The Candice Malcolm Show - January 17, 2022


The moving COVID-19 goalposts in Quebec (Ft. Viva Frei)


Episode Stats

Length

25 minutes

Words per Minute

213.70615

Word Count

5,531

Sentence Count

291

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

Why does Quebec always seem to have the most heavy-handed lockdown measures, and yet at the same time, their politicians seem to get the highest approval ratings? What is going on in La Belle Provence? In this episode of The Candice Malcolm Show, host Candice talks to Viva Frei, creator of the popular YouTube channel VivaFrei, about this and much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Why does Quebec always seem to have the most heavy-handed lockdown measures, and yet at the
00:00:04.360 same time, their politicians always seem to have the highest approval ratings? What is going on
00:00:08.880 in La Belle Provence? I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:16.660 Hi, everyone. Thank you so much for tuning in. Now, from the outside, Quebec just seems like
00:00:21.040 a total madhouse. Every time there's a new fad or a new restriction, it seems like Quebec is
00:00:25.960 jumping to be the first to implement it. To me, the silliest thing, out of all the silly
00:00:30.040 restrictions that we've seen in COVID, the idea of a curfew, the idea that somehow at night,
00:00:34.760 COVID becomes more dangerous, and if you're out after a certain hour, you become more infectious,
00:00:39.000 it's just so silly, and it just shows the anti-scientific approach, and yet that's one
00:00:43.600 of the things that Quebec continues to do. So we don't really talk a lot about Quebec on the Candice
00:00:48.820 Malcolm Show and here at True North, and I want to try to rectify that and correct that, and so we're
00:00:53.100 going to do a complete focus today on what's going on in Quebec, as well as some of the broader
00:00:58.120 trends, and to do that, I am joined by someone who I am a big fan of, I've admired for a very, very long
00:01:03.380 time. I'm talking about David Freiheit, who runs the YouTube channel Viva Frei, and David is a, he was a
00:01:11.400 lawyer in Montreal from 2007 to 2018 before making the leap into YouTube, and he's now sort of a full-time
00:01:17.720 YouTuber, social media guy. So Viva or David, it's so great to have you on the show.
00:01:23.320 Thank you for having me. I'm still a member of the bar, so technically I have one file left,
00:01:27.480 and it's a trial coming up in 2023 that we started, the file started in 2015. So as mad as the world is,
00:01:34.820 the practice of litigation is a very long and tedious process.
00:01:38.700 Well, that's interesting. We can get into it, and before we do, I just want to hear a little bit,
00:01:44.300 you know, we've never had you on the show before. I've been a fan for a long time. I really got into
00:01:48.380 your YouTube videos. I think it was back during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, and you sort of broke
00:01:52.800 everything down in like a very logical, coherent, rational way. I really appreciate that. I love your
00:01:58.480 stuff. I also like how, you know, sometimes I see you doing YouTube videos in the car or with kids
00:02:04.220 running around, and it's such a great reflection of real life. So why don't you tell us a little bit
00:02:09.040 about yourself, and what made you take this jump from being, you know, a super serious lawyer into
00:02:15.240 doing something more fun and something more interactive, like becoming a YouTuber?
00:02:19.220 Well, it's funny. Going back to CEGEP, I was in Dawson College, studied film, studied creative arts,
00:02:24.980 fine arts, and then studied philosophy, but then you have to get a job, and you have to, you know,
00:02:29.640 go and integrate into real life. So I got a law degree and then practiced, but I've always loved that stuff.
00:02:34.340 And the practice of law, I never loved for the reason, you know, tedious, paper pushing,
00:02:40.380 soul crushing, when you win, you lose, when you lose, you lose. And so I kept on saying, you know,
00:02:45.400 if I don't like it more next year, I'll stop. If I don't like it more next year, I'll stop.
00:02:48.740 Then I had my first kid, and I walked out of the big firm, ended up starting my own boutique. It was a
00:02:55.020 solo practice turned into a boutique litigation, but seven years into that, still didn't like it. And on
00:03:00.860 the sideline, I was making videos, playing around on YouTube, playing around with GoPros,
00:03:05.880 and I discovered video, videography, you know, content creation. But I noticed every time I put
00:03:11.380 up a video about what it's like to be a lawyer, people got engaged, they liked that they said
00:03:14.780 more of this. And then it just happened. I mean, I did a breakdown of an Alex Jones deposition in
00:03:21.240 2018. And that really caused me to discover the niche. I don't like practicing law, but I'm
00:03:26.860 reasonably decent at understanding it and explaining it. Although I think I was good at practicing as
00:03:31.060 well. And then I just, the channel turned into that and it, you know, it went to where it is now,
00:03:35.600 which is, you know, breaking down the lawsuits and litigation of general stuff, but a lot of COVID
00:03:41.900 stuff for the last two years. The Brett Kavanaugh was interesting. That was back in the day
00:03:45.760 where I tried to remain neutral with my own personal opinion. And I still explained both
00:03:51.220 sides, but now I've become much more vocal in explaining which side I side with and which side
00:03:56.080 I believe in. Brett Kavanaugh, I remember at the time, I can understand both sides, even if I didn't
00:04:01.300 agree with both sides as much. I thought one side was definitely had a stronger argument than the
00:04:06.200 other. And now, you know, I think now it's time for people to get the facts and then also hear
00:04:11.980 opinions from people they either trust or do not trust, depending on how they view me.
00:04:17.540 It's funny how you describe the law profession, because my husband is also a, you know, he calls
00:04:22.580 himself a recovering or retired corporate lawyer. And he described it as the legal profession is like
00:04:28.180 a pie eating competition, where if you win, the prize is more pie, right? So it's just like a never
00:04:33.380 ending thing there. Oh, it's even more depressing than that. It's like, if you win, everybody's still
00:04:40.840 unhappy because they've paid the lawyer, however much it's taken, however many years. And when
00:04:45.220 you lose, they're even more unhappy. And it was at the point where like, I didn't even feel good
00:04:49.800 when I won. And I, sometimes I would win so devastatingly, I would still feel bad because
00:04:54.020 it involved crushing somebody else. So yeah, pie eating contest. I might pick something that I
00:04:58.340 don't like eating like a mayonnaise eating contest. Well, that was good. And I will admit. So when I
00:05:04.240 first came across your channel and it was during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, I kind of assumed that you
00:05:08.280 were on the left, just because I, you know, I made the assumption because you're a lawyer,
00:05:12.880 I find that most people in the legal profession tend to be liberals and that you're from Montreal.
00:05:16.860 It was like two strikes against you. So I just assumed, you know, this guy is really reasonable
00:05:20.580 and really fair because he's presenting both sides. And that's something that I find is totally absent
00:05:25.280 on the political left. And so it didn't, you know, when it sort of came out that you decided to run for
00:05:29.780 the PPC and your political persuasion became more evident, it's like, okay, no wonder he was being so
00:05:34.740 fair about both sides because it doesn't seem to be something that the left tends to do very well.
00:05:39.980 I want to ask you though, as, as a YouTuber, as someone who gauge on the social media side of
00:05:44.780 things and sort of new media, what is your view on the traditional media in Canada, in Quebec? You
00:05:51.100 know, we can see that the sort of legacy media fading away into relevancy and, you know, some of the
00:05:58.360 issues with, with, with just being untrusted, unfair and younger people not engaging at all. I wonder
00:06:03.980 what, what's your perspective on the future of the traditional media, legacy media, and how do you
00:06:10.080 see your role and the role of, of, of platforms like YouTube and people doing video blogs like you do
00:06:15.480 in, in changing the landscape?
00:06:17.800 I'll preface it. They're liars. And I, I don't think I ever fully appreciated it, or I don't think
00:06:23.220 they were as egregious, overt liars as they have become. And I don't know if it's because they've taken
00:06:28.140 so much federal money that they are now indebted to the hand that feeds them. Some people say they were
00:06:32.780 always liars, but I do remember once upon a time, W5 CTV doing investigative journalism, undercover
00:06:39.440 stuff, you know, secretly recorded video stuff to blow the lid off controversies. I remember that
00:06:45.360 in my life, 60 minutes used to do it. I don't know when they became such liars or if they were always
00:06:51.140 liars, but I just wasn't aware of it, but they're dishonest to the point where it can't be incompetence
00:06:56.700 and it can't be anything but malice or deliberate partisanship. When I discovered this was part of my, my red
00:07:04.680 pilling process. When I discovered that, you know, Trudeau effectively bought off the media with I think
00:07:11.420 it was $600 million in subsidies. When I found out that the CBC and Radio Canada are subsidized to the
00:07:17.740 tune of $1 billion a year by the federal government, it all started to make sense. But with the advent and
00:07:23.160 the explosion of independent media on YouTube, on Twitter, on social media platforms, it became even
00:07:28.980 more in your face. And it became even more like an existential fight for survival because even with
00:07:35.820 the billion dollar subsidies, they still can't compete. They still are losing traction. They're still
00:07:42.240 losing traffic and they're losing credibility. But I think it's gotten worse over time. Throw money
00:07:48.460 into the equation. It definitely gets worse. Throw their existence into the equation. You know, there's
00:07:52.920 the old expression, I forget who it was that said it, but when you fight corruption, corruption fights
00:07:56.880 back. And the more independent media gains credibility, pushes back and reveals the lies, the more what we
00:08:05.400 called legacy media or traditional media or mainstream media lashes out. But throw money into the equation
00:08:10.940 and it will fundamentally corrupt a relationship and it will fundamentally turn what is supposed to be
00:08:15.820 independent media into dependent media. And they're dependent on the government dollars that
00:08:20.120 they're supposed to be reporting on. So you don't need to be Nostradamus to know how that corrupts a
00:08:24.940 relationship. Well, absolutely. And we saw that we saw the interesting blog post come out from a
00:08:31.160 former CBC journalist that said just that, you know, that the powers that be in society, big corporations,
00:08:36.400 governments amassing power. The CBC doesn't ask them questions, doesn't isn't skeptical about them.
00:08:40.940 Well, of course not. That's that's who they owe their livelihood to. Instead, they're skeptical of,
00:08:45.200 you know, just regular everyday Canadians who don't hold the correct trendy left wing opinions,
00:08:49.920 right? For sure. And and you see the trend, but you also then see it reflected in legislation. I
00:08:54.900 forget if it's Bill C-10 or C-16, the one that wanted to regulate social media, internet, the way they
00:09:00.640 regulate television and radio. And you had, oh, that guy with the mustache, I forget his name now,
00:09:05.480 the minister of heritage, you know, coming out and saying, we're not going to regulate independent
00:09:10.560 accounts unless they're big, unless they make money off their accounts. Well, that's how you see the
00:09:15.420 political infiltration into the independent media, where they say, like, all of the subsidies,
00:09:20.300 all of the protection that the government has given the media, the scratching each other's back,
00:09:25.340 still losing ground. So what does the what do the politicians have to do? Come in and regulate
00:09:29.160 the the the wild west of the information landscape, the way they've regulated television and radio.
00:09:35.640 But it has, it's an evolution in process. And you see that the powers that be are going after where
00:09:41.240 the freedom is. And that's why it's important for maybe a separate discussion, but independent
00:09:46.280 content creators, important for them to fight back on this realm where you basically have the
00:09:51.600 government wanting to regulate and control the internet, the way they control television and radio.
00:09:55.660 And it's wild to see it just how they're all kind of working in lockstep together, you see social
00:10:02.040 media giants, completely silencing any dissenting opinions. And if anything, that just grows the
00:10:07.540 sort of intrigue and interest. I mean, you've seen this with the sort of vaccine skeptic movement
00:10:12.040 throughout the pandemic. It's like any side of the story that's just talking about, hey, hey,
00:10:16.860 what are some of the unintended consequences? What are some of the downsides about rushing out these,
00:10:20.580 these these vaccines? It's like the information just disappears and the people get de-platformed
00:10:26.000 and it kind of raises intrigue. Like, what, what, why are you silencing them? The more that they're
00:10:29.820 silenced, the more intrigued I am. And so they're kind of like doing the exact opposite of what they
00:10:34.620 intend to do.
00:10:35.920 It is known as the Streisand effect, but it's also just known as the, you know, eye-opening effect.
00:10:40.000 It's the red pill people are now seeing. At the time, back in the day when the vaccine was being
00:10:44.480 rolled out, if you suggested there were potential side effects, even side effects that are known for all
00:10:49.960 vaccines, all of anything that goes into your body can trigger a response. Even if you stated those,
00:10:54.620 you were de-platformed, suspended, banned. And then just today, CTV comes out with an article that
00:10:59.860 would have gotten you banned probably 12 hours ago, or certainly 12 months ago, that the vaccine is
00:11:05.560 interfering with women's menstrual cycles. Whereas had anybody said that a year ago,
00:11:09.740 they would have been banned, de-platformed, you know, de-personed, whatever. And so it is interesting.
00:11:15.200 On the one hand, it's the Streisand effect. But on the other hand, when people see the truth
00:11:18.180 finally come out, and they're like, whoa, the people they were going after a year ago were saying
00:11:22.220 the same things that the mainstream media is saying now, exactly the same thing with the origins of
00:11:27.260 COVID. It was a bannable offense to suggest that it originated man-made in a lab in Wuhan, China.
00:11:33.660 Bannable offense. And now it's become mainstream media headlines. So when people see this happen
00:11:40.020 in real time, it's eye-opening, it's awakening, but it also causes the powers to fight back even
00:11:44.940 harder to maintain control over their, they're, they're allowing others to access information
00:11:50.300 and knowledge. And that's, that's what the battle is over right now.
00:11:53.900 Absolutely. I couldn't have said it better myself. And we've seen it so many times. I mean,
00:11:57.400 it's like, you know, you're not allowed to put anything out there that promotes vaccine
00:12:01.220 skepticism. But then all of a sudden, the government pulls AstraZeneca because they say it's not safe.
00:12:05.760 They pull Johnson & Johnson because they say it's not safe. It's like, you know, you're giving us
00:12:09.920 reason to be skeptical. Well, David, sorry, I keep calling you Viva. But David, if you, if I wanted
00:12:15.600 to bring you on today to really talk about Quebec, because sort of from an outsider's perspective,
00:12:19.980 there's two things that happen. One, it seems like you guys always have the most heavy handed
00:12:23.080 restrictions. And then second, it seems like whatever's happening in Quebec eventually happens
00:12:27.320 in the rest of the country. So, you know, you guys had to lock down over the holidays. And then,
00:12:30.960 you know, as soon as a few weeks later, it was like Ontario, BC, Manitoba, everyone followed suit.
00:12:35.720 So you live in Quebec, you live through some of the most severe restrictions. Why is it that the
00:12:41.260 government in Quebec seems to be so heavy handed about COVID? And why do people put up with it?
00:12:46.420 I cannot answer the question. Well, let me, I can answer the question of why people put up with it,
00:12:50.780 but it presupposes or it causes me or forces me to divine intention. I think people are terrified on
00:12:58.260 the one hand, they have been bombarded with, I'm going to call it fake news, fear porn for the last
00:13:03.640 two years to the point where they are now so scared of a sniffles, so scared of Omicron that
00:13:09.480 I know personally, people who have actually isolated their children for 10 days in a house so that the
00:13:16.640 parents don't get exposed to this. People have been traumatized with fear and it's a normal human
00:13:22.300 condition. I think part of being a rebel is like the more people push, the more you push back. And I
00:13:27.540 was of the persuasion where I followed for a bit, you know, two weeks to flatten the curve,
00:13:31.640 let's all do our part. But the more they kept pushing, it's in my nature to push back. And now
00:13:36.100 two years later, I'm, I'm off the rails to some, I don't, but they put up with it because of fear.
00:13:40.820 Some of them put up with it because it just doesn't, it doesn't affect them. You know,
00:13:43.960 some people have done better under all of this and it has not compromised their lives. If you don't go
00:13:48.140 out at night, if you don't have kids in school, if you don't have a job that was, that was shut
00:13:52.760 down, if you don't have a business that was shut down, if you didn't live a lifestyle that was not
00:13:56.980 affected, or if you can maintain the lifestyle nonetheless, just pay more for travel, uh, do
00:14:02.020 whatever is required, uh, in terms of financial, uh, expenses to live the life that you've always
00:14:07.340 lived. Well, you're not going to complain. Some people have done better, uh, in which case they're
00:14:11.280 not going to complain either. So really it is, it's the middle of the road people who have been
00:14:16.160 suffering the brunt of this, but they have been, uh, they've been forced into silence to some extent
00:14:21.360 because you can't complain about it because you're selfish. You can't complain about it because
00:14:25.620 you're undermining the science. So for a number of reasons, people have been forced into silence,
00:14:31.340 but I think the more that people speak up, the more that people speak out of others. I don't know
00:14:35.740 that Quebec's been leading this because, you know, they've been, they've been nuts over in the
00:14:39.540 Maritimes bubble for a while. You know, they had the cross border, uh, uh, blockade, uh, from the
00:14:45.600 Maritime bubble to Quebec and Ontario. Uh, you know, they were prohibiting, uh, by way of injunction,
00:14:51.200 peaceful assembly protests against the measures in Nova Scotia, Alberta locking up pastors, uh,
00:14:57.120 Canada as a whole has been on, on the, on the free fall sort of in tandem. Quebec might, uh,
00:15:03.820 have a little more liberty, I should say in pulling away people's liberties because they've
00:15:07.760 already done it enough historically, uh, in the province, we're used to laws that prohibit
00:15:13.000 religious facewear because we've, we've, we've, we've tolerated them pre COVID. We're used to laws
00:15:18.020 that restrict language rights because they were there pre COVID. So comes down to it at the end
00:15:22.380 of the day in Quebec to say, okay, well, just two weeks to flatten the curve. Now we're going to
00:15:25.540 lock in your house. People are so terrified. They won't speak out against it. Uh, people are so
00:15:29.600 terrified. They think it's necessary and others, uh, too late. You can't say anything about it because
00:15:34.060 it's already there, but it really does feel like we're living through a real time, real life
00:15:38.800 Milgram experiments where you have experts, medical experts, Horatio Arruda, literally
00:15:44.480 imposing a curfew that they themselves in real time acknowledge has no scientific basis.
00:15:49.480 And it's just like, Hey, let's just, let's just see if this works better do something. Cause at least
00:15:53.320 if we do something, people are going to think we're doing something and they're not going to
00:15:55.740 think we're doing nothing. We're in this case doing nothing might've been less destructive than
00:15:59.580 doing what they're doing. But I don't, I don't think we're leading the way. I think we have a bit
00:16:03.240 of a precedent in Quebec given our language laws and given some other laws that we, uh,
00:16:07.340 have accepted that limit our freedoms, but Canada has been going downhill pretty quickly,
00:16:12.420 pretty much in tandem. Uh, but yeah, no, you're absolutely right. Yeah, you're right. I, I shouldn't
00:16:18.340 pick on, on Quebec, uh, David, because I know like one of the most egregious things that have happened
00:16:22.540 in the entire pandemic was when Ontario premier, conservative premier Doug Ford, um, gave police
00:16:28.720 permission to stop anybody at any time, any place, uh, to ask them what they're doing out, which is sort
00:16:33.040 of an Australian measure. And one of the, one of the most, uh, you know, empowering
00:16:37.340 and heartening moments of the, of the pandemic is that the police by and large said, no, we're not
00:16:41.420 doing that. We're not enforcing this, um, unconstitutional, irrational, uh, edict. And,
00:16:46.900 and, and then it sort of went away. So certainly we've seen madness, um, across the entire spectrum.
00:16:52.240 One thing that I found is that in some ways the laws that, uh, are designed to kind of pick on young
00:17:00.460 people and disproportionately harm young people are sort of like the ones that they get the most
00:17:05.320 attention and, and are in some ways most popular. I know we saw a group of Quebec influencers on an
00:17:10.660 airplane, uh, you know, they're out of the country, they chartered a plane. It's, it's their, it's their
00:17:14.700 own private plane. And yet this, this elicited outrage from the media and politicians, I know
00:17:19.740 Justin Trudeau commented on it. Um, the idea of a curfew, it really, it really is to impact young
00:17:25.080 people who, who by and large, you know, people in their twenties don't really have the same, uh,
00:17:30.500 impact from COVID. They don't really die and they don't get sick in the same number. So it's like
00:17:34.280 all of these, all of these blunt, heavy handed measures, um, they, they harm young people the
00:17:40.040 most because they're the least likely to get sick and the most likely to have this sort of negative
00:17:44.240 societal effects that will be with them their whole lives. And that's one of my biggest criticisms
00:17:48.320 is just how, you know, rather than like saying, Hey, let's just make sure that we protect the most
00:17:52.740 vulnerable. It's like, we just have these blanket laws that impact everyone and, and harm
00:17:56.480 young people. That's not even getting into the impact on kids in schools and forcing little
00:18:00.520 kids to wear masks, forcing little kids to get vaccinated, uh, you know, without, without the
00:18:05.360 long-term data of long-term side effects and consequences. It's all just been really, really
00:18:09.640 disheartening. It's, it's, it's madness. And I went through, uh, on one of my videos of talking to
00:18:15.280 some McGill students, they're, they're in isolation in university. If they have unlawful gatherings,
00:18:20.140 they can get suspended from school, uh, forced to pay fines to the government. Uh, they're forced to go
00:18:25.380 into, you know, pay for accommodations off campus. Uh, then you get into, you know, the compelled
00:18:31.420 vaccination of teenagers and giving them the vaccine passports. My kid at her school, uh, saw people
00:18:37.800 kicked off the soccer field when they wanted to try out for soccer because they weren't fully
00:18:40.660 vaccinated 13 year old kids. I mean, this is, it's, it's psychological abuse. It's unscientific.
00:18:47.140 It's unconstitutional. It's immoral. It's, it's everything. And, you know, so without getting too
00:18:53.560 much into that, you know, at the very least in Ontario, your police, uh, said, no, we're not
00:18:57.480 going to do this in Quebec. They're literally arresting everybody who's out protesting the
00:19:01.500 curfew. Uh, it, it's a weird thing. Quebec's police have always been a little, they've been
00:19:06.920 a little, Quebec's police have always had a reputation within Canada more so than other
00:19:10.180 provinces. But what is interesting is just seeing the powers that be respond to this, who
00:19:14.500 opposes it, who willingly enforces it, who gleefully enforces it. But it's the, I won't say
00:19:20.340 part of the plan. It's just the, uh, side benefit of the plan is that when you get everyone dependent
00:19:25.780 on the state or fearful of the state, you get everyone adhering to the edicts of the state,
00:19:31.260 regardless of whether or not they agree with them and regardless of whether or not they're
00:19:33.440 scientific. So the police need their paychecks, the people can't afford the fines. And so you end
00:19:38.700 up having everyone living in fear. And I mean, it is nothing shy of tyranny. And I believe by the
00:19:46.000 true definition of the term fascism, it's nothing but fascism where you have government working with
00:19:50.640 corporations, working with the media, all having their beautiful orgy of power to reign in the
00:19:57.940 population and basically control every aspect of their life, right down to who they can have in
00:20:03.000 their own house for private gatherings, which are currently outlawed in Quebec. If you can believe
00:20:07.120 that. It's crazy, David, because if you described any of this to us, you know, three years ago,
00:20:12.920 four years ago, that these kinds of measures were happening, we, I would never believe you.
00:20:16.400 You know, if someone said, Hey, Donald Trump just got elected and guess what he's going to do. And
00:20:19.620 he named everything that Justin Trudeau has done in the last year, I would say you're completely
00:20:23.240 wacko. And that would never happen in North America. And yet here we are and it's happening
00:20:27.420 and it's happened. I know, you know, you're, you're a brilliant legal mind and you are also
00:20:31.800 an activist. So what, what is it that you're doing to push back against this? And what can other
00:20:36.060 Canadians do, uh, that say enough is enough. We want our freedoms back. We want to go back to normal.
00:20:40.240 We don't want to live under this medical tyranny anymore.
00:20:43.600 I'm not sure if I'm a brilliant legal mind and I'm not sure if I'm an activist because I,
00:20:47.200 I bought them end of the day. I, you know, I don't tell people to go out and protest. I don't
00:20:51.680 tell people to go out and break the law. And I don't do it myself. Uh, I, I raise awareness. I
00:20:56.500 think I explain what's going on. I explain why I think it's fundamentally unconstitutional,
00:21:01.060 uh, why I think it's fundamentally immoral and why I think it's fundamentally unscientific in my
00:21:05.520 limited, uh, you know, I'm not a scientist, but I, I have a brain and I can read articles.
00:21:09.940 And I can also see what the scientists are saying now compared to what they said a year
00:21:13.500 ago, uh, raise awareness, explain what's that issue. I've had these discussions with people
00:21:18.660 over the last two years. Like, sure. There's some of them said there's a risk. The government
00:21:22.280 goes too far. And I, and I keep needling. Like, is it too far now when they pepper sprayed
00:21:25.940 the guy in the face at Tim Hortons, cause he wasn't wearing a mask. Was it too far then
00:21:29.580 when they're compelling vaccination of 12 year olds? Is it too far now third shot in Quebec,
00:21:34.200 or you won't be able to go into grocery stores. Is it too far now in new Brunswick? Is it too far
00:21:39.020 now? So sometimes, you know, like I think it was Orwell who said in times of madness,
00:21:42.580 stating the obvious as a revolutionary act, just keep stating the obvious. The problem is
00:21:47.080 I am not sure that people, um, want the change. I think there's a lot of people who are,
00:21:53.700 I won't say beyond the point of, of, of repair, but who are certainly in the frame of mind right now
00:21:59.100 that they're double masking outside. And when you have a significant enough portion of the
00:22:04.620 population that thinks that we actually need these measures to stave off an existential threat
00:22:10.140 to our very existence, uh, they will do anything. I mean, it's, uh, who said that Nietzsche, if you can
00:22:16.460 get people to believe the absurd, you can get them to commit atrocities, you know, something along those
00:22:20.440 lines. We're at the point where a large portion of the population are now firmly embedded in believing
00:22:26.440 the absurd. And they, I think they cannot bring themselves to admit that they believe the absurd
00:22:30.320 because it would have to mean that they were duped, uh, which would be an attack on their own
00:22:34.840 intelligence. It would be an attack on their own ego. And so they cannot admit that. And they just
00:22:39.140 have to keep going further and further into the, into the scenario. I won't say the lie out of
00:22:43.880 respect. Uh, so I, I don't know that you can have the change until you have enough people who want the
00:22:48.280 change. Uh, I don't think it can be a violent change. I don't think it can be an unlawful change
00:22:52.660 because I've been saying this from the beginning when people say, well, why don't you go out there and
00:22:56.740 you know, break curfew and break the law. I'm thoroughly convinced that nothing would play more
00:23:01.880 into the hands of the, of the, of the tyrants of Trudeau of Legault than to have people out there
00:23:06.460 breaking windows, breaking the laws. Cause when they did that in old Montreal and they smashed
00:23:10.180 some windows and Lord knows who did it. Cause I don't know that there were people part of the actual
00:23:13.680 movement that did it. What, what happens to police on the street. And so it can't be a, a violent
00:23:20.140 solution. It has to be a political one because it's not going to be a judicial one. Cause I've seen how
00:23:25.120 the courts are just not doing anything. The courts are not intervening in Quebec. We had a lawyer
00:23:30.780 challenged the curfew on an injunctive basis. The court said, no, not, not a serious enough, uh,
00:23:36.020 violation. Uh, les entrepreneurs en action de Quebec EAQ sued for the lockdown measures,
00:23:41.400 the face masks. The court said, no face masking kids is, is, is justifiable because the risk,
00:23:47.120 however minimal is there. The quarantine hotels have been upheld at the federal level. The courts are not
00:23:51.880 going to do anything. There's no judge. That's going to want blood on his or her hands by having
00:23:56.380 struck down a law and then have someone blame him for the deaths of someone in an old person home.
00:24:00.800 Uh, the politicians are not going to make any change now because they see it's too beneficial
00:24:04.720 to keep pushing this fear. Uh, Trudeau himself will never let up on this because this COVID pandemic
00:24:10.720 has been the biggest blessing for Trudeau's reign as prime minister, because nobody's talking about
00:24:15.600 Aga Khan scandal. Nobody's talking about SNC Lavalin scandal. Nobody's talking about
00:24:19.500 Wee's charity scandal. There was another one I forgot, which, oh, I always forget the third one.
00:24:24.720 No, the fourth one. Nobody's talking about his scandals anymore. And he gets to go into full
00:24:29.040 tyrannical parent mode. He's got our backs. Uh, and it's the perfect distraction. So don't expect him
00:24:35.480 to walk anything back. Don't expect Legault to walk anything back because while he's jamming down
00:24:40.440 these unconstitutional laws, he's trying to jam down other unconstitutional laws, Bill C-96,
00:24:45.400 the reform to Bill 101. So they love it. It's the biggest power grab for the government.
00:24:49.140 And they're, they're, they're never going to give back the power. And if the solution is not going
00:24:52.920 to be political by the will of the people, the people are going to live with it. And that's
00:24:57.800 going to be that. It's sad to think, because I think you're right. So many people do in some
00:25:02.880 ways benefit, not maybe not necessarily, you know, benefit from the, the overarching fear that they,
00:25:07.720 that they live with, but it's like, you know, if it's the middle winter and it's negative 30 outside
00:25:11.900 and you don't have to go to work, you can just work from home. That's really a lot better. Right. So I,
00:25:16.980 I think unfortunately a lot of people have just slid into this sort of comfort and they want to put
00:25:21.780 their safety, they're willing to put their safety ahead of everything else, sacrifice their liberty
00:25:25.800 for security. And we know that they'll get neither, but you're right. We definitely have our work cut
00:25:31.380 out for us, David. And I'm so glad that there are people like you out there sort of on the front lines
00:25:35.740 of the internet, explaining everything, breaking everything down, helping us stay educated and aware
00:25:40.880 of all the various problems. So I thank you for your YouTube channel and all the work you do over there.
00:25:45.400 And I really appreciate you joining the show today. Thank you very much for having me. It was great.
00:25:49.780 All right. Thank you so much for tuning in. I'm Candace Malcolm and this is the Candace Malcolm Show.