00:00:47.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:35.000Well, typically, you're able to go through the courts.
00:01:38.000That's why the courts exist to be able to resolve civil matters, to be able to figure out if somebody was wronged and then be able to get a remedy.
00:01:52.000Well, joining us now is Robert Barnes, a constitutional attorney who is here to explain a new effort, as well as Warner Mendenhall from the Mendenhall Law Group.
00:02:04.000Robert and Warner, welcome to the program.
00:02:14.000You're very clear on constitutional matters.
00:02:17.000Tell us about your upcoming event in Atlanta, and then tell us about this journey that you are on to be able to represent people that were significantly harmed by the vaccine.
00:02:30.000So, you know, Werner helped put together the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation conference that's going to take place in Atlanta towards the end of March.
00:02:38.000The goal is to bring a lot of lawyers together that are in this space to discuss what options and alternatives exist for those that want to be able to get remedy for the various injuries being caused by this vaccine.
00:02:52.000As the vaccine adverse event reporting system designed by Congress to monitor and measure potential adverse effects from a vaccine, it has set records with this vaccine.
00:03:03.000I mean, you're talking about 10x, 30x, 100x ratios of injury compared to prior vaccines.
00:03:09.000And in fact, this vaccine has caused more injuries than all of the vaccines that have ever been recorded and reported by the VARES data since VARES inception, you know, almost three decades ago.
00:03:24.000Credit to Steve Kirsch and others who are helping found the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation and to put forward remedies that could be available and put together the people that could help bring those remedies to come about within the legal system.
00:03:37.000Currently, the Brooke Jackson case is the major case that could bring remedy.
00:03:43.000Brooke Jackson is a whistleblower who brought a claim on behalf of the American people through the United States of America.
00:03:50.000This is called the Key TAM Actions or False Claims Act claims.
00:03:54.000Warner's been doing those for many decades.
00:03:56.000I've been a part of them on and off for several decades.
00:03:59.000Brooke Jackson is someone who is a sincere clinical trial person who helped make sure drugs were done in a manner that would produce safe and effective drugs.
00:04:08.000She was part of and witnessed what was taking place at the very critical stage three of the clinical trials concerning Pfizer in Texas.
00:04:17.000And what she witnessed shocked and horrified her.
00:04:20.000Basically, if there was any rule you could violate, Pfizer did.
00:04:23.000If there was any regulation you could ignore, Pfizer did.
00:04:26.000If there was any metric or measurement of data that needed to be honestly and accurately reported, it was falsified or fabricated or otherwise doctored to mislead the government and mislead the American people, ultimately, into believing this was a safe, effective vaccine when it was not safe, it was not effective, and it was not even a vaccine.
00:04:46.000She's brought her claim on behalf of the American people because Pfizer obtained billions of dollars from the government based on these lies that they told.
00:04:56.000Their contract required they comply with the FDA rules and requirements.
00:05:00.000Their contract required they deliver a safe, effective vaccine that would, in quote, in the exact words of the contract under Trump's Operation Warp Speed, provide a drug that would prevent COVID infection.
00:05:12.000Of course, we now know it did no such thing.
00:05:16.000Now, their excuse is that the Biden administration is in cahoots with Pfizer, and so the case shouldn't be allowed to move forward on behalf of the American people because they say that as long as the Biden administration is in cahoots with them, they shouldn't be held responsible or accountable for their dangerous lies that have disabled and killed tens of thousands, maybe even millions of people around the world as we gather data.
00:05:40.000Her case is scheduled for oral argument in Beaumont, Texas on March the 1st.
00:05:46.000So, Warner, taking a step back here, something I'm curious about: aren't the vaccine companies basically protected or indemnified through an act of Congress in the 1980s?
00:05:58.000Basically, don't all the cases just get put into the vaccine injury recovery fund, excuse my lack of precision on the language, but isn't there a taxpayer-funded pool of money to solve this?
