The CBC publishes a racist screed, then quietly rewrites it
Episode Stats
Words per minute
194.79887
Harmful content
Misogyny
15
sentences flagged
Toxicity
25
sentences flagged
Hate speech
10
sentences flagged
Summary
The CBC publishes a racist screed against white conservatives, and then quietly rewrites the article after some pushback. It's Fake News Friday, and today we're covering a truly remarkable piece that was published by the state broadcaster, the CBC.
Transcript
00:00:00.420
The CBC publishes a racist screed against white conservatives and then quietly rewrites the article after some pushback.
00:00:08.740
It's Fake News Friday, I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.
00:00:16.260
Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning in today.
00:00:18.800
I am going to focus the entire episode today on this truly remarkable piece.
00:00:24.240
It was an opinion piece that was published by the state broadcaster, by the CBC on its website,
00:00:29.380
and it is one of the absolute worst offenders, worst examples of just absolute malfeasance,
00:00:36.640
editorial and journalistic malfeasance on behalf of our government journalists.
00:00:44.480
I cannot believe it was published and I cannot believe the way that the CBC tried to cover their tracks
00:00:49.320
and cover it up and make it less offensive after the fact.
00:00:52.960
So we're going to go into it, we're going to talk about every aspect of this ridiculous piece that was published earlier in the week.
00:00:59.380
But first, if you like The Candace Malcolm Show, if you like what we do, if you enjoy Fake News Friday,
00:01:03.840
Fake News Friday is certainly my favorite show.
0.69
00:01:05.940
It is a show that we do every Friday where we go through some of the worst examples
00:01:09.420
of the unethical groupthink mentality in the Canadian media.
00:01:13.900
We talk about how it is just such a huge conflict of interest that all of these journalists now receive money from the Trudeau government.
00:01:19.900
So the exact journalists who are there to hold the government accountable,
00:01:23.520
to keep their feet to the fire, to expose corruption, expose bad behavior, expose government waste,
00:01:28.000
those same journalists are reliant upon Trudeau and his government to pay their salaries, to support their jobs.
00:01:35.340
So if it wasn't for Trudeau, if Trudeau wasn't the Prime Minister, they wouldn't be getting these bailouts,
00:01:40.500
Recall that Trudeau has greatly expanded the budget of the CBC,
00:01:44.420
despite the fact that CBC viewership is plunging, nobody watches it,
00:01:48.600
its credibility is at an all-time low, and yet they're still receiving all of this money.
00:01:52.620
It's such an incredible conflict of interest, and that is what we cover every Friday on Fake News Friday,
00:01:59.060
But like I was saying, if you like our show, if you like what we do,
00:02:01.840
the whole purpose behind True North as a media outlet, as an independent media outlet,
00:02:05.880
is that we don't accept any money from the government.
00:02:09.940
We think that that inhibits a journalist from doing their job.
00:02:13.180
So by principle, we will never take any money from the government.
00:02:20.740
But because of that, we need support from our audience.
00:02:23.880
We rely entirely on the donation of our generous viewers and supporters.
00:02:28.340
So if you want to be part of the movement, if you want to join True North Nation,
00:02:36.480
And if you really like True North, you can donate $10 a month.
00:02:39.320
You get access to our True North Insiders Club, where you get all sorts of perks.
00:02:43.600
And basically, you just get the pride of knowing that you are supporting truly independent
00:02:50.480
So if you like what we do at the Candace Malcolm Show, and you're currently watching this video
00:02:53.620
on YouTube, don't forget to like this video, subscribe to True North, hit that little notification
00:03:01.060
Let me know what you think of the show, what you think of Fake News Friday.
00:03:03.860
And if you have any suggestions for a future episode, if you're watching on Facebook, please
00:03:07.980
like this video, share with your friends, leave us a comment again.
00:03:11.080
And don't forget to like True North and like my personal page, Candace Malcolm.
00:03:15.760
Finally, if you are listening to the show in podcast form over on Google Podcasts, Apple
00:03:20.820
Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts, please consider leaving us a five-star review.
00:03:24.940
It really helps us out in the search and in the algorithm.
00:03:29.080
And also, don't forget to subscribe to the Candace Malcolm Show so that you never miss an
00:03:34.180
Okay, so I want to go back to this original news story that was published on Monday, published
00:03:41.900
And just first of all, as a little bit of an aside, I don't really understand why the
00:03:46.260
CBC chose to get into the whole idea of editorial news.
00:03:50.220
You know, the whole idea behind the state broadcaster, there's a couple basic justifications.
00:03:54.920
First is that we need more reporters covering Canadian news.
