The Charlie Kirk Show - September 08, 2022


Blood Clots? Ivermectin Vindicated? Dr. Pierre Kory & Dr. Robert Malone in One Episode


Episode Stats

Length

35 minutes

Words per Minute

162.37447

Word Count

5,767

Sentence Count

450


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcripts from "The Charlie Kirk Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:00.000 Hello, everybody.
00:00:01.000 Welcome to this episode of the Charlie Kirk Show.
00:00:02.000 We got Dr. Pierre Corey with us to talk about ivermectin, a new study that vindicates ivermectin further.
00:00:09.000 And then Dr. Robert Malone, what is inverted totalitarianism?
00:00:12.000 Two of my favorite guests.
00:00:14.000 Very thoughtful, extremely factual.
00:00:17.000 Enjoy this conversation.
00:00:18.000 Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:22.000 That is freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:24.000 Subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show by typing in Charlie Kirk Show and subscribe in the upper right-hand corner.
00:00:29.000 Get involved with TurningPointUSA today, tpusa.com.
00:00:34.000 If you go to tpusa.com/slash book, that is tpusa.com/slash book.
00:00:40.000 We have a special offer for you where if you give $15 or more at tpusa.com slash book, you get a copy of the college scam, half off.
00:00:50.000 So tpusa.com slash book, and the proceeds go to turning point USA.
00:00:55.000 So you can support Turning Point USA and get a copy of my book, The College Scam, tpusa.com slash book.
00:01:04.000 That is tpusa.com slash book.
00:01:07.000 Buckle up, everybody.
00:01:08.000 Here we go.
00:01:09.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:01:11.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
00:01:13.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:01:17.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
00:01:20.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:01:21.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:01:22.000 His spirit, his love of this country.
00:01:24.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:01:30.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:39.000 That's why we are here.
00:01:42.000 Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at AndrewandTodd.com.
00:01:51.000 Joining us right now is someone who has saved thousands, if not tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of lives.
00:01:57.000 I do not say that lightly.
00:01:59.000 He's made a big impact on my own ability to communicate about the Chinese coronavirus and treatments that have been suppressed by the regime.
00:02:07.000 He's someone who I consider to be a completely honest and courageous person because he has no agenda except that of which pursuing the truth.
00:02:15.000 You can tell a lot about a person about how they're treated once they decide to pursue truth.
00:02:21.000 And this person has had attempts of cancellation and smears and all that.
00:02:24.000 Joining us now is Dr. Pierre Corey.
00:02:26.000 Doctor, welcome back to the program.
00:02:28.000 Hey, Charlie, good to be back.
00:02:30.000 Thanks.
00:02:30.000 So, doctor, it seems as if there's a study that came out recently that reinforces everything you've been saying for the last 18 months.
00:02:39.000 Tell us about it.
00:02:41.000 Yeah.
00:02:42.000 So, I mean, this is really the second study from the same group.
00:02:46.000 I was a co-author.
00:02:47.000 I didn't do the study, but I helped in the preparation and writing.
00:02:51.000 You know, it's a study that comes out of data from a city in Brazil called Itajai.
00:02:56.000 And it's the largest study on ivermectin to date.
00:02:59.000 And in this follow-up study, so the first one showed what we knew would happen, which is it showed this massive reduction in infections, in hospitalizations, and death amongst it was at that time, it was 159,000 subjects in a program in that city where they offered all the city city members or the citizens of that city an opportunity to participate in a prevention program by taking ivermectin four days a month.
00:03:28.000 And, you know, beyond what that study found, this was a follow-up study where they looked at the subjects and they split them up into those who took ivermectin regularly, those who didn't take all the doses that they were supposed to, and those who didn't at all.
00:03:41.000 And when you looked at the regular ivermectin users, I mean, it was just absolutely eye-popping.
00:03:46.000 I mean, it was a 92% reduction in death and 100% reduction in hospitalization.
00:03:52.000 Nobody went to the hospital, and there was about 50% reduction in infections.
00:03:56.000 You know, the thing is, though, Charlie, you know this.
00:03:59.000 We have had data showing the efficacy of ivermectin now for almost two years.
00:04:05.000 The data is overwhelming.
00:04:06.000 The evidence-based is now 91 controlled studies, of which this is the second largest.
00:04:12.000 And every single study always shows the benefits.
00:04:16.000 Some of them may not statistically significant, but that's not what you use.
00:04:19.000 You use the aggregate of all the data.
00:04:21.000 I've never seen a more proven medicine in any disease model in my life.
00:04:25.000 This one is just, this one just, you know, it's hard to argue data anymore.
00:04:30.000 I'll tell you how, sorry, I'll tell you how they argue it, but not, you know, it's not honest and it's full of lies.
00:04:39.000 So, doctor, I mean, we've been through this a couple of times, but I think it's worth repeating.
00:04:44.000 This is an incredibly frustrating moment because you just said, and I don't, I want to make sure I'm precise in repeating it, the most effective drug you've ever seen against a specific virus.
00:04:54.000 Is that right?
00:04:56.000 Absolutely.
00:04:57.000 I mean, I've studied a lot of different therapies and interventions and numerous different diseases that I've managed over my career.
00:05:03.000 And this one is absolutely the most potent.
00:05:05.000 I mean, when I first started using it in the pandemic, I mean, I knew from my first patient, I mean, she was sick for two weeks, unrelenting fevers, high heart rates.
00:05:13.000 She couldn't get out of bed.
00:05:15.000 And she took ivermectin on a Sunday night.
00:05:17.000 And by Monday morning, her heart rate was down to 80.
00:05:20.000 She defferves and she felt like she felt so, so much better.
00:05:24.000 And that was within 12 hours of the first dose.
00:05:27.000 And that same response continued to be observed for many, many months.
00:05:32.000 Now, things got different later with different variants.
00:05:35.000 You needed more drugs or medicines.
00:05:37.000 That's why our protocols have combinations of therapies, but ivermectin was always a mainstay and has always shown efficacy.
00:05:44.000 But so is there any correction from the institutions that are now happening with these studies?
00:05:50.000 Is there any retreat?
00:05:52.000 I mean, we're talking about lives here, Doctor.
00:05:53.000 I know this is what really animates you, as it does me.
00:05:57.000 I lost mentors and friends of people that died alone in a hospital because they were given a ventilator, and that was it.
00:06:04.000 That was like the treatment protocol.
00:06:07.000 I mean, there's no bringing those people back.
00:06:09.000 It's not going to happen.
00:06:10.000 Are there any apologies, any adjustments, doctor?
00:06:16.000 Not on ivermectin.
00:06:17.000 I mean, the academia and listen, the way in which they did this is it's been well documented for decades that pharma controls the high-impact journals.
00:06:27.000 It's the high-impact journals that drive the headlines and that drive doctors' behaviors and beliefs.
00:06:33.000 Pharma knows this.
00:06:34.000 This is why they captured those journals decades ago.
00:06:36.000 This is why former editors of those journals have since left, resigned, and written books about it, about the overwhelming influence of pharma.
00:06:45.000 And the tactic in which they deployed is they have published the only studies they publish in those high-impact journals are purportedly negative studies, and meaning they didn't show a statistically significant benefit.
00:06:58.000 And then those studies are used to drive headlines and guidelines.
00:07:01.000 And those are just under a handful of studies of the 91 that we have.
00:07:06.000 And it's a sleight of hand trick.
00:07:08.000 They have, I mean, the system across the world, the academia, guidelines, and agencies are so dug in against ivermectin.
00:07:16.000 I don't see any retreat.
00:07:17.000 However, Charlie, we are starting to see retreats on the vaccines.
00:07:22.000 You saw the CDC guidance recently now starting to admit that it might not protect against or doesn't protect against transmission.
00:07:30.000 And I'll tell you the two big retreats I saw.
00:07:32.000 And again, I'm changing the subject to vaccines because I don't see it on ivermectin.
00:07:36.000 The two big ones are the UK changed, quietly changed their guidance on their website, now saying that they have no safety data to support the vaccination of pregnant women.
00:07:46.000 And they also updated their guidance to say they're no longer offering vaccines to five to 11-year-olds.
00:07:52.000 So you're starting to see some backtracking away from these vaccines, but I don't see any on ivermectin.
00:07:59.000 This has been roundly ignored by almost all major media, with the exception of the Blaze, which has a large following and readership.
00:08:07.000 So you're seeing a drive, you know, you see social media.
00:08:10.000 So definitely that is one kind of major media outlet that covered it.
00:08:15.000 And so there is a discussion on ivermectin, but you're not going to see a change from these agencies.
00:08:20.000 They're completely captured, like we've talked about before.
00:08:22.000 It's regulatory capture.
00:08:24.000 And Charlie, if they backtracked on ivermectin, it would threaten the market for Molnu Piravir, Paxlovid, anything else they have in their pipeline.
00:08:35.000 They're not going to do it.
00:08:36.000 It's so cynical, but it's so true.
00:08:37.000 We're talking about profit motive over lives.
00:08:41.000 And look, I say this as a free market guy.
00:08:43.000 There's something fundamentally wrong with it.
00:08:45.000 And I had this debate with a libertarian guy the other day.
00:08:48.000 He said, the market will always solve everything.
00:08:50.000 I said, wait a second.
00:08:50.000 You have a cheaper, more effective drug as the ivermectin.
00:08:55.000 Why is that not then getting out there?
00:08:57.000 Sometimes there are things that are outside of market forces that actually the opposite happens, where the market force actually incentivizes you to get the less effective, more expensive drug.
00:09:07.000 And so I'm not saying, you know, you have government take over everything, obviously.
00:09:11.000 I'm not saying I'm just at times, though, you have to remove yourself from whatever ideology you might be focused on and ask yourself, what is good for people?
00:09:19.000 And why is that the cheap, widely accessible drug that obviously works?
00:09:23.000 And I'll just back you up, Doctor.
00:09:24.000 I mean, I'm far from a doctor, but many people I have helped connect with your network and others to help get ivermectin.
00:09:32.000 And every single person, praise God, made a speedy recovery.
00:09:36.000 As soon as ivermectin hit their system, it was almost, it was miraculous.
00:09:40.000 Tyler Boyer, one of our team members here, had a 10-day thing.
00:09:43.000 He was not doing well.
00:09:45.000 And Ivermectin turned it around.
00:09:47.000 Yeah, it happens all the time, like I said.
00:09:50.000 And you're right about those markets.
00:09:52.000 Without getting into how the market solves anything, I will just say this: is that the healthcare market, especially around pharmaceuticals and therapeutics, has never worked in our favor.
00:10:04.000 It has always been controlled by pharma.
00:10:06.000 And pharma, their whole operating model is what you just said.
00:10:10.000 It's about preserving and pretending and trying to prove that the new shinier pill works better than the old, cheaper, off-patent one.
00:10:19.000 That has been the truth in the pharmaceutical industry for decades.
00:10:23.000 Ivermectin is only the latest.
00:10:25.000 The first one they attacked was hydroxychloroquine and COVID.
00:10:28.000 They've attacked others, but this is what they do.
00:10:31.000 They've done it for decades.
00:10:32.000 You cannot use off-patent medicines.
00:10:34.000 It will destroy their bottom line.
00:10:36.000 And that market is geared to always get you to get the new shiny pill.
00:10:39.000 And I have to look at, I mean, I watch a lot of football.
00:10:42.000 I must have seen at least five advertisements over the weekend of Pfizer running these apps.
00:10:48.000 You saw these ads?
00:10:49.000 Maybe you didn't.
00:10:50.000 I mean, I've seen them.
00:10:51.000 And they say, you know, COVID really hurts the overweight.
00:10:54.000 I say, wait a second.
00:10:55.000 For a year and a half, we were saying that.
00:10:57.000 So now they say it.
00:10:58.000 And then they say, by the way, ask your doctor about a Pfizer-approved oral.
00:11:03.000 And I say, there's one that you can take.
00:11:08.000 How many years have I been telling you about Relief Factor?
00:11:10.000 Producer Andrew's right here doing an Iron Man thanks to Relief Factor.
00:11:13.000 And truth is, I know there are millions of people.
00:11:16.000 In fact, some say over 100 million people struggling with some kind of pain, maybe from exercise or just getting older.
00:11:21.000 That can do it, getting older, which is why I'm so impressed with the people at relieffactor.com.
00:11:25.000 They are on a mission.
00:11:26.000 You rarely see this kind of focus and commitment.
00:11:28.000 They recently shared with me that they are doubling down and want to literally double their total number of happy customers in the next year.
00:11:34.000 And I believe they'll do it.
00:11:35.000 So here's the deal.
00:11:36.000 If you're struggling with back pain, neck pain, shoulder, hip, or knee pain, even general muscle aches and pain, then I'm suggesting you order their three-week quick start, still discounted, only $19.95.
00:11:46.000 Go to relieffactor.com.
00:11:47.000 That's relieffactor.com.
00:11:49.000 Check it out right now, relieffactor.com.
00:11:51.000 Should order the three-week quick start two, discount only $19.95 to see if it will work for you.
00:11:55.000 I think it possibly could.
00:11:57.000 Give your body what it needs to heal itself.
00:11:58.000 Go to relieffactor.com.
00:12:00.000 That's relieffactor.com.
00:12:01.000 Check it out right now.
00:12:05.000 I want to get your thoughts, though, on the booster shot, doctor.
00:12:08.000 It seems as if they're pushing this rather aggressively.
00:12:12.000 What are your thoughts on people getting the booster shot?
00:12:16.000 Why are they pushing this so hard?
00:12:18.000 Doctor, what are your thoughts?
00:12:20.000 So, Charlie, we already have immense amount of data showing that the boosted fare worse on almost every respect.
00:12:29.000 There's numerous countries' data showing the double, triple boosted.
00:12:33.000 They go to the hospital more, they die more.
00:12:35.000 And that's leaving alone looks at excess mortality.
00:12:39.000 You know, I'm really tired of these sleight of hand tricks, right?
00:12:42.000 They want everyone to think that COVID is the worst thing that can happen to you.
00:12:47.000 It is not.
00:12:48.000 Dying is the worst thing that happened to you.
00:12:50.000 And the vaccinated and boosted are dying at higher rates than anyone else.
00:12:54.000 And so when you put your buttons on and just look at COVID, maybe you have an argument, but not there.
00:12:58.000 No, but sorry to interrupt.
00:13:00.000 I don't want to be rude, but is the argument I get every time I say that, they say it's because sicker, older people get vaccinated, therefore they're dying at higher rates.
00:13:09.000 Is that true?
00:13:11.000 It is true that sicker and older people die from COVID more often.
00:13:15.000 It is not true that the vaccines will change that frequency.
00:13:21.000 It just doesn't.
00:13:22.000 The vaccines have failed, Charlie.
00:13:24.000 They've failed for every age group.
00:13:26.000 They've failed on toxicity and they failed on efficacy.
00:13:30.000 And really, the way to judge a vaccine is what it does to your health.
00:13:33.000 And like I said, if you're going to be disabled more and die more from a vaccine, who cares whether it's from COVID or not?
00:13:40.000 And even when you just look at COVID, again, the data, non-U.S. data, right, the U.S. data unfortunately is corrupt.
00:13:47.000 And I don't know if I've talked to you how they've done that, but we know that the hospital, those in the hospital have been doubly vaccinated, triply vaccinated, and there are high proportions in hospitals per 100,000.
00:14:00.000 It's not just because they've, you know, more countries have higher vaccination rates.
00:14:04.000 This is per 100,000.
00:14:05.000 So the rate of those entering hospitals is higher than the vaccines.
00:14:09.000 The other thing, Charlie, is we have just absolutely terrifying emerging data about the immune suppression of the vaccines.
00:14:16.000 You already saw that outbreak of this childhood hepatitis, which we believe is due to mass immune suppression.
00:14:24.000 We already have data showing incredible amounts of cancers.
00:14:29.000 The heart attacks, the strokes in young people without comorbidities.
00:14:33.000 I mean, the data is just absolutely overwhelming.
00:14:36.000 But going back to your question, why do they keep pushing this?
00:14:40.000 Listen, their actions can only be understood one way since the beginning.
00:14:48.000 They have just been relentless in pushing their products.
00:14:51.000 There is nothing that will stop them.
00:14:53.000 No amount of data which will stop them.
00:14:55.000 They're going to push their pricey pills and they're going to push their vaccines, no matter how illogical or how non-scientifically supported.
00:15:02.000 And somehow a large part of the country goes along with that and trusts them.
00:15:06.000 The implicit faith and trust, I don't know how they've retained it because it's eroded for large parts of the country, but I would still say that some majority still believes that there is truth and science and expertise coming out of those agencies.
00:15:20.000 And that has not been true for a long time.
00:15:23.000 Yeah, you're right.
00:15:24.000 It's about product pushing.
00:15:25.000 So what can be done?
00:15:27.000 What is the path forward?
00:15:28.000 What is the solution to some of this stuff?
00:15:30.000 We need to obviously keep on elevating voices like yours, but when I see these Pfizer advertisements, I get angry.
00:15:38.000 What's the path forward?
00:15:40.000 So you have to uncover the fraud.
00:15:42.000 We know that this campaign is built on immense amount of fraud starting from your initial trials.
00:15:48.000 The real answer, I think, there's twofold.
00:15:50.000 One is the legal route and one is the media route.
00:15:52.000 The media route, I don't know how to do that one because there really has been global censorship across major media for most of the pandemic.
00:16:02.000 They have hidden so much troubling data on the vaccines and shown so much efficacious data on repurposed drugs.
00:16:09.000 But I think the legal route, it's time for the lawyers, the judges, and the prisons.
00:16:14.000 Because if you go the legal route, you can get what's called discovery.
00:16:18.000 We can find out how much they knew, what they knew, how much they buried.
00:16:23.000 And I really think that people are going to be held accountable.
00:16:25.000 And through those court cases, I think the truth will come out.
00:16:28.000 But this is a war of information, Charlie, that we're fighting.
00:16:31.000 And the other side is absolutely incredibly powerful.
00:16:36.000 And because I see it.
00:16:37.000 I see it in society.
00:16:38.000 I see the whole healthcare system.
00:16:40.000 You have an entire country's doctors who are doing insane things, like ignoring natural immunity.
00:16:46.000 They have no knowledge of the toxicity because of this censorship and propaganda.
00:16:50.000 And again, I'm not an expert on how to fix a world that's gone mad, but I am a diagnostician.
00:16:55.000 And my diagnosis is unrelenting censorship and propaganda.
00:16:59.000 We have to remain committed to the truth, regardless of where it takes us.
00:17:04.000 We have to strip ourselves of ideologies and abstractions.
00:17:07.000 It's very, very important.
00:17:09.000 This entire thing has been about profit and ideology, and people have suffered because of it.
00:17:15.000 Dr. Pier Corey, you're welcome anytime.
00:17:16.000 Thank you so much for joining us.
00:17:18.000 Thanks.
00:17:19.000 Bye now.
00:17:21.000 MyPillow is having their biggest sale of the year.
00:17:25.000 You have all helped build My Pillow into an amazing company that it is today.
00:17:28.000 Now, Mike Lindell, inventor and CEO, wants to give back exclusively to his listeners.
00:17:34.000 The Perkale and Giza dream bedsheets sets are available in a variety of colors and sizes, and they are now on sale for as low as $29.98 with our listener code, Kirk.
00:17:44.000 Order now because when they're gone, they're gone.
00:17:46.000 The Perkale and Giesel dream sheets are breathable and have a cool, crisp feel.
00:17:51.000 They come with a 10-year warranty and a 60-day money-back guarantee.
00:17:55.000 Don't miss out on this incredible offer.
00:17:57.000 There is a limited time supply, so make sure to order now.
00:18:00.000 Call 800-875-0425 right now and use promo code Kirk or go to mypillow.com and click on the radio listener square and use promo code Kirk.
00:18:10.000 This offer will not last long and they are known to sell quickly.
00:18:13.000 So order now with promo code Kirk at mypillow.com.
00:18:18.000 Joining us is another great American patriot, one of my favorite guests.
00:18:23.000 And honestly, if I had to make a list of one of the positives that came out of this man-made tragedy of the China virus, it would be getting to know, at least remotely, Dr. Robert Malone.
00:18:34.000 He's one of the captains of the 18.
00:18:36.000 He's special.
00:18:37.000 Doctor, welcome back to the program.
00:18:39.000 So good to see you.
00:18:40.000 And thank you for having me on.
00:18:42.000 Of course.
00:18:43.000 Seems as if there's a lot of blood clots that are popping up across the country in younger, able-bodied people.
00:18:49.000 The devil's advocate argument would be, oh, come on, blood clots are normal.
00:18:53.000 It's just now getting press attention.
00:18:55.000 Is this normal, doctor?
00:18:57.000 It says that a six feet blood clot was removed from a high school football player's leg.
00:19:02.000 What's going on here?
00:19:04.000 So deep venous thrombosis is certainly something that can happen, and we have to be careful about confusing association with causation.
00:19:16.000 But the burden of the data are getting stronger and stronger.
00:19:21.000 And in terms of what's going on, there's a number of papers out now.
00:19:26.000 And it's not just these deep blood clots or the post-mortem autopsy samples, but it's also the lung COVID patients, those that are suffering from this spectrum of problems like I used to suffer from, having to do with tinnitus, hard of hearing, problems with exercise tolerance. brain fog,
00:19:56.000 respiratory problems, and of course cardiac problems.
00:20:00.000 And there's a growing amount of data suggesting that this is due to aberrant clotting that may be driven by the spike protein that's in your blood.
00:20:10.000 And we know from the cell paper that came out at the beginning of this year that that levels of that spike protein S1 subunit in the blood of people who have received the vaccine are higher than in the blood of those that have had the natural infection.
00:20:29.000 So we're having long COVID and the data is demonstrated, and we're also having the post-vaccination syndrome.
00:20:36.000 And the data are demonstrating that these large fraction of these patients have microclots.
00:20:44.000 A number of pathologists, particularly some in South Africa, Dr. Praetorius is often mentioned, have really been on tracking.
00:20:54.000 And there's about to be a meeting of five key pathologists from all across Europe and South Africa and the United States in Vienna very shortly.
00:21:04.000 And my good friend Ryan Cole is going to be there.
00:21:06.000 Ryan has evaluated over 30 of these large clots.
00:21:11.000 And let's, one thing we can dispel is the rumors that this is due to metal particulates or crystalline structures, etc.
00:21:23.000 Ryan is one of the most highly qualified pathologists I've ever met.
00:21:28.000 And he has carefully examined these post-mortem clots.
00:21:32.000 And he sees no sign of any crystalline structures in there.
00:21:37.000 It's easy to find this stuff because it refracts light.
00:21:41.000 And so you can use polarized light and you'll see the crystals.
00:21:44.000 There's no sign of that.
00:21:46.000 And he's done a number of special stains.
00:21:48.000 There does seem to be a problem with something called beta amyloid.
00:21:53.000 And it's true.
00:21:54.000 This is not a rumor.
00:21:56.000 There's evidence of aberrant folding, which is to say that the proteins involved in blood clotting are clotting and aggregating in a very unusual, irregular fashion.
00:22:09.000 And that's probably what's driving these very odd clots that are being seen in the postmortems and also being seen in patients such as the unfortunate gentleman that you're referring to.
00:22:23.000 Yeah.
00:22:23.000 And so what we're seeing is younger and younger people that are getting blood clots, but also embalmers that are now coming out.
00:22:32.000 And they're saying they're seeing record numbers of blood clots and of all sorts of different types of issues.
00:22:40.000 And so I want to play a piece of tape here.
00:22:44.000 Let's play cut 68 and we'll go from there.
00:22:46.000 Warning, the images you're about to see may be disturbing to some viewers.
00:22:50.000 Your discretion is advised.
00:22:54.000 These are not typical blood clots that form after a person's death.
00:22:58.000 When a funeral director sent a sample to a lab in Texas, its elemental composition was found to be extremely low in iron, magnesium, potassium, and zinc.
00:23:07.000 This suggests that the clots are forming from something other than blood.
00:23:12.000 And this is not an isolated case.
00:23:14.000 Many embalmers across the country are finding similar clots in the deceased after COVID-19 vaccination began in 2021.
00:23:22.000 So, Dr. Malone, this is happening in young, able-bodied people, and there's an unusual amount of people just dropping dead for unexplained death.
00:23:31.000 You're the inventor of this technology, and these blood clots are obviously leading into terrible, terrible outcomes.
00:23:40.000 Do you think we'll ever get an admission from the public health officials that one might be leading to the other?
00:23:47.000 Well, what we do have is the UK is now stopping the jab in children.
00:23:54.000 We have huge amount of data that I'm going to be releasing as a summary that was presented at the recent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the CDC, which demonstrates, as you point out, a remarkably high rate of pediatric complications post-vaccination.
00:24:15.000 And we have these many papers now, and we're now at the level where we're having opinion and review papers published in places like Nature.
00:24:25.000 So this is the top journals, acknowledging that we have this problem of amyloid clots, microclots forming in a broad range of patients.
00:24:35.000 And we have clear, unambiguous data from the CDC's vSAFE system, which has finally come online, which were presented at this recent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or ACIP meeting, which demonstrates that we're having a remarkably high rate of adverse events post-vaccination in children.
00:25:00.000 It's unequivocal.
00:25:02.000 It cannot be denied.
00:25:03.000 Other nations are taking action.
00:25:06.000 And in the ACIP meeting, when members of the ACIP who were kind of not with the narrative, doing their job, raised questions, they were basically blown off and disregarded.
00:25:19.000 They were not answered.
00:25:21.000 We're in a situation, Charlie, where the government officials seem, I don't know how else to say this.
00:25:29.000 They seem to be operating in a lawless fashion where they are completely decoupled from any norms or guidance that has previously guided how these decisions are made and these kinds of data are evaluated.
00:25:44.000 In other words, we got a problem, Houston, and I'm not sure what we're going to do about it.
00:25:50.000 Well, so yeah, let me ask you this.
00:25:52.000 Part of what I think needs to be the solution is justice.
00:25:57.000 And justice is, as Aristotle would say, is the messiest of all the virtues, but it's very, very important.
00:26:03.000 And so there's been a recent article, Peter Navarro and Dr. Stephen Hatfield wrote an article the other day accusing Dr. Fauci and his gang of what I would call smug demagogues and ideologues of, they said, quote, mass murder.
00:26:17.000 Do you agree with that?
00:26:19.000 Someone wants to start to pay a penalty for this.
00:26:22.000 Yeah, you're referring to the recent Washington Times office from my friends Hatfield and Navarro, which I read and concur with.
00:26:31.000 More remarkably as shown in the headlines, they are projecting literally hundreds of thousands of excess deaths in the United States alone due to the, let's just call it administrative state to create a basket case around it, due to the administrative state blocking the availability of these existing inexpensive drugs that are clearly increasingly demonstrated to be effective.
00:27:00.000 And to that point, we have yet another article that's come out of Brazil.
00:27:05.000 My friend Flavio has just published.
00:27:07.000 And it had to be in a very low-level peer-reviewed journal because none of the big journals would take it.
00:27:12.000 But it unequivocally demonstrates the effectiveness of ivermectin and prophylaxis.
00:27:19.000 The thing that my friend Brett Weinstein advocated for so long ago in that podcast with myself and Steve Kirsch, and which caused him to be demonetized by YouTube.
00:27:32.000 The data are coming out now, Charlie.
00:27:34.000 They're not going to be able to hide.
00:27:36.000 And I agree, there has to be consequences for these actions, but they can't happen unless there is a wave election at the midterm.
00:27:46.000 That's right.
00:27:46.000 That's just the way things are.
00:27:49.000 And part of the mandate needs to be to disassemble the administrative state.
00:27:53.000 You know, I always try to look for positives in life because we're just surrounded by negatives.
00:27:57.000 In fact, in human psychology, you know this is that we're actually, I believe God designed us this way.
00:28:03.000 Some people would say it's evolutionarily because of this way.
00:28:05.000 We're designed to see danger, right?
00:28:08.000 We're not designed to see all the good things that are around us.
00:28:11.000 That's partially what keeps us alive, but also in a comfortable world that can keep you also insane.
00:28:17.000 I think one of the positives, though, is that people are starting to recognize the threat of the administrative state and what needs to be done to hold them accountable.
00:28:26.000 How does that tie into everything we're talking about, this fourth branch of government, unelected, unknown, unchecked power of the administrative state?
00:28:34.000 The administrative state led by the senior executive service, which virtually cannot be fired unless they do something that is particularly egregious, is what Mr. Trump tried to get rid of and to break.
00:28:48.000 And they are the ones that run the government.
00:28:51.000 They run the executive branch.
00:28:53.000 The presidency does not direct the administrative state.
00:28:57.000 It's upside down.
00:28:59.000 This is called inverted totalitarianism.
00:29:02.000 And Mr. Trump actually needs credit for what he did do, including the attempt to get Schedule F through as a strategy to try to break this up.
00:29:13.000 They are very, very deeply entrenched, and they're fighting back on a daily basis.
00:29:20.000 It's not just the documentation now that's coming out about the just casual, complete collusion between the administrative state and tech and media to censor people and to stop information sharing.
00:29:37.000 But it's also now this evidence we have in all these other agencies of the administrative state lashing out in a whole variety of ways.
00:29:49.000 And we can speak about the FBI, et cetera, but I think you just had better experts on than I for that.
00:29:56.000 Well, Dr. Malone, you have wisdom in all fields.
00:29:59.000 In fact, I just wrote down, and I don't have a lot of talents.
00:30:02.000 I have a talent for spotting one-liners and things that really pop.
00:30:06.000 Inverted totalitarianism.
00:30:07.000 That's right up there with mass formation psychosis.
00:30:12.000 It really is a question of: do we want to live in a republic or do we want to live in some form of a kleptocratic monarchy?
00:30:20.000 A lot of this goes downstream from there, but the argument you're making and the term that you used is inverted totalitarianism is that it's not just top down, it's also bottom up.
00:30:30.000 Is that right?
00:30:31.000 Yeah, so we have the collusion and integration of these large bureaucrats, these very powerful bureaucrats.
00:30:40.000 And it's also a vertical integration up to the United Nations and the World Health Organization, and then a horizontal integration with big financial interests, big industry, tech, pharma, et cetera.
00:30:55.000 And Charlie, I'm sure your audience knows it.
00:30:58.000 I've been beating the drum for a long time now.
00:31:01.000 The literal political science definition or the term fascism, I don't use that term lightly, is the fusion of the interests of large corporations and the state.
00:31:14.000 And that's what we have right now.
00:31:16.000 But like with many totalitarian structures, this is almost leaderless.
00:31:24.000 They can replace any leader at the top because the leader doesn't matter.
00:31:29.000 We can see that in our lives over the last few years.
00:31:33.000 And you can see how the policies have been carried all the way through, whether it was the Trump administration or this current one.
00:31:44.000 And what that demonstrates is the enormous power of this entrenched bureaucracy that political scientists call the administrative state.
00:31:54.000 This isn't a conspiracy term.
00:31:56.000 I try to stick with the real solid use of language and definitions that are the norm in political science and psychology to try to describe these phenomena.
00:32:07.000 And that's what this is.
00:32:09.000 This is literally the actual definition of fascism, which is the fusion of the interests of corporations and the state.
00:32:18.000 That's so well put.
00:32:19.000 Yeah, the administrative state is actually a very technical term.
00:32:22.000 It came about prior to Woodrow Wilson by German historicists who, interestingly enough, were also fascinated with the reconfiguration of the human species as well.
00:32:33.000 A lot of mad scientists and a lot of the most extreme, let's just say, and disastrous interventions in humanity happened from those very same people.
00:32:44.000 Your thoughts, Doctor?
00:32:46.000 Eugenics.
00:32:47.000 And now in the modern embodiment, we have Mr. Harari who reports to Mr. Schwab.
00:32:54.000 And we have also this fascinating logic.
00:32:58.000 I use the term trying to be gentle and not alarmist.
00:33:04.000 But there's a report that we've covered in our substack that is issued by the combined think tank for the German and British military that strongly advocates for transhumanism.
00:33:19.000 It acknowledges the transhumanism, which the World Economic Forum believes is the next generation, the next industrial revolution, where we will accelerate human evolution through the fusion of man and machine and the use of genetic engineering,
00:33:37.000 that the armed forces and presumably the Five Eyes Alliance, which we're a part of together with Australia and Canada, believe that it's necessary to move forward with the transhumanism agenda because apparently the Chinese are doing it.
00:33:54.000 And it's the same logic as with nuclear war, mutually assured destruction.
00:33:59.000 They're doing it, so we have to do it, even though the ethics aren't sound.
00:34:04.000 We're in a situation, as you know, as a key thought leader in this area, Charlie, where we have thrown out the Judeo-Christian playbook in terms of ethics.
00:34:15.000 We believe that's irrelevant now.
00:34:17.000 That's not me, not you, not our audience, but these people that are making these decisions believe that ethics are irrelevant and man is just another thing that can be manipulated and should be manipulated.
00:34:34.000 And, you know, you know, this goes right down the Harare discussions about the genetics of belief and belief in a higher power, et cetera.
00:34:47.000 It's a very bizarre world.
00:34:50.000 It's twisted.
00:34:51.000 It's demented.
00:34:52.000 I believe it's spiritually dark.
00:34:54.000 Some would say even demonic.
00:34:56.000 I really do believe that.
00:34:58.000 So I'm with you on that.
00:35:01.000 Doctor, we're out of time.
00:35:02.000 I hope to have you at one of our events.
00:35:04.000 We would love that.
00:35:05.000 We have a big one in December in Phoenix, Arizona.
00:35:07.000 I'm going to try to get you out here.
00:35:08.000 But you're special and thank you for your courage and for your clarity.
00:35:11.000 We really appreciate it.
00:35:12.000 Thank you, Doctor.
00:35:13.000 Thank you, Charlie.
00:35:14.000 Bye-bye.
00:35:17.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
00:35:18.000 Email me your thoughts as always.
00:35:19.000 Freedom at CharlieKirk.com.
00:35:21.000 Thanks so much for listening.
00:35:23.000 God bless.
00:35:27.000 For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk dot com.