The Charlie Kirk Show - A Color Revolution in Israel? with Darren Beattie and Robert Barnes

00:00:00.000 Today on the Charlie Kirk show, Darren Beattie from Revolver.news joins us to talk about the TikTok pill and also a color revolution happening in Israel.

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody.

00:00:09.000 And then we have Robert Barnes, Barnes Law, joins to talk about Trump indictment news.

00:00:15.000 Alvin Bragg, is there an insurrection happening in Nashville?

00:00:19.000 And the TikTok bill.

00:00:20.000 And finally, we talk about reparations.

00:00:22.000 Buckle up, everybody.

00:00:23.000 Here we go.

00:00:25.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

00:00:26.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.

00:00:28.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

00:00:32.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

00:00:35.000 I want to thank Charlie.

00:00:36.000 He's an incredible guy.

00:00:37.000 His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.

00:00:44.000 Turning point USA.

00:00:46.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

00:00:54.000 That's why we are here.

00:00:57.000 Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandTodd.com.

00:01:07.000 Joining us is Darren Beattie.

00:01:08.000 He runs one of the most important websites, Revolver.news.

00:01:11.000 You guys should visit it every day.

00:01:12.000 I certainly do.

00:01:13.000 Darren, welcome back to the program.

00:01:14.000 Darren, I want to talk about Israel.

00:01:16.000 You have a very unique take on that.

00:01:18.000 But first, I just want to get your thoughts on this Restrict Act that we've been talking about that more Republicans than Democrats are sponsoring.

00:01:26.000 And I just want to remind our audience what Republicans are sponsoring this.

00:01:29.000 John Boozman from Arkansas, Mike Crapo from Idaho, Lindsey Graham from South Carolina, Tom Tillis from North Carolina, Chuck Grassley from Iowa, Kevin Kramer from North Dakota, Shelley Moorcapito from West Virginia, Mitt Romney from Utah, Susan Collins from Maine, Dan Sullivan from Alaska, Jerry Moran from Kansas, Deb Fisher from Nebraska, and John Thune from South Dakota.

00:01:54.000 Darren, your thoughts on the Restrict Act?

00:01:57.000 Well, when you have a bill that's supported by Lindsey Graham, Tom Tillis, and Mitt Romney, you know you're in for a beauty, as they say.

00:02:08.000 The Restrict Act, what can we say about it?

00:02:11.000 Well, first thing to know is that it's a Trojan horse type bill.

00:02:16.000 What it's being packaged as is some kind of way to counteract the nefarious foreign communist-infused influence of TikTok, which is a natural sell.

00:02:29.000 Everybody can get behind that.

00:02:31.000 But what it actually is, is a Trojan horse and amounts effectively.

00:02:36.000 I think the best description of it that I've heard is the Patriot Act for the Internet.

00:02:42.000 Even though the marketing is specifically tailored to TikTok, something that we all love to hate, the actual substance of the bill is very vague and it is no way limited to TikTok.

00:02:55.000 It's vaguely constrained to technologies associated with quote-unquote foreign adversaries, a flexible term that can be defined in any way that the Commerce Department wants it to be defined in, according to the vague language of the bill.

00:03:14.000 And I think the contextual view here, the bird's eye view, what we need to understand about this is in an era of unprecedented, dangerous politicization of the national security state, we need to be especially wary of granting the national security state enhanced, unprecedented.

00:03:38.000 I totally agree.

00:03:40.000 And that's the thing.

00:03:41.000 But the thing is, it's such a great marketing ploipe. 0.65

00:03:46.000 They take advantage of people's natural and entirely justified concern with and really revulsion toward Chinese influence and especially things like TikTok. 0.89

00:04:00.000 And they say, look at all of these, look at all these bad things going on with TikTok and use that as a pretext, ironically, it's a dark irony, but use that as a pretext to impose internet restrictions that actually make us a lot more like China. 0.79

00:04:17.000 That's what's so interesting. 0.85

00:04:19.000 Exactly.

00:04:19.000 And there's one other point that I think is worth noting: the timing is interesting.

00:04:25.000 Again, you'll have all of these politicians, none of whom who will speak up and speak out about the treatment of the January 6 prisoners, none of whom will speak out again about hot-button issues that directly affect the well-being of Americans.

00:04:43.000 And all of a sudden, they're the incredible Hulk when it comes to beating down TikTok.

00:04:48.000 What an easy target.

00:04:49.000 It's almost as though this is the rare occasion that the regime gives them permission to, you know, let your hair down a little bit.

00:04:57.000 Now, you know, you're neutered 99% of the time.

00:05:01.000 Here's the 1% where you get to play act as though you're actually tough and able to do something because they'll go on all day about TikTok, but really it seems to be a consolation prize for the fact that they're entirely impotent when it comes to reining in the power and abuses of American tech companies such as Google, such as Facebook, such as Twitter, even after the improvements instituted by Elon.

00:05:29.000 Overwhelmingly, the chief threat to American freedom on the internet and the chief manipulation impacting Americans' ability to process information happens through these American tech companies such as Google.

00:05:48.000 But they're so powerful.

00:05:49.000 They're so deeply integrated into the security state.

00:05:52.000 As we learn over and over through the Twitter files revelations, these politicians are totally helpless in light of American big tech companies.

00:06:02.000 And so all they can do is impotently point their fingers at TikTok.

00:06:07.000 And to make matters worse, they're doing that in order to push forth a bill that would actually further restrict freedoms on the internet for American citizens.

00:06:20.000 And all the while, during an era in which the national security state has proved most aggressive in politically attacking Americans.

00:06:30.000 That's exactly right.

00:06:31.000 I'm at a place now, Darren, where I cynically do not think it's possible to ban TikTok without also getting something awful alongside of it.

00:06:41.000 It's just we do not have the political precision.

00:06:45.000 We do not have the, in my opinion, experts that I trust.

00:06:50.000 And so I begrudgingly am at the place where I'd rather have to live with TikTok still existing than getting this Leviathan while quote unquote banning TikTok.

00:07:01.000 And hilariously, Darren, you read the bill, there's no guarantee that TikTok would actually get banned.

00:07:05.000 That's what's so hilarious.

00:07:06.000 Exactly.

00:07:07.000 No, that's the funny thing. 0.69

00:07:08.000 What would actually happen if it gets passed is they restrict our internet and half these people are probably on China's payroll anyway. 0.92

00:07:15.000 That's exactly right. 0.71

00:07:16.000 And then they don't do it.

00:07:17.000 Exactly.

00:07:18.000 And then they'll say, oh, no, just kidding, but Telegram we're going to ban because a lot of right-wingers use it and there's a Russian owner, right?

00:07:23.000 Rumble, we're going to ban because it was founded in Canada. 0.77

00:07:26.000 Twitter, we're going to ban because the Saudis invested and Elon runs it, right? 1.00

00:07:30.000 You go through the list. 1.00

00:07:31.000 So I think we're in harmony there, Darren.

00:07:33.000 I hate to be so cynical about things, but the last bastion of our ability to challenge tyranny are some of these platforms, right?

00:07:42.000 A free and open internet right now doesn't quite exist as it used to, but there's still little, you know, getter, Twitter, Telegram, Revolver.

00:07:51.000 They would love nothing more than to be able to use the power of the state to restrict us.

00:07:55.000 And that's literally the name of the bill.

00:07:57.000 All right, Darren, shifting gears for a second here.

00:08:00.000 Israel is in bedlam right now, but you're arguing that you think a color revolution is underway.

00:08:07.000 First, remind our audience what a color revolution is.

00:08:10.000 And are you arguing this is the central intelligence agency?

00:08:13.000 I would find that hard to believe.

00:08:16.000 Not necessarily, no, but I think what you see, which is amazing, I suggest everyone, if you haven't seen it, go look at some of the footage.

00:08:25.000 It's a big deal what's going on in Israel.

00:08:27.000 It's profoundly disruptive.

00:08:29.000 And you have mass demonstrations in the streets.

00:08:32.000 You have all the hallmark of what's termed color revolution, which refers to the mass mobilization of various interest groups, huge demonstrations in the streets.

00:08:44.000 You can, you know, the paradigmatic examples are the Eastern European color revolutions, Ukraine color revolution, but you can also think of the mass demonstrations of, say, Black Lives Matter in the United States, which are organized according to the same principles.

00:08:59.000 And you see something resembling this very closely in Israel.

00:09:05.000 And actually, it's very interesting.

00:09:08.000 And I don't know how deep of a dive we want to do, but there's so many layers to this because the kind of superficial layer is, you know, there's just like we have, you know, here in the United States, you know, people don't know this, but before Revolver, before the White House, before being an academic, I worked for two years for the great Robert Bork, who was really a seminal figure.

00:09:37.000 He should have been on the Supreme Court.

00:09:38.000 Yeah, conservative jurisprudence.

00:09:40.000 And one of his big issues was counteracting this problem of judicial activism.

00:09:46.000 And even back then, which is now a much longer time ago than I care to even think about or express, even back then, as bad as things were in the United States, Israel had an extremely pronounced problem with judicial activism, left-wing activism basically being implemented through the court system.

00:10:09.000 And so Bibi and his allies have attempted to curtail the issue of sort of what they consider to be unjust, out-of-bounds encroachment of the judiciary through enhancing powers of the parliament.

00:10:28.000 And this has, you know, naturally excited many different groups that are favorable to the left-wing side in Israel.

00:10:36.000 And so the superficial version of the clash is this question of the role of the judiciary versus parliament.

00:10:44.000 There's an underlying tension there that I think is profound and has even to some degree shaped the political contours of the West more broadly.

00:10:57.000 And that is the antagonism between Bibi, Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak.

00:11:08.000 And they just represent very different factions politically.

00:11:14.000 Ehud Barak sort of aligned with the left, and the left, the left faction of the national security state, similarly in America, is most closely associated with the color revolution methodology of regime change.

00:11:30.000 In the United States, you see this Atlanticist faction that happens to be particularly obsessed with Russia and Europe and very closely aligned with this constellation of human rights NGOs.

00:11:46.000 And one of its central figures would be somebody like George Soros, who Has a very kind of strange relationship with Israel, certainly deeply hostile to somebody like Netanyahu.

00:12:02.000 And Netanyahu's sort of right-wing group and the Likud is sort of in some sense, you know, internationalized.

00:12:14.000 It's made alliances with various sort of nationalist movements throughout the West.

00:12:20.000 And so, in some way, the clash going on in Israel recapitulates the larger clash between sort of the nationalists and the left between people like the late Sheldon Adelson and maybe somebody like George Soros at the sort of oligarch level.

00:12:47.000 And then within the national security state, it recapitulates the factions within it, of one side being the sort of Atlanticist color revolution faction that's very much opposed to populist nationalist movements and has even appropriated the color revolution methodology in order to undermine nationalist regimes in the same way that they would a foreign adversary,

00:13:14.000 including they've turned those tools inward, as I've been talking about for a long time.

00:13:20.000 And so it might, in a certain way, it's a localized political conflict in a country that's not America.

00:13:28.000 So it can seem, well, this isn't that important.

00:13:30.000 There are some sort of analogies just on that political level to what's happening here because the judicial activism problem and so forth.

00:13:39.000 But I think the deeper significance of it is this factional aspect whereby sort of Bibi and his opposition within Israel sort of again recapitulate the dominant antagonisms politically that have shaped the Western political world for you know close to the past decade.

00:14:06.000 In closing here, do you think that elements of a color revolution strategy are currently at play domestically here in America?

00:14:16.000 Sure, yes.

00:14:17.000 I mean, you see it intensify at periods and sort of wane in other periods.

00:14:23.000 It certainly intensifies around any presidential election season. 0.71

00:14:28.000 In the United States, it typically takes the form of some kind of George Floyd type situation, a BLM type situation.

00:14:36.000 And going all the way back to the time of the Trayvon Martin incident under Obama, arguably even before that, but it really intensified there.

00:14:47.000 People noticed the pattern: well, something like this tends to happen leading up to an important election, and there are mass mobilized protests, and they seem to come out of nowhere and then kind of disappear just as conveniently.

00:15:05.000 So that capacity to mobilize mass groups on a dime and then turn off the spigot more or less at will, although there is interesting blowback.

00:15:17.000 It's not totally a top-down thing.

00:15:21.000 It can get out of hand, even from the standpoint of the people who organize it.

00:15:25.000 But more or less, I'd say the BLM version of mass protest is the American manifestation of the color revolution model that we've deployed in a variety of foreign theaters. 0.56

00:15:40.000 I agree.

00:15:41.000 Darren, Revolver.news, great job.

00:15:43.000 Talk to you soon.

00:15:44.000 Thank you.

00:15:48.000 Look, are you concerned about the American K-12 education system?

00:15:52.000 Are you worried about what your children and your grandchildren are learning or honestly not learning in school?

00:15:57.000 If you answer yes, my friends at Hillsdale College have a free resource for you.

00:16:00.000 Hillsdale College understands the importance of education to the future of our country.

00:16:04.000 They're now offering 10 free print copies of their recent issue of En Primus.

00:16:11.000 It's titled Education as a Battleground, written by Hillsdale College President Larry P. Arne.

00:16:16.000 The special issue provides a factual account of the issues in the ongoing battle over education, explaining why parents and teachers, not unelected bureaucrats or activists, should guide what our children are learning.

00:16:30.000 With Hillsdale College, you can make a difference in your community by distributing these copies of En Primus at your church, local business, or even in your doctor's office.

00:16:39.000 Do not miss this opportunity to arm yourself with the facts.

00:16:42.000 Claim your 10 free copies of Education as a Battleground by visiting charlie4hillsdale.com.

00:16:48.000 That's charlieforhillsdale.com.

00:16:50.000 I love Hillsdale College.

00:16:52.000 I'm an enthusiastic promoter of them.

00:16:54.000 So check it out right now at charlie4hillsdale.com.

00:17:01.000 Several topics to cover with the great Robert Barnes.

00:17:04.000 Robert, welcome back to the program.

00:17:06.000 So, Robert, I want to start by, you know, beginning to dive into here the issue that I think many people are concerned about in so many different ways, which is, well, actually, I want to start on a different one.

00:17:22.000 There's a protest actually right now.

00:17:23.000 I want to talk about the Restrict Act.

00:17:24.000 I want to talk about the indictment.

00:17:26.000 But apparently, Robert, I don't know if you saw there's a bunch of people that have gone into the Tennessee Capitol.

00:17:30.000 Have you seen this?

00:17:32.000 What do you know about it?

00:17:33.000 Yeah, I'm from Tennessee.

00:17:34.000 Got a lot of friends in Tennessee.

00:17:36.000 And they wouldn't do that in a lot of county capitals across the state.

00:17:40.000 They would do it in the state capitol because that's Nashville that's trying to emulate itself on being the next Austin, Texas, unfortunately.

00:17:47.000 Someone should run for mayor there on a platform of purging the commies that are trying to take over the city. 0.99

00:17:52.000 But basically, you have, I mean, this is just David Hogg, astro turf, getting a bunch of young kids to believe something that's utter nonsense and taking sort of left-wing activism.

00:18:03.000 It's fascinating how when the left takes over a capital, it's part of democracy.

00:18:09.000 But if somebody on the right simply walks in following security guards, they end up in a gulag in D.C. 0.53

00:18:16.000 So the extraordinary contradiction, living contradiction of how people are treated based on their method of protest continues to show up on a day-to-day basis.

00:18:26.000 And this is just the latest iteration of it.

00:18:29.000 Yeah, we have a video here of a bunch of teenagers actually pushing police officers and struggling with them and assaulting police officers.

00:18:37.000 I don't think they're going to be put into solitary confinement, put into a gulag, have a special committee impaneled and having the entire FBI go after them.

00:18:47.000 I venture a guess the FBI will do nothing now that the Nashville State Capitol is being stormed.

00:18:53.000 We're going to keep an eye on that.

00:18:54.000 So, Robert, I want to ask you about the Restrict Act.

00:18:57.000 It's amazing to me how little coverage this has received.

00:19:00.000 I don't like TikTok. 1.00

00:19:01.000 TikTok is garbage. 1.00

00:19:02.000 It's terrible. 1.00

00:19:03.000 It's awful.

00:19:03.000 It's an indefensible application.

00:19:06.000 But where I'm at currently, I do not think there is a way to ban TikTok without also making the beast more powerful than ever.

00:19:12.000 That's a sad reality, but you got to live in reality.

00:19:15.000 Robert, talk about the constitutionality or the unconstitutionality of the Restrict Act.

00:19:20.000 The Restrict Act is simply Patriot Act 2.0, disguised as an effort to regulate and restrict TikTok in China that has very little to do with TikTok or China and will instead criminalize the ability of ordinary everyday Americans to independently access the sources they want online.

00:19:38.000 It even has a provision for 20 years in federal prison if you use a VPN.

00:19:44.000 People use VPNs to protect their anonymity.

00:19:46.000 People use VPNs to be able to access servers around the world of various independent news sites.

00:19:53.000 People in China use VPNs to be able to get outside the Chinese system. 0.68

00:19:57.000 We're basically imposing, our answer to China's TikTok is to impose China's system of global surveillance on our own domestic population and limitation on internet access. 0.94

00:20:07.000 That's exactly the wrong approach is to replicate the Chinese approach. 0.92

00:20:11.000 If they're serious about punishing and limiting TikTok, there is a constitutional way to do so. 0.94

00:20:18.000 Simply allow ordinary Americans to sue the Chinese government, which has all kinds of resources in the United States, including buying up a lot of farmland, to sue the Chinese government for invading privacy, for trying to do all this social political harm on our young people, including inducing suicides and all kinds of horrific things that TikTok has already been sued for doing in different capacities.

00:20:41.000 But right now, under U.S. law, you can't sue the Chinese government for it.

00:20:46.000 That doesn't make any sense. 0.62

00:20:47.000 So what we should do is empower ordinary juries to be able to hold the Chinese government responsible for their illicit activity, not replicate the Chinese model with the Restrict Act by restricting Americans' freedoms and Americans' liberties. 0.64

00:21:01.000 Okay, a Trump indictment. 0.53

00:21:02.000 It seems to have been delayed a month from now.

00:21:05.000 Robert, you're a lawyer.

00:21:06.000 What's going on here?

00:21:08.000 And what do you think is actually happening?

00:21:08.000 What do we know?

00:21:11.000 Two different things.

00:21:12.000 They're trying to flip other people.

00:21:14.000 They're trying to get other people to falsely testify against Trump on something above and beyond the Stormy Daniels case.

00:21:20.000 The problem with the Stormy Daniels case is, first, Trump committed no crime.

00:21:23.000 You're allowed to contribute however much you want to your own campaign, if that's the allegation, when the evidence is it had nothing to do with the campaign.

00:21:31.000 It's not like people didn't know that Trump was Trump in certain respects.

00:21:35.000 He wasn't running for pastor or Sunday school teacher.

00:21:38.000 He was running for president, as Jerry Falwell long described about Ronald Reagan, who also didn't have necessarily a perfect ideal personal life in some respects.

00:21:47.000 And so there is no crime there.

00:21:49.000 That's problem one.

00:21:50.000 Problem two is, of course, violates statute limitations.

00:21:52.000 Problem three is it appears the prosecutor violated due process rules in what was allowed to be presented to the grand jury.

00:21:58.000 So my guess is he is second-guessing his own decision to move forward. 0.91

00:22:01.000 Trump did a good job saying, look, this nutjob wants to indict me.

00:22:05.000 And that caused a public backlash that led the prosecutor to second guess his own actions because the professionals in his own office, a bunch of lefties, by the way, said, hold on a second, this looks a little insane even for us.

00:22:17.000 So my guess is he's searching and seeking for something else, some little tax charge, something else he can tag on, even though there'll be no factual grounds for it, no legal basis for it, a clear political weaponization in violation of the selected prosecution prohibitions of the Constitution.

00:22:34.000 It's not going to stop him because the left is so absorbed with the idea of indicting Trump.

00:22:39.000 Trump's enemies are so absorbed with the idea of indicting Trump.

00:22:42.000 And this is a George Soros appointed DA.

00:22:44.000 And Soros has said Trump is his number one adversary and enemy.

00:22:48.000 And so I think that they are obsessed with indicting him.

00:22:50.000 The problem is he committed no crime.

00:22:52.000 I mean, Trump has to be one of the most innocent politicians in the history of America.

00:22:56.000 No, no, not even that.

00:22:57.000 No, let's go even deeper.

00:22:58.000 One of the most innocent New York City real estate developers.

00:23:00.000 I mean, you're trying to tell me any New York City real estate developer with 40 years of business examined with this scrutiny, you're not going to be able to, you'll find a lot.

00:23:12.000 I mean, that is open season.

00:23:15.000 And the best they have is a payment to Stormy Daniels that Michael Cohen actually did, was not reimbursed for, that is against no New York law.

00:23:24.000 This guy's as clean as a whistle.

00:23:26.000 Completely.

00:23:27.000 I mean, he's got it.

00:23:28.000 I mean, he's gone through every form of full body cavity audit that you possibly could.

00:23:32.000 And you're right.

00:23:33.000 I mean, to survive in New York, I mean, the folks who controlled the construction industry for a long time in New York and now he controlled certain other industries in New York were kind of difficult people to deal with.

00:23:42.000 And yet Trump somehow managed to do so.

00:23:45.000 He managed to do it legally.

00:23:46.000 He managed to deal with it and do everything legally.

00:23:49.000 To deal with New York City politicians, some of the most corrupt politicians in the world.

00:23:53.000 It just shows how clean he is.

00:23:56.000 And that's why they have to manufacture crimes against him. 0.53

00:23:59.000 You know, the old Berea principle to Stalin, show me the man, I find you the crime.

00:24:03.000 Well, they've been trying to find the crime on Trump now for a decade and they can't find any.

00:24:08.000 And boy, have they tried their best.

00:24:09.000 And so going into the Georgia case, what do you think the chances are that Trump gets indicted in Georgia or the DOJ?

00:24:17.000 What are your thoughts?

00:24:18.000 I think the DOJ case is already weak.

00:24:21.000 It was but made weaker when Biden was exposed to have actually committed issues, crimes with classified conduct as a vice president and senator because he did not have declassification authority, unlike President Trump, who did.

00:24:32.000 So the Mar-a-Longo case was always bogus.

00:24:34.000 It was more show and theater than substance.

00:24:37.000 And I think they know there's nothing there.

00:24:39.000 They also know there's nothing there connected to January 6th.

00:24:42.000 They couldn't get anybody to even fabricate or falsify testimony.

00:24:45.000 They went after Steve Bannon.

00:24:46.000 He refused to falsify or fabricate anything against the president.

00:24:49.000 So I think they know that case is DOA. 0.96

00:24:52.000 And in the Georgia case, they had a complete lunatic. 0.97

00:24:54.000 Even Anderson Cooper admitted she was a lunatic running the grand jury. 1.00

00:24:58.000 The witch. 1.00

00:24:58.000 Yeah, the Wiccan. 1.00

00:24:59.000 Yeah.

00:25:00.000 I mean, openly.

00:25:00.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:25:01.000 I mean, you can't make this stuff up.

00:25:03.000 I mean, it's so crazy.

00:25:05.000 It's stuff that if you put in a book, people would think you're just fictional.

00:25:08.000 It's fabricated.

00:25:09.000 But no, you have an actual wicked witch of the West in the grand jury chair in Georgia.

00:25:15.000 How do you let a case go forward with that nut? 0.79

00:25:17.000 And I represented the president in Georgia.

00:25:19.000 He did nothing wrong at all in Georgia.

00:25:21.000 He asserted his constitutional rights and remedies, which was his prerogative and his principled role to do as president of the United States.

00:25:28.000 So they don't have a case.

00:25:30.000 The only question is, does a prosecutor that's so politicized bring a fake case instead?

00:25:36.000 Even the media's own polls show that most Americans would reject it as being a politically motivated prosecution.

00:25:41.000 So this continued effort to persecute the president, which is really an effort to go after his base of support, to go after them through him, to silence them by silencing him, has never worked with Trump, and it's not going to work ultimately.

00:25:55.000 But it doesn't mean we don't all have more legal headaches to deal with in the interim.

00:26:00.000 Robert Barnes, check out his locals.

00:26:02.000 What is the tag for your locals?

00:26:04.000 Oh, sure.

00:26:05.000 VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.

00:26:07.000 Very good.

00:26:08.000 Robert, thank you so much.

00:26:09.000 Thanks a lot.

00:26:13.000 Look, Americans have had it.

00:26:14.000 They're done supporting companies that rake in hundreds of millions of dollars, sometimes billions of dollars, while trashing the country that made their success possible.

00:26:23.000 Until recently, we had to take it, but companies like Patriot Mobile are building a whole new economy, one which embraces the values that made America the greatest nation on earth.

00:26:33.000 Look, Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.

00:26:38.000 Look, they offer dependable coverage for all three major networks, and they offer you a performance coverage guarantee.

00:26:43.000 If you're not happy with your coverage, you could switch to a different network for free without changing carriers.

00:26:49.000 All this, plus the knowledge that you're supporting free speech, the sanctity of life, Second Amendment, and our military first responder heroes.

00:26:57.000 Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team makes switching awfully easy.

00:27:01.000 Just go to patriotmobile.com slash Charlie or call them today at 878-PAT.

00:27:06.000 Make the switch.

00:27:07.000 It's no new money out of your budget.

00:27:09.000 In fact, it will save you money.

00:27:10.000 Go to patriotmobile.com slash Charlie.

00:27:13.000 That is patriotmobile.com slash Charlie.

00:27:15.000 Get free activation today with the offer code Charlie.

00:27:18.000 We need to stand together and support companies that share our values.

00:27:22.000 PatriotMobile.com slash Charlie or call 878-PATRIT, patriotmobile.com slash Charlie.

00:27:32.000 So currently, you're going to see more and more footage of this, I'm sure.

00:27:36.000 And we have it to play in a second.

00:27:38.000 It seems to be a group of high school kids, again, who are just proxies of the regime, who are told that their purpose in life should be activists, being activists, very unfulfilling life, have stormed the Nashville state capitol, this Tennessee state capital, I should say.

00:27:55.000 And basically, have started to push, started to push back police, have started to push back the troopers there.

00:28:08.000 Let's go 94 of them shoving cops. 1.00

00:28:10.000 Play cut 94.

00:28:30.000 I mean, they're pushing pretty hard.

00:28:33.000 Is there going to be a drag net to arrest all of them?

00:28:36.000 Is there going to be a mass gulag campaign to put high schoolers for being insurrectionists?

00:28:42.000 Will the media care?

00:28:44.000 95 shows the high school students staging an insurrection in Tennessee.

00:28:49.000 You know, over a thousand people have been arrested or charged for January 6th.

00:28:52.000 How many of these high school kids are going to be charged with unlawful entry, unlawful occupation, assaulting police officers, harassment?

00:28:59.000 Anybody?

00:29:00.000 Will the FBI, will Merrick Garland go and do a massive drag net?

00:29:04.000 No, Merrick Garland will probably do a drag show. 0.68

00:29:06.000 Play cut 95. 0.83

00:29:25.000 Yeah, I mean, they're acting like children because they are children, but they're being raised by adults who are also children, just screaming, enough is enough.

00:29:31.000 Do something.

00:29:33.000 We're going to keep covering this story.

00:29:35.000 I don't think the FBI is going to do anything anytime soon.

00:29:40.000 I wanted to cover this.

00:29:40.000 So we've been bashing the Restrict Act that gives all this power to the federal government via the Commerce Secretary, part of the federal government.

00:29:49.000 So part of this is really disturbing because the Commerce Secretary has a lot of power as well.

00:29:55.000 They also control the U.S. Census.

00:29:58.000 New story out today shows that the U.S. Census Bureau or the agency under the Secretary of Commerce is debating whether or not to add a question to blacks of are you a descendant of slaves?

00:30:12.000 This is a precursor to reparations.

00:30:15.000 And I am not a pessimist, but I want to be very clear that the pace that we're moving right now, you are going to live in a country where there is reparations. 0.60

00:30:30.000 You're going to live in a country where white people are going to be forced to give money to black people for something you did not do, for something you are not connected to, just because you look like somebody who did something bad.

00:30:43.000 So I have some very simple questions for the reparation crowd. 0.61

00:30:49.000 Do white people get money because our ancestors, 600,000 of them, died in the Civil War so that blacks could be free?

00:30:57.000 Do we get reparations for that?

00:30:59.000 Number two, what if a child is half black or half white or a person is half white or half black? 0.73

00:31:05.000 Do they pay reparations to themselves? 0.63

00:31:08.000 What about new blacks into the country, Nigerians, Haitians, people from Western Africa that have immigrated in that last 20 or 30 years? 0.95

00:31:17.000 They have to go play, they have to pay reparations to other blacks that claim to be oppressed because their ancestors were slaves? 0.83

00:31:27.000 How does one prove that they're descendants of slaves? 0.79

00:31:31.000 So let me get this straight. 0.92

00:31:32.000 It is evil and Racist to ask a black to go show ID when you vote, but somehow you're going to be able to have a black show all of the paperwork that they're the descendant of slaves. 0.99

00:31:49.000 So can't ask for voter ID, but somehow blacks are going to have to show that. 1.00

00:31:57.000 Doesn't make any sense. 0.70

00:32:00.000 So the U.S. government is considering asking blacks if their ancestors were slaves on the census, presumably to gather reparations data.

00:32:09.000 So again, I'm going to ask these questions.

00:32:10.000 What if your ancestors are slave owners or slaves?

00:32:14.000 Do I get a rebate if my ancestors fought to free the slaves?

00:32:18.000 Can you identify a descendant of slaves?

00:32:21.000 Can you identify as a descendant of slaves?

00:32:24.000 Why does that impact your own life?

00:32:25.000 Don't you have agency and free will?

00:32:27.000 They don't believe in free will, by the way.

00:32:29.000 This is a question that just floored me the other day.

00:32:32.000 We're going to talk about in our AMA tomorrow: the left believes only in cause and effect.

00:32:36.000 There's no free will, there's no agency.

00:32:38.000 Everything you think you're doing, you're merely witnessing, and it's because of something that happened to you previously or prior.

00:32:44.000 What if your ancestors are both slave owners and slaves?

00:32:51.000 So, Wall Street Journal News Exclusive, U.S. considers asking black Americans on census if they are slave descendants.

00:33:00.000 Yeah, reparations are coming really soon. 0.99

00:33:02.000 It's an amazing quote.

00:33:03.000 So they're doing this.

00:33:04.000 They're trying to do this in San Francisco, and they're debating it.

00:33:07.000 And it's just so incredible because they put this forward.

00:33:11.000 And Reverend Tony Pierce said after they agreed to $5 million for reparations, he said, where's the money?

00:33:19.000 Where's the cash?

00:33:20.000 Where's the check?

00:33:21.000 He said, that money is not enough.

00:33:26.000 We are quickly going into a set of policies where whites are going to have to pay money for something they did not do, for something their ancestors might not even have done, because they look like the bad thing. 0.79

00:33:39.000 It's going to happen very soon. 0.67

00:33:41.000 This is CRT, DEI, white guilt in full force. 0.76

00:33:47.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.

00:33:48.000 Email us your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:33:51.000 Thanks so much for listening, and God bless.

00:33:57.000 For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.

The Charlie Kirk Show - March 30, 2023

A Color Revolution in Israel? with Darren Beattie and Robert Barnes

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript