The Charlie Kirk Show - Eric Swalwell: Chinese Communist Party Puppet + How Texas Could Save America

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody. 0.64

00:00:00.000 Today on the Charlie Kirk show, we dive into Americans being bought and purchased by the Chinese Communist Party, Eric Swalwell. 0.64

00:00:08.000 I am joined in the second part of this episode by Andrew, producer Andrew. 0.81

00:00:12.000 You guys are going to love it.

00:00:13.000 You guys can email us your questions, freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:00:16.000 Please consider supporting us.

00:00:18.000 CharlieKirk.com/slash support.

00:00:20.000 Critical episode.

00:00:21.000 Buckle up, everybody.

00:00:22.000 Here we go.

00:00:24.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

00:00:25.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.

00:00:27.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

00:00:31.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

00:00:34.000 I want to thank Charlie.

00:00:35.000 He's an incredible guy.

00:00:36.000 His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.

00:00:45.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

00:00:53.000 That's why we are here.

00:00:57.000 Do you know this just about two weeks till Christmas?

00:00:59.000 It's incredible.

00:01:00.000 I love Christmas season.

00:01:01.000 Some people don't like it.

00:01:02.000 It is our crazy season here at Turning Point USA.

00:01:05.000 We got people running all over the place, people filming stuff.

00:01:07.000 We got Student Action Summit coming up in Palm Beach.

00:01:10.000 It's a crazy time, and it's a good time to be alive despite all the chaos, the uncertainty, and the confusion.

00:01:15.000 But I know a lot of you guys want to give back, and we've been given so much.

00:01:20.000 So let's do just that.

00:01:23.000 And let's try to get behind an effort that makes a very serious difference this Christmas season.

00:01:29.000 We've been partnering with Prison Fellowship.

00:01:32.000 They've served over 300,000 children of prisoners, coordinating Christmas blessings for prisoners' children through their annual Angel Tree program.

00:01:41.000 But time is short, and it takes a lot of work to line up families.

00:01:44.000 And look, this is about the kids.

00:01:47.000 Kids should not be punished because their mom and dad are in prison.

00:01:51.000 And for just $22, you can help share the love of Christ right here on my show.

00:01:55.000 Your gift is the most important.

00:01:57.000 Volunteers like Dawn from Dallas know that every donation, large or small, is so important.

00:02:03.000 Children of prisoners deserve to experience the love of Christ that only you can make happen.

00:02:09.000 So please make sure these precious kids are never forgotten.

00:02:13.000 Just go to charliekirk.com and click on the Angel Tree banner.

00:02:16.000 $22 delivers joy to one child or just a gift of $220.

00:02:21.000 You can bless 10 children of prisoners with a special Christmas present.

00:02:25.000 Angel Tree family is also given access to a free, easy-to-read copy of the Bible in English or Spanish.

00:02:31.000 So once more, please go to charliekirk.com, click on that Angel Tree banner, or phone 888-206-2802 to join my campaign for prison fellowships Angel Tree this year.

00:02:42.000 But please hurry, Christmas is two weeks away this Friday.

00:02:47.000 We are going to get into Texas suing other states around voter fraud.

00:02:54.000 And also, 10 senators have just signed on to an amicus brief in front of the United States Supreme Court.

00:03:01.000 We're unpacking all of that and more, but I want to get to some breaking news.

00:03:05.000 I'm a very dedicated college football fan.

00:03:09.000 I love college football.

00:03:10.000 What I love about college football is how, unlike in professional sports, recruitment is a key element of success in college football.

00:03:19.000 It's not just about the players, it's about the program.

00:03:24.000 From the recruiters to the strength coaches to the plays to everything about it, it's about an infrastructure that is built.

00:03:32.000 Not to say that in the NFL, that's not the case, but there's definitely more variety of the teams in the NFL that are able to rise and fall.

00:03:39.000 The New England Patriots, obviously, being the exception to that.

00:03:42.000 But a key part of the success in college football is the recruiting side of it.

00:03:48.000 In fact, the best programs, Alabama, Clemson, Notre Dame, Ohio State, they have now been so ambitious, so forward-thinking, they are offering full scholarships to 13 and 14-year-olds on the suspicion that these young men are going to be five-star recruits.

00:04:12.000 These 13 and 14-year-olds are hardly shaving, but they're 6'6, 220 pounds, and they offer them a full scholarship.

00:04:22.000 So what does that have to do with what's happening today in politics?

00:04:27.000 Well, just in the last 24 hours, there has been a story that has come out that shows that the Chinese Communist Party has engaged in the very same type of recruitment here in America.

00:04:42.000 Let's play tape here of Gordon Chang saying this exactly on Fox News regarding Joe Biden.

00:04:53.000 Play tape. 0.95

00:04:54.000 There is incredible arrogance among the Chinese elites, and that's what I take away from this video. 0.92

00:04:59.000 You know, there are a number of instances that Dee talks about, and I don't know if they're actually true or not, but the point is that this is what Chinese leaders think. 0.87

00:05:09.000 And because they think that way, they're going to push a President Biden around. 0.53

00:05:13.000 They're going to do things which are dangerous because we're going to have to push back.

00:05:18.000 Under President Trump, the Chinese didn't try this because they were afraid of him.

00:05:22.000 So what I'm concerned about is the state of mind of China.

00:05:26.000 And we see this from Xi Jinping, the Chinese ruler, all the way down to this guy, Didong Shang. 0.53

00:05:31.000 This is dangerous.

00:05:33.000 So the same way that Alabama and Notre Dame and other college football teams recruit multi-generations of talent, the Chinese Communist Party has embarked on an ambitious recruitment scheme to recruit young and upcoming political leaders that one day they might be able to hold influence over them.

00:05:59.000 Anaxios, a Chinese national named Fang Fang, targeted up and coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.

00:06:13.000 Through campaign fundraising, extensive networking, personal charisma, and romantic or sexual relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors, Fang was able to gain proximity to political power, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials, and one former elected official. 1.00

00:06:30.000 So as Notre Dame tries to recruit 13 and 14 year olds that will one day be the five-star recruit linebackers and strong safeties and quarterbacks of tomorrow, the Chinese Communist Party sends in attractive Chinese women to go seduce American politicians so that they can have favor over them. 1.00

00:06:47.000 Now, mind you, these American politicians don't currently have a lot of power. 1.00

00:06:50.000 This is in the belief that one day they might be at the highest levels of power in our government.

00:06:57.000 In the middle of all this is the Russian hoaxer himself, the man who, if he was in charge, we'd be sending Tomahawk missiles and U.S. infantry troops into Moscow and St. Petersburg, Eric Swawell.

00:07:10.000 Eric Swawell is one of the most disingenuous American politicians out there.

00:07:19.000 Swawell has said on multiple occasions that Donald Trump is an agent of Russia.

00:07:24.000 He was one of the cheap propagandists behind this lie.

00:07:28.000 And Swawell was in a relationship in one way or the other, we're not sure of the depth or the aspects of it, with Fang Fang.

00:07:40.000 Fang Fang is a Chinese Communist Party spy.

00:07:46.000 Let's play tape of Eric Swawell trying to make the case for collusion.

00:07:50.000 Remember, this is how he thought about foreign interference when it came to Russia.

00:07:53.000 Play tape.

00:07:54.000 Russia attacked our democracy this past election.

00:07:57.000 And then they showed up to his Trump Tower, offered the evidence to his family.

00:08:02.000 They received it.

00:08:04.000 They didn't turn it down.

00:08:05.000 Donald Trump, for years, had been working with the Russians.

00:08:08.000 He brought people on his campaign who had ties to the Russians.

00:08:10.000 We have seen a candidate and a president who has spoken in very flattering ways about Vladimir Putin.

00:08:17.000 All of the arrows continue to point to a personal, political, and financial relationship that Donald Trump had with the Russians.

00:08:22.000 A personal and financial relationship that Trump had with the Russians.

00:08:26.000 You mean like that you have with our greatest enemy, the Chinese Communist Party, Eric Swawell?

00:08:31.000 You see, the case demonstrates, this is from Axios, China's strategy of cultivating relationships that may take years or even decades to bear fruit.

00:08:39.000 So I know a lot of the people at Axios.

00:08:41.000 A lot of them are good people.

00:08:42.000 My question is: why did they not release this story before the election?

00:08:45.000 This story at Axios is a pretty incredible story.

00:08:49.000 Why are they releasing this now?

00:08:50.000 Maybe they didn't have all the facts and the sources.

00:08:52.000 I'll give them the benefit of the doubt there.

00:08:54.000 But at Axios, why didn't they release this a month and a half ago?

00:08:57.000 This would have been a bombshell story heading into the election, especially since there's a subcontractor for the Chinese Communist Party about to become president if we don't do our job and reverse the current electoral votes in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.

00:09:14.000 So Eric Swawell has declined to comment on this story, but it said that Beijing is, quote, engaged in a highly sophisticated, malign foreign influence campaign.

00:09:25.000 If that's the case, why has no one attacked the fact that Joe Biden is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese Communist Party?

00:09:35.000 Fang Feng used political gatherings, civic society conferences, campaign rallies, and campus events to connect with elected officials and other prominent figures, according to U.S. intelligence agencies and officials.

00:09:52.000 You see, the Chinese Communist Party has been playing the long game in this Axios piece, which is at least at least eight pages long.

00:09:59.000 It's a very lengthy piece.

00:10:00.000 There's no way they wrote this overnight.

00:10:02.000 It shows Eric Swawell with pictures with this Chinese Communist Party spy, Fang Fang, and it's saying that Fang's ties to Eric Swawell began when he was a council member for Dublin City, California.

00:10:17.000 So Fang Fang started to recruit Swawell, who looked like an up-and-coming, ambitious city council member.

00:10:27.000 The Chinese Communist Party is more invested in the long-term political strategy of our country than most parts of the Republican Party.

00:10:35.000 The Chinese Communist Party has developed more of a farm team than the Republican Party has.

00:10:42.000 Fang's earliest known engagement with Swawell occurred to the Chinese Student Association.

00:10:47.000 Huh, wonder who's been worrying about that.

00:10:49.000 By 2014, she has risen in local political circles and developed close ties to Swawell's office. 0.98

00:10:56.000 That is just the beginning of that Chinese corruption story. 0.98

00:10:58.000 And guess what? 0.91

00:10:59.000 It also has some ties to the governor of Georgia.

00:11:06.000 Well, it's been quite a year, hasn't it?

00:11:08.000 Well, it's actually been a total nightmare.

00:11:10.000 And Christmas is a great time to reflect, especially on those who helped us get through it.

00:11:14.000 Now, Noble Gold has put together this incredible collection of American Eagle 22 carat gold coins so you can say a huge thank you to the people you love.

00:11:23.000 Nothing says you're amazing, quite like a four-coin gold American Eagle Limited edition proof set.

00:11:29.000 Now, look, it's nice.

00:11:30.000 It looks beautiful, all these sorts of things.

00:11:32.000 Let's talk about why you really need this.

00:11:34.000 To protect against inflation.

00:11:36.000 When inflation comes, you need things you can touch, not just things you can see on a computer screen.

00:11:41.000 That's why you need to buy two sets and you'll be gifted a free five-ounce silver Apollo 11 coin.

00:11:46.000 The Apollo 11 is valued at over $300.

00:11:49.000 In case you missed it, you'll receive the coin for free if you purchase this holiday offer.

00:11:52.000 To learn more, call NobleGold at 877-646-5347 and tell them Charlie Kirk sent you.

00:11:58.000 Ask for Noble Gold holiday thank you offer by calling 877-646-5347 or visit noblegoldinvestments.com.

00:12:08.000 Here we have pictures of Eric Swawell, according to Axios.com, being very close to Fang Fang.

00:12:16.000 Few seem to know Fang Fang on a personal level.

00:12:19.000 Several acquaintances told Axios she seemed to come from wealth.

00:12:23.000 She drove a white Mercedes, according to one official, but she never spoke about her family or her hometown.

00:12:28.000 Swawell and Fang Fang were very close.

00:12:31.000 She hosted multiple fundraisers for Swawell.

00:12:35.000 Now, it says here that Fang was a bundler for Swawell and other candidates.

00:12:40.000 Now, mind you, it is illegal for foreign nationals to contribute to U.S. politicians.

00:12:47.000 There is no evidence that Fang Fang gave any money to Swawell, but there is evidence that she was raising money for him, a bundler.

00:12:57.000 Why was Eric Swawal okay with a foreign national, a Chinese Communist Party citizen, being a bundler for his campaign?

00:13:04.000 He was so close to Fang Fang that federal investigators had to come in and warn Eric Swalwell that he was dealing with a Chinese Communist Party spy.

00:13:12.000 And do you remember the story that Diane Feinstein had a Chinese Communist Party spy driver for nearly 15 years, either 15 or 20 years?

00:13:22.000 It looks as if the Chinese Communist Party has infiltrated the top levels of government all throughout the San Francisco political empire, Democrat political empire.

00:13:31.000 The Bay Area political operative who witnessed Fang's fundraising on Swalo's behalf was concerned whether donors she brought in were legally permitted to donate.

00:13:39.000 They found no evidence of illegal contributions.

00:13:42.000 However, Fang facilitated the potential assignment of interns into Swalwell's office. 0.66

00:13:47.000 Oh, so Fang Fang, the Chinese Communist Party spy, our greatest enemy, they're not an adversary, they're an enemy, is staffing Capitol Hill via Eric Swalwell. 0.52

00:13:59.000 Fang attended conferences for mayors across the United States, and Fang engaged in sexual or romantic relationships with at least two mayors of Midwestern cities.

00:14:10.000 I have a feeling we're going to find out who those mayors are very soon, because if they're Republican mayors, the New York Times will have them on the front page of the New York Times within a day.

00:14:18.000 If they're Democrat mayors, citizen journalists will find within a week.

00:14:22.000 That's just the way this stuff works.

00:14:23.000 So if the New York Times finds any interest in this story, we'll find out who those mayors are very, very soon.

00:14:28.000 So you see, that's exactly what happened with the pardon story.

00:14:31.000 Remember that pardon story came out last week where they said that someone is trying to exchange money for a pardon in the Trump White House?

00:14:37.000 I said, give the New York Times 48 hours and their sources will tell them exactly who it is.

00:14:41.000 And like clockwork came out.

00:14:42.000 It actually ended up being a non-story.

00:14:44.000 The guy that was pushing for it is dead.

00:14:46.000 A man that I knew of, Sanford Diller from San Francisco, ended up being a non-story.

00:14:52.000 At a 2014 conference in Washington, an older Midwestern mayor, quote, from an obscure city, referred to Fang as his girlfriend and insisted the relationship was genuine despite the clear age difference between Fang and himself.

00:15:06.000 Fang also had a sexual encounter with an Ohio mayor in a car that was under electronic FBI surveillance, said one current U.S. official.

00:15:14.000 When the mayor was asked why Fang was interested in him, Fang told him she wanted to improve her English, the same official said.

00:15:22.000 And so what we are seeing is a concerted, multi-dimensional effort from our greatest enemy to infiltrate our government.

00:15:35.000 And yet Eric Swalwell went on television.

00:15:40.000 Let's play Cut 35.

00:15:42.000 Eric Swawell on CNN making accusations of Trump-Russian collusion in May of 2017.

00:15:49.000 Play tape.

00:15:50.000 There's a pattern here, John, on the classified and unclassified side of deep personal, political, and financial ties that Donald Trump and people in his family, in his businesses, and on his campaign had with a foreign adversary in Russia that converged at the same time that Russia was interfering with our campaign.

00:16:09.000 This is a complicated set of financial transactions, electronic messages, foreign witnesses.

00:16:15.000 It's going to take time, not as fast as I'd like, but the American people deserve to hold any U.S. person accountable that was working with Russia.

00:16:23.000 There is a complicated campaign that goes to show Eric Swalwell, through electronic messages and wire transfers, had a financial dealing relationship with the Chinese Communist Party.

00:16:37.000 Let's play Cut 37 again.

00:16:40.000 Russia attacked our democracy this past election, and then they showed up to his Trump Tower, offered the evidence to his family.

00:16:49.000 They received it. 0.51

00:16:50.000 They didn't turn it down.

00:16:52.000 Donald Trump for years had been working with the Russians.

00:16:54.000 He brought people on his campaign who had ties to the Russians.

00:16:57.000 We have seen a candidate and a president who has spoken in very flattering ways about Vladimir Putin.

00:17:03.000 All of the arrows continue to point to a personal, political, and financial relationship that Donald Trump had with the Russians.

00:17:09.000 Eric Swalwell is AA baseball for the Chinese Communist Party.

00:17:14.000 The big leagues is Joe Biden, the big man, as he's called in certain documents. 0.75

00:17:20.000 If Joe Biden becomes president of the United States and we are unsuccessful in these legal challenges, in the rallies, in the calls, and the emails that you guys can participate in in everylegalvote.com, then the Chinese Communist Party will control our government.

00:17:40.000 Play Ratcliffe, DNI Director Ratcliffe on Tucker Carlson last evening. 0.91

00:17:46.000 We've been warning about this for months.

00:17:47.000 We knew that Joe Biden had serious ties, not just ties, but he's an employee of the Chinese Communist Party.

00:17:54.000 He works for them.

00:17:55.000 He is their math.

00:17:56.000 They are his master.

00:17:58.000 He is subservient to Xi Jinping.

00:18:01.000 Play tape.

00:18:02.000 The most jarring part of the piece, I thought, was your description of the massive ramp up of the Chinese military.

00:18:10.000 And from your telling, not necessarily for defensive purposes.

00:18:14.000 What do you think their aim is?

00:18:17.000 Well, again, dominate militarily, technologically, and economically.

00:18:22.000 On the military front, they've already achieved having the largest navy of any country in the world.

00:18:29.000 From a military force standpoint, the People's Republic of China has a military of 2 million.

00:18:35.000 They want them to be the largest, and they also want them to be the strongest, which is why they're engaged in what you referenced, which is called gene editing, literally trying to alter the DNA, experimenting on DNA to make soldiers, sailors, and airmen stronger and more powerful.

00:18:52.000 That's horrifying. 0.86

00:18:53.000 So you know who else did this in the attempt to create the evil Third Reich in the 1930s and 1940s? 0.79

00:19:00.000 The National Socialist Workers' Party military during their blitzkrieg attempts when they pierced the Maginot line into France. 0.81

00:19:08.000 One of the ways they were able to do this is they gave almost pseudo-heroin type injections to their infantry.

00:19:20.000 It made their fighting force be able to go for 100 hours straight when they invaded France.

00:19:27.000 The French resistance and soldiers had never seen anything like it.

00:19:30.000 And when they actually pierced the Maginot line, they were able to make it all the way to the Atlantic Ocean in five days, able to make it to Paris within three days.

00:19:39.000 No one has ever seen the kind of pace of invasion. 0.57

00:19:43.000 And so what the Chinese Communist Party is trying to do is very similar to what the National Socialist Workers' Party did in the 1930s and 40s.

00:19:51.000 However, the difference is the infiltration.

00:19:56.000 You see, the Chinese Communist Party, they're doing things differently than the Soviet Union did and the National Socialist Workers' Party did or the Italian fascists.

00:20:07.000 You see, their strategy for the last couple of decades has been to infiltrate, influence, and take over our government from within.

00:20:16.000 They know that we're the finest fighting force on the planet.

00:20:19.000 They know that we are still the wealthiest country on the planet.

00:20:22.000 They know that if they were to awaken a sleeping giant, we would rise in retaliation. 0.67

00:20:27.000 So what has the Chinese Communist Party done? 0.94

00:20:29.000 They have funded social justice warrior causes to weaken the spirit of America. 0.94

00:20:35.000 They have funded environmentalist groups, which we discuss in our third hour with Congressman Lance Gooden today.

00:20:41.000 And you guys can check that out on our podcast.

00:20:43.000 They fund and support BLM Incorporated.

00:20:47.000 Producer Connor, can we get the tweet that goes to show the Chinese Communist Party tweeting out support of Black Lives Matter?

00:20:54.000 You see, it was the Chinese Communist Party that was saying they support BLM Incorporated, despite the Chinese Communist Party having well over 1 million Muslims in concentration camps.

00:21:08.000 You see, a lot of these groups say, never again will we allow another Holocaust. 0.60

00:21:11.000 That's a lie.

00:21:13.000 There's a Holocaust that is basically happening right now in China. 0.88

00:21:19.000 Not to mention the cyber warfare, the ties into our election, the hacking, the small dollar donations that might have gone through Act Blue that members of Congress have been asking for answers. 0.88

00:21:31.000 But our Department of Justice, you don't understand.

00:21:34.000 They're really worried to make sure Lori Laughlin and her kids are actually getting in the USC under the right standards.

