.93

00:05:31.920 So there's no need to stab your own MPs in the back.

00:05:34.740 There's no need to take the legacy media narrative.

00:05:36.940 They're obviously trying to discredit conservatives.

00:05:38.820 It doesn't matter what the truth really, really is.

00:05:41.400 They'll just do whatever they can.

00:05:42.460 So like you say, it was, it was an unnecessary error

00:05:45.380 from Polyev there.

00:05:47.000 Yeah.

00:05:47.360 Well, let's hope we don't see too many more of those in 2024.

00:05:50.200 Okay.

00:05:50.540 Another, uh, fake news narrative and story from 23.

00:05:52.940 I couldn't, I couldn't not include this story, Harrison,

00:05:55.060 because whenever it comes to anything to do with Israel,

00:05:58.260 there's just this derangement that you see in the legacy media

00:06:01.220 where they just don't like Israel.

00:06:02.500 Like if you take a step back, look, like you could,

00:06:05.040 you could say, I don't like foreign wars.

00:06:06.220 I don't think Canada should have any involvement.

00:06:07.480 You can say like, look, let people in the Middle East

00:06:09.680 deal with their own problems.

00:06:10.780 But when you're sort of talking about covering a war,

00:06:13.560 covering like objectively what is happening,

00:06:15.620 it's like the media refuse to do that.

00:06:17.180 They look at the situation in Israel.

00:06:19.380 And it kind of goes to like a broader ideological divide, Harrison,

00:06:22.500 because I think like generally speaking,

00:06:24.800 liberals look at the world of like,

00:06:27.000 you're either oppressed or you're an oppressor. 0.88

00:06:28.980 And because Israel is rich and successful

00:06:30.920 and they have an advanced military

00:06:31.920 and they have a developed economy and a developed society,

00:06:34.640 you know, they must be the oppressors.

00:06:36.500 And these Palestinians who live in squabble 1.00

00:06:38.460 because their leaders are terrorists 1.00

00:06:40.140 who spend all their money trying to kill Jews, 1.00

00:06:42.900 they don't have basic infrastructure. 0.99

00:06:44.960 They must be the oppressed. 0.92

00:06:46.060 And so there's a sort of sympathy that happens

00:06:48.220 in the Middle East.

00:06:49.480 So from the beginning of the war,

00:06:50.980 we've just seen story after story after story

00:06:52.920 that legacy media gets wrong.

00:06:54.300 Not that they get wrong,

00:06:56.060 you know, half the time they're using talking points

00:06:57.640 from Hamas,

00:06:58.480 but then they double down and triple down

00:07:00.380 and refuse to admit that they're,

00:07:02.340 you know, that they're incredibly biased.

00:07:04.440 The CBC right off the bat

00:07:06.040 refuses to label Hamas as terrorists.

00:07:08.400 It's like, okay, fine.

00:07:09.800 You know, they won an election,

00:07:10.980 they're a governing party,

00:07:12.000 but their tactics on October 7th

00:07:14.340 were clearly terrorism.

00:07:15.280 They went into people's homes

00:07:16.380 and murdered families.

00:07:17.740 And the entire point behind terrorism

00:07:19.780 is attacking civilians

00:07:21.660 with the aim of terrorizing a civilization

00:07:25.160 and terrorizing society.

00:07:26.180 And that's what it does.

00:07:26.720 Like the idea that terrorists could just enter your home 0.99

00:07:28.920 and kill your kids. 1.00

00:07:29.920 Like that's the biggest thing you could do 1.00

00:07:32.180 to spread terror.

00:07:32.840 So CBC showing their ideological colors

00:07:34.940 right off the bat.

00:07:36.040 And then, you know,

00:07:36.900 a couple weeks into the war,

00:07:38.800 you saw it again.

00:07:40.300 There were stories and reports on social media

00:07:41.940 in the evening

00:07:42.600 that a hospital had been leveled,

00:07:44.080 that Israel had bombed a hospital.

00:07:45.860 And everyone jumped on it,

00:07:47.580 including the prime minister,

00:07:48.960 the foreign affairs minister,

00:07:50.020 just instantly took Hamas's word 0.80

00:07:51.640 that 500 people had died

00:07:53.020 and that this Al-Hali Baptist hospital

00:07:55.460 had been leveled.

00:07:56.960 As soon as it was morning

00:07:58.000 and there were footage,

00:07:59.220 you could see that the hospital

00:08:00.160 was still standing,

00:08:01.060 that there was no evidence

00:08:02.260 of a huge attack from Israel.

00:08:04.300 And it became pretty clear

00:08:05.360 that it was a misfired rocket

00:08:06.980 that had actually hit a parking lot,

00:08:08.440 not killed that many people,

00:08:09.640 wasn't that big of a story.

00:08:11.200 CBC doubled down on it.

00:08:12.340 They kept their story up.

00:08:13.260 And then when the CBC president

00:08:14.720 was testifying in parliament,

00:08:16.920 she doubled down on it again. 0.97

00:08:18.100 So it's like they can't admit

00:08:19.240 that they're lying.

00:08:19.780 They won't admit that they're wrong.

00:08:21.620 A couple more quick examples here.

00:08:23.520 Harrison,

00:08:23.800 the Globe and Mail called,

00:08:25.200 so a couple weeks ago,

00:08:26.080 there was this humanitarian pause

00:08:27.640 in fighting for a return of hostages.

00:08:30.700 In return,

00:08:31.400 in exchange,

00:08:32.300 Israel agreed to release 0.83

00:08:33.460 some prisoners,

00:08:34.440 prisoners who had been convicted

00:08:35.420 on terrorism charges.

00:08:37.120 And the Globe and Mail

00:08:37.760 called it a prisoner swap, right?

00:08:39.040 It's like you're exchanging kids

00:08:41.040 who are kidnapped

00:08:41.620 for convicted terrorists

00:08:43.440 and you call that a prisoner swap?

00:08:45.440 You know,

00:08:46.040 the kidnapped Israelis

00:08:47.420 were not prisoners.

00:08:48.220 They were hostages.

00:08:50.080 Another one,

00:08:50.620 the Globe and Mail,

00:08:51.080 was claiming that

00:08:51.860 all of the casualties

00:08:53.840 on the Palestinian side

00:08:55.060 were civilian.

00:08:56.880 Here they say

00:08:57.500 13,300 civilians

00:08:59.680 were killed

00:09:00.540 on the Palestinian side.

00:09:01.420 It's like,

00:09:02.000 you know,

00:09:02.280 Israel says that 0.66

00:09:03.360 of the people

00:09:04.440 that they've killed,

00:09:05.280 5,000 to 6,000

00:09:06.280 were Hamas fighters,

00:09:07.960 right?

00:09:08.280 So claiming that

00:09:11.000 everyone who died

00:09:11.920 is a civilian,

00:09:13.100 ignoring the fact

00:09:13.720 that Hamas is even there,

00:09:15.680 pretty brutal.

00:09:16.540 And then I think

00:09:17.120 the worst one

00:09:18.220 in this genre

00:09:19.220 of anti-Israel reporting

00:09:22.280 was this story

00:09:23.940 that CTV aired

00:09:24.960 in Toronto

00:09:25.580 talking about Hanukkah,

00:09:26.880 like purely just talking

00:09:27.760 about the religious festival,

00:09:29.260 the festival of lights,

00:09:30.360 lighting of the menorah.

00:09:32.000 And then out of nowhere,

00:09:33.700 the control room

00:09:34.640 goes to B-roll,

00:09:35.620 which is just the,

00:09:36.240 you know,

00:09:36.440 the secondary footage

00:09:37.280 that they show on the screen.

00:09:38.560 And it showed,

00:09:39.740 like,

00:09:40.100 the worst footage

00:09:40.860 of kids being pulled

00:09:42.520 from rubble

00:09:43.320 and bombing in Israel.

00:09:44.980 It was like,

00:09:45.600 you know,

00:09:45.920 Jews celebrating

00:09:46.980 Hanukkah in Toronto.

00:09:47.720 What does that have to do

00:09:48.560 with kids

00:09:50.040 in this, like,

00:09:50.880 really graphic footage

00:09:52.260 in Gaza?

00:09:53.700 I mean,

00:09:54.200 it just shows,

00:09:56.020 really,

00:09:56.940 that there's some

00:09:58.140 pretty deranged people

00:09:59.080 in the legacy media

00:10:00.060 and people who

00:10:00.880 hate Israel, 0.68

00:10:03.120 you know,

00:10:03.500 support Hamas 0.64

00:10:04.980 and want to tell

00:10:06.320 that side of the story.

00:10:08.280 Yeah,

00:10:08.780 I mean,

00:10:09.000 I think one thing

00:10:09.840 that's clear

00:10:10.240 is that there are

00:10:10.800 a lot of people

00:10:11.540 in the legacy media

00:10:12.420 who are ideologically

00:10:14.380 driven on this issue.

00:10:15.540 They're not there

00:10:16.060 to really report

00:10:16.840 what's going on.

00:10:18.500 They have their own

00:10:19.440 biases against Israel

00:10:21.000 and that's become

00:10:21.640 super obvious

00:10:22.420 from the very beginning

00:10:23.500 of this.

00:10:24.280 I think also

00:10:24.800 the CBC

00:10:25.480 not even calling

00:10:26.500 the October 7th attack

00:10:28.280 terrorism,

00:10:29.280 not calling Hamas

00:10:30.120 terrorists. 0.53

00:10:31.180 That's insane. 1.00

00:10:32.820 They're obviously terrorists. 0.99

00:10:34.300 The Canadian government 0.83

00:10:35.100 describes Hamas

00:10:36.260 as a terrorist organization,

00:10:37.780 yet the CBC

00:10:38.420 is hesitant

00:10:39.380 to call them

00:10:39.940 a terrorist group.

00:10:41.160 It's wild.

00:10:41.700 And also,

00:10:42.800 I think the media

00:10:43.860 hasn't learned anything

00:10:44.740 from Ukraine,

00:10:45.640 Russia,

00:10:46.380 right?

00:10:47.120 Obviously,

00:10:47.720 these modern conflicts

00:10:49.000 are played out

00:10:50.220 in social media.

00:10:51.640 People are trying

00:10:52.280 to get the upper hand

00:10:53.580 on social media

00:10:54.400 and so immediately

00:10:56.200 jumping to conclusions,

00:10:57.480 immediately taking

00:10:58.180 the word of one side

00:10:59.960 like we saw

00:11:00.820 with the Al-Shifa hospital,

00:11:02.700 immediately taking

00:11:03.540 Hamas' side on that 0.98

00:11:04.760 and publishing it

00:11:05.420 as though it's fact

00:11:06.140 before they even had

00:11:07.180 to retract stories,

00:11:08.340 edit headlines,

00:11:09.480 change the story

00:11:10.080 because it turns out

00:11:10.880 to not be true.

00:11:12.580 Nobody seemed

00:11:13.160 to learn anything

00:11:13.860 from Ukraine,

00:11:15.220 Russia,

00:11:15.560 where, again,

00:11:16.480 both sides

00:11:17.100 were putting out

00:11:17.640 fake stories

00:11:18.400 and the media

00:11:19.400 was just taking it

00:11:20.220 at face value

00:11:21.280 and reporting it.

00:11:22.280 That's what the media

00:11:22.880 did here.

00:11:23.420 They immediately

00:11:24.220 jumped to the worst

00:11:25.000 conclusion,

00:11:25.580 blaming Israel

00:11:26.120 for an attack

00:11:26.800 on a hospital,

00:11:27.720 which didn't

00:11:28.840 actually happen.

00:11:29.680 So media

00:11:30.720 hasn't learned anything.

00:11:31.800 The media is clearly

00:11:32.660 driven by a bias

00:11:33.620 against Israel 0.70

00:11:34.580 and if that isn't

00:11:35.540 clear now,

00:11:36.140 then I'm not sure

00:11:37.420 when it will ever

00:11:38.380 be clear to Canadians.

00:11:39.240 Yeah,

00:11:40.100 that's such a good

00:11:40.460 point about Ukraine.

00:11:41.500 It's like,

00:11:41.800 how many stories

00:11:42.920 were just so

00:11:43.400 embarrassingly bad

00:11:44.540 that basically

00:11:45.140 came from a meme

00:11:46.160 or just someone

00:11:46.760 making stuff up

00:11:47.500 on Twitter

00:11:47.900 and the legacy media

00:11:49.260 reporting it

00:11:49.960 as fact?

00:11:51.040 And it's like,

00:11:52.060 you know,

00:11:52.940 with Hamas,

00:11:53.920 it's like,

00:11:54.260 they're not a reliable,

00:11:55.680 credible source.

00:11:56.780 They're going to tell you lies.

00:11:57.900 That's their whole,

00:11:58.800 like,

00:11:59.360 that's what they do

00:12:00.160 every single day.

00:12:01.360 And it just shows

00:12:03.220 how bad,

00:12:05.180 like,

00:12:05.380 how uncredible

00:12:06.360 their reports are,

00:12:07.300 that these are supposed

00:12:08.180 to be serious,

00:12:08.900 trusted journalists

00:12:09.480 and yet when it comes

00:12:10.620 to, like,

00:12:10.860 the very basics

00:12:11.640 of Journalism 101

00:12:12.540 and ethics,

00:12:13.840 they don't follow it

00:12:14.960 and on such a big,

00:12:15.980 important issue like this,

00:12:16.980 it's really sad.

00:12:19.400 Yeah,

00:12:19.860 absolutely.

00:12:20.640 I'm going to move on

00:12:21.380 to the next story here,

00:12:22.440 Candace.

00:12:22.860 So this story

00:12:23.860 is utterly insane.

00:12:26.060 I'm just going to put it

00:12:26.680 out there at the beginning.

00:12:27.900 This is now

00:12:28.580 the Rainbow Bridge incident.

00:12:31.180 If you'll recall

00:12:31.780 a few months ago,

00:12:32.960 last month,

00:12:33.640 there was this concern

00:12:36.200 that during

00:12:37.240 American Thanksgiving

00:12:38.080 there was a terrorist attack

00:12:39.400 at the Rainbow Bridge

00:12:40.840 border crossing

00:12:41.580 in Niagara.

00:12:42.660 Now,

00:12:42.840 the reason a lot of Canadians

00:12:43.900 might think that

00:12:44.920 is because

00:12:45.760 legacy media journalists

00:12:47.400 ran with the story

00:12:49.200 saying that sources

00:12:50.520 inside of

00:12:52.380 the Canadian government

00:12:53.480 were initially operating

00:12:55.300 under the assumption

00:12:56.020 that it was terror-related.

00:12:57.460 That is a verbatim quote

00:12:58.640 from a CTV News article

00:13:00.180 published at 1.09 p.m.

00:13:04.080 Then at 2 o'clock,

00:13:05.580 2.25 or so,

00:13:07.180 Pierre Polyev,

00:13:08.380 at question period,

00:13:10.100 of course,

00:13:11.040 not assuming that CTV

00:13:12.260 has just ran a fake story,

00:13:14.220 asks the Prime Minister

00:13:15.340 how he will respond

00:13:16.800 to what is perceived

00:13:17.920 to be a potential

00:13:18.920 terrorist attack.

00:13:20.940 Nothing was wrong

00:13:21.900 with what Pierre Polyev

00:13:22.740 said there.

00:13:23.740 CTV News

00:13:24.560 ran with this story,

00:13:26.540 said that the Canadian

00:13:27.860 government was operating

00:13:28.800 under terrorist assumptions,

00:13:30.180 Polyev then

00:13:30.960 did the right thing

00:13:31.980 and allowed the Prime Minister

00:13:33.260 to comment

00:13:33.980 to the nation

00:13:35.140 about what is going on here.

00:13:37.160 Then,

00:13:37.900 from that point on,

00:13:39.300 it was as if,

00:13:40.200 Candace,

00:13:40.660 the legacy media

00:13:41.400 just decided that

00:13:42.200 no one was actually

00:13:42.800 going to see

00:13:43.200 that original report

00:13:44.100 and they were going

00:13:44.960 to attack Polyev

00:13:46.320 for jumping to conclusions,

00:13:48.580 for calling it

00:13:49.120 a terrorist attack.

00:13:50.580 First of all,

00:13:51.340 he didn't say that.

00:13:52.420 He said that media reports

00:13:54.080 were saying that

00:13:54.880 it was a terrorist attack.

00:13:56.440 And watch this exchange.

00:13:57.940 A lot of our audience

00:13:58.600 has seen it,

00:13:59.080 but it just shows you

00:14:00.000 the disconnect

00:14:01.400 between the truth

00:14:02.900 and legacy media journalists.

00:14:04.960 This is a Canadian

00:14:06.020 press journalist

00:14:06.840 the day after

00:14:07.920 questioning Pierre Polyev

00:14:09.560 on why he said

00:14:10.820 that it was a terrorist attack

00:14:12.480 at the Rainbow Bridge.

00:14:13.340 Watch this.

00:14:13.820 Do you think it was responsible

00:14:15.560 for you to call

00:14:17.260 yesterday's explosion

00:14:18.260 by the customs,

00:14:19.540 by the checkpoint

00:14:20.340 at the Rainbow Bridge

00:14:21.240 terrorism

00:14:21.800 when no U.S.

00:14:23.700 or Canadian officials

00:14:24.840 said that was,

00:14:25.640 authorities said

00:14:26.280 that was the case

00:14:26.860 and when the New York

00:14:28.040 governor also said

00:14:29.500 there was no evidence

00:14:30.200 to suggest terrorism activity?

00:14:31.780 Actually,

00:14:32.340 you're wrong. 0.83

00:14:32.780 Are you with CP?

00:14:33.260 Okay, so CP,

00:14:35.200 by the way,

00:14:35.640 CP, just for everyone's

00:14:36.560 knowledge,

00:14:37.480 did have to make

00:14:38.420 three corrections

00:14:39.460 for falsehoods

00:14:41.040 that they put

00:14:41.660 into a single article.

00:14:42.740 I think that might

00:14:43.120 be unprecedented.

00:14:44.860 I'm actually thinking

00:14:46.180 about checking

00:14:46.700 with the Guinness Book

00:14:47.520 of World Records

00:14:48.260 to see if there's

00:14:49.480 ever been a news agency

00:14:50.700 that has had to issue

00:14:51.720 three corrections

00:14:52.920 for patent falsehoods

00:14:55.040 that they admit

00:14:55.660 they had been made

00:14:56.960 in one single article

00:14:57.920 and now you've made

00:14:58.620 yet another falsehood

00:14:59.780 in your question.

00:15:00.420 Where you are wrong

00:15:03.180 is that CTV reported

00:15:04.940 that the government

00:15:05.540 of Canada

00:15:06.100 was presuming

00:15:07.520 that the incident

00:15:08.100 was terrorist.

00:15:09.760 So, yeah,

00:15:10.640 that was,

00:15:10.920 and that's what I said

00:15:11.480 in my remarks.

00:15:12.820 You're right.

00:15:13.740 It was a media report.

00:15:15.000 But it's citing

00:15:15.600 media reports and not...

00:15:17.500 Which is what I said.

00:15:18.740 In the House,

00:15:19.300 I said there are

00:15:19.800 media reports.

00:15:21.900 And you think

00:15:22.540 that's a responsible

00:15:23.160 thing to go on

00:15:23.940 to make that kind

00:15:24.760 of a statement

00:15:25.700 at the time

00:15:26.240 without speaking...

00:15:27.380 What kind of statement?

00:15:29.160 Calling something

00:15:29.920 terrorist.

00:15:30.320 I didn't.

00:15:32.260 I said there were

00:15:33.220 media reports.

00:15:34.900 That's the distinction

00:15:35.660 we're making, okay?

00:15:36.640 No, there's no distinction.

00:15:38.540 What I said,

00:15:40.420 and I was right,

00:15:41.960 was that there were

00:15:42.800 media reports

00:15:43.660 of a terror-related event.

00:15:48.080 By your admission,

00:15:49.620 there were media reports

00:15:51.400 of a terror-related event.

00:15:54.280 And that media report,

00:15:56.080 according to CTV,

00:15:57.080 unless you're questioning

00:15:57.780 their integrity now,

00:15:58.780 came from security officials

00:16:01.860 in the Trudeau government.

00:16:04.120 So do you think

00:16:04.860 the CTV was irresponsible

00:16:06.120 in putting out that tweet?

00:16:10.740 Do you think

00:16:11.400 it was a responsible comment

00:16:12.400 to make it in the House?

00:16:13.000 Sorry, I'm asking,

00:16:14.320 I have already answered that.

00:16:16.200 Do you think CTV

00:16:17.060 was irresponsible

00:16:17.760 to put that tweet out?

00:16:19.780 That's none of my business.

00:16:21.580 That's not for me to comment.

00:16:24.000 But you just did comment.

00:16:28.780 Okay.

00:16:29.580 So I just hope

00:16:30.780 you're not going to print

00:16:31.440 something that you have

00:16:32.020 to apologize for again.

00:16:33.060 So Candace,

00:16:34.240 if the legacy media

00:16:35.560 publishes a story

00:16:37.200 in which they say

00:16:38.480 that government officials

00:16:39.560 are operating under

00:16:40.460 the assumption

00:16:41.000 that it was a terrorist attack,

00:16:42.740 is the leader of the opposition

00:16:44.340 just supposed to

00:16:45.400 discredit all that

00:16:46.700 when he speaks

00:16:47.380 and basically say

00:16:49.600 the media is wrong? 0.99

00:16:51.080 It's so ridiculous. 0.96

00:16:52.820 Well, I reported 0.88

00:16:54.760 on this story as well, Harrison,

00:16:56.240 and I said it was 1.00

00:16:56.820 the stupidest fake news story 1.00

00:16:58.160 I'd ever seen 1.00

00:16:58.980 because the media

00:16:59.720 became obsessed with it.

00:17:01.280 It was like unbelievable

00:17:02.220 how big of a story

00:17:03.280 this was on legacy media,

00:17:05.300 social media,

00:17:05.880 on Twitter, on X.

00:17:07.400 Every single journalist

00:17:08.560 was like up in arms

00:17:10.480 and worked up

00:17:11.100 about how irresponsible

00:17:12.020 it was for Pierre Polyev.

00:17:14.280 You had all the hosts

00:17:15.240 over at CBC.

00:17:16.180 You had their at-issue panel.

00:17:17.500 You had all of the

00:17:18.480 political commentators.

00:17:19.760 They were all focused

00:17:20.560 on this story 1.00

00:17:21.180 and it was so stupid. 1.00

00:17:22.240 It was like Pierre Polyev 1.00

00:17:23.800 just quoted a CTV story

00:17:25.380 and you could see

00:17:26.340 the evolution

00:17:26.920 of the legacy media spin on it

00:17:29.680 because at first

00:17:30.880 they were saying,

00:17:31.840 oh, he's talking about

00:17:33.280 terrorism that's reckless

00:17:34.060 and then it's like,

00:17:34.700 oh, no, it's media reports.

00:17:35.640 Oh, he's relying on Fox News

00:17:37.040 and then it's like,

00:17:38.340 no, no, there's a CTV story

00:17:40.360 and they were like,

00:17:40.800 oh, no, that CTV story

00:17:41.720 came out in the afternoon

00:17:42.500 and it's like,

00:17:43.380 no, no, the CTV story

00:17:44.280 came out like an hour

00:17:45.060 before Polyev went out

00:17:45.920 and they're like,

00:17:46.800 well, the story

00:17:47.260 must have been updated.

00:17:48.140 Like, it was like,

00:17:49.600 whatever you came,

00:17:50.520 whenever you came back

00:17:51.340 at them with facts,

00:17:52.520 they would just change

00:17:53.720 their attack against Polyev

00:17:55.300 and it was really

00:17:56.640 just one of those

00:17:57.380 like inside the legacy

00:17:59.140 media bubble story

00:18:00.220 that like you have to 0.96

00:18:01.280 be so deranged 0.96

00:18:02.660 to actually think 0.89

00:18:03.820 that this was a scandal,

00:18:04.960 to think this was a big deal

00:18:05.960 and yet the amount of ink

00:18:07.180 that was spread,

00:18:07.860 the amount of,

00:18:08.800 that was spilled

00:18:09.460 on the story,

00:18:10.020 the amount of airtime

00:18:11.040 it got

00:18:11.500 and then the liberals

00:18:12.400 who brought it up

00:18:12.900 the next week again

00:18:13.600 and they were attacking

00:18:14.300 him in the House of Commons

00:18:15.080 calling Pierre Polyev

00:18:16.920 Islamophobic or something.

00:18:18.680 Like,

00:18:19.300 this is an example 1.00

00:18:21.220 of really how stupid, 1.00

00:18:23.400 how stupid 1.00

00:18:24.100 the legacy media is 1.00

00:18:25.400 when it comes to

00:18:26.180 their coverage

00:18:26.720 of Pierre Polyev.

00:18:28.180 Yeah, outrageous.

00:18:29.720 Just shows you

00:18:30.240 that the conservatives

00:18:31.620 should never,

00:18:32.500 should never accept

00:18:33.800 what the legacy media

00:18:34.720 is going to write about them.

00:18:35.700 They'll never,

00:18:36.220 they'll never write

00:18:37.000 the truth anyway.

00:18:37.960 So,

00:18:38.360 and they'll never give them

00:18:39.120 a fair shake.

00:18:39.760 So what's the point

00:18:40.460 in trying to play to them?

00:18:41.420 They'll never give you

00:18:42.220 fair coverage.

00:18:43.360 A hundred percent.

00:18:43.940 It's like something

00:18:44.280 about Pierre Polyev

00:18:45.060 just really triggers

00:18:45.820 the legacy media

00:18:46.620 and they can't help themselves.

00:18:47.840 So anytime they have

00:18:48.500 an opportunity

00:18:49.020 where they think

00:18:50.140 they've caught him

00:18:50.860 saying something

00:18:51.500 slightly off guard

00:18:52.600 that they'll attack

00:18:54.400 and it's really transparent.

00:18:56.160 Well,

00:18:56.300 I want to talk

00:18:56.940 a little bit more.

00:18:57.960 My next story

00:18:58.540 that I'm bringing

00:18:58.960 is about the liberal government

00:19:01.040 trying to regulate

00:19:02.720 the internet,

00:19:03.300 trying to regulate news,

00:19:04.640 streaming,

00:19:05.460 online streaming act.

00:19:06.520 You know,

00:19:06.800 we talk about

00:19:07.420 how Pierre Polyev

00:19:08.260 triggers the media.

00:19:09.020 I think that there might

00:19:10.000 only be one or two people

00:19:11.080 that trigger the legacy media

00:19:12.300 more than Pierre Polyev.

00:19:13.660 That would probably be

00:19:14.240 Elon Musk

00:19:14.900 and Joe Rogan.

00:19:16.240 Anytime those two

00:19:17.120 talk about Canada,

00:19:18.320 you're going to see

00:19:19.060 a bunch of stories

00:19:19.760 in the legacy media

00:19:20.600 about how terrible they are.

00:19:21.960 Well,

00:19:22.120 Joe Rogan,

00:19:22.820 just very,

00:19:23.340 very briefly

00:19:23.780 on his podcast,

00:19:25.140 commented

00:19:25.480 on this new

00:19:26.760 initiative

00:19:28.620 that the liberals

00:19:29.200 are introducing.

00:19:30.340 So here's a clip,

00:19:32.300 just very brief

00:19:32.940 from Joe Rogan's show.

00:19:35.280 Frozen

00:19:35.640 communist

00:19:36.640 So this is

00:19:38.220 the Liberals

00:19:38.900 Online Streaming Act.

00:19:40.500 As soon as this came out,

00:19:41.400 you know,

00:19:41.600 it created a huge stir

00:19:43.520 because people are like,

00:19:44.360 what?

00:19:44.640 The government's

00:19:45.340 going to go even further

00:19:46.460 in regulating

00:19:47.060 the internet

00:19:47.880 and news?

00:19:49.280 And instantly,

00:19:50.140 the liberals

00:19:50.580 defended themselves

00:19:51.340 and said,

00:19:52.180 no,

00:19:52.340 no,

00:19:52.440 we're not going

00:19:53.460 to regulate podcasts.

00:19:54.340 We're just going

00:19:54.960 to regulate platforms,

00:19:56.340 right?

00:19:56.560 And so then you had

00:19:57.160 the Canadian press

00:19:57.800 parroting the liberal

00:19:59.040 government

00:19:59.420 and assuring Canadians

00:20:00.820 that,

00:20:01.240 no,

00:20:01.320 Joe Rogan's wrong

00:20:02.280 and the liberals

00:20:03.420 are just,

00:20:04.640 their online streaming

00:20:05.740 won't regulate

00:20:06.640 social media creators

00:20:07.720 and podcasts.

00:20:08.880 But of course,

00:20:09.440 in the fine print,

00:20:10.260 Harrison,

00:20:10.760 we see that

00:20:11.700 they actually will.

00:20:12.540 They're going to be

00:20:13.220 regulating the platform.

00:20:16.660 So they'll be regulating

00:20:17.640 for Canadian content

00:20:18.620 and they're going

00:20:19.560 to be obviously

00:20:20.020 interfering in the algorithms

00:20:21.020 and imposing

00:20:21.820 their own censorship

00:20:22.380 because they're going

00:20:22.960 to be regulating

00:20:23.600 Spotify and YouTube

00:20:25.360 and the places

00:20:26.020 where Canadians

00:20:26.560 get their podcasts.

00:20:27.380 So it's kind of

00:20:28.140 a distinction

00:20:28.580 without a difference,

00:20:29.500 right?

00:20:29.640 It's saying,

00:20:30.280 oh no,

00:20:30.500 we're not going

00:20:30.900 to regulate

00:20:31.340 True North.

00:20:32.420 We're just going

00:20:32.960 to regulate

00:20:33.340 all the places

00:20:34.140 where Canadians

00:20:35.280 can find

00:20:36.080 True North podcasts.

00:20:37.320 And it's like,

00:20:38.120 that's exactly

00:20:38.700 the same thing.

00:20:39.560 And it's interesting

00:20:40.420 to see how this happens,

00:20:42.100 Harrison,

00:20:42.360 because anytime

00:20:43.740 the liberals

00:20:44.180 introduce a new plan

00:20:45.480 to either bail out

00:20:47.240 the media

00:20:47.700 or to regulate

00:20:48.740 a different aspect

00:20:49.440 of how Canadians

00:20:50.300 get their news,

00:20:51.280 you see legacy media

00:20:52.260 journalists jump up

00:20:53.180 and defend them,

00:20:54.160 right?

00:20:54.320 Defending them,

00:20:54.920 saying,

00:20:55.140 no, no, no,

00:20:55.560 it's not as bad

00:20:56.180 as you hear

00:20:56.780 or this is what's

00:20:57.480 really happening

00:20:58.100 or whatever.

00:20:58.480 It's like,

00:20:59.080 again,

00:20:59.360 in a free country

00:21:00.060 and a free press,

00:21:01.320 you would see

00:21:01.880 journalists criticizing

00:21:02.780 the government.

00:21:03.300 You wouldn't see

00:21:03.840 the journalists

00:21:04.300 always playing

00:21:05.200 this defense role

00:21:06.140 of trying to explain

00:21:07.580 how actually

00:21:08.980 the criticisms are wrong

00:21:10.180 and actually

00:21:10.500 what the Trudeau government

00:21:11.080 is doing is just fine.

00:21:12.460 We see this over

00:21:13.040 and over again.

00:21:13.980 Just the other week,

00:21:15.140 Harrison,

00:21:15.480 when the Trudeau liberals

00:21:16.900 announced their

00:21:17.560 fall economic update

00:21:18.660 and part of it

00:21:19.660 was another

00:21:20.160 $125 million bailout

00:21:22.140 to news agencies.

00:21:23.320 it came in the form

00:21:24.220 of a tax credit

00:21:25.240 that allowed you

00:21:25.920 to write off

00:21:27.400 up to 35%

00:21:28.460 of someone's paychecks,

00:21:30.420 so up to $30,000

00:21:31.360 per employee

00:21:32.780 in the newsroom

00:21:34.100 and you had a bunch

00:21:35.040 of journalists

00:21:35.500 being like,

00:21:36.340 this isn't a bailout,

00:21:37.320 it's just tax credit,

00:21:38.840 like it's totally different.

00:21:40.480 It's like anyone

00:21:40.900 who's ever run a business

00:21:41.780 knows that like money

00:21:43.440 in your bottom line,

00:21:44.780 that's a bailout,

00:21:45.840 right?

00:21:45.960 That's the government

00:21:46.540 giving you extra money

00:21:48.000 to hire more journalists

00:21:49.180 and to pay for journalists.

00:21:50.540 So anyone saying

00:21:51.280 that's not a bailout,

00:21:52.060 they clearly just don't

00:21:53.020 know anything about

00:21:53.820 like economics

00:21:55.320 or business. 0.99

00:21:56.200 It's so pathetic 1.00

00:21:57.040 and yet you saw it 1.00

00:21:58.140 from so many people.

00:22:00.080 You would think, Candace,

00:22:01.240 that if these journalists

00:22:02.540 were getting

00:22:03.080 all of this money

00:22:04.320 from the government,

00:22:05.400 they might have

00:22:05.940 some interest

00:22:06.700 in trying to

00:22:07.500 maybe even pretend

00:22:08.860 to hold the government

00:22:09.600 accountable,

00:22:10.520 pretend as though

00:22:11.200 the money that they're

00:22:11.860 getting from the government

00:22:12.680 is not obviously

00:22:13.580 influencing their coverage,

00:22:14.880 but they're not

00:22:15.200 even trying anymore.

00:22:16.420 It's like they really

00:22:17.220 don't care about perception,

00:22:18.960 they just know that

00:22:19.820 maybe Canadians

00:22:21.120 are just going to accept this,

00:22:22.060 we're just going to accept

00:22:22.840 that all of our

00:22:23.940 major news outlets

00:22:25.060 are being paid off

00:22:26.620 by the government

00:22:27.160 and the government

00:22:27.920 is just going to

00:22:28.640 parrot their talking points.

00:22:30.080 They don't really seem

00:22:31.000 to have any interest

00:22:32.160 at all

00:22:32.840 in telling the truth

00:22:34.320 or trying to discredit

00:22:35.660 the fact that

00:22:36.400 no, the money we get

00:22:37.560 from the government

00:22:38.040 isn't impacting our coverage.

00:22:39.920 Speaking of this,

00:22:41.220 this next story

00:22:42.260 is exactly in line

00:22:44.220 with that.

00:22:45.080 Out of nowhere,

00:22:46.420 seemingly out of nowhere,

00:22:47.360 the Canadian press

00:22:48.260 decided to publish

00:22:49.420 a story

00:22:49.940 which said that,

00:22:51.260 and this is the headline

00:22:51.960 by the way,

00:22:52.900 conspiracy theories

00:22:53.880 are popular in Canada,

00:22:55.400 especially among conservatives,

00:22:57.360 Paul says.

00:22:58.560 So that was published

00:23:00.000 in the Canadian press

00:23:00.900 and of course,

00:23:01.760 the legacy media

00:23:02.600 have just

00:23:03.560 take those articles

00:23:04.680 and republished them

00:23:05.680 immediately

00:23:06.120 on all of these

00:23:07.280 different platforms.

00:23:08.000 So you had

00:23:08.500 CTV,

00:23:09.360 CP24,

00:23:10.720 and the Globe and Mail.

00:23:12.140 That headline,

00:23:13.200 which is obviously

00:23:13.800 partisan in nature,

00:23:14.840 which is obviously

00:23:15.380 targeted at conservatives

00:23:17.200 and is aimed at

00:23:18.160 making conservatives

00:23:18.960 look bad,

00:23:20.560 was just published

00:23:21.680 without any concern

00:23:22.500 at all.

00:23:23.300 And then,

00:23:23.800 something strange

00:23:24.440 happened, Candace,

00:23:25.300 because of course,

00:23:26.100 when all the legacy

00:23:26.720 media outlets

00:23:27.280 tweeted out this article,

00:23:29.460 the Canadians

00:23:30.240 gave them pushback

00:23:31.200 and said, 1.00

00:23:31.660 what is this garbage? 1.00

00:23:33.320 This is such 1.00

00:23:34.340 a patently absurd article.

00:23:36.840 CP24

00:23:37.280 and CTV News

00:23:39.040 changed their headline.

00:23:40.520 They removed any mention

00:23:41.900 of conservative

00:23:42.480 at all

00:23:43.280 because obviously,

00:23:44.480 it's so obviously

00:23:45.600 partisan.

00:23:46.640 Except for the Globe and Mail.

00:23:47.700 The Globe and Mail

00:23:48.300 didn't bother

00:23:49.000 changing their headline.

00:23:49.860 They thought,

00:23:50.280 oh, that's fine.

00:23:51.300 Now, this is where 0.90

00:23:52.060 the article gets ridiculous.

00:23:54.140 One of the conspiracy

00:23:55.100 theories that apparently

00:23:56.240 conservatives believe in

00:23:57.480 is that the mainstream

00:23:58.800 media manipulates

00:24:00.500 information.

00:24:01.820 This is a direct

00:24:03.040 example of the

00:24:03.740 mainstream media

00:24:04.360 manipulating information.

00:24:05.820 One of thousands

00:24:06.960 of examples,

00:24:08.080 Candace,

00:24:08.520 of the media

00:24:09.600 doing this.

00:24:10.280 And yet,

00:24:10.900 this is supposed

00:24:11.380 to be news. 0.97

00:24:12.580 It's ridiculous. 0.86

00:24:14.400 This is really 0.96

00:24:15.080 the perfect

00:24:15.640 fake news story

00:24:17.260 for 2023,

00:24:18.500 Harrison.

00:24:19.360 I mean,

00:24:20.020 look,

00:24:20.520 when I first

00:24:21.300 opened that article,

00:24:22.120 I read it,

00:24:22.620 I was like,

00:24:22.960 oh, give me a break. 0.60

00:24:23.820 And then I start

00:24:24.600 reading it.

00:24:25.040 It was like,

00:24:25.720 oh, Canadians 1.00

00:24:26.240 believe in flat earth.

00:24:27.620 Some Canadians

00:24:28.140 believe in flat earth

00:24:28.860 and talk about

00:24:29.680 real conspiracies,

00:24:30.560 right?

00:24:31.260 And then all of a sudden

00:24:32.120 they kind of sneak in,

00:24:33.300 oh,

00:24:33.720 and this percentage

00:24:35.280 don't believe

00:24:35.960 in the severe effects

00:24:39.080 of climate change.

00:24:40.440 And, you know,

00:24:40.940 here now we have

00:24:41.480 some stuff about

00:24:41.900 the COVID vaccine

00:24:42.680 and about whether

00:24:43.520 COVID was invented

00:24:44.560 in a lab.

00:24:45.600 And then,

00:24:46.220 yeah,

00:24:47.180 the media thing.

00:24:47.700 And it's like,

00:24:48.220 they kind of just

00:24:48.680 like went from

00:24:49.160 real conspiracies

00:24:49.920 all the way down

00:24:50.720 to just like things

00:24:51.560 that have actually

00:24:52.100 factually been proven true.

00:24:54.120 And look,

00:24:54.660 both sides believe

00:24:55.420 things that aren't

00:24:56.400 quite true.

00:24:56.980 I mean,

00:24:57.380 people on the left

00:24:58.180 still believe

00:24:58.840 Russiagate.

00:24:59.380 They still believe

00:25:00.220 that somehow

00:25:00.720 Russia interfered

00:25:02.080 under the 2016 election

00:25:03.280 and that Donald Trump

00:25:04.080 isn't the legitimate

00:25:05.100 president of the United States.

00:25:07.000 I'm sure lots of liberals

00:25:08.380 and left-wing Canadians

00:25:09.260 still believe

00:25:09.980 the robocall scandal

00:25:12.340 that was completely invented

00:25:14.200 by the legacy media

00:25:15.160 that was never proven

00:25:16.540 in any way,

00:25:17.380 shape,

00:25:17.540 or form.

00:25:17.880 But they believe

00:25:18.420 for many,

00:25:18.880 many years

00:25:19.240 that Stephen Harper

00:25:19.880 had stolen

00:25:20.520 the 2011 election,

00:25:23.000 Canada.

00:25:23.400 Like,

00:25:23.820 they never mentioned

00:25:24.540 the things

00:25:25.040 that left-wing Canadians

00:25:26.900 believe.

00:25:27.380 They just only make it

00:25:28.720 about the things

00:25:29.640 that conservatives believe,

00:25:30.660 which obviously

00:25:31.520 this is just

00:25:32.040 a complete hatchet job

00:25:33.500 from the beginning

00:25:34.700 and no one should

00:25:35.820 take these people seriously.

00:25:37.880 Yeah, 1.00

00:25:38.360 it's totally pathetic. 0.99

00:25:40.100 I mean, 0.99

00:25:40.620 what,

00:25:41.040 just actual facts

00:25:42.560 are now conspiracy theories

00:25:44.180 that conservatives believe in

00:25:45.420 as if the mainstream media

00:25:46.780 didn't manipulate

00:25:47.900 basically every single story

00:25:49.520 during the pandemic

00:25:50.400 as if they didn't manipulate

00:25:51.900 basically any story

00:25:52.860 during the Freedom Convoy.

00:25:53.980 It's absurd

00:25:54.860 and so obviously partisan

00:25:56.680 that no one should ever

00:25:58.000 take these people

00:25:58.500 seriously again.

00:25:59.480 It's just,

00:25:59.860 it's just not worth

00:26:00.680 anyone's time.

00:26:01.860 Well,

00:26:02.360 I think that's a perfect place

00:26:03.460 to leave it today.

00:26:04.760 So Harrison and I

00:26:06.120 will be back next week.

00:26:07.620 You know,

00:26:07.840 next week is Christmas

00:26:08.920 so we hope you have

00:26:09.440 a wonderful holiday

00:26:10.340 with your family.

00:26:10.940 Same to you, Harrison.

00:26:12.040 And we will be back

00:26:13.280 this time next week

00:26:14.840 giving you

00:26:16.220 the finals.

00:26:17.540 We're gonna,

00:26:17.820 we've held

00:26:18.720 the four biggest

00:26:19.840 fake news stories

00:26:20.600 of the year

00:26:20.920 so we'll be back

00:26:21.560 with that

00:26:22.560 for the end of 2023.

00:26:24.360 So thanks so much

00:26:24.960 for tuning in today.

00:26:26.500 Again,

00:26:26.700 Merry Christmas,

00:26:27.200 have a great one

00:26:27.780 and we will see you back

00:26:29.020 next week.

00:26:29.840 It's Fake News Friday.

00:26:30.600 I'm Katis Malcolm

00:26:31.060 and this is

00:26:31.680 The Katis Malcolm Show.

The Candice Malcolm Show - December 22, 2023

The biggest fake news HOAXES of 2023

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript