The Charlie Kirk Show - June 22, 2022


FDA Advisory Committee Revelations and Explosive Vaccine Injury Data—Thought Crimes with Steve Kirsch and James Roguski


Episode Stats

Length

34 minutes

Words per Minute

144.54546

Word Count

4,982

Sentence Count

363

Misogynist Sentences

6


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcripts from "The Charlie Kirk Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk Show, a thought crime episode.
00:00:03.000 We're not allowed to be talking about these topics.
00:00:04.000 So text it to your friends and make sure you're subscribed.
00:00:07.000 James Roguski and Steve Kirsch about the vaccine.
00:00:09.000 Is the vaccine hurting people?
00:00:10.000 Is it killing people?
00:00:12.000 I asked some questions about that.
00:00:14.000 I take no stance on it personally.
00:00:15.000 I just ask questions.
00:00:16.000 You can listen to our guests as they explore these provocative topics.
00:00:21.000 You can email me directly, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:24.000 Subscribe to our podcast and make sure that the plus sign is punched if you have an Apple iPhone.
00:00:30.000 Get involved with Turning Point USA Today and come to our student action summit in Tampa, Florida, tpusa.com slash SAS.
00:00:38.000 That is tpusa.com slash SAS.
00:00:41.000 It's going to be an amazing event.
00:00:42.000 Bring your kids, bring your grandkids.
00:00:44.000 Come at tpusa.com/slash SAS.
00:00:48.000 Buckle up, everybody.
00:00:49.000 Here we go.
00:00:50.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:00:52.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
00:00:54.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:00:57.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
00:01:01.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:01:02.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:01:03.000 His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:01:11.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:20.000 That's why we are here.
00:01:23.000 Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
00:01:26.000 For personalized loan services, you can count on.
00:01:28.000 Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandtodd.com.
00:01:35.000 We're not going to let off this topic.
00:01:37.000 We spent about a whole year just asking our audience, what's going on with the vaccine?
00:01:43.000 We're asking not just our audience, but experts, what is this mRNA gene therapy?
00:01:49.000 And unfortunately, the story is not going away.
00:01:53.000 We on this program are very disappointed with the FDA, which seems to be approving these phase three experimental gene therapies for babies and toddlers.
00:02:05.000 It's an inexplicable development.
00:02:07.000 And with us to help unpack this is James Roguski.
00:02:12.000 We had James on our program first for the World Health Organization fights.
00:02:18.000 James joins us right now.
00:02:20.000 He's an independent journalist.
00:02:22.000 James, welcome back to the program.
00:02:23.000 Thank you very much for having me.
00:02:25.000 There is so much information to talk about.
00:02:27.000 Where would you like to start?
00:02:28.000 Well, let's start with this.
00:02:29.000 I just want to reiterate my disappointment for the FDA approving these phase three experimental gene therapies for babies and toddlers.
00:02:37.000 Can you debrief our audience and tell us what happened?
00:02:40.000 Well, first off, a point of clarification, they are not FDA approved.
00:02:44.000 They are authorized for emergency use.
00:02:47.000 That's important.
00:02:47.000 Got it.
00:02:48.000 And it's incredibly arguable that there is an emergency because children of the ages from six months to four or five years, it isn't an emergency.
00:02:59.000 It's something that they don't die from COVID.
00:03:02.000 They rarely, if ever, end up in the hospital.
00:03:05.000 Anyone who has problems has comorbidities.
00:03:08.000 They're already sick children.
00:03:10.000 And people have to realize that the CARES Act made it so that any hospital who gets takes a swab and sticks it up somebody's nose until they get a positive COVID result on a PCR test, which everyone should by now know, you know, is not a way of diagnosing.
00:03:30.000 It's a way of gaining access to a 20% bonus on the entire hospital stay.
00:03:37.000 Now, that's something that people may or may not know.
00:03:39.000 And if they know, they tend to forget.
00:03:42.000 The CARES Act gives a 20% bonus to hospitals.
00:03:46.000 Someone could be in the hospital for whatever the reason may be.
00:03:50.000 And if they keep jabbing them up the nose until they get a positive test on a PCR, who knows how many cycles they ran that test, they get a 20% bonus.
00:03:59.000 They call that person a COVID patient.
00:04:02.000 And so, all that being taken into account, what happened at the FDA vaccine advisory committee meetings last week, I think is out and out fraud.
00:04:16.000 It certainly would be considered incompetence.
00:04:20.000 I felt so outraged by it that as I was watching the eight-hour meeting, right, at 11 a.m. my time here in California, it was so obvious to me that the fraud was occurring.
00:04:34.000 I published my article right then and there before they voted, documenting the fraud that was occurring.
00:04:42.000 Because, you know, normally I take my time, I sleep on an article, I ask people for their feedback, but it was so blatant that I published it mid-meeting just to point to the fact that if I could see the issue is that what happened in that meeting should have been obvious to absolutely everybody.
00:05:05.000 Okay.
00:05:06.000 And what happened is the FDA essentially became a marketing team, a cheerleading team, a sales pitch team for Moderna and Pfizer.
00:05:20.000 To get into the details of it, if you want, I don't know how much time we have.
00:05:25.000 The biggest problem is that they started out, you know, just one of the four groupings, right?
00:05:32.000 Little children in the Pfizer study between six and 23 months.
00:05:36.000 What they started out with was about 1,200 children.
00:05:41.000 And before the end of the data collection on April 29th, they had whittled that down to 277 children.
00:05:50.000 So, you know, question number one is where did two-thirds of the children disappear to?
00:05:55.000 Why is the follow-up not happening with those two-thirds of the children?
00:06:00.000 But it actually gets worse.
00:06:02.000 They threw out all of the information.
00:06:05.000 They didn't actually talk about the data.
00:06:07.000 What they talked about was something called immunobridging.
00:06:11.000 It's too involved to get into in a brief radio show, but they only ended up doing blood tests on 80 of the participants in that group.
00:06:23.000 And they've changed the definition of a quote-unquote vaccine.
00:06:27.000 A vaccine used to mean that you were immune, that you would not get the disease, that you were fully protected.
00:06:34.000 Now it just means that you get an immune response.
00:06:38.000 Well, you can inject chicken soup into somebody's arm and you're going to get an immune response.
00:06:44.000 It doesn't correlate.
00:06:46.000 And the FDA has argued amongst themselves in previous meetings that there is no way really to say that when an injection based on the Wuhan strain causes you or your body to create antibodies, that that's going to have any protection against variant Omicron, BA12345, whatever it may be.
00:07:09.000 The level of fraud involved here is amazing.
00:07:14.000 But they also overlooked things like Moderna having eight times as much mRNA as Pfizer and therefore also having far more side effects.
00:07:28.000 Let me ask you really quick, and this is important.
00:07:30.000 Some of our audience is new to this topic, believe it or not.
00:07:33.000 They've been following us and they come in and out.
00:07:35.000 They're not an expert like you do.
00:07:36.000 Just two things.
00:07:37.000 Can you talk about how the actual technology of this vaccine is different than some vaccines that people might have received 10 or 20 years ago, whether it be the polio vaccine or whatever?
00:07:50.000 And number two, can you please elaborate on what is an mRNA vaccine?
00:07:55.000 It might be actually the same answer.
00:07:57.000 Absolutely.
00:07:58.000 In previous years, the idea was that you would take a pathogen, you would damage it or neutralize it or attenuate it in some fashion, and then you would inject that into the system.
00:08:09.000 The body would see the full-fledged organism that has been made so that it won't kill you.
00:08:15.000 And your immune system response to that is based on actually the pathogen.
00:08:21.000 mRNA is just a genetic sequence that is wrapped up in a little particle of fat.
00:08:28.000 They refer to it as a lipid nanoparticle.
00:08:32.000 They argued that it would only go into your arm and your immune system would recognize it and have an ability to identify it in the future.
00:08:41.000 But unfortunately, that isn't the reality.
00:08:43.000 It actually goes everywhere in your body.
00:08:45.000 And the mRNA is the genetic code that gets the cells in the human body to actually make the spike protein.
00:08:55.000 And so you're not just injecting the pathogen, you're injecting essentially the blueprint.
00:09:02.000 So the factories inside every cell in your body can then make the pathogen.
00:09:07.000 The issue at hand here with Moderna is they've put eight times as much of this mRNA as the Pfizer injection.
00:09:18.000 And children are being given the same dose, whether they are a six-month-old, tiny little child, or a five-year-old.
00:09:28.000 And so what the data shows is that kids who got the placebo compared, I'm sorry, kids who got the injection versus the placebo were five times as likely to have severe adverse events.
00:09:42.000 And within the children who got the placebo on top of that, the smaller children were three times as likely to have severe adverse events as the older children, just because of the size difference.
00:09:57.000 We're blessed to live in the greatest nation ever to exist in the history of the world.
00:10:01.000 Luke 12, 48 says, quote, to whom much has been given, much will be required.
00:10:06.000 We as Christians can shape our world.
00:10:08.000 One of these ways is how we steward our finances and our money.
00:10:11.000 If you have money and stocks, you have the power to affect change through your investments.
00:10:15.000 Jesus spoke about money in roughly 15% of his teachings and 11 out of 39 of his parables.
00:10:21.000 How do we follow his teachings about money?
00:10:23.000 Well, my friends at PAX Financial can help.
00:10:25.000 I've opened an account with them.
00:10:26.000 I think very highly of them.
00:10:27.000 They are fiduciaries that will make sure you have a responsible plan to retire.
00:10:31.000 I trust them with my money, and I hope you will as well.
00:10:34.000 But look, they'll also help you invest in companies that align with your beliefs.
00:10:38.000 No companies that engage in pornography or in excessive drinking or in a degenerate lifestyle.
00:10:45.000 If you have $150,000 to invest, please text my name, Charlie, to the number 74868.
00:10:52.000 And even if you don't have $150,000, maybe they'll make an exception for you.
00:10:55.000 I don't know, but just learn more about them.
00:10:57.000 Look, text Charlie to 74868.
00:11:00.000 Take advantage of the power to make a difference with your money.
00:11:03.000 PAX Financial.
00:11:04.000 It was great for me.
00:11:05.000 I think it will be terrific for you.
00:11:10.000 So I'll be very honest.
00:11:12.000 When it comes to Georgia, I don't get it.
00:11:16.000 Today is the Alabama primary.
00:11:19.000 And Alabama and Georgia are two very similar states where there's kind of this southern good old boys network where they're Republican, but a lot of Republican in name only.
00:11:30.000 And this is an interesting phenomenon.
00:11:32.000 And it's an open, it's a moving theory, if you will.
00:11:35.000 I am open for correction, But I'm pretty close to writing a pretty substantial piece on this and doing a whole podcast on it, where my theory is that it's actually unhealthy for a state politically to be too Republican or too Democrat.
00:11:55.000 I actually think a state ends up being freer if it's right near the 50-50 margins.
00:12:02.000 Now, the case in point example I use is Florida.
00:12:05.000 I believe if you have to compete for your votes, and then it's not an automatic that you're going to hold on to political power the next time around, you actually have to be more accountable, you have to be more transparent, and you have to be better.
00:12:22.000 You have to be a better leader.
00:12:23.000 So Florida is a great example of that.
00:12:26.000 Now, Texas is a very interesting state.
00:12:28.000 Texas absolutely and totally has a good old boy network.
00:12:33.000 So Georgia has a good old boy network that got Brian Kemp past the primary.
00:12:37.000 How?
00:12:39.000 I don't quite understand it.
00:12:41.000 I believe Alabama has that good old boy network that is going to make Katie Britt the nominee.
00:12:45.000 I hope Mo Brooks wins today, but the polling doesn't look very good.
00:12:48.000 I did a teletown hall for Mo Brooks.
00:12:51.000 I hope everyone goes out and votes for Mo Brooks today, but I'm trying to be realistic as well.
00:12:55.000 Donald Trump has come out and endorsed Britt, but we'll see what happens.
00:13:00.000 The southern states have kind of this, we're all Republican, and if you are kind of a moderate Democrat, you might as well run as a Republican.
00:13:09.000 Texas used to be like that.
00:13:11.000 Now, Texas has its smoke-filled rooms and its backhanded deals, but the Bush family ran the Texas Republican Party for a long time.
00:13:25.000 The good old boy network of Texas was run by the Bush dynasty.
00:13:30.000 Now, trust me, there's a cartel of insiders in Austin and in Texas.
00:13:34.000 Trust me.
00:13:35.000 I'm not saying it's been displaced, but it has been severely weakened.
00:13:42.000 Where the Texas Republican convention was this last weekend, and it's evidence, and it's something that should give us hope for the Republican Party across the country, that there is a new movement that has taken over the Republican Party.
00:13:56.000 Texas was used to kind of walk around on eggshells and Texas Republican Party kind of be moderate Republicans.
00:14:05.000 It's anything but that.
00:14:06.000 The grassroots, thanks to Donald Trump's leadership, have taken over the Republican Party in Texas.
00:14:14.000 Best example of this, when John Corey went to go speak at the Texas convention, gets booed off stage by the Texas grassroots because of his outright support of gun control, Play Cut 51.
00:14:40.000 The Republican Party is being revitalized.
00:14:43.000 It finally has a new grassroots center that we've been waiting for for so long.
00:14:49.000 And honestly, I have to give Ron DeSantis a tremendous amount of credit for this.
00:14:54.000 Florida pushed Texas to start acting like Texas.
00:14:57.000 Now, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia, those and Utah, South Carolina, I got nothing for you.
00:15:06.000 But I think it's because they're actually very Republican.
00:15:13.000 May I make a provocative argument?
00:15:16.000 The more Democrats that have moved to Texas, the more conservative the leadership of the Republican Party has become in Texas.
00:15:28.000 The more Texas has become like a battleground state, Texas has now reasserted itself in leadership.
00:15:35.000 And I believe it's out of self-preservation.
00:15:41.000 South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, still okay.
00:15:46.000 Those other states, I got nothing for you.
00:15:48.000 I don't get it what's happening.
00:15:49.000 They might as well be Democrats at times.
00:15:51.000 But Texas, it's no longer the Bush dynasty.
00:15:55.000 It's a people-centered grassroots party that has taken over the Texas Republican Party.
00:16:02.000 That's good news.
00:16:05.000 Hey, everybody.
00:16:06.000 As you know, our friend Mike Lindell has an amazing passion to help everyone get the best sleep of your life.
00:16:11.000 He didn't stop by simply creating the best pillow.
00:16:13.000 Nope, you know, Mike.
00:16:14.000 He's got lots of energy.
00:16:15.000 He's done it again by introducing his My Slippers.
00:16:18.000 For a limited time, you'll save $90 on a pair of MySlippers.
00:16:21.000 This blowout sale of the year won't last, so order now.
00:16:23.000 Mike has taken over two years to develop it.
00:16:25.000 The MySlippers are designed to wear indoor and out all day long.
00:16:28.000 Made with MyPillow, foam, and impact gel to help protect fatigue.
00:16:31.000 Made with quality leather suede.
00:16:33.000 I love Mike Lindell.
00:16:34.000 I know you do too.
00:16:35.000 Support him and get something comfortable in return.
00:16:37.000 Call 800-875-0425.
00:16:40.000 Use promo code Kirk or just go to mypillow.com and click on the radio listener square and use promo code Kirk.
00:16:46.000 This offer will not last long.
00:16:47.000 So order now with promo code Kirk at mypillow.com.
00:16:50.000 Mypillow.com, promo code Kirk.
00:16:55.000 When I first asked our audience about whether or not they had adverse effects or events to the COVID vaccine, I did this right before I got married last May.
00:17:07.000 And I got flooded, overwhelmed with emails, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:17:12.000 Charlie, I took the vaccine and now my right leg is somewhat paralyzed.
00:17:17.000 My dad dropped dead and just one after the other, after the other, thousands and thousands and thousands of emails.
00:17:24.000 I said, there's something going on here that isn't being reported.
00:17:27.000 And unfortunately, I think we are just starting to see some of the adverse events start to pop up.
00:17:35.000 There's one man who's trying to find an accurate number of what the heck is actually going on.
00:17:41.000 And that is Steve Kirsch.
00:17:42.000 He does a wonderful job and he's been in our program previously.
00:17:45.000 Steve, welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show.
00:17:47.000 Thanks, Charlie.
00:17:48.000 It's good to be here.
00:17:49.000 Steve, so you are trying to do a real poll, an actual data analysis of the damage that this vaccine has potentially caused.
00:17:58.000 Tell us about it.
00:18:01.000 Sure.
00:18:01.000 You know, there are lots of different ways that we can assess what's happened to people.
00:18:07.000 I think one of the most reliable ways, and it's in plain sight, but the media has completely ignored it.
00:18:14.000 It's government, it's official U.S. government data.
00:18:17.000 It's called the Fred database, F capital F-R-E-D, just like it sounds, Fred database.
00:18:23.000 And when you look at it, it's unambiguous that we've added 1.8 million people to the disabled list since the vaccines rolled out.
00:18:37.000 And it's correlated with vaccine rollout.
00:18:41.000 And so I did a survey, and I had a professional survey organization do it.
00:18:48.000 So there wasn't a survey of my followers because my followers are pretty much all unvaccinated.
00:18:55.000 So the survey goes out to 500 Americans that are selected to be representative of the population of America.
00:19:05.000 And so what we find out is confirmation of that.
00:19:10.000 So the 500 people basically, of the 500 people, we found that 1% of the people who get vaccinated end up unable to be able to work, to be able to hold a job.
00:19:27.000 And so this isn't, this confirms that, so that's that's essentially 2 million Americans.
00:19:33.000 So that confirms the number from the FRED database, which is the official U.S. government data of the 1.8 disabled.
00:19:40.000 So those 1.8 disabled are, we're looking at basically 2 million people who are now unable to hold a job because they got the COVID vaccine.
00:19:53.000 And this is by their own admission.
00:19:55.000 This isn't by somebody else saying that they were injured or making an assessment.
00:20:01.000 We don't like a misinformation spreader making an assessment that the vaccine caused this disability.
00:20:08.000 These are the people themselves, not judging other people.
00:20:14.000 These are people who answered the survey themselves saying, and these people are vaccinated, of course, because they're vaccine injured.
00:20:23.000 So they're not anti-vaxxers saying this.
00:20:28.000 These people, the first question was, hey, you know, how many doses of the vaccine did you have?
00:20:34.000 So nobody knew what was coming down on this survey.
00:20:37.000 So it wasn't like people were faking their answers.
00:20:40.000 And so the fact that the number that we derived from the survey, the 2 million disabled, was the same as the disabled in the FRED database that are newly disabled since the vaccines rolled out, can pretty much suggest only one thing.
00:20:59.000 The vaccines have disabled at least 2 million Americans.
00:21:03.000 Now, we also, by that same survey, we found that there are 25 million.
00:21:12.000 We can extrapolate from the survey, that 25 million Americans had a vaccine injury, which required a doctor or hospital visit or both.
00:21:24.000 25 million.
00:21:25.000 And there are 35 million Americans who believe that they were vaccine injured in some way.
00:21:32.000 So we have 35 million vaccine injured, 25 million of which had to either go to a doctor or a hospital for their injury.
00:21:41.000 And we have 2 million, basically, that are so injured that they cannot hold the job.
00:21:49.000 So let me ask you a question just to kind of play devil's advocate here.
00:21:52.000 A 1.8 million increase of people in the disabled, is that an abnormal increase?
00:21:58.000 Is that something?
00:21:59.000 What would be an annual increase to the disabled roles over a 12-month period?
00:22:08.000 Yeah, you know, it was actually going down during the pandemic.
00:22:14.000 It was going down.
00:22:16.000 You know, so you'd expect it to be relatively stable.
00:22:19.000 People are dropping off, people being at it, but it was going down before they rolled out the vaccines.
00:22:27.000 And so it's really hard to explain this.
00:22:31.000 And there was a great substack by Elgato Malo, otherwise known as the bad cat.
00:22:41.000 And he basically looked at all the evidence and did a great analysis, just showing that the timing of the additional disabilities were all correlated to the timings of vaccination.
00:22:58.000 Do you think?
00:22:59.000 Okay, so but some of the skeptics would say it might be long COVID or it might be any increased disability, you know, payments from the government.
00:23:10.000 Is there any other possible explanation?
00:23:13.000 No.
00:23:14.000 Okay.
00:23:15.000 Yeah, no, not, you know, not that anybody's been able to find.
00:23:15.000 Tell me.
00:23:20.000 You know, so if there is, hey, I would love if you've got someone who wants to come on your show and debate me on this, I would love to debate that alternate explanation.
00:23:33.000 But, you know, it's all these people.
00:23:35.000 I have just, we've never been able to get anybody who wants to debate any of these statistics on camera with a, you know, on any show that's got any kind of viewership.
00:23:52.000 Nobody wants to go on camera to talk about any of these statistics.
00:23:58.000 And it's not just, you know, this particular survey that's problematic.
00:24:06.000 You know, there's a Google search results.
00:24:09.000 I published a Substack article in my Substack at stevekirsch.substack.com.
00:24:15.000 And I published an article on Google searches.
00:24:19.000 And I was searching for various search terms like vaccine injury or sudden death or blood clots.
00:24:30.000 And it's amazing that there's no interest in these terms in Google until these COVID vaccines roll out.
00:24:42.000 And Google has search history going back to 2004.
00:24:46.000 And so all of a sudden, since the vaccines rolled out, it's amazing the number of search terms, which have never been searched before, which have never been searched to that extent before, nearly that extent.
00:25:00.000 And now all of a sudden, you see these peaks in these search terms.
00:25:04.000 I mean, it's very troubling and very, very hard for anybody to understand.
00:25:10.000 And today, I got, just to amplify that point, I got a text message about a very prominent woman who's miscarried three times.
00:25:26.000 She's got nothing wrong with her, and the doctors can't figure out why she's miscarried.
00:25:32.000 Now, I wrote a Substack article about a week ago about the, there's this famous paper done by a CDC author where they looked at the miscarriage rates and it was only had partial data at the time.
00:25:50.000 And they claimed, oh, there's nothing to see here.
00:25:52.000 There's no, this rate is not over the top and everything is normal.
00:25:59.000 And they eventually got the paper, they forced the journal to correct the paper to say, well, okay, so we actually can't tell whether it's good or not.
00:26:12.000 But you see, that paper was published more than a year ago.
00:26:17.000 And the miscarriage data would have all come in by now.
00:26:23.000 But the thing is that there's silence by the authors of that paper on the miscarriage data.
00:26:30.000 So why would a CDC author not publish the miscarriage, the final miscarriage data in the study?
00:26:44.000 Why would they withhold the miscarriage data?
00:26:46.000 Why would the CDC withhold the miscarriage data?
00:26:50.000 The only reason that the CDC would withhold the miscarriage data is if it's devastating.
00:26:59.000 There's no other explanation.
00:27:02.000 Why haven't public officials called for autopsies?
00:27:05.000 Why hasn't a single public official, Charlie, called for any autopsies?
00:27:13.000 Not even Ron DeSantis is calling for autopsies.
00:27:19.000 What are these people trying to hide?
00:27:23.000 You know, and you know, I credit DeSantis.
00:27:25.000 I mean, he's spoken out.
00:27:26.000 He said, look, kids under five shouldn't get the vaccine.
00:27:31.000 And he said, healthy kids five and over shouldn't get it either.
00:27:37.000 You know, I credit him for that.
00:27:38.000 But look, nobody should be, no kid should be getting these vaccines.
00:27:41.000 I would like to see the data that backs up DeSantis's claim that if you're an unhealthy five-year-old, that you should get vaccinated because there is no data.
00:27:54.000 And he has a really good surgeon general, Joe Ladapo, who knows there's no data to support the claim that, oh, if you're not a healthy kid, you should get vaccinated.
00:28:07.000 So the point is that there isn't any data.
00:28:11.000 There's no risk-benefit data for any of these vaccines.
00:28:15.000 And we're not talking just the COVID vaccines, Charlie.
00:28:18.000 We're talking every single vaccine in America today, there is no risk-benefit analysis showing that these vaccines are helpful.
00:28:33.000 And so this is why people like Andrew Wakefield have done studies that show just the opposite, that show that if you're vaccinated, you're going to be about 10 times less healthy.
00:28:49.000 It was not a trivial thing in terms of overall health.
00:28:53.000 So Steve, what is SADS and what do you believe is causing it?
00:28:58.000 So SADS is the euphemism for vaccine death.
00:29:07.000 So when you hear about somebody dying from sudden adult death syndrome, what it means is that they were killed by the vaccine.
00:29:20.000 And so we're seeing a lot of this.
00:29:23.000 If you go and do a Google search of sudden adult death syndrome, you know, and I, so I looked at the Google trends on this.
00:29:31.000 So this is just going like off the charts recently.
00:29:34.000 And that's because all these people are dying just unexpectedly from unknown causes.
00:29:41.000 Nobody can determine the cause.
00:29:43.000 So the medical community is frustrated by that.
00:29:46.000 So they have to come up with a new disease called sudden adult death syndrome.
00:29:53.000 And the term has actually been around for a while because it pops up in Google in the past.
00:29:57.000 And so they associate this disease with a vaccine injury or vaccine death because they can't call it a vaccine death because that would be counter narrative and they would be deplatformed or they would lose their jobs or it's just not allowed.
00:30:22.000 And so the sudden adult death syndrome is the cool term that the medical community is using.
00:30:30.000 And so if you're one of us, you know to associate that, that means, okay, they admitted the death was caused by a vaccine.
00:30:42.000 And if you don't, if you're not clued in that the vaccines are dangerous, then you just think, sudden adult death syndrome.
00:30:50.000 What is it about this vaccine, though?
00:30:52.000 I mean, do you believe that all vaccines might have these characteristics or is there something different about the technology in this particular vaccine that might make it more likely to kind of have these adverse events?
00:31:05.000 No, no, it's specific to this vaccine.
00:31:08.000 This is why when you look at the various data, for example, you see it's flatlined the entire 32 years in terms of deaths.
00:31:18.000 And then there's this huge spike where instead of like 200 deaths, we now have over 13,000 deaths in the United States alone in the various system.
00:31:33.000 Now, why is there suddenly this huge increase in the amount of death?
00:31:41.000 And that's because the vaccine itself is causing this death because it's creating all sorts of inflammation.
00:31:48.000 And it's also causing your immune system to attack your own body, especially in your heart, which is why we have this myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart muscle.
00:32:03.000 And this wasn't happening before.
00:32:04.000 And so what's going on is that these vaccines are not staying in your shoulder like a traditional vaccine would.
00:32:13.000 And traditional vaccine, you inject it in your shoulder, it sticks around in your shoulder, and all of the antibodies come and attack it, and they attack some of the muscle tissue around there.
00:32:24.000 But they're actually attacking what was with a foreign substance.
00:32:30.000 So what's different about these vaccines is they're going into your cells and they're changing the genetic makeup of the cell so that it now expresses it.
00:32:41.000 That's different than like what the TDAP vaccine would have done.
00:32:44.000 Oh, yeah.
00:32:45.000 Okay.
00:32:45.000 So what is the technical difference?
00:32:47.000 I mean, I'm just a layman here, so we have about a minute remaining.
00:32:49.000 Sorry.
00:32:50.000 So the technical difference is that if you think of your cells as, you know, my little fist here, and you think of a vaccine, the vaccine comes in and it's this new cell and it looks like this.
00:32:50.000 Yeah.
00:33:04.000 It looks like a foreign invader.
00:33:05.000 It doesn't look like my fists at all.
00:33:06.000 So the body attacks the new cell.
00:33:08.000 Okay.
00:33:09.000 So what the COVID vaccines do is something different.
00:33:13.000 They said, hey, we can cut corners here.
00:33:15.000 Instead of having to manufacture this vaccine with all of these antigens and then inject you with the antigen, let's make the body, let's fool the body into expressing the antigen on the surface of the cell.
00:33:31.000 So instead of it being, hey, these little business cards floating around and we'll put that in the bloodstream, it says, if my head is a cell, let's go and have the cell basically sprout a horn that has the antigen so that the body will learn to fight it.
00:33:48.000 But the problem with that, and so all of our cells are now spouting these spikes, you know, so instead of being like a normal person, you know, I got spikes coming out of my head, it's going to attack it.
00:34:03.000 And the problem is that the immune system gets confused and attacks the normal cell because it thinks it's a foreign invader.
00:34:14.000 So it's like overtrained to say, oh, now I'm going to attack your heart cell because that looks like a foreign invader.
00:34:20.000 Steve Kirsch, everybody.
00:34:21.000 Thank you, Steve.
00:34:23.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
00:34:24.000 Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:34:27.000 Thanks so much for listening.