00:06:10.000What makes your legal complaints to be able to navigate that?
00:06:15.000Well, I mean, there is a taxpayer pool of funding, but it's minuscule and it hasn't worked ever since it was put into place.
00:06:24.000So, it's clearly not a useful tool for people.
00:06:59.000It's actually called the Griner case, not to be confused with Brittany Griner.
00:07:03.000But Dr. Griner brought a lawsuit about the definition of vaccine.
00:07:07.000So, we need to go back to these definitional issues, challenge them, fight these through the courts, and get this thing classified as something other than a vaccine, because really it's a biological product.
00:07:20.000Second, we do need to look at the PrEP Act and the immunity that was put forth by the PrEP Act.
00:07:28.000We think that that has violated the traditional police powers of the states and the cities in this country.
00:07:36.000So, these are core ideas and core issues that have really changed the functioning of our country.
00:07:44.000And then, finally, at a bigger level, we need to look at what the WHO is doing and make sure that we're not losing sovereignty through international treaties and agreements.
00:07:53.000So just really quick, let me just make sure I understand that the technical definition of a vaccine versus a biological or a treatment is actually very important here, right?
00:08:07.000Because if the pharmaceutical companies are able to convince a judge or a jury that this is a vaccine, then it would fall under the federal government protections.
00:08:24.000One is, did they misrepresent, like the advantage of the False Claims Act is it's outside of those immunity claims.
00:08:32.000So if you lie to the government to get money, then you can, this came about after the Civil War because so many contractors provided, you know, bad blankets, bad food, bad boots, you name it.
00:08:43.000And the government was off, some of the government agents and bureaucrats were in on it.
00:08:47.000And so Congress said, we got to fix this.
00:08:49.000We got to allow the ordinary American, if they know information about this, to bring a claim on behalf of the American people without regard to the American government if somebody lied to get money from the government or the people's taxpayers.
00:09:52.000Because if I was Pfizer's lawyer, they'd say, well, just because it didn't do exactly what we wanted it to didn't mean it's not the thing that you're saying it is.
00:09:58.000But the final argument you just made as a gene therapy, now I think we're getting into the crux of it because it actually isn't the same as the polio vaccine I had when I was a kid or the MMR vaccine.
00:10:11.000It actually is a whole different type of thing.
00:10:16.000Look, everybody, we're nine meals away from anarchy.
00:11:42.000We're trying to get attorneys together to really spread the word about the types of litigation that can be pursued and what we can do to help rebuild this country through legislation and litigation.
00:11:53.000So, for either of you, you guys can jump in here.
00:11:55.000But from what I understand, the crux of this entire legal challenge is whether or not the protections that the vaccine companies received because of the bill that was passed into law in the 80s applies to mRNA technology.
00:12:33.000If you walked into a Pfizer clinical trial, you could see needles sticking out of bags and you could see people's medical records plastered on the wall.
00:12:41.000The janitor could figure out, you know, who has what disease.
00:12:44.000It's supposed to be a placebo blind test.
00:13:02.000We'll find out at the oral argument March 1st where that's going to go.
00:13:05.000In terms of challenging for injuries, that is the trickier part.
00:13:10.000And Warner can speak to some of the difficulties and hurdles we have about getting remedy for people that have been injured by this vaccine.
00:13:18.000Yeah, certainly it's important to establish that there's fraud at the beginning of all this with the clinical trials, not just for Pfizer, by the way, but for other companies that were out there.
00:13:29.000They all are using similar clinical trial processes, and those clinical trial processes are horribly corrupted at this point in the way our system is running them.
00:13:40.000More difficult, as Robert says, is that we have now got millions of people who've been injured by these shots and at least hundreds of thousands dead just in our country.
00:13:52.000So we need to strip away this idea that this is a vaccine in the first place so that the liability can be opened up.
00:14:01.000And we need to strip away the protections of the PrEP Act.
00:14:05.000So those are longer-term efforts, but they are really necessary to engage in.
00:14:10.000The second thing that I think can happen, we need our politicians to wake up to what needs to happen there.
00:14:17.000Just like with the sexual abuse cases, we need to open this back up.
00:14:21.000There's been an abuse of the population here, and we need to extend the statute's limitations so these families can get some recovery for the loved ones that they have lost and the loved ones that they are having to care for due to injuries right now.
00:14:37.000It's not easy, but it is going to take the people of this country taking back their power and moving their politicians in the right direction.
00:14:46.000I can imagine that Pfizer and these vaccine manufacturers are going to throw everything they possibly can at you guys.
00:14:52.000How many active lawsuits are there against these vaccine manufacturers right now?
00:15:01.000Well, right now, the only big whistleblower claim is Brooke Taxon's claim.
00:15:05.000That's why they've attacked her repeatedly in the court.
00:15:07.000They've attacked me personally repeatedly in the court.
00:15:10.000They've induced the court to talk about tweets and things like that because their goal has been a campaign of distraction, of the attack the lawyer, attack the whistleblower, attack everybody except deal with the truth.
00:15:25.000They've been obsessed with not allowing any discovery in the case.
00:15:28.000If Pfizer is so innocent, why are they so scared of a little discovery?
00:15:33.000I mean, Pfizer is one of the most criminally fined drug dealers in the history of the world.
00:15:39.000I mean, they make El Chapo look like a corner street drug dealer by comparison.
00:15:43.000Nobody kills people and disables people as much as Pfizer does.
00:15:47.000And we have the criminal fines to prove it.
00:15:50.000And this has probably been their worst violation of human rights and Americans' rights in the history of America in terms of public health.
00:15:58.000And the question is: are we going to get remedy?
00:16:00.000Are the courts going to continue to be closed?
00:16:02.000Are they continuing to help cover up Pfizer's crimes?
00:16:05.000Or will they help expose those crimes?
00:16:07.000The same with if the courts are closed, will Congress step up to the gap and fix the laws?
00:16:12.000We shouldn't, you know, we have the childhood immunization laws from the 80s, we have the PrEP Act from the early 2000s.
00:16:20.000These laws, whenever you create a situation where a drug company has nothing to lose from lying to the American people and pushing a drug on them because they're completely immune, they have guaranteed profits and no liability risk.
00:16:34.000That's a bad combination for public health.
00:16:36.000And Americans are seeing the consequence.
00:16:39.000Kids like Maddie DeGray are seeing the consequences.
00:16:41.000People are being disabled and killed all across the world because of this.
00:17:56.000It's very timely because a lot of things are going on with the WHO.
00:17:59.000Tell us what's going on with the WHO right now.
00:18:01.000Well, right now, this week, they are having week-long meetings with the working group to consider amendments to the international health regulations.
00:18:11.000What's going on outside in the media world is everybody's talking about something else.
00:18:18.000They're talking about the proposed pandemic treaty, which they will be having meetings with a different group next week.
00:18:26.000The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body will be talking about the proposed treaty next week.
00:18:31.000And what I've been seeing in the media is just a lot of information.
00:18:35.000So there are documents that are readily available on the WHO website.
00:19:07.000And essentially, what's happening these next two weeks is they are somehow transitioning from collecting proposals for the amendments in the treaty and then shifting towards negotiating.
00:19:22.000And so at this moment in time, our negotiators are, I do not believe, legally certified to be even involved in negotiating these changes to the regulations.
00:19:37.000And we, the people, have certainly not been consulted as to whether or not we even want any of this to be happening.
00:19:45.000And so arguably, this is a global coup where nations around the world are trying to transfer their sovereignty, their control, their authority over to the WHO.
00:20:01.000And as a consequence of that, if the World Health Assembly were to adopt those changes, it would drag all of the members of the WHO along with it.
00:20:11.000And I think ultimately the best answer is to exit the WHO because it's become an abusive relationship that wants to take control of every aspect of health by changing regulations where our silence would be viewed as consent.
00:20:29.000So thank you for giving me a voice to speak.
00:20:31.000Yes, is it true that they are avoiding the term treaty because then that would circumvent Senate authorization or oversight?
00:20:45.000So let me make sure that there's two separate things that people are aware of.
00:20:49.000There are two completely separate paths that are being negotiated in the World Health Constitution, World Health Organization's Constitution.
00:21:01.000In Article 19 and 20, they talk about a convention or an agreement.
00:21:06.000In Articles 21 and 22, they talk about other international instruments.
00:21:13.000In our Constitution, people are familiar with a treaty.
00:21:18.000All you really need to know are two things, right?
00:21:21.000We've, our nation, the United States, have been brought into tens of thousands of international entanglements with the simple signature of a president.
00:21:32.000Biden signed the Paris Climate Accords.
00:21:35.000I'm sorry, Obama signed the Paris Climate Accords.
00:22:06.000Last year, Biden proposed amendments to the existing regulations.
00:22:12.000They were kicked to the curb, but a totally separate collection of amendments to five articles were submitted by a group of nations, including the United States.
00:23:04.000So this week is the working group for the international health regulations.
00:23:09.000And Colin McGiff, MCIFF, is actually a vice chairperson of the working group itself.
00:23:19.000The United States sends a delegation of like 50 people.
00:23:22.000So there are many, many, many other people involved.
00:23:25.000But generally, the chief delegate is Javier Becera, the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
00:23:30.000Now, next week, in the intergovernmental negotiating body about what everybody just calls the pandemic treaty, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, a couple of months ago, named Pamela Hamamoto as the ambassador to take charge of the negotiations for the quote-unquote pandemic treaty.
00:23:56.000And so, different groups, different negotiations, somewhat different people.
00:24:16.000Indonesia, Russia, Armenia, and a handful of other nations have put forth proposals to essentially implement a Chinese-style track and trace.
00:24:26.000You have to have a QR code, a vaccine certificate, a prophylaxis certificate, a testing certificate, a passenger locator form, a recovery certificate.
00:24:36.000That's really what I believe they want.
00:24:39.000And that is not discussed in the discussions about the treaty.
00:24:44.000I think that's a bit of a decoy out there.
00:24:46.000These proposed amendments for this tracking and tracing digital health certificate are in the discussions about the proposed amendments.
00:24:55.000Are they meeting mostly by Zoom right now, or is there a physical meeting that is happening?
00:25:09.000And so if you were to rank like a threat assessment analysis, what do you think warrants the most concern and focus and energy of all the things that they're discussing right now at the WHO?
00:25:25.000They have a lot of crazy things that you can't ignore.
00:25:30.000But I think ultimately, if we're able to stop them from putting us in a digital prison, that stops a lot of what they want to do.
00:25:41.000And so I've also put together a page called rejectdigitalenslavement.com.
00:25:48.000And this is something that they have been pushing for and pushing for.
00:25:52.000And Europe, especially, many of the people and the nations there are starting to become comfortable with the idea that you have to have a QR code.
00:26:01.000Now, it doesn't mean you have to have a phone.
00:26:05.000But while people in the United States are very familiar with their Second Amendment rights and their First Amendment rights, we're talking here about Fourth and Tenth Amendment.
00:26:16.000The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect your right to privacy.
00:26:21.000And the mistake that almost everybody makes if they ever go to the doctor or hospital or clinic is they sign in and they check the box that essentially gives all of your data and allows the hospital to share it with the world.
00:26:38.000Come with your own paperwork controlling your own data.
00:26:42.000The 10th Amendment, back in May last year, Louisiana, God bless them, the Assembly agreed to a resolution that, in my own words, you know, paraphrasing, said to the WHO: you don't have authority over the state of Louisiana.
00:27:00.000Any health changes would have to go through a referendum where the people of Louisiana would approve it.
00:27:08.000Even on page 61 of the international health regulations right now, when the U.S. agreed to the changes that happened in 2005, the mission to Geneva, when they agreed to what those changes were, said very clearly, well, we're a federal government.
00:27:27.000We can't control health in the states.
00:27:31.000This is really a state's rights issue.
00:27:34.000So every individual person in every state in the country has to get on their assembly and their state legislature to stand up for the fact that the federal government does not have any authority to tell people in any given state what they can or cannot do in regards to health.
00:27:56.000And there have been a handful of states who have stood up for that state's rights issue.
00:28:01.000So the meetings... goes on for a couple days right now.
00:28:10.000You're a citizen journalist consuming all of this.
00:28:14.000They actually are doing it in Geneva, so it kind of starts at midnight and runs all through the night.
00:28:18.000And they've given me a break because some of the meetings are closed.
00:28:22.000Some of them are being done in secret.
00:28:24.000And probably what is likely to occur is at some point, they're going to shift to negotiation mode.
00:28:34.000And there's a part of me that can understand that when you're in serious negotiations with multiple nations, that's not the kind of thing that you want to broadcast publicly.
00:28:45.000You want people to be able to speak freely.
00:28:47.000But the different nations are all tugging the World Health Organization apart at the seams.
00:29:46.000America has always been the world leader in invention, innovation, and technology.
00:29:51.000Now China is poised to take its place as the next world leader in technology.
00:29:56.000Don't miss the shocking new movie, Innovation Race, available now at SalemNow.com.
00:30:00.000It exposes the truth, how China is exploiting weaknesses in our U.S. patent system, stealing our inventions and technology, and we are helping them do it.
00:30:10.000China could soon control all of our 5G technology, which will eventually control all of our devices.
00:30:17.000With the flip of a switch, the Chinese Communist Party could turn off our power grids, remotely drive your car off your road, or turn off your pacemaker.
00:30:25.000Innovation Race is a clarion call to action.
00:30:31.000Unless we take a stand, China will become the next world leader, threatening our economic and military security and the very idea of American greatness.
00:30:39.000In today's high technology world, there is no prize for second place.
00:32:33.000And I'm just saying, Nikki Haley should be careful about saying that politicians are not in their prime and they need to be in their prime when they serve because she wouldn't be in her prime according to Google or whatever it is.
00:32:48.000You have not seen a retreat so vivid since the Nazis invaded France and they run into the hills.
00:32:57.000Don Lamond was trying everything he possibly could to wave a white flag.
00:33:43.000And by the way, he even backpedaled people say dumb things all the time to kind of put them in the strange penalty box and to make a big deal out of it.
00:34:28.000No, it's because there were some very sensitive women in the CNN staffing room, certainly in the CNN HR department, and obviously on the CNN set that got really triggered and offended.
00:34:43.000They probably didn't like Don anyway, and this probably brought it over the edge.
00:34:48.000And now Don is like groveling and he wants his job back and he goes, has to go through formal training following sexist comments and all this sort of nonsense.
00:34:57.000And however, what's interesting, though, is that, okay, so the media is really, so you're allowed, so teenage girls with men in their bathroom, perfectly fine, but you can't attack women that are getting older.
00:35:12.000So I'm just trying to understand the rules because it's ever-changing, which again is a sign you're living in a tyrannical, politically correct country.
00:35:20.000But how often are you allowed to go on television and engage in the tired trope that men are stupid?
00:35:32.000I mean, from commercials to family guy to Simpsons to how many pop cultural narratives have this trope of the suburban, usually white, overweight father who's a clumsy, bubbling idiot who's forgetful, drinks too much beer, and falls asleep on the couch.
00:35:54.000If Don Lamond would have been like, you know, Donald Trump is no longer in his prime because men tend to lose their mind as they get older.
00:36:01.000They'll be like, oh, that's hilarious.