00:03:58.040
The other is to make sure that news is able to travel throughout the country.
00:04:02.120
It's a big country, especially in the North, that Northerners are able to access radio and
00:04:07.380
news in places where there wouldn't be a market to support that kind of thing.
00:04:11.360
But when you get into the idea of opinion journalism, which is a different kind of journalism, you
00:04:17.400
Because again, the CBC is funded by the government.
00:04:22.260
So when you start hosting opinions, you know, just by virtue of there being opinions in politics,
00:04:28.400
You know, I'm an opinion columnist over at the Toronto Sun.
00:04:33.960
Sometimes my opinions are very, very controversial.
00:04:36.620
There is a whole group of Canadians out there who really hate me, who hate my opinion, hate
00:04:45.100
And no matter which position you take, you're going to experience that.
00:04:48.160
But when it comes to the state broadcaster, the idea that they would start inserting opinions,
00:04:51.980
it sort of looks like it's an officially endorsed opinion.
00:04:55.160
It's an opinion endorsed by the state, which again, gets into really dicey territory.
00:05:03.800
And this article that I'm going to talk about today is exactly why.
00:05:07.320
This is exactly why the CBC has no business publishing editorial opinion pieces.
00:05:17.460
I'm basically going to read it in its entirety because it is just so surprising, so shocking,
00:05:26.640
On election day, I greeted people who voted for parties that hate people like me.
00:05:31.980
And then the sub-headline here says, elections provide numerical evidence of the rise of right-wing
00:05:44.220
I think I might be pronouncing that incorrectly.
00:05:47.860
And we are told that she was a Elections Canada officer.
00:05:52.940
So this is a person who worked for Elections Canada, who is one of the officers who welcomed
00:06:00.580
So a government official, a person who has been hired by the government to oversee our
00:06:06.120
For some reason, this person felt the need to write an opinion piece to tell us what she
00:06:11.120
thinks of Canadians, what she thinks of the people who are voting.
00:06:17.640
This woman should never be allowed to work for Elections Canada again.
1.00
00:06:20.720
People who have outward opinions like this, they don't fit the role of a sort of non-partisan,
00:06:28.120
The whole idea of the public service is that it is not partisan.
00:06:33.720
It's this sort of stable force within the government.
00:06:38.020
The politicians who run the country come and go.
00:06:39.720
But this civil service remains neutral and trusted.
00:06:42.940
And so when you have a crazy opinion like the one I'm going to present to you, you can
00:06:47.080
recognize we have a deeper problem in this country when it comes to the partisanship
00:06:51.220
and the ideology, clearly, that's seeping through into the public service.
00:06:55.440
OK, so I'm going to basically read this thing in its entirety because it's so shocking.
00:07:01.480
It says, I've always loved the idea of democracy in action and have voted in every single election
00:07:07.300
This September, I worked for Elections Canada as an information officer.
00:07:10.860
On election day, I greeted incoming voters, determined if they were at the correct polling
00:07:14.820
address, and helped count votes after the polls closed.
00:07:18.400
During the first hour of my shift, an elderly white woman came in with a walker.
1.00
00:07:24.180
After skimming over her voter identity card, I informed her that unfortunately, she was at
00:07:37.100
She thanked me profusely for directing her to the right place.
00:07:40.920
OK, so remember that the headline of this article is, I greeted people who voted for parties
00:07:47.220
So here we see there's this interaction with an elderly white woman.
00:07:53.760
How did she show that she hated people like you?
00:07:57.780
Well, the interaction, it turned out, was actually quite pleasant.
00:08:11.040
It says, I was buoyed both at her dedication to her civic duty, as well as her kind words.
00:08:16.160
However, after she left, I couldn't help but wonder whether, despite our pleasant interaction,
00:08:21.680
she was one of the people who hate people like me, dun-dun-dun.
00:08:25.380
So again, this woman is just basically wildly speculating that because this woman was old
0.97
00:08:31.040
and white, she must be a hateful bigot, essentially.
1.00
00:08:34.300
Even though there's no evidence from the interaction, the assumption that she has is that this woman,
1.00
00:08:39.100
because she's white, because of her appearance, she must be a hateful bigot.
1.00
00:08:42.660
Again, because this woman, this elections worker, clearly thinks that Canadians are hateful
1.00
00:08:47.440
She clearly thinks that the average default position of a Canadian is hateful bigot.
0.97
00:08:53.220
She goes, obviously, I am well aware that it is unhealthy to distrust people who I have
00:08:59.540
But I am a visibly Muslim, South Asian woman, and also well aware of the rising number of
00:09:04.960
police-reported hate crimes throughout Canada, like the mass murder of a Muslim family in
00:09:09.840
London, Ontario this summer, and the rhetoric that enables it.
00:09:13.440
OK, so she's telling us that she is a visible Muslim, that she is from South Asia, and that
00:09:19.040
she thinks that basically because of a handful of hate crimes and because of one heinous murder
00:09:24.140
that happened in the country, that therefore the entire country must hate her.
00:09:28.600
And then she talks about the rhetoric that enables it.
00:09:31.340
So stay tuned for that, the rhetoric that enables it, because we're going to try to understand
00:09:35.240
a little bit more about what she thinks about why Canadians are so hateful.
00:09:40.400
It says, well, it might be tempting to dismiss that as extreme behaviour from a select few.
00:09:45.660
Elections, like the recent election of the 2021 Canadian federal election, give us numerical
00:09:50.220
evidence of the rise of right-wing politics and hateful rhetoric throughout Canada.
00:09:55.700
This evidence, in turn, serves as a reminder that many people in my community hate people
00:10:00.500
like me so much that they want to elect officials who have demonstrated similar hatred.
00:10:06.600
So she's saying it's not just select examples, it's not just a handful of crazy people out
00:10:10.720
there, the idea that elections show us how many people out there actually support this
00:10:17.180
And so she's tying that to right-wing politics in Canada.
0.81
00:10:20.780
So she's saying, OK, here we go, here are the numbers that prove that this hatred
00:10:29.700
She says, when I helped count polls during election night and having interacted with numerous
00:10:33.980
voters throughout the day, it was jarring to realize that many of the people who had seemingly
00:10:39.340
been nice to me throughout the day had chosen to vote for the Conservative Party, whose leader's
00:10:46.880
slogan was the xenophobic phrase, take Canada back, and whose former leader Stephen Harper
00:10:52.400
sought to ban kneecaps and implement a barbaric practices hotline when he was Prime Minister.
00:10:57.960
In fact, almost six million Canadians voted for the Conservative Party this past election,
00:11:04.580
Though the Liberal Party won more ridings in both elections, the Conservatives received
00:11:09.380
OK, so basically the bill up here is that there are these extreme far-right parties that clearly
0.57
00:11:13.600
must, what, hate Muslims and support attacks against Muslims.
00:11:17.020
So she's sort of setting it up like we basically, what I was expecting anyway, was that she was
0.88
00:11:22.300
going to go into a tirade against the People's Party and Maxine Bernier because that's the one
1.00
00:11:26.080
who the media paint as being sort of xenophobic and far-right.
00:11:29.600
But then in this paragraph, we realize that she's not even talking about the new absurd
00:11:34.700
And Maxine Bernier, remember in 2019, much of his campaign circled around limiting immigration
00:11:39.340
and sort of defending Canadian values and sort of no longer supporting the multicultural
00:11:46.640
So I expected her to be talking about Maxine Bernier.
00:11:49.480
But again, in this paragraph, she reveals that no, she's talking about all Conservatives.
00:11:53.640
She's talking about the party that received the most votes in Canada.
00:11:57.400
So this woman thinks that anyone who is a conservative, therefore, must be a bigot.
0.98
00:12:02.260
Anybody who is an old white woman, therefore, must be a bigot.
1.00
00:12:05.560
Basically, what this piece is revealing is that the person who wrote this piece is kind
1.00
00:12:11.000
of unhinged, is kind of a lunatic, is kind of a crazy person.
0.95
00:12:13.780
She's one of those paranoid people who believes that everybody hates her, everybody's out to
1.00
00:12:17.840
She clearly doesn't have a very high opinion of Canada, the country that welcomed her, the
00:12:23.040
And in fact, she's so free in Canada that she even gets published by the CBC, which I
00:12:28.460
think is the largest, most circulated website, news website in Canada.
00:12:31.680
So even though she feels so oppressed and so hated in Canada, she still has all these wonderful
00:12:35.920
opportunities that she doesn't seem very grateful about.
00:12:38.500
But again, this story really just reveals her insane bias.
00:12:42.720
And the fact that this piece was published is an absolute disgrace.
00:12:48.600
She does go on to talk about the People's Party.
00:12:50.860
She says, some of the people I interacted with had voted for the far-right's People's
00:12:54.220
Party of Canada, whose leader, Maxine Bernier, had proposed to end multiculturalism, reduce
00:12:58.820
the number of immigrants and refugees Canada receives, and foster hate speech under the
1.00
00:13:03.700
guise of free speech as part of his party's platform.
00:13:06.520
The PPC received more than 840,000 votes in the 2021 federal election.
00:13:10.340
That's more than double the number of votes they received in the 2019 federal election.
00:13:13.820
And it's because these policies resonate with some Canadians.
00:13:16.640
Well, the reason that Maxine Bernier more than doubled his electoral fortune is because
00:13:21.820
he moved away from talking about immigration all the time, and he started critiquing the
00:13:25.640
government for lockdowns and overzealous COVID response.
00:13:29.780
And so the reason that he got so many more votes and the message that resonated to Canada
00:13:33.820
wasn't even about immigration this time around.
00:13:36.240
It was about the pandemic and the insane response that the government has been having.
00:13:43.540
And even just to go back even further, just because you want to limit the number of immigrants
1.00
00:13:47.540
that Canada takes doesn't mean by virtue that you're a racist or a bigot.
00:13:53.560
It's like, it's like so basic and so limited and just so poorly argued that it's hardly even
00:13:59.840
But regardless, you know, this piece is just so pathetic.
0.94
00:14:03.540
I'll just read a little bit more as I'll skip a few paragraphs.
0.98
00:14:06.000
She says, the results of these recent elections is tangible proof that this hatred is not
00:14:12.840
They are real people, some of whom are my neighbors.
00:14:15.360
Some of these people might even belong to my community.
00:14:17.920
After all, immigrants and racialized people make up a sizable chunk of right-wing voters
00:14:24.440
This is often due to a combination of their economic interests, e.g. less taxes, conservative
00:14:29.040
cultural values, e.g. anti-abortion or anti-LGBT policies, support for a specific politician,
00:14:35.300
or their internalized self-hatred or views on colorism, which outweighs any oppression
00:14:42.140
they may face at the hands of other voters or candidates in their party.
00:14:46.240
So first, it's just so obvious from reading this thing that this woman has such a reductive,
0.97
00:14:51.380
infantile, very simplistic, very silly view of conservatives broadly.
0.91
00:14:56.720
She's writing an entire opinion piece saying that people who vote for right-wing parties,
0.93
00:15:01.180
including the conservatives who are hardly right-wing, give me a break, hardly right-wing.
00:15:04.600
But if you vote for conservatives, it's because of these very simplistic ideas.
00:15:08.540
She clearly has a very low opinion of Canadian voters, including immigrants or what she calls
00:15:14.400
There are so many made-up words in this piece, racialized, colorism.
00:15:19.200
This woman is definitely a gender studies major.
1.00
00:15:22.920
It definitely has some kind of a really steeped, woke, leftist ideology.
00:15:30.220
So finally, I'll just read the final sentence here.
00:15:32.060
She says, I hope I'm wrong to be fearful, and I hope that my neighbors will get to know
00:15:36.500
me and my community before casting their ballots.
00:15:39.640
So again, the final insinuation here is that if you get to know a Muslim person, if you get
00:15:44.240
to know her community, you would never vote for a right-wing party.
00:15:47.620
So again, very reductive, this idea that if you are on the right, if you're conservative,
00:15:52.340
because you must be a bigot, because you don't know Muslims, because you don't understand
0.73
00:15:55.600
people from other cultures, it's just plain wrong.
1.00
00:15:57.680
It's very simplistic, very, very silly view of the right.
1.00
00:16:01.260
Shame on this woman for being so ignorant and for thinking that her ignorant view is
1.00
00:16:05.800
so important that she wants to put it out there.
1.00
00:16:09.720
The CBC should have a better process for screening pieces, for editing pieces, for determining
00:16:17.440
It's not like this woman is a paid columnist who gets to submit a piece every week, and they're
0.63
00:16:21.760
used to her, and they're saying, okay, she might be controversial.
1.00
00:16:23.760
But we own that, we'll protect that, we'll make sure that everything is bulletproof before
00:16:31.080
To the contrary, as soon as this piece started to get some scrutiny, and believe me, it got
00:16:35.960
When this piece was put up, there was a lot of pushback, a lot of people online scratching
00:16:40.400
their head, wondering what the heck is going on over at the CBC, that they would receive
00:16:44.800
this piece, think, you know what, this is a great piece, wow, how thoughtful, wow, this
00:16:49.400
is totally fair, wow, these arguments are so well-argued that we're just going to post
00:16:56.780
Usually, just sort of to pause for a second and talk about the behind-the-scenes aspect
00:17:01.380
of a news organization, I run one here at True North, I'm the editor-in-chief, I know
00:17:07.800
Typically, if someone submits an article, or a video in our case, or an op-ed, you know,
00:17:12.720
you read it through, you make sure, like I said, it's bulletproof, that every single
00:17:15.800
piece can be completely justified, that every stat, every fact has a source, or you know
00:17:22.480
where it came from, that the piece is true, that you are confident with it, that it has
00:17:26.480
met your journalistic standards, and your integrity, your ethics, and everything like
00:17:33.120
Usually, it's read over by at least two or three people, and that's just at True North.
00:17:36.940
I imagine CBC has many, many, many, many, many more staff members and people on their
00:17:41.800
editorial team that can help with the editing process.
00:17:45.000
So the fact that this piece, as I just read it, the original piece, made it through all
00:17:49.940
of those stages, and the CBC put it out, is a crazy, crazy indictment of just how terrible
00:17:55.680
the CBC is, of just how absolutely poorly organized this place is, of their complete
00:18:00.820
lack of ethics and integrity when it comes to journalism.
0.99
00:18:04.240
I'm just floored by the fact that they would put out a garbage, garbage piece like this by
1.00
00:18:08.200
a person who sounds like a paranoid lunatic when it comes to accusing everyone around her
1.00
00:18:15.720
And so, of course, the backlash was pretty strong, pretty fierce.
00:18:20.460
Here you have John Kay, who is the editor over at Collette, and he says,
00:18:25.720
got it, if someone votes for a party you don't like, they must be a bigot.
00:18:30.020
Well, there was a lot of comments just like this on Twitter.
00:18:34.160
Well, they basically completely rewrite the piece.
00:18:36.360
They take down that original version that I just read, and they put up something that
00:18:39.820
is just completely different, completely watered down.
00:18:44.900
They clearly recognized that the piece that they put out was indefensible, that there was
00:18:50.620
And so rather than just completely killing the piece and saying, we apologize for publishing
00:18:55.160
this complete nonsense, we'll try to do better going forward.
00:19:02.400
They just kind of rewrote the piece and tried to basically make it seem like they had done
00:19:07.640
nothing wrong, hope that people don't notice that this was a completely rewritten piece.
00:19:16.020
You can see that there's like stealth edits that really water the piece down.
00:19:19.480
But again, they don't make it clear that they've changed it.
00:19:21.360
When you go onto the website and you read the piece, there's no big note anywhere at
00:19:27.360
There's no correction label or anything like that.
00:19:30.240
They just sort of stealth went in and changed the headline.
00:19:32.880
It now says on election day, I greeted people who voted for candidates who might hate people
00:19:38.840
So they added that who might before it just said who hate people like me.
00:19:42.680
So again, that might word really, really couches it and makes it a lot less assertive than
00:19:49.700
Basically, I'm not entirely sure, to be honest, who made these changes, whether the editor
00:19:53.320
just went in and did it themselves or whether they went back to this elections candidate woman
00:19:57.360
and said, look, you got to really make this piece a lot stronger because it's not standing
00:20:01.920
But regardless, a lot of the really, really loaded pieces are now gone.
00:20:06.520
For instance, for some reason, she still talks about her interaction with the woman in the
00:20:13.980
But they took out the fact that she was elderly and white.
0.78
00:20:18.160
So for some reason, CBC thought that it would be better if they took out the part that identified
00:20:28.160
But it sort of underscores the idea that the piece, as it was written, was just really appalling
00:20:36.060
Jonathan Kaye does a great job on his Twitter of literally going through, comparing the screenshot
00:20:41.520
to screenshot of all the changes and really dissecting it.
00:20:46.560
But I will just say that this is one of the worst offenders for Fake News Friday.
00:20:49.880
We joked about it internally here at the Candace Malcolm Show and at True North.
00:20:52.960
That we might have to do like an award show for the biggest fake news stories of the year.
00:20:57.980
And if we did, this would certainly be a contender because this was absolutely appalling.
00:21:03.500
And the CBC has noticed this, at least implicitly, by going through and making such drastic changes.
00:21:10.320
And the only way that we know that the changes were made, if you happen to come on and see
00:21:15.040
this piece after all these edits were made, is just at the very, very bottom, the very,
00:21:21.820
First, it says, editor's note, this column and headline has been revised to clarify the
00:21:26.720
writer's reaction was to some conservative candidates and their policies, and not broadly
00:21:35.120
And it says a previous version of this column said,
00:21:38.920
Arpan Canna was a former MP with the Conservative Party.
00:21:42.080
In fact, Canna was a candidate for the party, but was not elected.
00:21:45.460
So again, just a total, total joke, horrible, horrible disservice and abuse by the public
00:21:53.060
It is no wonder why Canadians don't watch the CBC and they don't trust the CBC.
00:21:57.880
It is because the CBC is absolutely dysfunctional.
00:22:03.980
I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.
00:22:05.880
I'm Candace Malcolm, and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.