00:21:41.000 I don't think Lori Laughlin's a good person.

00:21:43.000 Do I think that it took a multi-hundred person unit from the Department of Justice to go try and solve the college admission scandal? 0.97

00:21:52.000 Probably more pressing issues like the Chinese Communist Party.

00:21:55.000 Why did we have to send a 20-person platoon to go arrest Roger Stone, a non-violent offender? 0.74

00:22:01.000 Why did we have to go send 13 FBI agents to go look into Bubble Wallace? 0.64

00:22:05.000 Because there was a rope hanging from his garage. 0.89

00:22:09.000 Meanwhile, the Chinese Communist Party has seamlessly infiltrated every level of government without anyone stopping them except President Trump. 0.90

00:22:18.000 President Trump is the only person to stand up against the sinister satanic forces of China. 0.93

00:22:24.000 I use that word intentionally.

00:22:27.000 What China is trying to do is dark. 0.99

00:22:29.000 It is evil.

00:22:32.000 They harvest organs.

00:22:33.000 They try to genetically modify their human beings, as you heard DNI Director Ratcliffe talk about.

00:22:40.000 And now we have growing evidence that Eric Swawell was compromised by a Chinese Communist Party spy. 0.75

00:22:49.000 Diane Feinstein was driven around by a Chinese Communist Party spy for 15 years. 0.60

00:22:55.000 China has influenced our country in every single form and fashion, but it doesn't stop there.

00:23:02.000 What if I told you that the governor of Georgia made a special visit to the Houston consulate?

00:23:10.000 And I do want to nuance this.

00:23:11.000 It is normal for governors to meet with foreign ambassadors to try to solicit business and try to solicit investment.

00:23:22.000 That's normal.

00:23:24.000 However, Brian Kemp is seen pictured multiple times with high-level officials from the Chinese Communist Party.

00:23:33.000 And let's not even start with Hunter Biden.

00:23:35.000 The question is, who in our country is not compromised by the Chinese Communist Party? 0.82

00:23:40.000 So you see, tactically and strategically, the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP, instead of fighting us outright, they infiltrated us. 0.91

00:23:51.000 They bought us. 0.58

00:23:52.000 They said, what's your price?

00:23:54.000 And Nixon and H.W. Bush and all the globalists, they opened us up with bad trade deals with China, and we imported piles and tons of plastic that we didn't need in a massive labor arbitrage, which made us poor, China wealthier, and now they have us over a barrel.

00:24:13.000 September 5th, 2020 from DailySignal.com, this BLM Inc. co-founder and pro-Communist China group are partnering up.

00:24:22.000 And this article goes to show that Alicia Garza is partnering with the Black Futures Lab, with the Chinese Progressive Association.

00:24:31.000 I wonder why.

00:24:33.000 Hawaii Chaiying, known for her aggressive pushback, I might be mispronouncing it. 0.78

00:24:39.000 I mean no offense.

00:24:40.000 I'm just reading a tweet.

00:24:42.000 Against foreign criticism of China's handling of the Chinese coronavirus outbreak, Uyghur concentration camps and brutal police violence against Hong Kong protesters, join the international outcry over George Floyd's death by tweeting, I can't breathe. 0.99

00:24:56.000 Hawai Chaiying. 0.97

00:24:59.000 Imagine yourself in a private meeting with Xi Ji Ping and you're in charge of global domination for China. 0.99

00:25:05.000 Let's pretend that's your daily job. 0.97

00:25:07.000 You go to work and your job is to destroy America.

00:25:10.000 That's your job.

00:25:11.000 You wake up every day and you think about how do I destroy America?

00:25:14.000 And you're in this meeting with Xi Ji Ping and Xi Ji Ping asks you, so how are you going to do it?

00:25:20.000 And you say, well, we are going to help financially support the groups that are doing it for us.

00:25:28.000 We're going to get behind BLM Incorporated.

00:25:30.000 We're going to get behind the Sierra Club.

00:25:31.000 We're going to shut down America's energy independence.

00:25:34.000 We're going to open their borders.

00:25:36.000 And before we know it, they're not going to make vitamin C in their country, which we don't.

00:25:41.000 They're not going to make anything of critical nature in their country, which they won't.

00:25:45.000 Now, mind you, what's really interesting, and I learned this in the last week.

00:25:49.000 Did you know that China has tariffs on us?

00:25:53.000 You see, the free market purists that have been dominating the Chamber of Commerce and the Republican Party for the last 20 years say free trade is wonderful.

00:26:01.000 We have free trade with China.

00:26:03.000 That's nonsense.

00:26:05.000 Do you know that we are not allowed to import hogs or pork into China?

00:26:11.000 China is the number one pork market in the world.

00:26:14.000 They have a fascination with pork.

00:26:16.000 Not sure why.

00:26:17.000 It's just part of their culture.

00:26:19.000 And we are not allowed, unless we have serious tariffs and pay a huge price to import Iowa hogs and Iowa pork into China because China is protecting their farmers and their homegrown pork industry.

00:26:38.000 But when it comes to steel, China has been allowed to dump steel into our markets for decades.

00:26:45.000 Why is that? 0.73

00:26:46.000 It's because the Chinese Communist Party has purchased the Chamber of Commerce, which is the Chamber of China, and they've infiltrated every single level of government. 0.87

00:26:55.000 They've influenced the United States Senate, the U.S. Congress, governor's mansions, and not to mention rare earth minerals, antibiotics. 0.94

00:27:03.000 I could go through the entire list.

00:27:05.000 And so the question in the next decade will be, are we serious enough about the Chinese threat within our country to actually be unafraid of being called the R-word? 0.76

00:27:17.000 You see, the Chinese Communist Party, they've invested heavily in these Confucius Institutes on college campuses. 0.83

00:27:24.000 The greatest weapon for the Chinese Communist Party is not a thermonuclear weapon. 0.51

00:27:29.000 It is political correctness because it does not allow us to call out the Chinese Communist Party. 0.90

00:27:36.000 You see, the Chinese Communist Party have, they have developed the new atom bomb against America, political correctness, because it makes us unable to criticize China without being called a racist. 0.88

00:27:49.000 The new Manhattan Project is now being developed at Brown University. 0.93

00:27:53.000 You know what it's called?

00:27:54.000 Critical race theory.

00:27:56.000 The next D-Day is not going to be an invasion of the Chinese Communist Party coming into Seattle or Oakland or Los Angeles. 0.90

00:28:04.000 Instead, the invasion is through our institutions that handcuff our conversation from being able to speak. 0.93

00:28:12.000 And it's not even a few decades away.

00:28:14.000 It's actually a few weeks away.

00:28:19.000 So here's another way 2020 has thrown us through a loop this Christmas season.

00:28:23.000 Look, lots of my go-to gifts are non-starters this year.

00:28:27.000 I mean, for example, how are you supposed to give concert tickets?

00:28:31.000 There's no Lola Palooza.

00:28:32.000 I can't give tickets to go see the Chicago Bulls because there's no one showing up.

00:28:38.000 And so what am I giving for Christmas?

00:28:40.000 Raycon wireless earbuds.

00:28:42.000 I am giving people them because they're the best with seamless Bluetooth pairing and a comfortable noise isolating fit.

00:28:48.000 By the way, Mr. Producer is actually wearing them right now.

00:28:51.000 He's wearing them and he's got the watch.

00:28:53.000 He's got the whole portfolio and he's doing a great job.

00:28:57.000 The audio is amazing, comparable to what you get from other premium brands, except Raycon started half the price.

00:29:02.000 Who can beat that?

00:29:03.000 Best of all, these are people that you give the gifts.

00:29:05.000 They can use them for calls or music.

00:29:06.000 Or if they don't want to hear you anymore because you're making too much sense politically, they can tune out and they can listen to the Charlie Kirk show as well with Raycon.

00:29:13.000 So look, buyraycon.com slash Kirk.

00:29:15.000 They're being very generous this Christmas season.

00:29:17.000 So they're offering my listeners 15% off buyraycon.com slash Kirk.

00:29:21.000 It's byraycon.com slash Kirk.

00:29:26.000 So now that we've established the obvious Chinese Communist Party threat, what's happening with these lawsuits? 0.60

00:29:32.000 Can we reverse this election?

00:29:35.000 There's actually some good momentum that I want to share with you.

00:29:37.000 I want to start with this article here.

00:29:39.000 Texas is suing Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, saying that there are so many instances of election fraud that their own electoral votes have now been disenfranchised.

00:29:54.000 So there's a lot of momentum, everybody, and that momentum is because of you.

00:29:58.000 You guys have helped keep the phone calls going, the rallies going, the public support going, and the pressure going.

00:30:04.000 And considering the current composition of the U.S. Supreme Court, we have Amy Coney Barrett, we have Alito, Thomas Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.

00:30:12.000 No matter what Roberts wants to do, we have five fair justices on the U.S. Supreme Court, thanks to President Donald Trump and thanks to his commitment to building a strong judiciary.

00:30:25.000 And so the question is this.

00:30:27.000 Will we be able to prove in court the amounts of irregularities?

00:30:32.000 Because I think a lot of us throw around this term evidence.

00:30:35.000 And yes, there is evidence.

00:30:37.000 The question is, how do we persuade a court of this?

00:30:40.000 And most importantly, how do we persuade a liberal judge of this?

00:30:45.000 Because overturning an election, even if that election is fraudulent and flawed, we need to be very specific of how we argue these cases.

00:30:54.000 Sidney Powell's lawsuit has just been thrown out of Georgia, which was considered to be the Kraken lawsuit.

00:30:59.000 And so, this is not about Sidney Powell.

00:31:02.000 It's just in order to meet the threshold and the standard of being able to have a lawsuit proceed in a court of law, there needs to be not just whistleblower evidence.

00:31:14.000 There needs to be very specific types of thoroughly vetted, presentable evidence.

00:31:24.000 I asked producer Andrew to join us.

00:31:26.000 Following the legal fights and all of the issues around voter fraud and what is happening in the courts very closely.

00:31:35.000 And I wanted to make sure that we got everything as it happens in real time.

00:31:39.000 What is now happening with Texas suing the other states?

00:31:43.000 Right.

00:31:43.000 So Texas, this has been sort of the big story of the morning.

00:31:48.000 God bless Texas was trending on Twitter because I think a lot of the base is coming out and said, finally, somebody with some muscle is getting behind this fight.

00:31:59.000 So I'm reading right here from Breitbart.

00:32:01.000 The state of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday, challenging the election procedure in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

00:32:14.000 So one of the first questions that you should probably think in this instance is: well, why is this just now happening and why can they go straight to the Supreme Court?

00:32:24.000 Because you might know that Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis have been arguing state by state.

00:32:30.000 They've been holding these hearings with state legislatures.

00:32:34.000 And then, meanwhile, every time their cases get dismissed at a lower court, they instantly appeal and they say, good, we wanted to get that out of the way quickly.

00:32:43.000 We're going to the Supreme Court.

00:32:44.000 Okay, but here you've got the state of Texas that goes immediately to the Supreme Court.

00:32:49.000 So how did they do that?

00:32:50.000 Well, Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article 3 provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects, it is, meaning the Supreme Court, is the court of first impressions on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.

00:33:09.000 So that is the kicker.

00:33:10.000 It's actually brilliant what the state of Texas has done here.

00:33:13.000 So it's a maneuver, it's a legal maneuver that gets around all of these lower courts and takes it straight to the highest court in the land where technically we have sort of like a five and a half to three and a half majority.

00:33:26.000 But also, Andrew, walk us through.

00:33:28.000 So there are thousands and thousands and thousands of cases that try to get to the Supreme Court.

00:33:32.000 Every year there's 8,000 cases on average, and they take about 80%.

00:33:37.000 So it's less than 1% of cases get to the Supreme Court.

00:33:42.000 So by having the might of Texas, and you've got a lot of friends there that probably are behind some of this action, Charlie.

00:33:50.000 I know a lot of people that are working very hard on this.

00:33:53.000 And turning point action as well, working very hard.

00:33:55.000 Yeah.

00:33:56.000 So the point is, you know, Texas argues that these states violated the electors clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislature.

00:34:09.000 So this ties back to our previous conversation of what's going on in Pennsylvania.

00:34:13.000 In Pennsylvania, you had a heavily Democratic state Supreme Court, 5-2 Democrat to Republican, essentially gut Act 77.

00:34:23.000 Now, Act 77, they're actually arguing is unconstitutional anyways because you have to change state election laws at the constitutional level, not at a law level.

00:34:34.000 That's sort of a nuance there.

00:34:36.000 Nevertheless, you had the state Supreme Court gut that law and make a bad thing worse.

00:34:42.000 And they're arguing that that same thing happened in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

00:34:47.000 So Texas is going straight to the top.

00:34:50.000 Texas, God bless Texas, trending on Twitter.

00:34:52.000 Then they removed it.

00:34:53.000 Big conspiracy theory on Twitter this morning.

00:34:56.000 But Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors.

00:35:03.000 And this is where sort of all of these disparate pieces come together, right?

00:35:08.000 You've seen Jenna Ellis arguing this as well, that states have every right to appoint their electors.

00:35:15.000 We had Tyler Bowyer on the program, who's the COO of Turning Point United States.

00:35:18.000 He happens to be listed in a lawsuit.

00:35:19.000 Yeah, listed in a lawsuit.

00:35:21.000 It's actually the Sydney Powell lawsuit here in Arizona, but he's alongside the other 10 electors.

00:35:25.000 The state of Arizona has 11 electors, so 11 electoral votes.

00:35:29.000 But they're saying, hey, just because there's too much fraudulent activity, there's too many irregularities, you have to let the state legislatures, which are Republican-controlled, appoint their own electors.

00:35:44.000 According to the American Psychological Association, chronic stress is linked to the six leading causes of death.

00:35:50.000 Stress has been implicated in heart issues, inflammation, obesity, mental illness, and more.

00:35:56.000 Most people think of stress as caused by things like work, traffic, tense relationships.

00:36:00.000 You know all the list.

00:36:02.000 So they focus on what they hope are solutions, such as meditation or going to the spa, but it doesn't fix the problem.

00:36:08.000 To fight stress, proper nutrition is frequently overlooked.

00:36:12.000 I personally have been taking magnesium for its health benefits.

00:36:15.000 I take it every night.

00:36:16.000 This is a mineral that helps most people, and they don't even know it.

00:36:20.000 Magnesium is the body's master mineral.

00:36:23.000 Powerful, over 300 critical reactions, including detoxification, fat metabolism, energy, stress, even digestion, is influenced by the presence of magnesium.

00:36:33.000 If your body is giving you warning signs, why don't you listen to it?

00:36:36.000 There's a new magnesium product called Magnesium Breakthrough.

00:36:40.000 It's the ultimate magnesium supplement, easily the best I've ever seen your experience.

00:36:44.000 Believe it or not, I actually have a lot of experience of magnesium.

00:36:47.000 All seven forms of this mineral.

00:36:49.000 The Charlie Kirk Show is able to arrange for a special batch of it to be set aside for our audience this holiday.

00:36:56.000 And I guarantee it's the best deal available on this product.

00:36:59.000 Seriously, with volume discounts combined, with our custom 10% coupon code, Kirk10, you can save up to 40% off select packages of magnesium breakthrough.

00:37:09.000 That's an amazing value.

00:37:10.000 And I promise that the deal is only available on the specific website, buyoptimizers.com/slash Kirk.

00:37:18.000 You won't find that deal on Amazon or even the company's own website.

00:37:21.000 Magnesium Breakthrough is the most effective magnesium supplement I've ever tried.

00:37:26.000 Say goodbye to having to buy seven different bottles of magnesium to get the complete dose.

00:37:32.000 Go to buyoptimizers.com/slash Kirk and use the coupon code Kirk10 to save up to 40% off select packages.

00:37:40.000 Get the most full-spectrum and effective magnesium product ever at the best price today.

00:37:48.000 So this is from Heather Kagle, who is actually from Politico.

00:37:52.000 She says, the inaugural committee, which Charlie and I both had to Google, it's basically like the prom planning committee.

00:38:00.000 It's the party committee in Washington.

00:38:02.000 The inaugural committee fails to pass simple resolution essentially acknowledging Biden as president-elect after all Republicans opposed.

00:38:11.000 Hoyer, Democrat, offered the resolution, which failed three to three.

00:38:15.000 Other committee members are House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell, Senator Blunt, and Klobuchar.

00:38:24.000 So these are like actually heavy hitters.

00:38:26.000 So they can't order catering to you.

00:38:27.000 So they basically, yeah, they can't, they can't.

00:38:29.000 And I mean, it's, you know, they say the resolution was very basic, per folks with knowledge.

00:38:33.000 It would have notified American people that Congress is preparing for inauguration of Biden and Harris in coordination with health experts as we observe this transition of power.

00:38:42.000 I mean, it's very basic, perfunctory, sort of Washington, you know, bureaucratic nonsense.

00:38:47.000 But nevertheless, three Republicans, including McCarthy, McConnell, and Blunt, says.

00:38:53.000 So it's not a binding resolution, basically.

00:38:57.000 They can't begin to order the curtains for the Biden inauguration, basically.

00:39:00.000 Exactly, which is, hey.

00:39:01.000 There you go.

00:39:02.000 It hasn't been.

00:39:03.000 And it shows that Republican leadership is not backing down, is what it shows.

00:39:06.000 I mean, and here's really the argument, right?

00:39:06.000 Yeah.

00:39:09.000 So, if you're out in the base, and I've seen this a lot, and I think it's actually something interesting for you to discuss, but a lot of people are saying, oh, this is all just to make the base happy, right?

00:39:21.000 So, we talked about Eric Erickson yesterday.

00:39:23.000 One of his main frustrations in this time we're in is he says, oh, all these people that know better are just trying to make the base happy.

00:39:30.000 They're just doing the song and dance so they don't get a case.

00:39:33.000 That's not at all what we're doing.

00:39:34.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:39:35.000 We actually know and see and believe that there is widespread and real voter fraud.

00:39:40.000 Yeah, well, there's a great piece here that we picked up from the Epic Times.

00:39:43.000 The move on chorus needs to deal with the facts of the election.

00:39:47.000 Andrew, do you want to walk through that?

00:39:49.000 Yeah, I mean, this is a response to Ross.

00:39:54.000 I always say his name wrong, Duthat, but it's not how you pronounce it, Ross Duthot.

00:39:59.000 Some French name?

00:40:00.000 Yeah, well, I don't know.

00:40:01.000 He's basically, he's actually a brilliant, brilliant guy.

00:40:04.000 I've read some of his books.

00:40:06.000 I should know how to pronounce his last name as a result.

00:40:08.000 Nevertheless, he's friends with the kind of David French types and the smarter-than-thou conservatives.

00:40:18.000 And, you know, this piece calls him a faux conservative at the New York Times.

00:40:22.000 So he's a columnist at the New York Times, very smart guy, but he's, you know, he's basically been incredibly critical of Donald Trump, as you would predict.

00:40:31.000 But he wrote a piece, you know, in the New York Times that says, why do so many Americans think that the election was stolen?

00:40:39.000 And I think for him, it was this sort of good faith effort to say, hey, guys, take this seriously, that we have a problem here.

00:40:46.000 There's a lot of people that don't think this election was on the up and up.

00:40:51.000 And so this piece basically says, you know, in brief, this is a quote from it.

00:40:56.000 I'd like to introduce Ross, Duthat, to Occam's Razor.

00:41:03.000 And what Occam's Razor is, in short, all things being equal, the simplest and most forthright explanation is often the correct one.

00:41:12.000 In the present case, the correct answer to Ross's question is, why do so many Americans think the election was stolen?

00:41:19.000 Is this because it was.

00:41:22.000 And I think it's a wonderful summation of everything that we've been doing for weeks on this show.

00:41:29.000 It's just to say this does not pass the eye test, the smell test, or anything.

00:41:35.000 Just how normal people knew instinctively that their government was not being run correctly for the last 30 or 40 years, and President Trump represented a disruption and a hurricane that they could send to D.C., they know that this election was completely fraudulent.

00:41:49.000 And so what's really interesting is how Democrats and how dark money groups are responding to this.

00:41:54.000 So we were watching some cable TV this morning really early prepping for the show, going through all these articles, going through kind of what's happening in the news cycle, making phone calls to some of our sources inside.

00:42:03.000 And this ad popped up, and I couldn't really believe it.

00:42:07.000 And I said, who's running this ad?

00:42:10.000 And again, this is not what my commentary here is not really about Bill Barr.

00:42:13.000 I have plenty of complaints about Bill Barr, but it's this pro-Bill Barr advertisement that all of a sudden is running on TV.

00:42:19.000 Listen and watch this very carefully, and then let's kind of dive deep into what this really means.

00:42:24.000 Why is the left running?

00:42:26.000 Why are they running these ads?

00:42:27.000 Play tape.

00:42:28.000 Bill Barr, President Trump's attorney general and loyal ally, America's top prosecutor and a champion of conservative values.

00:42:37.000 Now, when it comes to the November election, Bill Barr has said he, quote, has not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome.

00:42:46.000 America has spoken.

00:42:48.000 The election was fair.

00:42:49.000 The results accurate.

00:42:51.000 Republicans and Democrats were elected to offices up and down the ballot.

00:42:55.000 It's time to move forward together.

00:42:58.000 No one asked you to run that ad.

00:43:01.000 No.

00:43:01.000 I mean, I thought that everything's fine.

00:43:03.000 You got the electors seated.

00:43:04.000 You have the New York Times that says everything's going to be fine.

00:43:08.000 By the way, that pro-Bill Barr ad is run by the Progressive State Leaders Committee, some left-wing super PAC.

00:43:16.000 Why are they all of a sudden protesting so much, Andrew?

00:43:19.000 Well, I think it's because different polls are out there stating different percentages.

00:43:25.000 But Cruz last night, when he was speaking with Hannity, quoted that 39%, let's just say 40% of Americans think this election was stolen or that there was fraudulent activity happening.

00:43:37.000 So they know that there's a lot of Americans, millions of Americans that are onto it.

00:43:44.000 They know.

00:43:45.000 And I think that's the famous Hamlet quote from before: the lady doth protest too much, which is the old Shakespeare quote.

00:43:54.000 So that's what's really going on.

00:43:54.000 Yeah.

00:43:57.000 And, you know, there's two scenarios.

00:44:01.000 There's two possibilities here, right?

00:44:03.000 One is they know they're guilty and they're trying to get out ahead of it and say, oh, come on, guys.

00:44:08.000 Even Bill Barr is saying this.

00:44:10.000 By the way, a progressive group.

00:44:12.000 Yeah.

00:44:12.000 And by the way, and on Fox, which strange.

00:44:15.000 So listen, I think that's one possibility that they know they're caught.

00:44:19.000 The other possibility is, you know, the less conspiratorial, I would say, or the less, the more gracious one is that they're trying to bring the country together.

00:44:28.000 Unity, build back better, all of that stuff, which I think, you know, I think.

00:44:34.000 Well, but what's so stunning about this is you would only run that ad, which is a multi-hundred thousand, if not multi-million dollar ad buy, if you didn't think there was something to these voter integrity fights that we're doing.

00:44:45.000 No.

00:44:45.000 That's the only reason you would run an ad like that.

00:44:47.000 I think they know that this election is so tainted and is so historically awful in the way that we have expanded the voter rolls.

00:44:57.000 We've expanded mail-in balloting, which again, a bipartisan commission in 2005, chaired by former president Jimmy Carter, said it is mail-in balloting is the most presents the largest opportunity for voter fraud of all the different forms of voting that you can have.

00:45:16.000 So we know that this election, just based on those two points, most mail-in balloting in history, bipartisan commission says it's the type of voting with the most fraud.

00:45:26.000 We know that this was a historically unprecedented election in the way that we ran it.

00:45:31.000 We also know that these state legislatures, which is exactly what Texas is alleging, have completely gutted all the safeguards put in place by the state constitutions and by normal law-abiding citizens to protect our elections.

00:45:45.000 We know this is historically bad.

00:45:47.000 They know it.

00:45:47.000 They know that this is tainted.

00:45:49.000 They know that they do not have a mandate to run this country because we do not trust them.

00:45:54.000 We don't believe what they're telling us.

00:45:56.000 This sit-down, shut up, take it, move on chorus needs to acknowledge the fact that we're not going to sit down and shut up.

00:46:03.000 And that's why we salute Ted Cruz.

00:46:05.000 We salute the state of Texas.

00:46:06.000 God bless Texas.

00:46:07.000 Because if we do not believe that this is true, if we do not believe the results of this election, then we don't have a republic.

00:46:14.000 There is no mandate to lead.

00:46:15.000 This will be four years of hell.

00:46:17.000 Well, and so the Progressive State Leaders Committee advocates for progressive policies that promote fairness, justice, and equity.

00:46:25.000 They're the ones that are running pro-Bill Barr advertisements on Fox News, trying to tell you that there is no voter fraud.

00:46:31.000 Don't look here.

00:46:32.000 Listen, the only reason they would be doing this is because there is voter fraud, because they did pull off a con job.

00:46:38.000 They did steal this election.

00:46:40.000 And they are trying to stop public opinion, and they want to stop your grassroots enthusiasm.

00:46:44.000 So you know what you should take this as?

00:46:46.000 You're getting close.

00:46:48.000 They're getting nervous.

00:46:49.000 They're getting anxious that you're getting close to the grand prize, which very well might be certain states saying, we are not going to seat our electors.

00:47:00.000 Exactly.

00:47:01.000 This may feel, I mean, I've talked to a lot of people off air and behind the scenes, and they say, oh, Andrew, this is a long shot of long shots.

00:47:09.000 This is a long shot of long shots.

00:47:11.000 And I constantly remind them, and I say, okay, sure.

00:47:14.000 But, you know, a long shot didn't stop us from going to the moon.

00:47:18.000 It didn't stop, we didn't stop a lot of great things from happening in history.

00:47:22.000 So here's the point.

00:47:24.000 You've got a very small number of states separated by a very small number of votes, and you've got millions of ballots that are in question.

00:47:33.000 So when you actually, when you think about it, how many votes are we down by in Wisconsin?

00:47:37.000 20?

00:47:37.000 20,000?

00:47:38.000 How many in the 1970s?

00:47:39.000 11,000 in Arizona.

00:47:40.000 12 and 11.

00:47:41.000 You take those three states, that's 40,000 votes, and you've got a different president post-election.

00:47:48.000 And at least you have 270.

00:47:51.000 They don't get to 270.

00:47:52.000 It goes to the House of Representatives.

00:47:53.000 We win that.

00:47:54.000 Yeah.

00:47:55.000 And then Trump serves four more years. 0.98

00:47:57.000 We need one state to break.

00:48:00.000 When you try and present this, it's like, oh, we're all being a bunch of kooks, and this is crazy, and this is a long shot.

00:48:05.000 Guys, move on, get over it.

00:48:07.000 Like, this is, you know, you're just doing this to appease the.

00:48:09.000 No, none of that is true.

00:48:12.000 This is 40,000 votes separating Donald Trump from the White House, and it's an unprecedented election.

00:48:17.000 We have never held an election like this.

00:48:20.000 Never, ever, ever, ever, ever.

00:48:22.000 And so when, and you take a state like Florida that took 20 years to get absentee balloting right.

00:48:29.000 They were voting for like days leading up to election day.

00:48:33.000 So we had all this wonderful early voting data out of Florida.

00:48:37.000 We had all these safety.

00:48:38.000 Florida knows how to run an election.

00:48:39.000 And then meanwhile, you contrast that with the states that are getting sued by the state of Texas.

00:48:44.000 Well, Texas also ran a pretty good election, I have to say.

00:48:46.000 I mean, yeah.

00:48:47.000 And Texas, by the way, was the only state that I, well, maybe not the only state, but the very high-profile state that rejected Dominion voting systems because it was, you know, they three times.

00:48:56.000 Yeah, there was not sufficient security measures in place.

00:49:00.000 And by the way, Donald Trump won Texas by six points despite all the polls saying that he was going to lose Texas.

00:49:05.000 Yeah, I mean, I'd love to win Texas by 15 points, but nevertheless, there's a balance problem.

00:49:10.000 We're going to fix it long term.

00:49:11.000 But six points is pretty convincing.

00:49:13.000 Super convincing.

00:49:14.000 And we made gains in the state house level there.

00:49:17.000 Rio Grande Valley, which we hadn't won in a century.

00:49:17.000 Rio Grande.

00:49:21.000 So, yeah, I mean, listen, we're building a stronger, bigger, broader coalition.

00:49:24.000 Trump himself got 11 million more votes, right?

00:49:27.000 Andrew, you brought up a great point.

00:49:28.000 If you can all of a sudden prove 12 to 14,000 votes of fraud in Arizona, and then Wisconsin, Georgia, one or two.

00:49:37.000 You got to get a couple of these states to start to break.

00:49:40.000 Andrew, give us the update on the Sydney Powell lawsuit in Georgia.

00:49:43.000 Let's play Sidney Powell, and then, Andrew, you can fill in the gap.

00:49:45.000 Sidney Powell.

00:49:45.000 Sounds good.

00:49:46.000 The American people have been defrauded from their lawful votes in this election, and that cannot stand.

00:49:54.000 So, totally agree.

00:49:57.000 Let's talk about what happened today in that Georgia courtroom.

00:50:01.000 A defeat, not the first one.

00:50:03.000 This happens in the process, but you got shut down today, at least in federal court.

00:50:08.000 Can you tell us about what happened?

00:50:10.000 Yes, we were there for a hearing on motions to dismiss filed by every organization that you can imagine, even as interveners, where they had no place to be in our case.

00:50:21.000 But the DNC and Perkins-Coy law firm and everyone aligned on the left decided to file briefs in our case, and the court let them do that.

00:50:31.000 And they argued against our complaint that alleges all the election fraud and multiple federal constitutional claims that arise from that that invalidated the votes of hundreds of thousands of Georgians who voted for President Trump.

00:50:46.000 Some didn't have their votes counted.

00:50:48.000 Some had their votes eradicated effectively by fraudulent ballots.

00:50:54.000 The court wouldn't pay any attention to any of it.

00:50:56.000 It was obvious the judge had made up his mind before he hit the bench, and he read from a prepared, from prepared notes when he granted the motion to dismiss.

00:51:05.000 So we had a real argument, but I would say it was essentially meaningless, except to the extent the public got to hear another federal judicial proceeding that didn't turn out the way it should have.

00:51:17.000 So, Sydney, can you give us a little bit of a path forward?

00:51:21.000 What happens next?

00:51:22.000 We have had some difficulties in court, as you know.

00:51:26.000 You still have the fire.

00:51:27.000 A lot of folks have faith, but the Electoral College is meeting next week.

00:51:31.000 So, how's this going to play out?

00:51:34.000 Well, we're going to proceed immediately with an emergency appeal, and we expect to get relief in the Supreme Court.

00:51:42.000 And so, what Sydney was mentioning there, which is really interesting, is that these very expensive and elite law firms.

00:51:49.000 Perkins Coy.

00:51:50.000 They represent all the tech companies.

00:51:52.000 Facebook.

00:51:53.000 Just so you know, that's Facebook's law firm.

00:51:55.000 They have offices all around the country.

00:51:55.000 Yeah.

00:51:57.000 They're $2,000 an hour type law firm.

00:52:01.000 This is Democrat, deeply entrenched Democrat establishment legal teams.

00:52:07.000 And they have well over 1,000 partners or attorneys. 0.75

00:52:11.000 Crazy.

00:52:11.000 It's big.

00:52:12.000 It's one of the biggest law firms.

00:52:13.000 What she just said is they showed up uninterrupted.

00:52:16.000 Uninvited.

00:52:17.000 I'm sorry.

00:52:17.000 Uninvited.

00:52:18.000 Well, and I think that's what it means is that behind the scenes, you've got powerful players that are basically saying to all of their high-priced attorneys and their most powerful allies in this space, they're saying, hey, get behind this, shut this down.

00:52:32.000 Again, the lady doth protest too much, methinks.

00:52:36.000 If it was such a bad case, why is all of a sudden Perkins coin showing up?

00:52:39.000 This is a joke.

00:52:40.000 If this is a joke, why?

00:52:41.000 Oh, Dominion, there's nothing to it. 1.00

00:52:43.000 Venezuelan ties.

00:52:45.000 Why is Perkins Coy with their $2,000 an hour legal billings showing up in Georgia submitting briefs?

00:52:53.000 Yeah.

00:52:54.000 It shouldn't have been allowed anyway.

00:52:56.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:52:56.000 Well, so this is what's interesting about this judge's rationale for dismissing this.

00:53:02.000 He says, additionally, I find that the plaintiffs waited too long to file this suit.

00:53:08.000 Their primary complaint involves the Dominion ballot marking devices.

00:53:12.000 They say those machines are susceptible to fraud.

00:53:14.000 There is no reason they could not have followed the Administrative Procedure Act to the rulemaking authority that had been exercised by the Secretary of State.

00:53:23.000 This suit could have been filed months ago at the time these machines were adopted.

00:53:27.000 Well, that is a heck of a thing to say.

00:53:31.000 I mean, he's saying months ago when these machines were adopted.

00:53:36.000 Yeah, months ago, nobody knew what Dominion was.

00:53:38.000 Nobody knew what ESNS was.

00:53:40.000 Nobody knew what SmartMatic was.

00:53:41.000 Nobody knew what CEITL was.

00:53:42.000 I mean, that's just...

00:53:44.000 That's a poor argument.

00:53:45.000 It's a poor argument.

00:53:46.000 And then he says furthermore that the courts have convincingly held these types of cases are not properly before federal courts.

00:53:53.000 Well, so these are state elections.

00:53:55.000 So, I mean, listen, this is legal maneuvering.

00:53:58.000 It's dismissive. 1.00

00:53:59.000 Sydney Powell's right to appeal and what she's going to do ASAP.

00:54:04.000 Does it make sense that the company who controls half of online retail eavesdrops on your private conversations at home?

00:54:10.000 What about the idea that a single company controls 90% of search results, runs your email service, and gets to track everything you do on your smartphone?

00:54:18.000 Big tech and big data, they're more powerful than most countries are, and they profit by exploiting your personal data.

00:54:24.000 It's time to put a layer of protection between your online activity and these tech juggernauts, and that's why I use ExpressVPN.

00:54:30.000 Look, they're spying on you right now.

00:54:33.000 We talk about this a lot on the Charlie Kirk show.

00:54:35.000 Do you want to protect yourself from spying thieves?

00:54:37.000 Then it's ExpressVPN.

00:54:39.000 Think about how much of your life is on the internet.

00:54:42.000 Sadly, every site you visit, video you watch and message you send gets tracked and data mined.

00:54:47.000 But when you run ExpressVPN on your device, the software hides your IP address, something big tech can use to personally identify you.

00:54:53.000 This is camouflage, okay?

00:54:55.000 This is the invisibility cloak, Harry Potter style, to hide yourself from ExpressVPN.

00:55:01.000 ExpressVPN also encrypts 100% of your internet data to keep you safe from hackers and eavesdroppers on your network.

00:55:08.000 And ExpressVPN does all this without slowing your connection.

00:55:10.000 That's why it's rated the number one VPN service by CNET and Wired.

00:55:15.000 What I like most about ExpressVPN, and I use it every day, is you download the app on your phone, one button, you're protected.

00:55:21.000 So stop handing over all your personal data to big tech, the monopoly that we talk about a lot on this program.

00:55:26.000 So do something about it.

00:55:27.000 Don't just complain.

00:55:29.000 Protect yourself.

00:55:30.000 It's ExpressVPN, the only VPN I trust.

00:55:33.000 Expressvpn.com/slash Charlie, E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash Charlie to get three extra free months free.

00:55:43.000 Go to expressvpn.com slash Charlie right now to learn more.

00:55:49.000 Andrew, do you want to keep on building that out?

00:55:51.000 Yeah, I mean, it's just, I just find it really absurd that they're basically saying, how come you didn't file your complaints about Dominion before?

00:55:59.000 I bet Sidney Powell had not, didn't even know, you know, Dominion was a thing.

00:56:03.000 She's constantly said over and over again, you know, she's shocked at what she's uncovered.

00:56:08.000 She had no idea how did these things get through?

00:56:12.000 How come the ownership alone of Dominion voting system is so questionable?

00:56:20.000 This is not conspiracy theories.

00:56:22.000 It does go back to Venezuela.

00:56:25.000 And Hugo Chavez, you know, basically became a dictator, but he won election again and again and again in these very convincing landslide victories where he was expected to lose on a few of those occasions.

00:56:40.000 And they essentially inverted the results. 0.63

00:56:44.000 And it's a wild thing when you go to a place like Miami and Florida and you meet all these Venezuelans that have fled. 0.78

00:56:52.000 They're Venezuelan exiles living in the United States. 0.73

00:56:55.000 I mean, this is one of the reasons why Florida went so convincingly for the president is because they were fleeing this banana republic, no institutional integrity systems that we have in South America. 1.00

00:57:08.000 So now we use their voting system. 0.71

00:57:09.000 Yeah, we use their voting system.

00:57:10.000 I mean, this is not conspiratorial.

00:57:12.000 We have CNN clips that confirm this.

00:57:16.000 And so for this judge to say, well, why didn't you file this back then?

00:57:20.000 Nobody knew any of this, except for the people that probably pulled it off, right?

00:57:24.000 Now, listen, I don't know that votes were getting switched.

00:57:27.000 I can tell you that very reputable people, including Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren, are on the record just as I think in 2019, complaining that these systems were vulnerable to cyber threats.

00:57:43.000 That's back when the left used to care about this.

00:57:45.000 Well, and that was back before, if that were true, it would hurt them.

00:57:50.000 But now they don't want to talk about it because their guy got in, nothing to see here, move on.

00:57:56.000 But before, they were actually saying, hey, there's reasonable reason to be suspicious here about these voting systems.

00:58:04.000 So, anyways, I think it's a really valid question.

00:58:08.000 Okay, do you want to walk us through this Texas lawsuit?

00:58:10.000 Because a lot of people are asking us about that.

00:58:12.000 Let's do it.

00:58:12.000 Freedom at CharlieKirk.com.

00:58:14.000 So the state of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday, challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

00:58:27.000 So one of the first things that we need to explain in this instance is how did Texas get to the Supreme Court when other litigators like Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani have been essentially doing barnstorming the nation in all of these six battlegrounds.

00:58:43.000 Yeah, and they've had their cases dismissed and what they do instantly is they appeal.

00:58:49.000 And you'll often hear somebody like Jenna Ellis say, hey, thanks for turning us down quickly.

00:58:54.000 That's the main thing.

00:58:55.000 We knew you were going to turn us down.

00:58:56.000 We're on our way to the Supreme Court.

00:58:59.000 So, what's so genius about what happened today with Texas and why it's a big deal, why this story on Breitbart that I'm reading from by Joel Pollock, who's a friend of the show, why it has 20,000 comments right now, which is a lot, is that they found a loophole, essentially, a legal maneuver that got them right to the top of the food chain here, which is the Supreme Court.

00:59:25.000 So, here's the kicker of how they were able to do this.

00:59:29.000 Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article 3 provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.

00:59:44.000 So, that's the kicker.

00:59:45.000 Article 3 states that because it's a dispute between two states, in this instance, we're talking about Texas versus Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.

00:59:56.000 So, they have to determine it because it's two states going back to back here, going up against brilliant.

01:00:00.000 Yeah, it's super sober.

01:00:02.000 So, I should text Landry, who's the Attorney General of Louisiana, to do the same thing.

01:00:07.000 Bring it on.

01:00:08.000 I'm going to do that.

01:00:09.000 All of them.

01:00:10.000 You know, Phil Klein, he's a former of Kansas.

01:00:13.000 But I'm sure he knows all of them.

01:00:15.000 He should be calling them and telling them to do the same thing.

01:00:17.000 Why is the Republican Association of Attorney Generals not on this?

01:00:20.000 Maybe they are.

01:00:21.000 I mean, maybe that's where this started.

01:00:22.000 I mean, Texas.

01:00:23.000 I know Ken Paxton.

01:00:24.000 He's a cowboy.

01:00:25.000 Yeah.

01:00:25.000 He's definitely doing this, and there's a lot of people that are freaking out for good reason.

01:00:29.000 Yeah.

01:00:29.000 Ken Paxton's American hero, in my opinion.

01:00:32.000 So he was the one, by the way, just as an aside, that took all that heat during COVID that said, I would rather take Dan Patrick.

01:00:39.000 Oh, is it two guys again?

01:00:40.000 Lieutenant Governor of Texas.

01:00:41.000 Yeah, you're right.

01:00:42.000 It has two guys.

01:00:42.000 Okay, so, but that was still a good quote.

01:00:44.000 He took a lot of flack for saying he wanted his kids to live free in the state, in this country, even if that meant he had a greater risk of contracting COVID.

01:00:53.000 Anyway, so these are the merits of the case.

01:00:56.000 So Texas is arguing that Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin violate the Constitution because they violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures.

01:01:16.000 Okay, so in the Constitution, the Electors Clause grants state legislatures the authority to do these sorts of things, right?

01:01:23.000 So to change election laws at the state level.

01:01:25.000 Something Charlie always says and something we repeat, it's a mantra here.

01:01:29.000 The United States was formed by the states, not the other way around.

01:01:34.000 The U.S., the United States.

01:01:35.000 The states created the federal government.

01:01:36.000 Yes, exactly.

01:01:37.000 The federal government did not create the state.

01:01:38.000 So embedded all over the Constitution are little clauses like the Electors Clause, which says the states have the power.

01:01:46.000 Each state is not actually electing, is not sending millions of votes to the federal government to pick a president.

01:01:53.000 They're actually elect human beings who are electors.

01:01:55.000 Tyler Boyer is an elector in the CO at Turning Point Action.

01:01:58.000 Exactly.

01:01:59.000 Turning point USA. 0.67

01:02:00.000 He was here in this seat where I'm sitting yesterday explaining this because he's named in a lawsuit here in Arizona.

01:02:06.000 So states appoint electors, which then pick the president based on the Electoral College.

01:02:11.000 You have to get 270 or more to win.

01:02:15.000 That's what this is.

01:02:16.000 270 people.

01:02:17.000 So that's a provision within the Constitution that is essentially empowering officials at the state level as opposed to the federal level to be directly involved in the selection of a president.

01:02:31.000 And so what they're saying is that these states violated it.

01:02:33.000 They took the power out of the legislature's hands, the state legislature's hands, and they gave it to a Supreme Court in the instance of Pennsylvania, which has a five to two Democrat majority.

01:02:44.000 So it's a completely partisan Supreme Court in Pennsylvania.

01:02:47.000 It's highly partisan, five to two.

01:02:50.000 If you're taking a Case that is argued by Republicans in Pennsylvania, fat chance.

01:02:57.000 It's not going to happen.

01:02:58.000 You're five to two, you're out.

01:02:59.000 And that's what happened.

01:03:00.000 Pennsylvania, Act 77, it was a law that was passed in a bipartisan fashion in 2019 that allowed for no excuse mail-in voting.

01:03:10.000 What that means is I can request an absentee ballot without an excuse.

01:03:15.000 I don't need an excuse.

01:03:16.000 I don't need to say that I'm bedridden.

01:03:17.000 I don't need to say that I'm going to be living in France.

01:03:19.000 I can just say, hey, I want one.

01:03:20.000 Okay, great.

01:03:21.000 But it did have certain provisions and it had certain deadlines and it had certain safeguards.

01:03:25.000 What happened in that instance was that the Supreme Court gutted it in a case.

01:03:29.000 They gutted all those provisions because of COVID.

01:03:33.000 So they used COVID, and this is what we've seen all across the country.

01:03:36.000 This is why this, this is why it's an issue at all.

01:03:41.000 This election is historically out of, like, it's just terrible.

01:03:45.000 There's no precedent.

01:03:46.000 There's no precedent.

01:03:47.000 There's no safeguards.

01:03:48.000 The laws and the safeguards have been gutted.

01:03:49.000 This is why we keep seeing across the country rejection rates for absentee ballots and mail-in ballots plummet.

01:03:56.000 So in the past year, for example, I think in Pennsylvania, it was 3% rejection rate.

01:04:01.000 Now it's 0.3%.

01:04:02.000 So how do we go, how did we accept so many more ballots, even though there were millions more being cast?

01:04:08.000 And the other thing we know is that when ballots are cast by newcomers to the absentee system, they get rejected at a greater rate because it's confusing.

01:04:16.000 You miss certain things.

01:04:17.000 You read the instructions wrong, whatever it might be.

01:04:20.000 And yet we have this phenomenon happening all over the country.

01:04:23.000 So Texas is saying these states have violated the Constitution and the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause.

01:04:30.000 So the Equal Protection Clause, and I know you know a decent amount about this, but it's essentially a lot of the wonks behind the scenes are arguing that it's actually the Equal Protection Clause.

01:04:41.000 If Trump is going to overturn this election, it might be because of the Equal Protection Clause.

01:04:45.000 That might actually be the strongest legal footing he has to stand on.

01:04:50.000 And so some of you guys are asking, well, why is it that every one of these states have different ways of doing things?

01:04:56.000 Again, the Constitution actually calls for a state-based system to elect our president.

01:05:01.000 It might frustrate you, but if we had a federal system, it could very well be worse.

01:05:06.000 Yeah.

01:05:07.000 There would be no Texas or Florida that would be able to do it the correct way and go about it the right way.

01:05:12.000 There would be no Texas or Florida that would be able to sue the federal government.

01:05:15.000 That's right. 0.65

01:05:15.000 Or take these cases to the Supreme Court. 0.65

01:05:17.000 Well, the brilliance of Ken Paxton.

01:05:19.000 And the brilliant of Ken Paxton is Texas suing Georgia, as you mentioned, Article 3.

01:05:25.000 And the precedent is the only way to remedy state conflicts.

01:05:29.000 I think this was decided first in the Commerce Clause, or it was either Marbury versus Madison.

01:05:34.000 It was one of the first lawsuits, consequential lawsuits, when you have state conflicts, which actually does not happen very often, by the way.

01:05:42.000 It goes immediately to the United States Supreme Court.

01:05:44.000 Is that right?

01:05:45.000 Yeah, because of Article 3, which says the Court of First Impressions.

01:05:49.000 I don't think it was Marbury versus Madison was the National Bank, I think.

01:05:52.000 Nevertheless, this is what the Texas lawsuit says.

01:05:56.000 This is pulling a select from their lawsuit.

01:06:00.000 Certain officials in the defendant states, again, those defendant states are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

01:06:08.000 Certain officials presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail and voting.

01:06:15.000 The defendant states flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.

01:06:27.000 Whether well-intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect.

01:06:32.000 They made the 2020 election less secure in the defendant states.

01:06:37.000 So remember when people tell you that this was the most secure election in American history and when the social media platforms and you posted about it and they said, this is contested.

01:06:47.000 This was the safest election.

01:06:48.000 Mail and balloting is very secure.

01:06:51.000 No, no, it's objectively not as secure.

01:06:55.000 It's objectively less secure.

01:06:57.000 And again, we always go back to that bipartisan commission, election commission, chaired by former president Jimmy Carter that said mail-in balloting is the least secure way to vote.

01:07:09.000 So this is essentially what this lawsuit is hinging on.

01:07:13.000 It's saying this was the least secure election in those defendant states.

01:07:19.000 Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, again, that don't have the power to do so, yet they did it anyways, because of the pandemic.

01:07:30.000 So so much of 2020, you can relate back to this pandemic.

01:07:35.000 I feel like the only major piece of this year's news that wasn't about the pandemic was Solomani.

01:07:43.000 It was like Solomoni was the big news story.

01:07:46.000 It was January.

01:07:47.000 And then everything else has been pandemic.

01:07:49.000 But then there's race riots, too.

01:07:50.000 No, that's pandemic.

01:07:52.000 That was pent-up pandemic energy.

01:07:55.000 You locked up a whole people for months and months and months.

01:07:58.000 And then it just took, you know, they didn't have jobs.

01:08:01.000 They didn't have fun.

01:08:03.000 They didn't have outlets outdoors.

01:08:06.000 You locked down their kids' playgrounds.

01:08:09.000 And then all of a sudden you give them one excuse to write.

01:08:11.000 And guess what they're going to do?

01:08:12.000 They're going to write.

01:08:13.000 So the decision I was thinking of that probably applies to this most is McCullough versus Maryland, which, again, Marbury versus Madison, all these M's, Marlborough versus Madison, McCullough versus Maryland, which was the Supreme Court decision that defined the scope of the United States Congress's legislative power in relates to state legislatures.

01:08:33.000 So basically the dispute, and again, I'm reading here from an academic paper, is basically the national bank and a tax on the state of Maryland imposed on it.

01:08:42.000 And in the ruling, the Supreme Court established the necessary and proper clause, which gives the federal government certain implied powers that are not necessarily explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.

01:08:54.000 And this is the big part, that the federal government is supreme over the states.

01:08:58.000 And so states' ability to interfere with the federal government is limited.

01:09:02.000 Therefore, the states all of a sudden can't say, well, this is where the precedent for the Civil Rights Act and all this came in.

01:09:07.000 But more than that, the U.S. Supreme Court can say to Georgia, you're not allowed to all of a sudden violate the Equal Protection Clause just because you're Georgia.

01:09:18.000 So there is a limit to state sovereignty.

01:09:18.000 Yeah.

01:09:21.000 And we see this also with items like immigration, right?

01:09:24.000 Immigration is one of those buckets that has been argued in courts that necessarily...

01:09:29.000 I think this is wrongly.

01:09:30.000 Well, yeah, but it's necessarily federal because we have to be able to trust the people traveling within state boundaries that they have entered the country legally, which requires a federal oversight.

01:09:41.000 You know, Army, Navy, these types of things also have federal oversight.

01:09:46.000 So there's legal maneuvering, there's nuance with different issues.

01:09:51.000 But this is one particular issue, as you just pointed out, where the Supreme Court is sovereign.

01:09:56.000 It controls ultimately.

01:09:58.000 It's the arbiter of this.

01:09:59.000 There's a Latin term for this.

01:10:01.000 I'm going to think of it.

01:10:03.000 It might be sterid decisis, something like that.

01:10:07.000 That's about right.

01:10:07.000 It sounds right.

01:10:08.000 Anyway, sounds good.

01:10:09.000 My Latin and my Supreme Court, a little bit rusty, okay?

01:10:13.000 Article 3 is not.

01:10:14.000 Stera decisis.

01:10:14.000 Yeah, I think that's right.

01:10:15.000 I think that's right.

01:10:15.000 Yeah, I think that's right.

01:10:17.000 So you guys can email us your questions, freedom at charliekirk.com.

01:10:20.000 I want to ask you this one.

01:10:21.000 Courtney says this, isn't it part of the genius in the lawsuit that these states will have no protection under the Safe Harbor Act?

01:10:28.000 Quote, under the Electoral Count Act of 1887, Congress must count the electoral votes from states that choose their electors and resolve any legal disputes over the choice by the acts deadline.

01:10:41.000 Yeah.

01:10:41.000 So this is what we're dealing with in Pennsylvania.

01:10:43.000 And this is why what happened with Alito.

01:10:46.000 For those of you who don't know, Alito had originally, again, different Supreme Court justices are sort of appointed to different states to handle emergency filings, right?

01:10:59.000 So in this instance, you had Parnell and Kelly file an emergency brief before asking for emergency relief to the Supreme Court.

01:11:07.000 And Alito was the person, is the justice in charge of Pennsylvania.

01:11:11.000 So he was the one that said, okay, sure, I'm going to set a deadline of December 9th originally that says Governor Wolf and the state of Pennsylvania have to present their defense of why they think this case has no merit by December 9th.

01:11:26.000 Well, then he moved it up to December 8th.

01:11:28.000 And the rationale largely is this safe harbor idea, right?

01:11:33.000 So the safe harbor essentially says that these states are going to pick their electors, assuming there is no pending legal disputes.

01:11:41.000 Okay, well, on the 9th, they would have picked them.

01:11:45.000 There would have been no pending legal disputes, right?

01:11:48.000 But on the 8th, if you get this done and Alito says, actually, I'm going to hear the case of the Supreme Court.

01:11:54.000 I'm going to grant you emergency relief.

01:11:56.000 Let's have it in front of the full court.

01:11:58.000 Well, then there's still pending legal challenges to picking the electors.

01:12:03.000 Therefore, you can't seat electors.

01:12:05.000 And so to your point, to our very smart viewers' point, if the Supreme Court is now involved in multiple states, then it would be a constitutional question that you could argue.

01:12:19.000 Yes, there's pending litigation and challenges in all of these states.

01:12:22.000 Therefore, you can't seat electors, which is a big deal.

01:12:27.000 And also, you put all this together.

01:12:29.000 There's different legal challenges that are happening simultaneously.

01:12:32.000 We have the Pennsylvania, the interstate one with Texas.

01:12:35.000 Not to mention the Amistad Project has lawsuits all across the country happening.

01:12:39.000 Phil Klein, right?

01:12:40.000 Yeah, Phil Klein's got a lot.

01:12:41.000 I mean, here's what's interesting: Phil Klein and the Amistad Project, couldn't speak any more highly of them.

01:12:49.000 They're filing in all these states, right?

01:12:52.000 And they're breaking down their legal challenges by different vote buckets, basically that they're challenging the legitimacy of different vote buckets.

01:13:00.000 Now, again, I bring this back to the top for a reason: that this is an unprecedented election.

01:13:07.000 This may feel like a long shot.

01:13:08.000 This may feel like craziness.

01:13:10.000 This may feel like there's no hope.

01:13:12.000 If you break it down, we got a vote margin in Arizona of 10,457 votes in Arizona.

01:13:20.000 Phil Klein and the Amistad Project challenged the legitimacy of 305,563 votes.

01:13:27.000 So just think about that.

01:13:30.000 10,500 vote margin.

01:13:32.000 He's got 305,000 votes tagged as saying these are illegal votes.

01:13:37.000 Now, again, you got to think about this, and this isn't again, but we've talked about it off air.

01:13:41.000 But just for you guys listening, there's two different tracks.

01:13:44.000 You've got this sort of Dominion cyber security, SmartMatic track that City Powell's really going after.

01:13:51.000 And there's other lawsuits alleging discrepancies here.

01:13:55.000 And then you've got this mail-in balloting issue.

01:13:58.000 Now, the theory, and I think it's a pretty solid theory, is that the Democrats basically went into this election. 0.96

01:14:04.000 They said, Donald Trump is the devil. 0.94

01:14:06.000 He is the worst thing that we've seen since the 1940s. 0.99

01:14:11.000 That's the only thing they could unite behind.

01:14:13.000 It's the only thing that they can unite behind.

01:14:14.000 And this is actually a really fascinating side tangent that we could go on about the pending civil war within the Democrat Party.

01:14:22.000 But you've got this man that they've all united behind, and they genuinely think this.

01:14:28.000 They genuinely think that they are saving the Republic and potentially saving the world by defeating Donald Trump and doing it through this sort of color revolution, this, I guess, nonviolent means, right?

01:14:43.000 And so you've got multiple players in theory.

01:14:46.000 Now, this is a building legal case, a building theory, building idea.

01:14:52.000 But you've got old school Democrat machine politics at play in the cities like Milwaukee, Detroit, these Democrats, strongholds, Philadelphia.

01:15:02.000 We had Robert Cahaley on the show a couple weeks before the election saying, hey, I've got from Trafalgar Group, who turned out to be the most accurate pollster in the country.

01:15:11.000 He had us, he had Trump up by a couple points in Pennsylvania.

01:15:15.000 He said, and you said, so you think he's going to win Pennsylvania?

01:15:15.000 And I'll never forget.

01:15:18.000 And you remember his answer?

01:15:19.000 He said, unless there's the massive fraud.

01:15:21.000 And everyone laughed at him.

01:15:22.000 Not everyone.

01:15:22.000 Yeah.

01:15:23.000 He said, well, you've got to beat Biden by two or three or four points in Pennsylvania just to overcome the fraud that's built in.

01:15:29.000 So this is old school Democrat city politics, the machinery that stuffs ballot boxes.

01:15:36.000 Well, it's been going on for a long time.

01:15:37.000 You know, it goes all the way back to Aaron Burr.

01:15:39.000 And so Aaron Burr, who many of you remember in American history, got shot.

01:15:44.000 But he actually built the New York political machine.

01:15:44.000 Yep.

01:15:46.000 Oh, no, he shot Hamilton.

01:15:48.000 I apologize.

01:15:49.000 He was in a duel.

01:15:50.000 He was in a duel.

01:15:51.000 It was an honor duel, old school style, and he shot Alexander Hamilton, our nation's first Secretary of the Treasury.

01:15:58.000 So Burr, interestingly enough, he was vice president under Thomas Jefferson, but Burr raised a bunch of money to go solve a water problem in New York, only spent a little bit of money on that, and he ended up establishing the Bank of New York, ended up becoming J.P. Morgan Chase, as it is today, and ended up becoming the center of all political corruption on the East Coast.

01:16:20.000 He'd fund politicians' campaigns.

01:16:22.000 He'd pay for their bills.

01:16:24.000 And that was kind of the start of where all the vote counting nonsense happened because Aaron Burr wanted to create a political machine there.

01:16:32.000 Anyway, that's how far back.

01:16:33.000 Well, no, the machinery does go far back.

01:16:35.000 And a lot of these places have not had Republican, I guess, you know, political representation or rule majorities in decades and decades and decades.

01:16:47.000 And they've become corrupt, which single-party rule, just look at the state of California, becomes corrupt when they have a supermajority there in California, and things devolve quickly.

01:16:57.000 Doesn't keep them honest.

01:16:59.000 The point is, there was multiple tracks.

01:17:03.000 One is, you know, I think with a wink and a nod, what happened was, you know, the powers that be said, hey, this election, do what you always do, just do a little extra.

01:17:11.000 I think that's one track.

01:17:13.000 I think the other track is they told us what they were going to do.

01:17:16.000 They said, we need mail invaliding.

01:17:18.000 The pandemic is happening.

01:17:20.000 We need mail and mass mail invaliding.

01:17:22.000 So why did they start saying that?

01:17:23.000 Why did they start yelling that from the rooftops?

01:17:25.000 And then meanwhile, you have Trump saying, this is going to be a disaster.

01:17:29.000 None of this is legal.

01:17:30.000 We're going to be mired in the courts.

01:17:32.000 So when they tell you this was crazy, no, everybody was predicting this.

01:17:36.000 Yesterday, we pulled up an article from September in the Wall Street Journal talking about Pennsylvania's mail and madness, right?

01:17:43.000 So let's go to Pennsylvania.

01:17:44.000 The Amistad group has isolated 121,297 illegal ballots.

01:17:50.000 The margin there, 81,000, right?

01:17:53.000 Now, this has nothing to do with ballot stuffing.

01:17:55.000 This has nothing to do with midnight or 1 o'clock in the morning.

01:17:59.000 There's big ballot stuffing, these spikes that we all talk about.

01:18:03.000 This is just procedural stuff.

01:18:05.000 So illegal votes counted.

01:18:06.000 Estimate of ballots requested in the name of a registered Republican by someone other than that person.

01:18:11.000 They have that at 53,909.

01:18:13.000 Legal votes not counted.

01:18:15.000 Estimate of Republican ballots that the requester returned but were not counted, 44.892.

01:18:22.000 44,892 ballots.

01:18:24.000 Illegal votes counted.

01:18:26.000 Electors voted where they did not reside.

01:18:28.000 That's 14,000 plus.

01:18:30.000 Illegal votes counted.

01:18:32.000 Out-of-state residents voting in-state.

01:18:33.000 That's 7,400.

01:18:35.000 So this is just double votes, 742.

01:18:38.000 They've isolated all these different buckets.

01:18:41.000 And they've so just on a simply procedural.

01:18:43.000 So there's multiple ways you could attack this.

01:18:45.000 You've got old school machinery, Democrat machinery.

01:18:48.000 You've got mail and ballot madness and these electors base or these state governors and oftentimes state supreme courts overruling the legislatures.

01:18:57.000 Then you've got just lax policies.

01:19:00.000 You've got ballot, you know, there's multiple different axes of attack, axes of attack, as I've heard it said, on this election that make us all, you know, obviously question it, not to mention the wonderful article out of the Federalist, The Five Miracles that Biden magically pulled off, where he basically new analysis shows Biden winning nearly impossible margins on mail and ballots in Pennsylvania.

01:19:24.000 Yeah, that's amazing.

01:19:25.000 Basically, there's just, if exit polling holds in Pennsylvania after election night, Biden still comes up like two or three hundred thousand votes short in Pennsylvania.

01:19:36.000 He would have had to win a statistically, basically impossible amount of mail and ballots.

01:19:42.000 So that's so listen.

01:19:45.000 Is this conspiratorial?

01:19:46.000 Not at all.

01:19:47.000 What's conspiratorial is to allege that everything was fine.

01:19:53.000 If you guys like what you hear and you want more of it, I can tell you where to go.

01:19:56.000 It's charliekirk.com/slash support.

01:20:00.000 Email us anything you want us to see, freedom at charliekirk.com.

01:20:03.000 And your go-to place for news and information should be charliekirk.com.

01:20:07.000 If you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, it's tpusa.com.

01:20:10.000 Tpusa.com.

01:20:12.000 Talk to you soon, everybody.

01:20:13.000 God bless.

01:20:14.000 Thanks so much.

The Charlie Kirk Show - December 09, 2020

Eric Swalwell: Chinese Communist Party Puppet + How Texas Could Save America

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript