The Candice Malcolm Show - November 22, 2021


The Canadian Left respond to the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial


Episode Stats

Length

28 minutes

Words per Minute

197.78102

Word Count

5,645

Sentence Count

297

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

Kyle Rittenhouse is found not guilty and the left loses its mind. Candice Malan talks about the case and how the left in Canada are reacting to the verdict and how they use the case as an example of racism in America.


Transcript

00:00:00.040 Kyle Rittenhouse is found not guilty and the left loses its mind. I'm Candice
00:00:03.960 Malcolm and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:10.380 Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning in. I hope everyone out there had a wonderful weekend
00:00:13.820 out there with their families. It is Monday so we are going to get back into it today. I want to
00:00:18.180 talk about this Kyle Rittenhouse trial. I don't usually focus on U.S. issues here on the show
00:00:22.240 because there's already so much out there where you can find commentary and analysis and opinion
00:00:27.320 on what's happening in the U.S. but for this case it's starting to spill into Canada so I want to
00:00:31.620 talk about how the left in Canada are reacting to this case and how it's relevant. So in case you
00:00:38.060 haven't been following I'll just give you a really brief overview. So a jury on Friday found Kyle
00:00:42.900 Rittenhouse not guilty of murder for fatally shooting two men and injuring a third last year during the
00:00:48.420 riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin marking the end of a contentious trial that pitted the prosecution
00:00:52.680 against the judge. Rittenhouse who is 18 now, he was 17 at the time of this incident, he lives in a
00:00:59.100 northern suburb of Chicago which is about 15 miles from Kenosha, Wisconsin. So on August 25th of 2020,
00:01:05.360 again when he was 17 years old, Rittenhouse decided to patrol downtown Kenosha area along with other
00:01:10.580 armed men in order to protect a used car dealership from looting and vandalism. So he showed up to protect
00:01:17.720 the property of a family friend. He was also there with a first aid kit because he was providing first
00:01:23.640 aid to people who needed it. The city as you may recall had devolved into rioting over the police
00:01:29.420 shooting of Jacob Blake who was a black man by a white Kenosha police officer. I only mention the race
00:01:35.480 of the officer and the individual is because that is what the contention was. That was why we saw the
00:01:39.940 looting and rioting as we've seen in so many other instances across both Canada and the U.S.
00:01:44.520 that this racial divide is really being amplified and pitted against people and it's used as a
00:01:50.180 platform for all of this bad behavior. So back to Rittenhouse, while guarding this used car dealership,
00:01:56.260 he was chased by a mob and he ended up shooting fatally two people, Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony
00:02:01.780 Huber, injuring a third, Gabe Groskvitz. The defendant and the three men he shot were all white. So even
00:02:08.660 though the issue has that component of race, the issue here with Cal Rittenhouse and the three people
00:02:14.200 who shot wasn't a racial issue. It had nothing to do with race. It was amplified onto the national
00:02:18.400 platform because of the connection to the Kenosha rioting and the connection to Jacob Black. So it was
00:02:24.420 all sort of used by the left-wing media to again point to another example of racism in America, supposedly
00:02:30.140 how this white person, Cal Rittenhouse, who was a teenager, we were told he was some kind of a white
00:02:36.920 nationalist, that he was a Trump supporter and then he was just there shooting people up. It turns out
00:02:41.020 that wasn't the case at all. So he was arrested and charged with five felony charges, one misdemeanor
00:02:46.440 charge. The most serious charge was intentional homicide, Wisconsin's top murder charge, which
00:02:50.440 carries a mandatory sentence of life in prison. The others were reckless homicide, attempted homicide,
00:02:55.100 two counts of reckless endangerment and being a minor legally in possession of a firearm. And again,
00:03:00.600 if you watch this case, if you watch the trial and the facts come out, which we'll talk about on the
00:03:03.660 show, we'll unpack it all. It became very evident that this young man was acting in self-defense,
00:03:08.280 that the entire media narrative invented about him was a pure, pure fantasy. It was untrue.
00:03:14.020 It wasn't accurate. All of the things that were said about the young man, including the fact that
00:03:18.460 he was a white supremacist, he was on Tucker Carlson and he said that he supports Black Lives Matter.
00:03:22.480 He supports the BLM movements and he supported the protesters who were there. He was again,
00:03:26.740 simply there to help provide order, to protect property and to provide first aid. So again,
00:03:31.580 the entire media narrative about him was basically false. This is what it looked like, a very,
00:03:36.140 very powerful moment in the courthouse. This is what it looked like when Kyle Rittenhouse was found
00:03:40.740 not guilty.
00:03:41.820 H. Grosskreutz, we the jury find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty.
00:03:50.180 Members of the jury, are these your unanimous verdicts? Is there anyone who does not agree with
00:03:55.560 the verdicts as read? Would you wish the jury pulled?
00:04:00.240 No.
00:04:00.460 Okay. Okay. Okay, folks, your job is done.
00:04:04.600 And today I'm delighted to be joined by a young writer, brilliant young writer who keeps the
00:04:10.160 website slow to write. His name is Samuel Say. And Samuel wrote about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
00:04:16.740 He wrote about how it isn't really about white privilege, but it's about a different kind
00:04:20.520 of privilege. So Samuel, thank you so much for joining us today.
00:04:24.160 Thank you for having me. I'm a big fan, so thank you.
00:04:26.160 Well, we're a big fan of your writing over there. And really, you have a very thoughtful
00:04:31.600 way of looking at things. I like the name of your website as well, Slow to Write, because
00:04:36.120 it's not like a hot take. It's not like a quick reaction. You're very, very thoughtful in regards
00:04:42.120 to how you analyze these kind of issues. So why don't you tell us a little bit about your take on
00:04:47.640 the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and what we're seeing sort of as a reaction?
00:04:52.580 Yeah. Yeah. And the article you're referring to, I say something along the lines of this
00:04:58.580 trial is definitely a consequence of privilege, but Kyle Rittenhouse isn't the beneficiary of that
00:05:05.260 privilege. He's a victim of that privilege. And what I mean by that is there are two prominent
00:05:10.860 privileges at display here from the beginning of this entire saga in Kenosha and in the trial.
00:05:18.460 And it's primarily Black privilege and leftist privilege. What I mean by that is the whole
00:05:25.900 issue in Kenosha started because a Black criminal allegedly was abusing his ex-girlfriend,
00:05:36.020 which led her to get a restraining order against him. And then he violated that in one instance
00:05:42.340 and was attempting to perhaps assault her again. And then she called the cops and the cops came to
00:05:47.800 arrest him. This man is Jacob Blake. And then when the cops were trying to arrest him, he was
00:05:53.720 fighting them off and nearly grabbed a knife, which he later admitted is true. He was about to grab a
00:06:00.080 knife, which would have threatened the cops' lives, of course. And the cops ended up shooting him in the
00:06:04.480 back after several warnings. So immediately, the entire, similar to the George Floyd issue, the entire
00:06:12.280 world and cultural institutions ended up attacking the cops as being racist strictly because he was a
00:06:18.700 Black man for no other reason, but because he's a Black man, which led to the riots. And then, of course,
00:06:24.440 that prompted Kyle Rittenhouse to go to the riots to defend a family friend and to help protect the area
00:06:33.220 that he's very familiar with. And in there are some of the supporters who are leftist white men
00:06:41.800 attacked him. And I've seen the entire video. He clearly was acting in self-defense as a jury
00:06:48.460 recognized as well, too. And these white leftists, these people who are trying to harm him, and one,
00:06:57.860 Gage, I'm forgetting how to say his last name, but the key witness is his first name is Gage. I think
00:07:01.620 it's Grotskowitz, something like that. He, he actually took out a pistol and was about to shoot him in the
00:07:08.740 head before Kyle Rittenhouse. And incredibly, like, he was, he honestly was very brave in his, in his entire
00:07:16.880 demeanor. He ended up shooting him in the arm to keep this man from shooting him in the head. So then this
00:07:22.680 white, perhaps conservative, I can't call him a leftist. I don't know exactly where he is, but he would,
00:07:29.020 assumingly, he is some kind of a conservative. He, he then is, is, is on trial for homicide.
00:07:38.080 Meanwhile, the people who were trying to harm him, who are white leftists, are seen as victims,
00:07:43.600 including the two who were killed and the one that was injured. My point in saying all that is,
00:07:49.140 a lot of conservatives, I think, mistakenly say this is a matter of
00:07:52.780 what Kyle Rittenhouse's skin color. I don't think so necessarily. I think it plays a role,
00:07:58.580 but I think considering that his victims, well, since it victims, because his attackers, his attackers
00:08:04.380 were, were white. I think it's that he is a white conservative. That's the real issue. And it's,
00:08:12.860 so that's what I'm saying that it's really a matter of black privilege and leftist privilege. If he was a
00:08:17.220 leftist, he would not have, he would not have been on trial. The same way that Antifa, many of them
00:08:22.060 being leftists have been attacking people for, for several years now, and there's been very little
00:08:27.400 justice against them. Well, and that was part of the thing. I mean, there's, there's so much that
00:08:31.580 we can unpack in what you just said. Let's start with the initial interaction with the police that led to
00:08:37.980 all the rioting, because it, to me, from my perspective, Samuel, so much of it kind of blurs
00:08:42.620 together. There's been so many instances of a, what appears, you know, at first sight to be an
00:08:48.460 instance of police brutality caught on tape. We know that when something's caught on tape, you're
00:08:52.740 not really getting necessarily the full perspective. I remember that with the Covington high school
00:08:57.200 kids, that, that, that all of the, all of the footage that originally came out kind of showed these
00:09:01.700 boys perhaps being the aggressors and, and, and, and, and starting it. And then once we saw the full
00:09:07.120 context, it became very clear that the boys were just, you know, waiting for their bus to bring them
00:09:11.220 back to school. And the, you know, the, the, the other side were the agitators, the, and, and, and
00:09:16.060 it changed the entire perspective. So, so with this specific case, uh, with Jacob, like, I remember
00:09:20.320 this one, uh, pretty distinctly because I just happened to be watching the news closely, uh, when
00:09:25.240 it happened, I took some interest in it because, because like you said, uh, you know, this was an
00:09:29.640 instance of a, of a, of a dangerous criminal who was violating a restraining order by harassing and
00:09:36.360 perhaps even raping his, his former girlfriend. And she is the one that called the police to
00:09:40.840 get him out of there. And once, once the police arrived, he was evading them. And, and, and then
00:09:45.180 it wasn't until he sort of dove into his car to grab at something, we don't know what it was,
00:09:49.680 um, that, that he was shot. So I just, you know, wanted, wanted to know your, your perspective on
00:09:57.100 these cases. Do you think that there is a problem with police brutality in the U S do you think that
00:10:02.260 there is an issue, an underlying issue with, with racism and police, or, or do you think that,
00:10:07.240 that like this case with Jacob black, uh, that the police are for the most part, well-trained
00:10:12.280 and, and, and really just get a bad rap from the, the, the sort of prevalence of, um, people,
00:10:18.660 people focusing on anecdotal evidence and not the statistics and people focusing on the fact
00:10:24.480 that we can now see because of cell phone footage and things like that, we can now see what police
00:10:29.500 interaction with, you know, law enforcement looks like. And, and, and to some people it's just
00:10:34.060 jarring. They don't, they don't like it. So where, where on the spectrum do you, do you lie on that
00:10:37.600 issue? Well, one kind, one example of police brutality is one too many, right? So on, on just on
00:10:46.620 that at all, I will say that of course there is police brutality, but that's true everywhere. I think
00:10:51.420 the issue is that it's completely and utterly overblown. Uh, it's not anywhere near as prevalent
00:10:57.980 as some make it out to be. Um, when it comes to them being well-trained, that's where I would say
00:11:03.200 there's an issue. Um, from my understanding, there is a lack of training involved. Even now,
00:11:09.340 all the talks about police reform, it's really dealing with defunding them, which will just
00:11:13.860 make things worse, of course, or it's just, uh, body cam footage, which is good. But the problem is
00:11:19.660 it's still not going to be dealing with their real issue, which is that they're underfunded actually
00:11:23.980 in many ways and they are not receiving the country in where they need, where the only kind of training
00:11:28.940 they have now is, well, if your life is in danger, shoot. And if your life, if their life is in
00:11:32.940 danger, they should do that. But there are certain things they can learn before that, which would be
00:11:37.100 helpful, um, for them to be, um, to, to avoid being in a situation where their lives are in danger.
00:11:42.940 In terms of the racist aspect, um, in almost all these cases about police brutality against
00:11:50.460 black people, racism is, is, cannot be proved as the basis for this. Uh, even now, people don't
00:11:58.780 want to talk about this, but even the George Floyd issue, which is now considered the most,
00:12:02.540 um, the biggest example of police brutality against the black in a racist fashion, there is no evidence
00:12:09.180 at all that it was racist. You can talk about it being police brutality and everything else, but in
00:12:13.180 terms of the motivations behind it, we don't know that at all. So, um, I don't think there is a case at
00:12:19.340 all of, um, in fact, uh, black police officers are actually much more likely to, um, to be, you know,
00:12:28.060 to, to, to commit police brutality against black people than white people are, than white cops are.
00:12:33.900 So I don't think racism at all is the issue here. I think it is oftentimes, um, that the cops are
00:12:40.060 justified most of the time in these cases, at least in this major cases, and people just not
00:12:44.940 understanding what good police work really looks like. And then you see these videos and they think,
00:12:49.100 well, wait a minute, these cops are being aggressive. Well, they have to be aggressive.
00:12:52.700 Otherwise, yeah, otherwise they'll not go home that night. We've, you know, we talk a lot about
00:12:59.820 these interactions when it comes to police being the aggressors in times. Well, uh, in America,
00:13:04.700 every year, 50 cops are killed. Um, and that's actually much more than the number of unarmed black
00:13:11.260 people that they kill. Right. It's significantly more than many imagine. So these cops are, are aware
00:13:18.140 that oftentimes if they, if they don't, um, if they're not aggressive in defending their lives,
00:13:23.100 they will not go home. Right. And okay. So then in your, in your article, you talk about in your essay,
00:13:28.380 you talk about what you call black privilege. So, so after, after, uh, Jacob Blake was shot,
00:13:33.820 he wasn't killed, but he was, I believe, paralyzed. Um, we, we immediately saw the reaction,
00:13:40.060 which looked very similar to the George Floyd reaction where, you know, there were some
00:13:44.140 honest to goodness protesters who were just out there saying, we don't like the system.
00:13:47.820 We don't like what's going on in our community. But then what we see is there's always a sort of,
00:13:52.460 you know, bad apples that, that take advantage of the situation and they want to go out and they
00:13:56.700 want to riot. And it seemed like, uh, one of the individuals that, that, that was killed this
00:14:01.340 evening by, um, from the gun of Kyle Rittenhouse, uh, was one of these individuals. This guy had spent a
00:14:06.140 bunch of time in prison. He was a pedophile. He, he was a sex offender. Um, he, he just was like,
00:14:11.180 seemed like a pretty bad dude. Um, not black. He was white. And, and he was one of the people,
00:14:15.660 but, but it seems like when, whenever there's a case of, of, of sort of justice, the justice system
00:14:21.340 coming up in the public face, you know, there's that mix. And, you know, we see, I believe that the,
00:14:27.820 the, the, you know, the funny CNN chyron that, um, fiery yet peaceful protests came from this
00:14:32.700 Kenosha riot, but, but, but from watching this, this, uh, trial, you know, all of the elements
00:14:38.860 were there. They were rioting, they were rioting. And Samuel, we saw it over the weekend. So I, I used
00:14:43.180 to live in San Francisco. I spent a few years living there and I saw some footage from San
00:14:47.900 Francisco from Walnut Creek of basically just people taking advantage of this, this outcome
00:14:54.380 to go and loot and riot, very expensive stores. We're talking about Louis Vuitton and Nordstrom.
00:14:59.340 Uh, I think we have some, some footage of that. So, so we're going to play, uh, this clip and then,
00:15:04.060 and then I'll get you to react. So, so let's see what that looked like.
00:15:06.460 Like a well-organized operation, people sprinted to waiting cars, carrying bags full of merchandise
00:15:13.340 from Nordstrom's in Walnut Creek Saturday night. I saw people running down the street. I probably saw
00:15:18.300 50 to 80 people in like ski masks, crowbars, night, like a bunch of weapons. In one dramatic scene,
00:15:24.540 a car veered around a police SUV to make a getaway, but another officer stopped him with his gun drawn.
00:15:30.860 Three people were arrested. All are charged with robbery. One of them is also charged with being
00:15:35.580 a felon in possession of a gun. NBC Bay Area has obtained a still image from a security camera
00:15:41.340 inside Nordstrom's during the robbery. A company spokesperson says five of their employees were
00:15:46.780 injured. Police saying at least three workers were assaulted, one with pepper spray. And tonight,
00:15:51.980 there is still cause for concern. Walnut Creek police took to social media warning about the
00:15:56.700 possibility of another robbery. Some high-end shops like Tiffany's closed early. Janet Catalano and Marnie
00:16:03.420 Pantar were the last customers in the store as staff locked their doors. How are they in there?
00:16:08.620 They're a little nervous. They are a little nervous for sure, as, as I would be too, if I worked retail
00:16:14.300 in this area right now. In a prepared statement, the mayor of Walnut Creek says the city is actively
00:16:20.060 working to try to prevent any of these incidents from happening here again. And you can see that
00:16:24.940 they are already taking efforts. The street going through Broadway Plaza Mall has been blocked off
00:16:30.620 for most of the day. And police officers are everywhere. Nordstrom's is still closed. A bit of
00:16:35.660 an inconvenience for customer Frank Augustin, who couldn't return a pair of shoes. It's such a shame
00:16:40.700 that, you know, we have to worry about this. I mean, you see it in San Francisco at, you know,
00:16:44.780 with the Louis Vuitton on Friday night. The situation in Walnut Creek coming just 24 hours
00:16:49.340 after a similar robbery in San Francisco. Nine stores were either burglarized or vandalized.
00:16:54.620 Some store workers were also injured. There have been eight arrests so far. And San Francisco's
00:16:59.980 police chief says there will be more. In Walnut Creek, Sergio Quintana, NBC Bay Area News.
00:17:05.340 So Samuel, so maybe you can help us break down this phenomenon. Why do people get away with
00:17:12.460 this kind of looting and rioting in the aftermath of a public decision? And why do you describe all of
00:17:17.580 this as black privilege? Yeah, I think there's two reasons behind it. One is there's a soft bigotry of
00:17:25.740 low expectations for black people in that people think so lowly of black people that they think, well,
00:17:31.180 what do you expect when they have, when there's, you know, so-called living under oppression.
00:17:37.100 Therefore, then that they expect us to live like animals where we just end up going around scrapping
00:17:42.060 for goods. Or so that's, that's the first reason. The other reason is, and I think this is a much more
00:17:49.660 sinister reason behind all of this, is that black privilege exists because leftist and critical race
00:17:55.980 there is want to use racism as a basis for changing the system, as a basis for creating a revolution.
00:18:03.340 I think that is what's really at play here, is that they don't, the reason why they would defend
00:18:07.900 and utilize, eulogize and speak well of pedophiles and, you know, and abusers is because they're willing
00:18:15.740 to use anything they possibly can to change the system. So Kyle Rittenhouse really isn't, they don't,
00:18:21.980 they hate Kyle Rittenhouse, but only because he is an example of a person who is defending or who
00:18:28.460 still supports the American constitution, in that he still believes in second amendment, of course,
00:18:33.340 because he had that, you know, that rifle with him. And I think it's really about changing the system and
00:18:39.180 changing America's founding principles, or really Western principles, and not so much these individual
00:18:45.660 cases. Well, yeah, so one of the things that came out, so I'll just say, when the case, this trial,
00:18:51.580 the facts of it first came out before it was a trial, but just when it hit the media that some
00:18:55.900 people were killed during these riots, and it seemed like, you know, it was a white, it was some kind of
00:19:01.260 a white nationalist or white supremacist that was, you know, they're shooting it up. That's sort of the
00:19:05.340 impression that we got from the media. And it wasn't really until you look at the facts of the case,
00:19:10.140 when it became the trial, you start to look at some of the video footage, where it became pretty obvious,
00:19:15.100 pretty evident, Sam, that this was a case of self-defense. You know, I saw a video of this
00:19:19.180 young man, and he was talking about how he was there to provide first aid. So he had his medical
00:19:24.540 kit right on him. You know, he just said the gun is for self-defense. And then right in the middle
00:19:29.420 of an interview, he ran off because he was trying to help somebody. So it seemed like someone who was
00:19:33.340 there, yes, to defend the property of a family friend who owned a car dealership where the cars were
00:19:37.980 getting torched, and there was millions of dollars in damage every night. But he was also like a,
00:19:42.940 he was a good citizen, you know, you could describe him as someone who was there
00:19:47.900 to help maintain order in a very chaotic time in American life. And yet, like you said, because of
00:19:54.540 the way he looked, because of perhaps the principles that he was upholding, the media just did their best
00:19:59.180 to demonize him in a way that that was so divorced from reality after watching the facts of this case.
00:20:05.660 And we saw some of that in Canada, too. Sam, I just want to read a couple of the
00:20:10.780 kind of reactions that we saw. So Jagmeet Singh, who's a leader of the NDP party,
00:20:14.780 a leader of a political party in Canada, he says this,
00:20:17.980 I knew today's verdict is painful for many. It feels like another failure by a broken system designed
00:20:23.020 to protect some and hurt others. For those that carry such grief and must continue to witness denials
00:20:28.940 of justice. My heart is with you. So first of all, he's saying that the US, he's commenting on the
00:20:34.780 justice system of a foreign country, saying that it is a broken system that is designed to protect
00:20:40.700 some and hurt others. And then he says flat out that it's a denial of justice. So I suppose Jagmeet Singh
00:20:47.500 would rather see a young man convicted of murder, a murder that he didn't commit. He didn't commit
00:20:52.220 murder. He was found not guilty of that. He was acting in self-defense. So why is it that people
00:20:59.500 like Jagmeet Singh, and I mean, there's others, Toronto Star writer, Sri Pardikar, I think that's
00:21:07.740 how you pronounce her name, Sri Pardikar. She writes, damn the laws that acquit Kyle Rittenhouse,
00:21:13.020 for they show no care for justice. So no care for justice. Charles Adler, popular radio host,
00:21:19.020 used to be a conservative, but now he's gone the other direction. He says, there are those who think
00:21:23.960 that if Kyle Rittenhouse was a young African American, the verdict would be the same. I am
00:21:27.700 not one of those. What do you think of these Canadians commenting? And what do you think of
00:21:33.120 their take on the US justice system? Yeah. You know, we all know that America absolutely influences
00:21:40.280 Canada, and that we there are a lot of similarities there. But when you are a an elected official,
00:21:47.800 and you're commenting, as you said, on a foreign, on a foreign nation's
00:21:51.880 system, essentially, that is, that is, that's a major problem. But the reason why Jagmeet Singh is
00:21:58.740 saying that is because he believes the same thing about Canada. He believes that our system is also
00:22:03.920 broken, and it's only designed for a particular kind of people and to harm other people. I mean,
00:22:08.840 AOC said the same thing. AOC is really his counterpart in the US. And AOC said the same thing about
00:22:13.760 that American system, that basically, it's designed for white supremacists, to protect white people and
00:22:19.520 to harm non white people. And this is really a very, very important thing. I think a lot of us
00:22:25.140 conservatives are focusing on the wrong issue here, we're focusing on the racial aspect here. And
00:22:31.340 that I mean, that is true. This is really about a racial issue. But, but the racial issue, as I said
00:22:36.140 earlier, is being used as a basis to change the system in America and in Canada, that critical race
00:22:42.420 theories and leftists believe that our Western system is broken. They truly believe that it was,
00:22:48.180 it was designed to be broken, to, for everybody else and to privilege, to privilege other white
00:22:54.900 people. So when Joe Biden himself also called Kyra in the House, a white supremacist, they know he's
00:23:01.620 not, they didn't, they don't care. They're just saying that the entire system that people like him
00:23:06.680 want to defend is white supremacy. And therefore, they need to change the system,
00:23:12.440 and then to truly get rid of due process, which is why they ignoring that a vert, that there was a
00:23:17.600 verdict reached by a jury. They're ignoring all that because they believe that entire system
00:23:22.160 is meant to, to support white supremacy and white privilege. So I think that the real issue here is
00:23:28.820 that we need to recognize that these Canadians and these Americans who are angry at the verdicts,
00:23:34.040 at least not all of them, but many of them, some of them don't know the facts, right? But those who
00:23:37.740 do know the facts, they're simply ignoring the facts as a means to change the system into a more
00:23:43.320 socialist and, or so-called anti-racist and communist system.
00:23:48.460 Well, it's just so interesting that, again, from watching the facts of this case, Samuel,
00:23:52.780 the thing that seemed unfair to me was the fact that this was even on trial. The fact that this was
00:23:57.080 even a high profile case, because as soon as the facts were there, I mean, all they had to do is
00:24:01.400 prove reasonable doubt. And, and, and, and surely it wasn't, it wasn't like they described. And I'm
00:24:06.880 surprised that a prosecutor would have even taken this case up. You know, you said that many of them
00:24:11.580 don't really know the facts of the case. I'm not trying to pick on Robin Urbeck here, because I think
00:24:15.400 she's a really good writer, but this is what she put on, on, on Twitter. And it kind of just goes with
00:24:20.200 our conversations. I'm going to read it out. And pardon my language, because I'm going to read what
00:24:23.260 she writes. And it's not, it's not entirely, it's not, it's not entirely sanitized. But anyway,
00:24:31.020 she says, notwithstanding how much of an asshole this guy is for carrying around a rifle during a
00:24:35.360 protest, like a dress up GI Joe doll, the prosecution's case here was pretty tough. The
00:24:40.120 defense didn't have to prove Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense. The prosecution had to
00:24:43.520 disprove it. So it seems like my takeaway from that tweet was that, that, that Robin was mostly
00:24:48.460 offended by the way this guy looked, right? She, she called him an asshole and she said he was
00:24:52.240 dressed up like a GI Joe doll. I, you know, I travel around the world and I know that a lot of,
00:24:57.320 in a lot of places where the situation is chaotic and unstable, that you see weapons, you see people,
00:25:02.720 usually military, but in some, in some places you see plainclothes officers, like in Israel,
00:25:07.140 you go just about anywhere in Israel and you see people with weapons across your chest in the same
00:25:12.580 way that Kyle Rittenhouse looked like, because they're there to protect people in case of, in case of
00:25:17.460 any kind of an attack. And, and, you know, some people might not like that, that that's the reality
00:25:21.880 in the United States, but, but you mentioned the second amendment and that's part of it. And it
00:25:25.740 didn't seem like from the interviews that I saw of Kyle Rittenhouse the night of the protest,
00:25:29.860 you know, he, he wasn't there as a vigilante. He was there again to keep order and to, to try to
00:25:33.940 protect people. And, and, and yet again, because of the way he looks, I think it's turned into this
00:25:39.860 racial animosity. And the other thing, Samuel, is that the three people that got shot that night
00:25:44.040 were all white. They were all sort of Antifa type rebel rousers that looked, seemed like from all
00:25:49.480 the evidence that we saw in the case, were there to cause no good. The fellow you mentioned, Gabe,
00:25:53.960 who, who drew a gun and, and tried to shoot Kyle Rittenhouse in the head, he was there as an ACLU
00:25:58.940 observer. So he, he's sort of part of the leftist institutions that we're supposed to revere and
00:26:03.620 respect if you're watching the legacy media. And yet, you know, from, from his own testimony on the
00:26:08.560 stands, it seemed to me that he was, he was much more there as a criminal, as opposed to a peaceful
00:26:14.200 protester. So a final question for you, you know, all of this is just to say, what's, what's the kind
00:26:19.760 of takeaway that we can have? And what can conservatives do to sort of push back against all, you know,
00:26:25.040 this entire cultural war that we find ourselves in the middle of?
00:26:30.160 Yeah, I think, you know,
00:26:31.620 we, we need to recognize that honestly, a lot of white people, white Canadians, white Americans need
00:26:38.680 to be, uh, need to stop being afraid of being called white supremacists or, or, or white privileged,
00:26:43.980 because they believe that about every white person, especially if you're a conservative,
00:26:47.580 you just need to know that they're saying that really because of the view of Western, uh, the
00:26:53.340 Western system, the Western society. And really, it's not really about you, because if you support
00:26:57.960 Black Lives Matter, then they say, okay, then you are the good kind of white person then.
00:27:01.260 So it's really just an attack on you and your, and your good principles is not because of your
00:27:07.000 character, because with Clyde Roadhouse, they didn't know anything about his character. They
00:27:10.080 were simply attacking him instead of his attackers, instead of the criminals who were trying to end
00:27:15.540 his life, because they were supporting Black Lives Matter. They were on the right side by supporting
00:27:21.580 the riots. But if you are against the riots, then you are the enemy. So just knowing that it's not
00:27:26.080 really an attack against, um, your character was an attack against your principles.
00:27:31.260 Um, I think also just recognizing what critical race theory is, um, you know, as I mentioned
00:27:36.600 before, this is really about leftist privilege and Black privilege and not white privilege.
00:27:40.920 Um, that is what these guys wants, what the leftists want. They want to change America. They
00:27:47.020 want to change Canada and, and to, and to get rid of the founding principles that, that created
00:27:52.000 these nations. And they're willing to use things like this. They're willing to use racial issues and
00:27:57.180 every issue as a, as a way to manipulate and indoctrinate people into wanting to get rid of
00:28:03.200 the system, a system that would actually help someone like Kyle Rittenhouse from being a victim
00:28:08.760 of mob justice.
00:28:10.400 Right. Well, protect them from being wrongfully accused. I mean, that used to be a cornerstone of
00:28:15.640 our society. And we're so proud of due process and the rule of law. And today it seems like those
00:28:19.600 things are demonized. Well, Samuel, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you for your brilliant
00:28:23.460 writing over at slow to write.com. We really appreciate hearing from you. Thank you so much
00:28:27.520 for joining us.
00:28:28.400 Thank you so much.
00:28:29.640 All right. Thanks for tuning in. I'm Candace Malcolm and this is the Candace Malcolm show.